Beginning of the End of Cost Competitiveness in CEE Countries - Analysis of Dependence between Labor Costs and Internationalization of the Region

Wilinski, Witold Article Beginning of the End of Cost Competitiveness in CEE Countries - Analysis of Dependence between Labor Costs and Internationalization of the Region Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe Provided in Cooperation with: Institute of Economics, University of Łódź Suggested Citation: Wilinski, Witold (2012) : Beginning of the End of Cost Competitiveness in CEE Countries - Analysis of Dependence between Labor Costs and Internationalization of the Region, Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, ISSN 2082-6737, Łodz University Press, Łodz, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 43-59, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0003-0 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/259095 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 10.2478/v10103-012-0003-0 WITOLD WILIŃSKI* Beginning of the End of Cost Competitiveness in CEE Countries – Analysis of Dependence between Labor Costs and Internationalization of the Region Abstract The main purpose of this study is to verify whether previous low level of labor costs being one of competitive edges of CEE countries is a factor that may determine competitiveness of this region in the long run. In the study a regression analysis has been carried out on the sample of all EU countries in order to verify the dependence between internationalization degree measured by OFDI stock per capita on labor costs in manufacturing sector and on GNP per capita. The results of the regression analysis clearly show the occurrence of such dependence. This means that gradual increase in labor costs in CEE countries will result in not only reduced inflow of investments from developed countries to this region but also transfer of production to more cost competitive countries. In order to exemplify the above econometric model I carried out empirical analysis of the companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, identifying the companies for which efficiency-seeking is the main internationalization motive. The analysis of internationalization of 26 companies during the years 1990-2010 clearly shows that a significant part of investments is located outside the territory of Poland, in the countries with lower labor costs. This fact confirms that CEE countries will gradually become less and less attractive in terms of *Ph.D., World Economy Faculty in Warsaw School of Economics 44 Witold Wiliński costs not only for MNEs from developed countries but also for the companies originating from transition economies. 1. Introduction Over the last twenty years, CEE countries have been an important place from the perspective of FDI inflow from highly developed states. Through the accession to the EU and adoption of an institutional system functioning in the Western Europe, most CEE countries carried out quick and effective market transformation. Inflow of know-how together with investment of MNEs from the EU and USA, systematic growth of GDP per capita as well as the possibility of competing in common European market since 2004 enabled accelerated internationalization of companies originating from this region. Growth of GDP per capita and the resulting consistent growth of wealth of the societies lead to a permanent increase in costs of economic activities in this region, particularly in the countries which became EU members in 2004. One of the main purposes of this study is to verify whether the motives for internationalization of the Polish companies indicate that the CEE countries (in particular those which joined the EU in 2004) are gradually loosing their cost advantage over the Western Europe and are gradually moving production to the countries that are more competitive in terms of costs to improve their profitability. The paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the applied research method is described. In section 2, a description of the most important internationalization theories is presented. Section 3 concentrates on macroeconomic data of OFDI from CEEC. In section 4, discussion of the research results is presented. 2. Research methods In the study, two research methods have been applied. Firstly, a regression analysis has been carried out on the sample of all EU countries in order to verify the dependence between internationalization degree measured by OFDI stock per capita on labor costs in manufacturing sector and on GNP per capita. Secondly, the companies for which efficiency-seeking is the motive for internationalization have been identified on the basis of empirical data of the companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. From this group, the Beginning of the End of Cost… 45 companies which carried out down-market FDI locating their investment in the countries that are cost competitive compared to the Polish companies were selected. Gradual increase in labor costs correlated positively with the level of internationalization, with simultaneous identification by means of empirical verification of the companies transferring their business activity from Poland to the countries with lower labor costs would be a sufficient evidence – that cost competitiveness gradually ceases to be the main advantage of locating investments in CEE countries, particularly in Poland. 3. Theory of firm internationalization From the point of view of this study, the most important internationalization theories are those concerning transition economies. However, to make the picture complete, the evolution of the most important internationalization theories during the last fifty years is presented below. Evolution of the research on internationalization was a function of changing economic reality and more and more clear business globalization. One should remember, however, that the globalization was and is carried out with various intensity. The early works on internationalization (e.g. Vernon 1966; Kindleberger 1969; Hymer 1976; Caves 1971; Buckley and Casson 1976) explained to a large extent the decisions concerning FDI market imperfections. The theory which describes the mechanisms of making foreign investment in the broadest way at the meso level is John H. Dunning’s (1981; 1993; 1996) eclectic theory of international production, also known as the OLI Paradigm. The advantages defined in this theory: ownership advantage, location advantage and internationalization advantage have impact on the decisions of the companies relating to FDI. The eclectic theory is supplemented by investment development path, which shows the dependence between the economic development level and the investment position of the state (i.e. the relation between OFDI and IFDI). Goldstein (2009, p. 82) concluded that the IDP model had indeed proven very useful for evaluation of smaller European economies. An important addition to the above theories is the Uppsala model created by Johnson and Vahlne (1977), who paid attention to cyclical nature of internationalization, which is carried out gradually – sequentially. This is the consequence of a risk arising from a limited knowledge of the foreign market. According to the sequential internationalization model, companies expand their activities first on the markets of culturally close neighboring countries, and then, 46 Witold Wiliński using the knowledge gained, consider expansion into more distant markets, with larger cultural distance to their local market. Due to delayed expansion of MNEs from emerging countries, most literature concentrates on issues related to MNEs from highly developed states. The first most important studies concerning internationalization of businesses from emerging economies are those carried out by Wells (1983) and Lall (1983), and the most recent studies are those carried out by: Ramamurti (2004), Meyer (2004), Jansson (2007), Sauvant (2008), Goldstein (2009) and Narula (2010). From the point of view of narrowing this issue to CEEC only, important publications are those by (Meyer 2001; Goldstein 2009; Meyer et al. 2009; Narula 2010, Wilinski 2011). All previous publications relating to internationalization of companies from CEE can be divided into three main groups: Firstly, publications in which a group of states and businesses originating from them is analyzed (Svetlicic and Rojec 2003; Kalotay 2004; Rugraff 2010); secondly, those concentrating on one state only and on the businesses established in it (Jaklic and Svetlicic 2003; Rosati and Wilinski 2003; Kalotay 2010; Filippov 2010, Wilinski (2012); thirdly, the studies comparing BRIC states, in which strategies of internationalization of Russian companies are analyzed, compared to Brazilian, Indian and Chinese companies. 4. Background: OFDI from CEE countries Internationalization of companies from CEE is a relatively new issue. The internationalization started at the beginning of 1990s only, after the economic and political system changed in this part of Europe. In most CEE countries the change of the political system forced the change of the economic system. Generally, during the years 1990-2010 the CEE countries could be treated both as transition economies and emerging markets. At present, the level of economic growth in some of them indicates, however, that they can already be considered highly developed countries; in many cases the market transformation has also been completed. While analyzing internationalization of CEE enterprises, their specific macro- and microeconomic environment should be taken into consideration. First of all, (1) lack of significant experience in internationalization of business activities before 1990, (2) lack of sufficient capital accumulation by the companies, that could enable them to expand into foreign markets, (3) in case of private companies, short period of the business activities (less than 20 years), (4) Beginning of the End of Cost… 47 small domestic market before the accession to the EU and, therefore, difficulties in quick achieving the effect of scale on the local domestic market. The aforementioned factors significantly determined the moment when the CEE companies initiated internationalization. The analysis of macroeconomic data of the CEE countries shows that OFDI stock from this region amounts to only 2% of global OFDI stock (Unctad 2010). In his studies, Gorynia (2010) shows that net outward investment position (NOIP) in most of these countries is still negative, and the conclusion of his analysis of the Investment Development Path (IDP) is that the CEE states are still at stage 2. Note, however, that post-communist countries are characterized by diversified economic growth and diversified degree of internationalization. Generally, they can be divided into 4 groups: (1) EU member states, (2) EU candidate states, (3) Russia and (4) former Soviet Union countries. The last group (4) consists of the countries with the lowest degree of internationalization, and in most cases with the lowest GDP per capita and the lowest degree of progress in economic reforms (e.g. Belarus, Kyrgyzstan). Russia is classified into a separate category, mostly due to the internationalization model which is definitely different from the internationalization model of the EU member states and EU candidate states as well. It is also characteristic of Russia that it is the only post-communist country where OFDI stock is higher than IFDI stock. The specificity of the Russian internationalization model is caused by the following: firstly (1) the fact that in most cases the Russian companies investing abroad are the companies operating in fuel and power industry, (2) secondly, the fact that such companies operate in this industry in the domestic Russian market results in such companies having significant capital surplus and if they want to develop they have to invest both in the companies related to transmission infrastructure and in the companies of fuel and power industry in the neighboring countries. It is characteristic of the Russian internationalization model that GDP per capita in Russia is lower than average for the new EU member states, nevertheless Russia has been in recent years the only country where the overseas investments of local companies are higher than foreign investments in Russia. In turn, two first groups, i.e. the states which have already become EU members and the states which are going to join this organization are undoubtedly similar. A thesis can be made that the countries such as Croatia will certainly follow the same way of internationalization as neighboring Slovenia being already the EU member. The first group of the states, i.e. post-communist EU member states, consists in many cases, as I have already mentioned, of the states which are already completing their market transformation process and are, at the same 48 Witold Wiliński time, emerging economies. However, this group is not uniform due to diversified levels of internationalization of their economies, economic growth level (GDP per capita) and domestic market size. The leaders of internationalization among new EU member states are Slovenia and Estonia which had small domestic market, which forced the companies interested in achieving the effect of scale to expand relatively quickly into foreign market. In turn, the companies originating from Poland and operating in relatively large domestic market did not have sufficient motivation to expand quickly into external markets, therefore, in 1990s internationalization of the Polish companies was relatively low. Among new EU member states, we should also pay attention to two states that acceded the EU latest of all. There is no doubt that their internationalization is hindered by a low level of GDP per capita and a relatively large domestic market (larger, for example, than Slovenian and Estonian). 5. Results and discussion According to the internationalization theory, GNP is one of important determinants of OFDI stock per capita. It is not, hoverer, the only variable having significant influence on OFDI per capita. I present below the regression analysis of dependence between OFDI per capita and two variables: 1. Productivity cost of man-hour in manufacturing sector; 2. GNP per capita. To carry out the regression analysis I used data from 26 EU member states concerning: 1. Productivity costs of labor in industry, source: Eurostat, 2. GNP per capita published by World Bank, 3. OFDI from World Investment Report, however, to make the data comparable, the statistics published in EUR are converted into USD at average annual exchange rate for a given year. Single-equation regression model is defined as follows: y i = g (x i1 , x i2 ,…, x ik) + ε i i = (1,2,…..n) where: y i – i value of dependent variable, x ij – i value of independent variable; j=1,2,...k, ε i - i rest (error) of the model (difference between estimated and empirical values of y i ), Beginning of the End of Cost… 49 n – number of observations, k – number of explanatory variables. In this case, the function is linear, therefore: y i = α 0 + α 1 x i1 + α 2 x i2 + α k x ik + ε i dependent only on two explanatory variables y i = α 0 + α 1 x i1 + α 2 x i2 I used the following independent (explanatory) variables in the regression equation : • cost of labor in 26 EU countries in industry 1 ; • GNP per capita in 26 EU countries; and OFDI per capita as a dependent (being explained) variable and I obtained the following linear equation: y i = 1.312x 1 -0.335 x 2 - 0.684 For this linear equation, R 2 = 0.73 and adjusted R 2 = 0.65. Due to the fact that in this regression model there are two small samples with equal numbers, I compared absolute empirical value T-test with critical value of these statistics in order to verify whether explanatory variables are statistically relevant. For x i1 : T-test emp │1.75│> T-test crit -1.71 For x i2 : T-test emp │0.18│> T-test crit -1.71 The result confirms that both explanatory variables applied in the model are statistically relevant. The results of calculations for the entire regression model are presented in table 1. 1 Due to the specific nature of OFDI from Luxemburg I intentionally omitted statistics concerning that country. It is clear that a major part of investment, which is treated in international statistics as the investment originating from that country, actually originates from other countries which intentionally register their companies in Luxemburg. 50 Witold Wiliński Table 1. Regression analysis of OFDI per capita dereminants 1 labour hour cost GNP per capita R-square 0,69 Adj. R-square 0,66 No. of obs. 26 26 α0 0 1,31 -0,34 Stand. dev. - 0,47 0,49 tStat (emp.)* - 1,75 0,18 tStat (theor.)** - -1,71 -1,71 * and ** 5%. Source: own calculation. The resulting value R 2 = 0.73 with confirmed statistical relevance of explanatory variables shows that OFDI per capita for EU member states is dependent in 73% on labor productivity cost increase and GNP per capita level increase. Increase in labor costs by 1 USD results in increase in OFDI per capita by 1.31 cents (with unchanged level of GNP per capita). This means that increased labor costs in industry result in, undoubtedly, a higher value of OFDI per capita and thus higher internationalization of the businesses. Therefore, we can state that this is the factor stimulating the degree of internationalization of the EU member states. The analysis of the main motives for internationalization (assets seeking, resource seeking, market seeking and efficiency seeking) shows that the motive concerning productivity increase is most frequently related to locating production in the areas that are more competitive in terms of costs compared to the parent country. It is common knowledge that the companies motivated by market seeking search mainly for new markets, whereas those motivated by resource seeking concentrate on exploration of natural resources and the only fact that is of importance to them is whether there are natural resources in a given country rather than labor cost. In turn, assets seeking motives are related to searching for specific assets that may ensure long-term competitive edge to the investing company. Therefore, we may attempt to make a thesis that in the case of efficiency seeking, the companies seek to improve their economic effectiveness not only Beginning of the End of Cost… 57 the countries that are cost competitive compared to Poland. This fact confirms that cost competitiveness – being a short-term competitiveness – gradually ceases to be the most important determinant for conducting business activities by the companies in the CEE region. References Buckley P. J. and Casson M. (1976), The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Palgrave Macmillan Caves R. E. (1971), International Corporations: the Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment, ‘Economica’, Vol. 38, pp. 1-27 Dunning J. H. (1981), International Production and Multinational Enterprise, London: Palgrave Macmillan Dunning J. H. (1993), Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy. Reading, Mass., and Wokingham, England: Addison Wesley Dunning J. H. and Narula R. (1996), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments, London and New York: Routledge Dunning J.H. and Narula, R. (2002), The Investment Development Path revisited, [in]: J.H. Dunning, Theories and Paradigms of International Business Activity. The Selected Essays of John H. Dunning, Volume 1, Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Eurostat (2009), Data in focus – Population and social conditions, European Communities Filippov S. (2010), Russian Companies: the Rise of New Multinationals, ‘International Journal of Emerging Markets’ Vol. 5 no. 3/4 pp.307-332 Goldstein A. (2009), Multinational Companies from Emerging Economies: Composition, Conceptualization and Direction in the Global Economy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan Gorynia M., Nowak J. and Wolniak R. (2010), Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: The IDP trajectories of selected countries, ‘Poznan Universtity of economics review’, Vol. 10 no. 1 pp. 5-26 Hymer S. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: a Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Unpublished 1960 PhD thesis, Cambridge MA: MIT Press Jaklic A. and Svetlicic M. (2003), Enhanced Transition Trough Outward Internationalization, Outward FDI by Slovenian Firms. Aldershot: Ashgate Johanson J. and Vahlne J-E. (1977), The Internationalisation Process of the Firm: a Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’, Vol. 8 no. 1, pp. 23-32 58 Witold Wiliński Jansson H. (2007), International Business Strategy in Emergign Country Markets – The Institutional Network Approach, Norhampton: Edward Elgar. Kalotay K. and Sulstarova A. (2010), Modelling Russian Outward FDI, ‘Journal of International Management’. 16 (2010) 131–142 Kalotay K. (2004), The late riser TNC: Outward FDI from Central and Eastern Europe, Conference paper “New Europe 2020. Visions and Strategies for Wider Europe,” Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku Kindleberger Ch. (1969), American Business Abroad, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Lall S. (1983), The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, Chichester West Sussex and New York: Wiley Meyer K. (2001), Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe, Copenhagen Business School, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’ no. 32: 357-367 Meyer K. (2004), Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’ no. 35: 259-276 Meyer K., Estrin E., Bhaumik S., and Peng M.W. (2009), Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies, ‘Strategic Management Journal’, Volume 30, 61–80, January 2009 Narula R. (2010), Much Ado about Nothing or Sirens if a Brave New World? MNE Activity from Developing Countries and its Significance for Development, Paris: OECD Development Centre Ramamurti R. (2004), Developing countries and MNEs: extending and enriching the research agenda, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’ no. 35: 277–283 Ramamurti R. and Singh J.V. (2009), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. New York: Cambridge University Press Rosati D. and Wilinski W. (2003), Outward Foreign Direct Investments from Poland, [in]: Marian Svetlicic and Matija Rojec (Eds.), Facilitating Transition by Internationalization: Outward Direct Investment from Central European Economies in Transition, Aldershot: Ashgate, 175-204 Rugraff E. (2010), Strengths and Weaknesses of the Outward FDI Paths of the Central European Countries, ‘Post-Communist Economies’, no. 22: 1, 1 — 17 Runjuan L., Feils D. and Scholnick B. (2011), Why are different services outsourced to different countries?, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’, no. 42, 558-571 Sauvant K. (2008), The rise of Transnational Corporations from Emerging Markets, Northampton: Edward Elgar Svetlicic M. and Rojec M. Eds. (2003), Facilitating Transition by Internationalization: Outward Direct Investment from Central European Economies in Transition, Aldershot: Ashgate UNCTAD (2010), World Investment Report 2010, Investing in a Low-carbon Economy. New York and Geneva: United Nations Beginning of the End of Cost… 59 Vernon R. (1966), International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, ‘Quarterly Journal of Economics’, LXXX, 190–207 Wells L. T. (1983), Third World Multinationals, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Wiliński W. (2011), Internationalization of companies from former communist countries - OFDI from Central, East and South Europe and CIS countries, [in:] M. Marinov (ed), Internationalization of Emerging Economies and Firms, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 40-63 Wiliński W. (2012), Internationalization through the Warsaw Stock Exchange – an empirical analysis, ‘Post-Communist Economies’, 24(1), pp. 145-154 Witt M. and Lewin A.E. (2007), Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints, ‘Journal of International Business Studies’, no. 38: 579–594 Streszczenie POCZĄTEK KOŃCA KONKURENCYJNOŚCI KOSZTOWEJ PAŃSTW EUROPY ŚRODKOWEJ I WSCHODNIEJ – ANALIZA ZALEŻNOŚCI POMIĘDZY KOSZTAMI PRACY A INTERNACJONALIZACJĄ REGIONU Głównym celem artykułu jest weryfikacja, czy niski poziom kosztów pracy w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej będący do tej pory jednym z czynników wpływających na konkurencyjność tego regionu pozostanie nim w dłuższej perspektywie czasowej. W pracy na podstawie próby wszystkich państw UE zbadano zależność pomiędzy poziomem internacjonalizacji (stan odpływu BIZ per capita) a kosztami pracy w sektorze przedsiębiorstw i GNP per capita. Analiza regresji potwierdziła istnienie zależności pomiędzy wyżej wymienionymi czynnikami. Oznacza to, że stopniowy wzrost kosztów pracy w państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej prowadził będzie do stopniowego odpływu BIZ z tego regionu do państw bardziej konkurencyjnych kosztowo. W celu egzemplifikacji powyższych zależności w pracy dodatkowo przedstawiono analizę inwestycji zagranicznych polskich spółek notowanych na GPW, z których to 26 dokonało inwwestycji zagranicznych o wyraźnych motywach związanych z obniżeniem kosztów produkcji. Fakt ten potwierdza powolny spadek konkurencyjności kosztowej polskiej gospodarki, tym samym zmusza do poszukiwania nowych rozwiązań instytucjonalnych mogących utrzymać konkurencyjność polskiej gospodarki w długim okresie.