Types matter: taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus (Bleeker, 1871) (Cypriniformes, Xenocyprididae) and some relevant species of East Asia

285 Types matter: taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus (Bleeker, 1871) (Cypriniformes, Xenocyprididae) and some relevant species of East Asia Xiao Chen1,2 , Shiping Su1, Xiaohua Zhang1, Richard Van der Laan3, E Zhang2 1 College of Animal Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China 2 Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China 3 Almere, Netherlands Corresponding author: E Zhang ([email protected]) Copyright: © Xiao Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International – CC BY 4.0). Research Article Abstract Issues concerning the identification of Chanodichthys oxycephalus are addressed. This species is a senior synonym of Ch. oxycephaloides and is restricted to the Chang-Jiang basin and adjacent lakes. Specimens previously identified as Ch. oxycephalus, represent misidentifications of either Ch. abramoides or Ch. dabryi. Chanodichthys oxycephalus, Ch. abramoides, and Ch. dabryi are confirmed as three distinct species. Chanodichthys dabryi shinkainensis is treated as a junior synonym of Ch. abramoides. Additional comments are provided on some cultrin fishes from Lakes Dongting and Xingkai mentioned in earlier literature. This study clears up the taxonomic confusion surrounding associated species. Key words: Cultrin fishes, nomenclature, species recognition, taxonomic chaos Introduction Cultrin fishes represent a group of xenocypridids characterized by a remarkably compressed body with distinct ventral keel, elongated anal fin, and semi-buoyant or adhesive egg-laying behavior in lentic habitats and widely distributed across the river-lake systems of East Asia (Chen et al. 2022; Cheng et al. 2022). This group includes many genera of economic significance in China, such as Chanodichthys Bleeker, 1860, Culter Basilewsky, 1855, Megalobrama Dybowski, 1872, and Parabramis Bleeker, 1864 (Tang et al. 2013). It has been shown that the vast majority of East Asian cultrin fishes have a relatively short evolutionary history (18.5–0.2 Mya) (Chen et al. 2022a; Cheng et al. 2022; Van der Laan 2025). Although phylogenetic relationships of these fishes are recently evaluated with molecular evidence (Wang et al. 2007; Tang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2022a), their generic classification and species identification are not fully clear. Currently, the genus Chanodichthys comprises ten species: Ch. abramoides, Ch. dabryi, Ch. elongatus, Ch. erythropterus, Ch. flavipinnis, Ch. mongolicus, Ch. oxycephaloides, Ch. oxycephalus, Ch. qionghaiensis, and Ch. recurviceps (Chen et al. 1998; Fricke et al. 2025), while Culter consists of two species, Academic editor: Fedor Konstantinov Received: 8 February 2024 Accepted: 5 October 2025 Published: 30 October 2025 ZooBank: https://zoobank. org/22A5038B-C269-4A02-B7D7AC9E9D55E77A Citation: Chen X, Su S, Zhang X, Van der Laan R, Zhang E (2025) Types matter: taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus (Bleeker, 1871) (Cypriniformes, Xenocyprididae) and some relevant species of East Asia. ZooKeys 1257: 285–303. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.1257.120512 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025) DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 286 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Cu. alburnus and Cu. compressocorpus (Kottelat 2013; Fricke et al. 2025). All these species are widespread in Russia, Korean Peninsula, and China, with an extended distribution of a single species Ch. flavipinnis to northern Vietnam (Appendix 1: Table A1). Most of them, being of economic importance, are commonly encountered in catches of rivers and lakes fisheries (Peng et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2017). The two genera have been the subjects of modern taxonomic research on cultrin fishes (Yih and Chu 1959; Bănărescu 1967a, 1967b, 1972; Li 1992; Luo 1994; Luo and Yue 1996). Previous molecular phylogenetic studies indicated that the generic classification and species identification of the subfamily Cultrinae, as conventionally defined (Luo and Chen 1998), might be inaccurate (Wang 2007; Tang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2022a). Chanodichthys oxycephalus seems to be an elusive fish. It was initially described in Culter by Bleeker (1871) based on a single specimen of 290 mm SL collected from the Yang-tse-kiang or Yangtze River (today’s Chang-Jiang in mandarin Chinese) by Dabry de Thiersant, a French consular official in China (Luo 2005). Taking into account that the consulate where Dabry then served was located in Hankau (today’s Hankou), Hubei Province, central China (Israeli 1989), its type locality might be the Hankou District of Wuhan City, in the middle Chang-Jiang basin. Subsequent researchers referred this fish to Erythroculter and reported on its occurrence in Lake Shinkai, the Ussuri River of the lower Amur River basin, and the Chang-Jiang basin (Yih and Chu 1959; Wu 1964). It was later transferred to Culter (Luo and Chen in Chen et al. 1998; Zhang and Zhao 2016), and recently to Chanodichthys (Kottelat 2013; Chen et al. 2022c). Despite its current recognition as a valid species in Chinese literature, the current systematics of Ch. oxycephalus still remain poorly understood. No additional specimens have been caught from its known range since Yih and Chu (1959). During two decades of our fish surveys in the mid-lower Chang-Jiang basin, lots of collected specimens without exception were identified as Ch. oxycephaloides rather than Ch. oxycephalus. When Chinese Culter (now transferred to Chanodichthys) species were taxonomically revised, no researcher examined the type specimen of Ch. oxycephalus. To address the issue regarding the validity of Ch. oxycephalus, photographic examination of the types was performed for this species and some relevant species. Also, over one hundred specimens, provisionally identified as Ch. oxycephaloides or Ch. oxycephalus from the Chang-Jiang basin, were examined. Seventy-one curated specimens from other basins (including Lake Xingkai, Heilongjiang Province) were examined to clarify the ambiguity between Ch. oxycephalus and Ch. Oxycephaloides, and the relationship with some other relevant cultrin fishes. A taxonomic explanation for the lack of official sampling records of Ch. oxycephalus for more than 60 years is provided here. Material and methods Specimen sampling and preservation Specimens utilized for this study were sampled in accordance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics animal welfare laws (GB/T 35892-2018). Gill nets and trap nets were used to collect specimens. After being anesthetized, all captured individuals were fixed by immersion in either ethanol or 287 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus formalin. For morphological examination, caught specimens of cultrin fishes were stored in 10% formalin. Voucher specimens are deposited in the collection of the Museum of Aquatic Organisms at the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IHB). Morphological analysis Measurements were taken point to point with digital calipers connected directly to a data-recording computer via Bluetooth and data recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm. Measurements were taken on the left side of specimens whenever possible, following methods used by Kottelat (2001) and Xie et al. (2003). Morphological examinations were made in this study for type specimens deposited in the relevant museums (see abbreviations in Appendix 1: Table A2). Head length (HL) and measurements of other parts of the body are given as percentages of standard length (SL) (Table 1). Counts of vertebrae were taken from radiographs of Micro-CT or X-rays. Table 1. Morphometric measurements and meristic counts for Chanodichthys oxycephalus, Ch. abramoides, and Ch. dabryi. Note: SD (standard deviation). Character Ch. oxycephalus (n = 30) Ch. abramoides (n = 21) Ch. dabryi (n = 23) Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD SL (mm) 66.7–236.7 136.9 ± 52.4 149.8–270.9 208.6 ± 30.9 73.7–193.5 140.5 ± 35.0 Morphometric data % of SL Body depth 22.2–29.5 25.5 ± 1.9 25.9–31.3 27.9 ± 1.7 21.0–27.9 24.5 ± 1.7 Body width 8.0–11.9 9.4 ± 1.1 7.7–9.5 8.9 ± 0.5 8.5–11.8 9.5 ± 0.9 Caudal-peduncle length 9.2–15.4 12.0 ± 1.8 10.9–14.4 12.2 ± 1.1 8.0–13.9 11.6 ± 1.5 Caudal-peduncle depth 6.7–10.9 8.9 ± 1.1 8.4–10.8 9.7 ± 0.6 8.2–11.2 9.3 ± 0.8 Pectoral-fin length 15.0–20.2 16.7 ± 1.6 18.2–21.8 19.7 ± 1.0 17.9–20.8 19.2 ± 0.9 Pelvic-fin length 12.9–17.9 14.7 ± 1.3 15.5–19.7 17.4 ± 1.1 15.8–19.3 17.5 ± 0.9 Anal-fin length 11.0–13.3 12.3 ± 0.8 21.6–27.0 24.9 ± 1.6 9.6–13.9 12.4 ± 1.0 Dorsal-fin length 16.8–23.5 21.1 ± 2.3 18.3–23.0 20.5 ± 1.6 14.2–24.2 19.7 ± 2.4 Head length 25.2–29.2 26.7 ± 1.2 25.2–29.6 27.0 ± 1.2 23.9–26.9 25.6 ± 0.9 % of HL Head depth 45.6–57.8 51.5 ± 3.5 67.4–84.2 79.8 ± 4.6 52.7–63.9 58.1 ± 2.6 Head width 32.5–40.6 36.2 ± 2.5 33.7–42.3 37.5 ± 2.4 34.6–45.0 39.0 ± 2.3 Snout length 26.1–31.0 28.5 ± 1.6 26.4–32.6 29.6 ± 2.1 23.2–32.3 27.9 ± 2.0 Eye diameter 17.6–28.9 21.1 ± 3.3 16.1–36.1 19.4 ± 5.0 18.3–27.2 21.8 ± 2.6 Mouth depth 21.8–39.5 30.3 ± 7.2 30.4–55.0 35.0 ± 6.2 25.7–39.9 31.5 ± 3.8 Mouth width 60.4–67.8 65.0 ± 2.4 63.7–87.8 73.5 ± 7.2 51.9–75.1 60.7 ± 4.9 Meristic counts Lateral-line scales 73–75 74 ± 0.5 64–69 68 ± 0.5 64–70 67 ± 0.7 Scale rows above lateral line 13 13 12–13 12 ± 0.5 13–14 13 ± 0.5 Scale rows below lateral line 7 7 8–9 8 ± 0.5 6–7 6 ± 0.5 Circum-peduncular scales 21–22 21 ± 0.5 20–23 22 ± 0.5 20–22 21 ± 0.5 Vertebral counts 4+37–38 37 ± 0.5 4+42–43 42 ± 0.8 4+41–43 42 ± 0.3 288 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Results Redescription of Chanodichthys oxycephalus (Bleeker, 1871) Chanodichthys oxycephalus (Bleeker, 1871) Culter oxycephalus Bleeker, 1871a: 74, pl. 5 (Chang-Jiang, China). Appeared first as name only in Bleeker 1870: 252. Also appeared in Bleeker 1871b: 87 and Bleeker 1873: 10. Culter oxycephaloides Kreyenberg & Pappenheim, 1908: 104 (Lake Dongting, south central China); Compilation Group XNC 1984: 53–54 (Xichuan); Yang 1987: 61–62 (Lake Liangzi); Wu 1989: 66–67 (Chishui); Institute SFR and Department of Biology SNU 1992: 44–45 (Xunyang, Xixiang, Baihe, Ankang); Luo 1994: 47 (Chang-Jiang); Chen et al. 1998 (mid-upper Chang-Jiang basin); Yao 2010: 37 (Anqing, Chaohu, Chang-Jiang); Guo et al. 2021: 164–167 (Guangyuan, Nanchong, Yibin); Wu et al. 2021: 98–99 (Xinhua, Hengyang); Wang 2022: 128 (Nanjing); Chen and Fu 2024: 122–123 (Xinjian, Duchang, Poyang). Erythroculter oxycephaloides: Nichols 1928: 30 (Lake Dongting); Yih and Chu 1959: 87 (Lake Liangzi); Wu 1964: 103 (Lake Liangzi, Yunxian, Mudong, Hechuan). Culter (Erythroculter) oxycephaloides: Kimura 1934: 107 (Chongqing). Specimens examined. • MNHN 0000-5050, holotype, 290 mm SL: Chang-Jiang; • ZMB 16686, 172 mm SL: Lake Dongting (photographic examination); • IHB 201807055611–14, 8 specimens, 65.9–122.4 mm SL: Hunan Province: Xiangyin County, Menggu Village (28°48'04.88"N, 112°53'28.42"E), caught by X. Chen, C. An, W. Shao, 5 Jul 2018; • IHB 201805055611–14, 3 specimens, 65.9–122.4 mm SL: Hunan Province: Yueyang City, Chenglingji (29°26'09.73"N, 113°08'43.87"E), collected by X. Chen, D. T. Nguyen, L. Zhang, 10 May 2018. • IHB 201807165611– 14, 4 specimens, 65.9–122.4 mm SL: Hunan Province: Yueyang City, Hongqihu (29°13'56.86"N, 112°57'11.99"E), collected by X. Chen, L. Cao, L. Qiu, 16 Jun 2018. Diagnosis. Chanodichthys oxycephalus can be diagnostically separated from all congeneric species by its reduced vertebral count (4+37-38), and distinguished from other species, except morphologically similar congeners Ch. dabryi and Ch. abramoides, by having a sub-superior and oblique mouth and 23–29 branched anal-fin rays. It is distinct from the latter two species in having a pointed (vs non-pointed), steeply (vs –gradually) elevated humpback behind to the head and higher lateral-line pored scales 73–75 (vs ≤ 70). Description. Morphometric measurements for examined specimens in this study provided in Table 1. See Fig. 1 for general appearance. Body strongly compressed and deep; dorsal profile convex with a significant hump posterior to nape and ventral profile somewhat straight. Abdominal keel developed from the pelvic-fin insertion to the anus. Head small, pointed, laterally compressed, length less than body height. Snout protruded, longer than eye diameter. Mouth sub-superior, slit; maxilla slightly shorter than mandible, with its posterior end extending backwards below nostril but not to anterior margin of orbital. No barbels. Eye large, laterally positioned in anterior half of head. Interorbital space wide and slightly convex, distance larger than eye diameter. Nostril near anterior margin of eye, with lower margin above a line aligning up- 289 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus per margin of eye. Gill aperture broad, extending forward approximately below posterior margin of eye. Gill membranes united to narrow isthmus. Dorsal fin with 3 simple and 7–8 branched rays; last simple ray stiff with a smooth posterior margin, and shorter than HL; origin posterior to vertical through pelvic-fin base; distal margin slightly concave. Pectoral fins short and pointed, with 1 simple and 15–16 branched rays; tip of adpressed fin rays not reaching pelvic-fin insertion. Pelvic fin with 2 simple and 8 branched rays, inserted anterior to dorsal-fin origin, or midway between pectoral-fin insertion and anal-fin origin; tip of adpressed fin rays not reaching anal-fin origin. Pelvic axillary scale present, short, not reaching beyond base of last ray. Anal fin with 3 simple and 23–26 branched rays; origin posterior to vertical through posterior end of dorsal-fin base, or much closer to pelvic-fin base than to caudal-fin base, distal margin slightly concave. Caudal fin deeply forked, longest rays more than twice as long as shortest rays, and upper and lower lobes pointed. Lateral line complete, originating from upper extremity of gill opening, descending downwards above pectoral-fin base, and extending almost straightly along the mid-lateral of body, running parallel to the ventral margin onto caudal peduncle. Perforated scales 73 (14) or 75 (16); scale rows above lateral line 13 (30) and below 7 (30); circum-peduncular scales 21 (16) or 22 (14) and pre-dorsal scales 13 (30). Coloration. In freshly collected specimens, head and dorsum of body greyblack, underside and abdomen silver; back and lateral head peppered with small dark spots. Back darker and belly lighter. Fins reddish, caudal fin orange-red. In formalin-stored specimens, ground color slightly faded; body dorsally greyish and ventrally greyish-white and back of head becoming yellowish-brown. Fins grey to creamy yellow. Sexual dimorphism. No sexual dimorphism was observed in the specimens checked. Geographical distribution and habitat. Chanodichthys oxycephalus is restricted to the Chang-Jiang basin (Fig. 2), based on the data obtained during the field survey and historical records from the literature (Compilation Group XNC 1984; Figure 1. Lateral view of Chanodichthys oxycephalus, ca 250 mm TL; China: Jiangsu: Nanjing, Jul 2021, collected by Tao Ju and Zhaochen Ding. Illustrated by Zhixian Sun. 290 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Yang 1987; Wu 1989; Institute SFR and Department of Biology SNU 1992; Yao 2010; Duan et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2021; Wang 2022; Chen and Fu 2024). Specimens, previously identified by Luo and Chen (1998) as Culter oxycephaloides from the mid-upper Chang-Jiang basin, belong to this species; meanwhile, the voucher specimens, recognized by them as Ch. oxycephalus from Lake Liangzi of Hubei Province and Lake Shinkai of Heilongjiang Province, are in fact a misidentification of Ch. dabryi. Discussion Identity of Chanodichthys oxycephalus The Ch. oxycephalus reported in Chinese literature has long been misidentified. Specimens, so far identified as Ch. oxycephalus from Lake Liangzi of Hubei Province and Lake Xiaoxingkai of Heilongjiang Province (Luo and Chen 1998: 193, fig. 112), do not conform to the species depicted by Bleeker’s (1871a) illustration of its holotype in terms of head shape and dorsal spine length. Our photographic examination on the holotype of Ch. oxycephalus (MNHN 0000-5050, Fig. 3a, b), which is not in a good state, indicates that it has at least 73 lateral-line pored scales, and 22 scale pockets likely corresponding to the same count of circum-peduncular scales, both more numerous than the 65, as stated in Figure 2. Distribution map of Chanodichthys oxycephalus (green area) and related records compiled from historical literature and field surveys. Note: red solid circles = valid records; crossed circles = literature-derived invalid historical records. The grey region delineates the sympatric distribution of cultrin fishes, viz., the studied area. 291 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Figure 3. a, b. Chanodichthys oxycephalus, MNHN 0000-5050, holotype; a. Lateral view. b. X-ray image, arrow indicates the abnormal vertebrae; c, d. Ch. oxycephaloides, ZMB 16686, holotype; c. Lateral view; d. Micro-CT photograph; e. Bleeker’s (1871a) illustration of Ch. oxycephalus. 292 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Bleeker’s (1871a) description. Thus, these numbers indicate that the original description was inaccurate in these two meristic counts. This inaccuracy is also seen in his accompanying drawings of several other fish species, for example, the lateral line was missing in pl. 2 fig. 2 for Acanthorhodeus macropterus (= Acheilognathus macropterus), incorrectly counted in pl. 6 fig. 1 for Hemibarbus dissimilis (= Paracanthobrama guichenoti), and indistinctly depicted in pl. 4: fig. 2 for Sarcocheilichthys sinensis. Main reasons for this might be: (1) the lateral-line scales were then believed to be of no taxonomic importance for species identification, thus receiving little or no attention, and (2) the lower counts of lateral line scales likely resulted from the ease with which cultrin fish scales are shed. Actually, Ch. oxycephalus, as here defined, is a subjective senior synonym of Ch. oxycephaloides. Kreyenberg and Pappenheim’s (1908) description of Ch. oxycephaloides as a new species was mainly based on its differences in the count of lateral-line scales with Ch. oxycephalus, without examination on its holotype. The Ch. oxycephaloides of Chinese literature (e.g. Luo and Chen 1998: 197, fig. 115) conforms to its original description. This fish, as depicted in Bleeker’s (1871a) illustration of the holotype, has a pointed snout in lateral view, a small head with large eyes and a straight dorsal profile, a prominent humpback behind the head, and pectoral fins inserted vertically anterior to the dorsal-fin origin, and 65 lateral line pored scales. Except the last count, all these characters are completely in agreement with those of Ch. oxycephaloides based on our photographic examination on the holotype (ZMB 16686, Fig. 3c, d). As noted above, lateral line pored scales are at least 73 for the holotype of Ch. oxycephalus, marginally aligning with the known range of this count (73–85) for Ch. oxycephaloides (Luo and Chen 1998: 196). The same species is thus represented by the holotypes of Ch. oxycephalus and Ch. oxycephaloides, and their type localities are in the middle Chang-Jiang basin (Fig. 4a). It is essential to clarify the taxonomic confusions surrounding the misidentification of Ch. oxycephalus. This species, as here defined, is so far known from the Chang-Jiang basin and affiliated lakes. Our examination indicated that three specimens, under the name of Ch. oxycephalus from Lake Liangzi of Hubei Province and Lake Shinkai of Heilongjiang Province, China (Luo and Chen in Chen et al. 1998), have a sub-superior mouth, fewer than 70 lateral-line pored scales, and a blunt snout and a straight dorsal profile of the head. These characters render them conspecific with Ch. dabryi of Chinese authors. Chanodichthys dabryi was originally described by Bleeker (1871a) based on a single specimen of 270 mm SL, caught in 1868 by Dabry de Thiersant from the Chang-Jiang. It is currently identified as a valid widespread species in China. Photographic examination of the holotype of Ch. dabryi (MNHN 0000-5078; Fig. 5d, e) showed that the species develops a straight dorsal profile of the head, a gradually elevated humpback behind the head, fewer than 70 lateral-line scales, and a greyish-black caudal fin, all of them separating it from Ch. oxycephalus, as here defined (Fig. 4b). So far synonymized with Ch. oxycephalus in Chinese literature is Ch. abramoides, a species originally described in Culter by Dybowski (1872) from Lake Shinkai and the Ussuri River. Our photographic examination on the holotype (ZMB 7933; Fig. 5b, c) of Ch. abramoides indicated that the species possesses a markedly concave dorsal profile of the head, 65 or 66 lateral-line pored scales, a protruding lower jaw greater than the upper jaw in length, dorsal spine nearly equal to HL, and longer pectoral fins with adpressed fin tip extending 293 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus to or beyond pelvic-fin insertions, all of them unshared with Ch. oxycephalus, as here defined. Hence, we are fully in agreement with Bogutskaya and Naseka (2004) and Dyldin et al. (2023) that Ch. abramoides and Ch. oxycephalus are distinct species. A markedly concave dorsal profile of the head and a steeply uprising humpback behind the head also distinguish Ch. abramoides from Ch. dabryi. Both are further distinct in head depth and anal-fin length (Table 1). All above findings indicate that Ch. abramoides, Ch. dabryi, and Ch. oxycephalus are separate valid species. This study does not support that Bogutskaya et al.’s (2008) assertion that the three species might be synonyms. Taxonomic status of relevant species Chanodichthys dabryi shinkainensis (Yih & Chu, 1959) This subspecies was originally described in Erythroculter from Lake Shinkai of northeastern China (Yih and Chu 1959). Its establishment was based on its variation in body shape with E. d. dabryi. This classification has been followed Figure 4. a. Lateral view of Chanodichthys oxycephalus, China: Hunan, Xiangyin County, Lake Dongting, collected by X. Chen, L. Cao, L.H. Qiu, photographed by C.T. An, 26 Oct. 2017; b. Ch. dabryi, China: Hunan, Miluo County, Lake Dongting, collected by X. Chen, L. Cao, Z.T. Wang, photographed by C.T. An, 20 Jan. 2018. 300 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Cheng PL, Yu D, Tang QY, Yang JQ, Chen YY, Liu HZ (2022) Macro-evolutionary patterns of East Asian opsariichthyin–xenocyprinin–cultrin fishes related to the formation of river and river-lake environments under monsoon climate. Water Biology and Security 1(2): 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2022.100036 Compilation Group XNC (1984) Fish of Henan Province. Henan Science and Technology Press, Zhengzhou, 193 pp. [In Chinese] Duan P-X, Yang Z, Tang H-Y, Xiao Q, Gong Y, Xiao TY, Liu X-Y (2015) Study on age, growth, reproduction and the status of resource development of Culter oxycephaloides (Kreyenberg et Pappenheim) in the Xiao River. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 39(04): 695–704. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1230.Q.20150727.1424.016 [In Chinese] Dybowski B (1872) Zur Kenntniss der Fischfauna des Amurgebietes. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 22: 209–222. Dyldin Y, Orlov A, Hanel L, Romanov V, Fricke R, Vasil’eva E (2023) Ichthyofauna of the fresh and brackish waters of Russia and adjacent areas: Annotated list with taxonomic comments. 2. Order Cypriniformes, Suborders Catostomoidei, Cobitoidei and Cyprinoidei. Journal of Ichthyology 63(4): 636–686. https://doi.org/10.1134/ S0032945223040045 Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Van der Laan R (2025) Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/ catalog/fishcatmain.asp [Accessed 13 January 2025] Guo YS, Sun ZY, He XH, Jin W, Chen YL (2021) Colored Atlas of Fishes of Sichuan (I). Science Press, Beijing, 1012 pp. [In Chinese] ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp. https://www.iczn. org/the-code/the-international-code-of-zoological-nomenclature/the-code-online/ Institute SFR and Department of Biology SNU (1992) Fish of Shaanxi Province. Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, Xi’an, 192 pp. [In Chinese] Israeli R (1989) Consul de France in Mid-nineteenth-century China. Modern Asian Studies, 33 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00010167 Kottelat M (2001) Fishes of Laos. Wildlife Heritage Trust Publications, Colombo. Kottelat M (2013) The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: A catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement 27: 1–663. Kreyenberg M, Pappenheim P (1908) Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Fische der Jangtze und seiner Zuflüsse. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1908: 95–109. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.12852 Li SZ (1992) On the scientific names of Culter alburnus & C. erythropterus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 17(3): 128–131. [In Chinese] Luo YL (1994) Some clarifications on the Cultrinae fishes of China. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 18(1): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.3724/issn1000-3207-1994-1-45-d [In Chinese] Luo GH (2005) History of Western Botanical and Zoological Studies in China. Shandong Education Press, Jinan, 444 pp. [In Chinese] Luo YL, Chen YR (1998) Fauna Sinica: Osteichthyes Cypriniformes II Cultrinae. Science Press, Beijing, 112 pp. https://doi.org/10.3724/issn1000-3207-1996-2-182-5 [In Chinese] Luo YL, Yue PQ (1996) Preliminary studies on phylogeny of subfamily Cultrinae (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 20(2): 182–185. [In Chinese] Myer GS (1940) The nomenclatural status of the Asiatic fish genus Culter. Copeia 1940(3): 199–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1437984 301 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Nichols JT (1928) Chinese fresh-water fishes in the American Museum of Natural History’s collections: A provisional check-list of the fresh-water fishes of China. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 58(64): 1–62. Nichols JT (1943) The Fresh-water Fishes of China. The American Museum of Natural History, New York, 388 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12103 Pan JH, Zhong L, Zheng CY, Wu HL, Liu JZ (1991) The Freshwater Fishes of Guangdong Province. Guangdong Technology Press, Guangzhou, 593 pp. [In Chinese] Peng J-L, Wang X-Z, Wang D, He S-P (2009) Application of DNA barcoding based on the Mitochondrial COI gene sequences in classification of Culter (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 33(2): 271–276. https://doi.org/10.3724/issn1000-32072009-2-271-o [In Chinese] Richardson J (1846) Report on the Ichthyology of the Seas of China and Japan. R. and J.E. Taylor, London, 153 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.59530 Tang KL, Agnew MK, Hirt MV, Lumbantobing DN, Raley ME, Sado T, Teoh VH, Yang L, Bart HL, Harris PM, He S, Miya M, Saitoh K, Simons AM, Wood RM, Mayden RL (2013) Limits and phylogenetic relationships of East Asian fishes in the subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Zootaxa 3681(2): 101–135. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.2.1 Turanov SV, Kartavtsev YP, Shapovalov ME (2019) The first attempt at studying the species diversity of fish in Lake Khanka using DNA barcoding techniques. Russian Journal of Genetics 55(4): 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541904015X Van der Laan R (2025) Freshwater Fish List (44th Edition.) Wang W (2007) Study on Population Genetic Diversity of Culter alburnus and Phylogeny of Cultrinae, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 156 pp. [In Chinese] Wang Q (2022) Nanjing Common Aquatic Wildlife Identification Manual, Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, 210 pp. [In Chinese] Wang XZ, Li JB, He SP (2007) Molecular evidence for the monophyly of East Asian groups of Cyprinidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) derived from the nuclear recombination activating gene 2 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42(1): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.014 Wang Y-L, He Y-F, Zhu Y-J, Wang X-G, Yang D-G (2017) Study on the Growth Characteristics and Resource Status of Humpback (Culter dabryi) in Lake Changhu. Chinese Journal of Zoology 52(6): 1015–1022. [In Chinese] Wang L-H, Luo X-Z, Wang D, Li W, Li Z, Zou G-W, Liang H-W (2019) Identification analysis of DNA barcoding based on mitochondrial COI and Cytb genes in Culter fishes. Freshwater Fisheries 49(4): 22–28. [In Chinese] Whitehead PJ (1970) The Reeves collection of Chinese fish drawings. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Historical Series 3(7): 191–233. https://doi. org/10.5962/p.314503 Wu XW (1964) Chinese fishes of Cyprinidae (I). Science & Technology Press, Shanghai, 315 pp. [In Chinese] Wu L (1989) Fish of Guizhou Province. Guizhou People Press, Guiyang, 346 pp. [In Chinese] Wu YA, Li H, Liao FC, Yang X, Xie ZG (2021) The Fish Fauna of Hunan Province. Science Press, Beijing, 488 pp. [In Chinese] Xiang DG, Li YF, Li XH, Chen WT, Ma XH (2021) Population structure and genetic diversity of Culter recurviceps revealed by multi-loci. Biodiversity Science 29(11): 1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2021166 [In Chinese] 302 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Xie ZG, Xie CX, Zhang E (2003) Sinibrama longianalis, a new cyprinid species (Pisces: Teleostei) from the upper Yangtze River basin in Guizhou, China. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51(2): 403–411. Yang GR (1987) Fishes in Hubei Province. Hubei Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, 299 pp. [In Chinese] Yang HR, Zhao HH, Sun JJ, Xie ZZ, Yang ZT, Liu L (2016) The complete mitochondrial genome of the Culter recurviceps (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA, Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis 27(1): 762–763. https://doi.org/10.3109/1 9401736.2014.915529 Yao WQ (2010) Systematic Synopsis of Fishes in Anhui Province. Beijing Normal University Press and Anhui University Press, Hefei, 165 pp. [In Chinese] Yih BL, Chu ZR (1959) Review of the genera Culter and Erythroculter of China. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 3(2): 170–196. [In Chinese] Zhang CG, Zhao YH (2016) Species Diversity and Distribution of Inland Fishes in China. Science Press, Beijing, 296 pp. [In Chinese] Zhang X-G, Zhang H, Xiong B-X (2008) Subspecies validity for genus Culter (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) based on morphometrics analysis. Environmental Biology of Fishes a Fishes 2009(86): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3458-8_27 Zhao WG (2022) Handbook of Fish Identification in the Heilong-Jiang Basin (China). Science Press, Beijing, 314 pp. [In Chinese] Appendix 1 App References Basilewsky S (1855) Ichthyographia Chinae borealis. Nouveaux Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 10: 215–263, pls 1–9, 467–488. Bleeker P (1871) Memoire sur les cyprinoïdes de Chine. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van. Amsterdam 12: 1–91, pls. 1–14. Ding RH (1990) On a new subspecies of genus Erythroculter from Qionghai Lake, Sichuan, China (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 15(2): 246– 250. [In Chinese] Dybowski B (1872) Zur Kenntniss der Fischfauna des Amurgebietes. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 22: 209–222. He JC, Liu ZH (1980) Description of a new subspecies of Erythroculter from Yunnan, China. Zoological Research 1(4): 483–485. [In Chinese] Kreyenberg M, Pappenheim P (1908) Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Fische der Jangtze und seiner Zuflüsse. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1908: 95–109. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.12852 Richardson J (1846) Report on the Ichthyology of the Seas of China and Japan. R. and J.E. Taylor, London, 153 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.59530 Tirant G (1883) Mémoire sur les poissons de la rivière de Hué. 1883: 80–101. Saigon. Yih BL, Chu ZR (1959) Review of the genera Culter and Erythroculter of China. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 3(2): 170–196. [In Chinese] 303 ZooKeys 1257: 285–303 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1257.120512 Xiao Chen et al.: Taxonomic status of Chanodichthys oxycephalus Table A1. List of valid species of genus Chanodichthys and Culter and their related information. Valid name Name used Original reference Type locality Geographical area Chanodichthys abramoides Culter abramoides Dybowski 1872 Lake Shinkai and the Ussuri River East Asia Chanodichthys dabryi Culter dabryi Bleeker 1871 Chang-Jiang, China East Asia Chanodichthys erythropterus Culter erythropterus Basilewsky 1855 Rivers flowing into Bohai Bay, Beijing, China East Asia Chanodichthys flavipinnis Culter flavipinnis Tirant 1883 Hué, Vietnam South Asia: Vietnam Chanodichthys mongolicus Leptocephalus mongolicus Basilewsky 1855 Mongolia and Manchuria, northern China East Asia: Vietnam, China, Russia, Mongolia, Korea and Japan Chanodichthys elongatus Erythroculter mongolicus elongatus He and Liu 1980 Lake Chenghai, Yunnan Province, China Lake Chenghai Chanodichthys qionghaiensis Erythroculter mongolicus qionghaiensis Ding 1990 Lake Qionghai, Sichuan Province, China East Asia Chanodichthys oxycephaloides Culter oxycephaloides Kreyenberg and Pappenheim 1908 Lake Dongting, Hunan Province, China Chang-Jiang Chanodichthys oxycephalus Culter oxycephalus Bleeker 1871 Chang-Jiang, China Chang-Jiang Chanodichthys recurviceps Leuciscus recurviceps Richardson 1846 Guangzhou, China East Asia: China Culter alburnus Erythroculter ilishaeformis Basilewsky 1855 Rivers flowing into Bohai Bay, Beijing, China East Asia: Mongolia, Russia, southern and eastern China, and Vietnam Culter compressocorpus Cultrichthys compressocorpus Yih and Chu 1959 Lake Xingkai, China Lake Xingkai, China Table A2. Details on the fish collections mentioned in this paper. Abbreviation / name Preserved unit / other names AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA IHB Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, Systématique et Évolution, Laboratoire d’Ichthyologie Générale et Appliquée, Paris, France. Other Abbr.: MNHN-IC ZIN Laboratory of Ichthyology, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. Other Abbr.: ZIAS, ZISP, ZIL. Old Name: Academy of Sciences of the USSR ZMB Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutionsund Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin, Germany. Other Abbr.: ISZZ, ZMHU. Old Name: Humboldt-Universität, Museum für Naturkunde, Zoologisches Museum, Vertebraten (Wirbeltiere), Ichthyologie, Berlin, Germany ASIZB Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Other Abbr.: ZMFMIB. Old Name: Zoologial Museum, Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Chang-Jiang Yangtze River or Yang-tse-kiang Heilong-Jiang Heilongjiang River or Amur River Lake Dongting Tungtingsee or Lake Tungting Lake Xingkai Lake Khanka, Lake Chanka or Lake Shinkai, including Lake Xiaoxingkai (Lake Little Khanka) and Lake Daxingkai (Lake Big Khanka).