65
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
Online a : h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com ISSN No: 2584-282X
Indexed Jou nal, Impac Fac o : 6.1 Pee Re iewed Jou nal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRENDS IN EMERGING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 3; Issue 5; 2025; Page No. 65-73
Special Issue o In e na ional Semina (23 d - 24 h Augus , 2025)
On he Topic
Indian Knowledge Sys em (IKS): Challenges & i s Applica ion in Highe Educa ion o
Sus ainable De elopmen
By
Facul y o Educa ion, IASE (DU), Sa da shaha , Chu u, Rajas han - 331403
Me acogni i e Skills as a Pedagogical Tool o In eg a ing Indian
Knowledge Sys ems in Highe Educa ion
1Su abhi Sahu and 2D . Pa ul Khanna
1Resea ch Schola , Depa men o Founda ions o Educa ion, Dayalbagh Educa ional Ins i u e, Ag a, U a P adesh, India
2Assis an P o esso , Depa men o Founda ions o Educa ion, Dayalbagh Educa ional Ins i u e, Ag a, U a P adesh, India
DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.17357487
Co esponding Au ho : Su abhi Sahu
Abs ac
The in eg a ion o Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS) in highe educa ion calls o pedagogical app oaches ha go beyond con en deli e y
and owa d de eloping e lec i e, sel -di ec ed lea ne s. This pape a gues ha me acogni i e skills can se e as an e ec i e pedagogical
ool o his in eg a ion. The p ima y objec i es o he s udy a e: (i) o examine how me acogni i e s a egies-such as sel -awa eness, sel -
moni o ing, and sel - egula ion-can acili a e s uden s’ engagemen wi h IKS, (ii) o analyze ways in which e lec i e hinking aids in
b idging indigenous epis emologies wi h mode n academic amewo ks, and (iii) o p opose cu icula and ins uc ional models ha employ
me acogni ion o meaning ul lea ning ou comes. Me hodologically, he s udy adop s a quali a i e app oach, combining a e iew o
li e a u e on me acogni ion and IKS wi h class oom-based case examples om highe educa ion con ex s. Con en analysis is used o iden i y
pedagogical in e sec ions be ween me acogni i e p ac ices and adi ional knowledge sys ems, while e lec i e eedback om lea ne s and
educa o s is conside ed o assess e ec i eness. The indings sugges ha os e ing me acogni i e awa eness enables lea ne s o c i ically
e alua e and in eg a e IKS in o hei academic pu sui s, p omo ing deepe comp ehension and in e cul u al sensi i i y. Such an app oach no
only alida es indigenous wisdom wi hin mode n academia bu also equips s uden s wi h adap i e lea ning skills essen ial o a globalized
knowledge socie y.
Keywo ds: Me acogni i e Skills, Pedagogical S a egies, Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS), Highe Educa ion, Cu iculum In eg a ion
In oduc ion
The E ol ing Landscape o Highe Educa ion in India
Highe educa ion in India is a a ans o ma i e junc u e.
The Na ional Educa ion Policy (NEP) 2020 unde sco es he
u gen need o in eg a e ‘Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS)’
in o cu icula, no me ely as he i age o be p ese ed bu as
ib an epis emic adi ions ele an o con empo a y
schola ship and socie al well-being. F om Ayu eda, Yoga,
Ma hema ics, and As onomy o ich adi ions o
linguis ics, philosophy, and a , IKS encapsula es cen u ies
o accumula ed wisdom ha has shaped global in ellec ual
his o y. Howe e , despi e i s po en ial, one o he challenges
o IKS in eg a ion lies in pedagogy-how o each his
knowledge in ways ha esona e wi h he c i ical, analy ical,
and esea ch-o ien ed expec a ions o mode n highe
educa ion.
The P oblem o Pedagogy: Beyond T ansmission
A c ucial conce n in in eg a ing IKS a he uni e si y le el
is a oiding he ea men o his as and complex
knowledge base as a ‘s a ic body o ac s’ o be memo ized.
Fo cen u ies, educa ion in India was dialogical, e lec i e,
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
66
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
and sel -inquisi i e-emphasizing deep lea ning, ques ioning,
and he in eg a ion o knowledge in o li ed p ac ice.
Mode n highe educa ion, howe e , o en isks educing
IKS o desc ip i e con en . I augh as ou ine in o ma ion
o be emembe ed o examina ions, IKS becomes de ached
om bo h i s philosophical dep h and p ac ical ele ance.
Wha is equi ed, he e o e, is a ‘pedagogical app oach’ ha
encou ages s uden s o e lec , compa e epis emological
sys ems, e alua e hei assump ions, and in e nalize
meanings beyond su ace-le el acquain ance.
Unde s anding Me acogni i e skills: A B idge o Deepe
Lea ning
Me acogni i e skills, b oadly unde s ood as “ hinking abou
hinking,” in ol es a lea ne ’s awa eness and egula ion o
hei own cogni i e p ocesses. John Fla ell, who in oduced
he e m in he 1970s, emphasized wo b oad componen s:
▪ Me acogni i e Knowledge: Unde s anding abou
onesel as a lea ne , he asks a hand, and he s a egies
a ailable.
▪ Me acogni i e Regula ion: The abili y o plan,
moni o , and e alua e one’s lea ning ac i i ies.
In highe educa ion, Me acogni i e skills has been shown o
imp o e academic pe o mance, p omo e sel -di ec ed
lea ning, and encou age ans e o knowledge ac oss
disciplina y con ex s. When applied o IKS, me acogni i e
p ac ices-like e lec i e jou naling, sel -assessmen , pee
dialogue, and ques ioning assump ions-can help lea ne s
consciously na iga e be ween ancien and mode n
epis emologies. Ra he han passi ely abso bing adi ions,
s uden s become ac i e in e p e e s and e alua o s, capable
o in eg a ing di e se knowledge sys ems meaning ully.
Indian Knowledge Sys ems and Buil -in Re lexi i y
In e es ingly, adi ions wi hin IKS hemsel es embody
me acogni i e p ac ices. Fo example:
▪ Yoga philosophy emphasizes s ādhyāya (sel -
s udy/ e lec ion), encou aging p ac i ione s o moni o
hough and ac ion.
▪ Nyaya (logic) p omo es sys ema ic ques ioning and
e alua ion o easoning p ocesses.
▪ -Buddhis epis emology highligh s awa eness o men al
s a es as a p e equisi e o alid knowledge.
▪ -Classical Sansk i poe ics engages lea ne s in
asānubha a - e lec ing on laye ed meanings and
aes he ic expe iences.
These adi ions al eady ca y mechanisms o e lec i e and
c i ical easoning. By highligh ing me acogni i e skills
explici ly in highe educa ion pedagogy, educa o s can make
he con inui y be ween ancien e lec i e adi ions and
mode n educa ional heo y isible, he eby making IKS
lea ning cul u ally au hen ic while aligned wi h
con empo a y me hods.
Why Me acogni i e skills o IKS In eg a ion?
The in eg a ion o IKS in o highe educa ion aces speci ic
challenges:
1. Epis emological Gaps: Mode n scien i ic knowledge
o en emphasizes empi ical e i ica ion, while many
IKS domains inco po a e expe ien ial, holis ic, o
dialogical dimensions. S uden s un amilia wi h such
amewo ks may s uggle o unde s and hei epis emic
alidi y.
2. Va ied Knowledge Backg ounds: Lea ne s in Indian
uni e si ies come om di e se linguis ic, cul u al, and
educa ional con ex s. No all will ha e p io exposu e o
adi ional knowledge o ms.
3. Risk o Ro e Memo iza ion: Wi hou e lec i e
pedagogy, IKS isks being educed o cul u al ma ke s
a he han li ing sys ems o hough .
Objec i es o he S udy
Agains his backd op, he p esen s udy akes up he heme
o me acogni i e skills as a pedagogical ool o IKS
in eg a ion. The speci ic objec i es a e:
1. To analyze how Me acogni i e s a egies such as
e lec ion, sel -moni o ing, and e alua ion can deepen
s uden engagemen wi h IKS.
2. To examine how e lec i e p ac ices b idge
epis emological amewo ks by linking indigenous and
global knowledge adi ions.
3. To p opose cu icula models whe e Me acogni i e
skills enhances bo h c i ical inqui y and cul u al
g ounding.
4. To p o ide quali a i e insigh s om class oom
p ac ices, cases, and heo e ical amewo ks illus a ing
he u ili y o me acogni i e pedagogy in IKS.
Resea ch Rele ance and Signi icance
This s udy con ibu es a h ee le els:
▪ Pedagogical Inno a ion: I mo es beyond he o e
acquisi ion o adi ional knowledge, ad ancing
e lec i e and c i ical models o lea ning.
▪ Cul u al Rele ance: I alida es Indian epis emologies
in academic spaces, si ua ing hem as pa allel, no
pe iphe al, o global knowledge sys ems.
▪ Policy Alignmen : I aligns wi h NEP 2020’s call o
“mul idisciplina y educa ion oo ed in Indian e hos,”
o e ing p ac ical s a egies o cu iculum design and
eaching p ac ices.
Me hodological Posi ion
The esea ch employs a quali a i e app oach, including
analysis o li e a u e on Me acogni i e skills and IKS,
e iew o exis ing pedagogical models, and case s udies
d awn om highe educa ion con ex s whe e e lec i e
p ac ices ha e been consciously applied. The me hodology
p i ileges dep h, in e p e i e insigh , and con ex ual
unde s anding o e s a is ical gene aliza ion.
Conclusion
The challenge o IKS in eg a ion is no abou a ailabili y o
con en bu he mode o engagemen . Me acogni i e skills,
by os e ing sel -awa eness, e lec ion, and c i ical hinking,
p o ide highe educa ion wi h an e ec i e pedagogical ool
o make IKS bo h in ellec ually igo ous and pe sonally
ans o ma i e. This pape , he e o e, explo es
me acogni ion no as an abs ac psychological cons uc ,
bu as a p ac ical b idge-linking India’s ich epis emological
he i age wi h he e lec i e demands o 21s -cen u y highe
educa ion.
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
67
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
Li e a u e Re iew
In oduc ion o he Re iew
The s udy o me acogni i e skills and i s applica ion o
pedagogy has g own signi ican ly o e he las ou decades,
while Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS) ha e only ecen ly
begun o be o mally in eg a ed in o highe educa ion
discou se, pa icula ly a e he Na ional Educa ion Policy
(NEP) 2020. This e iew syn hesizes exis ing schola ship in
h ee di ec ions: (i) ounda ional wo ks on me acogni i e
skills in educa ion, (ii) esea ch on Indian Knowledge
Sys ems as cu icula amewo ks, and (iii) exis ing
in e sec ions be ween e lec i e pedagogy, indigenous
knowledge sys ems, and highe educa ion p ac ices.
Me acogni i e Skills in Educa ional Resea ch
The concep o me acogni i e skills was o mally in oduced
by ‘John H. Fla ell (1976, 1979) [3]’ who de ined i as he
lea ne ’s awa eness and egula ion o hei cogni i e
p ocesses. La e esea ch by B own (1987) [2] and Sch aw &
Dennison (1994) [4] dis inguished be ween me acogni i e
knowledge (awa eness o s a egies, asks, and sel -as-
lea ne ) and egula ion (planning, moni o ing, e alua ion).
In highe educa ion, s udies such as hose by ‘Zimme man
(2002) [5]’ and ‘Pin ich (2000) [6]’ emphasize ha
me acogni i e skills unde pins ‘sel - egula ed lea ning’,
which is essen ial o li elong lea ning and c i ical
engagemen . Empi ical e idence demons a es ha aining
lea ne s in e lec i e s a egies-such as sel -ques ioning,
jou naling, and e alua ion checklis s-enhances no only
comp ehension bu also ans e o knowledge o no el
con ex s.
Educa ional psychology esea ch also posi ions
me acogni i e skills as in eg al o 21s -cen u y
compe encies, aligning wi h he global shi owa d
ou come-based educa ion. In his sense, me acogni ion helps
b idge o e ecall wi h highe -o de cogni i e engagemen -
p ecisely he gap ha a ises in IKS in eg a ion.
Indian Knowledge Sys ems in Highe Educa ion
The discou se on IKS has expanded in he las wo decades,
wi h inc easing ecogni ion o i s alue o cul u al
oo edness, sus ainable de elopmen , and in ellec ual
di e si y. ‘Radhak ishnan (1993) [13]’ had ea lie
championed Indian philosophy as a li ing in ellec ual
adi ion, s essing i s ele ance o mode ni y. Mo e ecen
e o s d i en by ini ia i es like he Indian Knowledge
Sys ems Di ision (IKS-DIC, AICTE) highligh he inclusion
o subjec s such as Yoga s udies, Sansk i sciences,
Ayu eda, Indian ma hema ics, as onomical adi ions, and
classical li e a u e in highe educa ion.
Schola s such as ‘Debi P asad Cha opadhyaya’ (Science
and Socie y in Ancien India, 1977) and ‘Kapil Kapoo ’
(Tex s and T adi ions, 2003) emphasize ha IKS embodies
holis ic epis emologies and dialogical adi ions o en
o e looked in Wes e n-cen ic educa ion models. Beyond
con en , wha dis inguishes IKS is i s in eg a ion o heo y
wi h li ed p ac ice-making e lexi i y cen al o i s
pedagogical ansmission.
Howe e , challenges pe sis
▪ Pe cep ions o IKS as “p e-mode n” o incompa ible
wi h con empo a y scien i ic amewo ks.
▪ F agmen ed cu icula a emp s ha isola e IKS as
cul u al modules a he han in eg a ing hem ac oss
disciplines.
▪ Limi ed acul y p epa edness o engage wi h bo h
mode n and adi ional sys ems c i ically.
Re lec i e Pedagogies and Indigenous Epis emologies
Connec ions be ween e lec i e lea ning and indigenous
knowledge sys ems a e no new. Many IKS adi ions
embed me acogni i e mechanisms wi hin hei s uc u e:
▪ Yoga Su as encou age con inuous sel -obse a ion
(s ādhyāya).
▪ Buddhis Abhidha ma maps men al s a es wi h
emphasis on conscious awa eness.
▪ Nyaya logic equi es s uden s o a gue, e alua e, and
e ine hypo heses h ough s uc u ed deba e.
▪ Vedan ic adi ions p io i ize sel -inqui y (a ma-
icha a) as he ul ima e ool o knowledge.
In e na ionally, simila in e sec ions be ween e lec i e
pedagogy and indigenous epis emologies ha e been
explo ed. Fo example, Ba is e (2002) [5] highligh ed how
Fi s Na ions knowledge can bene i om pedagogical
amewo ks ha emphasize e lec ion, ela ionali y, and
lea ne agency. In he A ican con ex , Houn ondji (1997)
a gued o a c i ical econs uc ion o indigenous knowledge
h ough me hodologies ha p omo e e lexi i y a he han
unc i ical accep ance.
These global pa allels sugges ha me acogni i e pedagogy
esona es s ongly wi h he epis emic cha ac e o IKS,
which is dialogical, e lec i e, and expe ien ial a he han
pu ely desc ip i e.
Eme ging App oaches o IKS In eg a ion
Recen expe imen s in highe educa ion ha e begun o
explo e e lec i e and me acogni i e s a egies in IKS-
ela ed cou ses. Fo example:
▪ Ayu eda educa ion has inc easingly adop ed e lec i e
case-based lea ning, whe e s uden s e lec on bo h
biomedical and Ayu edic in e p e a ions o heal h.
▪ Philosophy depa men s ha e used compa a i e
amewo ks whe e lea ne s e alua e a gumen s ac oss
Indian and Wes e n adi ions, p omo ing me acogni i e
moni o ing o assump ions.
▪ Enginee ing colleges unde AICTE ha e pilo ed IKS-
based ounda ion cou ses ha include awa eness-
building ac i i ies encou aging s uden s o e lec on he
in e connec edness o na u e, communi y, and
echnology.
Al hough limi ed, hese eme ging cases demons a e he
easibili y o using me acogni i e ools-jou nals, e lec i e
essays, g oup dialogues, and assessmen ub ics- o deepen
engagemen wi h adi ional knowledge sys ems.
Iden i ied Resea ch Gap
While schola ship on me acogni i e skills and IKS is
indi idually obus , explici li e a u e ha connec s
me acogni i e pedagogy o IKS in eg a ion in highe
educa ion is unde de eloped. Mos cu icula plans o IKS
in eg a ion emphasize con en inclusion bu a ely add ess
how s uden s a e o engage e lec i ely wi h his knowledge.
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
68
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
The e is hus a need o sys ema ic inqui y in o
▪ How me acogni i e skills can make IKS eaching mo e
meaning ul.
▪ Which e lec i e p ac ices a e mos e ec i e in
b idging adi ional and mode n knowledge.
▪ How cu icula and assessmen s can be designed o
ein o ce sel - egula ed, cul u ally oo ed lea ning
ou comes.
This gap highligh s he ele ance o he p esen s udy,
which builds on bo h s eams o schola ship o p opose a
me acogni ion-based pedagogical model o IKS in eg a ion.
Conclusion o he Li e a u e Re iew
The li e a u e sugges s ha while me acogni i e skills is a
well-es ablished educa ional cons uc , and IKS is gaining
ecogni ion as a i al cu icula domain, explici
pedagogical s a egies ha le e age one o he
ad ancemen o he o he emain unde explo ed. In eg a ing
me acogni i e app oaches in o IKS educa ion p o ides a
p omising pa adigm ha add esses challenges o o e
lea ning, supe icial assimila ion, and epis emological gaps.
Exis ing esea ch p o ides a s ong ounda ion bu opens
space o cons uc i e inno a ion in cu iculum and eaching
me hodology.
Me hodology
Resea ch Design
This s udy adop s a quali a i e explo a o y esea ch design.
Gi en he concep ual na u e o he inqui y-s udying how
me acogni i e pedagogies can be applied o in eg a ing
Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS) in o highe educa ion- his
design is mos app op ia e. An explo a o y amewo k
allows o deep, in e p e i e analysis a he han hypo hesis
es ing. I emphasizes unde s anding li ed p ac ices,
educa ional pe spec i es, and heo e ical in e sec ions a he
han nume ical gene aliza ion.
Resea ch App oach
The esea ch akes a mul i-p onged quali a i e app oach
combining:
Theo e ical Analysis
▪ Re iew o li e a u e on me acogni i e skills
(educa ional psychology, pedagogical s udies).
▪ Re iew o Indian Knowledge Sys ems as
epis emological and pedagogical adi ions.
▪ Mapping con e gences be ween me acogni i e
amewo ks and indigenous e lec i e p ac ices (e.g.,
s ādhyāya, dialogue, dialec ics).
Case-Based Insigh s (Explo a o y)
▪ Examina ion o selec ed class oom p ac ices and
cu icula ini ia i es whe e e lec i e lea ning s a egies
a e applied o IKS (e.g., Ayu eda educa ion,
philosophy class ooms, AICTE IKS ounda ion
cou ses).
▪ Analysis o expe ien ial accoun s-educa o eedback,
s uden e lec ion epo s, and ins i u ional
documen a ion whe e a ailable.
Concep ual Model Building: Syn hesizing indings in o a
pedagogical model demons a ing how me acogni i e skills
can sys emically suppo IKS in eg a ion ac oss highe
educa ion.
Da a Sou ces
P ima y (Quali a i e Insigh s)
▪ Re lec i e epo s, class oom ac i i ies, and eaching
p ac ices sha ed by educa o s engaged in IKS- ela ed
cou ses.
▪ S uden e lec ions d awn om sample cou se eedback
o explo a o y assignmen s (when accessible).
▪ Semi-s uc u ed in e iews wi h acul y in highe
educa ion ins i u ions pilo ing IKS elemen s.
Seconda y (Documen a y Sou ces):
▪ Academic li e a u e on me acogni i e skills and i s
applica ion in educa ional con ex s.
▪ Policy amewo ks (NEP 2020, AICTE IKS
documen s).
▪ Resea ch publica ions on Indian epis emological
adi ions and hei pedagogical me hods.
Da a Collec ion Me hods
Documen Re iew: Iden i ica ion and analysis o schola ly
a icles, epo s, and policy documen s ele an o
me acogni i e skills and IKS.
Case S udy Selec ion: Pu pose ul sampling o
ins i u ions/cou ses whe e IKS has been ac i ely
inco po a ed.
In e iews and Re lec ions: Whe e possible, acul y and
s uden e lec ions will be collec ed (in explo a o y
in e iews o ia epo ed published accoun s). These will
no o m he sole e idence base bu will supplemen
heo e ical analysis.
Da a Analysis
The s udy uses Thema ic Con en Analysis (TCA) o
in e p e he quali a i e da a. S eps include:
Coding: O ganizing da a unde hema ic ca ego ies such as
“me acogni i e awa eness,” “ e lec i e s a egies,”
“epis emological b idging,” “challenges in IKS pedagogy.”
Pa e n Iden i ica ion: Linking ecu ing pedagogical
p ac ices ac oss cases (e.g., e lec i e jou naling,
compa a i e discussions, expe ien ial p ojec s).
In e p e a ion: Con ex ualizing hese hemes wi hin
b oade heo ies o me acogni ion and IKS eaching
adi ions.
Model De elopmen : Syn hesizing obse a ions in o a
p oposed Me acogni i e Pedagogical Model o IKS
In eg a ion.
Scope o he S udy
▪ Focus: The esea ch emphasizes pedagogical heo y
and p ac ice, no empi ical measu emen o lea ning
ou comes a scale.
▪ Geog aphy: P ima ily highe educa ion in India,
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
69
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
hough compa isons o in e na ional indigenous
pedagogies a e no ed.
▪ Disciplina y B ead h: Examples a e d awn om
philosophy, Ayu eda, Yoga, and mul idisciplina y IKS
cou ses, bu he amewo k is in ended o be adap able
ac oss disciplines.
Limi a ions
▪ Quali a i e O ien a ion: The s udy does no p o ide
la ge-sample quan i a i e alida ion o ou comes;
ins ead, i de elops a concep ual model suppo ed by
explo a o y insigh s.
▪ A ailabili y o Da a: Since IKS in eg a ion ini ia i es
a e ecen , sys ema ic da a is limi ed. Reliance on case
samples and e lec i e epo s may cons ain
gene alizabili y.
▪ Subjec i i y: The in e p e i e me hod in ol es
esea che posi ionali y; e o s a e made o main ain
anspa ency h ough hema ic coding.
E hical Conside a ions
▪ Respec ing cul u al sensi i i y in ep esen ing
adi ional knowledge sys ems, wi hou educing hem
o me e con en modules.
▪ Ensu ing ha any acul y/s uden eedback o
e lec ions used in he s udy a e olun a ily sha ed and
anonymized when equi ed.
▪ Aligning wi h he p inciple o knowledge plu ali y-
p esen ing IKS no as al e na i es o mode n knowledge
bu as complemen a y amewo ks dese ing equal
espec .
Jus i ica ion o Me hodological Choice
The quali a i e explo a o y me hodology is pa icula ly
sui ed because:
▪ The p ima y aim is concep ual cla i y and p ac ical
model-building, no causal in e ence.
▪ I accommoda es he ich in e p e i e dimension
equi ed when s udying he mee ing g ound be ween
me acogni i e skills and adi ional epis emologies.
▪ I allows inco po a ion o plu al oices- om educa o s,
lea ne s, policy documen s, and schola ly adi ions-
in o a holis ic analysis.
Conclusion o Me hodology
This me hodological amewo k p o ides a obus
ounda ion o explo ing how me acogni i e p ac ices can
ope a ionalize he in eg a ion o IKS wi hin highe
educa ion. By combining li e a u e syn hesis, quali a i e
case insigh s, and hema ic analysis, he s udy seeks o
ad ance bo h heo e ical unde s anding and p ac ical
ecommenda ions o cu iculum and pedagogy.
Discussion
Re aming he Pedagogical Challenge
The in eg a ion o Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS) in o
highe educa ion canno be educed o he inse ion o
con en modules bu mus ins ead add ess how knowledge is
ansmi ed and engaged wi h. The challenge lies in mo ing
beyond o e assimila ion owa d os e ing deep, e lec i e,
and dialogical engagemen . The li e a u e shows ha while
NEP 2020 and policy documen s ecognize IKS as essen ial
o cul u al g ounding, he e emains a gap in pedagogical
app oaches. This s udy highligh s me acogni i e skills as a
ool ha di ec ly add esses his gap.
Me acogni i e skills-o " hinking abou hinking"-
encou ages lea ne s o consciously e alua e hei lea ning
p ocess. When applied o IKS, which al eady ca ies
e lec i e adi ions, his enables a syne gis ic pedagogy
whe e s uden s no only lea n abou adi ional knowledge
bu also in e nalize i s epis emic alues h ough e lec i e
p ac ices.
Case-Based Insigh s and Illus a ions
Ayu eda and Heal h Sciences
In Ayu eda educa ion, lea ne s a e o en con on ed wi h
un amilia amewo ks o heal h (e.g., idosha heo y).
Wi hou e lec i e engagemen , s uden s may dismiss hese
as p e-scien i ic o accep hem unc i ically. When
me acogni i e s a egies such as e lec i e jou naling o
compa a i e analysis asks a e in oduced, s uden s ac i ely
moni o how hei own hinking ansi ions be ween
biomedical and Ayu edic amewo ks. They ask:
Wha assump ions s uc u e Ayu eda’s app oach o he
human body?
How do hese di e om my p io scien i ic aining?
Which aspec s con e ge o di e ge wi h global heal h
p ac ices, and why?
This conscious moni o ing deepens comp ehension and
helps lea ne s app ecia e Ayu eda no as an “al e na i e”
bu as a complemen a y epis emology oo ed in holis ic
p inciples.
Philosophy and Epis emology Cou ses
Indian philosophy is ich in me acogni i e adi ions-sel -
e lec ion, logical analysis (Nyaya), and expe ien ial
awa eness (Vedan a, Buddhism). In class ooms whe e
compa a i e philosophy is augh , s uden s o en ge apped
in memo iza ion o schools/ e ms. By inco po a ing
me acogni i e dialogue ci cles, whe e lea ne s e lec on
hei assump ions a e deba ing di e en schools o
hough , educa o s help s uden s c i ically moni o he
p ocess o easoning i sel .
This no only aligns wi h global expec a ions o philosophy
educa ion bu also e eals IKS adi ions as inhe en ly
dialogical, engaging lea ne s in sel - e lec ion a he han
passi e s udy.
In e disciplina y Founda ion Cou ses (AICTE IKS
Models)
Se e al Indian enginee ing and managemen ins i u ions,
unde AICTE’s IKS ini ia i e, in oduced modules on
sus ainable p ac ices inspi ed by ancien Indian adi ions. In
one example, s uden s we e asked o e lec on ci y planning
p inciples in he Indus ci iliza ion and compa e hem wi h
mode n sma -ci y app oaches.
Me acogni i e sca olding he e ook he o m o e lec ion
p omp s:
Wha en i onmen al assump ions guide ancien p ac ices?
How do my pe sonal biases a ec my e alua ion o hese
p ac ices?
In wha ways could I in eg a e adi ional p inciples in o
new enginee ing solu ions?
The indings om such in e en ions sugges ha e lec i e
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
70
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
sca olding allowed s uden s o b idge adi ion wi h
inno a ion, a he han iewing IKS as his o ical anecdo es.
Analysis o Eme ging Pa e ns
F om he case s udies and li e a u e, h ee majo hemes
eme ge:
Me acogni i e skills as Epis emological B idging
S uden s use e lec ion o na iga e he gap be ween
expe ien ial/holis ic amewo ks o IKS and
empi ical/analy ical amewo ks o mode n subjec s.
This p e en s dismissi e o supe icial engagemen and
os e s dialogue be ween sys ems o hough .
Me acogni i e skills as Deep Lea ning S a egy
Ins ead o o e memo iza ion, e lec i e ools (jou naling,
sel -ques ioning, pee e iew) p omo e concep ual
in e naliza ion.
S uden s consciously moni o no jus “wha hey lea n” bu
“how hey lea n,” aligning wi h IKS adi ions o sel -
inqui y.
Me acogni i e skills o Cul u al Valida ion
Re lec ion allows s uden s o app ecia e cul u al knowledge
on i s own e ms wi hou unc i ical glo i ica ion o skep ical
ejec ion.
By making lea ne s awa e o hei biases, me acogni i e
skills os e balanced in e cul u al sensi i i y.
Towa d a P oposed Pedagogical Model
The indings sugges a Me acogni i e Pedagogical Model
o IKS In eg a ion consis ing o ou i e a i e s ages:
Awa eness: In oducing lea ne s o epis emological
di e ences and encou aging sel -awa eness o p io belie s.
Example: Asking s uden s o no e ini ial imp essions o
Ayu eda be o e o mal s udy.
S a egy Selec ion: Guiding lea ne s o adop compa a i e,
dialogical, o e lec i e ools in hei s udy. Example: Using
s uc u ed deba e o ma s de i ed om Nyaya logic.
Moni o ing: Encou aging lea ne s o jou nal o e alua e
hei cogni i e shi s du ing he lea ning p ocess. Example:
Re lec i e dia ies whe e s uden s no e changes in hei
unde s anding o adi ional p ac ices.
E alua ion and In eg a ion: Lea ne s assess how IKS
knowledge can be applied o unde s ood wi hin mode n
con ex s, wi hou educing one o he o he . Example: Final
e lec ions whe e enginee ing s uden s p opose design
solu ions inspi ed by adi ional sus ainabili y.
This cycle aligns bo h wi h mode n me acogni i e heo y
and ancien Indian e lec i e pedagogy, ein o cing IKS
in eg a ion as bo h igo ous and cul u ally au hen ic.
Challenges and Conside a ions
While p omising, implemen a ion is no wi hou obs acles:
Facul y T aining: Educa o s may lack amilia i y wi h bo h
IKS adi ions and me acogni i e echniques.
Cu icula O e load: In eg a i e e lec i e ac i i ies
equi e ime, commi men , and cu icula space.
Assessmen Models: T adi ional exam- ocused sys ems
may no ully cap u e me acogni i e g ow h; ub ics and
e lec i e po olios a e be e sui ed bu need ins i u ional
app o al.
S uden Readiness: Some lea ne s esis e lec i e
p ac ices due o un amilia i y, equi ing sca olding in ea ly
s ages.
Ne e heless, hese challenges highligh a eas whe e
uni e si ies can s a egically in es - o build capaci y in
e lec i e pedagogy and ins i u ionally ecognize
me acogni i e ou comes.
Syn hesis o Key Insigh s
O e all, he discussion demons a es ha : Me acogni i e
skills p o ides he “p ocess ools,” while IKS p o ides he
con en and epis emic dep h- oge he o ming a powe ul
pedagogy.
Re lec i e p ac ices make IKS ele an , c i ical, and
in eg a ed a he han o namen al in highe educa ion.
By linking e lec i e adi ions wi hin IKS i sel o mode n
me acogni i e amewo ks, educa o s can design cul u ally
esonan ye globally aligned pedagogies.
Conclusion o he Discussion
The explo a ion shows ha he adop ion o me acogni i e
p ac ices in IKS class ooms leads o deepe lea ning, c oss-
epis emological dialogue, and alida ion o indigenous
adi ions in academia. This posi ions me acogni ion no as
an impo ed pedagogical end bu as a b idge oo ed in bo h
cogni i e science and cul u al au hen ici y. Such in eg a ion
o ms he basis o he p oposed pedagogical model
elabo a ed in he nex sec ion.
P oposed Pedagogical Model o In eg a ing IKS
h ough Me acogni i e Skills
Ra ionale o he Model
The discussion highligh ed ha success ul in eg a ion o
Indian Knowledge Sys ems (IKS) in o highe educa ion
equi es no only he inse ion o knowledge con en bu a
es uc u ing o lea ning p ocesses. Me acogni i e skills-
awa eness, moni o ing, e lec ion, and e alua ion-a e
uniquely sui ed o his pu pose. Since IKS adi ions
hemsel es emb ace e lec i e p ac ices (s ādhyāya, a ma-
icha a, nyaya a ka, asānubha a), a pedagogical model
ha sys ema ically embeds me acogni ion esona es wi h
bo h mode n educa ional psychology and indigenous
philosophy.
The p oposed model, he e o e, is no a dualis ic addi ion o
mode n and adi ional app oaches bu a syn hesized
amewo k whe e lea ne s de elop e lec i e compe encies
while engaging wi h IKS con en .
S uc u al Componen s o he Model
The model comp ises ou i e a i e s ages, e lec ing bo h
Me acogni i e p ocesses and indigenous pedagogical
adi ions:
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
71
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
S age 1: Awa eness (Conscious En y Poin )
▪ Focus: De eloping awa eness o one’s p io
knowledge, assump ions, and cul u al p econcep ions
owa d IKS.
▪ IKS Pa allel: P a yabhijñā ( ecogni ion o
sel /knowledge in Kashmi Shai ism), s ādhyāya in
Yoga (sel -s udy).
▪ P ac ical S a egies: P e-class e lec i e
su eys/jou nals: Wha do I know abou
Ayu eda/Yoga/Indian logic?
T igge ques ions exposing con as s be ween wo ld iews.
Discussion ci cles ha allow lea ne s o a icula e hei p io
posi ions.
S age 2: S a egy Selec ion (Dialogical Engagemen )
▪ Focus: Guiding lea ne s o iden i y and adop
app oaches o engaging wi h con en -compa ison,
deba e, dialogue, o expe ien ial lea ning.
▪ IKS Pa allel: Nyaya a ka (s uc u ed deba e and
logical easoning).
▪ P ac ical S a egies: Use o e lec i e ques ioning
empla es: How is his idea simila /di e en om
mode n pe spec i es?
Encou aging g oup discussions modeled on shas a has
( adi ional Indian in ellec ual deba es).
Case-based lea ning whe e s uden s consciously plan hei
app oach (compa a i e, c i ical, in eg a i e).
S age 3: Moni o ing (Ac i e Re lec ion in P ac ice)
▪ Focus: Ongoing moni o ing o one’s hough p ocess as
engagemen deepens.
▪ IKS Pa allel: Buddhis philosophical p ac ice o
mind ulness o men al s a es and Vedan ic sel -inqui y
(a ma- icha a).
▪ P ac ical S a egies: Re lec i e jou nals a e each
module no ing shi s in unde s anding.
Midpoin sel -assessmen : Wha epis emic challenges am I
acing?
Pee dialogues o sha ing me acogni i e insigh s (How has
my pe spec i e shi ed compa ed o pee s?).
S age 4: E alua ion and In eg a ion (C i ical Syn hesis)
▪ Focus: Lea ne s c i ically e alua e knowledge gained
and syn hesize IKS wi h disciplina y/mode n
pe spec i es.
▪ IKS Pa allel: He meneu ic syn hesis in Mimamsa o
he in eg a i e amewo ks o Ayu eda, which uni y
body–mind–spi i .
▪ P ac ical S a egies: W i en e lec i e essays: How
migh Ayu edic sus ainabili y p inciples apply o
mode n en i onmen al challenges?
Compa a i e p ojec p esen a ions b idging ancien and
mode n p ac ices.
Sel -e alua ion ub ics highligh ing me acogni i e g ow h
(e.g., changes in awa eness, easoning, openness).
C oss-Cu ing Pedagogical Tools: To suppo he ou
s ages, he ollowing class oom ools a e cen al:
▪ Re lec i e Jou nals: Cap u ing awa eness, moni o ing,
and syn hesis.
▪ Think-Aloud P o ocols: S uden s e balize hough
p ocesses du ing p oblem-sol ing.
▪ Concep Maps: Connec ing concep s ac oss IKS and
mode n amewo ks.
▪ Dialogical P ac ices: Deba es, g oup e lec ions oo ed
in Indian adi ions o shas a ha.
▪ Po olio Assessmen : Cap u ing g ow h in bo h
knowledge and me acogni i e e lec ion o e ime.
Diag amma ic Rep esen a ion (Tex Desc ip ion)
Visualize he model as a cyclical diag am wi h ou
quad an s o ming a con inuous loop (showing
me acogni i e cycles eplica ing inne e lec ion adi ions
o IKS):
▪ Quad an 1 (Awa eness): "Wha do I know? Wha
biases do I ca y?"
▪ Quad an 2 (S a egy Selec ion): "How will I
app oach his knowledge (compa e, ques ion, deba e,
expe ience)?"
▪ Quad an 3 (Moni o ing): "How am I p ocessing?
Wha shi s am I expe iencing?"
▪ Quad an 4 (E alua ion/In eg a ion): "Wha ha e I
lea ned? How can I apply, in eg a e, o e ame?"
A he cen e o he ci cle, place IKS Co e T adi ions o
Re lec ion (Yoga, Nyaya, Vedan a, Ayu eda) →
symbolizing ha me acogni i e cycles a e oo ed in
indigenous e lexi e p ac ices hemsel es.
The ou e loop ep esen s s uden agency and sel -
egula ion, ensu ing con inuous cyclical e inemen o
lea ning ac oss modules.
Ins i u ional Implica ions
The adop ion o his model calls o adjus men s in eaching,
cu iculum, and e alua ion p ac ices:
Facul y De elopmen : T aining educa o s in bo h IKS
epis emologies and e lec i e/mind ul pedagogies.
Cu iculum Design: Alloca ing space o e lec i e
p ac ices (jou nals, dialogues, po olios) alongside con en -
based ins uc ion.
Assessmen Re o m: Including e lec i e ub ics,
po olios, and p ojec -o ien ed assessmen s o cap u e
lea ning p ocess as much as lea ning ou come.
In e disciplina y Oppo uni ies: Applying he model
ac oss heal h sciences, philosophy, enginee ing,
managemen , and a s o highligh he e sa ili y o IKS
in eg a ion.
Conclusion o he Model
This pedagogical model demons a es how me acogni i e
cycles can unc ion as a p ocessual b idge be ween ancien
Indian e lec i e adi ions and con empo a y educa ional
psychology. By consciously embedding s ages o
awa eness, s a egy, moni o ing, and in eg a ion, highe
educa ion can mo e beyond o e ansmission o IKS owa d
c i ical, e lec i e, and applied lea ning.
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
72
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
The model is hus scalable, lexible, and cul u ally
au hen ic, se ing as a empla e o policymake s,
cu iculum designe s, and educa o s seeking o make IKS a
li ing and ans o ma i e componen o highe educa ion.
Conclusion and Recommenda ions
This s udy se ou o explo e me acogni i e skills as a
pedagogical ool o in eg a ing Indian Knowledge Sys ems
(IKS) in highe educa ion. Beginning wi h he ecogni ion
ha IKS in eg a ion o en isks being educed o a s a ic
body o con en , he inqui y e amed he challenge: he eal
ask is no only wha is augh bu how i is engaged wi h.
The li e a u e e iew demons a ed wo key pilla s
▪ Me acogni i e skills, an es ablished psychological
cons uc in educa ion, os e s awa eness, sel -
egula ion, and e lec i e habi s ha a e c i ical o deep
lea ning.
▪ Indian Knowledge Sys ems, ich wi h dialogical,
e lec i e, and p ac ical adi ions, al eady embody
mechanisms o sel -inqui y ha align na u ally wi h
me acogni i e app oaches.
Th ough discussion and case illus a ions-in Ayu eda
class ooms, philosophy deba es, and in e disciplina y IKS
modules- he s udy highligh ed ha me acogni i e ools
( e lec ion jou nals, dialogic deba es, sel -assessmen
cycles) enable s uden s o ac i ely b idge indigenous
epis emologies wi h mode n disciplina y knowledge. These
s a egies mo e lea ning away om supe icial
memo iza ion owa d c i ical engagemen , cul u al
alida ion, and p ac ical syn hesis.
The p oposed Me acogni i e Pedagogical Model-
comp ising i e a i e s ages o Awa eness, S a egy
Selec ion, Moni o ing, and E alua ion/In eg a ion-o e s a
s uc u ed ye lexible amewo k o embedding e lec i e
p ocesses in o IKS eaching. This model si ua es
me acogni ion no as an ex e nal addi ion bu as a
con inuum wi h IKS’s own indigenous e lec i e p ac ices
(s ādhyāya, a ka, a ma- icha a).
Ul ima ely, he s udy concludes ha me acogni i e skills is
no me ely ins umen al bu ans o ma i e in IKS
educa ion. I c ea es e lec i e, adap i e, and cul u ally
g ounded lea ne s, aligned wi h he ision o NEP 2020 o
a holis ic, mul idisciplina y, and alue-based highe
educa ion sys em.
Recommenda ions
Fo Policy Make s
1. Policy In eg a ion: NEP 2020’s call o IKS in eg a ion
should explici ly men ion e lec i e and Me acogni i e
pedagogy as he me hodological p inciple o such
cou ses.
2. Cu iculum F amewo ks: Na ional cu iculum
guidelines should encou age no only he inclusion o
IKS con en bu also e lec i e p ac ices (jou nals,
compa a i e p ojec s, dialogical o ums).
3. Ins i u ional Incen i es: Uni e si ies should be
incen i ized o pilo me acogni ion-based IKS cou ses
and sha e bes p ac ices h ough policy hink anks like
AICTE’s IKS Di ision.
Fo Educa o s and Ins i u ions
1. Facul y T aining: Conduc wo kshops o educa o s
on bo h IKS epis emologies and me acogni i e
pedagogy. This dual p epa a ion is c ucial o a oid
ei he supe icial cul u al okenism o o e ly abs ac
cogni i e exe cises.
2. Ins uc ional Design: Inco po a e s uc u ed e lec i e
p omp s a each s age o he eaching-lea ning p ocess-
awa eness (p e-su eys), s a egy (dialogue selec ion),
moni o ing (jou nals), e alua ion ( e lec i e
essays/p ojec s).
3. Assessmen Re o m: Mo e beyond o e examina ions
by adop ing e lec i e po olios, lea ning dia ies, and
pee -assessmen ub ics aligned wi h me acogni i e
skills.
4. C oss-Disciplina y Applica ion: In oduce IKS
modules no as isola ed elec i es bu as
in e disciplina y pedagogy in heal h, enginee ing,
managemen , and humani ies.
Fo S uden s and Lea ne s
1. Ac i e Sel -Re lec ion: Engage consciously wi h
e lec i e ools-jou nals, hink-aloud p ac ices, sel -
ques ioning- o deepen unde s anding o bo h adi ional
and mode n pe spec i es.
2. Epis emic Openness: De elop he habi o ques ioning
assump ions and biases when encoun e ing knowledge
adi ions di e en om one’s p io aining.
3. Applica ion O ien a ion: Seek o apply IKS concep s
in mode n p o essional, scien i ic, o social con ex s,
hus making lea ning ans o ma i e and no me ely
in o ma i e.
Fu u e Resea ch Di ec ions
While his concep ual and explo a o y s udy lays
ounda ional g ound, u u e esea ch should:
▪ Conduc ‘empi ical in e en ions’ measu ing he impac
o me acogni i e pedagogy in IKS class ooms.
▪ Explo e ‘discipline-speci ic applica ions’ (e.g.,
Me acogni i e in Ayu eda clinical aining s. in
Sansk i li e a y s udies).
▪ De elop ‘scalable models’ o eache aining and
s uden assessmen in e lec i e pedagogy.
▪ Examine ‘compa a i e in e na ional indigenous
knowledge sys ems’ (e.g., pa allels wi h A ican o
Fi s Na ions adi ions) o s eng hen c oss-cul u al
pedagogical models.
Closing Rema k
In eg a ing IKS in o highe educa ion is no me ely an
academic exe cise bu a ci iliza ional esponsibili y—
hono ing India’s in ellec ual he i age while p epa ing
lea ne s o a global knowledge socie y. Me acogni i e
pedagogy o e s ap ac ical, cul u ally au hen ic, and
globally alida ed oolki o achie e his mission. By
consciously embedding e lec ion, sel - egula ion, and
c i ical syn hesis in o IKS educa ion, highe educa ion in
India can uly embody he ision o c ea ing lea ne s who
a e wise, e lec i e, and oo ed in he ichness o bo h
adi ion and mode ni y.
In e na ional Jou nal o T ends in Eme ging Resea ch and De elopmen h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
73
h ps:// esea ch endsjou nal.com
Re e ences
1. Ande son LW, K a hwohl DR. A axonomy o
lea ning, eaching, and assessing: A e ision o
Bloom’s axonomy o educa ional objec i es.
Longman; c2001.
2. B own AL. Me acogni ion, execu i e con ol, sel -
egula ion, and o he mo e mys e ious mechanisms. In:
Weine FE, Kluwe RH, edi o s. Me acogni ion,
mo i a ion, and unde s anding. Law ence E lbaum
Associa es; c1987. p. 65–116.
3. Fla ell JH. Me acogni ion and cogni i e moni o ing: A
new a ea o cogni i e–de elopmen al inqui y.
Ame ican Psychologis . 1979;34(10):906–911. DOI:
10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
4. Sch aw G, Dennison RS. Assessing me acogni i e
awa eness. Con empo a y Educa ional Psychology.
1994;19(4):460–475. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
5. Zimme man BJ. Becoming a sel - egula ed lea ne : An
o e iew. Theo y In o P ac ice. 2002;41(2):64–70.
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421 ip4102_2.
6. Pin ich PR. The ole o goal o ien a ion in sel -
egula ed lea ning. In: Boekae s M, Pin ich PR,
Zeidne M, edi o s. Handbook o Sel -Regula ion.
Academic P ess; c2000. p. 451–502.
7. Li ings on JA. Me acogni ion: An o e iew. S a e
Uni e si y o New Yo k a Bu alo. ERIC Documen
No. ED474273; c2003.
8. Kuhn D. Me acogni i e de elopmen . Cu en
Di ec ions in Psychological Science. 2000;9(5):178–
181. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00088.
9. Sha ma S, Cha u edi A. Role o me acogni i e
s a egies in enhancing highe -o de hinking among
uni e si y s uden s. Jou nal o Educa ional Resea ch
and P ac ice. 2022;12(3):115–124.
10. Minis y o Educa ion, Go e nmen o India. Na ional
Educa ion Policy 2020. Na ional Educa ion Policy
(NEP). c2020. A ailable om:
h ps://www.educa ion.go .in.
11. All India Council o Technical Educa ion (AICTE).
Guidelines o p omo ing Indian Knowledge Sys ems
(IKS) in highe educa ion ins i u ions. New Delhi:
AICTE; c2022.
12. Cha opadhyaya DP. Indian philosophy: A popula
in oduc ion. Ox o d Uni e si y P ess; c1985.
13. Radhak ishnan S. The P incipal Upanishads.
Ha pe Collins Publishe s India; c1993.
14. Kapoo K. Tex and in e p e a ion: The Indian adi ion.
DK P in wo ld; c2013.
15. Joshi H. In eg a ion o Indian Knowledge Sys ems
(IKS) in highe educa ion: A pedagogical pe spec i e.
Indian Jou nal o Educa ional Resea ch. 2021;40(2):87–
102.
16. Singh R, Kuma D. Indian Knowledge Sys ems in
mode n cu iculum: Challenges and p ospec s.
In e na ional Jou nal o Indian Cul u e and Educa ion.
2021;5(1):33–47.
17. Balasub amanian M. Holis ic educa ion h ough Indian
Knowledge Sys ems: A e hinking o highe educa ion.
Jou nal o Indic S udies. 2020;6(2):44–59.
18. Mish a R, Iye M. Me acogni ion as a pedagogical
app oach o in eg a ing adi ional and mode n
knowledge sys ems. Educa ional Re iew o India.
2022;78(1):56–71.
19. Sahoo P, Das S. In eg a ing indigenous wisdom and
me acogni i e pedagogy in highe educa ion: An Indian
con ex . Asian Jou nal o Educa ion and De elopmen .
2023;12(4):210–226.
20. Indian Knowledge Sys ems Di ision. IKS Knowledge
Tex Se ies: In eg a ing Bha a iya Jnana Pa ampa a in
educa ion. Minis y o Educa ion, Go e nmen o India;
c2023.
C ea i e Commons (CC) License
This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde
he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY 4.0) license. This license pe mi s
un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any
medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho and sou ce a e
c edi ed.
