Linking human resources practices to employee engagement in the hospitality industry: The mediating influences of psychological safety, availability and meaningfulness

Rabiul, Md Ka im; Ahmad Edwin Mohamed; A aul Ka im Pa wa y; Tan Fee Yean; Si i Zai un Osman A icle Linking human esou ces p ac ices o employee engagemen in he hospi ali y indus y: The media ing in luences o psychological sa e y, a ailabili y and meaning ulness Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics (EJM&BE) P o ided in Coope a ion wi h: Eu opean Academy o Managemen and Business Economics (AEDEM), Vigo (Pon e ed a) Sugges ed Ci a ion: Rabiul, Md Ka im; Ahmad Edwin Mohamed; A aul Ka im Pa wa y; Tan Fee Yean; Si i Zai un Osman (2023) : Linking human esou ces p ac ices o employee engagemen in he hospi ali y indus y: The media ing in luences o psychological sa e y, a ailabili y and meaning ulness, Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics (EJM&BE), ISSN 2444-8451, Eme ald, Leeds, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, pp. 223-240, h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/EJMBE-12-2020-0347 This Ve sion is a ailable a : h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/325534 S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen: Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den. Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen. So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen (insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en, gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e. Te ms o use: Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal and schola ly pu poses. You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public. I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence. h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/ Linking human esou ces p ac ices o employee engagemen in he hospi ali y indus y: he media ing in luences o psychological sa e y, a ailabili y and meaning ulness Md Ka im Rabiul Facul y o Hospi ali y and Tou ism, P ince o Songkla Uni e si y –Phuke Campus, Phuke , Thailand Ahmad Edwin Mohamed School o Tou ism, Hospi ali y and E en Managemen , Uni e si i U a a Malaysia, Sin ok, Malaysia A aul Ka im Pa wa y Facul y o Hospi ali y, Tou ism and Wellness, Uni e si i Malaysia Kelan an, Ko a Bha u, Malaysia Tan Fee Yean School o Business Managemen , Uni e si i U a a Malaysia, Sin ok, Malaysia, and Si i Zai un Osman Adminis a i e Science and Policy S udies, Uni e si i Teknologi MARA, Melaka, Malaysia Abs ac Pu pose –D awing on sel -concep heo y, his s udy e alua es he media ing e ec s o employees’ psychological s a es on he ela ionship be ween human esou ces (HR) p ac ices and employee engagemen . Design/me hodology/app oach –Th ough andom sampling, 434 cus ome -con ac on line employees om i e-s a ho els in Malaysia pa icipa ed in he c oss-sec ional su ey. Findings –The esul s p oduced by he Sma -PLS (pa ial leas squa es) indica e ha HR p ac ices posi i ely and signi ican ly in luence employees’psychological s a es o sa e y, meaning ulness and a ailabili y. All hese psychological s a es also exe posi i e in luences on employee engagemen (o ganisa ional and wo k engagemen ). Sa e y and a ailabili y media e he links be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen , bu no meaning ulness. P ac ical implica ions –HR p ac ices and employees’psychological s a es a e necessa y in ensu ing posi i e employee ou comes and imp o ing cus ome se ice p o ision. O iginali y/ alue –The indings con ibu e o he u he ex ension o sel -concep heo y and employee engagemen by inco po a ing he media ing oles o employees’psychological s a es in he ela ionships be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen . Keywo ds Human esou ce p ac ices, Meaning ulness, Sa e y, A ailabili y, Wo k engagemen , O ganisa ional engagemen Pape ype Resea ch pape Linking human esou ces p ac ices 223 © Md Ka im Rabiul, Ahmad Edwin Mohamed, A aul Ka im Pa wa y, Tan Fee Yean and Si i Zai un Osman. Published in Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics. Published by Eme ald Publishing Limi ed. This a icle is published unde he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may ep oduce, dis ibu e, ansla e and c ea e de i a i e wo ks o his a icle ( o bo h comme cial and non-comme cial pu poses), subjec o ull a ibu ion o he o iginal publica ion and au ho s. The ull e ms o his licence may be seen a h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licences/by/4.0/legalcode The cu en issue and ull ex a chi e o his jou nal is a ailable on Eme ald Insigh a : h ps://www.eme ald.com/insigh /2444-8494.h m Recei ed 7 Decembe 2020 Re ised 31 May 2021 12 Augus 2021 Accep ed 21 Oc obe 2021 Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics Vol. 32 No. 2, 2023 pp. 223-240 Eme ald Publishing Limi ed e-ISSN: 2444-8494 p-ISSN: 2444-8451 DOI 10.1108/EJMBE-12-2020-0347 In oduc ion Highly engaged employees o en esul in educed u no e in en ion, be e cus ome se ice deli e y, imp o ed inancial pe o mance, dec eased job s ess and inc eased psychological well-being (Ha e e al., 2020;Memon e al., 2020). Despi e he impo ance o employee engagemen , only 15% o employees a e engaged wo ldwide (Ha e and Rubens ein, 2020), including 19% in Sou heas Asia coun ies such as Malaysia (Gallup, 2017). The hospi ali y indus y in Malaysia con ibu es o he coun y’s g oss domes ic p oduc consis en ly: i was he hi d la ges in o eign e enue ea nings wi h 86.1bn in 2019 (The S a , 2019;T ading Economics, 2020). As such, i is impe a i e o ocus on inc easing employee engagemen , especially among on line cus ome -con ac employees who signi ican ly a ec he success o he ho el indus y owing o hei di ec and equen in e ac ions wi h cus ome s (Rabiul e al., 2021;Rabiul and Yean, 2021). To inc ease employee engagemen , s udies ha e shown ha human esou ce (HR) p ac ices and employees’psychological s a es play signi ican oles (Al es e al., 2020;Guan and F enkel, 2018;Memon e al., 2020;Zhang e al., 2018). Se e al s udies ha e iden i ied ha HR p ac ices in luence employee engagemen using di e en media ing mechanisms such as psychological empowe men , o ganisa ional commi men , job sa is ac ion and psychological capi al (Ak a and Pangil, 2018;Huang e al., 2017;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). Al hough hese s udies con ibu ed o he employee engagemen li e a u e, a ew gaps emain unexplo ed. Fi s , he exis ing s udies ailed o sys ema ically in es iga e he e ec s o HR p ac ices on employees’psychological s a es (meaning ulness, sa e y, a ailabili y) which lead o g ea e employee engagemen . Al hough di e en psychological s a es exis (e.g. Hyland, 1990: Kahn, 1990;Rabiul e al., 2021) in he li e a u e, we in es iga e Kahn’s (1990) h ee psychological s a es as media o s be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen . Kahn (1990) showed he impo ance o psychological s a es by s a ing, “people employ and exp ess o wi hd aw and de end hei p e e ed sel es on he basis o hei psychological expe iences o sel -in- ole”(p. 702). Mo eo e , p io s udies claimed ha psychological s a es o meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y a e he unde lying mechanisms o inc ease posi i e ou comes among employees (Basi , 2017;Chen e al., 2016a;Fle che , 2016;Wang e al., 2019). Sel -concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012;Rabiul e al., 2021) sugges s ha indi iduals will gene a e posi i e eeling in he wo kplace when hey ecei e he necessa y suppo om o ganisa ions. As such, when HR p ac ices om he o ganisa ions a e a ailable, employees will expe ience posi i e psychological s a es o a ailabili y, sa e y and meaning ulness o wo k. Consequen ly, employees will exp ess posi i e a i udes owa ds hei wo k oles (wo k engagemen ) and o ganisa ions (o ganisa ional engagemen ). Second, ea lie s udies ocussed p ima ily on inc easing employees’wo k engagemen (Guan and F enkel, 2018;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019;Memon e al., 2020;Zhang e al., 2018), while igno ing o ganisa ional engagemen (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019). As employees need o pe o m mul iple oles in he o ganisa ion, bo h o ganisa ional and wo k engagemen s a e impo an (Saks, 2006,2017). Acco ding o Saks (2017), wo k engagemen is “ he ela ionship be ween an employee and his o he job’and o ganisa ional engagemen is an ‘indi idual’s’ ole, esponsibili y, and asks associa ed wi h one’s membe ship in an o ganisa ion”(p. 79). Limi ed s udies (e.g. May e al., 2004) ha e examined h ee psychological s a es oge he o unde s and he impo ance o hese s a es in engaging employees a wo k. The e o e, delinea ing on sel -concep heo y (Rabiul e al., 2021), he p esen esea ch examines he media ing e ec s o an employee’s pe cei ed psychological s a es (e.g. meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y) on he ela ionship be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen (wo k and o ganisa ional engagemen ) in he ho el indus y in Malaysia. This s udy adds alue o he li e a u e in wo ways. Fi s , i en iches sel -concep heo y and employee engagemen by in es iga ing he media ing in luence o employees’ h ee EJMBE 32,2 224 psychological s a es be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen . Second, he indings con ibu e o he hospi ali y li e a u e on engaging employees h ough good HR p ac ices and imp o ing employees’psychological eeling o meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y a one’s wo kplace. Li e a u e e iew Employee engagemen Kahn was he i s schola who in oduced he e m “wo k engagemen ”in 1990 (May e al., 2004;Saks, 2006). Acco ding o Kahn (1990),pe sonal engagemen o employee engagemen was de ined as “ he simul aneous employmen and exp ession o a pe son’s‘p e e ed sel ’in he ask beha iou s ha p omo e engagemen o wo k and o o he s, pe sonal p esence (physical, cogni i e, and emo ional), and ac i e, ull ole pe o mance”(p. 700). Since hen, employee engagemen has a ac ed he a en ion o many business o ganisa ions and academicians. Building on he ideas o Kahn (1990),Saks (2006) iden i ied wo ypes o pe sonal engagemen : job engagemen and o ganisa ional engagemen . Simila ly, Schau eli and Salano a (2011) s a ed ha “employee engagemen is a b oade concep and may also include he ela ionship wi h he employee’s p o essional o occupa ional ole and wi h his o he o ganisa ion”(p. 40). Ne e heless, his s udy p e e s o use wo k engagemen , which some called job engagemen (Saks, 2006) o wo k engagemen (Schau eli and Salano a, 2011), while Saks (2017) used he e ms in e changeably. Wo k engagemen e e s o “a posi i e, ul illing wo k- ela ed s a e o mind ha is cha ac e ised by igou , dedica ion, and abso p ion”(Schau eli e al., 2006, p. 702). Vigou explains abou indi iduals’high-le el men al esilience and physical ene gy o pe o m he wo k ole e en in di icul ies (Dolla d and Bakke , 2010;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). Dedica ion e e s o indi iduals’a ec i e belie in wo k ole whe e hey expe ience he sense o p ide, en husiasm, challenge and signi icance (Rabiul and Yean, 2021;Schau eli and Salano a, 2011). Abso p ion, on he o he hand, is abou a pe asi e and pe sis en s a e o mind conce ning one’s wo k ole and he inabili y o de ach om i (Bakke and Deme ou i, 2017). O ganisa ional engagemen e e s o an indi idual’s“ ole, esponsibili y, and asks associa ed wi h one’s membe ship in an o ganisa ion”(Saks, 2017, p. 79). Speci ically, i desc ibes he ex en o which an employee engages in ac i i ies ha a e mo e ela ed o o ganisa ional ac i i ies bu no he wo k ole (Saks, 2006;Schau eli and Salano a, 2011). In o he wo ds, o ganisa ional engagemen occu s due o employees’sa is ac ion, en husiasm and commi men o he o ganisa ion (Kim and Koo, 2017). HR p ac ices Two well-known HR p ac ices included in he managemen li e a u e a e called “so ”and “ha d”p ac ices (C egan e al., 2021;Jensen e al., 2011;Mu huku, 2020). Con ol-o ien ed o “ha d”HR p ac ices concen a e on con olling employees h ough he applica ion o p ocedu es and ules (C egan e al., 2021;Gould-Williams and Da ies, 2005;Jensen e al., 2011). So HR o commi men -o ien ed p ac ices, on he o he hand, ocus on inc easing employees’mo i a ion and de eloping s ong commi men owa ds o ganisa ions (Ak a and Pangil, 2018;Joha i e al., 2013;Gu lek and Uygu , 2021). So HR p ac ices p o ide high quali y and lexible wo k pe o mance by in ol ing employees in he decision-making p ocess, building us in hei manage s and exp essing conce ns o employees (El ehail e al., 2020;Gu lek and Uygu , 2021;Mowb ay e al., 2020). Gi en he na u e o he wo k en i onmen in he ho el indus y, he combina ion o bo h so and ha d HR p ac ices may be mo e e ec i e o engage employees in wo ks a he han u ilising hem sepa a ely. Linking human esou ces p ac ices 225 Mo eo e , he collec i e e o s o HR p ac ices will augmen he e ec s on employees’ psychological s a es, which hen inc eases wo k engagemen (Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019; Klou sinio is and Mihail, 2020). Howe e , he e is no uni e sal speci ic se o HR p ac ices ha a e sui able o e e y o ganisa ion (Klou sinio is and Mihail, 2020). Thus, his s udy p oposes ha so HR p ac ices could imp o e he psychological s a es o employees and os e g ea e wo k and o ganisa ional engagemen (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017;Basi , 2017;Chen e al., 2016a; El ehail e al., 2020;Gu lek and Uygu , 2021). HR p ac ices (e.g. aining and de elopmen , employee pa icipa ion, ewa ds and cogni ion, ca ee ad ancemen , app aisal sys em, job secu i y, ec ui men p ocess and eamwo k) a e i al o employees’g ow h (e.g. Al es e al., 2020;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019;Mowb ay e al., 2020;Mu phy e al., 2018). HR p ac ices and psychological s a es Acco ding o Saks and G uman (2014), psychological meaning ulness “in ol es he ex en o which people de i e meaning om hei wo k and eel ha hey a e ecei ing a e u n on in es men s o sel in he pe o mance o hei ole”(p. 160). I e e s o indi iduals’ expe iences a wo k ha a e meaning ul, aluable and wo hwhile (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;Kahn, 1990). In gene al, indi iduals judge hemsel es by hei job and hei e o s (Edmondson, 1999;S ege e al., 2013). Wo k becomes meaning ul once i acili a es indi iduals o achie e one o mo e elemen s o meaning, which ma ches he pu pose o he indi idual such as pe sonal g ow h, sel - ealisa ion, challenge, au onomy o compe ence (Edmondson and Lei, 2014;Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;Kahn, 1990). The HR p ac ices conside ed in his s udy a e ela ed o psychological meaning ulness. Fo example, aining helps employees o de elop necessa y skills o u he hei ca ee de elopmen (den Ha og e al., 2013). O he aspec s, including employee pa icipa ion in decision-making, a e ela ed o sel - alue; job secu i y ensu es ca ee s abili y; and ec ui men is ela ed o sel - ealisa ion (den Ha og e al., 2013;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). App aisal, ewa d and ecogni ion a e ela ed o inc eased social and socio-economic s a us, which could be psychologically meaning ul (El ehail e al., 2020). Teamwo k also could enhance meaning ulness because o he collegiali y among he eam membe s and all a e ha ing simila pu pose. In sum, combined HR p ac ices migh make employees o eel digni y and espec o hei wo k which would likely gene a e meaning ulness. This is sugges ed by sel -concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012;Shami e al., 1993) which posi s ha indi iduals ha e a sense o expe ience o posi i e sel -concep (meaning ul wo k) due o ha ing o ganisa ional suppo s (HR p ac ices). Thus, we p oposed: H1. HR p ac ices posi i ely and signi ican ly in luence employees’psychological meaning ulness. Kahn (1990) de ined psychological sa e y is “as eeling able o show and employ one’s sel wi hou ea o nega i e consequences o sel -image, s a us, o ca ee ”(p. 708). I e e s o a suppo i e, open and us wo hy wo k en i onmen whe e employees eel sa e o ake isks and make i ial e o s wi hou ea o se e e punishmen (Rabiul e al., 2021;Lyu, 2016). This also means ha employees who exp ess hei iews openly o hei supe io s will no eel h ea ened wi h ad e se consequences (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017;Dolla d and Bakke , 2010;Edmondson, 1999). A psychologically sa e en i onmen will no a ec employees’ ca ee s, sel -image o s a us in ha m ul ways (Lyu, 2016). HR p ac ices (job secu i y, aining, app aisal, ewa ds, ec ui men and eamwo k) c ea e a suppo i e wo k en i onmen and emo e insecu i ies and anxie ies (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017;Edmondson, 1999). Some schola s in hei me a-analyses (e.g. Ca meli and Gi ell, 2009;F azie e al., 2017) e eal ha collec i e app op ia e HR p ac ices (e.g. app aisal, EJMBE 32,2 226 job secu i y, aining, ewa ds, ec ui men , eamwo k and pa icipa ion) gene a e a sense o psychological sa e y a wo k by building ela ionships wi h employees. Fo example, h ough pa icipa ion, employees can oice hei opinions conce ning u u e g ow h and ca ee de elopmen oppo uni ies o hei supe io s (Mowb ay e al., 2020). All employees eel sa e a wo k due o collec i e HR p ac ices ( aining, ec ui men p ocess and eamwo k) ha help employees o ocus on collec i e goals and a oid con lic (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017; Ca meli and Gi ell, 2009;F azie e al., 2017). Edmondson and Lei (2014) claim ha employees will ha e a sense o secu i y and es ablish posi i e ela ionships wi h hei employe s when hei pe sonal in e es s and u u e ca ee de elopmen a e adequa ely add essed. Posi i e a i udes owa ds HR p ac ices gene a e psychological sa e y ha leads o pe sonal g ow h and de elopmen (Edmondson, 1999). All hese HR p ac ices gene a e psychological sa e y in di e en ways which is consis en wi h sel -concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012). The e o e, i is p oposed: H2. HR p ac ices posi i ely and signi ican ly in luence employees’psychological sa e y a he wo kplace. Kahn (1990) de ined psychological a ailabili y as “indi iduals’sense o ha ing he physical, emo ional, o psychological esou ces o pe sonally engage in a pa icula momen ”(p. 714). May e al. (2004) u he desc ibe psychological a ailabili y as a pe sons’abili y o pe o m wo k wi h cogni i e, emo ional and physical engagemen . Posi i e suppo s om o ganisa ions such as aining, ca ee de elopmen oppo uni y, job secu i y, app aisal, ewa ds and ecogni ions and ai ec ui men p ocess will de elop sel -concep ha makes employees become con iden o pe o ming hei wo k a any gi en si ua ion (Gu lek and Uygu , 2021;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). HR p ac ices play bo h an ex insic and an in insic mo i a ional ole because hey help employees g ow ac i ely by de eloping hei skills and con idence, which makes hem mo e psychologically a ailable o pe o m he asks (Bakke and Deme ou i, 2017;Chen e al., 2016b;Ka a epe and Ka adas, 2019). Wang and Xu (2017) ound ha HR p ac ices enhance employees’abili y o pe o m asks. Fo example, a p ope ec ui men sys em esul s in he hi ing o capable employees. Mo eo e , eedback sys ems esul in he ecogni ion o employees’s eng hs and weaknesses, which can be de eloped h ough aining. Employee pa icipa ion, job secu i y, eamwo k, app aisal, ewa ds and ecogni ion o good wo ks p o ide in insic mo i a ion and os e employees’psychological a ailabili y (Wang and Xu, 2017;Zi a e al., 2020). O e all, in line wi h sel -concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012;Rabiul e al., 2021) ha in a wo k en i onmen whe e a ailable app op ia e HR p ac ices ( aining, job secu i y, app aisal, ca ee ad ancemen and ewa ds and ecogni ion) a e o e ed by he o ganisa ion, employees will display posi i e ene gy and psychological a ailabili y, ei he in insically o ex insically (Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). Thus, we p opose he ollowing: H3. HR p ac ices posi i ely and signi ican ly in luence employees’psychological a ailabili y. Psychological meaning ulness and employee engagemen Meaning ulness is associa ed wi h a a ie y o pe sonal and o ganisa ional consequences ha a e ela ed o an employees’success a wo k (Mos a a and Abed El-Mo alib, 2018;S ege e al., 2013). Low meaning ulness esul s in apa hy and de achmen (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;May e al., 2004). In con as , high meaning ulness esul s in high commi men and in ol emen owa ds he wo k (Chen e al., 2011). Psychologically meaning ul wo k gene a es pe sonal g ow h and sa is ac ion, which leads employees o be mo e commi ed o engage ully a wo k (El ehail e al., 2020;Kunie e al., 2017;S ege e al., 2013). Linking human esou ces p ac ices 227 Meaning ul wo k p o ides ex insic and in insic mo i a ion, which may in luence employees o engage a wo k wi h ull dedica ion, abso p ion and igo ousness. Se e al empi ical s udies con i med ha psychological meaning ulness is posi i ely linked o employees’engagemen a wo k and o he posi i e employee ou comes (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;May e al., 2004;Mos a a and Abed El-Mo alib, 2018;Rabiul e al., 2021). The e o e, we p opose: H4–H5. Psychological meaning ulness posi i ely and signi ican ly in luences (H4) wo k engagemen and (H5) o ganisa ional engagemen . Psychological sa e y and employee engagemen In a psychologically sa e wo k en i onmen , indi iduals ha e a sense o con idence ha hey “will no be emba assed, ejec ed, and punished by someone o speaking up”(Edmondson, 1999, p. 355). Wi hou psychological sa e y, wo king en i onmen s a e ambiguous, unp edic able and h ea ening (Kahn, 1990;May e al., 2004). Hence, employees may eel anxie y and ea in a si ua ion in which hey need o ask o help, eedback o p opose ideas (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017;Dolla d and Bakke , 2010;Edmondson, 1999;Kahn, 1990). In con as , Edmondson (1999) s a es ha in psychologically sa e en i onmen s, employees ha e “a sense o con idence ha he eam will no emba ass, ejec , o punish someone o speaking up”(p. 354). As such, pe cei ed psychological sa e y enhances in e pe sonal ela ionships among employees h ough a suppo i e, open, us wo hy, lexible and non- h ea ening en i onmen (Rabiul e al., 2021;Lyu, 2016). In such an en i onmen , employees ha e he oppo uni y o sha e hei pe sonal opinions o hei supe io s and build us wi h senio managemen , which may lead o engagemen a wo k (Ha e e al., 2020;Ki k-B own and Van Dijk, 2015;Robinson e al., 2004). A s udy by Basi (2017) o Malaysian hospi al employees showed ha psychological sa e y posi i ely in luenced wo k engagemen . Acco dingly, we p opose: H6–H7. Psychological sa e y posi i ely and signi ican ly in luences (H6) wo k engagemen and (H7) o ganisa ional engagemen . Psychological a ailabili y and employee engagemen A ailabili y deno es an indi idual’s belie o ha ing physical, emo ional and men al esou ces o pe o m he assigned asks in a pa icula momen (Kahn, 1990). Mo e speci ically, i e e s o he emo ional, physical and psychological asse s which an indi idual possesses ha a e equi ed o do he job a any momen wi hou in e up ion (Binyamin and Ca meli, 2010;May e al., 2004). Indi iduals’own e alua ion o hei pe sonal esou ces (physical, emo ional and men al) o pe o m he gi en asks while conside ing a ious social dis ac ions is also i al (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;Kahn, 1990). Al hough physical a ailabili y a ies, indi iduals’s eng h, s amina and lexibili y could in luence hei wo k- ela ed engagemen (F azie e al., 2017;Edmondson, 1999). Mo eo e , indi iduals need o be bo h emo ionally and men ally p epa ed o wo k. Kahn (1990) no es ha wi hou he posi i e eeling o ha ing psychological a ailabili y, indi iduals a e mo e p obable o disengage om hei appoin ed wo k oles. The e o e, we p oposed he ollowing: H8–H9. Psychological a ailabili y posi i ely and signi ican ly in luences (H8) wo k engagemen and (H9) o ganisa ional engagemen . Psychological s a es (meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y) as he media o s be ween HR p ac ices and employee engagemen T aining and de elopmen a e among he acili ies p o ided by a ious o ganisa ions o u he g ow employees’skills and abili ies (Aga wal and Fa ndale, 2017). Employees wi h EJMBE 32,2 228 su icien skills and knowledge will expe ience less anxie y and emo ional exhaus ion han hei less-compe en coun e pa s. This inc eases eelings o meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y, which lead o s onge wo k and o ganisa ional engagemen (Dolla d and Bakke , 2010;Gu lek, 2020). Once employees expe ience hese psychological s a es, hey a e mo e likely o engage a wo k (May e al., 2004). This is because employees who pe cei e hei wo k as meaning ul will ha e posi i e a i udes owa ds hei u u e p o essional de elopmen ; hus, hey will wo k ha de (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019). Employee in ol emen in decision-making p ocesses is ano he c i ical indica o o engagemen as hey eel alued by he o ganisa ions (Robinson e al., 2004). Mo eo e , employee in ol emen in decision-making c ea es oppo uni ies o sha e ideas wi h supe io s, which is posi i ely associa ed wi h wo k engagemen (Aon Hewi , 2018; Robinson e al., 2004). Once an o ganisa ion o e s a clea ad ancemen p ocess, employees’ engagemen and mo i a ion a wo k become mo e meaning ul (e.g. Ak a and Pangil, 2018; Ash on, 2017;Bakke and Deme ou i, 2017;Huang e al., 2017). This is consis en wi h sel - concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012;Rabiul e al., 2021)– ha posi i e suppo om HR p ac ices is associa ed wi h he de elopmen o posi i e sel -concep (meaning ul wo k), which leads o g ea e wo k and o ganisa ion engagemen . Employees wi h pe cei ed sa e y will be con iden o pe o m wo ks as hey ha e su icien skills and knowledge (F azie e al., 2017) which can be done h ough aining and de elopmen . Employees a e commi ed a wo k, exp ess a posi i e a i ude and a e sa is ied owing o ca ee ad ancemen oppo uni ies (Ak a and Pangil, 2018;Ash on, 2017;Huang e al., 2017). Job secu i y is concep ualised as he deg ee o which employees expec o s ay a hei jobs o e an ex ended pe iod (Ak a and Pangil, 2018;Gould-Williams and Da ies, 2005; Ki k-B own and Van Dijk, 2015). Job secu i y is an ex insic ac o ha mo i a es employees o each hei ull po en ial (Ash on, 2017;Bakke and Deme ou i, 2017;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019). Ha ing a secu e job means employees will eel psychologically sa e and engage in hei wo k ole (Ak a and Pangil, 2018;Kahn, 1990). Likewise, in line wi h sel - concep heo y (A yee e al., 2012;Rabiul e al., 2021) ha indi idual employees may g ow posi i e sel -concep and con idence (psychological a ailabili y) o pe o m he job ask ha ing he app op ia e HR p ac ices om he o ganisa ion. In sum, employee in ol emen , app aisal, ca ee ad ancemen oppo uni y, job secu i y, aining, de elopmen and ewa ds and ecogni ion c ea e psychological s a es o meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y among employees ha e en ually lead o g ea e wo k and o ganisa ional engagemen (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;Kunie e al., 2017;May e al., 2004;Mos a a and Abed El-Mo alib, 2018;Robinson e al., 2004). Hence, he ollowing hypo heses we e p oposed: H10–H11. Psychological meaning ulness media es he link o HR p ac ices and employees’(H10) wo k engagemen and (H11) o ganisa ional engagemen . H12–H13. Psychological sa e y media es he link o HR p ac ices and employees’(H12) wo k engagemen and (H13) o ganisa ional engagemen . H14–H15. Psychological a ailabili y media es he link o HR p ac ices and employees’ (H14) wo k engagemen and (H15) o ganisa ional engagemen . The esea ch amewo k is shown in Figu e 1. Me hod Measu emen s F on line ho el employees exp essed hei opinions abou o ganisa ions’HR p ac ices, acili ies and hei psychological s a es and wo k engagemen based upon a con inuous scale Linking human esou ces p ac ices 229 (1 5s ongly disag ee o 7 5s ongly ag ee). Unidimensional HR p ac ices ( en i ems) adap ed om Jensen e al. (2011) and Gould-Williams and Da ies (2005) we e used. A sample i em was, “I eel my job is secu e in his ho el”. Ea lie esea che s (den Ha og e al., 2013;Huang e al., 2017) ound ha his scale had good eliabili y. Psychological meaning ulness (six i ems; sample i em, “ he wo k I do on his job is meaning ul o me”) and psychological a ailabili y ( i e i ems; sample i em, “I am con iden in my abili y o deal wi h p oblems ha come up a wo k”) we e adap ed om May e al. (2004). These scales ha e shown good eliabili y and alidi y (Chen e al., 2011;Fle che , 2016;Rabiul e al., 2021;May e al., 2004). Edmondson (1999) de eloped a se en-i em scale o psychological sa e y (sample i em, “I is sa e o ake a isk in his eam”). Chen e al. (2016a),Rabiul e al. (2021) and Wang e al. (2019) con i med i had high eliabili y and alidi y. Wo k engagemen (nine i ems; sample i em, “a my job, I eel s ong and igo ous”) was adap ed om Schau eli e al. (2006). O ganisa ional engagemen (six i ems; sample i em, “Iam highly engaged in his o ganiza ion”) was adap ed om Saks (2006). Ea lie s udies (Fle che and Scho ield, 2019;Ka adas and Ka a epe, 2019;Rabiul and Yean, 2021;Saks, 2006) con i med he eliabili y and alidi y o hese scales. Sample and da a collec ion This s udy su eyed ull- ime cus ome -con ac on line employees wi h a minimum o one yea expe ience a i e-s a a ed ho els in Wes Malaysia. Acco ding o he Minis y o Tou ism, A s and Cul u e (MOTAC) Malaysia, as o 14 June 2019, he e a e 107 i e-s a ho els (MOTAC, 2019). This s udy su eyed employees a 95 i e-s a ho els loca ed in Wes Malaysia, ollowing an ea lie s udy by Kim and Koo (2017), o cap u e an adequa e sample size and bes ep esen he coun y’s ho el indus y. Cus ome -con ac on line employees in i e-s a ho els a e mo e likely o ha e in e ac ions wi h cus ome s o main ain se ice s anda ds (Kim and Koo, 2017). O he 95 i e-s a ho els, 80 a e loca ed in six s a es including Kuala Lumpu (n531), Selango (n516), Penang (n510), Melaka (n58), Pahang (n58) and Kedah (n57). A e con ac ing HR depa men s o pe mission, we ob ained posi i e esponses om 43 ho els and con inued wi h he da a collec ion. Gi en he unknown popula ion in he Malaysian ho el indus y, we employed K ejcie and Mo gan’s (1970) ecommenda ions. They sugges ed ha a sample size o 384 cases is adequa e o es hypo heses o a popula ion o ≥10,000,000. O e 16 weeks – om June o Figu e 1. Concep ual model EJMBE 32,2 230 A ms ong, J.S. and O e on, T.S. (1977), “Es ima ing non esponse bias in mail su eys”,Jou nal o Ma ke ing Resea ch, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396-402. A yee, S., Walumbwa, F.O., Zhou, Q. and Ha nell, C.A. (2012), “T ans o ma ional leade ship, inno a i e beha iou , and ask pe o mance: es o media ion and mode a ion p ocesses”, Human Pe o mance, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 1-25. Ash on, A.S. (2017), “How human esou ces managemen bes p ac ice in luence employee sa is ac ion and job e en ion in he Thai ho el indus y”,Jou nal o Human Resou ces in Hospi ali y and Tou ism, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 175-199. Aon Hewi (2018), “2018 ends in global employee engagemen global employee engagemen ebounds o ma ch i s all- ime high”, a ailable a : h p://images. anscon inen almedia.com/ LAF/lacom/Aon_2018_T ends_In_Global_Employee_Engagemen .pd . Bakke , A.B. and Deme ou i, E. (2017), “Job demands– esou ces heo y: aking s ock and looking o wa d”,Jou nal o Occupa ional Heal h Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 273-285. Basi , A.A. (2017), “T us in supe iso and job engagemen : media ing e ec s o psychological sa e y and el obliga ion”,The Jou nal o Psychology, Vol. 151 No. 8, pp. 701-721. Binyamin, G. and Ca meli, A. (2010), “Does s uc u ing o human esou ce managemen p ocesses enhance employee c ea i i y? The media ing ole o psychological a ailabili y”,Human Resou ce Managemen , Vol. 49 No. 6, pp. 999-1024. Ca meli, A. and Gi ell, J.H. (2009), “High-quali y ela ionships, psychological sa e y, and lea ning om ailu es in wo k o ganiza ions”,Jou nal o O ganiza ional Beha io ,Vol.30No.6, pp. 709-729. Cheah, J.H., Memon, M.A., Chuah, F. and Ting, H. (2018), “Assessing e lec i e models in ma ke ing esea ch: a compa ison be ween pls and plsc es ima es”,In e na ional Jou nal o Business and Socie y, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 139-160. Chen, Z.J., Zhang, X. and Vogel, D. (2011), “Explo ing he unde lying p ocesses be ween con lic and knowledge sha ing: a wo k-engagemen Pe spec i e 1”,Jou nal o Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 1005-1033. Chen, S., Zhang, G., Zhang, A. and Xu, J. (2016a), “Collec i ism-o ien ed human esou ce managemen and inno a ion pe o mance: an examina ion o eam e lexi i y and eam psychological sa e y –Co igendum”,Jou nal o Managemen and O ganiza ion, Vol. 22 No. 4, p. 549. Chen, M., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, X. and Li, W. (2016b), “The impac o high-commi men HR p ac ices on ho el employees’p oac i e cus ome se ice pe o mance”,Co nell Hospi ali y Qua e ly, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 94-107. C egan, C., Kulik, C.T., Johns on, S. and Ba am, T. (2021), “The in luence o calcula i e (‘ha d’) and collabo a i e (‘so ’) HRM on he layo -pe o mance ela ionship in high pe o mance wo kplaces”,Human Resou ce Managemen Jou nal, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 202-224. den Ha og, D.N., Boon, C., Ve bu g, R.M. and C oon, M.A. (2013), “HRM, communica ion, sa is ac ion, and pe cei ed pe o mance”,Jou nal o Managemen , Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 1637-1665. Dolla d, M.F. and Bakke , A.B. (2010), “Psychosocial sa e y clima e as a p ecu so o conduci e wo k en i onmen s, psychological heal h p oblems, and employee engagemen ”,Jou nal o Occupa ional and O ganiza ional Psychology, Vol. 83 No. 3, pp. 579-599. Edmondson, A. (1999), “Psychological sa e y and lea ning beha io in wo k eams”,Adminis a i e Science Qua e ly, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 350-383. Edmondson, A.C. and Lei, Z. (2014), “Psychological sa e y: he his o y, enaissance, and u u e o an in e pe sonal cons uc ”,Annual Re iew o O ganiza ional Psychology and O ganiza ional Beha io , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 23-43. El ehail, H., Ha azneh a, I., Abuhjeeleh, M., Alzghoul, A., Alnajdaw, S. and Ib ahim, H.M. (2020), “Employee sa is ac ion, human esou ce managemen p ac ices and compe i i e ad an age he case o No he n Cyp us”,Eu opean Jou nal o Managemen and Business Economics, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 125-149. Linking human esou ces p ac ices 237 Fle che , L. (2016), “How can pe sonal de elopmen lead o inc eased engagemen ? The oles o meaning ulness and pe cei ed line manage ela ions”,The In e na ional Jou nal o Human Resou ce Managemen , Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 1203-1226. Fle che , L. and Scho ield, K. (2019), “Facili a ing meaning ulness in he wo kplace: a ield in e en ion s udy”,The In e na ional Jou nal o Human Resou ce Managemen , pp. 1-29. F azie , M.L., Fainshmid , S., Klinge , R.L., Pezeshkan, A. and V ache a, V. (2017), “Psychological sa e y: a me a-analy ic e iew and ex ension”,Pe sonnel Psychology, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 113-165. Gallup (2017), “S a e o he global wo kplace”, a ailable a : h p://www.manage lenchan eu .o g/wp- con en /uploads/Gallup-S a e-o - he-Global-Wo kplace-Repo -2017_Execu i e-Summa y.pd . Gould-Williams, J. and Da ies, F. (2005), “Using social exchange heo y o p edic he e ec s o h m p ac ice on employee ou comes”,Public Managemen Re iew, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 1-24. Guan, X. and F enkel, S. (2018), “How HR p ac ice, wo k engagemen and job c a ing in luence employee pe o mance”,Chinese Managemen S udies, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 591-607. Gu lek, M. (2020), “E ec s o high-pe o mance wo k sys ems (HPWSs) on in ellec ual capi al, o ganiza ional ambidex e i y and knowledge abso p i e capaci y: e idence om he ho el indus y”,Jou nal o Hospi ali y Ma ke ing and Managemen , Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 38-70. Gu lek, M. and Uygu , A. (2021), “Se ice-o ien ed high-pe o mance human esou ce p ac ices and employee se ice pe o mance: a es o se ial media ion and mode a ion models”,Jou nal o Managemen and O ganiza ion, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 197-233. Hai , J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Ande son, R.E. (2014), Mul i a ia e Da a Analysis, Pea son New In e na ional Edi ion, 7 h ed., Pea son Highe , New Yo k, NY. Hai , J.F., Rishe , J.J., Sa s ed , M. and Ringle, C.M. (2019), “When o use and how o epo he esul s o PLS-SEM”,Eu opean Business Re iew, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 2-24. Ha e , J. and Rubens ein, K. (2020), “The 38 mos engaged wo kplaces in he wo ld pu people i s ”, a ailable a : h ps://www.gallup.com/wo kplace/290573/engaged-wo kplaces-wo ld-pu -people- i s .aspx. Ha e , J.K., Schmid , F.L., Ag awal, S., Blue, A., Plowman, S.K., Josh, P. and Asplund, J. (2020), The Rela ionship be ween Engagemen a Wo k and O ganiza ional Ou comes 2020, Q12®Me a- Analysis, Gallup. Huang, Y., Ma, Z. and Meng, Y. (2017), “High-pe o mance wo k sys ems and employee engagemen : empi ical e idence om China”,Asia Paci ic Jou nal o Human Resou ces, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 341-359. Hyland, M.E. (1990), “A unc ional heo y o illness”, in Bake , W.J., Hyland, M.E., an Hezewijk, R. and Te wee, S. (Eds), Recen T ends in Theo e ical Psychology. Recen Resea ch in Psychology, Sp inge , New Yo k, NY. Jensen, J.M., Pa el, P.C. and Messe smi h, J.G. (2011), “High-pe o mance wo k sys ems and job con ol: consequences o anxie y, ole o e load, and u no e in en ions”,Jou nal o Managemen , Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 1699-1724. Joha i, J., Adnan, Z., Yean, T.F., Yahya, K.Y. and Isa, S.N. (2013), “Fos e ing employee engagemen h ough human esou ce p ac ices: a case o manu ac u ing i ms in Malaysia”,Ju nal Pengu usan, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 15-26. Kahn, W.A. (1990), “Psychological condi ions o pe sonal engagemen and disengagemen a wo k”, Academy o Managemen Jou nal, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 692-724. Ka adas, G. and Ka a epe, O.M. (2019), “Un a eling he black box: he linkage be ween high- pe o mance wo k sys ems and employee ou comes”,Employee Rela ions, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 67-83. Kim, M. and Koo, D. (2017), “Linking LMX, engagemen , inno a i e beha io , and job pe o mance in ho el employees”,In e na ional Jou nal o Con empo a y Hospi ali y Managemen , Vol. 29 No. 12, pp. 3044-3062. EJMBE 32,2 238 Ki k-B own, A. and Van Dijk, P. (2015), “An examina ion o he ole o psychological sa e y in he ela ionship be ween job esou ces, a ec i e commi men and u no e in en ions o Aus alian employees wi h ch onic illness”,The In e na ional Jou nal o Human Resou ce Managemen , Vol. 27 No. 14, pp. 1626-1641. Klou sinio is, P.V. and Mihail, D.M. (2020), “The e ec s o high pe o mance wo k sys ems in employees’se ice-o ien ed OCB”,In e na ional Jou nal o Hospi ali y Managemen , Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 1-12. K ejcie, R.V. and Mo gan, D.W. (1970), “De e mining sample size o esea ch ac i i ies”,Educa ional and Psychological Measu emen , Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 607-610. Kunie, K., Kawakami, N., Shimazu, A., Yoneku a, Y. and Miyamo o, Y. (2017), “The ela ionship be ween wo k engagemen and psychological dis ess o hospi al nu ses and he pe cei ed communica ion beha io s o hei nu se manage s: a c oss-sec ional su ey”,In e na ional Jou nal o Nu sing S udies, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 115-124. Lynch, S.M. (2013), Using S a is ics in Social Resea ch: A Concise App oach, Sp inge Science & Business Media, London. Lyu, X. (2016), “E ec o o ganiza ional jus ice on wo k engagemen wi h psychological sa e y as a media o : e idence om China”,Social Beha io and Pe sonali y: An In e na ional Jou nal, Vol. 44 No. 8, pp. 1359-1370. May, D.R., Gilson, R.L. and Ha e , L.M. (2004), “The psychological condi ions o meaning ulness, sa e y and a ailabili y and he engagemen o he human spi i a wo k”,Jou nal o Occupa ional and O ganiza ional Psychology, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 11-37. Memon, M.A., Salleh, R., Mi za, M.Z., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Ahmad, M.S. and Ta iq, A. (2020), “Sa is ac ion ma e s: he ela ionships be ween HRM p ac ices, wo k engagemen and u no e in en ion”,In e na ional Jou nal o Manpowe , Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 21-50. Mos a a, A.M. and Abed El-Mo alib, E.A. (2018), “E hical leade ship, wo k meaning ulness, and wo k engagemen in he public sec o ”,Re iew o Public Pe sonnel Adminis a ion, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 112-131. MOTAC (2019), “Ra ed ou is accommoda ion p emises”, a ailable a : h ps://www.mo ac.go .my/en/ check/ho el?s5&n53& 540. Mowb ay, P.K., Wilkinson, A. and Tse, H.H. (2020), “High-pe o mance wo k sys ems and employee oice beha iou : an in eg a ed model and esea ch agenda”,Pe sonnel Re iew, Vol. 50 No. 6, pp. 1530-1543, doi: 10.1108/p -12-2019-0692. Mu phy, K., To es, E., Ing am, W. and Hu chinson, J. (2018), “A e iew o high pe o mance wo k p ac ices (HPWPs) li e a u e and ecommenda ions o u u e esea ch in he hospi ali y indus y”,In e na ional Jou nal o Con empo a y Hospi ali y Managemen , Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 365-388. Mu huku, M. (2020), “So HRM model: human capi al as he g ea es asse o o ganiza ional pe o mance”,Jou nal o Human Resou ce and Leade ship, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 14-29. Podsako , P.M. and O gan, D.W. (1986), “Sel - epo s in o ganiza ional esea ch: p oblems and p ospec s”,Jou nal o Managemen , Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 531-544. Rabiul, M.K. and Yean, T.F. (2021), “Leade ship s yles, mo i a ing language, and wo k engagemen : an empi ical in es iga ion o he ho el indus y”,In e na ional Jou nal o Hospi ali y Managemen , Vol. 92 No. 1, pp. 1-10. Rabiul,M.K.,Pa wa y,A.K.,Mohamed,A.E.andRashid,H.O.(2021),“Leade ship s yles, psychological ac o s, and employee commi men o se ice quali y in he ho el indus y”, Jou nal o Quali y Assu ance in Hospi ali y and Tou ism, pp. 1-29, doi: 10.1080/1528008x.2021. 1913695. Robinson, D., Pe yman, S. and Hayday, S. (2004), “The d i e s o employee engagemen (408)”, Ins i u e o Employmen S udies websi e, a ailable a : h p://www.employmen -s udies.co.uk/ sys em/ iles/ esou ces/ iles/408.pd . Linking human esou ces p ac ices 239 Saks, A.M. (2006), “An eceden s and consequences o employee engagemen ”,Jou nal o Manage ial Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 600-619. Saks, A.M. (2017), “T ansla ing employee engagemen esea ch in o p ac ice”,O ganiza ional Dynamics, Vol. 2 No. 46, pp. 76-86. Saks, A.M. and G uman, J.A. (2014), “Wha do we eally know abou employee engagemen ?”,Human Resou ce De elopmen Qua e ly, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 155-182. Schau eli, W. and Salano a, M. (2011), “Wo k engagemen : on how o be e ca ch a slippe y concep ”, Eu opean Jou nal o Wo k and O ganiza ional Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 39-46. Schau eli, W.B., Bakke , A.B. and Salano a, M. (2006), “The measu emen o wo k engagemen wi h a sho ques ionnai e”,Educa ional and Psychological Measu emen , Vol. 66 No. 4, pp. 701-716. Shami , B., House, R.J. and A hu , M.B. (1993), “The mo i a ional e ec s o cha isma ic leade ship: a sel -concep -based heo y”,O ganiza ion Science, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 577-594. S ege , M.F., Li man-O adia, H., Mille , M., Menge , L. and Ro hmann, S. (2013), “Engaging in wo k e en when i is meaningless”,Jou nal o Ca ee Assessmen , Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 348-361. The S a (2019), “Tou ism con ibu es RM42bil o economy”,The S a , a ailable a : h ps://www. hes a .com.my/business/business-news/2019/08/24/ ou ism-con ibu es- m42bil- o-economy. T ading Economics (2020), “Malaysia ou ism e enues j1998-2019 da a j2020-2022 o ecas j His o ical jCha ”, a ailable a : h ps:// adingeconomics.com/malaysia/ ou ism- e enues. Wang, Z. and Xu, H. (2017), “How and when se ice-o ien ed high-pe o mance wo k sys ems os e employee se ice pe o mance”,Employee Rela ions, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 523-540. Wang, X., Guchai , P., Lee, J. and Back, K. (2019), “The impo ance o psychological sa e y and pe cei ed ai ness among ho el employees: he examina ion o an eceden and ou come a iables”,Jou nal o Human Resou ces in Hospi ali y and Tou ism, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 504-528. Xu, J., Xie, B. and Tang, B. (2020), “Guanxi HRM p ac ice and employees’occupa ional well-being in China: a mul i-le el psychological p ocess”,In e na ional Jou nal o En i onmen al Resea ch and Public Heal h, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 1-15. Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Dallas, M., Xu, S. and Hu, J. (2018), “How pe cei ed empowe men HR p ac ices in luence wo k engagemen in social en e p ises –a mode a ed media ion model”,The In e na ional Jou nal o Human Resou ce Managemen , Vol. 29 No. 20, pp. 2971-2999. Zi a , A., T usson, C. and Choudha y, A. (2020), “Towa ds a high-pe o mance HR bundle p ocess o lean se ice ope a ions”,In e na ional Jou nal o Quali y and Reliabili y Managemen , Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 25-45. Co esponding au ho Md Ka im Rabiul can be con ac ed a : [email p o ec ed] Fo ins uc ions on how o o de ep in s o his a icle, please isi ou websi e: www.eme aldg ouppublishing.com/licensing/ ep in s.h m O con ac us o u he de ails: [email p o ec ed] EJMBE 32,2 240