Analysing consumer adoption intentions of drone-enabled food delivery services: The moderating role of uncertainty avoidance
Abstract
EconStor is a publication server for scholarly economic literature, provided as a non-commercial public service by the ZBW.
Full text
Ahmad, Shakeel; Chaogai, Xue; Shah, Sayed Kifayat; Popp, József; Acevedo-Duque, Angel Article Analysing consumer adoption intentions of drone-enabled food delivery services: The moderating role of uncertainty avoidance Amfiteatru Economic Provided in Cooperation with: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Suggested Citation: Ahmad, Shakeel; Chaogai, Xue; Shah, Sayed Kifayat; Popp, József; AcevedoDuque, Angel (2025) : Analysing consumer adoption intentions of drone-enabled food delivery services: The moderating role of uncertainty avoidance, Amfiteatru Economic, ISSN 2247-9104, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Vol. 27, Iss. 69, pp. 606-624, https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2025/69/606 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/319827 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 606 Amfiteatru Economic ANALYSING CONSUMER ADOPTION INTENTIONS OF DRONE-ENABLED FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES: THE MODERATING ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE Shakeel Ahmad1, Xue Chaogai2, Sayed Kifayat Shah3, József Popp4 and Angel Acevedo-Duque5 1)2)Zhengzhou University, Henan, China 3)Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China 4)John von Neumann University, Hungary and WSB University, Poland 6)Universidad Autonoma de Chile, Public Policy Observatory, Santiago, Chile Please cite this article as: Ahmad, S., Chaogai, X., Shah, S.K., Popp, J. and Acevedo-Duque, A., 2025. Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-Enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance. Amfiteatru Economic, 27(69), pp. 606-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2025/69/606 Article History Received: 19 December 2024 Revised: 15 February 2025 Accepted: 17 March 2025s Abstract While drone-enabled food delivery continues to gain prominence, a notable research gap exists in comprehending the impact of real-life psychological challenges — specifically autonomy, competence, and relatedness — on consumer adoption intention in various cultural contexts. This study explores the identified research gap by analysing these challenges through the self-determination theory lens, employing partial least squares structural equation modelling to evaluate survey responses from 423 participants in South Korea and China. The results of our study revealed that the autonomy problem has no significant effect, while the competency problem has a significant positive impact on adoption intentions for drone-enabled food delivery services in both South Korea and China. The effect of relatedness was positive and significant in China, but negative and significant in the South Korean context. These data also demonstrated a moderating impact of cultural dimension (uncertainty avoidance) on a relationship between these factors and adoption intention, demonstrating how culture impacts consumer adoption behaviour. Our results in this research are one of the first to contextualise basic issues by filling gaps in the current literature and offering valuable insights for food service businesses. Our study’s results will also guide the formation of effective drone-enabled food delivery systems in diverse societies by supporting businesses in tailoring their methods to match consumer behaviours. Keywords: drone-enabled food delivery, uncertainty avoidance, autonomy, competence, relatedness JEL Classification: O33, M31, L66, L1, D81, C83 Corresponding author, Xue Chaogai – e-mail: [email protected] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s).
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 607 Introduction A drone is a flying vehicle capable of independent operation using sensors and computers (Hwang et al., 2021; Nunkoo et al., 2024). The drone manufacturing and services industry is valued at over $528 million and is projected to rise significantly with a compound annual growth rate of 9.49% from 2024 to 2029 (Nunkoo et al., 2024). Nowadays, it has gained interest in its use for delivery in several industries, namely agriculture, entertainment, shopping, and public services (Nunkoo et al., 2024). Accordingly, drone-enabled food delivery (DEFD) services have appeared as a revolutionary force shaping and shifting the economic possibilities and dynamics of the delivery services business (Shahzad et al., 2024). According to Nunkoo et al. (2024), DEFD services offer the benefits of faster delivery and the ability to reach any location. For this reason, many countries are taking the bull by the horns to initiate and set up DEFD services to declare themselves as leaders in this new business model to satisfy consumer demands (Hwang et al., 2021). For example, China began to lead the DEFD business model when Jingdong JD (a major e-commerce platform) first started such services to deliver 5 to 30 kilograms of food packages up to 300 km in 2017 (Choe et al., 2021). Similarly, Meituan, another food delivery platform in China, began operations in 2021 using DEFD services that currently serve over ten thousand customers in Guangdong province (Shahzad et al., 2024). In the same way, the South Korean government also wants to increase the drone market to about $70.4 million, which is now projected to grasp $4.4 billion by 2026 (Hwang et al., 2019). For the first time in 2020, South Korea began a test flight of a 3 km DEFD service in Sejong City to respond to the growing demand for efficient delivery services (Fly Dragon Drone Tech, 2024). First time, South Korea increased the financing for drone testing and training from US $1.5 million in 2017 to US $3.7 million in 2018, aiming to elevate the capacity and workforce of drone-related personnel to 164.000 by 2026 (Hwang et al., 2019). A research by Hwang et al. (2019) indicates that over 1.500 individuals get injuries and approximately 30 individuals die each year in food delivery incidents, with over half of the fatalities occurring among those under 29 years of age. DEFDs provide an alternative approach that improves services by mitigating losses and reducing operational expenses (Shahzad et al., 2024). However, in the context of DEFD services, there remains a paucity of research aimed at exploring the issues and risks that affect consumer intent and behaviour (Shankar et al., 2021). For instance, according to the self-determination theory (SDT), the influence and satisfaction of three fundamental psychological needs – autonomy (ATP), competence (CTP), and relatedness (RTP) (Deci and Ryan, 1985) – have yet to be explored. The absence of these prerequisites might give rise to substantial psychological distress, dissatisfaction, and diminished overall pleasure (Allen and Anderson, 2018). Pal and Arpnikanondt (2024) also pointed out that unsatisfactory ATP induces mental tiredness stemming from a perceived loss of control, while insufficient CTP and RTP diminish customer trust and intensify emotions of social isolation. Furthermore, researchers also highlight the inevitability of evaluating consumer intentions and acceptance in different geographical regions to obtain an improved understanding of cultural differences in consumer behaviour (Hwang et al., 2021). These beneficial acumens will help in inducing the design and execution of DEFD services to address consumer worries and broader acceptance. To address these gaps, this research seeks to expand our understanding of the influence of ATP, CTP, RTP related factors on consumer adoption intention (CAI), as well as the impact
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 608 Amfiteatru Economic of a cultural dimension named uncertainty avoidance (UNA) within the context of DEFD services. Bridging these gaps will significantly improve the literature by incorporating consumer behaviour theories in DEFD services and will also give valuable information to food delivery industry specialists, allowing for a better understanding of consumer concerns and attitudes towards DEFD services. Knowing the consumer’s psychological perspectives in the DEFD context will further help service providers create user-friendly and emotionally engaging services that can increase trust and satisfaction. Furthermore, this study is organised in the following style. The second part summarises the theoretical background and proposes hypotheses. Similarly, the third section describes the study methodology and results. The results discussion and implications are provided in the fourth section, while the final section provides conclusions, limitations, and opportunities for further study. 1. Theoretical background and hypotheses development 1.1. Theoretical background The advantages of employing DEFD and other cutting-edge technologies can be analysed from multiple perspectives. On the one hand, these innovations will eliminate hazardous occupations, allowing people to be free from physically demanding, monotonous, routine and tedious tasks (Shahzad et al., 2024). Recent advancements in robotics and drone technologies hold the promise of enhancing workplace inclusivity and safety (Kwanya, 2023; Lukić Nikolić, 2024). Therefore, these autonomous self-services are considered more reliant than conventional services. On the other side, these innovative technologies foster feelings of isolation and loneliness by reducing human involvement in legitimate social interaction (Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024; Lukić Nikolić, 2024). Therefore, empirical studies, such as those by Lin et al. (2020), Pal and Arpnikanondt (2024), Zhu et al. (2024), and Hong and Ahn (2023), illustrate the extensive application and significance of the psychological dimensions of SDT across many technological contexts. The fulfilment of these needs can enhance satisfaction, engagement, and motivation (Yuan et al., 2024b). For this reason, our empirical research integrates self-determination theory (SDT), providing a detailed framework for interpreting consumer psychology and behaviour by defining realworld issues into autonomy (ATP), competence (CTP), and relatedness (RTP) (Deci and Ryan, 2013). ATP relates to an impulse for self-reliance and control, which may be compromised when consumers confront limited choices or complex procedures linked to technology or services (Guay, 2022). Similarly, an individual’s perceived technological resiliency and optimism in their competence and desire to use and trust technology may significantly influence their sense of CTP and RTP (Ahn and Back, 2019). All these problems reveal unresolved psychological demands that substantially affect individual well-being and satisfaction (Allen and Anderson, 2018). On the contrary, when these basic requirements are hindered, people’s confidence, ability to withstand setbacks, and perception are all negatively affected (Sherman and Cohen, 2006). Moreover, Hofstede’s uncertainty avoidance (UNA) highlights the extent to which individuals reject ambiguity and incertitude and their preference for a structured environment and clearly defined objectives (Hofstede, 1984). While all six of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions offer valuable insights into customer behaviour, prompted a more focused
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 609 examination of UNA within this study. Individuals who significantly overlook uncertainty frequently opt for established and reliable approaches. For instance, a culture highly prone to UNA can accentuate the perceived risks and intensify consumer distrust and opposition (Van et al., 2021; Escandon-Barbosa et al., 2021). On the other hand, people living in lower UNA cultural systems tend to be more open and flexible thereby counteracting an adverse impact on behalf of these psychological needs for acceptance. In comparison to other cultural dimensions, China and South Korea demonstrate distinct levels of uncertainty avoidance. Consequently, the degree of comfort individuals experience regarding the inherent risks and unpredictability of the technology will largely influence their willingness to adopt DEFD services. This highlighted the need to align tailored technology with nuanced cultural distinctions to address consumer mindsets and behaviours regarding emerging technologies effectively (Escandon-Barbosa et al., 2021). 1.2. Hypotheses development According to the Self-Determination Theory, real-world problems may be categorised into three types (Deci and Ryan, 1985). The initial kind of autonomy (ATP) related problem pertains to the degree to which persons may experience coercion to engage in certain actions with significantly restricted free choice (Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024). Increased ATP may diminish purchase and adoption intention by undermining trust and perceived convenience (Guay, 2022). Our study posits that individuals with lower anxiety levels are more likely to accept autonomous DEFD solutions due to their reduced anticipation of negative outcomes. This occurs due to their excessive concern and anticipation of disastrous outcomes (Hamilton, 1959). The introduction of DEFD, like any emerging technology, involves a level of uncertainty that encompasses aspects of operational reliability and adherence to regulatory standards. Research indicates that uncertainty typically triggers anxiety and results in apprehension (Gu et al., 2020). As a result, increasingly anxious customers are less inclined to utilise DEFD due to apprehensions regarding potential issues, including delivery errors, privacy infringements, or even accidents. We also believe that consumers demonstrate a higher prospect of engagement when DEFD service systems allow for straightforward changes to delivery parameters, thereby maintaining their sense of control. When consumers perceive a lack of control over the delivery process – whether regarding timing, specific dropoff locations, or the capacity to make post-order adjustments – they may experience discomfort with adopting and purchasing DEFD services. Accordingly, we hypothesise: H1. Autonomy problem positively influences consumer adoption intentions to use DEFD services. The second category of discontent arises from competence-related problems (CTP). An individual’s perception of CTP is realised upon achieving accomplishments, such as task completion, goal fulfilment, or triumph (Martela and Riekki, 2018). CTP denotes a sense of mastery and effectiveness in one’s endeavours. Regarding the issue of competence, we contend that anxiety will exacerbate the genuine frustrations experienced by individuals utilising DEFD services within a culture that prioritises uncertainty avoidance. In traditional food delivery systems, delivery personnel encounter challenges including traffic congestion, time constraints, and potential mistreatment by employers. These factors can result in errors, delays, and a deterioration in service quality. Over time, these issues can diminish the personal reputation of the delivery personnel and induce anxiety (Doby and Caplan, 1995). Furthermore, clients may encounter dissatisfaction stemming from variable service quality, delayed deliveries, or miscommunication, which can intensify their concerns.
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 610 Amfiteatru Economic In conventional food delivery methods, challenges such as traffic congestion, human error, and delivery bias can lead to inconsistent service quality. These challenges are a source of frustration and anxiety for both delivery personnel and customers, highlighting the need for a more reliable solution. A lack of fulfilment will lead to CTP issues, causing the individual to question their skills (Martela and Riekki, 2018; Hong and Ahn, 2023). Elevating the CTP problem may diminish confidence in the service, resulting in increased adoption intentions (Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024), however, the fulfilment of this problem will lead to the adoption of these services. Accordingly, we hypothesise: H2. The competency problem positively influences consumer adoption intentions to use DEFD services. The third type of frustration impacting DEFD uses is the issue of relatedness (RTP), which indicates that an individual perceives connections with others, experiences caring relationships, and feels a sense of belonging within a community (Henz, 2022; Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024). Furthermore, the aspect of RTP presents social advantages, which can serve as a significant source of intrinsic motivation (Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024). In the context of this study, consumers may express concerns that utilising drone delivery could create the impression of being impersonal or detached from conventional shopping methods. Additionally, there may be apprehensions regarding the potential disruption drones could cause within their neighbourhood environment. Establishing a socially acceptable perception of drone delivery – by portraying it as environmentally sustainable or community-focused – can mitigate this danger (Shahzad et al., 2024). Elevated RTP risks may repel socially concerned users, diminishing their propensity to utilise the service. Therefore, we hypothesise: H3. Relatedness problems positively influence consumer adoption intentions to use DEFD services. 1.3. Uncertainty avoidance as a moderator Recent cultural studies have examined pandemics, national culture, luxury brands, business, tourism, and sustainability in the context of innovations (Escandon-Barbosa et al., 2021). However, this research is the inaugural investigation focusing on Hofstede’s Uncertainty Avoidance (UNA) aspect as a moderator in analysing the influence of ATP, CTP, and RTP factors on the buying intention of DEFD services. Hofstede’s UNA aspects examine cultural responses to uncertainty as well as vulnerability (Merkin, 2006). This component is necessary for examining cross-cultural disparities since it elucidates how society reacts to various uncertainty (Wang, 2021). For example, countries with high UNA index, such as South Korea (85th), endeavour to mitigate uncertainty via the implementation of robust legal frameworks. These cultures adopt a careful approach to innovation, prioritising predictability, risk management, and reassurance while cultivating trust and confidence. Alternatively, societies characterised by low UNA, such as China, which is ranked 30, demonstrate a significant tolerance for ambiguity and risk. These cultures demonstrate a significant level of adaptability and a readiness to embrace innovation. In this type of society, individuals often exhibit an early adopter mentality and demonstrate the willingness to embrace the potential advantages of innovation, prioritising them over the associated risks. Enhanced emotional connections and social trust can help bridge psychological divides and facilitate adoption behaviour (Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024). According to our empirical research, the UNA component will turn challenges into opportunities, foster trust, and assist in raising DEFD
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 611 service confidence and satisfaction. Therefore, organisations can successfully address consumer concerns and increase adoption rates in different markets by customising strategies based on cultural environments. In response, we propose the following four hypotheses: H4a. Consumer uncertainty avoidance can positively moderate the relationship between the consumer autonomy problem and the adoption intention of DEFD services. H4b: Consumer uncertainty avoidance can adoption moderate the relationship between consumer competency and the adoption intention of DEFD services. H4c: Consumer uncertainty avoidance can positively moderate the relationship between the relatedness and the adoption intention of DEFD services. 2. Methodology This study utilised a quantitative survey method to investigate consumer adoption intentions regarding DEFD services in China and South Korea. Our focus was exclusively on organisations in Shenzhen and Sejong cities due to their significance as a centre for high-tech smart cities in China and South Korea (To et al., 2021; Um and Chung, 2021). All measuring items included in this study are derived from prior research such as (Litvin et al., 2004; Escandon-Barbosa et al., 2021; Pal and Arpnikanondt, 2024) and have been significantly changed to meet current study requirements. The three categories of real-world issues (autonomy problem, competence problem, and relatedness problem), uncertainty avoidance, and adoption intentions are assessed using a five-point Likert scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Given that we modified the syntax of the questions, we decided to check the content and face validity of the items before conducting the main survey. To determine content legitimacy, we talked to two experts with over six years of experience in management information systems and business analytics. Following the content validity assessment, we examined the instrument’s face validity with four PhD candidates specialising in information systems and user experience. They assessed each item based on overall readability, clarity, and comprehensibility, resulting in changes to the text of both items. Ultimately, we conducted a pilot test with a limited sample of 30 respondents (15 from China and 15 from South Korea) to assess the reliability of the items included in the questionnaire. All constructs achieved average variance explained (AVE) values over 0.5 and Cronbach’s alpha (α) values surpassing 0.7, demonstrating the appropriateness of the items for the current context (Shah et al., 2024). A total of 550 questionnaires were disseminated to the respondents. In the initial phase, we collected 373 responses from various groups. The sample size has been identified as requiring enhancement. Consequently, we solicited input from individuals who had yet to participate in the initial phase. The questionnaire included attention-check questions along with a modest monetary incentive. The follow-up enabled the collection of further responses, culminating in a total of 450 final responses. We thoroughly reviewed all the responses and removed those that required additional essential information or were incomplete and ultimately retained a final sample of 423 (204 South Korea, 219 China). Based on our proposed model of having five variables, the sample size adhered to the recommendations of Kline (2023) and Shah et al. (2025), who said that a minimum of 100-150 samples is requisite for conducting a
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 612 Amfiteatru Economic structural equation modelling (SEM) technique. The sample from South Korea included 204 respondents, comprising 66.34% male and 33.65% female participants. The range of ages indicated that 42.30% of individuals were aged 18-30, 29.80% were in the 31-40 age range, and 27.88% were between the ages of 41-55. In terms of educational attainment, 50.96% of the individuals had a bachelor’s degree, 29.80% had a master’s degree, and 19.23% completed primary education. Regarding the utilisation of DEFD services, 67.31% were nonusers, while 32.69% engaged with it in some capacity. Similarly, the sample from China included 219 respondents, primarily male (61.7%), with the majority aged 20-30 years (44.68%), followed by those aged 31-40 years (33.33%), and 41-55 years (21.98%). The data on education levels indicates that a significant majority possess a bachelor’s degree (64.53%), while 26.24% have attained a higher, and 9.21% have completed primary education. Furthermore, 38.29% were identified as service users, whereas 61.71% were classified as non-users. 3. Results analysis 3.1. Measurement model The proposed model underwent evaluation utilising the PLS-SEM technique. We began by performing screening and preliminary statistical tests, which included frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, common method bias assessment, and multicollinearity evaluation. The mean values (2.3-4.1, 2.7-4.2), standard deviation (0.77-1.1, 0.65-1.06), variance inflation factor (1.03-2.69, 1.14-2.05), of the variables demonstrate that there are no abnormalities present in our dataset. We analysed the items’ cross-outer loading (OL) to determine if each question demonstrated adequate variation in the variable. It is advisable that an item, whether singular or in combination, for a specific variable should achieve a minimum loading of 0.70 (Yuan et al., 2024a). We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis to assess the model’s validity and reliability and our findings in table no. 1 validate all established standards (Yuan et al., 2024a). The results demonstrate that all VIF values are below the threshold of VIF ≤ 3.3 which confirms the absence of such issues in the data (Hair and Alamer, 2022, Shah et al., 2023). The minimum standard for establishing convergent validity is 50% (Hair et al., 2017), and has been achieved in table no. 2. Moreover, discriminant validity signifies that the items exhibit distinct distinctions within the specific variable. Based on (Shah et al., 2025) study, values beyond 70% indicate pronounced and substantial volatility in the variable. The results indicate that all variables exhibit positive values, thereby affirming the attainment of discriminant validity. Composite reliability indicates the dependability of items and their accurate interpretations for the particular variable. HTMT has been introduced as a new method for evaluating discriminant validity in business and psychology (Yuan et al., 2024b). HTMT scores that fall below 0.90 confirm the model’s validity and indicate the achievement of discriminant validity. The results indicate that a sufficient level of HTMT has been achieved, as illustrated in table no. 3. 3.2. Structural model To test the hypotheses of the study, we performed a structural model in SmartPLS using a bootstrapping method of 5000 resampling, which provides initial support and an idea of the directional relationship among the variables (Hair et al., 2017). Looking at our results (as shown in Table no. 4 and figure no. 1), we found that, in countries with a low and high level of UNA such as South Korea and China, hypothesis 1 related to ATP was found insignificant
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 613 (β = 0.080; p > 0.614, β = -0.134; p > 0.110) respectively. Regarding hypothesis 2, in low and high UNA culture, the CTP has a positive and significant (β = 0.609; p < 0.00, β = 0.155; p < 0.00) impact on adoption intentions (CAI), while in terms of RTP in H3, this relationship is negatively significant (β = -0.245; p < 0.00) for high and insignificant (β = 0.015; p < 0.387) for low level of UNA culture. In terms of moderation (as shown in table no. 4 and figure no. 2), the H4a hypothesis was found insignificant (β = -0.035; p < 00.589), H4b was found positively significant (β = 0.125; p < 0.010) and H4c was found negatively significant (β = -0.141; p < 0.038) in South Korean context, while H4a (0.169; p < 0.005) was found positively significant, H4b (β = -0.147; p < 0.001) was found negatively significant and H4c was found insignificant (β = -0.050; p < 0.182) in China context. These results provide an interesting base for the discussions below: Table no. 1. VIF, mean, standard deviation, outer leadings values South Korea China Items VIF M SD OL VIF M SD OL ATP1: I feel freedom and a sense of choice when engaging in DEFD service. 1.915 2.878 0.908 0.802 1.719 2.982 1.018 0.755 ATP2: I feel stressed during DEFD service. 1.393 3.756 0.989 0.842 1.193 3.866 0.818 0.824 ATP3: DEFD service offers me with exciting options. 1.555 2.458 0.951 0.81 1.581 2.821 1.062 0.724 ATP4: There is little possibility for me to determine how to utilise the DEFD service. 1.428 2.374 0.968 0.796 1.727 2.750 1.039 0.719 CTP1: I think I am pretty good at DEFD service. 1.699 3.191 0.926 0.79 1.353 3.339 0.872 0.747 CTP2: In comparison to others, I did well at DEFD services. 1.242 4.145 0.773 0.712 1.208 4.232 0.654 0.818 CTP3: I felt competent after ordering at DEFD. 1.827 3.046 1.033 0.815 1.292 3.411 0.95 0.716 CTP4: I couldn’t do very well on DEFD service. 1.41 3.198 1.115 0.721 0 0 0 0 RTP1: I enjoy a variety of food options at DEFD. 1.428 3.702 0.826 0.68 1.658 3.875 0.825 0.796 RTP2: I feel close to restaurants through DEFD. 1.885 3.298 0.871 0.856 1.76 3.375 1.021 0.851 RTP3: My friends at DEFD provide me with assistance. 2.077 2.847 0.912 0.781 1.891 3.821 0.924 0.772 RTP4: I experience a significant sense of disconnection in the absence of DEFD service. 1.959 3.206 0.986 0.794 1.84 3.866 0.955 0.77 CAI1: I intend to adopt DEFD services. 1.032 3.672 1.08 0.899 2.501 3.964 0.918 0.864 CAI2: I will often use the DEFD service in the future. 1.655 3.756 0.989 0.945 1.904 4.232 0.818 0.916 CAI3: I plan to adopt using the DEFD service. 1.71 3.809 0.958 0.938 1.385 3.964 0.79 0.949 CAI4: I would like to use DEFD as much as possible. 1.721 4.145 0.773 0.756 1.941 2.821 0.654 0.814
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 620 Amfiteatru Economic significantly between developed and developing regions. Therefore, we suggest that future studies gather data from additional regions. Other cultural dimensions are also highlighted as significant moderators in accepting technology-mediated services. Future studies are recommended to consider demographic characteristics when explaining consumer behaviour. Secondly, our findings regarding consumer behaviour toward DEFD services may evolve. Consequently, future research should examine consumer behaviour regarding DEFD services that incorporate the latest innovations. Thirdly, we emphasise that while SDT offers a valuable paradigm for understanding intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, several factors beyond RTP and ATP influence the actual adoption of DEFD. The adoption process may be significantly affected by factors such as perceived risk, convenience, and other cultural values, hence diminishing the effect size of these particular SDT features. Moreover, consumers have yet to fully perceive their ability to satisfy the requirement for RTP (personal contact) or ATP (process control); therefore, future studies should consider these factors. Lastly, this study simultaneously assessed independent and dependent variables, which may result in common method bias. Therefore, to assess independent and dependent variables, it is advisable to gather data over a period of time. Funding and acknowledgements This work is supported by the Humanities and Social Science Research Projects of the Ministry of Education (No. 23YJC630090, 19YJA630096). References Abbasi, G.A., Rodriguez-López, M.E., Higueras-Castillo, E. and Liébana-Cabanillas, F., 2024. Drones in food delivery: an analysis of consumer values and perspectives. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, [e-journal] pp.1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2024.2407496. Ahn, J. and Back, K.-J., 2019. The role of autonomy, competence and relatedness: Applying self-determination theory to the integrated resort setting. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 31(1), pp.87-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2018-0088. Al-Okaily, M., Lutfi, A., Alsaad, A., Taamneh, A. and Alsyouf, A., 2020. The Determinants of Digital Payment Systems’ Acceptance under Cultural Orientation Differences: The Case of Uncertainty Avoidance. Technology in Society, [e-journal] 63, article no. 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101367. Allen, J.J. and Anderson, C.A., 2018. Satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in the real world and in video games predict internet gaming disorder scores and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, [e-journal] 84, pp.220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.034. Choe, J.Y. (Jacey), Kim, J.J. and Hwang, J., 2021. Perceived risks from drone food delivery services before and after COVID-19. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 33(4), pp.1276-1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-20200839.
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 621 Daskalopoulos, E.T. and Machek, O., 2024. Leveraging social capital for digital transformation: The role of ambidexterity and familial orientation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, [e-journal] 35(2), article no. 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2024.100512. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. 1985. Cognitive evaluation theory. Intrinsic Motivation and SelfDetermination in Human Behavior. [e-book] Boston, MA: Springer US. Available at: <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 > [Accessed 9 September 2025]. Doby, V.J. and Caplan, R.D., 1995. Organizational stress as threat to reputation: Effects on anxiety at work and at home. Academy of Management Journal, [e-journal] 38(4), pp.1105-1123. https://doi.org/10.2307/256622. Escandon-Barbosa, D., Salas-Paramo, J., Meneses-Franco, A.I. and GiraldoGonzalez, C., 2021. Adoption of new technologies in developing countries: The case of autonomous car between Vietnam and Colombia. Technology in Society, [e-journal] 66, article no. 101674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101674. Fly Dragon Drone Tech, 2024. South Korea tests drone food delivery service. [online] Available at: < http://www.dronefromchina.com/new/Korea-tests-drone-meal-deliveryservice.html#:~:text=In%20a%20test%20conducted%20in,department%20said%20in% 20a%20statement > [Accessed 24 October 2024]. Gu, Y., Gu, S., Lei, Y. and Li, H., 2020. From Uncertainty to Anxiety: How Uncertainty Fuels Anxiety in a Process Mediated by Intolerance of Uncertainty. Neural Plasticity, [e-journal] pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8866386. Guay, F., 2022. Applying Self-Determination Theory to Education: Regulations Types, Psychological Needs, and Autonomy Supporting Behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, [e-journal] 37(1), pp.75-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355. Hair, J. and Alamer, A., 2022. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, [e-journal] 1(3), article no. 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B. and Chong, A.Y.L., 2017. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, [e-journal] 117(3), pp.442-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130. Hamilton, M., 1959. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, [e-journal] 32(1), pp.50-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.20448341.1959.tb00467.x. Henz, P., 2022. The psychological impact of the Metaverse. Discover Psychology, [e-journal] 2(1), article no. 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-022-00061-3. Hofstede, G., 1984. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. s.l.: SAGE. Hong, E. and Ahn, J., 2023. The role of autonomy, competence and relatedness in motivation to use self-service technology (SST) among customers with difficulties in SST. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, [e-journal] 14(4), pp.630-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2022-0265.
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 622 Amfiteatru Economic Ahmad Husairi, M. and Rossi, P., 2024. Delegation of purchasing tasks to AI: The role of perceived choice and decision autonomy. Decision Support Systems, [e-journal] 179, article no. 114166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114166. Hwang, J. and Choe, J.Y., 2019. Exploring perceived risk in building successful drone food delivery services. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, [ejournal] 31(8), pp.3249-3269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2018-0558. Hwang, J., Choe, J.Y., Choi, Y.G. and Kim, J.J., 2021. A comparative study on the motivated consumer innovativeness of drone food delivery services before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, [e-journal] 38(4), pp.368-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2021.1921671. Hwang, J., Kim, H. and Kim, W., 2019. Investigating motivated consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, [online] 38, pp.102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.004. Khalil, A., Shankar, A., Bodhi, R., Behl, A. and Ferraris, A., 2024. Why Do People Resist Drone Food Delivery Services? An Innovation Resistance Theory Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [e-journal] 71, pp.13038-13048. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3202485. Kline, R.B., 2023. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Fifth edition. [e-book] New York: Guilford Press. Available at: <https://www.guilford.com/books/ Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/RexKline/9781462551910?srsltid=AfmBOoqV9wkKfB7DsOhQB78GKv7ha3zLOip5REd5bKx2wdh0jKeqAqF> [Accessed 10 May 2024]. Kwanya, T., 2023. Working with robots as colleagues: Kenyan perspectives of ethical concerns on possible integration of co-bots in workplaces. In: D.O. Eke, K. Wakunuma and S. Akintoye eds., 2023. Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.65-99. Lin, J., Guo, J., Turel, O. and Liu, S., 2020. Purchasing organic food with social commerce: An integrated food-technology consumption values perspective. International Journal of Information Management, [e-journal] 51, article no. 102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijinfomgt.2019.11.001. Litvin, S.W., Crotts, J.C. and Hefner, F.L., 2004. Cross‐cultural tourist behaviour: a replication and extension involving Hofstede’s uncertainty avoidance dimension. International Journal of Tourism Research, [e-journal] 6(1), pp.29-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.468. Lukić Nikolić, J., 2024. Students’ Perceptions of Workplace Robots in the Republic of Serbia. Management:Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, [e-journal] 29(2), pp.61-70. https://doi.org/10.7595/ management.fon.2024.0004. Martela, F. and Riekki, T.J.J., 2018. Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work. Frontiers in Psychology, [e-journal] 9, article no. 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157. Merkin, R.S., 2006. Uncertainty avoidance and facework: A test of the Hofstede model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, [e-journal] 30(2), pp.213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.001.
Food Market Shifts – Challenges for Food Chain Actors AE Vol. 27 • No. 69 • May 2025 623 Nam, J., Jung, Y. and Kim, J., 2024. Understandings of the AI business ecosystem in South Korea: AI startups’ perspective. Telecommunications Policy, [e-journal] 48(6), article no. 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102763. Nunkoo, R., Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B. and Rana, N.P., 2024. Drivers and inhibitors of consumers’ adoption of AI-driven drone food delivery services. International Journal of Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 123, article no. 103913. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhm.2024.103913. Pal, D. and Arpnikanondt, C., 2024. The sweet escape to metaverse: Exploring escapism, anxiety, and virtual place attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, [e-journal] 150, article no. 107998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107998. Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2023. Self-Determination Theory. In: F. Maggino ed., 2023. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.6229-6235. Shah, S.K., Tang, Z., Yuan, J., Popp, J. and Acevedo-Duque, Á., 2023. Complexity in the use of 5G technology in China: An exploration using fsQCA approach. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, [e-journal] 45(2), pp.2193-2207. https://doi.org/10.3233/ JIFS-223129. Shah, S.K., Yuan, J., Tajeddini, K., Gamage, T.C. and Liu, M., 2025. Exploring the nexus of institutional factors and regulatory focus in driving platform-based servitization and circular economy adoption. Technology in Society, [e-journal] 81, article no. 102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102854. Shah, S.K., Yuan, J., Wang, W. and Yuan, J., 2024. Adoption of Bionic Soft Robots in Organizations: The Role of Information Disclosure and Government Support. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [e-journal] 71, pp.14145-14154. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3436819. Shahzad, M.F., Yuan, J. and Shahzad, K., 2024. Elevating culinary skies: Unveiling hygiene motivations, environmental trust, and market performance in drone food delivery adoption in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [e-journal] 203, article no. 123375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123375. Shankar, V., Kalyanam, K., Setia, P., Golmohammadi, A., Tirunillai, S., Douglass, T., Hennessey, J., Bull, J.S. and Waddoups, R., 2021. How Technology is Changing Retail. Journal of Retailing, [e-journal] 97(1), pp.13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jretai.2020.10.006. Sherman, D.K. and Cohen, G.L., 2006. The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. [e-journal] 38, pp.183-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5. Sohn, S., 2024. Consumer perceived risk of using autonomous retail technology. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 171, article no. 114389. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2023.114389. To, W.-M., Lee, P.K.C. and Lau, A.K.W., 2021. Economic and Environmental Changes in Shenzhen—A Technology Hub in Southern China. Sustainability, [e-journal] 13(10), article no. 5545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105545. Um, T. and Chung, N., 2021. Does smart tourism technology matter? Lessons from three smart tourism cities in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, [e-journal] 26(4), pp.396-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1595691.
AE Analysing Consumer Adoption Intentions of Drone-enabled Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance 624 Amfiteatru Economic Van, H.-T., Gim, S., Lim, E. and Vo, T.-T.-T., 2021. Applying Hofstede’s culture theory in the comparison between Vietnam and Korean e-government adoption. In: J. Kim and R. Lee eds., 2021. Data science and digital transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.81-93. Wang, Y., 2021. Government policies, national culture and social distancing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence. Safety Science, [e-journal] 135, article no. 105138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105138. Wong, A., Wei, L. and Tjosvold, D., 2015. Business confidence in government regulators: Cooperative goals and confirmation of face in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, [e-journal] 26(3), pp.268-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-20130049. Xiao, B. and Benbasat, I., 2018. An empirical examination of the influence of biased personalized product recommendations on consumers’ decision making outcomes. Decision Support Systems, [e-journal] 110, pp.46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.dss.2018.03.005. Yuan, J., Shah, S.K., Ardito, L. and Jin, X., 2024a. User behaviour in sustainable technology: an exploration of endorsement strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, [e-journal], pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2024.2333783. Yuan, J., Shah, S.K., Popp, J. and Acevedo-Duque, A., 2024b. Understanding the forced adoption of an AI-based health code system in China. Amfiteatru Economic, [e-journal] 26(66), pp.550-567. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2024/66/550. Zeuge, A., 2020. The sweet escape – A research agenda on escapism in information systems research. [online] Available at: <https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/bitstream/ubsi/1634/5/ The_Sweet_Escape.pdf > [Accessed 12 March 2025]. Zhu, T., Zhang, L., Deng, H., Liu, C. and Liu, X., 2024. Consumer autonomy: A strategy to alleviate the self-serving bias in tourism value co-creation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, [e-journal] 60, pp.72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jhtm.2024.06.010.
