Open Science in Chile: Challenges and Potential

Open Science in Chile: Challenges and Potential Alvaro Lopez FOLIO Linked Data Editor Product Owner alvar[email protected] Open Science in Chile Government-Driven Progress in a Challenging Landscape This is an analysis of Chile's evolving Open Science ecosystem, examining the interplay between government policy, university leadership, and systemic challenges in advancing research accessibility. Government Leadership in Chile's Open Science Ecosystem In Chile's research and development landscape, the government stands as the unequivocal leader, shouldering the vast majority of financial and policy responsibilities. This central role profoundly influences the direction and implementation of Open Science initiatives across the nation. Dominant Funding Role The government funds approximately 61% of all R&D activities in Chile (Benavente, 2019). This substantial investment primarily flows through two key entities: •ANID (National Research and Development Agency): As the principal public agency for funding scientific research, technological development, and innovation, ANID provides competitive grants, fellowships, and support for research infrastructure. Its programs are crucial for researchers across all disciplines and are increasingly geared towards promoting open access to publications and data as conditions for funding. •Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation: Established to provide strategic direction and coordinate policies, the Ministry plays a critical role in setting the national agenda for science, technology, and innovation. It formulates policies that guide ANID's funding priorities and works to integrate scientific outputs into national development goals, including the promotion of Open Science principles. Government Leadership in Chile's Open Science Ecosystem Driving Open Science Adoption The government drives Open Science adoption through several mechanisms: •Policy and Mandates: The Ministry and ANID develop and enforce policies that require researchers receiving public funds to make their publications and, increasingly, their research data openly accessible. These mandates are fundamental in shifting academic practices towards greater transparency and collaboration. •Funding Mechanisms: By explicitly linking funding eligibility and reporting requirements to Open Science practices, the government incentivizes researchers and institutions to comply with open access and data sharing principles. •Infrastructure Development: Government support is vital for establishing and maintaining national repositories, data centers, and digital platforms necessary for the dissemination and preservation of open research outputs. Government Leadership in Chile's Open Science Ecosystem Challenges of a Government-Led Approach While the government's leadership is essential, this centralized model also presents specific challenges for the Open Science movement: •Dependency on Political Cycles: The stability and direction of Open Science policies can be vulnerable to changes in government priorities or budget allocations, leading to potential inconsistencies and delays. •Bureaucracy and Agility: Government-led initiatives can sometimes be slower to adapt to rapid technological changes or evolving researcher needs compared to more agile, privately funded models. •Limited Diversification: The overwhelming reliance on public funding means fewer alternative funding streams, potentially stifling innovation that might emerge from diverse public-private partnerships or philanthropic contributions. •Capacity Building: Ensuring uniform adoption and high-quality Open Science practices across all publicly funded institutions requires significant investment in training, infrastructure, and cultural change, which can be a slow process. National Policy & Funding Instruments Chile's Open Science infrastructure rests on coordinated government policy and targeted funding programs. The Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation, established in 2018, serves as the central coordinating body for national research policy, operating with an annual budget of approximately 430 billion Chilean pesos (2020). FONDECYT Research Grants Chile's primary competitive research funding program supports individual and collaborative projects across all disciplines, increasingly requiring open access compliance for funded research outputs. National Open Access Policy (ANID) Mandates open availability of publications resulting from public funding and actively promotes FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) across research institutions. National Policy & Funding Instruments Centers and Associative Research ( formerly Millennium Science Initiative) A flagship program supporting research excellence centers and institutes, fostering long-term scientific and technological development and encouraging collaborative, transparent research practices. It supports independent research groups (“Millenium nuclei”) and institutional collaboration (“Research rings”). InES Open Science Program A transformative initiative funding 32 Chilean universities to date, to build comprehensive Open Science capacity through institutional repositories, researcher training programs, and university-level policies, in order to manage research knowledge, scientific information, and data according to ANID's open access policies and international standards. National Policy & Funding Instruments Other funding instruments ANID supports different areas through diverse funding programs: •Human Capital: Funding for Post-doctorate, Doctorate and Master scholarships, plus, related academic and institutional installation. •Applied Research: R&D project funding, technology research and transfer, plus start-up funding, •Networking and collaboration: Scientific collaboration and development of Science, Technology and Innovation capabilities, such as in Macrozone Nodes funding. Gender studies and Astronomy are also very relevant in this area. •Publication support: ANID has a publication funding program for local researchers. •International funding: ANID connects researchers with international funding and research programs, such as Horizon Europe, ECOS-Sud or ACCESS. Universities in Action While national policy sets the framework, individual universities are translating Open Science principles into concrete action through funded projects and institutional initiatives. Since 2021, 24 traditional universities and 8 private universities have been funded by InES Ciencia Abierta projects, for a total amount of USD $6,820,634. Most projects dealt with creating institutional support for Open Science within their universities and a governance system that would allow to keep Open Science working. Something to consider, is that every project is funded for a 2-year lapse, and then each institution will need to find a way to keep the development working with their own funding, which may involve a challenge to some universities. Chronic Underfunding: A Critical Barrier to Open Science in Chile Chile's ambition to foster a vibrant Open Science ecosystem is significantly hampered by persistent chronic underfunding in R&D. This financial constraint permeates every aspect of the scientific endeavor, from basic infrastructure to researcher well-being, ultimately impeding the transformative potential of open practices. Global and Regional Context of R&D Investment With just 0.34% of GDP, Chile's R&D investment starkly contrasts with the average of 2.7% seen in OECD countries, placing it among the lowest investors in the developed world. Within Latin America, while showing some progress, Chile still lags behind regional peers like Brazil (1.19%) and Argentina (0.55%), highlighting a systemic underappreciation for scientific development and its crucial role in societal progress. Chronic Underfunding: A Critical Barrier to Open Science in Chile Underfunding Impact •Infrastructure Deficiencies: Many research institutions struggle with outdated equipment, insufficient laboratory space, and a lack of access to cutting-edge technology. This directly impacts the quality and scope of research, making it difficult to generate high-quality data suitable for open sharing. •Researcher Salaries and Retention: Low and stagnant salaries for researchers, particularly in early and mid-career stages, create significant financial insecurity. This often forces talented individuals to seek opportunities abroad or in other sectors, leading to a critical brain drain and an inability to attract top global talent necessary for a competitive research landscape. •Limited Research Capacity: Underfunding restricts the number of available research grants and projects, forcing institutions to make difficult choices between competing priorities. This limits the capacity for longterm, ambitious research programs and hinders the ability to scale up initiatives, including those related to Open Science implementation. Historical Trends and Consequences for Open Science Historical data indicates a consistent pattern of low R&D investment over several decades, making it a deeply entrenched issue rather than a temporary setback. This chronic underinvestment has profound consequences for Open Science: without adequate funding, the development of robust open access repositories, data management systems, and specialized personnel for data curation and sharing becomes nearly impossible. Institutions are forced to prioritize immediate research outputs over the sustainable infrastructure needed for open practices. Chronic Underfunding: A Critical Barrier to Open Science in Chile Potential Solutions and Investment Targets Addressing this challenge requires a multi-pronged approach, with significant increases in R&D spending as a cornerstone: •Increased Government Allocation: A national commitment to raise R&D investment to at least 1% of GDP within the next five years, aligning with regional leaders. •Public-Private Partnerships: Incentivizing private sector investment in research through tax breaks, co-funding mechanisms, and innovation challenges to diversify funding sources. •Targeted Funding for Open Science Infrastructure: Dedicated funds for developing and maintaining national open access platforms, data repositories, and training programs for researchers in open data management. •Competitive Salaries: Adjusting researcher salary scales to attract and retain top talent, reducing the incentive for emigration. Without these substantial and sustained investments, the full promise of Open Science in Chile—to accelerate discovery, enhance transparency, and foster global collaboration—might remain largely unfulfilled. Chronic Underfunding: A Critical Barrier to Open Science in Chile Private Sector Role in Chilean Open Science Despite Chile's aspirations for an Open Science ecosystem, the private sector's involvement remains largely on the sidelines. This critical absence curtails innovation, limits sustainable funding avenues, and leaves a significant gap in translating research into real-world applications. Compared to nations like Germany, where corporate R&D contributes over two-thirds of national investment, or South Korea, known for its deep industryacademia linkages, Chile's private sector investment in R&D, and consequently in Open Science initiatives, hovers around 28%. Key Barriers •Lack of Incentives: Insufficient tax breaks or direct funding mechanisms for companies investing in open research. •Cultural Gap: There’s some disconnect between academic research timelines and industry's demand for immediate, commercially viable outcomes. •Intellectual Property Concerns: Hesitation to share data or methodologies due to fears of losing competitive advantage. •Awareness Deficit: Limited understanding within the private sector about the benefits and models of Open Science collaboration. Reduced Investment Private sector R&D investment in Chile is significantly lower than in OECD counterparts, often prioritizing short-term, proprietary gains over open research collaboration. Missed Opportunities This gap stifles applied research, delays commercialization of academic findings, and prevents the co-creation of innovative solutions tailored to industry needs. Key Barriers Hurdles include perceived low return on investment, lack of clear intellectual property policies for open projects, and insufficient platforms connecting researchers with industry. Potential Benefits Greater private involvement would diversify funding, accelerate innovation, create new markets, and foster a more dynamic and sustainable Open Science ecosystem. Recommendations Strategies include enhanced tax incentives, simplified public-private partnership frameworks, and dedicated platforms to facilitate industryacademia collaboration and knowledge transfer. Private Sector Role in Chilean Open Science Strategic Recommendations •Targeted Tax Credits: Introduce robust tax incentives for companies funding or participating in Open Science projects. •Innovation Hubs: Establish joint public-private innovation centers focused on translating open research into commercial products. •IP Frameworks: Develop clear, collaborative Intellectual Property guidelines that protect both academic and commercial interests. •Knowledge Exchange Platforms: Create forums and platforms to facilitate dialogue and collaboration between researchers and industry leaders. This untapped potential represents missed opportunities in areas like sustainable mining, renewable energy, and digital transformation. Increasing private sector engagement is vital for diversified funding, accelerated innovation, and ensuring Open Science initiatives are economically sustainable and impactful. Private Sector Role in Chilean Open Science Chilean researchers face a harsh reality: their time is fragmented across competing demands, leaving Open Science practices to compete for attention with mandatory responsibilities. This allocation differs significantly from typical international benchmarks. Own creation. Sources: Griffith & Altinay (2020), Bernasconi et al (2021) 24% 32% 44% CHILEAN RESEARCHERS Research Teaching Management and Other 40% 40% 20% OECD Research Teaching Management and Other Researcher Workload: A Silent Barrier to Open Science Adoption Chilean faculty members spend almost half their working hours on administrative and teaching responsibilities, significantly more than the OECD average, leaving only one quarter for actual research activities—a much smaller proportion compared to their OECD counterparts. There’s a critical implication: Open Science can often be perceived as "extra" work rather than an integrated practice. With over 55% of their time split between research and teaching, researchers have minimal bandwidth for new demands. Open Science, while beneficial, often requires additional effort for data curation, documentation, platform learning, and navigating complex sharing protocols, which are not currently integrated into standard workflows or adequately rewarded. This all can be felt as burdens rather than benefits when researchers are already stretched thin across teaching and administration, especially when their research time is already below international averages. Researcher Workload: A Silent Barrier to Open Science Adoption Streamline Administration Reduce bureaucratic hurdles in grant applications and reporting to free up valuable research time. Dedicated Support Provide specialized personnel and training for data management, repository submission, and Open Science best practices. Integrate Workflows Develop tools and institutional policies that embed Open Science practices directly into existing research processes. Incentives & Recognition Acknowledge and reward Open Science contributions in tenure, promotion, and funding decisions. Researcher Workload: A Silent Barrier to Open Science Adoption References •Rabesandratana, T. (2018). Chile, keen to become a knowledge society, creates a Ministry of Science. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/chile-keen-become-knowledge-society-creates-ministry-science •Ramírez Bulos, C., & Rodríguez-Vargas, A. (2025, March 20). Unlocking Chile's productivity growth. OECD Ecoscope. https://oecdecoscope.blog/2025/03/20/unlocking-chiles-productivity-growth/ •Ronda-Pupo, G., Fernández-Vergara, N., Alda-Varas, R., Álvarez-Castillo, F., Molina, C., & Terrazas-Núñes, W. (2022). Research Performance of Chilean University System 2006-2020. Investigación bibliotecológica,36(91), 109-123. Epub 15 de noviembre de 2022. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2022.91.58505 •Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR). (2025). XIV ISAES 2025. Retrieved from https://scar.org/scar-events/ •Universidad Central de Chile. (2023). Proyecto InES Ciencia Abierta. https://www.ucentral.cl/ucentral/site/edic/base/port/ciencia_abierta.html •Universidad de Santiago de Chile (VRIIC). (2023). Proyecto InES: Ciencia Abierta. Retrieved from https://vriic.usach.cl/index.php/proyectoines-ciencia-abierta