D3.3 Benchmarking tailored climate services for local applications using local knowledge and data
Abstract
The I‐CISK project is focusing on the co‐creation process of human‐centred climate services (CS). The scientificwork conducted in I‐CISK aims to explore fit‐for‐purpose methodologies, tailored to address local needs. Thisdocument reviews the contribution of the tailored methods, local data, local knowledge and stakeholderfeedback in order to achieve a higher usability of the I‐CISK developed CS compared to the global and nationalones (benchmarking). This analysis is done for all seven I‐CISK Living Labs (LL), each with their own specificcontexts and purposes.
Full text
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 DeliverableD3.3 Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplications usinglocalknowledgeanddata October2024
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 InnovatingClimateservicesthroughIntegratingScientificandlocalKnowledge DeliverableTitle:DL3.3Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusing localknowledgeanddata Author(s):LluísPesquer(CREAF),IliasPechlivanidis(SMHI),DanieleCastellana(RC510), VakhoChitishvili(CENN),KatherineEgan(ECWMF),PaoloMazzoli(GECO), AlexandrosZiogas(ENVIS),SchalkJanvanAndel(IHE),AmandaBatlle (CREAF),EsterPrat(CREAF),MichaWerner(IHE). DateOctober2024 Suggestedcitation:PesquerL.,PechlivanidisI.,etal.(2024)Benchmarkingtailoredclimate servicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata Availability:☒PU:Thisreportispublic[Pleaseselect] ☐CO:Confidential,onlyformembersoftheconsortium(includingthe CommissionServices) DocumentRevisions: AuthorRevisionDate LluísPesquerFirstdraft June2024 LluísPesquer,IliasPechlivanidis,etal.SeconddraftSeptember2024 MichaWerner,IliasPechlivanidisReviewOctober2024 LluísPesquer,IliasPechlivanidis,etal.FinalversionOctober2024
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 1 ExecutiveSummary TheI‐CISKprojectisfocusingontheco‐creationprocessofhuman‐centredclimateservices(CS).Thescientific workconductedinI‐CISKaimstoexplorefit‐for‐purposemethodologies,tailoredtoaddresslocalneeds.This documentreviewsthecontributionofthetailoredmethods,localdata,localknowledgeandstakeholder feedbackinordertoachieveahigherusabilityoftheI‐CISKdevelopedCScomparedtotheglobalandnational ones(benchmarking).ThisanalysisisdoneforallsevenI‐CISKLivingLabs(LL),eachwiththeirownspecific contextsandpurposes. Mainconclusionsofthisworkare: MostI‐CISKCSdevelopedhighspatialresolutionoutputmodelswhichareusefultounderstandthe localimpactsofclimatechange,andtheyallowtodesignbetteradaptationdecisionsandpolicy actions. Differentdownscalingtechniques(specificformeteorologicalorhydrologicalapplications)areapplied inthespecifictailoredmethods.Thecontributionoflocaldataistotallyrelevantinthesetailoring processes;theroleoflocalknowledgeisstilllow. Usersdemandseveralimprovementsonthevisualizationoftheclimatedata(speciallyforuncertainty inpredictionsystems)tosupportacorrectinterpretationofclimateinformationandtoachievethe maximumusabilitytothesectorsinvolved. Keywords ClimateServices,tailoredinformation,usability,localdata,localknowledge.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 2 AboutI‐CISK I‐CISK’sambitionistoinnovatehowclimateinformationisused,interpretedandactedonthroughanext‐ generationofClimateServicesthatfollowahumancentred,socialandbehaviourallyinformedapproach; integratingtheknowledge,needsandperceptionsofcitizens,decisionmakersandstakeholderswithclimate informationatspatialandtemporalscalerelevanttothem. ClimateServices(CS)arecrucialtoempoweringcitizens,stakeholdersanddecision‐makersintakingclimate‐ smartdecisionsthatareinformedbyasolidscientificevidencebase,thatcontributetowardsasustainable Europeaneconomy,lifestyle,environmentalprotectionandresourceuse,andthatareresilienttoclimate changeandcompatiblewithachievingclimateneutrality.Europeanandinternationalcollaborativeresearch efforts,includingCopernicusandGEOSShaveestablishedasolidscientificfoundationforaneffectiveCSvalue chain,includingadvancedscientificknowledge,monitoringandmodellingofclimatechangeandtheimpacts ofclimateextremes.However,severalbarrierschallengethecurrentgenerationofCSinachievingthefull opportunityoftheirvalue‐proposition.Thesechallengesincludethefailuretoincorporatethesocialand behaviouralfactorsandthelocalknowledgeandcustomsofclimateservicesusers.Additionally,the effectivenessofclimateservicesischallengedby;thestillpoorlydevelopedunderstandingofthemulti‐ temporalandmulti‐scalardimensionofclimate‐relatedimpactsandactions;thetranslationofCS‐provided dataintoactionableinformation;considerationofreinforcingorbalancingfeedbackloopsassociatedtousers’ decisions;andthelackoftrans‐disciplinaryapproachesacrossthefullCSvaluechain. I‐CISKaimstoseizetheseuntakenopportunitiesthroughahuman‐centredframeworkforco‐productionof nextgenerationCSthatspansthefullCSvaluechaintakingthedownstreampartofthevaluechainasastarting point.TheI‐CISKframeworkrealisesthefullpotentialofinformationprovidedthroughCSbyempowering actorstotaketheimpactsofextremeclimaticeventsandclimatechangeintoaccountintheirdecisions.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 3 TableofContents 1Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1 1.1PurposeofthisDocument...................................................................................................................1 1.2StructureofthisDeliverable................................................................................................................1 2IntegrationofLocalDataandKnowledgetoProvideUser‐TailoredInformation.......................................3 2.1Definitions............................................................................................................................................3 2.2TheI‐CISKLivingLabsandtheirchallenges..........................................................................................3 2.3MethodsFollowedtoTransformLocalData/KnowledgeinTailoredInformationateachLivingLab5 3State‐of‐the‐artinTailoringClimateServicesforLocalApplicationsusingLocalKnowledgeandData.....8 3.1InternationalClimateServices.............................................................................................................8 3.2NationalClimateServices.....................................................................................................................9 3.2.1ClimateServicesinSpain................................................................................................................9 3.2.2ClimateServicesinGeorgia...........................................................................................................10 3.2.3ClimateServicesinHungary..........................................................................................................10 3.2.4ClimateServicesintheNetherlands.............................................................................................10 3.2.5ClimateServicesinItaly................................................................................................................10 3.2.6ClimateServicesinGreece............................................................................................................11 3.2.7ClimateServicesinLesotho..........................................................................................................11 3.3TowardstheNeedforTailoredClimateServices...............................................................................11 4BenchmarkingoftheImplementedClimateServicesacrosstheLivingLabs............................................13 4.1Andalucía‐SpainLivingLab...............................................................................................................13 4.1.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................13 4.1.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................13 4.1.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................14 4.1.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................14 4.2Alazani‐GeorgiaLivingLab................................................................................................................15 4.2.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................15 4.2.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................16 4.2.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................16 4.2.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................16 4.3Budapest–HungaryLivingLab..........................................................................................................17 4.3.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................17 4.3.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................18 4.3.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................18
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 4 4.3.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................18 4.4Rijnland‐TheNetherlandsLivingLab................................................................................................19 4.4.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................19 4.4.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................20 4.4.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................20 4.4.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................21 4.5EmiliaRomagna–ItalyLivingLab......................................................................................................21 4.5.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................21 4.5.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................23 4.5.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................23 4.5.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................23 4.6Crete–GreeceLivingLab...................................................................................................................23 4.6.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................23 4.6.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................24 4.6.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................25 4.6.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................25 4.7LesothoLivingLab..............................................................................................................................25 4.7.1ClimateServicedescription...........................................................................................................26 4.7.2Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge..............................................................................27 4.7.3Usabilityofthetailoredmethods.................................................................................................27 4.7.4Benchmarking...............................................................................................................................27 5SummaryofLessonsLearntfromtheLocalApplications..........................................................................29 5.1LessonsLearntfromtheLocalApplicationsateachLivingLab.........................................................29 5.2DiscussionandMovingForward........................................................................................................31 References.........................................................................................................................................................33
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 5 ListofFigures Figure1MapofthesevenI‐CISKLLlocations.............................................................................................4 Figure2Screenshotofone(precipitationseasonalforecasts)oftheimplementedSpainLLclimate services.Itprovidesdifferentpercentilesoftheensemblesresults,medianleftupperfigureand uncertainty/dispersionintherightupper.Plotofthe6monthsforecastsofpercentileensemblesofclicked locationatthebottom......................................................................................................................................13 Figure3Left:exampleofinteractivesurveyaboutCSusabilityinbilateralmeetingswithLLstakeholders. Right:averagefeedbackfromallbilateralmeetings.........................................................................................14 Figure4Left:IndicatorsselectionlegendofEDOandGDO.Right:Differentexperimentandmodeloptions intheClimateDataStore(CDS)ofCopernicus.................................................................................................15 Figure5ScreenshotofforecastexampleoftheGeorgiaLLpilotclimateservice.....................................16 Figure6UrbanheatmapCS,Erzsébetvárosdistrict,Budapest.................................................................17 Figure7Dronecontroller(dronesequippedwiththermalcameras)fortheErzsébetvároscampaign, Budapest.18 Figure8ScreenshotofLLRijnlandclimateservicecomponentofseasonalriverdischargeforecastwith lowflow(drought)alertthresholdindicated(https://i‐cisk.dev.52north.org/living‐labs/rijnland—nl/app/,last visited2October2024).....................................................................................................................................19 Figure9ScreenshotofItalyLLCS;leftsection–identifyingtheriverstationofinterest.Ontheleftside theuseridentifiestheriverstationofinterestusingamapinterfaceoralist,whileontherightside(seenext figures)riverdischargeforecastsareprovidedeitherasdailyvaluesfortheincomingseason(averageand expectedvariability)orasmonthlycumulatevalues,thelatterismoreinterestingtotheLLuserswithwater storagecapacity.................................................................................................................................................21 Figure10ScreenshotofItalyLLCS;rightsection–browsingthehydrologicalforecasts. ..........................22 Figure11ScreenshotofGreeceLLCS:(a)Seasonalforecastingofsurfacewateravailabilityatabasinlevel, includinguncertaintyinformation,and(b)seasonalforecastoflandslidesusceptibilitylocallyandspatially variablycoveringthewholeisland....................................................................................................................24 Figure12ScreenshotoftheClimateServiceprototypefordroughts,displayingdroughtrisklevelsacross LesothodistrictsforSeptemberandJanuarybasedonuserinput.Additionallayerscanbeaccessedviathe Layersmenu.Pleasenotethatthisisaprototype,andthefinaldesignmaydiffer.........................................27
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 6 ListofTables Table1IntroductiontothelivinglabsandthechallengesaddressbyI‐CISK.....................................................4 Table2SummaryofthetailoredmethodsandtheusabilityofthelocalapplicationsforeachLL..................29
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 1 1 Introduction 1.1 PurposeofthisDocument IntheDescriptionofWorkoftheI‐CISKprojectitisstatedthateffortswillbetargetedtowardsinnovationand enhancementofexistingclimateservices(CS)anddownstreamimpact‐basedproducts,andconsequentlyon thesupportofdecisionsandpoliciesinmultiplesectorsaccountingfortheirlocaltrade‐offs.InWorkPackage 3(WP3),oneoftheaimsistoaddressthelocalneedsandsectoralgapsofexistingCS,andtherefore,various state‐of‐the‐artmethodswillbeusedtogetherwithtools/methodstointegratelocalstate‐of‐the‐art observationsandlocalknowledge.Bothcontinental/globalandlocal‐scaleprocess‐basedimpactmodels,e.g. forthewaterandagriculturesectors,willbeusedtoassesssub‐seasonal,seasonalandcentennialchanges andimpactsattheLivingLab(LL)scale.Therefore,acontinuousdialoguewithvariousWPs,e.g.WP1,WP2 andWP4,hasbeenestablishedtoensureacontinuousexchangeandfeedbackofinformationrequiredto translatedatasetsintotailoredinformationandindicatorsforlocaluse. TheobjectivesofWP3are: Toadvancelocalimpactpredictionsandprojectionsofclimatechangeandfutureextremesby developingmodellingchainsthatefficientlyintegrateexistingCSwhilecombininglocaldataand knowledgeforlocaltailoring. Toexploredifferentscientificstate‐of‐the‐artmethodstobridgedataandservicescurrentlyseparated ontemporalandspatialscales(fromforecaststoprojections)andincreasetrustinlocalpredictions. Toevaluatetheusefulnessoftheintegratedimpactpredictionsandassessmentsforlocaloperations anddecision‐makingfrombothascientificandauserperspective. Tounlockthebenefitsoftransformationofdatatoinformationforandwithintheclimate‐sensitiveLL regionsandsectorsbyimprovingtheconfidenceinformationofindicatorswhileenhancingtheir usability. Todevelopuser‐drivenvisualisationtoolsthatensurerobustandseamlesstransferofproduced informationfromCS,andcommunicatepredictions,explicitlyincludinguncertainty,forinformed decision‐making. Toproviderecommendationsforproductadaptations,extensionsandCSimprovements,anddeliver fit‐for‐purposetools,methodsandproductsforuser‐tailoredreal‐timeoperationalservices. Toachievepartoftheobjectiveslistedabove,thisdocumentpresentsthecurrentlyongoingworkandreports ontheadvancedstepsoftheprogressinWP3,whileitaddressesaseriesofspecificobjectivesthatinclude: Reviewingdifferentapproachestotheintegrationoflocaldataandknowledgeatthescaleoftheliving labtoaddressthelocaluserneeds. ComparingthedifferentusabilityoftheexistinginternationalandnationalCSwiththeI‐CISK dedicatedCS. Describingthetailoredmethodstoaccomplishtheuserrequirementsinaco‐designandco‐develop process. BenchmarkingthetailoredCSoverthespatialextentoftheLLs. 1.2 StructureofthisDeliverable Thisdeliverableisstructuredin5chapters: Chapter1(current)istheintroductiontothedocumentpresentingthescope.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 8 3 State‐of‐the‐artinTailoringClimateServicesforLocalApplicationsusing LocalKnowledgeandData Inthischapter,wereviewthemaininternationalinitiativeswhichdevelopglobalCS,alongwithnational initiativesforthecountriesinvolvedinthesevenLL.Chapter3isimportanttosetthesceneofexisting benchmarksandjustifytheimportanceoftailoredclimateservices.LaterinChapter4,theexisting internationalandnationalCSwillbeaddressedandcomparedwiththeCSdevelopedwithinI‐CISK. Climateservicescanbedescribedasthegeneration,provision,andcontextualisationofconsistent, authoritative,andtimelyclimateinformationtosupportdecision‐making.Themaintaskistotransform climate‐relateddataintocustomisedproducts,adviseonbestpractices,anddevelopandevaluatesolutions thatmaybeusefulforsociety(Street2014).Theygenerallyinvolvetools,products,websites,orbulletins. (VaughanandDessai,2014).Theycanbeglobal,regionalorlocal,andforgeneralpurposes,multidisciplinary orfocusedonaspecificsector(health,tourism,agriculture,watermanagement,etc.)ordedicatedtoconcrete hazards(floods,droughts,forestfires,urbanheatwaves,etc.).Theycanbemultitemporaloraddressedto specifictimescale,includinghindcast,sub‐seasonalorseasonalforecasts,decadalorcentennialclimate projections.ThetailoredinformationprovidedbythecorrespondingCSshouldconsideralltheseaspects. 3.1 InternationalClimateServices AnumberofglobalandcontinentalclimateservicesareavailablebeingabletomeettherequirementsofI‐ CISKLLusers.ThesearedescribedindetailintheI‐CISKdeliverableD3.1“Preliminaryreportontheskill assessmentandcomparisonofstate‐of‐the‐artmethodsforforecastsandprojectionsofextremes”and summarizedbelow: Copernicus:CopernicusistheEuropeanUnion’sEarthObservationProgramme(www.copernicus.eu). Itprovidesarangeofservicescoveringtheatmosphere,oceans,land,climatechange,securityand emergencyservices.MostoftheCopernicusCS,whichcouldbepotentialsolutionstoI‐CISKgoalsand activities,arehostedintheC3S(CopernicusClimateChangeService)https://climate.copernicus.eu/. Inaddition,theCopernicusEmergencyManagementService(CEMS)isofhighrelevanceforsomeof theproject’sLLs(seeChapter4),particularlytheCopernicusDroughtObservatoriesforEurope(EDO) andtheglobe(GDO);seehttps://drought.emergency.copernicus.eu/. EuropeanClimateDataExplore:ThisCSisintheframeofaEuropeanClimate‐ADAPT(https://climate‐ adapt.eea.europa.eu)initiative.ThemostrelevantistheAgricultureCS,whichprovidesasetof agroclimaticvariablesat0.25degreespatialresolution(https://climate‐ adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/knowledge/european‐climate‐data‐explorer/agriculture).Also,theWater andcoastalCSscollecthydrologicalandmarinedatasetsat0.25degreespatialresolution https://climate‐adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/knowledge/european‐climate‐data‐explorer/water‐and‐ coastal. FAO:TheFoodandAgricultureOrganization(FAO)hoststheAgriculturalStressIndexSystem(ASIS; https://asis.apps.fao.org/).Itmonitorsagriculturalareaswithahighlikelihoodofwater stress/droughtonaglobalscaleusingsatellitetechnology(Rojasetal.,2013).ASISprovidesallraster datasetsthroughtheFAOHand‐in‐HandGeospatialPortalandtheGoogleEarthEngine(GEE).The AQUAMAPS(https://data.apps.fao.org/aquamaps/)isAQUASTAT’sonlinegeospatial(regionaland global)databaseonwaterresourcesandagriculturewithgeospatialmodellingandanalytics functionalitiesforwatermanagement.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 9 GEOSS:TheGlobalEarthObservationSystemofSystems(GEOSS)hasdevelopedseveralCSsunder differentspecificinitiativessuchastheGlobalWaterSustainability(GEOGloWS; https://www.geoglows.org/pages/geoglows‐service),theGlobalDroughtInformationSystem(GDIS; https://earthobservations.org/organization/work‐programme/global‐drought‐information‐system), theCropMonitorbyGEOGLAM(https://cropmonitortools.org/tools/cmet/)andAquaWatch (https://www.aquawatchsolutions.com/). WMO:TheWorldMeteorologicalOrganization(WMO)developedtheClimateServicesInformation System(CSIS)asthecoreoftheGlobalFrameworkforClimateServices(GFCS).Someselectedspecific CSswhichcouldfittotheneedsoftheI‐CISKLLusers,are:theIntegratedDroughtManagement HelpDesk(https://www.droughtmanagement.info/),theGlobalData‐processingandForecasting System(GDPFS,https://community.wmo.int/en/activity‐areas/global‐data‐processing‐and‐ forecasting‐system‐gdpfs)andthePublicWeatherServices(PWS)withtheWorldWeather InformationService(WWIS)(Ritterbush2006). AlltheseglobalCSsareusefulandrelevantformanypurposes,buttheydonotbenefitfromthecontribution oflocaldataandlocalknowledgeatLLlevel.Asdiscussedintheprevioussection,increasingthespatial resolutionoftheseglobaldatasets—whicharevisualizedanddeliveredbytheseinternationalCSs—isoneof themostdemandedfeatures.TheCoordinatedRegionalClimateDownscalingExperiment(CORDEX, https://cordex.org/about/)isarelevantinternationalinitiativeoftheWorldClimateResearchProgram (WCRP)specificallyaimedatachievingthisgoal.CORDEXanditsdifferentdomains,suchasEuroCORDEX, MedCorDEX,etc.,seektoadvanceandcoordinatethescienceandapplicationofregionalclimatedownscaling throughglobalpartnerships.TheCORDEXgoalsare:1)betterunderstandingofregional/localclimate phenomena,theirvariabilityandchanges,2)improvementofregionalclimatedownscalingmodels,3) generationofcoordinatedsetsofregionaldownscaledprojections,and4)communicationandknowledge exchangewithusersofregionalclimateinformation.Currently,CORDEXleadstheexperimentdesignforthe dynamicaldownscalingofCMIP‐6(Gutowskietal.,2016). 3.2 NationalClimateServices 3.2.1 ClimateServicesinSpain AEMET(thepublicSpanishMeteorologicalAgency)providesasetofdifferentCSforallofSpain,including seasonalforecasts,climateprojections,andadroughtobservatory.Theassociatedclimateinformationis availablethroughdifferentmapbrowsers:theAdapteCCaplatform (https://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimat*icos/cambio_climat/visor‐AdapteCCa)showstheEuroCORDEX (CORDEXatEuropeanDomain,Jacobetal.,2014)climateprojectionsmaps,thedroughtmonitor (https://monitordesequia.aemet.es/)isapaletteofmonthlydroughtindices’maps(historicalavailablein https://monitordesequia.csic.es/historico)andatimeseriesplotofachosenlocation,the https://www.aemet.es/es/portal/serviciosclimaticos/prediccion_estacional,currenthydrologicalvariables areavailableinhttps://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimaticos/vigilancia_clima/balancehidrico. ElTiempo(https://www.eltiempo.es/),anunofficialyetpopularCSplatform,isaprivatedigitalmediachannel ownedbyPelmorexCorp,andisspecializedinshort‐midrangeweatherforecasts,howeveritdoesnotcover seasonalforecastsnorclimateprojections. TheLCSCClimatologyandClimateServicesLaboratory(https://lcsc.csic.es/)contributestothestudyof climaticdroughts,theircauses,changes,andimpacts.Italsodevelopsfree‐accesssoftware,databasesand climateservicesfordroughtquantification.Thespatialresolutionsofmostproductsare:1degreeforglobal, 0.125degreesforEuropeanand1.1kmfornational(Spain).
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 10 3.2.2 ClimateServicesinGeorgia InGeorgia,preparationsareunderwaythroughvariousprojects,suchasGRAIL (https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects‐operations/project‐detail/P175629)andtheMulti‐HazardEarly WarningSystem(https://www.undp.org/georgia/projects/early‐warning‐climate‐information),howeveruntil today(September2024)nothinghasbeenfullyestablishedyet. 3.2.3 ClimateServicesinHungary TheCSimplementedbytheHungarianMeteorologicalService(https://www.met.hu/en/idojaras/)provide essentialmeteorologicalvariablesinshortrecentpasttimeseriesandshort‐termforecasts. 3.2.4 ClimateServicesintheNetherlands ThenationalleveldroughtinformationavailabletotheLLRijnlandatthestartofI‐CISK,andstillto‐date (September2024)arethemainnationalservicesusedaretwodroughtmonitoringwebsites,onefromthe nationalmeteorologicaloffice(KNMI;https://www.knmi.nl/nederland‐nu/klimatologie/droogtemonitor),and anotherfromthenationalagencyforwaterresourcesmanagement(RWS; https://waterberichtgeving.rws.nl/owb/droogtemonitor). TheKNMIserviceprovidescountry‐averagepotentialprecipitationdeficitintimeseriesgraphsandinmap format.Theprecipitationdeficitiscalculatedasacumulativedifferencebetweenprecipitationandpotential evapotranspirationfrom1stofAprilonward.Themaponlyshowsthemostrecentobservedcumulative precipitationdeficit.Thetimeseriesgraphshowstheobserved,butalsoaforecastforthecoming14days basedonECMWFIntegratedForecastingSystem(IFS)EnsemblePredictionSystem(EPS).TheKNMIdrought monitordoesrefertofurtherinformation,suchasStandardisedPrecipitationIndex(SPI),whichcontainsan interactivemapwithgriddedinformation,alsowithamaximum2‐weekleadtime.TheRijnlandwater authorityisinterestedinusingthisinformationintheirlocaldroughtmonitoraswell,andarebuildingup experiencewithusingthisdata,butlocaldecisionguidelineswithalertthresholdsforSPIhavenotyetbeen developed. TheRWSdroughtmonitor'skeyinformationusedintheLLRijnlandistheobservedriverdischargeatLobith station,togetherwitha14‐daystreamflowprediction.Nationallow(andhigh)flowalertlevelsareindicated. TheRijnlandwaterauthorityusesthesefortheirlocaldroughtpre‐alertaswell,becauselowflowsintheRhine increasesalinityintrusionfromtheseatowardsthemainfreshwaterintakepoint.ThenationallevelRWS droughtmonitoringdoesrefertoanensemblepredictionforthesamestreamflowstation,whichareusedby theRijnlandwaterauthority,butalsotheseforecastsdisplayedarewithamaximum2‐weekleadtime. 3.2.5 ClimateServicesinItaly InItaly,nationalclimateservicesareprimarilyprovidedbytheMeteorologicalServiceoftheItalianAirForce (MeteoAM),whichoffersawiderangeofforecastsandclimatedata,includingbothshort‐termandlong‐term projectionsofmeteorologicalvariables.TheseservicesareaccessiblethroughtheofficialportalofMeteoAM (https://www.meteoam.it/it/). Additionally,theMeteoItalianSupercomputingPortal(MISTRAL;https://www.mistralportal.it/it/mistral‐ open‐services‐it/)providesopenaccesstoclimatedata,includingnear‐termweatherforecastsand environmentalmonitoring.Thesetoolsareessentialforvarioussectorsandareclosertotheneedsofthe ItalianLLbyprovidingmeteorologicalforecastthatcouldpotentiallybelinkedtotherequestedhydrological forecastofthelocalservice.However,themostrelevantservicesforthecurrentcontextaretheregional ratherthannationalones.Forinstance,themonthlymapswithdroughtindicatorsprovidedbyAgenzia PrevencioneAmbienteEnergiaEmilia‐Romagna(ARPAE;https://www.arpae.it/it/temi‐ambientali/meteo) andtheseasonalforecastsarecloserinscaleandfocusondroughtseason,tothespecificneedsoftheLL.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 11 ARPAEproducesanddistributesclimatic,meteorologicalandhydrologicaldata:climateprojectionsummary reportsandbulletins,historicaldataanddatafrommonitoring.Itisimportanttonotethatnoneofthesetools currentlyofferseasonalflowforecastsforrivers,whichisasignificantgap.Suchforecastsareprovided,albeit withoutprecisedownscalingandthuswithlimitedreflectionoflocalhydrology,bytheCEMS‐GloFASForecast (https://cds‐beta.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/cems‐glofas‐forecast)asmentionedintheinternational sectionabove. 3.2.6 ClimateServicesinGreece TheNationalMeteorologicalServiceofGreece(HellenicNationalMeteorologicalService,HNMR; http://emy.gr/emy/en)istheofficialproviderofCSsinGreece.TheseCSsincludeinformativemaps,tables andreportsforshort‐andmedium‐rangeweatherforecastsforallofGreece,localisedatregional,andcity level,aswellasfortheentireEuropeanregion.Additionally,HNMRprovidesextremeweatherwarnings, climatologicaldata,andseasonalforecastshortreportsbasedonECMWFseasonalforecastreporting. However,itdoesnotincluderegionalorlocalisedinformationonseasonaldata,nordoesitincludeclimatic projections. Inadditiontoofficialservices,thereareseveralunofficialyetpopularnationalandlocalclimateservices. Meteo(www.meteo.gr)isanadditionalweatherforecastingserviceprovidedbytheNationalObservatoryof Athens(ResearchInstitute).Itoffersshort‐rangeforecastingthroughintuitivemaps,tablesanddiagrams, weatherwarnings,andmeteorologicalmeasurementsacrossGreece.Othersimilarservices,butless interactiveandwithlimitedinformation,includeFreeMeteo.gr(https://freemeteo.gr/),K24.net (https://gr.k24.net/m/),andlocalservicessuchasCretaWeather.gr(https://cretaweather.gr/). Inthethematicareaofclimaticprojections,anationalhubwasdevelopedrecentlyin2023bytheHellenic MinistryofEnvironmentandEnergy.Thishubcanbeaccessedthrough http://mapsportal.ypen.gr/thema_climatechangeorhttps://adaptivegreecehub.gr/.Itprovidesclimatic projectionsdataorganisedininteractivemapsandrasterdatawitharesolutionof5kmforapproximately25 climaticvariablesandindices,aswellasinformationonclimatechangeadaptation. 3.2.7 ClimateServicesinLesotho ThemainnationalinitiativesthatprovideClimateServicesare: TheLesothoMeteorologicalServices(LMS)deliversseasonalprecipitationoutlookstonational stakeholdersprimarilythroughpresentationsatnationalroundtablemeetings.LMSpreparesits seasonalforecastusingtheNorthAmericanMulti‐ModelEnsemble(NMME),whichisdownscaled withreanalysisproducts(ClimateHazardsGroupInfraRedPrecipitationwithStationdata;CHIRPS)and datafromlocalweatherstations.Theythenrefinethisforecastbycomparingittotheregional seasonaloutlookproducedbytheSouthernAfricaRegionalClimateOutlookForum(SARCOF).Based onthiscomparison,LMSfinalizesitsseasonaloutlookTheyalsoprovideupdatesthroughoutthe seasonviaemailtokeepstakeholdersinformed.Additionally,deliversdailytemperatureforecastvia emailandbulletins. TheLesothoVulnerabilityAssessmentCommittee(LVAC)providesassessmentsusingtheIntegrated FoodSecurityPhaseClassification,reportingonbothcurrentandprojectedfoodinsecurityforthe upcomingconsumptionyear,attheadministrativelevel1.Theanalysisissharedintheformofareport withnationalstakeholders. 3.3 TowardstheNeedforTailoredClimateServices ThebenchmarkofthetailoredCScanbemeasuredbytheirusability,particularlyconcerningsolutions designedtoaddresstheexistingusabilitygap(Raaphorstetal.,2020).Usabilitydependsontheleveland
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 12 qualityofinteractionbetweeninformationproducersandusers.Itcanprovideinsightsintothegapbetween thepotentialusefulnessofclimateinformationperceivedbyscientistsandwhatusersfindusableintheir decision‐makingprocess(Lemosetal.,2012).Moreover,adisconnectionbetweenclimatedataproduction anditsapplicationcanexacerbatethisgap(Singetal.,2018). ItisimportanttonotethattheI‐CISKCSimplementationisstillunderdevelopmentor,atleast,withalimited testingperiodforusabilityvalidationbyendusers.Therefore,itisprematuretoconductacomprehensive benchmarkevaluationbyarepresentativegroupofI‐CSIKstakeholdersatdifferentLLs.Instead,wewill approachusabilitybyanalysingthesolutionsdesignedtoovercomethemostcommonandparticularbarriers thatimpactusereffectivenessandsatisfaction(Pimenteletal.,2022;BrasseurandGallardo,2016)toimprove CSusability: lowlevelofuserengagementintheco‐developmentprocess lowspatialresolutioninCSinformationandlackofappropriatemethodfortailoring misunderstandingtheprovidedclimateinformation(e.g.uncertainty) lackofaCSevaluationphase(notethattheCSevaluationisthescopeoftheoncomingI‐CISKD3.4 deliverable) informationisnotactionableformanagementanddecision‐making. Giventhattheusabilityisdifficulttoevaluatebyquantitativemetric,giventhat“differentactorsperceivethe usefulnessofscientificinformationdifferently”(PorterandDessai2017),thereforethenextchapter qualitativelycomparestheusefulnessoftheI‐CISKCSsversusexistinginternationalandnationalCSswhich werebrieflydescribedintheprevioussubsection.WeaimtohighlightthesuccessoftheI‐CISKCSsin overcomingtheidentifiedbarriersandhighlightingtheaddedvalueandbenefitstheyprovidefortheLLs.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 13 4 BenchmarkingoftheImplementedClimateServicesacrosstheLivingLabs ThischapterreviewsthesevenI‐CISKLLsinordertounderstandthedesignedand/orimplemented improvementsappliedtotheircorrespondingtailoredCSforovercomingthemainbarriersandincreasingtheir usability.WerecommendadditionalreadingoftheI‐CISKdeliverablesD1.1“CharacterizationoftheI‐CISK LivingLabs”,foramoredetailedinformationoftheLivingLabscharacteristics,andD2.1(Preliminaryreport) andD2.4(final)“InformationonClimateServiceNeedsandGaps”forextendedexplanationsofthemain barrierstotheCSusabilityineachLL. 4.1 Andalucía‐SpainLivingLab TheAndalucíaLLismainlylocatedintheGuadalquivirRiverBasinDistrict(RBD),plusasmallpartofthe GuadianaRBD.Itmainlyfocusesinthecomarca(region)ofLosPedroches,aprimarilyagriculturalarealocated inthenorthoftheprovinceofCórdoba,intheautonomousregionofAndalucía,Spain.Italsoincludesthe SierradeCazorla,SeguraandLasVillasNaturalParkintheupperGuadalquivirRBDasacomplementarysite fortestingthedevelopedCSforforestrylandscapes. 4.1.1 ClimateServicedescription ThisCSavailableinhttps://i‐cisk.dev.52north.org/living‐labs/guadalquivir‐‐es/isanAgriculturalandForestry PlanningServiceandiscomposedbyasetofproducts:historicalclimateinformation,seasonalclimate forecasts,climateprojections,agroclimaticinformationandgroundwatercharacterization.Theirgoalsarethe reductionofthevulnerabilitytoclimaterisksto(1)supportsustainableagriculturalandenvironmental management,(2)buildsocietalresiliencetomultiplerisks,(3)counterruralexodusandabandoningof agriculturalactivities,(4)buildacultureofdecisionmakingbasedonup‐to‐dateandevidence‐based informationandscientificdata,and(5)strengththeadoptionofEuropeanclimatechangepolicies. Figure2 Screenshotofone(precipitationseasonalforecasts)oftheimplementedSpainLLclimateservices.It providesdifferentpercentilesoftheensemblesresults,medianleftupperfigureanduncertainty/dispersion intherightupper.Plotofthe6monthsforecastsofpercentileensemblesofclickedlocationatthebottom. 4.1.2 Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge ThecontributionoflocaldataistotallyrelevantforthehistoricalandpredictionsCSinthisLL.Historicalrecords fromAEMET,timeseries(1975‐2022)ofmonthly,anddailyinareferencesubperiod(1993‐2007),ofmean temperatureandprecipitationallowedtogenerateahighspatialresolutionmonthlymaps(250m)aswellfor droughtindicators:StandardisedPrecipitationIndex(SPI),StandardisedPrecipitationEvapotranspiration
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 14 Index(SPEI).Wealsoconsideredauxiliarylocaldatasets(SAIH,CAPDR,PAART,etc.,Trojeretal.,2024)for testing/evaluationpurposes,theirtimesseriesarenotstillenoughlargeforacontributiontotherobust climatemodellingmethodologies. ThecontributionoflocalknowledgeisspeciallyveryrelevantinthisLLintwoCSs: AgroclimaticCS:theexperienceoflocalfarmersguidedtheselectionofvariables,suchasaggregated springprecipitationandmeantemperatureinMayandJune,tobeintroducedasindependent explanatoryvariablesinthemultiplelinearregressionmodelforannualoilproduction. HydrogeologiccharacterizationCS:thelocalfarmersandlocalpublicmanagerssuggestedthe locationsoffieldcampaignsandreviewandvalidatethecharacterizationreportswiththeirexpertise. 4.1.3 Usabilityofthetailoredmethods Afterstakeholderconsultationinformoflivequestionariesinbilateralandsectorialonlinemeetings,themain barriersofCScollectedinthisLLabouttheCSusabilityare: thelackoftailoredinformationwithtworelevantaspects:insufficientspatio‐temporalresolution (theyprioritizedthespatialresolution)andlackofaccesstohistoricalmeteorologicaltimeseries. effectivedisseminationtotargetaudiences. misunderstandingofforecastuncertainty. MosteffortsinthisLLtodevelopCSsusingtailoredmethodsfocusedondownscalingtechniques.Theseefforts aimedtogeneratehigh‐resolution(HR)historicalmaps,HRseasonalforecasts,andmid/highresolution climateprojections,allappliedtomonthlyprecipitationandmeantemperature. Ingeneral,wecollectedgoodevaluationsintermsofusability(Figure3)fromtheLLusers(seeMAP compositioninD1.1CharacterizationoftheI‐CISKLivingLabs)abouttheCSbasedonthedeveloped downscalingmethods.Somerefinementsonvisualizationandtime‐respondarerequestedandweareworking tosolvethem,buttheytotallyagreewiththespatialandtemporalresolutionoftheprovidedclimate information.Regardinguncertainty,usersinterestedinriskmanagementoftenaskforreliablepredictions. Figure3Left:exampleofinteractivesurveyaboutCSusabilityinbilateralmeetingswithLLstakeholders.Right: averagefeedbackfromallbilateralmeetings. 4.1.4 Benchmarking AcomparisonwithexistingCSsfrominternationalinitiativeswithsimilartoI‐CISKobjectivesrevelsthat CopernicusC3SandCEMS(GDOandEDO)providevaluableclimateinformation,butdonotaccomplishtwo mainrequirementsformostoftheSpainLLendusers:finerspatialresolutionandclearunderstandable information.Figure4showsthedifferentoptionsandindicatorsindroughtCSandclimateprojections’ downloadingservice.DuringtheCSco‐creationprocess,weselected(andsimplified)themaininformation
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 15 followingtheusers’demand.Inaddition,thelanguageisabarriertoproperlyunderstandtheclimate information. Figure4Left:IndicatorsselectionlegendofEDOandGDO.Right:Differentexperimentandmodeloptionsin theClimateDataStore(CDS)ofCopernicus. ThecomparisonwithnationalCSexhibitsthaneventhereareseveralexistingdownscaleddatasets,suchas http://www.meteo.unican.es/datasets/spain02at20km(Herreraetal.,2012)or5km(Hernanzetal.,2022) thesemaynotfitthedemandsofmostLLstakeholders.Inthiscase,thelanguage(Spanish)makeseasythe understandingoftheinterfaces,optionsandclimateinformationbyusers,howeverthededicated developmenttotheirlocalneedsincreasestheI‐CISKCSusability.Finally,thededicatedvisualfunctionalities toallowcomparisonofconditionsbetweendifferentmonth/year(seeFigure2),ordifferentlocationsare appreciatedbytheusers. 4.2 Alazani‐GeorgiaLivingLab TheAlazaniRiverBasinLLislocatedwithintheterritoryofGeorgia.Duetothecomplexmountainous topographyandhighlydiverseclimatesettings,Georgiaissubjecttoclimate‐relatedhazardssuchasfloods, flashfloods,landslides,debrisflow/mudflowsnowavalanches,hailstorms,windstormsanddroughts. 4.2.1 ClimateServicedescription TheI‐CISKCS(https://i‐cisk.dev.52north.org/living‐labs/alazani‐‐ge/)isaWaterResourceManagement Service(integratedmanagementtoEUWaterFrameworkDirective)withthemaingoals:(1)toimprove resiliencethroughincreasedfoodproductionandwaterresourcemanagementfordrinkingwaterand irrigation,and(2)toachievegreaterexploitationofrenewableenergy(hydropower)throughimproved management,policymaking,supplyanddemandbalancingandenergysaving.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 16 Figure5ScreenshotofforecastexampleoftheGeorgiaLLpilotclimateservice. 4.2.2 Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge TheNationalEnvironmentalAgency(NEA)isthemainhydrologicalagencyinGeorgia,andoperatesthe networkofhydrologicalandmeteorologicalstations.ObserveddischargedataatstationsintheAlazaniand Ioribasinsisprovidedtoevaluateandbias‐adjusttheseasonalstreamflowforecasts.Thisincludeshistorical data,aswellasrealtimedata.Thelatterisavailableonlyatalimitednumberofsites,asthehydrological networkisstillbeingreconstructedfollowingitsvirtualcollapseafterthesovietperiod.Localpastexperience offarmers’associationscontributestotheimpactfarmingdecisions’planning. 4.2.3 Usabilityofthetailoredmethods ThetailoredmethodsthatarebeingimplementedintheCSofthisLLare: Sub‐seasonalandSeasonaldroughtforecastsbasedondroughtindicatorstodisplayexpecteddrought conditionsacrosstheAlazaniandIoribasins(displayedatsub‐basinlevel). Hydrologicalforecastsatkeylocations,downscaledtosinglesub‐catchmentandspecificpoint locationsofinterest. ThespecificbarriersdetectedinthenationalCSofthisLLare: Servicediscontinuity(on‐demandasopposedtoregularproduction). Lackoflong‐termnationalstrategy. Demandsonsector‐tailoredinformationforagricultureplanning. ThemainbarriersfortheusabilityoftheinternationalCSsarethelanguageforsomeofthelocaldecision‐ makersandendusers. 4.2.4 Benchmarking ThereiscurrentlynoprovisionofstreamflowforecastsinGeorgia,andusersinsteadrelyonweatherforecasts offorinstanceprecipitation,whichismainlysourcesfromweatherapps. ItisnotpossibletocomparetheI‐CISKCSwiththenationalCS,becauseasexplainedinsubsection3.3.2these arecurrentlyunderdevelopmentatthenationallevel,incollaborationwiththeRuralDevelopmentAgency,
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 17 NEA,UNEPandotherpartners.Seasonalstreamflowforecastsarenotincludedinthosedeveloping capabilities.ThebenefitsversusInternationalCSthatarecurrentlyavailableoftheCSdevelopedintheGeorgia LLare: Integrationofbasinmanagement(EUWaterFrameworkDirective). Improvedresiliencethroughincreasedfoodproductionandwaterresourcemanagementfordrinking andirrigation. Greaterexploitationofrenewableenergythroughimprovedmanagement,policymaking,supplyand demandbalancingandenergysaving. Widerrangeofvariablesrelatedtoheatwaves. 4.3 Budapest–HungaryLivingLab TheBudapestLLislocatedintheErzsébetvárosdistrict,aninner‐cityareaofBudapest(thecapitalandmost populouscityofHungary).Theareaisdenselyconstructedwithmanyprotected‐heritagebuildingsmostly fromthelate19thandearly20thcenturies. Thisdistricthasalowpercentageofgreenspaces,withahighdensityofbuildings,andthereforeisparticularly exposedtoheatwaves,whicharealreadycausingissuesforarangeofsectorsinthecity.Thefocusofthe LivingLabisonurbanheatislandsinthetourismandpublichealthsectors. 4.3.1 ClimateServicedescription TheI‐CISKCS(https://i‐cisk.dev.52north.org/living‐labs/budapest‐‐hu/)isanUrbanHeatPlanningServicewith twospecifictools: Time‐seriesanalysis:Utilizingorthophotosasahigh‐resolutionbaselinefortime‐seriesanalysisof thermaldata.Thismethodallowsfortrackingchangesinurbanheatovertimewithaclearreference tothephysicalchangesintheurbanlandscape. Energybalancemodellingwithdetailedsurfaceinformation:Applyingenergybalancemodelsthatuse detailedsurfaceinformationfromorthophotos,combinedwiththermaldata,tointerpreturbanheat dynamicsmoreaccurately. Figure6UrbanheatmapCS,Erzsébetvárosdistrict,Budapest.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 24 demand,especiallyforcoolingneedsduringthehotsummerdaysandnights,isanimportantconsideration forthetourismindustry.Extremeweatherevents(e.g.heavyprecipitationevents,highwinds)andflood impacts(coastalandriver)areprimarilyrelatedtotransportationinfrastructure(mainlyportsandroads), whichsupportstheeconomicactivityaswellastourism‐relatedinfrastructure(landslidepotentialdue,among others,toheavyrain,seeFigure11.b).Assuch,themainendusersoftheCSincludetourismenterprises, tourists,citizensandusersfromthewatersupply,transportationandenergysectors. TheCSdevelopedaddressesthesectorialneedsatdifferenttemporalandspatialscales.Theserviceis structuredbasedontwomaintemporalscales:(a)seasonalandsub‐seasonalinformationwhichaddress operationalneedsforinformedandimproveddecisionmaking,and(b)end‐of‐centuryclimaticprojectionsfor supportinglong‐termplanningadaptationmeasures. (a) (a) (b) (b) Figure11ScreenshotofGreeceLLCS:(a)Seasonalforecastingofsurfacewateravailabilityatabasinlevel, includinguncertaintyinformation,and(b)seasonalforecastoflandslidesusceptibilitylocallyandspatially variablycoveringthewholeisland. 4.6.2 Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge Localhistoricaldata(useofprecipitationandtemperaturemeasurementsthroughouttheisland)havebeen usedforthedownscalingofmeteorologicalvariablestodrivehydrologicalimpactmodellingandprovide better,localizedinformation. Localinformationandlocalknowledgewerecrucialandactuallyshapedthedevelopedservices.Thisledto thedesignoftheservicetoprovide:(a)theinformationneeded,(b)forthetimeneeded,and(c)forthespatial scaleneeded:
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 25 Watermanagementsector:identificationofspecificneeds(informationneeded,e.g.4monthswet periodsurfacewateravailability)foroperationalaswellaslongtermplanning(periodofdecision making–whentheinformationisnecessary,targetperiodthattheinformationcovers–e.g. NovembertoFebruary,typeofinformationrequiredforbetterdecisionmaking,potentialgains,etc.). Transportation:identificationofspecificneedsforoperationalaswellaslongtermplanning(what typeofinformationisrequiredforeachoftheperiodaddressed,whatdecisionsaremadeaddressing differentperiodsofoperations,climatichazardsidentified,typeofinformationrequiredforbetter decisionmaking,potentialgains,etc.). Tourism,accommodation:identificationofspecificneeds(informationneedede.g.specificclimatic indexesorvariables)foroperationalaswellaslongtermplanning(periodofdecisionmaking–when theinformationisnecessary,targetperiodthattheinformationcovers). 4.6.3 Usabilityofthetailoredmethods ThetailoredmethodsimplementedintheCSoftheCrete‐GreeceLLare: SeasonalforecastsofLandslideSusceptibilitybasedonprecipitationseasonalforecasts. Seasonalforecastsofsurfacewateravailabilitytailoredtospecificreservoirmanagementneeds. Theindexproducedwasbasedonacollectionofinformationfromstakeholders(watermanagement) regardingthedecisionstobemade,theproblemstobeaddressedandtherelevanttimelines.Itaddresses waterallocationanddistributionseasonalplanningbasedontheexpectedwetyearsurfacewateravailability atareservoirbasinlevel.Theinformationproducedisbasedonseasonalforecastingofsurfacewater discharge(informationproducedwithintheI‐CISKproject),whenitsavailabilitycoversthewetperiodin question.However,whenthisproduct(seasonalforecastofsurfacewateravailability)isnotavailableforthe desiredperiod(e.g.earlyintheyear),estimationoftheindexisprovidedbasedoncomparisonofcurrent hydrologicalyearwithstatisticalanalysisofhistoricaldata. ThespecificbarriersdetectedintheexistingnationalandinternationalCSofthisLLare: Climatechangeserviceslackcross‐sectorlinks. Lackofsector‐tailoredinformationandsector‐specificindicators. Lackofaccessibilityfornon‐expertusers. Lowspatio‐temporalresolution. 4.6.4 Benchmarking ThedevelopedClimateServicesareaddressingdataneedsgapsunderacross‐sectoralapproach,providing informationonhighspatial(1kmx1kmisthekeyfeaturefortheirusability)andtemporalscalessuitablefor operationaldecisionsupport(seasonal)andlong‐termplanning.ThenewCSprovidenewinformationto support: Improvedplanninginthetourismsector,tosupportadaptationofproductsanddestinationsand widenthespatialdistributionoftourismintheMediterranean. Betterinformedandmoreagileplanningoftourismpolicyandbusinessactivities(shortandlong term). ImprovedwaterresourcesplanninganduseefficiencyinCrete(targetSDG6–Cleanwaterand sanitation). 4.7 LesothoLivingLab TheLesothoLLisspreadinmultiplelocationsthroughoutthecountry(Lesothoisalandlockedcountryin SouthernAfrica)focusingonareasathighriskofdroughtsandcoldwaves.Thefrequencyofextremeevents islikelytoincrease,withclimateprojectionssuggestingahotteranddrierconditionsinthefuture,posing
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 26 higherandmorefrequentriskoffoodinsecurity.TheLivingLabfocusesontheDisasterManagementandas itiskeyinthepreparationandresponsetosuchextremeevents. 4.7.1 ClimateServicedescription InLesotho,twoCSsarebeingimplementedatRedCross‐ImpactBasedForecastingportal,withthegoalof enhancingthetimelyexecutionofanticipatoryactionsforcoldwavesanddroughts,usingimpact‐based forecasts. However,thereiscurrentlynocleardemandfromusersforaclimateserviceinformationsystem(i.e.,a platform)thatvisuallydeliversthisserviceforcoldwaves.Instead,thesupportprovidedfocusesonhelping theLesothoMeteorologicalServiceimprovetheaccuracyoftheirforecasts. Incontrast,theclimateservicefordroughtswillbeaninformationsystemdesignedtomonitordrought forecastsandsupportearlyactionplanningtomitigatedroughtimpacts.Theseactionscanbeautomatically triggeredwhenlinkedtopre‐approvedplansandfinancing,asdetailedintheEarlyActionProtocolagreed uponbyrelevantstakeholders. KeyactionsareplannedforOctober,markingthestartoftherainyseason,whenearlywarningmessagesare disseminatedtocommunitiesatrisk,andJanuary,whencashtransfersaremadetocommunities.TheClimate ServicewillprovideseasonalforecastsinSeptemberfromtheLesothoMeteorologicalServiceandinformation onprecipitationobservationsandforecastedfoodinsecurityinJanuary.TosupportLRCSoperations, additionaldatasuchaspopulationdensityandlivelihoodzoneswillalsobeincluded.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 27 Figure12ScreenshotoftheClimateServiceprototypefordroughts,displayingdroughtrisklevelsacross LesothodistrictsforSeptemberandJanuarybasedonuserinput.Additionallayerscanbeaccessedviathe Layersmenu.Pleasenotethatthisisaprototype,andthefinaldesignmaydiffer. 4.7.2 Integrationoflocaldataandlocalknowledge TheI‐CISKCSfordroughtsprimarilyreliesonlocaldataproviders.Currently,thereisnoautomatedmethodto integratethisdataseamlessly.TheAnticipatoryActionfocalpointatLRCSwillmanuallyupdatethelocal informationintotheCS.Globaldatamaybeincludedtoofferpreliminaryinsightsintotherainyseasonbefore thelocalseasonaloutlookisavailable. InLesothoLL,localknowledgecontributestofarmersdecisionmakingandsupportstheVulnerability AssessmentAnalysisreports.Inaddition,localknowledgeisintendedtoincorporatetheindigenous knowledgefromcommunities,atthisstagewithoutsuccess.Thiscontributioniscrucialinacollaborative processinCSco‐designing,withtheaimtoachievethattheoutcomesarenotperceivedasimposed. 4.7.3 Usabilityofthetailoredmethods TheClimateServicefordroughtsisunderdevelopment,withfeedbackonusabilityfromthemainuseralready incorporatedintothedesign.Thisiterativeprocessensuresthattheservicemeetstheneedsofitsusers. 4.7.4 Benchmarking Forcoldwaves,anEarlyActionProtocol(EAP)hasbeendraftedbyLRCSandiscurrentlyintheprocessof acceptanceandreview.However,questionsremainaroundtheactionthresholdsincludedforsnowand temperatureforecasts.Forsnow,thethresholdistoolooselydefined(occurrenceof‘moderate’snowinthe Lesothohighlands),whilstfortemperature,althoughthethresholditselfismorespecific(maximum temperature<=2Cforatleasttwoconsecutivedays)itsapplicationinrealityisnotclear(forexample spatially).Aparticularbarriertodevelopingtheactionthresholdsforsnowwasalackofobservedsnowdepth observations,whichideallywouldhavehelpeddefinethethresholdsthroughananalysisofhowmuchsnow fellduringpastcoldwaveeventswithknownimpacts.Toaidthresholdrefinement,andadditionallyto understandforecastperformanceatthosethresholds,user‐centredevaluationofboththresholdsandECMWF forecastsisbeingconductedusingERA5Landreanalysisdataasa‘truth’proxy.ComparisonofERA5Land temperatureandsnow‘records’toadatabaseofimpactioncold/snoweventsisexpectedtoprovidevaluable informationfortherefinementofEAPactionthresholds.Oncethesethresholdshavebeenthoroughlydefined,
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 28 auser‐centred,event‐basedassessmentofECMWFtemperatureandsnowforecastcanbeundertaken.Itis hopedthatthiswillprovidefurtherinformationtotheLesothoMeteorologicalService(LMS)onforecast performance,includingforexample,areeventstypicallytooearlyortoolate?Howoftendoweseefalse alarms?Takentogether,thisshouldsupportbothLMSandLRCSintheircoldwaveanticipatoryactions.Whilst thisisnotinitselfnewclimateservice,itsupportsandbolstersthecurrentprocessforcoldwavepreparation andanticipatoryaction.Resultswillbepresentedinafollow‐onI‐CISKdeliverableD3.4“Assessmentofexisting andtailoredclimateservicesusingarangeofuser‐drivenevaluationmetrics”. Fordroughts,noexistingclimateserviceoffersacentralizedvisualizationofmultipleinformationsources tailoredtouserneeds.Currently,usersreceiveinformationfromvariousstakeholdersintableorlistformats, oftenfilledwithtechnicaljargon,makingitchallengingtointerpret.Thereisaneedforacentralizedplatform thatconsolidatesinformation,makingiteasiertoaccessandunderstandtherelationshipsbetweendifferent datasets.Additionally,internalcommunicationwithinLRCSiscurrentlyinefficient,primarilyoccurringvia email.TheCSwillmakethisbetter,byprovidingaplatformeasilyaccessiblebyusers.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 29 5 SummaryofLessonsLearntfromtheLocalApplications 5.1 LessonsLearntfromtheLocalApplicationsateachLivingLab Table1providesacomprehensiveoverviewofthevariousaspectsoftheI‐CISKCSsacrossthedifferentLL implementations:applieddomain,localdataandlocalknowledgecontribution,tailoredmethods implemented,mainbarriersfromauserperspective,andthebenefitsandaddedvaluedoftheseI‐CISKCSs. Fromthissummary,supportedbythecontentofthepreviouschapters,wecanconcludethefollowing: MosttailoredI‐CISKCSsaimtogenerateoutputswithhigherspatialresolutionthantheavailablefrom global,regional,ornationalservices. DownscalingtechniquesarewidelyappliedastailoredmethodsacrossmanyLLs,withlocaldata playingacrucialroleintheseefforts. LocaldatafallsshortofmeetingFAIR(Findability,Accessibility,InteroperabilityandReuse)data principles. Despitetheextensiveinformationcollectedduringtheco‐creationprocesses,onlyafewLLsfully benefitfromlocalknowledgecontributions.Thisknowledgeisprimarilyusedtoenhancethe understandingofclimateinformation,butnottobuildcomprehensiveclimateknowledge. InsomeLLs,usingthelocallanguageisarequirementforacompleteunderstandingoftheclimate information,whileinothers,thetechnicalterminologyposesabarrier. Theinterpretationoftheprovidedclimateinformation(particularly,theuncertainty)iskeyfor developingactionsforwaterresourcesplanning,tourismpolicy,climateadaptationandvulnerability reductionindifferentsectorsatdifferentLLs. Sector‐tailoredinformationand/orsector‐specificindicatorsarerepeatedlydemandedinsomeLLs. Table2SummaryofthetailoredmethodsandtheusabilityofthelocalapplicationsforeachLL. LivingLabDisciplineLocaldata contribution Local knowledge contributio n I‐CISK tailored methods Barriersinthe existingCSs Addedvalue fromI‐CISK tailoredCSs Andalucía‐ Spain Meteorolo gical Longtimeseries oftemperature and precipitation densenetwork observations Advisoryon explanatory variables, potential correlations anddesign of agriculture adaptation strategies Statistical downscaling, bias correction Lowspatial resolution, language, misunderstandi ngofforecast uncertainty, lackofsector‐ tailored information Highspatial resolution, language, visualization toolsaddressed touserneeds Alazani‐ Georgia Hydrologic al Timeseriesof discharge, temperature and precipitation. Sparsenetwork, withmany Past experience from farmers Sub‐seasonal andseasonal drought forecasts, hydrological downscaled forecasts Service discontinuity, lackoflong‐ termnational strategy Integrationof basin management, improvedwater resourceand renewable
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 30 stationsnot operational energy managements Budapest– Hungary Meteorolo gical HRairborne thermalimages, VGI Noinfo. available Datafusion techniques, CNNfor enhanced pattern recognition, orthophoto aided vegetation indexing Lackofspecific heatwaves’ variables, limited informationon green infrastructure Detailedurban heatmappingat thestreetand blocklevel Rijnland‐ The Netherlands Hydro‐ meteorolo gical Groundstation observations Precip.,ETpot, andQ Advisoryfor themulti‐ level dynamic drought alert thresholds S2Sdrought forecastsand sectorspecific alerts,climate change information Droughtalert leadtime limitedto14 days,no referenceto climatechange information S2Sdrought forecasts Droughtalerts withsector specifictexts. Droughtforecast andclimate changeinfoin oneapplication Emilia Romagna– Italy Hydrologic al Timeseriesdata offlow measurements Experience frompast drought episodes, designof adaptation strategies HRseasonal hydrological forecasts Visualization barriers, misunderstandi ngofgraphical elements Supporting decision‐making, waterresources planning Crete– Greece Hydrogeol ogical Historicaltime seriesof precipitation temperature measurements Decisions relatedto climate hazards (droughts, wildfiresand heatwaves) andenergy demand Seasonal forecastsof landslide susceptibility andsurface water availability Lackcross‐ sectorlinks,lack ofaccessibility fornon‐expert users,low spatio‐temporal resolution Waterresources planning, tourismpolicy LesothoMeteorolo gical Rainfall observations Supportto vulnerability assessments Drought forecasts,cold wavesEarly Action Protocol Disconnected datasetsintable orlistformats, technicaljargon Impact‐based forecasts, centralized platform, harmonized climate information
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 31 5.2 DiscussionandMovingForward Currently,globalandEuropeanorganizationsprovideawiderangeofCSbasedonhigh‐qualityclimatedata. Theseorganizationsgenerateandpresentvarioustypesofoutputs,fromhindcastsandsub‐seasonalto seasonalforecaststoclimateprojections,usinganensembleofmodelsandemissionscenarios.Theyproduce bothessentialmeteorologicalvariables(e.g.,precipitationandtemperature)aswellasimpactindicators,such asdroughtindices,bioclimaticindicators,andagroclimaticindicators,atdifferenttemporalandspatialscales. TheplannedCopernicusCSevolutionwillfocustorespondthesemainrequirements: Climatepredictioninformationatdecadaltimescales Linkingextremeweathereventstoclimatechange Theactionplantodevelop,explainedinAEuropeanresearchandinnovationRoadmapforClimateServices (EuropeanCommission2015)relatedto“Enhancingthequalityandrelevanceofclimateservices”includes manyactionswiththecentreonthelocalusersandwhichareaddressedtodecision‐making.Itconcludeswith therecommendationofensuringthatstakeholdersareinvolvedthroughouttheprocess(CSdevelopment). FromtheexperienceinI‐CISKLLs,basedontheneedsexpressedbystakeholders,themainrecommendations fromausabilityperspectiveforimprovingclimateinformation,withinandbeyondtheI‐CISKLLs,are: 1) Toincreasethespatialresolutionofclimate(impact)information: Informationfromregionalmodelsisnotadequatetounderstandthelocalimpactsofclimatechange. SomeI‐CISKLLsfeatureheterogeneouslandscapeswithhightopographicvariabilityandthe spatiotemporalpatternsofmeteorologicalandclimatevariablesareverycomplexatalocalscale; hencetheneedforincreasingthespatialresolution. 2) Toincreasetheprovisionofhydrologicalforecasts: Meteorologicalforecastsaremorewidelyavailablethanhydrological,andthosearehighdemanded insomeI‐CISKLLs.NotethatthewatersectorhasagreatrepresentationintheMAPcompositionon someI‐CISKLL,andmaybeothercompositionmaycallformoreextensionofbioclimaticor agroclimaticpredictors. 3) Toenrichthein‐situcomponentforenhancinglocaldata: Localdatashouldpopulateglobal(atleastEuropean)datasets.NationalAgenciesshouldsharetheir localobservationstoglobal/Europeaninitiatives.Thesedatasetsshouldbeaccessibleincommon repositories,andtheyshouldbeusedintheregionalmodelsindifferentprocesses(training, calibration,validation,etc.). 4) Toincreasetheprovisionofextremes: Modellingandpredictingextremeeventsisverycomplex;however,thescientificcommunityshould intensifyitsresearcheffortsinthisarea.Extremeeventsareofgreatinteresttostakeholders,asthey haveasignificantimpactonbothnaturalandhumanenvironments,aswellasontheiractivities. AndthemainrecommendationsfromausabilityperspectivefortheevolutiontonewlygeneratedCSsare: 1) Toinclude(ormaintain)theco‐creationstrategy: StakeholderengagementintheI‐CISKLLshasdemonstratedsignificantbenefitsfortheusabilityofCS. Theinvolvementoflocalstakeholdersinthedesign,development,deliveryandevaluationofCSsadds clearvalue.Thecontributionoflocalknowledgeanddataishighlyrelevantandessentialforthe serviceuptakeandimproveddecision‐making. 2) Toaddcomparisontoolsbetweenpastandfuture:
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 32 Theinclusionofsimpleanalysis/scenariotools,forinstance,acomparisonofpredictionsagainstapast benchmarkevent(withhighimpact)helpstounderstandfuturepredictionsandthepotentialimpact ofthesepredictions. 3) TodevelopsectorialCSswithtailoredclimateinformation: TheexistingessentialvariablesandtheirimpactindicatorsavailablefromCopernicusareusefulfor specificsectors;howevernewgenerationclimateservicesshoulddevelopspecificsectorialclimate informationtoforestry,agriculture,urbanplanning,tourism,watermanagement,etc.usingtailored information,methodsandtools. 4) Toreducelanguageandsemanticbarriersandtoprovideleaningmaterials: Therightinterpretationofclimateinformationisakeypointfortherightdecisionsbylocal stakeholders.Thereductionofclimatevulnerability,theadaptationmeasuresandthereductionof impactsinclimatehazardsdependsonthisinterpretation.Barriersinthisinterpretationshouldbe reduced,andconstantlyupdatedlearningmaterialsshouldbeprovided.
D3.3‐Benchmarkingtailoredclimateservicesforlocalapplicationsusinglocalknowledgeanddata 33 References Berg,P.,Bosshard,T.,Yang,W.,&Zimmermann,K.(2022).MIdAS—MultI‐scalebiasAdjuStment.Geoscientific ModelDevelopment15,6165–6180https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd‐15‐6165‐2022 Brasseur,G.P.,Gallardo,L.(2016)Climateservices:lessonslearnedandfutureprospects.Earth’sFuture,4(3) 79‐89,https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EF000338 Buontempo,C.,Hewitt,C.D.,Doblas‐Reyes,F.J.,Dessai,S.(2014).Climateservicedevelopment,deliveryand useinEuropeatmonthlytointer‐annualtimescales.ClimateRiskManagement6,1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.10.002 Dixon,K.W.,Lanzante,J.R.,Nath,M.J.,Hayhoe,K.,Stoner,A.,Radhakrishnan,A.,Balaji,V.,Gaitán,C.F.(2016) Evaluatingthestationarityassumptioninstatisticallydownscaledclimateprojections:ispastperformancean indicatoroffutureresults?ClimaticChange135,395‐408https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584‐016‐1598‐0 EuropeanCommission:Directorate‐GeneralforResearchandInnovation,Street,R.,Parry,M.,Scott,J.,Jacob, D.etal.,AEuropeanresearchandinnovationroadmapforclimateservices,PublicationsOfficeoftheEuropean Union,2015,https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/702151 Frické,M.H.(2018).Data‐Information‐Knowledge‐Wisdom(DIKW)Pyramid,Framework,Continuum.In: Schintler,L.,McNeely,C.(eds)EncyclopediaofBigData.Springer,Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐ 32001‐4_331‐1. GutowskiW.J.,Giorgi,F.,Timbal,B.,Frigon,A.,Jacob,D.,Kang,H.‐S.,Raghavan,K.,Lee,B.,Lennard,C.,Nikulin, G.,O'Rourke,E.,Rixen,M.,Solman,S.,Stephenson,T.,Tangang,F.(2016)WCRPCOordinatedRegional DownscalingEXperiment(CORDEX):adiagnosticMIPforCMIP6.GeoscientificModelDevelopment,9,4087– 4095,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd‐9‐4087‐2016 Jacob,D.,Petersen,J.,Eggert,B.etal.EURO‐CORDEX:newhigh‐resolutionclimatechangeprojectionsfor Europeanimpactresearch.RegEnvironChange14,563–578(2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113‐013‐ 0499‐2 JacobsK.L.,StreetR.B.(2020)Thenextgenerationofclimateservices.ClimateServices20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100199 Hermans,T.D.G.,Šakić Trogrlić,R.,vandenHomberg,M.J.C.,Bailon,H.,Sarku,R.,Mosurska,A.(2022) Exploringtheintegrationoflocalandscientificknowledgeinearlywarningsystemsfordisasterriskreduction: areview.NaturalHazards114,1125‐1152.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069‐022‐05468‐8 Hernanz,A.,García‐Valero,J.A.,Domínguez,M.,Ramos‐Calzado,P.,Pastor‐Saavedra,M.A.,&Rodríguez‐ Camino,E.(2022).EvaluationofstatisticaldownscalingmethodsforclimatechangeprojectionsoverSpain: Presentconditionswithperfectpredictors.InternationalJournalofClimatology,42(2),762‐776. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7271 Herrera,S.,Gutiérrez,J.M.,Ancell,R.,Pons,M.R,Frías,M.D.,FernándezJ.(2012)DevelopmentandAnalysis ofa50‐yearhigh‐resolutiondailygriddedprecipitationdatasetoverSpain(Spain02)InternationalJournalof Climatology,32,74‐85https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2256 Kniveton,D.,Visman,E.,Tall,A.,Diop,M.,Ewbank,R.,Njoroge,E.,&Pearson,L.(2014).Dealingwith uncertainty:Integratinglocalandscientificknowledgeoftheclimateandweather.Disasters,39(1),35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12108