Enzymatic Glycosylation Strategies in the Production of Bioactive Compounds

Citation: Andreu, A.; ´ Corovi´c, M.; Garcia-Sanz, C.; Santos, A.S.; Milivojevi´c, A.; Ortega-Nieto, C.; Mateo, C.; Bezbradica, D.; Palomo, J.M. Enzymatic Glycosylation Strategies in the Production of Bioactive Compounds. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ catal13101359 Academic Editor: Evangelos Topakas Received: 28 August 2023 Revised: 28 September 2023 Accepted: 1 October 2023 Published: 11 October 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). catalysts Review Enzymatic Glycosylation Strategies in the Production of Bioactive Compounds Alicia Andreu 1, Marija ´ Corovi´c 2, Carla Garcia-Sanz 1, A. Sofia Santos 1, Ana Milivojevi´c 2, Clara Ortega-Nieto 1, Cesar Mateo 1,* , Dejan Bezbradica 2,* and Jose M. Palomo 1,* 1Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica (ICP), CSIC, Marie Curie 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (A.A.); c.gar[email protected] (C.G.-S.); [email protected] (A.S.S.); [email protected] (C.O.-N.) 2Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (M. ´ C.); [email protected] (A.M.) *Correspondence: [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (J.M.P.) Abstract: Enzymatic glycosylation is a versatile and sustainable biotechnological approach that plays a pivotal role in the production of bioactive compounds. This process involves the enzymatic transfer of sugar moieties onto various acceptor molecules, such as small molecules, peptides, or proteins, resulting in the synthesis of glycosides. These glycosides often exhibit enhanced bioactivity, improved solubility, and enhanced stability, making them valuable in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and the food industry. This review explores the diverse enzymatic glycosylation strategies employed in the synthesis of bioactive compounds. It highlights the enzymatic catalysts involved, including glycosyltransferases, glycosidases, glycophosphorylases, and glycosynthases. It considers the advantages and disadvantages of these biocatalysts in the stereoselective and regioselective synthesis of different types of glycosylated molecules, phenolic and aliphatic alcohols, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, glycoderivatives, glycopeptides, and glycoproteins with a clear focus on food and pharmaceutical chemistry. Furthermore, the review outlines various sources of sugar donors, activated glycosides, and sugar nucleotides, as well as the utilization of engineered enzymes and microorganisms for glycosylation reactions. The advantages of enzymatic glycosylation, including its high regioselectivity, stereoselectivity, and sustainability, are emphasized. Therefore, these approaches combining the use of different catalytic systems, the improvement of tools such as immobilization technology or chemical or genetic modification to improve the glycosylation process, could be useful tools in continuous biotechnological advancements. Keywords: enzymes; glycosylation; oligosaccharides; glycoderivatives 1. Introduction There are many compounds described in the literature with good biological activity such as antioxidants, anti-inflammatories, or different drugs used in different processes and with good applicability in different fields such as pharmacology, sweeteners, etc. However, in many cases, these compounds are absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and metabolized very quickly in the bloodstream and especially in the liver. In other cases, the problem is that since most of them are highly hydrophobic, their solubility in aqueous medium is very low, so the concentrations in blood are very small, causing a decrease in the biological activity [ 1 ]. Thus, in nature, most of the compounds with biological activity are associated with sugar residues. This helps in different biological processes such as the maintenance of cell integrity, in cell recognition, or in defense mechanisms at the molecular level [ 2 – 5 ]. Imitating the nature of glycosylation is a very effective process to transform natural products, and in many cases enhances or modifies their biological activity after altering their physical, chemical, and biological properties [ 6 ]. Considering Catalysts 2023,13, 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101359 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 2 of 28 this, on many occasions, the derivatization of the hydroxylated compounds with simple sugars or with oligosaccharide chains is interesting to contemplate. Depending on the type of linkage formed, in many cases these compounds are less hydrolyzable, and their metabolism occurs in the colon and is caused by the gut microbiota. In addition, sugar derivatization makes the compounds more soluble in an aqueous medium, increasing their concentration in blood. At the center of any enzymatic glycoderivatization strategy is a glycosidic bond-forming enzyme. A number of factors must be taken into account when selecting a suitable catalyst, in particular (i) practical access to the corresponding substrates (and catalyst); (ii) ability of the catalyst to act on a wide range of substrates; and (iii) efficiency of glycosidic bond formation. In organic chemistry, natural glycosidases (GH) can be used to catalyze different synthetic processes. Although glycosidases use to be classified according to the type of glycosidic bond formed or hydrolyzed by their catalytic activity (galactosidases, glucosidases, etc.), they are usually grouped into two main groups, such as glycosidases and transglycosidases. Glycosidases are able to form glycosidic bonds by reverse hydrolysis, with equilibrium shift. Transferases are essential enzymes involved in the glycosylation of bioactive compounds, playing a pivotal role in modifying the structure and function of these molecules. These glycosyltransferases (GT) enzymes facilitate the transfer of specific sugar moieties from activated donor molecules onto acceptor compounds, such as proteins, peptides, or small molecules. The glycosylation process, catalyzed by transferases, leads to the formation of glycoconjugates, which often exhibit enhanced bioactivity, improved solubility, and increased stability. The diversity of transferases, including glycosyltransferases, sulfotransferases, and sialyltransferases, among others, enables the generation of a wide range of glycoconjugates with varying glycan structures and functions [7]. In addition to the multitude of enzymes that exist in nature, in recent years, different mutant enzymes have been developed that have had their hydrolytic capacity eliminated, greatly improving their synthesis yields [ 8 ]. Finally, in some cases, there are described processes in which different cell lines have been used to catalyze reactions involving glycosidase enzymes [9]. In the present review, different processes of great interest in synthesis using the different catalytic systems described above will be addressed, as well as the different applications where these enzymatic processes can be employed (Figure 1). Catalysts 2023, 13, x 2 of 28 after altering their physical, chemical, and biological properties [6]. Considering this, on many occasions, the derivatization of the hydroxylated compounds with simple sugars or with oligosaccharide chains is interesting to contemplate. Depending on the type of linkage formed, in many cases these compounds are less hydrolyzable, and their metabolism occurs in the colon and is caused by the gut microbiota. In addition, sugar derivatization makes the compounds more soluble in an aqueous medium, increasing their concentration in blood. At the center of any enzymatic glycoderivatization strategy is a glycosidic bond-forming enzyme. A number of factors must be taken into account when selecting a suitable catalyst, in particular (i) practical access to the corresponding substrates (and catalyst); (ii) ability of the catalyst to act on a wide range of substrates; and (iii) efficiency of glycosidic bond formation. In organic chemistry, natural glycosidases (GH) can be used to catalyze different synthetic processes. Although glycosidases use to be classified according to the type of glycosidic bond formed or hydrolyzed by their catalytic activity (galactosidases, glucosidases, etc.), they are usually grouped into two main groups, such as glycosidases and transglycosidases. Glycosidases are able to form glycosidic bonds by reverse hydrolysis, with equilibrium shift. Transferases are essential enzymes involved in the glycosylation of bioactive compounds, playing a pivotal role in modifying the structure and function of these molecules. These glycosyltransferases (GT) enzymes facilitate the transfer of specific sugar moieties from activated donor molecules onto acceptor compounds, such as proteins, peptides, or small molecules. The glycosylation process, catalyzed by transferases, leads to the formation of glycoconjugates, which often exhibit enhanced bioactivity, improved solubility, and increased stability. The diversity of transferases, including glycosyltransferases, sulfotransferases, and sialyltransferases, among others, enables the generation of a wide range of glycoconjugates with varying glycan structures and functions [7]. In addition to the multitude of enzymes that exist in nature, in recent years, different mutant enzymes have been developed that have had their hydrolytic capacity eliminated, greatly improving their synthesis yields [8]. Finally, in some cases, there are described processes in which different cell lines have been used to catalyze reactions involving glycosidase enzymes [9]. In the present review, different processes of great interest in synthesis using the different catalytic systems described above will be addressed, as well as the different applications where these enzymatic processes can be employed (Figure 1). Figure 1. Concept scheme of enzymatic glycosylation of bioactive compounds and applications. Figure 1. Concept scheme of enzymatic glycosylation of bioactive compounds and applications. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 3 of 28 From this strategy, it is interesting to emphasize the synthesis of derivatives of phenolic compounds because of their high interest due to their, in many cases, good biological activity and their low solubility. This makes them excellent candidates for their glycosylation due to the advantages provided by such treatment, as mentioned above. 2. Enzymatic Glycosylation of Phenolic Compounds Phenolic compounds are an important class of chemicals containing one or more hydroxyl groups bounded directly to an aromatic hydrocarbon group [ 10 ]. Considering their chemical structures, phenolic compounds can be divided into several classes, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, coumarins, quinones, stilbens, and lignans (Figure 2) [ 11 ]. They possess various beneficial bioactivities including antioxidant, antiatherogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties, which make them generally interesting in various scientific areas [ 12 – 14 ]. However, despite numerous biological activities, their wider application is limited due to their low solubility and stability in water, since they are easily degraded by light irradiation in aqueous solution [ 10 ]. Glycosylation of phenolic compound seems to be a useful tool to enhance their solubility and stability in water, as well as to improve their biological and pharmacological properties, such as tyrosinase inhibitory activity, browning-resistant activity, and antitumor properties, by increasing their bioavailability or, sometimes, by decreasing the toxicity and side effects [6,10,15]. Catalysts2023,13,x 3of28   Fromthisstrategy,itisinterestingtoemphasizethesynthesisofderivativesofphe‐ noliccompoundsbecauseoftheirhighinterestduetotheir,inmanycases,goodbiological activityandtheirlowsolubility.Thismakesthemexcellentcandidatesfortheirglycosyl‐ ationduetotheadvantagesprovidedbysuchtreatment,asmentionedabove. 2.EnzymaticGlycosylationofPhenolicCompounds Phenoliccompoundsareanimportantclassofchemicalscontainingoneormorehy‐ droxylgroupsboundeddirectlytoanaromatichydrocarbongroup[10].Consideringtheir chemicalstructures,phenoliccompoundscanbedividedintoseveralclasses,suchasfla‐ vonoids,phenolicacids,tannins,coumarins,quinones,stilbens,andlignans(Figure2) [11].Theypossessvariousbeneficialbioactivitiesincludingantioxidant,antiatherogenic, anti‐inflammatory,andantimicrobialproperties,whichmakethemgenerallyinteresting invariousscientificareas[12–14].However,despitenumerousbiologicalactivities,their widerapplicationislimitedduetotheirlowsolubilityandstabilityinwater,sincethey areeasilydegradedbylightirradiationinaqueoussolution[10].Glycosylationofphenolic compoundseemstobeausefultooltoenhancetheirsolubilityandstabilityinwater,as wellastoimprovetheirbiologicalandpharmacologicalproperties,suchastyrosinasein‐ hibitoryactivity,browning‐resistantactivity,andantitumorproperties,byincreasing theirbioavailabilityor,sometimes,bydecreasingthetoxicityandsideeffects[6,10,15].  Figure2.Chemicalstructuresofthemainclassesofphenoliccompounds. Extractionofphenolicglycosidesfromnaturalsourcesiscomplexanduneconomical, whileachemicalapproachfortheirsynthesisrequirestoomanystepsofprotection,acti‐ vation,coupling,anddeprotection[10].Ontheotherhand,duetotheenzyme’sregio‐ andstereoselectivityandmildreactionconditions,enzymaticglycosylationisconsidered averyattractive,environmentallyfriendlystrategyforobtainingthesevaluablecom‐ pounds[16].Todate,ithasbeenproventhatenzymessuchasglycosyltransferases(EC2.4) andglycosidases(EC3.2.1)cancatalyzetheglycosylationofphenoliccompounds[10].In thisreview,themostrepresentativerecentresearchonthebiotransformationofphenolic compounds,usingpureenzymesorwholemicrobialcellstoconferglycosylationpoten‐ tial,asbiocatalystswillbediscussed. 2.1.Glycosyltransferase Glycosyltransferases(GTs)areasubclassofenzymesthatcatalyzethetransferofa sugarresiduefromvarioussugardonorstoavarietyofimportantbiomoleculesasaccep‐ torsincludingmono‐,di‐,oroligo‐carbohydrates,glycans,lipids,peptides,andnumerous Figure 2. Chemical structures of the main classes of phenolic compounds. Extraction of phenolic glycosides from natural sources is complex and uneconomical, while a chemical approach for their synthesis requires too many steps of protection, activation, coupling, and deprotection [ 10 ]. On the other hand, due to the enzyme’s regioand stereoselectivity and mild reaction conditions, enzymatic glycosylation is considered a very attractive, environmentally friendly strategy for obtaining these valuable compounds [ 16 ]. To date, it has been proven that enzymes such as glycosyltransferases (EC2.4) and glycosidases (EC3.2.1) can catalyze the glycosylation of phenolic compounds [ 10 ]. In this review, the most representative recent research on the biotransformation of phenolic compounds, using pure enzymes or whole microbial cells to confer glycosylation potential, as biocatalysts will be discussed. 2.1. Glycosyltransferase Glycosyltransferases (GTs) are a subclass of enzymes that catalyze the transfer of a sugar residue from various sugar donors to a variety of important biomolecules as acceptors including mono-, di-, or oligo-carbohydrates, glycans, lipids, peptides, and numerous other small molecules [ 17 ]. Therefore, they serve critical roles in oligosaccharide, polysaccharide, Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 4 of 28 and glycoconjugate biosynthesis, as well as protein glycosylation and the synthesis of valuable natural products [ 17 ]. Based on their catalytic properties, glycosyltransferases are classified into two groups: Leloir and non-Leloir enzymes [10]. 2.1.1. Leloir Glycosyltransferase In vivo synthesis and modification of glycans is catalyzed by Leloir glycosyltransferases. Due to a strict specificity and high efficiency in glycosylation of various natural acceptors using activated glycosyl donors (e.g., nucleotide-sugar conjugates, lipid phosphate sugars, and phosphate sugars), these enzymes are widely used for the synthesis of phenolic glycoconjugates [ 10 ]. A summary of different examples has been included in Table 1. Feng and co-workers identified phenolic glycosyltransferase MhGT1 from the filamentous fungus Mucor hiemalis which exhibited a promising capability for regioand stereospecific O-glycosylation of different phenolic compounds [ 18 ]. By examining 93 compound libraries of phenols from Traditional Chinese Medicinal herbs as substrates, they revealed that MhGT1 exhibited very broad substrate specificity and catalyzed the glycosylation of 72 structurally diverse drug-like scaffolds and sterols using uridine diphosphate (UDP) glucose as a sugar donor. Interestingly, MhGT1 showed high regiospecificity towards compounds bearing prenyl moieties and were more active with prenylated phenols as substrates comparing to their non-prenylated analogues, which was explained by the large active cavity of MhGT1 consisting of hydrophobic and charged amino acid residues [ 18 ]. This is particularly important, having in mind that prenylated phenolics show better bioactivities compared to their phenolic precursors, including cardio-, neuro-, and osteoprotection, as well as antioxidant and anti-diabetic activity [19]. Table 1. Example of different Leloir glycosyltransferases. Enzyme Glycosyl Acceptor Glycosyl Donor Conditions/Products Yield Refs. glycosyltransferase MhGT1 from the filamentous fungus Mucor hiemalis glycycoumarin and 93 phenolic substrates UDP Glu 30–40 ◦C, pH 8.0–9.0 enzyme activity enhanced by Ca2+, Mg2+ and Ba2+ ions average conversion 89% for substrates containing prenyl groups [18] UDP glycosyltransferases UGT58A1 from Absidia coerulea UGT59A1 from Rhizopus japonicas 13 different phenolic acceptors including lignans, flavonoids, anthraquinon, stilbene, benzophenone, curcuminoid, xanthones, and coumarin UDP Glu UDP GluA 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8–9, 5 mM MgCl2, 400 µM UDP-Glc, 200 µM magnolol, and 200 µg of protein, 45 ◦C, 2 h. Mg2+, Mn2+, Ca2+, Ba2+ increase activity Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Cu 2+ , decrease activity 94% [20] UDP glycosyltransferase, Bs-PUGT from B. subtilis PI18, (cloned and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified) tyrosol, cinnamic alcohol, vanillin, ferulic acid, and caffeic acid trehalose, sucrose, lactose. maltose, starch, glucose pH 8.0, 30 ◦C, 25 g/L sucrose, 10 mM Ca2+, and 0.5 g/L caffeic acid 78.3% with caffeic acid as acceptor [21] UDPglucosyltransferase from Beauveria bassiana ATCC 7159 expressed in E. coli quercetin resveratrol, curcumin and zearalenone UDP Glc 2.5 mM quercetin, 2 mM sugar donor, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8 and 0.125 mg/mL of purified recombinant BbGT protein, 35 ◦C Ca2+, Mg2+, and Mn2+ stimulate the activity of BbGT, while Zn2+ inhibit it. five monoglucosylated and one diglucosylated quercetin derivatives by BbGT-harboring E. coli quercetin-7-O-β-dglucosides 0.34 mM from 0.83 mM quercetin in 24 h by BbGT-harboring E. coli quercetin-3-O-β-dglucoside 0.22mM from 0.41 mM quercetin in 12 h by BbGT-harboring S. cerevisiae [22] Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 5 of 28 In another study, Xie et al. identified two novel phenolic UDP glycosyltransferases (PUGTs) in fungi, membrane-bound proteins UGT58A1 (from Absidia coerulea), and UGT59A1 (from Rhizopus japonicas), which can transfer sugar moieties from active donors to phenolic acceptors and form corresponding glycosides [ 20 ]. Whole cells of these two fungi were successfully applied for the glycosylation of two phenolic compounds, magnolol and honokiol, to obtain the corresponding bioactive glycosides with high yields [ 23 ], hence, the authors used recombinant enzymes from these two fungi and investigated their catalytic promiscuity, regioselectivity, and stereoselectivity in the formation of different phenolic glycosides. The activities of both enzymes are strongly influenced by the presence of various cations—Mg2+, Mn2+, Ca2+, Ba2+ increase activity, Ni2+, Co2+, and Cu2+, decrease activity, while with Zn2+ the glycosylation activity was diminished [20]. As potential substrates, 13 different phenolic acceptors with diverse structures were tested, including lignans, flavonoids, anthraquinon, stilbene, benzophenone, curcuminoid, xanthones, and coumarin. Both enzymes were able to catalyze the glucosylation of magnolol, honokiol, chrysin, emodin, curcumin, and three xanthones (1,3,6-trihydroxyxanthone, 1,3,7-trihydroxyxanthone, and 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxyxanthone). UGT58A1 enabled higher conversion rates for all suitable substrates compared to UGT59A1. Additionally, several phenolic substrates—fisetin, resveratrol, 2,4-dihydroxy bezophenone, 1,3,8-trihydroxylxanthone, and 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin—were suitable glycosyl acceptors only for UGT58A1, indicating that this enzyme possesses a particularly high potential to be used as a catalyst in the synthesis of bioactive glycosides. By using substrates that contain multiple nucleophiles, single monoglucosylated products were obtained, suggesting regioselectivity of UGT58A1. For example, fisetin possesses four phenolic hydroxyl groups, however a single product, fisetin-3-Oβ -glucopyranoside, was detected and identified, with a conversion degree of 94%. Regarding tolerance to sugar donors, out of three tested (UDP-Glc, UDP-GlcA, and UDP-Gal), UGT58A1 was able to recognize UDP-Glc and UDP-GlcA with magnolol as an acceptor [23]. Another phenolic UDP glycosyltransferase, Bs-PUGT from Bacillus subtilis PI18, was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) [ 21 ]. The purified enzyme was tested with several naturally occurring phenolics such as tyrosol, cinnamic alcohol, vanillin, ferulic acid, thymol, cinnamic acid, and caffeic acid. Obtained results proved its high activity towards all examined substrates except in thymol and cinnamic acid. By using whole-cell E. coli/Bs-PUGT as a catalyst and caffeic acid as a model substrate in a process assisted by 10 mM Ca 2+ ions, 78.3% molar yield of caffeic acid glucosides was accomplished at optimized conditions. The addition of metal ions proved to be a valuable tool for increasing the molar yield of caffeic acid glucosides and shortening the reaction time. A novel glycosyltransferase gene (BbGT) from Beauveria bassiana ATCC 7159 was discovered and heterologously expressed in E. coli by Ren et al. [ 22 ]. After functional characterization through in vitro reactions, it was shown that the purified enzyme was UDPglucosyltransferase, which could convert quercetin into five monoglucosylated derivatives and one diglucoside. Metal ions such as Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and Mn 2+ stimulate the activity of BbGT, while Zn 2+ show an inhibitive effect on the enzymatic activity of BbGT. Additionally, the authors reported the broad substrate specificity of BbGT, since it was shown that, in addition to quercetin, this enzyme could also catalyze the glucosylation of resveratrol, curcumin, and zearalenone. Moreover, considering that whole-cell biotransformation can provide UDP-glucose in situ, the in vivo glucosylation of quercetin by BbGT was also investigated. In addition to E. coli, different microbial expression host, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae,Pseudomonas putida, and Pichia pastoris, were used. Interestingly, it was shown that BbGT expressed in E. coli showed different product profiles in vivo and in vitro , since the main product of the in vivo glucosylation of quercetin was quercetin-7-Oβ -D-glucoside, while diglucoside was not detected. On the other hand, the products of quercetin glucosylation also depended on the microbial host used, since the major product in P. putida, Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 6 of 28 and P. pastoris was the same as in E. coli, quercetin-7-Oβ -D-glucoside, while the enzyme dominantly produced quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucoside in S. cerevisiae. 2.1.2. Non-Leloir Glycosyltransferase Compared to Leloir glycosyltransferases, which require expensive glycosyl donors and generally tolerate natural acceptors, non-Leloir glycosyltransferases are compatible with low-cost donors and a wide range of acceptors, which is very important in terms of production process scale-up [ 10 ]. A summary of different examples has been included in Table 2. Table 2. Examples of different non-Leloir glycosyltransferases. Enzyme Glycosyl Acceptor Glycosyl Donor Conditions/Products Yield Refs. cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis (DGAS) isoquercitrin (IQ) sucrose For DGAS: 50 mg/mL sucrose, 1 mg/mL of isoquercitrin, in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH-7 at 45 ◦C, 1 units/mL, 24 h For CGTase: 50 mg/mL of soluble starch, 1 mg/mL of isoquercitrin, in 50 mM citrate phosphate buffer pH7 at 70 ◦C, 1 units/mL, 24 h Products: IQ-glucoside, IQ-diglucoside and IQ-triglucoside 97% conversion with DGAS 75% conversion with CGTase [24] amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis (DGAS) 15 different flavonoids, various mono-, diand trihydroxyflavones (HFVO) and - hydroxyflavanones (HFVA) sucrose 200 mM of sucrose, 50 µM of HFVO or HFVA, 1 unit/mL of DGAS, 50 mM buffer pH 5–8.8 at 45 ◦C 100% for HFVAs and HFVOs with 6-hydroxyl group 50–60% for HFVAs and HFVOs with 40-hydroxyl group [25] dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-1299CB4 expressed in E. coli epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) sucrose Nine different reaction products were purified 91.43% conversion of EGCG [6] cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacter sp. epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) hydrolyzed potato starch EGCG (20 mM), hydrolyzed potato starch (20 mg/mL), partially purified Toruzyme 3.0 L (5% v/v), 50 ◦C, 150 rpm Products: EGCG-30-O-α-Dglucopyranoside and EGCG-7-O-α-D-glucopyranoside 58% EGCG 30-O-α-Dglucopyranoside 13% EGCG 7-O-α-Dglucopyranoside [26] cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) from Thermoanaerobacter sp. hesperetin soluble starch hesperetin 15 mg/mL, soluble starch 180 mg/mL, CGTase 10% v/v, bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether 30% v/v, 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 60% v/v, 60 ◦C, 1000 rpm main product: hesperetin-7-O-αglucopyranosid 4.1% [27] Enzymatic glycosylation of isoquercitrin (IQ) using different glycosyltransferases, commercial cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase), and amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis (DGAS) was investigated by Rha et al. [ 24 ]. Both enzymes showed significant transglycosylation activity and, as a product, a reaction mixture of isoquecitrin derivatives, including IQ-glucoside, IQ-diglucoside, and IQ-triglucoside, was synthesized. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 7 of 28 However, several advantages of DGAS over CGTase were observed, including higher productivity, simpler process, and fewer by-products. Higher bioconversion was achieved with DGAS as a biocatalyst, as well as 97% conversion of IQ compared to 75% with CGTase [ 24 ]. The most important merit of DGAS application is the higher yield of specific isoquercitrin-triglucoside, which is the most bioavailable form among α -isoquercitrin glucosides. In the following study, the same group investigated the DGAS catalyzed site-specific α -glycosylation of 15 different flavonoids, various mono-, di-, and tri-hydroxyflavones (HFVO), as well as -hydroxyflavanones (HFVA) [ 25 ]. The regioselectivity of the used biocatalyst was confirmed, since it was shown that in the 3–OH and 7–OH positions the transglycosylation of flavonoids is negligible (Figure 3), while DGAS showed strong transglycosylation reactivity towards the 6–OH and 4 0 –OH positions of the mono-HFVOs and -HFVAs with glucose released from sucrose as a sugar donor. It was hypothesized by the authors that this kind of -OH selectivity is due to the specific interaction between the enzyme and substrate, since the diphenyl propane backbone of flavonoids fits well into the active pocket of the enzyme, so the 4 0− OH and 6 − OH axial positions in the flavonoid molecules were readily available for transglycosylation, while the 3–OH and 7–OH equatorial positions were inaccessible for transglycosylation with DGAS. Catalysts2023,13,x 7of28   specificisoquercitrin‐triglucoside,whichisthemostbioavailableformamongα‐isoquer‐ citringlucosides.Inthefollowingstudy,thesamegroupinvestigatedtheDGAScatalyzed site‐specificα‐glycosylationof15differentflavonoids,variousmono‐,di‐,andtri‐hy‐ droxyflavones(HFVO),aswellas‐hydroxyflavanones(HFVA)[25].Theregioselectivity oftheusedbiocatalystwasconfirmed,sinceitwasshownthatinthe3–OHand7–OH positionsthetransglycosylationofflavonoidsisnegligible(Figure3),whileDGAS showedstrongtransglycosylationreactivitytowardsthe6–OHand4′–OHpositionsofthe mono‐HFVOsand‐HFVAswithglucosereleasedfromsucroseasasugardonor.Itwas hypothesizedbytheauthorsthatthiskindof‐OHselectivityisduetothespecificinter‐ actionbetweentheenzymeandsubstrate,sincethediphenylpropanebackboneofflavo‐ noidsfitswellintotheactivepocketoftheenzyme,sothe4′−OHand6−OHaxialpositions intheflavonoidmoleculeswerereadilyavailablefortransglycosylation,whilethe3–OH and7–OHequatorialpositionswereinaccessiblefortransglycosylationwithDGAS.  Figure3.RegioselectivityofamylosucrasefromDeinococcusgeothermalis(DGAS)inreactiontohy‐ droxyflavonesandhydroxyflavanonesα‐glycosylation[25]. Efficientsynthesisofnovelepigallocatechingallate‐glucosides(EGCG‐Gs)wasper‐ formedbyusingdextransucrasefromLeuconostocmesenteroidesB‐1299CB4expressedinE. coliasacatalystandsucroseassugarresiduedonor[6].Theresponsesurfacemethodo‐ logicallyoptimizedprocessenabledanepigallocatechingallate(EGCG)conversionde‐ greeof91.43%.Ninedifferentreactionproductswerepurifiedandfiveofthemwereiden‐ tifiedasnovelcompoundsbyNMRspectroscopy.Novelcompoundshad45to368‐fold higherwatersolubilitycomparedtoparentmoleculeEGCG.Allderivativeshadlower antioxidantactivitycomparedtoEGCGandDPPHradicalscavengingcapacitydecrease washigherinmoleculeswithmoreglucosylunitsattached.Furthermore,7–OHgroup glucosylationwasproventohaveafunctionalroleinmushroomtyrosinaseinhibitory activityaswellasincreasingbrowning‐resistantactivities[6]. Inanotherwork,thesynthesisofvariousα‐glucosylderivativesofEGCGwasper‐ formedinaqueousreactionmediumat50°Cbyatransglycosylationreactioncatalyzed bycyclodextringlycosyltransferasefromThermoanaerobactersp.usinghydrolyzedpotato starchasaglucosyldonor[26].Twomonoglucosidesweresynthesizedasthemainreac‐ tionproducts,EGCG‐3′‐O‐α‐d‐glucopyranosideandEGCG‐7‐O‐α‐d‐glucopyranoside, withconversiondegreesof58%and13%,respectively(Figure4).Thesameresearchgroup investigatedthestereo‐andregioselectivityofcyclodextringlycosyltransferase(CGTase) fromThermoanaerobactersp.inaglycosylationofhesperetinusingthesolublestarchasa glucosyldonor[27].Asproducts,severalglucosidesweresynthesized.Themainproduct waspurified,andstructuralanalysishasshownthattheglucosylationofthehesperetin takesplaceatpositionO‐7oftheAring.Underanoptimizedreactioncondition,which includedthepresenceof30%ofbis(2‐methoxyethyl)etherasaco‐solvent,themaximum concentrationofmonoglucosidewasapproximately2mM,obtainedafter24hofreaction. Figure 3. Regioselectivity of amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis (DGAS) in reaction to hydroxyflavones and hydroxyflavanones α-glycosylation [25]. Efficient synthesis of novel epigallocatechin gallate-glucosides (EGCG-Gs) was performed by using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-1299CB4 expressed in E. coli as a catalyst and sucrose as sugar residue donor [ 6 ]. The response surface methodologically optimized process enabled an epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) conversion degree of 91.43%. Nine different reaction products were purified and five of them were identified as novel compounds by NMR spectroscopy. Novel compounds had 45 to 368-fold higher water solubility compared to parent molecule EGCG. All derivatives had lower antioxidant activity compared to EGCG and DPPH radical scavenging capacity decrease was higher in molecules with more glucosyl units attached. Furthermore, 7–OH group glucosylation was proven to have a functional role in mushroom tyrosinase inhibitory activity as well as increasing browning-resistant activities [6]. In another work, the synthesis of various α -glucosyl derivatives of EGCG was performed in aqueous reaction medium at 50 ◦ C by a transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacter sp. using hydrolyzed potato starch as a glucosyl donor [ 26 ]. Two monoglucosides were synthesized as the main reaction products, EGCG-3 0 -Oα -d-glucopyranoside and EGCG-7-Oα -d-glucopyranoside, with conversion degrees of 58% and 13%, respectively (Figure 4). The same research group investigated the stereoand regioselectivity of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) from Thermoanaerobacter sp. in a glycosylation of hesperetin using the soluble starch as a glucosyl donor [ 27 ]. As products, several glucosides were synthesized. The main product was purified, and structural analysis has shown that the glucosylation of the hesperetin takes place at position O-7 of the A ring. Under an optimized reaction condition, which Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 8 of 28 included the presence of 30% of bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether as a co-solvent, the maximum concentration of monoglucoside was approximately 2 mM, obtained after 24 h of reaction. Although the conversion yield of hesperetin was only 4.1%, this is the first report of using the free enzymes for α -glucosylation of hesperetin instead of whole cells. This was also extended to another example of glycosylated phenolic compounds [28]. Catalysts2023,13,x 8of28   Althoughtheconversionyieldofhesperetinwasonly4.1%,thisisthefirstreportofusing thefreeenzymesforα‐glucosylationofhesperetininsteadofwholecells.Thiswasalso extendedtoanotherexampleofglycosylatedphenoliccompounds[28].  Figure4.AnillustrationoftheenzymeselectioneffectonEGCGglycosylationregioselectivity.Re‐ actioncatalyzedbycyclodextringlycosyltransferasefromThermoanaerobactersp. 2.1.3.C‐Glycosyltransferases Duetotheirpotentialbenefitstohumanhealthandtheirbetterresistancetohydrol‐ ysiscomparedtoothertypesofglycosides,flavonoidC‐glycosideshaverecentlyattracted increasedattention[29].C‐glycosyltransferases(CGT)arethemostimportantbiocatalyst usedfortheenzymaticsynthesisofflavonoidC‐glycosides,sincetheyhaveshownhigh efficiencyandregiospecificity(Table3)[30]. Heetal.foundanovelC‐glycosyltransferaseTcCGT1fromthemedicinalplantTrol‐ liuschinensis,whichrepresentsthefirstCGTtocatalyzethe8‐C‐glycosylationofflavones (Figure5)[30].Moreover,thisenzymecouldcatalyzetheC‐glycosylationof36structur‐ allydifferentflavonoidsandfor12substratestheconversionyieldwasabove77%.Inad‐ ditiontoC‐glycosylation,theauthorsreportedthattheTcCGT1showedthehighcatalytic capabilitiesforO‐glycosylation,sinceitcatalyzedtheO‐glycosylationof44substrates,of which31wereflavonoids,withconversionyieldsofmorethan80%for8substrates.Most interestingly,TcCGT1exhibitedbothC‐andO‐glycosylationactivitytowards17sub‐ strates,includingvariousflavonoids.Afterinvestigationoftheenzymecrystalstructure andthecatalyticmultifunctionalstructuralmechanism,itwasrevealedthatthelargesub‐ stratediversityofTcCGT1isenabledbyaspacioussugaracceptorbindingpocket.More‐ over,conductionofthesite‐directedmutagenesisatI94EandG284KenabledtheO‐gly‐ cosylationactivityofTcCGT1,whilesuppressingtheC‐glycosylationactivity[30]. Peietal.developedaone‐pottwo‐enzymesystem,whichprovidedanefficient methodfortheproductionofisoorientinandisovitexin,flavonoidglycosides,involving thecyclingandregenerationofcostlyUDP‐glucoseinthereaction[31].  Figure 4. An illustration of the enzyme selection effect on EGCG glycosylation regioselectivity. Reaction catalyzed by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Thermoanaerobacter sp. 2.1.3. C-Glycosyltransferases Due to their potential benefits to human health and their better resistance to hydrolysis compared to other types of glycosides, flavonoid C-glycosides have recently attracted increased attention [ 29 ]. C-glycosyltransferases (CGT) are the most important biocatalyst used for the enzymatic synthesis of flavonoid C-glycosides, since they have shown high efficiency and regiospecificity (Table 3) [30]. He et al. found a novel C-glycosyltransferase TcCGT1 from the medicinal plant Trollius chinensis, which represents the first CGT to catalyze the 8-C-glycosylation of flavones (Figure 5) [ 30 ]. Moreover, this enzyme could catalyze the C-glycosylation of 36 structurally different flavonoids and for 12 substrates the conversion yield was above 77%. In addition to C-glycosylation, the authors reported that the TcCGT1 showed the high catalytic capabilities for O-glycosylation, since it catalyzed the O-glycosylation of 44 substrates, of which 31 were flavonoids, with conversion yields of more than 80% for 8 substrates. Most interestingly, TcCGT1 exhibited both Cand O-glycosylation activity towards 17 substrates, including various flavonoids. After investigation of the enzyme crystal structure and the catalytic multifunctional structural mechanism, it was revealed that the large substrate diversity of TcCGT1 is enabled by a spacious sugar acceptor binding pocket. Moreover, conduction of the site-directed mutagenesis at I94E and G284K enabled the O-glycosylation activity of TcCGT1, while suppressing the C-glycosylation activity [30]. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 9 of 28 Table 3. Examples of different C-glycosyltransferases. Enzyme Glycosyl Acceptor Glycosyl Donor Conditions/ Products Yield Refs. C-glycosyltransferase TcCGT1 from medicinal plant Trollius chinensis apigenin, luteolina and 36 more structurally different flavonoids UDP Glc 50 mm phosphate buffer pH 8 0.5 mM UDP–Glc, 0.2 mM aglycone, 50 mg purified recombinant TcCGT1, 30 ◦C for 12 h 100% conversion of apigenin and luteolin >77% for 12 substrates [30] C-glucosyltransferase (Gt6CGT) from Gentiana triflora expressed in E. coli BL21 combined with Glycine max sucrose synthase (GmSUS) luteoilin and apigenin UDP Glc 500 mM sucrose, 1.0 mM luteolin, 0.3 mM UDP and 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5, 3% DMSO (v/v), 5 mU/mL Gt6CGT, and 20 mU/mL GmSUS, 48 h at 45 ◦C products: isoorientin and isovitexin 94.7% conversion of luteolin 97.1% conversion of apigenin [31] Catalysts2023,13,x 9of28   Table3.ExamplesofdifferentC‐glycosyltransferases. EnzymeGlycosyl AcceptorGlycosylDonorConditions/ ProductsYieldRefs. C‐glycosyltransferaseTcCGT1 frommedicinalplantTrollius chinensis apigenin,luteolina and 36morestructurally differentflavonoids UDPGlc 50mmphosphatebufferpH8 0.5mMUDP–Glc,0.2mM aglycone,50mgpurified recombinantTcCGT1,30°Cfor 12h 100%conversionof apigeninandluteolin >77%for12substrates [30] C‐glucosyltransferase(Gt6CGT) fromGentianatrifloraexpressedin E.coliBL21combinedwithGlycine maxsucrosesynthase(GmSUS) luteoilinandapigeninUDPGlc 500mMsucrose,1.0mM luteolin,0.3mMUDPand50 mMphosphatebufferpH7.5, 3%DMSO(v/v),5mU/mL Gt6CGT,and20mU/mL GmSUS,48hat45°C products:isoorientinand isovitexin 94.7%conversionof luteolin 97.1%conversionof apigenin [31] Consideringtheunsatisfactoryproductivityofisoorientinsynthesisinconstructed recombinantE.coli[32],theauthorsdevelopedenvironmentallysafeefficientenzymatic invitroglycosylation[31](Figure5).TheyhaveusedC‐glucosyltransferase(Gt6CGT) fromGentianatrifloraexpressedinE.coliBL21combinedwithGlycinemaxsucrosesyn‐ thase(GmSUS)fortheproductionofisoorientinandisovitexin.GtCGTwasusedforregi‐ oselectiveglycosylation,sinceitwasreportedthatthisenzymecouldglycosylatecertain flavonoidsattheC‐6position,whileGmSUSwasutilizedtoconstructtheregeneration systemofUDP‐glucose.Byoptimizingcoupledreactionconditions,thehighmolarcon‐ versionsofprecursorflavonoids,luteolin(94.7%)andapigenin(97.1%),wereobtainedin thesynthesisofisoorientinandisovitexin,respectively.  Figure5.Regioselectiveglycosylationofapigeninandluteolincatalyzedby:(a)C‐glycosyltransfer‐ asefrommedicinalplantTrolliuschinensis(TcCGT1)[31]and(b)C‐glycosyltransferasefromGentiana triflora(Gt6CGT)[31]. 2.2.Glycosidases Glycosylhydrolases(GHs)orglycosidasesareenzymeswiththeprimaryfunctionof glycosidiclinkagehydrolysis,howevertheycanalsoproducenewglycosidicbonds throughatransglycosylationreactionwhenalternativenucleophilesparticipateasaccep‐ tors.Varioussugarunitscouldbetransferredtoarangeofdifferentnucleophilicaccep‐ tors,includingphenoliccompounds,withacompletestereoselectivityandveryhighre‐ gioselectivity.ExamplesofdifferentglycosidasesareshowninTable4.  Figure 5. Regioselective glycosylation of apigenin and luteolin catalyzed by: ( a ) C-glycosyltransferase from medicinal plant Trollius chinensis (TcCGT1) [ 31 ] and ( b ) C-glycosyltransferase from Gentiana triflora (Gt6CGT) [31]. Pei et al. developed a one-pot two-enzyme system, which provided an efficient method for the production of isoorientin and isovitexin, flavonoid glycosides, involving the cycling and regeneration of costly UDP-glucose in the reaction [31]. Considering the unsatisfactory productivity of isoorientin synthesis in constructed recombinant E. coli [ 32 ], the authors developed environmentally safe efficient enzymatic in vitro glycosylation [ 31 ] (Figure 5). They have used C-glucosyltransferase (Gt6CGT) from Gentiana triflora expressed in E. coli BL21 combined with Glycine max sucrose synthase (GmSUS) for the production of isoorientin and isovitexin. GtCGT was used for regioselective glycosylation, since it was reported that this enzyme could glycosylate certain flavonoids at the C-6 position, while GmSUS was utilized to construct the regeneration system of UDP-glucose. By optimizing coupled reaction conditions, the high molar conversions of precursor flavonoids, luteolin (94.7%) and apigenin (97.1%), were obtained in the synthesis of isoorientin and isovitexin, respectively. 2.2. Glycosidases Glycosyl hydrolases (GHs) or glycosidases are enzymes with the primary function of glycosidic linkage hydrolysis, however they can also produce new glycosidic bonds through a transglycosylation reaction when alternative nucleophiles participate as acceptors. Various sugar units could be transferred to a range of different nucleophilic acceptors, including phenolic compounds, with a complete stereoselectivity and very high regioselectivity. Examples of different glycosidases are shown in Table 4. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 16 of 28 Catalysts2023,13,x 16of28    Figure13.GlucosidesproducedbytransglycosylationofEGCGwiththesynthaseBGL‐1‐E521G [28]. Anotherinterestingglycosynthasesarefocusedonaβ‐1,3orβ‐1,4specificity,forex‐ ampleinglucansynthesis[55,58,59].AHordeumvulgareE231Gsynthasemediatedself‐ condensationofα‐laminaribiosylfluorideand3‐thio‐α‐laminaribiosylfluoridetopoly‐ merswithdifferentpolymerizationdegrees.Moreover,productionofmixed‐linked1,3‐ 1,4β‐glucansfromdi‐,tri‐,andtetra‐saccharidedonorshasbeenachieved,wherebytun‐ ingoftheβ‐1,3andβ‐1,4linkageratioproducedglucansthatdonotoccurinnature. Recently,progresshasbeenmadetowardsthedevelopmentofβ‐1,3‐glucansyn‐ thasesemployingthermo‐resistantβ‐glucosidasesasnativeenzymes,withtheinsitufor‐ mationofglycosylformatedonors,whichallowedtheuseofboththefluoridedonoror anexogenousformatenucleophiletoproduceaβ‐1,3disaccharide  [58,59]. Ontheotherhand,therearealsoglycosynthasesderivedfromendo‐glycosidases. Thesetypesofenzymesenabletheuseofoligosaccharideswithdifferentdegreesof polymerizationstoactasglycosyldonors.Thefirstglycosynthasereportedtoefficiently promotetheself‐condensationofoligosaccharidedonorsintopolysaccharideswascon‐ structedbygeneratingtheE197Amutantoftheretainingcellulase,Cel7B,ofHumicola insolens(HiCel7B)(Figure14)[60].  Figure14.Polysaccharidessynthesizedcatalyzedbyglycosynthases. Thispowerfulglycosynthasecatalyzesthetransferofα‐cellobiosylandα‐lactosyl fluorides(CelFandLacF,respectively)toavarietyofsubstrates,resultingintheformation ofaβ‐1,4glycosidiclinkage(β‐1,4glycosynthases). 4.2.Galactosynthases Functionaloligosaccharidesandglycanssuchasgalacto‐N‐biose(GNB)andlacto‐N‐ biose(LNB)glycoconjugatesareimportantcarbohydratesderivativesthatarepresentin Figure 13. Glucosides produced by transglycosylation of EGCG with the synthase BGL-1-E521G [ 28 ]. Recently, progress has been made towards the development of β -1,3-glucan synthases employing thermo-resistant β -glucosidases as native enzymes, with the in situ formation of glycosyl formate donors, which allowed the use of both the fluoride donor or an exogenous formate nucleophile to produce a β-1,3 disaccharide [58,59]. On the other hand, there are also glycosynthases derived from endo-glycosidases. These types of enzymes enable the use of oligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerizations to act as glycosyl donors. The first glycosynthase reported to efficiently promote the self-condensation of oligosaccharide donors into polysaccharides was constructed by generating the E197A mutant of the retaining cellulase, Cel7B, of Humicola insolens (HiCel7B) (Figure 14) [60]. Catalysts2023,13,x 16of28    Figure13.GlucosidesproducedbytransglycosylationofEGCGwiththesynthaseBGL‐1‐E521G [28]. Anotherinterestingglycosynthasesarefocusedonaβ‐1,3orβ‐1,4specificity,forex‐ ampleinglucansynthesis[55,58,59].AHordeumvulgareE231Gsynthasemediatedself‐ condensationofα‐laminaribiosylfluorideand3‐thio‐α‐laminaribiosylfluoridetopoly‐ merswithdifferentpolymerizationdegrees.Moreover,productionofmixed‐linked1,3‐ 1,4β‐glucansfromdi‐,tri‐,andtetra‐saccharidedonorshasbeenachieved,wherebytun‐ ingoftheβ‐1,3andβ‐1,4linkageratioproducedglucansthatdonotoccurinnature. Recently,progresshasbeenmadetowardsthedevelopmentofβ‐1,3‐glucansyn‐ thasesemployingthermo‐resistantβ‐glucosidasesasnativeenzymes,withtheinsitufor‐ mationofglycosylformatedonors,whichallowedtheuseofboththefluoridedonoror anexogenousformatenucleophiletoproduceaβ‐1,3disaccharide  [58,59]. Ontheotherhand,therearealsoglycosynthasesderivedfromendo‐glycosidases. Thesetypesofenzymesenabletheuseofoligosaccharideswithdifferentdegreesof polymerizationstoactasglycosyldonors.Thefirstglycosynthasereportedtoefficiently promotetheself‐condensationofoligosaccharidedonorsintopolysaccharideswascon‐ structedbygeneratingtheE197Amutantoftheretainingcellulase,Cel7B,ofHumicola insolens(HiCel7B)(Figure14)[60].  Figure14.Polysaccharidessynthesizedcatalyzedbyglycosynthases. Thispowerfulglycosynthasecatalyzesthetransferofα‐cellobiosylandα‐lactosyl fluorides(CelFandLacF,respectively)toavarietyofsubstrates,resultingintheformation ofaβ‐1,4glycosidiclinkage(β‐1,4glycosynthases). 4.2.Galactosynthases Functionaloligosaccharidesandglycanssuchasgalacto‐N‐biose(GNB)andlacto‐N‐ biose(LNB)glycoconjugatesareimportantcarbohydratesderivativesthatarepresentin Figure 14. Polysaccharides synthesized catalyzed by glycosynthases. This powerful glycosynthase catalyzes the transfer of α -cellobiosyl and α -lactosyl fluorides (CelF and LacF, respectively) to a variety of substrates, resulting in the formation of a β-1,4 glycosidic linkage (β-1,4 glycosynthases). 4.2. Galactosynthases Functional oligosaccharides and glycans such as galacto-N-biose (GNB) and lacto-Nbiose (LNB) glycoconjugates are important carbohydrates derivatives that are present in a wide scope of bioactive compounds. Thus, straightforward access to this type of scaffolds is crucial, with versatile applications in medicinal chemistry and biology [61–66]. So, Y-W. Kim et al. [ 66 ] studied a new route to access D-Lactoand D-Galacto-N-bioside glycans (D-LNB and D-GNB, respectively) involving an enzymatic pathway. In particular, glycosynthases have been revealed to be useful in the preparation of several oligosaccharides and other glycoconjugates [ 67 – 72 ], since they possess relevant transglycosylation activity with glycosyl fluorides or glycosyl azides with no appearing hydrolysis, giving opportunity for Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 17 of 28 the synthesis of galactosyl β -1,3-linked transfer products, such as D-LNB and D-GNB. The authors described the synthesis of a galactosynthase derived from the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 35 β -galactosidase. For that, a β -galactosidase from Bacillus circulans mutant (BgaC), where Ala, Gly, and Ser were inserted as substitutions for catalytic nucleophiles, was used to explore the potential catalytic activity when α -D-galactopyranosyl fluoride (αGF) and 4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNβG) were used as the sugar donor and acceptor, respectively. After the reaction completion, BgaC synthase bearing Ala and Ser did not yield the desired transfer products, leading only to hydrolysis of the sugar donor ( α GF). The one bearing Gly indeed generated a transfer product, and after careful LC-MS analysis by the authors, the observed product was a disaccharide bearing different glycosidic linkages from pNβG [66]. To further expand the selectivity studies using this BgaC-bearing Gly, 18 different aryl sugar acceptors were employed using α GF as the sugar donor at 25 ◦ C for 5h, with five glycosides being identified as acceptors for this BgaC. Thus, these five acceptors were then used to perform the transfer reaction leading to 10 different products (1a–1e and 2a–2e) bearing the β -1,3-linkage, which was confirmed by 13C-NMR (Figure 15). Analysis by HPLC and LC-MS also overruled the formation of trisaccharides [66]. Catalysts2023,13,x 17of28   awidescopeofbioactivecompounds.Thus,straightforwardaccesstothistypeofscaf‐ foldsiscrucial,withversatileapplicationsinmedicinalchemistryandbiology[61–66].So, Y‐W.Kimetal.[66]studiedanewroutetoaccessD‐Lacto‐andD‐Galacto‐N‐biosidegly‐ cans(D‐LNBandD‐GNB,respectively)involvinganenzymaticpathway.Inparticular, glycosynthaseshavebeenrevealedtobeusefulinthepreparationofseveraloligosaccha‐ ridesandotherglycoconjugates[67–72],sincetheypossessrelevanttransglycosylation activitywithglycosylfluoridesorglycosylazideswithnoappearinghydrolysis,giving opportunityforthesynthesisofgalactosylβ‐1,3‐linkedtransferproducts,suchasD‐LNB andD‐GNB.Theauthorsdescribedthesynthesisofagalactosynthasederivedfromthe glycosidehydrolase(GH)family35β‐galactosidase.Forthat,aβ‐galactosidasefromBa‐ cilluscirculansmutant(BgaC),whereAla,Gly,andSerwereinsertedassubstitutionsfor catalyticnucleophiles,wasusedtoexplorethepotentialcatalyticactivitywhenα‐D‐ga‐ lactopyranosylfluoride(αGF)and4‐nitrophenylβ‐d‐glucopyranoside(pNβG)wereused asthesugardonorandacceptor,respectively. Afterthereactioncompletion,BgaCsynthasebearingAlaandSerdidnotyieldthe desiredtransferproducts,leadingonlytohydrolysisofthesugardonor(αGF).Theone bearingGlyindeedgeneratedatransferproduct,andaftercarefulLC‐MSanalysisbythe authors,theobservedproductwasadisaccharidebearingdifferentglycosidiclinkages frompNβG[66]. TofurtherexpandtheselectivitystudiesusingthisBgaC‐bearingGly,18different arylsugaracceptorswereemployedusingαGFasthesugardonorat25°Cfor5h,with fiveglycosidesbeingidentifiedasacceptorsforthisBgaC.Thus,thesefiveacceptorswere thenusedtoperformthetransferreactionleadingto10differentproducts(1a–1eand2a– 2e)bearingtheβ‐1,3‐linkage,whichwasconfirmedby13C‐NMR(Figure15).Analysisby HPLCandLC‐MSalsooverruledtheformationoftrisaccharides[66].  Figure15.SynthesisofglycoderivativescatalyzedbyaBgaC‐Glygalactosynthase. Regardingcatalyticefficiency,BgaC‐Glywasrevealedtoperformbetterwhenα‐con‐ figuredglycosideswereused.Thus,theauthorswereabletodevelopanunprecedented synthesisofagalactosynthasederivedfromglycosidehydrolase(GH)family35β‐galac‐ tosidase,whichwasabletogeneratetransferproductsbearingthedesiredbearingofthe β‐1,3‐linkage.Furthermore,para‐nitrophenol‐αLNBandpara‐nitrophenol‐αGNBwereob‐ tainedinanupto98%yield[66]. Figure 15. Synthesis of glycoderivatives catalyzed by a BgaC-Gly galactosynthase. Regarding catalytic efficiency, BgaC-Gly was revealed to perform better when α - configured glycosides were used. Thus, the authors were able to develop an unprecedented synthesis of a galactosynthase derived from glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 35 β -galactosidase, which was able to generate transfer products bearing the desired bearing of the β -1,3-linkage. Furthermore, para-nitrophenolα LNB and para-nitrophenolα GNB were obtained in an up to 98% yield [66]. Given the versatility of β -galactosidase from Bacillus circulans mutant (BgaC), P. Bojarováet al. [ 73 ] reported the synthetic application of these mutant enzymes for the transformation of α -galactosyl fluoride ( α GF) and β -galactosyl azide ( β GN3) α -galactosyl to test the glycosynthase activity. Those three different mutants were obtained using selective mutagenesis, via active site modification to glycine, alanine, and threonine, and they were then applied in the transformation. Still, these donors were not successful and instead, two mutants (bearing glycine and threonine) were employed in the selective synthesis of azidofunctionalized N-acetyllactosamine using p-nitrophenyl β -d-galactoside as a galactosyl donor (Figure 16). Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 18 of 28 Catalysts2023,13,x 18of28   Giventheversatilityofβ‐galactosidasefromBacilluscirculansmutant(BgaC),P.Boja‐ rováetal.[73]reportedthesyntheticapplicationofthesemutantenzymesforthetrans‐ formationofα‐galactosylfluoride(αGF)andβ‐galactosylazide(βGN3)α‐galactosylto testtheglycosynthaseactivity.Thosethreedifferentmutantswereobtainedusingselec‐ tivemutagenesis,viaactivesitemodificationtoglycine,alanine,andthreonine,andthey werethenappliedinthetransformation.Still,thesedonorswerenotsuccessfulandin‐ stead,twomutants(bearingglycineandthreonine)wereemployedintheselectivesyn‐ thesisofazido‐functionalizedN‐acetyllactosamineusingp‐nitrophenylβ‐d‐galactosideas agalactosyldonor(Figure16).  Figure16.Synthesisofazido‐functionalizedN‐acetyllactosamine. Furthermore,thepreparedmutantsunexpectedlystillretainedaminorpartoftheir hydrolyticactivity,whichcanjustifywhyαGFandβGN3werenotsuccessfuldonors.The authorsstudiedthisbehaviorbymoleculardocking.Thus,theresultspublishedbythe authorshighlightthatthecatalyticnucleophilemaynotbeentirelyvalidtoallglyco‐ sidases,butinstead,structuralinteractionsintheactivesiteshouldbejudged[74,75]. Inordertoachievethesynthesisofvaluableα‐galactosyloligosaccharides[76,77],a glycosynthasefromtheBacteroidesthetaiotaomicronglycosidehydrolasefamily(GH)97 (BTsynthase)wasusedincombinationwithβ‐galactosylazide(βGN3)andα‐galactosyl fluoride(αGF)asdonors,andlactosewasusedasanacceptorwiththeassistanceofex‐ ternalanions.Inthiscase,aspreviouslyobserved,theformateprovedtobethebestassis‐ tantforattainingthedesiredoligosaccharidesinthetransglycosylation.Eventhoughin‐ hibitionofthedonorcleavagereactionisbetterperformedbytheazidethanbythefor‐ mate,anaccumulationofβGN3wasobservedwhenthiswasused,withalowyieldofthe transferproduct.Tojustifytheseresults,theauthorsperformedkineticstudiesthatsug‐ gestedtheformationofacomplexbetweentheenzyme,βGN3,andlactose,whichlimited thetransferreactionintheazide‐rescuedreaction[75]. Inthisway,GTsynthasewasabletoproduceα‐galactosidesviaformate‐rescued transglycosylation,whichwasachievedina90%yieldusingxyloseorlactoseastheac‐ ceptor,withgalactosylfluorideasthedonor. 4.3.Fucosynthases Asparagine‐linkedglycosylation,alsoknownasN‐glycosylation,isoneofthemost prevalentproteinpost‐translationalmodificationsinmammalsandplaysakeyrolein regulatingtheintrinsicpropertiesandbiologicalfunctionsofbasicproteins[76,77].Inpar‐ ticular,corefucosylationlinking16‐linkedfucosetothedeepestasparagine‐linkedN‐ acetylglucosamine(GlcNAc)moietyinN‐glycansisanimportantmodificationofN‐gly‐ coproteins.Intriguingevidencesuggeststhatcoreglycoproteinfucosylationregulatesdi‐ versecellularfunctions.Forinstance,severalstudieshaveshownthatincreasedassocia‐ tionwithcorefucosylationisoftenassociatedwiththedevelopmentofcancer[78–80]. However,thesynthesisofawell‐definedfucosylatedcoreglycoproteinstructurere‐ mainsachallengingtaskduetothecomplexityofmultiphasechemicalsynthesisorthe Figure 16. Synthesis of azido-functionalized N-acetyllactosamine. Furthermore, the prepared mutants unexpectedly still retained a minor part of their hydrolytic activity, which can justify why α GF and β GN3 were not successful donors. The authors studied this behavior by molecular docking. Thus, the results published by the authors highlight that the catalytic nucleophile may not be entirely valid to all glycosidases, but instead, structural interactions in the active site should be judged [74,75]. In order to achieve the synthesis of valuable α -galactosyl oligosaccharides [ 76 , 77 ], a glycosynthase from the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron glycoside hydrolase family (GH) 97 (BT synthase) was used in combination with β -galactosyl azide ( β GN3) and α -galactosyl fluoride ( α GF) as donors, and lactose was used as an acceptor with the assistance of external anions. In this case, as previously observed, the formate proved to be the best assistant for attaining the desired oligosaccharides in the transglycosylation. Even though inhibition of the donor cleavage reaction is better performed by the azide than by the formate, an accumulation of β GN3 was observed when this was used, with a low yield of the transfer product. To justify these results, the authors performed kinetic studies that suggested the formation of a complex between the enzyme, β GN3, and lactose, which limited the transfer reaction in the azide-rescued reaction [75]. In this way, GT synthase was able to produce α -galactosides via formate-rescued transglycosylation, which was achieved in a 90% yield using xylose or lactose as the acceptor, with galactosyl fluoride as the donor. 4.3. Fucosynthases Asparagine-linked glycosylation, also known as N-glycosylation, is one of the most prevalent protein post-translational modifications in mammals and plays a key role in regulating the intrinsic properties and biological functions of basic proteins [ 76 , 77 ]. In particular, core fucosylation linking 16-linked fucose to the deepest asparagine-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) moiety in N-glycans is an important modification of Nglycoproteins. Intriguing evidence suggests that core glycoprotein fucosylation regulates diverse cellular functions. For instance, several studies have shown that increased association with core fucosylation is often associated with the development of cancer [78–80]. However, the synthesis of a well-defined fucosylated core glycoprotein structure remains a challenging task due to the complexity of multiphase chemical synthesis or the inability of the biosynthetic 16-fucosyltransferase (FUT8) to directly fucosylate fullsized mature N-glycans [ 81 – 84 ]. For this reason, a method for direct fucosylation of intact glycopeptides and glycoproteins is highly desirable. Following this approach, the investigation group formed by Wang and coworkers [ 85 ] describes the design and generation of a potential α 1,6-fucosynthase and fucoligase for direct core fucosylation of intact Nglycoproteins without product hydrolysis by using novel mutants derived from Lactobacillus casei α-fucosidase. Firstly, they created several mutants of the L. casei 1,6-fucosidase glycosynthase and glycoligase and they assessed the enzymes’ capacity to core fucosylate a range of acceptor substrates (Figure 17). Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 19 of 28 Catalysts2023,13,x 19of28   inabilityofthebiosynthetic16‐fucosyltransferase(FUT8)todirectlyfucosylatefull‐sized matureN‐glycans[81–84].Forthisreason,amethodfordirectfucosylationofintactgly‐ copeptidesandglycoproteinsishighlydesirable.Followingthisapproach,theinvestiga‐ tiongroupformedbyWangandcoworkers[85]describesthedesignandgenerationofa potentialα1,6‐fucosynthaseandfucoligasefordirectcorefucosylationofintactN‐glyco‐ proteinswithoutproducthydrolysisbyusingnovelmutantsderivedfromLactobacillus caseiα‐fucosidase. Firstly,theycreatedseveralmutantsoftheL.casei1,6‐fucosidaseglycosynthaseand glycoligaseandtheyassessedtheenzymes’capacitytocorefucosylatearangeofacceptor substrates(Figure17).  Figure17.EvaluationoffucosidasemutantsfordirectcorefucosylationofN‐glycans.Reprinted withpermissionfromref85.Copyright2017AmericanChemicalSociety. FollowingtheglycosynthaseconceptproposedbyWithersandco‐workers[86],they performedsite‐directedmutagenesisattheidentifiednucleophileintheAlfCα1,6‐fuco‐ sidase,D200togenerateselectedmutants,includingD200G,D200S,D200A,andD200T. Similartothis,specificmutantsattheputativegenericacid/baseresidue,E274,suchas E274A,E274S,E274G,andE274D,werecreatedtoprovidepotentialglycoligases.Except forE274D,noneofthesemutantsshowedmorethantracesofresidualhydrolysisactivity duetomutationsatthecriticalresidues.Inaddition,thisstudyconfirmedthattheD200 residueisthenucleophileandthattheE274residueismostlikelythegeneralacid/base. Therefore,theyassessedthesynthesizedmutantsaspotentialglycosynthasesorgly‐ coligases.Thus,thepotentialglycosylationactivityofthenucleophilicmutants,including D200G,D200S,D200A,andD200T,wastestedusingbothβ‐glycosylazideandtheβ‐gly‐ cosylfluorideasthedonorsubstratesandFmoc‐Asn(GlcNAc)‐OHastheacceptorsub‐ strate(Figure18).Noglycosylationproductswereobservedinanyofthecasesstudied, andthisfindingindicatedthatthenucleophilicmutantstesteddidnotactasaglycosyn‐ thase.Then,theytestedtheuseofα‐fucosylfluorideasthedonorsubstrate(Figure18). Interestingly,theE274Amutantdisplayedgoodenzymaticactivitytotransferafucose residuetotheGlcNAcmoietyoftheacceptor,resultingindisaccharideFucα1,6GlcNAc‐ Asnwithregio‐andstereospecificity(Figure18).Similaroutcomeswereproducedbythe othertwomutants,E274GandE274S,whichwerelikewiseeffectiveα1,6‐fucosylationcat‐ alysts. Figure 17. Evaluation of fucosidase mutants for direct core fucosylation of N-glycans. Reprinted with permission from ref. [85]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. Following the glycosynthase concept proposed by Withers and co-workers [ 86 ], they performed site-directed mutagenesis at the identified nucleophile in the AlfC α 1,6fucosidase, D200 to generate selected mutants, including D200G, D200S, D200A, and D200T. Similar to this, specific mutants at the putative generic acid/base residue, E274, such as E274A, E274S, E274G, and E274D, were created to provide potential glycoligases. Except for E274D, none of these mutants showed more than traces of residual hydrolysis activity due to mutations at the critical residues. In addition, this study confirmed that the D200 residue is the nucleophile and that the E274 residue is most likely the general acid/base. Therefore, they assessed the synthesized mutants as potential glycosynthases or glycoligases. Thus, the potential glycosylation activity of the nucleophilic mutants, including D200G, D200S, D200A, and D200T, was tested using both β -glycosyl azide and the β - glycosyl fluoride as the donor substrates and Fmoc-Asn(GlcNAc)-OH as the acceptor substrate (Figure 18). No glycosylation products were observed in any of the cases studied, and this finding indicated that the nucleophilic mutants tested did not act as a glycosynthase. Then, they tested the use of α -fucosyl fluoride as the donor substrate (Figure 18). Interestingly, the E274A mutant displayed good enzymatic activity to transfer a fucose residue to the GlcNAc moiety of the acceptor, resulting in disaccharide Fuc α 1,6GlcNAc-Asn with regioand stereospecificity (Figure 18). Similar outcomes were produced by the other two mutants, E274G and E274S, which were likewise effective α1,6-fucosylation catalysts. In addition, they found that the AlfC mutants (E274A, E274G, and E274S) only displayed reduced activity in the absence of the GlcNAc acceptor. While the wild-type AlfC could promptly hydrolyze the donor substrate, it hydrolyzed -fucosyl fluoride slowly. These findings collectively suggested that the AlfC mutations represented a class of distinct O-fucoligase for core fucosylation, able to utilize inexpensive synthetic-fucosyl fluoride as the donor substrate rather than the pricey GDP-fucose as required by the α 1,6fucosyltransferase (FUT8).Simultaneously, they tested if the mutants could also fucosylate the GlcNAc moiety in the setting of different peptides sequences. The Endo-F3 D165A glycosynthase may use the Fuc α 1,6GlcNAc-peptides as excellent acceptor substrates to produce core-fucosylated complex N-glycopeptides (Figure 18). Finally, the authors demonstrate the potential applicability of fucoligase E274A for the site-specific incorporation of a core fucose in the complex oligosaccharide moiety of N-glycopeptides (Figure 19). Furthermore, experimental evidence revealed that in the glycoligase-catalyzed fucosylation, the fucose moiety was in fact added particularly to the innermost Asn-linked GlcNAc moiety of the glycopeptide. This strategy was successfully extended in the selective glycosylation of proteins and antibodies [85]. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 20 of 28 Catalysts2023,13,x 20of28    Figure18.Transglycosylationwith:(a)potentialα‐Fucosynthases;(b)α‐Fucoligases;(c)and(d) AlfCα1,6‐fucoligaseE274Amutant.Adaptedfigurefromref.[85]. Inaddition,theyfoundthattheAlfCmutants(E274A,E274G,andE274S)onlydis‐ playedreducedactivityintheabsenceoftheGlcNAcacceptor.Whilethewild‐typeAlfC couldpromptlyhydrolyzethedonorsubstrate,ithydrolyzed‐fucosylfluorideslowly. ThesefindingscollectivelysuggestedthattheAlfCmutationsrepresentedaclassofdis‐ tinctO‐fucoligaseforcorefucosylation,abletoutilizeinexpensivesynthetic‐fucosylfluo‐ rideasthedonorsubstrateratherthanthepriceyGDP‐fucoseasrequiredbytheα1,6‐ fucosyltransferase(FUT8).Simultaneously,theytestedifthemutantscouldalsofucosylate theGlcNAcmoietyinthesettingofdifferentpeptidessequences.TheEndo‐F3D165A glycosynthasemayusetheFucα1,6GlcNAc‐peptidesasexcellentacceptorsubstratesto producecore‐fucosylatedcomplexN‐glycopeptides(Figure18).Finally,theauthors demonstratethepotentialapplicabilityoffucoligaseE274Aforthesite‐specificincorpo‐ rationofacorefucoseinthecomplexoligosaccharidemoietyofN‐glycopeptides(Figure 19).  Figure19.Fucoligase‐catalyzeddirectcorefucosylationofN‐glycopeptides.Adapted figurefromref.[85]. Figure 18. Transglycosylation with: ( a ) potential α -Fucosynthases; ( b ) α -Fucoligases; ( c ) and ( d ) AlfC α1,6-fucoligase E274A mutant. Adapted figure from ref. [85]. Catalysts2023,13,x 20of28    Figure18.Transglycosylationwith:(a)potentialα‐Fucosynthases;(b)α‐Fucoligases;(c)and(d) AlfCα1,6‐fucoligaseE274Amutant.Adaptedfigurefromref.[85]. Inaddition,theyfoundthattheAlfCmutants(E274A,E274G,andE274S)onlydis‐ playedreducedactivityintheabsenceoftheGlcNAcacceptor.Whilethewild‐typeAlfC couldpromptlyhydrolyzethedonorsubstrate,ithydrolyzed‐fucosylfluorideslowly. ThesefindingscollectivelysuggestedthattheAlfCmutationsrepresentedaclassofdis‐ tinctO‐fucoligaseforcorefucosylation,abletoutilizeinexpensivesynthetic‐fucosylfluo‐ rideasthedonorsubstrateratherthanthepriceyGDP‐fucoseasrequiredbytheα1,6‐ fucosyltransferase(FUT8).Simultaneously,theytestedifthemutantscouldalsofucosylate theGlcNAcmoietyinthesettingofdifferentpeptidessequences.TheEndo‐F3D165A glycosynthasemayusetheFucα1,6GlcNAc‐peptidesasexcellentacceptorsubstratesto producecore‐fucosylatedcomplexN‐glycopeptides(Figure18).Finally,theauthors demonstratethepotentialapplicabilityoffucoligaseE274Aforthesite‐specificincorpo‐ rationofacorefucoseinthecomplexoligosaccharidemoietyofN‐glycopeptides(Figure 19).  Figure19.Fucoligase‐catalyzeddirectcorefucosylationofN‐glycopeptides.Adapted figurefromref.[85]. Figure 19. Fucoligase-catalyzed direct core fucosylation of N-glycopeptides. Adapted figure from ref. [85]. 4.4. Chitinases Chitinases are glycoside hydrolases (GH) that catalyze the hydrolysis of chitin generating chito-oligosaccharides (COS). Chitin and chitosans, its partially deacetylated derivates, are present in most living organisms, including bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals [ 87 , 88 ] and exhibit immunostimulant activities in mammals and plants [ 89 , 90 ]. In addition, several studies have shown that their breakdown products, COS, have antimicrobial and antitumor activities in animals, immunoenhancing effects in humans as dietary supplements [91–95] , and disease protective responses in plants [ 96 , 97 ], which makes them suitable for agricultural and medical applications [98–102]. Most of their biological activities require degrees of polymerization larger than the tetrasaccharide [ 89 ]. However, this is difficult to produce in a chemical synthesis due to the water insolubility of the products, which becomes higher as the degree of polymerization (DP) increases. Thus, in the search for bioactive COS pro- Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 21 of 28 duction, enzymatic synthesis represents a potential strategy through the transglycosylation activity of chitinases [103]. For this purpose, several research groups have studied the glycosynthase activity of various chitinases to obtain long-chain oligomers with potential biological applications. Alsina et al. [ 89 ] have studied the glycosynthase-like activity of six chitinases of the glycosyl hydrolases family 18 (GH18) to obtain larger oligomers or polymers, which could be more resistant. They selected four endo-chitinases of a bacterial and two endo-chitinases of an archaeal origin, and then mutated the catalytic assisting residue to alanin. Thus, the hydrolase activity would be reduced and an oxazoline derivate could be provided, which would act as a donor substrate for a condensation with an acceptor, catalyzing the polymerization reaction (Figure 20). Catalysts2023,13,x 21of28   Furthermore,experimentalevidencerevealedthatintheglycoligase‐catalyzedfuco‐ sylation,thefucosemoietywasinfactaddedparticularlytotheinnermostAsn‐linked GlcNAcmoietyoftheglycopeptide.Thisstrategywassuccessfullyextendedintheselec‐ tiveglycosylationofproteinsandantibodies[85]. 4.4.Chitinases Chitinasesareglycosidehydrolases(GH)thatcatalyzethehydrolysisofchitingen‐ eratingchito‐oligosaccharides(COS).Chitinandchitosans,itspartiallydeacetylatedderi‐ vates,arepresentinmostlivingorganisms,includingbacteria,fungi,plants,andanimals [87,88]andexhibitimmunostimulantactivitiesinmammalsandplants[89,90].Inaddi‐ tion,severalstudieshaveshownthattheirbreakdownproducts,COS,haveantimicrobial andantitumoractivitiesinanimals,immunoenhancingeffectsinhumansasdietarysup‐ plements[91–95],anddiseaseprotectiveresponsesinplants[96,97],whichmakesthem suitableforagriculturalandmedicalapplications[98–102].Mostoftheirbiologicalactiv‐ itiesrequiredegreesofpolymerizationlargerthanthetetrasaccharide[89].However,this isdifficulttoproduceinachemicalsynthesisduetothewaterinsolubilityoftheproducts, whichbecomeshigherasthedegreeofpolymerization(DP)increases.Thus,inthesearch forbioactiveCOSproduction,enzymaticsynthesisrepresentsapotentialstrategythrough thetransglycosylationactivityofchitinases[103]. Forthispurpose,severalresearchgroupshavestudiedtheglycosynthaseactivityof variouschitinasestoobtainlong‐chainoligomerswithpotentialbiologicalapplications. Alsinaetal.[89]havestudiedtheglycosynthase‐likeactivityofsixchitinasesofthe glycosylhydrolasesfamily18(GH18)toobtainlargeroligomersorpolymers,whichcould bemoreresistant.Theyselectedfourendo‐chitinasesofabacterialandtwoendo‐chi‐ tinasesofanarchaealorigin,andthenmutatedthecatalyticassistingresiduetoalanin. Thus,thehydrolaseactivitywouldbereducedandanoxazolinederivatecouldbepro‐ vided,whichwouldactasadonorsubstrateforacondensationwithanacceptor,catalyz‐ ingthepolymerizationreaction(Figure20). TheenzymesselectedwereBacilluscirculans,SerratiaproteamaculansChiD,Laceyella putidaChiA,SerratiamarcescensChiC,PyrococcusfuriosusChiB,andThermococcusko‐ dakaraensisChiA.Amongthem,LpChiA,SmChiC,andPfChiBhavenotreportedTGac‐ tivityonchitooligosaccharide(COS)substrates.  Figure20.Schemeillustratingtheglycosynthase‐likeactivityofGH18mutantchitinasestoobtain macrooligomersofchitosanusingDP5oxassubstrate.Reprintedwithpermissionfromref.[89]. Copyright2019Elsevier. Figure 20. Scheme illustrating the glycosynthase-like activity of GH18 mutant chitinases to obtain macrooligomers of chitosan using DP5ox as substrate. Reprinted with permission from ref. [ 89 ]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier. The enzymes selected were Bacillus circulans,Serratia proteamaculans ChiD, Laceyella putida ChiA, Serratia marcescens ChiC, Pyrococcus furiosus ChiB, and Thermococcus kodakaraensis ChiA. Among them, LpChiA, SmChiC, and PfChiB have not reported TG activity on chitooligosaccharide (COS) substrates. In relation to hydrolase activity, two types of tetrasaccharides were used as substrates, with the finding that all enzymes showed activity, especially BcChiA,LpChiA and SmChiC. Regarding to glycosynthase activity, the substrate used was pentaacetylchitopentaose oxazoline (DP5ox). After two hours of reaction, the authors found that a mixture of COS was generated for all mutant enzymes, from DP5 to DP15, with DP10, DP7, and DP8 being the main products. However, due to residual hydrolase activity, after 18 h of incubation lower than expected yields for the DP, >10 products were obtained as a result of hydrolysis and transglycosylation reactions. The best result was obtained for TkChiA, with a yield of 55% for DP10 after 18 h. The method followed by the authors performing a single mutation at the assistant residue in GH18 chitinases does not seem adequate to obtain COS with a larger DP due to the residual presence of hydrolase activity in the mutant enzymes. Further mutations would be needed to avoid the hydrolyzation and enhance the glycosynthase-like activity. In a new approach, Alsina et al. [ 104 ] focused on the study of the bacterial enzyme SpChiD. It had been shown that a single mutation in the assistant residue did not eliminate the hydrolase activity, so a different strategy was tested. For this purpose, different active Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 22 of 28 sites were mutated to achieve a greater reduction in the hydrolase activity. In addition to mutation D151A already being performed, others were added based on previous studies and simulation models that would enhance TG and decrease hydrolase activities. A second generation of four mutants with an additional mutation in each of them (S110G/D151A, G113S/D151A, F119A/D151A, and D149A/D151A) was performed. In one of the mutants (D149A/D151A), significant improvements in the wanted activity were achieved, obtaining DP10 as the majority product with the best ratio and an insoluble product yield of 30%. This enzyme was selected to design a third generation of new mutants. The triple mutants had reduced hydrolase activity compared to the previous mutants. Glycosynthase activity also improved, except in two of them. After 18 h, precipitate yields of 22 to 68% were obtained, with DP10 as the major product and getting the best results for Y154W/D149A/D151A and Y28A/D149A/D151A. The chitinases engineered in this third generation have better oligomerization yields than those of a single mutation and those of any reported GH18 transglycosylating chitinase. Thus, through a series of targeted mutations, it has been possible to design hybrids with better glycosyl synthase-like activity, but a further reduction in hydrolase activity would still be necessary for the designed mutants to have truly applicable activity. Following a similar strategy, Ohnuma et al. [ 105 ], mutated GH19 chitinases from Bryum coronatum (BcChi-A) to obtain chitin oligosaccharides using successfully 4,6-dimethoxy1,3,5-triazin-2-yl α-chitobioside [DMTα-(GlcNAc)2] as a donor substrate (Figure 21). Catalysts 2023, 13, x 23 of 28 Figure 21. (GlcNAc)4 synthesis catalyzed by glycosynthase derived from BcChi-A. Reprinted with permission from ref. [105]. Copyright © 2018, Oxford University Press. Single mutants did not show glycosynthase activity with the substrate after 48 h of reaction. However, the double mutants (E70G/S102A and E70G/S102C) showed activity and (GlcNAc)4 was obtained as the major product. For E70G/S102A, the production yield of (GlcNAc)4 was 22.4%. Small-chain oligosaccharides were also obtained as secondary products, showing the presence of residual hydrolase activity in the mutants, although it was much lower compared to wild-type enzymes. Thus, the introduction of well-studied combined mutations in different glycosyl hydrolases, such as the chitinases used in the described studies, can strongly reduce hydrolase activity and generate glycosynthase-like activity in the new mutants, which allows us to obtain oligosaccharides and long-chain glycoconjugates from different substrates. 5. Conclusions and Future Prospect This review article summarizes some of the most recent advances in enzymatic glycosylation processes focused on the fabrication of important bioactive compounds. Applicability to glycosylation process by glycosidases, glycosyltransferases, or the so-called glycosynthases have been described, along with the advantages or disadvantages of these enzymes in each process. Thus, the future prospects of enzymatic glycosylation strategies in the production of bioactive compounds are promising and hold significant potential in several areas: (i) Drug development: Enzymatic glycosylation can be used to enhance the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Future developments may focus on designing glycosylation strategies that improve drug targeting, bioavailability, and reduce side effects. This approach could lead to the creation of more effective and safer pharmaceuticals. (ii) Precision medicine: Tailoring glycosylation patterns in bioactive compounds to match individual patient profiles could become a reality. This personalized medicine approach may involve using enzymatic glycosylation to produce glycoconjugates that are optimized for specific patient populations, potentially improving treatment outcomes. (iii) Immunotherapy: Glycosylation plays a crucial role in modulating the immune response. Enzymatic glycosylation strategies could be used to develop glycoconjugates that enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies, such as cancer vaccines and monoclonal antibodies, by improving their interaction with immune cells and reducing immune evasion. Figure 21. (GlcNAc)4 synthesis catalyzed by glycosynthase derived from BcChi-A. Reprinted with permission from ref. [105]. Copyright © 2018, Oxford University Press. Single and double mutants were created by changing the catalytic base (Glu70) and the residue Ser102, which acts by fixing a water molecule. In a previous study, the authors had demonstrated that the single mutants showed glycosynthase activity with α -(GlcNAc)2 fluoride as donor substrate. In this paper, the authors tested these single mutants and new double mutants with DMTα -(GlcNAc)2 to obtain (GlcNAc)4, which were designed to improve the activity of the single ones. Single mutants did not show glycosynthase activity with the substrate after 48 h of reaction. However, the double mutants (E70G/S102A and E70G/S102C) showed activity and (GlcNAc)4 was obtained as the major product. For E70G/S102A, the production yield of (GlcNAc)4 was 22.4%. Small-chain oligosaccharides were also obtained as secondary products, showing the presence of residual hydrolase activity in the mutants, although it was much lower compared to wild-type enzymes. Thus, the introduction of well-studied combined mutations in different glycosyl hydrolases, such as the chitinases used in the described studies, can strongly reduce hydrolase activity and generate glycosynthase-like activity in the new mutants, which allows us to obtain oligosaccharides and long-chain glycoconjugates from different substrates. 5. Conclusions and Future Prospect This review article summarizes some of the most recent advances in enzymatic glycosylation processes focused on the fabrication of important bioactive compounds. Applicability Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 23 of 28 to glycosylation process by glycosidases, glycosyltransferases, or the so-called glycosynthases have been described, along with the advantages or disadvantages of these enzymes in each process. Thus, the future prospects of enzymatic glycosylation strategies in the production of bioactive compounds are promising and hold significant potential in several areas: (i) Drug development: Enzymatic glycosylation can be used to enhance the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Future developments may focus on designing glycosylation strategies that improve drug targeting, bioavailability, and reduce side effects. This approach could lead to the creation of more effective and safer pharmaceuticals. (ii) Precision medicine: Tailoring glycosylation patterns in bioactive compounds to match individual patient profiles could become a reality. This personalized medicine approach may involve using enzymatic glycosylation to produce glycoconjugates that are optimized for specific patient populations, potentially improving treatment outcomes. (iii) Immunotherapy: Glycosylation plays a crucial role in modulating the immune response. Enzymatic glycosylation strategies could be used to develop glycoconjugates that enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies, such as cancer vaccines and monoclonal antibodies, by improving their interaction with immune cells and reducing immune evasion. (iv) Functional foods and nutraceuticals: Enzymatic glycosylation can be applied to enhance the functional properties of food ingredients and nutraceuticals. Future research may focus on producing glycoconjugates that offer improved bioavailability of nutrients, better taste, and enhanced health benefits. (v) Biotechnology: Enzymatic glycosylation is essential in the biotechnology industry for the production of therapeutic glycoproteins, vaccines, and glycolipids. Ongoing advancements may lead to more efficient and scalable processes, reducing production costs and improving the quality of biopharmaceuticals. (vi) Sustainability: Enzymatic glycosylation is considered an environmentally friendly approach compared to chemical methods. The future may see increased emphasis on developing more sustainable glycosylation processes, using renewable feedstocks, and reducing waste generation. (vii) Glycoengineering: Advances in glycoengineering may enable the precise control of glycosylation patterns, allowing for the creation of bioactive compounds with defined glycan structures. This could lead to the development of novel therapeutics and diagnostics. (viii) Enzyme engineering: Continued research in enzyme engineering may result in the discovery or design of more efficient and robust glycosyltransferases and other glycosylation enzymes, expanding the range of substrates and glycan structures that can be synthesized. In conclusion, enzymatic glycosylation strategies are poised to play an increasingly important role in the production of bioactive compounds, offering opportunities for innovation in drug development, personalized medicine, and various industries. As our understanding of glycosylation mechanisms and enzyme capabilities deepens, we can anticipate exciting developments that will shape the future of bioactive compound synthesis and application. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, J.M.P., D.B. and C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., C.G.-S., A.S.S., C.O.-N., M. ´ C., A.M., J.M.P., D.B. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, A.A., C.G.-S., A.S.S., C.O.-N., M. ´ C., A.M., J.M.P., D.B. and C.M.; supervision, J.M.P. and D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 24 of 28 Funding: The authors thank the funding from Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Technological Development and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia (Contract No. 451-03-47/2023-01/200135, programme IDEAS, project no. 7750109 (PrIntPrEnzy) and European Commission, project “Twinning for intensified enzymatic processes for production of prebiotic-containing functional food and bioactive cosmetics” grant no. 101060130, HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-02-01. Acknowledgments: The authors thank the support of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia. The authors also wish to acknowledge the funding from European Commission, project “Twinning for intensified enzymatic processes for production of prebiotic-containing functional food and bioactive cosmetics “HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-02-01. The Authors would like to acknowledge networking support by the COST Action CA18132 (GlycoNanoProbes). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. Gantt, R.W.; Peltier-Pain, P.P.; Thorson, J.S. Enzymatic methods for glyco(diversification/randomization) of drugs and small molecules. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011,28, 1811–1853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Singh, S.; Phillips, G.N., Jr.; Thorson, J.S. The structural biology of enzymes involved in natural product glycosylation. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012,29, 1201–1237. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Song, M.C.; Kim, E.; Ban, Y.H.; Yoo, Y.J.; Kim, E.J.; Park, S.R.; Pandey, R.P.; Sohng, J.K.; Yoon, Y.J. Achievements and impacts of glycosylation reactions involved in natural product biosynthesis in prokaryotes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013,97, 5691–5704. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J. Nat. Prod. 2007 ,70, 461–477. [CrossRef] 5. Butler, M.S. Natural products to drugs: Natural product-derived compounds in clinical trials. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008 ,25, 475–516. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 6. Kim, J.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Kim, N.M.; Moon, Y.-H.; Ha, J.-M.; Park, N.; Lee, D.-G.; Hwang, K.-H.; Park, J.-S.; Kim, D. Functional properties of novel epigallocatechin gallate glucosides synthesized by using dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-1299CB4. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016,64, 9203–9213. [CrossRef] 7. Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry: A Textbook, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. 8. Lyu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, J.; Chen, S.; Han, T.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, R.; Xie, G.; Guo, Z. Molecular dynamics simulation guided distal mutation of Thermotoga naphthophila β -glucosidase for significantly enhanced synthesis of galactooligosaccharides and expanded product scope. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022,210, 21–32. [CrossRef] 9. Paliya, B.S.; Sharma, V.K.; Tuohy, M.G.; Singh, H.B.; Koffas, N.; Benhida, R.; Tiwari, B.K.; Kalaskar, D.M.; Singh, B.N.; Gupta, V.K. Bacterial glycobiotechnology: A biosynthetic route for the production of biopharmaceutical glycans. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023 , 67, 108180. [CrossRef] 10. Xu, L.; Qi, T.; Xu, L.; Lu, L.; Xiao, M. Recent progress in the enzymatic glycosylation of phenolic compounds. J. Carbohyd. Chem. 2016,35, 1–23. [CrossRef] 11. Saranraj, P.; Behera, S.S.; Ray, R.C. Traditional Foods from Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Innovations and Challenges, Innovations in Traditional Foods; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 159–191. 12. Sun, Q.; Heilmann, J.; König, B. Natural phenolic metabolites with anti-angiogenic properties–a review from the chemical point of view. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015,11, 249–264. [CrossRef] 13. Orhan, D.D.; Özçelik, B.; Özgen, S.; Ergun, F. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activities of some flavonoids. Microbiol. Res. 2010,165, 496–504. [CrossRef] 14. Taamalli, A.; Arráez-Román, D.; Zarrouk, M.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. The Occurrence and Bioactivity of Polyphenols in Tunisian Olive Products and by-Products: A Review. J. Food Sci. 2012,77, R83–R92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Méndez-Líter, J.A.; Tundidor, I.; Nieto-Domínguez, M.; de Toro, B.F.; Santana, A.G.; de Eugenio, L.I.; Prieto, A.; Asensio, J.L.; Sánchez, C.; Martínez, M.J. Transglycosylation products generated by Talaromyces amestolkiae GH3 β -glucosidases: Effect of hydroxytyrosol, vanillin and its glucosides on breast cancer cells. Microb. Cell Factories 2019,18, 97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Ji, Y.; Li, B.; Qiao, M.; Li, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X. Advances on the in vivo and in vitro glycosylations of flavonoids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020,104, 6587–6600. [CrossRef] 17. Schmid, J.; Heider, D.; Wendel, N.J.; Sperl, N.; Sieber, V. Bacterial glycosyltransferases: Challenges and opportunities of a highly diverse enzyme class toward tailoring natural products. Front. Microbiol. 2016,7, 182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 18. Feng, J.; Zhang, P.; Cui, Y.; Li, K.; Qiao, X.; Zhang, Y.T.; Li, S.M.; Cox, R.J.; Wu, B.; Ye, M. Regioand Stereospecific O-Glycosylation of Phenolic Compounds Catalyzed by a Fungal Glycosyltransferase from Mucor hiemalis.Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017 ,359, 995–1006. [CrossRef] 19. Chang, S.K.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, B. An update of prenylated phenolics: Food sources, chemistry and health benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021,108, 197–213. [CrossRef] Catalysts 2023,13, 1359 25 of 28 20. Xie, K.; Dou, X.; Chen, R.; Chen, D.; Fang, C.; Xiao, Z.; Dai, J. Two novel fungal phenolic UDP glycosyltransferases from Absidia coerulea and Rhizopus japonicus.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017,83, e03103-16. [CrossRef] 21. Li, B.; Chang, S.; Jin, D.; Zhang, S.; Chen, T.; Pan, X.; Fan, B.; Lv, K.; He, X. Ca2+ assisted glycosylation of phenolic compounds by phenolic-UDP-glycosyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis PI18. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019,135, 373–378. [CrossRef] 22. Ren, J.; Tang, W.; Barton, C.D.; Price, O.M.; Mortensen, M.W.; Phillips, A.; Wald, B.; Hulme, S.E.; Stanley, L.P.; Hevel, J. A highly versatile fungal glucosyltransferase for specific production of quercetin-7-Oβ -d-glucoside and quercetin-3-Oβ -d-glucoside in different hosts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021,106, 227–245. [CrossRef] 23. Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Lei, H.; Chen, R.; Wang, X.; Peng, Y.; Dai, J. Neuroprotective glucosides of magnolol and honokiol from microbial-specific glycosylation. Tetrahedron 2014,70, 8244–8251. [CrossRef] 24. Rha, C.-S.; Choi, J.-M.; Jung, Y.S.; Kim, E.-R.; Ko, M.J.; Seo, D.-H.; Kim, D.-O.; Park, C.-S. High-efficiency enzymatic production of α-isoquercitrin glucosides by amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis.Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2019,120, 84–90. [CrossRef] 25. Rha, C.-S.; Jung, Y.S.; Seo, D.-H.; Kim, D.-O.; Park, C.-S. Site-specific α -glycosylation of hydroxyflavones and hydroxyflavanones by amylosucrase from Deinococcus geothermalis.Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2019,129, 109361. [CrossRef] 26. Gonzalez-Alfonso, J.L.; Leemans, L.; Poveda, A.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.S.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Plou, F.J. Efficient α -glucosylation of epigallocatechin gallate catalyzed by cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from Thermoanaerobacter species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018 , 66, 7402–7408. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 27. González-Alfonso, J.L.; Míguez, N.; Padilla, J.D.; Leemans, L.; Poveda, A.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Sandoval, G.; Plou, F.J. Optimization of regioselective α -glucosylation of hesperetin catalyzed by cyclodextrin glucanotransferase. Molecules 2018,23, 2885. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Méndez-Líter, J.A.; Nieto-Domínguez, M.; de Toro, B.F.; Santana, A.G.; Prieto, A.; Asensio, J.L.; de Eugenio, L.I.; Martínez, M.J. A glucotolerant β -glucosidase from the fungus Talaromyces amestolkiae and its conversion into a glycosynthase for glycosylation of phenolic compounds. Microb. Cell Factories 2020,19, 127. [CrossRef] 29. Yang, B.; Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Gupta, V.K.; Jiang, Y. New insights on bioactivities and biosynthesis of flavonoid glycosides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018,79, 116–124. [CrossRef] 30. He, J.B.; Zhao, P.; Hu, Z.M.; Liu, S.; Kuang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, B.; Yun, C.H.; Qiao, X.; Ye, M. Molecular and Structural Characterization of a Promiscuous C-Glycosyltransferase from Trollius chinensis.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019 ,131, 11637–11644. [CrossRef] 31. Pei, J.; Sun, Q.; Gu, N.; Zhao, L.; Fang, X.; Tang, F.; Cao, F. Production of isoorientin and isovitexin from luteolin and apigenin using coupled catalysis of glycosyltransferase and sucrose synthase. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020,190, 601–615. [CrossRef] 32. Pei, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, L.; Shi, H.; Tang, F.; Cao, F. Efficient biotransformation of luteolin to isoorientin through adjusting induction strategy, controlling acetic acid, and increasing UDP-glucose supply in Escherichia coli.J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018 ,67, 331–340. [CrossRef] 33. Carevi´c, M.; Veliˇckovi´c, D.; Stojanovi´c, M.; Milosavi´c, N.; Rogniaux, H.; Ropartz, D.; Bezbradica, D. Insight in the regioselective enzymatic transgalactosylation of salicin catalyzed by β -galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae.Process. Biochem. 2015 ,50, 782–788. [CrossRef] 34. Gonzalez-Alfonso, J.L.; Ubiparip, Z.; Jimenez-Ortega, E.; Poveda, A.; Alonso, C.; Coderch, L.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.; Sanz-Aparicio, J.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Desmet, T. Enzymatic Synthesis of Phloretin α -Glucosides Using a Sucrose Phosphorylase Mutant and its Effect on Solubility, Antioxidant Properties and Skin Absorption. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021,363, 3079–3089. [CrossRef] 35. Murguiondo, C.; Mestre, A.; Méndez-Líter, J.A.; Nieto-Domínguez, M.; de Eugenio, L.I.; Molina-Gutiérrez, M.; Martínez, M.J.; Prieto, A. Enzymatic glycosylation of bioactive acceptors catalyzed by an immobilized fungal β -xylosidase and its multiglycoligase variant. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021,167, 245–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Sordon, S.; Popło´nski, J.; Huszcza, E. Microbial glycosylation of flavonoids. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2016,65, 7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Sordon, S.; Popło´nski, J.; Tronina, T.; Huszcza, E. Microbial glycosylation of daidzein, genistein and biochanin A: Two new glucosides of biochanin A. Molecules 2017,22, 81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 38. Sordon, S.; Popło´nski, J.; Tronina, T.; Huszcza, E. Regioselective O-glycosylation of flavonoids by fungi Beauveria bassiana,Absidia coerulea and Absidia glauca.Bioinorg. Chem. 2019,93, 102750. [CrossRef] 39. Dymarska, M.; Janeczko, T.; Kostrzewa-Susłow, E. Biotransformations of flavones and an isoflavone (daidzein) in cultures of entomopathogenic filamentous fungi. Molecules 2018,23, 1356. [CrossRef] 40. Dymarska, M.; Janeczko, T.; Kostrzewa-Susłow, E. Glycosylation of 3-hydroxyflavone, 3-methoxyflavone, quercetin and baicalein in fungal cultures of the genus Isaria.Molecules 2018,23, 2477. [CrossRef] 41. Rosado, E.; Delgado-Fernandez, P.; de las Rivas, B.; Muñoz, R.; Moreno, J.; Corzo, N.; Mateo, C. Production of β -Galactosyl Xylitol Derivatives Using Heterogeneous Catalysts of LacA β -Galactosidase from Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Molecules 2022 , 27, 1235. [CrossRef] 42. Cheng, K.L.; Bradely, T.; Budman, D.R. Novel microtubule-targeting agentsthe epothilones. Biologics 2008,2, 789–811. 43. Hofle, G.; Reichenbach, H. Epothilone, a myxobacterial metabolite with promising antitumor activity. In Anticancer Agents from Natural Products; Cragg, G.M., Kingston, D.G.I., Newman, D.J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 413–450. 44. Hardt, I.H.; Steinmetz, H.; Gerth, K.; Sasse, F.; Reichenbach, H.; Hofle, G. New natural epothilones from Sorangium cellulosum, strains So ce90/B2 and So ce90/D13: Isolation, structure elucidation, and SAR studies. J. Nat. Prod. 2001 ,64, 847–856. [CrossRef] [PubMed]