Public Policies and Chronic Diseases: Pathways Toward Comprehensiveness and Equity in Care — A Narrative Review

Copyright © ISRG Publishers. All rights Reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614750 197 ISRG PUBLISHERS Abbreviated Key Title: ISRG J Arts Humanit Soc Sci ISSN: 2583-7672 (Online) Journal homepage: https://isrgpublishers.com/isrgjahss Volume– III Issue -VI (November - December) 2025 Frequency: Bimonthly Public Policies and Chronic Diseases: Pathways Toward Comprehensiveness and Equity in Care — A Narrative Review Jocilane Lima de Almeida Vasconcelos1*, Lancciane Nilian Celino Reis2; Anelise Nogueira de Lima3; Flavio Santos Marques Junior4; Tânia Maria de Oliveira Moreira5; Jussara Barreto Moura Almeida6; Andreia Cristina Barboza da Silva Morais7; Mabel Alencar do Nascimento Rocha8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Wagner de Aguiar Raupp Rua Joao Tobias 15 38401066. Affiliation: PHD in Public Health – Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales | Received: 25.10.2025 | Accepted: 01.11.2025 | Published: 15.11.2025 *Corresponding author: Jocilane Lima de Almeida Vasconcelos Wagner de Aguiar Raupp Rua Joao Tobias 15 38401066. Affiliation: PHD in Public Health – Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales Abstract Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent one of the main challenges for global public health due to their high prevalence, burden of morbidity and mortality, and impact on quality of life. In Brazil, these conditions disproportionately affect socially vulnerable populations, placing complex demands on the Unified Health System (SUS). In this context, the principles of comprehensiveness and equity guide the development of fairer and more effective public policies. This narrative review aimed to critically analyze the strategies and challenges of Brazilian public policies targeting the care of people with NCDs, with an emphasis on promoting comprehensive and equitable care. Key strategies identified include the implementation of Health Care Networks, the strengthening of Primary Health Care through the Family Health Strategy, the creation of specific care pathways, and the adoption of intersectoral programs. The review concludes that effectively addressing NCDs requires more than regulations: it demands the implementation of structural actions, integrated planning, sustained investment, and the strengthening of social participation. Only through this collective effort will it be possible to guarantee the right to health with quality, equity, and comprehensiveness for the entire population. Keywords: public policies, chronic diseases, comprehensiveness in health, health equity. Copyright © ISRG Publishers. All rights Reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614750 198 Introduction Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) currently represent one of the most significant challenges for global public health, accounting for a high burden of morbidity and mortality, while severely impacting the quality of life of populations. In Brazil, the high prevalence of these conditions—such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, and chronic respiratory diseases—places considerable pressure on the Unified Health System (SUS), requiring organized and sustainable responses aligned with the guiding principles of comprehensiveness and equity as established by the 1988 Federal Constitution and regulated by the Organic Health Law (Law No. 8.080/1990) (da Cunha et al., 2025; Brandão et al., 2024). Comprehensiveness in care, as a guiding principle of health policy in Brazil, entails a broad, continuous, and coordinated approach across all levels of care, focusing on the unique needs of individuals and the complexity of the health-disease process. In turn, equity involves the recognition and reduction of health inequities through strategies that take into account social, economic, territorial, and cultural determinants influencing both illness and access to services (Barbosa et al., 2024; Moreira et al., 2025). Given this scenario, public health policies play a strategic role in formulating responses capable of effectively addressing NCDs while also reorienting care and management models toward more comprehensive, resolutive, and socially just practices. Instruments such as national plans and strategies, health care networks, primary health care programs, and intersectoral initiatives are fundamental mechanisms for organizing NCD care and expanding qualified access to health services and actions (Rodrigues et al., 2024). In this context, the present integrative review aims to critically analyze Brazilian public policies targeting the response to chronic diseases, with an emphasis on the pathways pursued toward comprehensiveness and equity in care, based on available scientific literature. This analysis seeks to identify advances, gaps, and perspectives that may support the development of more effective actions in the field of collective health. Methodology This study is a narrative literature review—a methodological approach that enables the collection and synthesis of available evidence on a given phenomenon, encompassing studies with diverse methodological designs and promoting a broader understanding of the subject (Whittemore & Knafl, 2005). The guiding research question for this review was: What are the strategies and challenges of public policies for the care of chronic diseases, considering the principles of comprehensiveness and equity? The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and Web of Science databases, selected for their relevance in the field of public health and the broad scope of scientific publications related to public policy and chronic diseases. Controlled descriptors and free-text terms were used in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, combined with Boolean operators AND and OR. The main search terms included: “public policies,” “chronic diseases,” “comprehensiveness in health,” and “health equity.” Studies published between 2021 and 2025 were included, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, provided they discussed public policies addressing non-communicable chronic diseases, with an emphasis on aspects related to comprehensiveness and/or equity in care. Excluded from the review were duplicate studies, non-systematic reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, experience reports, and works whose focus was not directly related to the central theme of the review. The selected studies were analyzed rigorously, considering thematic relevance, methodological quality, and their contribution to understanding the strategies and challenges of public policies in tackling NCDs through the lenses of comprehensiveness and equity. Data synthesis allowed the identification of recurring thematic categories, which served as the basis for organizing the results and developing a critical discussion of the selected literature. Results and Discussion The analysis of the selected studies allowed the findings to be organized into three thematic categories, developed through critical reading and synthesis of the available evidence in the literature. The first category addresses the main strategies adopted in public policies to promote comprehensiveness in the care of chronic diseases. The second category focuses on how public policies have addressed the issue of equity in access to and quality of care for people with non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs). Finally, the third category highlights the gaps and challenges identified in the literature regarding the effective implementation of public policies that ensure an integrated and equitable response to chronic diseases within the Brazilian health system. The results and discussions are presented below based on these three analytical dimensions. Main Strategies Adopted in Public Policies to Promote Comprehensiveness in Chronic Disease Care Comprehensiveness is one of the foundational pillars of the Unified Health System (SUS), understood as the provision of actions and services that address the full spectrum of individuals' health needs, across all levels of care, in a continuous, resolutive, and coordinated manner. In the context of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs), promoting comprehensiveness requires overcoming fragmented, disease-centered models of care and implementing strategies that integrate prevention, health promotion, treatment, and rehabilitation (da Cunha et al., 2025; de Almeida Vasconcelos et al., 2024). Over the past decades, various public policies have aimed to operationalize this principle through the reorganization of health care models. One of the main strategies has been the implementation of Health Care Networks (RAS), especially the Chronic Disease Care Network, established by Ordinance No. 483/2014. This network proposes a person-centered care model structured around Primary Health Care (PHC) as the main point of care coordination and gatekeeping, ensuring continuity and comprehensiveness. In this context, the Family Health Strategy (FHS) has been strengthened as the foundation of PHC, playing a key role in the early identification of risk factors, the longitudinal follow-up of users with NCDs, and coordination with other levels of care (Rodrigues et al., 2024). Copyright © ISRG Publishers. All rights Reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614750 199 Another significant strategy has been the expansion of access to specific care pathways for chronic conditions. These pathways outline clinical flows and evidence-based protocols, supporting integrated case management and guiding health professionals on the appropriate actions at each level of complexity—from screening to ongoing follow-up—thus promoting service integration and reducing barriers to care continuity (Brandão et al., 2024; Barbosa et al., 2024). Intersectoral programs such as the ―Health Academy Program‖ (Programa Academia da Saúde) and the ―Health in Schools Program‖ (Programa Saúde na Escola) have also contributed to comprehensive care by promoting health and preventing NCDs across different territories and age groups. These initiatives recognize the importance of social determinants in the healthdisease process and expand care beyond the clinical setting (dos Santos & da Cruz, 2025; Guimarães et al., 2025). In addition, tools for care management improvement—such as risk stratification, matrix support, and Family Health Support Centers (NASF)—have enabled a broader view of patients with chronic conditions. These instruments support interdisciplinary interventions and encourage shared responsibility in care (Rodrigues et al., 2024; de Almeida Vasconcelos et al., 2024). Despite the progress observed, the literature emphasizes that the effectiveness of these strategies still depends on sustained investment, ongoing team training, and strengthened regional governance. Although comprehensiveness is supported by official policies and guidelines, it continues to face structural and operational challenges that require political commitment and qualified management to be fully realized (Brandão et al., 2024; Guimarães et al., 2025). Equity in Access and Quality of Care for People with Chronic Diseases in Public Policies Equity in health, a fundamental principle of Brazil’s Unified Health System (SUS), refers to the differentiated provision of care based on the specific needs of individuals and social groups, aiming to address historical inequalities and ensure fairness in access and health outcomes. In the context of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs), an equity-focused approach is especially crucial, as these conditions disproportionately affect populations experiencing social, economic, and territorial vulnerability (dos Santos & da Cruz, 2025; Moreira et al., 2025). Brazilian public health policies have sought to incorporate the equity perspective through guidelines that recognize the social determinants of health as structural elements in the response to NCDs. Programs such as the Strategic Action Plan to Tackle NonCommunicable Chronic Diseases in Brazil (2011–2022), and its updated version for 2021–2030, emphasize the need for intersectoral interventions focused on health promotion, risk factor prevention, and expanded access to services, especially in highly vulnerable areas (de Almeida Vasconcelos et al., 2024). Primary Health Care (PHC), as the preferred point of entry into the system, is often highlighted as a key tool for reducing health inequities, as it operates in a territorialized and community-based manner. Strategies such as expanding the Family Health Strategy (FHS) in areas with a high Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and implementing active case-finding for NCD patients have helped mitigate disparities in access and care continuity (Guimarães et al., 2025; Mendonça et al., 2024). Additionally, financial incentive policies—such as differentiated funding for health teams working in remote areas or with specific populations (e.g., quilombola, Indigenous, and riverside communities)—have been used to reduce structural and geographic barriers to healthcare access. Initiatives targeting homeless individuals, rural workers, and incarcerated populations also exemplify state efforts to ensure equitable access to care, including for chronic condition follow-up (Malta et al., 2025). However, the literature indicates that although policies may include equity-oriented actions, the implementation of these guidelines remains uneven and, in some cases, insufficient to transform entrenched patterns of health inequality. Factors such as fragmented management, budget constraints, and shortages of health professionals in certain regions hinder the realization of truly equitable care (Pires, Ribeiro & Cruz, 2024; Barbosa, 2025). Therefore, addressing equity in public policies aimed at NCDs requires more than normative guidelines—it demands structural actions that account for historical inequalities, local contexts, and social participation as central elements in ensuring the right to health with justice and dignity (Kassim, 2024). Gaps and Challenges Identified in the Literature for the Effective Implementation of Comprehensive and Equitable Public Policies in the Management of Chronic Diseases Despite normative advances and the consolidation of institutional frameworks aimed at promoting comprehensiveness and equity in chronic disease care, the literature reveals a number of gaps and challenges that hinder the effectiveness of public policies in the Brazilian context. These limitations emerge both in the formulation and in the implementation of actions, reflecting regional inequalities, weaknesses in system management, and tensions between national guidelines and local realities (Malta et al., 2025; dos Santos et al.). One of the main obstacles identified is the fragmentation of services and the difficulty in coordinating different levels of care. Although Health Care Networks (RAS) and care pathways exist, continuity of care for people with chronic conditions remains inconsistent—particularly during transitions between primary, specialized, and hospital care. The lack of integrated information systems, combined with poor communication among professionals across the care network, undermines care coordination and disrupts the continuity of actions (Pires, Ribeiro & Cruz, 2024; Mendonça et al., 2024). In addition, the uneven implementation of policies across the national territory exacerbates disparities between regions, municipalities, and populations. A shortage of financial and human resources in remote or underserved areas limits the ability to provide timely and adequate care, creating access barriers that disproportionately affect socially vulnerable groups. The limited problem-solving capacity of primary care in some contexts, coupled with insufficient diagnostic and treatment services, contributes to the worsening of clinical conditions and increased demand for mediumand high-complexity services (Barbosa, 2025). Another recurring challenge is the weakness of governance and intersectoral management. While the social determinants of health are widely recognized as key factors in addressing NCDs, integration between health policies and other sectors—such as education, social assistance, labor, and the environment—remains underdeveloped, characterized by discontinuities and weak Copyright © ISRG Publishers. All rights Reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614750 200 institutional support. The absence of integrated regional planning, high turnover of managers, and inconsistent funding and programs all hinder the consolidation of sustainable, structural actions (Fonteles et al., 2025; Babinsck et al., 2025). The literature also highlights a lack of training and ongoing education processes to adequately prepare professionals for comprehensive and equitable chronic disease care. Many health teams still operate within a biomedical logic focused on disease and isolated interventions, rather than broader approaches that incorporate social, cultural, and subjective aspects of the healthdisease process (dos Santos et al.). Lastly, there is limited social participation in the formulation and oversight of policies targeting NCDs. The insufficient involvement of users and communities in defining priorities and strategies hinders the development of actions that align with the actual needs of each territory, thus compromising the effectiveness of interventions and the strengthening of social control—a fundamental principle of SUS (Gorza et al., 2025). These gaps and challenges reflect the complexity involved in operationalizing the principles of comprehensiveness and equity in chronic disease care and underscore the need for more robust, sustained, and participatory strategies to ensure truly universal, accessible, and just health care. Conclusion Addressing non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) in Brazil requires public policies that effectively integrate the constitutional principles of comprehensiveness and equity. This integrative review revealed that, although the country has advanced normative frameworks and well-established institutional strategies—such as Health Care Networks, the Family Health Strategy, and specific care pathways—significant challenges remain in their full implementation. The public policies analyzed reflect meaningful efforts to reorganize the health care model, with an emphasis on personcentered care, health promotion, and intersectoral coordination. However, the persistence of structural inequalities, service fragmentation, limited resources, and weak coordination between levels of management and care jeopardize the effectiveness of these strategies, especially in the most vulnerable territories. The gaps identified in the literature indicate that promoting comprehensiveness and equity in NCD care goes beyond policy formulation. It requires strengthening governance, regional management, and social participation. Consolidating practices that acknowledge users’ specificities, living conditions, and socioterritorial contexts is essential for building a fairer, more inclusive, and resolutive health system. Therefore, it is imperative that public health policies move beyond legal and normative frameworks to be effectively translated into concrete and sustainable actions. These actions must be grounded in integrated planning, adequate funding, ongoing team training, and robust social oversight. Only through this collective effort will it be possible to consistently tackle NCDs while ensuring the right to health with quality, equity, and comprehensiveness for all. References 1. Barbosa, A. A. D. O. (2025). Avaliação da Rede de Atenção à Saúde das Pessoas com Doenças Crônicas Não Transmissíveis no Estado de São Paulo. 2. Barbosa, T. M. S., Pristilo, C. B., Júnior, A. A., Victor, L. S., Soares, A. N. M., Nascimento, B. C., ... & da Cunda Ruthes, R. L. (2024). Estratégias preventivas para redução do risco de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. 3. Babinsck, L., Zampirolli, A. S., Sopeletto, J. M., Ruiz, J. P. F., Zampirolli, A. S., Fassarella, L. C., ... & Faccin, M. J. F. (2025). O monitoramento e conscientização de hiperglicemia e hipertensão arterial na população de Cachoeiro de Itapemirim-ES: uma abordagem comunitária para prevenção e controle de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 7(8), 86–96. 4. Brandão, T. L., Lima, I. S., Sarto, J. F., de Carvalho Mello, G. V., de Moura, A. C. N., de Carvalho Cavalcante, R. L., ... & da Silva, J. A. (2024). Saúde pública como pilar fundamental para o enfrentamento de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. 5. da Cunha, W. B., de Oliveira Guedes, V., Bezerra, S. T. F., da Costa, F. R., & de Oliveira, N. P. (2025). Desenvolvimento da política de saúde do homem na atenção primária: foco para as DCNT na população urbana e rural. Revista Políticas Públicas & Cidades, 14(3), e1853–e1853. 6. de Almeida Vasconcelos, J. L., de Moura-Ferreira, M. C., Ferreira, C. R., Peres, M. R. T. L., Felix, A. C. B. B., de Araújo, S. A., ... & Fernandes, P. C. C. (2024). Enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles: evolución y estrategias de control y prevención en Brasil. Observatório de la Economía Latinoamericana, 22(8), e6165–e6165. 7. dos Santos, A. Z. O., & da Cruz, T. R. S. (2025). O papel dos enfermeiros no cuidado às DCNT na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos, 8(19), e082303–e082303. 8. dos Santos, E. C. A., Lopes, M. Á. C. P., de Vasconcelos Pinheiro, P., & Araújo, E. S. (2025). Impacto financeiro do tratamento de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde. Financial Impact of the Treatment of Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases in the United Health. 9. Fonteles, L. C., da Silva Oliveira, K., de Carvalho Sampaio, H. A., Félix, T. A., & Ferreira, F. V. (2025). Intervenção nutricional em pacientes com hipertensão e diabetes: intensificando o cuidado na atenção primária à saúde. SANARE – Revista de Políticas Públicas, 24(1). 10. Gorza, M. E. K., Bortolon, G., Mantovani, G., Vargas, J. P. M., Lima Filho, V. F., Bergasmaschi, L. R., & Rizo, W. F. (2025). Integração entre políticas públicas e práticas locais para prevenção de doenças cardiovasculares no Sul do Espírito Santo, Brasil. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, 11(10), 199–213. 11. Guimarães, T. A., de Almeida Vasconcelos, J. L., da Silva Morais, A. C. B., de Faria, J. G., Alves, M. A., de Aquino Schneider, J. C., ... & Fernandes, P. C. C. (2025). Prevalencia de enfermedades crónicas en Brasil: un grave problema de salud pública. Observatório de la Economía Latinoamericana, 23(6), e10411–e10411. 12. Kassim, H. U. (2024). Programas de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis: comparação de políticas entre Brasil e Moçambique. Copyright © ISRG Publishers. All rights Reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17614750 201 13. Malta, D. C., de Aquino, É. C., de Magalhães Cardoso, L. S., Veloso, G. A., Vasconcelos, A. M. N., de Oliveira Cardoso, L., ... & Barreto, M. L. (2025). Probabilidade de morte prematura por doenças crônicas não transmissíveis: desafios para o alcance das metas dos Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável no Brasil e Unidades Federadas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 41(9). 14. Mendonça, J. F., Ribeiro Filho, M. A., da Silva, J. B., da Silva, C. C., de Andrade, S. C. R., Brito, T. G., ... & Pinto, V. S. D. S. C. (2024). A influência das doenças crônicas não transmissíveis na qualidade de vida de mulheres adultas. ARACÊ, 6(3), 6762–6770. 15. Moreira, R. C. A., Carneiro, F. B. M., de Senna, A. R., de Miranda, A. C. A. N., Vasques, L. F., Lage, D. M., ... & de Freitas Sommer, L. (2025). Análise dos determinantes sociais da saúde e sua influência na prevalência de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis em áreas vulneráveis. Caderno Pedagógico, 22(1), e13352– e13352. 16. Pires, L. D. J. A., Ribeiro, J. M., & Cruz, M. M. D. (2024). Um breve panorama sobre a Agenda 2030, as doenças crônicas não transmissíveis e os desafios de não deixar ninguém para trás. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 40, e00139323. 17. Rodrigues, A. M., Bacellar, F. F., Robattini, J. M. K., dos Santos, L. B., Costa, S. H. B. C. S., Barros, W. L., ... & Costa, M. J. M. (2024). Implementação de estratégias de sensibilização sobre as doenças crônicas não transmissíveis (DCNT) na atenção básica: um relato sobre na comunidade do Turu em São Luís (MA). Revista de Estudos Multidisciplinares UNDB, 4(2). 18. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652648.2005.03621.x