Assessing the effectiveness of tourism promotional videos: Creativity, emotional impact, perceived quality, and attitude towards the destination

Dias, Francisco; Lavaredas, Alexandra Meira Article Assessing the effectiveness of tourism promotional videos: Creativity, emotional impact, perceived quality, and attitude towards the destination Administrative Sciences Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel Suggested Citation: Dias, Francisco; Lavaredas, Alexandra Meira (2024) : Assessing the effectiveness of tourism promotional videos: Creativity, emotional impact, perceived quality, and attitude towards the destination, Administrative Sciences, ISSN 2076-3387, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 14, Iss. 12, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120323 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/321126 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Citation: Dias, Francisco, and Alexandra Meira Lavaredas. 2024. Assessing the Effectiveness of Tourism Promotional Videos: Creativity, Emotional Impact, Perceived Quality, and Attitude Towards the Destination. Administrative Sciences 14: 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ admsci14120323 Received: 2 October 2024 Revised: 15 November 2024 Accepted: 15 November 2024 Published: 1 December 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Article Assessing the Effectiveness of Tourism Promotional Videos: Creativity, Emotional Impact, Perceived Quality, and Attitude Towards the Destination Francisco Dias and Alexandra Meira Lavaredas * Tourism Department, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal; [email protected] *Correspondence: alexandra.avar[email protected] Abstract: Tourism promotional videos (TPVs) are widely used by destination management organizations (DMOs) in promotional campaigns. With the aim of opening new research perspectives in the field of tourism promotion, this article proposes a model for evaluating the effectiveness of TPVs—the Emovie model—conceptually anchored in studies on transformational and symbolic advertising. The model describes the interrelationship of four constructs: artistic value, positive emotional impact, perceived quality of the video, and perceived quality of the destination. The model was tested in three empirical studies carried out in parallel and using the same methodological procedures for quantitative analysis, applied to three samples totaling 674 individuals. The results show that the creativity and originality of TPVs elicit positive emotional reactions, resulting in favorable attitudes towards the message and the destination. This study is particularly important because it provides DMOs with a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of their promotional videos. Keywords: tourism promotion; videos; artistic value; emotional impact; perceived quality; destination 1. Introduction The formation of a destination’s image in the minds of potential tourists is largely based on information provided by image-forming agents (Gartner 1994;Tasci and Gartner 2007). Therefore, the quality and effectiveness of the messages sent out by DMOs are crucial to the success of their marketing efforts. DMOs use a wide range of instruments in their promotional campaigns, including advertisements in the media, media trips, sponsored television programs, participation in tourism fairs, direct marketing, and brochures. These traditional promotional tools are complemented by technological platforms that use audiovisual content as the preferred means of communication and that increasingly influence decision-making. In this context, video, which is used by 91 per cent of companies for promotional purposes (Video Marketing Statistics 2024), is becoming a fundamental tool in destination promotion campaigns, and is an important source of influence on tourists’ decision-making (Cao et al. 2021). In the field of audiovisual promotion, each DMO deals not only with competition from other destinations, but also with the myriad of audiovisual messages about its own destination that are emanating from other organizations and from consumers themselves. The coexistence of a myriad of videos about the same destination can generate a certain level of noise, reducing the effectiveness of the messages broadcasted by the DMOs. Therefore, only by effectively investing in the quality of the audiovisual content of their campaigns, making their videos “viral”, can DMOs make their own messages stand out. However, tourism studies have completely ignored the issue of the quality of the content of audiovisual campaigns promoting destinations. In fact, there is a deep divide between audiovisual tourism promotion practices, on the one hand, and scientific research agendas on the other. Nowadays, one of the biggest challenges for destination brands is to find creative forms of online communication capable of standing out in the complex digital noosphere, given Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120323 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/admsci Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 2 of 17 the immense proliferation of digital content generated by tourists, travelers, bloggers, and journalists. In this context, it is important to determine under what conditions the promotional videos of DMOs can have an impact on consumers. Despite the undeniable importance of promotional videos for tourism, the literature review shows that researchers have paid little attention to studying the persuasive effectiveness of videos as tourism image induction agents. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the conditions for the effectiveness of the messages contained in tourism promotional videos (TPVs). More specifically, it will focus on identifying the type of content in TPVs that is most likely to induce positive emotions and, thus, increase the effectiveness of the messages. The aim is to provide DMOs with a simple but reliable diagnostic assessment tool for TPVs, enabling them to pre-test different versions of their videos and choose, as the final version, the one most likely to impact their audiences. To this end, a broad review of the literature on advertising techniques and persuasive communication was carried out, covering four interconnected aspects. Firstly, reference is made to hedonistic information technologies (Shayekina and Tleuberdinov 2012;Van der Heijden 2004;Hsu and Lu 2007), which characterize the Web 3.0 technological ecosystem, as an alternative to more traditional utilitarian information technologies [Van der Heijden 2004;Hsu and Lu 2007;Holsapple and Wu 2007). Next, studies on psychological reactance to persuasion attempts are considered (Hannah et al. 1975;Bleier and Eisenbeiss 2015;Amarnath and Jaidev 2021;Chen et al. 2019). Thirdly, tourism studies are considered that highlight the role of emotions in the various stages of the tourist experience: before, during and after the trip (Aho 2001;Knobloch et al. 2017;Hosany et al. 2020). Lastly, studies on advertising carried out over the last three decades are considered, namely, studies on hedonic and emotional advertising appeals (Albers-Miller and Gelb 1996;Shayekina and Tleuberdinov 2012), studies on transformational advertising (Rossiter and Percy 1987;Johar and Sirgy 1991;Cutler et al. 2000), and Moriarty’s model of symbolic advertising (Moriarty 1987). The relevance and originality of this research lies in the study of the persuasive effectiveness of TPVs through the creation of an Effective Movie model (“Emovie model”), which aims to emphasize that emotions and affective dynamics are the core factor in the audiovisual tourism promotion process, as opposed to the excessive emphasis that has been placed on cognitive processes in tourism studies. 2. Conceptual Background (A) Information technologies: productivity versus pleasure The growing preference for online digital media over offline media is most likely related to the fact that the former allow for interactivity and playful sociability (Holsapple and Wu 2007). Several authors stress the hedonistic nature of online media, categorizing information technologies into two types: productivity-focused technologies versus pleasurefocused technologies (Van der Heijden 2004;Hsu and Lu 2007;Holsapple and Wu 2007). The evolution of the Internet to Web 2.0, and later to Web 3.0, is testimony to the paradigm shift in the media. Analog media (and Web 1.0) are productivity-focused technologies whose function is to acquire, store, retrieve, and distribute information, as well as to process the knowledge needed to perform relevant tasks, such as decision-making (Holsapple and Wu 2007). Tourism promotion brochures and catalogs are communication formats suited to productivity-focused technologies. Pleasure-orientated communication technologies, on the other hand, incorporate hedonic elements, such as creative and enjoyable content, animated images, appealing sounds and esthetically pleasing visual layouts, and can also promote interactivity and playful involvement. These include online games, virtual worlds (e.g., Second Life), video sharing (e.g., YouTube), social networks and Internet Protocol Television. Audiovisual tourism promotion is beginning to take advantage of the immense possibilities offered by these technologies. The gamification of destinations, storytelling, and fictional plots are increasingly present in TPV. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 3 of 17 (B) Concealing persuasive intent: from reactance to narrative transport When a message is categorized as “advertising”, it is immediately met with reluctance from consumers, who avoid it whenever they can (Baek and Morimoto 2012;Dodoo and Wen 2019;Speck and Elliott 1997). The rejection of advertising can be explained by reactance theory. Reactance consists of a negative psychological response as a means of resisting attempts at persuasion, which are considered coercive, and which leads people to act in the opposite direction to the meaning requested in the message (Hannah et al. 1975;Bleier and Eisenbeiss 2015;Amarnath and Jaidev 2021;Chen et al. 2019). The individual attitude is, thus, inverted as a rejection of what is perceived to be a threat to personal freedom (Edwards et al. 2002). Therefore, in addition to zapping to avoid advertising messages, they may also encounter audience reactance. Furthermore, studies on persuasion show that the credibility of a message is lower the more evident the sender’s persuasive intent is (see Gotlieb and Sarel 1991), as illustrated in Figure 1. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 18 sounds and esthetically pleasing visual layouts, and can also promote interactivity and playful involvement. These include online games, virtual worlds (e.g., Second Life), video sharing (e.g., YouTube), social networks and Internet Protocol Television. Audiovisual tourism promotion is beginning to take advantage of the immense possibilities offered by these technologies. The gamification of destinations, storytelling, and fictional plots are increasingly present in TPV. (B) Concealing persuasive intent: from reactance to narrative transport When a message is categorized as “advertising”, it is immediately met with reluctance from consumers, who avoid it whenever they can (Baek and Morimoto 2012; Dodoo and Wen 2019; Speck and Elliott 1997). The rejection of advertising can be explained by reactance theory. Reactance consists of a negative psychological response as a means of resisting attempts at persuasion, which are considered coercive, and which leads people to act in the opposite direction to the meaning requested in the message (Hannah et al. 1975; Bleier and Eisenbeiss 2015; Amarnath and Jaidev 2021; Chen et al. 2019). The individual attitude is, thus, inverted as a rejection of what is perceived to be a threat to personal freedom (Edwards et al. 2002). Therefore, in addition to zapping to avoid advertising messages, they may also encounter audience reactance. Furthermore, studies on persuasion show that the credibility of a message is lower the more evident the sender’s persuasive intent is (see Gotlieb and Sarel 1991), as illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. Credibility, reactance, and control of messages as factors in tourism image formation. Source: Adapted from Gartner (1994). Tourism promotion through traditional forms of advertising is associated with a low level of credibility (Gartner 1994). In order to increase the credibility of the message, prevent reactance and generate a strong impact on audiences, destination promoters and the tourism industry are opting for more covert promotional techniques, using celebrity testimonials, product/brand placement methods in feature films and TV series (Araújo Vila et al. 2018; Araújo 2018) and, more frequently, the production of creative and fictional videos (Gong and Tung 2017). Figure 1. Credibility, reactance, and control of messages as factors in tourism image formation. Source: Adapted from Gartner (1994). Tourism promotion through traditional forms of advertising is associated with a low level of credibility (Gartner 1994). In order to increase the credibility of the message, prevent reactance and generate a strong impact on audiences, destination promoters and the tourism industry are opting for more covert promotional techniques, using celebrity testimonials, product/brand placement methods in feature films and TV series (Araújo Vila et al. 2018;Araújo 2018) and, more frequently, the production of creative and fictional videos (Gong and Tung 2017). The use of creative audiovisual productions with a strong emotional impact (especially when they take on a trailer format) not only makes it possible to conceal the persuasive intent through fictional plots, but also to create narrative transportation (Chen and Chang 2017;Green and Brock 2000), taking viewers into a fantasy world, arousing more intense and more positive emotional reactions and numbing the critical sense, thus generating a more positive attitude towards the message (Escalas 2004). Through creative videos, tourism promoters seek to impress viewers (Hudson and Ritchie 2006) and persuade them to visit a given destination by mentally transporting Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 4 of 17 them to an experiential situation (Moyer-Gusé2008). Good videos elicit positive emotional reactions in the minds of potential tourists (Schiffman et al. 2013), as well as numbing their critical sense (Escalas 2004). The use of creative images, stories, and plots can build an emotional connection between a destination and its potential visitors based on positive destination images (Morgan et al. 2002). (C) The role of emotions in optimizing messages about tourist experiences There is a broad consensus on the determining role of emotions in the tourist experience (Aho 2001;Bastiaansen et al. 2019;Hosany et al. 2020;Knobloch et al. 2017;Tussyadiah 2014). Emotions are fundamental in the various stages of the time cycle of the tourist experience: 1. Before the trip, emotions activate attention and motivation and shape expectations in the process of choosing the destination (Gnoth 1997); 2. During the trip, emotions vary from moment to moment and in each location, making it easier for tourists to adapt to each situation (Nawijn 2011); 3. After the trip, in the memories and social sharing of the experience, positive and negative emotions are reactivated in association with the recollection of certain events, thus contributing to their consolidation and perpetuation in memory (Bastiaansen et al. 2019;Hosany et al. 2020). The relevance of emotions in tourism has been highlighted in a number of studies, for example, in holiday activities (Hosany and Prayag 2013); in experiences of participating in festivals in experiences of visiting theme parks (Bignéet al. 2005); adventure tourism (Faullant et al. 2011); shopping tourism (Yüksel and Yüksel 2007); tourism to heritage sites (Prayag et al. 2013); and visits to scenic spots (Wang and Lyu 2019). To generate customer-based brand equity for destinations, tourists’ emotional reactions are of paramount importance, as they are precursors to satisfaction with the destination (Faullant et al. 2011;Hosany et al. 2017), attachment to the destination (Yuksel et al. 2010), behavioral intentions regarding activities to be carried out at the destination (Prayag et al. 2013;Yüksel and Yüksel 2007), and the overall assessment of the destination’s image (Prayag et al. 2017). In this sense, it can be said that emotions are fundamental to providing memorable tourist experiences in destinations (Moyle et al. 2019). •Emotion as the centerpiece of promotional message processing Studies on the quality of promotional materials have focused on identifying the most effective stimuli or the most appropriate communication mix to generate the desired effect on audiences. These include measuring the effect of endorsement (Van der Veen and Song 2014), evaluating celebrity images (Wang et al. 2002), or evaluating pictorial and textual stimuli (Walters et al. 2007). These studies use attitude towards messages, attitude towards the brand, or purchase intention as indicators of effectiveness. The researchers mentioned above focus only on how the manipulation of certain concrete advertising stimuli influences advertising effectiveness. However, in these studies, the mental processing of tourism promotion messages is treated as a “black box” mediating between consumers’ exposure to promotional stimuli and the development of attitudes towards destinations, and is almost never considered (Li et al. 2018). However, outside of tourism, the literature on advertising effectiveness emphasizes the importance of emotional responses in consumers’ mental processing. According to Li et al. (2018), it has been empirically verified that emotion acts as an important precursor to consumer responses such as attitudes towards advertising and the brand (Holbrook and Batra 1987), brand interest (Morris et al. 2002), and purchase intention (Morris et al. 2002). More importantly, emotional reactions may, in fact, be a more reliable indicator of advertising effectiveness than cognition when the products or services are hedonic in nature (Johar and Sirgy 1991;Morris et al. 2002). Walters et al. (2012) found that the emotional reactions evoked by concrete images of tourism promotion are positively correlated with interest in the product and purchasing decisions. However, the tourism literature lacks Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 5 of 17 empirical studies on the role of emotions in tourism in general and tourism promotion in particular. •The impact of emotional and creative messages on tourism promotion The fact that tourism promotion strategies based on fictional, humorous, and emotional messages are generally successful is due, according to Ge (2019), to three complementary logics of consumer participation: (a) An economic logic based on the “attention economy”: The most valuable resource in the information age is not information, but the attention people pay to it (Lanham 2006); moreover, consumers tend to pay more attention to emotional and entertaining messages that generate involvement and commitment than to messages that extol the virtues of products (Leung et al. 2017). (b) A social logic that suggests that creative and entertaining messages are highly compatible with “networked individualism” (Wellman et al. 2003): Endorsing the symbolic meaning shared in creative and entertaining messages can contribute to the creation of a feeling of common affiliation in a brand community logic. (c) A cultural logic of participation based on the notion that hedonic messages on social networks serve as bricks of complex cultures that entice consumers to become involved in collective practices with which they identify (Burgess and Green 2018). A good, creative promotional video with a strong emotional impact aims to impress viewers (Hudson and Ritchie 2006) and persuade them to visit a destination by transporting them to an experiential situation (Moyer-Gusé2008). The greater the emotional impact generated by a video, the more likely it is to generate a “telepresence” effect (Cao et al. 2021;Hyun and O’Keefe 2012), i.e., to create in the viewer the sensation of “being there” (Steuer 1992). A video with a good creative storyline and a strong emotional slant has the ability to elicit telepresence and the viewer’s involvement with the destination, thanks to a mechanism of narrative transportation (Cao et al. 2021;Green and Brock 2000), defined as the viewer’s immersion in the story (Gong and Tung 2017). Narrative transportation involves images, affect, and focus of attention (Green and Brock 2000). In order to make TPVs more effective, DMOs tend to focus increasingly on fictional content, which more easily arouses emotional reactions in the minds of potential tourists (Schiffman et al. 2013). The use of images and stories in fictional TPV can build an emotional connection between the destination and viewers, leading (potential) tourists to form positive images of the destination (Morgan et al. 2002). Thus, displaying images, emotions, and stories in a fictional VPT is more effective in capturing tourists’ attention (Chen et al. 2019). (D) Advertising appeals, types of formats, and types of advertising Although tourism literature has never systematically examined the persuasive content of TPV messages, it is possible to learn valuable lessons from advertising studies and transpose these lessons into analyzing the effectiveness of TPVs (Figure 2). In this context, studies on types of advertising, as well as types of advertising formats and advertising appeals, are particularly important. •Utilitarian and rational versus hedonic and emotional advertising appeals Authors who have analyzed the content of advertising messages like Shayekina and Tleuberdinov (2012) highlight two categories of advertising appeals contained in these messages: (1) utilitarian and rational appeals, the aim of which is to highlight the superiority, quality, economy, value, or performance of a product. With this type of appeal, an attempt is made to focus the consumer’s attention on the product’s attributes; (2) hedonic and emotional appeals, the primary aim of which is to emphasize the emotional and experiential dimension of consumption, leading the consumer to identify with the product. In this sense, the messages include stimuli with an emotional impact in order to induce positive feelings in audiences. It should be noted that these two types of advertising appeals can be combined in the same message and, therefore, when analyzing the content of messages, it makes sense to consider a continuum of variations and hybrid situations, the opposing Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 6 of 17 poles of which are “pure” messages that convey only utilitarian and rational appeals, and only hedonic and emotional appeals. •Literal visual advertising versus symbolic visual advertising Moriarty (1987) proposed a categorical model for analyzing the content of print advertising, establishing a dichotomy between literal advertising formats versus symbolic advertising formats. The literal format uses the following rhetorical means: (1) identification (identification of the brand, logo or packaging); (2) description of components, attributes, shape, and appearance; (3) comparison between “before” and “after”; (4) comparison with other competing brands; and (5) demonstration, which consists of information on how to use the product. In contrast, the rhetorical devices of the symbolic model are (1) association with lifestyles, typical situations, and people, characters, or celebrities; (2) metaphors (allegorical use, unexpected substitution based on similarity with some attribute; (3) storytelling (use of narrative, drama and plot); and (4) esthetics (use of artistic expression, abstractions, and esthetic patterns). Later studies corroborated the applicability of Moriarty’s (1987) model to other media such as television and radio (An 2007;Cutler et al. 2000). •Informational versus transformational or experiential advertising The dichotomies mentioned above—1. productivity-focused vs. pleasure-focused technologies; 2. utilitarian and rational vs. hedonic and emotional appeals; 3. literal vs. symbolic formats—are fully in line with the classic categorization of advertising formats, namely, informational vs. transformational or experiential advertising (Puto and Wells 1984;Rossiter and Percy 1987;Johar and Sirgy 1991;Cutler et al. 2000). For these authors, informational advertising consists of informing about the key functional benefits that are considered important to consumers. It emphasizes the qualities of the product and sometimes specifies certain advantages compared to competing products. In contrast, transformational advertising consists of inducing a high level of emotional involvement in the consumer that facilitates greater acceptance of the product. Transformational advertising presents and emphasizes experiences of consuming the product, highlighting its benefits in terms of lifestyle, status, health, well-being, etc. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 18 Figure 2. Tourism promotion modalities. Source: authors. Considering that, in today’s digital ecosystem, people’s attention to messages is an increasingly precious economic resource (Lanham 2006), investment in the creativity and originality of TPV content has been considered a decisive factor in defining success formulas. It is, therefore, possible to delineate two distinct, albeit complementary, paths in the field of tourism promotion (Figure 2): on the one hand, a more traditional path, which was predominant or almost exclusive before the digital age, in which promotion focused consumers’ attention on the attributes of the destination; and, on the other, a dynamic and more creative path, which uses digital channels, competes for virality (consumer endorsement), and invests in narrative transport to generate the sensation of telepresence and the emotional attachment of audiences to the destination. This study on the effectiveness of VPTs fits into this second option. (E) Empirical model and hypotheses Applying the theoretical contributions in the field of advertising, presented above in the literature review, to the field of tourism allowed the authors to create a model for evaluating the effectiveness of tourism videos, the Effective Movie model (“Emovie model”). This acronym suggests the fusion of the term’s “emotion” and “movie”. The Emovie model emphasizes the role of emotion as a core factor in the audiovisual tourism promotion process, as opposed to the excessive emphasis that has been placed on cognitive processes in tourism studies (see Figure 3). The validation of this model could provide DMOs with a simple but reliable diagnostic assessment tool for TPVs, enabling them to pre-test different versions of their videos and choose as final versions those most likely to impact their audiences. Figure 2. Tourism promotion modalities. Source: authors. Considering that, in today’s digital ecosystem, people’s attention to messages is an increasingly precious economic resource (Lanham 2006), investment in the creativity and originality of TPV content has been considered a decisive factor in defining success formulas. It is, therefore, possible to delineate two distinct, albeit complementary, paths in Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 7 of 17 the field of tourism promotion (Figure 2): on the one hand, a more traditional path, which was predominant or almost exclusive before the digital age, in which promotion focused consumers’ attention on the attributes of the destination; and, on the other, a dynamic and more creative path, which uses digital channels, competes for virality (consumer endorsement), and invests in narrative transport to generate the sensation of telepresence and the emotional attachment of audiences to the destination. This study on the effectiveness of VPTs fits into this second option. (E) Empirical model and hypotheses Applying the theoretical contributions in the field of advertising, presented above in the literature review, to the field of tourism allowed the authors to create a model for evaluating the effectiveness of tourism videos, the Effective Movie model (“Emovie model”). This acronym suggests the fusion of the term’s “emotion” and “movie”. The Emovie model emphasizes the role of emotion as a core factor in the audiovisual tourism promotion process, as opposed to the excessive emphasis that has been placed on cognitive processes in tourism studies (see Figure 3). The validation of this model could provide DMOs with a simple but reliable diagnostic assessment tool for TPVs, enabling them to pre-test different versions of their videos and choose as final versions those most likely to impact their audiences. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 18 Figure 3. Model for evaluating the effectiveness of tourism videos (Emovie model). Source: Own elaboration based on Cadet et al. (2017) and Escalas (2004). The validation of the Emovie model presupposes the empirical testing of the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1 (H1). The artistic value of a VPT directly and positively influences its emotional impact on the viewer. It is hypothesized that there is a positive correlation between perceptions of the creativity and originality of videos and the intensity of the positive emotions felt by viewers when watching these videos. Hypothesis 2 (H2). The artistic value attributed to a VPT positively influences its perceived quality. Thus, videos rated as being very creative and very original are rated as being higher quality videos, and vice versa. Hypothesis 3 (H3). The artistic value attributed to a VPT positively influences the perceived quality of the destination promoted in the video. In other words, there is a positive correlation between evaluations of the creativity and originality of VPTs and evaluations of the perceived quality of the destinations promoted by these VPTs. Hypothesis 4 (H4). The positive emotional impact of a VPT directly and positively influences the perceived quality of that VPT. In other words, there is a positive correlation between the “emotional impact” and “perceived quality of the video” variables. Hypothesis 5 (H5). The positive emotional impact of a VPT directly and positively influences the perceived quality of the destination described in that VPT. In other words, there is a positive correlation between the “emotional impact” and “perceived quality of the video” variables. Hypothesis 6 (H6). There is a positive correlation between the perceived quality of the VPT and the perceived quality of the destination that these VPTs promote. 3. Materials and Methods 3.1. Empirical Studies, Stimulus Material, and Operationalization of the Constructs The validation of the VPT effectiveness assessment model was carried out in three empirical studies implemented in parallel, using six films competing in ART&TUR— International Tourism Film Festival (Viseu 2020) as the stimulus material. Each study investigated two different films, but using the same methodology: the same data collection script, the same questionnaire, and a film evaluation grid common to the various festivals Figure 3. Model for evaluating the effectiveness of tourism videos (Emovie model). Source: Own elaboration based on Cadet et al. (2017) and Escalas (2004). The validation of the Emovie model presupposes the empirical testing of the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1 (H1). The artistic value of a VPT directly and positively influences its emotional impact on the viewer. It is hypothesized that there is a positive correlation between perceptions of the creativity and originality of videos and the intensity of the positive emotions felt by viewers when watching these videos. Hypothesis 2 (H2). The artistic value attributed to a VPT positively influences its perceived quality. Thus, videos rated as being very creative and very original are rated as being higher quality videos, and vice versa. Hypothesis 3 (H3). The artistic value attributed to a VPT positively influences the perceived quality of the destination promoted in the video. In other words, there is a positive correlation between evaluations of the creativity and originality of VPTs and evaluations of the perceived quality of the destinations promoted by these VPTs. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 8 of 17 Hypothesis 4 (H4). The positive emotional impact of a VPT directly and positively influences the perceived quality of that VPT. In other words, there is a positive correlation between the “emotional impact” and “perceived quality of the video” variables. Hypothesis 5 (H5). The positive emotional impact of a VPT directly and positively influences the perceived quality of the destination described in that VPT. In other words, there is a positive correlation between the “emotional impact” and “perceived quality of the video” variables. Hypothesis 6 (H6). There is a positive correlation between the perceived quality of the VPT and the perceived quality of the destination that these VPTs promote. 3. Materials and Methods 3.1. Empirical Studies, Stimulus Material, and Operationalization of the Constructs The validation of the VPT effectiveness assessment model was carried out in three empirical studies implemented in parallel, using six films competing in ART&TUR—International Tourism Film Festival (Viseu 2020) as the stimulus material. Each study investigated two different films, but using the same methodology: the same data collection script, the same questionnaire, and a film evaluation grid common to the various festivals in the CIFFT—International Committee of Tourism Film Festivals (CIFFT) network, of which the ART&TUR Festival is a member. It is important to note that the promotional films that take part in the CIFFT network festivals feature content that essentially corresponds to the symbolic advertising format, as described by Moriarty (1987), namely, the association with lifestyles or celebrities, use of metaphors and storytelling, emphasis on esthetic elements, and a soundtrack (music) with a strong emotional impact. In addition, these films have the following common attributes: (i) they are short videos (2 to 4 min) that can be easily circulated on social networks; (ii) they have a high level of creativity, both in terms of music and soundtrack and in terms of image; (iii) are of a high standard of originality, emphasizing the symbolic and emotional aspects that propitiate narrative transport in order to induce attachment to the destination and telepresence; (iv) leave the characterizing attributes of destination images in the background; and (v) focus the attention of their audiences on narratives with creative and fictional plots, which arouse imaginary dreamlike relationships with the destination. This study used archive material from the 2020 edition of the ART&TUR Festival, as it was the year in which there were films with very similar characteristics, namely, (1) all 6 films were equally rated by the Festival jury (overall average of 88 points out of a maximum of 100, resulting from the assessment of a panel of 27 international jury members); (2) all 6 films promote tourist destinations; and (3) they incorporate original music, which is likely to have an emotional impact on viewers. Furthermore, as shown in Table 1, it was possible to pair the films 2 by 2, based on the following three criteria: (a) music with a strong emotional and nostalgic impact—films 1 and 2; (b) strong emphasis on tourist sociability: young couple versus family with children—films 3 and 4; (c) cultural contrast—focus on native culture versus focus on an exotic culture—films 5 and 6. Three parallel studies were therefore organized, each using two films as stimulus material, with the aim of gauging the validity of the Emovie model. However, the six films differed in two significant parameters, namely, the countries of origin and types of tourist experiences: film 1: Norway, showing close-ups and nature landscapes; film 2: Croatia (Rijeka), emphasizing cultural experiences in an urban context; film 3: Portugal (Algarve), with a great diversity of landscapes and locations; film 4: Spain (Costa Dorada), with images that show an atmosphere of tranquility and joy; film 5: Portugal (Algarve), with an emphasis on active tourism—cyclists riding along a cycle path; film 6: Japan (Takahama), with a strong emphasis on mystical experiences in natural surroundings. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 15 of 17 Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. References Aho, Seppo. 2001. Towards a General Theory of Touristic Experiences: Modeling Experience Process in Tourism. Tourism Review 56: 33–37. [CrossRef] Albers-Miller, Nancy, and Betsy Gelb. 1996. Business advertising appeals as a mirror of cultural dimensions: A study of eleven countries. Journal of Advertising 25: 57–70. [CrossRef] Amarnath, Debora Dhanya, and Uma Pricilda Jaidev. 2021. Toward an integrated model of consumer reactance: A literature analysis. Management Review Quarterly 71: 41–90. [CrossRef] Amirou, Rachid. 1995. Imaginaire touristique et sociabilités de voyage. Paris: PUF. An, Daechun. 2007. Advertising visuals in global brands’ local websites: A six-country comparison. International Journal of Advertising 26: 303–32. [CrossRef] Araújo Vila, Noélia, JoséAntónio Fraiz Brea, and Diego Tourbes. 2018. Las series audiovisuales: De un producto de entretenimiento a una herramienta promocional y de creación de imagen. In La imagen y la promoción de los destinos turísticos. Edited by Lucilia Cardoso and Francisco Dias. Pamplona: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi. Araújo, Arthur Filipe. 2018. Film-tourism y la imagen de destinos. In La imagen y la promoción de los destinos turísticos. Edited by Lucilia Cardoso and Francisco Dias. Pamplona: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi. Baek, Tay Hyun, and Mariko Morimoto. 2012. Stay Away From Me. Journal of Advertising 41: 59–76. [CrossRef] Bastiaansen, Marcel, Xander Dennis Lub, Ondrej Mitas, Timothy Hyungsoo Jung, Mário Passos Ascenção, Dai-In Han, Teemu Moilanen, Bert Smit, and Wim Strijbosch. 2019. Emotions as Core Building Blocks of an Experience. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 31: 651–68. [CrossRef] Bigné, J. Enrique, Luisa Andreu, and Juergen Gnoth. 2005. The Theme Park Experience: An Analysis of Pleasure, Arousal and Satisfaction. Tourism Management 26: 833–44. [CrossRef] Bleier, Alexander, and Maik Eisenbeiss. 2015. The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising. Journal of Retailing 91: 390–40. [CrossRef] Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green. 2018. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Cadet, Fabienne, Priscilla Aaltonen, and Vahwere Kavota. 2017. The Advertisement Value of Transformational & Informational Appeal on Company Facebook Pages. Marketing Faculty Publications 4: 116–30. Cao, Xinyue, Zhirui Qu, Yan Liu, and JiaJing Hu. 2021. How the destination short video affects the customers’ attitude: The role of narrative transportation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 62: 102672. [CrossRef] Chen, Tsai, and Hui-Chen Chang. 2017. The effect of narrative transportation in mini-film advertising on reducing counterarguing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies 8: 25–46. [CrossRef] Chen, Qi, Yuqiang Feng, Luning Liu, and Xianyun Tian. 2019. Understanding consumers’ reactance of online personalized advertising: A new scheme of rational choice from a perspective of negative effects. International Journal of Information Management 44: 53–64. [CrossRef] Cutler, Bob D., Edward G. Thomas, and S. R. Rao. 2000. Informational/Transformational Advertising: Differences in Usage Across Media Types, Product Categories, and National Cultures. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 12: 69–83. [CrossRef] Dodoo, Naa Amponsah, and Jing Wen. 2019. A Path to Mitigating SNS Ad Avoidance: Tailoring Messages to Individual Personality Traits. Journal of Interactive Advertising 19: 116–32. [CrossRef] Edwards, Steven M., Hairong Li, and Joo-Hyun Lee. 2002. Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of PopUp Ads. Journal of Advertising 31: 83–95. [CrossRef] Escalas, Jennifer Edson. 2004. Imagine yourself in the product: Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion. Journal of Advertising 33: 37–48. [CrossRef] Faullant, Rita, Kurt Matzler, and Todd Mooradian. 2011. Personality, Basic Emotions, and Satisfaction: Primary Emotions in the Mountaineering Experience. Tourism Management 32: 1423–30. [CrossRef] Gartner, William. 1994. Image Formation Process. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 2: 191–216. [CrossRef] Ge, Jing. 2019. Social media-based visual humour use in tourism marketing: A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Humour Research 7: 6–25. [CrossRef] Gnoth, Juergen. 1997. Tourism Motivation and Expectation Formation. Annals of Tourism Research 24: 283–304. [CrossRef] Gong, Tianyi, and Vincent Wing Sun Tung. 2017. The impact of tourism mini-movies on destination image: The influence of travel motivation and advertising disclosure. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 34: 416–28. Gotlieb, Jerry, and Dan Sarel. 1991. Comparative advertising effectiveness: The role of involvement and source credibility. Journal of Advertising 20: 38–45. [CrossRef] Green, Melanie, and Timothy Brock. 2000. The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 701–21. [CrossRef] Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 16 of 17 Hannah, Edward, Elena Rozen Hannah, and Barbara Wattie. 1975. Arousal of Psychological Reactance as a Consequence of Predicting an Individual’s Behaviour. Psychological Reports 37: 411–20. [CrossRef] Holbrook, Morris, and Rajeev Batra. 1987. Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising. The Journal of Consumer Research 14: 404–20. [CrossRef] Holsapple, Clyde, and Jiming Wu. 2007. User Acceptance of Virtual Worlds: The Hedonic Framework. Advances in Information Systems 38: 86–9. [CrossRef] Hosany, Sameer, and Girish Prayag. 2013. Patterns of Tourists’ Emotional Responses, Satisfaction, and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Business Research 66: 730–37. [CrossRef] Hosany, Sameer, Girish Prayag, Robert Van Der Veen, Songshan Huang, and Siripan Deesilatham. 2017. Mediating Effects of Place Attachment and Satisfaction on the Relationship between Tourists’ Emotions and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research 56: 1079–93. [CrossRef] Hosany, Sameer, Drew Martin, and Arch Woodside. 2020. Emotions in Tourism: Theoretical Designs, Measurements, Analytics, and Interpretations. Journal of Travel Research 60: 1391–407. [CrossRef] Hsu, Chin-Lung, and Hsi-Peng Lu. 2007. Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 23: 1642–59. [CrossRef] Hudson, Simon, and Brent Ritchie. 2006. Promoting Destinations via Film Tourism. Journal of Travel Research 44: 387–96. [CrossRef] Hyun, Martin Yongho, and Robert Martin O’Keefe. 2012. Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research 65: 29–35. [CrossRef] Irimiás, Anna, Ariel Zoltán Mitev, and Gábor Michalkó. 2021. Narrative transportation and travel: The mediating role of escapism and immersion. Tourism Management Perspectives 38: 100793. [CrossRef] Johar, Jotindar S., and M. Joseph Sirgy. 1991. Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal. Journal of Advertising 20: 23–33. [CrossRef] Knobloch, Uli, Kirsten Robertson, and Robert Aitken. 2017. Experience, Emotion, and Eudaimonia: A Consideration of Tourist Experiences and Well-being. Journal of Travel Research 56: 651–62. [CrossRef] Lanham, Richard. 2006. The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leung, Xi, Billy Bai, and Mehmet Erdem. 2017. Hotel social media marketing: A study on message strategy and its effectiveness. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 8: 239–55. [CrossRef] Leuthesser, Lance, Chiranjeev Kohli, and Katrin Harich. 1995. Brand equity: The halo effect measure. European Journal of Marketing 29: 57–66. [CrossRef] Li, Shanshi, Gabby Walters, Jan Packer, and Noel Scott. 2018. Using skin conductance and facial electromyography to measure emotional responses to tourism advertising. Current Issues in Tourism 21: 1761–83. [CrossRef] Malhotra, Naresh. 2007. Marketing Research. Hoboken: Pearson Prentice Hall. Morgan, Nigel, Annette Pritchard, and Rachel Piggott. 2002. New Zealand, 100% Pure. The creation of a powerful niche destination brand. Journal of Brand Management 9: 335–54. [CrossRef] Moriarty, Sandra. 1987. A Content Analysis of Visuals Used in Print Media Advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 64: 550–54. Morris, Jon D., Chongmoo Woo, James A. Geason, and Jooyoung Kim. 2002. The power of affect: Predicting intention. Journal of Advertising Research 42: 7–18. [CrossRef] Moyer-Gusé, Emily. 2008. Toward a Theory of Entertainment Persuasion: Explaining the Persuasive Effects of Entertainment-Education Messages. Communication Theory 18: 407–25. [CrossRef] Moyle, Brent D., Char-lee Moyle, Alexandra Bec, and Noel Scott. 2019. The next frontier in tourism emotion research. Current Issues in Tourism 22: 1393–99. [CrossRef] Murphy, Kevin, and Charles Davidshofer. 1988. Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Nawijn, Jeroen. 2011. Determinants of Daily Happiness on Vacation. Journal of Travel Research 50: 559–66. [CrossRef] Oliver, Richard. 1999. Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing 63: 33–44. [CrossRef] Pezlar, Ivo. 2014. Towards a More General Concept of Inference. Logica Universalis 8: 61–81. [CrossRef] Prayag, Girish, Sameer Hosany, and Khaled Odeh. 2013. The Role of Tourists’ Emotional Experiences and Satisfaction in Understanding Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 2: 118–27. Prayag, Girish, Sameer Hosany, Birgit Muskat, and Giacomo Del Chiappa. 2017. Understanding the Relationships between Tourists’ Emotional Experiences, Perceived Overall Image, Satisfaction, and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research 56: 41–54. [CrossRef] Puto, Christopher P., and William D. Wells. 1984. Informational and Transformational Advertising: The Differential Effects of Time. In NA—Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11. Edited by Thomas C. Kinnear. Provo: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 638–43. Rossiter, John, and Larry Percy. 1987. McGraw-Hill Series in Marketing.Advertising and Promotion Management. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. Schiffman, Leon, Aron O’Cass, Angela Paladino, and Jamie Carlson. 2013. Consumer Behaviour, 6th ed. Australia: Pearson Higher Education. Adm. Sci. 2024,14, 323 17 of 17 Shayekina, Zhannat M., and Timur S. Tleuberdinov. 2012. Formation of Advertising Appeal as a Basis for Creative Technologies. Education and Science Without Borders 3: 37–9. Speck, Paul, and Micheal Elliott. 1997. The Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Advertising Clutter. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 19: 39–54. Steuer, Jonathan. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42: 73–93. [CrossRef] Tasci, Asli, and William Gartner. 2007. Destination Image and Its Functional Relationships. Journal of Travel Research 45: 413–25. [CrossRef] Tussyadiah, Iis. 2014. Toward a Theoretical Foundation for Experience Design in Tourism. Journal of Travel Research 53: 543–64. [CrossRef] Van der Heijden, Hans. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28: 695–704. [CrossRef] Van der Veen, Robert, and Haiyan Song. 2014. Impact of the perceived image of celebrity endorsers on tourists’ intentions to visit. Journal of Travel Research 53: 211–24. [CrossRef] Walters, Gabrielle, Beverley Sparks, and Carmel Herington. 2007. The effectiveness of print advertising stimuli in evoking elaborate consumption visions for potential travelers. Journal of Travel Research 46: 24–34. [CrossRef] Walters, Gabrielle, Beverley Sparks, and Carmel Herington. 2012. The impact of consumption vision and emotion on the tourism consumer’s decision behavior. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 36: 366–89. Wang, Kuo-Ching, An-Tien Hsieh, and Wen-Yu Chen. 2002. Is the tour leader an effective endorser for group package tour brochures? Tourism Management 23: 489–98. [CrossRef] Wang, Lili, and Jiaying Lyu. 2019. Inspiring awe through Tourism and Its Consequence. Annals of Tourism Research 77: 106–16. [CrossRef] Wellman, Barry, Anabel Quan-Haase, Jeffrey Boase, Wenhong Chen, Keith Hampton, Isabel Diaz, and Kakuko Miyata. 2003. The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 8: 1031–49. [CrossRef] Video Marketing Statistics. 2024. Available online: https://www.wyzowl.com/video-marketing-statistics/ (accessed on 15 April 2024). Yüksel, Atila, and Fisun Yüksel. 2007. Shopping Risk Perceptions: Effects on Tourists’ Emotions, Satisfaction and Expressed Loyalty Intentions. Tourism Management 28: 703–13. [CrossRef] Yuksel, Atila, Fisun Yuksel, and Yasin Bilim. 2010. Destination Attachment: Effects on Consumer Satisfaction and Cognitive, Affective and Conative Loyalty. Tourism Management 31: 274–84. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.