Defining clear objectives and measuring them by using appropriate indicators [GRIP - D8.2]

1 NODES – Nord Ovest Digitale e Sostenibile FLAGSHIP PROJECT GRIP SPOKE 2 –GREEN TECHNOLOGIES AND SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIES DELIVERABLE D 8.2: Defining clear objectives and measuring them by using appropriate indicators REPORTING PERIOD Period covered: from (April 2024) to (September 2024) Periodic report date and version: 03/10/2024 version 1 Milestone 8.1 Responsible Prof. Paolo Esposito RM8 Responsible Prof. Paolo Esposito This report is part of the project NODES which has received funding from the MUR – M4C2 1.5 of PNRR funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU (Grant agreement no. ECS00000036) 2 Contents: GLOSSARY 4 EXPLANATION OF THE WORK CARRIED OUT AND OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRESS 6 3 Glossary Definition Hub Coordinator (HC) The Hub Coordinator represents the single point of contact for the implementation of the innovation ecosystem towards the MUR. It carries out the management and coordination activities of the innovation ecosystem, receives the fundings, verifies, and transmits to the MUR the reporting of the activities carried out by the Spoke and their affiliates. National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) This document uses the Italian acronym for the NRRP, which is PNRR (Piano Nazionale della Ripresa e Resilienza) Research Program Manager The person who will be the responsible for the overall scientific contents of the NODES project. The NODES will appoint the Research Program Manager. It refers to “Responsabile del Programma di Ricerca” in the MUR’s Call of proposal for “Ecosistemi di Innovazione” NODES’ Research and innovation program NODES’ Research and Innovation program is articulated in specific programs for each Spoke, with the aim to promote and support applied research on topics consistent with the Intelligent Specialization Strategy, with the guidelines of the 2021-2027 partnership agreement scheme, with regional operational plans and regional and national research and innovation priorities. Although NODES’ Spokes are concentrated on different themes, they will organize their activities and actions within a common framework – NODES’ Booster Methodoloy Spoke Coordinator The University in charge of coordinating the Spoke’s ecosystem. It refers to “Spoke” in the MUR’s Call of proposal for “Ecosistemi di Innovazione” Spoke Data Manager The person who will be the responsible for the monitoring and management of data generated at the Spoke level. The Spoke Coordinator will appoint the Spoke Data Manager. Spoke Partner The entity associated to the Spoke Coordinator. It can be an Innovation Cluster, Competence Center, Research Center related to the Spoke’s ecosystem and contributes to achieve objectives and impact under the Spoke’ leadership and management. It refers to “soggetti affiliati” in the MUR’s Call of proposal for “Ecosistemi di Innovazione”. Spoke Project manager The person who will be the responsible for the management, coordination and progress of the project at the Spoke level. The Spoke Coordinator will appoint the Spoke Project Manager. Spoke research and innovation program NODES’ Research and Innovation program is articulated in specific programs for each Spokes. The spoke will leverage a consolidated collaboration with leading private and public companies and will focus the applied research activity on technological domains and applications that can favour the integration of SMEs into new value chains. Spoke Scientific and Technical Manager The person who will be the responsible for the overall scientific contents of the project at the Spoke level. The Spoke Coordinator will appoint the Spoke Scientific and Technical Manager. Spoke Stakeholders Committee (SC) Consultation structure formed by relevant stakeholders (Government, universities, companies, civil society, third sector, etc.) Spoke Thematic General target focus and domain of the Spoke research. Spoke Topics Specific areas/lines of development within the Spoke. Spoke Work Package Leader At the Spoke level, Work Packages (WPs) will be organized by WP leaders, who will be responsible for performance evaluation and reporting. Flagship Project Main research project at the Spoke level with the goal of prototyping, testing, demonstrating the research activities towards higher TRLs. 4 List of Deliverables # Name Typ e Due month Due date Short description Ne w Du e Da te (if del ay) Delivery Date (actual) D8.1 Waste management in the context of public administratio n R PU 12 18/03/2024 Report containing data related waste management creating public value developed in the frame of the project and prepared from emerging public services practices 04/04/2024 D8.2 Defining clear objectives and measuring them by using appropriate indicators R PU 18 30/09/2024 Report containing appropriate indicators related waste managemen t creating public value 03/10/2024 D8.3 Methodology and training contents based on social impact R PU 24 D8. 4 Case Study applied to waste management R PU 28 D8.5 Urban waste management R PU 30 5 List of Milestone # Name Type Due month Due date Short description New Due Date (if delay) Delivery Date (actual) M1 Analysis of the state of art Report 10 (Gennaio 2024) 04/02/2024 The investigation of the legal framework. 04/02/2024 M2 Defining the main Stakeholder Mapping Report 12 18/03/2024 The investigation of the Stakeholder Mapping 04/04/2024 M3 Defining the main social impact and measuring public value creation Report 18 30/09/2024 The investigation of the legal framework 6 A) EXPLANATION OF THE WORK CARRIED OUT AND OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRESS 1. Introduction 1.1 Objective of the Deliverable Deliverable D2 entitled "Defining clear objectives and measuring them by using appropriate indicators " started at the beginning of April 2024. 1.2 Context After analysing waste management in the context of public administration, the social dimension of the services provided and the economic and intangible dimensions of their behaviour are assessed by defining clear objectives and measuring them through the use of appropriate indicators. The Research Team is composed by Professor Paolo Esposito, Arturo Capasso, Maria Moreno, Riccardo Resciniti, Francesco Rota, Matteo Rossi and Nicola Fontana. In July 2024 and in September 2024, new two researchers were recruited in fellowships funded by the NODES project's financial resources and included in the Research Team: Ahmad Zubair and Ciuffreda Raffaela. 2. Methodology The activities implemented are manifold and consist of: - Literature review on the theoretical framework; - Literature review on public value creation developed in the frame of the project; - Bibliographic collection on measuring public value. 3. Results Possible individuated indicators are: - Recycling Rate; - Per Capita Waste Reduction; - Air Quality; - Incidence of Waste-related Diseases; - Citizen Satisfaction; - Savings on Disposal Costs; 7 - Creation of Green Jobs; - Public Policy Evaluation. 4. Impact and Public Value The impacts of the indicators are: Recycling Rate: Measures the amount of materials recycled, highlighting the positive impact on waste reduction. Per Capita Waste Reduction: Indicates the effectiveness of waste reduction policies in the community. Air Quality: Monitor emissions associated with waste management and their impact on public health. Incidence of Waste-related Diseases: Direct measure of the impact of waste management on population health. Citizen Satisfaction: Results from surveys assessing the quality of waste management services and perceived impact. Savings on Disposal Costs: Reduction in expenses due to recycling practices and waste reduction. Creation of Green Jobs: Number of jobs generated in sectors related to sustainable waste management. Public Policy Evaluation: Analysis of the impact of waste management policies on the community and the environment. 5. Challenges and Obstacles Encountered Although the most problematic area of public value is measurement, its application has required the implementation of common internationally policies and procedures that take into account the relationship between the creation or destruction of public value by municipalities and their stakeholders. 6. Next Steps and Recommendations The next Deliverable is D3 “Methodology and training contents based on social impact”. 8 7. Conclusion 7.1 Summary of Key Results In conclusion, these indicators collectively reflect the substantial public value generated by effective waste management policies and practices. Recycling Rate serves as a crucial metric, not only demonstrating the volume of materials diverted from landfills, but also underscoring the positive environmental impact of reducing waste. A higher recycling rate translates directly into fewer resources consumed and less pollution generated, contributing to the broader goal of sustainability. Per Capita Waste Reduction highlights the effectiveness of policies at the community level. By tracking individual reductions in waste, we gain insight into how well these policies are being implemented and whether they are driving meaningful behavioral change among residents. Air Quality is an essential indicator for public health, linking waste management practices to environmental outcomes. Monitoring emissions from waste processing helps mitigate the negative effects on air quality, ensuring that the environmental footprint of waste management does not jeopardize the health of the population. Incidence of Waste-related Diseases provides a direct measure of the success or failure of waste management in safeguarding public health. Reducing the spread of diseases linked to improper waste disposal reinforces the importance of maintaining a clean, safe environment for all citizens. Citizen Satisfaction offers valuable feedback on the perceived quality of waste management services, as well as their social impact. High satisfaction levels indicate that services are meeting the needs of the community, fostering trust between the public and local authorities. Savings on Disposal Costs demonstrate the economic value of recycling and waste reduction. Lower disposal costs contribute to financial sustainability for municipalities, which can then reinvest those savings into further environmental or community initiatives. Creation of Green Jobs speaks to the economic and social benefits of a sustainable waste management system. By generating employment in green sectors, waste management not only helps protect the environment but also supports local economies through job creation. Public Policy Evaluation assesses the overall effectiveness of waste management strategies. By evaluating the impact of waste management policies, we can identify successes, challenges, and areas for improvement, ensuring that these policies continue to deliver positive outcomes for both the community and the environment. These indicators provide a comprehensive view of the value created or destroyed by waste management practices, illustrating how such initiatives not only reduce environmental harm but also promote social and economic benefits. By continuously monitoring and improving these areas, public authorities can maximize the public value generated through waste management systems. 9 7.2 Contribution of the Deliverable to NODES Objectives Findings are being reviewed for the drafting of a paper on appropriate indicators to measure public value in municipal waste management. 8. Bibliography Agovino, M., D’Uva, M., Garofalo, A., & Marchesano, K. (2018). Waste management performance in Italian provinces: Efficiency and spatial effects of local governments and citizen action. Ecological indicators, 89, 680-695. Bracci, E., Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Deidda Gagliardo, E., & Bruns, H.-J. (2019). Public value and public sector accounting research: a structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(1), 103-136. Brown, P. (2021). Public Value Measurement vs. Public Value Creating Imagination - the Constraining Influence of Old and New Public Management Paradigms. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 808–817. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. In (Vol. 74, pp. 445456). Cluley, V., Parker, S., & Radnor, Z. (2020). New development: Expanding public service value to include dis/value. Public Money & Management. Cui, T., & Osborne, S. P. (2022). Unpacking value destruction at the intersection between public and private value. Public Administration,1–20. D’Adamo, I., Favari, D., Gastaldi, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2024). Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union. Waste Management & Research, 0734242X241237171. Do, Q., Ramudhin, A., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., Li, D. (2021). A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy. International Journal of Production Economics. 239, 108209. Esposito, P., & Ricci P., (2015) How to turn public (dis)Value into new Public Value? Evidence from Italy, Public Money & Management, Vol. 35, N. 3, p. 227-231. Esposito, P., Antonucci, G., Palozzi, G., & Fijałkowska, J. (2024). Cognitive systems for improving decision-making in the workplace: an explorative study within the waste management field. Management Decision. Esposito, P., Dicorato, S. L., & Doronzo, E. (2021). The effect of ownership on sustainable development and environmental policy in urban waste management: An explicatory empirical analysis of Italian municipal corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1067-1079.