New geographic distribution records of Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in central northern Mexico
Abstract
The geographic distribution of Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 is expanded and updated, based on specimens collected in the regions of the Mexican Plateau, Sierra Madre Oriental, and Sierra Madre Occidental. Ten new records include the first municipal occurrences for the states of Zacatecas (Guadalupe, Sombrerete, Valparaíso, and Zacatecas) and San Luis Potosí (Mexquitic de Carmona), and additional locality records for Nuevo León (Galeana and Iturbide) and Coahuila (Saltillo).
Full text
the journal of biodiversity data NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 1179 Academic editor: Livia Pires do Prado Received: 10 July 2025 Accepted: 10 November 2025 Published: 26 November 2025 Copyright © The authors. This is an open‑access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International – CC BY 4.0) Abstract. The geographic distribution of Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 is expanded and updated, based on specimens collected in the regions of the Mexican Plateau, Sierra Madre Oriental, and Sierra Madre Occidental. Ten new records include the first municipal occurrences for the states of Zacatecas (Gua‑ dalupe, Sombrerete, Valparaíso, and Zacatecas) and San Luis Potosí (Mexquitic de Carmona), and addi‑ tional locality records for Nuevo León (Galeana and Iturbide) and Coahuila (Saltillo). Key words. Dolichoderinae, edible insect, escamolera ant, geographic range update, Nearctic region, Tapinomini, taxonomy Berumen-Jiménez M, Martínez-Salazar EA, Tarango-Arámbula LA, Rosas-Valdez R (2025) New geographic distribution records of Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in central northern Mexico. Check List 21 (6): 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Introduction The genus Liometopum Mayr, 1861 belongs to the tribe Tapinomini and comprises 21 extinct and seven extant species. Of the living species, four have a Holarctic distribution (Del Toro et al. 2009; Ward et al. 2010; Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Bolton 2025), while three are restricted to the Nearctic region: Liometopum luctuosum Wheeler, 1905, Liometopum occidentale Emery, 1895 and the widest distributed, Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 (Del Toro et al. 2009). Liometopum apiculatum is distributed in Arizona, Arkansas, California Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas, USA (Emery 1895; Wheeler 1905; Wheeler 1917; Wheeler and Bailey 1920; Smith 1936; Cole 1937; Browne and Gregg 1969; Hunt and Snelling 1975;Van Pelt 1983; Cokendolpher and Francke 1990; MacKay 1993; Andersen 1997; O’Keefe et al. 2000; Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001; MacKay and Mackay 2002; Del Toro et al. 2009; Guénard et al. 2017). According to Guénard et al. (2017), the specific identification of a record from Fresno, California needs to be reviewed, but a record from Los Angeles makes the presence of the species in that region plausible. In Mexico it is distributed across 25 states, from the north from Baja California and Tamaulipas to Quintana Roo (Wheeler 1905; Wheeler 1917; Navarrete et al. 2007; Ramos-Elorduy et al. 2007; Del Toro et al. 2009; Alatorre-Bracamontes and Vásquez-Bolaños 2010; Vásquez-Bolaños 2011; Dubovikoff et al. 2012; Cruz-Labana et al. 2014; Escalante-Jiménez and Vásquez-Bolaños 2015; Vásquez-Bolaños 2015; LaraJuárez et al. 2016; Dubovikoff et al. 2017; Guénard et al. 2017; Dattilo et al. 2020; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). Furthermore,L. apiculatumdistribution extends to Central America, specifically in Guatemala (Guénard et al. 2017). The economic importance of this ant as an edible insect in central Mexico has been reported with the larvae of the reproductive caste being the stage of the life cycle traditionally consumed as food (Ramos-Elorduy et al. 2006; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Figueroa-Sandoval et al. 2018; Ángeles-Tovar et al. 2021; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). The species interacts with different types of organisms. It builds nests at the base of various plant species, such as oaks, pines, agaves, cacti, and other tree species. It also feeds on the waste of other ants, including Pogonomyrmex barbatus Smith, 1858, Camponotus sayi Emery, 1893, and Solenopsis xyloni 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 21 (6): 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 New geographic distribution records of Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in central northern Mexico Mauricio Berumen-Jiménez1, 2 , Elizabeth A. Martínez-Salazar1, Luis A. Tarango-Arámbula3, and Rogelio Rosas-Valdez1 1 Laboratorio de Colecciones Biológicas y Sistemática Molecular, Unidad Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Av. Preparatoria S/N, Campus Universitario II, Col. Agronómica, C.P. 98066 Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México 2 Doctorado en Ciencias Básicas, Área de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Av. Preparatoria S/N, Campus Universitario II, Col. Agronómica, C.P. 98066 Zacatecas, México 3 Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus San Luis Potosí. Iturbide 73, 78620 Salinas de Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, México Corresponding author: Rogelio Rosas-Valdez ([email protected])
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1180 McCook, 1879. However, its main source of energy is the honeydew exuded by various species of the Hemiptera group, such as Saissetia oleae (Olivier, 1791), Anoecia cornicola (Walsh, 1863), Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell, 1893), Crassicoccus sp., and Eriococcus sp. (Velasco 2007; Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Berumen-Jimenez et al. 2021). Liometopum apiculatum inhabits a wide range of climates, soils, and altitudes (30–2900 m), from tropical and temperate forests to semi-desert environments, which explains its broad distribution and ecological plasticity across diverse habitats (Schowalter 2022). Despite its ecological, nutritional and economic importance (Dubovikoff et al. 2012; Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021), knowledge about the species remains limited, particularly regarding its distribution. Ecological niche models (Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021) suggest that central northern Mexico is a promising area to investigate, as it encompasses temperate regions of the Sierra Madre Occidental and Oriental as well as semi-desert zones of the Mexican Plateau, all within recognized biogeographic provinces (Morrone 2019). Therefore, to help fill this knowledge gap, we document new municipal records for L. apiculatum in the states of San Luis Potosí and Zacatecas, as well as new locality records for Coahuila and Nuevo León; the new records are situated within the biogeographic regions of the Sierra Madre Oriental, Sierra Madre Occidental, and the Mexican Plateau. Methods During 2022 and 2023 we manually collected ant specimens from vegetation preferred as nesting sites by Liometopum apiculatum (Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). Specifically, this vegetation includes species of the genera Quercus L., Agave L., Pinus L., Yucca L., Prosopis L., and Cylindropuntia (Engelm.) F.M. Knuth. We sampled once per locality, with each session lasting 4 h and preferably done before midday (08:00–12:00 A.M.) when L. apiculatum exhibits its highest foraging activity (Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015). At each locality, we sampled a single exploratory transect (approximately 300 m to 1 km long) in regions without previous records. The transect’s width was approximately 1 m, with occasional deviations toward potential nesting or foraging areas detected along the route. Our searches focused on vegetation (mainly tree trunks and the bases of cacti) where the species was nesting, encompassing both open and closed vegetation areas. From each locality, 10 worker specimens were manually collected and preserved in 80% ethanol. The absence of a sting in the ant facilitated hand collection, which is more selective and less invasive. Although only female workers ♀ (W) were sampled, they allowed reliable species identification and were the only caste encountered during the study period. Specimen identification was performed using identification keys and redescriptions of the species (Mackay and Mackay 2002; Fernández 2003; Del Toro et al. 2009) and confirmed through the original species description (Mayr 1870) and comparison with type specimens photographs available in the AntWeb.org (2025) (type: CASENT0915550 and syntype: CASENT09089). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Entomological Collection of the Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Durango, Mexico. A single collection code (CECD-HYM: Colección Entomológica CIIDIR Durango, Hymenoptera) was assigned to all specimens for each locality. Our specimens were dry-mounted and examined directly under a stereomicroscope (Luxeo 4D digital microscope LM-4145000) at 1.5× and 2× magnification, using a reference scale for calibration. Photographs were taken for documentation and figure preparation. Morphological measurements were taken using LABOMED Pixel Pro v. 2.8 software, and figures were prepared using Adobe Illustrator v. 26.3.1. Final photographs have a resolution of 300 dpi. The geographic distribution of L. apiculatum was updated using occurrence records from research reports, published articles (Emery 1895; Wheeler 1905; Wheeler 1917; Wheeler and Bailey 1920; Smith 1936; Cole 1937; Browne and Gregg 1969; Hunt and Snelling 1975; Van Pelt 1983; Cokendolpher and Francke 1990; MacKay 1993; Andersen 1997; O’Keefe et al. 2000; Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001; MacKay and MacKay 2002; Navarrete et al. 2007; Ramos-Elorduy et al. 2007; Del Toro et al. 2009; Alatorre-Bracamontes and Vásquez-Bolaños 2010; Vásquez-Bolaños 2011; Dubovikoff et al. 2012; Cruz-Labana et al. 2014; Escalante-Jiménez and Vásquez-Bolaños 2015; Vásquez-Bolaños 2015; Lara-Juárez et al. 2016; Dubovikoff et al. 2017; Guénard et al. 2017; Dáttilo et al. 2020; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021), and the databases GABI (The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics) (Guénard et al. 2017), AntWeb (2024), and GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) (2024). For GBIF and AntWeb, only records supported by collection numbers and verifiable specimens were retained. For GABI, reliance was placed on the curation and reliability of the
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1181 database, which is widely used and maintained by experts, although direct verification of vouchers was not always possible. The compiled data, together with newly obtained records, were used to generate geographic distribution maps in ESRI ArcGIS Desktop v. 10.8.2 (ESRI 2011). We created an updated distribution map of L. apiculatum using the World Imagerybasemap (ESRI 2024), displaying country boundaries and new records. Both maps are vector-based, with the graphic scale presented in kilometers, and the final figures were exported at 300 dpi resolution. All occurrence and specimen data supporting this study are deposited in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://doi.org/10.15468/gcykms). Results Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 New records. MÉXICO — Coahuila • Saltillo, Rancho Miguel Velásquez; 25.1553, –100.5826; 2268 m alt.; 16.IX.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez, N. Acuña-Quiñones, D. Ochoa-Vázquez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1525-1534, dry preserved — Nuevo León • Galeana, Carretera Matehuala-Linares; 24.6760, –100.1510; 2117 m alt.; 27.IX.2024; M. Berumen-Jiménez and N. Acuña-Quiñones; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1535-1544, dry preserved • Iturbide, Carretera Matehuala-Linares; 24.7500, –99.9550; 1173 m alt.; 26.IX.2024; M. Berumen-Jiménez and N. Acuña-Quiñones; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1545-1554, dry preserved — San Luis Potosí •Mexquitic de Carmona, Milpillas; 22.2544, –101.1286; 2042 m alt.; 09.XI.2024; R. Rosas-Valdez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECDHYM-1555-1564, dry preserved — Zacatecas • Zacatecas, Cerro de la Bufa; 22.4632, –102.3246; 2600 m alt.; 01.II.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1565-1574, dry preserved Figure 1. Worker of Liometopum apiculatum (CECD-HYM-1565; CECD- -HYM-1605; CECD-HYM-1621; CECD- -HYM-1585) collected at Cerro de la Bufa, Sombrerete, Valparaiso and Panzacola, Zacatecas, Mexico. A. Part of head in lateral view (maxillary palp) (n =10 and n =3 number of palp segments). B. Mandible in anterior view (n =10 and n =3 teeth). C. Full face view. D. Antenna (n =11 segments). E. Body lateral view. F. Gaster. CPHM: Concavity at the posterior margin of the head. CCl: Concavity at anterior clypeal. Sc: Scape. Mma: Masticatory margin. Mba: Basal margin. LP: Labial palp, MP: Maxillary palp. PD: Propodeal decline. Pe: Petiole. FGT: First gastral tergite. Photograph (E) by Daniel Ochoa-Vásquez.
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1182 • Zacatecas, Cerro de la Virgen; 22.4409, –102.3342; 2690 m alt.; 04.II.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez and R. Rosas-Valdez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1575-1584, dry preserved •Zacatecas, Panzacola; 22.3960, –102.2650; 2280 m alt.; 10.III.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez and Daniel Ochoa-Vázquez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1585-1594, dry preserved • Zacatecas, Ecoparque Centenario; 22.7769, –102.5461; 2420 m alt.; 07.X.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECDHYM-1595-1604, dry preserved • Zacatecas, Sombrerete, Carretera Zacatecas-Durango; 23.7408, –103.7925; 2348 m alt.; 10.IV.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez and Daniel Ochoa-Vázquez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECD-HYM-1605-1614, dry preserved • Valparaiso, La Campana; 23.0115, –103.3128; 2272 m alt.; 19.II.2023; M. Berumen-Jiménez and Daniel Ochoa-Vázquez; hand collected; 10 ♀(W), CECDHYM-1615-1624, dry preserved. Identification. All the diagnostic and differential features among Nearctic species of Liometopum are according to Mackay and Mackay (2002), Fernández (2003) and Del Toro et al. (2009). The specimens were identified as Liometopum based on the following characteristics, illustrated in Figure 1: coloration dark brown. Maxillary palp with six segments, and labial palp with four segments (Figure 1A), 7–10 teeth at the masticatory margin of the mandible and 3–5 teeth at the basal margin (Figure 1B). Slight Figure 2. New records of L. apiculatum in the states of Coahuila, Nuevo León and Zacatecas. Municipalities, A. Sombrerete. B. Valparaíso. C. Zacatecas. D. Guadalupe (Zacatecas). E. Mexquitic de Carmona (San Luis Potosí). F: Saltillo (Coahuila). G. Galena. H. Iturbide (Nuevo León).
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1183 concavity at the anterior clypeal edge without teeth (Figure 1C). Scape extends beyond the posterior margin of the head, and antenna 11-segmented (Figure 1D). Concavity at the posterior margin of the head (Figure 1C). Mesosome convex. Metanotal groove reduced to a suture. Legs with a spur present on each tibia. Petiole as scale without a subpetiolar process; first gastral tergite the largest (Figure 1E). Gaster covered with grayish pubescence (Figure 1F) dorsal setae erect and of variable length (short and long), some of the setae nearly as long as those on the pronotum. Liometopum apiculatum is distinguished from the other two species (L. occidentale and L. luctuosum) in North America by the following characteristics: (a) antennal scape surpassing posterior margin of head by at least twice the maximum thickness of scape (Figure 1D), and (b) petiole coming to sharp angular apex from dorsal view, the metapleural angle is straight and posterior propodeal face is erect in lateral view (Figure 1E). In addition, L. apiculatum has the entire gastral surface covered in pilosity, and these are very uneven in length that differentiates it from L. luctuosum. Distribution and habitat associations. In the 10 localities, the six sampled areas within the state of Zacatecas, along with one in San Luis Potosí, represent the first records for the municipalities of Guadalupe, Sombrerete, Valparaiso, Zacatecas, and Mexquitic de Carmona. For Nuevo León and Coahuila, our sampled sites represent only new records for the species within the corresponding municipalities (Figure 2). At each sampling site, we observed ants actively foraging on various plants and substrates. In Iturbide, Galena (Nuevo León), Saltillo (Coahuila), and Sombrerete (Zacatecas), the dominant vegetation was pine forest interspersed with elements of xerophilous scrub, the ants were collected from foraging trails on pine trees. In Valparaiso (Zacatecas), we collected individuals in a pine–oak forest, predominantly dominated by oaks. On Cerro de la Virgen (Zacatecas), the workers were found in an oak forest with grassland elements. In the Ecoparque Centenario (Zacatecas), a riparian vegetation area was present, and we collected the species from a willow tree. At Cerro de la Bufa (Zacatecas), the ant was found within an introduced eucalyptus forest, specifically foraging on one of the trees. Finally, at the sites in the Mexquitic of Carmona (San Luis Potosí) and Panzacola (Zacatecas), we found the species xerophilous scrub vegetation. Updating the geographic distribution. A total of 1028 records of L. apiculatum were retrieved from the databases and literature. The geographical distribution ranges from the southern United States and extends south to Guatemala through Mexico. A total of 664 records are from Mexico and 364 from the United States. Lately, this species was reported from Guatemala, extending its distribution Figure 3. Updated distribution of L. apiculatum. Polygon A, B, and C (inside the blue line) areas with gaps about distribution information of this species.
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1184 to Central America (Guénard et al. 2017). In addition, this study contributed to 10 new distribution records (Figure 3). Discussion Liometopum apiculatum is the ant species with the widest geographic distribution in Mexico, with records from 25 states (Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). Despite this broad distribution, the range of environmental conditions occupied by the species remains insufficiently documented (Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). The new occurrences reported here come from north-central Mexico, a region previously identified by ecological niche models as environmentally suitable for the species (Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). Our new records mainly correspond to the species’ occurrence in vegetation characterized as Pine Forest and Xerophilous Scrub (Rzedowski and Huerta 1978). Here, we present the first records of L. apiculatum from the municipalities of Guadalupe, Sombrerete, Valparaiso, and Zacatecas (state of Zacatecas), from the municipality of Mexquitic de Carmona (San Luis Potosí), from the municipalities of Galena and Iturbide (Nuevo León), and Saltillo (Coahuila) (Figure 1). One of the new records at Cerro de la Bufa, municipality of Zacatecas, includes vegetation disturbed by human activity, reforested with exotic Eucalyptus sp. The Cerro de la Bufa has been reforested with exotic trees for decades until recent years (CONABIO 2020). This record suggests that L. apiculatum can persist in recently disturbed environments. This finding highlights the species’ ecological flexibility and its ability to tolerate habitat alteration, which may contribute to its broad distribution across heterogeneous ecosystems. Focusing sampling efforts on areas with distributional gaps, particularly regions with few or no occurrence records, is essential to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the species’ range. The geographic distribution of L. apiculatum spans both the Nearctic and Neotropical regions, with notable differences in sampling coverage. In the United States of America, a further area of interest encompasses northwestern and central Texas, along with the states of Kansas and Oklahoma, which are in the Great Plains and Chihuahuan Desert provinces of the Nearctic region (Del Toro et al. 2009; Guénard et al. 2017; Morrone 2019; AntWeb 2024; GBIF 2024) (polygon B, Figure 3). In northwestern Mexico, it is imperative to conduct further investigations on the Baja California Peninsula, particularly across the Baja California province; this region also extends northward into eastern California and western Arizona (AntWeb 2024) (polygon C, Figure 3). Additional surveys are also required in the states of Sonora and Sinaloa, belonging to the Sonoran and Pacific Lowlands provinces, respectively (Morrone 2019). In northern Mexico, within the Nearctic and Transition zones (Morrone 2019, 2022), the geographic distribution data reveal an information deficit across portions of the Mexican Plateau and the Sierra Madre Occidental, particularly in the states of Chihuahua, Durango, and Zacatecas, which belong to the Chihuahuan Desert and Sierra Madre Occidental provinces (Morrone 2019). Additional gaps occur within the Sierra Madre Oriental, encompassing Coahuila, Nuevo León, and San Luis Potosí, which in part correspond to the Sierra Madre Oriental province (Del Toro et al. 2009; Guénard et al. 2017; Morrone 2019; AntWeb 2024; GBIF 2024) (polygon A, Figure 3). These distributional gaps also include coastal plains along the coasts of Baja California Norte, as well as Guerrero and Quintana Roo. Although three known records of L. apiculatum below 50 m a.s.l. come from these regions (Guénard et al. 2017), they represent isolated occurrences, and extensive low-elevation areas within these coastal zones remain unsampled or lack confirmed records. In contrast, within the Neotropical region, the southernmost distribution of L. apiculatum in Mexico is limited, with three records marking its range boundary in the states of Guerrero, Veracruz, and Quintana Roo (Del Toro et al. 2009; Guénard et al. 2017; AntWeb 2024; GBIF 2024), corresponding respectively to the Sierra Madre del Sur, Veracruzana, and Yucatán Peninsula provinces (Morrone 2022). Central America represents the species’ southernmost known limit, with a record from El Mirador, Petén, Guatemala, located in the Petén province (Guénard et al. 2017). Although Liometopum is primarily a Nearctic genus, these Neotropical occurrences likely represent relict populations (Del Toro et al. 2009). The new records presented here are all within the Nearctic region (Morrone 2019) and come from the municipalities of Guadalupe, Sombrerete, Valparaíso, and Zacatecas, located in the Zacatecan district of the Chihuahuan Desert province; they expand the species’ known range in central Mexico. We propose to search for the species in surrounding municipalities, in northern Zacatecas, within the Nearctic region and the Transition zone. The predominant vegetation in these areas consists of tem-
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1185 perate forest, grassland, and scrubland (CONABIO 2020), habitats where L. apiculatum regularly nests (Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). It is noted that the occurrence of this ant has been previously documented in Saltillo, Coahuila, and Galeana and Iturbide, Nuevo León (Guénard et al. 2017). However, the present study extends the distribution in the Sierra Madre Oriental. This highlights need for further fieldwork to better understand the distribution of the species. We suggest exploring the eastern region of San Luis Potosí, especially the Sierra Madre Oriental area because there are records of L. apiculatum in the neighboring states to the north (Nuevo León and Tamaulipas) and to the south (Queretaro and Hidalgo), all within this physiographic region. We make the following observations between previously reported records for this ant species (Guénard et al. 2017) and our new records: The previous records from Nuevo León (Galeana/Carretera Matehuala-Linares and Iturbide/Carretera Matehuala-Linares) are 14 km and 18 km, respectively, from the closest new record in the city of Galeana. The Saltillo record is 30 km from another in the same municipality. Sombrerete and Valparaíso, Zacatecas, are 91 km and 172 km, respectively, from the closest record in the municipality of Durango, Durango. Additionally, Valparaíso record is 190 km from a record in the municipality of Teúl de Gonzalez Ortega, Zacatecas. The Mexquitic de Carmona record is 27 km from the previously reported point in Soledad de Graciano Sánchez, San Luis Potosí. Finally, the records of Panzacola, Ecoparque Centenario, Cerro de la Bufa, and Cerro de la Virgen in Zacatecas are approximately 47 km and 60 km from the record reported in the municipality of Pánfilo Natera in the same state. Evaluating the spatial distances among existing records helps distinguish areas where apparent absences likely reflect insufficient sampling rather than true distributional limits. This spatial understanding is crucial for identifying potential dispersal corridors, assessing population connectivity, and detecting ecological discontinuities (Schowalter 2022). These considerations become especially relevant when considering the dispersal capacity of ants. For instance, some ant species can fly 2–5 km during their nuptial flights. However, most winged ants typically limit their flights to shorter distances of 100–300 m, primarily due to energy constraints and the urgency of finding a suitable nesting site (Quirán and Molas 1998; Cortés-Peréz and León-Sicard 2003; Fernández 2003). The documentation of new records, in conjunction with molecular studies, could yield valuable insights into the dynamics of dispersal and the genetic variation observed within geographically dispersed ant populations. Finally, L. apiculatum is not only ecologically significant but also has growing economic importance, which in some areas has led to threats to its colonies (Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). In central and northern Mexico, the immature stages of this species, known as “escamoles”, are extracted from underground nests in specific localities of Hidalgo, the State of Mexico, Tlaxcala, Puebla, Querétaro, San Luis Potosí, and Zacatecas (Ramos-Elorduy et al. 2006; Esparza-Frausto et al. 2008; Miranda-Roman et al. 2011; Lara-Juarez et al. 2018; Ángeles-Tovar et al. 2021). These extractions occur mainly in semi-arid and scrubland areas, where the product is sold in local and tourist markets. Although this activity provides seasonal income to rural communities, the lack of regulation and sustainable management may pose a risk to natural populations (Ramos-Elorduy et al. 2006). This species can influence the dynamics of other organisms due to its foraging behavior and interactions with various plants and animals (Velasco 2007; Hoey-Chamberlain et al. 2013; Lara-Juárez et al. 2015; Berumen-Jiménez et al. 2021). The species’ geographic distribution, spanning diverse ecosystems in northern Mexico, highlights the importance of identifying and protecting these habitats. A better understanding of its distribution will help prioritize areas that, due to their biodiversity, could be conserved along with this ant species. Acknowledgements We thank Daniel Ochoa-Vázquez, Lidia Ávila-Robles, and Nancy E. Acuña-Quiñones for field work, Elí A. Saucedo-Castillo (Director of the Department of Biodiversity, of the Secretary of Water and Environment) for let us the access to the Ecoparque Centenario Toma de Zacatecas. Miguel A. Velásquez Valle and María E. Roque Valdivia, and Ávila Robles family kindly provide access to their respective properties. We also thank M. en C. Daniel Ochoa García, Curator of the Colección Entomológica CIIDIR Durango for providing catalog accession numbers. MBJ thanks the Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECITHI), for support in the form of a scholarship for his postgraduate studies. We thank the reviewers and the academic editor for their helpful contributions which improved the manuscript.
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1186 Additional information Conflict of interest The authors declare that no competing interests exist. Ethical statement No ethical statement is reported. Author contributions Conceptualization: MBJ, RRV. Data curation: MBJ. Investigation: MBJ, RRV. Methodology: MBJ. WritingOriginal draft preparation: MBJ, RRV. WritingReviewing and Editing: EAMS, LATA. Authors ORCID iDs Rogelio Rosas-Valdez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7682-4984 Elizabeth A. Martínez-Salazar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-6930 Luis A. Tarango-Arámbula https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-1319 Mauricio Berumen-Jiménez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-6525 Data availability All data supporting this study’s findings are available in the main text. All occurrence and specimen data supporting this study are deposited in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://doi. org/10.15468/gcykms). References Alatorre-Bracamontes CE, Vásquez-Bolaños M (2010) Hymenoptera: Lista comentada de las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) del norte de México. Dugesiana 17 (1): 9–36. https://doi.org/10.32870/dugesiana.v17i1.3939 Andersen AN (1997) Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: A comparison with Australia. Journal of Biogeography 24 (4): 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1997.00137.x Ángeles-Tovar N, Estrada M, Sandoval-García MP, Vega-Serrano FV, Onofre-Sánchez JE (2021) Recolección y temporalidad de Liometopum apiculatum M. (Escamoles) en el municipio de Nantzha, Hidalgo México. Punto de Vista 12: 72–87. AntWeb (2024) Species: Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870. California Academy of Science. https://www.antweb.org/ description.do?subfamily=dolichoderinae&genus=liometopum&species=apiculatum&rank=species&project= allantwebants. Accessed on: 2024-11-29. AntWeb (2025) Comparison within species Liometopum apiculatum. California Academy of Science. https://www. antweb.org/getComparison.do?genus=liometopum&species=apiculatum&rank=species&pr=d. Accessed on: 2025-08-27. Berumen-Jiménez M, Valdez-Cepeda RD, Méndez-Gallegos SJ, Cadena-Íñiguez J, Esparza-Orozco A, TarangoArámbula LA (2021) Determinación del estado de conservación de la hormiga “escamolera” (Liometopum apiculatum MAYR) en México por el método de evaluación de riesgo–MER. Agrociencia 55: 539–555. https://doi.org/ 10.47163/agrociencia.v55i6.2558 Bolton B (2024) AntCat. An online catalog of the ants of the world. https://antcat.org/catalog/429121?qq=Liometopum. Accessed on 2025-08-26. Browne JT, Gregg RE (1969) A study of the ecological distribution of ants in Gregory Canyon, Boulder, Colorado. University of Colorado Studies. Series in Biology 30: 1–48. Cokendolpher JC, Francke OF (1990) The ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of western Texas. Part II. Subfamilies Ecitoninae, Ponerinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Dolichoderinae, and Formicinae. Special Publications of The Museum, Texas Tech University 30: 1–76. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16634395 Cole Jr AC (1937) An annotated list of the ants of Arizona.Entomological News48: 97–101. CONABIO (2020) La biodiversidad en Zacatecas. Estudio de estado. Versión digital. CONABIO y Gobierno del Estado de Zacatecas, México, Cuidad de México, México, 496 pp. Cortés-Peréz F, León-Sicard TE (2003) Modelo conceptual del papel ecológico de la Hormiga ArrieraAttalaevigata en los ecosistemas de sabana estacional (Vichada, Colombia). Caldasia 25 (2): 403–417. Cruz-Labana JD, Tarango-Arámbula LA, Alcántara-Carbajal JL, Pimentel-López J, Ugalde-Lezama S, Ramírez- -Valverde G, Méndez-Gallegos SJ (2014) Uso de hábitat por la hormiga escamolera (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr) en el centro de México. Agrociencia 48 (6): 569–582. Dáttilo W, Vásquez-Bolaños M, Ahuatzin DA, et al. (2020) Mexico ants: incidence and abundance along the Nearctic–Neotropical interface. Ecology 101 (11): e02944. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2944 Del Toro I, Pacheco J, Mackay W (2009) Revision of the ant genus Liometopum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 53: 299–370. Dubovikoff D, Coronado-Blanco J, Treviño-Carreón J, Ruíz-Cancino E (2012) Distribución y características de anidación de la hormiga Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) en la Sierra Madre
Check List 21 (6) · https://doi.org/10.15560/21.6.1179 Berumen-Jiménez et al. · New records of Liometopum apiculatum 1187 Oriental, Tamaulipas, México. In: 24°Encuentro Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica del Golfo de México, Tampico, México, 48–52. Dubovikoff E, Ruiz-Cancino E, Trevino-Carreon J (2017) Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) asociadas a tres orquideas de Miquihuana, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 33 (2): 416–418. Emery C (1895) Beiträge zur Kenntniss der nordamerikanischen Ameisenfauna. (Schluss). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 8: 257–360. Escalante-Jiménez AL, Vasquez-Bolaños M (2015) Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de la localidad Las Peñitas municipio de la Unión de Isidro Montes de Oca, Guerrero México. In: Castaño-Meneses G, Vásquez-Bolaños M, Navarrete-Heredia JL, Quiroz-Rocha GA (Eds.) Avances de Formicidae de Mexico. Ediciones Alcalá-Martínez IAstra, Jalisco, Mexico, 21–26. Esparza-Frausto G, Macías-Rodríguez FJ, Martínez-Salvador M, Jiménez-Guevara MA, Méndez-Gallegos SDJ (2008) Insectos comestibles asociados a las magueyeras en el ejido Tolosa, Pinos, Zacatecas, México. Agrociencia 42 (2): 243–252. ESRI (2011) World Imagery [basemap]. Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, USA. https://www.esri.com/en-us/home. Accessed on: 2025-0717. Fernández F (2003) Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, 424 pp. Figueroa-Sandoval B, Ugalde-Lezama S, Pineda-Pérez FE, Ramírez-Valverde G, Figueroa-Rodríguez KA, Tarango-Arámbula LA (2018) Producción de la hormiga escamolera (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr 1870) y su hábitat en el Altiplano Potosino–Zacatecano, México. Agricultura, sociedad y desarrollo 15: 235–245. GBFI (2024) Liometopum apiculatum. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/es/ search?q=liometopum%20apiculatum. Accessed on: 2024-11-20. Guénard B S, Weiser MD, Gómez K, Narula N, Economo EP (2017) The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). https:// doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_024:083. Accessed on: 2025-07-17. Hoey-Chamberlain R, Rust MK, Klotz JH (2013) A review of the biology, ecology and behavior of velvety tree ants of North America. Sociobiology 60 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v60i1.1-10 Hunt JH, Snelling RR (1975) A checklist of the ants of Arizona. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 10 (1): 20–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/40021316 Lara-Juárez P, Aguirre Rivera JR, Castillo Lara P, Reyes Agüero JA (2015) Biología y aprovechamiento de la hormiga de escamoles, Liometopum apiculatum Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Zoológica Mexicana 31 (2): 251–264. Lara-Juárez P, Castillo-Lara P, Tristán-Patiño FM, Rendón-Huerta JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR (2016) Range site and condition effects on “escamoles” ant (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr) nest density. Revista Chapingo. Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 22 (3): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.04.016 Lara-Juárez P, Aguirre Rivera JR, Castillo Lara P, Reyes Agüero JA (2018) Collecting pupae (Escamles) of Liometopum apiculatum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Dolichoderinae) in the San Luis Potosí high plain Mexico.Interciencia43 (11): 763–769. MacKay WP (1993) Succession of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on low-level nuclear waste sites in northern New Mexico. Sociobiology 23: 1–11. Mackay W, Mackay E (2002) The ants of New Mexico (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York, USA, 408 pp. Mayr G (1870) Neue Formiciden. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 20: 960–961. Miranda-Román G, Quintero-Salazar B, Ramos-Rostro B, Olguín-Arredondo, HA (2011) La recolección de insectos con fines alimenticios en la zona turística de Otumba y Teotihuacán, Estado de México.PASOS Revista Turismo Patrimonio Cultural9: 81–100. Morrone JJ (2019) Regionalización biogeográfica y evolución biótica de México: encrucijada de la biodiversidad del Nuevo Mundo. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 90: e902980. https://doi.org/10.22201/ ib.20078706e.2019.90.2980 Morrone JJ, Escalante T, Rodríguez-Tapia G, Carmona A, Arana M, Mercado-Gómez JD (2022) Biogeographic regionalization of the Neotropical region: new map and shapefile. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 94: e20211167. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220211167 Navarrete-Heredia JL, Vasquez-Bolaños M, Quiroz-Rocha GA (2007) New Mexican distributional data on the Sceptobiini–Liometopum association (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae–Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Dolichoderinae). Sociobiology 49 (3): 221–229. O’Keefe ST, Cook JL, Dudek T, Wunneburger DF, Guzman MD, Coulson RN, Vinson SB. (2000) The distribution of Texas ants. The Southwestern Entomologist 22: 1–92. Quirán EM, MolaS BMC (1998) Vuelo nupcial y fundación de colonias de Acromyrmex lobicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) en laboratorio, en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina.Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina57: 1–4. Ramos-Elorduy J, Pino MJM, Conconi M (2006) Ausencia de una reglamentación y normalización de la explotación y comercialización de insectos comestibles en México. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 45: 291–318.