Sagittula salina sp. nov., isolated from marine waste

1 Sagittula salina sp. nov., isolated from marinewaste LeilaSatari1, EstherMolinaMenor1, ÀngelaVidalVerdú1, JavierPascual2, JuliPeretó1,2,3 and ManuelPorcar1,2,* TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.005240 Author affiliations: 1Institute for Integrative Systems Biology I2SysBio, Universitat de ValènciaCSIC, Calle del Catedràtic Agustin Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain; 2Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence SL. Parc Científic Universitat de València, Calle del Catedràtic Agustin Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain; 3Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat de València, Calle del Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain. *Correspondence: Manuel Porcar, manuel. porcar@ csic. es; manuel. porcar@ uv. es; mporcar@ darwinbioprospecting. com Keywords: Sagittula; marine waste; new species; Rhodobacteraceae; Alphaproteobacteria. Abbreviations: ANIb, average nucleotide identity; dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization; MA, marine agar; MB, marine broth; ML, maximumlikelihood; NJ, neighbourjoining. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain M10.9XT has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MW785249. The genomic sequence of strain M10.9XT has been deposited under the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession number JAGISH000000000. Two supplementary tables and one supplementary figure are available with the online version of this article. 005240 © 2022 The Authors This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License. Abstract A novel Gramstainnegative, nonmotile, halophilic bacterium designated strain M10.9XT was isolated from the inner sediment of an aluminium can collected from the Mediterranean Sea (València, Spain). Cells of strain M10.9XT were rodshaped and occasionally formed aggregates. The strain was oxidasenegative and catalasepositive, and showed a slightly psychrophilic, neutrophilic and slightly halophilic metabolism. The phylogenetic analyses revealed that strain M10.9XT was closely related to Sagittula stellata E37T and Sagittula marina F0282T. The genomic G+C content of strain M10.9XT was 65.2 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values were 76.6 and 20.9 %, respectively, confirming its adscription to a new species within the genus Sagittula. The major cellular fatty acids were C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c and C16 : 0. The polar lipids consisted of phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid and an unidentified lipid. According to the resuts of a polyphasic study, strain M10.9XT represents a novel species of the genus Sagittula for which the name Sagittula salina sp. nov. (type strain M10.9XT=DSM 112301T=CECT 30307T) is proposed. The genus Sagittula was first described by González et al. in 1997 and reclassified within the Rhodobacteraceae family by Lee et al. in 2012 [1, 2]. At the time of writing, the genus Sagittula is composed of only two species: Sagittula stellata and Sagittula marina, both isolated from marine environments and promising strains with bioremediation capacities [1–3]. In the present research, we describe the polyphasic characterization of strain M10.9XT, which was isolated from the inner sediment of an aluminium can during the study on the microbial diversity of marine waste. Anthropic residue distributed worldwide represent a major environmental problem and constitute new ecological niches which may harbour potential new microbial species. Strain M10.9XT was isolated from the inner sediment of a can collected from Malvarosa beach, on the western Mediterranean Coast (València, Spain; 39° 27′ 48.3″ N 0° 19′ 07.6″ E), during a study of the microbial communities associated with marine waste residues [4]. The sediment was resuspended in PBS (1×, pH 7.4) and 50 µl was then spread on marine agar (MA; Laboratorios Conda S.A. Ref: 1059). The plates were incubated at 18 °C for a week. Strain isolation was carried out by restreaking on fresh media until pure cultures were obtained. Cell suspensions in marine broth (MB; Laboratorios Conda S.A. Ref: 1217) supplemented with 15 % glycerol (v/v) were cryopreserved at −80 °C. A polyphasic approach was followed in order to determine the taxonomic status of strain M10.9XT. After isolation, analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence in EzBioCloud revealed that S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T were closely related to strain M10.9XT. Therefore, these strains were selected as comparative strains. Unless otherwise specified, the reference strains S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T, from the DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Leibniz Institute, Braunschweig, Germany), and strain M10.9XT were grown simultaneously on MA medium at 30 °C. The phenotypic characterization of strain M10.9XT was carried out after a week of growth at 30 °C. The Gramstaining test was performed with KOH 3 % (w/v), recording viscosity as a positive result for Gramnegative bacteria [5, 6]. In order to test oxidase activity, a commercial oxidase test stick for microbiology (PanReac AppliChem) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. Hydrogen peroxide 30 % (v/v) was used to test catalase activity, by recording bubble formation as a positive result OPEN ACCESS 2 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 [5]. The motility of the strain was studied using the hangingdrop method [7]. Growth at different temperatures (4, 10, 16, 20, 24, 30, 37, 40 and 42 °C) and salt tolerance was checked on Zobell agar medium that contained the following ingredients (g l−1 in modified artificial seawater): Bacto peptone, 5; yeast extract,1; ferric citrate, 0.1; and Bacto agar, 15. The modified artificial seawater contained (g l−1): NaCl, 0–100; MgSO4 ·7H2O, 5.94; MgCl2 ·6H2O, 0.64; KCl, 4.53; and CaCl2, 1.3 [2]. Growth at different pH values (pH 5.0–10.0 at intervals of 0.5 pH units) was tested by culturing the strain in MB buffered with MES (pH 5.0–6.5), HEPES (7.0–8.5) and CHES (9.0–10.0) at a final concentration of 10 mM. The ability to grow under anaerobic conditions was determined with the BD GasPak EZ pouch system (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Growth under microaerophilic conditions was also tested using the BD GasPak EZ pouch system. Carbon source assimilation and enzymatic activities were assessed using API 20 NE and API ZYM strips (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, replacing saline solution 0.9 % with 3.5 % (w/v) sea salts solution (SigmaAldrich; Ref: S9883500G) for cell suspension preparation. GEN III MicroPlates (Biolog) were also used to test carbon source assimilation. For fatty acids analysis, strains M10.9XT, S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T were grown on MA at 30 °C for 48 h. The analysis was carried out following the protocol recommended by the midi Microbial Identification System (version 6.1) [8, 9]. Fatty acids were analysed on an Agilent 6850 gas chromatography system and using the TSBA6 method following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen) was used for genomic DNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s instructions but incubating at 65 °C after adding C1 reagent. Whole 16S rRNA gene PCR was carried out with universal primers 8F (5′- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG3′) [10] and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT3′) [11] following the protocol described by MolinaMenor et al. [12]. mega X software version 10.1.7 was used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The trees were reconstructed by the maximumlikelihood (ML) [13] and neighbourjoining (NJ) [14] methods. For the ML and the NJ trees, the T92+G+I evolutionary model and the Kimura twoparameter model were used, respectively. Bootstrap analysis was used in order to assess the reliability of the branch patterns based on 500 and 1000 replicates, respectively, for the ML and NJ trees [15]. The draft genome of strain M10.9XT was sequenced with an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system (2×150 bp pairedend sequencing). The genomic DNA was randomly fragmented by sonication. DNA fragments were then end polished, Atailed, and ligated with the fulllength adapters of Illumina sequencing. PCR amplification was carried out with P5 and indexed P7 oligos. An AMPure XP system was used to purify PCR products as the final construction of the libraries. The size distribution of the libraries was Fig. 1. Field emission scanning electron microscope image showing the general morphology of a cell of strain M10.9XT after growth in marine broth at 30 °C, 180 r.p.m. overnight. Size bar corresponds to 1 µm. 3 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 checked by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), and quantified by realtime PCR. The quality of the sequence reads was assessed with the FastQC tool (version 0.11.5) [16]. The ‘--isolate’ mode in SPAdes (version 3.14.1) [17] was used for genome assembly of paired reads. Assembly statistics were calculated with quast (version 5.0.2) [18]. Completeness and contamination levels were evaluated with CheckM (version 1.1.3) [19]. Genome annotation was carried out using the rast tool kit [20] integrated in patric version 3.6.8. In order to identify the closest type strains of strain M10.9XT and to calculate the dDDH genomic index, the draft genome was uploaded to TYGS [21]. Average nucleotide identity (ANIb) values were calculated with JSpecies [22] according to blast between genome pairs. The phylogenomic tree reconstruction based on a multiple alignment of a set of 92 housekeeping genes was conducted with UBCG (version 3.0) [23]. FastTree was used to infer the phylogenetic relationships. The reliability of the branch patterns was assessed using bootstrap analysis based on 100 replicates as well as with gene support indices. The morphological characteristics of strain M10.9XT were analysed through scanning electron microscopy. A fresh overnight culture of strain M10.9XT in MB was centrifuged and cells were fixed by resuspending them in 1 ml Karnovsky’s fixative (2 % paraformaldehyde, 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer; pH 7.4) overnight. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 7500 r.p.m. and washed with sterile deionized water and a series of ethanol solutions (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100 %; Pan Reac, AppliChem). Samples were filtered through a polycarbonate membrane filter with a 0.1 µm pore size (FilterLab PC; MPC0010013N) and incubated for 48 h in a desiccator prior to embedding them in resin using carbon tape. Sputtering was done using gold/palladium particles and samples were examined under the field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S4800; at SCSIE, University of Valencia). Cells of strain M10.9X T were aerobic, oxidasenegative, catalasepositive, Gramstainnegative, nonmotile, rodshaped (approximately 0.5 µm in diameter and 1.0–2.0 µm in length), exhibited polarity (Fig.1), and occasionally aggregated. Colonies on MA Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics between strain M10.9XT and other members of the genus Sagittula Strains: 1, M10.9XT; 2, S. marina DSM 102235T; 3, S. stellata DSM 11524T. Data for reference strains were analysed in parallel in the present study. +, Positive; −, negative. All strains are positive for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), leucine arylamidase, esterase lipase (C8), valine arylamidase and naphtholASBIphosphydrolase, dglucose, dmannose, dmannitol, maltose, potassium gluconate and malic acid. All strains are negative for lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotripsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-manosidase, α-fucosidase, nitrate reduction and indole production. Characteristic 1 2 3 Source Inner sediment of aluminium can Sea water Coastal environment G+C content (mol%) 65.2 61.6 65.0 Growth at/in: Temperature range (°C) 16–37 16–37 16–40 pH range 5.5–9.0 5.5–9.0 6.5–9.0 Salt tolerance (%, w/v) 1.0–5.0 1.0–8.0 1.0–8.0 Carbon source utilization (API 20NE): lArabinose + − − NAcetylglucosamine + + − Adipic acid + + − Phenylacetic acid − + + Enzymatic activity (API 20NE): Urease − − + Gelatin − + + Enzymatic activity (API ZYM): Acid phosphatase − + + α-Glucosidase − − + β-Glucosidase − − + NAcetyl-β-glucosaminidase + − − 4 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 medium were light cream, circular, convex, had entire margins, smooth and displayed a diameter of 1–2 mm after 5 days of incubation at 30 °C. Strain M10.9XT was able to grow between 16 and 37 °C (optimum at 30 °C) and showed NaCl tolerance up to 5.0 % (w/v). Strain M10.9XT was not able to grow on the media without salt. This strain can, therefore, be considered as halophilic based on the salt requirement shown for optimum growth [24, 25], which is in accordance with the data reported for other species within this genus. Strain M10.9XT was able to grow at pH 5.5–9.0 (optimum at pH 6.0–7.5). Strain M10.9X T was negative for acid phosphatase and gelatin hydrolysis, in contrast to S. stellata DSM 11524 T and S. marina DSM 102235T, which were positive for these activities. Moreover, strain M10.9XT was positive for Nacetyl-β-glucosaminidase, whereas S. stellata DSM 11524 T and S. marina DSM 102235 T showed a negative response to it. In contrast to strains M10.9X T and S. marina DSM 102235T, S. stellata DSM 11524T showed a positive response to urease, αand β-glucosidase. In API 20 NE strips, all three strains were able to assimilate dglucose, dmannose, dmannitol, maltose, potassium gluconate and malic acid. All three strains were negative for the assimilation of capric acid and trisodium citrate. The utilization of larabinose was only positive for strain M10.9XT, while Nacetylglucosamine and adipic acid were utilized by strain M10.9XT and S. marina DSM 102235T. Moreover, strain M10.9XT could not assimilate phenylacetic acid (Table1). Biolog GENIII MicroPlates revealed that strain M10.9XT was able to oxidize 48 carbon sources after 72 h, in contrast to strains S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T, which were able to oxidize 67 and 69 carbon sources, respectively (Table S1, available in the online version of this article). This suggests that S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T display a more polytrophic metabolism than strain M10.9XT. Fig. 2. Maximumlikelihood phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between strain M10.9XT and other members of the family Rhodobacteraceae based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The evolutionary model of nucleotide substitution used was the T92+G+I model. Numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap percentages based on 500 replicates (values below 50 % are not indicated). Scale bar, 0.020 substitutions per nucleotide position. Rhodobacter capsulatus ATCC 11166T (NR_043407.1) was used as an outgroup. 5 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 The almostcomplete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1410 bp) of strain M10.9X T was obtained and deposited in the DDBJ/ ENA/GenBank under the accession number MW785249. According to EzBioCloud database (www.ezbiocloud.net), the closest type strains to strain M10.9XT were Sagittula stellata E37T, Maliponia aquimaris CECT 8898T, Mameliella alba DSM 26384 T , Ponticoccus litoralis CLGR66 T and Sagittula marina F0282 T with 97.81, 97.74, 97.37, 96.34 and 96.22 % of similarity, respectively. The phylogenetic trees based on the ML and NJ methods showed that strain M10.9X T was closely related to S. stellata E37 T (Fig.2 and S1). Although the relationship between the reference strains and S. marina DSM 102235T was not supported by high bootstrap values due to the low resolution of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, the phylogenomic inference confirmed the inclusion of strain M10.9XT within the clade of Sagittula (Fig.3). The draft genome of strain M10.9X T consisted of 147 contigs (4 800 470 bp total length). The genomic G+C content was 65.2 mol%. There were 4717 predicted coding sequences, of which 3189 were predicted as proteins with functional assignments. The completeness value and contamination level of the draft genome were 99.7 and 1.3 %, respectively. This contamination value is low enough to consider the draft genome for further analysis. The strain M10.9XT 16S rRNA gene sequence was checked by using the blast tool (blastn) integrated in patric version 3.6.12 and compared with the 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieved from the complete genome sequence; the result was 100 % similarity. The phylogenetic trees based on the ML and NJ methods showed that strain M10.9XT was closely related to S. stellata E37T (Fig.2 and S1). The 16S rRNA gene based phylogenetic inference revealed that the genus Sagittula did not form a monophyletic group, independently from the algorithm used, as S. marina showed a paraphyletic position in both ML and NJ trees. Although the relationship between the reference strains and S. marina DSM 102235T was not supported by high bootstrap values due to the low resolution of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, the phylogenomic inference confirmed the inclusion of strain M10.9XT within the clade of Sagittula (Fig.3). A phylogenomic tree based on a set of 92 housekeeping gene sequences was reconstructed in order to obtain a more accurate phylogenetic inference of strain M10.9XT. Strain M10.9XT clustered with S. marina DSM 102235T. All three Sagittula strains formed a monophyletic group, which was supported by high bootstrap and Gamma distribution with Invariant sites (G+I) values. Fig. 3. Phylogenomic tree showing the position of strain M10.9XT among other members of the family Rhodobacteraceae based on a multiple alignment of a set of 92 housekeeping genes. Bootstrap analysis was carried out based on 100 replicates. Gene support indices (max. value: 92) and percentage bootstrap values (max. value: 100) are given at nodes. Scale bar shows 0.050 substitutions per site. Rhodobacter capsulatus DSM 1710T was considered as an outgroup. 6 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 The dDDH and ANIb values between strain M10.9XT and other type strains of the genus Sagittula were compared (Table 2). The dDDH values of strain M10.9XT against S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T were 20.9 and 20.2 %. The ANIb values of strain M10.9XT against S. stellata DSM 11524T and S. marina DSM 102235T were 76.6, and 75.6 %, respectively. These values are in accordance with the threshold established to consider strain M10.9XT as a new species, which are 70 % [26] and 95 % [27], respectively, for dDDH and ANIb. Analysis of polar lipids for strain M10.9XT was carried out by the Identification Service, DSMZGerman Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Leibniz Institute, Germany). Strain M10.9XT was able to synthesize phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid and an unidentified lipid. The polar lipid profile of strain M10.9XT is in accordance with the data previously reported by Lee et al. [2] for S. marina F0282T, which was also able to synthesize phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified aminolipids, an unidentified phospholipid and six unidentified lipids. The major fatty acid of strain M10.9XT was summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c; 84.4 %). Moreover, there was also a large amount of C16 : 0 (11.1 %). This is in accordance with the profiles displayed by other species within the genus Sagittula, which were also dominated by summed feature 8 and C16 : 0 (Table2). This result supports the adscription of strain M10.9XT to the genus Sagittula. According to the results of the phenotypic, genomic, and phylogenetic analyses carried out in the present study, there is evidence to support the inclusion of strain M10.9XT as a new member of the genus Sagittula, for which the name Sagittula salina sp. nov. is proposed. DESCRIPTION OF SAGITTULA SALINA SP. NOV. Sagittula salina ( sa. li’na. N.L. fem. adj. salina, salty, referring to the marine environment from which the strain was isolated). Colonies are light cream, circular, convex, entire, smooth and 1–2 mm in diameter after 5 days of incubation at 30 °C. Cells are Gramstainnegative, nonmotile, rodshaped (approximately 0.5 µm in diameter and 1.0–2.0 µm in length), exhibit polarity and occasionally aggregate. This species grows under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions, but no growth is observed in anaerobiosis. Growth occurs at 16–37 °C (optimum, 30 °C), pH 5.5–9.0 (optimum, pH 6.0–7.5), and tolerates 1.0–5.0 % (w/v) NaCl. Alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), leucine arylamidase, esterase lipase (C8), valine arylamidase, naphtholASBIphosphydrolase, Nacetyl-β-glucosaminidase and aesculin hydrolysis are detected. Lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotripsin, acid phosphatase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-manosidase, α-fucosidase, nitrate reduction, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolysis, aesculin hydrolysis, gelatinase and urease are not detected. In API 20 NE tests, positive for the assimilation of dglucose, dmannose, dmannitol, Nacetylglucosamine, maltose, potassium gluconate, malic acid, larabinose and adipic acid; and negative for the assimilation of capric acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid. Using Biolog GENIII MicroPlates, positive for the utilization of raffinose, αdglucose, pectin, Table 2. Fatty acid analysis (%) of strain M10.9XT and the strains of the genus Sagittula Strains: 1, M10.9XT; 2, S. marina DSM 102235T; 3, S. stellata DSM 11524T. tr, <1.0 %; –, not detected. Summed feature 3 was tr for all the strains. Fatty acid 1 2 3 Saturated C16 : 0 11.11 7.26 12.65 C18 : 0 1.34 1.67 2.16 C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c– – 5.57 Unsaturated C18 : 1 ω7c 11methyl – 4.67 3.42 Hydroxylated C12 : 0 2OH – tr tr C12 : 1 3OH 2.45 3.32 3.27 Summed features* 8 84.37 81.67 71.96 *Groups of fatty acids that cannot be resolved reliably from another fatty acid by the chromatographic system were labelled as ‘summed features'. Summed feature 3 corresponds to C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c. Summed feature 8 corresponds to C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c. 7 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 dmannose, dmannitol, dgalacturonic acid, methyl pyruvate, γ-aminobutyric acid, maltose, dfructose, darabitol, lalanine, lgalactonic acid lactone, dlactic acid methyl ester, α-hydroxybutyric acid, trehalose, methyl βdglucoside, dgalactose, myoinositol, larginine, dgluconic acid, llactic acid, β-hydroxy-d,lbutyric acid, cellobiose, dsalicin, 3methyldglucoside, glycerol, dglucuronic acid, gentiobiose, Nacetyldglucosamine, dfucose, dglucose6PO4, glucuronamide, α-ketoglutaric acid, sucrose, Nacetyl-βdmannosamine, lfucose, dfructose6PO 4 , dmalic acid, propionic acid, turanose, lrhamnose, quinic acid, lmalic acid, inosine, lserine, dsaccharic acid and bromosuccinic acid; and negative for the utilization of dsorbitol, gelatin, phydroxyphenylacetic acid, Tween 40, dextrin, lactose, glycyllproline, melibiose, laspartic acid, citric acid, α-ketobutyric acid, lglutamic acid, acetoacetic acid, lhistidine, mucic acid, Nacetyldgalactosamine, daspartic acid, lpyroglutamic acid, acetic acid, stachyose, Nacetyl neuraminic acid, dserine and formic acid. The major cellular fatty acids are C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c and C 16 : 0 . The polar lipids consist of phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified aminolipid, an unidentified glycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid and an unidentified lipid. The type strain, M10.9XT (DSM 112301T=CECT 30307T), was isolated from the inner sediment of an aluminium can collected from the western Mediterranean coast (Malvarosa beach, València, Spain). The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 65.2 mol%. Funding information This manuscript was financially supported by the EU funded project Micro4Biogas (FNR122020 (RIA), Project ID 101000470) and the Spanish Government on SETH Project (Reference: RTI2018095584BC41424344 cofinanced by FEDER funds and Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades). LS is funded by European project BIOROBOOST. EMM and ÀVV are recipients of a Formación del Profesorado Universitario (FPU) grant with references FPU17/04184 and FPU18/02578, respectively, from the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain). Acknowledgements We acknowledge Adriel Latorre from Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence for his help with the genomic analysis. We acknowledge Prof. Dr. Aharon Oren from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for his advice with the name of the species Author contributions À.V.V., E.M.M. and M.P. carried out the sampling. L.S., E.M.M. and À.V.V. performed the experimental procedures. J.Pa., supervised the experimental work and the bioinformatic analysis. L.S., E.M.M., À.V.V., J.Pa., J.Pe. and M.P. analysed the results as well as wrote and approved the manuscript. Conflicts of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. References 1. Gonzalez JM, Mayer F, Moran MA, Hodson RE, Whitman WB. Sagittula stellata gen. nov., sp. nov., a lignintransforming bacterium from a coastal environment. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997;47:773–780. 2. Lee DH, Cho SJ, Kim SM, Lee SB. Sagittula marina sp. nov., isolated from seawater and emended description of the genus Sagittula. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013;63:2101–2107. 3. Frank AM, Chua MJ, Gulvik CA, Buchan A. Functional redundancy in the hydroxycinnamate catabolism pathways of the salt marsh bacterium Sagittula stellata E37. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018;84:e0202718. 4. VidalVerdú À, LatorrePérez A, MolinaMenor E, Baixeras J, Peretó J, etal. Living in a bottle: bacteria from sedimentassociated mediterranean waste and potential growth on polyethylene terephthalate (petpet). MicrobiologyOpen 2021;1:e1259. 5. Tanner K, Mancuso CP, Peretó J, Khalil AS, Vilanova C, etal. Sphingomonas solaris sp. nov., isolated from a solar panel in Boston, Massachusetts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020;70:1814–1821. 6. Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Szostak MP, Spergser J. Entomomonas asaccharolytica sp. nov., isolated from Acheta domesticus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021;71. 7. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002;52:1049–1070. 8. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark: DE: MIDI; 1990. 9. MIDI. Sherlock Microbial Identification System Operating Manual, version 6.1. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 2008. 10. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M, Böttger EC. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1989;17:7843–7853. 11. Stackebrandt E, Liesack W. Nucleic acids and classification. In: Goodfellow M and O’Donnell AG (eds). Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics. London: Academic Press; 1993. pp. 152–189. 12. MolinaMenor E, GimenoValero H, Pascual J, Peretó J, Porcar M. High culturable bacterial diversity from a European desert: the Tabernas desert. Front Microbiol 2020;11:3253. 13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17:368–376. 14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighborjoining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425. 15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783–791. 16. Andrews S. FastQC. UK: Babraham Institute, . https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ 17. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to singlecell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19:455–477. 18. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013;29:1072–1075. 19. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015;25:1043–1055. 20. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, etal. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015;5:1–6. 21. MeierKolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated highthroughput platform for stateoftheart genomebased taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019;10:1–10. 22. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016;32:929–931. 8 Satari etal., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2022;72:005240 23. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I, etal. UBCG: Uptodate bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018;56:280–285. 24. Amoozegar MA, Safarpour A, Noghabi KA, Bakhtiary T, Ventosa A. Halophiles and their vast potential in biofuel production. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1895. 25. Kushner DJ. Life in high salt and solute concentrations: halophilic bacteria. In: Kushner DJ (eds). Microbial Life in Extreme Environments. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press, Ltd; 1978. pp. 317–336. 26. MeierKolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequencebased species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:1–14. 27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126–19131. Five reasons to publish your next article with a Microbiology Society journal 1. The Microbiology Society is a not-for-profit organization. 2. We offer fast and rigorous peer review – average time to first decision is 4–6 weeks. 3. Our journals have a global readership with subscriptions held in research institutions around the world. 4. 80% of our authors rate our submission process as ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’. 5. Your article will be published on an interactive journal platform with advanced metrics. Find out more and submit your article at microbiologyresearch.org.