Perception of natural cosmetics among Central european consumers

Hinčica, Vít; Řezanková, Hana; Macias, Klaudia; Schulzová, Marie Article Perception of natural cosmetics among Central european consumers Central European Economic Journal (CEEJ) Provided in Cooperation with: Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw Suggested Citation: Hinčica, Vít; Řezanková, Hana; Macias, Klaudia; Schulzová, Marie (2024) : Perception of natural cosmetics among Central european consumers, Central European Economic Journal (CEEJ), ISSN 2543-6821, Sciendo, Warsaw, Vol. 11, Iss. 58, pp. 233-251, https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/324613 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISSN: 2543-6821 (online) Journal homepage: http://ceej.wne.uw.edu.pl To cite this article Hinčica, V., Řezanková, H., Macias, K., Schulzová, M. (2024). Perception of Natural Cosmetics Among Central European Consumers. Central European Economic Journal, 11(58), 233-251. DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 Perception of Natural Cosmetics Among Central European Consumers Vít Hinčica, Hana Řezanková, Klaudia Macias, Marie Schulzová Open Access. © 2024 V. Hinčica, H. Řezanková, K. Macias, M. Schulzová, published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Vít Hinčica Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Relations, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic corresponding author: [email protected] Hana Řezanková University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic Klaudia Macias University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678 Warsaw, Poland Marie Schulzová Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic Perception of Natural Cosmetics Among Central European Consumers Abstract This paper aims to analyse consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards natural cosmetic products from three Central European countries. In this study, we employed quantitative surveys on samples of 230 Czech, 175 Slovak, and 325 Polish respondents. Based on the obtained data, we investigate whether and how the respondents’ country impacts how they formulate their statements regarding the features of natural cosmetics. For each country separately, we study the dependencies of respondents’ opinions and statements on their sociodemographic profile. The results of the research show statistically significant differences in the respondents’ answers to all substantive questions depending on their country of origin. Four findings are worth highlighting: first, respondents from all three countries prefer natural cosmetics over conventional ones mainly for health and environmental reasons. Second, the frequency of buying natural cosmetics is influenced by some sociodemographic factors, although this varies in all three countries. Third, respondents who buy natural cosmetics more often are also more likely to indicate them as products of higher quality than conventional cosmetics. Lastly, the declared composition of the product is the prevailing decision criterion for consumers when selecting natural cosmetic products. Keywords natural cosmetics | perception | consumers | behaviour | Central Europe JEL Codes M16, M31, D01 1. Introduction After emerging in the second half of the 19th century, the modern beauty industry witnessed tremendous growth in the 20th century (Jones, 2006). From the early 2000s, it has been further evolving, expanding its attention to men (Ersoy et al., 2015; Grand View Research, 2020). Nowadays, the beauty industry is a multibillion-dollar industry (Frith, 2014) and continues to grow at a rate of 4.75% worldwide and amounts to 511 billion dollars in 2021, with further growth expected in the coming years (Roberts, 2022). Consumers’ increasing interest in natural goods prompted manufacturers to look for new solutions for CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 235 cosmetic production. Modern technologies enable better development of natural products, which has also become important to the growth of the cosmetic industry (Bezerra et al., 2018; Amberg & Fogarassy, 2019). At the same time, competition in the natural/ organic cosmetics market is increasing, as is the number of brands offered (Statista Research Department, 2022; Fourati-Jamoussi, 2015). Additionally, the global natural cosmetics market is expected to grow in the coming years (Market Research Future, 2021). Despite the growing production and the availability of natural/organic cosmetics, consumers’ perceptions of these products and their purchase motives have yet to be thoroughly analysed worldwide. Current literature on natural/organic cosmetics especially lacks a cross-country comparison – only few papers have assessed more countries simultaneously so far (e.g., Dimitrova et al., 2009). This paper tries to respond to this significant research gap by conducting surveys in three Central European countries. Its main aim is to reveal how consumers of these countries perceive natural cosmetic products as well as assess various consumers’ attitudes towards these products. The data gathered from this international study will enable the ability to form a more comprehensive view of certain behaviour patterns in selecting and purchasing natural cosmetics, especially those patterns that have been insufficiently scrutinised by scholars so far, not assessed internationally or not investigated in direct connection to natural cosmetics. This study will mainly explore: 1) what primarily drives consumers in their preference for natural cosmetics over the conventional alternatives, 2) whether the sociodemographic profile of a consumer plays a vital role in the purchase frequency of natural cosmetics and whether it conditions the consumers’ perception of natural cosmetics in certain aspects, 3) whether there is a link between a consumer’s lifestyle and his/her purchase frequency of natural cosmetics, and 4) whether there is some prevailing decision criterion for consumers when choosing natural cosmetic products. The simultaneous exploration of the points listed above demands that an entirely new survey with international applicability be proposed. As the construction of the respective questionnaire cannot rely on past research only, the application of a selected theory on consumer behaviour will become necessary to serve as an underlying pillar. Also, as a secondary goal, this research will assess the presence of subjective norms in the decision-making of Central European consumers and will be thus partially linked to the theory of planned behaviour. It is expected that this study’s results will provide producers and sellers of natural cosmetics with a recent illustration of the actual Central European demand for natural cosmetic products and will offer other scholars interested in the same or similar topic a questionnaire that can be used in their own scientific endeavour. The formulation of practical and research implications, as well as suggestions for further research, will take place at the end of the paper. Given the inconsistent use of “natural”, “organic”, “green” and other related adjectives in connection to cosmetics in the existing popular, expert and academic texts (Barros & Barros, 2020; Franca & Ueno, 2020), this paper will prioritise the adjective “natural” – only in the cases of citing original sources the terminology used by their authors may be respected. In this study, the terms “natural cosmetics” and “natural cosmetic product” denote any product that is either named as such or is named and also perceived by consumers as such. 2. Literature review The negative effects of the fast development of our society on our environment have become visible all over the world. The extreme levels of industrial production and our consumption have led to enormous soil, water and air pollution (FAO &UNEP, 2021; Lawton et al., 2014). Along with the intensification of the abovementioned threats, the level of awareness in reference to environmental aspects is constantly increasing (Lampert et al., 2019; Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, 2018; Kulli et al., 2023). Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic shows a significant, positive impact on environmental awareness (Evensen et al., 2021) and thus influences people’s sustainable behaviours (Severo et al., 2021). Because the choice of product, packaging, and manufacturing process have an environmental impact, interest in natural cosmetics continues to grow (Amberg & Fogarassy, 2019). As for the health aspect, people are aware of the importance of a healthy lifestyle (bin Ridzuan et al., CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 236 2018). Positive changes in behaviour that influence health are also visible due to the pandemic (van der Werf et al., 2021; Balanzá-Martínez et al., 2020). Moreover, consumers purchase more health and wellness products (Stella Rising, 2021). Currently, many cosmetic products launched on the market are advertised as natural and, therefore, positively affecting health, which is likely to influence purchasing decisions. Below, relevant academic literature on consumer behaviour regarding the usage of natural cosmetics will be briefly exposed to formulate appropriate research questions. The literature using the adjective “organic” will also be dealt with because in most cases, the authors of the assessed sources did not distinguish between the terms “natural” and “organic”. Scholars often claim that environmental and health-related aspects are among the main drivers of the preference for different kinds of natural products. This is the case of Possamai et al. (2021), cooperating with a sample of 224 adults, of Kim & Seock (2009), working with a sample of 210 female college students, or Růžičková (2020), using a sample of 291 Czech consumers, or of Kantor & Hübner (2019), conducting a study on 826 Polish women. Nonetheless, no specific survey on why consumers may prefer natural cosmetics over conventional cosmetics could be found in current literature. In other words, no comparison was conducted. Therefore, we formulate the research question: RQ1: People prefer natural cosmetics over conventional cosmetics primarily due to environmental and health concerns. Extant studies point (e.g., Marangon et al., 2015; Fonseca-Santos et al., 2015; Żyngiel & Platta, 2015; Bochner, 2017) to the likely willingness of consumers of natural cosmetics and products to incur higher financial costs related to perceived value or the content of natural ingredients in such products. Some sources even explicitly state that natural cosmetics are perceived as more expensive (Amberg & Fogarassay, 2019; Kapogianni, 2015). However, so far, which groups of people may perceive natural cosmetics as more expensive than conventional cosmetics has not been investigated. As several papers (e.g., Ali & Ali, 2020; Muhammad et al., 2015) have already concluded that sociodemographic characteristics do influence the willingness to pay extra for organic or natural products, we will assume that these characteristics also influence the perception of the price level of natural cosmetic products. Therefore, we formulate the research question: RQ2: The sociodemographic profile of the consumers has a significant influence on the perception of the price level of natural cosmetics. Furthermore, it has not been investigated yet whether the frequency of purchasing natural cosmetics is related to consumers’ profiles. However, studies on other products (Harja & Ţimiraş, 2014; Ergin & Ozsacmaci, 2011; Verhoef, 2005) insinuate that there could be a dependence. Therefore, we formulate the research question: RQ3: The sociodemographic profile of the consumers has a significant influence on the frequency with which they buy natural cosmetics. Extant studies surveying consumers (Matić & Puh, 2016; Nguyen et al., 2019; Amberg & Fogarassay, 2019; Shimul et al., 2022) could not prove that healthconscious people are more motivated to buy natural cosmetics than less health-conscious consumers. Therefore, we define the research question: RQ4: The frequency with which people buy natural cosmetics does not depend on health consciousness. The studies listed above did not provide any definition of health consciousness. Lee et al. (2014) stated that health consciousness is a measure of an individual’s readiness to take health actions. Based on this statement, in this research, we will express health consciousness by affirming the question of whether people practice a healthy lifestyle. Kaliyadan et al. (2021) surveyed 413 Saudi adult females 18–50 years old to study attitudes, awareness, and practices related to organic cosmetics in the Saudi population. They could not find a link between the level of education and awareness about organic cosmetics. At the same time, no significant association between the age groups and the level of awareness about organic cosmetics was found. Inspired by their findings, we state two research questions: RQ5: Awareness about natural cosmetics does not depend on age. RQ6: Awareness about natural cosmetics does not depend on the level of education. CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 237 In the study described above, the term “awareness” was not defined, but in our research, it will be expressed as the ability to easily recognise a natural cosmetic product. Several authors, e.g., Sánchez-Bravo et al. (2021) and Loebnitz & Aschemann-Witzel (2016), learned that natural or organic products can be associated with higher quality. However, such an association might sometimes be a consumer’s belief only. It can therefore be expected that natural cosmetics are also associated with higher quality, which leads to the research question: RQ7: Consumers associate natural cosmetic products with higher quality. In general, minimal data exists on which criteria consumers consider the most when they buy natural cosmetics. Růžičková (2020) learned that the most important criterion among her respondents was no testing on animals. However, another study on the importance of the aspect related to animal welfare was also carried out, although it concerned other product groups. The results show that despite respondents’ declared commitment to animal welfare, interest in this aspect is moderate compared to other product characteristics (Verbeke, 2009). Kantor & Hübner (2019) learned that the quality and product composition were very important for the surveyed sample of Polish women. Respondents mentioned in a report by Naturativ (2018) indicated product composition as the primary factor influencing their purchase choice; however, they also mentioned positive opinions found on the Internet and attractive promotions as being of great importance. Taking into account the aforementioned findings, we finally formulate: RQ8: There is no prevailing decision criterion when consumers choose natural cosmetics. Overall, research on consumers’ attitudes towards natural cosmetics has mostly been developing in Asian countries. In the Central European region, the research has slowly grown in past years, but the number of studies that have been done is very low. Selecting the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland only, i.e., three neighbouring countries, we encounter general statistics for the natural cosmetics market. In Poland, it has been reported that there was a growing share of the natural cosmetics market in the overall cosmetics market. Hence, the natural cosmetics market’s value was still quite low there – some EUR 43 million only (1.3 EUR/per capita) (GfK Polonia, 2021). For the other two countries, it has been reported that the values of natural cosmetics were much lower in 2020 – around 20 million EUR in the Czech Republic (1.9 EUR/per capita) and less than 10 million EUR in Slovakia (1.8 EUR/per capita) (Statista, 2022). Although it might not be obvious from the previous lines, the existing research related to the assessment of consumers’ views over natural cosmetics not only varies significantly in terms of its thematical or geographical orientation, but it also tends to miss sound theoretical support. It can even be stated that the exposed research was mostly motivated by the authors’ curiosity to learn what occurs in the consumers’ minds rather than representing an intention to follow up on a certain theory. Although some authors have claimed that their papers are underpinned by a certain theory or even contributed to a theory’s development, it sometimes remains unclear how exactly they did so. The survey of the existing literature herein, therefore, did not bring a considerable opportunity to lean on a past study, and this study alone needs to bridge some of the past research directions by a proper survey. Nonetheless, this study, although in its second plane of focus, will observe one of the three core components of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) – the subjective norm. Recently, there has been a growing number of scientific texts on green behaviour and green consumption in which social influence on consumer behaviour was investigated (as evidenced, e.g., by Sivapalan et al., 2021 or Emekci, 2019). This paper may also provide new evidence from the Central European region on the matter of subjective norms. On the other hand, it must be stated that although this paper largely deals with consumers’ attitudes, they are not scrutinised here from the optics of the theory of planned behaviour. 3. Methodology For the achievement of the paper’s goal, i.e., to analyse the perception and attitudes towards natural cosmetic products by consumers from three Central European countries, we prepared a questionnaire composed of 14 questions, including seven core and six sociodemographic questions. The questionnaire’s seven core questions reflect the Nicosia model of consumer behaviour (Nicosia, 1966). This model differentiates four fields that altogether track a CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 238 consumer’s path towards the consumption of a certain product or service. The questionnaire survey assumed that the respondent purchases natural cosmetics. For this reason, a question on whether the respondent purchases natural cosmetics was placed before the first core one. In order to create comprehensive tables and shorten the text, in Table 1, we list the core questions in their complete wording as well as their abbreviated forms used further. We need to anticipate that the creation of our questionnaire did not mean a complete and exact application of all the patterns introduced or suggested in the original model presented by Nicosia (1966). Otherwise, the questionnaire would become too long and thus unattractive to prospective respondents and, more importantly, would not enable us to focus on the research questions we formulated through the assessment of the literature review. Moreover, the model itself is bulky and complex, so we only follow the comprehensive scheme that the book introduces and some of the variables that are proposed in the model. The firm’s attributes and the consumer’s attributes together compose the first model’s field, named “From the source of message to the consumer’s attitude”. It is suggested that these attributes, which may be numerous, form the consumers’ attitudes towards a certain product or service. In the questionnaire, the firm’s attributes leading to the formulation of the consumer’s position vis-à-vis natural cosmetics are investigated indirectly when respondents are asked to indicate the main reason for the purchase of such products. It can be assumed that consumers attribute certain characteristics to natural cosmetic products, such as positive health influence or environmental protection, mainly through messages the firms themselves (e.g., producers or distributors) transmit via various communication channels. Regarding the consumer’s attributes, in the questionnaire, they are determined by means of sociodemographic indicators (see further) and inquiring about the practicing of a healthy lifestyle. The second model’s field represents the phase of searching for information and evaluation. One question embodies such consumers’ activities: a question on the easy distinction of these products in the market. The third model’s field is the act of purchase. In the questionnaire, this field is represented by a question on the most frequent decision criterion during the purchase of cosmetics products. The feedback is the last field of the model and may again encompass different variables of which we Table 1. The core questions used, their abbreviated forms, and possible answers Question Abbreviated form Answers How often do you buy natural cosmetic products? shopping_frequency often; occasionally Do you agree with the statement that natural cosmetics are of higher quality than conventional cosmetics? higher_quality yes; no; it depends on the case Can you easily distinguish natural cosmetics from conventional ones (e.g., on the basis of packaging)? easy_recognition yes; no Do you agree with the statement that natural cosmetics are more expensive than conventional cosmetics? assumed_expensiveness yes; no; it depends on the case Which criterion do you follow most when choosing natural cosmetics? criterion_of_selection declared product composition; brand; advertisement; certification of the product; another (indicate) State the main reason for buying natural cosmetics compared to conventional cosmetics. reason_for_shopping I think they have a more influential effect on my health; I think I protect nature more; I believe that I support small and mediumsized enterprises more; another (indicate) Do you practice a healthy lifestyle? healthy_lifestyle yes; no Source: Authors’ work CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 239 selected experience. The experience with the product or service, among the other possible variables, may influence the consumer’s attributes as well as the firm’s attributes. In the questionnaire, we inquire about the price level and quality level of natural cosmetics to track respondents’ experience with natural products. As one may imagine, the last model’s field makes it possible to close the imaginary loop of the consumer’s path running from the first consideration of a product’s or service’s purchase to the actual consumption and then back to another consideration. Finally, we have included a question on purchase frequency. It is the first core question of our questionnaire and is not related to any of the four model’s fields. However, it is of high importance for our investigation because the number of times that a consumer purchases a natural cosmetic product is linked to all the four fields of the model as well as to some of our research questions. The purchase frequency mirrors the firm’s and consumer’s attributes, as well as the consumer’s search for information and evaluation, his/her decision-making and feedback (see Figure 1). In the questionnaire, most of the sociodemographic indicators used in Possamai et al.’s (2021) paper were taken and, where necessary, adapted. There are sex (two categories), age (6 intervals), completed education (3 categories), status (6 categories), permanent place of living (regions of every selected country) and income (7 or 8 valid possibilities and a possibility for nonresponding). Three language versions of the same questionnaire were prepared. Respondents were recruited from the social media contacts of the authors of this paper and a few university circuits, so convenience sampling was used. We targeted only people born in those countries and having permanent residence there. Respondents from the three countries answered in different periods of up to 8 days, from 20 September until 26 December 2021. The authors were unable to collect answers at the same time due to their work duties. Figure 1. Embedding the questionnaire’s questions in the Nicosia model Source: Authors’ work CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 240 All people were asked once via a private invitation, and no reminder was sent to them to avoid excessively invading their private lives (the same people have been invited to participate in other surveys). As soon as the replies stopped accumulating and it was clear no more answers would be reached, there was no need to extend the time for data collection and the survey ended. We collected 230 relevant replies from the Czech Republic, 175 from Slovakia and 325 from Poland. First, we investigated whether the answers to the core questions depend on a country. Then, the dependence of these answers on sociodemographic indicators was investigated in order to answer the formulated research questions. For both types of dependence, we applied statistical tests of independence and coefficients of dependence based on the frequencies in contingency tables. Namely, we used Cramér’s V, the Goodman and Kruskal tau and the uncertainty coefficient as the coefficients of dependence with the values from the interval from 0 (independence) to 1 (total dependence). For all three coefficients, we carried out tests with the following statistical hypotheses – the null hypothesis: “the value of the coefficient of dependence is zero” and the alternative hypothesis: “the value of the coefficient of dependence is not zero” (the same pairs of hypotheses for all three coefficients). Because Cramér’s V is computed as a square root of the Pearson statistic transformation, we also use square roots of the Goodman and Kruskal tau and the uncertainty coefficient to compare the values of each other in this paper. 4. Results As mentioned above, we analysed three samples obtained from 230 Czech respondents, 175 Slovak respondents, and 325 Polish respondents. Some categories of sociodemographic indicators appeared in low frequencies. For this reason, we merged some categories. The categories of sociodemographic variables used for the analyses are mentioned in Tables 2–4. In all three countries, the share of men was very low, being about 10% of the sample. In Table 5, there are frequency distributions for core variables. In the case of variables criterion_of_ selection and reason_for_shopping, some categories occurred with low frequencies (several respondents wrote their own categories). For this reason, we merged the categories with low frequencies into a category “another” (for a more detailed analysis of the results, see further). We found that the answers to all core questions depend on a country at the 5% significant level, see Table 6. In the case of variables higher_quality and assumed_expensiveness, the category “no” occurred with low frequencies in some countries. Thus, when investigating whether these variables depend on a country, we only consider two categories: “yes” and “other opinion”. In Table 6, there are values of three coefficients of dependence: symmetric Cramér’s V and asymmetric measures (the Goodman and Kruskal tau and the uncertainty coefficient). We found the values of these three coefficients are either the same or very similar. Moreover, the maximum of the p-values for the asymmetric measures is the same as the p-value for Cramér’s V. For the above reasons, we will mention only Cramér’s V in the following text. Differences in answers among the countries are obvious from Table 5, and in the following lines, selected results will be presented. We can see that the Polish respondents buy natural cosmetic products Table 2. Frequency distributions (in percent) for sociodemographic variables according to the countries (the numbers of respondents in parentheses) Czechia (230) Slovakia (175) Poland (325) sex men 10.4% 12.0% 8.9% women 89.6% 88.0% 91.1% age 24 or less 52.2% 37.7% 39.7% 25–44 27.8% 42.9% 45.8% 45 or over 20.0% 19.4% 14.5% education basic or secondary 55.2% 68.0% 47.7% higher or university 44.8% 32.0% 52.3% status employed or selfemployed 48.7% 58.9% 59.4% other status 51.3% 41.1% 40.6% Source: Authors’ work CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 247 consumers’ perception of the entire brand as prohealth and ecological. 6.3. Limitations and future research The study on Czech, Slovak and Polish consumers was limited by several factors. The first was the sizes of the research samples and the low frequencies of some categories. The problem with low frequencies was caused mainly by the sampling method – we had to rely fully on our social contacts. They were also able to share the questionnaire further. Therefore, we are unable to state how many persons were addressed in total, but those addressed directly almost always replied. Nonetheless, it is evident that some parts of society of the three countries were not represented sufficiently in our samples despite the major willingness to fill out the questionnaire, and people without internet access were not addressed at all. Although the recoding of some of the original categories into newer ones made the conduction of the necessary statistical analysis more meaningful, the diversity of categories within some variables has been significantly decreased, which then reduces the scope of new cognition. Another limitation is also related to the method of selecting respondents – the use of convenience sampling makes it impossible to interpret the results for the entire population of the three Central European countries. However, by comparing the results of the analyses in different countries, we can get a rough idea of the situation in the targeted region. Another issue is the interpretation of the questions, in particular those related to leading a healthy lifestyle – differences in the interpretation of this term may occur between nationalities as well as between each respondent. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of these statements – future research should use scales related to this matter to make the results more accurate. Furthermore, this cross-sectional study analyses data from a specific point in time and thus emphasises the attitude of consumers from the three countries towards natural cosmetics. However, taking into account the dynamic increase in consumer interest in natural products, it would be beneficial to conduct a longitudinal study to investigate changes concerning attitudes towards natural cosmetics, which may take place over a long-term horizon. There is a disproportionate distribution of respondents within the regions of the countries, but respondents’ answers did not depend significantly on the regions (in the Czech Republic, no statistically significant dependence on regions was found at all, in Slovakia and Poland only for 2 and 3 questions, respectively). Therefore, calculations based on these answers should not be significantly affected by disproportions. In addition, when it comes to the theoretical foundations of the research, prior research studies relevant to the paper’s topic were limited. This paper tried to incorporate a component of the theory of planned behaviour (subjective norm) and inquired about the main drivers and motives of consumers of natural cosmetics to better understand the phenomenon of green consumption, but a broader transposition of theoretical constructs into this study was avoided. Also, this paper only mirrors the core components of the Nicosia model of consumer behaviour for the composition of the questionnaire. However, the ambition of this study was not to replicate or even validate a complete theoretical model. This, as a result, means that the paper’s findings are more likely to be beneficial for the corporate sector than for academia. On the other hand, the fact that some of the past research findings could be validated here and few other discoveries were made may still be of high importance for future researchers in the topic of natural cosmetics. 7. Conclusion This research has aimed to partially fill the existing research gap in revealing whether differences exist among consumers from different countries regarding attitudes towards natural cosmetics. The available literature on the same or similar topics to date rarely used a perspective from multiple countries. Thus, three neighbouring countries from the Central European region were selected, and convenience sampling was used for the distribution of the same questionnaire in individual countries. In all three countries, the results indicate that health and, less importantly, environmental concerns are those that mainly propel people in their decision whether to prefer natural cosmetics to conventional ones. Furthermore, no statistically significant dependence could be found between how respondents perceive the price level of natural cosmetics and their sociodemographic profile simultaneously in all three CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 248 countries. Existing sources suggested there could be a link; however, those sources assessed other kinds of natural or organic products, so this research brings a new finding that should be carefully overviewed in the future by another survey. On the other hand, some respondent’s sociodemographic characteristics do influence the frequency of purchasing natural cosmetics, but there might be differences across countries regarding which characteristics may be the crucial ones for such influence. We can ascertain that from the perspective of all three countries, the frequency with which people buy natural cosmetics does not depend on health awareness. Moreover, one’s awareness about natural cosmetics is not dependent on respondents’ age or their level of education. Our research has also found out that consumers do not always associate natural cosmetics with higher quality as significant percentages of people in all three countries find this association on a case-by-case basis and small percentages of consumers even do not find such an association. Additionally, the research indicates that the declared composition of the product plays a crucial role in all three analysed countries. The last result worth commenting on is that a person who buys natural cosmetics often is more likely to indicate that such cosmetics are of higher quality than people who buy them occasionally. This research has also detected some other statistically significant dependencies, mostly linked to one or two of the three countries under investigation. These dependencies were not specifically commented on if not necessary, and some of them only represented a bypass effect of our investigation. It is nonetheless necessary to remind that our samples were limited, especially when it comes to the number of respondents in some categories. Therefore, the dependencies could be assessed again in the future. This paper is only partially supported by the existing theoretical background, and its orientation and results appear to be more beneficial for the cosmetic branch, especially companies active in the segment of natural cosmetics in the targeted region. Nonetheless, the paper may also become useful for further researchers as the previous lines bridged some gaps from past research on natural cosmetics and revealed whether some of the results from the Central European region paralleled findings from other investigations carried out worldwide. Moreover, the created questionnaire can be easily replicated in future research in other geographical regions and serve as an additional tool for the assessment of central behavioural traits and motives of consumers of natural cosmetics. Acknowledgement The authors want to thank Ms. Marianna Dunčková for helping collect data in the Slovak Republic. This article was prepared with the institutional support of the Faculty of International Relations and the Faculty of Informatics and Statistics of the Prague University of Economics and Business. References Ali, T., & Ali, J. (2020). Factors Affecting the Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Health and Wellness Food Products. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jafr.2020.100076. Altinbasak-Farina, I., & Guleryuz-Turkel, G. (2019). Profiling Green Consumers in an Emerging Country Context. In K. T. Caliyurt (Ed.), Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application (pp. 193–214). Singapore: Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7924-6_11. Amberg, N., & Fogarassy, C . (2019). Green Consumer Behavior in the Cosmetics Market. Resources, 8(3), 137. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/resources8030137. Balanzá-Martínez, V., Kapczinski, F., Cardoso, T. de A., Atienza-Carbonell, B., Rosa, A.R., Mota, J. C., & De Boni, R. B. (2020). The Assessment of Lifestyle Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Multidimensional Scale. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 14(1), 16–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. rpsm.2020.07.003. Barros, C., & Barros, R. B. G. (2020). Natural and Organic Cosmetics: Definition and Concepts. Preprints. https://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202005.0374.v2. Bezerra, K. G. O., Rufino, R. D., Luna, J. M., & Sarubbo, L. A. (2018). Saponins and Microbial Biosurfactants: Potential Raw Materials for the Formulation of Cosmetics. Biotechnology Progress, 34(6), 1482–1493. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2682. CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 249 Bin Ridzuan, A. R., Karim, R. A., Marmaya, N. H., Razak, N. A., Khalid, N. K. N., & Yusof, K. N. M. (2018). Public Awareness Towards Healthy Lifestyle. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 927–936. https://dx.doi. org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4790. Bochner, K. (2017). Badanie Firmy Mands Dla „Wiadomości Kosmetycznych”! Konsumenci Są Gotowi Płacić Więcej Za Kosmetyki Z Certyfikatem Naturalności. www.wiadomoscikosmetyczne.pl/dzial/3575konsument-i-trendy/artykuly/badanie-firmy-mandsdla-wiadomosci-kosmetycznych-k,42403. Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (Centre for Public Opinion Research) (CBOS). (2018). Polacy wobec zmian klimatu (Communication from the CBOS research survey, No. 158/2018), CBOS. https:// www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2018/K_158_18.PDF. Dimitrova, V., Kaneva, M., & Gallucci, T. (2009). Customer Knowledge Management in the Natural Cosmetics Industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1155–1165. https://doi. org/10.1108/02635570911002243. Emekci, S. (2019). Green Consumption Behaviours of Consumers Within the Scope of TPB. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), 410–417. https://doi. org/10.1108/JCM-05-2018-2694. Ergin, E. A., & Ozsacmaci, B. (2011). Turkish Consumers Perceptions and Consumption of Organic Foods. African Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 910–914. Ersoy, N. F., Yolal, M., & Batmaz, B. (2015). Cosmetic Consumption of Metropolitan Males an a Developing Country. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Negotia, 60(3), 5–22. Evensen, D., Whitmarsh, L., Bartie, P., DevineWright, P., Dickie, J., Varley, A., Ryder, S., & Mayer, A. (2021). Effect of “Finite Pool of Worry” and COVID19 on UK Climate Change Perceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(3). https://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2018936118. FAO and UNEP. (2021). Global Assessment Of Soil Pollution: Report. Rome: FAO. https://dx.doi. org/10.4060/cb4894en. Fonseca-Santos, B., Corrêa, M. A., & Chorilli, M. (2015). Sustainability, Natural and Organic Cosmetics: Consumer, Products, Efficacy, Toxicological and Regulatory Considerations. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 51(1), 17–26. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1984-82502015000100002. Fourati-Jamoussi, F. (2015). E-reputation: A Case Study of Organic Cosmetics in Social Media. 2015 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Economic Intelligence (SIIE), 125–132. https://doi. org/10.1109/ISEI.2015.7358734. Franca, C. C. V., & Ueno, H. M. (2020). Green Cosmetics: Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Green Chemistry. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 53(Jan/Jun 2020), 133–150. https://dx.doi. org/10.5380/dma.v53i0.62322. Frith, K. (2014). Globalizing Beauty: A Cultural History of the Beauty Industry. International Conference Association’s Annual Conference, 1–33. Washington: ICA. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/273633133_Globalizing_Beauty_A_ Cultural_History_of_the_Beauty_Industry. GfK Polonia. (2021). IX Cosmetic Industry Forum. https://www.wiadomoscikosmetyczne.pl/artykuly/ szymon-mordasiewicz-gfk-polonia-segmentkosmetykow,68114. Grand View Research. (2020). Market Analysis Report: Men’s Personal Care Market Size Report, 2022-2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/ industry-analysis/mens-personal-care-market. Harja, E., & Ţimiraş L. C. (2014). Particularities of Consumer Behavior in the Cosmetics Market. Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, (20), 188–195. https://dx.doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i20.272. Jones, G. (2006). Globalizing the Beauty Business Before 1980 (Working Paper, No. 06-056). Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/ Publication%20Files/06-056.pdf. Kaliyadan, F., Al Dhafiri, M., & Aatif, M. (2021). Attitudes Toward Organic Cosmetics: A Cross‐ Sectional Population‐Based Survey from The Middle East. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20(8), 2552–2555. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13909. Kantor, A., & Hübner, R. (2019). Women’s Behaviour on the Market of Natural Cosmetics. Studia Ekonomiczne, 379, 72–95. Kapogianni, M. (2015). Attitudes and Intention Toward Organic Cosmetics in Greece: An Exploratory Study. International Hellenic University, Greece. https:// repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/331. CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 250 Kemp, S. (2021). Digital 2021: Global Overview Report. www.datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021global-overview-report. Kim, S., & Seock, Y.-K. (2009). Impacts of Health and Environmental Consciousness on Young Female Consumers’ Attitude Towards and Purchase of Natural Beauty Products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(6), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14706431.2009.00817.x. Kulli, A., Grzywińska-Rąpca, M., Duarte, N., Goci, E., & Pereira, C. (2023). Consumption Behaviour Towards the Circular Economy. Central European Economic Journal, 10(57), 323–342. https://doi. org/10.2478/ceej-2023-0019. Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing Behaviour for Environmentally Sustainable Products: A Conceptual Framework And Empirical Study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004. Lampert, M., Metaal, S., Liu, S., & Gambarin, L. (2019). Global Rise in Environmental Concern: World Population Waking Up to the Ecological Crisis. Glocalities. http://www. courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ ClimateChangeGlocalities.pdf. Lawton, K., Cherrier, V., Grebot, B., Zglobisz, N., Esparrago, J., Ganzleben, C., Kallay, T., & Farmer, A. (2014). Contribution of Industry to Pollutant Emissions to Air and Water (Report for the European Commission). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2779/25422. Lee, K., Conklin, M., Cranage, D. A., & Lee, S. (2014). The Role of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Providing Healthful Foods and Nutrition Information with Health-Consciousness As a Moderator. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijhm.2013.10.005. Loebnitz, N., & Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2016). Communicating Organic Food Quality in China: Consumer Perceptions of Organic Products and the Effect of Environmental Value Priming. Food Quality and Preference, 50, 102–108. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.003. Marangon, F., Tempesta, T., Troiano, S., & Vecchiato, D. (2015). Sustainable Agriculture and No-Food Production: An Empirical Investigation on Organic Cosmetics. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita, (1), 63–77. https://dx.doi.org/10.3280/RISS2015-001005. Market Research Future (2021). Natural and Organic Cosmetics Market Size, Share, Segmentation by Type (Skin Care, Hair Care, Oral Care, Makeup Cosmetics and Others), by Consumer Group (Male and Female), by Distribution Channel (Store-Based and Non-Store Based) - Global Forecast till 2027. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/ natural-organic-cosmetics-market-7257. Matić, M., & Puh, B. (2016). Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Towards Natural Cosmetics. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews-Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 29(1), 53–64. https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/ekonomskivjesnik/article/view/3689. Muhammad, S., Fathelrahman, E., & Ullah, R. U. T. (2015). Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness To Pay for Certified Organic Food Products in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 46(1), 37–45. https://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ ag.econ.199045. Naturativ (2018). Slow Life in Poland 2018 (Report). Naturativ. https://www.naturativ.pl/raportslow/. Nguyen, P. N. D., Nguyen, V. T., & Vo, N. N. T. (2019). Key Determinants of Repurchase Intention Toward Organic Cosmetics. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(3), 205–214. https:// doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.205. Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2016). Pro-Environmental Purchase Behaviour: The Role of Consumers’ Biospheric Values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jretconser.2016.08.01. Nicosia, F. (1966). Consumer Decision Processes: Marketing and Advertising Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Possamai, F., Jelidi, S., Santos, B., Pereira, O. R., Cabo, P., & Sousa, M. J. (2021). Consumers Behavior and Perceptions Regarding Natural Cosmetic Products. 1st Natural Products Application: Health, Cosmetic and Food. https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/handle/10198/23461 Roberts, R. (2022). 2022 Beauty Industry Trends & Cosmetics Marketing: Statistics and Strategies for Your Ecommerce Growth. www.commonthreadco. com/blogs/coachs-corner/beauty-industrycosmetics-marketing-ecommerce. CEEJ • 11(58) • 2024 • pp. 233-251 • ISSN 2543-6821 • DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0016 251 Růžičková, L. (2020). Analysis of Purchasing Behaviour on the Natural Cosmetics Market. [Bachelor’s thesis, Technical University of Ostrava]. DSpace VŠBTUO. http://hdl.handle.net/10084/141967. Sadiq, M., Adil, M., & Paul, J. (2021). An Innovation Resistance Theory Perspective on Purchase of EcoFriendly Cosmetics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jretconser.2020.102369. Sánchez-Bravo, P., Chambers, E., NogueraArtiaga, L., Sendra, E., Chambers, E., & CarbonellBarrachina, Á. A. (2021). Consumer Understanding of Sustainability Concept in Agricultural Products. Food Quality and Preference, 89, 104136. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104136. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The Link Between Green Purchasing Decisions and Measures of Environmental Consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55. Severo, E. A., de Guimarães, J. C. F., & Dellarmelin, M. L. (2021). Impact of The COVID-19 Pandemic on Environmental Awareness, Sustainable Consumption and Social Responsibility: Evidence from Generations in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286. 124947. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947. Shimul, A. S., Cheah, I., & Khan, B. B. (2022). Investigating Female Shoppers’ Attitude and Purchase Intention Toward Green Cosmetics in South Africa. Journal of Global Marketing, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org /10.1080/08911762.2021.1934770. Sivapalan, A., von der Heidt, T., Scherrer, P., & Sorwar, G. (2021). A Consumer Values-Based Approach to Enhancing Green Consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.013. Statista (2022). Statista Market Forecast. https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beautypersonal-care/cosmetics/natural-cosmetics/unitedstates?currency=usd. Statista Research Department. 2022. Global Market Value for Natural and Organic Cosmetics and Personal Care from 2018 to 2027. https://www. statista.com/statistics/673641/global-market-valuefor-natural-cosmetics. Stella Rising (2021). Stella Intelligence: Health and Wellness Trends (Report). Stella Rising. https://www. stellarising.com/health-and-wellness-trend-report. Van der Werf, E. T., Busch, M., Jong, M. C., & Hoenders, H. J. R. (2021). Lifestyle Changes During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A CrossSectional Survey in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889021-11264-z. Verbeke, W. (2009). Stakeholder, Citizen and Consumer Interests in Farm Animal Welfare. Animal Welfare, 18(4), 325–333. Verhoef, P. C. (2005). Explaining Purchases of Organic Meat by Dutch Consumers. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(2), 245–267. https://dx.doi. org/ 10.1093/eurrag/jbi008. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. & Song, F. (2020). The Ethical Issues of Animal Testing in Cosmetics Industry. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 112–116. https:// dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20200804.12. Żyngiel, W., & Platta, A. (2015). Consumers’ Expectations Towards the Cosmetic Preparations of the Natural Origin Used in SPA & Wellness Treatments. Handel Wewnętrzny, 1(354), 324–333.