TEACHING APPROACHES AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS: A STUDY OF DIRECTED WRITING IN CAMEROON TECHNICAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS

In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion & Humani ies
Bilingual Jou nal o he Facul y o Educa ion, Uni e si y o Buea
Volume 1, Issue 1 No embe –Decembe 2025, pp. 68-85
DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.17659810
e-ISSN: XXXX-XXXX
Copy igh : © The Au ho (s), 2025. Published by Facul y o Educa ion, Uni e si y o Buea. This is
an Open Access a icle, dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0
License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use,
dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
. Page 68 o 85
TEACHING APPROACHES AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS: A
STUDY OF DIRECTED WRITING IN CAMEROON TECHNICAL
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Ngasu Be ek E engeneng
*
Depa men o English and Fo eign Languages.
Facul y o Le e s and Social Sciences Uni e si y o Douala
Abs ac
This s udy es ablishes ha eaching app oaches exe a signi ican and di ec in luence on
s uden s’ achie emen in di ec ed w i ing among echnical seconda y school s uden s in Douala,
Li o al egion. Despi e he cen ali y o di ec ed w i ing wi hin he English language
cu iculum, ongoing challenges ela ed o pedagogy, con ex ual ac o s, and lea ne engagemen
con inue o impede s uden pe o mance. The esea ch sys ema ically iden i ies he
p edominan ins uc ional me hods employed, c i ically e alua es hei measu able impac s on
s uden s’ w i ing p o iciency, assesses he ole o eache eedback, and in es iga es he manne
in which speci ic con ex ual ac o s media e hese e ec s. Th ough he applica ion o an
in eg a ed heo e ical amewo k, encompassing gen e-based heo y, ask-based language
eaching, language p ocess w i ing heo y, communica i e compe ence, and a compe ency-
based app oach, he s udy p o ides a comp ehensi e analysis o hese in e ela ionships.
Employing a mixed-me hods me hodology, including class oom obse a ions, analysis o
s uden sc ip s, and assessmen o w i ing ou comes, he indings illus a e ha di e en ia ion
in eaching app oaches co esponds closely wi h s uden achie emen ac oss dimensions such
as ask ul illmen , con en de elopmen , o ganiza ion, language use, and mechanics. The
consis en ly low le els o achie emen obse ed ac oss hese c i e ia unde line he necessi y o
educa o s and policy make s o implemen a ge ed adap a ions in ins uc ional p ac ice and
cu iculum design. The implica ions o his esea ch a e signi ican : i o e s clea , e idence-
based ecommenda ions o in o m and enhance ins uc ional me hodologies, guide cu iculum
e o m ini ia i es, and ein o ce he e ec i e implemen a ion o compe ency-based app oaches
wi hin Came oon’s educa ional sys em, he eby con ibu ing o he ad ancemen o w i ing
pedagogy in compa able educa ional con ex s.
Keywo ds:
Di ec ed W i ing, Teaching App oaches, W i ing Achie emen s, Feedback, Con ex ual Fac o s.
*
Co esponding Email: e engs[email p o ec ed]om
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 55
Résumé
Ce e é ude é abli que les app oches pédagogiques exe cen une in luence signi ica i e e
di ec e su la éussi e des élè es en éc i u e di igée du secondai e echnique de Douala, dans la
égion du Li o al. Malg é la place cen ale de l'éc i u e di igée dans le p og amme d'anglais,
des dé is pe sis an s liés à la pédagogie, aux ac eu s con ex uels e à l'engagemen des
app enan s con inuen de eine la pe o mance des élè es. La eche che iden i ie
sys éma iquemen les p incipales mé hodes pédagogiques employées, é alue de maniè e
c i ique leu s impac s mesu ables su la maî ise de l'éc i u e des élè es, é alue le ôle du
eedback des enseignan s e examine la maniè e don des ac eu s con ex uels spéci iques
a énuen ces e e s. G âce à l'applica ion d'un cad e héo ique in ég é, engloban la héo ie
basée su le gen e, l'enseignemen des langues pa les âches, la héo ie de l'éc i u e basée su
les p ocessus langagie s, la compé ence communica i e e une app oche pa compé ences,
l'é ude ou ni une analyse complè e de ces in e ela ions. En u ilisan une mé hodologie
mix e, incluan des obse a ions en classe, l'analyse des copies des élè es e l'é alua ion des
ésul a s en éc i u e, les ésul a s mon en que la di é encia ion des app oches pédagogiques
es é oi emen liée à la éussi e des élè es dans des dimensions elles que l'exécu ion des
âches, le dé eloppemen du con enu, l'o ganisa ion, l'u ilisa ion de la langue e la mécanique.
Les aibles ni eaux de éussi e obse és pou ces c i è es soulignen la nécessi é pou les
enseignan s e les décideu s poli iques de me e en œu e des adap a ions ciblées des
p a iques pédagogiques e de la concep ion des p og ammes. Les implica ions de ce e
eche che son impo an es : elle o e des ecommanda ions clai es e ondées su des données
p oban es pou éclai e e amélio e les mé hodologies pédagogiques, guide les ini ia i es de
é o me des p og ammes e en o ce la mise en œu e e icace des app oches pa
compé ences au sein du sys ème éduca i came ounais, con ibuan ainsi à l'a ancemen de la
pédagogie de l'éc i u e dans des con ex es éduca i s compa ables.
Mo s-clés:
Éc i u e di igée, App oches pédagogiques, Réussi e en éc i u e, Ré oac ion, Fac eu s
con ex uels.
In oduc ion
W i ing cons i u es a undamen al aspec o language acquisi ion and academic
achie emen . In Came oon seconda y schools, di ec ed w i ing, which equi es s uden s o
espond o speci ic p omp s wi hin he English language cu iculum and na ional
examina ions, is a cen al assessmen componen . Despi e i s signi icance, echnical s uden
pe o mance emains subop imal, p ima ily due o pedagogical limi a ions, con ex ual
cons ain s, and lea ne -speci ic challenges. This s udy equips eache s wi h p ac ical
s a egies such as pee e iew, sca olding, and gen e-based ins uc ion o imp o e s uden
ou comes in di ec ed w i ing. These me hods enable educa o s o enhance he e ec i eness
o hei pedagogical app oaches and be e suppo s uden achie emen . In e na ionally,
ins uc ional models such as gen e-based, ask-based, communica i e compe ence, and
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 56
compe ency-based app oaches a e designed o enhance w i ing ou comes. Howe e , in
Came oon, empi ical e idence connec ing hese pedagogical models o s uden achie emen
in di ec ed w i ing emains sca ce. This s udy in es iga es he in luence o eaching
app oaches on w i ing pe o mance, wi h pa icula a en ion o he media ing e ec s o
eedback and con ex ual a iables.
Ex ensi e examina ion epo s and schola ly s udies consis en ly highligh endu ing
de iciencies in di ec ed w i ing among s uden s in Came oon’s seconda y schools. These
de iciencies, including weak con en de elopmen , inadequa e mas e y o gen e
con en ions, equen g amma ical inaccu acies, and misin e p e a ion o ask
equi emen s, a e well-documen ed. Howe e , p e ious s udies ha e no ye measu ed he
di ec impac o speci ic pedagogical in e en ions on measu able s uden ou comes in
di ec ed w i ing. Al hough s uden -cen e ed amewo ks such as he compe ency-based
app oach (CBA) hold heo e ical p omise, hei implemen a ion is o en hinde ed by
sys emic ba ie s such as o e c owded class ooms, limi ed ins uc ional ma e ials, and
igid cu icula s uc u es. Exis ing esea ch p edominan ly desc ibes hese obs acles
wi hou su icien ly analyzing he impac o a ge ed ins uc ional me hodologies on
s uden pe o mance. Gi en he p oblem abo e, his s udy sough o answe he ollowing
esea ch ques ions:
 Wha eaching app oaches a e mos commonly used o each di ec ed w i ing in
Came oon seconda y schools?
 Wha challenges do eache s ace in applying di e en app oaches?
 Wha ole do con ex ual ac o s play in media ing he ela ionship be ween eaching
app oaches and w i ing ou comes?
 Wha pedagogical s a egies can be ecommended o enhance s uden s di ec ed
w i ing achie emen s in ESL class ooms in Came oon?
Theo e ical Conside a ion
This s udy sys ema ically examines he in luence o in eg a ed pedagogical
app oaches on s uden s’ p o iciency in di ec ed w i ing, ocusing explici ly on he
cons uc s o con en , o ganiza ion, and communica i e e ec i eness as a icula ed in he
na ional cu iculum. The heo e ical amewo k comp ises i e es ablished models: gen e-
based ins uc ion, ask-based language eaching, p ocess w i ing, communica i e language
eaching, and he compe ency-based app oach, each selec ed o i s demons a ed ele ance
and cong uence wi h seconda y educa ion policies in Came oon.
Gen e-based Theo y
Swales (1990) de ine a gen e as a ca ego y iden i ied by i s communica i e
pu poses, which de e mine he s uc u e and ea u es o a ex . Tex s wi hin a gen e sha e
common cha ac e is ics, including a ge audience, o ganiza ion o ideas, and language
choices. Fo ins ance, a hesis s a emen is equi ed in an a gumen a i e essay because he
gen e’s communica i e pu pose is o p esen a posi ion o o agains a speci ic issue.
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 57
Acco ding o Hyland (2007), he gen e-based app oach o w i ing ins uc ion has
i e sequen ial s ages: se ing he con ex , modeling, join cons uc ion, independen
cons uc ion, and compa ing. The i s s age, se ing he con ex , in ol es analyzing a
gen e's communica i e pu pose. This helps lea ne s si ua e he w i ing ask wi hin i s
b oade discou se communi y. In he modeling s age, s uden s obse e a sample
a gumen a i e essay and iden i y i s hesis s a emen , suppo ing a gumen s, and
conclusion. They hen assess hese ea u es wi h he ins uc o 's guidance. The join
cons uc ion s age collabo a i ely ein o ces hese gen e-speci ic ea u es. He e, eache s
and s uden s co-cons uc a ex — o example, d a ing an in oduc ion oge he on he
boa d o exempli y he iden i ied con en ions (Hyland, 2007).
In he independen cons uc ion s age, lea ne s w i e essays wi h ins uc o s
guiding hei unde s anding o gen e con en ions. In he compa ing s age, s uden s analyze
he communica i e pu poses and linguis ic ea u es o he a ge gen e compa ed o o he s.
This ac i i y deepens me acogni i e awa eness o gen e-speci ic expec a ions. This
app oach ma ches he Came oon cu iculum’s emphasis on gen e-based, di ec ed w i ing.
S uc u ed gen e awa eness suppo s con en , cohe ence, and p ope language. Combining
pedagogy wi h cu icula goals highligh s he ole o gen e-based eaching in building
s uden s di ec ed w i ing compe ence.
Task-based Language Theo y
Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) is a pedagogical amewo k ha emphasizes
in eg a ing au hen ic, goal-o ien ed asks in o bo h cu iculum planning and class oom
ins uc ion. This app oach aligns di ec ly wi h he p esen s udy’s objec i e o enhance
di ec ed w i ing skills wi hin cu iculum-manda ed en i onmen s. Unlike gen e-based
ins uc ion, which p io i izes con o mi y o p esc ibed ex ual con en ions, and p ocess
w i ing heo y, which highligh s indi idual cogni i e p ocesses, TBLT dis inguishes i sel by
acili a ing meaning ul language use in eal-wo ld communica i e si ua ions. This emphasis
on au hen ici y is in ended o ad ance s uden s’ abili ies o p oduce e ec i e w i en
communica ion wi hin con ex ually ele an scena ios. Lea ne s pa icipa e in asks such as
in o ma ional in e iews, collabo a i e w i ing p ojec s, and he c ea ion o documen s
ypical o p o essional co espondence. Each ask is s a egically designed o de elop
language p o iciency ha is bo h con ex ually app op ia e and unc ionally ele an . As Ellis
(2003) asse s, he success o TBLT depends on sus ained s uden engagemen and ac i e
in ol emen in communica ion- ocused ac i i ies, wi h p oblem-sol ing and genuine
exchanges se ing as ca alys s o subs an i e language acquisi ion. By embedding w i ing
ins uc ion wi hin au hen ic communica i e con ex s, TBLT sys ema ically add esses he
esea ch objec i es and ul ills cu icula equi emen s ha p io i ize demons able
p ac ical w i ing compe ence.
The s uc u e o TBLT ypically ollows h ee in e connec ed phases: p e- ask, ask
cycle, and pos - ask (Ellis, 2003; Nunan, 2004). Empi ical e alua ion o TBLT elies on
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 58
a ied me hodologies, including pe o mance-based assessmen s ha employ au hen ic
asks, a i udinal su eys ha cap u e s uden pe cep ions o engagemen and lea ning, and
sys ema ic class oom obse a ions ha measu e communica i e ou comes (Ba al e al.,
2016). In alignmen wi h he objec i es o he p esen s udy, TBLT si ua es language skill
de elopmen wi hin p agma ically meaning ul, goal-d i en assignmen s, hus di ec ly
suppo ing s uden s’ communica i e p o iciency, c i ical easoning, and con ex ually
app op ia e exp ession in di ec ed w i ing asks.
P ocess W i ing Theo y
Flowe and Hayes (1981) concep ualize w i ing as a ecu si e and dynamic
cogni i e p ocess encompassing he s ages o planning, ansla ing, and e iewing. This
p ocess-o ien ed amewo k enables a nuanced analysis o he cogni i e s a egies w i e s
employ goal-se ing, idea ion, and i e a i e e ision and unde sco es he impo ance o
me acogni i e awa eness in w i ing de elopmen . P ocess w i ing heo y he eby p o ides
a obus sca old o ins uc ional in e en ions ha cul i a e lea ne s’ abili ies o enac ,
sel -moni o , and sys ema ically e ine hei ex s. A ypical pedagogical sequence migh
in ol e s uden s b ains o ming a gumen a i e essay ideas, s uc u ing ou lines, d a ing in
inc emen al s ages, and engaging in s uc u ed pee e iew p io o p oducing inal
e sions. This i e a i e cycle suppo s he in e naliza ion o sel - egula o y s a egies and
esponsi eness o eedback, ein o cing he de elopmen o w i e au onomy. Addi ionally,
he ecu si e, ime-in ensi e na u e o p ocess-o ien ed ins uc ion o en con lic s wi h
cu icula schedules and ins i u ional ime cons ain s, p omp ing educa o s o cu ail o
bypass essen ial e ision s ages. These challenges no only comp omise he ull ealiza ion
o p ocess w i ing’s pedagogical bene i s bu also highligh he in insic need o in eg a i e
amewo ks. Pu pose ul in eg a ion o p ocess w i ing me hods wi h app oaches ha
o eg ound social con ex , gen e no ms, and communica i e au hen ici y is he e o e
essen ial o achie ing bo h egula o y and ins uc ional alignmen wi hin cu iculum-
manda ed en i onmen s.
Communica i e Language Teaching
Communica i e Language Teaching (CLT) is a language eaching me hod ha
p io i izes meaning ul and e ec i e communica ion in eal-li e si ua ions o e he mas e y
o g amma ules o ocabula y lis s. This lea ne -cen e ed app oach is based on he
p inciple ha communica ion is he p ima y goal o language lea ning. CLT emphasizes
language as a ool o in e ac ion and unde s anding a he han as an objec o s udy.
Ins uc ional s a egies include ole-playing, con e sa ion p ac ice, p oblem-sol ing, and
comple ion o au hen ic asks. Canale and Swain (1980) de ine Communica i e Language
Teaching (CLT) as a pedagogical app oach designed o os e lea ne s’ communica i e
compe ence ac oss ou key domains: g amma ical, sociolinguis ic, discou se, and s a egic
compe ence. Wi hin his amewo k, ins uc o s adop he oles o acili a o , guide, and co-
communica o , designing ins uc ional asks and deli e ing eedback ha a ge s bo h he
luency and app op ia eness o lea ne s' language use. The ele ance o CLT o his s udy
lies in i s emphasis on he unc ional aspec s o language, which suppo lea ne s in

In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 59
iden i ying communica i e pu poses and adap ing language o audience, one, s yle, and
con ex ual a iables. This heo e ical g ounding, he e o e, in o ms he de elopmen o
lea ne s’ abili y o selec app op ia e language unc ions, aligning closely wi h he
objec i es o di ec ed w i ing asks.
Compe ency-Based App oach CBA
The compe ency-based app oach (CBA) is a pedagogical amewo k ha
sys ema ically de elops lea ne s’ explici knowledge, p ac ical skills, a i udes, and alues
h ough engagemen in au hen ic, con ex ually meaning ul asks (Hyland, 2002). CBA is
u ilized in his s udy o i s e idence-based emphasis on os e ing ans e able
compe encies, enabling s uden s o apply acqui ed skills in di e se eal-li e con ex s
(Hyland, 2002). In di ec ed w i ing, CBA equi es s uden s o comple e communica i e
w i ing asks ha eplica e au hen ic scena ios, such as composing le e s, p epa ing
epo s, o d a ing speeches. Lea ne s demons a e compe ence h ough pe o mance-
based assessmen s ha e lec eal-wo ld communica i e demands. Assessmen in CBA is
ou comes-o ien ed, wi h p o iciency measu ed by ask comple ion and he abili y o mee
au hen ic communica i e equi emen s (Hyland, 2002). Educa o s design ac i i ies and
ma e ials ha simula e p o essional o socie al en i onmen s, p o iding ongoing o ma i e
eedback o suppo he pe sonalized de elopmen o skills. The adop ion o CBA in his
esea ch is jus i ied by i s s a us as he manda ed pedagogical app oach in Came oon’s
na ional cu iculum. I s ocus on au hen ic ask pe o mance aligns he amewo k wi h he
s udy’s objec i e o e alua ing s uden s’ abili y o ans e w i en communica ion skills o
p ac ical w i ing con ex s, ensu ing bo h con ex ual and me hodological alignmen (Hyland,
2002).
In summa y, his s udy’s in eg a ed heo e ical amewo k acili a ed a sys ema ic
and nuanced analysis o how dis inc and combined ins uc ional me hodologies namely:
gen e-based, ask-based, p ocess-o ien ed, communica i e, and compe ency-based
app oaches a ec s uden achie emen in di ec ed w i ing asks. The empi ical indings no
only co obo a e bu also ex end p e ious esea ch (Hyland, 2007; Flowe & Hayes, 1981;
Canale & Swain, 1980) by demons a ing ha , despi e hei es ablished heo e ical
s eng hs, he p ac ical e icacy o hese models is subs an ially mode a ed by class oom
eali ies and b oade con ex ual a iables. The documen ed, pe sis en de ici s in con en
ele ance, gen e con o mi y, and mechanical accu acy ac oss a ious w i ing gen es
s ongly align wi h ex an li e a u e indica ing ha isola ed pedagogical in e en ions o en
ail o add ess he ull spec um o s uden needs in esou ce-limi ed se ings. These
unde pe o mances ein o ce he consensus in schola ly wo k ha e ec i e w i ing
ins uc ion necessi a es a delibe a e in eg a ion o explici gen e ins uc ion, ecu si e
p ocess-w i ing s a egies, and au hen ic communica i e p ac ice (Hyland, 2007; Ba al e
al., 2016).
Ne e heless, he implemen a ion and e alua ion o such in eg a i e amewo ks
a e challenged by empi ical complexi ies, no ably he o e lapping cons uc s among
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 60
pedagogical models and me hodological di icul ies in a ibu ing ou comes o speci ic
in e en ions. The s udy’s quan i a i e esul s u he subs an ia e indings by Nunan
(2004) and Hyland (2002) ega ding he decisi e ole o con ex ual a iabili y such as
dispa i ies in esou ce alloca ion, class size, and eache expe ise in shaping he ideli y and
e icacy o ins uc ional p ac ices. These esul s unde sco e he necessi y highligh ed by
Canale and Swain (1980) o adap i e, con ex ually esponsi e ins uc ional planning.
Consequen ly, he p esen e idence suppo s calls in he li e a u e o lexible, da a-d i en
s a egies, including di e en ia ed ins uc ion, a ge ed eache de elopmen , and eedback
sys ems esponsi e o local educa ional eali ies. The s udy’s limi a ions also highligh he
ongoing need o con ex ually g ounded esea ch o disen angle he in e ac ions among
mic o-le el a iables and pedagogical inno a ion in shaping w i ing ou comes. Fu u e
esea ch should build on hese indings by p obing he mechanisms by which con ex ual
and ins uc ional ac o s in e sec , he eby in o ming he design o scalable and sus ainable
pedagogical e o ms sui ed o Came oon's di e se educa ional landscape.
Me hodology
Resea ch Design
A mixed-me hods esea ch design was employed, in eg a ing quan i a i e and
quali a i e app oaches o add ess he esea ch objec i es. The quan i a i e componen
assessed he s a is ical ela ionship be ween pedagogical app oaches and s uden s’
achie emen in di ec ed w i ing, suppo ing he e alua ion o eaching s a egy
e ec i eness. The quali a i e componen examined s uden s' pe cep ions and eache s'
challenges, p o iding con ex ual and in e p e i e insigh s in o ac o s in luencing w i ing
ou comes. This design enabled comp ehensi e explo a ion and obus in e p e a ion o he
complex dynamics in di ec ed w i ing in eaching and lea ning, aligning wi h he dual ocus
on ou come e alua ion and expe ien ial unde s anding.
Popula ion and Sampling
The s udy a ge ed a popula ion o 100 Fo m Fi e echnical s uden s, balanced by
gende , alongside 10 English language eache s who we e di ec ly esponsible o he
ins uc ion o di ec ed w i ing. Two schools we e pu posi ely selec ed Go e nmen
Bilingual Technical High School, Bonama oumbe (public), and A lan a Bilingual
Comp ehensi e and Technical High School (p i a e)bo h loca ed in Bonabe i, Douala, o
p o ide con as ing ins i u ional en i onmen s o compa a i e analysis. The school
selec ion c i e ia inco po a ed conside a ions o s uden popula ion he e ogenei y, he
p esence o s uc u ed di ec ed w i ing cu icula, logis ical accessibili y, he willingness o
pe sonnel o pa icipa e, and documen ed engagemen in p io educa ional esea ch. This
me hodological decision was in luenced by he cu icula ele ance o Fo m Fi e, as
s uden s a his ins uc ional le el pa icipa e in he GCE O dina y Le el English Language
examina ion, which o mally assesses di ec ed w i ing. The sampling p o ocol employed a
mul i-s age p ocedu e: pu posi e selec ion o ins i u ionally dis inc schools, s a i ied
sampling o ensu e p opo ional ep esen a ion ac oss gende and academic s eams, and
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 61
pu posi e ec ui men o eache s wi h demons able expe ience in di ec ed w i ing
pedagogy.
Va iables o he S udy
Th ee a iables we e conside ed in his s udy, each de ined below o cla i y hei
oles wi hin he esea ch amewo k.
 Independen a iable: The eaching app oaches implemen ed by eache s.
These app oaches include gen e-based ( eaching o ms and s uc u es o di e en
ex ypes), ask-based (using eal-wo ld w i ing asks), communica i e ( ocusing on
in e ac ion and communica ion in w i ing), p ocess-o ien ed (emphasizing d a ing,
e ising, and eedback), and adi ional eache -cen e ed me hods ( elying on di ec
ins uc ion and modeling by he eache ).
 Dependen a iable: S uden s’ achie emen in di ec ed w i ing. This was
measu ed by s uden pe o mance in w i ing asks, ocusing on he ollowing
c i e ia:
(1) o ganiza ion and cohe ence ( he logical low and a angemen o ideas),
(2) con en de elopmen ( he dep h and ele ance o ideas),
(3) language use (accu acy and a ie y o ocabula y and g amma ), and
(4) mechanics (co ec use o spelling, punc ua ion, and capi aliza ion).
Wi hin he esea ch amewo k, mode a o s a e de ined as ac o s ha can
in luence he s eng h o di ec ion o he ela ionship be ween eaching app oaches
(independen a iable) and w i ing ou comes (dependen a iable). Examples include
school en i onmen and class size; o example, a smalle class size may enhance he
e ec i eness o a communica i e app oach. Media o s a e de ined as ac o s ha explain
how eaching app oaches a ec w i ing ou comes. In his s udy, he media o s include
eache s' eedback s a egies and esou ce a ailabili y. These ac o s modi y he impac o
eaching me hods by shaping he pa hway om ins uc ion o s uden achie emen . Fo
example, pe sonalized eedback can enhance he e ec i eness o a eaching me hod in
suppo ing s uden w i ing skills.
Da a Collec ion Ins umen s
To ensu e he alidi y and eliabili y o he esea ch ins umen s, a igo ous mul i-
ins umen da a-collec ion s a egy was employed, closely aligned wi h he ou lined
esea ch objec i es. Ini ially, ins umen de elopmen began wi h an ex ensi e e iew o
he schola ly li e a u e and consul a ion wi h ield expe s. Collec i ely, he iangula ion o
alida ed su eys, s uc u ed in e iews, and class oom obse a ion no only s eng hened
me hodological igo bu also enhanced he accu acy and c edibili y o indings ega ding
he de e minan s o achie emen in di ec ed w i ing.
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 62
 Class oom obse a ion guide o analyzing p e alen eaching me hods,
eedback echniques, and ins uc ional p ac ices.
 Ques ionnai es and in e iews wi h eache s and s uden s o cap u e
s uden s’ pe cep ions, challenges, and he con ex ual eali ies hey ace.
 Di ec ed w i ing asks we e adminis e ed o s uden s o ga he quan i a i e
da a e lec ing p o iciency in key dimensions o w i ing, including o ganiza ion,
con en de elopmen , language use, and mechanics. The hypo heses we e
subsequen ly e alua ed using in e en ial s a is ical analyses, including - es s o
compa e g oup means, ANOVA o assess di e ences ac oss mul iple eaching
app oaches, and eg ession analysis o iden i y p edic o s o s uden s' w i ing
achie emen . This enabled he iden i ica ion o s a is ically signi ican ela ionships
among he a iables unde in es iga ion. Tasks adminis e ed o s uden s we e
based on an a icle, a speech, a o mal le e , and a deba e.
Da a Collec ion P ocedu es
Da a collec ion was s uc u ed sys ema ically in o h ee in e ela ed phases o
ensu e alignmen be ween he da a sou ces and he co e esea ch ques ions. In he ini ial
phase, class oom obse a ions we e conduc ed o eco d eaching app oaches, ins uc ional
s a egies, and eache -s uden in e ac ions, speci ically hose ela ed o di ec ed w i ing
ins uc ion. These obse a ions di ec ly add essed he i s wo esea ch ques ions
ega ding p e alen eaching p ac ices and he challenges eache s encoun e .
Subsequen ly, he second phase in ol ed adminis e ing s uc u ed w i ing asks o
s uden s, enabling quan i a i e e alua ion o hei pe o mance ac oss key domains such as
o ganiza ion, con en de elopmen , language use, and mechanics. These asks p o ided
empi ical da a ele an o he esea ch ques ions on s uden achie emen and i s link o
pedagogical p ac ices. In he inal phase, s anda dized ques ionnai es and semi-s uc u ed
in e iews we e adminis e ed o bo h s uden s and eache s o elici de ailed pe spec i es
on ins uc ional challenges, he in luence o con ex ual ac o s, and pe cei ed e ec i eness
o a ious eaching app oaches. In e iew p omp s we e e ined using obse a ional
insigh s o maximize con ex ual ele ance and hema ic dep h. This phased, in eg a i e da a
collec ion s a egy ensu ed ha each me hod con ibu ed a ge ed e idence o add ess
speci ic esea ch ques ions, esul ing in comp ehensi e, me hodologically cohe en da a
collec ion ully aligned wi h he s udy’s in es iga i e objec i es.
Quan i a i e da a explo a ion began wi h desc ip i e s a is ics o examine eaching
app oaches, ollowed by in e en ial s a is ics o es he hypo heses. Be o e emba king on
he co ela ion analysis, c i ical assump ions such as no mali y and mul icollinea i y we e
igo ously es ed o ensu e analy ical obus ness. The co ela ion analysis hen unpacked
ela ionships among s uden s' w i ing ou comes, eache eedback s a egies, and
con ex ual a iables. As o quali a i e da a examina ion, i began wi h ansc ibing and
e iewing all in e iew ansc ip s, ield no es, and ques ionnai e esponses o ensu e
accu acy. Open coding was employed o gene a e ini ial ca ego ies, pa ing he way o axial
coding, which unpacked connec ions and iden i ied ecu ing hemes. The coding p ocess
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 69
inco po a ed in o class oom ou ines, using manageable g oup sizes and clea pee
e alua ion c i e ia o accommoda e la ge classes. This aligns wi h he objec i e o
imp o ing s uden s’ unde s anding o gen e con en ions, which could be assessed by hei
p o iciency in iden i ying gen e ea u es in ex s. Thi d, scheduling should be modi ied o
alloca e dedica ed ime o p ocess-o ien ed w i ing p ac ice, suppo ing s uden
engagemen a mul iple s ages o composi ion. Fou h, egula in-se ice p o essional
de elopmen wo kshops on e idence-based w i ing pedagogy should be es ablished and
suppo ed by eache pee -coaching ne wo ks o acili a e p ac ical applica ion and
sus ained g ow h. Finally, as a long- e m objec i e, cu icula enhancemen s should
inco po a e au hen ic case s udies and applica ion-based ac i i ies ha demons a e he
oca ional ele ance o English w i ing o echnical s uden s. This app oach is in ended o
inc ease s uden mo i a ion and align ins uc ion wi h eal-wo ld communica ion demands.
Conclusion
In eg a ing p ocess-based, gen e-based, ask-based, communica i e language, and
compe ency-based ins uc ional app oaches, especially when combined wi h imely
eedback, can subs an ially imp o e s uden ou comes in di ec ed w i ing. The ollowing
analysis is o ganized in o h ee sec ions: quan i a i e indings on s uden pe o mance, an
examina ion o ins uc ional s a egies and hei implica ions, and ecommenda ions o
eache de elopmen . Quan i a i e assessmen o s uden wo k in le e w i ing, a icle
composi ion, speeches, and deba es indica es consis en unde pe o mance in con en
ele ance, cla i y o exp ession, g amma ical accu acy, o ganiza ional cohe ence, one
app op ia eness, and adhe ence o equi ed leng h. Each ins uc ional app oach add esses
speci ic challenges: p ocess-based ins uc ion suppo s con en de elopmen ; gen e-based
s a egies cla i y disciplina y con en ions; ask-based me hods si ua e language in
au hen ic ac i i ies; communica i e language eaching de elops in e ac ional compe ence;
and compe ency-based app oaches a ge speci ic skill acquisi ion. Howe e , sys emic
ba ie s such as low s uden mo i a ion, inadequa e esou ces, and la ge class sizes impede
p og ess. Add essing hese challenges equi es a ge ed p o essional de elopmen o
eache s o s eng hen hei abili y o implemen hese pedagogical s a egies and he eby
imp o e s uden achie emen in di ec ed w i ing.
Re e ences
Alghasab, M. (2025). English as a o eign language (EFL) seconda y school s uden s’ use o
a i icial in elligence (AI) ools o de eloping w i ing skills: Un eiling p ac ices
and pe cep ions. Jou nal o Language and Educa ion Resea ch, 15(2), 134–152.
Angg aeni, S., Pu a, R., & Wulanda i, T. (2025). E ec s o u ilizing sel - egula ed lea ning-
based ins uc ion on EFL s uden s’ academic w i ing skills: A mixed-me hod
in es iga ion. S udies in Fo eign Language Educa ion, 11(1), 44–67.
Annisa, N., Rahmawa i, F., & Hidaya , R. (2025). Explo ing he s a egies used by English
eache s in EFL high schools. In e na ional Jou nal o Educa ion Resea ch, 14(1),
55–68.

In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 70
Ba al , M. (2014). Task sequencing and ask complexi y in adi ional e sus online classes.
In M. Ba al , R. Gilabe , & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and ins uc ed
second language lea ning (pp. 95–122). London: Bloomsbu y.
Ba al , M., Gu zynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). The e ec s o ask complexi y and
class oom en i onmen on lea ne s’ engagemen wi h he language. In M. Sa o
& S. Ballinge (Eds.), Pee in e ac ion and second language lea ning: Pedagogical
po en ial and esea ch agenda (pp. 209–239). Ams e dam: John Benjamins.
Bla ch o d, P., Baines, E., Ku nick, P., Ma in, C., & Cla e, K. (2010). Class oom con ex s:
Connec ions be ween class size and wi hin-class g ouping. B i ish Jou nal o
Educa ional Psychology, 71, 119–142.
Canale, M. (1980). Theo e ical bases o communica i e app oaches o second language
eaching and es ing. Applied Linguis ics, 1(1), 1–47. Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y
P ess.
Çeşme, H., & Geçikli, M. (2025). EFL lea ne s’ me apho ical insigh s in o a mul i-modal
w i ing in e en ion. Humani ies and Social Sciences Communica ions, 12(1), 1–
12.
Cheng, X., Hung, S., & Wu, H. (2022). Teache s helping EFL s uden s imp o e hei w i ing.
In e na ional Jou nal o Applied Linguis ics and English Li e a u e, 11(2), 87–
101.
Dinsa, M. T. (2023). EFL s uden s’ w i ing s a egies, sel -e icacy, and w i ing pe o mance:
A desc ip i e-co ela ion s udy. GIST Educa ion and Lea ning Resea ch Jou nal,
26, 93–115.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language lea ning and eaching. Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Goshu, A. (2024). Using eache –s uden w i ing con e ences o enhance lea ne s’ L2
w i ing skills. Jou nal o Second Language W i ing, 65, 101239.
Hillocks, G. (1983). Bes w i ing ins uc ion uses all class oom esou ces, s udy says.
Educa ion Week, 3(15).
Hyland, K. (2007). Gen e pedagogy: Language, li e acy and L2 w i ing ins uc ion. Jou nal o
Second Language W i ing, 16(3), 148–164.
Hyland, K. (2008). W i ing heo ies and w i ing pedagogies. Indonesian Jou nal o English
Language Teaching, 4(2), 91–110.
K ashen, S. D. (2009). Diagnos ic w i ing assessmen : The de elopmen and alida ing o a
a ing scale. F ank u : Pe e Lang.
Liao, M., & Wong, C. (2010). E ec o dialogue jou nal on L2 s uden w i ing luency,
e lec ions, anxie y and eigh h-g ade s uden s. In e na ional Jou nal o
Ins uc ion, 10(1), 237–254.
Li lewood, W. (1981). Communica i e language eaching. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y
P ess.
Mbepwo Fongod, G., & Nalo a, E. M. (2025). P ojec -based lea ning and he de elopmen o
s uden s’ w i ing skills in English language in seconda y schools in Fako
Di ision o he Sou h Wes Region o Came oon. Wo ld Jou nal o Ad anced
Resea ch and Re iews, 26(3), 2787–2803.
Moluayonge, G. E., & Pa k, I. (2017). E ec o challenges wi h class size, class oom
managemen and a ailabili y o ins uc ional esou ces on science eache s’
eaching p ac ices in seconda y schools. Jou nal o Science Educa ion and
Technology, 41(3), 287–298.
Mpoche, K. (2018). Resea ch me hodology: A s uden companion. Macacos: Douala.
Mpoche, K., & Ngoh, A. (2012). The impac o CLT on ad anced lea ne s o English as a
second language: The case o s uden s o he Uni e si y o Yaoundé I. Came oon
Jou nal o S udies in he Commonweal h (CJSC).
In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen al Issues in Educa ion and Humani ies 1(1):68-85 E engeneng
P a g e | 71
Muluh, N. C. (2020). Re hinking w i ing skills de elopmen in Came oon. In eg Humani a is.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language eaching. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
RAND Co po a ion. (2020). W i ing ins uc ion in U.S. class ooms: Di e ging pe spec i es o
eache s ac oss con en a eas. RAND Educa ion and Labo .
Richa d, J. C., & Rodge s, T. S. (1986). App oaches and me hods in language eaching.
Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Sha ack, R. M., Alemnge, F. L., & E a, E. R. (2020). Class oom assessmen o essay w i ing and
s uden s’ lea ning o English language in seconda y schools in he Sou h Wes
Region o Came oon. In e na ional Jou nal o Science Academic Resea ch, 4(1),
34–42.
Song, S., & Abdullah, H. (2025). English as a o eign language (EFL) w i ing ins uc ion: A
e iew o bibliome ic analysis. Jou nal o English Language Teaching and
Linguis ics, 10(2), 112–132.
Sowell, J. (2024). W i ing ins uc ion in la ge seconda y school EFL classes: A quali a i e
pilo s udy. Jou nal o Language Educa ion Resea ch, 14(3), 201–219.
Tasisa, D. (2024). EFL s uden s’ w i ing s a egies, sel -e icacy, and w i ing pe o mance.
La in Ame ican Jou nal o Educa ional Resea ch, 18(2), 44–59.
U , P. (1991). A cou se in language eaching. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
U , P. (2009). A cou se in language eaching. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Yolande, O. E., & Ngwa, P. (2023). Compe ency-based app oach and w i ing skills
de elopmen in Came oon seconda y schools. In e na ional Jou nal o Science
and Con empo a y Inno a i e A s, 4(2), 45–57.