scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Pharmaceutical salts of venetoclax with dicarboxylic and sulfonic acids: solid-state characterization and dissolution performance

Havlůjová, Tereza; Hriňová, Erika; Zmeškalová, Eliška; Kučeráková, Monika; Ridvan, Luděk; Šoóš, Miroslav

Abstract

This study focuses on enhancing the aqueous dissolution of venetoclax through salt formation. Venetoclax,a BCS class IV B-cell lymphoma-2-selective inhibitor, exhibits very low solubility and bioavailability. Givenits multiple protonable groups, salt formation was explored to improve its dissolution properties.Dicarboxylic and sulfonic acids were selected as counterions for salt screening. Ten salts were synthesizedand characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. Intrinsic dissolution rate measurementsdemonstrated that all salts dissolve faster than the parent drug. The crystal structures of venetoclax,venetoclax fumarate, venetoclax oxalate, and venetoclax napsylate, which all solvated with acetonitrile, andunsolvated venetoclax tosylate were elucidated and described.

Full text

CrystEngComm PAPER Cite this: CrystEngComm,2025,27, 1816 Received 4th November 2024, Accepted 11th February 2025 DOI: 10.1039/d4ce01121j rsc.li/crystengcomm Pharmaceutical salts of venetoclax with dicarboxylic and sulfonic acids: solid-state characterization and dissolution performance† Tereza Havlůjová, a Erika Hriňová, a Eliška Zmeškalová, ac Monika Kučeráková, c Luděk Ridvan b and Miroslav Šoóš* a This study focuses on enhancing the aqueous dissolution of venetoclax through salt formation. Venetoclax, a BCS class IV B-cell lymphoma-2-selective inhibitor, exhibits very low solubility and bioavailability. Given its multiple protonable groups, salt formation was explored to improve its dissolution properties. Dicarboxylic and sulfonic acids were selected as counterions for salt screening. Ten salts were synthesized and characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. Intrinsic dissolution rate measurements demonstrated that all salts dissolve faster than the parent drug. The crystal structures of venetoclax, venetoclax fumarate, venetoclax oxalate, and venetoclax napsylate, which all solvated with acetonitrile, and unsolvated venetoclax tosylate were elucidated and described. 1. Introduction Venetoclax is a selective inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) protein used for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma, or acute myeloid leukemia. 1 This compound is classified as BCS class IV; therefore, it exhibits low solubility in water and low bioavailability in the human body. The absolute bioavailability of venetoclax is estimated to be only 5.4%. 2 This poses a significant challenge for clinical application and pharmaceutical formulation. However, in the venetoclax structure, multiple protonable groups can be found (Fig. 1); therefore, the preparation of salts is a possible route to overcome venetoclax's low aqueous solubility. Due to the aforementioned possible multivalence, the stoichiometric ratio of both components needs to be taken into consideration. Converting active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) into salts is a widely used and effective practice for modifying the solubility of molecules containing ionisable functional groups. Salts generally exhibit better solubility than their free parent drug. 3–7 The relative increase in intrinsic solubility is reported to be up to 1000 times that of the original compound. 8 The drug can pose as either a base or an acid component depending on its functional groups; its partnering counterion is chosen accordingly. To efficiently choose suitable counterions the drug can form salts with, an empirical approach called the pK a rule of salt formation is often employed. The rule is based on the difference in pK a values (ΔpK a ) between the acid and the base pair. Generally, a ΔpK a greater than 4 favors salt formation, while a ΔpK a lesser than −1 leans towards cocrystal formation. Intermediate ΔpK a values can lead to either outcome, being influenced by factors such as solvation and crystal packing. 9,10 Another limitation in counterion selection is the pharmaceutical suitability as it needs to be a non-toxic agent ideally without any pharmacological effect. Therefore, only a limited number of acids and bases satisfy these criteria. One of the comprehensive lists of such compounds is the Orange Book published by the Food and Drug Administration, which compiles all approved drugs and pharmaceuticals in the USA. 11–13 Moreover, this approach has already proved effective for various BSC II and IV drugs. In the case of miconazole and ketoconazole, both BCS II with extremely low solubility, formation of salt with naphthalene disulfonic acid not only led to enhanced dissolution and improved thermal stability but, due to the possibility of lowering the dosage at the same efficacy, also minimized host toxicity. 14 Antipsychotic drug olanzapine (BCS II) is also a very good example; it forms salts with a wide range of different counterions. These 1816 |CrystEngComm,2025,27, 1816–1829 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 a Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague, Technická 3, 16628, Prague 6, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] b Zentiva k.s, U Kabelovny 130, 10237, Prague 10, Czech Republic c Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 2, 182 00, Prague 8, Czech Republic †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2377711, 2377712, 2377714, 2393682 and 2393684. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ce01121j Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online View Journal | View Issue CrystEngComm, 2025, 27, 1816–1829 | 1817This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 not only exhibit improved dissolution properties but due to the large quantity of crystallographic data also serve as an interesting platform for examination of intramolecular interactions and molecular packing. 15–18 Another interesting example is BCS IV fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin which forms salts with various dicarboxylic acids without any detrimental effect on its antibacterial activity and, most notably, in glutarate and maleate salt demonstrate solubility improvement over commercially available forms. 19,20 After careful consideration of all the possible anionic counterions, we have chosen 13 organic acids due to their safety, stability, propensity to form crystalline salts, and suitable ΔpK a value (Fig. 1). Specifically, dicarboxylic acids were chosen on the basis of their use in pharmaceutical products and FDA approvals. 21 Moreover, their multivalence could be favorable in combination with the multiple protonation sites of venetoclax and lead to the formation of salts of various stoichiometries. Sulfonic acids were selected because they have been shown to greatly increase the solubility of drugs with extremely poor aqueous solubility, 14,22–26 as is the case of venetoclax. Information about venetoclax salts is scarce in peerreviewed literature; only one salt has been reported, namely, a lipophilic venetoclax docusate intended to improve lipid solubility and subsequent lymphatic transport. 27 So far, only one crystal structure of venetoclax is known and available in CSD; it is a hydrate. 28 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Materials Venetoclax was provided by Zentiva k.s. Most of the material available to us was amorphous. A small amount was crystalline. Acetonitrile and organic acids were obtained from various suppliers and used as delivered without any modifications. 2.2. Salt screening Thirteen organic acids from two different groups were selected. Sulfonic acids were represented by (+)-camphorsulfonic (camsylate), dodecylbenzenesulfonic (dodecylbesylate), ethanesulfonic (esylate), methanesulfonic (mesylate), 2-naphtalenesulfonic (napsylate), and p-toluenesulfonic (tosylate) acid. Dicarboxylic acids were represented by fumaric (fumarate), glutaric (glutarate), maleic (maleate), malonic (malonate), anhydrous oxalic (oxalate), succinic (succinate), and tartaric (tartrate) acid. 30 mg of venetoclax and 3 molar equivalents of counterion were dissolved in acetonitrile, then the mixture was heated to 70 °C and stirred for 2 hours. The solutions were cooled and stirred overnight. The nonprecipitated samples were put into an ice bath and stirred for an additional 2 hours. All resulting suspensions were filtered and dried at 50 °C under reduced pressure. All dried powder samples were then analysed by Raman spectroscopy. The samples displaying shifts when compared to those of API and the corresponding acid were then analysed by nuclear magnetic resonance, differential scanning calorimetry, and powder diffraction. 2.3. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) Diffraction patterns were collected using an X'Pert PRO MPD powder diffractometer (PANalytical): X-ray beam Cu Kα (λ= 1.542 Å), measured range: 4–40°2θ, excitation voltage: 45 kV, anodic current: 40 mA, step size: 0.016°2θ, time per step 0.3 s. Measurement was carried out on a flat sample with an area/thickness ratio equal to 10/0.5 mm. 2.5°Soller slits with a fixed slit width of 0.6 mm and automatic antiscatter slits were used to correct the primary beam. The irradiated area of the sample was 10 mm. Secondary optics consisted of 2.5°Soller slits and 5.0 mm antiscattering slits to correct the secondary beam. The detector was LYNXEYE_XE_T (1D mode). HighScore Plus software was used to process the diffraction patterns. 2.4. Raman spectroscopy The samples in glass vials were measured in an FTRaman RFS100/S spectrometer with a germanium detector (Bruker Optics, Germany). The wavelength of the Nd:YAG laser was 1064 nm. The measurement range was 4000 to 200 cm −1 with the spectral resolution of 4.0 cm −1 . 64 scans were accumulated for a single measurement. The software OMNIC and OPUS were used to process the Raman spectra. Fig. 1 Structures of venetoclax and counterion acids. CrystEngComm Paper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online 1818 |CrystEngComm,2025,27, 1816–1829 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 2.5. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) Solution 1 H NMR was used to confirm the stoichiometric ratio of both components as well as to determine the amount of residual solvent. Samples were dissolved in d 6 -DMSO, and 1 H NMR spectra were measured by a Bruker Avance III 500 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a Prodigy probe and with a repetition delay of 10 s. 2.6. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) The samples were weighed in an aluminium pan (10 mg). All measurements were performed on the TGA 6 instrument (PerkinElmer, USA). The range of investigated temperatures ranged from 20 °C to 300 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min −1 . 2.7. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) The samples were weighed in an aluminium pan (10 mg). The pan was covered, and the measurement was carried out under a nitrogen gas flow of 50 ml min −1 . All measurements were performed on the TA Instruments Discovery DSC. The range of investigated temperatures ranged from 0 to 300 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min −1 . 2.8. Intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) Intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) was determined using a Sirius inForm (Pion Inc., USA) device. IDR discs of 6 mm diameter were prepared by the direct compression of approximately 50 mg of API or venetoclax salt. The material was compressed at a constant load of 100 kg, relaxed for 1 min, and compressed again at the same pressure for another minute. IDR measurements were performed in 50 mL of phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8) with the addition of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) at a stirring speed of 100 rpm. UV spectra were recorded every 30 s using a probe with an optical path length equal to 20 mm. Absorbance between wavelengths of 300–500 nm was used to evaluate the amount of API released at each time point. IDR was obtained from the linear fit of the first 10 min of the measurement. The first three points were excluded because they usually represent the dissolution of the free powder captured on the disc during the preparation. Measurements were done in triplicates. 2.9. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) All single crystals were obtained by solvent evaporation under ambient conditions. The vial cap was pierced with a sterile needle with a 1.2 mm diameter to slow down solvent evaporation. Analyses of venetoclax acetonitrile solvate and venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate were performed at 95 K using a SuperNova diffractometer with a microfocus sealed tube, mirror-collimated Cu-Kαradiation (λ= 1.54184) and an Atlas S2 CCD detector. Venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate was measured at 120 K on an Xcalibur Gemini ultra diffractometer using Mo-Kαradiation (λ= 0.71073) from a fine-focus sealed X-ray tube with a graphite monochromator and an Atlas S2 CCD detector. Data reduction and absorption correction were performed with CrysAlisPro software. 29 The structures were solved by charge-flipping methods using Superflip software and refined by full-matrix least squares on squared value using Crystals 30,31 and Jana2020 software. 32 MCE software was used for the visualisation of residual electron density maps. 33 All H atoms were placed from the residual electron density map, and the C–H atoms were constrained to ideal geometries. In the structure of venetoclax napsylate 1:2 acetonitrile solvate, the solvent was partially occupied. It was modelled isotropically with an occupancy of 0.5. Structures were compared using the CrystalCMP 30,31 software. 2.10. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) calculation Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) calculations were performed using the Avogadro software. 34 The settings used for generating the MEP surface included selecting the van der Waals surface type and colouring it by electrostatic potential. A medium resolution of 0.18 Å was chosen to balance computational efficiency and surface detail, with the iso value set to 0. This configuration accurately represents the spatial extent of the molecule and provides insights into the charge distribution. 3. Results and discussion The salt screening was done by crystallization of venetoclax together with the respective acid in acetonitrile (described in detail in section 2.2). As recrystallization of just the API could lead to a different polymorph or solvate, it was tested as well. The resulting crystalline sample had a distinct diffraction pattern. Later we will show it to be acetonitrile solvate. For the salt screening evaluation, both the original crystal form and the acetonitrile solvate were used as references for the identification of new salt forms. Precipitation occurred at room temperature for all samples except dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, which precipitated only after an additional 2 h long stirring in an ice bath. Additional precipitation was observed in camsylate and napsylate samples upon refrigeration. Raman spectroscopy was employed to identify potential salt formation (Fig. S1†); the group frequency region was checked for specific functional groups present in both venetoclax and the corresponding acid and compared to the Raman spectra of each component searching for potential shifts signifying bonding in the sample; the same was done for the fingerprint region. Even though the liquid state of several counterions (dodecylbenzenesulfonic, ethanesulfonic and methanesulfonic acid) and the poor visibility of the sulfonic functional group in Raman spectra complicated this process, Raman spectroscopy was preferred over infrared spectroscopy due to its non-destructive nature. To further confirm the salt formation of samples exhibiting shifts in Raman spectra, a combination of 1 H NMR and XRD was employed. The presence of the counterion in the samples was confirmed by CrystEngCommPaper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online CrystEngComm, 2025, 27, 1816–1829 | 1819This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 1 H solution NMR and the molar ratio of both components was calculated (Table 1). All dicarboxylic salts crystallize in a 1:1 stoichiometry (API:acid), while all sulfonic salts crystallize in the 1 :2 ratio (API : acid). In venetoclax mesylate and napsylate traces of residual acetonitrile were detected and the amount was estimated from 1 H solution NMR (Table 1). The estimated molar equivalents were then used to calculate the amount of residual solvent for each salt using the daily dose of venetoclax, which is 400 mg. 1 This amounts approximately to 0.38 mg of acetonitrile in venetoclax mesylate and 0.62 mg in venetoclax napsylate. After consulting the ICH guidelines for residual solvents, we found that the permitted daily exposure of acetonitrile amounts to 4.1 mg per day; both our salts are well within the permitted limit. 35 Therefore, both samples were considered of sufficient quality for further work. The transcript of each spectrum can be found in the ESI.† Powder diffraction patterns were compared with the starting material as well as venetoclax acetonitrile solvate and the corresponding acid for possible overlap indicating mixture of pure components or different phases in the sample (Fig. 2 and S2 in the ESI†). XRPD confirmed the formation of 10 new crystalline salts with 13 possible counterions. This indicates a high propensity of venetoclax for salt formation. To evaluate the thermal behaviour and study the thermodynamic properties of the novel salts, DSC and TGA were performed. From the DSC, we can obtain information about the melting points and any possible solid-form transformations. The melting point of pure venetoclax is around 139 °C. 36 The acetonitrile solvate desolvates in the interval of 100–125 °C with a mass loss of 2.95% and then melts at 153.1 °C (see Fig. 3). As can be seen in Fig. 4, all the prepared salts, except dodecylbesylate (T m = 109 °C), have a significantly higher melting point, ranging from 165 °C to 226 °C. In general, the dicarboxylic acid salts have higher T m values than the sulfonic acid salts. There is an exception, though, with tosylate and its T m of 216 °C. In some samples, a decrease in mass is observed within the interval of 25–100 °C (Fig. 4). As the presence of residual solvent in any significant quantity was already negated by solution 1 H NMR, we suspect the presence of sorbed (unbound) water due to the steeper decrease in mass in the 25–50 °C region and, to some extent, the 50–100 °C region (Table S11 in ESI†). The sorbed water can influence stability and even facilitate solid-state changes such as hydrate formation. 37,38 Even through our best efforts to mitigate the hygroscopicity of some of the salts (thorough drying and storage in airtight containers), it could not be avoided altogether. In some respects, the dissolution properties are the most important characteristic of novel pharmaceutical salts. Acquiring an improvement in the aqueous solubility is the reason for studies like this one. Therefore, we have performed intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) measurements. For IDR, the powder studied is compressed into a disc with a known surface. Using this type of analysis, we obtain information about the dissolution of the investigated solid form without any potential effect of differing particle sizes. However, as we use UV-vis detection of broad wavelength interval (200 nm) to calculate the concentration and three of our counterions contain an aromatic ring, there is another arising concern, possible overlap with absorption maxima of venetoclax and subsequent false increase in concentration. As such, spectra of venetoclax and all aromatic sulfonic acids were measured, and the concentration of acid solutions was doubled compared to that of venetoclax for better comparability. Upon investigation of these spectra, a slight increase in absorbance was observed in the interval of 300– 325 nm of naphtalenesulfonic acid spectra (see Fig. S3 in ESI†), confirming an overlap. However, because of the lower absorbance for longer wavelengths and still fairly low Table 1 Novel forms of venetoclax and their stoichiometry based on solution 1 HNMR API Counterion Acetonitrile Camsylate 1 2 — Dodecylbesylate 1 2 — Esylate 1 2 — Fumarate 1 1 — Maleate 1 1 — Malonate 1 1 — Mesylate 1 2 0.02 Napsylate 1 2 0.033 Oxalate 1 1 — Tosylate 1 2 — Acetonitrile solvate 1 —1 Fig. 2 Powder diffraction patterns of novel salts of venetoclax. Fig. 3 DSC and TGA of venetoclax acetonitrile solvate. CrystEngComm Paper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online 1820 |CrystEngComm, 2025, 27,1816–1829 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 Fig. 4 DSC and TGA of new salts. CrystEngCommPaper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online CrystEngComm, 2025, 27, 1816–1829 | 1821This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 solubility of salts, the interval could not be shortened without the introduction of significant variability as some of the measured values were near the detection limit of the UV-vis probe. Nevertheless, based on good data fit, the effect should be minimal, and the obtained data serve the purpose of characterizing new crystalline solid forms of venetoclax (see Fig. S4 in ESI†). All of the novel salts have a faster dissolution rate compared to that of the pure API. Seven of the novel salts show only a minor improvement over pure API, increasing the IDR values approximately up to 1.5 times. Three salts, namely fumarate, maleate and napsylate, have a higher dissolution rate by a factor of 2 to 3. The most promising appears to be napsylate with an IDR of 34.13 ± 8.20 μg min −1 cm −2 , which is approximately 3 times higher than that of the venetoclax-free base (Fig. 5). One of the reasons for such a high dissolution rate could be the amorphous content in the desolvated salt powders. However, except for the venetoclax acetonitrile solvate and tosylate, none of the venetoclax samples displayed a high level of crystallinity based on their XRPD results. We have attempted to find trends to explain the dissolution behaviour of the novel venetoclax salts. In comparison to dicarboxylic and sulfonic salts, there is no clear trend to suggest the superiority of one group over the other. An intuitive negative correlation would be expected with the melting point of the salts. However, Fig. 6 shows no strong trend. It seems that the most successful candidates, dissolution-wise from the IDR point of view, are salts with melting points between 195 and 210 °C. When this temperature increases, a steep decrease in the IDR values can be seen. A similar trend is observed in salts with T m ranging between 170 °C and 190 °C. Interestingly, salts with melting points below 170 °C exhibit a slight dissolution improvement over their slightly higher melting counterparts. Upon correlation of IDR values of novel salts and T m values of their parent acids published in the literature, again, no strong trend is observed (Fig. S5†). This lack of correlation can be explained by examining the work of de Moraes et al., 39 who studied 51 salts of methylephedrine. Although they found some correlations, they were mostly valid only in isostructural salt groups. The crystal structures are ultimately what governs the solid-state properties. To explain the behaviour of the novel salts, it would be best to obtain their crystal structures. Therefore, we have attempted to grow single crystals of these salts. The only single crystals of sufficient quality obtained were of venetoclax acetonitrile solvate, venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate and venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate, venetoclax tosylate and venetoclax napsylate acetonitrile solvate. The structure solution from powder diffraction data is not feasible because of the size and flexibility of venetoclax and the presence of one or two molecular counterions combined with the relatively poor crystallinity of the materials. By visually examining the XRPD patterns, we found that they are all dissimilar, suggesting a significantly different crystal arrangement, which is in line with our findings. Due to fairly large ΔpK a values (Table 2) we expect the successful hits to be salts, and therefore we refer to them as such. However, to properly distinguish between salt and cocrystal, knowledge of crystal structure is essential. The correct classification is important not only to crystallographers but also to registration authorities. 40,41 Venetoclax acetonitrile solvate crystallises in the triclinic system in the space group P1 ¯. There is one molecule of API and one molecule of solvent in the asymmetric unit. Fig. S6† shows the asymmetric unit with the numbering of non C/H atoms. The comparison between the calculated and the experimental XRPD suggests the same crystal structure for both samples (Fig. S7†). This is further confirmed by 1 H NMR (transcript in the ESI†) as the calculated molar ratio of venetoclax:acetonitrile is 1:1 as well. There are three strong H-bonds in the structure, and they are shown in Fig. 7. In both figures, there are two molecules of venetoclax. The amidic N(19)–H forms an intramolecular H-bond with O(42). The other two H-bonds are intermolecular. The amine N(27)–H connects to amidic O(18) and the azaindole N(47)–H forms a H-bond to one of the sulfonyl oxygens, O(22). Fig. 5 IDR values for venetoclax and all its salts. Fig. 6 Melting points (T m ) of the novel salts vs. their dissolution IDR; sulfonic salts (red), dicarboxylic salts (blue). CrystEngComm Paper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online 1822 |CrystEngComm, 2025, 27, 1816–1829 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 Acetonitrile occupies discrete cavities in the structure. It is held together only by multiple weaker interactions like C– H⋯N(62) and C–H⋯N(50). A prominent feature in the molecular packing is the aromatic interaction between the two aromatic regions of the venetoclax molecule. The first (A) is the 7-azaindole (bicyclic functional group containing N47 and N50), and the second (B) is nitrophenyl (the benzene ring to which N37 connects). These form two parallel ribbons (visible in Fig. 8, for example, in the middle of the shown unit cell). These ribbons run parallel to the baxis and are both –A–B–A–B–. The ribbons are slipped with respect to each other, creating a zigzag pattern of the alternating aromatic groups. Venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate crystallises in the triclinic system in the space group P1 ¯. There is one molecule of API, one molecule of the oxalate ion, and one molecule of the solvent in the asymmetric unit. Fig. S8†shows the asymmetric unit with the numbering of non C/H atoms. Table 2 pK a and ΔpK a values of venetoclax and all acids (obtained through Chemicalize software) pK a value ΔpK a (strongest basic–strongest acidic) Venetoclax 8.1 (strongest basic); 3.52 (second strongest basic) — (+)-Camphorsulfonic acid −0.81 8.91 Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid −1.84 9.94 Ethanesulfonic acid −1.3 9.4 Fumaric acid 3.55 (strongest acidic); 4.41 (second strongest acidic) 4.55 Glutaric acid 4.46 (strongest acidic); 5.26 (second strongest acidic) 3.64 Maleic acid 3.05 (strongest acidic); 5.91 (second strongest acidic) 5.05 Malonic acid 2.43 (strongest acidic); 5.92 (second strongest acidic) 5.67 Methanesulfonic acid −1.61 9.71 2-Naphtalenesulfonic acid −2 10.1 Anhydrous oxalic acid 1.36 (strongest acidic); 4.11 (second strongest acidic) 6.74 Succinic acid 3.55 (strongest acidic); 5.69 (second strongest acidic) 4.55 Tartaric acid 2.72 (strongest acidic); 4.79 (second strongest acidic) 5.38 p-Toluenesulfonic acid −2.14 10.24 Fig. 7 (a and b) The main H-bonding motifs in venetoclax acetonitrile solvate. CrystEngCommPaper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online CrystEngComm, 2025, 27, 1816–1829 | 1823This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 H-bonding of venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate is shown in Fig. 9. Six strong interactions can be identified. There is a proton transfer indicating that the material is truly a salt between the oxalate carboxylate O(62) and the API N(9). The other carboxyl of oxalic acid is not deprotonated and forms a self-complementary homosynthon with another molecule of oxalate. There are two intramolecular H-bonds within the API: the amino N(39)–H connects to the adjacent nitro O(51) and the amidic N(31)–H connects to the ether O(16). Cl(1) forms a halogen bond with O(34). The azaindole moiety forms a self-complementary homosynthon N(21)– H⋯N(19). Oxalates form a flat zigzag ribbon onto which acetonitrile molecules attach perpendicularly (Fig. 10). The –A–B–A–B– aromatic interaction described in detail above for venetoclax acetonitrile solvate is also present. The structure of venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate contains one equivalent of solvent. However, in the bulk sample, no solvent was detected by 1 H NMR. This suggests a full desolvation under our drying conditions. Comparison between the calculated and the bulk powder XRPD suggests similarities in the structure (Fig. S9†); however, not all experimental peak positions are in accordance with the calculated ones. This is expected as both 1 H NMR and TGA confirm full desolvation of the bulk powder. Venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate crystallises in the monoclinic system in the space group P2 1 /c. There is one molecule of API, one molecule of the fumarate ion, and three molecules of the solvent in the asymmetric unit. Fig. S10 in ESI†shows the asymmetric unit with the numbering of non C/H atoms. H-bonding of venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate is shown in Fig. 11. Six strong interactions can be identified in the structure. There is a proton transfer indicating that the material is truly a salt between the fumarate carboxylate O(68) and the API N(9). The other carboxyl of fumaric acid is not deprotonated and also forms a H-bond with O(68). There are two intramolecular H-bonds within the API: the amino N(37)–H connects to the adjacent nitro O(48) and the amidic N(29)–H connects to the ether O(16). N(29) is also an acceptor of a halogen bond from Cl(1). The azaindole moiety forms a self-complementary homosynthon N(22)–H⋯N(24). The H-bonding is almost completely different in both structures. The only exceptions are a common H-bond and an Fig. 8 Molecular packing of venetoclax acetonitrile solvate. The solvent is shown in the spacefill mode. Fig. 9 (a–c) The main H-bonding motifs in the structure of venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate. CrystEngComm Paper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online 1824 |CrystEngComm, 2025, 27,1816–1829 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 intramolecular amidic N(H)⋯ether (O), and that in both structures, the solvent is held only by weak interactions. Both fumarate and acetonitrile occupy flat channels in the structure (Fig. 12). Although the –A–B–A–B–aromatic interaction described in detail above for venetoclax acetonitrile solvate is present also in the structure of venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate, the structures are very different, both from the view of molecular packing and from the conformations of the API. The structure of venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate contains three equivalents of solvent. However, in the bulk sample, no solvent was detected by 1 H NMR. This suggests a full desolvation under our drying conditions. Comparison between the calculated and the bulk powder XRPD does not yield any similarities (Fig. S11†). However, this is to be expected as both 1 H NMR and TGA confirm full desolvation of the bulk powder. Venetoclax napsylate 1:2 acetonitrile hemisolvate crystallises in the triclinic system in the space group P1. There is one molecule of API and two molecules of the napsylate anion together with a molecule of solvent (with 0.5 occupancy) in the asymmetric unit (and also in the unit cell). Fig. S12†shows the asymmetric unit with the numbering of non C/H atoms. The comparison between the calculated and the experimental XRPD looks somewhat similar but not identical (see Fig. S13†). As 1 H NMR indicates that there was no residual solvent in the bulk sample, we can assume that the crystal structure from a single crystal would change slightly when all of the solvent is removed from the lattice. The molar ratio between the API and the counterion is 1:2 from both 1 H NMR and the crystal structure. H-bonding of venetoclax napsylate 1 : 2 acetonitrile hemisolvate is shown in Fig. 13. Seven strong interactions can be identified. The molecule of venetoclax is protonated at two sites, on the aza-indole N34 and on the piperazine N17. Both of these NH form H-bonds to napsylates, N(17)H⋯O(77) and N(34)H⋯O(64). The other azaindole nitrogen, N(31)–H, also bonds to the same napsylate, O(65). There are two intramolecular H-bonds within the API: the amino N(47)–H connects to the adjacent nitro O(59) and the amidic N(39)–H connects to the ether O(26). N(39)–H actually forms a 3-center H-bond with the other acceptor being O(79) from a napsylate. Acetonitrile occupies discrete cavities in the structure. It is held together only by multiple weaker interactions such as C–H⋯O(42) and C–H⋯O(38) or C–H⋯Cl(1). The crystal packing is heavily influenced by aromatic interactions. This is understandable because in addition Fig. 10 Molecular packing of venetoclax oxalate acetonitrile solvate. The solvent is shown in the spacefill mode, and the counterion is shown in ball-and-stick mode. Fig. 11 (a–c) The main H-bonding motifs in venetoclax fumarate acetonitrile solvate. CrystEngCommPaper Open Access Article. Published on 15 February 2025. Downloaded on 12/4/2025 7:23:57 PM. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. View Article Online