Full text
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 DeliverableD2.5 User-CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration UsingDecisionTimelinesforCollecting,Understanding,and IntegratingLocalKnowledge August2024
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 InnovatingClimateservicesthroughIntegratingScientificandlocalKnowledge DeliverableTitle:User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration: UsingDecisionTimelinesforCollecting,Understanding,andIntegratingLocal Knowledge Author(s):MarcvandenHomberg ContributingAuthors(s):SumiranRastogi,LuciaDeStefano,NuriaHernandez‐MoraZapata,Memory Kumbikano,AlexandrosZiogas,PaoloMazzoli.Schalk‐JanvanAndel,Micha Werner. Date30August,2024 Suggestedcitation:VandenHombergM.,RastogiS.,etal.(2024)User‐centredvalidationof climateriskknowledgeintegration Availability:☒PU:Thisreportispublic[Pleaseselect] ☐CO:Confidential,onlyformembersoftheconsortium(includingthe CommissionServices) DocumentRevisions: AuthorRevisionDate MarcvandenHomberg,SumiranRastogiFirstdraftJuly2024 MichaWerner,MarijeSchaafsmaReviewJuly2024
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration i ExecutiveSummary Developingeffectiveclimateservices(CS)foranticipatingandrespondingtoclimatechangenecessitatesthe consideringofawidearrayofknowledgebases,encompassingbothscientificandlocalknowledges(LK). EffortsacrossliteratureandpracticehavecalledforintegrationofLKwithintheCSdesign,developmentand provisionprocess.However,todate,theintegrationofLKwithinCShasremainedverynarrow.Againstthis backdrop,theobjectiveofTask2.2oftheI‐CISKprojectistoidentifyandcollectLK,mainlythrough participatorymethodologies,tolinkexpertisefromtheconsortiumscientistsandLKfromthestakeholdersin theLivingLabs(LL)andcomplementclimatedatafromCopernicusandGEOSSandresearchwithlocaldata. Aspartoftask2.2,thedeliverableD2.2Conceptsandmethodstocharacterizeandintegratelocaland scientificknowledgewaspublishedinMarch2023(vandenHombergetal.,2023).Thisdeliverable,D2.5 User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration‐UsingDecisionTimelinesforCollecting, Understanding,andIntegratingLocalKnowledgecontinueswhereD2.2leftoffandcomplementsthemore conceptualD2.2withgroundedinformationandinsightsfromthesevenI‐CISKLLs.Task2.2closelyrelatesto taskT2.3Co‐identifysuitableclimateactionsbyCS,customizedtosectors&geographicareaandtoT3.3. Evaluationoftailoredinformationfromauserperspective. Inthisdeliverable,webuildonthecharacterisationofLKprovidedinVandenHombergetal.(2022), emphasizingthatLKencapsulatesdifferenttypesofknowledgesgeneratedthroughavarietyofprocesses, rangingfromtraditionsandcustomspasseddowngenerations,topersonalexperience,throughtoknowledge resultingfrombeingembeddedinanorganisationalsetup.WefocusonLKassociatedwithdecisionmaking inanefforttobetterunderstandLKinthecontextofitsuseandapplicability.Weusedecisiontimelinesasa structuredframeworktounderstandthesequenceandtimingofdecisionswithinacommunity.Bymapping outwhenandwhycertaindecisionsweremade,wegaininsightintothecontextualfactorsthatinfluence thesechoices.Thisincludesseasonalvariations,culturalevents,marketfluctuations,andenvironmental changes.WearguethatevenintheabsenceofformalCS,individuals(CSendusers)triangulatebetweentheir ownunderstandingofthelocalenvironment,theirpracticalexperience,contextualdrivers,andothersources ofinformation.Thiscanalsobeappliedtoorganisations(CSprovidersandpurveyors),astheytooare influencedbothbythecomplexfactorsthatinfluenceindividualdecisionmakingaswellasthestructure, mandateandcultureoftheorganisationsthemselves.Thistriangulationofinformationcaninform communities'understandingofthelocalenvironment,riskappraisal,triggerdecisionmakingorinfluencethe choiceofadaptationstrategy. Tounderstandhowthishappensinpractice,wepresentexamplesherefromI‐CISKLLswheretheuseof decisiontimelineshasbeenpilotedtoelucidateLKfromCSproviders,purveyorsandendusers.Wefindthat stakeholdersrelyonindicatorsderivedfromweatherpatterns,socio‐economicchanges,overarchingpolicy contexts,andexistingcultureofgovernancetoinformtheirdecisions.Linkingkeydecisionsandactionsto correspondingknowledgeandinformationsourceshelpsinunderstandingthecontextinwhichclimate informationwillbeprovided.Italsoprovidesinsightintowhatchannelsofinformationarealreadyregarded astrustworthybytheintendedusers,existingcompetencyofuserswhenitcomestounderstandingclimate information,andtheirexpectationwhenitcomestotheuseofclimateinformationtosupportthedecisions theymake.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration ii TableofContents 1Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1 2Background:LocalKnowledgeandDecisiontimelines...............................................................................4 2.1RecapitulationofLocalKnowledgedefinition.....................................................................................4 2.2Introductiontodecisiontimelines......................................................................................................4 2.2.1Weatherobservationsandexperienceswithclimatechange....................................................5 2.2.2Sectoralactivitiesandsocioeconomiccontext............................................................................6 2.2.3Strategic,operationalandtacticaldecisionmaking....................................................................6 2.2.4Copingandadaptationactions....................................................................................................9 3Methods....................................................................................................................................................10 3.1DecisionTimelinetool.......................................................................................................................10 3.1.1Weatherobservationsandexperienceswithclimatechange..................................................10 3.1.2Decisionmakingprocess...........................................................................................................10 3.1.3Copingandadaptationstrategies..............................................................................................11 3.2DevelopingdecisiontimelinesineachI‐CISKLivingLabs..................................................................11 4Results:CharacterisationoflocalknowledgeacrosstheLivingLabs........................................................12 4.1LivingLabinCrete,Greece................................................................................................................13 4.1.1DecisionTimeline:Watermanagers..........................................................................................14 4.1.2DecisionTimeline:Tourismresortmanagers............................................................................16 4.1.3DecisionTimeline:Portmanagers.............................................................................................17 4.2LivingLabinEmilia‐Romana,Italy.....................................................................................................19 4.2.1DecisionTimeline:Allstakeholders...........................................................................................19 4.3LivingLabinQacha’sNek,Lesotho....................................................................................................23 4.3.1DecisionTimeline:FarmersandNon‐Farmers..........................................................................23 4.4RijnlandLivingLab,theNetherlands.................................................................................................26 4.4.1DecisionTimeline:RijnlandRegionalWaterAuthority.............................................................26 4.5Alazani‐IoriLivingLab,Georgia.........................................................................................................29 4.5.1DecisionTimeline:WineMakers...............................................................................................29 4.5.2DecisionTimeline:WheatFarmers............................................................................................31 4.5.3DecisionTimeline:GeorgiaAmelioration..................................................................................32 4.6LosPedrochesLivingLab,Spain........................................................................................................33 4.6.1DecisionTimeline:OliveGrowers..............................................................................................34 4.6.2DecisionTimeline:DairyFarmers..............................................................................................36 4.6.3DecisionTimeline:DehesaFarmers..........................................................................................37
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration iii 5Discussion:SynthesisacrossLivingLabs....................................................................................................39 5.1UnderstandingLocalKnowledgeusedwithindecisionmakingacrosstheI‐CISKLivingLabs..........39 5.2PathwaysforLocalKnowledgeintegrationwithinClimateServices.................................................50 5.3ReflectionontheuseofDecisionTimelines......................................................................................51 5.4LocalKnowledgeandtheco‐creationprocess..................................................................................51 6ConclusionsandRecommendations.........................................................................................................53 7References.................................................................................................................................................54
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration iv ListofFigures Figure1WaysthroughwhichLKcaninformthedevelopmentofusableclimateinformation...................1 Figure2Climateservicesvaluechain..................................................................................................................2 Figure3DifferentwaysthroughwhichLKcanbegenerated.............................................................................4 Figure4Adaptationdecisionspaceincludingtheknowledgelayer.............................................................7 Figure5Componentsofthedecisiontime‐line..........................................................................................11 Figure6DecisiontimelineforwatermanagersintheCreteLL..................................................................14 Figure7TimelinefortourismresortmanagersintheCreteLL..................................................................16 Figure8DecisiontimelineforportmanagersintheCreteLL.....................................................................17 Figure9DecisiontimelineforallstakeholdersintheEmilia‐RomanaLivingLabinItaly...........................19 Figure10DecisionTimelineforFarmersintheLesothoLivingLab..............................................................23 Figure11DecisionTimelineforNon‐FarmersintheLesothoLivingLab......................................................24 Figure12DecisionTimelineRijnlandLivingLab............................................................................................26 Figure13DecisiontimelineforwinemakingintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab...................................................29 Figure14DecisionTimelineforWheatFarmingintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab.............................................31 Figure15DecisiontimelineforGeorgiaAmeliorationintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab....................................32 Figure16DecisionTimelineforOlivergrowersintheLosPedrochesLivingLab.........................................34 Figure17DecisiontimelinefordairyfarmersintheLosPedrochesLivingLab............................................36 Figure18DecisionTimelinefordehesalivestockfarmersintheLosPedrochesLivingLab.........................37 Figure19Waysinwhichdecisiontimelinescancontributetothecredibility,salienceandlegitimacyof climateinformation...........................................................................................................................................50 Figure20AddedvalueofLKexplorationacrossco‐creationphases............................................................52
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration v ListofTables Table1CharacterizationofthecurrentLLadaptationdecisionspaceforWaterManagers...........................15 Table2CharacterizationofthecurrentLLadaptationdecisionspaceforResortManagers...........................17 Table3CharacterizationofthecurrentLLadaptationdecisionspaceforResortManagers...........................18 Table4Overviewofkeydecisionsandknowledgeandinformationunderpinningthosedecisions............41
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration vi Glossary AcronymDefinition APIApplicationProgrammingInterface C3SCopernicusClimateChangeService CDSClimateDataStore CEMSCopernicusEmergencyManagementServices CMIPWorldClimateResearchProgramme’sCoupledModelIntercomparisonProject CORDEXCoordinatedRegionalClimateDownscalingExperiment CSClimateServices CSISClimateServicesInformationSystems DRRDisasterRiskReduction GEOGrouponEarthObservations GEOSSGlobalEarthObservationSystemofSystems GUIGraphicalUserInterface IPCCIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange LLClimateServicesLivingLabs NHMSNationalHydro‐meteorologicalService MOOCMassiveOpenOnlineCourse OGCOpenGeospatialConsortium S2SSub‐seasonaltoSeasonal TRLTechnologyReadinessLevel UNCCDUnitedNationsConventiontoCombatDesertification UNDRRUnitedNationsOfficeforDisasterRiskReduction UNFCCCUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange WCRPWorldClimateResearchProgramme WFDWaterFrameworkDirective WMOWorldMeteorologicalOrganization
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 1 1 Introduction Developinghuman‐centredclimateservices(CS)foranticipatingandrespondingtoclimatechange necessitatesunderstandingenduserneedsandtheirdecision‐makingprocesses.Thismeansawidearrayof knowledgebasesshouldbeconsidered,encompassingbothscientific(SK)andlocalknowledges(LK)and integratingLKalongthewholeCSvaluechain.IntegrationofLKhasbeenpositedasawaytobuildhuman‐ centredCS,therebyovercomingthe‘usabilitygap’thatimpedestheadoptionofCSbyendusers(Lemos, Kirchhoff,andRamprasad2012).ThisisattributedtothenotionthatinclusionofLKcanleadtoproductionof climateinformationthatiscredible,salientandlegitimate.Crediblereferstohowtocreateauthoritative, believable,andtrustedinformation;salienttohowrelevanttheinformationistodecisionmakingbodiesor publics;andlegitimatetohow“fair”aninformationproducingprocessisandwhetheritappropriately considersthevalues,concerns,andperspectivesofthedifferentactors(Cashetal.2003).Figure1highlights waysthroughwhichLKcanaddvaluetoclimateservices(Cashetal.2003).Currentevidence,however,points toalimitedviewandselectiveintegrationofLKwithinCS(Mulleretal.2024;Dubeetal.2024).Thishasbeen attributedtoalackofclarityintermsofwhatconstitutesLKcherry‐pickingofcertaindimensionsthatare moreamenabletoscience‐dominatedintegrationapproaches(Hadloset.,al2022;Hermansetal.,2022;Plotz etal.,2017). Figure1WaysthroughwhichLKcaninformthedevelopmentofusableclimateinformation.(Cashetal.2003;Taylorand deLoë2012) OneofthekeygoalsofI‐CISKistoinnovatehowclimateinformationisused,interpretedandactedonthrough anext‐generationofCSthatincorporatesdifferentknowledgesystems.Toachievethis,T2.2through deliverableD2.2andD2.5,setsouttoidentifyandcollectLK,mostlythroughparticipatorymethodologies,to linkexpertisefromtheconsortiumscientists,LKfromtheLL,andcomplementclimatedatafromCopernicus andGEOSSandresearchwithlocaldata.D2.2(VandenHombergetal.,(2022))titled,‘Conceptsandmethods tocharacterizeandintegratelocalandscientificknowledge’,providesaconceptualunderstandingofLK rethinkingitsapplicationandusewithinCS.ThedeliverableproposedapragmaticrethinkofLKforCS‐ emphasizingthatLKberegardedasanumbrellatermthatencapsulatesknowledgesgeneratedthrough differentprocesses,andarangeofLKholders;frommembersoflocalcommunitiestothoseinvolvedat differentlevelsofgovernance(adetailedrecapitulationispresentedinChapter2).Thisdeliverable,D2.5titled,
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 8 locationandonthesector(e.g.agenerationalfarmingbusinessmayhavemoreLKoftheenvironmentthana recentlyestablishedhotelchain).Possibly,itisalsotimedependent,wherebypeopleororganisations triangulatedifferentlydependingonwheretheyareintheseasonandwhetheritisshortlybeforeoraftera disasterorextremeweatherevent.Forexample,beforeanextremeweathereventarrives,thetriangulation canonlybedoneusingforecastsfromSKorfromearlywarningindicatorsthatanenduserobserves,suchas winddirectionsandthedarkeningoftheclouds(Bucherieetal.,2022),orofariversignifyingafloodmight come(SakicTrogrlicetal.,2019).However,despitethesedifferentdependencies,wehypothesizethatthere areoverarchingprinciplesoftriangulationthataregenericandreplicablefromoneareatoanotherandthat understandingthesewillbeusefulinthedesignofCS. Changesinthecontext:riskacceleratorsandcues ImportantinthedesignoftheCSistounderstandwhentheenduserwillgofromamoregeneralobserving oftheweathertothetakingofaction.Herebywecanalsodistinguishbetweena“normal”seasonwheremost sectoralorlivelihoodactivitiestakeplaceaccordingtoayearlyrecurringpatternandaseasonwheremore extremeweathereventstakeplace.Also,changesinthesocio‐economiccontextcaninfluencethenormal activities;forexample,changesinthemarketdemandduetoe.g.politicalormacro‐economicimpacts. Anyprecursorsoractualchangesintheweatherorsocio‐economiccontextcanresultinenhancedriskstothe livelihoodorsectoralactivities.Theseriskscanbepurelyweather‐based,suchasprolongedcoldwaves impactingtheagriculturalactivities,orpurelysocio‐economic,suchasCOVID‐19epidemicleadingtomarkets beingshutdown.Oftenrisksarealsobasedonacombinationofsocio‐economicandweatherchanges,where e.g.weatherconditionscanhamperaccesstomarkets,leadingtolessdemand.Enduserswillidentifyand characterizeriskinordertounderstandthepotentialnegativeimpact,suchaslossoflivestockoradiminished harvest.Theywilltrytoidentifyriskdriversorriskaccelerators(WalleandComes,2014). Theroleofcuesisakeyconcepttolinkthedifferentbuildingblocksinthedecisiontimelineandtogofrom themoregeneralriskidentificationtoanactionableindicator.Actorswilldecidetoactiftheyconsiderthere isenoughevidencetoswayadecision,andthisevidenceisprovidedthroughenvironmentalandsocialcues. Environmentalcuesareenvironmentalindicatorsthatexhibitthehazard.Socialcuesrelatetoindicators presentinthesocialenvironmentoftheperson(Choo,2009).Howpeopleandactorsactonacuedepends ontheinformationtheyreceive,theircopingcapacityaswellastheirknowledgeofthehazard(Choo,2009; Parkeretal.,2009).Insomecases,thecueresultsfromanindexorvariablebeingevaluatedagainsta threshold.Forexample,inanticipatoryaction,humanitarianorganizationswilltakeearlyactionifathreshold ofanimpact‐basedforecastissurpassed.Cuescanbeintertwined.Anexampleofwhenenvironmentaland economiccuesareintertwinediswhereworkonthelandcannottakeplaceduetoflooding.Thismightmean thatworkhastotakeplaceinashortertimewindow,leadingtoanincreaseindemandandlabouravailability andprice.Aproperunderstandingofthecuesisessentialforthedevelopmentofaclimateservicethatis usableandthatwillbeused. Betterunderstandingexistingsocialandenvironmentalcuescanhelptoco‐createtheCSinsuchawaythat enduserscanmakedecisionsmorepre‐emptivelyandfaster.Also,CScanincorporatethesecuestoprovide informationthatismoresalienttotheneedsoftheuserandisperceivedasmoretrustworthy.Thus,improving lastmileaccess. Itisimportanttorealisethatenvironmentalandsocialcuesdonotonlyoccurinexceptionalseasons,butalso thattheseoccurinnormalseasons,leadingtoenduserstotakeaspecificaction.However,inthiscase,these cuesareingrainedinthenormalwayofworkingandthesectoralandlivelihoodactivitiescanalsobeexecuted largelyroutine‐based.Inthispaperwefocusonthosecuesthatleadtothetakingofacopingoradaptation action.Inotherwords,thesearethecuesassociatedwithadeparturefromthenormalcircumstancesand weatherthatwhenobservedmayleadtouserstakingsuchaction.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 9 2.2.4 Copingandadaptationactions Thecopingandadaptationoptionscanbe,asexplainedinthesectionbefore,atthetactical(daytoday), operational(shorttermorseasonal)andstrategic(longterm)level.Theactionscanalsobeatthelivelihood (householdlevel),thebusiness(organizationallevel)orthepolicymakinglevel.DeStefanoetal.(2024)define copingandadaptationoptionsasfollows: Copingoptions:shorttermresponsesthatuseavailableskills,resources,andopportunitiestoaddress, manageandovercomeadverseconditions,withtheaimofregainingstabilityintheshort‐term(one seasonoryear,forinstance). Adaptationoptionsrefertomeasuresthatareavailabletoindividuals,communities,orregions. Availablemeasureswilldifferdependingonthesocial,economic,orphysicalcontextwheretheywill beimplemented,aswellastheknowledgeandresourcesavailable.Theycanbecategorizedas structural,institutional,ecological,orbehavioural.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 10 3 Methods 3.1 DecisionTimelinetool Anumberofparticipatorymethodshavebeenusedacrossliteraturetocollectlocalknowledgeanddata.De Stefanoetal.(2024)providesanoverviewofwhatthesemethodsareandtheirrelevanceingatheringLK. WhilethewaysinwhichLKaddsvaluetoindividualsandcommunitiesarediverseandchangedependingon thecontext,inthisdatacollectioneffortwewillparticularlyfocusontheuseofdecisiontimelinestoelucidate LKassociatedwithlivelihoodorsector‐specificdecisionmaking.Decisiontimelinesprovideastructured frameworktounderstandthesequenceandtimingofdecisionswithinacommunity.Bymappingoutwhen andwhycertaindecisionsaremade,wecangaininsightsintothecontextualfactorsthatinfluencethese choices.Thesefactorsmayvaryfromseasonalvariations,culturalevents,marketfluctuations,and environmentalchanges.Thistemporalmappingiscrucialforidentifyingpatternsandtrendsthatmightnotbe apparentthroughotherdatacollectionmethods,suchassurveysorinterviews. Webuildthetemplatefordecisiontimelineandrelatedinterviewquestionsbasedontheconceptsdiscussed inchapter2.Asdescribedinthepreviouschapter,thedecisiontime‐lineconsistsofthreemainbuildingblocks (seeFigure3aandb):the(1)weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities,the(2)decisionmakingprocess andthe(3)copingandadaptationactions(DeStefanoetal.2024). 3.1.1 Weatherobservationsandexperienceswithclimatechange Inthisfirstcomponentofthetimelineweaimtocapturehowindividualsorcommunitiesdescribetheweather conditionsintheirlocalareaoveraselectedtimeperiod.Thistimeperiodmayforexamplebetheannual farmingcalendar,oraselectedseason,dependingonwhatisrelevanttothelivelihoodorbusinessprocessof thecommunityorsectorforwhichthetimelineisestablished.Throughtheseseasonalpatterns,weather eventsthatareconsideredrelevantaswellaskeyperiodsofsocio‐economicimportancetolocalcommunities andsectorsareidentified. Additionaltotheweatherobservationsoverarelativelyshortselectedtimeperiod(seasonalorannual),LLs arealsoaskedtosharetheirobservationsorexperiencewithlong‐termchangestotheseweatherconditions theyhaveobservedorperceived,potentiallyasaconsequenceofclimatechange.Thisisrelatedtotheir accumulatedobservationsovermultipleyears.Forexample,peoplemayhaveobservedthattheonsetand durationofthewetseasonhassignificantlyshiftedovertheyears,beyondwhatcanbeexplainedbynormal climaticvariability. Aligningwiththetimelineofweatherconditions,actorsarethenaskedtoplotkeyoperationalandtactical activitiesand/oroperationsthatarecarriedoutacrosstheselectedtimeperiod.Theintentionistoestablish amonthbymonthbreakdownofkeylivelihoodororganisationalactivities,andwhereappropriate establishinglinkswiththedescriptionofweatherconditionsand/orthekeyperiodsofsocio‐economic importance.Asimilarexercise,mappingoutactivitiesagainsttheweatherandclimatetimelinecanbedone fortheexperiencewiththechangingclimateoverlongertimeperiods.However,asmentionedinChapter2, thisisusuallylinkedtomorestrategicactivities,suchasinvestinginlongtermadaptationmeasures 3.1.2 Decisionmakingprocess Basedonthesectoralactivitiesidentified,participantsarethenaskedtoidentifyexternalfactorsintimethat poseanenhancedrisk(i.e.actasanacceleratorofrisk,orriskaccelerator)tolivelihoodororganisational activities,whichmayleadtoadeparturefromthenormal(businessasusual).Theseriskscanbeweatheror climaterelated,butmayalsobebasedonotherexternalfactors(e.g.,socioeconomic,institutionalfactors). Identificationoftheserisksintimeisusefulinunderstandingfromtheuserperspectivetherisks(climaticor
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 11 non‐climatic)thatmayimpactonlivelihoodandsectoralactivitiesandanyseasonalityassociatedwiththese risks. Asapartofthedecision‐makingprocess,wealsotrytounderstandifparticipantshaveanywayofpre‐empting abovementionedrisksbasedontheirknowledgeofthelocalweatherandenvironmentalconditions (environmentalcues),throughtheirknowledgeofthesocio‐economiccontext(socio‐economiccues),or throughtheuseof(existing)climateservices.Wehypothesizethatlocalcommunitiescontinuouslytriangulate betweendifferenttypesofcuesintheirdailylife. 3.1.3 Copingandadaptationstrategies Finally,relatedtotherisk,inthelastcomponentofthedecisiontime‐line,participantsareaskedtoidentify copingand/oradaptationstrategiesthattheyadoptorconsideradopting.Thesestrategiescanrangefrom modificationstotheplanningofactivities,orchangestoinvestmentsinnewinfrastructure.Participantsare alsoaskedtoidentifyknowledgeorinformationsourcesthatareusedtoinformthechoiceorimplementation ofthesecopingandadaptationstrategies. Figure5Componentsofthedecisiontime‐line 3.2 DevelopingdecisiontimelinesineachI-CISKLivingLabs AlthoughthestructureofthedecisiontimelineestablishedineachLLfollowedthetemplateprovided,the approachtakentothecreationofthedecisiontime‐lineitself(i.e.datacollection)wasnotboundtoastrict guideline.ThiswaspredominantlydonebecauseofthedifferentcontextofeachLLandhowtheMAPsineach areconstituted.ItisalsoimportanttoconsiderthateachLLisinadifferentphaseoftheco‐creationprocess. Notethatinthedevelopmentofthedecisiontimelines,decisionmadeconsideringbothcopingandadaptation strategiesareconsidered.AstheLivingLabinBudapest,Hungaryfocusesprimarilyontheadaptationspace, thishasnotbeenincludedinthisanalysis,withthefocusontheothersixLivingLabs.Intheseitshouldalso benotedthatthougharepresentativesampleofoflivelihoodtypesandsectorsareconsidered,thisisnot necessarilyexhaustiveofalllivelihoodsandsectorspresentineachLivingLab.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 12 4 Results:CharacterisationoflocalknowledgeacrosstheLivingLabs InthischaptertheresultsofdevelopingthedecisiontimelinesineachoftheLLaresummarised.ForeachLL, thegeneralcontextoftheLLandthemainstakeholdersineachLLarebrieflydescribed.Decisiontimelinesare establishedforselectedmainstakeholdersineachoftheLL.Whilethedecisiontimelinesdevelopedforeach ofthesefollowacommonstructure,additionaldetailswhererelevanthavebeenincluded,andthesemay differbetweenLL. Foreachofthedecisiontimelines,avisualrepresentationofthetimelineisfirstpresented,followingbya shortnarrativeoneachofthethreecomponents; I. Weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities.Thisformsthebasisofthetimeline,describingthe “normal”weatherpatterns,ortheaspectsoftheclimatethatarerelevanttothatstakeholder.The secondpartofthebasisofthetimelineoutlinesthecurrent“normal”livelihoodandbusiness processesofthestakeholder.ClimaterelatedrisksidentifiedfromtheLKofstakeholders,focussing onclimaticpatternsandextremesthatimpactlivelihoodandbusinessprocessesareincluded,aswell asanyrelevantlong‐termchangesandtrendsthatareobservedorperceived.Socio‐economicrisks thatmayalsoimpactlivelihoodandbusinessprocessesarealsoincluded. II. Thesecondcomponentofthetimelineconsidersthedecision‐makingprocessesofthestakeholder, includingkeydecisionpoints,andtheenvironmentalcues(whichincludesweatherandclimate)orthe socio‐economiccuesthatarerecognisedasrelevanttothedecisionsmade.Thesemaybequalitative orobservationalcues,butmayalsoconsiderobservationofaindicatororvariablecrossingadefined thresholdvalue.Thissection,whererelevantalsoincludesthecurrentuseofCSandhowinformation isusedandtriangulated(oflocalandscientificknowledge) III. Thefinalcomponentdescribesthecopingandadaptationstrategiesrecognisedbystakeholdersthat canbetakeninresponsetotheenvironmentaland/orsocio‐economiccues.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 13 4.1 LivingLabinCrete,Greece ThemainweatherandclimaterelatedhazardsfacedbystakeholdersintheCreteLLincludeheatwaves,floods, wildfiresanddroughts.Thestakeholdersinvolvedarefromthetourism,transportation(portsandroads management),andwatermanagementsectors.ThesesectorsarerepresentedintheMAPbythree organisations;theGreekNationalTourismOrganization(tourismsector),whichisapublicbody;the OrganizationfortheDevelopmentofCreteS.A.(transport,hydraulic/agriculture/watersupplyinfrastructure) andtheMunicipalPortFundofRethimno(portmanagementandrelatedactivities)areinvolved.TheRegional DevelopmentCompanyofCreteSA.operatesintheprivatesector,whiletheGreekNationalTourism Organizationoperatesinthenon‐governmentalsector.ThemainendusersoftheCSidentifiedintheI‐CISK projectincludetourismenterprises,tourists,usersfromthewatermanagementandtransportation enterprises.Decisionsrelatedtoclimatehazardsarelinkedtowaterallocationinperiodsofdroughtsor significantwaterstress(i.e.summer,andinparticulartheendofsummerperiod);wildfiresandheatwavesfor theplanningoftouristactivitiesandenergydemand(duetohigherusageofcoolingsystems);andtourism andtransportationdisruptionrelatedtoflashfloods,landslidesandunfavourablewaveconditionsatports. ThemembersoftheCreteLLMAParegenerallycharacterisedbyhavingahigheducationalbackground,with asignificantawarenessofclimatechallengesandgoodabilitytounderstandthegoalsoftheI‐CISKproject. However,notallMAPmembersstartedfromasimilarlevelofunderstandingofexistingCSandoftheir potential.TheabilityofthedifferentmemberstoengageproductivelyintheCSco‐creationprocesstherefore variedconsiderably.SomeLLmembershaveadvancedtoolsand/orclimatestudiesattheirdisposal, specificallydevelopedtoaddresstheirclimateinformationneeds;whileothersrelyprimarilyonpublicly availableweatherservicesandtheirownpastexperience. InthecaseoftheCreteLL,thedecisiontimelinewasusedasatooltounderstandthedecision‐makingprocess ofthevariousstakeholderswithintheMAP.Decisiontimelineexercisesweredevelopedwiththethreemain actorsrepresentedintheMAP,whichforbrevitywerefertohereasTourismResortManagers,Water managersandPortManagers.Witheachoftheseadecisiontimelinewasdevelopedwiththeobjectiveto identifyinformationgapsandadaptationneeds.Interviewswerestructuredfollowinganinterviewmatrix.An exampleofthekindofinformationgatheredduringtheexercisewithoneoftheMAPmemberscanbefound inAppendixII.Informationwasgatheredindraftformatandthenusedfortheco‐creationprocess.Theclimate risksaddressedduringtheexerciseincluded:droughtandwaterscarcity,heavyprecipitation,floods,heat waves,seasurgesandsealevelrise,andspecificwindpatterns.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 14 4.1.1 DecisionTimeline:Watermanagers Figure6DecisiontimelineforwatermanagersintheCreteLL Figure6presentsthedecisiontimelinethatwasidentifiedwithwatermanagersintheCreteLL.Thetimeline focusesonthedecisionstheytakethatarerelatedtowaterallocationanddistributiontopublicandprivate clients,aswellasdecisionsonstorageordistributionofexcesswaterandlonger‐terminvestmentdecisions. Watermanagersidentifytheneedforbetterinformeddecisionsonwaterstorageandwaterallocation,amore efficientannualmanagementofthewaterreserves,especiallyifclimatestressisexpectedtoincreaseinthe followingdecades.Thiscanbetranslatedintotheneedforearlywarningsystemsofexpecteddroughts.A clearneedforseasonalwateravailabilityforecastingisidentifiedasaCSneed,whichishinderedbylackof trustinclimateinformation. Watermanagers,asallstakeholdersintheCreteLL,triangulatebetweendifferentsourcesofinformation whentakingdecisionsassociatedwithkeyactivities.Thedecisionswatermanagersmakeonwaterallocation anddistributionareinfluencedbyfactorssuchaswateravailabilityandinformationonexpecteddemand. Technicalinformationsuchasmonitoringoflowflowsacrosscrucialpointsintheyear(Nov‐Dec(wetperiod) andMay‐June(dryperiod))andprecipitationmeasurements(May‐June,Sept‐Oct)areusedbywater managersasenvironmentalcuestodecideregardingwaterallocationanddistribution.Thisinformationis providedbymonitoringstationsandincombinationwithpastexperience,areusedforseasonalandannual planning.Forlongerterminformationwatermanagersrelyonclimatestudiesandprojectionsofclimate changeasawaytoinformstrategicdecisions.Thewatermanagementorganization(OAK)isahigh‐capacity organizationthatcanusenewtoolssuchasadvancedearlywarningsystems,hasidentifiedclimatechangeas asignificantchallenge,takestheclimatechangeunderconsiderationforlongtermdecisionsandincorporates adaptationactionsintodevelopmentplanning.Alongsidethis,watermanagersalsorelyontheirpast experienceandknowledgeofannualprecipitationpatternsaswellassocioeconomiccuessuchasdemand changesduetotourism(May‐Sept)toanticipatewateravailability. Themainclimate‐relatedrisksidentifiedbywatermanagersaredrought,waterscarcityandfloods(seeTable 1).Theyaddresstheserisksthroughtheimplementationofarangeofoptions,eachwithdifferentassociated costsandtimehorizons.Short‐termchallengesareaddressedusingacombinationof:(a)historicalclimate andhydrologicdata;(b)managementexperienceusedtoimprovewaterdistributionandwateruse Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(wet&mild) &Weatherobservations Surfaceflowinrivers Sectoralactivities Allocationdecision(publicclients) AllocationDecisionrevision(publicclients) Allocationdecision(privateclients) Storageorreleaseofwatertotheenvironment Climaterelatedrisks Heatwaves&extremeweatherevents MeteorologicalDrought:lackofprecipitation Socio‐economicfactors Demandduetoneworincreasednumberofwaterusers(e.g.tourism) Demandduetoextendedtourismseason/increasedvisitors Environmentalcues Pastexperienceofprecipitationpatterns LowFlows Lowflows Socio‐economiccues Changesindemandduetotourism Demandfromagricultureduetonewinvestments Availablefundingandtools Longtermstrategiesofthewatermanagementorganisation CS&informationsources Operationalearlywarningsystems(shortterm)‐cimatestudiesandprojections(longterm) CopingStrategies Changingallocationofwaterresourcesbasedonpriorities AdaptationStrateges Investmentinnewreservoirs,changeofwaterplanning,usingalternativewatersources Spring(transition) Summer(hot&dry) Autumn(transition)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 15 monitoring;and(c)state‐of‐the‐artoperationalforecastingtools.Longtermchallengesareaddressedthrough significantinvestmentsinhydraulicinfrastructuresorthedevelopmentofoperationalforecastingtools, supportedbycase‐specificstudieswhichtakeintoconsiderationclimatechangeprojectionsandclimate changeimpacts.Floodhazardisalsomainlyaddressedonashort‐termbasis,basedonweatherforecasting, pastexperienceand/orspecificfloodimpactstudies. Table1CharacterizationofthecurrentLLadaptationdecisionspaceforWaterManagers(Source:DeStefanoetal.2024) Problem addressedTypeofmeasureInformation/knowledgeusedAdaptationscale Droughtand waterscarcity InvestinnewreservoirsThisisbasedonwell‐constructed studiesthatincludeanalysisof historicalclimatedataaswellas estimationsonfutureavailability (climateprojections)andneeds Adaptation Droughtand waterscarcity Improvewaterdistributionand waterusemonitoring Basedonhistoricaldataand managementexperience.Adecision‐ makingsystembasedonhydrologic similaritiestopastyearsandcurrent wateravailabilityandexpert judgement. Inthemiddleof copingand adaptation Droughtand waterscarcity Improveinformationonfuture possiblerisks Studieswhichanalyseclimate projectionsandclimatictrends Towardsadaptation Droughtand waterscarcity Investonoperationalservice tools State‐of‐the‐art,operational forecastingtoolswhichmakeuseof short‐termmeteorologicalmodels andimpactmodelling Adaptation Seasurgesand sealevelrise Studiesandprojectsforport protection–constructionofa newbreakwater MainlyhistoricalclimatedataInthemiddleof copingand adaptation FloodsIncorporateimproved meteorologicalforecasting informationintodecisionmaking, Meteorologicalforecasting information Coping FloodsUndertakingfloodimpactstudiesMainlyhistoricalclimatedataInthemiddleof copingand adaptation
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 16 4.1.2 DecisionTimeline:Tourismresortmanagers Figure7TimelinefortourismresortmanagersintheCreteLL Touristresortmanagersexpressedtwoveryspecificclimaticchallengesrelatedtothemanagementoftheir facilities.Oneisrelatedtotheannualneedsofextensivemaintenanceworks.Thesetakeplaceduringthelow seasonwhichismainlyduringthelateautumnandwinterperiodandcoincideintimewithperiodsofevents ofheavyprecipitationand/orwind.Ifextendedworksareplannedandhavetobecancelleddueto unfavourableconditions,thishasadditionalcostsandposesamanagementburdenforre‐planning.The secondisrelatedtoseasonalplanningneedsofoutdooractivitiesofferedtothecustomers.Extremeweather eventssuchasheatwavesorsummerheavyprecipitationand/orfloodshindersuchoutdooractivities. Forresortmanagers,planningofoutdoormaintenanceintheautumnmonthsisakeyactivityoftencoinciding withperiodsofhighwindsandheavyprecipitation.Uptonow,suchchallengesaredealtbyre‐actiontoevents andpreviousexperience(e.g.whichperiodsusuallyhavefavourableweather).However,underachanging climateamorerobustplanningsystem,onanoperationalbasiswouldbeneeded.Thisiswherethereis opportunityforaCSwithoperationalinformation,targetedtotheaboveneedstosupportbetterplanning. Falsepredictionscouldalsomeanaddedcostsandtheburdenofre‐planning;therefore,uncertaintyof seasonalinformationhasanimportantrole.Portandresortmanagersbothrelypredominantlyontheirpast experiencesandforecastinformationon,forexample,wind,stormsurgesandtemperaturetoinformtheir actions. Touristresortsarealsohigh‐capacityactorsthataddressclimatechallengesonamoreoperationalbasis, utilizingmainlyweatherforecastingandpastexperience(mainlyquickactionsandcopingratherthan adapting)toaddressextremeweatherevents.However,plannedadaptationactions(e.g.againstdroughtand waterscarcity,seeTable2)arealsotakenunderbroaderaspectsofcombiningeconomicviabilitywithan environmental‐friendlyculture.Anexampleistheimplementationofaclosedwater‐cyclebasedonextensive waterreusethatthetouristresorthasalreadyimplemented.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 17 Table2CharacterizationofthecurrentLLadaptationdecisionspaceforResortManagers(Source:DeStefanoetal.2024) Problem addressedTypeofmeasureInformation/knowledgeusedAdaptationscale Droughtand waterscarcity Closingthewater‐cycle(reuse) inlargetourist resorts/establishments Pastexperienceandhistorical dataonwateruseandfuture estimations Adaptation FloodsIncorporateimproved meteorologicalforecasting informationintodecisionmaking, Meteorologicalforecasting information Coping FloodsUndertakingfloodimpactstudiesMainlyhistoricalclimatedataInthemiddleof copingand adaptation 4.1.3 DecisionTimeline:Portmanagers Figure8DecisiontimelineforportmanagersintheCreteLL Forportmanagers,thekeyactivitiesrepresentedonthetimelineincludedecisionsthataretakenonashorter‐ termtimescalerelatedtotrafficmanagementintheport,whichisdoneonaweeklybasiscurrently.Ship managementintheportisanotheractivityrequiringportmanagerstoplanonmediumtolongerterm timescale(monthlyto5‐10years).Longertermplanning(5to10years)isalsodonefordecisionsrelatedto portdefences. Climaticaswellasnon‐climaticactivitiesimpacttheactivitiesofportmanagers,forexample,ship managementisimpactedbywindpatternsandspeed,trafficmanagementattheportsisimpactedbystorms andheat,whiledecisionsrelatedtoportdefencesareimpactedbyavailabilityoffundingandoverarching policiesregardingtourism.Inresponsetothisportmanagershadidentifiedtheneedtoinvestinseasonaland decadalforecastingservices. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(wet&mild) &Weatherobservations Sectoralactivities Decisionsonshipmanagementintheport(monthlyplanning) Portareatrafficmanagement(weeklyplanning) Longtermstrategyonportdefences&shipplanning(5‐10yearsplanning) Climaterelatedrisks Heatwaves Storms&strongwinds Storms&strongwinds Socio‐economicfactors Availablefundingandoverarchingpolicesregardingtourism Environmentalcues Pastexperienceofweatherpatterns Socio‐economiccues Longtermstrategyonportmanagement&portdefences CS&informationsources Earlywatningsystems:WindForecasts,Storms,Temperatureforecast CopingStrategies AdaptationStrateges Newdevelopmentsandinvestmentsinportdefences Spring(transition) Summer(hot&dry) Autumn(transition)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 24 Figure11DecisionTimelineforNon‐FarmersintheLesothoLivingLab Decisiontimelinesforfarmersandnon‐farmersareshowninFigure10andFigure11respectively.Ineachof thedecisiontimelinesdeveloped,thetoprowshowstheweatherforecastandweatherobservationdatathat isusedindecisionmaking.Thesecondrowshowsthelivelihoodactivitiesacrosstheseason,whichforfarmers includesthefarmingseason,suchastheleanseasonandthegreentodryharvestingseason.Thethirdrow explainsthedecision‐makingprocess.Thefirstdecisioniswhenthepre‐activationtriggerisreached.Thisis thecasewhentheLesothoMeteorologicalServicesissuetheseasonaloutlookinSeptember,withthetrigger beingbelownormalrainfall.ThesecondtriggerisreachedincasethattheOctober,November,December (OND)rainfallisbelownormalandtheVulnerabilityAssessmentAnalysisreport(bytheLesothoVulnerability AssessmentCommittee)‐issuedinJanuary‐projectsthat20%ofthepopulationwillbeindrought‐drivenIPC Phase3and4forthenextsixmonths.IPCphasesareanindicatoroftheleveloffoodsecurity,whereIPC Phase3isdefinedastheCrisisLevel,whileIPCPhase4isdefinedastheEmergencylevel. Weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities Throughouttheyear,variouslivestockandfarmingactivitiesareundertakenbyfarmers.Thefarmingseason beginsinAugust,followingthecoldseason,withlandpreparationastheprimaryfocus.Plantingstartsin SeptemberandcontinuesuntilDecember.Ascropsbegintogrow,weedingbecomesthemainactivity,lasting untilApril.TheharvestperiodthenrunsfromMaytoJuly.Forlivestockfarmers,thebreedingandsellingof livestocktypicallyoccurbetweenOctoberandJanuary.Theincomefromlivestocksalesisreinvestedinto agriculturalproductionandusedtopurchasefoodforhouseholdconsumptionwhilecropsarestillbeing planted. Non‐farmersengageinactivitiessuchasbrewingalcohol,fetchingandsellingfirewood,andparticipatingin aninformalsavingspoolcalledstokvel,whichisredistributedattheendofeachyear. Bothfarmersandnon‐farmersperceivesignificantweathervariabilitythroughouttheyearinQacha’sNek. Typically,theregionexperiencesrainfallandhightemperaturesatthebeginningandendoftheyear.Thecold seasontraditionallyspansfromApriltoJuly,butinrecentyears,householdshaveobservedthatthecold periodnowextendsintoSeptember.Strongwindsareaconstantthroughouttheyear,withparticularly intensegustsoccurringbetweenAugustandNovember.Thisincreasingweathervariability,includingextreme weatherevents,hasadverselyaffectedagriculturalproduction.Forinstance,farmershavereportedmore frequentoutbreaksoflivestockdiseasesand,insomecases,livestockdeathsduetoextremeheat. Additionally,prolongedcoldwaveshaveledtoareductioninagriculturalyield. Decisionmakingprocess Anumberoffactorsaffectthetimingofthekeylivelihoodactivitiesforbothfarmersandnon‐farmers.For example,forfarmersinQacha’sNek,changesinweathersuchasprolongedcoldwavesimpacttheabilityto carryoutcertainactivitiessuchasploughingtopreparethelandforcultivation.Otherfactorsthataffectthe Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics &Weatherobservations Rainwithintermittentdryspells ColdestMonth Rainwithintermittentdryspells Livelihoodactivities Brewing&SellingFirewood Stokvel(saveeverymonth&buye.g.groceriesinlargequantitiesattheendoftheyear) Climaterelatedrisks ColdWaves‐makingitmoredifficulttogetfirewood Socio‐economicfactors DecliningFoodstocks HighCrimeRates LessActiveMarkets Environmentalcues Earlieronsetandlongerdryspells Earlyarrivaloffrost&mistontopofmountains Socio‐economiccues LowMarketdemand CS&informationsources Radio SocialMedia CopingStrategies Usestokveltobuyfoodforthefamily Doingpiecejobs(casuallabour) Warm&WetSeasonCool&DrySeasonWarm&WetSeason
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 25 timingofactivitiesincludelowmarketsforlivestockandcropsalewhichinturncontributetowardslow income.Lowrainfall,whichresultsinwatershortagesforbothlivestockandcropproduction,andadeclinein foodstockwhichtypicallyoccursbetweenSeptemberandNovemberwhichistheplantingperiod,alsoaffect thetimingofactivities. Fornon‐farmersengagedinactivitiessuchasalcoholbrewing,extendedperiodsofcoldwavesaffecttheir abilitytobrewsinceitisdifficultforthemtofetchfirewoodduringthisperiod. Farmersandnon‐farmersrelyonbothenvironmentalandsocialcuestoanticipatedryspellsorchangesin rainfallpatterns.Forinstance,theyinterpretfrequentmistontopofmountaintopsandalongriversasa precursortocolderperiods.Farmersalsoobservedrywetlandstogaugeanonsetortheintensityofan ongoingdryspell.Observationsofthemoonarealsousedtopredictweatherchanges:aclear,brightmoon suggestsfairweather,whileahazyorringedmoonindicatesmoistureintheair,oftenprecedingrain.In additiontothis,observingthehaloaroundthemoonwhichiscausedbymoonlightrefractingthroughice crystalsintheupperatmospherealsosignifiesimminentrainorsnow. Asidefromtheenvironmentalandsocialcues,householdsaccessclimateinformationviatheradio,phone messagesandsocialmedia.Thisinformation,includingseasonaloutlooksinformsdecisionssuchaschoosing plantingtimes,selectingweather‐resistantseeds,implementingwaterconservationmeasuresandplanning rotationalgrazingschedules.Thesepracticeshighlighttheblendoftraditionalknowledgeandmodern forecastingmethodsthatfarmersutilizetoinformlivelihooddecisionmaking. Copingandadaptationstrategies Inresponsetofrequentweatherchangesandprolongedextremeconditions,farmershaveadoptedvarious copingandadaptationstrategiestomaintaintheiragriculturalproductivity.Thesestrategiesinclude protectingwellstosecurewatersources,rationingwatertoextenditsavailability,andpurchasingdrought‐ tolerantseedstoensurecropscanwithstanddryspells.Duringperiodsoffoodstockdecline,householdsoften buyfoodoncredit,deferringpaymentuntiltheyhavethemeanstosettlethedebt,ortheyusefundsfrom communalsavingsschemes(stokvels)topurchasefood.Additionally,whenwatershortagesoccurdueto drought,farmersturntoalternativesourcessuchasgroundwaterandlakestoprovidedrinkingwaterfortheir livestock.Thesemeasureshighlighttheresilienceandresourcefulnessoffarmersinthefaceofchallenging environmentalconditions.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 26 4.4 RijnlandLivingLab,theNetherlands TheRijnlandLLMAPinvolveswatermanagers‐theRijnlandWaterBoard‐,researchandacademia‐theI‐CISK consortiummembers‐,representativesofcivilsocietyorganizations,andindividualsfromwaterusesectors affectedbydroughts:recreationalnavigation(watertourism)andagriculture. IntheNetherlandsLL(Rijnland),userneedsarecentredaroundwaterresourcemanagement.Surfacewater ishighlycontrolledinRijnlandandisusedforbothirrigationanddrainage.Droughthasbeenidentifiedasthe keyfocusoftheLLunderI‐CISK,asitsimpactonsurfacewateravailabilityaffectsagriculture,waterquality (salinity)andwatertourism/recreationintheregion.TheambitionoftheLListoinfluencepublicand organisationalpreparednessandadaptationstrategiestodroughtatthesub‐seasonaltoclimate‐change timescales.UserneedsforaCStosupportthisincludelongerforecastleadtimes(sub‐seasonal,seasonaland climateprojection)andstrengtheningstakeholderengagement/communication. IntheRijnlandLL,theinformationthathasbeenusedtodevelopthedecisiontimelinehasbeengatheredin severalmeetingsandworkshopswiththeMAP,focusingoncurrentdroughtmeasures,currentinformation onhydro‐climaticimpacts,andpotentialdroughtadaptationactions.Inanextphase,thedecisiontimelines werethenrefinedandcomplementedwhererequiredwithinformationthroughone‐to‐onediscussionswith MAPmembers,incombinationwithfeedbackmeetingsontheprototypeoftheclimateserviceunder developmentwithintheI‐CISKprojectindividual. 4.4.1 DecisionTimeline:RijnlandRegionalWaterAuthority Notes:Copingmeasuresareenactedwhentheaccumulatedprecipitationdeficitexceeds150mm,and/orwhenthedischargeinthe RhineatthegaugingstationatLobithislowerthanadefinedthresholds,whichvariespermonth(April:1000m3/s;May:1400m3/s; June:1300m3/s;July:1200m3/s;August:1100m3/s;September:1000m3/s) Figure12DecisionTimelineRijnlandLivingLab ClimateCharacteristics,weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities Figure12showsthedecisiontimelinethatwasestablishedfortheRijnlandwaterauthority.Notethatthis timelinehasbeenestablishedfortheactivitiesofthewaterauthoritythatarerelatedtothemanagementof freshwateravailability.Thewaterauthorityhasseveralothertasksandactivitiesrelatedtothemanagement ofwaterresources,whicharenotconsideredhere.Fromthedecisiontimeline,itcanbeseenthatdecisions ontheimplementationofcopingstrategiesincaseofan(imminent)droughtstartinMarchandthen Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(mild&wet) &Weatherobservations Evaporativedemandexceedsprecipitation,seasonallylowflows Sectoralactivities PrepareWaterSystemforDrought Evaluation EnsuringavailabilityoffreshwaterinRijnlandsystemtomeetneeds(agriculture) Flushingwatersystemtokeepsalinitylevelslow Providinginformationbulletinstousers(agriculture,recreationalshipping) Climaterelatedrisks ReducedfreswateravailabilityinRhine,highsalinityatmainintakeatGouda Highevaporativedemand(hightemperatures)andlowprecipitation Environmentalcues DischargeintheRiverRhineatLobithbelowthreshold(freshwateravailability)* Accumulatedprecipitationdeficitabovethreshold(potentialevaporation‐precipitation)** ChangingdischargeregimeoftheRhine(longerandmoreextremelowflows) Increasingtemperaturesandreducedsummerprecipitation,risingsealevels Socio‐economiccues CopingStrategies PrepareWaterSystemforDrought Inspectionofembankments Usealternativerouteforfreshwaterintake Reducewater‐useinagriculture:irrigationbans Avoidsalineintrustionbyreducing/stoppinglockmovement AdaptationStrateges IncreasingstorageoffreshwaterintheRijnlandarea Spring Summer(mild&humid) Autumn(wet&windy)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 27 concentrateonthefirstsummerseasonmonthsAprilthroughtoMay,withweeklyre‐evaluationofactionsto betakenor(dis)continued. Droughtcopingstrategiesthathavebeenimplemented,inyearsthatthesewererequired,aregenerally discontinuedattheendofthesummerseason,typicallyinthemonthsofAugustandSeptember.Theseare largelyoperationaldroughtimpactmitigationmeasures.AroundNovemberthereisanevaluationmeetingby thedrought‐emergencymanagementteamofthewaterauthority,includingdiscussiononpotentialdrought andactionscenariosforthenextyears. Decisionmakingprocess Thewaterauthorityintensivelyusesmonitoredandpredictedhydro‐climaticinformationwithanuptotwo‐ weekpredictionleadtimetosupportthedecisionsfortakingcopingmeasures,whileinformationfromclimate scenariosmaybeusedtosupportinvestmentdecisionsonlong‐termdroughtriskmanagement(adaptation). Severalobserveddatasourcesandderivedindicatorsareused.ThisincludesriverdischargeintheRhine, accumulatedprecipitationdeficit,andtheStandardisedPrecipitationIndex(SPI).Atwo‐weekoutlookof precipitation,temperatureanddischargeisalsoused,andboththeseandtheobserveddataareconsulted. Thereisalsorelianceonlocal(expert)knowledgetopredictdrought,thoughintheholidayseasonitis reportedthatthosewiththisexpertisemaynotalwaysbeavailable.Informationthatthewaterauthorityfeel theylack,includesanoutlookwithlongerleadtime,anearlierstartofmonitoringofprecipitationdeficit(this nowstartsonApril1st),andinformationonthewaterdemandfromcrops. Inthediscussionswiththewaterauthority,severalconcernswereidentified.Beforethestartofthedrier season(February‐March),groundwaterlevelsmaybehigh,whichcouldleadtoanincreasedriskofflooding incaseofacriticalrainfallevent.Thereisalsouncertaintyaroundthetakingofthedecisiontostartthetaking inofwaterthroughalternativeroutes,whichareusedwhenthemainintakeoffreshwateratthecityofGouda becomestoosalineasaresultoflowflowsintheRhine,whichresultsinanenhancedincursionofsaltwater fromtheNorthSea.Thealternaterouterequiresthewaterauthoritytoliaisewithneighbouringauthorities, andifitturnsoutthatifthismeasurewasnotrequired(inretrospect),thenthatcouldleadtoalossoftrust. Thesameuncertaintyalsoholdswhendecidingwhentostopthemeasure.Iftheendofthesummerismarked byintermittentrainthenthedecisionisdifficult.Also,oncestoppeditisnoteasytorestartthemeasure. Theagriculturalsectorintensivelyusesmonitoredandshort‐termpredictionswithuptoaweekleadtime, andstronglyreliesonexperience,localknowledge,expertjudgementforoperation,alsoduringdroughts (coping).Forlong‐terminvestmentplanning,climatechangeinformationuseseemstohavebeenlimitedor hasnotbeenused.Thewatertourismsectorhasuntilnowbeenmostlyinterestedinbeinginformedonthe short‐termoperationaldroughtmitigationmeasuresthewaterauthorityistaking,particularlythosethat adverselyaffecttheirrecreationalspacesuchasreducedlocking,orlockingbans.Partofthereasonseemsto bealackofawarenessofthehydro‐climaticpredictionsthatarebeingusedbythewaterauthority.Longterm droughtriskinformationwithclimateprojectionshavealsonotyetbeenconsideredbythissector. Copingandadaptationstrategies MeasurestakeninthepastintheRijnlandLLtomanagedroughtrisks,includebothoperationaldroughtevent management(coping),and,toalimitedextent,long‐termstrategicdroughtriskmanagement(adaptation). Operationally,duringanimminentorongoingdrought,thewatermanagementauthorityandtheagricultural sectorhavetakenvariouscopingmeasures.Thewaterrecreationsectordoesnotseemhavetakenmitigation actionsduringpreviousdroughts.Forthelong‐termstrategicdroughtriskmanagementtoenhanceclimate changeadaptation,thewaterauthorityhassofarinvestedinincreasingitsadaptivecapacityfordroughts.The currentcopingandadaptationmeasuresasmentionedinworkshopsbytheLLMAPmembers,arelisted below:
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 28 Shorttermdamagemitigation(coping):dikeinspections,limitingship‐lockoperation,limitingsurface waterintakeandswitchingtoalternativeintakelocations,adjustingirrigationschedules,optimizeuse oflocalfreshwaterstorageforirrigation. Shorttermcommunicationforincreasedpreparedness(coping)didnothappenduringthe2018 droughtbutwaspreparedandsuccessfullyimplementedduringthe2022drought.Longterm investmentinwatersysteminfrastructure:increasingcapacityandrobustnessofalternativesurface freshwaterintakeduringdrought.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 29 4.5 Alazani-IoriLivingLab,Georgia Themulti‐actorplatform(MAP)inGeorgiaincludesadiversegroupofstakeholdersrangingfromclimate serviceproviders(NationalEnvironmentalAgency)toservicepurveyors(civilsocietyorganisations)andend users(individualfarmersandgroupsrepresentingtheinterestsofindividualfarmers).Theseactorsrepresent agriculture,watermanagementandenvironmentsectors(Masihetal.,2022).Previousandrecentinteractions withtheMAPunderscoredtheneedforclimateinformationpertainingtowateravailabilityanddroughtto informwaterallocationandagriculturalplanningprocesses.Preliminaryinsightsfromthedatacollection processconductedinAugust2023andMarch2024arepresentedbelow.Thedecisiontimelinespresented here(Figure13)representsoperationsrelatedtowinemaking,wheatfarmingandGeorgianAmelioration (irrigationprovider). 4.5.1 DecisionTimeline:WineMakers Figure13DecisiontimelineforwinemakingintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab ClimateCharacteristics,weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities ThekeyactivitiesmappedherewerebasedontheinputreceivedfromwinemakersinterviewedintheAlazani‐ IoriLL.Thekeyactivitiesassociatedwithwinemakinginclude‐pruningandtrimmingofvines(Jan‐April), pesticideoperations(May‐Aug),harvest(Sep‐Oct)andwineproduction(Nov‐Dec).Adetaileddecision timelineispresentedinFigure13anddiscussedindetailbelow. Decisionmakingprocessesandcues WinemakersintheAlazani‐Ioribasinrelyonlocalweatherconditionstoplantheiractivities.Allfarmers interviewedmentionedthelatearrivalofwinterandfrostsinearlyspring(“Springfreeze”)impactingtheir pruningactivities.Additionally,dependingonthesizeofthevineyardthetimingofoperationsisalso determinedbytheavailabilityoflabour.Winemakersalsocloselymonitortemperatureespeciallyduringlate springandsummer.Highprecipitationcombinedwithhightemperaturesposeaseverethreattothe vineyards.Lackofwater,particularlyduringdroughts,typicallyhappenaroundJune–August.However, vineyardscantypicallywithstandwaterstressedconditions.Winemakersalsorelyoninformationandadvice fromfarmers’associationsortheirownsocialnetworktodecideonpesticideoperations.Winemakers mentionedsharinginformationamongtheirpeersabouttheappearanceofpestsorfungusandtreatments Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(cool&mild) &Weatherobservations Rainwithintermittentdryspells HighTemperatures&Lowprecipitation Rainwithintermittentdryspells Sectoralactivities TrimmingandPruningVines PesticideOperations Harvest WineProduction Climaterelatedrisks Frost&excessiveprecipitation Watershortages&hightemperatures Hail&intenseprecipitation Toomuchprecipitation Socio‐economicfactors Availabilityofhumanresource(labour) Availabilityofhumanresource(labour)&machinery Environmentalcues Movementoftheclouds(directionofmovementasaprecursorofweatherconditions) Socio‐economiccues Consultationwithotherfarmers&farmerassociations Demandfromwinecompanies CS&informationsources Googleweather,yr.no(relyingonweeklyforecasts)andvariouswebsitesofferingfarmingadvice CopingStrategies Delaytrimmingandtyingupofvines Usewaterfromirrigationorwells AdaptationStrateges Investindripirrigationsystems Combinewinemakingwithagro‐toursim Spring(transition) Summer(hot&humid) Autumn(transition)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 30 relatedtothesame.Finally,winemakersreportedchangesintheharvestperiod,theharvestperiodmoving uptoamonthearlier(fromSep‐OcttolateAugust).Forfarmerssupplyinggrapestocommercialwinemakers, thereispressuretodelaytheharvestinordertohavehighsugarcontent,however,thisdelaytendstomake thevineyardsmoresusceptibletodamagebyhail,whichtypicallyhappensattheendofsummer‐autumn period.Winemakersreportedusingseveralweb‐basedapplicationstoobtaininformationonweather conditions.ThisrelianceonCSwaslimitedtoplanningday‐to‐daytacticaloperations.Forlonger‐termplanning farmersreliedontheirownpracticalexperience. Intermsofinformationuse,someofthefarmersinterviewedreliedonscientificallygeneratedweather forecasts,socialmedia,orwebsites(forexample,https://yr.noprovidedbyNorwegianMeteorological InstituteandNorwegianBroadcastingCorporation)toguidetheirdecisionmaking.Mostfarmers,however, mentionedthattheyreliedontheirpastexperiencetoguidetheirdecisionmakingaswellaslearningfrom otherfarmersintheircommunity,especiallywhenitcomestoon‐farmmanagementstrategiessuchassowing andplantingdates,sharinginformationonmildewappearanceetc. Copingandadaptationstrategies Intermsofcopingandadaptationstrategies,Georgianwinemakerstendtorelyonvaryingthetimingoftheir farmingactions,forexampledelayingpruningtillafterthespringfreezeorharvestingwineearlyinaneffort toavoidtheperiodinwhichhailstormsaremostfrequent.Forfarmerswithaccesstoirrigationchannels, payingforirrigationincaseofprecipitationdeficitduringthegrowingseasonhasalwaysbeenawaytocope withwatershortages.Somefarmersalsoreportedadaptingtheirtillingstrategiestomaintainsoilmoisturein caseofdrought.Cleaningirrigationcanalstomaintainwaterflowingwasanothermeasuretomitigatethe impactsofdroughts.Beyondthese,manyfarmersalsomentioned‘doingnothingandacceptinglosses’asa responsetoclimaterelatedstressors. Long‐termadaptationstrategiesreportedbyfarmersincludedinvestingininfrastructuremeasuressuchas dripirrigation,diggingwellstocompensateforthelackofwaterorinvestinginhailnetstoprotectthe vineyards.Farmerswithsufficientfinancialresourcesalsotransitionedtogreenhousefarmingtocopewith lackofwater.Farmersalsomentionedinstallingwindbreakstoreduceeffectsofwinderosionduringdroughts. Manyfarmersalsopractisedlivelihooddiversificationintheformofagro‐tourism(particularlyinthecaseof winemakers),rentingouttheirfarmlandtootherfarmersortransitioningtootherprofessions(suchas investinginlivestockoremigratingtourbanareas).
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 31 4.5.2 DecisionTimeline:WheatFarmers Figure14DecisionTimelineforWheatFarmingintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab. ClimateCharacteristics,weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities FarmersinvolvedinwheatfarmingintheAlazani‐Ioribasinwerealsoconsulted.Thedecisiontimeline(Figure 14)presentedhereelaboratestheactivitiesanddecision‐makingprocessoffarmersgrowingwinterwheat. Thekeyactivitiesofwheatfarmersincludesthepreparationofthelandandsowing(Sep–lateNov),pesticide treatmentsthroughoutthegrowingphaseofthewheatandharvestinthesummer(Jun–Jul). Decisionmakingprocessesandcues WinterwheatfarmersintheAlazani‐Ioribasinrelyonautumnrainstoinformtheirlandpreparationactivities andsowingstrategy.Farmerswaitforthecessationoftheautumnrainstobeginsowingsoastopreventany damagebyfungiorpests.Farmershavementionedtheunpredictablenatureoftheserains,remarkingthat autumnrainsareeitherdelayedandlacking,oraretooheavy.Combinedwithwarmertemperaturesthiscan leadtoinfestationbypestsorrodents.Duringthegrowingcycleofthewheat,farmerperformseveraltactical operationsincludeusingpesticidestomanagethecrop.Farmershavereportedthatthedelayedarrivalof winterandspringfrostaredetrimentalasitdestroystheyoungplantsthatresumegrowthinearlyspring (followingavegetativephaseduringwinter).WheatfarmersintheKakhetiregiontypicallyharvestinJune– July.Thetimingoftheharvestdependslargelyonwhetherfarmershavesufficienthumanresourcesand requiredmachineryforharvest.Manyfarmersintheregiondonotowntheirownlabourormachinery,and assuchrelyonbeingabletorenttheseresources.Farmershavereportedthatincreaseddemandcanput pressureonthepricesandavailabilityoftheseresources,therebyimpactingfarmerdecisions.Wheatharvest arealsoextremelyvulnerabletohailandextremerainfall.Occurrenceofthelatterduringthesummermonths canleadtoinfestationbypestsandrodents,andcreateflood‐likeconditionsthatmakesoperatingmachinery extremelydifficult. Intermsofenvironmentalcueswheatfarmersrelyontheirweatherobservations,particularlythosepertaining tothemovementofcloudstoplantheirdaytodayactivities.Generally,whenthecloudsmovefromasouth‐ easterlytoanorth‐westerlydirectionthenthisisassociatedwithdryconditions.Farmersalsoreportedusing weatherapplicationsontheirsmart‐phonestoinformthemselvesaboutweatherconditionstoplantheir Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(cool&mild) &Weatherobservations Rainwithintermittentdryspells HighTemperatures&Lowprecipitation Rainwithintermittentdryspells Sectoralactivities LandPrep. Sowing(winterwheat) PesticiceOperations Harvest(winterwheat) Climaterelatedrisks Lacking/delayedautumnrains SpringFrost Hail&intenseprecipitation Veryhightemperatures Socio‐economicfactors PestsandRodents PestsandRodents Highcostofinputs(seeds,pesticides,water,machineryandlabour) Lackofresources(delayharvest) Environmentalcues Movementoftheclouds(directionofmovementasaprecursorofweatherconditions) Socio‐economiccues Consultationwithotherfarmers&farmerassociations Availabiliyoflabour&machinery Expectedpriceonlocalmarkets CS&informationsources Googleweather,yr.no(relyingonweeklyforecasts)andvariouswebsitesofferingfarmingadvice CopingStrategies Deepertilling Delayedsowing Increaseduseofpesticides AdaptationStrateges Investmentinshortcyclewheat(harvestinMaytoavoidhail) Spring(transition) Summer(hot&humid) Autumn(transition)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 32 tacticaloperations.Farmersalsoreliedontheirownnetworksaswellasfarmerassociationsgainadviceand todecideontheiroperations.Lastly,thechoiceofgrowingwheatoveranothercrop(operationaldecision) dependsuponthepriceofferedinthelocalmarkets.Georgianwheatfarmersmentionedtheloweconomic productivityofwheatcausedbythehighcostofinputs,lowyieldsperhectareandcheapervarietiesof importedwheatavailableonthemarket.Externalfactorssuchasglobalaffairsandsubsequent(national) policyshiftscanalsoimpactfarmingdecisions.Fore.g.,in2022theRussianinvasionofUkraineledtoagrain crisis,whichbenefitedGeorgianfarmersastheirwheatcouldfetchahigherpriceonthemarket.Thisledto manyGeorgianfarmerschoosingtogrowwheatoverothercrops. Copingandadaptationstrategies Farmersmentionedusingseveralcopingstrategiestomanageclimaterelatedandnon‐climaterelatedrisks. Incaseofdroughtconditionsfarmersreportedusingdeepertillingstrategiestoensureenoughsoilmoisture. FarmersalsoreporteddelayingsowingtoDecemberasawaytocopewithtoomuchprecipitationinAutumn and/orwarmtemperatures.Farmersalsoreportedincreasingthefrequencyofpesticideapplicationseveral‐ foldtomanagethethreatfrompestsandrodents. Intermsofadaptationstrategies,onlyacoupleofwheatfarmersmentionedswitchingtoshort‐cyclewheat varieties,whichcanbeharvestedinMayasawaytoavoidhaildamage(Jun–Jul).Mostfarmersdiversified fromwheattoincludeothercropsthatprovidedbetterreturns. 4.5.3 DecisionTimeline:GeorgiaAmelioration Figure15DecisiontimelineforGeorgiaAmeliorationintheAlazani‐IoriLivingLab ClimateCharacteristics,weatherobservationsandsectoralactivities AdecisiontimelinewasalsocreatedbasedoninputsfromGeorgianAmelioration,anagencyfallingunderthe MinistryofAgricultureandresponsibleformanagingirrigationinfrastructureandsupplyingwaterforirrigation acrossthecountry.Incontrasttothewinemakersandthewheatfarmerstheseareconsiderasservice purveyors.Theprovisionofirrigationismanagedthroughacontractsystem,whereby,GeorgianAmelioration, basedonrequestsfromfarmers,setsupcontractsforthecomingirrigationseasonandawaterallocationplan fortheyear.Duringtheseasonthisirrigationscheduleisrevisedevery10daysinresponsetotheactual conditions. Decisionmakingprocessesandcues Asmentionedabove,GeorgianAmeliorationprovidesirrigationservicesthroughacontract‐basedsystem. Thesecontractsaresetupbasedonthenumberofintendedbeneficiaries,whichincludesfarmerswhoapply Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ClimateCharacteristics Winter(cool&mild) &Weatherobservations Rainwithintermittentdryspells HighTemperatures&Lowprecipitation Rainwithintermittentdryspells Sectoralactivities Settingupcontracts Finalisewaterallocationplan Irrigationseason(Reviseschedulex10days) Climaterelatedrisks Drought(temporarywatershortage) HighTemperature(Inrceasedwaterdemand) Socio‐economicfactors Deterioationofirrigationsupplynetwork Environmentalcues Dischargebelowthresholdsatlocalstations Socio‐economiccues Pastexperienceofexpecteddemand CS&informationsources HistoricalInformationonwateravailability WeatherForecast(mediumrange‐2weeks) CopingStrategies Changeallocation‐prioritiseperrenialcrops AdaptationStrateges Maintenanceofirrigationnetworktominimizewaterlosses Investmentinwaterstorageprojects(dams&reservoirs) Spring(transition) Summer(hot&humid) Autumn(transition)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 33 forirrigationservicesfromNov–Feb.Thefinalwaterallocationplanisinformedbythisdemandaswellas historicalinformationonwateravailabilityanddemand.Duringtheseason,GeorgianAmeliorationrelieson weatherforecasts(upto2‐weeks)aswellasreal‐timeinformationfromthelocalstations.Throughthisthey determinetheexpectedavailabilityofwatertorevisetheirrigationscheduleevery10days.Duringdiscussions withGeorgiaAmeliorationtheyindicatedthatinformationontheexpectedcumulativevolumeofavailable waterintheriverwithaleadtimeof1‐monthwouldgreatlyaidintheiroperations.Thisneedisstrengthened byachangeinthewaterallocationpolicy.Intheoldpolicy,farmerswouldbechargedbasedonthecontracts thatweremadebeforethestartofseason,irrespectiveofthewaterbeingdelivered.Inthenewpolicythere isashifttowardspaymentsforwateractuallydelivered,thusposingadditionalimportancetotheforecastof weatherconditionsandaccumulatedstreamflow. Copingandadaptationstrategies CurrentpracticefollowedbyGeorgianAmeliorationdictatesthatintheeventofadrought,asacoping measure,waterissuppliedonaprioritybasis,whereperennialcrops(likevineyards,walnutsetc)are prioritisedoverseasonalcrops(likewheat,maizeetc).Intermsofadaptationstrategies,Georgian Ameliorationisalsoinvestingintherenovation,expansionandmaintenanceoftheirrigationchannelsinorder toavoidwaterlosses.Furthermore,GeorgianAmeliorationisalsoinvestingininfrastructuresuchasreservoirs toincreasetheresilienceofthesystem. 4.6 LosPedrochesLivingLab,Spain TheAndalucíaMAPiscomposedofwatermanagers,managersofnaturalareas,agriculturalandforestry researchandoutreachorganisations,environmentalinformationpurveyors(REDIAM),farmingcooperatives, ahunters’association,andaruraldevelopmentorganisation.Togethertheyhaveabroadrepresentationof theagricultural,animalhusbandryandforestrysectorsintheLosPedrochesregion.Inthefirst2.5yearsof theproject(fromNovember2021toApril2024)theAndalusiaLLareahasexperiencedaprolongeddrought (+7years)thathasaffectedlocalwatersupplies.Thisdroughtwasalleviatedbyaparticularlyrainyspringin 2024.Asaresultofthis,theinformationcollectedfromstakeholdersoftenreferstoactionsthathavebeen carriedouttomanagetheongoingdrought. Thetimelineexercisewasdevelopedinsixfocusgroupsthatwereconductedwitholivegrowers,dairyfarmers anddehesa1livestockfarmers,aswellastechnicalstafffromtheOLIPEolivegrowerscooperativeandfrom theCOVAPlivestock(bothdairyanddehesa)farmers’cooperative.ThediscussionshelpedtheLLresearch teambetterunderstandthedecision‐makingprocessatdifferentgeographicalscales,theadaptationoptions beingusedandconsidered,andtheclimateinformationthatcouldhelpimproveadaptationdecisions.The workinthefocusgroupshadseveralbenefitsfortheworkoftheAndalucíaLL: • Validateandhelpadjustthescale‐temporalandspatial‐oftheCSunderdevelopmenttothe needsoftheend‐users. • Improveunderstandingofthedecision‐makingprocessandthepotentialadaptationpathways availablefordifferentactorsintheLLactingatdifferentscales‐farmlevelandcooperativelevel. • Enhancetheunderstandingoftheusersregardingthewayclimateinformationcanbeusedto informmanagementdecisionsatthefarmlevel. 1ThedehesaisanagropastoralsystemuniquetotheIberianPeninsulawhereoaktrees,primarilyholmoaks,native grassesandfree‐rangelivestock,primarilyIberianblackpigs,sheepandcows,interactunderthemanagementoffarmers.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 40 derivedfromweatherpatterns,socio‐economicchanges,overarchingpolicycontextsandexistingcultureof governance.Incaseofanorganisationalsetup,forexample,theRijnlandWaterAuthorityintheRijnlandLL, knowledgeassociatedwithprotocolsandproceduresiscombinedwithweather/climateinformationtoinform decisionmaking.Similarly,inthecaseofEmilia‐RomagnaintheItalianLL,acombinationofinformationfrom monitoringstations,existingprotocolsformanagementandpastexperiencearecriticalwhenmaking decisions.Forindividualenduserssuchasfarmers,forexample,inGeorgiaandLesotho,cuesderivedfrom long‐termobservationoflocalweatherconditions,localmarketconditionsandsocialinteractionswereused toinformdecision‐makingacrossdifferenttimescales.Insomecases,cuescanbedefinedasaclearthreshold, wherepreciseinformationisusedtotriggeraction.Tablebelowprovidesexamplesofsuchthresholdsbeing usedbyolivegrowersanddairyfarmersintheSpanishLLtoplantheiractions.Itshouldbenotedthatthe tablebelowprovidesanoverview,withoutintendingtobeexhaustiveoftheLKsources,cuesandthresholds thatmayexist.Gapsinthetablemaynotnecessarilymeanthatathreshold(forexample)doesnotexist. TheinformationsummarisedinTable4showsthatlinkingkeydecisionsandactionstocorresponding knowledgeandinformationsourceshelpsinunderstandingthecontextinwhichclimateinformationasmade availableinaCSisprovided.Italsogivesinsightintowhatchannelsofinformationarealreadyregardedas trustworthybytheintendedusers,existingcompetenciesofuserswhenitcomestounderstandingclimate information,andtheirexpectationwhenitcomestousingtheclimateinformation.
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 41 Table4Overviewofkeydecisionsandknowledgeandinformationunderpinningthosedecisions LivingLabLKHolderKeyDecisionsTimescaleTriangulationofinformationClimateinformation needs LKCuesThresholdsCSused Tactical Operational Strategic Crete, Greece Water Manager Storageor releaseof water Lowflows Pastexperience basedon annual precipitation patterns Weatherforecast(anda pilotEWS) Seasonalforecasts Water allocationand distributionto privateclients Expected tourism demand New investmentsin agriculture Available fundingand strategic planning Longterm strategyofthe water management Climatestudiesand projectionsofclimatechange
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 42 organisations Water allocationand distributionto publicclients Monitoringof flows(inNov‐ Dec(wet period)and May‐June(dry period) Pastexperience andknowledge ofannual precipitation patterns Expected tourism demand(May– Sept) Precipitationmeasurements (May‐June,Sept‐Oct) (Excess)Water allocationand distributionto publicclients Demanddueto extended tourismperiod PastExperience andknowledge ofannual precipitation patterns Precipitationmeasurements (May‐June,Sept‐Oct) ApilotcaseofEWS Port Manager Traffic management PastExperience WindForecasts StormForecasts Seasurgingdata Seasonalanddecadal forecastingservices. Ship management PastExperience
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 43 Portdefences Fundingand overarching policies regarding tourismand development plans Temperatureforecasts (duringveryhotperiods Historicaldata Resort Manager Maintenance works Pastexperience (identifying periodsof favourable weather). Forecasts Outdoor activities Emilia – Romana, Italy Regione Emilia Romagna Lower withdrawals during drought Weekly meetingswith Drought Observatory Setofdroughtindicators ARPAEmonitoring network Weeklyandseasonal forecastinformation Longterm management Climateprojections Extraordinary withdrawals authorisation ARPAEmonitoring network Weeklyandseasonal forecastinformation ARPAEProvisionof observedand forecasted meteorologica land hydrological data Consorzio Burana Storageand distributionof waterfor irrigation Anticipated demand Anticipationof reachinglow ARPAE’sDemandForecastWeeklyandseasonal forecastinformation
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 44 flows Pastexperience ofweather conditionsand learningfrom previousR&D interventions Maintenance and modernisation of infrastructure Pastexperience ofworkingwith R&D interventions Multi‐yearforecast information(ofextremes) Consorzio Emilia Centrale Distributionof waterfor irrigation Technical expertiseand experience Internal drought situationand emergency management protocols Minimum Ecological Flowplusfixed thresholds thattrigger “Emergency drought management Informationfrom monitoringstations; ARPAEforecastbulletin; statusofsnowandlakes; ARPAEmonitoring network Weeklyandseasonal forecastinformation Storageor releaseof waterby offline systems Volumeforecasts IRETIRiver discharge control Currentandhistoricaldata (fromARPAEor Hydrologicalhistorical valueannals) BulletinfromARPAE DailydatafromARPAE monitoringnetwork Forecastinformationon thedischarge(1‐2weeks and1‐monthahead)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 45 ARENMaintenance ofreservoirs DailydatafromARPAE monitoringnetwork; Weatherforecast Forecastsofstreamflowup 1‐monthahead Forecastsoflowflowsfor otherseasons(apartfrom summer) Scoutingfor newPlants Longtermclimatechange projections LesothoLivestock farmers Land preparation& Planting Observationof themoon Public gatherings Climateinformation providedviaradio,social mediaandphone messages Weeding Frequentmist ontopof mountainsas predictorof coldconditions Drywetlands Public gatherings Harvest Livestock breedingand sale Observationof themoon Public gatherings Non‐ farmers Brewing Frequentmist ontopof mountainsas predictorof coldconditions Drywetlands Observationof themoon Climateinformation providedviaradio,social media Stokvel Firewood selling Rijnland,The Netherlands Rijnland Water Imminent Drought Weeklyre‐ evaluationof Monitoredandpredicted hydroclimaticinformation
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 46 Authoritymanagement measures (March‐Sept) actionswithuoyo2‐week predictionleadtime Long‐term drought management Evaluation meetingbythe drought‐event emergency management teamofthe waterauthority (November) Investment decisions Climatescenarios Alazani – Iori, Georgia Winemake rs Pruning Experienceof dealingwith frost Availabilityof human resource Weeklypredictionof temperature& precipitationprovidedby yr.noandamindi.ge Reliableprecipitationand temperatureforecasts (oneto10‐daysahead); Informationonhail Daily operations (fore.g. spraying pesticides, tyingupwines etc) Advicefrom otherfarmers (through cooperativesor Facebook groups) Dailydirection ofmovementof clouds Harvest Demandfrom wine‐making factories Winevariety (sugarcontent)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 47 Availabilityof human resource Wheat farmers Land preparation andsowing Amountof precipitation& temperature Cessationof autumnrains Movementof clouds Pastexperience Consultation withother farmers Weeklypredictionof temperature& precipitationprovidedby yr.noandamindi.ge Reliableprecipitationand temperatureforecasts (oneto10‐daysahead); Informationonhail Pesticide operations Amountof precipitation& temperature Costof pesticides Consultation withother farmers Harvest Availabilityof labourand machinery Georgian Ameliorati o Finalisationof thewater allocationplan Demand information throughfarmer applicationsfor irrigation Historicalinformationon wateravailability (GeorgianAmelioration’s ownrecords) Streamflowandvolume forecasts(1‐monthahead)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 48 contracts Pastexperience ofmanaging demand. Provisionof irrigation service(during theseason) Previous experienceof revising irrigation schedules duringthe season Precipitationforecasts(2 weeks)&Monitoring streamflowthroughlocal stations Los Pedroches, Spain Olive growers Fertilisation Basedon previousyear’s harvest Economiccost Theautumn rainshavetofall between September‐ October(200 L/m3)andthen raininFebruary‐ MarchandApril (200L/m3). Temperature (ideal):20– 220C 15‐dayrainfalland temperatureforecasts providedbySpanish MeteorologicalServices (AEMET);onlineservice (tiempo.es) Harvest Phenological knowledge Pruning Experienceof dealingwith frost Dairy farmers Sowingof winterfodder crops Precipitation Observingflows inthestream Rechargingof theaquifer 100Lofwaterin thefirst2weeks ofOctober 15‐dayrainfalland temperatureforecasts providedbySpanish MeteorologicalServices (AEMET);onlineservice (tiempo.es) Harvest ProductionArainyMarch
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 49 forecastand numberof livestock isnecessary, withatleast 200litresof rainfall between Marchand April 3‐monthseasonal predictionsfor temperature& precipitationanddrought monitoringservice providedbyAEMET Livestock farmers Choosingthe cropvariety Localweather conditions(dry orwet) Knowledgeof cropresilience Sowing Wetnessofthe soil Buyingor sellingofpigs Acornharvest (expected)
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration 56 Siders,A.R.,andAndreaL.Pierce.2021.“DecidingHowtoMakeClimateChangeAdaptationDecisions.” CurrentOpinioninEnvironmentalSustainability52:1–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.017. Taylor,Brent,andRobC.deLoë.2012.“ConceptualizationsofLocalKnowledgeinCollaborativeEnvironmental Governance.”Geoforum43(6):1207–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2012.03.007. Troglic,RobertSakic,MelanieDuncan,GrantWright,MarcVanDenHomberg,AdebayoAdeloye,Faidess Mwale,andColinMcQuistan.2021.“InternationalJournalofDisasterRiskReductionExternalStakeholders’ AttitudestowardsandEngagementwithLocalKnowledgeinDisasterRiskReduction :AreWeOnlyPayingLip Service ?CTrogrli´”58(October2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102196. Šakić Trogrlić,R.,Wright,G.B.,Duncan,M.J.,vandenHomberg,M.J.,Adeloye,A.J.,Mwale,F.D.,& Mwafulirwa,J.(2019).Characterisinglocalknowledgeacrossthefloodriskmanagementcycle:Acasestudy ofSouthernMalawi.Sustainability,11(6),1681. VandenHombergM.,RastogiS.,Hernandez‐MoraZapataN.,etal.(2022)Conceptsandmethodsto characteriseandintegratelocalandscientificknowledge VandeWalle,B.,&Comes,T.(2014).Riskacceleratorsindisasters:insightsfromtheTyphoonHaiyanresponse onhumanitarianinformationmanagementanddecisionsupport.InAdvancedInformationSystems Engineering:26thInternationalConference,CAiSE2014,Thessaloniki,Greece,June16‐20,2014.Proceedings 26(pp.12‐23).SpringerInternationalPublishing. Weber,E.P.,&Khademian,A.M.(2010).Wickedproblems,knowledgechallenges,andcollaborativecapacity buildersinnetworksettings.IEEEEngineeringManagementReview,38(3),57. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2010.5559144
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration I Appendix1Guidanceforthedecisiontimelinesworkshop TipsfortheDecisiontimelineworkshop • Encourageparticipantstobeasspecificaspossibleespeciallywhendescribinglocal weatherconditionsaroundtheyear,howclimateandotherrisksareidentifiedetc. • Inordertostimulatediscussion,useexamplesofextremeeventsorotherlocal events(likeconstructionofanewirrigationchannel,otherinfrastructure developmentetc)totriggerpeople’smemory. • WhendiscussingLK,itisimportanttoavoidtheterm‘LK’asmuchaspossible. Insteadframethediscussionaroundhowrisksarerecognisedandifanylocal observationsareused,whattriggersdecisionsetc. • Keepthedecisiontimelinesasdetailedaspossible,don’tdisregardanyinputatthis stage. Workshopsetting:Onlineoroffline Materialsneeded:Iftheworkshopisonlinethenusethemiroboardtemplate.Incaseofanofflineworkshop, flipchartpaper,colouredpens,icons,tapeetccanbeusedtofacilitateaninteractivesession. Groupsize:Thisactivityshouldbecarriedoutinafocusgroupsettingwithatmost3to4persons.Ifpossible, andiftheLLMAPcomprisesstakeholdersfromdiverselivelihoodsthentheworkshopleadsshouldtrytoform thesefocusgroupsperlivelihood. Time:45‐60mins Timescaleconsidered:Priortostartingthedecisiontimelineworkshop,itisimportanttoidentifywiththe membersofthefocusgroupthedecisiontimescalethatisrelevanttothem.Forinstance,incaseoffarming andagriculturebasedlivelihoodsa12or18‐monthdecisiontimelinecanbeconsideredwhilefortourism‐ relatedbusinessesorothertypesofbusinesseslongertimescale(thosecorrespondingtobusiness developmenttimescale)maybechosen.InthecaseofurbandwellerslikethoserepresentedintheHungarian LL,alongertimescale(5yearsordecadal)mightbemoreusefulinunderstandinghowlifestyleanddecisions mayhavechangedinresponsetoheatstress. Activity Eachparticipantwillbegivenasheetofpaperwitharowandcolumns(orcorrespondingMiroboardtemplate) torecordtheinput.Eachstepoftheactivityentailsquestionsthatwillbeaskedtoalltheparticipants promptingthemtothink,discussandrecordtheiranswersontheirsheet.Aftereachsteptheanswerswillbe discussedasagroup,participantsarefreetoaddoredittheirresponseastheyseefit.Thequestions mentionedbelowareonlymeantasaguidanceandshouldbeadaptedtosuitthelocalcontext.Furthermore, questionsmentionedbelowaremostlydirectedtowardsCSendusers(fore.g.,individualfarmers,hoteliers etc).
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration II Part1‐Knowledgeoflocalclimaticconditionsandclimatehazardsthatimpactlivelihoodand businessprocesses. [Inthisfirstpart,participantsareprimarilyaskedtorecordtheirperceptionofweatherpatterns acrosstheyear,whichkeylivelihoodactivitieshappenandwhen.] • Whatweatherchanges(temperature,precipitationetc)dopeopleobserveacrossayear intheregion? • Whatkeydecisionsaretakenacrosslivelihoods(bothfarmingandnon‐farming,if applicable)andwhen? Askthemtoassigndifferentlivelihoodactivitiestotheseasonalcalendar • Whataretheseasonalchangesorexternaldriversthataffecttheirdecisionmaking?(For e.g.,changesinweather,income,availabilityoflabouretc) • ∙Howdoesweatherorclimatevariabilityimpactthedecisionsthattheytake? Part2‐Knowledgeonclimaterisks,informationtriangulationanduse [Participantsareencouragedtodiscussandelaborateonthewaysthroughwhichtheyidentify risksaheadoftime,howtheyobtainandtriangulateamongdifferentsourcesofinformation.] • Whatarethewaysinwhichparticipantsidentifytherisksfacedbythem? o Ifthereareanyenvironmentalcuestheyuse,learningfromtheirsocialrelationsor pastexperiencesetc? • Howdotheyusetheirunderstandingofthelocalenvironmenttounderstandtherisks? • Whatothersourcesandtypesofinformationareusedbythem? Part3‐Knowledgeofcopingstrategies,adaptationoptionsoranticipatoryactions [Inthispart,participantsareaskedtoelaborateonthecopingandadaptationstrategiesadopted bythem,whythosestrategiesandwhentheseareimplemented.] • Whattypesofcopingoradaptationstrategiesdoparticipantsimplementtomanagerisks andwhen? • Whatgainsorlossesdothesestrategiesprovidethem? • Whatimpactsthechoiceoftheseadaptationstrategies? o Whatarethesechoicesbasedon? o Whatknowledgeorinformationdoparticipantsusewhendecidingonthese adaptationstrategies? Part4‐Reflection [inthisconcludingsection,thepurposeistounderstandhowabovementionedlocalconditions, livelihoodactivities,copingmeasuresandinformationsourceshavechangedovertime]
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration III • Canyoudescribehowweather/seasonshavechangedinthelastxyears? • Canyoudescribeforushowyouroccupation/livelihoodhaschangedinthelastxyears? • Howhavetheriskschangedoverthepastyears?Changeintiming?Emergenceofnew typesofrisks? • Howhastheparticipant’sowncapacity(intermsofnewtechnologies,resourcesetc) changedoverthepastfewyears? DecisionTimelineWorkshopwithCSupstreamagents IncasetheMAPinvolvesCSupstreamagentsthentheabovelistofquestionscanbeadaptedto suittheirdecisionmakingprocess. • Whatweatherchanges(temperature,precipitationetc)dopeopleobserveacrossayear intheregion? • Focussingonakeyserviceprovided,whatprotocolisfollowedacrosstheyear? • Whataretheexternaldrivers(climatic)thatimpactthecontinuoussupplyofthe service?
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration IV TableA1Interviewmatrixusedinindividualmeetingsforidentifyinginformationgapsandadaptationneeds ‐ExamplefromthemeetingwiththeWaterManagementMAPmember.(Source:DeStefanoetal.2024) What decisions needstobe taken WhenWhatworries youwhen makingthese decisions Which variables/CSdo youuse WhatismissingOther Water allocationand distributionto publicclients (municipal utilities) (Water allocation decisionin April–for publicusers: howmuchand when) 1.Onceper year,usually earlyspring (March)or April(before theperiodwith increased demands) 2.In September thereisneed foradecision onwhether extrawaterwill beallocatedor withheldinthe reservoirsto ensure availability. Willtherebe enoughwaterto coversummer needs?Willitbe aprolonged summerperiod (includingahot autumn)?Will therebea droughtnext year(meaning nextwetperiod: Novemberto February)? (Municipalities (publicusers) maycompetefor thesame resource(water) attheendof summerandput politicalpressure tothewater manager) Maybesome monthly predictionsof precipitation and temperature, assessmentsof expectedneeds, previous experience (Statisticsof meteorological forecasting regarding precipitation amount) Question:are thereany specific thresholds whichareused? Drought forecasting (seasonal,6‐ month,1year), wateravailability forecasting–river flows(seasonal,6‐ month,1yeareven afewyears–two orthree), Whatwouldbe important:a forecastin Septemberabout thecomingwet period(mainly Nov‐Feb) Reservoirsand surfacewater systemswhere waterdemandsare lowerthan availableresources arelessvulnerable todroughtrisks andthereisless riskofover allocation) Investmentsin new reservoirs, changesin water planning, accessto otherwater sources,etc. Cost estimation– decideifthey shouldinvest onnew reservoirs.If costsaretoo highandthe needforextra waterisnot thathigh,then maybeother projectsand worksshould beprioritized. Longterm (water manager Organization forthe Development ofCreteuses projectionsup to2080) Uncertainty1.Surfacewater availabilityand generalwater availability 2.Arethereany newneeds? Andwhere? 3.Usually considerthree scenarios,good, average,bad 1.Conditionsrelate topossiblefuture rivallinguses(e.g. agriculture, tourismdemand etc.) 2.Howoftencan thereservoirs replenishtheirfull capacity?
D2.5–User‐CentredValidationofClimateRiskKnowledgeIntegration V
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 Colophon : ThisreporthasbeenpreparedbytheH2020ResearchProject“InnovatingClimateservicesthroughIntegrating ScientificandlocalKnowledge(I‐CISK)”.ThisresearchprojectisapartoftheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020 FrameworkProgrammecall,“Buildingalow‐carbon,climateresilientfuture:Researchandinnovationin supportoftheEuropeanGreenDeal(H2020‐LC‐GD‐2020)”,andhasbeendevelopedinresponsetothecall topic“Developingend‐userproductsandservicesforallstakeholdersandcitizenssupporting climateadaptationandmitigation(LC‐GD‐9‐2‐2020)”.ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropean Union’sHorizon2020researchandinnovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293. Thisfour‐yearprojectstartedNovember1st2021andiscoordinatedbyIHEDelftInstituteforWaterEducation. Foradditionalinformation,pleasecontact:MichaWerner(m.werner@un‐ihe.org)orvisittheprojectwebsite atwww.icisk.eu