Does crowdfunding contribute to digital financial inclusion?

Halim, Md. Abdul Article Does crowdfunding contribute to digital financial inclusion? Research in Globalization Provided in Cooperation with: Elsevier Suggested Citation: Halim, Md. Abdul (2024) : Does crowdfunding contribute to digital financial inclusion?, Research in Globalization, ISSN 2590-051X, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 9, pp. 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100238 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/331164 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 Available online 9 July 2024 2590-051X/© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Does crowdfunding contribute to digital financial inclusion? Md. Abdul Halim Department of Accounting, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Santosh, Tangail 1902, Bangladesh ARTICLE INFO Keywords: Crowd-Funding Models Digital Financial Inclusion Crowd-Funding Implication ABSTRACT This study extensively examines crowdfunding to promote and enhance digital financial inclusion. The goal of this research is to investigate the role of crowdfunding in digital financial inclusion and to establish a standardized measure for comparing the level of financial inclusion across various economies worldwide. Through a comprehensive analysis of relevant scholarly literature and empirical data, this research study presents an indepth investigation. The study shows that crowdfunding can contribute to financial inclusion through various models, including Reward-based CrowdFunding, Community-based CrowdFunding, Segregated Client Model, Notary Model, Guaranteed Return Model, Crowd-funding Asset Securitized Model, Donation-based CrowdFunding, Equity-based CrowdFunding, and Debt-based CrowdFunding. This study also shows that Singapore maintains its top position as the most financially inclusive market. Singapore is positioned at the top regarding the pillars of government assistance, employer support, and financial system support, ranking first, second, and third, respectively. This study will provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to establish their own crowdfunding platforms, as well as individuals interested in showcasing their businesses on such platforms. 1. Introduction The issue of financial inclusion has been a significant focal point since the global financial crisis of 2008, with a particular emphasis on the societal functions of financial services. Promoting financial inclusion has become an important focal point within the international economic reform agenda (Kim & De Moor, 2017). Digital financial services, microfinance, Islamic finance, financial education, and government intervention have increased, promoting financial inclusion. For example, digital financial services, including mobile banking and electronic financial transactions, are considered significant ways to reduce transaction costs and geographical barriers (Asongu and Nwachukwu, 2017. Crowdfunding is a financial technology platform that facilitates the funding of a project or business by soliciting monetary contributions from a wide group of individuals. This include the project funder, individuals who contribute through crowdfunding, and donors (Prananingtyas & Irawati, 2021). Crowd fundraising has become a novel financial option during the worldwide economic crisis. The advent of innovative crowdfunding technology (ICT), particularly the internet, has facilitated the expansion of this unique form of financing. It has been extensively utilized by startups and small and medium enterprises worldwide as a method of obtaining funds. Raising funds through online platforms via crowd fundraising has become more convenient and cost-effective (Kapoor & Sharma, 2022). Digital financial inclusion (DFI) refers to providing financial technology (FinTech) services to the population who lacks access to them. FinTech refers to the digital instruments that are influencing and strengthening the financial industry, ultimately contributing to a more robust financial and economic system (Anakpo, Xhate, & Mishi, 2023; Prananingtyas & Irawati, 2021). According to Napier, Melamed, Taylor, and Jaeggi (2013), the notion of financial exclusion encompasses not just individuals but also extends to organizations. According to their findings, a significant proportion of small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) owned by women in emerging economies, precisely 70 %, face limited access to financial services or receive inadequate support from financial institutions. This situation arises mainly owing to stringent collateral prerequisites, shorter loan durations, and comparatively higher interest rates imposed on women entrepreneurs than their male counterparts. In addition, agricultural enterprises encounter financial limitations, particularly in developing nations, due to the lack of established financial mechanisms. The United Nations (UN) defines a developing country with a moderate to low Human Development Index (HDI), an undeveloped industrial base, and a relatively poor living. This index compares poverty, illiteracy, education, life expectancy, and other aspects 1 (Ranis, Stewart, & Samman, 2006). The crowd-funding platform is a new online E-mail address: [email protected]. 1 https://www.educationalpathwaysinternational.org/what-is-a-developing-country/ (09 July 2023). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Globalization journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/journal/research-in-globalization https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100238 Received 18 November 2023; Received in revised form 4 July 2024; Accepted 8 July 2024 Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 2 fundraising process that usually finances a new organization by including many people. A small startup, small organization, or an essential organization like a bank can finance by raising a small amount of money from many people using social media. It is an institutional effort of numerous non-proficient individuals who are inserted in trust to back an endeavor on the web. This new type of financial innovation arose after the 2008 financial meltdown in light of the expanded challenges the independent company firms faced in getting assets from the conventional financial framework. CrowdFunding appeared in 2011 for the first time. China has had success using CrowdFunding platforms. End of July 2018, the number of CrowdFunding organizations was 251 (PIK, 2019). The majority of CrowdFunding organization is successful cases, around 82.3 % (PIK, 2019). The appearance of CrowdFunding systems looks to supply a new and available fundraising approach to startup companies and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Most Small and Medium Enterprises play a role in increasing the economic development of countries. However, these enterprises have faced a financial problem recently due to COVID19. Hence, CrowdFunding provides an effortless way for Small, Medium, and Enterprises to raise capital for better improvement and expansion. The CrowdFunding approach may be an effective and efficient way to improve the overall economy of developing countries. The importance of CrowdFunding is essential right now from a global perspective. The necessity of CrowdFunding will be needed in developing countries in the future. So, we should understand its activity and risk from investing that elements will influence supporters’ investment choice on CrowdFunding platforms (Abdeldayem & Aldulaimi, 2022; Dresner, 2014; Fenwick, McCahery, & Vermeulen, 2018; Hendratmi, Sukmaningrum, Hadi, & Ratnasari, 2019). Although it is believed that crowd-funding presents excellent opportunities for improving access to finance and supporting entrepreneurship, innovation, and development in developing countries, it is essential to consider some challenges that may hinder the adoption and growth on the continent. It is of utmost significance when one considers that the primary vehicles for expanding the crowd-funding sector, namely crowd-funding platforms, are mostly business endeavors in and of themselves. While business owners must face problems regardless of the environment in which they operate, specific difficulties continue to be prevalent in developing environments (Alon & Shneor, 2017; Singh & Belwal, 2008). Crowdfunding is amassing financial resources from a substantial group of individuals through modest individual contributions facilitated by the Internet to support a specific person or organizational endeavors or enterprises. Crowdfunding has the potential to reduce the rapid and cost-effective acquisition of capital for individuals or businesses who have been excluded from traditional financial services. This investigation makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of academic literature on inclusive development by examining the role of crowdfunding in promoting financial inclusion. The inquiry’s positioning is driven by the policy importance of organizing existing knowledge regarding the connection between crowdfunding and financial inclusion (Ordanini, Miceli, Pizzetti, & Parasuraman, 2011; Yeyouomo, Asongu, & Agyemang-Mintah, 2023). The emergence of crowdfunding is essential to overcoming the problem of traditional business financing. It is used as the opposite of the mainstream approach to business finance. When you want to start a new business or increase your capital, you must identify your business plan, market research, and business prototypes. Then, you have to raise funds from a limited source to implement your planning, namely the bank, the angel investor, and the venture capital firm, which limits your options to a few key players. You can think of the traditional approach as just a funnel because you will lose money and time if you fail to identify this funnel in the right investor or firm. On the other hand, crowdfunding platforms will resist you from that funnel. So, crowdfunding pushes digital financial inclusion to accelerate economic activities. This study has provided Crowd Funding models and policy implications that will help all stakeholders. Considering the strategies mentioned earlier, the objective of facilitating financial service accessibility for economically vulnerable and disadvantaged populations, as well as their aim to mitigate transaction expenses, crowdfunding may serve as a viable avenue for enhancing financial inclusion (Jenik, Lyman, & Nava, 2017; Pazarbasioglu et al., 2020). In contemporary times, the advent of digitization has introduced a multitude of novel participants into the realm of entrepreneurial finance (Allen, Gu, & Jagtiani, 2021). In the dynamic entrepreneurial finance environment, equity crowdfunding has emerged as a compelling fundraising mechanism for nascent enterprises (Belleflamme, Lambert, & Schwienbacher, 2014). Equity crowdfunding involves entrepreneurs issuing a public invitation to sell a set quantity of their company’s equity shares through an internet platform that facilitates the transactions. Investors frequently engage in these campaigns to achieve a monetary gain. Consistent with this perspective, Vismara (2016) observes that the provision of incentives to investors does not enhance the likelihood of achieving success in equity crowdfunding campaigns. Similarly, (Cholakova & Clarysse, 2015) discovered that nonfinancial motivations do not exert a noteworthy influence on the investment decisions made in the context of equity crowdfunding. Equity crowdfunding represents a comprehensive and emerging avenue for accessing risk financing. According to Vismara (2016), the typical magnitude of campaigns on UK platforms is approximately £250,000. Equity crowdfunding presents a significant opportunity to enhance the financial inclusivity of entrepreneurial groups that have traditionally faced substantial obstacles in obtaining financial resources. Decisionmakers widely regard equity crowdfunding as a powerful tool for fostering job creation, promoting economic growth, and enhancing competitiveness. The user’s text is already academic. Equity crowdfunding possesses an inclusive characteristic that extends to small investors (D. Cumming, Meoli, & Vismara, 2019). It presents a novel option for these investors to participate in the investment of small private enterprises. The participation of a substantial quantity of individual investors also gives rise to apprehensions regarding the safeguarding of these investors and their capacity to contribute value-enhancing elements to nascent enterprises. Appiah-Otoo & Chen (2023) Examining the effect of crowdfunding on carbon dioxide emissions (CO 2 E). Applying a dataset encompassing 32 countries spanning 2013 to 2020, they found that crowdfunding reduces CO 2 E, with a 10 % increase in crowdfunding leading to about 0.1 % reduction in CO 2 E. The analysis also reveals that crowdfunding reduces CO2E only after attaining a threshold of 5.938, around $379 million. The mechanism analysis shows that crowdfunding decreases CO 2 E through economic growth and financial development. Finally, there exists feedback causality between crowdfunding and CO 2 E. In their study, Abdallah and Younis (2023) analyze the impact of FinTech, Crowdfunding, and Information Technology (IT) on Nonprofit organizations (NPOs). Existing literature indicates that non-profit organizations (NPOs) are increasingly adopting financial technology (FinTech), crowdfunding, and information technology (IT) services to enhance their operational efficiency and overall effectiveness. The influence of FinTech, Crowdfunding, and IT on NPOs is evaluated using Web-based Services and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Abdeldayem and Aldulaimi (2023) Have the introduction of a novel crowdfunding paradigm called Islamic Shar¯ ıʿah-compliant crowdfunding (ICF). Furthermore, the content analysis unveiled four primary topics that serve as the fundamental pillars for the development of the ICF model. The Islamic Sharia provisions include the Project Idea (Halal) at 28.5 %, Funding Goal at 36 %, Return and Risk at 14 %, and Funding Commitments at 21.5 %. The findings indicate that all four types of crowdsourcing (reward-based crowdfunding, donation-based crowdfunding, loan-based crowdfunding, and equity-based crowdfunding) are permissible and substantiated by evidence from the Quran and Sunnah. When, According to the proposal by KH and Al Arif (2023), the results indicate the possibility of utilizing the Islamic crowdfunding model as an Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 3 alternative means of obtaining finance to attract potential investors. Manawar, Lukita, and Meria (2023) Examine international fintech best practices and explore their potential to enhance the economic security of individuals in underdeveloped nations. The concerns were categorized into three distinct groups: a scarcity of infrastructure, a society that exhibits reduced reliance on technology, and an unorganized and chaotic culture. The three fintech companies that best exemplify the three categories were subsequently analyzed: Micro Financing, Crowdfunding, and Digital payment systems. However, Equity crowdfunding platforms effectively align the financing needs of entrepreneurial companies with the money provided by investors (Buttic` e & Vismara, 2022). Previous studies contribute to Financial Inclusion and Corporate Governance (Assadi & Wroldsen). Crowdfunding platforms and financial services (Dehghani, Piwowar-Sulej, Salari, Leone, & Habibollah, 2023). Regulatory Contexts, Fintech Innovation and Financial Inclusion (Ray, Paul, & Miglani). Environmental and crowdfunding (Appiah-Otoo & Chen, 2023). Crowdfunding and Financial Technology (Abdallah & Younis, 2023). Islamic crowdfunding model and finance SMEs (Abdeldayem & Aldulaimi, 2023). Sharia Crowdfunding and Financing solution (KH and Al Arif (2023)). Evolution of Financial Technology (Manawar, Lukita, & Meria, 2023). Inclusive digital finance and equity crowdfunding (Buttic` e & Vismara, 2022). Financial Inclusion, Corporate Governance, Conventional Microfinance and Digital Crowdfunding (Assadi & Wroldsen). Crowdfunding and financial inclusion (Kapoor & Sharma, 2022). Role of FinTech, innovations, and digital financial inclusion (Rauniyar, Rauniyar, & Sah, 2021). Financial inclusion and crowdfunding (Baber, 2021). Opportunities and challenges of Crowdfunding in Africa (Chao, Serwaah, Baah-Peprah, & Shneor, 2020). Adoption of Financial Technology and Crowdfunding (Prananingtyas & Irawati, 2021). So, this study differs from the above papers. This study contributes to “Does Crowdfunding Contribute to Digital Financial Inclusion?” in this area by answering this question. The emergence of equity crowdfunding has facilitated the inclusion of a substantial number of individual investors in entrepreneurial financing (Drover, Wood, & Corbett, 2018). Crowd investors may exhibit divergent funding decisions compared to professional investors, such as business angels and venture capitalists (Fisher, Kuratko, Bloodgood, & Hornsby, 2017). Crowd investors, influenced by various investing rationales (Vismara, 2019), have the potential to enhance the inclusiveness of financial markets by facilitating access to funding for entrepreneurs from underrepresented groups. Equity crowdfunding platforms refer to online platforms that enable the raising of capital by businesses or individuals by selling securities to many investors. These platforms provide an According to (D. Cumming, Meoli, & Vismara, 2021), there is no evidence of discrimination against female ethnic entrepreneurs. These entrepreneurs have been found to attain crowdfunding performances that are comparable to or even greater than those of their male or local counterparts. Therefore, preliminary evidence indicates that equity crowdfunding presents the potential to enhance financial inclusivity. The remaining sections of this study are as follows: advantages of CrowdFunding, CrowdFunding model, Successful development by influencing components on CrowdFunding platforms, Market level of global digital financial and Discussion, the threat of CrowdFunding, and finally, conclusion and future direction. 2. Advantages of CrowdFunding CrowdFunding is online-based and has various advantages. It is a CrowdFunding (CF) investment fund with access to thousands of recognized investors who can view, communicate, and share your fundraising campaign. Crowd-funding promotes all aspects of your business. By enabling it, you are going through the invaluable process of getting your business to the top with history, offers, traction, addressable market, and price offers, making it an easily digestible package. You can share and promote your CrowdFunding campaign through social media, e-mail messages, and online marketing tracking. The best thing about online CrowdFunding is its capacity to incorporate and smooth out your fundraising endeavors. By building a single, extensive profile to which you can channel every one of your possibilities and potential investors, you dispense with the need to seek after every one of them exclusively. 3. CrowdFunding models 3.1. Reward-based Crowd-Funding business model The activity for a business to succeed is to identify its target customers. After identifying the target customers of the organizations, distribution channels need to be set up, and customer relationships need to be built up. The organization needs to be sure about the target customer using both the distribution channel and the customer relationship. Organizations can create value propositions when they can ensure their target customers. Then, they can use their core competence and resources and create a cost structure. Finally, they can make a profit model. The profit model depends on the value proposition and cost structure (PIK, 2019). Fig. 1 shows the Reward-Based Crowd-Funding Business Model. Initially, crowdfunding was utilized to gather financial resources for cultural or social initiatives that were not driven by economic motives (Pichler & Tezza, 2016). Reward-based Crowdfunding subsidizing includes people contributing to your business in return for a “reward,” commonly a type of the items (product or services) or administration your organization offers. Even though this strategy offers patrons a reward, it’s despite everything generally viewed as a subset of donationbased CrowdFunding as there is no equity or financial return. The impetus for engaging in a campaign may stem from non-monetary factors, such as the desire to advocate for a specific ideology or to assist marginalized groups (Allison, Davis, Short, & Webb, 2015). From this standpoint, reward-based crowdfunding holds the potential to facilitate the establishment of small enterprises and ensure the financial stability of small-scale farmers operating within the agriculture industry. Producers of agricultural commodities have the potential to offer supplementary engagement opportunities through collaborations with farms and restaurants. Funders can continuously obtain reliable food sources by establishing partnerships with fundraisers (Yoo & Choe, 2014). In reward-based crowdfunding, investors primarily function as prosumers, engaging in the act of purchasing the offered products. This approach can potentially reduce the likelihood of financial losses for investees and encourage funders to advocate for the consequences (Belleflamme, Omrani, & Peitz, 2015). 3.2. Community-based CrowdFunding business model In Self-initiative Crowdfunding, an entrepreneur can create his website or a separate blog to raise money. The entrepreneur himself also promotes his funds through this website. An independent CrowdFunding receives a fixed fee from the funds raised. Investors in this CrowdFunding usually do not receive financing rewards from their portion of the investment (donation-based CrowdFunding). On the other hand, they receive some form of financial benefit (reward-based CrowdFunding) (Adhikary & Kutsuna, 2016). Fig. 2 shows the Community-based CrowdFunding business model. 3.3. Segregated client model The client-segregated Models show that lenders provide loans to borrowers through the CrowdFunding platform. The CrowdFunding platform keeps separate accounts for lenders and borrowers so that lenders and borrowers can avoid conflicts. This calculation assures lenders and borrowers that they will protect them from bankruptcy even Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 4 if it fails. It collects a specified fee (a flat rate or a percentage of the total) from the borrower for loan origination. On the other hand, it takes administration fees for loan service and payment collection from the lender. The CrowdFunding platforms charge extra fees for additional services, such as selling loan portfolios in the secondary market (Kirby & Worner, 2014). Fig. 3 shows the Segregated Client Model. 3.4. Notary model The notary model is used in the United States (Kirby & Worner, 2014). The CrowdFunding platform does not act as a loan originator. It introduces individual lenders to borrowers so lenders can bid on the amount they want in their portfolios. The bank works as a loan originator. The CrowdFunding platform only issues notes to each lender to contribute to their loan. As a result, the risk for non-repayment loans shifts from the loan originator (bank) to the lender. The CrowdFunding platform also collects fees from lenders, borrowers, and the clientsegregated account model (Adhikary & Kutsuna, 2016). Fig. 4 shows the Notary Model. 3.5. Guaranteed return model The guaranteed return model is the most popular in China. It is used by the Credit Face platform (PIK, 2019); (Kirby & Worner, 2014). The loan originator provides the loan with a guaranteed return. The loan originator gives a guaranteed return to the lender on behalf of the borrower through a CFP. The CFP acts as a loan originator. The borrower has to pay interest at 12 % with an additional term of 2 weeks. On the other hand, the lender has to pay 12 % interest. The CFP charges a fee from both parties. It is practiced by Trust Body Fig. 1. Reward-Based Crowd-Funding Business Model Sourceconstructed by Author’s. Fig. 2. Community-based CrowdFunding business model. Self-initiative CrowdFunding Independent CrowdFunding. Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 5 International AB in Norway (PIK, 2019). Fig. 5 shows the Guaranteed Return Model. 3.6. Equity-based CF model The equity-based CFP shows that a firm offers a CFP to promote its shares. The CFP then invites investors to buy firm shares through various means of communication like social media and personal networks. After Fig. 3. Segregated Client Model. Source- (Kirby & Worner, 2014), constructed by Author’s. Fig. 4. Notary Model. Source-(Adhikary & Kutsuna, 2016), constructed by Author’s. Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 6 buying organization shares, investors become equity stakeholders and receive dividends. Since investors are equity stakeholders, any risk arising in the organization also falls on the investor. Since the investor also carries the risk, the organization or individual entrepreneur’s risk decreases. CFP receives a flat fee from the firm for conducting public relations activities and a flat rate on the number of funds raised from the firm. Equity-based CF is considered the most suitable for young firms and startup firms. Because, in a short period, those companies can receive large amounts of non-contractual funds from CFP that play a vital role in boosting their growth. Crowd-cube is the best example in the UK (Kirby & Worner, 2014). Fig. 6 shows the Equity-based CF Model. Unlike crowd-based and donation-based strategies, equity-based CrowdFunding permits contributors or investors to become partowners of your organization by trading capital for equity shares. Equity owners get a financial profit or reward for their investment and a portion of the income through distribution or dividends. Fig. 5. Guaranteed Return Model. Sourceconstructed by Author’s. Fig. 6. Equity based CF Model. Sourceconstructed by Author’s. Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 7 Lending-based crowdfunding has the potential to serve as an effective mechanism for mitigating financial exclusion. It is because traditional banks operate on a revenue model, which increases the likelihood of discriminatory practices against individuals who are economically disadvantaged or have low incomes. The creation of new financial alternatives, such as crowdsourcing, has been significantly influenced by efforts to address the limitations of traditional finance and advancements in technology. Crowdfunding can reduce the disparity between the availability and requirement of financial resources for entrepreneurial endeavors (Bruton, Khavul, Siegel, & Wright, 2015). Lendingbased crowdfunding has emerged as a novel approach to enhance credit ratings and serve as an alternate means of fundraising. When borrowers fulfill their loan repayment obligations within the designated time frame, they have the potential to enhance their total creditworthiness, hence increasing their likelihood of obtaining loans from alternative funding sources in subsequent instances (Ashta, Assadi, & Marakkath, 2015). 3.7. Crowd-funding asset securitized model The CF asset Securitized model is a complex model from other models. This model performs some different activities from the other models. The CF asset-securitized model creates marketable debt securities instead of loan assets and links them to the organized securities market. The CFP builds vehicles for an SPV to issue, collect sales proceeds, provide debt securities, and pay the investors an obligation (interest & principal). The SPV can hire more professional merchant bankers to secure an organized market for a fixed fee or commission. Fig. 7 shows the Crowd-funding Asset Securitized Model. 3.8. Donation-based CrowdFunding Extensively, you can think about any group CrowdFunding campaign in which there is no financial reward or return to the contributors or investors as donation-based CrowdFunding. Donation-based CrowdFunding activities include fundraising for charities, non-profits, disaster relief, and medical bills. Donation-based crowdfunding relies on voluntary contributions towards a common good. It resembles conventional campaigns conducted by charitable and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). A crowdfunding platform that operates on a donationbased model serves as an intermediary for charitable organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Crowdfunding has the potential to offer initial financial support to various initiatives aimed at enhancing women’s financial inclusion. These initiatives may include activities such as enhancing financial literacy, providing life skills and business training, and enhancing health and safety measures (RoigTierno, Blasco-Carreras, Mas-Tur, & Ribeiro-Navarrete, 2015). In the context of funding for social enterprises, donation-based or reward-based crowdfunding has emerged as a potentially viable method. This is because individuals contributing to crowdfunding Fig. 7. Crowd-funding Asset Securitized Model. Sourceconstructed by Author’s. Md.A. Halim Research in Globalization 9 (2024) 100238 8 campaigns are more inclined to prioritize providing public goods rather than expecting financial returns on their investments. Additionally, social enterprises, which are structured to serve the public interest, align well with the objectives and values of crowdfunding funders (Austin, Stevenson, & Wei–Skillern, 2006; Gerber, Hui, & Kuo, 2012). 3.9. Debt-based CrowdFunding Borrowers apply on the web, commonly for free. Their application is audited and checked by an automated system that decides the borrower’s interest rate and credit risk, defined as debt-based CrowdFunding. Investors purchase securities in a fund, which makes the credits to a bundle of borrowers. The investment brings in cash from enthusiasm for the unstable loans; the method makes money by taking a level of the loans & a loan servicing fee. 4. Successful development by influencing components on CrowdFunding platforms Researchers provided some reasons that influence the CF industry’s successful development. First, CF platforms offer a new funding probability to investors (Xu & Ge, 2017). There is a lack of investment opportunities in the traditional way. Hence, the appearance of CF systems gives a new investment opportunity to the market & reduces the shortage of funding opportunities in the present market. The second one is that the risks of credit investments are shifted and spread (Xu & Ge, 2017). Both investors and funders have lower investment risks in the CF system. An investor invests a small amount of money in the CFP. If the CF system fails to perform successfully, the funders will not have to repay all the funds to the investors. Fig. 8 forecasts the number of mobile devices worldwide from 2020 to 2025. (Source: Statista 2023). For succeeding CF platforms, they refer to some reasons besides these: Mobile banking and Internet development (Zheng, 2017). The number of mobile users will be 18.22 billion. Investors and fundraisers can be able to know available information through the Internet to ensure the information balance. CF can advertise itself through the Internet, whereas traditional businesses cannot. They said government support must build up the CFP successfully (Zheng, 2017). PIK (2019) referred to the idea that if a CF project desires success, it should use various business models in different environments (Chen, 2017). 5. Market level of global digital financial and discussion Table 1 shows the market level of global digital financial inclusion statistics. The determination of high and low values is contingent upon the analysis of average data. A value that is equal to or more than the average value is indicative of a high value, while a number that is below the average value is indicative of a low value. The Global Financial Inclusion Index, in its second iteration, evaluates the performance of two markets based on three key dimensions of financial inclusion: government, financial system, and employer support. This assessment aims to establish a standardized measure for comparing financial inclusion across various economies worldwide. The index amalgamates diverse data sources to create a consolidated metric of financial inclusion at the market level. Amidst the presence of complex macroeconomic and geopolitical circumstances across several regions, the primary discovery of the 2023 Global Financial Inclusion Index is encouraging. The analysis reveals a general upward trend in financial inclusion across the 42 markets examined. Singapore continues to maintain its position as the most financially inclusive market. Singapore is positioned at the top regarding the pillars of government assistance, employer support, and financial system support, ranking first, second, and third, respectively. Singapore’s advancement in the employer support pillar is remarkable, as it experienced a significant rise of 12 positions from its previous ranking of 14th in 2022 (Source: The Global Financial Inclusion Index 2023). 2 Table 1 shows that Singapore digital financial inclusion (DFI) SCORE-2023 is shown 73.90 which is greater than Hong Kong (71.09, second position), Switzerland (68.43, third position), United States (66.21, fourth position), Sweden (65.47, fifth position), Denmark (65.25, sixth position), United Kingdom (60.82, seventh position) and all other countries. When DFI SCORE-2022 is shown Singapore is 68.88 which also is greater than Hong Kong (65.16, fourth position), Switzerland (63.42, eighth position), United States (67.13, second position), Sweden (65.20, third position), Denmark (63.87, sixth position), United Kingdom (56.93, fourteen position) and remaining other countries (Source: The Global Financial Inclusion Index 2023). Table 1 shows that Singapore Govt. Support −2023 score is 75.32 which is greater than Hong Kong (75.30, second position), Switzerland (71.65, third position), United States (54.91, nineteenth position), Sweden (64.16, eighth position), Denmark (65.75, sixth position), United Kingdom (57.56, thirteenth position) and all other countries. When Govt. Support −2022 score is shown Singapore is 69.51 which also is greater than Hong Kong (62.17, eighth position), Switzerland (66.77, second position), United States (54.40, fifteenth position), Sweden (64.76, sixth position), Denmark (65.01, fifth position), United Kingdom (59.36, ninth position) and remaining other countries. Whereas Table 1 shows that Singapore financial support system (FSS) and employer system (ES) is 70.74 and 81.75 where position is third and second respectively in the year 2023 (Source: The Global Financial Inclusion Index 2023). In contrast, Baber (2021) discovered that the majority of European countries have a substantial proportion of their populations integrated into the formal financial system, enabling them to avail themselves of a wide range of financial services provided by these institutions. Furthermore, the past few years have witnessed a significant surge in the funds received and initiatives supported through crowdfunding, thanks to the widespread adoption of Fintech services in these nations. There has been a marginal decline in financial inclusion inside the United States. Nevertheless, it continues to occupy a prominent position in the general rankings, securing the fourth spot while also retaining its leading position in the pillar of financial system support. The nation witnessed a decrease in both the employer and government support sectors. The progress of financial inclusion is particularly pronounced in markets actively constructing financial systems that leverage technology. The countries that have had the most significant increases in economic growth include a number of emerging economies, namely Brazil, Thailand, Vietnam, and South Korea. Financial inclusion in the world’s major countries is experiencing a state of stagnation or decline. The markets under consideration exhibit moderate ratings in the pillars of government and financial system support while consistently displaying low ratings in the pillar of employer support. The economies of Southeast Asia are experiencing significant advancements in the realm of financial inclusion. A decline in the responsibility of employers to promote financial inclusion is observed in a cluster of Asian economies, as these markets receive increased assistance from their own governments and financial institutions. There exists a robust and positive correlation between advancements in financial inclusion and improvements in various indicators of social and economic development, including reduced levels of corruption and enhanced economic independence, resilience, and productivity. There is a discernible correlation between the level of market maturity and the primary source of support. In industrialized economies, robust government and financial system assistance frequently leads to 2 https://www.principal.com/financial-inclusion/data-resources. Md.A. Halim