Expanding the Landscape of Professional Project Management to Support Cancer Research in Serbia
Full text
Volume 18, Supplement 1, June 2024 Molecular Oncology 18 (Suppl. 1) (2024) 1–495 © 2024 The Authors. Molecular Oncology is published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited EACR 2024 Congress Abstracts Contents PROFFERED PAPER PRESENTATIONS ............... 2 Top Abstracts ......................................................................... 2 Symposium: Modulating the Tumour Microenvironment . 3 Symposium: Drug Resistance ............................................... 5 Symposium: Mechanism-based Clinical Trials ................... 6 Symposium: Precision Cancer Medicine in the Postgenomic Era ............................................................................ 7 Joint EACR-ICSA Symposium: Senescence, Dormancy, and Related Cell States .......................................................... 8 Symposium: Metabolism and Cancer .................................. 9 Symposium: Cell-based Therapies ..................................... 10 Joint EACR-AACR Symposium: Spatial Analysis of Tumours/Spatial Transcriptomics ...................................... 12 Symposium: Mechanical Forces of Cancer ........................ 13 Symposium: Mechanisms of Tumour Metastases ............ 14 Symposium: Targeting Mitochondria in Cancer ............... 15 Symposium: Liquid Biopsies .............................................. 16 Symposium: Drugging Tumour Suppressor Genes ......... 17 Joint EACR-ESR Symposium: Imaging the Tumour Microenvironment .............................................................. 18 Symposium: Making Cold Tumours Hot ........................... 19 Symposium: Drugging the RAS Pathway .......................... 20 Joint EACR-EMBO Symposium: Modelling Cancer .......... 21 Symposium: Ageing, Gender, and Cancer ........................ 22 POSTER PRESENTATIONS (Tuesday/Wednesday) ........................................ 24 Bioinformatics and Computational Biology ....................... 24 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT .......................................... 42 Biomarkers in Tissue and Blood ........................................ 43 Cancer Cell Biology ............................................................. 78 Cancer Genomics .............................................................. 164 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 178 Carcinogenesis .................................................................. 192 Drug Resistance ................................................................ 199 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 224 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 231 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 231 Epigenetics ........................................................................ 236 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 243 Experimental/Molecular Therapeutics, Pharmacogenomics ........................................................................................... 245 Immunotherapy ................................................................ 291 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 298 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 304 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 307 Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology .............................. 314 Prevention and Early Detection ........................................ 318 Radiobiology/Radiation Oncology ................................... 330 Signalling Pathways ......................................................... 337 Translational Research ..................................................... 351 Tumour Biology ................................................................ 383 Tumour Evolution and Heterogeneity ............................. 439 Tumour Immunology ....................................................... 445 POSTER IN THE SPOTLIGHT ........................................ 463 LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACTS ......................... 481 Proffered Papers 10-minute talks awarded for the highest scored abstracts, embedded in the scientific symposia sessions. These presentations are not accompanied by a poster. Posters in the Spotlight Tuesday 11 June, 18:15 - 18:40, Poster and Exhibition Hall Wednesday 12 June, 18:15 - 18:40, Poster and Exhibition Hall Dedicated sessions taking place in the spotlight area within the Poster and Exhibition Hall. Poster presenters with high scoring abstracts will give short presentations of up to 5 minutes each. Their posters will also be available to view during the Poster Discussion Sessions. Late-breaking Abstracts Late-breaking abstracts are those for which full data were not available at the time of the regular abstract deadline.
Molecular Oncology 18 (Suppl. 1) (2024) 1–495 © 2024 The Authors. Molecular Oncology is published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies 373 The transition from identifying predictive spatial biomarkers, known as spatial signatures, for immunotherapy responses to their clinical implementation requires a cohesive strategy that connects ultrahigh-plex discovery experiments with highthroughput translational investigations. This research focuses on integrating Akoya Biosciences' spatial multiplexed imaging technologies with advanced data analysis methods to achieve comprehensive spatial phenotyping from discovery to clinical applications. Material and Methods Human formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer tissues underwent profiling using ultrahigh-plex PhenoCode™ Discovery panels to assess cell lineage, immune activation, and checkpoint markers through the PhenoCycler®-Fusion spatial biology platform. Then, PhenoCode™ Signature panels were used to target specific biomarkers related to immune profile, immune contexture, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), macrophage polarization, and T cell status using the PhenoImager® HT platform. Whole slide image analysis was utilized for precise image analysis tasks, such as region of interest (ROI) segmentation, cell detection, classification, exploration of spatial interactions, and identification of distinct spatial signatures. Results and Discussions Our investigation unveiled unique spatial relationships across different tumor categories, providing quantification of immune cell distributions and their interconnections. The ultrahigh-plex data demonstrated strong correlation with high-throughput signature panel analyses, thereby paving the way for a streamlined approach to pinpointing and crafting predictive spatial signatures for immunotherapy efficacy. Conclusion Leveraging ultrahigh-plex discovery panels, highthroughput signature panels, and advanced deep-learning image analysis offers a holistic comprehension of cellular interactions within the tumor microenvironment. This integrated methodology, leveraging Akoya's end-to-end workflows, expedites the discovery of predictive spatial biomarker signatures across various human tissue samples. EACR2024-0816 Assessing anti-tumor efficacy of tumordendritic cell reprogramming using immuno-competent 3D tumor microtissue models I. Agarkova 1 , N. Rotankova 1 , C. Veser 1 , M. Rudnik 1 , L. Laure-Anne 1 , R. Andre 2 , R. Emilie 3 , P. Cristiana 2 , R. Fábio F. 4 , P. Carlos-Filipe 5 1 Insphero AG, Immuno-Oncology, Schlieren, Switzerland 2 Asgard Therapeutics, Immuno-Oncology, Lund, Sweden 3 Asgard Therapeutics, Oncology, Lund, Sweden 4 Asgard Therapeutics, Research, Lund, Sweden 5 Lund University, Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Lund, Sweden Introduction Despite the extensive use of mouse models in pre-clinical cancer research, their translatability is often limited by inter-species differences. Recent studies have reported that overexpression of the transcription factors PU.1, IRF8, and BATF3 (PIB) in cancer cells induces reprogramming into functional antigen-presenting type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1s). This suggests a novel strategy for cancer immunotherapy based on the recreation of cDC1s´ functional properties in tumor cells by in-vivo reprogramming, forcing presentation of endogenous tumor neoantigens and inducing personalized anti-tumor immunity. Here, we evaluate efficacy of cDC1 reprogramming using innovative invitro 3D human immunocompetent tumor microtissue (TMT) models. Material and Methods TMTs were generated by co-aggregation of T98G or A375 human tumor cell lines with cancer-associated fibroblasts in proprietary AKURA TM 384 well plates. We transduced TMTs with PIB-mCherry-encoding lentiviral particles at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs) and profiled cDC1 reprogramming efficiency by immunofluorescence staining and high-content confocal imaging. We observed that cDC1 reprogramming progresses in 3D TMTs and is associated with expression of the dendritic cell markers CD45 and HLA-DR. Additionally, we observed that higher MOI is associated with higher transduction and reprogramming efficiency and decreased TMT size. To further investigate ex vivo antitumor efficacy, we co-cultured TMTs with HLAmatched PBMCs and profiled cytokine secretion and TMT size as readouts for T cell activation and cytotoxicity. Results and Discussions We observed increased secretion levels of IFNγ, TNFα, and Granzyme B, accompanied by reduced TMT size, in the co-cultures containing PIB-mCherry-transduced TMTs compared to those with mCherry-transduced TMTs. Importantly, both readouts were correlated with the percentage of reprogrammed tumor-cDC1s within the 3D TMT in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that in situ cDC1 reprogramming promotes T cell activation and cytotoxicity. Conclusion In summary, we used 3D cocultures of human tumor, stromal, and immune cells in automation-compatible AKURA TM 384 well plates to demonstrate that cDC1 reprogramming progresses within TMTs, promoting antitumor immunity. Ultimately, these findings provide proof-of-principle for a novel cancer immunotherapy based on in situ cDC1 reprogramming and demonstrate the versatility of the AKURA TM platform for evaluating efficacy of novel anti-cancer therapies. EACR2024-0827 Expanding the Landscape of Professional Project Management to Support Cancer Research in Serbia A. Djuric 1 , M. Radulovic 1 , A. Damjanovic 1 , F. Remond 2 , S. Castellvi-Bel 3 , J. Zoidakis 4,5 , M. Cavic 1 1 Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Department of Experimental Oncology, Belgrade, Serbia 2 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi iSunyer 18780261, 2024, S1, Downloaded from https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1878-0261.13683 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [12/08/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Molecular Oncology 18 (Suppl. 1) (2024) 1–495 © 2024 The Authors. Molecular Oncology is published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies 374 FRCB-IDIBAPSCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas CIBERehdHospital ClínicUniversity of Barcelona, Gastroenterology Department, Barcelona, Spain 4 Biomedical Research FoundationAcademy of Athens, Department of Biotechnology, Athens, Greece 5 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Biology, Athens, Greece Introduction Research Management Offices (RMOs), separate organizational units within universities, research and healthcare centers, serve as advisory and supporting entities along the entire research process. Their purpose is to ensure and promote high-quality research thus contributing to excellence, sustainability and open science principles. This study aimed to analyze the advantages of the establishment and development of the first RMO at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia (IORS) and to propose further R&D strategies for the efficient implementation of EU grants to ensure sustainability of research ecosystems in Serbia. Material and Methods Within the framework of the STEPUPIORS Horizon Europe project, the first RMO was established at IORS as a project delievarble. The initial steps were to define the scope of activities and to develop project management competencies through training, workshops and seminars. Human capacities for project management were built through intensive training and expert visits. The grant management offices from partner institutions provided focused training on pre-award and post-award processes with adequate on-site training in project management. Results and Discussions Good preand post-award grant management practices were established within the first 12 months of the project. The RMO organized 5 training events on omics analyses, project management and education capacities, reaching over 200 Serbian researchers from 7 institutions. A training module was established on the dedicated project website (https://www.stepupiors.eu/training-webinars/) following Open Science principles. The RMO coordinated the development of 2 newsletters and 1 patient brochure on genetic testing in hereditary colorectal cancer. Five manuscripts on colorectal cancer patient management were published with the deposition of 2 datasets. Seven new grant applications were submitted. One female project member enrolled in a Master’s program for Management in the Health Care System. IORS guidelines for the management of international grants and depreciation of equipment were prepared. Conclusion The establishment of the IORS RMO induced a rise in cancer research excellence and professionalism in the implementation and coordination of their projects. The RMO will strive to support IORS staff in education, research and administration activities, with special reference to the digitalization of cancer research, open science and integrity and equity in the cancer research community in Serbia and the region. EACR2024-0893 ctDNA profiling of HR+/HER2-low and HR+/HER2-0 metastatic breast cancer patients N. Dobrić 1 , N. Dandachi 1,2 , E.V. Klocker 1 , C. Suppan 1 , R. Graf 3 , S. Hasenleithner 1 , P.J. Jost 1 , E. Heitzer 3,4 , M. Balic 1 1 Division of Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria 2 Research Unit Epigenetic and Genetic Cancer BiomarkersMedical University of Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria 3 Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BiomedicineMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria 4 Christian Doppler Laboratory for Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria Introduction Despite the substantial progress in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), there is still a significant proportion of patients with lower benefit from endocrine-based treatments. A meaningful proportion of these patients have HER2-low disease. As a subset of HER2-negative BC, they have traditionally been thought not to benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. However, recent studies involving HER2-low advanced BC patients have shown significant clinical benefits from HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) just based on the low expression of the HER2 protein. We performed a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based analysis of tumor fraction and mutational profiles to potentially identify different clinical behavior and therapeutic targets within these two groups. Material and Methods 113 plasma samples from 103 metastatic breast cancer patients (HR+/HER2-low, n=76; HR+/HER2-0, n=37) were collected either before starting 1 st line or 2 nd line treatment. Tumor fractions were assessed using an untargeted aneuploidy screening and expressed as zscores (mFAST-SeqS). The mutational landscape of ctDNA was established using a 77-gene panel (AVENIO ctDNA Expanded). Tumor fractions, the number of somatic variants and variant allele frequencies (VAF) were compared between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients. Results and Discussions HER2-low patients had significantly higher z-scores compared to HER2-0 patients (median 2.96 vs. 1.58, rank-sum p-value 0.023). In contrast, neither the highest nor the average VAF differed significantly between the two groups. While both groups presented with a median of 3 detected variants (HER2-low range: 1-20, HER2-0 range: 1-12), a significant difference was observed in the number of clonal variants between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients (median 2 vs. 3, rank-sum p-value 0.035). In contrast to previous reports, PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in HER2-0 patients (58.06%) compared to HER2-low patients (40%), whereas TP53 mutations were identified with 32.26% in HER2-0 and 26.67% in HER2-low patients. Conclusion Our results suggest a significant difference in the tumor fractions in plasma between HER2-0 and HER2-low in our patient cohort. Additionally, HER2-0 patients had a 18780261, 2024, S1, Downloaded from https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1878-0261.13683 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [12/08/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License