Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces

Martin, Aaron; Shukr, Amal Article Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces Cogent Business & Management Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Martin, Aaron; Shukr, Amal (2024) : Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces, Cogent Business & Management, ISSN 2331-1975, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350793 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/326272 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cogent Business & Management ISSN: 2331-1975 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20 Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces Aaron Martin & Amal Shukr To cite this article: Aaron Martin & Amal Shukr (2024) Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces, Cogent Business & Management, 11:1, 2350793, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2350793 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350793 © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 10 May 2024. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 745 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oabm20 ManageMent | ReseaRch aRticle Cogent Business & ManageMent 2024, VoL. 11, no. 1, 2350793 Person, place, and pragmatism: Theorizing urban spaces aaron Martin and amal shukr irvin D. Reid Honors College, Wayne state university, Detroit, Michigan, usa ABSTRACT cities old and new would benefit if they embraced a perspective distinct from the dominant thought regarding efforts to reinvent or contemporize themselves through urban renewal projects, specifically those related to social inclusion. Realism, as contrary to pragmatism, has been shown to impose a complacent attitude toward vulnerable urban communities through its attachments to predeterminacy. this paper analyzes the detrimental effects of a realist worldview on marginalized populations facing displacement as a result of these projects, and takes a Rortyan approach at delineating the implications of realist policy approaches in cities like los angeles, california, Detroit, Michigan, and Birmingham, england. the paper then turns to critique movements like ‘Detroit vs everybody’ and Richard Florida’s model in The Rise of the Creative Class as an effort to endorse a reconceptualization of policies in which elites relinquish their realist attachments in favor of outcome driven, pragmatic solutions that will, in turn, relieve these marginalized groups of the infringement imposed upon them. 1. Introduction the discourse used to describe urban renewal projects contributes to the notion that the displacement of marginalized local populations in urban areas is inevitable. We propose an alternative conceptual framework to a realist model of urban renewal in which the historically affected local populations are no longer imposed upon by realist informed public policy and thus establish their own sense of physical place. We argue that adopting a pragmatic approach to the perceived inevitability of displacement at the hand of urban renewal is an effective method for lessening cruelty among marginalized local populations. We begin the paper with an applied dilemma to help locate the respective theoretical positions of competing approaches. a recent proposal for injecting new investment dollars in the north end neighborhood of Detroit, Michigan has been met with skepticism and even outright opposition from community members and neighborhood activists. the north end situation serves to provide a helpful context for how we might apply more general intellectual traditions to concrete examples. after stepping through these existing tensions, we lean back to sketch a fuller picture of the traditions themselves. On one side, we trace the common intellectual strains found in foundationalism and realism that can—and do—produce outcomes justified as simply a matter of the inevitable coming true. On the other side, we show how pragmatism challenges these metaphysical assumptions by resisting the philosophical inclination to ground preferences in any comprehensive theory. although our analysis does rely on a Rortyan interpretation of pragmatism, Richard Rorty is but a single voice within the much larger pragmatic tradition. as such, we take a relatively brief inventory of important points of agreement as well as some of the ongoing debates within pragmatism itself. section 4 starts putting the pragmatic method to work in an attempt to expose the shortcoming of relying on realist discourse to adequately account for marginalization. Once we establish our strategy for © 2024 the author(s). Published by informa uK Limited, trading as taylor & Francis group. CONTACT aaron Martin [email protected] PhD associate Professor of teaching, irvin D. Reid Honors College, Wayne state university, Detroit, Mi, usa https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350793 this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. the terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 22 December 2021 Revised 20 March 2024 accepted 29 april 2024 KEYWORDS Urban renewal; pragmatism; Richard Rorty; realism; creative class; third place, city planning REVIEWING EDITOR huifen (helen) cai, Middlesex University Business school, United Kingdom SUBJECTS Policy analysis; cities & infrastructure; Postmodernism of cultural theory 2 a. MaRtin anD a. shUKR selecting which texts—i.e. our data—to include in our analysis, we interrogate an excerpt from a Los Angeles Times article on the anticipated fate of a local population facing displacement. By parsing out discourse that is contrary to Rorty’s pragmatic approach to advance liberal societies, and in effect, discourse that ultimately inhibits such progress, this section relies on Rorty’s advancement of championing a society in which public and private mores refrain from entanglement, one in which a desire for mutual protection supersedes an attempt to embrace a philosophical justification for human suffering. the section captures Rorty’s approach by highlighting predeterministic discourse, namely words like ‘inevitable’, ‘fundamental’ and ‘essential’, all of which underscore an attachment to the idle gains of a realist worldview. What follows seeks to undermine the conflation of private pursuits and public policy in the Rortyan sense, and through invoking examples of urban planners embracing such conflation in Birmingham, england and Detroit, Michigan, we explore its intrusive effects on these local populations at risk of displacement. Moreover, leaning on Rorty’s version of self-description and Ray Oldenburg’s concept of ‘third place’, we argue that displacement from such third places deprives individuals of one form of their private pursuit of self-development, and thus contributes to an infringement well beyond physical marginalization. Our final section offers a pragmatic critique of realist informed approaches to urban renewal, which opts to pivot away from a philosophical vocabulary that accompanies a realist worldview in favor of an outcome driven expenditure that deems cruelty the most unfavorable of consequences. By critiquing the methods of urban theorist Richard Florida, this section further explores instances in Detroit, Michigan to argue that Florida’s conception of those benefiting from such urban renewal efforts—the creative class, as Florida coins them—consequently prolongs a sense of alienation among other marginalized groups, and ultimately demonstrates that some of Florida’s critics, in their attempt to refute him, fall victim to realist entrapment themselves. the section concludes by maintaining that upon people recognizing their susceptibility to humiliation, and putting vulnerability first, can solidarity and thus flourishing take place. 2.The North End conundrum cities all over are eager to attract investment, fueled in no small measure by the ongoing need for housing—including affordable family housing (Kimetal., 2020). Where capital goes—that is, which cities and then where within these cities it goes—is often a matter of how (re)development proposals get articulated. approaches to urban planning become expressions of larger commitments about values, priorities, and trade-offs. Put more concretely, the question becomes: Who is it for? consider for a moment a recent urban planning conundrum emerging in the north end neighborhood of Detroit. north end is near Midtown, Detroit, home to the city’s only research university and its cultural district. Midtown’s years-long economic transformation into a ‘thriving’ hub of interest and activity is but one narrative to describe the change, albeit the dominant one, no doubt (Bonner & Katz, 2023). and that model is spreading throughout the city, as well—to places like north end, whose residents’ feelings are mixed, at best (aguilar, 2021). north end resident and artist, Bryce Detroit has made clear his position, one that caught the attention of both passersby and media. he started erecting signs at the edges of the north end neighborhood that proclaimed, ‘hood closed to gentrifiers’ (cassimy, 2020). his protest campaign comes on the heels of a $7.3 million housing project that (city of Detroit, 2023), in his and others’ view, neglects the need for family-sized housing in favor of smaller units intended to attract someone new to the area, someone who, for Bryce Detroit, is not just ‘foreign to [north end’s] cultural norms’ but often ‘come under the guise of support’ (cassimy, 2020). suspicions like his are well-founded and well-documented. (connolly, 2022; Kern, 2022). Bryce Detroit’s sights aren’t so much focused on young tech bros potentially interested in renting studio apartments in north end as they are on, as he puts it, the more structural issue of ‘land-use in my neighborhood’ (cassimy, 2020). his more significant quarrel is with policymakers, the people who read the people theorizing approaches to city planning and urban renewal. Before getting to the ‘What should be done?’ question applied to north end or wherever, it is important to consider the ‘What informs whatever answer is given?’ question. theoretical approaches to social issues ultimately state conclusions based on an initial set of assumptions. But within approaches that include these stated assumptions—often referred to as first principles, like assuming that the world has cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 3 an ultimate character to it for humans to then assess the validity of actions against said character—the approaches soon depart from one another in what that character happens to look like, thus offering justifications for solutions that stand in stark contrast to each other. Regardless, though, the initial set of assumptions on which to formulate philosophical responses to questions—to then be applied to, say, urban renewal—make them foundationalist. Foundationalists can appeal—and have appealed—to a variety of so-called foundations, such as religious texts for their ultimate point of origin from which to then proceed with their theoretical schematic. some, in similar cases, have pointed to passages on race for justifying racism, segregation, and, for them, ‘what’s fair’ (chappell, 1998); others point to different places in scripture for justifying equality, integration, and, for this latter group, ‘what’s fair’ (King, 2018). scripture certainly doesn’t have a monopoly on what foundationalists appeal to (Rorty, 1999, p. 151)—see also: (rugged) individualism, the (free) market, to name just two—and certainly, race is but a single choice among many foundational candidates. But in north end, a neighborhood in a city where race and jobs, especially automobile manufacturing jobs, and the intersection of those two, it is pervasive, as evidenced by Bryce Detroit’s characterization of recent investor attention in his neighborhood: for him, the history and legacy of ‘Black art’ is, among other things, part and parcel of the ‘cultural economy’ in north end (cassimy, 2020). specifically, context matters. For those of whom context matters most, and for whom foundational assumptions matter little or not at all in comparison to acknowledging and preventing more of what a slogan like ‘hood closed to gentrifiers’ is calling attention to—i.e. the impending displacement of long-time residents—belong to pragmatism (Rorty, 2010, p. 190). On the other side, foundationalists, be it the sort with whom we pragmatists are on the ‘same side’—the side of equality and integration—or the sort with whom we are not, want the question about ‘What should be done?’ to address, first and foremost, how an eventual policy proposal comports with first principles about ‘what’s fair’ in a way that is independent of context—free of a place and a people, free of north end and Bryce Detroit (Macintyre, 2007; Rorty, 2010, p. 271). alternatively, pragmatists are those who, as a matter of emphasis, desire to reposition the ‘What should be done?’ question as a forward-looking reframing of the issue itself: ‘What would it look like in north end if long-time families were priced out and forced to relocate?’. a pragmatic reorientation is an attempt to circumvent philosophical discussions about ‘justified true beliefs’ to instead jump to real-world scenarios and their effects on people—people like Bryce. in this way, pragmatists would not necessarily be in disagreement with one sort of foundationalist’s favored outcome (i.e. integration, equality, and inclusion); the pragmatist’s opposition lies in any foundationalist’s insistence that the outcome is the ‘true’ or ‘real’ one because it demonstrates interpretive alignment with what the initially stated criteria for ‘what’s fair’ was. Pragmatists resist this intellectual and argumentative expedition in favor of simply wanting context, more and more concrete, on-the-ground context for weighing actual competing visions and plans for whom things like neighborhoods and projects exist and serve. We used the word dominant earlier to describe the prevailing narrative surrounding Midtown, Detroit. that word aptly applies to the effect Richard Florida’s thinking and research has had on the field of urban planning, too. Florida’s creative capital theory suggests that ‘regional economic growth is driven by the location choices of creative people’ (Florida, 2004, p. 223). it is difficult to overstate the importance elites have given to his ideas (tiruneh, 2014). Part of what makes his theory ‘essentially’ what it is is that it ‘identifies the underlying factors that shape the location decisions of these people’. (Florida, 2004, p. 223). these creative types comprise his creative class. Florida’s model for regional vibrancy has a dependent variable—the member of his creative class—and this person, for Florida, possesses an essential faculty, an underlying character to them that explains their desires and choices more than any contingent forces to which they have been exposed. For Florida, this ‘something’ is akin to a philosophical gene of sorts. Once this class has come to realize this quality has been there, in them, all along—and now owing it to their nature—their decisions become justifiably ‘true’ ones, ones about where to live and what to do once they’ve arrived. it is not a favorite cuisine or type of nightlife per se, although that can be a manifestation of it, but a certain experiential ‘craving’ Florida sees in them (Florida, 2004, p. 188). it is here where Florida’s creative class framework becomes realist, where his creative types are envisaged as realists. cities desperate to attract investment opportunities have clung to Florida’s ideas in hopes for a return to prosperity (Pratt, 2008), accepting with that proposition certain inevitabilities along the way, such as that ‘even 4 a. MaRtin anD a. shUKR when experiencing culture is truly the goal, if hanging out in nightspots frequented by artists and aficionados is how [creative class members] choose to up [their] creative stimulation, [they] are going to pick up a lot of chaff along with it’ (Florida, 2004, p. 185). that’s bad news for the very temporal predicament in which Bryce and the other north end residents find themselves (Bridge, 2020). Florida does, however, acknowledge his creatives’ susceptibility to becoming posers themselves (Florida, 2004,185); and a decade later, Florida went much further, performing what has seemingly amounted to as a wholesale mea culpa (Wetherell, 2017). Worth mentioning here, though, is his enduring outsider-friendly stance (Florida, 2004, p. 292), especially noteworthy in light of urban planners and policymakers’ attempts at creating institutions and atmospheres welcoming of diversity (Dreher, 2005), an outcome we can celebrate with realists, even if that aim was largely pursued from an instinctually foundational approach.1 3.Theorizing from intellectual ‘places’ Urban renewal project proposals do not necessarily throw around such technical jargon. it is important to zoom out here and situate this terminology as part of a larger philosophical lexicon, which will become increasingly helpful as the paper progresses. Foundationalism accepts fixed narratives; our pragmatism does not, and it is in this recognition that a pragmatist accepts what the truth—or the just or the fair—is, and can be, is no more than ‘what works’ (Rorty, 2010, p. 503). Further, ‘what works’ is decided by a community, in conversation in a context, rather than against some singular, capital-t ‘truth’ version reached via some system of inquiry that rests on some initial and unquestioned assumptions, or first principles. More technically, foundationalists posit that epistemic belief is an adequately structured atemporal complex capable of justifying claims based on procedures put forth on the assumption of a priori knowledge, a feature that runs through the various strains of foundationalism. One assumption like this is that of the realists: realists hold that reality itself has an intrinsic nature, something with which we can then act in accordance (Rorty, 1999, p. 151). in this way, realism nods to foundationalism through its commitment to permanent converging truths that lie independent of human interpretation (searle, 1995). in short, there exists a single way to be human. therefore, if humans are a certain way, then certain human behaviors consistent with such a conception are not just expected to follow but provide confirmation of this purported natural order. it is here that we attach this realist tendency to the notion of inevitability, as inevitability serves to naturalize realism by granting it a conclusive, irrefutable predicate. so, because, in the realist view, this single reality offers an image of ‘human’—as opposed to interpreting humans creating themselves with no preconfigured instruction sheet—then some ensuing action can corroborate the validity of such an image for the realist. For instance, if it is philosophically understood that humans are by their nature a particular way, and this particular way is predatory by nature, then we accept it—e.g. ‘there will always be poverty’, the source of which is metaphysics rather than politics (gutiérrez, 1997; Karnani, 2011)—or, in ways, correct for it. On this reading of humans, predatorial behaviors are even embraced to the extent it is baked into the social calculus, where a certain number of prey lost have been written off as acceptable, if not regrettable, externalities. in such a scenario, predatory fill-in-the-blank [lending, listing, inclusion, etc., etc.] is not a matter of contingently planned or unplanned forces that happen to converge in some specific context—it may be that, sure, but it would also be more than that—it is part of the human condition, even if that condition is bemoaned, which is certain to happen because it is bound up in what is essential, philosophically, about being human. this binding aspect of inevitability with respect to realism occupies a place within the epistemic certainty of foundationalism that merits close attention, particularly the shoulder-shrug responses to the purported predeterminacy of cruel outcomes. For a fuller picture, though, it is worthwhile to situate realism within the much larger theoretical dialogue. We are the heirs to this idea of objectivity, of the insistence on an independent reality (Rorty, 1989, p. 196, 2010, p. 228). the realists’ resolve to chart human courses onto metaphysical maps helped us reach the enlightenment and subsequently experience the euphoric liberation that that rationality produced—like the proliferation of education, equality, liberty, individuality, prosperity, and so much more. the enlightenment’s promise of self-determination, understood as something rationally bestowed upon individuals, spawned democratic revolutions and then nurtured commitments to civic participation. the certainty with which enlightenment rationalists connected principles of equality and individuality to cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 5 the nature of what it meant to be a fully realized human being was permitted by realist dictum. as such, if free and equal individuals embody the accurate depiction of reality, then democratic government becomes legitimate, thus justifying statements like: When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s god entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation (Us 1776). simply put, pragmatism can never make such a forceful philosophical assertion; it does not lend itself to the kind of ‘metaphysical comfort’ that comes with realists’ confidence in their claims about certainty (nietzsche, 2000). Pragmatism, in this way, is reduced to something much more temperate: the comparing alternative scenarios using this-worldly examples. Well in the twenty-first century now, we maintain that we can acknowledge and appreciate realism’s intellectual contributions, while also asserting that its utility in the aid of progress is no longer required (Rorty, 1989, p. 194), thus swapping it for a different prompt: are specific autocracies like a and B or specific theocracies like c and D, and their respective mechanisms for improving conditions, preferable to democracies like X and Y, and their specific mechanisms that have this kind of electoral system and that kind of constitutional amendment process? then, let us compare specific features in these systems against one another to get to more of what we want rather than against some erected image of the nature of reality. such is our use of the pragmatic method. now, just because democracies have been shown to deliver, say, higher levels of autonomy (Pendlebury, 2004) and prosperity (norris, 2011) for their citizens does not alone preclude them from committing abuses like predatory majoritarianism against their own citizens. in this way, the pragmatic method could be deployed for achieving some stated goal (that, perhaps, pragmatists like us would find abhorrent), so long as there was no attempt to bolster their position with some comprehensive theory about humanity or truth or justice or fairness against which to gauge adherence or deviation, even if the process for communicating terms like ‘utility’ and ‘desired’ was blatant distortion (Rorty, 2010, p. 120). and therein lies the issue at hand: pragmatists like us are linguistically susceptible to the accusation of committing a kind of circularity incapable of condemning heinous acts on traditional philosophy’s terms. One effective response, we posit, has been Rorty’s unwavering commitment to keep the conversation fully in this world, again using very particular examples that contextualize the terms of both sides of the debate, playing the sides of one another by pointing to concrete scenarios that describe or depict what we want more of and less of (Rorty, 2010, pp. 225, 418). On the matter of equality, for example, we want less a conversation that begins ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident’ and more a conversation that begins ‘Michigan ‘house Bill 4966 would create the land tax equity act, which would allow [Detroit] to authorize a land value tax (lVt)’’ (clanton, 2023), for how to improve delivery today of the equality ushered in and promised by the enlightenment. We no longer need the former to prop up the latter. Rorty resists the attempt to lift pragmatism to the level of philosophy, rather pulling philosophy down, at once rebuffing the charge of circularity-induced moral relativism and indicting traditional philosophy of committing circularity in its own right; Rorty contends: i think that the answer to this question is that the pragmatist cannot justify these habits without circularity, but then neither can the realist. the pragmatists’ justification of toleration, free inquiry, and the quest for undistorted communication can only take the form of a comparison between societies which exemplify these habits and those which do not, leading up to the suggestion that nobody who has experienced both would prefer the latter (Rorty, 2010, p. 230). although we have come to mostly embrace Rorty’s version of pragmatism that puts right at the fore a full-throated postmodern rejection of absolutes, Rorty by no means has proprietorship over the term pragmatism. While pragmatism’s denial of truth corresponding to reality is a key element within the tradition (Rorty, 2010, p. 418), its emphasis on utility in outcome as a practice helps to separates it from traditional modes of intellectual inquiry. For example, pragmatism eschews contemplative slogans like ‘good for its own sake’. For this reason, it is more method than philosophy. For William James, one of the first pragmatists, getting to ‘the true’ amounts to ‘what is good in the way of belief’ (James, 1955); for John Dewey, another giant of classical pragmatism, it is simply more and more ‘growth’ (Dewey, 1980)— where we’re never going to reach fully grown, as it were. like their historical counterparts, contemporary 6 a. MaRtin anD a. shUKR practitioners employ pragmatism in various ways and for a number of ends. One difference among them is on the matter of real-world relevance these philosophical-like endeavors have, and consequently, the effect they then have on societies. On the one side, Richard Bernstein sees an important role for attending to philosophical quandaries in improving public life (Rorty, 2010, p. 474), as do other influential figures like John Rawls and Jürgen habermas, both of whose thinking contain strains of pragmatism (Rorty, 2010, p. 437). Rorty takes the more skeptical position—that philosophy is not as central to politics or progress as others contend, or hope, it is. this provocative stance, at least within philosophy circles, has caused much consternation, with Rorty’s critics charging him—especially his Jacques Derrida-like brand of postmodernism—with everything from quaint frivolity (Rorty, 2010, p. 475) to dangerous moral relativism (Rorty, 2010, p. 120). Moreover, they have accused him of committing what amounts to interpretive violence to supply textual evidence for achieving his anti-philosophical reimagining of pragmatism (stieb, 2005). in fact, Rorty and longtime interlocutor hilary Putnam sparred for decades (Malachowski, 2010), including over Putnam’s accusation of Rorty propagating relativism, something Rorty fervently and repeatedly denied (Rorty, 2010, p. 192). But for as much as the two quarreled at or near the margins, Putnam’s assertion that we all give up the attempt for a ‘god’s eye view’ has been embraced not just by Rorty but remains an instructive metaphor for pragmatic narratives (Putnam, 1981). Putnam’s pragmatic concession here prevents someone from serving as initially god’s eyes and then ultimately as god’s definitive mouthpiece. like Rorty, we find Putnam’s claim here convincing; we find Putnam’s claim of Rorty’s relativism much less so. conversely put, Rorty’s defense against relativism resonates with us, and we conclude that Rorty’s refusal to ever leave this temporal world for what ‘good’ or ‘growth’, or whatever, means offers us our preferred tool for our own analysis. 4. Loss in Los Angeles By the mid-2010s, less than a decade after the near collapse of major markets in 2008 which brought on the great Recession, signs of investment started popping up once again in urban areas (Voith & Wachter, 2014). Much of this larger revitalization effort was an attempt to create an entire ecosphere for attracting new talent in expanding sectors like tech (Ratti, 2015), a strategy that left working class communities, especially those tied to sectors like manufacturing or service, susceptible to being pushed out of their homes and neighborhoods (editor, eig). a 2016 publication by the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times predicts the supposed fate of residents living in Marmion Royal, an apartment complex in highland Park, as displayed by the title alone: ‘gentrification in l.a.: it’s cruel, and it’s inevitable’. as a result of hedge funds and private equity firms buying and upgrading apartment buildings within the area, increased rent prices for Marmion Royal tenants are forthcoming and will only, according to the board, ‘delay the inevitable’—that is, tenants seemingly have but three routes from which to proceed: ‘they can either pay the rent increases, move or be evicted’ (‘gentrification’). While much can be evaluated regarding the less than glamorous effects often accompanying urban renewal projects on the marginalized people of a given area, our focus, though related, is one centered on discourse. the editorial board anchors itself in a worldview that depicts displacement as nothing short of inevitable; the board questions not what will happen to Marmion Royal tenants but ponders instead the matter of when. such predeterministic discourse can be understood further when analyzing the similar discourse comprising much of the board’s mission statement: We reject overreaching moves by public authorities to control the culture or private mores. citizens’ right to privacy, to decide for themselves how best to lead their lives, is fundamental. it is in keeping with our Western roots to champion individual autonomy and the freedom of conscience. the United states has developed into one nation whose citizens are engaged in a common enterprise (‘about the times’). We condone the board’s advocacy for such a dichotomy. however, we take issue with the board’s advancement of an ‘engaged, common enterprise’, since it fashions society as one united by some abstract common goal rather than one united by a real world need for mutual protection.2 the problematic turn of the board’s discourse manifests itself further through the realist undertones of words like ‘fundamental’, and ‘roots’. to say that the right to privacy is fundamental is to suggest there cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 7 is a natural or essential feature in the public sphere that entitles some to certain reapings and that potentially denies others (Rorty, 1989, p. 33). such philosophical terminology that rests on notions of rights and entitlements proves to be stagnant, as the agency lies not within us, but within the presupposed outside agent from which such allocations derive. the result of this, as demonstrated by the editorial board, is that citizen agency is immediately relinquished for the comfort in believing that the sufferings of those marginalized—in this case, the displaced tenants of highland Park—are a regrettable, predictable necessity. While we agree that displacement as a result of urban renewal is cruel, we argue against the realist notions behind its inevitability. the inevitability of suffering as a result of urban renewal is heavily attached to realism, as maintained by Rorty. Because realists intend on discovering the version of truth in objective reality, as opposed to pragmatists, like us, who wish to construct theirs in solidarity, realists are susceptible to the rhetorical backlash of their predeterministic discourse (Rorty, 2010, p. 228). consequently, this search for objectivity dissociates them further from outcome driven pursuits, as they are immersed in their quest to fill the gap between human nature and nature itself with a discourse predicated on ‘the intrinsic nature of things’ (Rorty, 2010, p. 184). While such an incessant drive for bridging this gap may be a self-fulfilling expenditure in the private realm, it measures up to just that. adopting realism in the public realm is to refrain from, for instance, giving a reason for human suffering and instead it is to rely on something out in the world pointing us to ‘the way things are’, as done by the editorial board (Rorty, 2010, p. 114). the editorial board’s statements are informed by realist thought, as their argument grounds itself in the inherent nature of the tenants’ eventual displacement, which in turn, is reiterated through discourse that amplifies its supposed inevitability. With that, the realist’s comfort with the current or inevitable order of society becomes clear: realists provide a philosophical justification for the happenings of society not from a perspective tangible enough to be remedied, but from a perspective fixed on prescribing a sense of divine order to them (Rorty, 2010, p. 236). the editors’ three-route prediction for explaining the tenants’ circumstance is a prime example of such order: by limiting the possibilities of the tenants’ futures to just three options, the editors embrace a realist worldview. the predeterministic discourse used by realists proves not only counterproductive for diminishing cruelty, but on our view, is harmful, as it fosters a society complacent in its own stagnation. 5.Third place and Birmingham, England a similar cycle of stagnation manifests itself through urban renewal practices in england. in an effort to make the city more appealing, urban renewal measures in Birmingham, england, have ultimately ‘prevent[ed] the quarter [from] becoming engulfed by residential accommodation and [have] eroded its unique culture and identity’ through displacing a local population (Jones, 2016). Fox and grapes, an ‘older-style ‘traditional ale’ pub’, was acquired by the Birmingham city council after the ‘eastside regeneration programme’, and has been forced for sale as a result of the revitalization plans (Porter & Barber, 2006, p. 218). the program calls for purchasing local businesses or plots of land within the boundaries that the Birmingham city council declares will contribute significantly to the regeneration scheme, and consequently make way for trendy parks, shops, and bars. Despite protesting against such measures, the owner of Fox and grapes failed to nullify this decision, as removing the bar, according to the council, is necessary ‘to enable the comprehensive redevelopment of the area to proceed’ and ‘[its retention] within the scheme will necessitate accommodation and other refurbishment works to ensure that it sits appropriately within the redevelopment scheme’ (Porter & Barber, 2006, p. 218). these proclamations, we maintain, are attached to a realist worldview, as the use of the word ‘necessitate’ connotes the inevitable undertones related to revitalization. Moreover, the ‘accommodation’ the council refers to relates not to those who currently frequent the pub, but to the anticipated population that the council seeks to incentivize to come once the neighborhood has been ‘appropriately’ remodeled, and thus provides a realist justification for the former’s displacement. By thinking in terms of what has already been defined for the urban planners, such as in the case of Fox and grapes, they embrace a realist worldview to justify the continuation of a real-world problem affecting those facing displacement. For us, with Rorty, relying on realist descriptions supports the notion that one has not come to understand themselves and is simply ‘weaving new candidates for 14 a. MaRtin anD a. shUKR 10. Conclusion in sum, we want to disengage from the kind of critiques above—that is, no longer taking realism on with more realist vocabulary. such attempts amount to playing the language game on the rhetorical turf that justifies consequences, including cruelty, as inevitable and thus a regrettable necessity. With Rorty, we want to give up on locating the grounds on which to justify a sense of community and solidarity—in argument or policy—altogether, and instead, assess outcomes solely, and specifically, here, urban revitalization initiatives, on whether vulnerable local populations’ shared susceptibility to be hurt by displacement has been avoided. to claim success in such a way would require no further philosophical substantiation in support of the outcome; such practices would come from reevaluating vocabulary and then adopting a pragmatic one. to this end, we laid out the broader theory-oriented terms, first in the context of the north end neighborhood and then as part of a scholarly dialogue. Using words like texts to mean data and argument in place of results, we pragmatically asserted that to view displacement from a realist’s vantage point, as performed by the editors of the Los Angeles Times, is to deepen oneself into a state of compliance. additionally, we posited that once the inevitability of suffering is removed from the calculus of urban renewal projects, we can ameliorate the discursive justification of such cruel practices and humiliating consequences. We then portrayed the dangers of conceptualizing urban policy through a realist framework, as it not only excuses the physical marginalization of those affected, but, with Ray Oldenburg, infringes on their private pursuance of individual growth. last, we emphasized—through the example of Richard Florida and then a response from tommey Walker—that attempts at combating realism with another version of realism proves, on our analysis, outmoded in its futility. the marginalization of local populations stemming from realist urban policies are not likely to stop until the policies themselves are no longer realist. Ultimately, progress does not emerge from the same place that stifles it; accordingly, we argue not for a reformulated parallel debate but for an altogether different conversational practice. Notes 1. the authors are indebted to the referees for their feedback as well as to ty Jones and Mohamad Rammal for their research assistance. 2. the board’s “engaged, common enterprise,” as with the realist’s metaphysically conceived “common goal,” assumes such a goal has, for humanity, an “intrinsic nature” (Rorty, 1989, p. 59), one that transcends this particular community and extends to our—as in the human—community in the objective and thus realist sense. For realists, then, there no longer exists a community but the community, one in which they seek to measure against an objective reality, and through which, they apply these theoretical frameworks as philosophical foundations on which to pass public policy. to adhere to or advocate for the realist common goal is to abstractly ask of humans to position themselves in relation to—and require that they pursue—that metaphysically preconfigured understanding of what makes a “good” community and that which contributes to “good” public policy. But to propose such a venture amounts to accepting a single, or common, way to be human, where the private self conflates with the publicly endorsed, theoretically formulated definition of human. Pragmatists like us, with Rorty, prefer delineating the private and public versions of self—the versions that reconcile these spheres—through understanding ourselves as a “band of eccentrics collaborating for purposes of mutual self-protection rather than as a band of fellow spirits united by a common goal” (Rorty, 1989, p. 59). 3. We draw a parallel from Richard Florida, here, to Rorty’s pragmatic interpretation of intellectual endeavors, specifically with respect to Freud’s activities, where Rorty writes about Freud—and we argue is applicable to Florida—that “Freud gave up Plato’s attempt to bring together the public and the private, the parts of the state and the parts of the soul, the search for social justice and the search for individual perfection. … he distinguished sharply between a private ethic of self-creation and a public ethic of mutual accommodation. he persuades us that there is no bridge between them provided by universally shared beliefs or desires. … [Freud] cannot be used to define social goals…for humanity… there is no way to force Freud into a Platonic mold by treating him as a moral philosopher who supplies universal criteria for goodness or rightness or true happiness” (Rorty, 1989, p. 33). as such, for us, neither should Florida. 4. We use the word “philosophical” as pretty much synonymously with metaphysical, which like the term “realism” presumes a neutral and knowable objectivity that theorizing can attain, something we pragmatists reject. 5. the term “universalistic,” again, like “philosophical” and “realist,” connotes what pragmatists want to lose—the pursuit at objectivity. Pragmatists, instead want to swap such a vocabulary laden with “philosophical foundations” (Rorty, 1989, p. 44) for one in which solidarity needs no “grounding” and is satisfied with eliminating cruelty as outright sufficient (Rorty, 2010, p. 293). cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 15 Disclosure statement no potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). About the authors Aaron Martin is associate Professor of teaching in the irvin D. Reid honors college at Wayne state University. in addition to teaching the honors sequence of foundational courses, he created and leads an interdisciplinary research program where he and his student co-authors research for scholarly publication. Amal Shukr, a member of the irvin D. Reid honors college, has since graduated from Wayne state University. ORCID aaron Martin http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-6307 Data availability statement the authors have used no data to make available. References “about the times’ editorial Board.” Los Angeles Times, los angeles times, 19 Oct. 2015. aguilar, l. (2021). north end Planning study Unveils Detroiters’ angst over gentrification. BridgeDetroit, november 16, http://www.bridgedetroit.com/north-end-planning-study-unveils-detroiters-angst-over-gentrification/. anderson, s., & goode, a. (2015). it’s like somebody else’s Pub: Understanding conflict in third place. Advances in Consumer Research, 43, 1. Bonner, K., & Katz, B. struggling cities should take notes on Detroit’s Revival. World economic Forum. Retrieved June 22, 2023, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/06/struggling-cities-should-look-to-detroit-for-lessons-on-revival/. Bontje, M., & Musterd, s. (2009). creative industries, creative class and competitiveness: expert opinions critically appraised. Geoforum, 40(5), 843–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.07.001 Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. stanford University Press. Botz-Bornstein, t. (2018). What does it mean to be cool? april 23, 2010. https://philosophynow.org/issues/80/What_ Does_it_Mean_to_Be_cool. Bridge, g. (2020). appreciating the situation: Dewey’s pragmatism and its implications for the spatialisation of social science. in R. lake & J. Wills (eds.), The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry (pp. 69–85). Manchester University Press. cabras, i., & Mount, M. P. (2017). how third places foster and shape community cohesion, economic development and social capital: the case of pubs in rural ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrurstud.2017.07.013 cassimy, e. (2020). ‘hood closed to gentrifiers’ street sign gains popularity in detroit neighborhood. WDiV, november 18. https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2020/11/18/hood-closed-to-gentrifiers-street-sign-gains-popularity-indetroit-neighborhood/. chappell, D. l. (1998). Religious ideas of the segregationists. Journal of American Studies, 32(2), 237–262. https://doi. org/10.1017/s002187589800588X chinn, c. (2015, January 26). Why the Fox and grapes pub in Digbeth must be saved. https://www.birminghammail. co.uk/news/nostalgia/fox-grapes-pub-must-saved-8459422. city of Detroit. (2023). construction begins on ‘the Beauton,’ a new $7.3M mixed-use affordable housing project in north end neighborhood. July 17. https://detroitmi.gov/news/construction-begins-beauton-new-73m-mixed-use-af fordable-housing-project-north-end-neighborhood. clanton, h. (2023). Detroit, Mi: a case study on taxing land instead of property. Bipartisan Policy center, December 6. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/detroit-mi-a-case-study-on-taxing-land-instead-of-property/. connolly, J. (2022). a community fights for its health while battling impending gentrification: Bayview-hunters Point, san Francisco. in i. anguelovski, and J. J. t. connolly (eds.), The Green City and Social Injustice: 21 Tales from North America and Europe. Routledge. crewe, l., & Beaverstock, J. (1998). Fashioning the city: cultures of consumption in contemporary urban spaces. Geoforum, 29, 295. Dewey, J. (1980). Theory of the Moral Life. 1st irvington ed., irvington Publishers. Dreher, c. (2005). the gay/hipster index. salon. Retrieved april 21, 2005, from https://www.salon.com/2005/04/21/ florida_32/. 16 a. MaRtin anD a. shUKR editor, eig. (2018). new study shows how recovery from the great recession transformed the geography of U.s. economic Well-Being. economic innovation group, October 15. https://eig.org/new-study-shows-how-recove ry-from-the-great-recession-transformed-the-geography-of-u-s-economic-well-being/. Florida, R. l. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books. Frank, t. (1997). The conquest of cool (pp. 1–9, 26–32). chicago. gentrification in l.a.: it’s cruel, and it’s inevitable. (2016). Los Angeles Times, los angeles times, 13 Oct. greater corktown Development corporation. (2018). [Democracy collaborative]. [13 april ]. https://community-wealth. org/content/greater-corktown-development-corporation. gutiérrez, g. (1997). Renewing the option for the poor. in Liberation theologies, postmodernity, and the Americas. D. B. Batstone (ed.), Routledge. hillier, B. (2008). space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801928073 houck, B. (2017). UFO factory forced to close after construction crews damage building. Retrieved august 2, 2017. https://detroit.eater.com/2017/8/2/16085966/ufo-factory-corktown-bar-closed-damaged-building-elton-parkconstruction https://vseverybody.com/pages/our-story. James, W. (1955). Pragmatism and four essays from the meaning of truth. New American Library. Jones, t. (2016). Gentrification could ‘spell death of Jewellery Quarter. Birmingham Post. Karnani, a. (2011). Fighting poverty together: Rethinking strategies for business, governments, and civil society to reduce poverty (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Kern, l. (2022). Gentrification is inevitable and other lies. Verso. Kim, g., newman, g., & Jiang, B. (2020). Urban regeneration: community engagement process for vacant land in declining cities. Cities, 102, 102730–102730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102730 King, M. l.Jr. (2018). Letter from Birmingham Jail. Penguin Modern. chicago. Krätke, s. (2010). creative cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: a critique of Richard Florida’s approach to Urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682427.2010.00939.x larsen, R. (2017). Detroit: the Most exciting city in america? Retrieved november 20, 2017, from https://www. nytimes.com/2017/11/20/travel/detroit-michigan-downtown.html. lee, M. s. (2017). Detroit Vs Everybody to add stores, expand line as Tommey Walker Jr. taps into spirit of city. crain’s Detroit. Macintyre, a. c. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (3rd ed.). University of notre Dame Press. Malachowski, a. (2010). Putnam and Rorty: Pragmatism without Reconciliation. in The New Pragmatism (pp. 83–98). Mcgill-Queen’s University Press. Morgan, g., & Ren, X. (2012). the creative underclass: culture, subculture, and urban renewal. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00606.x Murgaš, F. (2011). creative class, creative economy, and the wisdom society as a solution to their controversy. Creative and Knowledge Society, 1(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10212-011-0013-5 nietzsche, F. W. (2000). The birth of tragedy. Oxford University Press. norris, P. (2011). Making democratic-governance work: the consequences for prosperity aPsa 2011 annual Meeting Paper, hKs Working Paper no. RWP11-035 nosowitz, D. (2018). How Detroit vs. Everybody Conquered the World. Retrieved June 28 , 2018, from https://www. racked.com/2018/3/28/17144402/detroit-vs-everybody-tommey-walker? Painter-Morland, M. (2011). Voice as “Relational space”: agency beyond narcissism or the loss of self. Mosaic: a Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 44(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2011.a418767 Peck, J. (2005). struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x Pendlebury, M. (2004). individual autonomy and global democracy. Theoria, 51(103), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.3167/ 004058104782267222 Perkins,. (2017). UFO Factory is starting its rebuild, plans to reopen. https://www.metrotimes.com/table-and-bar/ archives/2017/10/23/ufo-factory-is-starting-its-rebuild-plans-to-reopen-after-construction-damage. Porter, e., & Barber, a. (2006). the meaning of place and state-led gentrification in Birmingham’s eastside. City, 10(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600736941 Pratt, a. (2008). creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, 90(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x Putnam, h. (1981). Reason, truth and history. cambridge University Press. Ratti, c. (2015). Will your city rival silicon valley? World economic Forum. December 4, https://www.weforum.org/ agenda/2015/12/will-your-city-rival-silicon-valley/. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. cambridge. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Penguin Books. Rorty, R. (2010). The Rorty Reader. christopher J. Voparil and Richard J. Bernstein, eds. Wiley. searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press. cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 17 sleeman, M. (2012). there’s no home like place? chapter 3 in going home: essays, articles, and stories in honour of the andersons, ed. Pete Myers. stieb, J. a. (2005). Rorty on realism and constructivism. Metaphilosophy, 36(3), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679973.2005.00369.x thompson, B. (2014). ‘Hipsterfication’ won’t save Detroit. Retrieved June 23, 2018, from https://michronicleonline. com/2014/03/12/hipsterfication-wont-save-detroit/. tiruneh, e. (2014). Regional economic development in italy: applying the creative class these to a test. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0126-3 Voith, R., & Wachter, s. (2014). the Return of america’s cities: economic rebound and the future of america’s Urban centers. PenniUR. august 12. https://penniur.upenn.edu/publications/the-return-of-americas-cities. Web link: https://vseverybody.com/pages/our-story. Wetherell, s. (2017). Richard Florida is sorry. Jacobin. august 19. https://jacobin.com/2017/08/new-urban-crisis-revie w-richard-florida.