Everyday urban peace: Experiences from a marginalised neighbourhood in Cali, Colombia

Article EPC: Politics and Space 2025, Vol. 43(7) 1391–1408 © The Author(s) 2025 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/23996544251328148 journals.sagepub.com/home/epc Everyday urban peace: Experiences from a marginalised neighbourhood in Cali, Colombia Melanie Lombard University of Sheffield, UK Jaime Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia Carlos Andr´ es Tobar-Tovar Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Colombia Abstract Urban violence is a characteristic of urban living in both conflict and non-conflict settings. Its experience is often highly uneven, with marginalised communities most acutely affected, meaning that residents and organisations often have long experience of addressing conflict and violence. However, these efforts are disconnected from formal conflict resolution processes, and remain poorly understood in terms of constructing peace. Drawing on debates from peace and conflict studies, human geography, and urban studies, this article proposes the concept of ‘everyday urban peace’as a framework for better understanding how marginalised urban communities respond to conflict and violence. The article applies this framework in the context of a self-built neighbourhood in Cali, Colombia, where poverty and violence intersect with racialised segregation. It explores local residents’experiences and perceptions of conflict, violence and peace, through a conjunctural methodological approach focusing on three key moments in ‘post-conflict’Colombia. We argue that ‘everyday urban peace’offers new analytical possibilities for better understanding community responses to conflict and violence, by reframing the significance of their everyday activities for peace while taking seriously both place and time in marginalised urban neighbourhoods. This has implications for peace policy and practice, visibilising community efforts in pursuit of broadening the spectrum of formal intervention for peace, particularly in urban settings which are often neglected in these processes. Keywords Conjuncture, everyday, marginalisation, peace, urban Corresponding author: Melanie Lombard, School of Geography and Planning, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S3 7ND, UK. Email: m.b.lombard@sheffield.ac.uk Introduction It is well-recognised that ‘[v]iolence …is increasingly a defining characteristic of urban living in both conflict and non-conflict settings’(Gupte and Elshafie, 2016). Latin American cities are acknowledged to be among the most violent in the world (Citizen Council on Public Safety and Criminal Justice, 2021). While the causes of urban violence are multiple and diverse, commonalities across the region include the existence of armed conflicts alongside social and economic inequalities and exclusion from political participation (Hern´ andez-Garcia and Salgado-Ramirez, 2022). The experience of urban violence and conflict is highly uneven: marginalised communities are often most affected, especially where there are multiple and overlapping forms of marginalisation and stigmatisation (Gledhill, 2015). Yet in neighbourhoods where the state response to violence is often characterised by its ‘absence’or involvement as a protagonist, residents and organisations have long experience of addressing conflict and violence. However, these efforts are often disconnected from formal conflict resolution processes (Jaramillo et al., 2023), and they remain poorly understood in terms of constructing peace. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid from diverse disciplines to the role of ordinary people in constructing peace. Everyday peace approaches from peace and conflict studies (PCS) examine micro-scale responses to conflict and violence (Mac Ginty, 2021). Meanwhile, from human geography, peace geographies focus on the everyday to explore the mutual relationship between peace and space (Williams, 2015). However, these diverse disciplinary approaches remain disconnected from each other, and lack an explicit focus on the urban. The recent ‘urban turn’in PCS (Ljungkvist and Jarstad, 2021) suggests that urban studies has much to offer research on urban conflict and peace. This article makes a key contribution to these debates, presenting a synthesised framework bringing together everyday approaches to urban peace from peace and conflict studies, human geography, and urban studies, to better understand marginalised urban communities’experiences of conflict, violence and peace. It applies this framework in the context of urban Colombia, where the 2016 peace agreement sought to end 50 years of conflict between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrilla organisation. Internationally lauded for its ‘territorial peace’approach, which aimed to redress uneven regional development as conflict cause and consequence (Diaz et al., 2021), its implementation was nevertheless undermined by bureaucratic delays and the 2018 election of President Duque. The apparent subversion of the agreement by Duque, whose campaign appealed to ‘no’voters in 2016’s referendum, 1 was a focus of the ‘National Strike’mass protest in 2021, which particularly affected Cali. Colombia’s third largest city, Cali has high indices of poverty and violence, concentrated in its most marginalised neighbourhoods housing a significant AfroColombian population. These neighbourhoods have felt the indirect effects of Colombia’s armed conflict, particularly from migration due to displacement and demobilisation, which interact with multiple social, economic and structural violences. The election of left-wing President Petro in 2022 suggested the electorate’s support for his promise to further expand peace negotiations with diverse armed actors; yet 2 years on, this ‘total peace’agenda is increasingly viewed as failing. This conjuncture suggests an opportune moment to study urban peace and conflict in Colombia, in a context where the actual and potential effects of these processes in cities remain underexplored, reflecting their lack of urban focus (Cairo et al., 2018). In this context, we explore how multiply marginalised urban communities experience and respond to violence and peace, through the application of an everyday urban peace framework. In what follows, we explore first how debates on everyday peace, conflict, and violence have unfolded in PCS, human geography, and urban studies, synthesising ‘everyday urban peace’as our analytical lens. To examine the historical context of Colombia’s peace process and specific outcomes in Cali, we apply a temporally sensitive methodology inspired by conjunctural urbanism’s attention to space and time at key historical moments, 1392 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7) zooming in to a specific neighbourhood to explore how national processes affect urban communities. Based on ongoing research in this neighbourhood, we unfold our analysis through three specific moments since the 2016 peace agreement –post-agreement uncertainty in 2018, postelection contestation in 2019, and the turbulence of the pandemic and subsequent National Strike in 2021 –arguing for attention to effects on urban spaces and communities, and their responses through localised peace initiatives. We conclude with a re-articulation of our concept ‘everyday urban peace’, which offers a new analytical framework for understanding, recognising and building on the agency of marginalised place-based communities along spatial and temporal dimensions. In this way, the framework contributes to debates on urban peace, conflict and violence from PCS, human geography, and urban studies, arguing for the need to build on community practices in support of constructing peace at the local scale. Everyday urban peace: Advancing a synthesised approach Local and everyday peace The local turn in peace and conflict studies (PCS) emerged in recent decades in response to the deficiencies of liberal peace, theorised by politics and international relations scholars and pursued by the United Nations in places like El Salvador and Mozambique via a ‘combination of peace, democracy and free markets’(Richmond, 2006: 292). Questioning whether peace was possible without addressing inequalities inherent in liberal market democracy, critics condemned the ideological and self-interested imposition of ‘Western’ideals such as marketisation and austerity in diverse contexts (Mac Ginty and Richmond, 2013: 774). The failings of liberal peace, evident in Bosnia and Afghanistan, prefaced the local turn in peacebuilding theory and practice, which emphasised bottom-up, context-specific processes and understandings of peace deriving from local groups’priorities and relationships. Drawing on Lederach’s (2014) and Galtung’s (1969) ideas on ‘peace from below’, the local turn aimed to improve governance and ownership of peace through strengthening local institutions and supporting communities’agency (Leonardsson and Rudd, 2015). Building on the local turn, peace and conflict studies’focus on ‘ordinary’contexts, exploring highly localised and often mundane processes, led to the conceptualisation of everyday peace. Drawing on sociological theories of prosaic individual and group practices (e.g. De Certeau, 1984; Lefebvre, 1974), everyday peace explores agency among peacebuilding’s target populations, who enact sociality, reciprocity, and solidarity through small-scale interactions (Mac Ginty, 2021). Everyday peace examines ‘ordinary’people’s agency, highlighting individual sense-making processes which resist dominant narratives of conflict and division. Nevertheless, its framing in contrast to international peacebuilding risks essentialising the local, reifying binaries, and prioritising cultural factors over ‘historical relations of domination’including class (Iñiguez de Heredia, 2018: 343) and race (Courteyn, 2018). Additionally, the conceptually vague local turn fails to define ‘[w]ho, what and where is the local’(Ljungkvist and Jarstad, 2021: 2209), limiting its practical application. Parallel conceptualisations of everyday peace from human geography potentially address these critiques. Arising from critical appraisals of political geography debates on war, conflict, and violence after 09/11 (e.g. Graham, 2009;Gregory and Pred, 2007), and drawing on feminist geopolitics, peace geographies emphasise the spatial and temporal nature of peace (Koopman, 2011; McConnell et al., 2014;Williams, 2015). This suggests that ‘war and peace are manifestations of the intertwined construction of geographies and politics …[they are] relational, place-specific processes’, which are entangled rather than separate (Flint and Dempsey, 2023: 5). Building on wellestablished conceptions of space as relational (Massey, 2005), these debates explore the diverse Lombard et al. 1393 agencies, spaces, and scales of peace (Flint and Dempsey, 2023), arguing that ‘[p]eace(s) are always shaped in and through the spaces and times through which they are made’(Koopman, 2011: 194; see also Koopman, 2023). Peace geographies conceptualise everyday peace as ‘a fragile and contingent process that is constituted through everyday relations and embodiments, which are also inextricably linked to geographical processes’(McConnell et al., 2014: 18). The focus on space and place is underpinned by a commitment to ‘actually understanding what peace looks like from a subaltern perspective’ (Williams, 2015: 18). Methodologically closer to anthropology than international relations, this suggests that ‘[d]etailed empirical scholarship is critical for understanding everyday social relations and the (re)production of power’(McConnell et al., 2014: 15). For example, Courteyn’s (2018: 751) research in San Jos´ e de Apartadó, Colombia, highlights how local communities understand peace as a refusal to participate in war, but also a form of ‘building community through collective work’, responding to basic needs of land, shelter, health and education. In other words, (everyday) peace is a process, ‘a socio-spatial relation that is always made and made again’(Agnew, 2009 in Koopman, 2023: 178), although it may not always be equally distributed, and may (re)produce unequal power relations (Williams, 2015). The parallels between conceptions of everyday peace from peace and conflict studies, and geographical debates, make the lack of interface between them all the more curious. Local turn scholars have focused on peace and conflict dynamics rather than theorising spatialities of peace, while peace geographies have maintained a narrow focus on critiquing political geography (Macaspac and Moore, 2023). Nevertheless, both disciplines emphasise the agency of ‘ordinary people’in constructing peace (beyond state or international agencies), and are interested in ‘the kinds of quotidian work that ordinary people do in making peace amid ongoing physical, structural, or symbolic violence’(Macaspac and Moore, 2023: 42). Given the potential for closer integration of these perspectives, we propose a reconceptualisation of everyday peace which explicitly includes an urban dimension. ‘Everyday urban peace’emphasises the city as locus of conflict and peace, thus bringing together the different scalar focuses of these approaches, while also taking seriously the temporal dimension of the everyday, in order to better analyse urban violence and peace. Everyday urban peace: An emerging concept While urban studies has long engaged with questions of conflict and violence in cities, only recently has peace and conflict studies turned to the urban. Recent PCS debates argue that the city is a rational entry point for policy and peace intervention, given the specificities of urban environments as conflict theatres (Ljungkvist and Jarstad, 2021). This implies, firstly, attention to how urban spatialities affect and are affected by peace processes. For example, urban propinquity (or proximity) offers a basis for collective mobilisation (Bj¨ orkdahl, 2013), evoking longstanding theorisations of cities as dense, heterogeneous, and anonymous (Simmel, 1903), and resonating with geographers’attention to place and scale. Secondly, the urban setting offers potential to understand both local and national territorial concerns, exploring ‘how the dynamics of urban space interact with traditional notions of state territoriality as well as national and international peacebuilding institutions and practices’(Ljungkvist and Jarstad, 2021: 2219). Thirdly, the city offers an identifiable and manageable unit of analysis, often supported by the availability of specific urban data. While the urban turn in PCS is welcome, in order to conceptualise everyday urban peace, we argue for deeper engagement with existing work on peace, conflict, and violence from urban scholars. Debates from urban geography focus on cities as sites of conflict and peace through migration, mobility, and change processes. Recalling propinquity, they emphasise encounter, the element of momentary and chance meeting with difference, for its ‘vital role in producing space and subjectivity’(Wilson and Darling, 2016: 11). Encounters are part of the nature of cities which bring 1394 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7) together strangers in otherness, a condition of living with difference which may contain possibilities and joy alongside fear and anxiety (Wilson and Darling, 2016:3–4). This highlights the politics of urban space, as the locus for political relations and terrain for political claim-making by diverse groups, and ‘the role of the city as an actor’(Darling and Bauder, 2019: 5). It also suggests understanding the city as part of ‘trans-scalar’dynamics, highlighting struggles both within and beyond state-led processes. In particular, a focus on micro-scale interactions reveals the multiple, ‘unstable and non-linear’ trajectories that contribute to ‘developing resilience and moving towards peace and assertion in a slow, gruelling fashion’(Bhide, 2020: 61). Based on residents’life histories in a marginalised neighbourhood in Mumbai, Bhide (2020: 59) shows how over nearly three decades, residents experienced ‘multiple and overlapping forms of violence, generated through intersections of forces that are global, national, societal and local’. Amid threats of violence from local criminal organisations, state-led evictions, deficient services, and drug addiction, residents nevertheless mobilise individually and collectively to improve conditions in their neighbourhood. Yet while some forms of violence (e.g. state-led) diminish, other (structural) forms persist or emerge, such as water shortages amid negotiations between the local mafia and state. But while ‘multiple violence continues to be a facet of everyday life’(Bhide, 2020:66–7), paying attention residents’actions over time underscores their agency in small-scale, localised moves towards peace, while attending to historical and political conditions. Temporally sensitive approaches may be particularly relevant in contexts where endemic and regular violence disrupts notions of agency (Walker, 2010). In place where (racialised) violence is so extreme as to represent a form of ‘social death’, individual agency to effect change is circumscribed (Alves, 2019: 656). In such contexts, the insidious effects of everyday violence may limit residents’ responses to coping strategies, including fear and silence. Das’s (2006: 1) seminal study of community imaginaries after the collective violence of India’s partition shows how such an event ‘attaches itself with its tentacles into everyday life and folds itself into the recesses of the ordinary’. The relationship between historically significant events and everyday life may not be discussed directly among communities, but hidden within prosaic processes and relationships; the researcher must, therefore, examine ‘the engagement with suffering and healing that ordinary life reveals’ (Das, 2006:14–5). Even within silences, an everyday lens may reveal residents’‘negotiation, creativity and endurance …which can be seen both as heroic and ordinary’(Walker, 2010: 13). In contexts of racialised geographies, this suggests the ordinariness of resistance alongside ‘black suffering’,asMcKittrick (2011) argues. We propose the concept of ‘everyday urban peace’, synthesising approaches from PCS and human geography via urban studies’concern for spatial and temporal experiences in violent cities. Building on conceptions of everyday peace which highlight agency through ordinary people’s peacebuilding activities, PCS’s more recent emphasis on the city as nexus for state and local territoriality aligns with urban geographers’focus on the city’s trans-scalar potential. As a ‘contested and ambivalent socio-spatial formation’, cities are sites of local, national, and international governance, but also mobilisations against these processes (Darling and Bauder, 2019: 5). Building on temporally sensitive approaches, we argue that ‘everyday urban peace’requires deeper understanding and visibilisation of prosaic experiences of conflict and violence over time, both within and beyond formal processes. More specifically, everyday urban peace suggests understanding community-based responses to urban violence in marginalised neighbourhoods by taking both place and time seriously, including an understanding of the historic conditions and trajectories of marginalisation and violence in a given neighbourhood. This requires interrogating (spatialised) community responses developed over many years, which may contest or support formal peace efforts, and respond to longstanding conditions of marginalisation and structural violence, as well as physical violence. Conjunctural urban analysis offers methodological potential for this. Lombard et al. 1395 A conjunctural approach to everyday urban peace in Cali Conjunctural urban analysis Drawing on a nearly decade-long 2 research engagement with residents and organisations of neighbourhoods in Aguablanca District, this paper applies a temporally sensitive methodological approach inspired by urban studies’renewed interest in conjunctural analysis. Early political economy approaches to conjunctural analysis highlighted contradictions deriving from the structural conditions of a specific historical moment, giving rise to political action (Koivisto and Lahtinen, 2012). Methodologically, conjunctural analysis suggests interrogating moments ‘during which the different social, political, economic and ideological contradictions that are at work in society come together to give it a specific and distinctive shape’(Hall and Massey, 2010: 57). Hart (2018) applies conjunctural analysis comparatively, to focus on spatialised power relations at international, national and regional scales. Similarly, Peck’s (2017:9–10) ‘conjunctural urbanism’ balances attention to contextual complexity at city level with national, international, or global scales, ‘moving in and out from immediate (or proximate) contexts to the (constitutive) contexts of those contexts’. In other words, conjunctural urban analysis is interested in exploring the relationship between the general and the particular across both space and time (Leitner and Sheppard, 2020). In post-agreement Colombia, conjunctural analysis supports interrogating categories such as ‘transition’,‘post-conflict’, and ‘development’, enquiring into ‘the material and political conditions of their production’(Grajales, 2021: 1055) alongside their meaning in localised urban settings (Alves, 2019). Increasing attention is being paid to Colombian communities’role in social and spatial reconstruction (Alba-Niño, 2024), particularly given the failed participatory aspirations of formal approaches like territorial peace (Lombard et al., 2021;Valencia et al., 2024) and urban transformation (Griffin and Young, 2023). While the present conjuncture represents years of negotiation between the national government and the FARC, long predating the most recent talks (which started in 2012 and concluded with the 2016 agreement), it is difficult to understand the urban implications of this moment without zooming in to the micro-scale. Here, we focus on a specific neighbourhood in Cali, Barrio El Prado, 3 a majority AfroColombian neighbourhood in the city’s Aguablanca District. In Cali, where racialised segregation compounds marginalisation to materially affect residents’experiences of conflict and peace, ‘particular dynamics of armed conflict and structural conditions of racial precarity blur the lines between the urban and the rural, peacetime and wartime’(Alves, 2019: 659). This derives from the poverty, unemployment, lack of access to health and education, and violence that characterises Afro-Colombian neighbourhoods, compounding the trauma of conflict-induced displacement. In other words, the peace process has made little difference to the violent conditions in which Cali’s marginalised residents live, and its significance is filtered through other dynamics. Here, we explore three key moments in the context of the neighbourhood, based on a series of collaborative research engagements, to present a spatialised and historicised account of Colombia’s current ‘postagreement’conjuncture. The first moment, which took place from September 2018 to March 2019 (funded by the University of Sheffield’s Max Batley fund, with the involvement of Hern´ andez-Garcia and Lombard), coincided with the early days of the peace agreement’s implementation, a period of great uncertainty. Small-scale, pilot research explored residents’views of the agreement via two focus group discussions and six semi-structured interviews, with a mix of longstanding and newer residents (including displaced and demobilised individuals). The focus group discussions involved 12 participants, nine male and three female, aged between 21 and 65. The second moment occurred in November 2019, a year into Ivan Duque’s presidency, with a mandate to undo many of the peace agreement’s provisions. A symposium was organised at the local Pontificia Universidad Javeriana 1396 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7) Cali (led by Tobar, supported by Lombard) with seven community leaders from Aguablanca, including two leaders from El Prado. This facilitated a discussion about conflict and violence, community opportunities and peacebuilding initiatives. The third moment was February 2021 to June 2022, following the COVID-19 pandemic whose effects were still unfolding in Colombia, including the subsequent National Strike or ‘social uprising’from April to July 2021. A series of indepth interviews were undertaken with five social leaders in Aguablanca, including two from El Prado (in a project funded by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali and led by Tobar, with the involvement of Hern´ andez-Garcia and Lombard). The interviews explored economic opportunities and challenges; political representation and participation; and socio-cultural aspects and struggles. Additional material came from conversations with leaders during the National Strike (Tobar et al., 2021). In all three research engagements, discussions were recorded and transcribed, facilitating thematic analysis by individual members of the research team, which was then discussed further among the whole team and revised as necessary. Documentary evidence relating to these moments also informed the analysis, including documentation relating to the peace process, municipal policies, pandemic reports, and media coverage. 4 For each moment, the analysis below explores the historical context; effects on the neighbourhood, particularly focusing on conflicts and their spatialised consequences; and the community’s response. To contextualise this, we briefly outline Colombia’s conflict history and introduce the setting of the neighbourhood in Cali. Colombia’s post-agreement conjuncture in Aguablanca District, Cali The Colombian civil conflict has influenced the country’s urbanisation (OECD, 2022). In the case of Cali, forced displacement and dispossession in rural areas have shaped the city. As departmental capital, Cali’s growth from the mid-twentieth century was due initially to economic migration, then conflict-induced displacement from the 1990s, particularly of Afro-Colombian communities from the Pacific region. Of Cali’s population of 2.2 million (Alcald´ ıa De Cali, 2021), it is calculated that nearly 30% is Afro-Colombian (DANE, 2022), many of whom live in Aguablanca District. Aguablanca is a large area of former marshland housing self-built neighbourhoods in the east of the city, with a population of 455,790 (DANE, 2018). Although many neighbourhoods have consolidated and formalised, the district remains stigmatised due to high levels of poverty and marginalisation. This racialised stigmatisation can be understood as part of a broader pattern of discrimination rooted in Colombia’s colonial era and slavery (Alves, 2021;Lombard et al., 2021). Stigmatisation is also seen in the attribution of Aguablanca’s high levels of violence to its informal characteristics and criminal activity (Herrera Giraldo et al., 2023). Such narratives obscure structural forces of violence, including securitisation and police brutality (Alves, 2021), in areas where residents are as likely to be victims as perpetrators. El Prado is representative of Aguablanca’s neighbourhoods in many respects. In the early 1980s, economic migrants and displaced communities from conflict-affected departments Chocó and Nariño appropriated formerly agricultural land owned by local elites. Despite eviction threats, the neighbourhood was constructed through self-help processes, and over time, the installation of water, sanitation, and electricity improved living conditions. By 1990 El Prado was formally recognised and most plots legalised. Yet the neighbourhood suffers periodically from extreme violence: in 2017, there were 18 homicides in an estimated population of 8,300, giving a homicide rate of 216 per 100,000. Perceptions of violence perpetuate El Prado’s stigmatisation as a place ‘with an abundance of delinquents or thieves who plague the neighbourhood and damage the image of the area’(Murillo and Urrea, 1999: 15). Yet residents have mobilised at different moments to confront these issues. In El Prado, local community-based organisations work actively to improve residents’ living conditions, particularly focusing on violence and its effects on (young) inhabitants. In this Lombard et al. 1397 context, we explore experiences of everyday urban peace in Colombia’s post-agreement conjuncture through a focus on the three moments identified above. Everyday urban conflict and peace in post-agreement Colombia Uncertainty around the implementation of the peace agreement in 2018 Following the 2016 agreement, opinion in Colombia appeared polarised between supporters of full and immediate implementation, and critics who feared the peace process would result in impunity for conflict actors, particularly FARC members seen as being ‘rewarded’with seats in the Colombian congress. This polarisation was reflected in the narrow ‘no’victory in the referendum on the agreement. Nevertheless, although the referendum result supposedly reflected the divisions between isolated rural (and small town) conflict-affected areas which voted ‘yes’, and the betterconnected urban centres –apparently less directly touched by the conflict –which voted ‘no’, the reality of voting patterns was more complex (Diaz et al., 2021). Indeed, in Cali the ‘yes’vote won by 54.27% to 45.72% (Registradur´ ıa Nacional del Estado Civil, 2023). While the rural locus of the civil conflict meant that its impact on cities like Cali has been largely indirect, residents’knowledge of conflict dynamics has been acquired via relatives or acquaintances in affected rural areas. Additionally, rural-urban migration by internally displaced people, and to a lesser extent demobilised excombatants, has been significant in neighbourhoods like El Prado, driving population growth at different times. Nevertheless, such migration dynamics often remain relatively invisible in urban settings, due to fears of stigmatisation or insecurity. The rural focus of the 2016 peace agreement (Cairo et al., 2018) bolstered this impression of cities largely unaffected by conflict. Research with residents of El Prado in 2018 reflected both hope and uncertainty about the consequences of the agreement in Colombia. Diverse voices from the focus group discussions, which included both longstanding and newer residents of mixed ages and genders (although predominantly male), give a sense of this: ‘I hope from the agreement that at least there will be equity in the territory of Colombia, the whole of our country …starting with education’. ‘I think that instead of calling it a peace agreement, for me it would be more like reconciliation, living in a reconciled country, and …many things would improve’. ‘[I hope that] many opportunities open up in the country, in the business and social sectors, in politics’. These focus group participants’recognition of the potential for educational, social, political, and economic change suggest acknowledgement of the agreement’s promise to diminish (if not entirely end) violence in conflict-affected areas. However, other residents in these discussions were more sceptical, suggesting that, ‘Nothing is going to change’, and that, ‘The new government will destroy the agreement’, revealing fears about slow implementation affecting conflict actors’reintegration. These diverging views, reflective of the neighbourhood’s internal heterogeneity, also show how moderate optimism relating to the agreement was tempered by uncertainty around the pace and effectiveness of implementation. Such scepticism about the process is underscored by the effects of ongoing violence in Aguablanca’s neighbourhoods, paradoxically linked to previous peace processes. In common with other neighbourhoods in Aguablanca, El Prado has a history of receiving internally displaced people; it has also previously received demobilised incomers, particularly following paramilitary demobilisation in 2003–06. This latter process was perceived by residents to have led to an increase in violence and social problems, due to the installation of ‘oficinas de cobro’ 5 in the neighbourhood, 1398 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7) and youth recruitment to criminal organisations. There was therefore anxiety that the 2016 agreement would lead to further such waves of migration, due to Cali’s status as regional capital, and its proximity to the conflict-affected Pacific region, as one focus group participant suggested: ‘For us in Cali, we are the centre of the Pacific, we are the capital and we receive all the displacement here’. Nevertheless, a longstanding female resident highlighted the neighbourhood’s readiness to welcome newcomers: ‘El Prado is a neighbourhood of colours, a neighbourhood of incomers …one way or another they arrive, looking for an opportunity in the city of Cali’. She linked the neighbourhood’s capacity to accommodate newcomers with the community’s organisational capacity: ‘We are organising some meetings, El Prado is very well organised, and this has shielded us in one sense …the neighbourhood welcomes newcomers one way or another, supporting them to feel safe’. She explicitly associated this organisational capacity with the history of community mobilisation in the neighbourhood: ‘One thing that has become entrenched in El Prado, from around 1996 roughly, is that community work became stronger …this offers newcomers something that doesn’t exist elsewhere, a sense of belonging to the territory as a community …this enables good relationships and good coexistence’. In this sense, the strength of relationships and coexistence (convivencia) as a response to (potential) conflict is related to the social and physical construction of the neighbourhood, similar to Courteyn’s (2018) suggestion that everyday peace is entangled with neighbourhood materialities. Specific examples of this can be found in programmes provided by community-based organisations. Activities organised by the Community Action Board (JAC) 6 supported by local organisations in the neighbourhood’s community centre, primary school and public spaces have centred on recreation (e.g. football games) and different campaigns on health, finance, and environmental issues, such as cleaning up local green spaces, explored further below. A focus group participant explained how the physical improvements in the neighbourhood had improved quality of life there: ‘This is the best neighbourhood in Aguablanca, this is one of the neighbourhoods with a local clinic, church, school …We have no reason to envy other neighbourhoods’. Faced with the indirect effects of Colombia’s civil conflict, some longstanding residents in El Prado emphasised a narrative of self-organisation and readiness to welcome incomers, based on the material and social construction of the neighbourhood through the efforts of its residents. However, others remained sceptical of the agreement’s potential to affect ongoing violence in the area. Nevertheless, in Colombia’s early post-agreement conjuncture, a narrative of peace as inclusion, linked to residents’agency in constructing their neighbourhood, was apparent. This does not diminish the need for better attention and resources from the municipality, to address the neighbourhood’s social, economic, and infrastructural problems, for which local organisations continue to lobby. Yet it does suggest a recognition that peace is built locally (or place-based), from the bottom up and on a daily basis, supporting the understanding of everyday urban peace as an ongoing and spatially embedded process linked to the material surroundings of a community. The consolidation of Duque’s government in 2019 The presidential election of Ivan Duque in June 2018 represented a victory for sceptics, who saw it as an opportunity to challenge the peace agreement. Following installation of Duque’s government in August 2018, research in late 2019 offered a snapshot of its first 18 months. Representing the Centro Democratico party, Duque positioned himself in opposition to the outgoing Partido de la Union por la Gente (Social Party of National Unity) headed by Santos, the architect of the peace agreement. Duque, whose campaign had questioned the peace agreement’s legitimacy, quickly set about challenging its implementation, for example, making repeated objections to the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), a key transitional justice mechanism. Despite its initial successes, Lombard et al. 1399 Alba-Niño M (2024) Communities as a Subject of Social Fabric Construction in the Colombian Catatumbo Region. MAGALI Bulletin of Latin American Research 43(1): 32–45. Alcald´ ıa de Cali (2021) Informe de gestión 2021. https://www.cali.gov.co/documentos/1166/informes-degestion-del-municipio/. ´ Alvarez-Rodr´ ıguez AA (2022) El Paro nacional del 2021 en Colombia: estallido social entre din´ amicas estructurales y de coyuntura. La relevancia de la acción pol´ ıtica y del di´ alogo en su desarrollo y transformación. Prospectiva, Revista de Trabajo Social e intervención social 33: 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25100/prts.v0i33.11864 Alves J (2019) “Esa paz blanca, esa paz de muerte”: peacetime, wartime, and black impossible chronos in postconflict Colombia. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 24(3): 653–671. Alves J (2021) Fatal blow: urbicidal geographies, pax colonial and black sovereignty in the Colombian city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 39(6): 1055–1072. Anciano F and Lombard M (2024) Hybridising governance for resilience in a time of crisis: learning from community-based organisations in Cape Town and Cali. International Development Planning Review 47: 41–63. DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2024.15. Auyero J and Berti M (2015) Harm’s Way: The Dynamics of Urban Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ballv´ e T (2013) Territories of life and death on a Colombian frontier. Antipode 45(1): 238–241. Bell V, Hern´ andez-Garcia J, Bernasconi O, et al. (2021) Archives of Violence: Case Studies from South America. London, UK: University of London. Bhide A (2020) Everyday violence and bottom-up peace building initiatives by the urban poor in Mumbai. International Development Planning Review 42(1): 57–71. Bj¨ orkdahl A (2013) Urban peacebuilding. Peacebuilding 1(2): 207–221. Cairo H, Oslender U, Piazzini Su´ arez CE, et al. (2018) ‘Territorial peace’: the emergence of a concept in Colombia’s peace negotiations. Geopolitics 23(2): 464–488. Citizen Council on Public Safety and Criminal Justice (2021) Bulletin 2021 Ranking the 50 most violent cities in the world. Available at: https://geoenlace.net/seguridadjusticiaypaz/webpage/archivos.php (accessed 12 May 2020). Courteyn C (2018) Peace geographies: expanding from modern-liberal peace to radical trans-relational peace. Progress in Human Geography 42(5): 741–758. DANE (2018) Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2018. Available at: https://www.dane.gov.co/index. php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018 (accessed 7 June 2023). DANE (2022) Visibilidad estad´ ıstica población negra, afrocolombiana, raizal y palenquera. Available at: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/grupos-etnicos/CIDH_poblaci%C3%B3n_narp. pdf (accessed 7 June 2023). Darling J and Bauder H (2019) Introduction –sanctuary cities and urban struggles: rescaling migration, citizenship, and rights. In: Darling J and Bauder H (eds) Sanctuary Cities and Urban Struggles: Rescaling Migration, Citizenship, and Rights. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1–22. Das V (2006) Life and Words, Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. De Certeau M (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. London, UK: University of California Press. Diaz J, Staples H, Kanai J, et al. (2021) Between pacification and dialogue: critical lessons from Colombia’s territorial peace. Geoforum 118: 106–116. Flint C and Dempsey K (2023) Introduction: making geographies of peace and conflict. In: Flint C and Dempsey K (eds) Making Geographies of Peace and Conflict. London, UK: Routledge, 1–11. Galtung J (1969) Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167–191. Gledhill J (2015) The New War on the Poor, the Production of Insecurity in Latin America. London, UK: Zed. Graham S (2009) Cities as battlespace: the new military urbanism. City 13(4): 383–402. 1406 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7) Grajales J (2021) Losing land in times of peace: post-war agrarian capitalism in Colombia and Cˆ ote d’Ivoire. Journal of Peasant Studies 48(5): 1054–1074. Gregory D and Pred A (eds) (2007) Violent Geographies, Fear, Terror, and Political Violence. London, UK: Routledge. Griffin A and Young A (2023) Violence against a backdrop of colours? Ethnographic insights into tensions between urban transformation and ongoing violence in marginalised neighbourhoods. EPC: Politics and Space 41: 1351–1373. DOI: 10.1177/23996544231184051. Gupte J and Elshafie H (2016) The dialectics of urban form and violence. IDS Bulletin 47(2): 77–88. Hall S and Massey D (2010) Interpreting the crisis. Soundings 44: 57–71. Hart G (2018) Relational comparison revisited: marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography 42: 371–394. Hern´ andez-Garcia J and Salgado-Ramirez I (2022) Conflict, violence and inequality in Latin American cities. In: Gonz´ alez-P´ erez J, Iraz´ abal C and Lois-Gonz´ alez R (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Urban Studies in Latin America and the Caribbean. London, UK: Routledge. Herrera Giraldo M, Gonz´ alez Ceballos A and Ochoa D´ ıaz H (2023) The spatial and economic relationship between labour informality and homicides in Cali, Colombia. Development Policy Review 41: e12709. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12709. Iñiguez de Heredia M (2018) The conspicuous absence of class and privilege in the study of resistance in peacebuilding contexts. International Peacekeeping 25(3): 325–348. Jaramillo J, Lopez M, Ruiz A, et al. (2023) Participating in Peace: Violence, Development and Dialogue in Colombia. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. Kirby J (2021) Colombia’s protests are a product of its post-peace-deal reality. Vox. Available online at: https:// www.vox.com/22518904/colombia-protests-cali-duque-police-brutality (accessed 7 June 2023). Koivisto J and Lahtinen M (2012) Historical-critical dictionary of marxism: ‘conjuncture’.Historical Materialism 20(1): 267–277. Koopman S (2011) Let’s take peace to pieces. Political Geography 30: 193–194. Koopman S (2023) The spatialities of nonviolent peace activism in the midst of war, from Colombia to Ukraine in Flint C and Dempsey K. In: Making Geographies of Peace and Conflict. London, UK: Routledge, 37–53. Lederach J (2014) The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. New York, NY: Good Books. Lefebvre H (1974 [1991]) The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell. Leitner H and Sheppard E (2020) Towards an epistemology for conjunctural inter-urban comparison. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13: 491–508. Leonardsson H and Rudd G (2015) The ‘local turn’in peacebuilding: a literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 36(5): 825–839. Ljungkvist K and Jarstad A (2021) Revisiting the local turn in peacebuilding –through the emerging urban approach. Third World Quarterly 42(10): 2209–2226. Lombard M, Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa J and Salgado-Ram´ ırez I (2021) Beyond displacement: territorialization in the port city of Buenaventura, Colombia. Territory, Politics, Governance 11: 1324–1343. DOI: 10.1080/ 21622671.2021.1908160. Mac Ginty R (2021) Everyday Peace: How So-Called Ordinary People Can Disrupt Violent Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford Scholarship Online. Mac Ginty R and Richmond O (2013) The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly 34(5): 763–783. Macaspac N and Moore A (2023) Geographies of peace. In: Flint C and Dempsey K (eds) Making Geographies of Peace and Conflict. London, UK: Routledge, 37–53. Massey D (2005) For Space. London: Sage. McConnell F, Megoran N and Williams P (2014) Geographies of peace, new approaches to boundaries. In: Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution. London, UK: IB Tauris. Lombard et al. 1407 McKittrick K (2011) On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography 12(8): 947–963. Murillo F and Urrea F (1999) Din´ amica del poblamiento y algunas caracter´ ısticas de los asentamientos populares con población afrocolombiana en el oriente de Cali. Available at: https://bibliotecavirtual. clacso.org.ar/Colombia/cidse-univalle/20121113125431/art4.pdf (accessed 7 June 2023). OECD (2022) National urban policy review of Colombia. Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/ publications/national-urban-policy-review-of-colombia-9ca1caae-en.htm (accessed 7 June 2023). Pardo D (2021) Cali is paralysed. BBC News, Available online at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latinamerica-57100977 (accessed 7 June 2023). Peck J (2017) Transatlantic city, part 1: conjunctural urbanism. Urban Studies 54(1): 4–30. Registradur´ ıa Nacional del Estado Civil (2023) Informe de rendición de cuentas. https://www.registraduria. gov.co/Informe-2023.html. Richmond O (2006) The problem of peace: understanding the ‘liberal peace’.Conflict, Security and Development 6(3): 291–314. Simmel G (1903 [1971]) The metropolis and mental life. In Levine (ed.) Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11–19. Tobar C, Vargas S and Lombard M (2021) Urban protests in Colombia. SIID blog, 29 June. https://siid-blog. sites.sheffield.ac.uk/blog/urban-protests-in-colombia-what-are-they-about-and-how-have-cities-been-a. Valencia I, Castaño C and Silva-Ojeda DA (2024) Peasant agency and local orders in post-agreement Colombian marginalised regions. Bulletin of Latin American Research 43(1): 6–17. Walker R (2010) Violence, the everyday and the question of the ordinary. Contemporary South Asia 18(1): 9–24. Williams P (2015) Everyday Peace? Politics, Citizenship and Muslim Lives in India. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Wilson H and Darling J (2016) The possibilities of encounter. In: Darling J and Wilson H (eds) Encountering the City, Urban Encounters from Accra to New York. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 1–24. Melanie Lombard is Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography and Planning, University of Sheffield, UK. Her research explores how people make cities, particularly in conditions of urban crisis and informality, using qualitative and storytelling methodologies. She has undertaken research in cities in Latin America, Europe and Africa. In 2024, her book ‘Urban Informality’was published by Bristol University Press (with Philipp Horn). Jaime Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıais Professor at the Department of Aesthetics, in the School of Architecture and Design at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, in Bogot´ a, Colombia. He has expertise in studying social, violence and ecological conflicts, public space and housing in informal settlements, often in partnership with local communities; and leadership experience in international transdisciplinary research projects on co-producing urban NBS; on inclusive health, wellbeing and nature in cities; and on conflict and peace studies in Latin America. Carlos Andr´ es Tobar-Tovar is Associate Professor in the Department of Communication and Language at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Colombia. His research focuses on the study of vulnerability in urban and rural contexts in the department of Valle del Cauca, using collaborative methodologies for the narration of contested coexistence. He has developed research processes in cities in South Africa and Brazil. 1408 EPC: Politics and Space 43(7)