scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Updates from the MADICES (Machine-Actionable Data Interoperability for the Chemical Sciences) Workshop

Pearman-Kanza, Samantha

Abstract

Presentation by Dr Samantha Pearman-Kanza on: Updates from the MADICES (Machine-Actionable Data Interoperability for the Chemical Sciences) workshop at Ontolgies4Chem 2025. Abstract: In late October 2025, the MADICES 3 workshop brought together a diverse international community of researchers, developers, and practitioners to explore the complexities of interoperability across different aspects of the chemical sciences. This presentation will share key findings from the event, highlighting the discussions and practical activities that were undertaken to address these challenges, and reflect on the progress that has been made over the past three events.

Full text

https://www.psdi.ac.uk/ Updates from the MADICES (Machine-Actionable Data Interoperability for the Chemical Sciences) Workshop Ontologies4Chem 2025 11th November 2025 Dr Samantha Pearman-Kanza University of Southampton Introducing MADICES Core Themes Year Focus Area Key Themes 2022 Foundations • Historical challenges in chemical data archiving • Need for machine-actionable formats and FAIR principles • Barriers: lack of standards, metadata issues, long-term storage • The community needs clear standards, easy to use tools and integrations into existing tool chains • Report: https://madices.github.io/docs/2022/report 2024 Interoperability & Semantic Annotation • Platform-agnostic data exchange using JSON-LD and RO-Crate • Semantic annotation tools and ontology integration • Handling proprietary data formats and streaming • Early-stage annotation and vendor collaboration • Semantic meaning is KEY for reproducibility and open science acceleration • Report: https://madices.github.io/docs/2024/report 2025 Scaling & AI Integration • Education and outreach for semantic data • Best practices for Semantic Annotation • ELN Interoperability & Semantic Metadata • AI/LLM integration in lab workflows • FAIR instrument control and workflow schemas • Report: Coming Soon ELN Interoperability Introduction What is ELN Interoperability? The ability of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) to exchange, interpret, and reuse data across platforms and workflows. Supports FAIR principles: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable. Community Need Enables collaboration across institutions. Enhances reproducibility and long-term data stewardship. Reduces vendor lock-in and supports integration with broader research infrastructure. MADICES 2025 Goals: Define and formalize ELN interoperability use cases. Evaluate mechanisms like the .eln File Format and RO-Crate Schema Plus. Recommend future directions for semantic interoperability. “Electronic Lab Notebooks are great, but not on vacation” Cartoon by Phil Johnson for MIT. ELN Interoperability Use Cases Data Preservation Singular ELN Backup & Restore: Recover user data within the same ELN system. Whole ELN Backup & Restore: Restore entire ELN ecosystem after migration or failure. Data Migration Singular ELN Migration: Transfer user data to a different ELN with semantic mapping. Multiple ELN Migration: Institutional migration with complex structures and templates. Collaboration & Publishing Cross-platform ELN Collaboration: Share experiments across different ELNs. ELN Archiving for Publication: Preserve and publish ELN data alongside research outputs. Integration with External Systems Exchange ELN Data with Other Systems: Use ELN data in external workflows and archives. Instrument Workflow Integration: Automate data ingestion from instruments into ELNs. CC BY-ND 4.0 Errant Science - https://errantscience.com / Barriers & Challenges Diverse Data Models: ELNs vary in how they structure experiments, samples, and metadata, making consistent data exchange difficult. Semantic Annotation Gaps: Not all ELNs support ontologies or semantic schemas, limiting the ability to interpret and reuse data. Export/Import Limitations: Round-trip data exchange is often incomplete or lossy, especially when metadata is not preserved. Link Rot and External Dependencies: Referencing external ontologies or resources can lead to broken links and outdated references. However, incorporating entire ontology files can lead to bloated oversized files. Complex Data Structures: Nested and interlinked data objects are difficult to flatten and represent in standardised formats. Instrument Integration: Manual data handling from instruments is inefficient and error-prone, and integration often requires custom solutions. Ownership and Access Control: Managing permissions and ownership during data export/import adds complexity, especially across institutional boundaries. Scalability and Performance: Large ontologies and datasets can slow down processing and validation, requiring optimisation strategies. User Burden: Without automation and intuitive tools, users may struggle to curate, annotate, and share data effectively. Mechanisms & Approaches RO-Crate & RO-Crate Schema Plus: JSON-LD format for packaging research data with metadata. ELN File Format (Developed by the ELN Consortium to support standardized data packaging and exchange across eln platforms uses RO-Crate) Ontologies & SHACL: Modular ontologies and SHACL shapes enable validation and semantic consistency. Modularisation improves usability. API-Based Exchange: ELNs like elabFTW use APIs to resolve linked data. Machine-actionable links and self-describing data are key. Instrument Integration: SILA enables direct instrument-ELN interaction. FINALES acts as a broker for coordinated communication in large-scale projects. Cartoon created by ErrantScience.com for AI4SD: licensed under CC-BY-NC ELN Interoperability Recommendations Standardize Export Formats: Promote adoption of RO-Crate, RO-Crate Plus, and .eln profiles across ELNs. Develop Semantic Mappings: Agree on shared ontologies and schemas for metadata. Avoid passing internal ELN-specific data that lacks external meaning. Automate Instrument Workflows: Use standards like SILA to streamline data flow. Instruments should be able to send RO-Crates directly to ELNs with minimal manual steps. Create Demonstrators: Build proof-of-concept integrations to validate approaches. Examples include ingesting RO-Crates into platforms like OpenBIS [23] or DataLab [24]. Support API-Driven Interoperability: Ensure ELNs expose sufficient API endpoints for data access and manipulation. Consider access levels and ownership logic at import/export stages. Enable Self-Describing Data: Use semantic annotations and indexing algorithms to help systems follow relevant links and resolve references automatically. Cartoon created by ErrantScience.com for AI4SD: licensed under CC-BY-NC Semantic Annotation What is Semantic Annotation? Linking data to ontological concepts for machinereadable metadata. Supports FAIR principles: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable. Community Need Enhances data interoperability, discoverability, and reuse. Addresses challenges in scientific data integration and automation. MADICES 2025 Goals Provide guidance and best practices for semantic annotation. Identify and address key challenges in implementation and adoption. CC BY-ND 3.0 Dataedo - https://dataedo.com/cartoon/