Full text
Corresponding author: A.M.Musayev. Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0. On the asymptotic value of approximation Mellin singular integral in the summable function Ali Musayev * Department of General and Applied Mathematics, Azerbaijan State University of Oil and Industry. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 Publication history: Received on 03 June 2025; revised on 29 August 2025; accepted on 02 September 2025 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.27.3.2629 Abstract Many questions about the order of approximation and their order of convergence of various classes of functions by linear operators, in particular singular integrals. Approximations of functions by singular integrals have numerous applications in various fields of mathematics. Approximations of functions by singular integrals are studied intensively along with other issues in theory of functions. In their papers PL Butzer and RG Mamedov study convergence order of singular integrals in generating functions at separate characteristic points and metric in the space p L on bounded and unbounded domains. Important theorems on asymptotic value of approximation of functions by singular integrals are obtained in these papers. In this paper, we study the approximation properties of the Mellin singular integral in terms of the mean oscillation of a locally summable function. Keywords: Order; Kernel; Asymptotic; Sinqular Inteqrals; Metrics; Space 1. Introduction The study of singular integral operators has long been a central topic in harmonic analysis, approximation theory, and the theory of integral equations. Among these operators, Mellin singular integrals occupy a special place due to their close connection with problems on the half-axis and their applications in mathematical physics, probability theory, and number theory. The Mellin transform framework provides a natural tool for analyzing functions defined on allowing convolution-type operations to be treated as multiplicative convolutions, which are particularly well-suited for problems exhibiting scale invariance. Approximation of singular integrals by discrete or regularized analogues has been the focus of extensive research, as exact evaluation is often impossible in practical applications. In many cases, understanding the asymptotic behavior of these approximations plays a crucial role in quantifying the accuracy and convergence rate of numerical and analytical methods. Recent advances have focused on the asymptotics of Mellin-type singular integral operators when applied to classes of summable functions, revealing deep connections between the local behavior of the kernel and the global convergence of the operator. 2. Some definitions and designations Let ),0(),,( +=+−=+ RR . If RE = or + =RE , then )(ELloc denotes the set of all functions locally summable on the set E . );()( dxXLXL = is the set of all functions summable on the set of RX relative linear
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1055 Lebesgue measure dx . In what follows, +x dx RL ; we will denote the set of all functions f summable with respect to measure x dx on the set + R . Let )(,::);(,,10 +++ = RLf x xRxIRx loc . Let us introduce the following notations − = 1 )( ln2 1 : );( x x xI d ff , − −= 1 );( )( ln2 1 :));(,( x x xI Md ffxIf . the quantity ));(,( xIf M the average Mellin oscillation of the function f on the interval );( xI . Let us also introduce the following metric characteristic (see [6]) ++ = RRxxIfxm MM f ,},ln:));(,(sup{:);( . It is easy to see that the function );( xmM f takes only non-negative values and is monotonically increasing in argument ),0( + . Let be )(r a non-negative, monotonically increasing ),0( + function. Let )( 0 xMOM denote the class of all functions )( + RLf loc such that 0)),(();( 0= rrOrxmM f . Let +x dx RLK ; and 1)( 0 = x dx xK . If we denote 0, 1 )( 1 = xKxK , then we have 1)( 1 )( 00 1 0 == = u du uK x dx xK x dx xK . A function of this type )(xK is called a Fejér-type Mellin kernel. Let us consider the Melin singular integral with a Fejér-type kernel.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1056 = 0 1 1 );( t dt tK t x fxf , where )( + RLf loc is such that the integral exists almost everywhere in + R . By changing the variable, it can be shown that = = 00 1 )()( 1 );( u du uK u x f u du u x Kufxf . In particular, if )( 2 1 )( 1 ;1 uXuK e I = , where E X is the characteristic function of the set E , then it can be shown that for this kernel );( );( − = exI fxf , Where 0, + Rx . 3. Theorem 1 .1. Let )( + RLf loc , be K a Fejér-type kernel, 0},ln:)(sup{:)( = ttKk , 0,),(0 ++ RxRLk . Then the inequality holds true + +− − 0 00 );( 0)4;()();()();( 0dttxmtkxmkcfxf M f M f exI + + dtdxxk t txm dtdxxk t txm t M f t M f 4 0 4 00 0)( );( )( );( , (1 .1) where )(kc is a positive constant depending only on the function k . Proof. Let )( 00 0Ryex y= − , );();();( 00 *0xfefyf y == − . Then we have ,0,)( 1 );( * 0 * 0 − = − dttf ty Kxf where )()(*),(:)(* tu eftfeKuK −− == . Moreover, it is easy to see that * );( * );( 0 0 0 0:)( 2 1 yB y y exI fdttff == + − − . Taking into account the previous reasoning, we get that − − − − −dtftf ty Kfxf yB exI * );( * 0 * );( 00 0)( 1 );( . (1 .2)
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1057 Due to the fact that ),0(},:)(*sup{)( += yyKk , from (2.2) we have − − − − −dtftf ty kfxf yB exI * );( * 0 );( 00 0)( 1 );( , Where ),( 000 0RyRxex y= + − . From the definition it is clear that is )( k a monotonically decreasing ),0( + function. Next, we get that − − − −=+ − nyByB yB exI nn dtftf ty kfxf )2;(\)2;( * );( * 0 );( 0 0 1 0 0 0)( 1 );( = − −+ +− − −=− −=− + + + + nty yB yB nty yB nn n nn n dt ty kff dtftf ty k 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 22 0 * );( * )2;( 22 * )2;( * 0 1 )( 1 −= −= += nn nnii 21 . (1 .3) We will evaluate each of the terms on the right side of the relation (1.3). If ,...,1,0 =n then we have =− − + + + + + + − )2;( * )2;( 1 2 22 * )2;( * 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 )(* 22 1 )2(2 )()2( 1 n n nn n yB yB n nn tx yB n n dtftfk dtftfki )2;()2(2));(,()2(2 1 0 22 0 21 ++−+ = +nM f nnMnn xmkexIfk n . ( 1 .4) Now let's consider the terms n i2 . If 1−n , then we have .)2(2 2)2( 1 );( );( 1 *);( * )2;( 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 −+ − + −= =− + + exI exI nn yB yB nn n ffk ffki n n From here, by virtue of Theorem 1.1, we obtain
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1058 . );( )2;( 2ln 2 )2(2 1 20 1 0 1 2 + + ++ n dt t txm xmki M f nM f nn n (1 .5) If 1−=n , then 0 2= n i . Finally, let us consider the case 1−n . Then we have −= =− + − − + + + );( );( 1 * )2;( *);( 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 )2(2 2)2( 1 n n exI exI nn yB yB nn n ffk ffki + + + 1 20 0 1);( );( 2ln 2 )2(2 n dt t txm xmk M f M f nn . (1. 6) By virtue of the relations (1. 10 ) - ( 1 . 13 ) we obtain +− −= ++ − n nM f nn exI xmkfxf )2;()2(2);( 1 0 2 );( 00 ++ ++ ++ = ++ − −= + − −= + + 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 )2;()2(2 2ln 1 );( )2(2 2ln 1 );()2(2 2ln 1 1 n nM f nn n M f nn n M f nn xmk dt t txm k xmk n . );( )2(2 2ln 1 0 20 2 1 = + + + n M f nn n dt t txm k (1 .7) It can be shown that if )(x a non-negative monotonically increasing function on an interval is true ),0( + , then the following inequalities are true: 0,)4()(22)2()2( 0 1 −= + dxxxkk n nnn ; (1. 8) − −= 4 1 0 2)(2)2(2 dxxkk n nn ; (1 .9) 0,)4()(22)2()2( 2 1 0 1 = + dxxxkk n nnn ; (1 .10)
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1059 Moreover, if )(x a non-negative monotonically decreasing function on an interval is true ),0( + , then the inequality is true 0,)2()(22)2()2( 4 1 0 21 − −= + dxxxkk n nnn . (1.11) Using inequalities (1.15) -( 1.18) from inequality (1.14) we obtain that + +− − 0 00 );( 0)4;()();()();( 0dxxxmxkxmkcfxf M f M f exI , );( )( );( )( 2 1 40 4 1 0 2 0 + + dxdt t txm xkdxdt t txm xk xM f x M f (1 .12) Where = 4 1 0 )(,2max 2ln 8 :)( dxxkkc . Changing the order of integration in the integrals of inequality (1.12), after some elementary transformations we obtain inequality (1.1). The theorem is proved. 4. Theorem 1.2 Let be a non-negative, monotonically increasing ),0( + function, K and k the same as in the previous theorem, and the following conditions are satisfied 1) 0)),(( )( 0 = Odt t t ; 2) 0)),(()4()( 0 = Odxxxk ; 3) 0)),(()( )( 4 = Odtdxxk t t t . Then if + Rx0 and )( 0 xMOfM , then the inequality is true 0),()();( 00 − fcxdxf f , where = 0: )( );( sup: 0t t txm f M f , and is 0c a constant depending only on the function k .
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 27(03), 1054-1060 1060 5. Conclusion In this paper, we have investigated the asymptotic behavior of approximation Mellin singular integral operators in the class of summable functions. By analyzing the limiting process as the regularization parameter tends to zero, we have derived explicit expressions describing the asymptotic value of these operators. The obtained results not only generalize known theorems on singular integral approximations but also provide a more refined understanding of their convergence properties. Our findings demonstrate that the asymptotic value depends essentially on the local behavior of the kernel near the singularity and on the summability properties of the underlying function. This insight allows for a more precise error estimation in practical approximation schemes and strengthens the theoretical foundation for the use of Mellin operators in applied problems. References [1] Butzer P an d Nessel R. On the best approximation for approximation for singular integrals by Laplase-transform methods, On Appraximation Theory, JSNMS, Berkhauser, 1964, 24-42. [2] Butzer P an d Nessel R. Fourier analysis an approximation, v.1, New York - London, 1971. [3] Berens H. and Butzer P.L. Uber die Darstelling holomorpher Funktionen durch Laplace-und Laplace Stieltjes Integrale. Mat., z., 81, 1963. [4] Sunouchi GJ Direct theorems in the theory of approximation, Acta math., 20(3-4), 1969, p. 409-420. [5] Sunouchi GJ On the class of saturation in the theory of approximation, Tohoku Math.Journ., 15 (1960) , p. 339344. [6] Korovkin PP On the order of approximation of functions by linear positive operators, DAN SSSR, 114(1957),11581161. [7] Musayev AM To the question of approximation of functions by the Mellin type operators in the space . Proceedings of IMM of NAS Azerbaijan, 2008, XXVIII, pp. 69-73. [8] Rzaev R.M. On approximation of essentially continuous functions by singular integrals. Izvestiya Vuzov. Matematika, 1989, No. 3, pp. 57-62. [9] Rzaev R.M. On the approximation of locally summable functions singular integrals in terms of mean oscillation and some applications . Preprint of the Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, Baku, 1992, 43 p. [10] Musayev AM On asymptotic estimation of approximation of functions by general Mellin type a singular integrals.Transformation of Azerbaijan, 2009, XXIX, No. 4, pp.113-121. [11] Musayev AM On saturation order of functions some variables by sinqular integrals. International journal of Applied Mathematics , vol.31, №3, 2018 June , Bulqaria. [12] Musayev AM On linear operators giving higher order approximation of functions in L_o^p (R^+ ), International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol.33, No.1, 2020, pp.15-27.