The effect of ICT usage on economic growth in the MENA region: Does the level of education matter?

Abu Alfoul, Mohammed; Khatatbeh, Ibrahim N.; Bazhair, Ayman Hassan Article The effect of ICT usage on economic growth in the MENA region: Does the level of education matter? Economies Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel Suggested Citation: Abu Alfoul, Mohammed; Khatatbeh, Ibrahim N.; Bazhair, Ayman Hassan (2024) : The effect of ICT usage on economic growth in the MENA region: Does the level of education matter?, Economies, ISSN 2227-7099, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12100267 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/329194 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Citation: Abu Alfoul, Mohammed N., Ibrahim N. Khatatbeh, and Ayman Hassan Bazhair. 2024. The Effect of ICT Usage on Economic Growth in the MENA Region: Does the Level of Education Matter? Economies 12: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies12100267 Academic Editor: Laura-Mariana Cismas , Received: 21 August 2024 Revised: 19 September 2024 Accepted: 24 September 2024 Published: 1 October 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). economies Article The Effect of ICT Usage on Economic Growth in the MENA Region: Does the Level of Education Matter? Mohammed N. Abu Alfoul 1,*, Ibrahim N. Khatatbeh 2,* and Ayman Hassan Bazhair 3 1Department of Computing Technologies and Data Analytics, Ezymart Corporation Pty Ltd., Sydney 2000, Australia 2Department of Banking and Financial Sciences, Business School, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan 3Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Economics and Finance, Taif University, Taif 21974, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] (M.N.A.A.); [email protected] (I.N.K.) Abstract: This paper examines the effect of information and communication technology (ICT) usage on economic growth in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, with a focus on how education levels modulate this relationship. Covering data from 2000 to 2020 and employing a panel ARDL model for analysis, this research finds that, while ICT is prevalent across MENA, its impact on economic growth is negative. Furthermore, it reveals that education plays a crucial role in determining ICT’s effectiveness on economic growth. However, the positive impact of education is overshadowed by the adverse effects of brain drain, which negates the potential benefits ICT could have on the economy. This study highlights the importance for MENA policymakers to address the brain drain issue to enhance the positive impact of ICT on economic growth, suggesting the need for strategies that leverage both ICT and education to effectively foster economic development. Keywords: ICT; economic growth; education level; MENA region JEL Classification: I25; O15; O33 1. Introduction Over the past few decades, the proliferation of information and communication technology (ICT) has played a transformative role in enabling nations and their governments to leverage information as a springboard for economic progress. As reported by the International Telecommunication Union in 2021, 59.5% of the world’s population now engages with the internet. This surge in ICT accessibility has sparked a considerable volume of research into its contributions towards economic enhancement, especially highlighting its benefits for growth in the developing world. While many studies have confirmed that ICT adoption fosters growth, increases productivity, and creates job opportunities, there remains a gap in the literature specifically exploring how education levels impact the relationship between ICT use and economic growth (EG) (Sarangi and Pradhan 2020; Nabi et al. 2023). Although previous investigations have investigated the impacts of either ICT or education on EG separately (Abu Alfoul et al. 2024;Gómez-Barroso and Marbán-Flores 2020), the combined effects of their interaction remain less explored. Some research has focused on ICT’s role in enhancing educational efficiency and its subsequent effect on EG (Fu 2013;Cox and Marshall 2007). Nevertheless, the effect of educational attainment on the effectiveness of ICT in driving EG has not been thoroughly examined. This study explores how educational attainment influences the relationship between ICT use and EG, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Highlighting the importance of ICT in stimulating economic activities, the World Bank noted that numerous countries have achieved Economies 2024,12, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12100267 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/economies Economies 2024,12, 267 2 of 18 significant economic milestones through effective ICT deployment. This recognition has led many governments across both developed and developing countries to invest heavily in ICT infrastructure and adopt various advanced technologies, acknowledging their critical role in economic development. Thus, the nexus between education levels and ICT usage presents a complex dynamic with potentially varied effects on economic outcomes. Moreover, international bodies such as the World Bank have committed significant resources to support educational initiatives, viewing them as crucial drivers of a country’s economic triumph. In April 2012, the World Bank dedicated an average annual budget of $2.4 billion to education in lowand middle-income nations, expecting significant returns in productivity, innovation, and development levels. Globally, each additional year of schooling results in a 9% increase in hourly earnings (Klees et al. 2019). However, challenges emerge when the economic framework fails to optimally utilize ICT optimally, reflecting stunted EG. Factors like inadequate education quality can skew the labor market and impede growth, potentially driving individuals towards brain drain as a viable option for livelihood (Ernst and Feist 2024;Khatatbeh 2019;Dodani and LaPorte 2005). The brain drain trend has notably increased in MENA countries over recent years, raising concerns about its future implications if unaddressed. This paper’s contributions to the literature are twofold. First, it investigates how educational attainment influences the impact of ICT on economic growth, addressing a gap in existing research, particularly in the MENA region. By including education as a moderating variable, this study provides another perspective of understanding the relationship between ICT and education. Second, it highlights the issue of brain drain and demonstrates its detrimental effects on the potential benefits of ICT and education. These contributions provide practical recommendations for policymakers, emphasizing the need for strategic investments in education and ICT infrastructure and addressing brain drain to enhance economic growth. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2reviews the literature on education and institutional quality. Section 3presents this study’s variables and discusses the data and the model specification. Section 4discusses the empirical results. Section 5 provides policy implications, recommendations and conclusion. 2. Literature Review The theoretical framework in this study builds on endogenous growth theory (Romer 1990;Lucas 1988), which emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, and knowledge diffusion in long-term economic growth. In this context, ICT acts as a catalyst for productivity improvements, while education is crucial in enabling the workforce to utilize ICT technologies fully. Furthermore, human capital theory (Becker 1964) reinforces the importance of educational quality and access in determining how effectively ICT drives economic growth. Given the high rates of skilled labor migration (brain drain) in MENA, migration theories, such as Todaro’s (1976) model, offer additional insight into how the loss of educated individuals can reduce the potential economic gains from ICT investment. The literature on the relationship between ICT and EG has evolved significantly. Initial skepticism, as observed in early works by Jorgenson and Stiroh (1995), which reported a modest contribution of ICT to productivity growth, has gradually given way to a broader consensus on its substantial impact. Subsequent studies by Schreyer (2000) and Oulton (2002), and more comprehensive analyses by Fukao and Miyagawa (2007) have documented the transformative role of ICT in enhancing EG across various countries. These studies stress the critical role of ICT in driving productivity and economic expansion, particularly from the mid-1990s onwards. This body of research marks a significant shift in understanding, from viewing ICT’s economic contribution as minimal to recognizing its pivotal role in global economic development. Particularly, the widespread adoption of ICT has significantly enhanced the efficient allocation of resources, reduced production costs, and stimulated greater demand and investment across various economic sectors (Khatatbeh and Moosa 2022;Abu Alfoul et al. 2022;Bahrini and Qaffas 2019). Moreover, internet usage Economies 2024,12, 267 3 of 18 and broadband availability have accelerated innovation by fostering competition, leading to the creation of new products, services, and business models. Additionally, mobile phones have become a key driver of economic growth by improving access to financial services and enhancing information flow, which mitigates the challenges of distance and time, thereby increasing productivity and inclusivity. The following subsections present the literature on ICT, EG, and education and EG, respectively. 2.1. ICT on Economic Growth The investigation of the relationship between ICT and economic productivity has significantly evolved over the years. Early research conducted by Jorgenson and Stiroh in the mid-1990s suggested that the role of informatics in enhancing productivity growth was relatively modest. Their analysis, which spanned 1959 to 1973 across various nations, indicated that informatics contributed a mere 6% to an annual productivity increase of 2.94%. However, this perspective shifted dramatically in later years, with further investigations revealing a more substantial effect of ICT on economic development. By the end of the 20th century, studies by Jorgenson and Stiroh (2000), along with Oliner et al. (2008), highlighted that the influence of ICT on the U.S. economy expanded significantly post 1995. This period, marked by a technological boom, saw ICT contributing to approximately 13% of the total economic growth and 27% of labor productivity enhancement between 1973 and 1995. Early studies such as Schreyer (2000) identified a positive correlation between ICT and productivity growth across all G7 countries during the latter half of the 1990s. Similarly, Oulton’s (2002) findings corroborated this pattern within the United Kingdom, suggesting a widespread effect of ICT advancements on economic indicators in developed nations. Piatkowski’s (2003) study on Poland further emphasized the significance of ICT investments, attributing 8.9% of GDP growth and 12.7% of labor productivity improvements between 1995 and 2000 to technological advancements. The impact of ICT was not limited to Western economies; Van Ark and Piatkowski (2004) observed that ICT adoption facilitated the restructuring of manufacturing sectors in Central and Eastern Europe, aligning these economies closer to the standards of the former EU-15. Notably, the adoption and integration of ICT in these regions were found to exert a more substantial impact on productivity growth than observed within the EU-15. A comprehensive analysis by the OECD in 2007 and 2008 further validated the escalating influence of ICT-producing sectors on labor productivity across the globe since the mid-1990s. In Asia, Fukao and Miyagawa’s (2007) study highlighted Japan’s labor productivity and total factor productivity (TFP), revealing that, post 1995, Japan matched the TFP growth rates of the four major economies in the European Union—Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Concurrently, Hausmann et al. (2008) argued that countries specializing in ICT exports tend to witness higher productivity and economic growth rates. Similarly, Koutroumpis (2009) identified a significant link between ICT and economic growth in 22 OECD countries from 2002 to 2007, emphasizing the necessity of adequate technological infrastructure for this relationship to hold. Hawash and Lang (2010), in their analysis of 33 developing countries between 2002 and 2006, concluded that ICT adoption, coupled with higher education levels, significantly boosts productivity growth. Bohlin et al. (2010) expanded this analysis to 192 countries from 1990 to 2007, providing substantial evidence of ICT’s positive impact on productivity growth. Khuong Vu (2011) further validated these findings in a decade-long study from 1996 to 2005 across 102 countries, highlighting ICT’s pivotal role in fostering economic growth. Nevertheless, Niebel (2018) examined the economic growth of 59 countries from 1995 to 2010 and found no clear evidence that developing and emerging economies benefit more from ICT investments than developed ones, pointing out the importance of considering political and societal contexts in evaluating ICT’s economic impact. This body of literature highlights a broad consensus on the positive correlation between ICT investments and economic growth, with variations across different regions and economic statuses (Vu et al. 2020). While Economies 2024,12, 267 4 of 18 ICT investments can drive growth, the extent of their impact is influenced by factors such as export specialization, technological infrastructure, education levels, and sociopolitical environments. Furthermore, ICT has emerged as a pivotal force propelling the growth of various economic sectors, especially in the context of global liberalization efforts. Kais (2014) examined the specific effects of ICT on Tunisia’s economic expansion, revealing a pronounced and direct relationship with the nation’s GDP. Samimi et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis to understand the impact of ICT on economic growth across a broad set of countries, including both developed and developing economies, over the period from 2001 to 2012. Their research highlights a significant positive correlation between ICT deployment and economic growth, suggesting that investments in technology are beneficial for enhancing growth globally. However, their findings also point to variations in the impact of ICT, with developing countries experiencing different levels of economic benefit compared to their developed counterparts, indicating a complex relationship between ICT and economic growth. In a related study focusing on Bangladesh, Naym and Hossain (2016) explored the nexus between ICT investments and economic growth for the period between 1997 and 2013. While they identified a positive link between the use of ICT and economic growth, the correlation was not statistically significant. The researchers attributed this to the relatively modest share of ICT in the nation’s GDP and the constrained duration of the study, which limited the scope for a more detailed analysis. Bakry et al. (2023) suggest that the adoption and usage of ICT could have varying impacts on economic growth depending on different factors. Specifically, while ICT can boost growth in the long term, its impacts might not be significant in the short term. The study by Appiah-Otoo and Song (2021) provides an insightful comparative analysis of the impact of ICT on economic growth in rich and poor countries. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between ICT and economic growth across both groups, but with varying degrees of impact. In rich countries, ICT contributes more substantially to economic growth, facilitated by advanced infrastructure, higher investment in technology, and a more skilled workforce. Conversely, in poorer countries, while ICT still positively influences growth, the effects are less pronounced due to challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, lower levels of investment, and a gap in digital skills. The study underscores the importance of enhancing ICT accessibility and infrastructure in poorer countries to harness its growth potential fully (Moosa and Khatatbeh 2023). Awad and Albaity (2022) reveal that ICT significantly contributes to economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, primarily through improved access to information, enhanced efficiency in business operations, and the facilitation of innovation. However, the impact is mediated by several factors, including the level of ICT infrastructure, the regulatory environment, and the availability of complementary resources such as education and energy. The authors find that, while ICT can drive substantial economic growth, realizing this potential requires addressing existing infrastructural and institutional barriers. The study by Kowal et al. (2022) examines the critical role of digital innovations, particularly ICT, in fostering sustainable development during crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors highlight how digital technologies, including remote work platforms and digital payments, enable economic resilience by allowing businesses to continue operating despite disruptions. Additionally, digital education platforms ensure continuity in human capital development, mitigating the impact of educational disruptions. The study also emphasizes the contribution of ICT to environmental sustainability through improved resource management, reduced emissions, and the promotion of smart city initiatives. Furthermore, digital tools like telemedicine and real-time data systems enhance crisis management by supporting better decision making and resource allocation. Overall, the research underscores the dual role of digital innovations in addressing immediate crisis challenges and contributing to long-term sustainable development. The level of institutional quality also moderates the relationship between ICT and EG. For instance, Abu Alfoul et al. (2024) investigate the ICT’s effect on EG across the MENA Economies 2024,12, 267 5 of 18 region, considering the role of institutional factors. The study finds that ICT significantly promotes economic growth in MENA countries by enhancing productivity, facilitating innovation, and improving connectivity. However, the magnitude of ICT’s impact varies depending on the quality of each country’s institutions. Strong institutional frameworks, characterized by efficient governance, regulatory quality, and the protection of property rights, tend to amplify the positive effects of ICT on economic growth. In contrast, countries with weaker institutional environments may experience diminished benefits from ICT due to barriers such as regulatory inefficiencies and lack of investor confidence. The research underscores the importance of institutional reform alongside investments in ICT infrastructure and human capital development to maximize the socioeconomic benefits of digitalization in the MENA region. By fostering a supportive institutional environment, policymakers can create conditions that encourage ICT adoption, stimulate entrepreneurship, and attract investment, thereby driving sustainable economic growth. This study contributes valuable insights into the interplay between ICT, institutional quality, and economic development in the MENA context. It emphasizes the need for integrated policy approaches that address both technological advancements and institutional challenges to unlock the full potential of ICT as a catalyst for economic transformation. In the same context, Khatatbeh and AbuAlfoul (2024) and Adeleye et al. (2023) argue that policymakers should prioritize improving institutional quality alongside investments in ICT to ensure that economic growth benefits are translated into enhanced well-being, especially for lower income group countries. To sum up, the existing literature emphasizes the key role of ICT in driving EG. Building on these insights, this study aims to fill existing gaps by setting clear objectives and research questions to better understand the interaction between ICT, education, and economic growth in the MENA context. The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of ICT usage on economic growth in the MENA region. Accordingly, the study poses the following research question. RQ1: How does ICT usage influence economic growth in the MENA region? 2.2. Education on Economic Growth The nexus between education and EG has been central to the economic development literature. To begin with, the seminal works by Romer (1986) and Lucas (1988) highlight the essential role of educational development in economic progress. Subsequent empirical research has reinforced that education significantly contributes to EG. Barro (1991) demonstrated that enhancements in secondary school enrolments directly correlate with increases in the annual income growth rate, underlining education’s pivotal role in national economic development. Benhabib and Spiegel (1994) investigated the impact of the labor force’s educational attainment on EG, finding that human capital is a key driver of EG. Their analysis also revealed that the influence of education on innovation capabilities exhibits a stronger significance in wealthier nations compared to their less affluent counterparts, suggesting that the level of a country’s development influences the education–growth nexus. Krueger and Lindahl (2001) show that education significantly fosters growth in nations where educational levels are initially low, highlighting the transformative potential of educational investments in developing contexts. Similarly, Barro (2001) employed an endogenous growth model to analyze data from 100 countries between 1960 and 1995, concluding that cognitive skills, rather than merely the amount of education, play a more decisive role in propelling EG. Contrasting these findings, Pritchett (1996,2001) utilized cross-sectional data to argue that the nexus between human capital and EG does not hold for MENA countries. He attributed this finding to governance issues prevalent in the region, which hinder human capital accumulation and investments in education. Moreover, Pritchett pointed out that the education system in these countries often lacks in developing cognitive skills, further complicating the relationship between education and economic development. Altinok (2007) examined the dynamics between education and EG across 105 countries from 1960 to 2000, using international student achievement surveys to craft new performance indica- Economies 2024,12, 267 6 of 18 tors, highlighting education’s beneficial impact on EG. Similarly, Creel and Poilon (2008) utilized the augmented Solow model and found that human capital and public investment significantly contribute to EG, enhancing labor productivity and spurring technological advancements. Similarly, Pradhan (2009) explored this relationship in the Indian context from 1951 to 2001, identifying a uni-directional causal link from education to EG based on correlation error modelling techniques. In contrast, Barro and Lee (2013) positioned education at the core of economic development, using random and fixed effects models to highlight the critical role of human capital levels in driving EG. Quenum (2011) emphasized the importance of education levels in various economic sectors. A nuanced analysis was employed to differentiate the impact of different education levels on growth. His findings indicated a counterintuitive negative effect of post-primary education on EG in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries, emphasizing the paramount importance of education quality over the mere quantity of human capital between 1960 and 2013. Barro’s (2013) study highlights the critical role of education in driving economic growth. Using an empirical framework, the research shows that higher levels of education, especially secondary and tertiary, significantly boost economic growth by enhancing human capital, labor productivity, and innovation. The quality of education, measured by indicators like test scores, is also crucial for growth, with better educational outcomes leading to stronger economic performance. While primary education is important for basic skills, advanced education drives substantial development. Barro emphasizes the need for policies that improve education access and quality, such as investments in teacher training and infrastructure. The study also notes that countries with supportive economic and institutional environments see the greatest benefits from educational investments, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach to development. A closely related issue is the phenomenon of brain drain, characterized by the emigration of highly skilled and educated individuals from their home countries to more developed nations, which presents a complex interplay of causes and effects that significantly impacts the relationship between ICT and EG (Iqbal et al. 2020). Brain drain in developing countries arises from several interrelated factors. First, economic disparities, as individuals often migrate in search of better job opportunities, higher wages, and an improved quality of life (Beine et al. 2011). The contrast between limited prospects in their home countries and the wealth of opportunities in developed nations acts as a strong incentive for migration. In addition, Panagiotakopoulos (2020) argues that political instability plays a significant role in this phenomenon. Repressive political regimes, corruption, and lack of personal freedoms push skilled professionals to seek safer and more stable environments abroad, where their chances of career advancement are greater. Poor educational infrastructure is another key contributor, as individuals from developing nations often pursue higher education abroad due to a lack of quality educational opportunities at home (Usman et al. 2022). The consequences of brain drain on economic growth, particularly in relation to ICT, are complex. One major issue is the loss of human capital, where the emigration of skilled workers leads to a shortage of qualified personnel in critical sectors like ICT. This can hinder innovation, reduce productivity, and limit the ability of developing countries to fully leverage technological advancements. As noted by Liu et al. (2016), brain drain can reduce total factor productivity (TFP) growth in the home country, thereby hindering economic development. However, there are some positive effects, notably through remittances. Skilled emigrants often send money back home, providing financial support to families and contributing to local economies (Khatatbeh and Moosa 2023). These funds can also help boost investments in ICT infrastructure (Hunter 2015). However, the impact of brain drain is not uniform across regions; while some areas may benefit from remittances, others face severe skill shortages that stifle economic growth and technological progress. In a cross-country context, Wang and Liu (2016) assessed the education–growth nexus through a panel data model spanning 55 countries from 1960 to 2009. Their analysis revealed a robust positive link between human capital and EG, irrespective of a country’s Economies 2024,12, 267 7 of 18 development status. However, they noted that, while primary and secondary education levels did not significantly affect EG, tertiary education exhibited a profound positive influence. Hanif and Arshed (2016) also concluded that higher education exerts a more substantial impact on EG than lower education levels, aligning with the broader consensus that the quality and level of education are critical determinants of a nation’s economic trajectory. Finally, Habibi and Zabardast’s (2020) study thoroughly examines how digitalization and education collectively influence economic growth in both Middle Eastern and OECD countries. The study finds that digitalization significantly contributes to economic growth by enhancing productivity, fostering innovation, and creating new economic opportunities. This impact is more pronounced in OECD countries due to their advanced digital infrastructure and higher levels of digital literacy. In contrast, while benefiting from digitalization, Middle Eastern countries face challenges such as digital divides and less mature digital ecosystems, which can limit the full realization of digitalization’s economic benefits. Education emerges as a crucial factor that amplifies the positive effects of digitalization on economic growth. Higher educational attainment and better-quality education systems equip individuals with the necessary skills to leverage digital technologies effectively. The literature above aims to develop this study’s second main objective, which is to examine the moderating effect of education on the relationship between ICT and economic growth in the MENA region. Studies show that education enhances the favourable impact of ICT on economic growth. Higher educational attainment, especially in STEM fields, equips individuals to better utilize digital technologies, boosting economic benefits. Additionally, secondary and tertiary education levels play a key role in fostering innovation and increasing human capital, strengthening the overall effect of ICT on growth. Countries with stronger education systems are better positioned to capitalize on digitalization’s potential. Hence, this current study considers the following question. RQ2: Does the level of education moderate the relationship between ICT usage and economic growth? 3. Data and Methodology 3.1. Data This study utilizes a comprehensive panel dataset from 2000 to 2020, encompassing annual data from 15 countries in the MENA region, where complete data on the relevant variables were available. The countries included in this analysis are “Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates”. The primary variable of interest in this investigation is real GDP growth (RGDPG), serving as the indicator for EG, the dependent variable of this study. The variable of ICT usage within these countries is captured through five distinct proxies: personal computers per 100 inhabitants (computers), mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 individuals (mobile), percentage of individuals using the internet (Internet users), percentage of households with internet access (Internet access), and telephone lines per 100 people (telephone). These variables offer a multifaceted view of ICT engagement, where computers and telephones reflect the infrastructural conditions of ICT; mobile highlights the proliferation of contemporary telecommunications technologies; and Internet users, along with Internet access, illustrate the populace’s connectivity to the internet. It is anticipated that these measures of ICT usage will exhibit a positive correlation with EG. To examine the moderating effects of education on the relationship between ICT and EG, two educational proxies are utilized: the secondary school enrollment rate (secondary) as an indicator of broad educational coverage and a basic measure of a country’s human capital quality, and the tertiary school enrollment percentage (tertiary), reflecting the higher likelihood of internet use and access among individuals with tertiary education compared to those with lower levels of education. This study resonates with the sentiment expressed by Jean-Louis Sarbib, Senior Vice President of the World Bank’s Human Development Network: “Secondary education is the highway between primary schooling, tertiary education, and Economies 2024,12, 267 8 of 18 the labour market. Its ability to connect the different destinations and to take young people where they want to go in life is crucial”. Additionally, this analysis incorporates control variables such as gross fixed capital formation as a percentage of GDP (investment), which is expected to enhance labor efficiency through technological employment and increased access to ICT tools. This investment is also projected to stimulate local employment and labor productivity. Furthermore, this study controls for trade openness (openness), representing the sum of exports and imports as a percentage of GDP, facilitating technological exchange among nations. The impact of the Arab Spring on the region’s EG is also considered, with a dummy variable (DSPRING) assigned a value of 1 from 2011 onwards and 0 for prior years, to account for its potential effects. Detailed definitions and sources for all variables are provided in Table A2 in Appendix A. 3.2. Estimation Method We estimate a standard growth model expressed by the following equation: RGDPGi,t=β1lnICTi,t +β2lnEDUi,t +β3(lnICTi,txlnEDUi,t) +β4lnINVESTMENTi,t +β5lnOPENNESSi,t +ARABSi,t+ui,t(1) where i= 1 . . . , 16 and t= 2000, . . . , 2020. The variable RGDPGi,t represents the annual growth of GDP, ICTi,t represents the set of ICT variables, and EDUi,t is the set of education variables, while INVESTMENTi,t and OPENNESSi,t are the control variables. The impact of the Arab Spring is taken into account in the model by the dummy variable ARABS; ln is the natural logarithm and ui,trepresents the error term. Descriptive statistics and a correlation matrix for these variables are detailed in Table A2 in Appendix A. To address potential issues of multicollinearity and to conserve the model’s degrees of freedom—particularly critical given the finite nature of the observations available—ICT variables are introduced into the regression sequentially. This approach is twofold: firstly, it acknowledges the significant correlations among the ICT variables themselves; secondly, it aims to optimize the model’s degrees of freedom by judiciously selecting variables for inclusion, thereby mitigating the risk of multicollinearity and enhancing the robustness of our findings. 4. Empirical Results and Discussion In this study, we employ the Im, Pesaran, and Shin (IPS) unit root test, and its modified version introduced by Im et al. (2003), suited for the analysis of unbalanced panel data, which characterizes the dataset used in this research due to certain gaps in ICT variable observations. Prior to employing the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach for estimation, we initially conducted a panel unit root test to ascertain the stationarity status of the variables involved. This preliminary step is crucial for establishing the foundation for subsequent panel cointegration testing, which probes into the potential long-term equilibrium relationships among the study variables. The results of the panel unit root test, exhibited in Table A3 in Appendix A, reveal that the data series exhibit mixed orders of stationarity, alternating between I(0) and I(1). This mixed stationarity state fulfils a critical precondition for proceeding with the cointegration test aimed at detecting any long-term equilibrium dynamics among the variables. The outcomes of the panel cointegration tests lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis of non-cointegration, thereby supporting the argument for substantial long-term equilibrium relationships between the dependent variable, EG, and the various explanatory variables under consideration. Estimating these long-run relationships employs the panel ARDL methodology, as proposed by Pesaran et al. (1999), and involves the analysis of five distinct long-run equation variants. These variants reveal the effects on real GDP growth rates based on different dimensions of ICT usage—namely, Internet usage, Internet access, mobile, telephone, and computers, in addition to various control variables. The ARDL method was chosen due to its ability to capture both short-term dynamics and long-term relationships Economies 2024,12, 267 15 of 18 Table A3. Panel unit root test. IPS W-Statistic Level 1st Difference GDPG −7.278 *** −18.666 *** lnUSAGE −11.365 *** −9.790 *** lnACCESS −7.394 *** −2.867 *** lnMOB −15.523 *** −5.515 *** lnFIX −1.067 −6.318 *** lnEDU1 0.350 −9.531 *** lnEDU2 0.268 −8.135 *** lnGFCF −4.825 *** −12.634 *** lnTRADE −2.985 *** −10.715 *** Null hypothesis: unit root. Note 1: GDPG is an annual percentage growth rate of GDP; lnUSAGE is the natural logarithm of individuals using the internet as a percentage of the population; lnACCESS is the proportion of households with internet access at home as a percentage of the population; lnMOB is the natural logarithm of mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 people; lnFIX the natural logarithm of fixed telephone subscriptions per 100 people; lnGFCF is the natural logarithm of gross fixed capital formation as a percentage of GDP; lnEDU1 is the natural logarithm of the school enrolment, secondary as a percentage of gross; lnEDU2 is the natural logarithm of the tertiary school enrolment as a percentage of gross; lnTRADE is the natural logarithm of trade openness as a percentage of GDP. Note 2: Automatic lag length selection based on AIC. The test values are significant at * p< 0.1, ** p< 0.05, *** p< 0.01. References Abu Alfoul, Mohammad, Khatatbeh Nayel, Naser Ibrahim, and Fouad Jamaani. 2022. What Determines the Shadow Economy? An Extreme Bounds Analysis. Sustainability 14: 5761. [CrossRef] Abu Alfoul, Mohammed Nayel, Reza Tajaddini, Hassan F. Gholipour, Omar Bashar, and Fouad Jamaani. 2024. The Impacts of ICT on Economic Growth in the MENA Countries: Does Institutional Matter? PolitickáEkonomie 72: 446–77. [CrossRef] Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi, Sodiq Arogundade, and Biyase Mduduzi. 2023. Empirical analysis of inclusive growth, information and communication technology adoption, and institutional quality. Economies 11: 124. [CrossRef] Al-Dabbagh, Balsam, Eusebio Scornavacca, Allan Sylvester, and David Johnstone. 2016. The Effect of ICT Self-Discipline in the Workplace. arXiv arXiv:1606.00894. Alfoul, Mohammed Nayel. 2022. Effects of ICT Investment and Usage on Economic Growth in MENA Countries: Does Governance Matter. Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia. Altinok, Nader. 2007. Human Capital Quality and Economic Growth. Working Paper. Available online: https://shs.hal.science/halshs00132531/ (accessed on 22 September 2024). Altinok, Nadir, and Abdurrahman Aydemir. 2016. The Impact of Cognitive Skills on Economic Growth. Working Paper. Strasbourg: Beta—Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée. Appiah-Otoo, Isaac, and Na Song. 2021. The impact of ICT on economic growth-Comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy 45: 102082. [CrossRef] Awad, Atif, and Mohamed Albaity. 2022. ICT and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Transmission channels and effects. Telecommunications Policy 46: 102381. [CrossRef] Bahrini, Raéf, and Alaa Qaffas. 2019. Impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries. Economies 7: 21. [CrossRef] Bakry, Walid, Xuan-Hoa Nghiem, Sherine Farouk, and Xuan Vinh Vo. 2023. Does it hurt or help? Revisiting the effects of ICT on economic growth and energy consumption: A nonlinear panel ARDL approach. Economic Analysis and Policy 78: 597–617. [CrossRef] Barro, Robert Joseph. 1991. Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 407–43. [CrossRef] Barro, Robert Joseph. 2001. Human capital and growth. American Economic Review 91: 12–17. [CrossRef] Barro, Robert Joseph. 2013. Education and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance 14: 301–28. Barro, Robert Joseph, and Jong Wha Lee. 2013. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–98. [CrossRef] Becker, Gary Stanley. 1964. Human Capita. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Beine, Michel, Frédéric Docquier, and Cecily Oden-Defoort. 2011. A panel data analysis of the brain gain. World Development 39: 523–32. [CrossRef] Benhabib, Jess, and Mark M. Spiegel. 1994. The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 143–73. [CrossRef] Benos, Nikos, and Stefania Zotou. 2014. Education and Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis. World Development 64: 669–89. [CrossRef] Economies 2024,12, 267 16 of 18 Bohlin, Anders, Harald Gruber, and Pantelis Koutroumpis. 2010. Diffusion of new technology generations in mobile communications. Information Economics and Policy 22: 51–60. [CrossRef] Chapman, David William, and Suzanne Miric. 2009. Education Quality in the Middle East. International Review of Education 55: 311–44. [CrossRef] Cox, Margaret, and Gail Marshall. 2007. Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies 12: 59–70. [CrossRef] Creel, Jérôme, and Gwenaëlle Poilon. 2008. Is public capital productive in Europe? International Review of Applied Economics 22: 673–91. [CrossRef] Dedrick, Jason, Kenneth Kraemer, and Eric Shih. 2013. Information Technology and Productivity in Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of Management Information Systems 30: 97–122. [CrossRef] Dodani, Sunita, and Ronald E. LaPorte. 2005. Brain drain from developing countries: How can brain drain be converted into wisdom gain? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 98: 487–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ernst, Ekkehard, and Lisa Feist. 2024. Tomorrow at Work: The Age of Shortages. Intereconomics 59: 125–31. [CrossRef] Frankel, Jeffrey Alexander, and David Hibbard Romer. 1999. Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review 89: 379–99. [CrossRef] Freund, Caroline, and Diana Weinhold. 2002. The Internet and International Trade in Services. American Economic Review 92: 236–40. [CrossRef] Freund, Caroline, and Melise Jaud. 2014. Regime Change, Democracy, and Growth. Working Paper No. 14-1. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Fu, Jo Shan. 2013. Complexity of ICT in education: A critical literature review and its implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT 9: 112–25. Fukao, Ky ¯ oji, and Tsutomu Miyagawa. 2007. Productivity in Japan, the US, and the Major EU Economies: Is Japan Falling Behind? RIETI Discussion Paper Series 07-E-046. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=2030f1 8fcf9371a680cf2cc75784434d629ba824 (accessed on 22 September 2024). Gómez-Barroso, JoséLuis, and Rafael Marbán-Flores. 2020. Telecommunications and Economic Development—The 20th Century: The Building of an Evidence Base. Telecommunications Policy 44: 101904. [CrossRef] Habibi, Fateh, and Mohamad Amjad Zabardast. 2020. Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technology in Society 63: 101370. [CrossRef] Hanif, Nadia, and Noman Arshed. 2016. Relationship Between School Education and Economic Growth: SAARC Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6: 294–300. Hanushek, Eric Alan, and Ludger Woessmann. 2010. Education and Economic Growth. In Economics of Education. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 60–67. Hausmann, Ricardo, Dani Rodrik, and Andrés Velasco. 2008. Growth Diagnostics, the Washington Consensus Reconsidered, Towards a New Global Governance. London: Oxford University Press. Hawash, Ronia, and Guenter Lang. 2010. The Impact of Information Technology on Productivity in Developing Countries. Faculty of Management Technology Working Paper, (19). Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type= pdf&doi=1456132128f4651c84d782c06948ec9d0e12a215 (accessed on 22 September 2024). Hunter, Alistair. 2015. Empowering or impeding return migration? ICT, mobile phones, and older migrants’ communications with home. Global Networks 15: 485–502. [CrossRef] Im, Kyung So, Mohammad Hashem Pesaran, and Yongcheol Shin. 2003. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics 115: 53–74. [CrossRef] Iqbal, Kashif, Hui Peng, Muhammad Hafeez, and Khurshaid. 2020. Analyzing the effect of ICT on migration and economic growth in belt and road (BRI) countries. Journal of International Migration and Integration 21: 307–18. [CrossRef] Iwaisako, Tetsuya, and Koichi Futagami. 2013. Patent Protection, Capital Accumulation, and Economic Growth. Economic Theory 52: 631–68. [CrossRef] Jorgenson, Dale W., and Kevin J. Stiroh. 1995. Computers and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3: 295–316. [CrossRef] Jorgenson, Dale W., and Kevin J. Stiroh. 2000. Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 125–211. [CrossRef] Kais, Sabre. 2014. Introduction to quantum information and computation for chemistry. Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry, 1–38. Kasmaoui, Kamal, Mughal Mazhar, and Jamal Bouoiyour. 2018. Does Trust Influence Economic Growth? Evidence from the Arab World. Economics Bulletin 38: 880–91. Khatatbeh, Ibrahim Naser. 2019. The Macroeconomic Consequences of Financialization. Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Khatatbeh, Ibrahim Naser, and Imad Ahmed Moosa. 2022. Financialization and income inequality: An extreme bounds analysis. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 31: 692–707. Khatatbeh, Ibrahim Naser, and Imad Ahmed Moosa. 2023. Financialisation and income inequality: An investigation of the financial Kuznets curve hypothesis among developed and developing countries. Heliyon 9: e14947. [CrossRef] Economies 2024,12, 267 17 of 18 Khatatbeh, Ibrahim Naser, and Mohammad Nayel Abu-Alfoul. 2024. The determinants of the hidden economy in developed and developing countries. Applied Economics Letters 31: 1851–55. [CrossRef] Klees, Steven J., Nelly P. Stromquist, Joel Samoff, and Salim Vally. 2019. The 2018 world development report on education: A critical analysis. Development and Change 50: 603–20. [CrossRef] Koutroumpis, Pantelis. 2009. The economic impact of broadband on growth: A simultaneous approach. Telecommunications Policy 33: 471–85. [CrossRef] Kowal, Jolanta, Ewa Duda, Karolina Dunaj, Jarosław Klebaniuk, Juho Mäkiö, Ewa Pa´nka, and Piotr Soja. 2022. Digital Innovations for Sustainable Development in the Time of Crisis. International Journal of Pedagogy Innovation and New Technologies 9: 2–20. [CrossRef] Krueger, Alan Bennett, and Mikael Lindahl. 2001. Education for Growth: Why and for Whom? Journal of Economic Literature 39: 1101–36. [CrossRef] Liu, William Sheng, Frank Wogbe Agbola, and Janet Ama Dzator. 2016. The impact of FDI spillover effects on total factor productivity in the Chinese electronic industry: A panel data analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 21: 217–34. [CrossRef] Li, Xiaoying, and Xiaming Liu. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship. World Development 33: 393–407. [CrossRef] Long, Dara, and Sovannroeun Samreth. 2008. The Monetary Model of Exchange Rate: Evidence from the Philippines Using ARDL Approach. Available online: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/9822/ (accessed on 22 September 2024). Lucas, Robert Emerson, Jr. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42. [CrossRef] Mankiw, Nicholas Gregory, David Romer, and David Nathan Weil. 1992. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407–37. [CrossRef] Moosa, Imad Ahmed, and Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh. 2023. The Washington Consensus as a prescription for Arab oil-exporting countries: A critical evaluation. Research in Globalization 7: 100175. [CrossRef] Moosa, Imad Ahmed, Khaled Al-Saad, and Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh. 2024. The Quantity Theory of Money, Quantitative Easing and the Missing Inflation Phenomenon. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice 13: 71–88. [CrossRef] Murdoch, James, and Todd Sandler. 2002. Civil Wars and Economic Growth: A Regional Comparison. Defence and Peace Economics 13: 451–64. [CrossRef] Nabi, Agha Amad, Fayaz Hussain Tunio, Muhammad Azhar, Muhammad Shuja Syed, and Zia Ullah. 2023. Impact of information and communication technology, financial development, and trade on economic growth: Empirical analysis on N11 countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 14: 3203–20. [CrossRef] Naym, Junnatun, and Md Akram Hossain. 2016. Does investment in information and communication technology lead to higher economic growth: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management 11: 302. Niebel, Thomas. 2018. ICT and economic growth–Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Development 104: 197–211. [CrossRef] Noh, Young-Ho, and Kwanho Yoo. 2008. Internet, Inequality and Growth. Journal of Policy Modeling 30: 1005–16. [CrossRef] Oliner, Stephen D., Daniel E. Sichel, and Kevin J. Stiroh. 2008. Explaining a productive decade. Journal of Policy Modeling 30: 633–73. [CrossRef] Oulton, N. 2002. ICT and productivity growth in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18: 363–79. [CrossRef] Panagiotakopoulos, Antonios. 2020. Investigating the factors affecting brain drain in Greece: Looking beyond the obvious. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 16: 207–18. [CrossRef] Pesaran, Mohammad Hashem, Yongcheol Shin, and Ron Smith. 1999. Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: 621–34. [CrossRef] Piatkowski, Marcin. 2003. The Contribution of ICT Investment to Economic Growth and Labor Productivity in Poland 1995–2000. TIGER Working Paper Series No. 43. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=438100 (accessed on 22 September 2024). Pradhan, Rudra Prakash. 2009. The FDI-led-growth hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: Evidence from cointegrated panel analysis. International Journal of Business and Management 4: 153–64. [CrossRef] Pritchett, Lant. 1996. Mind Your p’s and q’s: The Cost of Public Investment Is Not the Value of Public Capital. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=620621 (accessed on 22 September 2024). Pritchett, Lant. 2001. Where has all the education gone? The World Bank Economic Review 15: 367–91. [CrossRef] Quenum, Vincent. 2011. Niveaux d’éducation et croissance économique dans les pays de l’UEMOA. Revue d’Economiethéoriqueet appliqué1: 41–61. Romer, Paul Michael. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–37. [CrossRef] Romer, Paul Michael. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102. [CrossRef] Saidi, Kais, and Chokri Mongi. 2018. The Effect of Education, R&D and ICT on Economic Growth in High Income Countries. Economics Bulletin 38: 810–25. Salem, Fadi. 2017. The Arab World Online 2017: Digital Transformations and Societal Trends in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution (Vol. 3). Dubai: MBR School of Government. Samimi, Ahmad Jafari, R. Babanejad Ledary, and MH Jafari Samimi. 2015. ICT & economic growth: A comparison between developed & developing countries. International Journal of Life Science and Engineering 1: 26–32. Sarangi, Ajoy Ketan, and Rudra Prakash Pradhan. 2020. ICT infrastructure and economic growth: A critical assessment and some policy implications. Decision 47: 363–83. [CrossRef] Economies 2024,12, 267 18 of 18 Schreyer, Paul. 2000. The Contribution of Information and Communication Technology to Output Growth: A Study of the G7 Countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. 2000/02. Paris: OECD. Solow, Robert Merton. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94. [CrossRef] Temple, Jonathan. 1999. A Positive Effect of Human Capital on Growth. Economics Letters 65: 131–34. [CrossRef] Todaro, Michael P. 1976. Urban job expansion, induced migration and rising unemployment: A formulation and simplified empirical test for LDCs. Journal of Development Economics 3: 211–25. [CrossRef] Usman, Mohammed AM, Huseyin Ozdeser, Behiye Çavu¸so˘glu, and Umar Shuaibu Aliyu. 2022. On the sustainable economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do remittances, human capital flight, and brain drain matter? Sustainability 14: 2117. [CrossRef] Van Ark, B., and Marcin Piatkowski. 2004. Productivity, innovation and ICT in Old and New Europe. International Economics and Economic Policy 1: 215–46. [CrossRef] Vu, Khuong Minh. 2011. ICT as a Source of Economic Growth in the Information Age: Empirical Evidence from the 1996–2005 Period. Telecommunications Policy 35: 357–72. [CrossRef] Vu, Khuong, Pedram Hanafizadeh, and Erik Bohlin. 2020. ICT as a Driver of Economic Growth: A Survey of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Telecommunications Policy 44: 101922. [CrossRef] Wang, Yining, and Shunfeng Liu. 2016. Education, Human Capital and Economic Growth: Empirical Research on 55 Countries and Regions (1960–2009). Theoretical Economics Letters 6: 347–55. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.