Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes
Abstract
Russian youth remains a group that is not sufficiently understood in current analyses of Russian politics and society. It is a part of society that has been very visible in recent political protests across the country, but there is also evidence that the younger generation is either disengaged from politics, or conservative and loyal to President Putin. The ZOiS survey among youth across fifteen regional capitals in the Russian Federation (April 2018) provides insights into these seemingly contradictory trends.
Full text
ZOiS REPORT YOUTH IN RUSSIA: OUTLOOK ON LIFE AND POLITICAL ATTITUDES No. 1 / 2018 · June 2018 Félix Krawatzek and Gwendolyn Sasse
ZOiS Report 1/2018 Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes 2 Executive summary Russian youth remains a group that is not sufficiently understood in current analyses of Russian politics and society. It is a part of society that has been very visible in recent political protests across the country, but there is also evidence that the younger generation is either disengaged from politics, or conservative and loyal to President Putin. The ZOiS survey among youth across fifteen regional capitals in the Russian Federation (April 2018) provides insights into these seemingly contradictory trends. The main survey findings are: – Russian youth reports being interested in politics – both in domestic politics and foreign policy – but their factual political knowledge is limited. – Internet sources, in particular social media, and Russian television are the most important sources of information about politics for the young (each chosen by about 30 per cent). – 61 per cent of the respondents reported taking part in the presidential elections, of whom 67 per cent said they voted for Vladimir Putin. These figures are slightly lower than the official figures for turnout and vote choice. – The respondents report a high level of trust in Russian president Vladimir Putin, in the Russian army, and in voluntary organizations. Trust in local and regional institutions is significantly lower. Trust and distrust in the Russian Orthodox Church are more evenly split. In the case of the Russian mass media distrust outweighs trust. Content 02 ___ Executive summary 04 ___ Introduction 05 ___ Youth and politics: interest but limited knowledge 08 ___ Political engagement: presidential elections, protests, youth organizations 08 ______ Presidential elections 2018 09 ______ Protests: awareness but little involvement 10 ______ Youth organizations 11 ___ Expectations and trust 14 ___ Russia and the world 15 ___ Values 16 ___ Conclusion 17 ___ Imprint
Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes ZOiS Report 1/2018 3 – There is widespread awareness of recent protests that have taken place across Russia. However, only the minority of respondents reports having taken part in – mostly local – social, political or environmental protests (about 5 per cent for each type of protest). Differentiating further within this cohort of the young, higher age decreases the likelihood of being aware of or participating in protests. Higher material well-being correlates with awareness of protests. – The respondents’ main expectations vis-à-vis the government are higher living standards (56 per cent), and anti-corruption reforms (14 per cent). When asked about their second most important expectation, anti-corruption reforms top the list (24 per cent), followed by higher living standards (20 per cent). – Political awareness and first-hand travel experience are spread evenly between Western countries and China / Asia. About a third of the respondents have travelled outside of Russia over the last year, mostly for tourism. Of those, more than half travelled to EU countries and about a third to countries of the Former Soviet Union. Only slightly fewer – 29 per cent – have travelled to Asia beyond the Former Soviet Union, but only about 6 per cent to the US. – China and the US are singled out as the top two countries Russia should have the closest relations with, chosen by 28 and 19 per cent of the respondents respectively. The third most frequently mentioned country is Ukraine (9 per cent). Among EU countries, Germany is chosen most often (by 7 per cent). – Labour mobility is low: nearly 90 per cent have not worked or lived elsewhere in Russia over the last year, and only just below 3 per cent have lived or worked in an EU country or a country belonging to the Former Soviet Union. – However, 54 per cent of the respondents are thinking about leaving their current place of residence: of those, almost 50 per cent would consider moving within Russia, while 21 per cent are interested in moving to an EU country and 7 per cent to the US. A lower self-reported level of household wellbeing correlates with thinking about migration. – Russian youth expresses support for the idea that everyone in society should share a knowledge of Russian history and identify with Russian culture. An active role of the state in this regard meets with approval. At the same time, more than 80 per cent of the respondents agree that all citizens should have equal opportunities based on the principle of non-discrimination. There is little support for the multicultural idea of preserving the distinct cultures of migrant communities and state policy on the integration of immigrants into the workforce is not a priority.
ZOiS Report 1/2018 Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes 4 Introduction1 The image of young people in Russia portrayed by Russian and Western media is highly ambivalent: on the one hand, young people have been prominent in the recent waves of protest across different parts of the Russian Federation, in particular in the anti-corruption and anti-Putin protest movement around Alexander Navalny. On the other hand, youth has repeatedly shown up in survey research as one of the most conservative and regime-loyal segments of society. In between, there is bound to be a group of disaffected youth. Youth is simultaneously stabilizing and challenging the current political regime in Russia, but what is the balance between those two poles? In order to answer these questions, we need to refine our understanding of the attitudes, aspirations, behaviour and social contexts of the younger generation in Russia. On the one hand, youth attitudes provide insights into the expectations for which politicians have to offer a more long-term perspective. On the other hand, the younger generation is an important test group for assessing the Russian regime’s success in shaping the population’s opinions. The extent to which youth has been at the centre of the political attention in Russia is striking. A number of official youth organizations were set up in the aftermath of the Ukrainian Orange Revolution in 2004. By learning from the role of youth in a sequence of colour revolutions in Eastern Europe, organizations such as Nashi and Rossiya Molodaya were created to proactively counter this trend and mobilize and manage youth in an attempt to protect the country from internal and external threats to stability. Over time, the official strategy has changed: the high visibility of public displays of regime support based on a top-down organizational network since the immediate aftermath of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine has been replaced by more long-term measures to train youth as the carrier of the conservative social and political values propagated by the regime. The reform of the school curriculum has gained in importance, with a particular emphasis on the teaching of history. ZOiS conducted an online survey among young(er) people aged 16 – 34 in fifteen regional capitals of the Russian Federation2 in the immediate aftermath of the re-election of Vladimir Putin as President on 18 March 2018. The format of an online survey was chosen, as it fits the communication practices of the younger generation, gives respondents control over the whole process and conveys a sense of greater anonymity than face-to-face interviews, something that is likely to be important in a politically restrictive setting. The survey was carried out between 2 and 9 April 2018 among a total of 2,018 respondents (with more respondents concentrated in the mid-to-upper end of the age spectrum owing to difficulties in recruiting the youngest eligible respondents). FIGURE1 Overall, the surveyed age categories account for about 40 million people out of a total population of the Russian 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the research assistance provided by Alice Lackner. 2 The following cities were included: Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Ekaterinburg, Kazan, Krasnoyarsk, Nizhnyi Novgorod, Chelyabinsk, Omsk, Rostov-on-Don, Ufa, Samara, Voronezh, Perm, Volgograd. n=2,018 FIGURE 1 Age category Source: Centre for East European and International Studies 16 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 AgeCategory Percent 16-17 6,00% 18-24 27,21% 25-34 66,80% n=2,018 6,0% 27,2% 66,8% 16-17 18-24 25-34
Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes ZOiS Report 1/2018 5 n=1,999 FIGURE 2 Self-reported household wealth Federation of about 144 million (World Bank 2016; https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=RU). All the ZOiS survey respondents live in urban areas. In terms of socio-economic profile, about a third described their household as having enough resources for clothing but not for larger household appliances; another third chose the next higher category of self-reported wealth where the available resources suffice for household appliances but not for a car. FIGURE2 In line with the quota sample (age, gender, location), there is an almost even split in terms of gender (49 per cent men, 51 per cent women), and about 41 per cent of respondents live with their spouses, while about a quarter reported living with their parents, and only 9 per cent live by themselves. Youth and politics: interest but limited knowledge Our survey shows that young people take an interest in the political affairs of their country. Fifty-five per cent of the respondents stated that they were interested in politics, with about two thirds of these respondents expressing an equal interest in domestic and foreign policy issues. Discussions about politics happen somewhat more frequently among colleagues and friends (60 per cent said these discussions take place ‘often’ or ‘sometimes’) than with relatives (50 per cent said these discussions take place ‘often’ or ‘sometimes’). Disagreements are more common in the conversations with colleagues (69 per cent disagree ‘often’ or ‘sometimes’) than among relatives (56 per cent disagree ‘often’ or ‘sometimes’), suggesting that political debate is a semi-public matter rather than a private one. Less than 10 per cent Self-reportedhouseholdwealth Percent Thereisnotenough moneyevenforfood 1,10% Wehaveenoughmoney onlyforthemostnecessarythings 8,20% Thereisenoughmoneyforfood, butnotenoughtobuyclothingandshoes 9,75% Thereisenoughmoneyforclothing andshoes,butnotenoughtobuy alargehouseholdappliance 33,72% Thereisenoughmoneyforhousehold appliances,butwecannotbuyanewcar 31,67% Thereisenoughmoneyforanewcar, butwecannotpermitourselves tobuyanapartmentorhouse 12,81% n=1,999 Weexperiencenomaterialdifficulties, ifneededwecouldacquire anapartmentorhouse 2,75% 1,1% 8,2% 9,8% 33,7% 31,7% 12,8% 2,8% There is not enough money even for food We have enough money only for the most necessary things There is enough money for food, but not enough to buy clothing and shoes There is enough money for clothing and shoes, but not enough to buy a large household appliance There is enough money for household appliances, but we cannot buy a new car There is enough money for a new car, but we cannot permit ourselves to buy an apartment or house We experience no material difficulties, if needed we could acquire an apartment or house Self-reportedhouseholdwealth Source: Centre for East European and International Studies
ZOiS Report 1/2018 Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes 6 of the respondents reported that they have ‘unfriended’ a contact on social media because of political disputes, thereby indicating a limited degree of political controversy in online networks. FIGURE3 The general declaration of political interest is accompanied by a self-reported lack of knowledge about Russia’s history and limited factual knowledge about politics. More than half of the respondents said that they do not know enough about the history of their country. The survey included a quiz about domestic and international affairs. Respondents were asked to identify Western, post-Soviet and Asian political leaders and answer factual multiple-choice questions about the size of the population of Russia, the number of EU member states or the country with the highest military spending. Only 2 per cent of the respondents achieved a full score in this test, with the majority getting about half of the questions right. Almost all respondents correctly identified the political leaders of countries such as the US, China, Germany and the UK. However, more than half failed to recognize the current President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. Given the amount of Russian media coverage of Ukraine since the Euromaidan, the annexation of Crimea and the war in eastern Ukraine, this lack of visual recognition is surprising. Given a choice of 100, 150 and 200 million as the size of the population of the Russian Federation, more than 60 per cent gave the correct answer, while 28 per cent inflated the population size to 200 million. Asked about the number of EU member states, only 22 per cent could give the correct answer out of a choice of four answers. Asked about the country with the highest total military spending, about half of the respondents gave the correct answer (USA), 22 per cent picked Russia and 16 per cent North Korea. FIGURES4 + 5 FIGURE 3 When you discuss politics, how often do you disagree? FIGURE 5 Which country has the highest military expenditure? FIGURE 4 What is the the population size of Russia? Discusspoliticswithcolleagues:disagree Percent Colleagues(n=1,794) Relatives(n=1,641) Often 16,22% 14,14% Sometimes 52,90% 42,47% Rarely 20,62% 31,51% Neveror almost never 10,26% 11,88% n=1,794 16,2% 52,9% 20,6% 10,3% 14,1% 42,5% 31,5% 11,9% OMen SomeNmes Rarely Neveror almostnever WhenyoudiscusspoliNcs,howoMendoyoudisagree? Colleagues (n=1,794) RelaNves(n= 1,641) Colleagues(n=1,794) Relatives(n=1,641) ThepopulationofRussia ThepopulationofRussia Percent 1About100million About100million 9,61% 2About150million About150million 61,96% 3About200million About200million 28,42% n=1,935 WhatisthethepopulationsizeofRussia? 9,6% 62,0% 28,4% About 100 million About 150 million About 200 million Whichcountryhasthehighestmilitaryexpenditure? Percent Russia 21,55% China 6,58% USA 52,29% NorthKorea 16,38% SaudiArabia 3,21% n=1,838 Whichcountryhasthehighestmilitaryexpenditure? 21,5% 6,6% 52,3% 16,4% 3,2% Russia China USA North Korea Saudi Arabia n=1,935 n=1,838 About 100 million About 150 million About 200 million Russia China USA North Korea Saudi Arabia Source: Centre for East European and International StudiesSource: Centre for East European and International Studies Source: Centre for East European and International Studies
Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes ZOiS Report 1/2018 7 FIGURE 6 Main source of information (first choice) Sourceofinformation,1stchoice Percent RussianTelevision 30,23% Russianradio 2,00% Regionalor local television andradio 6,50% Newspapers 2,15% VKontakte 19,09% Facebook 1,40% Twitter 1,50% Social networks except VKontakte, Facebook, Twitter 9,95% BBC 0,75% CNN 0,20% DeutscheWelle 0,05% OthersourcesontheInternet 23,34% Other 2,85% n=2,001 30,2% 2,0% 6,5% 2,1% 19,1% 1,4% 1,5% 9,9% 0,7% 0,2% 0,0% 23,3% 2,8% Russian Television Russian radio Regional or local television and radio Newspapers VKontakte Facebook Twitter Social networks except VKontakte, Facebook, Twitter BBC CNN Deutsche Welle Other sources on the Internet Other MainsourceofinformaTon(firstchoice) Russian youth primarily accesses political news through social media outlets, in particular through the Russian equivalent of Facebook called VKontakte (19 per cent), via Twitter or Facebook (1.5 and 1.4 per cent respectively) and other, unspecified social media (10 per cent). In total, about 30 per cent of the younger generation receive most of their information about politics through social media. Additionally, 23 per cent of the respondents said that other internet sources are their main sources of information. By comparison, 30 per cent rely on Russian television to inform themselves about politics. All of the major TV channels are state-controlled by now. Our respondents mostly watch the state-owned Channel 1, Russia 1, and Gazprom controlled NTV. FIGURE6 The print media retain greater diversity in terms of political views, but they do not play a significant role for Russian youth: only 2 per cent report turning to newspapers as their first and 4.5 per cent as their second most important source of information. There is, of course, a grey area, as the category ‘other internet sources’ might include online editions of newspapers and articles shared via social media. When asked about their second most important source of information, 19 per cent point to Russian television, followed by a total of about 35 per cent using social media (20 per cent use VKontakte, 1.5 per cent Facebook, 1.5 per cent Twitter, and 12 per cent other social media sites). As the second most important source regional media outlets (especially regional and local TV and radio used by just under 14 per cent of respondents) play a somewhat bigger role, underlining their complementary role. Traditional Western media outlets like BBC and CNN have negligible regular audiences. n=2,001 Source: Centre for East European and International Studies
ZOiS Report 1/2018 Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes 8 Political engagement: presidential elections, protests, youth organizations Presidential elections 2018 Sixty-one per cent of the respondents confirmed that they voted in the presidential elections in March 2018. Of the 39 per cent who said that they had not participated, about a third explained their choice with the feeling that their vote would not have made a difference, 16 per cent interpreted their abstention as a way to show their disapproval of the political system, and just under 11 per cent reported not identifying with the political views of any of the candidates. The umbrella category ‘other reasons’ contains reasons, such as having been ill on the day, other logistical reasons, or having forgotten about the elections. Actual vote choice is a question that respondents may have felt less comfortable to answer despite the fact that an online survey offers a higher degree of anonymity and that they could choose not to answer. Sixty-seven per cent of the respondents who chose to answer the question about vote choice said that they had voted for Vladimir Putin. These numbers are somewhat lower than the overall official election result of 77 per cent and the official turnout figure of 67.5 per cent. From the additional survey question of how many of the respondents’ five closest friends voted in the elections, turnout would have been closer to 55 per cent. These are, of course, no definite numbers, but the responses reflect a higher degree of abstention or election fatigue among Russian youth compared to other age groups. The vote shares for the other candidates also diverge from the officially declared results for the overall electorate, indicating somewhat higher support levels for a range of candidates associated with left-wing, liberal and rightwing political views: 14.4 per cent of the survey respondents reported having voted for the communist candidate Pavel Grudin (official result for the overall electorate: 11.8 per cent), 6.4 per cent for Ksenia Sobchak (official result: 1.7 per cent), 8.1 per cent for Vladimir Zhirinovsky (official result: 5.7 per cent) and 1.8 per cent for Grigorii Yavlinsky (official result: 1.1 per cent). FIGURE7 FIGURE7 Vote choice in presidental elections 2018 Whomdidyouvotefor? Percent SergeyBaburin 0,52% PavelGrudinin 14,40% VladimirZhirinovsky 8,19% VladimirPutin 67,36% KseniaSobchak 6,42% MaximSuraykin 0,62% BorisTitov 0,73% GrigoryYavlinsky 1,76% n=965 0,5% 14,4% 8,2% 67,4% 6,4% 0,6% 0,7% 1,8% Sergey Baburin Pavel Grudinin Vladimir Zhirinovsky Vladimir Putin Ksenia Sobchak Maxim Suraykin Boris Titov Grigory Yavlinsky VotechoiceinpresidenQalelecQons2018 n= 965 Source: Centre for East European and International Studies
Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes ZOiS Report 1/2018 9 Ahead of the presidential elections, the political regime had made a concerted effort to increase voter turnout as a key indicator of support for the current political regime. Some of these initiatives were aimed at young people specifically, such as the competition ‘If I were President . . . ’ which encouraged students to submit an essay, a drawing, a video or a project outline about what they would do if they were the country’s next leader. Over half of the survey respondents stated they had not heard of any of these initiatives. The only ones that triggered a recognition effect among a sizeable proportion of the respondents were the ‘Photo at the Polls’ (Foto na vyborakh) and ‘Together to the Polls’ (Vmeste na vybory). ‘Photo at the polls’ asked voters to take a selfie at a polling station and to post it on a social media outlet under a hashtag in return for being entered into a draw for electronic devices. The explicit goal of this initiative was to mobilize voters aged 18 – 39 and to create a positive atmosphere around the election. ‘Photo at the Polls’ was known to almost a quarter of our respondents but used by merely 2 per cent. The initiative ‘Together to the polls’ worked through a dating app inviting others to join them on election day. Eighteen per cent of the respondents had come across it, but again only about 2 per cent of them reported using it. Overall, the voter mobilization initiatives clearly did not appeal to young Russians. Protests: awareness but little involvement Just below 60 per cent of respondents said that they are aware of protests that took place across the Russian Federation during the last twelve months. A follow-up question that asked what these protests were about showed that respondents knew about protests against the current authorities, including Putin specifically, about corruption in general, or about the upcoming elections. However, only around four to five per cent said that they had participated in social and political or environmental protests, mostly at the local level, over the last year, and about 17 per cent reported knowing people who had taken part. FIGURES8 + 9 Beyond the fact that respondents based in Moscow and St. Petersburg are more likely to have heard about or to have FIGURE 8 Awareness of protests FIGURE 9 Participation in protests Areyouawareofprotests? Percent Yes 59,61% No 40,39% n=1,998 59,6% 40,4% Yes No Awarenessofprotests Participatesocial/politicalprotest Social/politic al protest (n=1,169) Environment al protest(n= 1,178) Yes 4,36% 5,18% No 95,64% 94,82% n=1,169 4,4% 5,2% 95,6% 94,8% Social/political protest (n=1,169) Environmental protest (n= 1,178) Participation in protests n=1,998 n=1,169 Yes No Source: Centre for East European and International Studies Source: Centre for East European and International Studies
ZOiS Report 1/2018 Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes 16 socio-economic status expressed lower support for multiculturalist values). The gender differences on all four dimensions do not achieve statistical significance. Overall, Russian youth supports both liberal nationalism and liberal citizenship. It remains more sceptical of conservative nationalism but even more so of multicultural citizenship. FIGURE19 Conclusion The self-reported political interest by Russian youth is not matched by their general knowledge or political engagement. However, there is awareness of protests and a general approval of protest as a legitimate way for expressing political opinions. Despite limited overall participation rates, this finding underlines why the regime is concerned and cracks down on protests using disproportionate force. Self-reported trust in the Russian president is high, though hard to interpret as part of a survey conducted in an authoritarian state. The similarly high level of trust in the Russian army corresponds to the regime’s displays of military capability and high military spending in recent years as well as the official discourse about the annexation of Crimea and the war in Eastern Ukraine. The reported low trust in local and regional institutions mirrors President Putin’s strategy to hold sub-national institutions, esp. regional governors, responsible for addressing the population’s socio-economic needs and thereby shift blame from the centre to the periphery. The Russian Orthodox Church is clearly a contested institution from the ZOiS survey, and the most distrusted institution are the Russian mass media. Russian youth looks both west and east. Personal travel, mostly for tourism, takes younger people to Western countries and Asia in equal measure, and China and the US top the list of countries the young want Russia to have a close relationship with. Labour mobility inside Russia and beyond is low, Communityvalues Averagesupportonascalefrom1to100 ConservativeNationalism 57 LiberalNationalism 71 LiberalCitizenship 74 Multiculturalism 40 Averagevalues;min=1,max=100 57 71 74 40 Conservative Nationalism Liberal Nationalism Liberal Citizenship Multiculturalism Communityvalues Averagesupportonascalefrom1to100 FIGURE 19 Community values Average support on a scale from 1 to 100 * Source: Centre for East European and International Studies *Respondentswereaskedtoagree / disagree(onascale) with each of the statements underlying these categories.
Youth in Russia: Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes ZOiS Report 1/2018 17 though over 50 per cent of the respondents are contemplating these options. Those who have lived and worked in an EU country deem democratic values and structural economic reforms more important than those who lack this personal experience. Based on the survey data alone it is impossible to say if this trend describes a change of attitudes away from home or if it simply shows that the respondents picked their destinations in line with their political attitudes. However, the correlation definitely maps the scope for the transmission of political and social remittances. The value set of the young is contradictory. On the one hand, there is widespread support for fundamental liberal values, such as non-discrimination, though only a small share of respondents supports active multiculturalism. Overall, a sizeable part of the population exhibits a conservative understanding of national identity. The latter echoes the values that the regime itself tries to propagate among the young. Returning to the opening question of whether youth is predominantly critical, loyal or politically disaffected, the survey data suggest that Russian youth poses a medium-term challenge to the regime. The young are somewhat more sceptical than the overall population about the direction in which their country is headed, but political engagement is limited. The political expectations of the young concentrate on socio-economic issues and, to a lesser degree, on anti-corruption reforms. These expectations do not diverge significantly from those of the overall population. However, if the regime fails to address these issues, the younger generation is more likely to compare its situation with the living standards in other countries, both east and west, experienced through first-hand travel experience. Combined with the reported interest in politics, awareness of protests, and trust in voluntary organizations, this could provide the basis for more opposition in the future. The survey also indicates that the regime’s official discourse aligns with the reported trust in central state institutions, with the notable exception of the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian mass media, and the ideas about what constitutes a national community. This suggests a partial success of the regime’s framing strategy, but also maps the need for readjustment. Imprint Authors Dr. Félix Krawatzek and Prof. Dr. Gwendolyn Sasse Published by © Centre for East European and International Studies (ZOiS) gGmbH Address Centre for East European and International Studies (ZOiS) gGmbH Mohrenstraße 60 10117 Berlin [email protected] www.zois-berlin.de Citation Krawatzek, Félix / Sasse, Gwendolyn: Youth in Russia. Outlook on Life and Political Attitudes, ZOiS Report 1/2018, (https://www.zois-berlin.de/fileadmin/media/Dateien/ ZOiS_Reports/ZOiS_Report_1_2018.pdf) ISSN 2512-7233 Layout Yuko Stier