B.Log

B.LOG
comple e ela i i y.o g
No embe 23, 2025
1 [ 2025.09.17 ] Humans a e no in con ol
by Amenoum
The species o humans seems o belie e i is in con ol o he de elopmen s
on Ea h and i s own a e. Howe e , o all he illusions p esen in he human
wo ld, his is he g ea es o hem all. And, inc easingly, i is u ning in o a big
delusion.
Wha is uling his wo ld a e na u al o ces. F om he pe spec i e o hese
o ces, humans a e no hing bu ano he ool a disposal, ha can be used o
p oduce ce ain e ec s.
When i comes o he clima e, en i onmen , o , e olu ion in gene al, he e
a e wo majo o ces a play. One o ce is ac ing o conse e he p esen s a e,
he o he is ac ing o b ing he sys em in o ano he equilib ium. In he con ex
o clima e, he o me is ying o p ese e he global a e age empe a u e o
abou 14 ◦C, he la e is ying o b ing i o a much la ge alue (22-23 ◦C,
pe my hypo heses[1]). And he la e is, ob iously, winning.
E idence o he illusion (and delusion) is moun ing up.
The expec ed slowdown in he ise o a mosphe ic g eenhouse gases du ing
he COVID-19 pandemic was no obse ed[2]. Since 2006, me hane le els a e
ising apidly, while he di ec an h opogenic con ibu ion is dec easing[3].
An h opogenic o cing is a pa o na u al egula ion. A ecen s udy has
shown ha he dec ease o an h opogenic ae osols in he 21s cen u y in he
No he n Hemisphe e has been p ecisely compensa ed by he la ge ae osol load-
ing wi h wild i es and olcanic ac i i y in he Sou he n Hemisphe e[4]. This is
s ong e idence ha , when i comes o Ea h’s de elopmen and egula ion, i is
he e ec ha ma e s, whe he he cause is an h opogenic o non-an h opogenic
is i ele an (in o he wo ds, he o ce is in e p e ing humans as one o he na -
u al ools a disposal). Thus, humans a e no in con ol o Ea h’s clima e, o
any hing, in he bigge scheme o hings. Humans may choose o s op p oducing
one o bo h o he e ec s (posi i e o nega i e o cing), bu ha is unlikely o
a ec he o ces - he e a e al e na i e ways o p oduce he same e ec s.
Ano he in e es ing example o his is he coupling be ween wa s and olcan-
ism, as he e ec s on clima e and he en i onmen can be e y simila be ween
1
he wo. Thus, inc ease in wa s leads o a dec ease in equi alen olcanism, and
ice e sa[5].
I you don’ belie e i , well, ha ’s no su p ising o unexpec able - in o de
o be ooled, i is desi able o a ool o belie e i is in con ol, o he wise i could
become useless o he o ces. I am almos useless. Bu being useless o he
o ces does no imply ha one is wo hless in gene al. I simply implies one is
ela i ely neu al, and genuine neu ali y is in incible in he ba le o pola ized
o ces.
When i comes o he as e oid de ense o he ba le agains clima e change,
people end o say hey’ e igh ing o he plane . A bla an lie, o cou se.
Plane can, and has li ed h ough, massi e as e oid bomba dmen s and massi e
clima e change ex emes. I su i es, whe he as a ball o i e, a ball o ice, o
some hing in be ween. The wo majo o ces a e no igh ing o he su i al
o he plane ei he , hey a e simply igh ing o e he plane ’s s a e, o ene gy
le el. I he plane wan s o change, i may e ol e some hing like humans o
kick-s a he ansi ion. Bu a e he ansi ion, ob iously, i any li e o ms a e
o emain on su ace, a e hose no igh ing agains he new s a e.
Ob iously, i he plane can e ol e li e as needed, people who say hey’ e
igh ing o he plane a e no e en igh ing o he li e on i . They’ e
simply igh ing o p ese e he cu en s a e. Whe he ha ’s good o
bad is, o cou se, ela i e. I he plane needs change, hen ha ’s bad
o he plane . Bu i ’s ac ually ha d o be su e o wha he plane
needs, wan s, o wha ’s bes o i , when one can ha dly unde s and i .
The e o e, neu ali y seems o be he only choice i one doesn’ wan o
isk doing a bad hing he e, and wi h ha , isk i s own ex inc ion.
2 [ 2024.06.09 ] Cold-hea ed e e
by Amenoum
Ou body uses hea o igh pa hogens, bu no hea alone, as hea alone is
no enough. Ele a ed hea inc eases chemical eac ions which enhances induced
oxygen dep i a ion, acidi y, inc ease in diges i e enzymes, oxici y and nu ien
dep i a ion. All his is used o subdue pa hogens, al hough i a ec s he body
as well.
To inc ease body empe a u e, he pa o he b ain measu ing and con ol-
ling body empe a u e sends a alse eading o he body. The body pa s a e
in o med ha he empe a u e is lowe han no mal so he body s a s shak-
ing (and we may e en eel cold) o inc ease he empe a u e. Tha ’s how e e
s a s.
2
Tha ’s one in e p e a ion. In he o he , he b ain is no decei ing he
body, a he he b ain simply se s he he mos a o new alue and he
body obeys. Bu i he e’s no decep ion, why do we eel cold? Decep ion
may be he e no o con use he body o ou sel es bu o con use he
pa hogen. This decep ion is p obably e lec ed in one kind o hys e esis
- whe e he empe a u e e ec on pa hogens is delayed. The hys e esis is
pa icula ly e ec i e agains pa hogens ope a ing on sho - e m in e es s
as i dec eases hei awa eness o immune esponse, imp in ing on hem
an illusion o con ol and in incibili y.
Decep ion is p obably e y common, in bo h, pa hogens and immune
sys ems. The only di e ence may be in how conscious i is.
Wha is in e es ing abou e e is ha i is no localized - i a ec s he
whole body. This is no he case in a ypical in lamma ion, whe e he immune
esponse is localized.
The e a e se e al possible easons o a non-localized esponse:
•inabili y o loca e he pa hogen,
•global pa hogen p esence (me as asis) o e ec , which i sel may equi e
a p io ela i ely p olonged decep ion o he immune sys em,
•lack o highly a ge ing mechanisms ha would be e ec i e agains he
pa hogen,
•co up ion o he immune sys em.
A global esponse is a isk bu wo h ying i he isk is lowe o he cells o he
body han i is o he pa hogen. The sel - egula ion co ela ed wi h immune
sys ems is p esen on Ea h su ace and p obably deep below i as well.
Animals on Ea h (including people) a e dying wi h ising empe a u es,
combined wi h inc easing acidi y (in he oceans, ainwa e , soil), inc easingly
anoxic condi ions, oxici y and nu ien dep i a ion (hunge ). And he e is a
s ong hys e esis in he sys em, e.g., mos o hea is bu e ed in he oceans and
a lo o esponse is baked in (e.g., ice mel , sea le el ise) - scheduled o occu
g adually o e ime, o ab up ly wi h occasional egime shi s and accele a ions
due o posi i e eedback e ec s.
We all know who he pa hogen is he e, bu he bu e ing o hea in he
oceans ells us explici ly ha he pa hogen is no in he ocean.
Ea hquakes would be a signal o e e and I do a gue, in my wo ks, ha
hese a e on he inc ease. Es ablished science claims ha appa en inc ease in
ea hquakes is no eal - i is he e ec o inc ease in seismome y and epo ing.
3
Bu ha ’s p obably an imp in ed illusion, as pa o he decep ion in he Ea h’s
immune sys em.
Humans s ill e use o admi ha Ea h is ali e ( ha ’s p obably wha de ines
a pa hogen - inabili y o disc imina e be ween a li ing being and a esou ce o
exploi a ion) which means hey s ill don’ ealize hey’ e being decei ed.
So he news oday a e ull o people dying o high empe a u e and hea
wa es, bu no, i ’s no he hea alone ha ’s killing hem, jus like he hea
alone is no killing any pa hogen.
This educ ionism, o ixa ion o a single ac o ( empe a u e, CO2, e c.)
is also ypical o a pa hogen. Bu his is jus he beginning. A some poin
humans will ha e o acknowledge ( o eal, no in emp y wo ds) ha he ex-
ploi a ion o holism is in he long- e m suicidal o any educ ionism. -
2.1 A e humans inhe en ly des uc i e?
J. Bendell is his book B eaking oge he (which I highly ecommend) a gues
ha humans a e no inhe en ly des uc i e. He a gues ha in human his o y
people we e o en ac ing as a pa o Ea h’s immune sys em - helping i h i e,
no as a pa hogen - helping i die. He claims ha i is he mone a y sys em in
place which is o cing people o be des uc i e and he claims ha his sys em
has been o ced on hem by he eli e. This sys em is based on deb s o p i a e
banks, which equi es unlimi ed g ow h o he economy in o de no o collapse.
He neglec s he ac ha people e ol e - people o oday a e no he same
as people o yes e day. Jus like heal hy cells become co up and u n in o
cance cells, people, o e ime, go co up and became cance . I is wi h his
co up ion ha hey’ e ins alled a sys em ha ensu es hei unlimi ed g ow h.
The sys em in place is hus coupled wi h people in place. Yes, he e’s inequali y
bu he majo i y wan s g ow h, no ma e how much hey ha e. The majo i y
o people wan o e en need such sys em in place. They migh say o he wise
bu y o emo e he hings p o ided o hem by his sys em and see wha
happens. In case o pola ized people ( he majo i y), no hing nice. Bu ha ’s
he o he p oblem Bendell is no immune o - ea men o he whole o humani y
as single species. He p o ides examples whe e people oday wo k qui e nicely
suppo ing o e en enhancing he ecosys em, a he hen being des uc i e. He
seems o belie e ha i he cu en mone a y sys em is emo ed o ans o med
acco dingly, he majo i y o humani y would beha e in such way. Mos likely,
howe e , ha ’s no ue. People oday who e ec i ely a e a pa o Ea h’s
immune sys em chose o be ha way. Some chose o be ha way once hey’ e
ealized ha being a pa o he ins alled mone a y sys em implies des uc ion
o he plane . Bu mos people don’ e en wan o know any hing abou i . By
now hey do know e y well abou he des uc ion, bu hey jus don’ wan
o be awa e o i . This is why hey happily chose censo ship o uncom o able
u hs o e change. They will only change hei beha io by o ce. Ei he by
an au ho i a ian egime o na u e, o a combina ion o bo h. And wi h each
shi o clima e o a new egime, he sys ems in powe will shi e en mo e
owa d au ho i a ian egimes. Since he eli e has he powe o ou sou ce hei
4
p oblems, i is he people, no he eli e, who will be o ced o change hei
li es yle o he wo se ( h ough inc easing axes, high in la ion, e c.). This will be
highly co ela ed wi h inc easing ebellion and des abiliza ion o sys ems, which
will ul ima ely ully collapse. Remo al o he sys em by o ce, howe e , will
no emo e co up ion p esen in majo i y o people and, wi hou i , hey will
p obably quickly ins all ano he one, which may be di e en in he beginning,
bu will o e ime co up (p obably mo e quickly han he p e ious one). In
o he wo ds, ans o ma ion o sys ems mus be coupled wi h ans o ma ion
o people in o de o ep esen a pe manen and eal change, a he han a
sho - e m illusion.
T ans o ma ion is co ela ed wi h he climax o auma. The bigge he
auma he highe is he p obabili y o mo e pe manen ans o ma ion. Bu
he bigge he auma he highe is he possibili y o dea h as well.
A majo ex inc ion may be in e p e ed hen as a il e , o a na u al selec ion
o su i al o hose i o ans o ma ion. In ha con ex , one could say ha
some o us a e o will be he chosen ones. I is my belie ha , he soone you
choose o li e di e en ly, he g ea e is he p obabili y you a e o will be he
chosen one.
3 [ 2023.11.15 ] Li e is de ac o e e ywhe e, bu
whe e’s he p o i ?
by Amenoum
I has been p o en ha mic obes exis high in Ea h’s a mosphe e, well abo e
40 km[6], hey’ e been de ec ed e en a 400 km heigh [7]. And his is a global
phenomenon. As e e y hing, g a i y is pulling hem down and since hey a e
mo e dense han he su ounding ai , hey a e, jus like ain, alling down. Su e,
he e is some la e al mo ion (which may be co ela ed wi h la e al momen a o
me eo s) bu he adial componen mus be signi ican . On Venus, hey could
be kep a loa o signi ican amoun s o ime due o ex eme supe - o a ion o
he a mosphe e, induced g a i y wa es and pho opho esis[8], bu on Ea h, no
as much. And i hey’ e no alling o millions o yea s, wi h hei popula ions
cons an ly eplenished, hey a e de ac o coming om space - wi h me eo s
(possibly mo e in come s han as e oids). Possibly e en in he smalles cosmic
dus pa icles, albei , hey’ e p obably a i ing al eady dead in such cases.
I hey would emain in a mosphe e much longe , hei p esence pe haps
could be explained by ejec ion om Ea h in la ge as e oid impac s and
maybe e en ex eme olcanic e up ions, bu such e en s a e oo a e o
be iable solu ion candida es.
Mic obes ha e been de ec ed in me eo i es on Ea h (p obably as ossils
5

as well), bu hey a e, by he e ec i e policy, conside ed con amina ion, e en
hough he dominan species in hese a e o en ex emophiles esis an o high
adia ion (e.g., Rub obac e adio ole ans) - which is no he case o he su -
ounding soil[9].
I he mic obes a e cons an ly aining down on Ea h, hey mus be de ac o
e e ywhe e and hey a e also cons an ly aining on o he celes ial bodies (on
Venus, e en mo e han on Ea h).
So why is his ac no ye es ablished as such among he popula ion?
Is his eally a ac ? In o he wo ds, is his ac ue?
No hing can be p o en absolu ely so no ac is an absolu e ac . A e all,
many scien i ic ac s ha e u ned ou o be lies. The a e age mains eam
scien is e ec i ely beha es like "ex ao dina y li e" is a ac , o absolu e
u h. "Mic obes in me eo i es a e con amina ion" - ano he such ac .
The e a e many such ac s in mode n science, making i e y eligious.
My ex ensi e esea ch, using a holis ic app oach (which, on a e age, is
e y lacking in mains eam), o e he yea s has led me o belie e, wi h
g ea con idence, ha li e is e e ywhe e. To me, hus, a leas occasional
i no cons an , ing ess o mic obes om space o Ea h - is a ac .
Con a y o a e age mains eam, I equi e e idence o show wi hou
ambigui y ha his is no ue, a he han he o he way a ound.
I am awa e ha mic obes a e cons an ly li ed up om Ea h and can
each g ea heigh s, bu all a emp s o explain mic obes a 400 km
heigh wi h Ea h o igin a e specula i e. Some specula e hey ide on
he low o ions[10] (elec ic cu en s), some specula e hey ide on ex-
eme e ical winds[11]. Bu hese ha e p oblems and can ha dly explain
hea ie pa icles (la ge han nanome e o de ) beyond 120 km heigh .
E en i ha ’s ue, he mic obial popula ion a g ea heigh s is p obably
domina ed by hose coming om space, he opposi e being ue nea
su ace. Viable (li ing) mic obes alling o Ea h ha e been de ec ed
beyond 40 km heigh . This is ha de o explain wi h mic obes li ed up
om Ea h’s su ace because hese mic obes ha e o pass h ough he
deadly ozone laye . Unlike mic obes alling in me eo s, hey wouldn’ be
p o ec ed by he ock and hei exposu e o ozone would las much longe
due o signi ican ly lowe adial eloci y. Resea ch shows ha exposu e
o mic obes o ozone concen a ion a abou 2.3 ppm esul s in 80% e-
duc ion in iabili y o mos mic obes a e 15 minu es[12]. How much
o hem would su i e he ip h ough he 30 km hick laye o a mo-
sphe e whe e ozone concen a ion is la ge han 2.5 ppm on a e age[13]
and eaches 15 ppm a 32 km heigh ?
Mic obes iding in me eo s hen ha e a g ea e chance o su i ing he
ip h ough he a mosphe e, which in his case (upwa d ip on as e oids
excluded) makes su i al on en y mo e likely han su i al on exi .
6
The eason, I belie e, lies in he biased hallucina ion guiding he beha io
and de elopmen o he pola ized human popula ion. Hallucina ions exis e -
e ywhe e in space, whe e e any o ganiza ion o indi iduals as a whole ac s as
a dis inc o gan(ism). These indi iduals don’ ha e o be physically connec ed
(in o ma ion exchange be ween hem can be wi eless). This has been p o en by
s udies showing ha spli ing o b ains in wo hal es does no , as ini ially be-
lie ed (and equi ed by con en ional heo ies on eme gen consciousness), esul
in spli ing o consciousness[14].
Hallucina ions may e en exis independen ly o consciousness, e en hough
hey a e gene ally co ela ed wi h consciousness. Due o ela i i y in causali y,
as pos ula ed in CR, hallucina ions exis independen ly om he o ganiza ion
co ela ed wi h i (jus like da k ma e can exis independen ly o coupled
eal mass). In o he wo ds, hallucina ion can a ec indi iduals (e.g., guiding
hem in o he o ganiza ion) jus as indi iduals can a ec he hallucina ion. This
en anglemen can be weak (e.g., in a empo a y o med lock o bi ds) o s ong.
Indi iduals o human species a e highly o ganized and o en ac as a con-
s i u ional quan um o some o ganiza ion. Hallucina ions on Ea h a e hus
e e ywhe e and a supe posi ion o all human o ganiza ions exis s as a la ge
hallucina ion. I is domina ed by pola ized o ganiza ions and, based on collec-
i e beha io o humans, his is no hing less han a hallucina ion o a de il - a
disease ac ing agains he well-being o he plane and any long- e m well-being
o i s own embodimen .
Conspi acies a e hus eal, i ’s jus ha d o pu he hallucina ion (o he
co ela ed collec i e) in jail and why would he de il uling he wo ld
wan o pu i s sel in jail? The jail i sel is he in en ion o he de il
and i exis s o hose who oppose i , in one way o ano he .
The de il and i s demonic componen s p io i ize inancial gain, jobs b inging
money o o ganiza ions, and o he sho - e m bene i s esul ing om o e ex-
ploi a ion. This hen explains he an h opocen ic beha io o he collec i e,
and why i always akes so long o accep new pa adigms (which deg ade he
s a us o homo sapiens as a special and sac ed igu e, whe he locally o in he
whole obse able uni e se) e en hough he e idence is ob ious om non-biased
pe spec i es. I is simply no in he [sho - e m] in e es o o ganiza ions like
NASA’s JPL o ind li e, as much as i is in hei in e es o [p olong he] sea ch
o li e.
This is why all o e s on Ma s a e no equipped o de ec li e, hey’ e
equipped o d ill, blas and i adia e ocks wi h high ene gy - and in ha p o-
cess des oy any li e ha may exis [15]. This is p obably no [much] he esul
o conscious ac ion o indi idual scien is s wo king on hese o e s and hei
missions, i is a subconscious guidance o he collec i e hallucina ion. Howe e ,
conscious ac ion may no be negligible in hose a highe posi ions in he hie -
a chy o such o ganiza ions - as hey a e mo e conce ned wi h unds, jobs and
7
public suppo . E.g., would he public o e whelmingly suppo he sea ch o
li e on Ma s i i has been al eady p o en (wi hou going o Ma s) ha li e exis s
he e?
2025.02.14
Ac ually I was w ong he e. The conscious esis ance o scien i ic
p og ess is widesp ead. Basically, mos o he mains eam scien is s
ac ually p io i ize hei ca ee s o e scien i ic p og ess. This is why
hey do no only c i icize (o en wi hou eal a gumen s) bu eac
wi h ange o any scien i ic wo k hey see as a h ea o hese ca ee s.
E ec i ely, inquisi ion exis s in science, as in any o he cul , i ’s jus
no powe ul enough o o u e he " ai o s" o dea h. I canno o ge
he main edi o o Na u e saying publicly how he books o R. Sheld ake
should be bu ned. Bu he ic ims o he 21s cen u y inquisi ion a e
no a e (A. Loeb, R. Temple, L. Ma gulis, J. E. B andenbu g, e c.),
and people a e some imes e en physically a acked by he en aged
zealo s. S ill, o a long ime, I did no wan o belie e ha NASA
would house many o hese zealo s. Sadly, i does. Appa en ly, NASA’s
JPL is con inced ha he disco e y o ex a e es ial li e (o mo e
p ecisely, he acknowledgmen o al eady disco e ed li e) would shi he
ocus om obo ic explo a ion o space (mainly Ma s) owa d human
explo a ion, hus, " aking" he business om Pasadena o Hous on[16].
Ob iously, hey ha e a lo o in luence on any s udies co ela ed wi h
space explo a ion and hey a e igh ing ha d o keep he au ho s in
check. In he s udies o hose who obey (and ha includes mos o
he au ho s), li e is ne e e en conside ed as an explana ion o he
obse ed phenomena, a he ou igh dismissed as a possibili y - e en
when ha implies he in en ion o some complex, a - e ched, and
ne e -be o e-wi nessed, abio ic mechanism. I makes one doub he
exis ence, ce ainly long- e m su i al, o any age o enligh enmen .
F om my pe spec i e, we a e li ing in da k ages by de aul , wi h an
occasional lash o ligh , bu wi h a egula endency owa d inquisi ion
- a all le els o socie y.
Howe e , hank ully, o hodoxy does no ha e absolu e powe . In his
case, human explo a ion canno be a oided as he monopoly o NASA
on Ma s is e y much h ea ened la ely and p i a e companies ha e
en e ed he game. Thus, hey migh e en ind a way o comple e
ha "in amous" Ma s-sample e u n mission be o e human boo s se
on Ma s. I ex a e es ial li e has o be disco e ed, I’m su e hey’ e
gonna y o ake c edi o i , once he esis ance becomes u ile. T u h
be old, i canno be denied ha JPL has some o he bes enginee s
and calcula o s, wi h g ea achie emen s behind hem, bu hey’ e
lousy scien is s. They shouldn’ be in ol ed in scien i ic analyses, hey
8
should do wha hey do bes - build obo s, send hem ou he e and
collec da a, bu lea e in e p e a ion o someone else. A e all, human
explo a ion won’ comple ely eplace obo ic explo a ion, ce ainly no
wi h he in en ion o AI. In ac , he need o obo s will p obably g ow,
so hei ea s seem unwa an ed.
2025.07.16
The e’s a new pape by O. Eldadi e al. examining he psycho-
logical mechanisms unde lying esis ance o pa adigm-challenging
in e p e a ions o anomalous obse a ions[17], a highly ecommended
ead.
2025.07.27
Ano he excellen new pape , ela ed o his, has came ou ecen ly[18].
The cons an exchange o mic obes be ween he celes ial bodies is ac ually
con enien o he de il when i comes o denial o ubiqui ous li e. Because
he e’s no much di e ence be ween mic obes on Ea h and o he bodies, i can
always explain i by con amina ion (when i should be in e p e ed as e idence
o con inuous p esence and exchange o li e on in e -plane a y scales).
E en ually, he de il will ind li e, bu no be o e he oppo uni ies o p o i
on i s denial ha e been exhaus ed.
Un il hen i will p obably con inue o abuse he Occam’s azo - claiming
ha he simples explana ion o an isola ed p oblem is he mos likely explana-
ion, e en hough he e a e no isola ed p oblems in na u e and he mos likely
solu ion is no he simples one a he he one ha sol es many p oblems a
once. And i will con inue o make o dina y claims ex ao dina y - so hey
equi e ex ao dina y e idence.
The god you claim as you p ope y does no use azo s and li e is no
ex ao dina y. You denial o li e ain’ some hing ex ao dina y ei he . Deal
wi h i , de il, o be gone.
4 [ 2023.08.10 ] A aid o cance ? Maybe i
would help o s ay away om hospi als...
by Amenoum
I is well known ha he bes place o pick up a disease is a place wi h g ea es
concen a ion o diseases - a hospi al. Howe e , no one belie es ha isi ing
hospi als migh inc ease one’s chances o ge ing cance o some o he disease
ha ’s no supposed o be in ec ious. Bu wha i i ’s ue?
9
Figu e 1: Concep ion loca ions
16

In e es ingly, he dis ance om Neum o Smiljan is equal o he dis ance
om Neum o Sibinj.
Howe e , while his is some in e es ing synch onici y, I don’ belie e his
is he place I was concei ed a . People he e usually go o he coas du ing
he summe so ega dless o he yea , a concep ion da e in he summe is no
compa ible wi h he bi h da e in Sep embe .
Bu he e’s ano he p oblem he e - his wo-dimensional map doesn’ accu-
a ely ep esen he globe and he o bi al pa h o he soul. The co ec pa h is
shown on he globe in Fig 2.
Figu e 2: Concep ion si es
One can eplica e his pa h in Google Ea h[24] simply by connec ing
Wools ho pe wi h Be hlehem wi h a line (’D aw line o shape’ bu on).
The line is now clea ly passing h ough my bi hplace, and my mos likely
concep ion si e. The bi hplace o Tesla (Smiljan) is now some 200 km away
om he line. Howe e , Tesla’s pa en s did mo e om wes e n Se bia o Smiljan
and he line is passing h ough wes e n Se bia. I is hus possible ha Tesla
17
was concei ed he e. I don’ know he exac place bu I know ha Tesla’s a e
descendan s o D aganići and D aganići illage is nea he line (only abou 20
km away).
O cou se, while concep ion should lie on he line, he place o esidence o
pa en s p io o child’s bi h may no bu i will, mos likely, be nea .
All hings conside ed, I belie e he e is a good p obabili y ha all ou
inca na ions indeed do belong o he same soul. Pe haps o he people could be
ound ha we e bo n nea he line so I could comple e he lis o inca na ions
o his soul.
2024.12.17
Indeed, I ha e e en ually ound a lo o candida es in p ominen
G eek hinke s[23]. No e ha he line is passing h ough G eece.
Py hago as, o example, was bo n in Samos, which is e y close o he
line (in he wo-dimensional map on Fig. 1 i is almos ouching he
line).
O cou se, he Ea h’s con inen s change o e ime. Thus, e en i he
soul’s o bi al is ollowing Ea h’s o a ion, he si es o concep ion could
mo e away om he line o e ime. While his mo emen should gene -
ally be negligible on he o de o millennia (a leas du ing weak e olu-
ion), how s able o how well synch onized is he o a ion o he o bi al
wi h he Ea h’s body o a ion? Du ing weak e olu ion, i should be e y
s able, howe e , he shape o he o bi in he o m o a ing is p obably
jus an app oxima ion. The wa e unc ion desc ibing he o bi could ha e
a leas one angula node, allowing o some de ia ion o he si e o lo-
caliza ion om he ing app oxima ion. Howe e , he o he e idence[22]
sugges s ha , e en i hese nodes exis , hey a e ei he e y limi ed in
numbe o he ampli ude (de ia ion) is e y low, unless he o bi al an-
gula momen um has a g oup and phase componen s (i.e., he o bi al is
ing-like and spinning a he speed equal o c, while he soul is a es
ela i e o ha o bi al bu i is oscilla ing adially - pe pendicula ly o
he o bi al). In his in e p e a ion, hus, wo en angled componen s o
o a ing space exis and only one is p obably coupling o bodies, e u n-
ing o he o iginal en anglemen a e decoupling (e.g., dea h). Howe e ,
e en in his in e p e a ion, he soul is mos likely o localize a he o bi al
line.
In any case, he li espan ma e s - all hese people should li e up o abou
he age o 85 i hey each old age. I hey don’ each old age, mos likely
ime o dea h is he ime o s ong ans o ma ion which o his soul gene ally
happens abou he age o 36 (no e ha Jesus died abou his age) and possibly
also a abou he age o 50.
18
Du ing s ong ans o ma ion he indi idual is mos likely o ge in ou-
ble as his ans o ma ion is commonly in e p e ed as a ne ous b eak-
down (i.e., madness). This may be due o con on a ion wi h au ho i ies
bu gene ally due o he e ec i e sense o immo ali y, when he indi id-
ual doesn’ eel s ongly connec ed o i s body.
Jesus was c uci ied du ing his ime, New on ans o med abou he same
age bu su i ed. I ha e also ans o med abou he same age and ha e
been con on ing au ho i y a he ime.
Bu hese a e di e en imes and I wasn’ c uci ied, a leas no physi-
cally. Howe e , I was e y close do dea h a leas h ee imes du ing he
pe iod. Tesla li ed h ough his oo.
I don’ know how s ong was he synch onici y expe ienced by Tesla o
New on, bu , in my case, a he peak e en my oice was di e en and i
was as he god was speaking h ough me (I was ac ing like a p ophe ),
simila o wha Muhammad and Jesus expe ienced.
No e ha Mecca (bi hplace o Muhammad) and Medina a e also ela-
i ely close o he o bi al o his soul[25]. Howe e , I belie e Muhammad
had a di e en soul, albei a closely ela ed one.
No e also ha e en dea hs seem o occu nea he line - Jesus died
oughly a he same place he was bo n, New on died in Kensing on/Lon-
don - only 115 km om he line, Tesla died in he o he pa o he wo ld
- New Yo k, bu s ill no oo a om he o bi al (666 km). I one adds
James Wa o he lis , he died only 66 km om he line (his bi h-
place is ≈200 km om he line, in G eenock, Sco land). In e es ingly,
A. Eins ein was bo n 63 km om he line. O cou se, Eins ein canno
be coun ed as one o he inca na ions o his soul. He li ed a he same
ime as Tesla, bu also his age a dea h and some o he cha ac e is ics do
no i my hypo heses (al hough his soul is likely o he same species[26],
some cha ac e is ics a e e y simila ), bu his begs he ques ion - why
a e he [bi hplaces o concep ion si es o ] g ea es hinke s o p ophe s
(on whose eachings mos eligions a e based) o human his o y concen-
a ed along he same o bi al? This is e y ha d o explain wi hou
in ol ing souls as I de ine hem. Appa en ly, o bi als o closely ela ed
souls a e clumped oge he .
Igno ance is bliss, i may be ue now bu i won’ s ay ue o -
e e .
7 [ 2023.01.17 ] E idence o coded e olu ion
by Amenoum
19
My heo y o plane a y neu ogenesis[1] implies Ea h is a li ing being. E idence
o his is piling up.
Fi s , I ha e ound s ong co ela ion be ween majo mass ex inc ions and
Ea h’s discon inui ies[27] (man le laye s). This is ex emely di icul o explain
wi hou in ol ing an equi alen o gene ic coding.
The e a e wo possible explana ions o he co ela ion:
•ei he he Ea h’s adius has expanded o almos 1000 km du ing he
Phane ozoic (las 541 million yea s) wi h discon inui ies be ween laye s
o med a imes o majo mass ex inc ions and ep esen ing some hing
simila o ee g ow h ings, o
•da es o majo mass ex inc ions a e ha dcoded in Ea h’s [b ain] man le.
A i s , i seems he i s explana ion doesn’ equi e li ing Ea h, howe e , i
Ea h has been g owing, new mass ob iously wasn’ being added on op o i ,
in gene al. New mass (which may be dominan ly liquid) mus ha e been added
(inges ed) h ough an opening (e.g., one e ealed/ ec ea ed wi h mel ing o ice
in An a c ica).
And how hen o in e p e his o he han ansmig a ion o cells o man le
laye s o eeding?
He e, i is assumed ha expansion o Ea h’s olume is no due o gas o
acuum expansion inside i , a he due o addi ion o mass. Some ac-
uum expansion canno be uled ou hough and i may be synch onized
wi h mass inges ion.
As usually is he case wi h Ea h, a supe posi ion o wo explana ions is
p obably mos likely.
Discon inui ies a e ha dcoded bu he Ea h p obably does expand a li le
oo wi h mass shi ed a hese discon inui ies (al hough, acco ding o paleo-
magne ic e idence and esea ch on Ea h’s pas o a ion, he expansion is no
signi ican , unless i is ela i ely quickly ollowed by con ac ion).
Mo e ecen ly, I ha e ound new e idence, no only o li ing Ea h, bu
li ing Ma s and Venus oo. Kleibe ’s law s a es ha an animal’s me abolic a e
scales o he 3/4 powe o i s mass. Fo la ge animals, me abolism is slowe .
I has been shown la e ha an exponen o 2/3 is mo e app op ia e o
smalle animals, howe e , I hink we’ll all ag ee ha Ea h is a la ge
animal and o hese he exponen 3/4 holds, especially o mammals.
Thus, i Venus, Ma s and Ea h a e animals o di e en species Kleibe ’s
law should apply o hem. I e olu ion o li e on he su ace o a plane is
20
cul i a ion o [la ge-scale] cells and p o eins which a e des ined o mig a e o
man le laye s a speci ic imes du ing emb yogenesis (neu ogenesis), hen he
a e o his cul i a ion (e olu ion) should be di e en be ween di e en plane s
and his di e ence can be calcula ed by applying he Kleibe ’s law.
So ha ’s wha I did[28]. When he law is applied o hese 3 plane s, ollowing
esul s a e ob ained:
•4.54 billion yea s o e olu ion on Ea h a e comp essed o 852 million yea s
on Ma s,
•4.54 billion yea s o e olu ion on Ea h a e comp essed o 3.9 billion yea s
on Venus.
And his is comple ely in ag eemen wi h s udies, which show Ma s los i s
habi abili y some 900 million yea s since o ma ion ( oughly 3.6 billion yea s
ago) and Venus some 700 million yea s ago.
No only do he esul s ag ee wi h esea ch, he esul s sugges he cu en
ex inc ion on Ea h is p obably inal and Ea h will soon lose su ace habi -
abili y. No o e e hough, howe e , ins ead o li ing su ace punc ua ed by
ex inc ion pulses he inanima e su ace will be punc ua ed by pulses o ela-
i ely sho - e m and p obably pa ial habi abili y (as e idence shows has been
happening on Ma s).
Ob iously, humans a e no special o Ea h, humans ha e e ol ed on Ma s
and Venus oo and p obably we en’ much di e en han us.
I e olu ion o humans is coded hen he cu en clima e change is p obably
coded oo so i humans would s op emi ing g eenhouse gases na u e would use
o he ways o achie e highe empe a u e o wha e e is equi ed o he majo
ex inc ion/ ansmig a ion.
And, ecen ly, e idence has shown up o ha oo. In he yea 2020, due
o lockdowns, humans ha e emi ed much less g eenhouse gases han usually,
howe e , s udies show bo h CO2and CH4[29] (me hane) ha e been ising[30].
In ac , me hane le els hi eco d high in 2020 wi h a new eco d se in 2021,
some hing ha ’s cu en ly unexplained[31].
Humans may ha e been used o kick-s a he p ocess bu he sense o
con ol is an illusion - p obabili y o humans o hal and e e se i is
in ini esimal i his is a coded majo e en a he han an excu sion. And
e en i i could be hal ed, ha p obably wouldn’ b ing any hing good
o anyone, i would be simila o hal ing he emb yonic de elopmen o
li e in a human womb.
Ano he indica ion ha he plane is aking o e may be he las yea ’s
colossal e up ion o he Hunga Tonga olcano, which, unexpec edly, ejec ed big
amoun s o wa e apo (g eenhouse gas) in o he a mosphe e ins ead o ejec ing
big amoun s o sulphu dioxide (SO2), hus hea ing he Ea h’s oposphe e
21

ins ead o cooling i [32]. O cou se, his hea ing e ec may be empo a y (las ing
less han a couple o mon hs o yea s) bu i will help elease mo e g eenhouse
gases om he poles. And who’s o say he e won’ be mo e e up ions?
I wa e apo would be cons an ly added o s a osphe e he e m " em-
po a y" becomes e y ela i e. In ha case, human CO2emissions won’
ma e a all. I his wa e comes om olcanic e up ions i is no cou-
pled o (con olled by) non-condensable gases in he a mosphe e - wa e
apo would now con ol empe a u e (and indi ec ly gases like CO2and
CH4) ins ead o he o he way a ound. We migh e en see wa e apo e-
placing ae osols ha p o ide he cooling e ec , hea ing he s a osphe e
and hus making a mosphe ic wa e li e ime longe , less empo a y.
I we a e amids a majo ex inc ion (and I’d say we ob iously a e) he e
will be mo e signi ican olcanic e up ions and, i he goal is o inc ease
a mosphe ic wa e apo , I wouldn’ be su p ised i Hunga Tonga e up s
again (o /and some o he simila candida e[33]) in a couple o yea s, i
no soone .
In he neu ogenesis heo y I ha e p edic ed ha he p ima y goal is he
inc ease o ocean acidi y (pH dec ease o 7.33) and I ha e also p edic ed
ha deep unde wa e olcanoes will ha e a big ole in achie ing his
goal. I ha is he case, a some poin su ace empe a u e migh s op
climbing and migh e en s a dec easing (while deep ocean hea s up) o
slow down degassing o CO2 om he ocean.
In any case, olcanoes should ha e a big ole al hough some olcanism
could be eplaced by human ac ion (e.g., nuclea wa ).
O cou se, i Ea h is a li ing being i s insides a e also p obably much di e -
en han wha is commonly hough . And ano he e idence o ha may ha e
shown up. One explana ion o he neu ino anomaly de ec ed by ANITA in
An a c ica is a signi ican ly di e en densi y p o ile o Ea h, sugges ing la ge
low-densi y (o hollow) a eas. And a la ge ela i ely hollow unnel below An a c-
ica, leading deep inside Ea h is exac ly wha I ha e p edic ed (mig a ion o
cells/p o eins equi es his unnel) and wha is expec ed o a li ing being.
The neu inos could e en be c ea ed inside Ea h. The monuclea usion
does no occu in Ea h’s co e bu some o m o low ene gy nuclea
eac ions could. In any case, s eams o cha ged pa icles and neu inos
a e possible.
A e all, we ha en’ d illed deepe han 12 km on land and 8 km below ocean,
which means we ha en’ eached any hing beyond he uppe c us . E e y hing
known abou Ea h’s in e io is he esul o assump ions and models ma ching
22
seismic eloci ies. Su e, some imes Ea h expels mine als like ingwoodi e ha
equi e high p essu e o o ma ion and pe haps his mine al e en o ms a laye
in Ea h’s man le bu his does no mean all o i o med inside Ea h - he same
mine al is commonly ound in me eo i es. Bu e en i i has been o med inside
Ea h, he p essu e/g a i y dis ibu ion can be mo e complex han assumed (as
i commonly is in li ing beings). I may ha e been o med in he e y ea ly
days o Ea h’s o ma ion when he plane was mo e comp essed.
Fo some eason, human ci iliza ion is coded o know e y li le bu con i-
den ly belie e a lo . I is e en coded o p og am i sel ha way. And when i
comes o bigges animals - om whales o plane s and beyond, o he smalles
- om mic obes o a oms and beyond, i couldn’ be mo e w ong. Bu ha ’s
no bad.
I an an elope would be [coded o be] always igh , he e would be no lions.
8 [ 2023.01.01 ] We a e Noah
by Amenoum
No hing can emain unchanged absolu ely o e e . Bu some hings can emain
ela i ely unchanged o billions o yea s. One o hese a e as e oids.
I you’d wan o s o e some hing o as long as possible you’d wan o s o e
i in he coldes place you could ind ha would lack oxygen and would be
p o ec ed om adia ion and mechanical dis u bance.
One possibili y a e c a e s on he Moon’s sou h pole. These a e conside ed
as one o he coldes places in he Sola Sys em, wi h a empe a u e some 33
deg ees abo e absolu e ze o[34].
Tha is ex emely cold bu , as c a e s sugges , no a sa e place o s o e
some hing o millions o billions o yea s.
The bes place would ha e o be he in e io o a bigge piece o ock in
space su icien ly away om a bu ning s a and sa e om collisions.
Tempe a u e o in e s ella space is less han 3 deg ees abo e absolu e ze o.
Wi hou a hea sou ce, mic obes can’ decompose ma e and i his ma e
is s o ed su icien ly deep cosmic adia ion won’ be able o do he job ei he .
Le ’s say you a e an ad anced bu ex inc ion acing ci iliza ion due o de-
c easing habi abili y o you home plane , wha would you do?
Su e, you would p obably pack some people, animals, he bs and o he es-
sen ial ma e ial on o ocke s and send hem o a nea by plane o moon whe e
hey migh ha e some chances o longe su i al. Bu ha may be a e y isky
and a sho - e m solu ion a bes .
Now le ’s say you’ e [con enien ly] con inced ha you a e special and ha no
in elligen li e, o li e a all, exis s beyond you home plane o beyond you sola
sys em. You will hen p obably wan o y o ensu e his li e doesn’ disappea
o e e . The bes hing you could do is o load up a couple o as e oids wi h
mic obes, ungi, i uses and DNA (s o ed in seeds and eggs) and send hem
away.
23
Le ’s say you’ e also e y p oud o you sel (and you DNA). In ha case,
al hough you p ide would usually mock he possibili y o ad anced ci iliza ions
beyond you home plane , you will ha e o admi ha he possibili y exis s and
so you will wan o make su e an ad anced ci iliza ion could no ice you li le
special a k.
The only hing ha can pe manen ly emain no iceable is he shape o you
as e oid.
No e ha his as e oid does no ha e o be a ock al eady in space. I
could be a piece o ock you’d ca e ou o you home plane and simply
launch in o space in a di ec ion o a plane a y sys em you suspec will
be sui able o li e once i a i es.
Now hink abou he unusual shape o ’Oumuamua. O iginally hough o
be in a ciga like shape, i appea s a hin disc[35] is mo e likely[36].
Now ask you sel why a e you eeling p oud? Is ha a coincidence?
E e y hing in na u e has mul iple pu poses. Wha is he pu pose o human
ci iliza ion? I migh look like cance bu wha i i was allowed o become
cance so i can de elop in o species ha can and will seed li e h oughou he
uni e se (al hough ha ’s su ely no he sole eason, as my heo ies sugges )?
I you hink abou i , who else would do i ? Su e, na u al as e oids c ea ed
in he Sola Sys em can con ain li e, bu hey a e unlikely o lea e he Sola
Sys em.
All hings conside ed, he e’s a good chance ha ’Oumuamua was launched
by a dying human o humanoid ci iliza ion, and i s hoped o des ina ion may
ha e e en been Ea h. I ailed, bu no all human ci iliza ions a e he same.
Some hi , some miss, and e en a ailu e can be ela i e - his one didn’ land on
a habi able plane inside he Sola Sys em bu i s ill migh land in some o he .
To inc ease he odds you will p obably launch a leas wo a ks. Bu did
’Oumuamua eally ail?
A he same yea ’Oumuamua was obse ed an in e s ella me eo (IM2,
o CNEOS 2017-03-09) impac ed Ea h. Could i ha e been some hing
ha sepa a ed om ’Oumuamua? Pe haps.
In wha shape will ou a k be? In a ciga shape - o sc eam cance , o a disc
shape - o speak o neu ali y? And will we design i in a way i shows peculia
beha io nea a s a ?
I we ush hings i will be a smoking ciga , i we don’ i may ha e g ea e
chances o su i al.
So i you wan o eel special, he e you ha e i - human ci iliza ion has been
chosen by he gods behind his uni e se as seede s o li e.
24
Seeding o li e should be unde s ood ela i ely, li e in some o m a he
des ina ion p obably exis s al eady. Mo e app op ia e e m may be in-
c easing di e si y o li e, which is, ne e heless, essen ial o su i al.
We a e legion o we a e many and we a e many o we a e Noah. Maybe.
9 [ 2022.12.25 ] Mode n physics is a joke, no
he elec on
by Amenoum
In physics, quali a i e desc ip ion o eali y should p ecede quan i a i e one.
Ma hema ics may be used o quan i y and co ela e ce ain na u e and me-
chanics wi h geome y and algeb a, which can ce ainly lead o inc eased un-
de s anding, knowledge, and p edic abili y o phenomena. Bu eali y ne e
changes wi h changing equa ions. Equa ions e ol e and adap o eali y wi h
inc easing expe ience, inc easing cogni i e capaci y and inc easing powe o ob-
se a ion. Jus because one has eached, o is app oaching, i s cogni i e o
obse a ional limi a ions, does no mean ha eali y is s a ing o espec s ag-
na ing equa ions. No, eali y is s ill e ol ing and s ill doesn’ ca e abou elegan
ma hema ical ela ions o cons uc s. I e en claim ha eali y is s ill in ui i e
and e y much physical. I is he mode n physicis who ga e up on in ui i e
in e p e a ions, and all he ca es abou now is he p ese a ion o exis ing ele-
gance in equa ions, making su e hey ag ee wi h he ou come o measu emen s,
o he p ecision o he appa a us. I such pe son is also a zealo i becomes
highly unlikely his desc ip ion o eali y will make sense o be unde s andable
o anyone.
A mode n physicis may claim ha mos abou eali y is known, bu
ha ’s he case only in his own limi ed eali y. He s ill knows no hing,
compa ed o wha he e is o know. The same goes o she, he-she,
she-he, i , he-i , she-i , i -he and i -she.
Sadly, ha is he s a e o physics oday - i is in es ed wi h ma hema icians
p oducing a bunch o nonsense ha ’s con inually being pa ched o ma ch he
ou comes o expe imen s[37]. This p epo en educ ionism is usually no a con-
scious conspi acy, a he a mani es a ion o a subconscious desi e o sho - e m
p o i on some le el. The e’s no hing scien i ic abou i so i will no lead o
p og ess in science, i is, in ac , hinde ing such p og ess, o en h ough he
main enance o illusion o p og ess by he es ablishmen o e-es ablishmen o
a alue o a ce ain pa ame e in ma hema ical pe u ba ion.
25
ice has been, unexpec edly, de ec ed on main bel as e oids (e en on
su ace), such as 24 Themis[44].
The e o e, i pebbles a e landing on Ea h wi h as e oids/come s, hey
migh ha e indeed o med on Ma s, howe e , i may be mo e likely hey
o med on some moon o an ou e plane .
O cou se, he odds o an as e oid o come con aining pebbles like hese
gene ally may no be so big (ce ainly no acco ding o gene ally accep ed
heo ies).
Appa en ly, come a y ma e ial is gene ally so so ha i doesn’ pene-
a e mo e han 40 km in o he a mosphe e and he only samples we ha e
a e he B ownlee pa icles[45] o dus om he a mosphe e and samples
collec ed by he S a dus p obe (I hank K. Ko le ić o kindly p o iding
his in o ma ion).
This hen ules ou come s as b inge s o pebbles o o ganic ma e ial, a
leas i one assumes hey’ e all made o such so ma e ial.
O cou se, in case o a compac mix u e o ice, dus and ha de ock,
some ma e ial can su i e he all, e en ice.
I ha ma e ial includes pebbles looking no di e en han hose shaped
by wa e on Ea h, once he ice mel s, how would one know he di e -
ence?
In some cases deepe analysis (e.g., o iso opic a ios) may be able o
con i m hese we e no o med on Ea h, bu who would ini ially suspec
hey did no and decide o pe o m such analysis? The p obabili y o
ha happening is p obably lowe han he p obabili y o such pebbles
alling on Ea h in he i s place. Which, howe e , as i u ned ou wi h
many hings so a , may be mo e common ha commonly hough , a
leas pe iodically.
Be o e ice was disco e ed on hem, i was hough ha as e oids canno
con ain ice. This was based on he assump ion ha hey ha e been
o med mo e han 4 billion yea s ago in condi ions p ecluding ola iles
such as wa e [46]. Unde he same hypo heses, hei na u e and posi ion
should be i ually unchanged since o ma ion. La e , i was hough
ha i hey did con ain wa e /ice i mus ha e e apo a ed/sublima ed
long ago.
Well, all hese assump ions we e w ong. Wa e ice seems o be common
in as e oids e en oday.
This means ha :
•such as e oids we e o med much mo e ecen ly, and/o
• hei composi ion was al e ed since o ma ion.
Wa e can be p oduced on he su ace o an as e oid h ough he in e -
ac ion o sola p o ons wi h oxide mine als, howe e he e a e unknowns
he e, and I ind i unlikely o his o be he only sou ce.
32

Some, i no mos , as e oids should ep esen emnan s o , o ejec ed
ma e ial om, plane s, dwa plane s and moons. As such, hey should
con ain wa e . And i my hypo heses on la ge scale g a i ons a e co ec ,
as e oids may no be c ea ed ou o hese bodies solely a dea h e en s
o du ing andom collisions, a he pe iodically (whe e sizes o c ea ed
as e oids a e p opo ional o pe iods o gene al oscilla ion o he Sola
Sys em ene gy). And his inc eases he p obabili y o as e oids con ain-
ing ozen pebbles, o ganic ma e ials, mic obes and i uses. While i is
gene ally assumed ha as e oids alling on Ea h ha e been c ea ed else-
whe e, i is also no impossible o some hing ejec ed om Ea h millions
o yea s ago o all back on Ea h oday.
One could e en in e p e he ocks humans b ough he e om he Moon
o be p ecu so s o la ge Moon ocks alling on Ea h (one could a -
gue ha his could be a p ecu so o us b inging la ge ocks om he
Moon he e bu I wouldn’ coun on i ). We hink we’ e special, bu all
ou ac ions a e coded somewhe e. We migh hink i is us who need
he mine als, bu i i is he Ea h who needs hem, he e a e be e ,
mo e e icien ways o b ing la ge ocks he e han u ilizing humans o
deli e y.
Bu le ’s ge back o he p edic ion - how o explain his synch onici y?
Assuming hese a e me eo i es, no only did me eo oids all on he land whe e I
p edic ed hey will, hey landed on my house - whe e I wished o hem o land.
O cou se, his may s ill be a wei d case o locally o med needle ice, bu e en
i ha is he case - wouldn’ i be a e y s ange coincidence ha some hing
a e and some hing wha I belie e I ne e saw be o e appea s he e imi a ing
me eo i es, whe e I p edic ed hem o all?
Wha e e his is hen, I don’ see i as meaningless coincidence.
I hese a e no me eo i es, I in e p e hem as ha binge s o p edic ed
me eo i es.
Howe e , na u e has shown me many imes ha i is he e ec ha
ma e s, no he cause. The e o e, i , o some eason, I had o see
me eo i es he e, pe haps an easie way o c ea e he e ec was [na u ally]
selec ed, one no in ol ing ocks alling om he sky.
We all some imes wish he e’s only one and undeniable in e p e a ion o
a pa icula phenomenon so we can be su e ha wha e e we expe ienced
indeed is wha we [wan o] belie e i is, bu comple e ela i i y equi es
mul iple in e p e a ions and na u e is cons an ly eaching us ha one
canno be absolu ely comple ely su e in any hing. Ul ima ely, we’ e
all belie e s and some o us nai ely belie e ha p obabili ies be ween
di e en in e p e a ions canno in e .
33
I belie e hey can and I belie e hey will - soon, away om moun ains
and i e s, mos s ones on he g ound may commonly be in e p e ed as
me eo i es.
Bu be o e ha s a e is eached, he e will exis a supe posi ion o in-
e p e a ions, an in e media e s a e, which may be he bes explana ion
he e oo.
A lo o wei d s u was epo ed alling om he sky h oughou he
his o y[47] (e.g., ish) and while mos o i may ha e e es ial sou ces,
some imes such explana ion seems e y unlikely. I ind he si ua ion sim-
ila o de ec ion o signs o ex an li e on o he plane s (e.g., phosphine
on Venus, me hane emissions on Ma s, ...). I li e canno be unambigu-
ously con i med as he sou ce mains eam science assumes he o igin is
abio ic. He e, i s u alling om he sky can be ound somewhe e on
Ea h i is au oma ically assumed i does come om Ea h and no o he
op ion is explo ed.
I ook a long ime o mains eam science o accep e en ha me eo i es
come om ou e space. Be o e he no ion was inally accep ed i was
mocked and ea ed as nonsense. I is ha d o belie e hen ha he idea
o ex a e es ial o igin o o ganic ma e enclosed in ice/ ock alling on
Ea h would no be mocked simila ly.
Howe e , gi en he ex eme condi ions o ou e space (ex eme cold, lack
o oxygen) o ganic ma e ial in an as e oid p ac ically canno decompose
(any mic obes ha would usually do he wo k wouldn’ wo k he e).
I should hen no be su p ising i o ganic ma e ial ejec ed om Ma s
millions o yea s ago would all on Ea h in a well p ese ed s a e.
In example, whea o seed has been epo ed alling enclosed in ice in
Wil shi e in 1686[47]. I indeed his ell om he sky, i may be mo e
likely o i o be Ma ian han e es ial and e en i i is e es ial i
s ill p obably ell om space and could be millions o yea s old.
The e a e mo e simila examples - in London, On a io, 1868.02.24, some
500 ons (!) o ce eal, a ad anced in decomposi ion, ell wi h snow in
a iolen s o m[47].
In Rajki (Rajko ), India, 1840.03.24, g ain ell du ing a hunde s o m,
i was epo ed ha na i es we e exci ed because he kind o g ain was
unknown o hem[47]. These a e e y in e es ing cases. Based on desc ip-
ions, i could be ha he same kind o ma e ial ell in all h ee places.
In e es ingly, I oo ha e ound aged (da k b own) seeds wi h he ice, I
jus didn’ men ion i ini ially as, unlike o pebbles, I eally couldn’
ule ou hese we e no he e be o e. The seeds didn’ look like ypical
g ain seeds hough - hey we e o simila size (couple o millime es) bu
comple ely sphe ical and I ha e no idea wha plan hey came om. I
do know hey didn’ come om plan s on he oo - hese a e mos ly
simple g asses and ege ables (UPDATE: I ha e es ablished la e ha
he sphe ules look exac ly like he be ies o Co nus sanguinea, which
34
does g ow nea by, howe e , be ies gene ally w inkle wi h age, hese one
we e ob iously aged bu he sphe ical shape was p ese ed, he e we e
no w inkles, which sugges s hey aged in unusual, possibly ex eme con-
di ions). I do no know how he seeds looked like in he o he cases
men ioned abo e, howe e , in hese oo i seems ha d o a ou one ex-
plana ion o e he o he - i hey came om as e oids how o explain
high co ela ion wi h he occu ence o s o ms?
I could be a meaningless o meaning ul coincidence (synch onici y) bu
le ’s conside he possibili ies o empo al ela i i y o pe iodici y o his
synch onici y ha would inc ease he odds.
Thunde s o ms can each 22 km in heigh . In he egion be ween 10 - 20
km he empe a u e is abou -53 ◦C, p essu e is 4 - 18 imes lowe han
a he su ace (densi y is 3 - 14 imes lowe ).
Now, me eo oids equen ly g aze Ea h’s a mosphe e a di e en angles,
would i no be possible ha pieces o hem some imes end up in a
highly ellip ical o bi wi h a pe ihelion in he s a osphe e below 22 km
heigh ? O cou se, such o bi should no las long (due o a mosphe ic
d ag), bu could su i e a leas o days (depending on eccen ici y, i
could su i e much longe ) be o e e e y hing mel s o a hunde s o m
e en ually dis up s i wi h he upd a o wa e (ice) and o he pa icles.
This sounds plausible o me. The same as e oid could e en be pe iod-
ically g ound by he a mosphe e. In example, an as e oid wi h o bi al
pe iod o 14 yea s could be esponsible o all h ee cases abo e (1686,
1840, 1868). I s o bi al semi-majo axis would be:
=3
T2GM
4π2= 12.5million km
Assuming a pe ihelion o 15+6378 km, he aphelion is a 25 million km,
a highly eccen ic o bi , as expec ed. O cou se, 14 yea s is a maxi-
mum pe iod ha sa is ies he condi ion, ha monics (e.g., 7 yea s, 4.66’
yea s) a e possible candida es oo al hough lowe pe iods a e less likely
conside ing i su i ed o a leas wo cen u ies and assuming i is no
pa icula ly big. In e es ingly, assuming he as e oid is s ill in o bi , he
yea 2022 is he yea when i should be in pe ihelion, he same yea I
disco e ed hese pebbles and o ganics in ice.
Taking in o accoun epo ed mon h and day o he wo yea s abo e
(1840 and 1868), he ac ual pe iod should be 13.9583’ yea s, gi ing he
mon h o Sep embe 2021 o he pe ihelion.
Howe e , aking in o accoun he d ag and loss o mass a pe ihelion,
due o conse a ion o momen um, he as e oid should be inc easing
eccen ici y and o bi al pe iod wi h each o bi .
The e o e, he cu en pe iod is p obably somewha bigge han 14.0
yea s (bu no much conside ing he e we e no big changes in pe iod
be ween yea s 1686 and 1840) and yea 2022 is a mo e likely da e o a
35
pe ihelion.
Posi ions o all places (incl. mine in Sibinj, C oa ia) on he globe a e also
in e es ing, sugges ing signi ican o bi al inclina ion ela i e o Ea h’s
equa o , bu also some hing peculia , good p obabili y o esonance wi h
Ea h’s o a ion pe iod - going in a ou o he as e oid hypo hesis.
Figu e 3: Po en ial o bi al pa h app oxima ion
This is shown in Fig. 3, he blue line is connec ing equa o on opposi e
sides o he Ea h and is passing h ough London, On a io. Uppe ed
line is connec ing London, On a io wi h Rajko , India. Lowe ed line
is passing h ough Wil shi e, UK and Sibinj, C oa ia. No e ha , i his
as e oid is o bi ing Ea h i s eloci y is signi ican ly lowe han ypical
eloci y o as e oids passing h ough Ea h’s a mosphe e. The o bi al
pa h canno connec hese si es wi hou aking Ea h’s o a ion in o
accoun . Ano he eason o de ia ion is non- ixed esonance (as he
as e oid is losing mass, esonance is uns able).
Howe e , in his pa icula case, he e is a p oblem - wi h he aphelion
a beyond he adius o Ea h’s Hill sphe e (1.5 million km), his o bi
is uns able and one mus assume his body is no g a i a ionally bound
o Ea h, i a he o bi s he Sun, pe iodically passing h ough Ea h’s
a mosphe e, c ea ing an illusion ha i o bi s he Ea h.
I old g ain is alling om he sky, I wonde i one day a well p ese ed
issue o a dinosau will all...
As I’ e ound i be o e elsewhe e I ind i he e oo, a piece o eali y whe e my
wishes a e highly co ela ed wi h u u e (appa en ly, I end o wish o hings,
36
o e ec s, ha ha e g ea p obabili y o mani es ing in u u e). I conside his
as ye ano he e idence o high de e minism o local e olu ion and comple e
ela i i y o causali y.
Howe e , i hese we e me eo s, I don’ hink his is he end o hem landing
he e (I ha e mo e wishes). I gene ally wish o hings ha will dec ease my
dependence on people and a he same ime be good o god Ea h (o G, as
I call him some imes - o he is a ela i e cons an ). As o he magni icen
c ys als o ice and wha e e came wi h hem, I hank you gods, e en hough,
in some in e p e a ions, you migh jus be messing wi h me. Whe he hese
a e me eo i es, o , wha may be mo e likely he e a e all, a locally c ea ed
imi a ion, o e en a supe posi ion o bo h, you jus ga e my li e ano he bi o
sense and happiness.
Now, how abou dec easing some p obabili y o hose in e p e a ions in
which you a e messing wi h me?—
10.1 Some hing e y in e es ing again
While he p e iously epo ed pebbles on he oo we e, a e all, mos likely
local ma e ial li ed up wi h needle ice o ma ion, his ime, some ocks de ini ely
ell om he sky, on he same house bu no on he oo , a he on he bo om
o a window opening ( he house is incomple e, no ac ual windows a e ins alled).
On 2023.07.19 a iolen s o m wi h e y s ong winds (a imes o e 120
km/h, unp eceden ed o his loca ion) occu ed he e. B ie ly, some hails one
ell du ing he s o m oo. A e he s o m, deposi s o clay wi h s ones we e
obse ed on he bo om o an window opening o he house, as shown in Fig. 4.
In e es ingly, a peculia ock ell igh in o he small plan con aine (diame e
∼10 cm) si ing in he middle o ha opening - wha a e he odds o ha ? The
ock is i egula , oughly 3 x 2 x 1.5 cm, shown in Fig. 5. The ock has a black
su ace, bu is mos ly beige yellowish-b own inside.
A e he analysis and consul a ion wi h geologis s, i has been concluded
ha he ock ep esen s a goe hi e/limoni e conc e ion.
The compac black mass should ep esen he i on- ich goe hi e in i s
esh non-oxidized s a e. The beige yellow-b own powde -like agg ega es
ep esen di e en s a es o hyd a ion/oxida ion o goe hi e (mainly
limoni e in di e en o ms).
No such ocks can be ound anywhe e nea by ( he building is on a hill wi h
highe g ound and young o es o he no h, alleys o he sou h, he soil he e
is hea y clay, no asphal ).
In he con aine , he ock was embedded in he op laye o soil (appea s
o be clay, abou 1 cm hick) ha was deposi ed du ing he s o m (benea h
i , he plan con aine con ains a mix u e o sand and g a el ha was p esen
be o e he s o m). The in all happened a an angle om he sou h di ec ion. I
37

is possible ha he clay and he ock came om di e en loca ions - pe haps
he clay pa icles we e ca ied by he wind while he ock ell a bi la e (in a
hails one?).
∼
Figu e 4: S o m deposi on he window ( ed a ow indica es clay deposi on he
le , o dina y ock on he igh )
Figu e 5: Goe hi e/limoni e domina ed conc e ion ha ell in he con aine
Is his a me eo i e? Well, al hough i does ha e a smoo h da ke c us , i
does no seem o ha e usion c us and doesn’ con ain egmaglyp s (i should
be no ed, howe e , ha I ha e ne e seen a li e me eo i e be o e so he e is some
unce ain y he e) and i ’s no magne ic (i does eac o a neodymium magne ,
bu weakly), so i i is a me eo i e, i ’s de ini ely no an o dina y me eo i e - i
had o all enclosed in ice. Un o una ely, he e is no way o me o de e mine
whe e did his ock came om. I i was ca ied by he wind i had o come om
a away. As no ed, winds we e ex emely s ong in his s o m bu wha a e he
odds ha a ock his big (and unusual one) is ca ied o miles (i ce ainly had
o be ca ied a high al i udes) and hen d opped in a small con aine on he
window o my house? Pe haps bigge odds a e o i o be a me eo i e.
38
Figu e 6: Goe hi e/limoni e domina ed conc e ion, b oken up
In any case, I wished o a me eo i e and I don’ hink his is he end o
he s o y. Bu i seems we’ e ge ing he e. In he i s episode, mos ocks
we e o dina y ocks which can be ound locally and i was ha d o con i m hey
ell om he sky, and hey we en’ so easy o spo . In his episode an unusual
ock (ac ually ela i ely esembling a me eo i e) o a ype which canno be ound
locally almos ce ainly ell om he sky, on he loca ion whe e i can be spo ed
easily - in he plan con aine , which I’m inspec ing daily. No only ha , he
clay deposi in he con aine in which he ock was embedded made i s ick ou
- as i he gods wan ed o make su e I’ll ind i .
E e y ime I eel e ibly alone god shows up somewhe e. And i I eel
dead, he shows up wi h ligh ning, igni ing my soul, as i he show mus
go on. A hese imes, I lo e ha show.
I’ e lea ned no o expec hings, bu judging om hese wo episodes, he
end is ob ious. So, in he nex episode - an e en bigge ock which I will
wi ness alling om he sky, o which i will be ob ious i is a me eo i e? Well,
I ce ainly wish so. When? Specula ion on localiza ion in ime o his kind o
hings is usually, well, a specula ion ( e y unce ain). Bu some imes he e a e
pa e ns sugges ing p edic abili y, making i ha d no o indulge in p ophecy.
The i s episode ai ed on 2022.12.14, he second one on 2023.07.19. In e es ing.
14 + 12 = 07 + 19 = 26
I his is no a meaningless coincidence, he da e o he 3 d episode should be
one o he ollowing:
39
01.25 02.24* 03.23* 04.22* 05.21 06.20 07.19 08.18 09.17** 10.16 11.15 12.14
* p obably mos likely
** possible co ela ion wi h ano he synch onici y[48]
The ob ained numbe (26) on bo h da es may be a meaningless coin-
cidence, bu he e a e good easons o hink i ’s no . As I’ e shown
elsewhe e (see "Da e o he Wo ld Wa III" blog en y), his kind o
synch onici y may be equen in na u e.
Yea I guess should be 2024 conside ing he end, and he mon h should
be Ma ch, so 2024.03.23 ? Nice da e. I con ains, wha appea s o be, my
a ou i e numbe (23), he numbe I mos o en see in synch onici y e en s.
Howe e , while I would like o see his, I don’ wan o ush anyone ( o ce
and synch onici y gene ally do no go oge he , bu o ce and disappoin men
usually do).
One one hand I don’ like gi ing such p ecise da es o p edic ions, espe-
cially because gods don’ seem o be willing o sha e hem easily (p ob-
ably be e ha way). On he o he hand, when I see pa e ns, i ’s
ha d o esis . And why should one esis ? I he pa e n is epea edly
con i med, a some poin , his becomes some hing o scien i ic alue. I
would only be oolish o claim om he s a ha his is some hing mo e
han specula ion.
Howe e , since we a e now alking abou wo ocks, wo da es a e pe haps
mo e likely. These wo? O .. 2030±1, 2033±1? G, who knows.
10.2 Exci emen a e eanalysis!
I ha e sa ed some o he i s ocks I’ e ound (on 2022.12.14) and he la ge
ock I’ e ound a e he s o m (on 2023.07.19) - which is now in 3 pieces. The
ocks we e s o ed in a ela i ely d y place, exposed o oom ai , bu away om
sunligh . Today I decided o eanalyse he black ocks. Su p isingly, he small
black ocks now look exac ly like he la ge black ock ha was ound a e
he s o m. These ocks we e ini ially comple ely black, bu appa en ly hey
con ain me al (mainly i on i seems) which oxidized ( us ed) o e ime so he
ocks pa ially changed colou . Bu ha ’s no all. I ied pu ing some o he
ocks (2 pieces o he la ge ock and some smalle ones) in cold eshwa e om
a local well (accumula ed ainwa e , ypical elec ical esis ance ∼250-350 kΩ,
esis i i y <250 Ωm). They all sank down and immedia ely s a ed degassing,
I ha e e en hea d a hissing sound a he beginning!
40
As a con ol, one o he o dina y ocks ha we e collec ed was also
subme ged. This did no p oduce any bubbling. An pa ially us ed
i on/nickel wi e did no p oduce any con inuous bubbling ei he (a small
bubble was p oduced bu emained a ached o he wi e).
The degassing was apid and con inuous in he beginning, hen spo adic, and
a e abou 10-15 minu es he e was no no iceable bubble p oduc ion (al hough
a lo o bubbles we e s ill a ached o he ocks).
Some ca bona e ocks (limes ones) will gi e o gas when pu in o acid
solu ions, and al hough he p esence o some ca bona e mine als canno
be excluded, hese a e no limes one ocks and his is no an acid solu ion.
Po ous ocks will bubble when wa e en e s he po es, bu hese a e no
po ous ocks (a leas no isibly, mic opo es could exis hough) and he
na u e o bubbling o me sugges s chemical eac ions. Jus in case, I’ e
d ied he ocks a oom empe a u e (humidi y < 30%) and epea ed he
expe imen one mon h la e . P io o ha , one piece o he la ge ock was
addi ionally hea ed in a mic owa e o abou a minu e on low powe (wi h
his, small pe cen age o he beige yellowish mine als changed colou in o
da ke b own - which can be in e p e ed as a ela i ely d y co osion).
A e subme sion, bubbles we e o med on all he ocks bu emained
a ached (simila ly o he case o imme sion o he us ed wi e, only he
numbe o bubbles he e was much highe ), excep o he hea ed ock,
which, in addi ion o nume ous adhe ed bubbles, did p oduce some small
con inuous bubbling om one spo bu o a e y sho ime (on he o de
o seconds). Thus, conside ing all his, I belie e chemis y is in ol ed
he e, a leas o some deg ee.
This ins an ly eminded me o polyme allic nodules ecen ly ound o p o-
duce oxygen a he bo om o he oceans[49], so I ha e ied measu ing ol ages
on he ocks a di e en poin s on he ock su ace.
The da k oxygen p oduc ion has been disco e ed in eshwa e aqui e s
as well[50], whe e oxygen is p oduced ia mic obial dismu a ion. In ha
case, molecula oxygen is p oduced h ough he b eakdown o soluble
compounds, such as ni i es (NO2
−). Oxygen p oduc ion on he sea loo
may also in ol e mic obes. Da k oxygen can also be p oduced h ough
adiolysis, in he p esence o adioac i e me als.
The highes alue I ha e ob ained was abou 0.2 V (highe ini ial alues
41
2022.03.09 *China in ading Pakis an[78] ≤2033* he e’s a weak signal China
migh also in ade Thailand
and/o Taiwan a some poin ,
bu all hese signals a e weak
2022.02.18 spli ing o Uk aine in o wo
coun ies[79] (eas /wes )
≤2033 p ecu so o his (Russian
akeo e o Eas e n pa s) is
al eady he e, howe e , o mal
globally accep ed di ision is
unlikely be o e 2024
2017/2018 mee ing o T ump and Pu in in *Sibinj
(small ci y in Sla onia, pa o C oa ia
a ime o p edic ion)
≤2033 mos likely ea lies da e is la e
2024, he eason o mee ing
was unclea a ime o p e-
dic ion, la e I ha e sugges ed
he eason, o one o he ea-
sons, will be he di ision o
Uk aine; i should be no ed
ha his p edic ion was made
while I was expe iencing ans-
o ma ion o consciousness, he
symp oms o which can also be
in e p e ed as psychosis o a
ne ous b eakdown, his p e-
dic ion hus could be a esul
o delusion bu ecen de elop-
men s a e inc easing he p ob-
abili y o his happening so
I’ e decided o ake his and
some o he p edic ions made
du ing he ime se iously (i
won’ hu i i u ns ou o be
alse, bu i i u ns ou o be
ue..)[80]
2021 inc easing equency o ea hquakes and
olcanism globally[1] (co ela ed wi h
man le gy i ica ion), possibly coupled
wi h inc easing looding
≤2066 p obably ongoing[5]
2017/2018 eme gence o a na u al sp ing nea my
house as a ela i e p ecu so o global
looding
≤2066 I conside he likely da e be o e
o a ound 2029, ea lies possi-
bili y a ound 2025; based on
he heo y o gene al p ecu -
so s
2017/2018 landing o a smalle me eo nea my
house as p ecu so o inc ease in global
as e oid/come a y bomba dmen
≤2066 Based on my heo ies on
gene al p ecu so s and plan-
e a y neu ogenesis; I con-
side he likely da e be o e o
a ound 2029, ea lies possibil-
i y a ound 2025; howe e p e-
cu so s o la ge me eo s may
ha e al eady landed on my
house in Decembe o 2022
and/o July 2023[81].
2021.12.04 s ong ea hquakes in C oa ia, la ge
up u es, inc easing equency o
ea hquakes[82], p obably coupled wi h
inc easing looding
≈2025-
2060
i s s onge ea hquakes
a e hypo hesized in yea
2025±1.25, nex in 2040±2.5,
2042.5±1.25, 2050±2.5, ..
48

2022.04.05 Wo ld Wa III s a ing on a da e co e-
la ed wi h o he wo wo ld wa s[83]
2024-2033 one possible da e, based on
o he signals, al hough un-
likely, could be he ending
hi d o yea 2024, in some
in e p e a ions, howe e , he
Wo ld Wa III has al eady
s a ed, in Feb ua y o yea
2022
2024.08.10 con lic s s a ing in Finland, Philippines
(and possibly Ge many), as pa o he
Wo ld Wa III o a p ecu so o Wo ld
Wa III[75]
≤2027
2024.01.31 mili a y ai ield bomba dmen , mul iple
co ela ions, co ela ed wi h he s a o
Wo ld Wa III (possibly in Slo akia o
Se bia)[84]
≤2034* da e is unce ain, bu gi en
ecen de elopmen s, p obably
soone han la e
2021 10Be (Be yllium-10) hal -li e excu sion
(dec ease) as pa o s ong e olu ion,
p edic ed alue o yea 2024 o 1.236 x
106yea s[1]
2024 pe he hypo hesis, hal -li e o
10Be should be dec easing cu -
en ly, calcula ions a e in good
ag eemen wi h measu emen s
and sugges con inuous hal -
li e dec ease since a leas he
i s measu emen in 1947, de-
c ease should con inue a leas
un il yea 2066 bu p obably
no a e yea 2075
2022.09.17 *po en ially signi ican e en (pos-
sibly co ela ed wi h nuclea adi-
a ion/ea hquakes/Mexico) in he
las hi d o yea 2024, may also
be co ela ed wi h he collapse o
T ini a ianism[85] (Roman Ca holicism)
≈2024.09.18 he p edic ion is he e-
sul o expe ienced[48]
synch onici ies[86], al hough
sugges ed, i migh no ha e
a global ele ance; UPDATE
2024.09.19: No hing happened
on he da e, excep mo e
synch onici y![87]
2022.03.07 g ea s ock ma ke collapse and ano he
g ea dep ession[5]
≈2023
(ini ial
p edic ion,
based on
incomple e
da a)
≈2025
( e ised)
in e es ingly, his p edic ion
was made analyzing global
olcanism, ye , mo e ob ious
signs o slowdown a e he e;
UPDATE 2023.01.23: I
u ned ou ha my da ase
on which his p edic ion was
based was incomple e, wi h
upda ed da ase , he signal o
g ea dep ession is lowe ed,
howe e , he signal s ill p e-
dic s a ecession in, o abou ,
yea 2023;
UPDATE 2024.03.12: The sig-
nal became s onge a e he
analysis o yea s 2022/2023,
his p obably means ha he
dep ession can be expec ed
a e all, possibly in yea
2024/2025.
2022.03.09 in e es s in Eu ope popula ion shi ing
om p o-Wes [and Uk aine] o p o-Eas
o owa ds neu ali y[78]
≤2030 p ecu so s s a ed appea ing
la e in he same yea
49
2021 inc ease in global synch onici y, sho en-
ing o in e als be ween ka mic ac ions
and eac ions
≤2066/2300 mul iple no able[79] e en s[88]
in 2022 can be in e p e ed as
ea ly signs o inc easing global
synch onici y
2020 a i icial human wombs[74] ≤2066/2300 mo e se ious p ojec s s a ed
appea ing in 2022[89]
2020 dec easing human e ili y, ise in asexu-
ali y, including ansien homosexuali y
and bes iali y
≤2066/2300 his is appa en ly ongoing;
his p edic ion is implied
wi h he heo y o plane a y
neu ogenesis[1], mo e de ails
on e ili y loss in Jou ney
h ough u u e[90]
2020 dec ease in ocean pH o 7.33 ≤2066/2300 ocean pH is cu en ly dec eas-
ing;
p edic ed in he heo y o plan-
e a y neu ogenesis[1]
2017/2018 bu ning o chu ches (collapse o T ini a -
ianism - Ca holic Chu ch)
≤2040 his p edic ion was made a
he peak o my men al excu -
sion, as pa o ans o ma ion
o consciousness ( he symp-
oms o which may be com-
monly in e p e ed as ne ous
b eakdown) when I was ac -
ing like a p ophe . I don’ e-
membe he exac wo ds bu I
said a he ime some hing like
"soon, he chu ches will bu n,
as hey should be bu n o he
g ound". Abou a yea la e ,
No e-Dame was on i e. In
2021, Ca holic chu ches we e
bu ning in Canada[91]. In
2023, 249 chu ches we e bu n
in India[92], and la e we e
bu ning in Pakis an[93]. Wha
I said he e, I now in e p e as
announcemen o he collapse
o he Ca holic Chu ch. This
may no necessa ily include he
li e al bu ning o chu ches, al-
hough i seems i jus migh .
2021 accele a ed e olu ion, ho izon al gene
ans e becoming dominan gene ans-
e me hod
≤2066/2300 pe he hypo hesis, he a e
o e olu ion is cu en ly co -
ela ed wi h he a e o in-
c ease in a mosphe ic CO2,
he e o e, inc ease in ho izon-
al gene ans e may be hap-
pening al eady ( he appa en ly
pe manen changes in o gan-
isms associa ed wi h i uses
could be in e p e ed as e i-
dence, a leas o a p ecu so );
i one conside s humans as
pa o na u e, ho izon al gene
ans e s, as pa o accele -
a ed e olu ion, a e inc easing
al eady
50
2020 mig a ion o species (including humans)
sou hwa d, e en ually o An a c ica
≤2066/2300 should be s imula ed by a -
ious phenomena (eg. in-
c easing hyd ogen sul ide emis-
sions, wea he changes wi h
AMOC collapse) mos ly co -
ela ed wi h clima e changes,
p edic ed by he heo y o
plane a y neu ogenesis
Table 3: Some o my p edic ions
No e ha , apa om some excep ions, da e o p edic ion he e is he
da e he p edic ion was published online, some o hese p edic ions we e
ac ually made yea s be o e.
P edic ions/da es ma ked wi h an as e isk (*) a e conside ed o ha e
g ea e unce ain y o lowe con idence.
Mos p edic ions a e based on he hypo hesis o accele a ed e olu ion
du ing majo mass ex inc ions, howe e , he e a e wo possible ajec o-
ies - model 1 ( as e ) and model 2 (slowe accele a ion).
I should be no ed ha in some o hese p edic ions i is he e ec ha
has impo ance in local e olu ion, hus he p edic ed cause o he e ec
may di e in eali y in case al e na i e causes o he same e ec a e
possible.
The au hen ici y o abo e p edic ions can be alida ed consul ing he
a chi es. All my wo ks (including his) a e a chi ed almos e e y ime
hey’ e upda ed. Pas e sions a e a ailable in PDF o ma a Zenodo
(CERN se ice) - link is a he bo om o he page. Less upda ed a chi e
is also a ailable a a chi e.o g (no e, howe e , ha a chi e.o g has some
ouble ende ing my ja asc ip , bu he sou ces a e he e and plain ex
can be e ealed).
–
11.1 On p edic ions
Some o he p edic ions he e ha e high unce ain y o low con idence, hese may
be unlikely o come ue bu hey a e lis ed due o po en ial scien i ic alue in
case hey do become ue. E en in case o o he p edic ions, i is p obably
unlikely ha all will become ue. Howe e , I am con inced ha mos will.
Wha I canno be pa icula ly con inced in a e he da es.
We can pu ou obse a ions in o equa ions bu i would be oolish o expec
o na u e o ollow hem - p ecisely o oughly, e en in he sho - e m, le
alone always and o e e . Wha one can see is always in ini esimally small
compa ed o wha one canno see. Thus, e en he mos p ecise equa ions will
e en ually be p o en mos incomple e unless allowed o e ol e. In ou cu en
51
o ms, we ha en’ been obse ing na u e o any signi ican ime compa ed o
i s age. Yes, we can see a in o he pas o e olu ion and he mo e we can see
in o he pas he mo e ce ain we may eel abou ou expec a ions o u u e.
Bu looking in o he pas hings ge blu y quickly and possible in e p e a ions
quickly mul iply. Yes, we can inc ease he p ecision o ou ins umen s, bu
when did ha comple ely alida e ou p e ious p edic ions (e en i we only
look o alida ion)? Wi h inc eased p ecision he e’s much mo e o obse e so
we inc easingly ely on machines o look o hings. He e, ou o e con idence
on es ablished equa ions will lead o biased machines which will ine i ably miss
new hings. E en ually we see wha we wan o see, no all he e is o see. In
ha case, inc easing con idence leads o inc easing illusion and ou p edic ions
become delusions. This is no ue only o p edic ions s emming om equa ions.
Deepe consciousness (subconsciousness) o in ui ion can be a be e p edic o o
u u e han equa ions, howe e , in mos cases i won’ be, as he same limi a ions
apply, only ins umen s a e di e en .
A p ope combina ion o unbiased in ui ion and equa ions is p obably
he bes .
Ap ophe p edic ing he exac da e o ce ain e en will mos ce ainly be
p o en w ong. The same is ue o ma hema ical heo ies p edic ing a iables
wi h g ea p ecision, e en wo se, i hese a iables a e ea ed as cons an s. Non-
dimensional a ios may be mo e eliable p edic o s bu hey mus be coupled
o dimensional hings in o de o be use ul and dimensional hings e ol e and
may di e ge. Two hings ha yes e day we e he same may no be he same
omo ow. No wo phenomena a e absolu ely he same anyway. We can p e end
hey a e (as mode n physicis s o en do), bu in u h hings a e always he
same up o a ce ain p ecision o ou ins umen s and ole able amoun o ou
igno ance o di e ences. And i , o example, wo kilog ams o wo seconds
a e no he same, nei he will he non-dimensional a ios be absolu ely non-
dimensional. No hing is absolu ely eliable.
In any case, a some poin , inc easing p ecision won’ e en be possible be-
cause e e y species is inhe en ly limi ed and will need o e ol e by o de s o
magni ude, o se le on a new le el o possible explo a ion.
11.2 O he p edic ions
This is no a comple e lis o my p edic ions, p edic ions no lis ed include
p edic ions on masses o pa icles (e.g., pho on mass oscilla ion) and simila
p edic ions he gene al public may no be conce ned wi h.
Pe haps one o he mos in e es ing ou comes o my esea ch is he p edic ion
ha li e mus exis e e ywhe e. E en i we educe he de ini ion o li e o
wha is commonly conside ed o be li ing in mains eam science, e olu ion o
en i onmen s will be en angled wi h e olu ion o li e o ms.
52
I ha e p edic ed ha complex li e exis s deep benea h Ea h’s su ace as well
as benea h he su ace o any li ing plane o a moon (whe e a plane /moon
can be ali e e en wi h no ob ious ac i i y on i s su ace). Tha does no mean
ha su aces o celes ial bodies a e gene ally de oid o li e - mic obes should
be p esen , i no on su ace (due o ha sh condi ions, such as adia ion) hen
gene ally no a below i .
I am, he e o e, con inced li e in Ma s exis s oday and some hing mo e
complex migh e en lu k jus below he su ace[62].
Addi ional p edic ions ha migh conce n gene al popula ion can be ound
in he a icle Jou ney h ough u u e[82].
12 [ 2022.11.22 ] T us ne - je uj mi, ne lažem
by Amenoum
Vidim da je s e iše na glasu bo ba p o i dezin o macija. Čo jek bi pomislio
da se konačno počinje cijeni i is ina, no daleko smo od oga a ako će i os a i
s e dok ops aju samo p ojek i u kojima su oni koji dik i aju š o jes a š o nije
dezin o macija oni koji p o i i aju na lopo luku i laži.
Tako bi i p ojek T us ne [94] u ok uženju koje alo izi a is inu bio doba i
poželjan p oduk no u o om s ije u...
Bo ba p o i dezin o macija je uzaludna u populaciji men alno samoog aničenih
pola izi anih ljudi koji p ens eno alo izi aju ono š o donosi k a ko očan p o i
pa ako s a ljaju je u u ono š o im enu no paše isp ed dokazane is ine.
Kad uzgajaš populaciju koja ne zna ni i želi zna i azmišlja i s ojom gla om
s e se s odi na je u pa nije čudo da Zemljinom po šinom ladaju lopo i i
lažo i koji o isko iš a aju je za s aku is inu pos oji ljepša laž a od ealnih
očeki anja ljepše obećanje.
Na oči o je o naglašeno u emenima deg adacije ekonomije i k ali e e ži -
o a pa se, bez os ješ enja populacije, eksponencijalno ju i u p opas .
E ek i no, ljudi želje da ih se k ade i laže a o ak e pla o me će lada i
( lasnici) p osječne populacije lo b zo poplju a i i do es i na ma ginu egzis-
encije ukoliko se decen alizacija cenzu e ne može nap a i i imagina nom a
ijes i/ eklame koje oglaša aju is inu ne mogu učini i p o i abilnijima od laži.
Š o je najgo e, ećina onih koji p opagi aju is inu dijeli ju bespla no pa ope
ljudi adije oscili aju između pod ža anja ( inanci anja) jednog ša la ana do
d ugog.
Ipak, pozd a ljam s aki pokušaj decen alizacije, iako je nemino no da će,
bez bene icija/p o i a za eli u, kao dio unde g ounda bi i ma ginalizi an a ako
po as e u popula nos i i p oglašen ilegalnim.
13 [ 2022.11.02 ] Fiksacija kao dio ikcije
by Amenoum
53

S e zg ade u EU bi se do 2050. ebale ans o mi a i u zg ade nul ih emisija[95].
Veselo. Ili u današnjem p ije odu - skupo i besmisleno.
Bilo da se adi o ozilima ili zg adama, koliko idim nijedan plan smanjenja
emisija ne uključuje smanjenje ukupnog oška ene gije okom p oiz odnje i
ži o nog ijeka p oiz oda e dugo očni u jecaj na okoliš. Np . kad se u ačuna
p oiz odnja, po nekim s udijama, elek ični au omobil ek se nakon 110 000 km
(±40 000 km, o isno o ome kako se p oiz odi s uja punjenja) po emisijama
izjednačuje s onima na osilna go i a, j. ek ada pos aje zeleniji od osila u
pogledu emisija. Ako se populacija po eća a a s njom i b oj au omobila na ces i
nema u nikak og smanjenja emisija pa i da s i oze elek ične au omobile.
Uos alom, da s i oze elek ična ozila, eško da bi se s a a el. ene gija
mogla dobi i iz obno lji ih iz o a (a ni ko ne u ačuna a no e emisije zbog g ad-
nje i od ža anja no ih elek ana).
To ijedi i za zg ade - nema u ukupnog smanjenja emisija, s e je o a banje.
Valja napomenu i da ma e ijali najčešće ko iš eni za izolaciju nisu bio az-
g adi i i dobi aju se iz osilnih go i a. Više ječnih ma e ijala, popu plas ike i
s i opo a - iše kandida a za ječnu sla u.
Nigdje se o i plano i ne do iču onog naj ažnijeg - nepo ebnog luksuza e
neog aničenog as a. Većina onih koji ne ži e u s ano ima ima kuće ine (a s i
i au omobile) sa g o nepo ebnog ili neisko iš enog p os o a okom upo abe.
Po eća amo populaciju (i po ičemo o po ećanje) a ne smanjujemo p os o
po čo jeku (za običan puk se možda k ad a u a s ano a smanjuje ali se za onih
1% po eća a - ukupno, nema smanjenja). Ako se i ne po eća a s ambeni p os o
po eća a se indus ijski - o smanjuje p os o za bios e u koja eguli a empe -
a u u i osigu a a u je e pogodne za ži o . Š o onda znači da mo amo ko is i i
s e iše ene gije da bi osigu ali ops anak a o ope po lači manje p os o a za u
bios e u... Zača ani k ug pozi i ne sp ege.
S e e mje e po iču s e eću o isnos i zaduži anje - i p ema plane u i
bankama, u is o ijeme osigu a ajući as indus ije i nejednakos i.
Za a a amo se CO2o iskom a p oblem je zap a o as ući ene ge ski o isak.
U kon eks u ops anka ži o a na po šini plane a, emisije s akleničkih
plino a, j. globalno za opljenje, samo su dio p oblema. Fiksacija na
eliminaciju ili s abilizaciju CO2emisija je ako samo još jedna mani-
es acija pa adigme za a a anja o e psiho ične populacije.
Uspu , neke od de inicija iksacije, po H a skom jezičnom po alu[96],
su:
1. ob ambeni mehanizam u us i ajućoj si uaciji; us i ana osoba
pona lja neku ak i nos za koju se u dilo da ne ješa a p oblem,
2. bolesna p eokupacija.
Obje de inicije jako dob o opisuju enu no s anje populacije.
P a i p oblem su klima ske p omjene upa ene/ko eli ane sa gubi kom
biodi e zi e a i deg adacijom okoliša. Kao š o gubi ak biodi e zi e a u
54
ašim c ije ima odi do pogo šanja ašeg zd a lja pa i do sm i ako se
nas a i, ako i opadajući biodi e zi e na plane u odi p ema eks inkciji
ži o a na is om.
Po puno je s ejedno odakle dolazi ene gija koju ko is i e - iz sola nih
panela ili osilnih go i a, s e dok se ukupna po ošnja ene gije po eća a
besmisleno je p iča i o od ži os i.
Ene ge ski o isak po s ano niku se od 1965. po ećao za 8000 kWh i ne
pokazuje znako e opadanja[97], dapače još lagano as e, una oč s im z . š ed-
nim ža uljama, e ikasnim klimama i os alim š edlji im u eđajima. A o go o i
da, u p osjeku:
•ko is imo s e iše p oiz oda i/ili,
•s e češće mijenjamo p oiz ode koje ko is imo i/ili,
•in enzi nije ko is imo p oiz ode (np . klima u eđaj zbog globalnog zag i-
ja anja).
Tako da imamo p oblem i bez po ećanja populacije a kamoli sa populacijom
koja as e za 200 000 no ih ljudo inja na dan.
Po ećanje populacije je enu no puno eći p oblem je je, u odnosu na
p osječni o isak, daleko odgo o nije za s mi po as ukupnog o iska od
1950.[98].
Figu e 8: Po ošnja ene gije populacije
T agedije kojima se op e ećujemo uključuju i nes anak ili sm jednog
jedinog čo jeka a u is o ijeme nemamo p oblema sa eks inkcijom s eg
ži o a na po šini plane a pa ako sla imo i ođenje s akog no og čo jeka
iako o s ima smanjuje šanse za ops anak.
Zanimlji o je da p osječan o isak u H a skoj i S biji (a odneda no i u BiH
e C noj Go i) p a i s je ski p osjek.
55
Ili s je ski p osjek p a i naš p osjek? Zanimlji o s akako, je sam p ije
pos a io hipo ezu da će se ono š o se događa u H a skoj p eslika a i na
s ije .
Ja sam s oj ene ge ski o isak pak d as ično smanjio zadnjih godina. Možda
i p osječnom puku sis em nameće smanjenje no o u globalu niš a ne znači kad
se p osjek o iska u globalu po eća a i je oja no oda no nije na od ži om ni ou.
Figu e 9: Gubi ak biodi e zi e a
Čes o se, u kon eks u p omjene klime spominju k i ične očke (p ek e -
nice, ipping poin s) no naj ažnija k i ična očka, ona nakon koje uis inu nema
po a ka je k i ična očka u biodi e zi e u, a ona je, je ujem, dosegnu a negdje
oko 2016. godine kada je globalna populacija di ljih ži o inja opala za 66% (2/3)
od 1970. godine.
A opada i dalje, enu no je na 69%[99].-
13.1 Po’ kile apsu da i d e š eke CO_2
Oda no mi je jasno da je iščeza anje upo ebe osilnih go i a nespoji o sa as-
ućim gladom za ene gijom, a sada je, konačno, ne ko p o eo i is aži anje koje
k an i a i no i ned ojbeno pokazuje o kolikom se za a a anju adi kada go o-
imo o zamjeni osilnih go i a sa z . obno lji im iz o ima[100].
Dakle, po upo ebi ene gije iz 2018., po ebno je doda nih 36000 TWh en-
e gije iz elek ične m eže da bi po puno izbacili osilna go i a kao iz o ene gije
- oko 4 pu a iše od pos ojećeg kapaci e a 2018. godine.
Dob o je napomenu i da aj kapaci e ećinski čine hid oelek ane i nuk-
lea na ene gija dok se za zamjenu ećinski plani aju je oelek ane i sola ne
elek ane - p ema spomenu oj s udiji, p eko 70% ukupne p oiz odnje bi o -
padalo na is e, a o znači da je po ebno sag adi i p eko 550000 no ih elek ana
p osječne eličine.
56
Figu e 10: Po ebna doda na elek ična ene gija za zamjenu osilnih go i a
57
ex ac ing oil (conside ing he ac ha na u al gas is gene ally o med deepe
han oil)?
And will he ex ac ed me hane be used solely o p oduc ion o hyd ogen
and no o o he pu poses - e.g., hea ing, whe e combus ion is eleasing CO2?
The u quoise hyd ogen, he e o e, p obably also doesn’ make sense unless
he me hane is enewable (e.g., me hane p oduced om biomass, no ex ac ed
om he deep). Bu he p oblem is - he e’s simply no enough enewable
me hane a ailable e en i i could be p oduced cheaply. In US, o example,
a ailable enewable me hane could eplace only 10% o ossil gas in use[124].
And i you do ha e enewable me hane, i is much be e o use i o eplace
ossil gas in use a he han use i o p oduce hyd ogen.
This lea es us wi h g een hyd ogen - p oduced by elec olysis o wa e using
enewable ene gy sou ces.
The e a e o he ways o ge hyd ogen, bu hese a e ei he mo e ex-
pensi e, and/o complica ed, and/o less e icien and equi e a lo o
imp o emen o comme cial iabili y[125].
He e he ques ion is - why? Why complica e (and lose ene gy) con e ing
elec ici y o hyd ogen (which is in uel cells con e ed back o elec ici y) when
one can use elec ici y di ec ly o s o e i in o a ba e y wi h less ene gy loss
and no issues wi h comp ession and anspo ?
In case o s o age, he only ad an age is he g ea e ene gy densi y o hyd o-
gen uel cells, compa ed o li hium-ion ba e ies. This can esul in bigge ange
and ligh e ehicles bu , o e all, likely no wo h i in case o au omobiles.
The o he ad an age may be in p oduc ion - i may be mo e en i onmen ally
iendly o p oduce g een hyd ogen and hyd ogen uel cells han ba e ies.
Bu i we use elec ici y o p oduce hyd ogen o ehicles (using g een hy-
d ogen uel cells o powe you house ins ead o using g een elec ici y simply
doesn’ make sense) ha will cause addi ional s ain on he elec ical g id which
will hen need addi ional capaci y.
P oduc ion o g een hyd ogen, hus, p obably only makes sense when he e
is su plus elec ici y ha would be unused o he wise.
15.3 Conclusion
I don’ see hyd ogen as a signi ican ene gy sou ce in u u e (unless used in
nuclea usion, bu I’m no con inced humani y will ad ance ha a ). I could
be o ced, poli ically, as dominan ene gy sou ce bu who will be able o a o d
i ? Pe haps one way o deal wi h clima e change is o educe he numbe o
pollu e s by ising p ices o ene gy. Ce ainly, hyd ogen based ene gy sou ces,
ega dless o he way hyd ogen is p oduced, a e mo e expensi e han o he s.
Hyd ogen is unlikely o eplace ossil uels and is an unlikely solu ion o
clima e change, bu g een solu ions a e becoming inc easingly expensi e o he
64

a e age Joe who is inc easingly being mo e conce ned wi h li e oday han wi h
li e omo ow, e en hough i is p ecisely ha kind o easoning ha c ea ed
he p oblem.
We can alk abou hyd ogen oday and abou wha no omo ow bu he e
ne e we e eal solu ions o he han he ans o ma ion o pola ized human
mind.
Will he a e age Joe be willing o signi ican ly sac i ice his li es yle o long-
e m su i al o will his kind all-back o [sho - e m] cheape ossil uels? Wha
abou he a e age Jane?
The answe is, o cou se, clea al eady[126], and i will be becoming clea e
and clea e wi h dec easing maneu e ing space o delusional sub en ions.
This is he posi i e eedback no accoun ed o - when pola ized human
is p essu ed i will eso o quick and e ec i e solu ions o p ese e,
no only i s li e bu i s li es yle as long as ha is possible, ega dless
o how di y hese solu ions a e, accele a ing i s own demise omo ow.
Ul ima ely, i appea s conse a ion o li es yle is e en mo e impo an o
he a e age human han sho - e m conse a ion o li e. O he wise, he
ene gy would be colo less and i s usage would be balanced and sha ed
wi h na u e, no inc easing exponen ially unde he ainbow o decei ing
labels. Tha ’s no solu ion, e en i g een label migh domina e o a
momen .
Funny hing is, no e e yone has o sac i ice li es yle, some li es yles
could be imp o ed. The key is, o cou se, in balance - balancing he a io
o ma e ial and spi i ual needs wi h he a io o ma e ial and spi i ual
needs o na u e. So a , e ec i ely, o he a e age human, na u e has
no ma e ial no spi i ual needs, only goods o aking.
And his is a e lec ion o gods s dogs ela ionship be ween humans
- humans will ne e be in balance wi h na u e as long as he e is no
balance be ween humans.
I know.. I’m epea ing s u , i ’s so annoying - why do I keep poin ing o
suicidal na u e o pola ized humans? Don’ we wan hem o go ex inc ?
I ’s an enigma...
I ’s p obably a legacy o my own pola ized pas . I know i ’s no easy be-
ing pola ized and suicidal jus as i ain’ easy o su i e being su ounded
by pola ized and suicidal human na u e.
16 [ 2022.10.06 ] The EU is doomed
by Amenoum
The Eu ope joining wi h US in o NATO was a ma iage des ined o ail. Bu
i won’ jus end wi h he b eakup o NATO, i will likely be coupled wi h he
65
b eakup o EU. This is mos ly due o asymme ic and unsus ainable ela ionship
be ween US and EU (o be ween US and he es o he wo ld).
In ha ela ionship, when i comes o o eign policy, he EU is a dog owned
by he da k side (deep s a e, o he neocons) o US. This was ine wi h pola ized
Eu opean people when US wa s didn’ a ec hem.
Wi h he wa in Uk aine, howe e , his is no longe he case, and mis-
alignmen be ween wishes o people and commands obeyed by EU poli icians is
g owing exponen ially. This is, ob iously, des abilizing EU.
The uns able/weak Eu ope is, o cou se, in he in e es o US. Cu ing
ies wi h Russia/China is making EU mo e dependen on US. No wonde
he he da k US and i s EU minions a e in es ing hea ily in o his wa .
This was all ca e ully planned in someone’s mind. And, o some o us,
i migh be ha d o unde s and why a e people s ill dying o in e es s o
hese bas a ds? Bu all becomes clea once one unde s ands ha his is
no a ela ionship be ween sane humans, his is a ela ionship be ween
sel -p oclaimed gods and dogs.
The US wan s o des oy Russia and i doesn’ ca e how many Uk ainians
will die o ha o how many Eu opeans will eeze o dea h, die due o ood
sho ages o , some ime in u u e, nuclea adia ion.
The wa in Uk aine can be ended oday and all his would be a oided i
US/EU would acknowledge Eas e n Uk aine as Russian e i o y (wi h a o mal
gua an ee ha Wes e n Uk aine won’ join NATO). Uk aine is a big coun y
and i was always di ided be ween p o-Russian eas and p o-Ame ican wes .
C imea e en was a pa o Russia o a long pe iod (1783 – 1917) be o e i was
gi en, by he heads o he So ie Union, o he Uk aine in 1954.
I is no su p ising hen ha i s popula ion is dominan ly Russian.
Bu i ’s no only C imea, mos o popula ion o eas e n Uk aine is ei he
Russian o p o-Russian, which is e iden in elec ions. Take o example he
2004 elec ions[127].
The esul s a e shown in Fig. 13. Ob iously, go e nmen o Yanuko ych
was wha mos ci izens o eas e n Uk aine wan ed. Newe elec ions show simila
esul s. Why a e hen he US and i s dogs decla ing cu en e e enda in eas e n
Uk aine a sham? The Russians e en in i ed UN, OECD and EU o o e see hese
e e enda bu hey all e used i [128]. Why? Because hen hey would ha e o
admi he eali y o eali y.
No e ha , i shouldn’ be su p ising ha oday eas e n Uk aine is e en
mo e p o-Russian, due o e o is a acks on Russians in eas e n Uk aine
ha ha e inc eased since 2014.
66
Figu e 13: Resul s o elec ions in Uk aine, 2004
The co up ed Wes simply doesn’ wan a peace ul esolu ion o he con lic .
In i s his o y, he US ne e did[129].
The e’s also g ea hypoc isy he e. Conside Koso o in Se bia - i was a pa
o Se bia (and s ill is by some) ha ’s mainly popula ed by Albanians. The
US/EU s ongly suppo s au onomy and independence o Koso o. Shouldn’ i
hen suppo he au onomy and independence o Russians in eas e n Uk aine?
O cou se i should bu he p oblem is - while Albanians a e p o-Ame ican, he
Russians end o be p o-Russian and a p o-Russian au onomy no se ing US
in e es s canno be allowed.
The Russia, China, No h Ko ea - all hese coun ies a e a i icially in la ed
h ea s o US, simply because hey don’ wan o se e US and obey US com-
mands, like EU does.
The EU is hus doomed, like any dog is, se ing he de il.
17 [ 2022.09.30 ] Good mou ning, black F iday
by Amenoum
As much as I don’ like poli ics and wa s I s ill eel a ec ed by he lies. And
he ime o wa is he ime o g ea es lies. The wa in Uk aine has con i med
wa s oday a e wa s be ween he [sys ems o he] Wes and he Eas . The Wes
is he US and i s p oxies, including mos o Eu ope. As o he Eas , i ’s s ill
67
Russia ( o he Wes , howe e , Russia is equal o Pu in and he Wes is equal o
he Wo ld ucking Uni edT M ).
I ’s always unny o hea how a single man is in ading a coun y and
planning o conque Eu ope.
China and some o he Eas e n coun ies a e no in hese wa s ye bu a e
inc easingly being pain ed as enemies so i ’s p obably jus a ma e o ime.
Lack o enemies equals o an exis en ial c isis o neoconse a i es, as-
socia ed complexes and ins i u ions[130]. And hey a e always shaping
US’ o eign policy (and EU’s la ely) o a g ea deg ee, ega dless wha
pa y is o icially in powe . The e will be no peace on Ea h, as long as
he e a e neoconse a i es, shaping o eign policies.
In any case, I can’ see China o any po en ial Russian ally as a Russian
p oxy and ha ells us how weak EU is, compa ed o he Eas . Rega dless o
opinion, he u h is no se ed in he Wes . The u h may no be se ed in
he Eas ei he , bu I can’ commen on ha , being mainly exposed o Wes e n
p opaganda, daily.
And lies he e a e becoming c azie by he hou .
Pa o p opaganda is no only o lie, bu o igno e ac s agains i . And
he Wes e n media seems o be comple ely unde con ol o a biased
p o-US machine.
A good example a e he a icles by R. Basu (UN) which she ied o
publish in he Wes bu was comple ely igno ed by media ou le s, e en
hough he s o ies we e ac ual epo s, no biased p opaganda.
The a icles old o So ie s p o ec ing he women and hei igh s in
A ghanis an bu also o US suppo ed mu de ous gangs e s h owing
acid in he aces o women[129].
Fo example, he e is no doub ha ecen gas leaks in No d S eam pipelines
a e he esul o sabo age. Bu le ’s ge a g ip on eali y - he p ime suspec o
his simply canno be Russia, he p ime suspec should be US. Ye , he Russia
is he p ime suspec in EU. I makes one wonde - wha kind o bones ha e he
dogs been gi en? O is i eally jus ea ha ules he EU?
I ha e o admi ha , a leas a e he wa in Yugosla ia in he 90’s, he
neighbo ing Se bia is a be e coun y o i s people han C oa ia is and, om
68
wha I’ e seen and hea d, Se bian people seem o be less de anged han C oa -
ians a e. C oa ia is a ucked up coun y sla ing o US and i s EU domina ing
assal s a es, while Se bia, e en hough i has p oblems, doesn’ seem o sla e
o anyone igh now.
I I would be pola ized, I would be ashamed o C oa ian leade ship and
C oa ian people o suppo ing his shi show, bu I don’ e en eel like C oa ian
anymo e.
I do no suppo i s US go e nmen . Bu I wouldn’ suppo Russian go -
e nmen ei he .
And e en hough I’m hinking abou mo ing o Se bia o somewhe e mo e
o he Eas I p obably won’ . I’m jus no pola ized enough, no do I ha e
he means, o go o he eas e en hough I eel he a ac ion (Bhu an is e y
in i ing).
So I emain in he ucked up land hey call Sla onia whe e he i s ques ion
o he day is: why do I keep waking up in o his nigh ma e?
The land ha s ill does no ha e he balls o say no o Zag eb, Zag eb which
doesn’ ha e he balls o say no o EU, EU which doesn’ ha e he balls o say no
o US, he US which doesn’ ha e balls.. only i ea ms. Bundled wi h suicidal
s upidi y.
Al hough no in allible, an good sou ce o in o ma ion on poli ics o e all
is N. Chomsky.
Abou he cu en si ua ion, Chomsky is saying he same[131].
So go on, keep manu ac u ing lies, keep oiling he p opaganda machine, o
god’s sake, accele a e i . Engage you nuclea weapons, le you demons and
hei minions expose hei ue na u e, so he colo less o us can, inally, es in
peace, dead o ali e. Fo any eali y o us is be e , han he one p omising a
p omised land in he ising ocean o bla an lies.
In o he news...
Good mou ning black F iday Sep embe 19 h 1986.
18 [ 2022.09.17 ] Pla i nuklea ni a , c ena zima,
zeleni bogo i i c ni sola ni paneli
by Amenoum
Dok sam bio lud, ili iz an sebe (dio ans o macije s ijes i oko 2018. godine),
izja io sam u jednom enu ku da će as s e pobi i Ame ikanci. Tokom emena,
nisam oj izja i da ao puno značaja, no ijes i u zadnje ijeme po iču me na
dublje p ouča anje onoga š o sam u o ijeme p oiz eo.
69

S e š o sam izja io ada o budućnos i danas se pokazuje sas im izgled-
nim scena ijem. Tako da mi se s e p imje eniji e min za s anje u kojem
sam bio čini značajna desink onizacija lokalnog p os o a i lokalnog e-
mena a s e manje nekak a beznačajna psihoza. Kao da sam ijelom bio
na jednom mjes u u p os o u no dušom na nekom d ugom mjes u u e-
menu. Š o je, po eo iji Komple ne Rela i nos i[38], sas im ela i no
moguće iako ne u ijek p e iše je oja no.
No nalazimo se, po mojim hipo ezama, u pe iodu jake e olucije kada
ne je oja no pos aje s e je oja nije pa možda i o o usko o neće bi i
ako čudno. Dapače, naknadnim is aži anjem zaključio sam da go nja
izja a i ekako ima ežinu (de alji su u blog članku The 3 d Ac ).
T eći s je ski a je, ealno, eć počeo. Ako i ne osjećamo s i posljedice
upo ebe a enog o užja, sas im sigu no osjećamo posljedice poli ičkog a o-
anja i bezumlja koje i inače p a i s aki a a o dje je pop imilo s je ske azm-
je e.
Kao da o nije dos a, s e iše se spominje nuklea ni a . Zanimlji o je
da su puna us a nuklea nog a a up a o Ame ikancima (i onima koji se ako
osjećaju). Zanimlji o je i da Ame ikanci s e iše o užja šalju Uk ajini i da se
u adi s e iše i o dalekome nom nao užanju pa se in enzi no azmišlja i o
mlaznim a ionima[132].
S e o se s e eže može in e p e i a i kao sukob Uk ajine i Rusije a s e iše
kao sukob NATO-a (SAD-a) i Rusije.
Uk ajinci, na p imje , nemaju pilo e koji znaju up a lja i o im a ion-
ima. Tako da donacija mo a uključi a i i ening, no hoće li ag ima i
emena za njega ili će a ionima pilo i a i ne ko d ugi?
Tako da je sas im izgledno da će se a p oši i i an g anica Uk ajine. No
Rusija u ima s e manje opcija. Na baze NATO-a u Eu opi i Ame ici se sigu no
neće ići nekak om pješadijom i enko ima. Ra dakle pos aje nuklea an.
Velike će š e e bi i i u H a skoj, možda zbog baza u okolini a možda
zbog p o-US lade i s ega š o se po ezuje s im.
A ako NATO odluči o mi a i neku jaču bazu u H a skoj, bi će o k aj
H a ske.
Rusija d uge opcije nema, Ame ikanci s e o znaju i čini se kao da neki o
p iželjkuju.
Zanimlji o je onda pogleda i š o kažu s udije u ezi nuklea nog a a. A
70
zadnja s udija[133] kaže slijedeće:
•2 milija de m ih u slučaju nuklea nog a a Indije i Pakis ana,
•5 milija di m ih u slučaju nuklea nog a a Ame ike i Rusije.
Dakle, p ak ički, eks inkcija ljudske s e u slučaju i jednog i d ugog.
Na a no, neće s i um ije i odmah i di ek no od posljedica nuklea nih
de onacija. Umi a će se je oja no naj iše od gladi.
Možemo za o k i i i Ame ikance je s e upućuje na o da su oni s e zakuhali,
no i is ok mi nekako s e iše sm di na zapad.
Kina je danas in es i ana kapi alizmom popu zapada pa se i ponaša
slično. Sas im je izgledno da će, popu Ame ike nekad, k enu i s oku-
pacijom i mili a izacijom e i o ija iz an Kine.
A pogledaj e zadnje p os jede u H a skoj. Ako znamo da H a i baš
nisu skloni p os jedo anju a kamoli upo ebi sile u is ima ( ećina se boji
kažnja anja) eba se zapi a i ko sponzo i a nasilje u is im?
Nasilje, j. e o is e, u p os jedima kojima se ušila las u Uk ajini
sas im je izgledno sponzo i ala Ame ika, sponzo i a li o e Rusija?
Des abilizacija sis ema od s ane konku en nog sis ema nije nikak a
no os ni i je iše baš i ajna (zna se da je CIA np . adila na des abi-
lizaciji las i u I anu još u 50-im godinama p ošlog s oljeća).
Ipak, pos ojeća las je za Sla once (a i mnoge d uge), po mom mišljenju,
daleko od idealne pa i nije loše da se s uši.
Mogli bi ako i Kineze, pa čak i Ruse, danas nazi a i Ame ikancima.
U s akom slučaju, moja izja a da će as s e pobi i Ame ikanci ne z uči iše
ako besmislena.
Dapače, s e iše je ujem u scena ij u kojem pogiba p eko 7 milija di ljudi
a ops aju oni neu alni, možda ek oko 1.5 milijuna ljudi.
Neće e milija de, po mojoj eo iji, nes a i zau ijek. Poja i će se u mu i-
anim oblicima hib ida nekadašnjih ljudi i nekadašnjih ži o inja, neš o o po niji
na adijaciju, a možda i na nekom d ugom mjes u.
Sloje i ko e plane a su mjes a s pojačanom adijacijom (ona gene i a
doba dio opline) pa se nuklea ni a može sh a i i kao dio p ocesa
adap acije za no o ok uženje.
Zanimlji o je do es i nuklea ni a u kon eks klima skih p omjena.
71
Mnoš o zanimlji os i u zadnje ijeme. Zanimlji o.
Po ci i anoj s udiji, jedna od posljedica nuklea nog a a bi će globalno sniža-
anje empe a u e od 1.5 ◦C (ako ćemo se za a a a i) do 14.8 ◦C ( ealnije).
Posljedica će o bi i zasićenja s a os e e čes icama pepela (slično pojačanom
ulkanizmu). A budući da će se snižene empe a u e zad ža i ba 10-20 godina
može e s oje sola ne panele okači i mačku o ep.
Ako eć kupuje e panele, sa je ujem da kupi e one osje lji ije na di uzno
z ačenje (od kojih će bi i neke ko is i) a ne di ek no.
Zanimlji o je p imje i i da je nuklea na adijacija u dob oj mje i ion-
izi ajuća, s ojs o adijacije koje se i isko iš a a u sola nim panelima.
No paneli su p ilagođeni za ionizaciju idlji im spek om.
Doba in es icijski po ez danas bi ako možda bio p oiz odi i panele
osje lji ije na gama i be a z ačenje umjes o na idlji i spek a . Tak i
paneli pos a ljeni na k o aše kuće ne samo da bi p oiz odili s uju
nego bi i as š i ili od adijacije (dob o bi inače bilo i kuću ukopa i u
zemlju).
Zanimlji o da sam ja počeo s oju kuću ukopa a i i p ije nego š o sam
sh a io da će bi i nuklea nog z ačenja. Onaj koji je sa s ojim bogom
doba neće se ni boja i - ni i a a, ni i mi a, ni i zime, ni i adijacije.
Neće je se aga od ekao pa oda no zna da ga ag nema zaš o spaša a i
s ojim s aho ima.
Već sam p ije sh a io da su a o i za plane is o š o i ulkanizam[5] pa nije
čudno da se, umjes o ulkanizma, po iče a . Oči o je lakše ljude na je a i da
se bo e nego na je a i ulkan da p o adi.
Nuklea ni a , dakle, možemo in e p e i a i i kao s eds o za bo bu p o i
globalnog zag ija anja ( eakcija Zemljinog imunog sis ema).
Zanimlji o je da s jedočenja o posje ima anzemaljaca uključuju ame -
ičke i uske nuklea ne silose.
Ako sh a imo u s u ži o a kao dio imunog sis ema Zemlje, možda su
nas, s jesno ili nes jesno, upozo a ali da će ak i i a i naše nuklea no
o užje da bi eguli ali naše bjesomučno zag ija anje a mos e e?
Zanimlji o je da s jedoci ih sus e a čes o spominju i s oje snu kon olu
uma od s ane posje i elja... Pa, kao š o ekoh, neke konspi acije možda
i nisu s jesne s d ije ljudske pola izi ane s ane, ali o, po mojoj eo iji
ela i nos i, samo znači da su s jesne s neke eće s ane.
No i dnja da je a eća s ana anzemaljska ili da nije ljudska, ope
72
je ela i na. Ako su e olui ali iz ljudi (a po mojim eo ijama jesu[74])
može se eći da su o su is o ljudi, samo nemaju domaće po ijeklo (njiho o
po ijeklo je je oja no na Ma su).
Ne bih pak isključio ulkanizam. Pojačane geo e malne ene gije će bi i p i
po šini nakon a a (i sama adijacija će zag ija a i po šinu) je ljudi će a om
naj je oja nije p e iše snizi i empe a u u. Ako samo- eguli ajući mehanizam
Zemlje na po šini ops ane do oljno dugo (a u dob oj mje i bi ebao - mnoge
ži o inje su, na p imje , lo o po ne na adijaciju a biljkama bi adijacija mogla
omogući i da za ladaju zemljom i o u gigan skim oblicima) može se očeki a i
i podizanje empe a u e na neki način a o ope može omogući i geo e malna
ene gija.
Ako spomenu a eća s ana obi a a u dubini Zemlje moguće je i da, u
od eđenoj mje i, kon oli a adijaciju koja se amo od ija.
De ek i ano isokoene ge sko kozmičko z ačenje koje izbija na po šini
An a k ike[134] a koju mode na izika ne može objasni i može bi i
posljedica nuklea ne uzije (ili nekih d ugih nuklea nih in e akcija) kon-
oli ane od is e s ane. Š o ade amo?
Pa možda se sp emaju o opi i led - između os alog, da bi podigli em-
pe a u u uslijed nuklea ne zime. Zanimlji o je da odu ijek imam želju
posje i i An a k iku no bez mogućnos i da o i učinim znao sam požel-
je i da ona posje i mene. Uz podginu u azinu mo a za 65 me a a ako
ne i iše e uz nuklea nu zimu i kolaps a lan ske me idijanske ob ajuće
s uje, mogla bi mi se želja i os a i i. Panonsko mo e mi je edo i o u
gla i zadnjih godina. Ipak, za is o, ebalo bi malo iše ode ili od eđene
seizmičke ak i nos i ne bi li se oda koncen i ala u Panonski bazen.
Voda može pak doći i d ugim pu em, uz p ed iđenu pojačanu ek oniku
i agmen i anje ek onskih ploča mogla bi na i a i i iz dubine. Za sad
s e o još u ijek z uči kao scena ij iz an as ike i ako će se ako neš o i
dogodi i, ne čini se izglednim u sko o ijeme.
–
18.1 Rela i na alkemija
Ne je ujem pak da će nuklea ni a doseći ak e azmje e da će bi i u cijelos i
odgo o an za nadolazeće s anje na Zemlji. Ako pos oji iše opcija da se pos igne
is i e ek , ponekad će najbolje ješenje bi i ela i na supe pozicija uz oka, a o
u o om slučaju znači da će se e ek pos ići kombinacijom nuklea nog o užja,
ulkanizma i pojačanog kozmičkog z ačenja (ugla nom sa Sunca) pa cijalnim
kolapsom magne skog polja. U p i odi ak a ješenja i jesu najčešća je di-
73
Negdje oko 2017/2018 godine, dok sam bio lud, izja io sam da će T ump i Pu in
doći u Sibinj.
Nije o bilo klasično ludilo. To je bilo s anje koje je mode na medic-
ina doneda no zabunom pois o jeći ala sa psihozom (čini se da iše nije
ako[152]) a ja nazi am s anjem duše uslijed ans o macije s ijes i u
kojem je iz aža anje is e u elikoj mje i ezul a p epla ljenos i sink o-
nici e om.
To je ada izgledalo kao p o očans o Baba Vange pa bi u njega je oja no
ugla nom i po je o ali oni koji je uju u p o očans a is e gospođe dok bi os ali
o om p o oku ili p o oku (o isi koga se pi a) p ed iđali sko ašnji pu p ema
od eđenoj ja noj us ano i...
Inače, nakon k aćeg is aži anja zaključio sam da za mnoga p o očans a
Baba Vange za koja se di da su se ispunila nema ele an nih iz o a
dok ele an ni iz o i pos oje za ona koja se nisu ispunila.
No, mnoga njezina p ed iđanja su zap a o očna, iako nisu i godine u
kojima bi se ebala os a i i - š o je čes i p oblem kod p o oka koji ne
ma u i aju u p o oke.
Zais a, iz kojeg azloga bi se Pu in i T ump (koji iše nije ni p edsjednik
SAD-a) u sko oj budućnos i sas ajali, i o u mjes u za koje nije čula ećina
H a a a kamoli s ije ?
Čini se da nema smisla, ali p o očans a događaja u budućnos i čes o nemaju
smisla u sadašnjos i.
No, od poče ka a a u Uk ajini e naja om T umpa da će se pono no kan-
didi a i za p edsjednika s a i zap a o idu u smje u u kojem je sas im izgledno
da će se o a d ojica negdje sas a i.
Ako se T ump zais a kandidi a lo je oja no će i pobijedi i na izbo ima.
Za o pos oji iše azloga no naj eći je smanjenje IQ-a p osječne popu-
lacije e s e eća b iga za š o k a ko očnije in e ese (uslijed klima skih,
inancijskih i os alih uda a) pa ako i za od ži os poslo a kojima će se
i in e es i pod ža a i.
A kada se adi o k a ko očnim in e esima nema ećeg šampiona od čo -
jeka koji negi a globalno za opljenje i jasno pod ža a osilnu indus iju
(š o i njega samog, u od eđenim s edinama ba , čini ži ućim osilom).
Kada u a u dođe do zasićenja ili bezizlazne si uacije, običaj je da se ođe
80

d ije za aćene s ane sas anu negdje na neu alnom e enu e dogo o e izlaz -
koji obično p eds a lja p izna anje os ojenog e i o ija ili podjelu nečije zemlje.
Tako je bilo i u a u u Jugosla iji - gdje su Tuđman i Miloše ić dogo a ali
podjelu Bosne (ne S bije ni i H a ske!).
Ne go o im o sas anku u Ka ađo đe u 1991., go o im o d ugim sus-
e ima, p ens eno o [ja nom!] sas anku na neu alnom e i o iju, u
Žene i poče kom 1994[153].
Doći će ako i enu ak kada će T ump i Pu in dogo a a i podjelu Uk ajine
(ne Ame ike ili Rusije!).
S e iše se a u Jugosla iji čini kao naja a ili p e eča (p ecu so ) a a
Ame ike i Rusije.
Os aje samo pi anje mjes a sas anka. A sas im sigu no neće se sas a i negdje
na is oku (u Kini np .) ili zapadu. Na je oja nije mjes o sas anka je up a o
negdje u s edini.
Možda ne je oja no z uči, ali is ini o je da između H a ske i S bije pos-
oji ničija ili neu alna zemlja. Taj apsu d nas ao je p emješ anjem dijela
oka Duna a je S bija s oja a zemlju do oka Duna a koji pos oji danas, dok
H a ska s oja a zemlju do s a e g anice (s a og oka). Tako se s o io mali
dio od nekih 7 km2kojeg ni ko ne p iznaje kao s oje, a neki amo pokuša aju i
s o i i no u d ža u[154].
Zanimlji o je da pos oje još samo 2 ak a mjes a na S ije u (jedno je na
An a k ici a d ugo u A ici).
Još zanimlji ije, u o om kon eks u, je činjenica da je o mjes o udaljeno
samo 100 km od Sibinja.
Ipak, iako nema neu alnijeg mjes a od o oga u Eu opi, eško da će se o a
d ojica sas a i baš na mjes u gdje nema in as uk u e ni i ci ilizacije.
No eć p ije sam go o io da bi dugo očno najbolje bilo za Sla oniju da se
odspoji od H a ske[105] ( j. Zag eba), a o pos aje i s e je oja niji scena ij -
iako o mnogi još u ijek ne ide. Za i ko misli da će Sla onci (od kojih je doba
dio bio p isiljen emig i a i) s emenom pos aja i s e zado oljniji Zag ebom?
Ili će bi i s e nezado oljniji je budućnos s akako ne izgleda dob o?
Ako se Sla onija, ili ba jedan njen dio, osamos ali (može pak os a i u nekoj
laba oj ede aciji sa Zag ebom) sumnjam da će [p]os a i članica NATO-a (u
s akom slučaju, bilo bi o suicidalno).
Ta Sla onija bi ako pos ala neu alna i izbjegla a koji se, po s emu sudeći,
akođe kuha na o im p os o ima.
I e o sa šenog e i o ija za sas anak d ojice gla ešina - is očno je p o-
ame ički Zag eb a zapadno p o-s pska (p o- uska možda i ne p e je ano, ali
81
sigu no an i-ame ička) S bija. Dakle, puno bolji izbo nego Š ica ska, koja bi
uos alom, kako je k enulo, mogla još i ući u NATO.
Možemo sada sh a i i onaj komadić neu alne zemlje između S bije i H a ske
kao nago ješ aj ili p e eču ećeg komada neu alne zemlje između o e d ije
d ža e.
U pola izi anom s ije u bilo bi o od elikog značaja za Sla oniju. Sas-
anak d ije s je ske sile u Sla oniji u ak om enu ku bilo bi ned ojbeno
p iznanje is e kao samos alne i neu alne zemlje. Dežu ni poli iča i bi
ekli da ne bi bilo loše ni za ekonomiju.
A s obzi om da je pos ojanje ba jedne neu alne zemlje u in e esu o ih
sila (ako niš a d ugo, da se mogu dogo a a i uslijed a o a) eško da će
ak u zemlju ne ko di a i ili pokuša a i des abilizi a i (na oči o ako ne
bude s ogo demok a ska ni i s ogo komunis ička) pa a o a i na njenom
e i o iju.
Pa e o još jednog azloga za odjeb p o-US Zag eba.
Os aje još samo do es i o u d ojicu do Sibinja da bi p o očans o bilo u
po punos i ispunjeno.
Pa, ako p e pos a imo da će se sus e dogodi i negdje u s edini Sla onije
(š o bi bio ealan scena ij) onda je pod učje oko Sibinja jedan od kandida a.
Idealno bi bilo da i dio Bosne južno od Sla onskog B oda p oglasi neu al-
nos i ud uži se sa Sla onijom. Ne zbog sas anka nego da se Sla oncima
osigu a neome an p is up bosanskim će apima, na a no, a Bosancima
š a eć aže u Sla oniji (sebe?).
Možda se s e o još u ijek čini kao san, no ja sam se eć od ekao d ža l-
jans a e ne p iznajem H a sku d ža u o ak u kak a jes . Dakle, š o se mene
iče, zemlja na kojoj ži im eć jes neu alna i nemam niš a p o i da se o a d o-
jica sas anu na mom imanju - pod u je om da neće do es i i s a o e, galami i
i sme a i mi u adu.
Dapače, možda ih počas im i čaš’com akije. Ako donesu bocu akije, na -
a no.
22 [ 2022.08.03 ] Is Ea h ge ing [l]a e ?
by Amenoum
No, he Ea h is no la and i ne e will be unless i inc eases o a ion signi i-
can ly. And o ha , celes ial bodies gene ally need mo e mass.
82
This is because e e y sphe ical body wi h a g a i a ional maximum in i s
cen e will be, wi h inc easing o a ion, ans o ming om sphe ical o m in o
a disk.
Since angula eloci y is lowe on he poles, g a i a ional o ce o e powe s
cen i ugal o ce, edis ibu ing mass om pola egions in o equa o ial.
Due o conse a ion o angula momen um, added mass should slow down
o a ion bu his is no he case wi h celes ial bodies (gas plane s, o example,
gene ally o a e as e wi h inc eased mass).
Because o his, gene al assump ion is ha acqui ed mass al eady had a
big angula momen um. Mass was acqui ed om he collapse o a spinning
cloud o gas, which, wi h a dec ease in o bi al adius mus inc ease o a ion
speed. Some o ha momen um is hen ans e ed o al eady acqui ed mass -
inc easing o a ion o he body.
Ea h is cu en ly no ge ing any addi ional mass om o bi ing clouds o
gas, howe e , wi h mel ing o ice on he poles and ising sea le els, he Ea h is
ge ing mo e la .
I Ea h would be a luid (liquid o gas), his edis ibu ion o mass would
be, oge he wi h idal o ces induced by he Moon, slowing down he o a ion
o Ea h a equa o while speeding up o a ion a he poles.
All due o conse a ion o angula momen um:
L=m
Since momen um L mus emain cons an , mo e mass m on he equa o [wi h no
addi ional momen um] will dec ease o a ion - angula eloci y . E en mo e,
i adius is inc eased oo (will be, i he e is no inc ease in mass densi y).
On he poles whe e mass and adius we e dec eased, o a ion inc eases.
Bu Ea h’s o a ion is speeding up[155].
One explana ion o his is Ea h’s igidness - dec easing adius a he poles
is inc easing o a ion a he poles bu also a he equa o because he wo a e
mos ly connec ed by solid mass.
This is a alid and mos likely explana ion, howe e , due o endency o
conse e momen um, his is also inc easing ension (hea ) be ween he equa o
and he poles - edis ibu ed mass is luid and i will esis accele a ion (in-
c eased luid mass on equa o , o conse e momen um, mus slow down ins ead
o speeding up).
The as e he ice mel s, he ic ion is bigge (and ension be ween he equa-
o and he poles) and g ea e is he possibili y o ea hquakes and olcanism.
I he ice would apidly mel (e.g., in a day) his would also p oduce
global looding.
The edis ibu ion o mass wi h mel ing o pola ice is also inc easing di e -
ences be ween momen a o equa o luids and pola luids (equa o ial ending
o slow down, pola speeding up).
83
Inc easing di e en ial o a ion is inc easing induced Co iolis o ce - which
ansla es o s onge , as e o a ing o exes, e.g., hu icanes ( yphoons).
Is he g owing numbe o la -Ea he s co ela ed wi h his la ening o
Ea h?
Is he la ening and inc easing o a ion a p ecu so o acquisi ion o mass
[adding addi ional spin momen a], e.g., as e oids, o Moon [ agmen s]?
Well, acco ding o my heo ies, his is likely all co ela ed.
23 [ 2022.07.04 ] The canonical blasphemy
by Amenoum
New on claimed Bible was co up ed. This is my conclusion as well, bu anyone
in e es ed can easily see ha wi h a bi o esea ch (al hough ho ough analysis
can be much mo e e ealing). The co up ion was e iden e en be o e he ind
o he collec ion o gospels a Nag Hammadi in 1945, which includes gospels
ha he Ch is ian council disca ded and le ou o he Bible.
Some o he gospels con adic each o he bu he bishops did no choose
o include wha is, o is a leas closes o, he u h, a he wha se ed hei
in e es s bes .
Sc ibes copying sc ip u es o en changed hem o se e hei in e es s,
mo e and mo e wi h ime. This was well documen ed by B. D. Eh man
in "Misquo ing Jesus: The S o y Behind Who Changed he Bible and
Why", which I highly ecommend o anyone in e es ed in he o igins o
Ch is iani y and he Bible.
Many people belie e ha i was he apos les who w o e he gospels,
howe e , a he ime o Jesus mos people we e illi e a e and ha is
ue o mos i no all apos les as well (Paul, who is known as Paul he
Apos le and who did know how o ead and w i e, was ac ually no one
o he apos les, his w i ings howe e we e he basis o he majo i y o
he New Tes amen ). O e ime, he chu ch has no only inc eased he
quan i y o ex in sc ip u es, i has added new apos les o he s o y.
The gospels o Luke, John, Ma and Ma k a e no gospels o 4 di e en
apos les, hey a e he p oduc o 4 di e en sc ibes copying ex s (and
in he p ocess changing and adding s u ) om he same sou ces, o
e en a single sou ce. One such sou ce could be he gospel o Ma cion
(who was no an apos le ei he ), howe e , I ind he ea ly e sion o
Ma k o be close o he u h ( his i no he e sion in he Bible),
o one eason - ange . People expe iencing o e whelming synch onici y
84
who a e also ac ing as p ophe s (o which I ha e expe ience) will a
his s age [o he ans o ma ion o consciousness] ac wi h ex eme sel -
con idence, audaci y and de e mina ion, bu also will show no me cy
in hei in e ac ion wi h he weak-minded. Thus, exp ession o Jesus
a imes ce ainly could ha e been in e p e ed as ange . This ange
was p esen in mul iple places in he ea ly Ma k (be o e i was u he
co up ed), bu i is no p esen in any gospels included in he biblical
canon.
As I’ e said elsewhe e, a lo o hings in humani y s a ou good and wi h
good in en ions, bu as hey g ow hey ine i ably ge ei he co up ed
o silenced. Ch is iani y go co up ed, and la e i sel s a ed silencing
hose who we e p opaga ing s o ies close o he u h.
One gospel ha was le ou , which I ind in e es ing, is he Gospel o Thomas
(i ’s mos likely he ea lies w i en and closes o he u h) wi h abou hal o
sayings ha a e no p esen in canonical gospels.
Some claim Gospel o Thomas lacks apocalyp ic hemes (Jesus was an apoc-
alyp ic p eache ) doub ing i s au hen ici y, howe e , I ind i mo e likely o
canonical gospels o lack au hen ici y.
As o apocalypses, I will show ha his gospel is ull o e e ences o hem,
albei indi ec ones.
Jesus o en used pa ables and allego ies so he meaning o wha e e he was
saying depends on in e p e a ion.
I am con inced Jesus was in luenced by synch onici y and o in e p e Je-
sus p ope ly one needs o expe ience o e whelming synch onici y (which
I also belie e Jesus expe ienced). New on expe ienced i abou he age
o 35 (people, howe e , in e p e ed i as ne ous b eakdown), I did oo
a abou he same age, as well as Tesla and Jesus (i is no a coincidence
ha Jesus died soon a e his, I was close o dea h mysel ).
This is my in e p e a ion o his sayings in Gospel o Thomas[156].
(1) And he said, "Whoe e inds he in e p e a ion o hese say-
ings will no expe ience dea h."
Coupling o souls and bodies canno las absolu ely o e e , he e o e, one
canno escape dea h (decoupling) o a pa icula inca na ion.
Howe e , Jesus belie ed ha a soul can become ee om cycles o einca -
na ion (coupling wi h bodies) and hus dea h.
Ano he possibili y is ha dea h he e should be in e p e ed as o ge ulness
(memo y ese ) ha occu s be ween inca na ions.
Bu when is his supposed o happen?
85

As shown la e , he belie ed his happens once one ob ains knowledge o sel .
This could also be in e p e ed as a e e ence o ebi h ( ans o ma ion o
consciousness) - when a pe son’s soul e ec i ely becomes ebo n e en hough
he e is no decoupling om he body.
Such ans o ma ions a e likely o peak du ing he apocalypse.
(3) Jesus said, "I hose who lead you say o you, ’See, he king-
dom is in he sky,’ hen he bi ds o he sky will p ecede you. I hey
say o you, ’I is in he sea,’ hen he ish will p ecede you. Ra he ,
he kingdom is inside o you, and i is ou side o you. When you
come o know you sel es, hen you will become known, and you will
ealize ha i is you who a e he sons o he li ing a he . Bu i you
will no know you sel es, you dwell in po e y and i is you who a e
ha po e y."
The li ing a he is ou god, plane Ea h. Once you genuinely ealize (be-
come conscious) o sel -simila i y o uni e ses and ha [you ] ac ions a ound
you a e e lec ed inside you you will become like you god.
Lacking knowledge o you sel you a e lacking sel -consciousness.
(14) Jesus said o hem, "I you as , you will gi e ise o sin o
you sel es; and i you p ay, you will be condemned; and i you gi e
alms, you will do ha m o you spi i s. When you go in o any land
and walk abou in he dis ic s, i hey ecei e you, ea wha hey
will se be o e you, and heal he sick among hem. Fo wha goes
in o you mou h will no de ile you, bu ha which issues om you
mou h - i is ha which will de ile you."
As I ha e s a ed elsewhe e, as ing is a pe iod o a couple o weeks cha -
ac e ized by he loss o appe i e o ood ha one li es h ough once du ing
ans o ma ion o consciousness.
No e ha loss o appe i e is also common jus be o e dea h. This is no a
coincidence. The wo phenomena a e highly co ela ed. T ans o ma ion
o consciousness ce ainly can be in e p e ed as ebi h.
Fo ced as ing is w ong and he e Jesus con i ms ha . He also says ha
[ i ualis ic] p aye s and alms (cha i y) a e bad (my hough s exac ly).
Jesus says i someone gi es some hing o you (like ood), gi e some hing in
e u n.
I is ob ious now why would chu ch ejec his gospel. Fo me, howe e , his
gospel con i ms he co up ion wi hin he chu ch. Ob iously, Jesus belie ed in
ka ma and didn’ like i uals (e.g., as ing o he sake o as ing, p aye s o he
sake o p aying).
86
(15) Jesus said, "When you see one who was no bo n o woman,
p os a e you sel es on you aces and wo ship him. Tha one is
you a he ."
God Ea h is no bo n o a woman. Howe e , he e a e di e en in e p e a-
ions - no necessa ily mu ually exclusi e. Qui e likely, he wo d ’woman’ he e
is a esul o sc ibe in e en ion, a eplacemen o he wo d ’lie’ o ’lies’. This is
no he only example whe e his equi alency be ween women and lies has been
used, as one can see u he below. This was common.
(22) Jesus saw in an s being suckled. He said o his disciples,
"These in an s being suckled a e like hose who en e he kingdom."They
said o him, "Shall we hen, as child en, en e he kingdom?"Jesus
said o hem, "When you make he wo one, and when you make he
inside like he ou side and he ou side like he inside, and he abo e
like he below, and when you make he male and he emale one and
he same, so ha he male no be male no he emale emale; and
when you ashion eyes in he place o an eye, and a hand in place
o a hand, and a oo in place o a oo , and a likeness in place o a
likeness; hen will you en e he kingdom."
This is an indi ec e e ence o he apocalypse (o 21s cen u y as I hypo h-
esize) and ans o ma ion o consciousness.
Ob iously, young child en a e no pola ized and as such speak he u h.
He e, Jesus says ha when you become neu al and s op lying you will
become like god.
Di e ences be ween human males and emales (in mass/size and cogni ion)
a e gene ally decaying and acco ding o my hypo heses, pola ized male and
emale genomes in some bodies a e using o o m a mo e neu al body (and
such bodies a e di e ging in o sepa a e species om pola ized indi iduals).
(106) Jesus said, "When you make he wo one, you will become
he sons o man, and when you say, ’Moun ain, mo e away,’ i will
mo e away."
This is an ano he indi ec e e ence o apocalypse.
As s a ed be o e, when wo [opposi ely] pola ized humans use in o one, he
indi idual will be neu al, and as such, accep u h ("sons o man" he e should
be in e p e ed as "sons o u h", o "messenge s o u h").
By my heo ies, such usion na u ally occu s du ing s ong (accele a ed)
e olu ion h ough ho izon al gene ans e . Neu al people ha e a sense o
synch onici y and a he ime o he ca aclysm he wishes o mos neu al will be
synch onized wi h happenings in he en i onmen . This is how Moses e ec i ely
mo es moun ains.
(11) Jesus said, "This hea en will pass away, and he one abo e
i will pass away. The dead a e no ali e, and he li ing will no die.
87
In he days when you consumed wha is dead, you made i wha is
ali e. When you come o dwell in he ligh , wha will you do? On
he day when you we e one you became wo. Bu when you become
wo, wha will you do?"
Ano he e e ence o he apocalypse.
Due o pills and medica ions, oday he e a e a lo o old people li ing
ha would be dead o he wise - hey could be seen as zombies kep ali e o
p o i . Bu i ’s no jus old people, ma e ialis s in gene al could be in e p e ed
as zombies as he inc easing ma e ialism is highly co ela ed wi h he loss o
soul. On op o ha , plas ics a e u ning people in o zombies[157]. Wi h he
apocalypse his p ac ice will be gone (dead will no be ali e), while, wi h he
ans o ma ion o consciousness o usion, li ing a e ebo n bu do no die. He e,
Jesus also sugges s he usion o some will be empo a y (as I ha e hypo hesized
o homo.gamma hyb ids[74]).
Figu e 15
Chime as (hyb ids) in Fig. 15 a e homo.gamma indi iduals ying o a ain
knowledge, hoping o ans o m back o human o m. The mass scale on he
pic u e symbolizes balance o non-pola iza ion (neu ali y) which one needs o
s i e o o achie e g ea e in elligence.
88
No e ha o he s in e p e he igu e abo e di e en ly.
Howe e , I am con inced ha he o iginal sou ce is no Egyp ian. Egyp-
ians copied i and hen misin e p e ed i - as usually is he case wi h
wes e n eligions. Jus like he ansla ion o gospels by he chu ch was
biased, so was he ansla ion o igu es biased by Egyp ians.
I hypo hesize ha hyb ids will be mos ly hyb ids o homo and canine species
(as shown in he pic u e), and his will be achie ed h ough ho izon al gene
ans e . Thei in elligence will be highe han he in elligence o dogs bu
lowe han he cu en in elligence o humans. Technology o he c ea ion o
hyb ids, albei pe haps no oo sophis ica ed ye , al eady exis s. I belie e hese
hyb ids will appea by he yea 2040. The e is ce ainly no lack o mo i a ion
o he c ea ion o such hyb ids. Dogs a e much easie o con ol and manipula e
and, wi h he c umbling ci iliza ion, i will only ge ha de o con ol o dina y
human popula ion. The e a e o he mo i es, which I ha e desc ibed elsewhe e.
Why yea 2040? One eason is he inc easing amoun o plas ics in human
b ains, which is highly co ela ed wi h inc easing men al diseases - such as
demen ia/dep ession. Acco ding o ends, by yea 2040, he amoun o plas ics
in b ains will be, on a e age, so la ge, ha majo i y o people will su e om
hese diseases. I hypo hesize ha he ans o ma ion o hyb ids will be sold,
among o he hings, as a cu e o hese men al diseases. I is possible ha his
could also sol e he e ili y issues in humans, o a leas i will be ad e ised
as such.
One can e en ind he e e ences o plas ics and demen ia in he Sec e Book
o John[158]:
I hen asked him, “Lo d, wha o he souls o he people who do no
know whose people hey a e? Whe e do hey go?” He esponded,
“In hose people he a i icial spi i has g own s ong and hey ha e
gone as ay. Thei souls a e bu dened, d awn o wickedness, and
cas in o o ge ulness.” “When hey come o h om he body, such
a soul is gi en o e o he powe s c ea ed by he ule s, bound in
chains, and cas in o p ison again. A ound and a ound i goes un il
i manages o become ee om o ge ulness h ough knowledge. And
so, e en ually, i becomes pe ec and is sa ed.”
O cou se, Jesus he e alks abou he o ge ulness ha appea s be ween inca -
na ions bu he’s also alking abou he climax (apocalypse). The plas ics in he
b ain is he climax o ma e ialism (a i icial spi i , g own s ong) and demen ia
(people who do no know whose people hey a e) is he climax o o ge ulness.
(57) Jesus said, "The kingdom o he a he is like a man who
had good seed. His enemy came by nigh and sowed weeds among
he good seed. The man did no allow hem o pull up he weeds; he
said o hem, ’I am a aid ha you will go in ending o pull up he
89
Bu who is leas likely o be w ong abou da es?
I eckon ha is he one who is genuinely no biased (belongs o neu alum
species[74]) and employs scien i ic me hods in esea ch and analysis.
I such one is w ong abou a da e, i p obably won’ be a o .
One o such people is New on, he calcula ed he apocalypse canno s a
be o e yea 2060 (la e e ised o 2016) and a e 2344.
O cou se, one could a gue ha , e en hough New on has employed
sound easoning, he sou ce ma e ial o his analysis (old sc ip u es o m-
ing he bible) is no us wo hy.
Howe e , by my heo ies and hypo heses on synch onici y and species o
homo, he e i is no he ma e ial ha is impo an - a he who did he
analysis. In o he wo ds, I belie e New on would come up wi h he same
o simila da es analysing some hing else and hese would ha e a good
p obabili y o being co ec .
People like New on and Tesla a e genuine messenge s (o messenge pa -
icles/p o eins ela i e o hei hos o god - Ea h in his case). Such
people a e ex emely a e, bu hei p ophecies ha e good p obabili y o
becoming ue.
No e ha my heo y o comple e ela i i y implies ela i e causali y.
This ela i i y should be s ong in neu alums and e en s onge in mes-
senge s. Thus, in hese people, some imes he esul will p ecede logic
and analysis behind i . In o he wo ds - a conclusion o s a emen based
on signals o synch onici y o e en in ui ion alone will gene ally la e be
p o en o be co ec (e en i cen u ies la e ).
E ec i ely, hese people can sense u u e.
This is in ag eemen wi h my esea ch oo, I ini ially came up wi h yea s
2018 and 2066 bu chose 2018.
Howe e , ou o hese candida e yea s, he choice o yea s 2016 and 2018
he e was based on in e p e a ion o e en s o synch onici y a he ime when
he in e p e e s we e [o e whelmed bu ] inexpe ienced in synch onici y.
Synch onici y can be a pa o scien i ic me hod, bu i needs o be
mas e ed o be p ope ly and p ecisely in e p e ed.
Howe e , e en mis akes u u e mas e s o synch onici y make in hei
ea ly in e p e a ions a e e y ela i e mis akes.
The su ace wo ld did no end ei he in yea 2016 o 2018 bu hese yea s a e
ob iously no a o and I now in e p e supe posi ion o hese wo (2017±1) as
he s a o he apocalypse (poin o no e u n), wi h yea 2063±3 as he end.
96

The appea ance o wo yea s was he sign[al] o synch onici y i sel - i signals
ha he apocalypse does no occu in a single yea , i a he has a s a and
end yea wi h a peak in be ween (likely yea 2048±2).
2024.07.14
In e es ingly, J. Bendell is his book B eaking Toge he p o ides a gu-
men s ha ci iliza ion collapse has s a ed some ime abou he yea
2016.
No hing can happen in an absolu e ins an o ime (in e al o absolu e
0 leng h). The la ge he ene gy, gene ally, he la ge is i s li espan and
he ha de is o a ec i globally.
Plane s a e la ge bodies o ene gy and i would ake eno mous bu s s o
ene gy o immedia ely a ec all li e on he plane . Mechanisms do exis
- e.g., emission o adia ion by dying s a s, collision wi h o he bodies
o simila magni ude o ene gy, e c. Howe e , on ha scale, in e al
be ween such e en s is billions o ou yea s.
I is unlikely ha such e en s happen du ing ex inc ions ha a e less
han 100 million yea s apa , and ha includes he majo ex inc ions o
Phane ozoic.
The e o e, al hough explosi e o ca aclysmic e en s can elease a lo o
ene gy in a sho pe iod o ime, hese will be localized. In example,
a la ge as e oid s iking Ea h can ha e immedia e consequences o a
la ge a ea a ound he poin o impac , bu i s di ec in luence on li e on
he o he side o he plane migh be negligible. Tha pa o he plane
migh be in luenced indi ec ly (e.g., due o igge ed clima e change) and
e en ually li e he e migh ge ex inc bu his will ha e o play ou o e
a la ge pe iod o ime.
Thus, he impulse o ene gy causing he apocalypse in his cen u y is
likely o be sp ead ou o e a couple o decades and i is also likely o be
agmen ed in o localized ca as ophes o di e se na u e.
I is hen mo e na u al o de ine he beginning and he end o an apoca-
lypse (and, s a ing unce ain y, sp ead e en hese oo o e some ime/s-
pace), a he han de ining he yea o an apocalypse (a leas no ou
yea ). Du ing his pe iod he e will be sudden ca aclysmic changes and
megadea hs bu global ins an wipeou o all li e should be unlikely.
On he o he hand, i he hypo hesized leng h on he 1s o de cycle o
he Sola Sys em (4.25 billion yea s [on a e age]) is co ec he e is a
good possibili y we a e a he end o such cycle.
In ha case, global wipeou canno be excluded, howe e , by my hy-
po heses, e en ha e en should be p eceded by ca aclysmic e en s o
97
smalle scale ( he end o a la ge cycle is ela i ely synch onized wi h
ends o cycles o smalle scale).
26 [ 2022.06.10 ] Sanc ions on u u e
by Amenoum
In some cases, sanc ions on a coun y will isola e i and nega i ely impac i s
economy - as happened wi h No h Ko ea.
This, howe e , also has some bene i s and could u n ou o be good in
he long- e m - isola ed coun ies a e also less open o global diseases and hey
in es mo e in sel -sus ainabili y and local p oduc ion. I such coun y disca ds
he policy o in ini e g ow h and doesn’ s imula e inequali y - i could be a
much heal hie and be e place o li e o an a e age Ea hling han o e blown
economies whe e quali y o li e o a e age is de e io a ing (howe e , No h
Ko ea is s ill a om pe ec ion).
One a gumen o he in ini e g ow h o popula ion is he assumed highe
p obabili y o eme gence o geniuses. This is such a s upid a gumen on
many le els. I humans somehow do each a popula ion much bigge han
i is now and some Eins ein eme ges om i , he i s and he las wo ds
he would say would be: "You ucking idio s.". The u h is, we ha e
highly in elligen people (some on pa wi h Eins ein) igh now, we jus
don’ like wha hey’ e saying, so we mock and deg ade hei in elligence
ins ead. I he numbe o Eins eins is g owing wi h popula ion on his
wo ld, he amoun o idio s and hei sheep is g owing p opo ionally
o en, whe e nis he numbe o Eins eins (and he e we e a leas wo
Eins eins a he ime o Eins ein). So, e en i mo e popula ion does
imply mo e Eins eins, hey a e inc easingly becoming less likely o be
hea d, espec ed and app ecia ed. When people li ed in small ibes,
hese ibes we e concen a ed a ound some wise man (e.g., shaman),
who was espec ed and lis ened o. Bu as he ibe g ows i ends o ge
co up ed, some sma ass comes up and in en s democ acy, so he idio s
can be chosen o be he shaman e e yone will lis en o. And mul iple
ibes could uni e in hei ideology o idioc acy. The globalized wo ld o
he Wes is one such big ibe, whe e he bigges democ acies a e uled
by he bigges idio s.
Sanc ions on some coun ies, on he o he hand, can p oduce he opposi e
o he in ended e ec .
98
Sanc ions on Russia a e one such example. Why? Because i s expo s a e
massi e and i al o economies a ound he wo ld (e.g., oil and ood) and sanc-
ions will ine i ably be pa ial o ine ec i e.
The end esul o EU sanc ions on Russian oil, o example, is no ha
EU s ops buying Russian oil. The end esul is such ha , ins ead o
buying cheap Russian oil om Russia, EU is buying expensi e Russian
oil om India.
He e, India p o i s by eselling Russian oil, no ha m is done o Russia,
bu he e’s eal ha m done o Eu opean ci izens, who a e now paying
much mo e o he same hing.
Sanc ions on Russian ene gy may ha e educed Russian ene gy expo s some-
whe e, bu hey ha e also inc eased he p ice o ha ene gy. So he losses a e
compensa ed wi h inc eased p ices and Russian ene gy companies a e no losing
money - in ac , hey migh be ea ning e en mo e[169].
Since he p ice o ene gy dic a es he p ice o e e y hing else, a e age Ea h-
lings in coun ies imposing he sanc ions a e su e ing he consequences.
Acco ding o GlobalPe olP ices, he p ice o 1 li e o gasoline in C oa ia,
o example, is cu en ly 1.864 EUR (14 HRK), while 1 li e in Russia is 0.786
EUR (5.9 HRK).
C oa ia is, in many ways, an excep ional coun y - he e oo. I s p ices
a e among he bigges p ices in he wo ld - he p ice o gasoline he e is
he same as i is in Ge many[170], while by income pe capi a i should
be much close o p ice o gasoline in Russia.
Since p ice o oil on in e na ional ma ke s is he same o all coun ies,
high p ices a e mos ly he p oduc o axes, ee ma ke [whe e go e n-
men is no e ec i ely limi ing he ma gins o co po a ions] and co up
poli ics which se es o eign in e es s, no he in e es s o local people.
The axes he e a e high. These ha e been, o gasoline, e en lowe ed
ecen ly (wi hou he dec ease, he p ice would be almos 16 HRK pe
li e ), bu , ob iously, he p ices a e s ill e y high o he a e age C oa-
ian Ea hling.
So will he sanc ions on Russia (and China) p oduce he No h Ko ea e ec
in coun ies like C oa ia?
In a way, bu he p oblem, ega ding economy, will, in he long- e m he e
become much wo se - due o libe al, ee ma ke and high axes, local p oduc ion
and sel -sus ainabili y is no s imula ed - ins ead, a e age Ea hling is expec ed
o wo k, bo ow and gi e mo e so i can pay mo e.
This howe e , should, in he long- e m u n ou o be good o na u e he e
99
and, consequen ly, o neu al people who succeed in ejec ing sla e y.
Wi h inc easing p essu e, pola ized people will mo e away whe e hey can
ea n mo e money while neu al po en ials should be mo e and mo e u ning away
om go e nmen and eso ing o isola ion and/o o ma ion o communi ies
whe e cu ency is no money, o a leas whe e money is no p one o in la ion.
Loss o people and loss o suppo o go e nmen will lead o u he in-
c ease in p essu e on axpaye s, as deb s and axes will be inc easing (unless
go e nmen dec eases i s spending and bo owing, which is highly unlikely in
democ a ic capi alism).
This, in u n, will u he s imula e emig a ion and con emp o go e nmen
and he cycle con inues - accele a ing collapse.
No e ha his u he co obo a es my heo y on gene al p ecu so s[171].
Be o e ans o ma ion, I was exp essing pola ized beha io - he sys em
o my body and soul was pola ized. Bu some 5 yea s ago he pola ized
componen collapsed and I became dominan ly neu al. Now, he same
is happening wi h my coun y o esidence - pola ized people a e mo ing
away a an inc easing a e.
Howe e , i is unlikely ha he whole pola ized popula ion will mo e
away, some migh die in ca as ophes (e.g., loods, diseases, wa s, ...)
and some migh ans o m o neu alums like I did.
Acco ding o he heo y, he wo ld will ollow and pola ized people will
ul ima ely ge ex inc .
27 [ 2022.05.20 ] China will [ha e o] in ade Pak-
is an
by Amenoum
I ha e p e iously s a ed ha he de il is a aid o [long- ange] nuclea weapons.
De il, in his con ex , is he Ame ican (o p o-Ame ican) democ a ic
capi alism. People who a e, consciously o unconsciously, conspi ing in
he name o his de il, a e hose who p o i he mos om his kind o
capi alism - big banke s and in es o s. Bu he e a e also people who
a e, consciously o unconsciously, di ec ly o indi ec ly, wo king o hese
demons - om go e nmen and media down o o dina y people.
Bu ha does no mean i will lea e coun ies possessing such weapons alone.
By all means, i will y o impose sanc ions on such a coun y in an a emp
100
o weaken i s economy, p o oke an in e nal u moil, hoping i will des abilize
i sel and abandon de elopmen o long- ange nuclea missiles (in case hese a e
no ye de eloped).
I ha e p e iously decoded a message in signals o synch onici y elling me
ha China will in ade Pakis an.
F om my subs an ial expe ience wi h synch onici y, i is gene ally co e-
la ed wi h subconsciousness o en co ela ed wi h e ec i e u u e. While
ou consciousness is awa e o p esen ime, deepe le els o consciousness
(subconscious) a e mo e localized in he pas and u u e. And my sub-
conscious has been p o en co ec abou u u e many imes so I usually
ake i se iously. In his case, howe e , he signal was mo e complex and
in e p e a ion bias o consciousness (p esen ime) canno be excluded.
E en so, I do no wan o disca d i , because, whe he p o en co ec o
inco ec , i has scien i ic alue. This is why I decided o in es iga e he
possibili y o his happening.
A he ime, ha didn’ make much sense - esea ch showed China and
Pakis an ha e a his o y o good ela ions and I didn’ see how he wa could
happen. Bu wi h ecen de elopmen s in Pakis an a amilia pa e n eme ged
- wha is happening now in Pakis an is wha was happening in Uk aine be o e
he wa .
The wa in Uk aine was p eceded by he ins alla ion o a p o-Ame ican
go e nmen , e o is a acks on Russians in Uk aine and a ma ch owa d NATO
membe ship - all in o de o p o oke Russian in asion so he de il can impose
sanc ions on Russia and e en ually o e h ow he Russian go e nmen . Be o e
all his - Russia and Uk aine had good ela ions, jus like China and Pakis an
had.
A acks on Chinese people[172] in Pakis an a e ising[173].
Pakis an is a well-known aining g ound o e o is s. These e o is s
a e no some spon aneously o ganized g oup o people andomly a ack-
ing andom people o un. These ep esen ou sou ced mili a y powe
and hey’ e a acking people o money. And who do you hink would
sponso e o is s o a ack Russians and Chinese ci izens?
Using e o is s o p o oke Russia and China is no only cheape , bu
con enien o o he easons. The US does no wan di ec con lic wi h
Russia and China because hey ha e nuclea weapons.
Bu hey oo do no wan di ec con lic wi h US so hey won’ accuse
US o hese a acks, hey will accuse ins alled p o-Ame ican go e nmen
(which is also esponsible) when hey choose o in ade.
Tha go e nmen won’ s op he e o and will be disc imina ing Chi-
101

nese ci izens in Pakis an as i was disc imina ing Russians in Uk aine.
So hey mus in ade [i he e’s no o he way] o o e h ow ha go -
e nmen because his can ha dly be s opped o he wise. E en i hey
wouldn’ ca e abou losing powe , in luence and de ensi e s eng h, hey
can’ jus do no hing and igno e a acks on hei people o long.
The de il will a ack i s own people and hen accuse o he s o hese
a acks i needed.
A he beginning o he wa in Uk aine, a ideo eme ged o supposedly
Russian ank c ushing a Uk ainian ci izen in a ca . I was la e es ab-
lished ha he ank could no ha e been Russian, i was Uk ainian. So
wha was ini ially in e p e ed as an ac o iolence was hen in e p e ed
as an innocen acciden . Bu was ha an acciden ? Wha abou ha
d one ha landed in Zag eb? Does anyone se iously belie e ha was an
acciden ? O ha i was Russian?
And how come no one [bu hemsel es] is egula ly e o izing Ame i-
cans?
The wo ld is biased and is choosing sides ins ead o choosing u h. E -
e yone knows wha US is doing, a lo o common people say hey oppose
i bu gene ally anonymously and hey’ e s ill paying axes o Ame ican
o p o-Ame ican go e nmen , so hey suppo all o i .
No one is doing wha hey say hey’ e doing, no one is doing wha hey
hink hey’ e doing, e e yone’s lying, i ’s disgus ing.
And las mon h, a p o-Ame ican p ime minis e was ins alled in Pakis an[174],
a e a p o-Pakis ani minis e Im an Khan was o e h own and imp isoned.
P o-Ame ican go e nmen and biased media a e impo an o he de il -
he ole o hese is o p o oke and mobilize an i-Chinese mili a iza ion and
mo emen s o ensu e China encoun e s s ong esis ance in he coun y - so i
can be accused o s a ing a wa and so he sanc ions can be imposed. Russia
didn’ eac as enough o a oid escala ion o wa and sanc ions, while he de il
was as enough o uel he an i-Russian p opaganda.
In some way, China has been ying o ake o e Pakis an peace ully o
yea s (i was in es ing hea ily in Pakis an) - i doesn’ wan wa , jus like
Russia did no wan i . Again, i would be be e o he a e age Pakis ani o
le China ule hem, a he han he de il, bu hings a e cu en ly no going
in ha di ec ion. Wi h sanc ions on Russia, China and wa s aging wo ld-wide,
deb s will be inc easing exponen ially and in la ion will be aging oo. This will
be de as a ing o he poo and i won’ b ing any hing good o 99% o he
popula ion. Bu banke s will ge iche and mo e powe ul o e you - as long as
you alue hei money mo e han you alue... well, you sel .
So, a e age ci izen, don’ be so as in accusing China o s a ing ha wa
jus like you we e as o accuse Russia o s a ing he wa - by suppo ing he
p o-Ame ican go e nmen (wi h money) you a e esponsible o ha wa , mo e
han China.
102
The p esiden o C oa ia (who has laws bu is one o mos in elligen p esi-
den s in he wo ld) is ying o keep C oa ia neu al in his wo ld-wide mess and
he is being po ayed, by he de il in cha ge, as a p o-Russian e il madman.
I you’ e no on he side o he de il you will be accused o being agains
him and you will be po ayed as an enemy, e en hough you migh be
neu al.
2022.08.15
The de il is now p o oking China o a ack Taiwan. No e ha
go e nmen ins alled in Taiwan is p o-Ame ican. No e also ha US
has, o e his o y, sp ead i ’s mili a y p esence all o e he neighbou ing
islands - Indonesia, Guam, Philippines and Indo-Paci ic in gene al. The
US waged a wa wi h Philippines when i decided o annex Philippines
a he han acknowledge i s decla a ion o independence in 1898.
Only la e , a e he land was o ally des oyed in he Wo ld Wa II
(and 1 million Filipinos died) and he e was no much use o i , he
independence was o mally g an ed, bu he US and i s mili a y ac ually
ne e le . I hey ake o e Taiwan, wha pa o he Paci ic will be le
o China o in luence and con ol?
The US has s ong p esence in Sou h Ko ea and Japan. They wan ed
Uk aine oo. The US is ob iously squeezing he sphe e o in luence o
Russia, No h Ko ea and China as much as possible and is ying o
su ound hem wi h US and p o-US mili a y.
Se iously, is he wo ld peace h ea ened by hese 3 coun ies? A e Ame i-
cans eeling h ea ened, being housands o miles om Russia and China
and wi h neighbou ing coun ies wi h no Russian o Chinese mili a y
p esence?
The US con ols abou 750 bases in a leas 80 coun ies wo ldwide and
spends mo e on i s mili a y han he nex 10 coun ies combined[175].
Russia has less han 30 bases[176] and mos in o me So ie epublics,
ob iously o de ensi e pu poses (ea ly wa ning ada s). China p ac i-
cally doesn’ ha e any and No h Ko ea has... yeah.
Ob iously, i is he ea o he de il ha makes he wo ld o ques ionable
balls pain i as a sain . While e en he de ensi e Russian p esence in
i s neighbou ing coun ies is a h ea o US, he US ( ha claims o be
he home o he b a e) is ins alling i s ea ly-wa ning ada s in ucking
Poland. I Poland is a US neighbou wha does ha make Eu ope?
Fo mally independen , like Philippines, bu se ing he de il?
No h Ko ea would no ha e nuclea weapons a all (and maybe no
103
one else) i US wouldn’ be so g eedy, bu somehow No h Ko ea
is a h ea o he wo ld and US, which has 100 imes mo e nuclea
weapons is a li le lamb ha ’s adia ing peace and shi ing p ospe i y
all o e he wo ld. The u h is, many would sleep be e and many
would ea be e i his pa icula lamb would be slaugh e ed. I’m
no saying one should igh i , bu i would be good no o se e he de il.
2024.09.06
Pakis ani a my and he eli e a e unde hea y in luence o US.
Go e nmen is no in con ol o he a my (i ’s usually he o he way
a ound) and a my con ols he o eign policy. Occasionally, a poli ical
pa y ha wan s o change ha (like Im an Khan’s) comes o powe bu
usually doesn’ las long. Howe e , people a e inc easingly becoming
dissa is ied wi h a my/US dominance, so i is no su p ising ha
candida es aligned wi h he banned Khan’s pa y collec i ely won
a esounding ic o y in he 2024 pa liamen a y elec ions. I doub
ha he US/a my will jus gi e he powe away. Mo e likely, he e
will be ano he coup. Bu , as he people a e inc easingly o ing o
p o-Pakis ani ( a he han p o-US) pa ies, one can expec ha he
de il will do some ex a s eps o ensu e he ins alled p o-US pa y
emains in powe . In Uk aine, his was secu ed wi h wa (se ing,
among o he hings, as an excuse o cancel he elec ions). Thus, wha
p obably ollows is an inc ease in p o oca ions o China, which will
p obably be d agged in o wa wi h Pakis an wi hin 3-4 yea s once he
p o-US go e nmen is ins alled.
Simila hings a e happening ac oss Sou h Asia[177]. The e a e
egime changes in S i Lanka and Bangladesh, in ensi ica ion o China-
Philippines con lic s (amid p o oca i e US mid- ange missile deploymen
in Philippines). Wi h missile deploymen s in Eu ope (e.g., Finland, Ge -
many) as well, he US seems well commi ed o d agging he wo ld in o
Wo ld Wa III in nea u u e.
28 [ 2022.05.14 ] Building a shiny sh ine o de-
cep ion wi h ossils o muddy g een
by Amenoum
A couple o days ago Gua dian published he esul s o a esea ch abou plans
and in es men s o bigges ossil uel i ms[178]. The esul - all o hem a e
in es ing hea ily in o new ossil uel p oduc ion, aiming o spend $103 million
pe day o he es o he decade on hese p ojec s. On op o ha , hey ha e
104
de eloped p ojec op ions ha could lead hem o spend addi ional $84 million
pe day.
I all ha oil is bu ned i would inc ease global a e age empe a u e o
almos 3◦C abo e p e-indus ial (1850-1900) le els - no coun ing he eedback
emissions, which a e inc easing exponen ially wi h inc ease in CO2. Taking
hese in o accoun , he inc ease will be 4◦C a leas .
These companies we e always a he op o he iches companies in he
wo ld, and wi h cu en su ge in oil p ices hey became e en mo e aluable -
Saudi A amco has ecen ly o e aken Apple as he mos aluable company in
he wo ld.
They a e ea ning so much money ha i is unlikely he addi ional op ions
will no be ealized.
They knew abou clima e change be o e anyone else and hey we e coun ing
(be ing) on i so hey can d ill in he A c ic - hese plans ha e no changed ( hey
ha e e en g own). Despi e all he clima e policies and hype abou enewables,
i ’s s ill business as usual o ossil uel indus y.
Apa om ha ing la ge in luence on poli ics in democ a ic capi alism, you
can be su e ha hese companies did a ho ough esea ch on he cu en and u-
u e s a e o he wo ld and i s echnology - so i hey’ e be ing agains humani y
hal ing global wa ming you can also be su e i ’s a p e y sa e be .
Fo a lo o us, his is no su p ising. Pola ized people ins inc i ely
seek sho - e m p o i , i ’s in hei na u e, and na u e o beings canno
be changed easily - i equi es ans o ma ion o consciousness which is
likely p ede e mined o happen only o a small pa o human popula ion
in he cu en gene a ion.
I is no only he p ice o oil ha is ising - among o he hings, he p ices
o li hium, cobal and nickel a e ising and so he p ice o ba e ies and elec ic
ehicles ha e o ise oo.
Demand o li hium will only ise and, o p e en p ices ising e en mo e,
new mines will be equi ed. This is a p oblem wi h cu en echnology due
o wa e equi emen s - ≈2000 ons o wa e a e equi ed o ex ac 1 on o
li hium.
In places like Ne ada (which has li hium deposi s) one would ha e o choose
be ween spending wa e on mining and spending wa e on a ming (i is cu -
en ly used o a ming).
Fo local esiden s a leas , ood (and wa e !) should be mo e impo an
han ba e ies.
The p ice o oil (i axes on oil don’ inc ease) should be alling wi h all hese
new p ojec s while he p ice o ba e ies could be inc easing.
Bu imagine wha will happen i (o , mo e likely, when) China en e s he 3 d
wo ld wa . I su ely won’ be igh ing agains Russia. A ha poin , you can
o ally o ge abou cheap sola panels and cheap echnology in gene al (cheap
105
31.2 Lokalno a o anje - ka aoke uz mogućnos p olje a
U našoj zemlji samoop edjeljenih paćenika, božjih gospoda a i ažjih sluga,
si uacija je ša ena, miješaju se endencije p ema komunizmu idemok aciji, no
pu u EU je oči o pu p ema demok a skom kapi alizmu, samo uz spo adično
za a a anje kojekak im sub encijama.
Figu e 17: Pi amida obo a božans u kiča
No azlika između boga ih i si omašnih ne po eća a se samo na indi idualnoj
azini, o ijedi i za či a e egije. Ako p e lada demok a ski kapi alizam, j.
kad p es anu sub encije, Sla onija će se np . još i iše si omaši i dok u Zag ebu
s anda d as e.
Zapi aj e se onda i i Sla onci, kada as ame ički NATO ili Zag eb (kojem
demok a ski kapi alizam oči o iše paše a as kupuje obećanjima) pošalje u a
p o i d ugog sis ema - za sam uis inu oliko suicidalan da želim ginu i za još
eće si omaš o?
Može e bi i poš eni ealis , a može e bi i i ko isni idio koji mozak d ži
na paši u bašči neokonze a i aca, pa onda ginu i za njiho e ideale kad
as pošalju u a , kao s oku sa ispaše u klaonicu.
31.3 Op oš ajna zaba a, s kajmakom... uz a omu će apa
Ne olim a o e, olim is inu. Ono š o se se i a u medijima o a o ima je
lo p is ano iz ješ a anje uz mnoš o isk i ljenih činjenica. Rus u a u nije
značajno d ugačiji od Ame ikanca u a u, pos oji od eđena azlika u ome ko
112

iše laže, no najbi nija azlika je u onom p ije i poslije a a. Razlika je u količini
nejednake jednakos i.
No, iz pozicije neu alnog čo jeka koji ne želi služi i ni jednom ni d ugom
sis emu, azlike nema. Da li će se pla i lonac nazi a i šupljim ili c eni p aznim
o alno me boli ku ac. Neću da jedem iz p aznog lonca.
32 [ 2022.04.22 ] Use and abuse o ime loops
by Amenoum
In e es ingly, la ely I ha e been exposed o a numbe o mo ies, se ies and
compu e games in ol ing ime a el. Seems o be a popula heme nowadays,
bu one hing is in common o all he sc ip s - i ’s ne e done igh .
Tha ’s because causal loops, ime loops and closed imelike cu es canno
be done [absolu ely] igh in na u e.
Howe e , ela i e such loops a e possible and a e common.
Locally, he e a e ime loops wi h pe iods o a day, a mon h and a yea .
Time is cyclic in na u e and epea s i sel , i jus canno be epea ed absolu ely
equally o he p e ious cycle - because i ’s no isola ed. The e a e o he cycles
and o e e y cycle he e is a bigge cycle and a smalle cycle.
One can cons uc a me ic in which a imelike cu e is he pa h o Ea h’s
o bi a ound he Sun (Ea h’s pa h h ough space is also a pa h h ough ime).
No e ha , in Gene al Rela i i y, Ea h’s o bi is no ollowing a closed
imelike cu e.
Solu ions o Eins ein’s ield equa ions can p oduce closed imelike cu es
bu hese a e abs ac - s emming ei he om unbounded o isola ed
condi ions o usage o absolu e cons an s, and, as such, canno exis in
[comple ely ela i e] physical eali y.
Now assume he Moon is o bi ing Ea h in such a way i c osses his pa h
wice wi h each o bi .
The Moon is hen a ime a elle - one ime i appea s in u u e, he o he
in he pas o Ea h’s pa h h ough ime, while he Ea h a els h ough i s
pas cons an ly.
Bu om he pe spec i e o he Moon, ice e sa is ue.
No e ha his solu ion is isola ed - we a e conside ing passage o ime
ela i e o he Sun only. Sun migh ha e a dominan in luence he e and
we can conside his a dominan ac o in he absolu e solu ion o he
Ea h’s imelike cu e bu i we zoom in on Ea h (o zoom ou ), we will
ha dly conclude ha e e y yea is he same o Ea h, le alone any hing
113
on, o inside, i .
I should be clea now why absolu e ime loops canno exis - such ime
loop would ha e o be in ini ely big (i is he sum o all cu es associa ed
wi h all dis inc sou ces o ene gy) and on such loop one can ne e c oss
he same poin wice. One can ha e closed imelike cu es on isola ed
mani olds bu hese a e no absolu e ime loops, hey a e as ela i e as
ha isola ion.
So why a e all he mo ies [and ma hema icians who belie e in absolu e
eali y] w ong?
Fo many easons, bu p ima ily because o assumed ame in a iance - you
can always ell who is a ime a elle , he same pe son is a ime a elle
ega dless o a ame o e e ence.
In o he wo ds, hese mo ies ea u e causali y and ime a el oge he , while
he wo simply canno wo k oge he .
In eali y he e is no absolu e disc imina ion be ween pas and u u e, ac ion
and eac ion, and causali y is jus a special case o co ela ion a ising in pocke s
o localized absolu ism - places, o scales, o uns able ene gy.
Ma hema ically, he cause o causali y i sel is he in la ion o ime be ween
e en s whe e asymme y in ene gy c ea es a di ec ion o e olu ion enabling
disc imina ion be ween ac ion and eac ion.
Inc easing iola ion o causali y on ou scale should hen indica e pending
de la ion and ela i e in e sion o causali y. And iola ion o causali y i sel
should be p eceded by he sho ening o pe iods be ween ac ion and eac ion
(accele a ed e olu ion), o , ka mic in e ac ions...
33 [ 2022.04.05 ] Da e o he Wo ld Wa III
by Amenoum
An in e es ing synch onici y has ecen ly been spo ed be ween s a da es o
wo wo ld wa s and Russian in asion o Uk aine[184], as shown in Table 3.
Le ’s calcula e he odds o his. In e e y yea , he e a e 12 da es wi h numbe s
Wo ld Wa I 1914.07.28 19+14+07+28=68
Wo ld Wa II 1939.09.01 19+39+09+01=68
Uk aine in asion 2022.02.24 20+22+02+24=68
Table 4: Co ela ion be ween wa da es
adding up o 68, so a chance ha any wa will s a on such a day is 12/365.25
= 1:30.44. No such a small chance, bu wha is a chance ha wo wo ld wa s
114
will bo h s a on such a day? The answe is:
122
365.252= 1 : 926.44
Now he chance is a bi smalle , bu wha a e he odds ha 3 wo ld wa s would
all s a on such a day? The answe is:
123
365.253= 1 : 28198.56
So he odds a e almos 1:30000, no impossible, bu small enough o conside
his as a meaning ul synch onici y.
Howe e , he s a o in asion o Uk aine canno be a o mal da e o he s a
o a wo ld wa . I one would conside Russian in asion o Uk aine as he s a o
he Wo ld Wa III, one should also conside Ge man in asion o Czechoslo akia
as s a o he Wo ld Wa II (a da e which doesn’ add up o 68), a he han
Ge man in asion o Poland (when he wo ld ac ually engaged in o wa wi h
Ge many).
Ge man occupa ion o Czechoslo akia in WW2 was simila o Russian
occupa ion o Uk aine - wi h a smalle pa o he coun y annexed i s
and o he pa s in aded la e .
In e es ingly, Ge man annexa ion o he Sude enland (pa o Czechoslo-
akia) s a ed on Oc obe 1s , 1938 - a da e which also adds up o 68.
I should be clea , howe e , ha Russia did no ake C imea by o ce
(annexa ion is hus a w ong wo d he e), as C imeans eally a e Russians
and na u ally didn’ igh Russia. In ac , a e he Maidan coup d’é a ,
hey we e p e y much a aid o he Kyi go e nmen and wan ed o be
back wi h Russia.
The wa in Uk aine is jus he in o (wo ld is no o mally in ol ed in ha
wa , al hough a ming o Uk aine by he Wes ce ainly is a di ec in ol emen ),
Wo ld Wa III will o mally s a when ei he Russia in ades ano he coun y
o someone p e ending o be Russia i es a missile owa d a NATO coun y o
pe o ms a simila alse lag ope a ion - igge ing a di ec and o mal esponse
o he wo ld.
Assuming he co ela ions abo e a e meaning ul, one could hen p edic
possible o mal da es o he s a o he Wo ld Wa III. I don’ hink Russia
will in ade any o he coun y soon.
Russians a e e y pa ien , 8 yea s ha e passed be ween acquisi ion o
C imea and ull scale in asion - compa e ha o Ge many who in aded
Czechoslo akia only 5 mon hs a e annexa ion o Sude enland and hen
5 mon hs la e in aded Poland.
115
O cou se, Ge many didn’ encoun e much esis ance in Czechoslo akia
so he si ua ion now is a bi di e en (bu would i be wi hou he Wes
a ming Uk aine? P obably no .).
On he o he hand, hose p e ending o be Russia a e mo e likely o be
impa ien so he e’s good p obabili y o he o mal s a da e o he Wo ld
Wa III o be a da e in he cu en yea .
I don’ gamble, bu i I would, I would say 2022.05.21, ±1 mon h... and
would p obably be w ong.
2024.02.03
Indeed, someone did y o s a he Wo ld Wa III in 2022 on mul iple
occasions (e.g., d one in C oa ia, inciden s in Poland). All his came
om he Uk ainian side, bu hey could be used as a p oxy he e by
someone else.
—-
33.1 Physical in e p e a ion
A p ope synch onici y should no be based on andom o con enien (biased)
logic. In he example abo e, i was con enien o spli he yea in o wo numbe s
bu can he wo numbe s be co ela ed wi h physical eali y? In na u e, he e
a e yea ly and mon hly cycles and he numbe s ep esen ing day, mon h and
yea can be co ela ed wi h hese cycles - ep esen ing a pa icula s a e o a
local uni e se.
The e a e also bigge cycles which in na u e co ela e wi h he o de o
magni ude.
The e o e, one canno jus spli he numbe [in a da e] a bi a ily and claim
he e is meaning ul synch onici y he e.
Ac ually one can do ha , co ela ion wi h physical eali y migh be ound
e en ually, bu i is a gamble.
Howe e , spli ing he yea in o a numbe ep esen ing cen u y and a num-
be ep esen ing a yea in ha cen u y should be allowed (elabo a ed in nex
chap e ). Due o cyclic na u e, i is also allowed o disca d highe componen s
(bigge cycles) in compa ison (al hough his dec eases p obabili y o meaning ul
co ela ion, and magni ude o e ec ).
116
No e ha , i one does no spli he yea , he sum o numbe s in he i s
wo wo ld wa s is s ill he same (1949).
So i da es o wo ld wa s a e co ela ed, one could also conside a di e en ,
simple logic, such as one shown in Table 4. In any case, one could a gue ha
Wo ld Wa I 1914.07.28 14+07+28=49
Wo ld Wa II 1939.09.01 39+09+01=49
Wo ld Wa III 2022.04.23 ?
2022.05.22 ?
...
22+04+23=49
22+05+22=49
...
Table 5: Co ela ion be ween wo ld wa da es
he sum i sel is meaningless - he addi ion o yea s, mon hs and days seems like
adding apples o o anges. Howe e , his is no he case - his is he equi alen
o adding small apples o big apples, which makes mo e sense.
No e howe e , ha adding apples and o anges is no absolu ely mean-
ingless ei he - i is he addi ion o one ood and ano he ood. I is jus
mo e likely one will be adding big apples o small apples han adding
apples o o anges.
Uni e ses a e sel -simila and bigge cycles esemble smalle cycles in na u e.
Thus, i na u e does no disc imina e be ween he scales [o ene gy], he sum o
no malized scales makes na u al sense.
Ma hema ically, he uni e se is no malizing he scaling ec o in ope a ion.
In example, o Wo ld Wa I:
14 07 28×

365.25
30.4375
1
=>14 07 28×

365.25/365.25
30.4375/30.4375
1/1

= 14 ∗1+7∗1 + 28 ∗1 = 49
No e ha , in Comple e Rela i i y, he e is no disc imina ion be ween
space and ime. Th ee adjacen e ical ene gy le els co espond o
h ee dimensions o ime as well. Each dimension o ime hus ep esen s
a pa icula scale.
Fo mo e in o ma ion, see chap e The uni ica ion in Comple e Rela i -
i y.
117

33.2 A p ope e e ence ame
One could a gue ha a cen u y canno be co ela ed wi h a known pe iodici y
in local eali y and ha migh be ue - i one does no conside ha monics.
A luna -sola cycle is equal o 33-34 yea s, e y close o 100/3, making i
he 3 d ha monic o a 100-yea pe iod.
A luna -sola cycle is also he 5 h ha monic o he o bi al pe iod o he
ou e mos plane , Nep une (≈165 yea s).
Bu is cen u y he igh choice o he in e p e a ion?
The pe iod o a luna -sola cycle migh be a be e (mo e localized) e e ence
ame, bu whe e/when does he cycle s a ?
Assuming he luna -sola cycles a e aligned wi h cen u ies, yea s 1900, 1933.33,
1966.66, 2000 would be he yea s o cycle beginnings/ends du ing he las cen-
u y. This would p oduce he same sum o he 1s and he 3 d wo ld wa as
in Table 4, bu no o he Wo ld Wa II ( he sum would be 06+09+01=16, as
he wa s a ed in yea 6 o he cycle).
Howe e , assuming he cycle s a s wi h he yea 1907, he sums o he
wo ld wa s become equal again. This is shown in Table 5. In ac , choosing any
E en G ego ian da e Luna -sola da e Sum
Wo ld Wa I 1914.07.28 **07.07.28 07+07+28=42
Wo ld Wa II 1939.09.01 **32.09.01 32+09+1=42
Wo ld Wa III 2022.04.23? **15.04.23 15+04+23=42
Table 6: Luna -sola co ela ion be ween wo ld wa da es
yea om 1907-1914 o he s a o he 1s cycle in las cen u y would p oduce
equal sums.
No e ha I ha e pu as e isks (**) in place o a luna -sola cycle o
luna -sola da es in Table 5. Acco ding o he hypo hesis (check a icle
Unde s anding synch onici y[139]), he numbe o equally ea ed pe i-
ods in a da e ( ime) is co ela ed wi h he magni ude o e ec in space.
Thus, he e i was assumed ha wo ld wa s ha e oughly equal e ec o
magni ude 3.
Howe e , i is possible ha all ha e he e ec o magni ude 4. In
ha case, i s wo wo ld wa s mus ha e happened du ing he
same luna -sola cycle. Fo he sake o a gumen , le ha cycle be 01.
The da e o he Wo ld Wa III now mus be di e en , as shown in Table
118
6.
E en G ego ian da e Luna -sola da e Sum
Wo ld Wa I 1914.07.28 0107.07.28 01+07+07+28=43
Wo ld Wa II 1939.09.01 0132.09.01 01+32+09+1=43
Wo ld Wa III 2022.04.20? 0415.04.20 04+15+04+20=43
Table 7: Luna -sola co ela ion be ween wo ld wa da es
The expec ed magni ude o he wa should hus be known wi h he s a
da e.
I he wo ld wa has s a ed in Uk aine a e all ( he e is a signi ican
di e ence in e ec be ween Ge man in asion o Czechoslo akia and Rus-
sian in asion o Uk aine, i i is he e ec ha ma e s no he o mal
in ol emen o he wo ld - he Wo ld Wa III has s a ed), i s magni ude
will be a leas 4 acco ding o da es wi h 100-yea cycles (cen u ies), bu
acco ding o luna -sola da es, i shouldn’ be a wo ld wa a all.
Since he e a e signals sugges ing he wo ld wa is upon us, I belie e
indeed i is. I is only he s a da e ha is s ill ques ionable.
So wha is, in he end, he p ope e e ence ame, p oducing p ope da es
o us, o p ope ly co ela e e en s in local ime?
The e is a high equali y (low ela i i y in equali y) be ween he phenomena
o wo ld wa s and he e’s logic o hese o occu a he same poin in scale-
in a ian cyclic ime.
Mo e in a iance he e is be ween e e ence ames, he be e , so pe haps
we should synch onize ou cen u ies wi h luna -sola cycles synch onized wi h
wo ld wa s [synch onici y] (o olcanism) and decla e his he yea 2011, no
2022. Tha ’s how much he wo ld lags behind some o us anyway...
33.3 Unce ain y
Na u e migh use leap yea s in ou b ains, bu ha ’s no he case e e ywhe e.
Simila is he case wi h o he cycles - somewhe e in ege numbe s will be used,
somewhe e p ecision will no be sac i iced as much and leap quan a will be
smalle . Da es can also di e be ween one pa o he wo ld and he o he .
To ake all his in o accoun , o any da e he e, unce ain y o ±1 day should
be implied.
33.4 End no es
NOTE: This chap e was added on 2024.02.03, upda ed on 2024.06.19.
I don’ like o hypo hesize abou conscious human conspi acies, bu ce ainly
119
i is possible ha some kind o human o ganiza ion is planning wo ld wa s o
ying o s imula e hem pe iodically, consciously choosing speci ic da es (spe-
ci ic sums o numbe s could also be usable i one wan s o communica e a da e
in sec e ). In ha case, one would expec he da es o ailed a emp s o wo ld
wa ini ia ion o also con o m o he same logic. The d one a ack on Zag eb
(2022.03.10) does no p oduce he expec ed sum, howe e , he missile a ack
on Poland[185] (2022.11.15) does, p oducing numbe 68, jus like o he da es in
Table 3! The e o e, conscious conspi acy o no , his should be aken se iously.
I, howe e , do no hink i is conscious. I his is conscious, hen one would
expec o he da e o he d one a ack on Zag eb o also ollow he logic (unless
i eally was an acciden , which I doub ). This is p obably a subconscious in lu-
ence on human minds by some hing bigge . I hypo hesized elsewhe e wha i is.
One could call i collec i e human subconscious, bu his is no simply he sum
o supe posi ion o indi idual human subconsciousness. I p obably has bigge
in luence on indi iduals han he o he way a ound (I wouldn’ say i eme ged
om indi idual minds, a he i is guiding hese minds and weakly e ol ing
wi h hem). This subconscious can e ec i ely sense u u e. Thus, p obably
only da es o e en s wi h highe p obabili y o s a ing he wo ld wa con o m
o he logic. The a ack on Zag eb had low p obabili y - no casual ies, only mi-
no damage o in as uc u e. The No d s eam pipeline sabo age (2022.09.26)
had no casual ies ei he (in his case, howe e , he in en ion was pe haps no
o s a he Wo ld Wa III, a he o boos US economy a he expense o Rus-
sian and EU economy). Howe e , in he a ack on Poland, people we e killed.
Po en ial o he Wo ld Wa III he e was ce ainly highe .
So when will he Wo ld Wa III s a and how i will look like? I ecen ly
had a d eam, which I in e p e as a ela i e ision o his e en [84]. I may
be some hing locally ex apola ed by my subconscious bu I do seem o ha e
de eloped some kind o a 6 h sense, which is s ill g owing bu has ma u ed
enough o sense u u e wi h high p obabili y o success ul in e p e a ion. I
he collec i e subconscious can p edic u u e wi h g ea p obabili y o success
and i has e ec on indi iduals, he e ec is p obably no he same and no
as big o all indi iduals. Supe posi ion o d eams (o isions) in an indi idual
would be a good signal o in o ma ion sha ing be ween he collec i e mind and
an indi idual mind. And ha ’s exac ly wha I’m expe iencing. I should be
no ed ha all isions mus be ela i e (no ision is he absolu e ision o u u e
o pas , only mo e o less accu a e in e p e a ion, e en i he e en may ha e
a high p obabili y o occu ence). In any case, my ision in ol es an ai ield
(possibly in Slo akia). As o he da e, I do no know i , bu appa en ly he e’s
high p obabili y ha he sum o numbe s will be 68. I he inciden is supposed
o p o oke NATO-Russia wa hen i has o occu be o e NATO dies. No e ha
T ump has announced he US wi hd awal om NATO, which migh indeed
happen i he becomes he p esiden again (and p obabili y o ha happening
is high, in my opinion). The US wi hd awal would no be he end o NATO
(al hough i could ce ainly be in e p e ed as a big signal o pending collapse)
bu his could imply some cons ain s on he Wo ld Wa III da e. I he aim is
o p o oke NATO-Russia con lic and p o oca ions o igina e om a US pa y
120
hen his con lic p obably should s a a e he US wi hd awal (see The 3 d
Ac blog en y o explana ion on why he 3 d Wo ld Wa is likely o s a
a ha ime). In any case, p o oca ions will likely con inue and he one wi h
bigge casual ies and damage will p obably do he ick.
34 [ 2022.03.25 ] Synch onici y in icy ka ma
by Amenoum
Some hing odd happened oday.
I was doing some cons uc ion wo k in he ci y wi h my pa en s. A some
poin , a guy (who seems o li e nea by) comes, says hello, and gi es us ice-
c eams.
This seemed odd, bu I didn’ hink abou i much - neighbo s can be iendly,
e en i we’ e ne e expe ienced hem sha ing ice-c eams be o e.
Howe e , la e , he e y same day, hings go in e es ing.
On he way home we s opped a he s o e o mom o buy some g oce ies.
We didn’ no ice any hing unusual a he ime, bu an hou la e she no ices she
was cha ged o a couple o ice-c eams, e en hough she didn’ buy any! Wha
is he meaning o his?
To me his shows a couple o hings - co ela ion o synch onici y and ka ma,
ela i i y in cause and e ec .
I ha e p edic ed global inc ease o synch onici y du ing s ong e olu ion bu
also he sho ening o pe iods be ween ka mic e en s (due o synch oniza ion o
la ge scale and small scale ene gies - space and ime).
One could also in e p e his as ano he message om god [Ea h]: no h-
ing is ee.
This has ele a ed impo ance a his ime - wi h all hose weapons being
sold as gi s.
We go ice-c eams om one man (who paid o hem), we paid ice-c eams
(unconsciously e en) o someone else - he e y same day. This simple example
con ains e idence o 3 impo an hings:
•e idence ha ka ma is indeed he gene alized law o ac ion and eac ion,
•e idence ha in e als be ween ka mic ac ions and eac ions a e dec eas-
ing,
•e idence ha causali y is commonly iola ed on la ge scale oo.
Howe e , he s o y didn’ end he e. My mo he wen o he s o e a e wa ds,
asked o a e und (some hing I wouldn’ do, bu she’s no awa e ha ka ma
121
no a ack i s , when i ’s much mo e con enien o p o oke he con lic
and hen come ou as a sa iou in he end (by helping o o e h ow
a "madman", o example). Su e, some people may bene i om he
ins alled p o-US puppe s ( hose inclined o he Wes e n uncons ained
capi alism, especially co up eli es), bu a leas hal o people won’ ,
and in he long- e m, once he land is plunde ed and becomes owned
en i ely by g eedy Wes e n co po a ions, mos people will li e in po e y.
The e o e, once he wa expands beyond Uk aine, and b ainwashed Wes -
e ne s s a saying "we old you so" (implying, as always, g eedy Russia is a e
all o us), jus hink again whe he you wan o pa icipa e in his US p oduced
shi -show.
Ano he common a gumen o Wes e ne s is as ollows - i Russia didn’
a ack Uk aine o expand a he o secu e he eas e n p o-Russian egion,
why did hey bomb Kie ? Well, why did NATO bomb Belg ade (capi al
o Se bia) when he wa was in he o he pa o Se bia (Koso o)? The
eason can be e alia ion, o o o e h ow he go e nmen (no e ha ,
jus as NATO did no bomb Se bia a andom, nei he did Russia bomb
Uk aine a andom - in bo h cases, he capi al was bombed, whe e he
go e nmen esides). The e is a di e ence hough - he US is using
NATO o o e h ow go e nmen s so hey can ensu e US domina ion
and g ow h, while he Russia wan s o o e h ow he co up p o-US
go e nmen in o de o elimina e he ob ious h ea o he su i al o
Russians and Russian way o li e. Russia p obably would ag ee on he
di ision o Uk aine, bu hey know ha is no a long- e m solu ion. As
long as he p o-US go e nmen ules in he wes e n pa , he e will be
p o oca ions.
The US needs he wa so hey did e e y hing hey could o p o oke i . Fi s ,
he US pa ies ha e in es ed billions o dolla s in o Uk aine (mos ly h ough,
so called, NGOs) p io o he Maidan coup in 2014 when he p o-Uk ainian
go e nmen (Yanuko ych) was o e h own (some claim his go e nmen was
p o-Russian, and i may ha e been inclined owa d Russia, bu we e Russian in-
e es s p io i ized o e Uk ainian in e es s? I ce ainly was mo e p o-Uk ainian
han wha came a e i ). I ’s bla an ly ob ious who sponso ed he coup. This
could be coun ed as a p o oca ion i sel , bu majo p o oca ions s a ed a e
he co up p o-US go e nmen was ins alled - con inuing sponso ed e o ism
in pa s o Uk aine popula ed by Russians (eas e n Uk aine), o bidden use o
Russian language, appliance o NATO membe ship. P o oca ions didn’ s op
he e. A e Russia ook back C imea, he US-sponso ed Uk ainian go e n-
men blocked he No h C imean Canal, which was, up o ha poin , p o iding
128

abou 85% o wa e o C imeans. Did anyone se iously hink Russians will gi e
C imea back a e his? No, he pu pose o his was o dep i e innocen Russian
(o p o-Russian) popula ion o a i al esou ce and hus p o oke ano he con-
lic . I ’s eally ema kable how he Russians managed no o espond o his
p o oca ion o 8 yea s (all ha ime C imeans we e o ced o impo wa e
om Russia).
Does anyone se iously hink ha one would wan o be go e ned by a
go e nmen blocking you wa e access? Whe he you belie e C imeans
a e p o-US o no , his ac is pu e Nazism.
A e he wa s a ed, p o oca ions did no end, bu his ime he aim was
o in ol e NATO. And now Eu opean go e nmen s a e inc easingly p epa ing
people o he wa wi h Russia. NATO s ill doesn’ espond o p o oca ions,
bu ha ’s p obably because he US is s ill in NATO.
Why do you hink NATO is expanding? You hink, o example, ha he
ecen ly joined Sweden is suddenly a aid o Russia? No, he eason hey
joined NATO is because he US wan s NATO o be as big as possible
once hey [e ec i ely, i no o mally as well,] wi hd aw om i (i.e.,
once he Wo ld Wa III s a s). A big NATO is a big headache o
Russia. And a big NATO wi hou US in i , is a win-win o US. Once
NATO collapses and Russia is signi ican ly weakened, he "good" old US
will come o "sa e" us all. Wi h Eu opeans (and possibly Russians) le
wi h s icks and bones, his could p e y much look like coloniza ion o
Ame ica, i no wo se.
This will p obably change once T ump becomes a US p esiden again. And
once US wi hd aws, you can be su e ha NATO will s a esponding, and
hen all hell will b eak loose. The US is coun ing on i . I has al eady p o i ed
a lo o blowing Eu opean gas pipelines, now i ’s ime o p o i om dying
Eu opeans, a e hey p o i om selling hem weapons o cou se. I jus hope
he Russians know ha Sla onia (eas e n pa o C oa ia) is no dominan ly
p o-US (a leas ha ’s wha I wan o belie e), so he nuclea missiles will be
aimed u he o he wes . In ac , ha d one (p o oca ion) ha c ashed in
p o-US Zag eb p obably can be in e p e ed as a p ecu so o a nuclea missile,
landing in Zag eb, US - e en hough he p o oca ion came om Uk aine.
While Eu opean leade s and media a e p epa ing e e yone o he Wo ld
Wa III, in Russia hey a e discussing how o p e en such wa [196].
129
The madness in he Wes is s agge ing and g owing by he minu e, so
I do no hink Russia will be able o p e en his wa . I guess one can
s ill hope ha people in Eu ope won’ be s upid enough o suppo his,
bu , as said al eady, people a e b ainwashed in o hinking ha Russia is
hei enemy and, on a e age, hey seem ine wi h i . Russia is no you
enemy, nei he is China. The US is you enemy. You co up leade s,
who se e he US, a e you enemy. You, se ing hese idio s, a e you
enemy. Bloody suicidal and e il ucking na ion. I’m sick o i . Such
a sad, sad ucking wo ld I’m li ing in... On he o he hand, I belie e
e e yone in he end will ge wha hey dese e. And he less idio s and
hei se an s he be e o he plane . Maybe I should be happy abou
his?
36.2 Upda es
36.2.1 2024.08.10
P o oca ions con inue. The US is u ning Finland and Philippines in o new
p oxy ba leg ounds. US ins alled mid- ange missiles in hese coun ies simply
canno be in e p e ed as de ensi e weapons. I s ongly sugges wa ching he
ake on he si ua ion by Neu ali y S udies[197]. When is he wa gonna s a
in hese coun ies? Well, mos likely wi hin he e m o cu en go e nmen s in
hese coun ies, p obably wi hin 3 yea s. The democ acy has al eady deg aded
in hese coun ies, bu once he wa s a s, elec ions will be cancelled (jus like
hey ha e been cancelled in Uk aine) - no due o wa (as is usually p esen ed
as excuse), bu o ensu e he wa goes on.
36.2.2 2024.09.30
I ecen ly came ac oss a ideo whe e an Uk ainian (allegedly a leas ) olun ee
in he wa is a guing ha Russian in asion is mo i a ed by no hing mo e bu
impe ialis ic desi es o expansion, because ha was mos ly he case in his o y.
This is o cou se, a e y biased pe spec i e bu no so ha d o unde s and gi en
he ac ha Uk aine was a "popula " ba leg ound in he pas and Russians
we e o en in ol ed (many di e en pa ies we e in ol ed o e his o y - Ge -
many, Poland, Cossacks, Ta a s, ...). And hey do no ha e a ond memo y
o So ie Union. Howe e , he e a e many issues wi h his pe spec i e and
i was ob iously in luenced by US p opaganda. Fo example, Mongolians and
Geo gians a e no he same as Russians. To say ha Mongolian occupa ion o
Uk aine in he 13 h cen u y is he same as Russian occupa ion because hey
sha e dis an oo s is jus w ong. Mongolians in aded Kie an Rus’ e i o y
(which encompassed p esen day Uk aine) and he Kie an Rus’ is he cul u al
ances o o Uk aine, Russia and Bela us. So his is he same as saying ha
Uk aine in aded Uk aine. Russians and Uk ainians a e mo e closely ela ed o
130
each o he han hey a e o Mongolians. In he Russo-Polish wa in he 17 h
cen u y, all kinds o a mies we e in ol ed. While he e a e eco ds o Uk ainian
Cossacks epelling Russian in asion, he e a e also eco ds o Uk ainian-Russian
con ingen s igh ing Polish a my allied wi h Ta a s. And Cossacks ha e bo h
Uk ainian and Russian oo s. The Uk ainian-So ie wa in he 20 h cen u y
was p obably simila o he wa oday - Uk aine was a p oxy o he ba le
be ween one sys em and he o he . Du ing ha wa , Uk aine was occupied by
di e en pa ies, e.g., by Ge many (in 1918 Uk aine had a Ge man-ins alled
go e nmen ), and Poland (occupied Wes Uk aine). In he Wo ld Wa II, Nazi
Ge many, Hunga y and Romania a imes occupied Uk aine, only o be la e
e ook by So ie Union. So i doesn’ eally make sense o judge p esen day
Russia by he sins o he Russian Empi e o he So ie Union. Does anyone
conside con empo a y Ge many as Nazi Ge many? And in e p e a ion o sins
he e is ela i e. In he his o y, Russian ba les had expansionis mo i es, bu a
imes we e de ensi e (whe e Uk ainians and Russians ough agains he same
enemy). Uk ainians may ha e lea ned o ha e S alin o he amine o 1932-1933
bu i was pa o a wide So ie amine ha las ed om 1930-1933 and has
a ec ed all g ain-p oducing a eas in So ie Union, no jus Uk aine. The amine
may ha e been he esul o bad poli ics, bu he e is no e idence ha S alin
explici ly o de ed s a a ion. And e en i he did, S alin was no Russian, he was
Geo gian. In any case, mode n Russia ain’ So ie Union o wha e e was he e
be o e he SSSR, and Pu in ain’ S alin (is Zelenskyy Hi le ?). Russia was y-
ing o sol e all issues wi h US and p o-US go e nmen s o yea s and i showed
g ea pa ience abou i , bu i was me by cons an p o oca ion. F om wha
I’ e seen, i is no seeking dominance in he wo ld, i is seeking coope a ion,
jus like China. BRICS is a pe ec e idence o ha . US, on he o he hand, is
obsessed wi h dominance. Pe haps wes e n Uk aine wan s o be domina ed by
US, bu I s ongly doub ha eas e n Uk aine wan s ha . Di ision o he coun-
y (which is p e y big, b w) is he ob ious solu ion ha could ensu e peace
and is p obably some hing ha sane Uk ainian popula ion would be sa is ied
wi h, bu one pa y he e is g eedy, and ha ’s he one labelling he o he pa y
as such.
37 [ 2022.02.18 ] Message om god: Recalib a-
ion
by Amenoum
Synch onici y is an o dina y phenomenon o me, and may be o many o h-
e s. Bu no all synch onici y is pe sonal. I ha e ound elsewhe e ha num-
be s commonly in ol ed in synch onici y e en s co espond o ans o ma ional
ages in humans, and ha he equency/in ensi y o synch onici y seems o be
highes du ing soul-body ans o ma ion[57]. Soul-body ans o ma ion e en s
shouldn’ be limi ed o humans, howe e , he ages should di e (unless, a leas
in some cases, di e en a es o passage o ime o di e en animals a e aken
131
in o accoun ). None heless, he synch onici y e en s we expe ience seem o be
ailo ed o us. The synch onici y, hus, seems o be a way o communica ion,
p obably be ween some global subconscious associa ed wi h he species and
indi iduals o he species. Unlike consciousness, subconscious is, pe my hy-
po heses, mo e co ela ed wi h pas and u u e, a he han wi h he p esen . I
also suspec he e a e di e en [sub]species o he global subconscious, pola ized
and neu al, and he neu al one, being mo e objec i e, should be mo e likely
o con ey a message ha accu a ely speaks abou he u u e. To in e p e he
message co ec ly, howe e , a neu al pe spec i e is equi ed as well. I is possi-
ble ha neu al messages a e, by de aul , expe ienced by neu al indi iduals, so
his migh no be a p oblem. E en so, he e is no gua an ee ha he in e p e a-
ion will ac ually be co ec . Howe e , i one is o lea n he language, one mus
y deciphe ing messages. Then, wi h enough ial and e o , p og ess could be
made. He e’s one such y..
On 2022.02.06, a Mo occan boy, 5 yea s old, apped in a well o 4 days,
dies[198].
On 2022.02.18, A boy in A ghanis an, 5 yea s old, apped in a well o 3
days, dies[199] (some sou ces claim he was 6 yea s old and apped in a well o
4 days[200] hough).
The same day, 13 people (all women and child en) in India die, a e alling
in o a well[201].
All hese loca ions a e oughly on he same geog aphic la i ude, as shown in
Fig. 18.
Figu e 18: Well loca ions (A ghanis an loca ion sou ce: O iginal News202)
He e, one could in e p e he 3 d signal as he s op signal in he message and
disca d i due o weake en anglemen , howe e , i also migh ha e a g ea e
132
pu pose.
Ob iously, he i s wo signals e eal s ong synch onici y - a gene ally a e
e en "5 yea old boy apped in a well o 4 days dies" has happened wice on
Ea h wi h less han wo weeks dis ance apa in ime.
No only ha , bu he wo loca ions a e sepa a ed by he same dis ance in
space om he G ea Py amid in Giza (as shown by blue lines in Fig. 18).
In e es ingly, he G ea Py amid is a he same longi ude as Uk aine (a
e ical line passing h ough he loca ion o he G ea Py amid would also pass
igh h ough he middle o Uk aine).
Wha is he meaning o his?
Wha I see in his message is ha he loca ion o he G ea Py amid should
be he loca ion o a 0◦(p ime) me idian, no G eenwich.
The choice o a 0◦me idian on a plane should no be a bi a y (mos animals
a e bila e ally symme ical, al hough, in i s adul o m, Ea h migh become
adially symme ical - like sea s a s, o example).
Usage o he longi ude o he G ea Py amid (31◦E) as he P ime me idian
has been p oposed be o e, as i was claimed ha his loca ion was he geog aph-
ical cen e o Ea h[203].
Newes calcula ions pu he cen e a bi no h, in Tu key, bu only 3◦mo e
eas in longi ude, a 34◦E.
No e how close a e igh s ha ha e occu ed (o a e occu ing) in Sy i-
a/I aq and Uk aine o ha longi ude.
This cen e is changing o e ime, na u ally, bu i is qui e possible ha he
loca ion in Giza is he co ec loca ion on a e age.
The ac ha coun ies a o a ound his longi ude a e neu al and/o di ided
coun ies be ween eas and wes cul u es (Uk aine being he bes example, bu
he e’s also Sy ia/I aq on he igh and o me Yugosla ia on he le , e c.) is
ano he s ong a gumen in a o o he hypo hesis.
This is he longi ude a ound which i would be expec able o s ongly po-
la ized eas and wes coun ies o wage hei wa s - while neu al people, like
women and child en, lose hei li es.
Bu he e could be addi ional messages he e - i ’s in e es ing ha , despi e
all alling in a well, none o hese people died o d owning...
One addi ional message is he announcemen o spli ing o Uk aine in o
wo coun ies.
133

UPDATE 2023.03.31 A leas 35 people died a e alling in o a well
yes e day in Madhya P adesh, India[204]. No su e i his is ela ed
o he o iginal message bu I hough I migh w i e i down, jus in
case i p o es ele an la e . A e people now alling in o wells [in India]
annually?
38 [ 2022.02.11 ] Fi s human on Ma s won’ be
so human
by Amenoum
In 1783 he Mongol ie b o he s sen a sheep, a duck and a oos e alo in a
ho ai balloon o see i g ound-dwelling animals can su i e he ip high abo e
g ound ( he duck se ing as he expe imen al con ol).
In 1957 a dog called Laika became he i s li ing being in o bi al space ligh .
In 1968 o oises we e o bi ing Moon, as i s inhabi an s o Ea h o do so.
These a e examples, bu animals p eceded b a e human explo e s in explo-
a ion many imes in his o y.
Ma s’ su ace is ha sh o humans and exposu e o adia ion du ing he ip
could lea e se ious consequences. Add o all ha he mode n obsession wi h
p ese a ion o human li e and you know ha i s animal on Ma s is unlikely
o be a mode n human.
Bu i won’ be jus any animal. Mos likely, his will be a hyb id, mos likely
a hyb id o a dog and man. I call i homo.gamma.anubis. Sounds amilia ?
Yes, I am con inced ha Egyp ians didn’ build he wo la ges py amids
and I now belie e wha hey ound in he sa cophagus in he G ea Py amid in
Giza was a ossil o homo.gamma. I explains e e y hing[58].
S ill, hese hyb ids a e unlikely o be esis an o adia ion, so hey will
p obably be wea ing some hing like a coa o ungi[205] on hei ip o Ma s.
When will his happen?
E. Musk said SpaceX could send humans o Ma s as ea ly as 2024, assuming
hey send some ca go in 2022 (hm.. ha ’s his yea ... he’s c azie han I am).
I’d say 2029 is mo e ealis ic, i will ake some ime o hyb ids o ge public
app o al, i no hing else...
Hm, a e I’ e pos ed his, Elon Musk has e ised his es ima e[206] - o
2029. I knew someone o he han me is eading my blog...
Nah, i ’s jus eali y aligning wi h my p edic ions[207].
134
So keep wa ching mo ies, soon homo.gamma will be added o he bag o he
holy poli ical co ec ness, now i ’s s ill unde - ep esen ed[208] o o e - ep esen ed[209].
Oh yeah, don’ wo y, he second ip o Ma s will be poli ically co ec , i
will include some o he b a e humans oo... o all o hem assembled in o one
ambo, called Rainbow.
39 [ 2022.02.09 ] New kind o people, kind o ,
e y cheap, made in China
by Amenoum
A lo o people belie e ha echnology and human in ellec can and will sa e
humani y om wha e e u u e holds o us. O he s don’ hink so, bu belie e
d as ic changes a e a away.
Those who belie e [and especially ac ] di e en ly a e e y a e.
I ha e made a lo o p edic ions while de ising my heo ies. One o hese
is pe iodically accele a ed e olu ion, bu e en I am some imes su p ised a he
speed hese p edic ions a e becoming ue.
One o hese a e a i icial human wombs[74]. This has now become a eali y[210].
Su e, he echnology is no ye used on human emb yos bu ha ’s only because
he law doesn’ allow i . The echnology i sel is ma u e o such use and i ’s
only a ma e o ime be o e his will be o icially allowed.
Many people don’ ealize how signi ican his is. I ’s one o he u ning
poin s in his o y ha will, being a logical ansi ion due o ex eme condi ions,
p obably go unno iced - bu he implica ions a e eno mous.
I any hing can be called a Pando a’s box - his is i , a gian one. I opens up
a pa h o comple e manipula ion and o al con ol o popula ion by indus ial
go e nmen s.
Maybe you don’ ca e wha happens wi h hese babies, bu hen you p ob-
ably don’ ca e abou you sel , o a couple o easons:
•you could become obsole e du ing you li e ime,
•when you die, you could einca na e as one o hese babies.
These babies will, ine i ably, be di e en , no only due o epigene ic di e ences
du ing de elopmen bu e en mo e due o gene ic manipula ion which will soon
become manda o y.
These emb yos will e ec i ely be esou ces jus as plan s a e esou ces in
ood indus y. So you can expec hyb ids oo - dogs, o example, a e mos
likely candida es o his, hey can be mo e easily con olled, hey don’ ask
much, e c.
In ac , I ha e p edic ed hese hyb ids be o e (homo.gamma species). Con-
side ing how hings a e p og essing, I’d say such hyb ids a e only a couple o
yea s away (e en i hey migh be hidden om public a i s o ob ious ea-
sons).
135
You hink e hics will p e en his? Righ . When p egnancies become illegal,
adi ional human is becoming ex inc and all his e hics wi h i .
Bu somehow I don’ hink anyone’s gonna wai un il you die. Ei he you
dying will be accele a ed some way (I’ e p edic ed his oo be o e, wi h no
conscious conspi acies) o his will be sold as a necessi y, a cu e, o some hing
simila . I’d say bo h is ue.
This u u e will be ad e ised as hea en (i makes i physically easie o
mo he s, inc eases equali y be ween men and women di ec ly and indi ec ly...).
Will you buy i ?
Yes, you p obably will. Wha do you ha e, o belie e, ha you didn’ buy?
Jus like school is used o p epa e child en o sla e y - which somewhe e
goes o ex emes and somewhe e mo e emphasis is pu on ac ual edu-
ca ion, he de achmen o babies om mo he s a such ea ly s age o
de elopmen won’ ha e equal consequences e e ywhe e, bu a ques ion
comes o mind - who will he u u e child e en ually conside as i s pa -
en ? The biological ones o he sys em? Things a e going o become
e y ucked up...
A connec ion be ween a mo he and a child in u e us is much deepe han
gene ally hough [211] bu his will be igno ed, a o ed connec ions oday a e
emo e.
A i icial wombs, jus as accine subsc ip ions, a e a logical s ep in he con-
inuous aliena ion o people om [wild] na u e (and physical connec ion).
40 [ 2022.02.07 ] A wish o de anged, command
o he damned
by Amenoum
When you s ongly belie e (know) some hing is bound o happen and you
s ongly desi e o i o happen, i is ha d o esis making p edic ions abou i
- when exac ly i will happen?
Bu his desi e will ine i ably make you biased and will in luence you p e-
dic ion.
You in elligence can be clouded by di e en hings - dep ession, desi es,
s ess, o any o he pola ized disease.
Due o his cloudy wea he in you b ain you won’ be conscious abou he
bias in you p edic ion. This is why i is always good no o claim any hing
136
wi h absolu e ce ain y and why i would be good o eanalyze and co ec you
s a emen s e e y now and hen (al hough, gene ally, he bes p ac ice would be
no o has e wi h s a emen s in he i s place).
While I o en claim I am neu al, I oo ge biased a imes and p edic
p ema u e da es o ce ain e en s (which some imes could be in e p e ed as
"pu ing wo ds in o god’s mou h"). Howe e , I will gene ally co ec my mis ake
soon (i I do no , hen he p edic ion is no conside ed a mis ake - i is based
on hypo heses wi h a high deg ee o con idence).
Now look wha has he Whi e House na ional secu i y ad ise said ecen ly:
"We a e in he window. Any day now, Russia could ake mili a y ac ion agains
Uk aine, o i could be a couple o weeks om now."[212]. This is jus one o
simila s a emen s coming om US. They’ e gone as a as p oducing his: "U.S.
in elligence agencies belie e Russia has o med a plan o ab ica e a p e ex o
an in asion o Uk aine, po en ially by p oducing p opaganda ideos showing a
s aged a ack."[213].
This is a ypical example o someone wi h a s ong desi e o a pa icula
e en o happen. The e is no e idence p o ided no does any hing sugges he e
is any e idence. The e is only a weak hypo hesis based on p esence o Russian
mili a y (mos ly in hei own coun y!).
I, o example, belie e ha US has ab ica ed a lo o p e ex s in he pas
p e y much all o e he wo ld. Many people belie e he same, bu no one goes
o wa agains US e en wi h a solid e idence, le alone belie .
Yes, maybe he e is some inc eased ac i i y and buildup o oops on he
Russian pa bu wha abou cons an inc eases in US p esence and ac i i y
all o e he wo ld? In Sou h Ko ea, o example, hey’ e egula ly doing exe -
cises and hey’ e e en managed o make Sou h Ko ea pay o hei con inuous
p esence and p o oca ion o No h Ko ea![214]
Bu why should I ca e o wha happens in Uk aine? I shouldn’ . Bu he
US is, by i s in la ion o ea and p epa a ion o wa , p essu ing Uk aine o
join he NATO. I ’s pe ec ly unde s andable ha Russians don’ wan his o
happen - nei he do I, no does anyone sane who does no wan a Wo ld Wa III.
The US wan s i ob iously (o despe a ely?), so hey’ e s a ed sending gi s,
no only o NATO membe s bu o Uk aine oo ( o whom hey decided will
join he NATO). A couple o days ago, my coun y has been gi en a couple
o helicop e s. Oh how happy we a e. Indeed. A ne e -ending, bloody blue
Ch is mas. I’m su p ised we didn’ ge any bombs o deco a e ou ees. Bu I
guess Uk ainians a e he special ones, oday.
Luckily, we’ e a small coun y and only ha e a couple o pilo s who can ly
hese mons ous machines, so hey didn’ send us mo e. Bu maybe hey’ll each
some o us o ee so we can ge mo e and be e en mo e happy.
These a e only he mos ecen gi s, he e ha e been o he gi s o e he
yea s, all mili a y equipmen - by some s ange coincidence (ob iously, hey
we e coun ing on a wa in his pa o he wo ld o qui e some ime). Yeah,
who ca es abou ood, weapons a e wha poo coun ies need he mos ...
I guess he only eason A ica ge s ood is because hey’ e oo skinny o
ca y weapons.
137
In ha e y in e es ing expe imen wi h mice done qui e some ime ago[225],
he mouse popula ion wen ex inc soon a e hey we e gi en e e y hing hey
need (o so i is commonly hough ).
The mice li ed in a plague- ee (s e ile) en i onmen , wi h a pleni ude o
com o s, a lack o p eda ion and an unlimi ed supply o consumables - all he
luxu ies equi alen o mode n human li e.
Compa isons wi h human popula ion a e also in e es ing[226], bu hey all
conclude ha humans a e di e en and can a oid disas e (ex inc ion).
Yes, ha ’s ue, bu only i human sani y is p ese ed.
In he expe imen , mice we e isola ed om na u e, hey we e gi en e e y-
hing hei body needs in na u e bu , wi h ha , hey ha e s opped doing wha
na u e needs hem o do - hey’ e los hei g ea e pu pose.
Na u e does no need all o mice doing wha ’s needed bu i signi ican pe -
cen o popula ion doesn’ pa icipa e and gi e back, jus ake (like mice in he
expe imen ), hei na u e will mess up hei psyche.
Pe haps you belie e ha na u e does no need you so you won’ go c azy,
s a killing you child en, a acking you ma es in bu s s o agg ession and
p ac ice cannibalism, like he mice did.
Bu ha is exac ly wha you will do - unless you belong o ha small pe -
cen age ha always emains. A bunch wi h non-con ollable (neu al) psyche.
And i is no wild na u e ha will a ec he psyche o pola ized people - i
is he collec i e psyche o people ha a ec s he psyche o indi iduals jus like
he psyche o indi iduals a ec s he psyche o he popula ion.
You migh say you don’ ca e wha o he people do o say bu ha ’s i ele-
an - you will descend in o madness, his is simply how hings wo k in na u e,
i ’s a mechanism embedded in li e ope a ion.
In any popula ion, i is no only he indi iduals ha a e e ol ing minds,
he popula ion is e ol ing a mind o i s own - jus look a all he conspi acy
heo ies. A lo o bad hings a e going on ha some o en y bu ail o pin
o conscious ac ion o indi iduals o g oups o indi iduals. This is ob iously
gene ally no conscious on indi idual human le el.
Souls and bodies co-e ol e (one does no eme ge om he o he ) so you
canno expec ha i is only he indi iduals o he body ha a ec he mind o
popula ion - in luence goes in bo h di ec ions.
A e all, i is well known ha mind can in luence indi idual cells o he
body, e en consciously (e.g., aising empe a u e o he body h ough g-Tummo
medi a ion), you jus ha e o admi ha popula ion o humans can be mapped
o disc e e mind jus like he popula ion o neu ons in you head can.
In na u e, e e y hing has mul iple oles (in e p e a ions) - e e y hing is
ela i e. The oo eason why popula ions sel -des uc is he iola ion o
conse a ion o ela i i y h ough educ ion o possible in e p e a ions,
loss o di e si y and isola ion om na u e.
144

The e o e, i you a e pola ized and wan o a oid sel -des uc i e s ong
and sick pola iza ion you should sepa a e om gene al popula ion and se le in
neu al en i onmen whe e you will ha e a pu pose o e e y hing else a he
han exis solely o he sake o humani y.
The soone he be e , as he collapse o ci iliza ion has al eady s a ed. I
you don’ no ice i , ha ’s only because you psyche has al eady been al e ed in
o de o igno e i .
Bu you ha e p obably no iced he su ge o i a ionali y wi h he pandemics.
Tha was jus he in o. Think I don’ know wha I’m saying? You’ e al eady
insane.
I ha e al eady been nea sel -des uc ion bu I ha e su i ed insani y. I was
spa ed o dea h because I s ill ha e g ea e pu poses. One o hem was o ell
he ale.
To be i o e olu ion is no o be i o ep oduc ion and adap ed o
en i onmen - i is o ha e a g ea e pu pose. Wi hou i you will no
only lose he abili y o ep oduce bu you will lose you sel .
When hie a chy s a s collapsing, he las o su i e a e hose i o an-
a chy. O he s ha e no choice bu o annihila e, obeying, now, he laws
o mas e Chaos. Bu his god is no a cu se, and i is no summoned by
ana chis s, i is summoned by he annihila o s hemsel es, wi h annihi-
la ion o god’s good (wild) na u e.
UPDATE 2023.05.06
Taking e e y hing in o accoun , I now belie e ha his c aziness will be
a mo e o less localized phenomenon (co ela ed wi h UBI, inc ease in
o ali a ianism and lack o ood/habi a di e si y o di e si y in gene al).
Tha does no mean he ex inc ion won’ be global, bu gene ally, i may
be di e en han desc ibed abo e[227].
47 [ 2021.12.12 ] Finding sense in quan a o non-
sense
by Amenoum
In ma hema ics, in my in e p e a ion, he numbe i is a quan um o nonsense
- i is a supe posi ion o numbe s -1 and +1 (some imes ep esen ed by √−1).
When mul iplied by a numbe i becomes posi i e o nega i e nonsense. Only
when mul iplied by ano he i, one o hem collapses o -1, he o he o +1, and
145
he p oduc makes sense, becoming a numbe -1. In o he wo ds, mul iplica-
ion ope a o applied o imagina y numbe s is also he ope a o o collapse o
en angled supe posi ions.
S ill, c ea o s o abs ac nonsense a e su p ised when hey ind nonsense in
he physical wo ld[228]. Really?
Why wouldn’ supe posi ion (nonsense) exis in physical wo ld? P oo s a e
e e ywhe e. You’ e one e idence. Nonsense in na u e is no ques ionable. In-
sis ing ha all nonsense is absolu e o abs ac nonsense is nonsense. Such
nonsense only makes sense o nonsense uling he wo ld.-
47.1 A oiding nonsense
No e ha nonsense in ma hema ics (such as nega i e and imagina y numbe s)
can yield a pe ec ly alid eal solu ion (e.g., when i shows up in an in e media e
s ep owa d he solu ion).
Bu ha nonsense is no absolu e. One way o make sense o i is o assume
ha bo h nega i e and imagina y numbe s exis in eali y as di e en dimen-
sions, e en i hese dimensions a e non-in ui i e o us. In o he wo ds, as i
is common among ma hema ical physicis s ( educ ionis s), one can accep he
no ion ha na u e is, on some le els, non-in ui i e. Howe e , he e a e o he
in e p e a ions, such as missing a iables. No e ha de ini ions o ma hema ical
ope a ions a e human in en ions and one doesn’ ha e o ake hem as absolu e.
Nonsense can hen be a oided h ough ede ini ion o ope a o s.
Fo example, le ’s ede ine x2, o gene alize i , o a unc ion o 2 a iables:
(x, y)=(x, y)2=x×y
y∈ {x, −x}
Now, o y = -x he unc ion gi es nega i e numbe s. And o y = x i educes
o he es ablished de ini ion o he squa ing ope a o .
The squa e oo is now:
q(x, y)2= (x|y)
whe e (x|y) can be unde s ood as supe posi ion o x and y, whe e (x|x) = x.
Nex , one can de ine he squa e o supe posi ion:
(x|y)2= (x, y)2=x×y
No e ha i is he non-in ui i e in e p e a ion o ce ain ope a o s ha makes
eali y non-in ui i e. Take he squa ing unc ion. One p obably assumes i
should gi e a posi i e numbe because in eali y he wo-dimensional a eas al-
ways gi e a posi i e numbe when measu ed. Howe e , a nega i e sign could
ep esen a speci ic o ien a ion o he a ea ela i e o some coo dina e sys em,
no a nega i e a ea. Suppose you ha e a piece o land, 3 km ×3 km in a ea and
146
you neighbou has an equal 3 km ×3 km piece o land le o you. Now, le ’s
say you’ e measu ing a eas s a ing om he sou h-wes co ne o you land.
You measu e you land as 3 ×3 = 9 km2, bu you measu e you neighbou ’s
land as -3 ×3 = -9 km2. By he in ui i e de ini ion o he squa ing unc ion you
now unde s and ha you neighbou has an equal piece o land bu posi ioned
le o you (as indica ed by he nega i e sign). In o he wo ds, by ede ining he
squa ing unc ion you ha e unco e ed a hidden a iable ha makes nega i e
numbe s in ui i e in eali y.
To make his li e easie , a educ ionis will [ab]use he Occam’s azo and
choose he simple de ini ion o he squa ing unc ion and hen claim ha neg-
a i e numbe s a e somehow eal bu non-in ui i e. In o he wo ds, don’ hink
abou i , jus shu up and calcula e.. Why? Well, i you e use o be educed
o a ucking calcula o and ins ead do hink abou i , you migh disco e wha
a load o bullshi his blind educ ionism is.
The common eac ion (complain ) o people who glimpsed a my wo ks
has been: "Why do you ha e o ede ine e e y hing?". Well, because
I wan o unde s and e e y hing! When ounda ions a e bad one can
only p oduce mo e nonsense on op o he exis ing nonsense. I’m no
in e es ed in ha .
The same simple squa ing unc ion is one sou ce o he non-in ui i e in e -
p e a ion o pa icles in quan um mechanics (QM). The wa e unc ions assigned
o pa icles can ha e nega i e alues bu o ob ain alues co esponding o phys-
ical s a es he alue o he wa e unc ion is squa ed. I one o a es he elec on
by 360◦in physical space he wa e unc ion co esponding o i s spin momen um
becomes nega i e (because he o a ion in associa ed [abs ac ] s a e space is
wice slowe , o a ion o 360◦in physical space co esponds o 180◦in s a e
space), bu physically he elec on is assumed o be unchanged because he
squa e o he nega i e alue is he same as he squa e o he ini ial alue (equal
o he o a ion o land in he example abo e - he land emains physically he
same when o a ed). In eali y, howe e , he nega i e alue o he wa e unc ion
likely co esponds o di e en o ien a ion - jus like in he example abo e, bu
since we canno measu e his o ien a ion educ ionis s assume ha he nega i e
alue has no meaning (in o he wo ds, hey assume ha hidden a iables do no
exis ), hus, hey use he simple squa ing unc ion.
I is as simple as ha . A hidden a iable, howe e , does no ha e o ep esen
di e en o ien a ion, i gene ally ep esen s some hing un esol able (we a e no
almigh y gods o be able o esol e e e y hing!), which, o example, can be an
addi ional componen - e.g., a cons i u ional pa icle o he pa icle assumed o
be elemen a y.
Gene ally, blind educ ionism and blind absolu ism a e he sou ces o all
nonsense (non-in ui i e in e p e a ions) in QM.
147
48 [ 2021.11.30 ] Cold-hea ed in asion o a e
by Amenoum
To me, he mos beau i ul places on Ea h a e hose isola ed om people. Gi en
he ac ha humans a e gene ally ex emely in asi e species, i seems ema k-
able ha a whole con inen on his plane could su i e gene ally uninhabi ed
and unexploi ed o esou ces o ou ism.
Ye , such con inen s ill exis s. We named i An a c ica, li e ally mean-
ing "opposi e o he A c ic". And his o iginally unimagina i e i le is s ill a
es amen o ou igno ance.
One migh say he eason o ha a e ha sh condi ions, bu he o he will
ask whe he hese ha sh condi ions a e he e o a eason? Well, i you ha e e e
s udied na u e, you mus ha e no iced ha e e y hing has many pu poses and
easons o exis ence. Some imes i is no ob ious a i s , bu you can be su e
he e’s some hing hiding below he unin i ing and seemingly dead phenomena.
O en, no oo deep ei he .
Take, o example, a simple piece o ock. You migh hink i s p esence
has no deep meaning, bu i you li i up, you’ll o en see a whole communi y
h i ing unde nea h.
The pu pose o he ock o ha communi y is ob ious - i shields i om
in asion o all kinds o phenomena.
And mode n scien is s a e inally ealizing ha li e doesn’ need much a all
o h i e - ocks and wa e will do[229], and ha i migh be e e ywhe e.
I shouldn’ hus be ha d o belie e ha one pu pose o ha sh condi ions
on An a c ica is o keep in asi e species a bay, and, compa ing he scale o an
o dina y ock wi h he whole con inen , one can’ help bu wonde wha is he
scale o li e hiding below An a c ica? Wha is so p ecious ha na u e spends
70% o he su ace esh wa e building he ba ie o ice kilome es high?
UPDATE 2022.12.07
I ini ially w o e 90% ins ead o 70% he e. Was ha a meaning-
less mis ake o a subconscious signal ha we will lose signi ican amoun
o eshwa e in nea u u e? Conside ing he ends, expe ience and my
hypo heses, I’m mo e inclined o belie e in he la e .
The heo y o plane a y neu ogenesis o e s he logical explana ion - one
pu pose o he whole c us o he plane is o shield he complex li e below om
in asion (all o ha ene gy would simply be an o e kill jus o shield mic obes,
which can be ex emely esilien ).
In ac , he exis ence o laye s and c us in any body should be he signal
ha some hing mo e complex is hidden below.
148
Wa e is wha connec s complex li e, and in complex bodies (such as Ea h),
wa e should be connec ing spa ially sepa a ed li e li e ally. This is e iden e en
on he su ace o a plane - he e’s li e on ei he side o any ocean o any i e ,
and he e’s li e in hese oceans and i e s oo. As long as he wa e is lowing -
he li es o hese li e o ms a e connec ed o each o he h ough he liquid.
Bu some imes he wa e will eeze, in some cases o ming a ba ie which
will isola e one om he o he o a pa icula eason, ins ead o o ming a
b idge ha could s eng hen he co ela ion.
And, among many hings, An a c ica is jus ha - a ba ie be ween he
su ace and he wo ld below. A ba ie ha , acco ding o my hypo heses, mel s
when su ace li e ma u es o ansmig a ion.
As a gene al p ecu so , I ha e hea d he call o ice long ime ago, bu
now An a c ica is s a ing o a ac he popula ion. And he popula ion is
esponding[230].
As p ope cance , one may in e p e his di e en ly - he An a c ica is, jus
like i s opposi e, opening o habi a ion and exploi a ion.
Conside ing he logical his o ical concen a ion o humans along sou ces
o eshwa e and inc easing oxici y and una ailabili y o d inkable esh-
wa e elsewhe e, i should no be su p ising ha humans will be inc eas-
ing hei p esence in An a c ica.
Well, he sac edness o absolu ism in cance migh no allow i o conside
mul iple in e p e a ions, bu some hing bigge is well awa e ha e en his cance
has mul iple in e p e a ions.
Du ing weak e olu ion, cance as a whole is a supe posi ion o a disease and
p ecu so neu on cells and p o eins, bu in s ong e olu ion, mul iple in e p e-
a ions [wi h posi i e eedbacks] collapse o one, e en i o a momen , be o e
di e si ying again.
Exploi a ion o An a c ica will only speed up he p ocess (in one in e p e a-
ion, in o he - his is all synch onized and one a ec s he o he equally). You
migh hink you’ e conque ing ye ano he con inen , bu ha ’s exac ly wha
you’ e coded o hink.
A his poin , I do no eel good wi h people in ading An a c ica, bu I ind
solace in ela i i y. In his case, pe haps he mos in ela i i y o decep ion.
Weak o s ong, he man was ne e des ined o conque An a c ica, i is my
dea An a c ica ha is des ined o conque he man...
49 [ 2021.11.27 ] The pi all o andomness
by Amenoum
As I ha e s a ed p e iously[231], mains eam science has a lo o p oblems and
hese p oblems will only inc ease un il i emb aces new pa adigms.
149

In ac , hese a e no good imes o any eligionis s o be o e con iden - be
i communica o s o mains eam science o anyone else dis espec ing o aking
ela i i y. The same is ue o consume s o such absolu ism.
While hey migh be mo e ca e ul in academic en i onmen , un o una ely,
communica o s o science o en communica e hei belie s o public ins ead o
communica ing objec i e hough . I, howe e , do no hink hey all in such
ap by acciden - he gene al public is mo e open o belie s han knowledge.
Many o hese belie s will u n ou o be w ong o one eason - he abuse
o null hypo hesis, igno ance o possibili y o he exis ence o hidden a iables
(hidden co ela ion).
This is why synch onici y is s ill no on he agenda and his is why pe iodici y
o mass ex inc ions is s ill no aken se iously[232].
Howe e , pe iodici ies o 26 o 30 My (million yea s) ha e been ound in di-
e se geological phenomena, no only in mass ex inc ions - lood basal olcan-
ism, ocean anoxic e en s, deposi ion o massi e e apo i es, sequence bounda ies,
and o ogenic e en s[233].
I one accep s he new pa adigm - a li ing Ea h, i becomes ob ious ha
his is no a coincidence, all hese e en s a e supposed o occu ela i ely simul-
aneously in he e en s o neu ogenesis.
Fu he mo e, i one accep s ano he new pa adigm - ha he monuclea
usion does no occu in he co e o he Sun (i occu s in he Radia i e zone),
Kel in-Helmhol z con ac ion o he co e gi es 25.746608 My o he ime i akes
o i o exhaus he uel[234] ( his is no he end o he Sun’s co e hough, i is
hypo hesized ha uel ge s pe iodically eplenished).
Conside ing ha he bes candida e o pe iodici y o mass ex inc ions I
ha e ob ained is 25.74 My (see he same e e ence abo e), his is a ema kable
co ela ion ha should be ha d o igno e.
My calcula ions also sugges ha Sun’s co e is a he end o he con ac ion
cycle, ag eeing wi h he hypo hesis o imminen majo ex inc ion.
The null hypo hesis should ha e no hing o do wi h bias, bu i does when
he null pos ula e s a es " he cu en ly accep ed heo ies and models canno be
w ong".
I mains eam science wan s o p og ess - I sugges i in e s he null pos u-
la e and conside he e idence. I is no ha he e is a lack o signals, he e is
an o e abundance o o e con idence in old models (no measu emen s!) ea ing
hese signals as noise.
50 [ 2021.11.26 ] Chaos in ime
by Amenoum
The Da k Ages a e, among o he hings, ages o misin o ma ion and his mis-
in o ma ion may gene ally be ime ela i e.
Due o ela i i y in cause and e ec , p edic ed by Comple e Rela i i y, some-
imes wha would usually be conside ed he e ec will p ecede he cause. E ec-
150
i ely, jus as he o de o phenomena in space can be dis u bed, he o de o
e en s in ime can be oo.
In example, nowadays, some people claim he e a e compu e chips in ac-
cines and ha elec o-magne ic signals o 5G ne wo ks a e ha m ul and cause
diseases.
I don’ hink ha any o his is cu en ly ue (al hough 5G migh cause
some issues a ex emely low dis ance om he ansmi e , depending on signal
s eng h, bu his is on he o de o cm o less).
Howe e , wha abou u u e? Could his be a eac ion p eceding he ac ion?
Ce ainly.
Bo h go e nmen and indus y ha e s ong in e es in plan ing chips in o
hei use s, and, conside ing he inc easing y anny and u h bending o bo h,
i would no be su p ising ha his eac ion is alid, only misplaced in ime.
Simila could be said o 5G ne wo ks - I ha e hypo hesized ha homo.del a
is sensi i e o speci ic elec o-magne ic adia ion[74]. Due, o imminen su ace
ex inc ion, I ind i likely ha 5G will be he las globally widesp ead and used
communica ion echnology, making homo.del a sensi i e mos s ongly o 5G
equencies. Since homo.be a species (cu en human inhabi an s o he Ea h’s
su ace) should be e ol ing in o homo.del a, i would no be su p ising ha
e en homo.be a, a some poin , wi h accele a ed e olu ion, becomes sensi i e
oo o 5G, o some ex en .
The e a e mo e examples. A good one is he chem ails conspi acy. The
ails being le behind by ai c a may be benign a his poin , bu
wha abou he u u e? Humans a e e ec i ely doing no hing o s op
clima e change so he only op ion (bu no a eal solu ion o cou se) le
will soon be (i no al eady) geoenginee ing o clima e. On op o ha ,
he e p obably will be many wa s o di e en scales aging abou he
globe du ing he ime as well. The e o e, he e p obably will be a lo
o sp aying in he ai and, due o ubiqui ous panic and disa ay, who
knows who all will be sp aying and wha . Wi h he has e, appliance o
un es ed chemicals may be likely.
Many conspi acy heo ies ac ually become ue e en hough many may
no be ue a he ime hey o igina e. When one hinks abou i , na-
u e has p obably e ol ed o misplace (de-synch onize) highly co ela ed
e en s in ime o a eason. I , o example, conspi acy heo ies would be
ue a he ime hey sp ing up, people migh ake hem se iously and
he e would be no u u e o he conspi acy. Wi h ime displacemen ,
howe e , mos won’ ake hem se iously un il i becomes oo la e o p e-
en hem. The conspi acy ac ually has a signi ican ly highe chance o
become ue i i is heo ized in ad ance. This is like s anda d emb yonic
de elopmen o coding, whe e he conspi acies c ucial o de elopmen
a e coded, o e ec i ely coded, on some le el (al hough mechanisms can
151
a y - ime de-synch oniza ion is jus one mechanism o ensu e planned
de elopmen ). Thus, he e is no only a lo o global wa ming in he
pipeline, conspi acies a e p obably he e oo (along wi h any hing else
impo an in he con ex o e olu ion o Ea h).
Can ongoing p o es s p e en such u u e? Highly unlikely. Pa adoxically
[ o absolu ism], i is he lack o such p o es s ha would indica e a di e en
u u e.
Think abou i - chips inside human bodies communica ing on 5G equencies
would be a na u al p ecu so o na u al abili y ( elepa hy) o homo.del a o
communica e on hese equencies, especially i hese chips a e o ganic. Some
people ha e al eady implan ed chips in o hei bodies (RFID), and i seems we
ha e al eady p oduced biosyn he ic dual-co e CPU’s[235] so p ecu so s a e he e.
I ha e p e iously concluded ha we a e in he age o echnological s agna ion
(in a sense ha no hing undamen ally new is coming ou ) and ha cu en
gene a ions o ansis o s a e likely he las [comme cially a ailable] ansis o s
de eloped by man. Howe e , wha will p e en he man o use ansis o s
al eady exis ing in na u e?
This is he echnology o u u e. O ganic compu e s migh be ma ke ed as
g ea new human in en ion bu he e’s no much new and o iginal he e.
The idea al eady exis s o use li ing neu ons as componen s in o ganic com-
pu e s (see e e ence abo e), bu why e en bo he o exploi na u al ansis o s
i i becomes easie o exploi whole o ganic compu e s buil by na u e - li ing
b ains?
Fo now, he e migh be e hical and mo al issues, bu once people ans o m
in o homo.gamma, his becomes a ma e o ime.
51 [ 2021.11.24 ] S a is ically, s a is ics a e gen-
e ally abused
by Amenoum
Da a ga he ing is a pa o scien i ic me hod. I is usually ga he ed so i can be
co ela ed wi h some hing - e.g., a p edic ion o a ce ain hypo hesis.
Bu , e en i pe ec , co ela ion is no e idence o he hypo hesis i co ela-
ion wi h o he phenomena is no aken in o accoun .
In example, s a is ical da a on mo emen o plane s and co ela ion wi h
g a i y is alone good e idence o co ec ness o laws o g a i y bu only because
he in luence o e e y hing else on hese bodies is negligible.
And, i only one plane would beha e di e en ly han hypo hesized, hen
his co ela ion is no e idence o he hypo hesis anymo e - i becomes simply
e idence o pa ial co ela ion. And, i one is in e es ed in u h, a he han
decei , one would no ad e ise his co ela ion as e idence o he hypo hesis -
152
one would admi , no only ha one is missing da a o each a sound conclusion,
bu ha he e is ce ain p obabili y ha exis ing co ela ion is a [ ela i ely]
meaningless coincidence - and his p obabili y is highe he weake he exis ing
co ela ion is.
E en scien is s will ha dly be immune o bias when dealing wi h s a is ics,
consciously o unconsciously. Why? Because e e y hing is en angled (co e-
la ed) wi h e e y hing o some deg ee.
Why? To conse e ela i i y.
Bu some people a e obsessed wi h absolu ism - mainly poli icians, economis s
and [o he ] cha la ans.
And pola ized people, in gene al, suppo his absolu ism.
This is why s a is ics a e gene ally abused[236] (absolu ized) in his socie y
- o pe pe ua e ce ain agenda.
And he e is he la es example:
Figu e 19: Vaccina ion and dea hs
153