scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Decolonial Prompting: Rewriting AI Toward Black Futures

ONUH, FRANK

Abstract

This presentation develops a theory of decolonial prompting as a method of engaging large language models (LLMs) and other AI systems from the perspective of Black studies and decolonial thought. It argues that prompting is not a neutral technical skill but a political act situated within the coloniality of power, where race, knowledge, and humanity have been historically organized through Eurocentric hierarchies. Drawing on Quijano, Mignolo, and Wynter, the talk traces how modern AI systems inherit and reproduce colonial logics in their training data, defaults, and interfaces. It then introduces decolonial prompting as a practical method for Black scholars and communities to contest erasure, expose algorithmic anti-Blackness, and rewrite machinic outputs toward Black futures. Using case studies from my experience with OpenAI’s Sora and Canva, alongside mainstream chat and image models, the presentation shows how visual and textual outputs often encode Blackness as deficit or pathology. It maps the layered subject positions involved in prompting such as colonized subjects, programmers, validators, and corporate/state actors—and argues that every prompt is a negotiation between subject, object, and frame. The slide deck was prepared for the African Studies conference panel on AI, race, and decoloniality with the full paper published by the Cambridge University Press in the African Studies Review in 2026. It is intended both as a conceptual intervention and a practical resource for those seeking to engage AI critically and strategically, and in solidarity with Black and other marginalized communities.

Full text

Decolonial Prompting: Rewriting AI Toward Black Futures Presenter: Frank Onuh Slide DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17655159 Sora’s Gaze Canva’s Racialized Image Economy The Four Gazes White Male Colonized Coded Prompting is the act of giving input that constrains and directs the output of a machine and sets the frame in which the system should respond. The Evolution of Prompting in Early Computing Batch computing - Users spoke the machine's language - punch cards and fixed code (1940s–1960s) Real-time prompts – Live command interaction (1950s–1970s) Higher-level languages – FORTRAN, COBOLand BASIC (1950s–1970s) Early chatbots, e.g., ELIZA (1960s–1980s) Web & voice (1990s–2010s) LLM era (2017–present) Programmed response vs. adaptive dialogue About Unscripted Interaction - machine could not arrange words differently so as to give an appropriately meaningful answer to whatever is said in its presence, as even the dullest of men can do. Hallucination and agentic inagency synthetic comprehension and advanced mimicry René Descartes (1637) The “Prompting Problem” A Universal Language of Thought Leibniz (1666) The alphabet of human thought Calculus of reasoning Calculemus or “Let us calculate”. Origin of a generative view of prompting Reasoning as computation & generative The Illusion of Intelligence The Mechanization of thought Searle’s Chinese room: syntax vs. semantics The “symbol grounding problem” The limits of origination (“Stochastic Parrot” - Bender et al, 2021) The primacy of human Intent The Infrastructural Bind: Resistance is enacted on the platform of power The Epistemic Limit: Cannot recalibrate the model's core weights The Risk of Recuperation: Vulnerable to commodification A Prefigurative & Proximal Praxis Serves immediate harm mitigation against algorithmic bias The Paradox & Necessity The Political Economy of Prompting Frank Onuh [email protected] Slide DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17655159