Evaluating the effectiveness of investment in boosting South Africa's economic growth: A comparative analysis across different administrations

Semenya, Dikeledi; Kanayo, Ogujiuba Article Evaluating the effectiveness of investment in boosting South Africa's economic growth: A comparative analysis across different administrations Administrative Sciences Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel Suggested Citation: Semenya, Dikeledi; Kanayo, Ogujiuba (2024) : Evaluating the effectiveness of investment in boosting South Africa's economic growth: A comparative analysis across different administrations, Administrative Sciences, ISSN 2076-3387, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 14, Iss. 8, pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080173 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/320987 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Citation: Semenya, Dikeledi, and Kanayo Ogujiuba. 2024. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investment in Boosting South Africa’s Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis across Different Administrations. Administrative Sciences 14: 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ admsci14080173 Received: 11 May 2024 Revised: 23 July 2024 Accepted: 26 July 2024 Published: 12 August 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). administrative sciences Review Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investment in Boosting South Africa’s Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis across Different Administrations Dikeledi Semenya and Kanayo Ogujiuba * School of Development Studies, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: South Africa’s economic growth has been slow since the 1980s due to inefficiencies in the manufacturing, mining and quarrying, ICT, electricity, gas, and water sectors. This article uses the theoretical framework and growth rates to identify key reasons for this slowdown. Key issues include inefficiencies within the gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and inadequate infrastructure, primarily due to government behavior. This article used secondary data to perform the desktop analysis. To promote economic growth, the South African government and allied stakeholders should consider increasing investments in public infrastructure and financing research and development. This article argues that economic growth is driven by government expenditure, easy access to financing, and technological advancements. To promote economic growth, a comprehensive approach is needed, including tax breaks, loan guarantees, and pro-business legislation. Keywords: economic growth; gross fixed capital formation; investment 1. Introduction South Africa has undergone a significant transformation since achieving democracy in 1994, but its economic growth has been stagnant (Rodrik 2008). In comparison to many people’s expectations, the average growth rate of 3% during the first ten years after apartheid fell well short of what was thought to be required to enable a stable transition to democracy in South Africa (Du Plessis and Smit 2006). The early 2000s saw another period of strong growth, fueled by high commodity prices and global economic expansion (Fukunishi 2014). South Africa’s economic growth has been a bumpy ride since 1980, marked by significant fluctuations and periods of both robust expansion and contraction (Ferendinos 2012). The early 1980s saw relatively strong growth, exceeding 4% annually, thanks to high gold prices and a global economic boom. However, this was followed by a sharp downturn in the mid-1980s due to external sanctions imposed against the apartheid regime, internal political instability, and rising inflation (Tryman and Jallow 1994). The 1990s brought renewed optimism with the transition to democracy and the implementation of economic reforms. Growth averaged around 3% annually, driven by increased investment and domestic demand. However, the gains were not evenly distributed, and unemployment and poverty remained high. Nonetheless, GDP growth reached a peak of 5.4% in 2007 (Kanbur and Noman 2021). This growth has not necessarily translated into improved well-being for the population, with challenges such as job quality and environmental sustainability persisting (Kanbur and Noman 2021;Jayne and Sanchez 2021). The region’s transition from area expansion to productivity growth in agriculture is seen as a key factor in sustaining livelihood improvements (Jayne and Sanchez 2021). The increase in foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa, including South Africa, has also contributed to economic growth (Blanas et al. 2019). However, the sustainability of this growth is a concern, with the relationship between savings and GDP per capita being a key factor (Klutse 2020). Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080173 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/admsci Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 2 of 20 However, Maswana (2009) asserts that the global financial crisis of 2008 hit South Africa hard, causing a recession and negative growth in 2009. The recovery from the crisis was slow and uneven. Growth remained sluggish in the 2010s, averaging around 1.5% annually (Raputsoane 2018). This was exacerbated by structural deficiencies, such as electricity load shedding and strained industrial relations (Groepe 2015). Despite some recovery in household spending, the economy continued to face challenges, including a hike in personal income taxes and high service costs (Fourie 2015). The persistently declining growth rate, falling below the 5.4% target, further underscored the need for more effective policy measures (Kganyago 2015). This was attributed to various factors, including political uncertainty, policy inconsistencies, and global economic headwinds (Raputsoane 2018). The impact of these factors is further exacerbated by structural challenges in the economy, such as the need for greater inclusivity and job creation (Dessus et al. 2019). In recent years, South Africa’s economic growth has been subdued, hovering around 2%. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the challenges, causing a significant economic contraction in 2020 (Ikwegbue et al. 2021). While the economy has shown signs of recovery in 2021 and 2022, the outlook remains uncertain due to ongoing challenges such as high unemployment, inequality, and power shortages. However, since the early 1980s, investment slowed due to the political and economic sanctions of the apartheid period (Laverty 2007). Nonetheless, the inability to shift investment toward these sectors has led to environments in which clientelism, patronage, and corruption have thrived (Zalk 2016). This was made even worse by a ‘high-profit and low-investment’ economy and post-1980s deindustrialization and a lack of black ownership in strategic sectors of the economy (Zalk 2021). These underlying themes, taken together, explain the investment trends in South Africa which have dominated the past four decades. However, South Africa’s mining and quarrying sector has historically played a significant role in the national economy, with investment fluctuating over the years based on global market forces and domestic policy decisions (Makoela 2021). Despite challenges like regulatory uncertainty and infrastructure constraints, the mining and quarrying sector in South Africa remains an attractive investment destination. Recent years have seen increased interest in renewable energy minerals, presenting exciting opportunities for the future (Baker et al. 2014). Rodrik (2008) asserts that the South African manufacturing landscape has undergone significant transformations since 1980. While investment trends fluctuated over the period, the general trajectory exhibits an upward curve, with notable peaks and turns reflecting broader economic and political contexts. From 1980 to 1994, investment was relatively stable, ranging from 2% to 4% of the GDP despite increasing political instability and international sanctions (Fine 2018). Furthermore, the South African manufacturing sector has shown resilience and potential for growth, driven by factors such as government initiatives, currency depreciation, and increased investment (Barnes et al. 2004). However, it faces challenges including infrastructure constraints, a skills gap, and policy uncertainty (Bhorat and Rooney 2017). The sector’s performance is influenced by a U-shaped relationship between the manufacturing share of the GDP and per capita GDP, exchange rate depreciation, good governance, and the size of the domestic market (Mijiyawa 2017). Baker et al. (2015) asserts that throughout the period of 1980 to 2022, investment in South Africa’s electricity, gas, and water sector has undergone significant fluctuations, reflecting the evolving political and economic landscape. However, investment growth slowed down in the late 2000s and early 2010s due to the global financial crisis and concerns about the government’s management. Despite these challenges, investment picked up again in the mid-2010s due to the government’s commitment to diversifying the energy mix and promoting renewable energy sources. Investment in information, computer, and telecommunications equipment (ICT) in South Africa has steadily increased over the past four decades, rising from 1.5% to 6.3% from 1980 to 2022. This growth is driven by factors such as the liberalization of the telecommunications sector, the rapid growth of the internet, and the increasing adoption of ICT by businesses and consumers. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 3 of 20 The late 1990s and early 2000s saw a further period of strong growth, as businesses and consumers increasingly adopted ICT technologies (Gillwald et al. 2012). The dot-com boom in South Africa led to a surge in internet-based business investment, reaching 7.1% of total investment by 2008. However, the 2008 global financial crisis led to a decline, dropping to 4.9% by 2010. Since then, ICT investment has recovered somewhat but has not yet reached pre-crisis levels. Despite this decline, ICT investment remains a significant driver of economic growth in South Africa. This article uses secondary data from the Reserve Bank of South Africa, analyzing economic growth and gross fixed capital formation in four sectors from 1980 to 2022. This article unravels the complex interrelationship between gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and economic growth in the context of South Africa with a special focus on three of the most critical sectors: manufacturing; mining and quarrying; and water, gas, and electricity. By investigating the relation of capital formation in manufacturing, mining and quarrying, and water, gas, and electricity with economic growth, this article tries to find major trends in investment and relate them to future economic policy. This analysis is relevant for South Africa as it attempts to establish a recovery path in the postpandemic period while pursuing long-term, sustainable development. Firstly, it covers a critical gap in the direct assessment of the relationship between GFCF and economic growth in South Africa, which has noticeably been missing from the literature as a specific subject. Secondly, it is important in the wider scope of economic policies given that fostering investment in infrastructure and industrial capacities is a goal of the National Development Plan 2030. Finally, knowledge from this study will help solve the problems of socioeconomics, unemployment, poverty, and inequality in South Africa. The analysis of these relationships in this paper will therefore contribute to imperative investment policies and economic policies that will ensure sustainable development and economic resilience in the country. 1.1. Issues in Context Ncanywa and Makhenyane (2016) and Meyer and Sanusi (2019) again answered in the affirmative the question concerning the relationship between gross fixed capital formation and economic growth, with Ncanywa and Makhenyane (2016) further underlining the role of investment activities in boosting the economy. Meyer and Sanusi (2019) also noted that investment had a positive long-term effect on employment. Ncanywa and Ralarala (2020) and Feddersen et al. (2017) explained the specific sectors and mechanisms through which capital formation impacts economic growth. Ncanywa and Ralarala (2020) identified manufacturing and technology as the major sectors to invest in, while Feddersen et al. (2017) pointed out the role of exports in encouraging capital formation and increasing economic growth. These findings thus establish the critical importance of focused investment strategies in these core sectors since they have the potential to improve the overall economic performance of South Africa. This has a structural change with the economic growth in South Africa’s manufacturing sector and implications for the general economy. Tregenna (2008) documented how the manufacturing share of the national output serves as an important direct demand stimulator for the services sector and the entire economy. However, as Meyer and McCamel (2017) indicates, in recent times, there has been a decline in the sector towards its relative contribution to the national GDP and employment. This decline results from stiff competition from Southeast Asia and human skills deficiency (Bhorat and Rooney 2017). Despite this, Pasara and Garidzirai (2020) emphasize the potential of gross capital formation to stimulate economic growth and employment, showing how specific investments in this area could salvage the situation. The mining and quarrying sector in South Africa has faced a series of challenges over time: it has been home to fluctuating levels of investment, commodity price volatility, and regulatory uncertainty at different levels (Leon 2012;Moraka and Jansen van Rensburg 2015). These three conditions have fueled inconsistent contributions to economic growth, where periods of high commodity prices have led to peak investment cycles (Saunders Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 4 of 20 2008). South African firms have still exhibited their general resilience in such situations as they have a tradition of operating in adverse environments (Luiz and Ruplal 2013). Nevertheless, the downfall of the industry has been prescribed by the implementation of the divisive Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 2002, which has sparked critical licensing delays and regulatory uncertainty (Leon 2012). Still, the activities that have been carried out by the government in order to drive transformation in the industry will not balance out the fact that this is a sector that has been consistently failing to attract investor trust, as well as the mentioned black economic empowerment (Moraka and Jansen van Rensburg 2015). The mining and quarrying sector continues to be a significant element of South Africa’s GDP, and the economy that surrounds it is a global juggernaut. However, these opportunities also present challenges. Labor unrest, environmental concerns, and the need for modernization are the primary concerns (Syrett 2016). The environment is concerned about the generation of wastewater and sediments, among other factors, as a result of mining. This has resulted in the call for sustainable mining practices (SOME) (Manyuchi et al. 2019). The industry has been unable to make a significant contribution to the sustainability of development due to the dearth of technological and human resources (Broadhurst et al. 2014). These facilities are a source of resilience in a tourism sector that is otherwise highly vulnerable, as well as an entry point to a transition to the green economy. The wider tourism industry’s electricity needs are primarily met by seawater desalination, which consumes both onand off-grid electricity (Montmasson-Clair 2015). The water, gas, and electricity industry forms a critical part of economic growth in South Africa but has its challenges in terms of investment and its infrastructure. For instance, Khonjelwayo and Nthakheni (2020) exemplify the role of regulation in the electricity distribution area that enables investments, placing emphasis on government intervention and capital from the private sector. Ilesanmi and Tewari (2017) and Ogujiuba and Mngometulu (2022) insist on the important aspects of energy consumption and measures of human capital investment in economic growth, where this requires more investment in social and economic infrastructure. Khobai et al. (2016) go further by emphasizing the causal relationship between electricity supply and economic growth, calling for measures that improve the supply, thus reducing power outages. Buraimoh et al. (2020) capture the transformations and restructuring in the electricity industry, with the dawn of independent power producers calling to signal the importance of deregulation and competition. 1.2. Conceptual Framework The discussion on economic growth is a deep tapestry of varied theories and models, each offering a unique insight into the plausible mechanism behind prosperity. One such corner block is Solow’s neoclassical growth theory, which serves as a fundamental scaffold for the dissection of the roots of economic expansion. Zhang (2018) brings to light the objective of the theory, which was to explain the interaction between economic growth and a complex set of factors, ranging from income distribution to public goods. To follow a different theoretical perspective, Nweke et al. (2017) expound that the Harrod–Domar model indicates the pivotal role of capital accumulation through investment in fostering economic advancement. The model points to the need for nations to shift their resources from consumption to capital production, with savings as its linchpin. It further gives a note of caution against imbalance, pointing out that either too much or too low GFCF might cause inflationary pressures or stagnation, respectively (Dumo et al. 2023). Standing in contrast to the neoclassical and Harrod–Domar paradigms, the endogenous growth theory, advocated by Romer (1990), disqualifies the idea of diminishing returns to capital accumulation. It argues that a country’s investments in human capital and innovation as internal factors are the primary determinants of sustainable long-run growth. This view brings out the importance of GFCF in enhancing a country’s productive capacity and in fostering the development of innovation. On the other hand, the Vicious Circle Theory gives a rather gloomy picture of how poor GFCF can perpetuate poverty by providing an automatic vicious cycle of low income, low savings, and limited investment (Nafziger 2006). Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 5 of 20 It brings out how targeted policies need to focus on saving, investment, and infrastructural development to be able to break the shackles of poverty. The nexus between gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and economic growth, however, is multifaceted as well evidenced by various viewpoints. Liening (2013) emphasizes human capital development, while Ayres (1998) points out the significance of natural resources and technological innovation. Moreover, Telnova (2019) and Panizza (2017) support the idea of financial policy carried out by the government and emphasize the possible negative effect of an overgrown financial sector on the growth of the economy. 1.3. The Interplay between Gross Fixed Capital Formation in Manufacturing/Mining and Quarrying/Electricity, Gas, and Water Gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) is a critical indicator of economic health in the manufacturing sector as it quantifies the investment in machinery, buildings, and infrastructure that is utilized to improve productivity, innovate, and sustain a competitive edge (Dovletmurzaeva 2023). Significantly, inward FDI has been discovered to stimulate GFCF within manufacturing production (Amighini et al. 2017). In relation to financial systems, including contracts, markets, and intermediaries, the equally positive function is identified in the promotion of technological innovation and economic growth (DemirgüçKunt et al. 2018). The most recent pertinent development is the emerging concept of green finance, which serves to address the necessity of combating climate change and identifying new investment channels associated with sustainable manufacturing (Debrah et al. 2023). Significant determinants are supposed to be the performance of the GFCF in the mining and quarrying sector about potential output and capacity, with direct impacts on the availability of raw materials for other industries (Saini et al. 2017). On the contrary, very high risks in the sector are revealed because the capital formation by this sector is very vulnerable to a variation in commodity prices and international demand, and that leads to the extensive fluctuation in this rate (Lkhagva et al. 2019). Emphasis would underline the necessity of sustainable management and reinvestment in other sectors not to worsen the negative implications of mining booms (Lkhagva et al. 2019). The rationale on behalf of the essential need is derived from the fact that infrastructure investments are necessary to develop the mining industry, including in Australia (Perks 2016). The UN has agreed that throughout the various stages of mining activities, several Sustainable Development Goals are affected; hence, there is potential leverage to those goals (Kennedy et al. 2020). The interrelation of this sector with other sectors is multilayered and deep, having a considerable bearing on economic stability and growth (Pradhan et al. 2018). Investment in electricity, gas, and water is key to the establishment of abundant and sustainable energy and water resources that are critical for industrial manufacturing. It is further complicated by the interconnectedness of electricity and gas, offering some possibility of facing these challenges and risks (Peng and Poudineh 2016;Skaggs et al. 2012). Interdependencies among manufacturing, mining, and utility sectors are critical for growth and development on a sustained basis (Peng and Poudineh 2016). This is more so in the electricity and gas sectors that require a comprehensive framework to conceptualize their nature of interdependence (Hibbard and Schatzki 2012). In Europe, the electricity generation market confirms the necessity to consider market interdependencies in energy system modeling (Lienert and Lochner 2012). The United States and Canadian experiences reinforce the previous argument since the energy industries of the two countries are highly interdependent, with substantial integration and cooperation (McKinney 2008). These works highlight the critical importance of ensuring balanced and sustained GFCF in all sectors to guarantee a steady supply of raw materials and utilities for manufacturing and mining activities. Therefore, a dynamic interrelationship in growth personalizes the GFCF of the manufacturing and mining and quarrying sectors along with the electricity, gas, and water sectors. Such cross-sectoral investment, which is balanced and strategic, contributes immensely to sustained growth in the economy, raises productivity, and translates into enhanced competitive advantages in a global Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 6 of 20 perspective. This is how capital formation must be geared in conjunction with technological developments and market exigencies integrating a resilient and robust economic infrastructure supporting durable prosperity. 2. Related Literature 2.1. The Influence of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and ICT on Economic Growth Often, researchers find investment in ICT to be the biggest contributor to economic growth for most countries; however, Yousefi (2011), using time-series cross-country data of a total of 62 countries suggests otherwise, with the results of the study showing that the level of investment in ICT for countries with different incomes is different. The study further revealed that for highand upper-middle-income groups, investment in ICT influxes economic growth, while it fails in lower-middle-income countries. The relationship between ICT and economic growth is not always mixed; in fact, some studies have found a single relationship between the two. Aghaei and Rezagholizadeh’s (2017) study, for example, found that ICT significantly affects economic growth in OIC countries by applying growth model framework dynamics and the static panel data approach. According to a study by Okogun et al. (2012), utilizing autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) for the country of Nigeria, investments in ICT have a considerable impact on economic growth. The study also comes to the conclusion that strong returns on ICT investments lead to economic growth. Matlou (2019) used the ARDL model to study the association between ICT infrastructure investment and economic growth in South Africa from 1992 to 2013. The variables were shown to be co-integrated, demonstrating a long-term positive link between ICT investments and GDP. Sookha (2018) evaluated the influence of mobile communications infrastructure investment on South African economic growth. The autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) methodology was used in this investigation. There was no cointegration between the variables, and thus no long-run relationship. Naym and Hossain (2016) conducted a study using linear regression analysis for the country of Bangladesh and found that there is a positive but not statistically significant correlation between ICT investment and economic growth. The study also suggests that the smaller share of ICT investment in the GDP and the shorter time span available for the country than what is required for conducting a rigorous statistical analysis may be the reason for the lack of significance of the results. 2.2. Influence of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Manufacturing on Economic Growth Economic scholars have long debated the relationship between manufacturing investment and economic growth. Manufacturing has a proven to have a positive impact on economic growth, but the link is complex and depends on several variables, including environmental concerns, the unique circumstances of each nation, and technology advancements. The literature on the relationship between the variables is described below. According to a study conducted by Meyer and Sanusi (2019), manufacturing investment contributes positively to economic growth in the long term. This conclusion is based on research utilizing the VAR model that looked at how sectoral investment and government spending affected South Africa’s economic growth during the quarter of 1995–2016. Gachunga (2019) argues that FDI (foreign direct investment) in the infrastructure sector has a positive and significant impact on the economic growth of Kenya, while the manufacturing and agriculture sectors have had a positive insignificant effect. The argument spans from the OLS results tested in the study. Subsequently, Kolisi (2021) ascertained the long-term correlation between foreign direct investment in the manufacturing sector and economic growth in South Africa from 2006 to 2018. The autoregressive distributed lag model was used in empirical research to look at the long-term relationship between the variables. The findings imply that foreign direct investment in manufacturing has a long-term detrimental effect on economic growth. Furthermore, Opoku et al. (2019) studied the influence of FDI on African economic growth using panel data from 38 African nations from 1960 to 2014. The system’s generalized method of moments (GMM) results revealed Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 7 of 20 that while FDI positively and unconditionally stimulates economic growth, its growthenhancing effect is fictitious when conditional sectoral effects are considered. According to the channels of manifestation, the pass-through impact of FDI is only considerable for the agriculture and service sectors and, for the most part, negative, albeit insignificantly, for the manufacturing sector. 2.3. Influence of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Mining and Quarrying on Economic Growth Ennin and Wiafe (2023) and Gochero and Boopen (2020) observed that foreign direct investment (FDI) in the mining industry could result in positive immediate impacts on economic growth. In spite of this, Ennin also admitted the possibility of future barriers. Bucaj (2018) echoed similar discoveries, accentuating the indispensability of persistent and increased FDI provisions in order to maximize its benefits. (Gyeke-Dako et al. 2015) highlighted the importance of stable financial environment in realizing the beneficial role of FDI in stimulating economic growth. Still, these studies underscore how foreign direct investment through mining can pull a country out of poverty while it underscores good governance and favorable regulation as important issues to consider. Additionally, Rahimov (2013) investigated the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the economic growth of a selection of host countries between 1994 and 2011. The study showed that FDI has a favorable impact on economic growth using aggregate-level FDI data for an assortment of five developing nations. Next, sector-specific statistics were used to determine whether every sector contributes positively to growth. It was discovered that the sectors’ outcomes differ. The manufacturing and mining industries appeared to benefit from the findings, whilst the trade and financial intermediation sectors appeared to have a detrimental impact on economic growth. 2.4. Influence of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Electricity, Gas, and Water on Economic Growth Ayub et al. (2021) and Khaliq and Noy (2007) conducted studies on the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth. Ayub et al. (2021) found that longterm economic growth in Pakistan can be boosted by investments in infrastructure such as roads, railways, gas projects, telecommunication, water, and power projects. Khaliq and Noy (2007) found that FDI contributes positively to economic growth, but the composition of FDI matters when analyzing diverse FDI inflows across sectors. Only a small number of sectors show positive FDI inflows, and one sector even has a strong negative impact. Latief and Lefen (2019), and others conducted an empirical analysis on Pakistan’s power and energy sector, focusing on the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI), energy consumption, and economic growth from 1990 to 2017. The study found that Pakistan’s power and energy sector received more FDI recently, and patterns in energy production and consumption showed significant differences from prior years. The findings support a short-run, positive, bidirectional causal link between energy use and economic growth. Javid’s study examined the relationship between infrastructure investment and economic growth in Pakistan from 1972 to 2015, comparing public and private sector investments. The study found that investments in public infrastructure often have a greater effect on economic growth than investments in private infrastructure. A heterogeneous view is provided by the literature on the effect of GFCF on economic growth. In the long run, GFCF in manufacturing generally increases the economic growth rate, although there are studies suggesting that such an effect might be long term. GFCF in mining and quarrying constantly reveals a positive impact on economic growth. Similarly, GFCF in the water, gas, and electricity sectors tends to positively affect the economic growth in the long run, while negative results are found in some studies. In turn, according to the results of these studies, there is this divergence, which means there is complexity and sectoral specificity in the process of relations in items of capital formation and economic growth, and the effect of capital formation varies in other industrial contexts. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 8 of 20 3. Economic Growth and GFCF in South Africa Table 1presents the growth rates of GFCF in the three sectors. From 1980 to 1985, in the presence of the apartheid era, the economic growth of the country South Africa experienced slow growth as well as major declines. The biggest decline was in 1983, which saw a decrease from 4 to 1%. During that period, the country moved from slow growth to no growth. The country’s economic growth did not improve during the next period (1985–1990), which was still in the apartheid era. There were still significant declines, with 1985 recording the highest decline of 3.4%. In 1985 and 1986, economic growth was hampered by ZAR 15.5 billion in politically induced capital outflows (SARB 1987). There was a trace of growth in 1988, which was 2%. There was no evidence of growth in the four years preceding the end of apartheid. In March 1989, the South African economy began a recession, which worsened in 1992 before leveling off in the first half of 1993 (South African Reserve Bank 1993). Table 1. Growth rates. Date GDP GFCFMQ GFCFM GFCFEGW 1980 4.2 26.2 34.5 1.6 1981 2.9 5.5 −3.0 4.5 1982 −2.7 −5.9 −9.8 14.5 1983 −4.1 −9.3 −2.9 7.9 1984 2.8 3.6 −13.3 11.9 1985 −3.4 7.5 −26.6 −6.3 1986 −2.2 7.8 −24.7 −37.3 1987 −0.1 −1.2 −11.9 −9.5 1988 2.0 9.3 42.8 −14.3 1989 0.3 3.2 35.5 2.5 1990 −2.4 −6.2 13.8 −5.1 1991 −3.1 −6.8 −11.7 −20.9 1992 −4.2 −18.7 −6.0 0.2 1993 −0.9 −24.9 3.9 −8.2 1994 1.1 18.2 9.2 13.6 1995 1.0 4.2 20.6 20.4 1996 2.1 1.6 6.6 13.3 1997 0.5 12.7 3.1 −3.5 1998 −1.6 7.6 −2.7 −24.0 1999 0.3 −4.4 −0.1 −18.5 2000 2.1 11.7 1.2 −17.4 2001 0.4 8.0 6.1 −2.2 2002 0.2 13.6 −3.0 14.4 2003 1.5 5.0 3.6 33.2 2004 3.4 −19.2 17.4 16.2 2005 4.1 −11.6 9.7 10.8 2006 4.4 48.7 12.8 14.3 2007 4.0 28.0 6.4 37.5 Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 15 of 20 5. Summary From the 1980s to the early 2020s, the South African economy experienced significant fluctuations. The most significant decline occurred in 1983 with a 4.1% decrease. The economy transitioned from a state of sluggish growth to one of near stagnation. The South African economy was in a state of decline from 1985 to 1990 due to apartheid. In 1985, the economy experienced an extraordinary 3.4% contraction, which was further exacerbated by ZAR 15.5 billion in politically induced capital outflows (SARB 1987). Despite a 2% recovery in 1988, there had been no substantial development in the four years leading up to the end of apartheid. In March 1989, the nation officially entered a recession, which persisted until 1992. However, there was some degree of moderation before the economy stabilized in early 1993 (South African Reserve Bank 1993). The relationship between GFC and economic growth has been an issue of concern. In the 1980s, GFCF increases were not supporting economic growth steadily. In 1985, GFC increased by 7.5%, while economic growth decreased by 3.5%. From 1987 to 1990, GFC and the economy fell. In 1988 to 1989, an increase in GFC allowed for economic growth. In 1990 to 1993, however, GFC and the economy fell. Interestingly, economic growth increased in 1999 and 2004 with a falling GFC. After 2004, economic growth in most cases fell with increasing GFC, except in 2018, where it stayed constant with a GFC increase. The connection between economic growth and key sectors in South Africa portrays a complicated picture. The manufacturing, mining and quarrying, and water sectors each provide a unique contribution, with their performance influencing the overall trajectory. While economic growth has fluctuated in recent years, gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) in these sectors has also been uneven. Manufacturing, for example, has displayed signs of stagnation, with GFCF unable to keep up with anticipated expansion. Mining and quarrying, on the other hand, has seen a decrease in GFCF due to both resource restrictions and worldwide market changes. Energy sectors such as electricity, gas, and water likewise present a mixed bag, with infrastructural investments being offset by operational issues. South Africa’s economic trajectory from 1978 to 2022 has been shaped by apartheid-era policies, post-apartheid reparations, and global economic pressures. Apartheid led to racial segregation, economic imbalance, and inward-focused policies, resulting in infrastructure development and skilled labor pools but entrenching inequality. Post-apartheid, the Reconstruction and Development Programme aimed to address historical injustices but faced obstacles like fiscal limits, corruption, and HIV/AIDS. Economic development remained slow, particularly among black South Africans. The 20th century saw attempts at economic change through initiatives like Black Economic Empowerment, but these have been criticized for enriching a small elite and failing to address structural inequality. To achieve sustainable growth, the government must combat inequality, improve governance, and build a more dynamic and competitive economy. This article analyzes the period of 1980–2022 in South Africa to determine the impact gross fixed capital formation has on economic growth. Other related ideas and their potential influence on the outcome are not explored in this research, nor are events that occurred outside of this time frame. However, the findings from this study can be utilized as a guide for the government’s new ideas and contribute to the ongoing discussion in emerging countries about the relationship between gross fixed capital formation and economic growth. This study offers insightful information about the tactics that can accelerate South Africa’s growth trajectory, promoting wise choices that alleviate economic inequalities and improve the general welfare of its people. Recommendation The South African government and policy stakeholders have a lot of things to take into consideration considering this study’s findings in order to promote the nation’s economic growth: 1. This study suggests that the South African government and the Reserve Bank should increase public infrastructure investment and funding for research and development Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 16 of 20 to stimulate economic growth. Additionally, the bank should direct investments in programs or infrastructure and lower interest rates to make borrowing more affordable for companies, despite the weak association between manufacturing investment and economic development. 2. The South African Reserve Bank should consider easing capital adequacy requirements to allow banks to lend more money to the mining and quarrying industry, as there is no correlation between investment in these industries and economic growth. The government and central bank should employ a multifaceted strategy, including tax cuts, loan guarantees, and regulatory environments, to encourage private investment and direct investment in public infrastructure projects, such as renewable energy and water treatment facilities. 3. Encouraging public–private partnerships (PPPs) can reduce government risk and utilize private sector resources. Increasing regulations’ predictability and clarity boosts investor confidence and attracts money to industries like gas, water, and electricity. South Africa can harness its potential through these policies, fostering economic expansion and a prosperous future. Diversifying investments across sectors, like renewable energy, technology, and advanced manufacturing, can mitigate the risks associated with overdependence on mining or manufacturing, promoting a future resilient economy for sustainable growth. 4. South Africa needs policies to create an investment environment, such as regulatory improvements, fiscal incentives, and public–private partnerships, to attract investment in sectors like mining and quarrying. This will boost economic growth and job creation. Structural policies should address manufacturing sector challenges and enhance competitiveness and innovation to contribute to sustainable growth and job creation. Modernizing the sector and improving its productivity and access to domestic and international markets is also crucial. 5. Policymakers should focus on infrastructure development, regulatory reforms, private sector investment attractiveness, and state-related enterprise efficiency to improve service delivery, productivity, and overall economic performance. When the economy is heading towards a recession, countercyclical investment policies can stabilize the economy by investing in high-multiplier projects. Holistic reviews of economic indicators, including business confidence, structural barriers to growth, and external economic factors, should be undertaken to formulate realistic policy responses. This comprehensive analysis can help identify possible policy interventions to guarantee sustainable growth and development. By doing so, policymakers can ensure sustainable growth and development. 6. Policies should balance capital formation across relevant sectors, promoting growth for emerging sectors with high potential. Encouraging investments in renewable energy and advanced manufacturing can sustain economic activity and reduce overdependence on traditional sectors. Additionally, exploring industrial policy improvements that emphasize productivity, innovation, and market access can bolster industrial growth and economic development both domestically and internationally. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, D.S. and K.O.; methodology, D.S. and K.O.; validation, K.O.; formal analysis, D.S.; investigation, D.S. and K.O.; data curation, K.O.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S. and K.O.; writing—review and editing, D.S. and K.O.; visualization, D.S.; supervision, K.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding, and the APC was funded by the University of Mpumalanga, South Africa. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 17 of 20 References Aghaei, Majid, and Mahdieh Rezagholizadeh. 2017. The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on economic growth in the OIC Countries. Economic and Environmental Studies 17: 257–78. [CrossRef] Amighini, Alessia A., Margaret S. McMillan, and Macro Sanfilippo. 2017. FDI and Capital Formation in Developing Economies: New Evidence from Industry-Level Data (No. w23049). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Anyadike, Kennedy, and Chukunalu Mgbomene. 2023. COVID-19 pandemic and nigeria’s economic growth: A comparative analysis of pre and post 2020. International Journal of Advanced Research in Accounting, Economics and Business Perspectives 7: 94–111. [CrossRef] Aron, Janine, and John Muellbauer. 2002. Interest rate effects on output: Evidence from a GDP forecasting model for South Africa. IMF Staff Papers 49 (S1): 185–213. Ayres, Robert U. 1998. Towards a disequilibrium theory of endogenous economic growth. Environmental and Resource Economics 11: 289–300. [CrossRef] Ayub, Muhammad, Rabia Rasheed, Rashid Ahmad, and Furrukh Bashir. 2021. Infrastructural Investments and Economic Growth: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 7: 591–98. [CrossRef] Baker, Jonathan, Kenneth Strzepek, William Farmer, and C. Adam Schlosser. 2014. Quantifying the impact of renewable energy futures on cooling water use. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50: 1289–303. [CrossRef] Baker, Lucy, Jesse Burton, Catrina Godinho, and Hilton Trollip. 2015. The Political Economy of Decarbonisation: Exploring the Dynamics of South Africa’s Electricity Sector. Cape Town: Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town. Barnes, Justin, Raphael Kaplinsky, and Mike Morris. 2004. Industrial policy in developing economies: Developing dynamic comparative advantage in the South African automobile sector. Competition & Change 8: 153–72. Bhoola, Fatima, and Uma Kollamparambil. 2011. Trends and determinants of output growth volatility in South Africa. International Journal of Economics and Finance 3: 151–60. [CrossRef] Bhorat, Haroon, and Christopher Rooney. 2017. State of Manufacturing in South Africa. Cape: Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town. Blanas, Sotiris, Adnan Seric, and Christian Viegelahn. 2019. Job quality, FDI and institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from firm-level data. The European Journal of Development Research 31: 1287–317. [CrossRef] Broadhurst, Jennifer L., Jean Paul Franzidis, and Brett Cohen. 2014. Contribution of the minerals industry towards sustainable development in South Africa. African Journal of Sustainable Development 4: 207–23. Bucaj, Alketa. 2018. The impact of FDI in mining on Kosovo’s economic growth. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8: 260–85. [CrossRef] Buraimoh, Elutunji, Abayomi Aduragba Adebiyi, Oladimeji Joseph Ayamolowo, and Innocent Ewean Davidson. 2020. South Africa electricity supply system: The past, present and the future. Paper presented at 2020 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, Nairobi, Kenya, August 25–28; pp. 1–5. Debrah, Caleb, Amos Darko, and Albert Ping Chuen Chan. 2023. A bibliometric-qualitative literature review of green finance gap and future research directions. Climate and Development 15: 432–55. [CrossRef] Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, and Dorothe Singer. 2018. Household finance and economic development. In Handbook of Finance and Development. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 534–49. Dessus, Sebastien C., Marek Hanusch, and Yoko Nagashima. 2019. South Africa Economic Update: Enrollments in Tertiary Education Must Rise. Available online: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1462587/south-africa-economic-update/2105949/ (accessed on 3 August 2023). Dovletmurzaeva, Malika. 2023. Development of innovative infrastructure of the industrial sector. E3S Web of Conferences 451: 02009. [CrossRef] Du Plessis, Stan, and Ben Smit. 2006. Economic Growth in South Africa Since 1994. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. Dumo, Genesis A., Harriette D. Ico, and Ederliza V. Magpantay. 2023. Applicability of Harrod-Domar Model in Explaining Economic Growth in the Philippines. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies 5: 22–46. [CrossRef] Ennin, Anthony, and Emmanuel A. Wiafe. 2023. The impact of mining foreign direct investment on economic growth in Ghana. Cogent Economics & Finance 11: 2251800. Feddersen, Maura, Hugo Nel, and Ferdi Botha. 2017. Exports, capital formation and economic growth in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance 9: 213–44. Ferendinos, Michael Gerry. 2012. Strategies for South Africa’s Ascent in the Modern World-System. Available online: https: //scholar.sun.ac.za/items/541d47a1-283e-4dc7-a91a-69004fba6742 (accessed on 25 July 2024). Fine, Ben. 2018. The Political Economy of South Africa: From Minerals-Energy Complex to Industrialisation. London: Routledge. Fourie, Thea. 2015. Rocky recovery expected for South Africa during 2015: Economy. Professional Accountant 2015: 12–13. Fukunishi, Takahiro. 2014. Introduction: African Farmers and Firms in a Changing World. In Delivering Sustainable Growth in Africa: African Farmers and Firms in a Changing World. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1–22. Gachunga, Muhia John. 2019. Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on economic growth in Kenya. Information Research and Review 6: 6161–63. Gillwald, Alison, Mpho Moyo, and Christoph Stork. 2012. Understanding What Is Happening in ICT in South Africa. A Supply— And Demand-Side Analysis of the ICT Sector. Evidence for ICT Policy Action Policy Paper 7. Available online: https:// researchictafrica.net/publication/understanding-what-is-happening-in-ict-in-south-africa/ (accessed on 25 July 2024). Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 18 of 20 Gochero, Plaxedes, and Seetanah Boopen. 2020. The effect of mining foreign direct investment inflow on the economic growth of Zimbabwe. Journal of Economic Structures 9: 54. [CrossRef] Groepe, Francois. 2015. François Groepe: South Africa’s Structural Unemployment Challenge—The Most Important Issues to Be Addressed to Place South Africa on a Sustainable Growth Path in an Effort to Reduce Unemployment Levels. Address by Mr François Groepe, Deputy Governor of the South African Reserve Bank, on the Occasion of the Release of the 14th UASA South African Employment Report, Johannesburg, 30 April 2015. Available online: https://www.bis.org/review/r150610e.htm (accessed on 25 July 2024). Gyeke-Dako, Agyapomaa, Abena D. Oduro, Festus Ebo Turkson, and Priscilla Twumasi Baffour. 2015. Employment Effects of Different Development Policy Instruments: The Case of Ghana. Rd4 Project. Available online: http://www.r4d-employment.com/papers/ publications/ (accessed on 25 July 2024). Hibbard, Paul J., and Todd Schatzki. 2012. The interdependence of electricity and natural gas: Current factors and future prospects. The Electricity Journal 25: 6–17. [CrossRef] Hodge, David. 2006. Inflation and growth in South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30: 163–80. [CrossRef] Ikwegbue, Paul Chukwudi, Andrew O. Enaifoghe, Harris Maduku, and Leonard U. Agwuna. 2021. The challenges of COVID-19 pandemic and South Africa’s response. African Renaissance 18: 271. [CrossRef] Ilesanmi, Kehinde Damilola, and Devi Datt Tewari. 2017. Energy consumption, human capital investment and economic growth in South Africa: A vector error correction model analysis. OPEC Energy Review 41: 55–70. [CrossRef] Jayne, Thomas S., and Pedro Antonio Sanchez. 2021. Agricultural productivity must improve in sub-Saharan Africa. Science 372: 1045–47. [CrossRef] Kanbur, Ravi, and Akbar Noman. 2021. Book Review. Intelligent Decision Technologies 15: 173–74. [CrossRef] Kennedy, Solina Rose Levine, Perrine Toledano, Jennifer Rietbergen, and De Villiers-Piaget. 2020. Mining and the SDGs: A 2020 Status Update. Available online: https://www.responsibleminingfoundation.org/mining-and-the-sdgs/ (accessed on 25 July 2023). Kganyago, Lesetja. 2015. Lesetja Kganyago: South Africa’s Growth Performance and Monetary Policy. Paper presented at Address by Mr Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank at the Bureau for Economic Research, Cape Town, South Africa, October 22. Khaliq, Abdul, and Ilan Noy. 2007. Foreign direct investment and economic growth: Empirical evidence from sectoral data in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 313–25. Khobai, Hlalefang, Sanderson Abel, and Pierre Le Roux. 2016. An investigation into the electricity supply and economic growth nexus for South Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6: 701–5. Khonjelwayo, Bongani, and Thilivhali Nthakheni. 2020. Investment in electricity distribution capital infrastructure in South Africa: The role of regulation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 23: 1–10. [CrossRef] Klutse, Senanu Kwasi. 2020. The problem of economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa–The case of Ghana, Republic of Congo, Kenya and Lesotho. In The Challenges of Analyzing Social and Economic Processes in the 21st Century. Szeged: University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. [CrossRef] Kolisi, Nwabisi. 2021. Manufacturing Sector Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in South Africa. SA-TIED Working Paper 161. Available online: https://sa-tied.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/SA-TIED-WP161-YS.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2023). Latief, Rashid, and Lin Lefen. 2019. Foreign direct investment in the power and energy sector, energy consumption, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability 11: 192. [CrossRef] Laverty, Alexander. 2007. Impact of Economic and Political Sanctions on Apartheid. The African File. Available online: https: //theafricanfile.com/politicshistory/impact-of-economic-and-political-sanctions-on-apartheid/ (accessed on 25 July 2023). Leon, Peter. 2012. Whither the South African mining industry? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 30: 5–27. Lienert, Martin, and Stefan Lochner. 2012. The importance of market interdependencies in modeling energy systems–the case of the European electricity generation market. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 34: 99–113. Liening, Andreas. 2013. Growth Theory and Endogenous Human Capital Development: A Contribution to the Theory of Complex Systems. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/html/4-1500317_30800.htm (accessed on 25 July 2024). Lkhagva, Davaajargal, Zheng Wang, and Changxin Liu. 2019. Mining Booms and Sustainable Economic Growth in Mongolia— Empirical Result from Recursive Dynamic CGE Model. Economies 7: 51. [CrossRef] Luiz, John M., and Meshal Ruplal. 2013. Foreign direct investment, institutional voids, and the internationalization of mining companies into Africa. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 49: 113–29. [CrossRef] Manyuchi, Mercy M., Charles Mbohwa, and Edison Muzenda. 2019. Mining waste management for sustainable mining practices. Paper presented at International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand, July 22; pp. 137–142. Makoela, Pheladi Petty. 2021. A Correlation Analysis of the Effect of Internationalisation on the Global Competitiveness of the South African Mining Sector. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Maswana, Jean Claude. 2009. Global financial crisis and recession: Impact on Africa and development prospects. Paper presented at Japan International Cooperation Agency-Research Institute Task Force on Africa Meeting, Pretoria, South Africa, July 10. Matlou, Lebogang. 2019. ICT infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth in South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, Wits Business School, Johannesburg, South Africa. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 19 of 20 McKinney, Joseph A. 2008. United States-Canada Energy Interdependencies. Southern Journal of Canadian Studies 2: 1. [CrossRef] Meyer, Daniel Francois, and Kaseem Abimbola Sanusi. 2019. A causality analysis of the relationships between gross fixed Capital formation, economic growth, and employment in South Africa. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica 64: 33–44. [CrossRef] Meyer, Daniel Francois, and Richard Tabang McCamel. 2017. A time series analysis of the relationship between manufacturing, economic growth and employment in South Africa. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 8: 1206–18. Mijiyawa, Abdoul Ganiou. 2017. Drivers of structural transformation: The case of the manufacturing sector in Africa. World Development 99: 141–59. [CrossRef] Montmasson-Clair, Gaylor. 2015. The Interplay between Mining and Green Economy in South Africa: An Energy Lens. SSRN 2748019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315013870_The_Interplay_between_Mining_and_Green_ Economy_in_South_Africa_An_Energy_Lens (accessed on 23 July 2024). Moraka, Nthabiseng Violet, and Marie Jansen van Rensburg. 2015. Transformation in the South African mining industry-looking beyond the employment equity scorecard. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 115: 669–78. [CrossRef] Nafziger, Emerson D. 2006. Inter-and intraplant competition in corn. Crop Management 5: 1–9. [CrossRef] Naym, Junnatun, and Md Akram Hossain. 2016. Does investment in information and communication technology lead to higher economic growth: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management 11: 302. Ncanywa, Thobeka, and Lehlo Makhenyane. 2016. Can Investment Activities in the Form of Capital Formation Influence Economic Growth in South Africa? Available online: http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10386/1653/34%20Makhenyane.pdf? sequence=1 (accessed on 25 July 2024). Ncanywa, Thobeka, and Ombeswa Stsaba Orienda Ralarala. 2020. Investment in selected business sectors as a catalyst for South African growth. African Journal of Development Studies 10: 79. [CrossRef] Nweke, Godwin Onyinye, Stephen Idenyi Odo, and Charity Ifeyinwa Anoke. 2017. Effect of capital formation on economic growth in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 5: 1–16. Ogujiuba, Kanayo, and Ntombifithi Mngometulu. 2022. Does Social Investment Influence Poverty and Economic Growth in South Africa: A Cointegration Analysis? Economies 10: 226. [CrossRef] Okogun, Oluwanishola A., O. Michael Awoleye, and Willie Owolabi Siyanbola. 2012. Economic value of ICT investment in Nigeria: Is it commensurate. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences 1: 22–30. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei, Muazu Ibrahim, and Yakubu Awudu Sare. 2019. Foreign direct investment, sectoral effects and economic growth in Africa. International Economic Journal 33: 473–92. [CrossRef] Panizza, Ugo. 2017. Non-linearities in the Relationship between Finance and Growth. Comparative Economic Studies 60: 44–53. [CrossRef] Pasara, Michael Takudzwa, and Rufaro Garidzirai. 2020. Causality effects among gross capital formation, unemployment and economic growth in South Africa. Economies 8: 26. [CrossRef] Peng, Donna, and Rahmatallah Poudineh. 2016. A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors. Energy Strategy Reviews 13: 32–52. [CrossRef] Perks, Cameron. 2016. Transporting industrial minerals in Australia. Industrial Minerals 588: 26. Pradhan, Rudra Prakash, Mak B. Arvin, Mahendhiran Nair, Sara E. Bennett, and John Henry Hall. 2018. The dynamics between energy consumption patterns, financial sector development and economic growth in Financial Action Task Force (FATF) countries. Energy 159: 42–53. [CrossRef] Rahimov, Vugar. 2013. Sectoral Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Host Country Economic Growth: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Raputsoane, Leroi. 2018. Quantifying Economic Recovery from the Recent Global Financial Crisis. Available online: https://mpra.ub. uni-muenchen.de/87410/ (accessed on 25 July 2024). Rodrik, Dani. 2008. Understanding South Africa’s economic puzzles. Economics of Transition 16: 769–97. [CrossRef] Romer, Paul. Michael. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102. [CrossRef] Saini, Varinder, Manoj K. Arora, and Ravi P. Gupt. 2017. Assessment of surface coal mining impacts using Landsat time series data. Paper presented at the 38th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS-2017), New Delhi, India, October 23–27, vol. 10, pp. 23–27. Saunders, Richard. 2008. Crisis, capital, compromise: Mining and empowerment in Zimbabwe. African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine de Sociologie 12: 1. [CrossRef] Skaggs, Richard, Kathleen A. Hibbard, Peter Frumhoff, Thomas Lowry, Richard Middleton, Ron Pate, Vincent C. Tidwell, J. G. Arnold, Kristen Averyt, Anthony C. Janetos, and et al. 2012. Climate and Energy-Water-Land System Interactions Technical Report to the Us Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. No. PNNL-21185. Richland: Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL). Sookha, Keshal. 2018. The Impact of Mobile Communications Infrastructure Investment on Economic Growth in South Africa. Available online: https://open.uct.ac.za/items/bd1719cb-3c13-44d6-b237-e67482572ae2 (accessed on 25 July 2024). Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 173 20 of 20 South African Reserve Bank. 1993. Annual Economic Report 1993. Available online: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=a6efe798 886985c3JmltdHM9MTcyMjY0MzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0wZDk4NTNlMS00MjgwLTZiYjUtMjc5Zi00NzhhNDM0YjZhOGQmaW5 zaWQ9NTE5NA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=0d9853e1-4280-6bb5-279f-478a434b6a8d&psq=SARB+1993+pdf+recession&u= a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmVzYmFuay5jby56YS9jb250ZW50L2RhbS9zYXJiL3B1YmxpY2F0aW9ucy9yZXBvcnRzL2FubnVhbC1 lY29ub21pYy1yZXBvcnRzLzE5OTMvNTU1MC9Bbm51YWwtRWNvbm9taWMtUmVwb3J0LS0tMTk5My5wZGY&ntb=1 (accessed on 25 July 2024). South African Reserve Bank. 1987. South African Reserve Bank Annual Economic Report. Available online: https://www. bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=edcb5c5ac9925aefJmltdHM9MTcyMjY0MzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0wZDk4NTNlMS00MjgwLTZiYjUtMjc5 Zi00NzhhNDM0YjZhOGQmaW5zaWQ9NTIyOQ&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=0d9853e1-4280-6bb5-279f-478a434b6a8d& psq=sarb+1987+pdf&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmVzYmFuay5jby56YS9jb250ZW50L2RhbS9zYXJiL3B1YmxpY2F0aW9ucy9 yZXBvcnRzL2FubnVhbC1lY29ub21pYy1yZXBvcnRzLzE5ODcvNTU1Ni9Bbm51YWwtRWNvbm9taWMtUmVwb3J0LS0 tMTk4Ny5wZGY&ntb=1 (accessed on 25 July 2024). Syrett, Laura. 2016. African mining:: Investing against the odds? Industrial Minerals 580: 2. Telnova, Hanna. 2019. Conceptual approaches to economic growth: The need to transform national financial policy imperatives. Economics of Development 4: 1–10. [CrossRef] Tregenna, Fiona. 2008. Sectoral Engines of Growth in South Africa: An Analysis of Services and Manufacturing. No. 2008/98. WIDER Research Paper. Helsinki: The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). Tryman, Mfanya Donald, and Saba Jallow. 1994. Apartheid in Retreat: Economic Sanctions and Political Reform. The Challenge to Racial Stratification 4: 245. Van Seventer, Dirk, Channing Arndt, Robert. J. Davies, Sherwin Gabriel, Laurence Harris, and Sherman Robinson. 2021. Recovering from COVID-19: Economic scenarios for South Africa. Northwest Washington: Intl Food Policy Res Inst, vol. 2033. Yousefi, Ayoub. 2011. The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20: 581–96. [CrossRef] Zalk, Nimrod. 2016. Selling off the silver The imperative for productive and jobs-rich investment: South Africa. New Agenda: South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy 2016: 10–15. Zalk, Nimrod. 2021. Structural Change in South Africa. In Structural Transformation in South Africa: The Challenges of Inclusive Industrial Development in a Middle-Income Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 28. Zhang, Wei Bin. 2018. Economic Growth Theory: Capital, Knowledge, and Economic Stuctures. London: Routledge. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.