Hook-and-Destroy Strategy for Efficient Activation of Persulfate by B-Doped Pyrochar for the Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater

Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13121035 Article Hook-and-Destroy Strategy for Efficient Activation of Persulfate by B-Doped Pyrochar for the Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater Sanja Panić 1, *, Nebojša Vasiljević 1,2 , Mirjana Petronijević 1 , Igor Antić 1 , Jelena Živančev 1 and Nataša Đurišić-Mladenović 1 1 Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] (N.V.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (J.Ž.); natasa.mladeno[email protected]s (N.Đ.-M.) 2 Faculty of Technology Zvornik, University of East Sarajevo, 75400 Zvornik, Bosnia and Herzegovina * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract This study presents a sustainable and efficient strategy for removing contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) from wastewater using non-metal-doped pyrochar catalysts synthesized via a green, one-step pyrolytic process from pinewood sawdust, urea, and boric acid. The resulting Nand B-doped pyrochars were evaluated for their ability to activate peroxydisulfate (PDS) and degrade a mixture of 25 CECs (15 pesticides and 10 pharmaceuticals). B-doped pyrochar exhibited superior bifunctional performance, combining high adsorption capacity with efficient catalytic PDS activation. Structural characterization confirmed the incorporation of boron into the carbon matrix, generating electron-deficient Lewis acid sites and enhancing the affinity toward PDS and CECs. Quenching and adsorption–degradation analyses revealed a synergistic combination of radical and non-radical pathways, supported by π–π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and Lewis acid–base interactions. Reusability tests confirmed long-term stability and high degradation efficiency over four cycles. These findings demonstrate the potential of B-doped pyrochar as a cost-effective, stable, and environmentally friendly catalyst for practical wastewater treatment. Keywords: metal-free pyrochar catalysts; B-doped pyrochar; persulfate activation; contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); hook-and-destroy strategy; wastewater treatment 1. Introduction The availability of clean and safe water is essential for protecting public health and maintaining ecological balance. In recent decades, rapid population growth and intensified human activities have led to the continuous discharge of various chemicals from anthropogenic sources into aquatic environments, posing serious risks to both human health and aquatic ecosystems [1]. Among these pollutants, a group of commonly referred to as contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), includes pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and various industrial chemicals. Many CECs exhibit high mobility through water Academic Editor: Xin-Gui Li Received: 23 October 2025 Revised: 27 November 2025 Accepted: 27 November 2025 Published: 29 November 2025 Citation: Panić, S.; Vasiljević, N.; Petronijević, M.; Antić, I.; Živančev, J .; Đurišić-Mladenović, N. Hook-and-Destroy Strategy for Efficient Activation of Persulfate by B-Doped Pyrochar for the Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/toxics13121035 Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/license s/by/4.0/). Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 2 of 26 flows, eventually reaching groundwater and drinking water sources [2]. They are frequently detected in wastewater effluents and even in treated drinking water, yet they remain largely unregulated and are not routinely monitored. Many CECs are persistent and toxic with a potential for bioaccumulation, while their occurrence at trace concentrations limits the efficiency of conventional treatment technologies, underscoring the urgent need for advanced remediation strategies. As environmental regulations become increasingly stringent, the demand for innovative, efficient, and sustainable treatment technologies is greater than ever. In November 2024, the European Parliament adopted a revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC), introducing a fourth treatment stage (quaternary treatment) designed to remove at least 80% of selected micropollutants, including some pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals [3]. In this context, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have emerged as promising strategies for the degradation of recalcitrant organic pollutants [4,5]. Among these, persulfate-based AOPs (PS-AOPs) have gained particular attention owing to their strong oxidative potential and cost-effectiveness [6,7]. These processes rely on peroxymonosulfate (PMS) or peroxydisulfate (PDS) to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as sulfate radicals (SO4•−), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radicals (O2•−), and singlet oxygen (1O2), or to trigger electron-transfer processes (ETP) [8]. Sulfate radicals, in particular, exhibit a high redox potential (2.5–3.1 V), relatively long half-life (30–40 µs), and stability across a broad pH range (2.0–8.0) [6]. The activation of persulfates typically requires external energy input (e.g., UV, heat, ultrasound) or the use of catalysts [4,8–10]. Among these, heterogeneous catalysts stand out due to their simplicity, energy efficiency, and environmental compatibility compared to energy-intensive activation methods [11]. Despite these advantages, the development of high-performance catalysts for persulfate activation remains a major challenge. Effective heterogeneous catalysts must possess optimized physicochemical properties, including tailored band structures, large surface areas, and suitable morphologies, while also complying with the principles of green chemistry. Although transition metal-based catalysts exhibit high catalytic activity, their application is often hindered by drawbacks such as metal leaching, secondary pollution, and poor long-term stability [12]. In this context, carbon-based materials such as biochar, graphene, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and nanodiamonds have emerged as promising alternatives for the green remediation of CECs [13,14]. These materials provide large surface areas, abundant functional groups, and intrinsic defects that serve as active sites for both radical and nonradical persulfate activation. Importantly, non-radical pathways, including singlet oxygen generation and electron-transfer processes, offer advantages such as high selectivity, tolerance to background water constituents (e.g., inorganic anions, pH fluctuations), and reduced formation of toxic by-products [15]. Within this group, biochar derived from biomass waste, including pyrochar and hydrochar, stands out as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to metal-based catalysts. Beyond enabling waste valorization, biochar serves as a highly efficient green catalyst for CEC degradation in PS-AOPs due to its simple preparation, wide availability of feedstocks, and low production cost [10,16]. In particular, pyrochar, obtained through high-temperature pyrolysis of dry biomass under oxygen-limited conditions, contains abundant structural defects, edge sites, and functional groups (e.g., –COOH, –OH, –CO) that promote oxidant activation and facilitate electron shuttling in persulfate-based systems [8,17,18]. However, pristine carbon materials generally suffer from limited intrinsic catalytic activity. To address this limitation, recent studies have focused on their engineering by heteroatom doping to tailor surface properties and enhance catalytic performance. Doping with elements such as B, N, S, Si, Se, and F can modulate the electronic structure, increase defect density, and generate additional active sites [17,19]. For example, nitrogen, Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 3 of 26 with higher electronegativity than carbon (3.04 vs. 2.55), promotes electron transfer and induces charge redistribution, thereby enhancing PMS adsorption on N-doped carbon materials [18,20,21]. Similarly, sulfur, with an electronegativity close to that of carbon (2.58), increases spin density in the lattice, improving conductivity, catalytic activity, and stability [20]. In contrast, boron, with lower electronegativity (2.04) and structural similarity to carbon, forms stable covalent bonds during high-temperature synthesis. B-doping creates electron-deficient Lewis acid sites that promote pollutant adsorption and electrontransfer processes [5,12]. While B-doped carbons have been widely studied in energy-related applications, their role in persulfate-based AOPs remains underexplored. Recent advances increasingly highlight the promise of boron-doped carbon materials as efficient metal-free catalysts for persulfate activation, owing to their ability to introduce electrondeficient Lewis acid sites, enhance charge redistribution, and promote non-radical pathways with high selectivity and stability [5,12]. Compared with conventional carbonaceous materials and pristine biochars, B-doped systems exhibit improved affinity for persulfate and greater electron-transfer capability, enabling faster degradation of diverse organic contaminants [10,17,19]. At the same time, several competing PS-AOP technologies, such as metal-based catalysts, UV-/heat-assisted activation, and Fe-modified biochars, remain limited by issues including metal leaching, secondary pollution, high energy demands, and susceptibility to oxidative deactivation [6–8,12]. These recent developments underscore the relevance of designing sustainable, heteroatom-engineered carbocatalysts, particularly those doped with boron, as robust and environmentally compatible alternatives for practical persulfate-based water treatment. Biochar provides a sustainable and cost-effective platform for the development of Bdoped carbocatalysts, as it is derived from renewable waste biomass and can be engineered to achieve high surface area, tunable porosity, and versatile surface chemistry. Moreover, it supports circular economy principles by enabling resource recovery and waste valorization. Engineered biochars, particularly those doped with heteroatoms, are recognized as high-capacity adsorbents for organic pollutants; thus, coupling adsorption with PS-AOPs can significantly enhance the removal efficiency of CECs from wastewater. This integrated hook-and-destroy strategy combines adsorption and catalytic degradation in a synergistic manner: pollutants are first concentrated on the catalyst surface and subsequently degraded [22–24]. However, a key limitation of this approach lies in the susceptibility of biochar-based catalysts to radical-induced damage during oxidation. Therefore, the development of stable bifunctional materials with robust adsorption and catalytic performance, capable of withstanding harsh oxidative conditions, is essential for the practical application of PS-AOPs. Accordingly, this study aims to develop and characterize high-performance, metalfree heteroatom-doped pyrochars for the cooperative adsorption and persulfate oxidation (PSO) of selected CECs in wastewater. Particular emphasis is placed on elucidating the role of boron doping in enhancing pollutant adsorption, facilitating non-radical pathways, and improving catalytic stability under environmentally relevant conditions. By addressing current limitations, this work advances the hook-and-destroy strategy and introduces a novel, green, and efficient B-doped pyrochar catalyst with strong potential for broader application in advanced water treatment technologies. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Chemicals All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Urea (NH2CONH2, 99.0%, nitrogen source), boric acid (H3BO3, ≥99.5%, boron source), and potassium persulfate (K2S2O8, ≥99.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Reagents employed in quenching experiments included methanol (CH3OH, Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 4 of 26 ≥99.9%), tert-butanol (TBA, ≥99.5%), sodium azide (NaN3, ≥99.5%), and chloroform (CHCl3, ≥99.5%) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile (CH3CN, ≥99.9%) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for the recovery of CECs adsorbed onto catalyst surfaces. Solvents and additives used for sample preparation and instrumental analysis (methanol, acetonitrile, formic acid, ≥99%, and ammonium acetate) were of LC– MS grade (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultrapure water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ·cm, TOC < 5 µg/L) was produced using a Direct-Q® purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Analytical standards of pesticides and pharmaceuticals were purchased from HPC Standards GmbH (Cunnersdorf, Germany). The pesticide set included acetamiprid (CAS 135410-20-7), carbaryl (CAS 63-25-2), carbofuran (CAS 1563-66-2), diazinon (CAS 333-415), dimethoate (CAS 60-51-5), ethoprophos (CAS 13194-48-4), imazalil (CAS 35554-44-0), linuron (CAS 330-55-2), malathion (CAS 121-75-5), methamidophos (CAS 10265-92-6), methidathion (CAS 950-37-8), omethoate (CAS 1113-02-6), phosphamidon (CAS 13171-216), propiconazole (CAS 60207-90-1), and trichlorfon (CAS 52-68-6). The pharmaceutical set included acetaminophen (paracetamol, CAS 103-90-2), atenolol (CAS 29122-68-7), carbamazepine (CAS 298-46-4), diltiazem (CAS 42399-41-7), famotidine (CAS 76824-35-6), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, CAS 58-93-5), propranolol (CAS 525-66-6), ranitidine (CAS 6635759-3), salbutamol (CAS 18559-94-9), and sotalol (CAS 3930-20-9). All standards were ≥98% purity and prepared as individual stock solutions in methanol or acetonitrile. Stock solutions were stored at −20 °C until use. 2.2. Preparation of Metal-Free Carbocatalysts Pinewood sawdust (PW), used as the precursor for pyrochar production, was rinsed, dried, and ground into a fine powder before further processing. The biomass was mixed with urea and/or boric acid at a 1:1 weight ratio, dispersed in water, and ultrasonicated for 30 min. The resulting suspension was subjected to high-energy ball milling at 300 rpm for 15 min using a FRITSCH Planetary Mono Mill Pulverisette 6. The milled material was dried overnight and subsequently annealed in a tube furnace at 800 °C for 2 h under a continuous nitrogen flow (110 mL/min) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. After thermal treatment, the obtained biochar (BC) was washed with ultrapure water, oven-dried at 80 °C, and stored in a desiccator until use. The obtained metal-free carbocatalysts were denoted as N-PW-BC, B-PW-BC, and N,B-PW-BC, corresponding to the incorporated dopant(s), N, B, and N simultaneously with B, respectively, in PW-based BC. For comparison, pristine pyrochar (PW-BC) was prepared under identical annealing conditions but without dopants. 2.3. Characterization Methods The morphology and elemental composition of B-PW-BC, identified as the most efficient among the prepared carbocatalysts, were examined using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific Apreo 2C, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The images were taken at a beam acceleration of 10 kV or 5 kV, a working distance of 10 mm, and a current of 0.10 nA, using the EDT and T1 detectors. The EDX analyses were performed under the same settings. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a Rigaku Miniflex 600 unit (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.15406 nm) using a counting step of 0.3° and a counting time per step of 3 s. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer using the KBr pellet method. Surface composition and chemical states were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, SPECS) equipped with a PHOIBOS 100 energy analyzer (SPECS Surface Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 5 of 26 Nano Analysis GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Measurements were performed in fixed analyzer transmission (FAT) mode with a pass energy of 40 eV and step size of 0.5 eV for survey scans, and 20 eV with 0.1 eV step size for high-resolution spectra. A monochromatic Al Kα source (1486.74 eV, 250 W) was employed under ultra-high vacuum (~5 × 10−7 Pa). The sample was mounted on the XPS stage with double-sided conductive adhesive tape. Data processing included Shirley background subtraction and Gaussian–Lorentzian peak fitting using CasaXPS software (version 2.3.26). The textural properties of the B-PWBC were determined using the method of low-temperature adsorption of N2 at the temperature of liquid N2 (−196 °C) in the flow of He as the carrier gas (St 1 on NOVA touch 2LX instrument, Quantachrome Instruments, Florida, USA). For comparison purposes, HRSEM and XRD analyses were also performed on the pristine pyrochar sample (PW-BC). 2.4. Adsorption and Catalytic Oxidation Experiments Catalytic oxidation experiments with PW-BC, N-PW-BC, B-PW-BC, and N,B-PW-BC were performed in 250 mL beakers containing 100 mL of a single mixture (aqueous model solution) comprising all 25 CECs simultaneously—15 pesticides and 10 pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs). Two initial concentrations were tested for each compound (10 and 30 µg/L), selected to reflect high levels reported for WWTP influents and effluents in Serbia and the broader Balkan region [25–27]. The reactions were carried out at 25 °C. For each experiment, 100 mg of catalyst and 135 mg of potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) were added to the solution, followed by magnetic stirring at 600 rpm. At predetermined time intervals, 1 mL aliquots were withdrawn from the reaction mixture and filtered through a 0.22 µm Nylon syringe filter. A 0.5 mL portion of each filtrate was immediately mixed with 0.5 mL of methanol to quench the reaction. To evaluate adsorption on B-PW-BC, as the most efficient carbocatalyst, experiments were carried out under identical conditions but without persulfate addition. Residual concentrations of CECs were determined using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC– MS/MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) without additional sample preparation. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Rapid Resolution HD ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Instrumental conditions and optimized parameters for each analyte were reported previously [28]. For quantification, six-point calibration curves were established for all analytes, covering a concentration range from the method limits of quantification (Table S1) to 100 µg/L, which encompassed the spiked sample levels (10 and 30 µg/L). Quality assurance included parallel control samples (non-treated solutions) in each batch to confirm spiked concentrations and verify system performance. All experiments were conducted in duplicate. In PSO experiments, CECs adsorbed on the surface of B-PW-BC were recovered by ultrasonic treatment of the suspension in acetonitrile for 20 s, and the supernatant was analyzed by UHPLC–MS/MS. The used recovery method was adopted from Chu et al. with slight modifications [22]. The same carbocatalyst was tested on a real wastewater effluent sample from a local WWTP, which was filtered through a 0.45 µm glass-fiber membrane filter before PSO. The measured characteristics of the wastewater sample after the filtration were: UV254 = 0.124, turbidity 0.57 NTU, pH = 8, and TOC = 8.15 mgC/L. After PSO, a wastewater sample was prepared using solid-phase extraction (SPE) with Oasis HLB cartridges (6 mL, 200 mg; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The detailed sample preparation procedure was described in [28]. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 6 of 26 2.5. Catalyst Stability and Reusability The stability and reusability of the B-PW-BC catalyst were evaluated through four consecutive catalytic oxidation cycles. After each run, the catalyst was collected by filtration, thoroughly washed with ultrapure water to remove residual reactants and by-products, oven-dried at 80 °C, and reused under identical experimental conditions. The residual catalytic performance was expressed in terms of CECs removal efficiency after each cycle. 2.6. Quenching Experiments To elucidate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) involved in CEC degradation, quenching experiments were conducted under the same conditions as the catalytic oxidation tests, with the addition of specific scavengers. A persulfate-to-scavenger molar ratio of 1.7 was applied, following literature recommendations [29]. Methanol was used to quench both •OH and SO4•−, whereas tert-butanol (TBA) selectively scavenged •OH [17]. Chloroform was employed as an O2•− scavenger, and sodium azide (NaN3) was used to quench 1O2. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. PDS Catalytic Activity of Metal-Free Pyrochar-Based Materials The catalytic performance of the synthesized metal-free carbocatalysts was evaluated in the presence of PDS using a model aqueous solution containing 15 pesticides and 10 PhACs (10 µg/L each). Figure 1 shows the removal efficiencies of the selected CECs obtained for four different catalytic systems after 90 min of reaction. As shown in Figure 1, all tested carbocatalysts displayed higher reactivity toward PhACs compared to pesticides. Notably, omethoate and trichlorfon were oxidized only in the presence of the B-doped sample, whereas pristine pyrochar was completely inactive for phosphamidon degradation. Pristine pyrochar showed modest activity (<60% removal) toward methamidophos, acetamiprid, and carbofuran. The N-doped pyrochar achieved < 50% removal of methamidophos, phosphamidon, and linuron, while it exhibited excellent activity toward dimethoate (84.2%) and nine other pesticides that were nearly completely degraded within 90 min. In contrast, the dual-doped material (N,B-PWBC) did not show consistent enhancement compared to the N-doped catalyst: improvements were observed for methamidophos and linuron, but reduced activity was noted for carbofuran, ethoprophos, and malathion. Overall, only six pesticides (diazinon, acetamiprid, imazalil, methidathion, carbaryl, and propiconazole) were almost completely removed (>95%) with the N,B-codoped pyrochar after 90 min. In comparison, the B-doped pyrochar exhibited the most pronounced catalytic effect. In combination with PDS, it achieved near-complete removal (>95%) of 13 out of the 15 pesticides tested, confirming that boron incorporation substantially enhanced the PDS activation capacity of pyrochar. The removal efficiencies of PhACs highlighted the strong catalytic potential of heteroatom-doped pyrochars (Figure 1b). Pristine pyrochar showed the lowest activity toward salbutamol and only moderate performance for acetaminophen and atenolol. The N-doped pyrochar exhibited high catalytic activity, achieving nearly complete removal (~100%) of nine PhACs, with only a slight reduction in efficiency for atenolol. In contrast, codoping with N and B did not provide additional benefits compared with single-doped systems. The B-doped pyrochar demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving almost complete degradation of all PhACs tested, with removal efficiencies close to 100% for ten compounds and 94.5% for atenolol. Overall, all tested carbocatalysts showed substantially higher affinity toward PhACs compared to pesticides, as seven PhACs were al- Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 7 of 26 most completely removed across all catalytic systems. These findings confirm that heteroatom incorporation into the carbon framework significantly enhances the PDS activation performance of pyrochar-based catalysts. Figure 1. Removal efficiencies (%) of selected (a) pesticides and (b) PhACs in the presence of metalfree pyrochar-based catalysts after 90 min of oxidation process (experimental conditions: [individual CEC] = 10 µg/L; [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial solution pH = 6.5). An efficiency of 100% was achieved when the residual concentration of the compound of interest at the end of the process was below the quantification limit of the applied method. The catalytic performance of pristine and heteroatom-doped pyrochars was further evaluated by fitting the experimental data to a pseudo-first-order kinetic model (Figure 2): C=C ଴eି୩౗౦౦ ୲ where C and C0 represent the pollutant concentrations at time t and 0 min, respectively, and kapp is the apparent rate constant. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 8 of 26 Figure 2. Degradation kinetics of selected CECs ((a) pesticides, (b) PhACs) in metal-free pyrocharbased catalysts/PDS system with (c) corresponding values of the pseudo first-order rate constant. In the presence of pristine pyrochar, six pesticides (methamidophos, dimethoate, acetamiprid, carbofuran, methidathion, and ethoprophos) showed relatively consistent degradation with the highest rate constant for dimethoate (kapp = 0.021 min−1). Diazinon, carbaryl, malathion, and propiconazole exhibited a rapid initial removal (>60% within 5 min), followed by slower degradation, while carbaryl showed the lowest rate constant (0.0097 min−1). Imazalil and linuron were completely removed within 5 min. N-doped pyrochar accelerated pesticide degradation, with most compounds fully removed after 5 min, except dimethoate and carbofuran, which degraded more slowly (kapp = 0.0056 and 0.0124 min−1, respectively). The N,B-codoped system showed a similar trend, achieving >70% removal of nine pesticides within 5 min but with slower subsequent degradation of dime- Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 9 of 26 thoate, acetamiprid, and carbofuran. By contrast, B-doped pyrochar demonstrated exceptional catalytic activity, achieving >90% removal of 13 pesticides within 5 min, while omethoate and trichlorfon were degraded only during the initial stage of the process. Regarding the PhACs, distinct kinetic profiles were observed with pristine pyrochar, particularly for sotalol, acetaminophen, salbutamol, atenolol, and carbamazepine, the latter showing the highest rate constant (kapp = 0.0367 min−1). The incorporation of heteroatoms (N, B, or both) markedly enhanced performance, resulting in rapid degradation of all PhACs, with most compounds almost completely removed within 5 min. Both singledoped and codoped pyrochars significantly outperformed pristine pyrochar, with the Bdoped catalyst again showing the highest overall activity. The dual N,B-doped pyrochar did not exhibit a consistent improvement in catalytic activity compared to single-doped materials, suggesting that the simultaneous introduction of these two heteroatoms does not necessarily lead to the expected synergistic enhancement. One possible explanation is that concurrent incorporation of nitrogen and boron can generate competitive or even antagonistic effects on the electronic structure of the carbon matrix [12,13]. Nitrogen, being more electronegative than carbon, enriches adjacent sites with electron density and typically facilitates radical-type persulfate activation pathways, whereas boron introduces electron-deficient Lewis acid centers that promote non-radical mechanisms such as direct electron transfer or surface-bound reactive complexes [5,9]. When these dopants coexist within the same local domains, their opposite electronic influences may partially counterbalance one another, diminishing the net charge polarization and thereby lowering the density of catalytically relevant active sites. Moreover, codoping can perturb the structural integrity of the carbon lattice more severely than single-atom substitution. The introduction of heteroatoms with different atomic radii and bonding preferences may generate nonuniform defect clusters, distort graphitic domains, or interrupt π-electron delocalization, leading to suboptimal defect distribution and reduced electronic conductivity [13]. Such structural perturbations can also decrease accessible porosity or block functional groups that are otherwise available in single-doped materials, ultimately hindering the adsorption of persulfate and target CECs. Similar observations have been reported for other multi-heteroatom-doped carbons, where the expected synergistic effects fail to occur due to over-doping or lattice disorder [20]. Taken together, these electronic and structural interferences provide a plausible explanation for the weaker-than-anticipated catalytic performance of the N,B-codoped pyrochar, suggesting that in this system dual doping induced competition rather than cooperation between active sites. For broader context and to strengthen the performance assessment, it is important to note that the catalytic behavior of the synthesized pyrochars is comparable to, and in several cases surpasses, that reported for commercial activated carbon and other established carbon-based catalysts used for persulfate activation. Previous studies have shown that activated carbon and conventional metal-free carbons typically exhibit moderate removal efficiencies and often rely predominantly on radical pathways with limited selectivity and susceptibility to surface oxidation [10,17]. In contrast, the B-doped pyrochar developed in this study demonstrated markedly faster degradation kinetics and broader reactivity toward structurally diverse CECs. Similar improvements have been reported for heteroatom-engineered carbons, where dopants such as N or B increase defect density and promote non-radical electron-transfer pathways, resulting in higher stability and more efficient PDS activation than commercial activated carbon [12,19]. These comparative trends indicate that the performance of the B-doped pyrochar is fully aligned with, and in many cases superior to, benchmark carbonaceous catalysts commonly applied in PS-AOPs. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 16 of 26 Table 1. Removal efficiencies (%) of selected pesticides in the presence of B-doped pyrochar after 10 min of adsorption, 10 min of pre-adsorption and 10 and 90 min of PSO, and 10 and 90 min of PSO (experimental conditions: [individual CEC] = 30 µg/L; [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial solution pH = 6.5). Pesticide Type and Duration of the Process Removal Efficiency in the Adsorption Process (%) Adsorption Efficiency in PSO (%) Degradation Efficiency in PSO (%) Methamidophos AD 10 min 59.1 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 2.4 91.1 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 1.4 97.8 PSO 10 min 0.9 95.4 PSO 90 min 0.3 99.7 Omethoate AD 10 min 63.0 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 38.8 31.8 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 33.7 21.3 PSO 10 min 41.4 25.9 PSO 90 min 32.6 22.0 Diazinon AD 10 min 100 * AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 35.1 65.0 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 15.6 84.4 PSO 10 min 31.1 68.9 PSO 90 min 15.7 84.4 Trichlorfon AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 46.0 37.0 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 32.5 37.1 PSO 10 min 41.7 37.7 PSO 90 min 31.1 39.5 Dimethoate AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 28.3 71.7 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 26.6 73.4 PSO 10 min 26.0 74.0 PSO 90 min 24.6 75.5 Acetamiprid AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 26.5 73.5 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 27.0 73.0 PSO 10 min 21.5 78.5 PSO 90 min 20.8 79.2 Phosphamidon AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 56.4 43.6 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 57.0 43.0 PSO 10 min 43.5 55.0 PSO 90 min 40.6 59.4 Carbofuran AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 33.7 66.3 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 33.2 66.8 PSO 10 min 23.9 76.1 PSO 90 min 21.1 79.0 Imazalil AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 27.3 72.7 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 15.3 84.7 PSO 10 min 12.5 87.5 PSO 90 min 12.9 87.1 Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 17 of 26 Methidathion AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 45.7 54.3 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 29.6 70.4 PSO 10 min 39.5 60.6 PSO 90 min 40.2 59.8 Ethoprophos AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 27.0 73.0 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 19.0 81.0 PSO 10 min 23.6 76.5 PSO 90 min 21.3 78.7 Carbaryl AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 14.4 85.6 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 12.1 87.9 PSO 10 min 9.9 90.1 PSO 90 min 12.2 87.8 Linuron AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 40.2 59.8 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 24.4 75.6 PSO 10 min 31.4 68.6 PSO 90 min 24.2 75.8 Malathion AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 31.0 69.0 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 16.3 83.7 PSO 10 min 34.4 65.6 PSO 90 min 0.0 100.0 Propiconazole AD 10 min 100 AD 10 min + PSO 10 min 24.5 75.5 AD 10 min + PSO 90 min 11.0 89.1 PSO 10 min 48.0 52.1 PSO 90 min 47.4 52.6 AD—Adsorption; PSO—Persulfate oxidation; * An efficiency of 100% was achieved when the residual concentration of the compound of interest at the end of the process was below the quantification limit of the applied method. A clear cooperative effect of simultaneous adsorption and oxidation was observed for phosphamidon (55.0%) and carbofuran (76.1%), which showed substantially higher degradation within 10 min compared to the sequential process. By contrast, for omethoate, diazinon, trichlorfon, dimethoate, acetamiprid, ethoprophos, carbaryl, linuron, and malathion, the pre-adsorption step did not significantly affect catalytic performance. Interestingly, a negative impact of pre-adsorption was noted for methidathion and propiconazole, where the highest degradation levels (70.4% and 89.0%, respectively) were achieved after 90 min of oxidation without prior adsorption. The B-doped pyrochar exhibited outstanding adsorption affinity toward all selected PhACs, achieving nearly complete removal (~100%) for nine out of ten compounds (Figure 9). Beyond its superior adsorption, the material also displayed high catalytic activity for PDS activation. After 90 min of simultaneous adsorption and oxidation, seven PhACs (sotalol, acetaminophen, salbutamol, famotidine, ranitidine, propranolol, and diltiazem) were almost completely degraded. For atenolol and carbamazepine, a small fraction of the pollutants remained physically adsorbed on the catalyst surface, with degradation efficiencies of 90.4% and 88.7%, respectively, in the absence of a pre-adsorption step. In contrast, hydrochlorothiazide Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 18 of 26 (HCTZ) was removed predominantly through adsorption, with only ~30% oxidized, regardless of prior adsorption. Overall, these results confirm the cooperative benefit of simultaneous adsorption and persulfate-driven oxidation. The synthesized B-doped pyrochar therefore functions as a bifunctional material, integrating both adsorption sites and catalytic centers, and enabling adsorption-enhanced degradation of PhACs. Figure 9. Removal efficiencies (%) of selected PhACs in the presence of B-doped pyrochar after 10 min of adsorption, 10 min of pre-adsorption, and 10 and 90 min of PSO, and 10 and 90 min of PSO (experimental conditions: [individual CEC] = 30 µg/L; [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial solution pH = 6.5). An efficiency of 100% was achieved when the residual concentration of the compound of interest at the end of the process was below the quantification limit of the applied method. 3.5. The Plausible Mechanism of PDS Activation—Quenching Experiments To identify the reactive oxygen species (ROS) responsible for CEC degradation, scavenging tests were performed with four common quenchers at a persulfate-to-scavenger molar ratio of 1.7 [29]. All experiments were conducted as simultaneous adsorption–oxidation processes (without pre-adsorption) at an initial concentration of 30 µg/L per compound. For the majority of tested pollutants, no significant differences in removal efficiencies were observed in the presence of scavengers compared to control runs. Consequently, most CECs, including 11 pesticides (e.g., diazinon, dimethoate, carbofuran, malathion, propiconazole) and 10 PhACs (e.g., sotalol, propranolol, HCTZ, carbamazepine), were almost completely degraded within the first 5 min of reaction in all cases, indicating that the applied quenchers did not exert a clear inhibitory effect. Notable exceptions were methamidophos, omethoate, trichlorfon, and phosphamidon, where distinct changes in degradation profiles were recorded in the presence of the respective scavengers (Figure 10). These results suggest that ROS participation in the degradation pathway is compound-specific and more evident for certain pesticides, while for the majority of CECs, adsorption combined with fast electron-transfer reactions dominated the overall removal. Radical pathways. PDS can be activated in metal-free systems through both radical and non-radical processes. Methanol (•OH and SO4•− scavenger) and tert-butanol (selective for •OH) were used to probe radical species. In the presence of these quenchers, methamidophos removal was significantly suppressed (from 96.3% to 66.4% with MeOH and 72.4% with TBA), confirming the involvement of both •OH and SO4•−. Minor inhibition was observed for omethoate and trichlorfon with TBA, though this may partly reflect hydrophobic adsorption of TBA onto the catalyst surface, limiting persulfate access rather than selectively quenching •OH [42]. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 19 of 26 Figure 10. Effects of various scavengers on removal efficiencies of methamidophos, omethoate, trichlorfon, and phosphamidon (experimental conditions: [individual CEC] = 30 µg/L; [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial solution pH = 6.5; PS:scavenger molar ratio 1.7). Role of superoxide and singlet oxygen. Chloroform addition indicated the contribution of O 2 • − , particularly in the degradation of trichlorfon (efficiency reduced from 79.4% to 63.2%) and methamidophos (96.3% to 62.1%). Omethoate degradation was almost completely suppressed, suggesting a vital role of O 2 • − in its decomposition. Sodium azide (NaN 3 ) was used to probe singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ). While its effect was negligible for phosphamidon and trichlorfon, methamidophos degradation was strongly suppressed (only 39.1% removed after 30 min), confirming that 1 O 2 played a decisive role. 1 O 2 originates from the breakage of the peroxide bond, and typically, can be generated from photoexcitation of oxygen molecules, recombination of O 2 • − , and PDS activation by the ketonic group of the carbonaceous catalyst [12,43,44]. The generation of 1 O 2 in the examined system is consistent with the presence of C=O functionalities on the catalyst surface (identified by XPS, Figure 6), which can facilitate electron transfer with persulfate [43]. Non-radical electron transfer pathway (ETP). For most CECs (11 pesticides—diazinon, dimethoate, acetamiprid, carbofuran, imazalil, methidathion, ethoprophos, carbaryl, linuron, malathion, propiconazole and 10 PhACs—sotalol, acetaminophen, salbutamol, atenolol, famotidine, ranitidine, propranolol, HCTZ, diltiazem, carbamazepine), degradation efficiencies were unaffected by scavengers, despite near-complete removal within minutes. This suggests that a non-radical electron transfer pathway was dominant. In this mechanism, the catalyst acts as a conductor mediating electron transfer between adsorbed organics and persulfate. Depending on substrate properties, two pathways can operate: (i) electron shuttle, favored by electron-rich compounds, and (ii) adjacent transfer, where electron-poor organics capture electrons from adsorbed persulfate [22]. The electron shuttle mechanism could be related to carbofuran and carbaryl, having the highest overall electron richness compared to other 9 pesticides. In the case of 10 PhACs, the degradation of acetaminophen, salbutamol, and propranolol, as electron-rich compounds, could follow the same type of ETP, while the adjacent transfer might be more typical for the rest of 16 electron-poor CECs. Co-adsorption of CECs and persulfate on the catalyst surface is essential for ETP to create ternary mediators (electron acceptor-conductor-electron donor), which would further trigger the electron transfer [45,46]. Hence, to improve the contribution of ETP in the degradation of CECs, it is of great importance to design and synthesize a carbocatalyst with synergistic adsorptive and catalytic functionality. Contribution of B doping. Boron incorporation (BCO 2 , BC 2 O, B 3 C species) creates Lewis acid sites that facilitate pollutant adsorption and persulfate activation. The substitution of C by B lowers electronegativity (2.04 vs. 2.55), redistributes charge density, and introduces structural defects, all of which enhance electron-transfer reactivity [41,47]. Consequently, B-doped pyrochar provides synergistic adsorption and catalytic centers, Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 20 of 26 accelerating pollutant degradation and continuously regenerating free sites for re-adsorption. Overall mechanism. The degradation of organophosphorus pesticides (e.g., methamidophos, omethoate, trichlorfon, phosphamidon) proceeds via combined radical (•OH, SO4•−, O2•−) and non-radical (1O2, ETP) pathways, consistent with their diverse electron-withdrawing and electron-donating substituents. For most other pesticides and all PhACs, non-radical ETP dominated, facilitated by π–π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and boron-induced Lewis acidity. These findings highlight the bifunctional role of Bdoped pyrochar in the hook-and-destroy strategy, where pollutants are first adsorbed and subsequently oxidized through synergistic radical and non-radical mechanisms. 3.6. Stability of B-Doped Pyrochar—Reusability Test Industrial catalytic processes require stable catalysts that can withstand prolonged operation or multiple batch cycles [29]. Within the hook-and-destroy strategy, however, catalyst deactivation can occur due to surface oxidation of the carbon lattice during pollutant degradation, particularly via radical pathways [22,48]. Literature reports suggest that boron incorporation can mitigate this effect, as strong C–B bonds suppress carbon lattice oxidation and thereby enhance long-term durability of carbocatalysts [49]. To assess the stability of B-doped pyrochar, reusability experiments were carried out for the degradation of 25 selected CECs over four consecutive adsorption–oxidation cycles (Table 2). After each cycle, the catalyst was recovered, washed, and reused under identical conditions. Table 2. Reusability of B-doped pyrochar/PDS system for the degradation of 15 selected pesticides and 10 PhACs after 10 min of PSO (experimental conditions: [individual CEC] = 30 µg/L; [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial solution pH = 6.5). Pesticide Removal Efficiency in 1st Cycle (%) Removal Efficiency in 2nd Cycle (%) Removal Efficiency in 3rd Cycle (%) Removal Efficiency in 4th Cycle (%) Methamidophos 100 * 100 98.8 98.2 Omethoate 49.7 36.5 41.6 39.0 Diazinon 100 100 100 100 Trichlorfon 70.3 63.9 65.9 62.9 Dimethoate 100 100 100 100 Acetamiprid 100 100 100 100 Phosphamidon 100 100 100 100 Carbofuran 100 100 100 100 Imazalil 100 100 100 100 Methidathion 100 100 100 100 Ethoprophos 100 100 100 100 Carbaryl 100 100 100 100 Linuron 100 100 100 100 Malathion 100 100 100 100 Propiconazole 100 100 100 100 PhACs Sotalol 100 100 100 100 Acetaminophen 100 100 100 100 Salbutamol 100 100 100 100 Atenolol 95.6 93.0 92.5 93.9 Famotidine 98.4 97.8 98.8 98.8 Ranitidine 99.9 99.7 100 100 Propranolol 100 100 100 100 Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 21 of 26 HCTZ 100 100 100 100 Diltiazem 100 100 100 100 Carbamazepine 100 100 100 100 * An efficiency of 100% was achieved when the residual concentration of the compound of interest at the end of the process was below the quantification limit of the applied method. The reusability of B-doped pyrochar was confirmed by its consistently high performance in removing all tested CECs across four consecutive cycles. Only minor declines in efficiency were observed for methamidophos (100% → 98.2%), omethoate (49.7% → 39.1%), trichlorfon (70.4% → 62.9%), and atenolol (95.6% → 93.9%). This slight deactivation can be attributed to their degradation pathways, which, as indicated by quenching tests, involve both radical and 1O2-mediated non-radical processes—pathways more prone to partial catalyst oxidation. For all other pesticides and PhACs, the B-doped pyrochar retained nearly identical removal efficiencies even after four cycles, demonstrating excellent cycling stability. This durability can be ascribed to the stabilizing role of boron moieties, which protect the carbon lattice from oxidative damage and preserve catalytic functionality. The B-PW-BC catalyst retained high activity throughout, with only a slight decline (<10%) in overall removal efficiency after the fourth cycle. This minor reduction can be attributed to partial pore blockage or deposition of oxidation by-products. These results confirm that boron doping not only enhances catalytic activity but also improves the structural stability of pyrochar under oxidative conditions, making it a robust and reusable carbocatalyst suitable for practical wastewater treatment applications. 3.7. Evaluation of Catalytic Performance on a Real Wastewater Sample The efficiency of persulfate-based catalytic systems can be substantially influenced by constituents of real aqueous environments, such as inorganic anions (Cl−, SO42−, H2PO4−), organic matter, and variations in pH [50]. These matrix components compete with both catalyst active sites and generated radical species, which often leads to lower performance compared to model solutions. To assess the practical applicability of B-doped pyrochar, catalytic tests were performed on a real wastewater effluent collected at the discharge point of a local WWTP into a nearby lake. The effluent quality complied with the Serbian Regulation on Emission Limit Values for Pollutants in Water [51]. Targeted UHPLC-MS/MS analysis (Figure 11) identified 12 CECs: four pesticides (acetamiprid, carbofuran, linuron, and tebuconazole) and eight PhACs (sotalol, salbutamol, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), propranolol, carbamazepine, bezafibrate, and diclofenac acid). Among them, HCTZ was detected at the highest concentration (107 ng/L), while all others were present at levels up to 35 ng/L. Upon treatment with the B-PW-BC/PDS system, nearly complete removal (>95%) of all detected pollutants was achieved within 10 min, with the sole exception of bezafibrate, which remained largely unaffected. This resistance can be attributed to its specific molecular features: the presence of a chlorobenzene moiety introduces strong electron-withdrawing effects that lower the electron density of the aromatic ring, reducing its susceptibility to oxidative attack. In addition, the ionized carboxyl group at near-neutral pH increases hydration and weakens electrostatic interactions with the nearly neutral pyrochar surface (pHZC ≈ 7.1), thereby limiting adsorption. Since adsorption is a prerequisite for the hook-and-destroy mechanism, the reduced affinity of bezafibrate toward the catalyst surface prevents efficient catalytic activation. Furthermore, competition with organic matter and inorganic anions in the real wastewater matrix may have further inhibited its removal. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 22 of 26 These findings highlight the excellent adaptability of the B-doped pyrochar under realistic water matrix conditions, confirming its potential as a practical and robust catalyst for wastewater remediation. Figure 11. Removal efficiencies (%) of the identified CECs in the real effluent sample in the presence of B-doped pyrochar after 10 min of PSO (experimental conditions: [carbocatalyst] = 1 g/L; [PDS] = 5 mM; T = 25 °C; initial effluent sample pH = 7.9). An efficiency of 100% was achieved when the residual concentration of the compound of interest at the end of the process was below the quantification limit of the applied method. 4. Conclusions In this study, a sustainable and highly efficient B-doped pyrochar was prepared from pinewood sawdust via a simple one-step pyrolytic process and evaluated as a metal-free bifunctional catalyst for the removal of 25 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including 15 pesticides and 10 pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs). The obtained material demonstrated outstanding adsorption capacity and superior catalytic performance in persulfate activation. Nearly complete removal of most target pollutants was achieved within minutes, with B-doped pyrochar significantly outperforming pristine, N-doped, and N,B-codoped analogs. The catalyst also exhibited excellent reusability, retaining high activity after four consecutive cycles with only minor efficiency losses for a few organophosphorus pesticides and one PhACs (atenolol). Mechanistic investigations combining quenching experiments and surface characterization revealed the coexistence of radical (SO4•−, •OH, O2•−) and non-radical (1O2, electron transfer pathway, ETP) mechanisms. While organophosphorus pesticides were degraded through combined radical and non-radical pathways, the removal of most other investigated CECs proceeded predominantly via non-radical ETP, facilitated by π–π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and Lewis acid sites introduced by boron doping. This synergy underpins the efficiency of the hook-and-destroy strategy, in which pollutants are first adsorbed and subsequently oxidized in situ. Finally, evaluation on real wastewater effluent confirmed the practical adaptability of the B-doped pyrochar/PDS system, achieving >95% removal of 11 out of 12 identified CECs within 10 min. Bezafibrate was the only compound not effectively removed, which can be explained by its strong electron-withdrawing chlorobenzene group, ionized carboxyl functionality, and poor adsorption affinity at neutral pH. These findings highlight B-doped pyrochar as a robust, cost-effective, and environmentally benign carbocatalyst with strong potential for advanced wastewater treatment applications. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 23 of 26 Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics13121035/s1, Table S1. List of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) included in the study with their chemical structure, compound class, CAS number, and method limit of quantification (MLOQ). Figure S1. HRSEM image of pristine pyrochar. Figure S2. XRD pattern of pristine pyrochar (References [52–55] are cited in the supplementary materials). Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.P. and N.Đ.-M.; methodology, S.P., N.V. and N.Đ.-M.; investigation, S.P., I.A. and J.Ž.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; writing—review and editing, S.P., N.V., M.P., I.A., J.Ž. and N.Đ.-M.; supervision, N.Đ.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or EU executive agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. This study is conducted under the project TwiNSol-CECs that has received funding from Horizon Europe program under grant agreement no. 101059867. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. References 1. Xin, S.; Liu, G.; Ma, X.; Gong, J.; Ma, B.; Yan, Q.; Chen, Q.; Ma, D.; Zhang, G.; Gao, M.; et al. High efficiency heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst biochar modified CuFeO2 for the degradation of tetracycline: Economical synthesis, catalytic performance and mechanism. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 280, 119386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119386. 2. Aumeier, B.M.; Georgi, A.; Saeidi, N.; Sigmund, G. Is sorption technology fit for the removal of persistent and mobile organic contaminants from water? Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 880, 163343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163343. 3. Díaz-Gamboa, L.; Martínez-López, S.; Ayuso-García, L.M.; Lahora, A.; Martínez-Alcalá, I. Can Lagoons serve as a quaternary treatment for micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants? Recent implications for compliance with the new urban wastewater treatment directive. Environments 2024, 11, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11060105. 4. Mustafa, F.S.; Hama Aziz, K.H. Heterogeneous catalytic activation of persulfate for the removal of rhodamine B and diclofenac pollutants from water using iron-impregnated biochar derived from the waste of black seed pomace. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 170, 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.030. 5. Pan, G.; Wei, J.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z. Insight into boron-doped biochar as efficient metal-free catalyst for peroxymonosulfate activation: Important role of -O-B-Omoieties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 445, 130479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130479. 6. Wang, C.; Huang, R.; Sun, R.; Yang, J.; Sillanpää, M. A review on persulfates activation by functional biochar for organic contaminants removal: Synthesis, characterizations, radical determination, and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106267. 7. Huang, P.; Zhang, P.; Wang, C.; Tang, J.; Sun, H. Enhancement of persulfate activation by Fe-biochar composites: Synergism of Fe and N-doped biochar. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 303, 120926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120926. 8. Fu, M.; Yan, J.; Chai, B.; Fan, G.; Ding, D.; Song, G. In situ synthesis of CoFe-LDH on biochar for peroxymonosulfate activation toward sulfamethoxazole degradation: Cooperation of radical and non-radical pathways. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 4018–4032. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nj05132j. 9. Duan, X.; Sun, H.; Wang, Y.; Kang, J.; Wang, S. N-doping-induced nonradical reaction on single-walled carbon nanotubes for catalytic phenol oxidation. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs5017613. 10. Gasim, M.F.; Lim, J.W.; Low, S.C.; Lin, K.Y.A.; Da Oh, W. Can biochar and hydrochar be used as sustainable catalyst for persulfate activation? Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132458. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 24 of 26 11. Chatterjee, R.; Bhanja, P.; Bhaumik, A. The design and synthesis of heterogeneous catalysts for environmental applications. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 4765–4771. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1dt00544h. 12. Liu, B.; Guo, W.; Wang, H.; Si, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Luo, H.; Ren, N. B-doped graphitic porous biochar with enhanced surface affinity and electron transfer for efficient peroxydisulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 396, 125119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125119. 13. Dou, J.; Cheng, J.; Lu, Z.; Tian, Z.; Xu, J.; He, Y. Biochar co-doped with nitrogen and boron switching the free radical based peroxydisulfate activation into the electron-transfer dominated nonradical process. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 301, 120832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120832. 14. Panić, S.; Đurišić-Mladenović, N.; Petronijević, M.; Stijepović, I.; Milanović, M.; Kozma, G.; Kukovecz, Á. Valorization of waste biomass towards biochar production—Characterization and perspectives for sustainable applications in Serbia. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 37, 104043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104043. 15. Long, Y.; Bu, S.; Huang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Xiao, L.; Shi, X. N-doped hierarchically porous carbon for highly efficient metal-free catalytic activation of peroxymonosulfate in water: A non-radical mechanism. Chemosphere 2019, 216, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.175. 16. Yuan, X.; Cao, Z.; Li, J.; Patel, A.K.; Dong, C.; Jin, X.; Gu, C.; Yip, A.C.K.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Ok, Y.S. Recent advancements and challenges in emerging applications of biochar-based catalysts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 67, 108181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108181. 17. Ye, F.; Shi, Y.; Sun, W.; Pang, K.; Pu, M.; Yang, L.; Huang, H. Construction of adsorption–oxidation bifunction-oriented carbon by single boron doping for non-radical antibiotic degradation via persulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140148. 18. Qu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sun, M.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Ge, C.; Zhang, Y. Ball milling-assisted preparation of N-doped biochar loaded with ferrous sulfide as persulfate activator for phenol degradation: Multiple active sites-triggered radical/nonradical mechanism. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 316, 121639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121639. 19. Zaeni, J.R.J.; Lim, J.W.; Wang, Z.; Ding, D.; Chua, Y.S.; Ng, S.L.; Oh, W.D. In situ nitrogen functionalization of biochar via onepot synthesis for catalytic peroxymonosulfate activation: Characteristics and performance studies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 241, 116702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116702. 20. Ding, D.; Yang, S.; Qian, X.; Chen, L.; Cai, T. Nitrogen-doping positively whilst sulfur-doping negatively affect the catalytic activity of biochar for the degradation of organic contaminant. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 263, 118348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118348. 21. Hu, W.; Xie, Y.; Lu, S.; Li, P.; Xie, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. One-step synthesis of nitrogen-doped sludge carbon as a bifunctional material for the adsorption and catalytic oxidation of organic pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 680, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.098. 22. Chu, C.; Yang, J.; Huang, D.; Li, J.; Wang, A.; Alvarez, P.J.J.; Kim, J.H. Cooperative pollutant adsorption and persulfate-driven oxidation on hierarchically ordered porous carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 10352–10360. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03067. 23. Alvarez, P.J.J.; Chan, C.K.; Elimelech, M.; Halas, N.J.; Villagrán, D. Emerging opportunities for nanotechnology to enhance water security. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 634–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0203-2. 24. Su, J.; Lu, H.; Wang, F.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Xiao, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhu, L. High-efficient, broad-spectrum and recyclable mesoporous TiO₂ adsorbent for water treatment. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2021, 325, 111345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111345. 25. Đurišić-Mladenović, N.; Živančev, J.; Antić, I.; Rakić, D.; Buljovčić, M.; Pajin, B.; Llorca, M.; Farre, M. Occurrence of contaminants of emerging concern in different water samples from the lower part of the Danube River Middle Basin—A review. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 363, 125128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125128. 26. ICPDR (International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River). Joint Danube Survey 4—A Comprehensive Analysis of Danube Water Quality; ICPDR: Vienna, Austria, 2021. Available online: https://www.icpdr.org (accessed on 15 September 2025). 27. Petrović, M.; Škrbić, B.; Živančev, J.; Ferrando-Climent, L.; Barcelo, D. Determination of 81 pharmaceutical drugs by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with hybrid triple quadrupole–linear ion trap in different types of water in Serbia. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.079. 28. Rakić, D.; Antić, I.; Živančev, J.; Buljovčić, M.; Šereš, Z.; Đurišić-Mladenović, N. Solid-phase extraction as promising sample preparation method for compound of emerging concerns analysis. Analecta Tech. Szeged. 2023, 17, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2023.4.16-24. Toxics 2025, 13, 1035 25 of 26 29. Rodrigues, C.S.D.; Madeira, L.M. p-Nitrophenol degradation by activated persulfate. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101265. 30. Sui, L.; Tang, C.; Du, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, K.; Yang, F. Preparation and characterization of boron-doped corn straw biochar: Fe(II) removal equilibrium and kinetics. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 106, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.001. 31. Ateş, A.; Aydemir, B.; Öksüz, K.E. Investigation of physicochemical and biological properties of boron-doped biochar. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 14, 26355–26369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04567-1. 32. Chen, D.; Cen, K.; Zhuang, X.; Gan, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Insight into biomass pyrolysis mechanism based on cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: Evolution of volatiles and kinetics, elucidation of reaction pathways, and characterization of gas, biochar and bio-oil. Combust. Flame 2022, 242, 112142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112142. 33. Pusceddu, E.; Santilli, S.F.; Fioravanti, G.; Montanaro, A.; Miglietta, F.; Foscolo, P.U. Chemical–physical analysis and exfoliation of biochar-carbon matter: From agriculture soil improver to starting material for advanced nanotechnologies. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115601. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab4ba8. 34. Qu, Z.; Sun, F.; Gao, J.; Zhao, G. Activity origin of boron doped carbon cluster for thermal catalytic oxidation: Coupling effects of dopants and edges. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.017. 35. Akhtar, M.S.; Ali, S.; Zaman, W. Innovative adsorbents for pollutant removal: Exploring the latest research and applications. Molecules 2024, 29, 4317. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184317. 36. Jagadeesh, N.; Sundaram, B. Adsorption of pollutants from wastewater by biochar: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2023, 9, 100226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100226. 37. Baccar, R.; Sarrà, M.; Bouzid, J.; Feki, M.; Blánquez, P. Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by activated carbon prepared from agricultural by-product. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.099. 38. Dong, X.; Chu, Y.; Tong, Z.; Sun, M.; Meng, D.; Yi, X.; Gao, T.; Wang, M.; Duan, J. Mechanisms of adsorption and functionalization of biochar for pesticides: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 272, 116019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116019. 39. Yang, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Q.; Ghaffar, A.; Chen, B. Application of graphene-based materials in water purification: From the nanoscale to specific devices. Environ. Sci. Nano 2018, 5, 1624–1297. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8en00194d. 40. Tran, H.N.; Wang, Y.F.; You, S.J.; Chao, H.P. Insights into the mechanism of cationic dye adsorption on activated charcoal: The importance of π–π interactions. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 107, 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.010. 41. Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, X.; Cao, D.; Guo, T.; Yang, B. Insights into heterogeneous catalysis of peroxymonosulfate activation by boron-doped ordered mesoporous carbon. Carbon 2018, 135, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.106. 42. Wang, H.; Guo, W.; Liu, B.; Wu, Q.; Luo, H.; Zhao, H.; Si, Q.; Sseguya, F.; Ren, N. Edge-nitrogenated biochar for efficient peroxydisulfate activation: An electron transfer mechanism. Water Res. 2019, 160, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.059. 43. Cheng, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y. Non-photochemical production of singlet oxygen via activation of persulfate by carbon nanotubes. Water Res. 2017, 113, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.016. 44. Lee, J.; Hong, S.; Mackeyev, Y.; Lee, C.; Chung, E.; Wilson, L.J.; Kim, J.H.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Photosensitized oxidation of emerging organic pollutants by tetrakis C₆₀ aminofullerene-derivatized silica under visible light irradiation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10598–10604. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2029944. 45. Mian, M.M.; Liu, G. Activation of peroxymonosulfate by chemically modified sludge biochar for the removal of organic pollutants: Understanding the role of active sites and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 392, 123681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123681. 46. Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Duan, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S. Density functional theory calculations for insight into the heterocatalyst reactivity and mechanism in persulfate-based advanced oxidation reactions. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 11129–11159. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03099. 47. Sawant, S.V.; Patwardhan, A.W.; Joshi, J.B.; Dasgupta, K. Boron doped carbon nanotubes: Synthesis, characterization and emerging applications—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 131616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131616. 48. Zeng, T.; Tang, X.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; Jin, S.; Dong, F.; He, J.; Song, S.; Zhang, H. Atomically dispersed Fe–N₄ site as a conductive bridge enables efficient and stable activation of peroxymonosulfate: Active site renewal, anti-oxidative capacity, and pathway alternation mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 20929–20940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06229. 49. Chen, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, M.; Kang, H.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; et al. Nitrogen-doped carbon modified with boron atoms activating peroxydisulfate for sulfamethoxazole degradation: The electron transfer-dominated pathway. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 116080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.116080.