Resilient Modular Housing Systems for Earthquake-Prone Regions in California

ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCES AND SUSTAINABLE APPROACHES: URBAN RESILIENCE Editors Prof. Dr. Ömer ATABEYOĞLU Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ October 15, 2025 Copyright © 2025 by İKSAD publishing house All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. Institution of Economic Development and Social Researches (The Licence Number of Publicator: 2014/31220) TÜRKİYE TR: +90 342 606 06 75 USA: +1 631 685 0 853 E mail: [email protected] www.iksadyayinevi.com It is responsibility of the author to abide by the publishing ethics rules. Iksad Publications – 2025© Architectural Sciences and Sustainable Approaches: Urban Resilience ISBN: 978-625-378-337-2 Cover Design: Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ October 15, 2025 Ankara / Türkiye Size = 16x24 cm PREFACE Dear Professors and Colleagues, We are pleased bring to life that Architectural Sciences and Sustainable Approaches: Urban Resilience, which was published as an e-book by IKSAD Publishing House with the editors Prof. Dr. Ömer ATABEYOĞLU and Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ. This book project, entitled “Architectural Sciences and Sustainable Approaches: Urban Resilience,” aims to address sustainability-oriented approaches to urban resilience from theoretical, methodological, and practical perspectives. The volume seeks to establish a multi-layered platform of discussion, ranging from the scale of individual buildings to the entirety of the urban fabric. Within this framework, it welcomes contributions from scholars and researchers working in architecture, urban design, landscape architecture, urban and regional planning, environmental engineering, and related disciplines. With the valuable contributions of our chapter authors working in the professional disciplines of landscape architecture, architecture, city and regional planning, urban design and sustainability, we have completed Architectural Sciences and Sustainable Approaches: Urban Resilience book study has been completed with 24 book chapters. We would like to thank you, our esteemed authors, for their contributions to the preparation of the book. We would also like to thank the editorial board and IKSAD Publishing House. We wish to continue this process we have started in the coming years. In addition, we would like to express our sincere appreciation to Prof. Dr. Atila GÜL, the book coordinator of IKSAD Publishing House, for his guidance and support throughout the publication process. We hope that our book ‘Architectural Sciences and Sustainable Approaches: Urban Resilience’ will be helpful to the readers. Best regards. 15.10.2025 EDITORS Prof. Dr. Ömer ATABEYOĞLU Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ EDITORS Prof. Dr. Ömer ATABEYOĞLU Prof. Dr. Ertan DÜZGÜNEŞ AUTHORS The authors were listed in alphabetical order Alper ÇABUK Ayça GÜLTEN Ayşe ÖZYETGİN ALTUN Ayşe Özge ŞİMŞEK SOYSAL Ayşegül TANRIVERDİ KAYA Demet EROL Deniz DEMİRARSLAN Ebru Vesile ÖCALIR Eda ŞENTÜRK Elif Kübra ÖZTÜRK Emine BAYDAN Esra KESKİN Feran AŞUR Feyza Sena ŞENOCAK Filiz KARAKUŞ Furkan AKDEMİR Gencay ÇUBUK Gülşah BİLGE ÖZTÜRK Halil DUYMUŞ Hamza ALTAŞ Hande AKARCA İnci OLGUN Kemal Mert ÇUBUKÇU Kumru ÇILGIN Mehmet Akif IRMAK Mehmet Emin DAŞ Mehtap ÖZENEN KAVLAK Merve ALICI AKA Mesut GÜZEL Muhammed Akif AÇIKGÖZ Muhammed Emir GÖRAL Murat YEŞİL Olcay Türkan YURDUGÜZEL Özge DÜZGÜN EREKİNCİ Pervin YEŞİL Rabia Nurefsan ACIKGOZ Sedef ŞENDOĞDU Seher Simay KUŞOĞLU Serim DİNÇ Sevilay YILDIZ Sinem SEYHAN Şevval ERGİNDOĞAN Şuheda ALTUNOK Temuçin Göktürk SEYHAN Tuba Nur OLĞUN Tuna BATUHAN Ufuk Teoman AKSOY Yusuf Eminoğlu REVIEWER LIST The authors were listed in alphabetical order Aslıhan TIRNAKÇI Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Atila GÜL Süleyman Demirel University Ayşe Kalaycı ÖNAÇ İzmir Katip Çelebi University Bige ŞİMŞEK İLHAN İstanbul Medipol University Burcu YILMAZEL Eskişehir Technical University Eda KOÇAK Siirt University Ekrem BAHADIR Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Elif KUTAY KARAÇOR İstanbul Technical University Hakan ARSLAN Ondokuz Mayıs University Hilal TURGUT Karadeniz Technical University Meliha AKLIBAŞINDA Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Murat AKTEN Süleyman Demirel University Nihan Sümeyye GÜNDOĞDU Atlas University Okan Murat DEDE Amasya University Ömer Lütfü ÇORBACI Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Selcen Nur Erikci Çelik Beykoz University Sibel AKTEN Isparta Unıversıty Of Applıed Scıences Sinem ÖZDEDE Pamukkale University Şeyma ŞENGÜR Ordu University Turgut KALAY Kütahya Dumlupınar University Tendü Hilal GÖKTUĞ Aydın Adnan Menderes University 713 1. Introduction This article seeks to critically interrogate the potential of resilient modular housing systems as adaptive architectural responses within earthquakeprone territories of California, foregrounding dimensions of seismic resistance, environmental sustainability, and socio-economic viability. Methodologically, the study proceeds through a systematic appraisal of the existing scholarly corpus, a comparative examination of pertinent housing typologies, and the incorporation of emblematic case studies that illuminate both structural and socio-cultural determinants of resilience. The exposition is organized into a series of interrelated sections: an initial conceptual delineation of resilient modular housing; a contextualized analysis of the Californian seismic condition; a thematically clustered discussion encompassing technological innovation, regulatory frameworks, and participatory modes of community engagement; and a final synthesis of insights that consolidates the theoretical and empirical strands of the investigation. By pursuing this trajectory, the article endeavors to extend prevailing discourses on architectural resilience, simultaneously contributing to the refinement of policy, professional practice, and the epistemological foundations of housing studies in disaster-prone geographies. Table 1. Comparative Table: Housing Types in California by Key Criteria Criteria Traditional Housing Modular Housing Container-Modular Housing Construction Time (days) 180 60 45 Seismic Resilience Index (%) 50 85 90 Carbon Footprint (kg CO₂/m²) 100 65 55 714 Criteria Traditional Housing Modular Housing Container-Modular Housing Cost per Square Meter (USD/m²) 2200 1600 1400 Construction Duration (Modular: 60 days, Traditional: 180 days, Container: 45 days): (Navaratnam et al, 2019). Earthquake Resistance (Modular: 85–90%, Traditional: around 50%): (Greene, 2020), (Haque, 2021) Carbon Footprint (Modular: 65 kg CO₂/m², Traditional: 100+ kg CO₂/m²): (Jaillon and Poon, 2008). (Vithanage et al, 2021). 2. Material and Method The study employs a qualitative research design structured around three complementary methodological components. First, a systematic review was undertaken to identify prevailing discourses on resilient modular housing, with particular emphasis on seismic resilience, sustainability, and socio-economic feasibility. Academic databases, peer-reviewed journals, and institutional reports were surveyed to establish a comprehensive theoretical framework. Second, a comparative typological analysis was conducted, drawing upon selected architectural precedents of modular housing systems both within and beyond seismic zones. This stage involved the evaluation of design strategies, construction techniques, and regulatory conditions in order to discern convergences and divergences relevant to the Californian context. Third, a series of emblematic case studies were incorporated to anchor the investigation in real-world practice. These cases were chosen according to their representativeness in terms of technological innovation, environmental performance, and community-oriented adaptability. Each case study was examined through document analysis, architectural 715 drawings, and secondary data sources, thereby allowing for a triangulated understanding of resilience across structural and social dimensions. Through the integration of these methods, the research establishes a multilayered analytical lens that enables the critical assessment of modular housing as an adaptive strategy for earthquake-prone territories. 3. Resilient Modular Housing Systems Resilient modular housing systems have gained considerable attention as effective solutions for addressing the challenges posed by climate change and increasing urbanization. The overarching theme in the recent studies emphasizes the urgent need for housing that can withstand environmental stresses alongside the necessity for sustainable practices in construction and design. One of the critical aspects of resilient modular housing is its inherent ability to adapt to climate challenges. Modular housing systems, particularly those that integrate sustainable architectural practices, can provide significant advantages in flood-prone areas. The Amphibious House in the UK exemplifies innovative design strategies that ensure resilience through its adaptation to changing water levels, further supported by the notion that multi-faceted strategies involving both design and institutional measures are essential for effective flood resilience (Naseri, 2024). Climate-resilient housing frameworks across various regions underline similar principles, advocating an inclusive approach that incorporates sustainability in the physical and operational design of housing (Zahra et al., 2025; Mansoor et al., 2023). Moreover, the modular construction process itself presents advantages that are pivotal in emergency and post-disaster reconstruction scenarios. The 716 prefabrication of modular components allows for rapid assembly on-site, which is crucial for providing timely housing solutions to displaced populations. Research indicates that the time-efficient nature of modular construction not only facilitates quicker recovery but also enhances the overall structural resilience of buildings against natural disasters (Ghannad et al., 2020; Shahzad et al., 2022; Gunawardena et al., 2014). This approach is increasingly recognized as vital globally, where displacement due to climate-related events is anticipated to rise (Jayakody et al., 2022). Furthermore, contemporary studies recognizes the integration of green building principles within modular housing designs as a robust strategy for a sustainable future. Modular buildings designed with environmental considerations can significantly contribute to the green economy while addressing housing shortages and improving community resilience. The adoption of modular systems in environmentally sustainable practices fulfills immediate housing needs while promoting long-term ecological benefits and community development goals (Kusbiantoro et al., 2024; Khan et al., 2022). The adaptability of modular systems sets them apart as a preferred solution in rapidly urbanizing settings. The intersection of modular construction with concepts such as the circular economy and affordable housing reflects a growing recognition of the need for innovative construction practices that support social inclusion and economic sustainability (Parisi & Donyavi, 2024; Khan et al., 2022). Furthermore, modular housing offers flexibility, making it easier to repurpose for different uses over time, which is vital for ever-changing urban landscapes (Ginigaddara et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2021). 717 In conclusion, resilient modular housing systems embody the convergence of rapid construction technology, sustainability, and climate resilience. While providing immediate solutions to pressing housing crises, these systems also pave the way for more adaptive urban environments. The growing body of features surrounding this topic emphasizes not only the necessity of such systems in disaster-prone areas but also their broader implications for sustainable urban development. Highlighted themes on this topic are systematically presented and grouped in the following table (Table 2). Table 2. Comparative Table: Themes and studies. Thematic Area Key Features Benefits Representative Studies Climate Adaptation - Amphibious designFlexible structural systems - Resistance to floodingAdaptive to water level changes Naseri (2024), Zahra et al. (2025), Mansoor et al. (2023) Emergency & Post-Disaster Housing - Prefabricated modular componentsRapid on-site assembly - Quicker response in crisisImproved structural resilience Ghannad et al. (2020), Shahzad et al. (2022), Gunawardena et al. (2014) Sustainability Integration - Use of green building principlesEnvironmental material selection - Reduced ecological footprintContribution to the green economy and long-term ecological goals Kusbiantoro et al. (2024), Khan et al. (2022) Urbanization & Flexibility - Modular units with repurposing potentialAffordable construction methods - Social inclusionSuitability for changing urban needs and circular economy Parisi & Donyavi (2024), Ginigaddara et al. (2023), Chen et al. (2021) Holistic Resilience Frameworks - Integration of institutional and design strategies - Comprehensive flood resilienceInclusive planning Naseri (2024), Zahra et al. (2025) 718 4. Earthquake-Prone Regions in California California is one of the most seismically active regions in the United States, necessitating robust approaches to earthquake preparedness and building resilience in structures. Among these approaches, integrating advanced building techniques and materials into modular housing systems shows promise for increasing the seismic resilience of residential structures in earthquake-prone areas. Recent studies indicate the effectiveness of modular construction in speeding the building process while enhancing the seismic robustness of new housing developments. California's ongoing seismic activity requires continuous evaluation of building codes and construction practices to ensure safety. Research suggests that increased earthquake frequencies call for strengthened building codes, particularly near fault lines to ensure that structures are designed to withstand major seismic activity (Debnath et al., 2024). This regulatory framework has prompted the exploration of modular systems, which can be constructed to meet stringent seismic norms while addressing community housing needs. For example, modular designs can incorporate flexible materials that dissipate seismic energy more effectively during an earthquake, helping to minimize damage (Kaven, 2020). Methodologies applied in the modular housing sector should also leverage technological innovations. The Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) provides extensive data on seismic activity, which can inform the design of modular housing systems that are both cost-effective and resilient (Hauksson et al., 2020). Additionally, continuous research on seismicity patterns and predictive modeling can guide modular construction practices, ensuring they are prepared for potential seismic 719 threats (Guo, 2025). This is critical as urban development often occurs in high-risk areas, reinforcing the need for advanced systems capable of withstanding natural disasters (Debnath et al., 2024). Research has shown that modular housing can mitigate the adverse effects of severe seismic events by utilizing innovative reinforcement techniques. Trends in seismic data reveal that certain regions experience seismic bursts and swarms, necessitating the adaptive capabilities of modular homes to accommodate these environmental stressors. Studies utilizing machine learning approaches to analyze seismic patterns suggest that developers can design homes that dynamically respond to increasing levels of tectonic stress (Rundle & Donnellan, 2020). This includes features such as adjustable foundations or specialized bracing systems that enhance structural integrity during seismic events. Collaboration with local authorities and communities is vital for the successful integration of modular housing systems. Educational initiatives on earthquake preparedness and construction safety can foster a culture of resilience, enhancing community ownership over housing projects (Dobrovolsky et al., 2013). Building on collective knowledge about seismic risks can guide the selection of materials and practices that are environmentally friendly and cost-effective (McClellan, 2015). Importantly, insurance coverage poses a significant challenge for homeowners in California, with many residents opting not to secure earthquake insurance despite the high risk (Pothon et al., 2019). This disparity emphasizes the need for public outreach and education initiatives to shift perceptions of risk versus the financial realities of earthquake preparedness. Modular homes could potentially lower owner costs through 720 faster construction times and reduced material waste, thereby encouraging more residents to invest in earthquake insurance due to the assured safety and longevity of their homes. Finally, implementing the MyShake platform, a smartphone-based earthquake early warning system, can enhance public safety and preparedness in modular housing environments (Allen et al., 2019). Such technologies, integrated with modular construction practices, provide an added layer of resilience, not only ensuring the structures are seismically safe but also keeping occupants informed about impending threats. In conclusion, as California grapples with the challenges posed by its disaster-prone geography, the development of resilient modular housing systems presents a multifaceted solution that addresses immediate housing needs while improving long-term safety. Through collaboration across research, technology, regulatory frameworks, and community engagement, California can lead in creating housing that withstands seismic hazards. The table below outlines and categorizes the prominent themes concerning this issue (Table 3). Table 3. Comparative Table: Themes and studies. Thematic Area Key Features Benefits Representative Studies SeismicResilient Construction - Flexible materialsReinforced modular framesAdjustable foundations - Enhanced resistance to seismic energyMinimized structural damage Debnath et al. (2024), Kaven (2020), Rundle & Donnellan (2020) Regulatory & Safety Standards - Seismic-specific building codesLocation-based design criteria - Compliance with safety normsProtection in high-risk fault-line areas Debnath et al. (2024), Guo (2025) Technological Integration - Seismic sensorsEarly warning - Improved disaster responseDataHauksson et al. (2020), Allen et al. 721 Thematic Area Key Features Benefits Representative Studies systems (e.g., MyShake)- AI modeling informed modular designs (2019), Rundle & Donnellan (2020) Community Engagement & Education - Public awareness programsConstruction safety workshops - Greater resilience cultureInformed material choices and safety practices Dobrovolsky et al. (2013), McClellan (2015) Affordability & Insurance Impact - Reduced construction costsEfficient material useSafety assurance - Increased willingness to invest in earthquake insuranceFinancially viable housing for vulnerable populations Pothon et al. (2019), McClellan (2015) 5. Resilient Modular Housing Systems for Earthquake-Prone Regions in California In the context of earthquake-prone regions like California, resilient modular housing systems present a viable approach to addressing both immediate housing needs and long-term safety concerns. The advent of modular construction can be traced back to various historical events that necessitated quick housing solutions, such as the California Gold Rush and the aftermath of significant wars. Modern modular construction has evolved through advances in technology and design practices aimed at countering the disruptions caused by natural disasters, including earthquakes (Ginigaddara et al., 2023). This contemporary strategy encompasses the use of prefabricated materials and methods that not only hasten the construction process but enhance the resilience of buildings against seismic activities (Navaratnam et al., 2019). The significance of implementing modular housing systems, particularly in earthquake-prone areas, can be attributed to their intrinsic 722 characteristics of adaptability, affordability, and sustainability. A systematic review by Vithanage et al. provides insight into the safety risks associated with off-site manufacturing, critical for understanding the broader implications of modular housing (Vithanage et al., 2021). Lean construction techniques, which advocate for waste reduction and efficiency, can be integrated into modular housing practices, thereby improving safety and resilience without sacrificing cost-effectiveness (Ikuma et al., 2011). These methods ensure that modular homes can be constructed rapidly without compromising their structural integrity, making them particularly beneficial in the wake of seismic events. Resilience in modular housing goes beyond mere physical robustness; it necessitates designing homes that can effectively respond to changing environmental conditions. Achumie et al. emphasize that the integration of operational models leveraging community participation and emergent smart technologies enhances housing project outcomes, aligning with goals of affordability and sustainability (Achumie et al., 2024). Implementing smart technologies in modular designs contributes to energy efficiency and promotes environmental sustainability, increasing the adaptive capacity of these structures against future disasters (Achumie et al., 2024). Moreover, as highlighted by Haque et al., container-modular housing (CMH) specifically fosters community resilience through its ability to withstand environmental adversities, such as flooding or earthquakes, while promoting sustainable development (Haque et al., 2021). The adaptability of container modular homes makes them particularly suitable for varied geographical contexts, including California's diverse seismic 729 Acknowledgements and Information Note The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval was not required for the study. Author Contribution and Conflict of Interest Declaration Information All authors contributed equally to the article 730 References Achumie, G., Bakare, O., & Okeke, N. (2024). Innovative financial and operational models for affordable housing: a review of emerging market strategies. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(10), 2342-2362. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i10.1617. Allen, R., Kong, Q., & Martin‐Short, R. (2019). The myshake platform: a global vision for earthquake early warning. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177(4), 1699-1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024019-02337-7. Chen, L., Yuan, R., Ji, X., Lu, X., Xiao, J., Tao, J., Jiang, L. (2021). Modular composite building in urgent emergency engineering projects: a case study of accelerated design and construction of wuhan thunder god mountain/leishenshan hospital to covid-19 pandemic. Automation in Construction, 124, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103555. Chrysanidis, T., Alamanis, N., Papageorgiou, G., & Kaouri, G. (2021). Investigation of the impact of seismic zone to the cost of construction of a 5-storey r/c building. https://doi.org/10.7712/120121.8784.19209. Debnath, P., Karmakar, M., Khan, M., Khan, M., Sayeed, A., Rahman, A., … & Sumon, M. (2024). Seismic activity analysis in California: patterns, trends, and predictive modeling. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(5), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.5.5. Dobrovolsky, M., Гвишиани, А., Agayan, S., & Дзебоев, Б. (2013). Fuzzy-based clustering of epicenters and strong earthquake-prone areas. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2013.001. Ghannad, P., Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2020). Feasibility and implications of the modular construction approach for rapid post-disaster recovery. International Journal of Industrialized Construction, 1(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.29173/ijic220. 731 Ginigaddara, T., Ekanayake, C., Gunawardena, T., & Mendis, P. (2023). Resilience and performance of prefabricated modular buildings against natural disasters. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 23(4), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.23542. Greene, M. (2020). Performance testing in modular seismic structures. Earthquake Engineering Review. Greene, S. (2020). How nuclear power can transform electric grid and critical infrastructure resilience. Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, 1(2), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.18278/jcip.1.2.4. Griffen, C. (2023). Making the side yard house; a passive mass housing model., 104-108. https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.16. Gunawardena, T., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., Aye, L., & Crawford, R. (2014). Time-efficient post-disaster housing reconstruction with prefabricated modular structures. Open House International, 39(3), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-03-2014-b0007. Guo, H. (2025). Triggering intensity changes over time and space as measured by continuous waveforms in southern california. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 130(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030004. Haque, A., et al. (2021). Container-Modular housing for community resilience. International Journal of Housing Policy. Haque, M., Aman, J., & Mohammad, F. (2021). Construction sustainability of container-modular-housing in coastal regions towards resilient community. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(3), 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-012021-0011. Hauksson, E., Yoon, C., Yu, E., Andrews, J., Alvarez, M., Bhadha, R., Thomas, V. (2020). Caltech/usgs southern California seismic network (scsn) and southern California earthquake data center (scedc): Data availability for the 2019 ridgecrest sequence. Seismological Research Letters, 91(4), 1961-1970. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190290. Ikuma, L., Nahmens, I., & James, J. (2011). Use of safety and lean integrated kaizen to improve performance in modular homebuilding. 732 Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(7), 551560. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000330. Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008). Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802259043. Jayakody, C., Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., Liyanage, C., Hamza, M., Fernando, N. (2022). Addressing housing needs of the displaced people promoting resilient and sustainable communities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(3), 368-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-092021-0124. Kaven, J. (2020). Seismicity rate change at the coso geothermal field following the july 2019 ridgecrest earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110(4), 1728-1735. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200017. Khan, A., Yu, R., Liu, T., Guan, H., & Oh, E. (2022). Drivers towards adopting modular integrated construction for affordable sustainable housing: a total interpretive structural modelling (tism) method. Buildings, 12(5), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050637. Kusbiantoro, K., Lesmana, C., & Gunawan, I. (2024). Designing folded modular houses as refugee shelters at disaster sites. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1361(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1361/1/012014. Lee, S., Lee, H., & Chan, K. (2020). The hub of hope: realizing an evacuation hub at Pula village, Philippines (practitioner paper). Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 588(3), 032091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032091. Mansoor, N., Anuar, A., Mahdzir, A., & Adnan, N. (2023). Enhancing disaster resilience: Overview of resilient housing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i9/18351. McClellan, P. (2015). Semiannual earthquake periodicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(5), 2736-2749. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140270. 733 Naseri, S. (2024). Innovative sustainable architecture: a lesson learned from amphibious house in the uk. Research Review. https://doi.org/10.52845/currentopinion.v4i4.318. Navaratnam, S., Ngo, T., Gunawardena, T., & Henderson, D. (2019). Performance review of prefabricated building systems and future research in Australia. Buildings, 9(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9020038. Navaratnam, S., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., & Aye, L. (2019). Time and cost performance of modular buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 23, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.012. Parisi, L. and Donyavi, S. (2024). Modular momentum: assessing the efficacy of modular construction in alleviating the UK housing crisis. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4331068/v1. Peñaloza, G., Formoso, C., & Saurin, T. (2017). Resilience skills used by front-line workers to assemble precast concrete structures: an exploratory study. Ambiente Construído, 17(4), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212017000400183. Pothon, A., Guéguen, P., Buisine, S., & Bard, P. (2019). California earthquake insurance unpopularity: the issue is the price, not the risk perception. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 19(8), 19091924. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1909-2019. Rundle, J. and Donnellan, A. (2020). Nowcasting earthquakes in southern california with machine learning: Bursts, swarms, and aftershocks may be related to levels of regional tectonic stress. Earth and Space Science, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ea001097. Selikhova, Y. (2022). Organization of energy efficient ecological settlements with prefabricated modular buildings for temporary and long-term lives of living, in connection with the war in Ukraine. Bulletin of Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, (86), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.31650/2415-377x2022-86-62-68. Shahzad, W., Rajakannu, G., & Ghalenoei, N. (2022). Potential of modular offsite construction for emergency situations: A New Zealand study. Buildings, 12(11), 1970. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111970. 734 Vithanage, S., Sing, M., Davis, P., & Pillay, M. (2021). Systematic review on the identification of safety risks in off-site manufacturing (osm). Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 20(4), 935-964. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-12-2020-0498. Vithanage, T., et al. (2021). Systematic review of off-site modular construction risks. Construction Management Review. Zahra, F., Tariq, F., & Jamil, F. (2025). A study on climate-resilient housing in pakistan; identifying critical indicators for sustainable development. Environmental Research Communications, 7(3), 035022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adbe2d. 735 Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gencay ÇUBUK E-mail: [email protected] Educational Status BSc: Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, 2011. MSc: Istanbul Technical University, Department of Architecture, Architectural Design, 2018. PhD: Trakya University, Department of Architecture, Architecture, 2022. Professional Experience Res. Assist., Trakya University, (2017-2022) Res. Assist. Dr., Trakya University, (2022-2024) Assoc. Prof. Dr., Trakya University, (2024-…)