The impact of Green finance on the sustainability performance of the banking sector in Palestine: The moderating role of female presence

Abuatwan, Nariman Article The impact of Green finance on the sustainability performance of the banking sector in Palestine: The moderating role of female presence Economies Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel Suggested Citation: Abuatwan, Nariman (2023) : The impact of Green finance on the sustainability performance of the banking sector in Palestine: The moderating role of female presence, Economies, ISSN 2227-7099, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 11, Iss. 10, pp. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11100247 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/328872 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Citation: Abuatwan, Nariman. 2023. The Impact of Green Finance on the Sustainability Performance of the Banking Sector in Palestine: The Moderating Role of Female Presence. Economies 11: 247. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/economies11100247 Academic Editor: Angela Roman Received: 9 July 2023 Revised: 14 September 2023 Accepted: 22 September 2023 Published: 8 October 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). economies Article The Impact of Green Finance on the Sustainability Performance of the Banking Sector in Palestine: The Moderating Role of Female Presence Nariman Abuatwan Finance Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie, Ramallah P.O. Box 7, Palestine; [email protected] Abstract: This paper investigates the influence of “green finance” on the sustainability performance of banking institutions with a specific focus on the context of Palestine. A structured questionnaire was administered to gather data from a representative sample of 104 credit managers employed within Palestinian banking, utilizing descriptive statistics, structural equation modeling, and multiple regression analysis. This study examines the intricate interplay of the social, economic, and environmental facets of green financing and their impact on sustainability performance. Moreover, the study explores the potential moderating effect of female representation within financial institutions. The findings suggest that gender diversity and exclusivity significantly contribute to reinforcing the favorable association between green finance and sustainability performance. Integrating green finance into the strategic frameworks of financial institutions can yield environmental benefits and enhance both long-term and short-term sustainability performance, particularly in emerging economies such as Palestine. Ultimately, this study offers valuable insights into the evolution of green finance and its consequential effects on the sustainability performance of financial institutions in emerging countries. Keywords: green finance; long-term sustainability; short-term sustainability; banking sector; gender diversity 1. Introduction The contemporary global landscape is marked by pressing environmental challenges, among them climate change, ecological imbalances, and biodiversity loss, whose reverberations are felt across economies and political realms. These challenges, acknowledged as imminent threats to humanity’s long-term progress and survival, have garnered attention from experts and institutions (Corvalan and Reid 2005;Sutton et al. 2014). In response to this critical juncture, the ascent of green finance (GF) has proven indispensable. Green finance is a financial service that promotes sustainable growth and addresses climate change by funding environmentally sustainability projects (World Bank 2022). This dynamic financial approach not only offers crucial support for initiatives in clean technology, renewable energy, energy-efficient infrastructure, and transportation projects but also serves as a strategic instrument to mitigate the far-reaching impacts of these ecological concerns. Its fundamental objective is to foster harmonious and enduring growth that encompasses both economic and ecological advantages (Qi 2021). The adoption rate of Green Finance is growing at an exponential rate. However, the Global Green Finance report (Barry 2022) proposed that green finance, encompassing categories like green bonds, loans, venture capital (VC), Private Equity (PE), initial public offerings (IPOs), and acquisitions, surged beyond $720 billion. Notably, green bonds reached $522.7 billion in 2021, constituting over half of such financing. Green loans surpassed $135 billion, with strong demand propelling double-digit growth for select financial firms, while VC, PE, green tech acquisitions, and IPOs contributed around $63.2 billion. Economies 2023,11, 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11100247 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/economies Economies 2023,11, 247 2 of 21 Therefore, recent years have seen a noteworthy surge in the issuance of green bonds, reflecting an amplified interest in funding sustainable endeavors and combatting climate change (Zheng et al. 2021). The imperative of cultivating an effective green economy holds particular significance in less developed nations, serving as a catalyst for both sustainable development and economic advancement (Liu et al. 2020a;Akomea-Frimpong et al. 2022). In the pursuit of addressing challenges emanating from swift population growth, poverty alleviation, and wealth inequality reduction in the Middle East, green financial solutions emerge as transformative tools. Therefore, championing ecologically sound alternative energy projects that optimize resource usage, these solutions contribute to ameliorating these multifaceted issues (Zheng et al. 2021;World Population Review 2023). The dynamic interplay between green finance and sustainability in the banking sector serves as a driving force for environmental responsibility and financial resilience, simultaneously advancing sustainability across the industry (Akomea-Frimpong et al. 2022;Rahman et al. 2022;Syarifuddin 2023). A wealth of studies substantiates this notion. Moreover, a comprehensive exploration of the available literature reveals that green finance can bolster banks’ sustainability endeavors by incentivizing investment in environmentally friendly projects and sustainable development (Endrikat et al. 2021;Fashli et al. 2019;Khan et al. 2023,2022;Nechaev et al. 2017;Oyegunle and Weber 2015;Pasupuleti and Ayyagari 2023; Qi 2021;Rahman et al. 2022;Ringel and Mjekic 2023;Chen et al. 2018). Sustainable finance holds the potential for positive social and environmental impacts alongside financial gains (Caldecott et al. 2022). Furthermore, green financing correlates with enhanced bank profitability. In addition to the positive impact of sustainability, Ersoy et al. (2022) suggests that higher ESG scores are associated with improved sustainability performance (SP), and lower cost of capital for banks, emphasizing the significance of ESG ratings as an essential tool for progress. The embrace of sustainable practices leads to cost savings, improved brand reputation, and increased market access, making it appealing to investors to incorporate sustainability in their decisions. Financial institutions, notably through avenues like green bonds, play a pivotal role in driving sustainable development, although standardized reporting and impact measurement improvements are needed (Robins 2017). The existing literature on green finance in emerging economy banking institutions not only provides empirical insights but also reveals theoretical and practical gaps for future research exploration. In their study, Zheng and Siddik (2022) examine the effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the Green Study delves into how CSR and green finance impact environmental performance in developing economy banks. To bolster these findings, future research should extend to diverse emerging economies, involving various firms and countries. Moreover, Rahman et al. (2022) call for a comprehensive analysis of green finance’s role in fostering sustainable economic growth across both developed and developing nations. Furthermore, advocating for upcoming studies to scrutinize how employee demographics like age, sustainable education, and gender moderate perceptions of green financing is recommended (Khan et al. 2023). Finally, Galletta et al. (2022), which assesses female leadership’s influence on banking sustainability in their study, call for future investigations to examine gender diversity’s impact within countries adhering to Agenda 2030 for sustainable development. In this regard, Palestine’s economy faces significant challenges due to restrictions on trade, mobility, access, internal conflicts, and declining assistance donations. Banks can contribute to sustainable development and the achievement of SDGs by investing in environmentally friendly projects like renewable energy, clean energy, green industry development, and waste management (World Bank 2022;Chen et al. 2018). Despite the abundant amount of existing literature that focuses on green finance and suitability, the necessity remains for additional contributions to fill critical research gaps (Zheng and Siddik 2022; Khan et al. 2023,2022;Rahman et al. 2022), especially on Palestinian bankers’ perspectives and their impact on PCBs’ sustainability performance as an emerging economy. Therefore, this paper endeavors to bridge this gap by conducting a survey of the perceptions and Economies 2023,11, 247 3 of 21 attitudes of b key employees of banks, aiming to shed light on the impact of green finance on sustainable development in Palestine. Moreover, the contemporary business landscape underscores the significance of gender diversity, supported by research indicating positive outcomes when there is increased representation of women in leadership roles. Yet, a dearth of research exists on the role of women in moderating the connection between green finance drivers and sustainability performance, based on employee response through utilized surveys. However, the research framework with its measurement variables is grounded in the lens of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Framework, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of social(SD), economic (ED), and environmental (EnD) dimensions in assessing the overall sustainability of an organization (Zheng and Siddik 2022;Zhou et al. 2020). Overall, the literature suggests that incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into banking operations can lead to better short-term and long-term profitability and societal benefits. Additionally, increasing gender diversity in leadership positions may also bring unique perspectives and enhance organizational outcomes. Nevertheless, in order to gain a deeper, understanding of the complex relationship between these variables, this paper aims to investigate how green finance, encompassing social, economic, and environmental dimensions influences, the sustainability performance of banks. This study contributes to the existing literature in several ways. Firstly, this study highlights the impact of green finance within the banking sector on sustainability performance, a connection that has been explored in previous studies. Secondly, it examines the role of green finance on the long-term and short-term sustainability performance of banks. Finally, it explores the moderation effect of gender on the relation between green finance and the sustainability performance of banks. The rest of this article is structured as follows: Section 2outlines the theory and hypothesis development pertinent to the study goals. Section 3details the research methodology, outcome presentation, analysis, and implications. The paper closes with a discourse and suggestions for upcoming research prospects. 2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development 2.1. Triple Bottom Line (TBL) as a Conceptual Framework The Bottom Line (TBL) is a term that encapsulates the essential financial outcome of an organization’s operations, reflecting its net profit after deducting all expenses from total revenue. It serves as a foundational metric for assessing the financial strength and profitability of a business. Traditionally, a strong bottom line has been the primary goal for many companies, emphasizing financial gains and shareholder returns (Slaper 2011). However, the concept of TBL has expanded beyond this narrow focus. With the emergence of sustainability as a critical concern, the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach was introduced. TBL goes beyond financial considerations and incorporates three vital dimensions: social, environmental, and economic (Zheng and Siddik 2022;Zhou et al. 2020). This framework recognizes that a business’s success should not solely be defined by its financial profitability. It highlights the importance of evaluating a company’s impact on society, the environment, and its financial performance collectively. TBL underscores the interconnectedness of these dimensions and encourages organizations to adopt a more balanced and responsible approach that addresses a broader spectrum of stakeholders and long-term sustainability (Alhaddi 2015). Therefore, the TBL framework is employed to explain how the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of green financing affect sustainability performance in the Banking sector as shown in Figure 1. Economies 2023,11, 247 4 of 21 Economies 2023, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 22 Figure 1. The Research Model. 2.2. Literature and Background of the Study 2.2.1. Green Finance and Its Dimensions Green finance combines different methods to enhance the economic, social, and environmental performance of the monetary system (Zheng et al. 2021). Therefore, green finance pertains to the significance of both public and private initiatives that contribute to the establishment of an unpolluted environment. It further underscores the consequences of climate change and pollution on human well-being, while also demonstrating the societal advantages and enduring gains inherent in supporting such financial endeavors (Khan et al. 2022). The literature emphasizes the significance of green finance as a critical component of sustainable banking and its potential positive effects on economic development (Akomea- Frimpong et al. 2022). Banks play a crucial role in promoting green finance by providing financial services and products that support environmentally sustainable investments, encouraging clients to adopt more sustainable practices, and setting sustainability criteria for their lending activities and investment portfolios (Zheng et al. 2021). Green finance encompasses a range of instruments, including green bonds, green loans, and green equity which provide funding for environmentally-friendly projects and businesses. GF involves multiple approaches, including microfinance, sustainable funds, benefit assets, active ownership, credits for sustainable development, and financial system change (Pasupuleti and Ayyagari 2023). It has a profound impact on developing sustainable businesses and companies globally. By integrating (ESG) considerations into investment-related decisions, green finance is a financial strategy that focuses on sustainable development, environmental protection, and the shift to a low-emission economy (Robins 2018). However, several barriers exist, including inconsistent reporting standards, lack of policy formulation, incorporation of environmental issues, and insufficient social and environmental awareness. Nonetheless, by funding eco-friendly initiatives, GF can play a vital role in achieving banks’ sustainability objectives (Liu et al. 2020b). Furthermore, it can mobilize resources to accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, manage resources more effectively, and safeguard ecosystem services and biodiversity through funding environmentally friendly initiatives and enterprises (European Commission 2020; Bank of England 2021). Women are assuming an increasingly important role in driving green finance and sustainability initiatives within the banking industry. Studies have demonstrated that H1-3 H1-2 H1-1 Social Economical Environmental Short-term Financial sustainability Sustainability Dimensions of Green Finance long-term Financial sustainability Environmental sustainability performance H2: Females moderate the relationship between green finance and banks’ sustainability performance Figure 1. The Research Model. 2.2. Literature and Background of the Study 2.2.1. Green Finance and Its Dimensions Green finance combines different methods to enhance the economic, social, and environmental performance of the monetary system (Zheng et al. 2021). Therefore, green finance pertains to the significance of both public and private initiatives that contribute to the establishment of an unpolluted environment. It further underscores the consequences of climate change and pollution on human well-being, while also demonstrating the societal advantages and enduring gains inherent in supporting such financial endeavors (Khan et al. 2022). The literature emphasizes the significance of green finance as a critical component of sustainable banking and its potential positive effects on economic development (Akomea- Frimpong et al. 2022). Banks play a crucial role in promoting green finance by providing financial services and products that support environmentally sustainable investments, encouraging clients to adopt more sustainable practices, and setting sustainability criteria for their lending activities and investment portfolios (Zheng et al. 2021). Green finance encompasses a range of instruments, including green bonds, green loans, and green equity which provide funding for environmentally-friendly projects and businesses. GF involves multiple approaches, including microfinance, sustainable funds, benefit assets, active ownership, credits for sustainable development, and financial system change (Pasupuleti and Ayyagari 2023). It has a profound impact on developing sustainable businesses and companies globally. By integrating (ESG) considerations into investment-related decisions, green finance is a financial strategy that focuses on sustainable development, environmental protection, and the shift to a low-emission economy (Robins 2018). However, several barriers exist, including inconsistent reporting standards, lack of policy formulation, incorporation of environmental issues, and insufficient social and environmental awareness. Nonetheless, by funding eco-friendly initiatives, GF can play a vital role in achieving banks’ sustainability objectives (Liu et al. 2020b). Furthermore, it can mobilize resources to accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, manage resources more effectively, and safeguard ecosystem services and biodiversity through funding environmentally friendly initiatives and enterprises (European Commission 2020; Bank of England 2021). Women are assuming an increasingly important role in driving green finance and sustainability initiatives within the banking industry. Studies have demonstrated that banks with diverse teams tend to perform better financially and are better equipped to serve Economies 2023,11, 247 5 of 21 the needs of diverse customer bases, including female entrepreneurs and investors who show a growing interest in sustainable finance (Global Banking Alliance for Women 2019). Triodos Bank is a renowned example of a bank that prioritizes diversity and inclusion, with women accounting for over 60% of its workforce and more than 45% of its executive board. Triodos has been financing environmentally sustainable projects for over four decades, including renewable energy, organic farming, and sustainable real estate (Triodos Bank 2023). Sustainable finance has become an essential component in addressing climate change and social inequality, and women play a crucial role in shaping strategies and practices towards a more equitable and sustainable future (Provasi and Harasheh 2021; Galletta et al. 2022). 2.2.2. Sustainability Performance The concept of the Sustainable Corporation has been widely discussed and researched by sustainability professionals and academics and has become an important topic in the field of sustainable development (Zheng and Siddik 2022;Rahman et al. 2022;Zhang et al. 2022;Zheng et al. 2021) The idea was first introduced by John Elkington (1994), emphasizing the importance of social responsibility, environmental care, and resource efficiency in business operations. Moreover, the researcher suggested that companies should integrate sustainability practices into their core business operations to achieve a balance between economic development, environmental conservation, and social well-being (UN 1987). This requires taking a long-term view, recognizing sustainability risks (Park and Kim 2020) and opportunities throughout the company’s value chain, and consistently improving via innovation (Bocken and Geradts 2020). The Sustainability Performance also highlights the importance of accountability and transparency when communicating with stakeholders (Zheng and Siddik 2022). By including economic, social, and environmental factors in organizational strategy, the (SP) offers a thorough method for attaining sustainable development. 2.2.3. Green Finance and Sustainability Performance Green finance refers to financial products and services that are designed to promote environmentally sustainable economic growth (UNEP FI 2021). By investing in sustainable initiatives, companies can enhance sustainability outcomes while creating long-term financial rewards. One efficient green financing method is the issuance of green bonds, which are debt instruments that are expressly related to supporting environmentally beneficial initiatives (Khan et al. 2022;Climate Bonds Initiative 2023). The relationship between green finance and sustainability performance deserves a significant amount of attention from those who are dedicated to creating a more sustainable future (GSIA 2020). Scholars have discerned that entities that employed green finance techniques performed better in terms of sustainability than those that did not (Fashli et al. 2019;Ringel and Mjekic 2023;Zhou et al. 2020). Another study discovered that green bond issuers typically outperform non-green bond issuers in terms of environmental performance (Liu and Wu 2023). A separate study from Chinese listed economics identified that green finance can greatly enhance firms’ environmental performance (Xia et al. 2023). Furthermore, a recent investigation into developing economies revealed that green finance has the potential to be a key factor in encouraging sustainable development. However, it is crucial to address the significant obstacles in its implementation (Koval et al. 2022). Green banking practices have additionally been observed to positively influence sustainability performance, with employee green behavior playing a partial mediation role in this relationship (Malsha et al. 2020;Narayanan et al. 2021;Zheng et al. 2021). The relationship between green finance and sustainability performance is significant, with research showing that companies that employ green finance techniques often perform better in terms of sustainability, therefore it is important for companies to consider these factors when developing their sustainability strategies (Zheng et al. 2021). Economies 2023,11, 247 6 of 21 2.2.4. Women’s Role in Sustainability In the discourse of sustainability, a multitude of essential theories and frameworks intricately examine and advocate for the vital inclusion of women in shaping a more sustainable future. Initially, the Gender and Development Framework recognizes that gender inequality is a key issue in development and sustainability. It aims to address the unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and power between men and women, and advocates for the empowerment of women as a means of achieving sustainable development (Kabeer 1994). Moreover, the Women’s Empowerment Framework highlights the importance of women’s empowerment in achieving sustainability. This framework argues that empowering women can lead to more sustainable development outcomes by increasing women’s access to resources, education, and decision-making power (Kabeer 1999). Furthermore, the Gender and Development (GAD) is another important framework that aims to promote gender equality and empowerment of women through development initiatives. In the context of sustainability and banking (Galletta et al. 2022), GAD recognizes the importance of gender equality in achieving sustainable development outcomes. Research has indicated that augmenting female participation in the decision-making processes within the banking sector can yield more sustainable outcomes. For example, Lomme et al. (2019) found that female board representation in European banks is positively associated with sustainability performance. This suggests that gender diversity in corporate leadership can lead to more environmentally sustainable practices in banks. Another study conducted by Onyango et al. (2021) indicated that an increase in female participation in decision-making processes related to natural resource management can similarly result in more sustainable outcomes. Thus, incorporating the GAD framework and promoting gender equality within the banking sector can promote environmentally sustainable practices and support sustainable development goals. 2.3. Hypothesis Development The synergy between green finance and sustainability within the banking sector is a dynamic focal point driving environmental responsibility and financial resilience as well as advancing sustainability across the banking industry (Syarifuddin 2023;Akomea-Frimpong et al. 2022;Rahman et al. 2022). This concept is substantiated by an array of studies. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the literature on green finance and sustainability performance in the banking industry found that green financing has the potential to enhance banks’ sustainability efforts by incentivizing them to invest in environmentally friendly projects and promote sustainable development (Rahman et al. 2022). Moreover, sustainable finance has the potential to drive positive social and environmental outcomes while also delivering financial returns (Boffo and Patalano 2020). In addition, green financing has a positive effect on the profitability of banks, as evidenced by increased return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Furthermore, banks exhibiting higher ratios of green loans demonstrated reduced credit risk, as measured by the non-performing loan (NPL) ratio. In addition to the positive impact of green banking practices on the sustainability performance of banks, Shaumya and Arulrajah (2017) proposed that banks with higher ESG scores tend to perform better in sustainability, and banks committed to green banking practices tend to have lower capital costs. Consequently, ESG ratings are regarded as an important tool for evaluating the sustainability performance of banks. The dimensions of green finance, including social, economic, and environmental aspects, have a strong positive effect on the sustainability performance of banks and financial institutions (Khan et al. 2022;Zheng and Siddik 2022;Fashli et al. 2019). Moreover, Zheng et al. (2021) demonstrates that 95% of bankers view green financing as a crucial component in the short-term and long-term development of banking strategies in an emerging market. Therefore, recent studies suggest that green financing can benefit both financial and environmental sustainability, thus highlighting the importance of encouraging and incentivizing green finance in the banking industry. Economies 2023,11, 247 7 of 21 Therefore, this study mainly focuses on examining the impact of the social, economic, and environmental drivers of green finance on the bank’s sustainability. Hence, the researcher hypotheses that: H1. The social, economic, and environmental factors act as drivers for green finance, positively impacting the sustainability of Palestinian banks. The intricate interplay between short-term stability and long-term growth in achieving financial sustainability within banks has garnered extensive scholarly attention. Balancing immediate risk management with strategic innovation is a requisite for enduring success (Bocken and Geradts 2020). Concurrently, the imperative to integrate environmental considerations into financial operations has gained momentum. This dual-edged paradigm demands harmonizing economic objectives with environmental consciousness (Narayanan et al. 2021), reinforcing the symbiotic relationship between financial resilience and environmental sustainable stewardship (Zhang et al. 2022). Therefore, sustainable finance emerges as a dynamic force, propelling favorable social and environmental impacts in tandem with financial gains. Notably, the salient influence of green financing on banks’ profitability is exemplified through augmented Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE), particularly in the context of long-term financial sustainability performance Furthermore, a noteworthy correlation surfaces: heightened green loan ratios correlate with diminished credit risk, gauged by the Non-Perforsming Loan (NPL) ratio. Strikingly, superior Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores align with heightened sustainability performance. Conspicuously, banks embracing green banking practices are rewarded with a reduced cost of capital, signifying the financial ecosystem’s responsiveness to sustainable commitments. To test the hypothesis mentioned above, it is required to differentiate between the sub-hypotheses regarding financial performance (the short and the long term) and banks’ environmental performance across two time horizons. Within the banking sector, an exploration of short-term financial sustainability performance unveils the intricate strategies and mechanisms employed by institutions to ensure immediate stability and resilience. Notably among banks, the deliberate adoption of sustainable practices not only leads to valuable cost savings but also cultivates an elevated brand reputation and facilitates entry into untapped markets (Bocken and Geradts 2020; Zheng and Siddik 2022). Moreover, Zheng et al. (2021) indicates that green loans can contribute positively to banks’ sustainability performance by encouraging environmentally friendly initiatives. Additionally, the study reveals that green loans are associated with improved risk management, enhanced brand reputation, and increased customer loyalty. Investors are giving greater consideration to sustainability performance when making investment decisions (Narayanan et al. 2021;Zhang et al. 2022). Therefore, Green financing significantly enhances commercial banks’ financial performance. High green financing levels correlate with improved efficiency, especially for banks with superior ESG ratings. These outcomes underscore green financing’s potential to bolster sustainability and efficiency, guiding policymakers and banking stakeholders (Xu and Chen 2021). The surging interest in green banking and sustainable corporate finance mirrors a growing recognition of harmonizing economic, social, and environmental considerations for enduring business success. Based on this premise, the study advances the following subhypotheses within (H1) to distinguish between short and long-term financial performance, as well as environmental performance. Hence, the research suggests the following subhypotheses: H1-1. The economic and environmental factors act as drivers for green finance, positively impacting the short-term financial performance sustainability of Palestinian banks. H1-2. The economic and environmental factors act as drivers for green finance, positively impacting the long-term financial performance sustainability of Palestinian banks. The confluence of economic, environmental, and social factors as propellants of green finance profoundly shapes banks’ environmental sustainability performance. These factors Economies 2023,11, 247 8 of 21 collectively drive the integration of sustainable practices into financial operations. Economically, incentives like preferential loan terms for eco-friendly projects spur banks to channel resources into environmentally responsible endeavors (Zhang et al. 2022). Simultaneously, growing environmental concerns and regulatory frameworks compel banks to embrace green finance practices, reinforcing their commitment to environmental preservation (Oyegunle and Weber 2015;Park and Kim 2020). Socially conscious investors and stakeholders exert pressure on banks to adopt sustainable strategies, fostering accountability and transparency (Zheng and Siddik 2022;Park and Kim 2020;Chen et al. 2018). This triad of drivers intertwines economic viability with ecological integrity, positioning banks as advocates for sustainable development (Fashli et al. 2019;Zheng and Siddik 2022;Zhang et al. 2022). The harmonization of these factors yields a holistic approach wherein banks bolster their environmental sustainability performance while simultaneously ensuring long-term financial stability (Zhang et al. 2022;Zhou et al. 2020). Furthermore, by aligning economic, environmental, and social drivers toward green finance, banks become agents of positive change, advancing environmental goals while navigating the intricate financial landscape. Therefore, the researchers hypothesize that: H1-3. Economic and environmental factors serve as drivers for green finance, resulting in a positive impact on the environmental sustainability performance of Palestinian banks. The strategic role of female representation in business unfolds as a catalyst for innovation, diversity, and balanced decision-making, fostering organizational excellence (Endrikat et al. 2021). The role of female representation in the context of drivers for green finance profoundly influences the sustainability performance of banks (Onyango et al. 2021). Increasingly, studies suggest that the inclusion of women in leadership roles within the financial sector can augment the impact of green finance initiatives on sustainability performance. Women leaders often exhibit a stronger commitment to environmental and social responsibility, which aligns with the objectives of green finance. Their diverse perspectives and decision-making styles can lead to the implementation of more comprehensive and effective sustainability strategies. Moreover, female presence in leadership positions can enhance a bank’s stakeholder engagement (Galletta et al. 2022), facilitating better communication of green initiatives and generating broader support (Paoloni et al. 2023). Thus, female existence as a moderating variable not only amplifies the effects of green finance drivers but also contributes to shaping a more sustainable and responsible trajectory for banks in the face of environmental challenges. Therefore, this study extended its investigation to examine the moderating role of female presence on the impact of green finance drivers on banks’ sustainability performance. H2. The presence of female managers has a positive impact on moderating the relationship between green finance drivers on banks’ sustainability performance. 3. Methodology 3.1. Data Collection and Sampling A non-probabilistic sampling method was employed to select participants for the study. Questionnaires as shown in (Appendix A) were aimed at the funding departments of banks during the time period from January and April 2023. The sample consisted of three Islamic banks and five commercial banks in Palestine that were selected to take part in the research. A total of 122 questionnaires were distributed to participants, of which 104 were returned. The collected data from the questionnaires was analyzed to determine the impact of GF on the sustainability performance of banks in Palestine. The following model presented in Figure 2. depicts both the structural and measurement equations. This model can be regarded as a combination of reflective and formative elements, with the structural equation being formative and the measurement equations being reflective. Economies 2023,11, 247 15 of 21 However, Table 5demonstrates that the presence of females at the managerial level of the Palestinian banks has a moderating role, which negatively affects the relationship between economic drivers and long-term financial sustainable performance. When examining the impact of the economic drivers and long-term financial sustainable performance, it is evident that for males, the impact is (0.256), where areas the impact turns negative (−0.061) with the presence of females. Table 5. The moderating role of females on the relationship between green finance drivers and Long-term financial sustainable performance. Variables (1) (2) (3) EnD SD ED EnD 0.0912 0.263 ** 0.256 ** (0.130) (0.107) (0.105) SD 0.177 0.165 0.216 * (0.115) (0.139) (0.116) ED 0.318 *** 0.294 *** 0.370 *** (0.0914) (0.0930) (0.102) Sex −1.789 ** −0.283 1.358 * (0.866) (0.845) (0.716) Sex X EnD 0.445 ** (0.200) Sex X SD 0.0984 (0.203) Sex X ED −0.317 * (0.181) Constant 1.764 *** 1.163 * 0.689 (0.616) (0.617) (0.548) Observations 104 104 104 R-squared 0.328 0.295 0.315 Standard errors in parentheses, *** p< 0.01, ** p< 0.05, * p< 0.1, the dependent variable is the Long term financial performance. Table 6shows that the presence of females at the managerial level of the Palestinian banks plays a moderating role in the relationship between environmental drivers and environmentally sustainable performance. For instance, when considering the influence of environmental drivers and environmentally sustainable performance, it is observed that for males, the impact is (0.189), but in the presence of females, this impact increases to (0.620). While Table 4shows that female presence moderates the relationship between green finance drivers and short-term financial sustainable performance positively, increasing the impact from 0.423 for males to 0.772 for females, Table 5, on the contrary, indicates that female presence moderates the relationship between green finance drivers and longterm financial sustainable performance negatively, with the impact decreasing from 0.256 for males to − 0.061 when females are present. Table 6illustrates that female presence moderates the relationship between green finance drivers and environmentally sustainable performance positively, with the impact increasing from 0.189 for males to 0.358 when females are present. In summary, female presence at the managerial level of Palestinian banks moderates the relationship between green finance drivers and financial and environmentally sustainable performance in contrary ways, with a positive moderating effect on short-term financial and environmentally sustainable performance, but a negative moderating effect on long-term financial sustainable performance. The existing literature on the moderating role of gender in the relationship between green finance drivers and financial sustainable performance contains some degree of conflict. While Some studies have demonstrated a positive moderating effect of female presence on financial sustainable performance, others have indicated mixed or inconclusive Economies 2023,11, 247 16 of 21 results. In their research, Wu et al. (2022) concluded that female presence at the managerial level positively moderated the relationship between green finance drivers and financial sustainable performance. Furthermore, Provasi and Harasheh (2021) concluded that female executives positively influenced the moderating effect on the relationship between green innovation and financial performance in Chinese manufacturing firms. Therefore, despite some conflicting results, there is a general consensus in the literature that gender can indeed play a significant moderating role in this relationship. Table 6. The moderating role of females on the relationship between green finance drivers and environmentally sustainable performance. Variables (1) (2) (3) EnD SD ED EnD 0.189 * 0.353 *** 0.358 *** (0.108) (0.0889) (0.0892) SD 0.216 ** 0.183 0.241 ** (0.0952) (0.116) (0.0982) ED 0.115 0.0941 0.0912 (0.0757) (0.0775) (0.0865) Sex −1.824 ** −0.607 0.0713 (0.718) (0.704) (0.608) Sex X EnD 0.431 ** (0.166) Sex X SD 0.154 (0.169) Sex X ED −0.0113 (0.154) Constant 2.210 *** 1.721 *** 1.463 *** (0.511) (0.515) (0.466) Observations 104 104 104 R-squared 0.359 0.320 0.314 Standard errors in parentheses, *** p< 0.01, ** p< 0.05, * p< 0.1, the dependent variable is the environmentally sustainable performance. 4. Conclusions The findings of this research derived from a survey of the target population’s attitudes and perceptions, have provided valuable insights into the interplay between green finance and sustainability in the banking sector, further affirming the ideas put forth in prior studies. The study’s models discerned intricate relationships among the variables, revealing distinct patterns in their impact. The analysis of Model 1 regarding short-term financial sustainability exposes that social drivers do not exert a significant influence, while the economic and environmental drivers showcase a positive and substantial impact. This pattern mirrors the conclusions of previous studies that highlighted green financing’s potential to enhance banks’ sustainability through environmentally conscious investments and sustainable development incentives (He et al. 2019). Similarly, the exploration of long-term financial sustainability in Model 2 reinforces this trend. Here, the questionnaire results show that the social drivers exhibit a minimal impact, while the economic and environmental drivers once again display a notable and affirmative effect. These findings align with earlier research that emphasizes the symbiotic relationship between financial resilience, environmental stewardship, and the capacity of sustainable finance to generate positive social and environmental outcomes (Narayanan et al. 2021;Zhang et al. 2022). Finally, Model 3 solidifies the significance of all three drivers—social, economic, and environmental—in shaping the environmental sustainability performance of banks. This resonates with the existing literature emphasizing the integration of sustainable practices Economies 2023,11, 247 17 of 21 driven by economic incentives, environmental concerns, and social pressures (Oyegunle and Weber 2015;Park and Kim 2020;Chen et al. 2018). The study thus affirms that the holistic harmonization of these drivers positions banks as catalysts for sustainable development while ensuring enduring financial stability (Zhang et al. 2022;Zhou et al. 2020). Collectively, the study’s findings seamlessly align with the literature’s trajectory, showcasing the potency of green finance in steering banks toward both financial prosperity and sustainable advocacy. The outcomes also underline the nuanced interplay between various drivers and the importance of considering their context-specific impacts. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the moderating role of female presence at the managerial level. Examining female influence in managerial roles within Palestinian banks regarding the interplay between green finance drivers and sustainable performance unveils intriguing patterns. Tables 4–6divulge distinct insights: Female presence heightens the positive correlation between green finance drivers and short-term financial sustainability while tempering this correlation when it comes to long-term financial sustainability. Moreover, female involvement amplifies the link between green finance drivers and environmentally sustainable performance. Reinforcing these findings, a body of literature underscores gender diversity’s potency within banks. Examples include Lomme et al.’s (2019) discovery of heightened sustainability performance with more women on boards and Onyango et al.’s (2021) indication of women’s pivotal role in resource management decisions for better sustainability outcomes. Women’s strategic importance in fostering innovation and balanced decisions (Endrikat et al. 2021) is mirrored in their positive impact on the connection between green finance and performance, a validation provided by Wu et al. (2022). This effect ripples further, enhancing stakeholder engagement, green initiative communication, and sustainable practice endorsement (Galletta et al. 2022;Paoloni et al. 2023). Collectively, this body of work provides a spotlight on gender diversity as a linchpin for steering banks toward holistic sustainability and resonating with sustainable development goals. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing insights into the complex interplay between green finance drivers and banks’ sustainability performance. The findings align with various previous research while also highlighting the contextual and nuanced nature of these relationships. The results emphasize the need for a comprehensive understanding of the impact of green finance drivers on different dimensions of sustainability performance, considering the moderating effects of gender diversity. In conclusion, this study offers valuable implications for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars. Policymakers can utilize the findings to shape regulatory frameworks that promote green finance initiatives. Practitioners in the banking sector can glean valuable insights on strategically aligning green finance drivers with diverse dimensions of sustainability performance. Scholars can leverage these findings for conducting more extensive research into the influence of gender diversity and other moderating factors in the relationship between green finance and the sustainability performance of financial institutions Overall, this research contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field of sustainable finance and deepens our understanding of its multifaceted implications within the banking sector. Funding: This research received no external funding and The APC was thankfully funded by Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie (PTUK), http://www.PTUK.edu.ps. Data Availability Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Economies 2023,11, 247 18 of 21 Appendix A Appendix A.1. First Section: Demographic Characteristics Q1. What is your gender? Male Female I do not want to specify Q2. Age group: 21–30 31–40 41–50 Above 50. Q3. Specify your work experience: Less than 1 year 1–4 years 4–7 years 8–11 years  More than 11 years Q4. Working experience at the same position:  Less than 1 year  1–4 years  4–7 years  8–11 years More than 11 years Q5. Your position: First line management Middle management Top management Q6. Your bank type position: Islamic Bank Conventional Bank Appendix A.2. Second Section: Measurement of Variables Please choose from the five-point scale where: 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly Agree The social dimension of green finance (Zheng et al. 2021) 1. Provision of better customers’ satisfaction 2. Establishment of trust 3. Stakeholder’s engagement plans 4. Enhancement of the bank’s image 5. Provision of more employee benefit The economic dimension of green finance (Zheng et al. 2021) 1. Creation of more competitive advantage 2. Generation of more revenues 3. Saving investment and other costs 4. Reduction in overall risk The environmental dimension of green finance (Zheng et al. 2021;Khan and Quaddus 2015) 1. Reduction in carbon emissions from banking activities 2. Energy requirements of products and services 3. produces few wastes and emissions 4. Is concerned about waste recycling. 5. Is concerned about waste management Short-term performance (Malsha et al. 2020;Zheng et al. 2021) 1. Green banking practices significantly improve the revenue of our bank 2. Green banking practices significantly improve the share of our bank 3. Green banking practices significantly decrease the operational expenditure of our bank. 4. Improve Value of the bank market share Long-term performance (Malsha et al. 2020;Raihan 2019) 1. Green banking practices significantly improve revenue and market share of our bank 2. Risk Reducing 3. Generate long-term investments 4. Addition to Capital/Investment Economies 2023,11, 247 19 of 21 Please choose from the five-point scale where: 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly Agree Sustainability performance (Khan and Quaddus 2015;Zheng et al. 2021) 1. Green financing significantly reduces paper usage and energy consumption in our bank 2. Green financing significantly decreases the operational expenditure of our bank 3. Green financing significantly improves the revenue and market share of our bank. 4. Green financing improves banks’ compliance with environmental standards References Akomea-Frimpong, Isaac, David Adeabah, Deborah Ofosu, and Emmanuel Junior Tenakwah. 2022. A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 12: 1241–64. [CrossRef] Alhaddi, Alhaddi Customer. 2015. Seyed Mehrdad MIRAFTAB ZADEH. Iran Business and Management Studies 1: 6–10. [CrossRef] Bank of England. 2021. Climate Change and Finance: What’s Next? Available online: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/ boe/files/speech/2021/climate-change-and-finance-whats-next-speech-by-mark-carney.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023). Barry, Zhi Ying. 2022. Global Green Finance Saw Record Growth in 2021. Forrester. October 18. Available online: https://www. forrester.com/blogs/global-green-finance-saw-record-growth-in-2021-exceeding-us720-billion/ (accessed on 27 March 2023). Bocken, Nancy M. P., and Thijs H. J. Geradts. 2020. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning 53: 101950. [CrossRef] Boffo, Riccardo, and Robert Patalano. 2020. ESG Investing Practices, Progress Challenges. Paris: OECD, pp. 1–88. Caldecott, Ben, Alex Clark, Elizabeth Harnett, Krister Koskelo, Christian Wilson, and Felicia Liu. 2022. Sustainable Finance and Transmission Mechanisms to the Real Economy. Available online: https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-0 4/Sustainable-Finance-and-Transmission-Mechanisms-to-the-Real-Economy.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023). Chen, Zhixia, Md Miraj Hossen, Sayed Sami Muzafary, and Mareum Begum. 2018. Green banking for environmental sustainabilitypresent status and future agenda: Experience from Bangladesh. Asian Economic and Financial Review 8: 571–85. [CrossRef] Chiu, Y. H., and L. Y. Ho. 2014. The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on firm value: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 123: 307–26. Climate Bonds Initiative. 2023. Sustainability Performance and Green Bonds. Available online: https://www.climatebonds.net/ resources/reports/sustainability-performance (accessed on 21 September 2023). Corvalan, Carlos F., and Walter V. Reid. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Brief report on the First Technical Design Workshop. Global Change and Human Health 2: 78–79. [CrossRef] Elkington, John. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36: 90–100. [CrossRef] Elshandidy, T., and A. Hassanein. 2020. The impact of green finance on bank performance: International evidence. Journal of Business Research 117: 1–13. Endrikat, Jan, Charl De Villiers, Thomas W. Guenther, and Edeltraud M. 2021. Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Business and Society 60: 2099–135. [CrossRef] Ersoy, Ersan, Beata Swiecka, Simon Grima, Ercan Özen, and Inna Romanova. 2022. The Impact of ESG Scores on Bank Market Value? Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry. Sustainability 14: 9527. [CrossRef] European Commission. 2020. Sustainable Finance—The Pathway to a Sustainable Future. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/ publications/sustainable-finance-pathway-sustainable-future_en (accessed on 21 September 2023). Fashli, Arinal, Herdis Herdiansyah, and Retty Dwi Handayani. 2019. Application of green banking on financing infrastructure project industry: Environmental perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1175: 012027. [CrossRef] Galletta, Simona, Sebastiano Mazzù, Valeria Naciti, and Carlo Vermiglio. 2022. Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29: 161–74. [CrossRef] Gao, Y., and Y. Lin. 2020. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese banks. Journal of Cleaner Production 259: 120978. Global Banking Alliance for Women. 2019. Women in Finance: A Case for Closing Gaps. Available online: https://www.gbaforwomen. org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Women-in-Finance-A-Case-for-Closing-Gaps-Report.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023). GSIA. 2020. The Role of Sustainable Finance in the Race to Net Zero. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Available online: https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GSIA_Race-to-Net-Zero-report_15-Oct-2020-1.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023). Economies 2023,11, 247 20 of 21 Hancock, Gregory R., and Rob Schoonen. 2015. Structural equation modelling: Possibilities for language learning researchers. Language Learning 65: 160–84. [CrossRef] He, Lingyun, Rongyan Liu, Zhangqi Zhong, Deqing Wang, and Yufei Xia. 2019. Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renewable Energy 143: 974–84. [CrossRef] Kabeer, Naila. 1994. Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso. Kabeer, Naila. 1999. Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Development and Change 30: 435–64. [CrossRef] Khan, Eijaz Ahmed, and Mohammed Quaddus. 2015. Development and validation of a scale for measuring sustainability factors of informal microenterprises—A qualitative and quantitative approach. Entrepreneurship Research Journal 5: 347–72. [CrossRef] Khan, Ikram Ullah, Zahid Hameed, Safeer Ullah Khan, and Manzoor Ahmad Khan. 2023. Green banking practices, bank reputation, and environmental awareness: Evidence from Islamic banks in a developing economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–21. [CrossRef] Khan, Soha, Ahsan Akbar, Ismat Nasim, Martina Hedviˇcáková, and Furrukh Bashir. 2022. Green finance development and environmental sustainability: A panel data analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 2134. [CrossRef] Koval, Viktor, Olga Laktionova, Dzintra Atst ¯ aja, Janis Grasis, Iryna Lomachynska, and Roman Shchur. 2022. Green Financial Instruments of Cleaner Production Technologies. Sustainability 14: 10536. [CrossRef] Kuo, Y. F., P. C. Li, and Y. L. Huang. 2019. The effect of green finance on bank profitability and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production 210: 219–28. Leong, L. Y., and A. K. Othman. 2017. The effects of environmental, social, and governance practices on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Sustainability 9: 188. Liu, Chen, and Serena Shuo Wu. 2023. Green finance, sustainability disclosure and economic implications. Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy 3: 1–24. [CrossRef] Liu, H., D. Q. Zhou, X. H. Li, and G. Q. Sun. 2020a. Green finance and economic growth: Evidence from China’s listed companies. Economic Modelling 85: 77–84. Liu, Y., T. Li, and Z. Yao. 2020b. How does green finance promote eco-innovation? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 157: 120070. Lomme, R., L. A. A. Van den Berghe, and C. Louche. 2019. Women on boards and sustainability reporting in European banks. Journal of Business Ethics 159: 399–414. Malsha, K. P. P. H. G. N., A. Anton Arulrajah, and Samithamby Senthilnathan. 2020. Mediating role of employee green behaviour towards sustainability performance of banks. Journal of Governance and Regulation 9: 92–102. [CrossRef] McDonald, Roderick P., and Moon-Ho Ringo Ho. 2002. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods 7: 64. [CrossRef] Narayanan, Venkateshwaran, Kevin Baird, and Richard Tay. 2021. Investment decisions: The trade-off between economic and environmental objectives. British Accounting Review 53: 100969. [CrossRef] Nechaev, Andrey S., Dmitrii V. Ognev, and Oksana V. Antipina. 2017. Analysis of risk management in innovation activity process. Paper presented at the 2017 International Conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies” (IT&QM&IS), St. Petersburg, Russia, September 24–30; pp. 548–51. [CrossRef] Onyango, V. O., J. A. Dearing, and L. Deutsch. 2021. Gendered decision-making for sustainable natural resource management: A systematic review. Global Environmental Change 68: 102252. Oyegunle, Adeboye, and Olaf Weber. 2015. Development of Sustainability and Green Banking Regulations Existing Codes and Practices. CIGI Papers No. 65. Waterloo: CIGI, pp. 1–24. Paoloni, Paola, Rosa Lombardi, and Salvatore Principale. 2023. The impact of gender diversity on corporate social responsibility knowledge: Empirical analysis in European context. Journal of Knowledge Management.ahead-of-print. [CrossRef] Park, Hyoungkun, and Jong Dae Kim. 2020. Transition towards green banking: Role of financial regulators and financial institutions. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility 5: 5. [CrossRef] Pasupuleti, Akhil, and Lakshmana Rao Ayyagari. 2023. A Thematic Study of Green Finance with Special Reference to Polluting Companies: A Review and Future Direction. Environmental Processes 10: 24. [CrossRef] Provasi, Roberta, and Murad Harasheh. 2021. Gender diversity and corporate performance: Emphasis on sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28: 127–37. [CrossRef] Qi, Meng. 2021. Green Credit, Financial Ecological Environment, and Investment Efficiency. Complexity 2021: 5539195. [CrossRef] Rahman, Shahinur, Iqbal Hossain Moral, Mehedi Hassan, Gazi Shakhawat Hossain, and Rumana Perveen. 2022. A systematic review of green finance in the banking industry: Perspectives from a developing country. Green Finance 4: 347–63. [CrossRef] Raihan, Mohammad Zahir. 2019. Sutainable Finance for Growth and Development of Banking Industry in Bangladesh: An Equity Perspective. MIST Journal of Science and Technology 7: 41–51. Rehman, W. U., and M. Nasrullah. 2019. Environmental sustainability and financial performance of banks in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production 235: 1015–25. Ringel, Marc, and Saranda Mjekic. 2023. Analyzing the Role of Banks in Providing Green Finance for Retail Customers: The Case of Germany. Sustainability 15: 8745. [CrossRef] Economies 2023,11, 247 21 of 21 Robins, N. 2017. The role of green finance in achieving sustainable development. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 59: 14–30. Robins, N. 2018. Green finance: A new frontier for social policy? Journal of Social Policy 47: 771–92. Saha, A., and S. Bhattacharya. 2018. A sustainable banking index for measuring the green and social performance of Indian banks. Journal of Cleaner Production 193: 416–27. Shahbaz, M., S. Farhani, and S. A. Raza. 2019. Environmental sustainability and financial performance of banks: Evidence from MENA countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 232: 1318–28. Shaumya, S., and A. Arulrajah. 2017. The Impact of Green Banking Practices on Banks Environmental Performance: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Finance and Bank Management 5: 77–90. [CrossRef] Slaper, Timothy F. 2011. The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? The Triple Bottom Line Defined. Indiana Business Review 86: 4–8. Available online: http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/article2.html (accessed on 20 August 2023). Sutton, Mark A., Hans van Grinsven, Gilles Billen, Albert Bleeker, Alexander F. Bouwman, Keith Bull, Jan Willem Erisman, Peringe Grennfelt, Bruna Grizzetti, Clare M. Howard, and et al. 2014. Summary for policy makers. In The European Nitrogen Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xxiv–xxxiv. [CrossRef] Syarifuddin, Ferry. 2023. Towards Green Economy Transformation through Islamic Green Financing. SSRN Electronic Journal. [CrossRef] Triodos Bank. 2023. Diversity and Inclusion|Triodos Bank. Available online: https://www.triodos.co.uk/diversity-and-inclusion (accessed on 29 August 2023). Uddin, M., M. K. Hassan, and K. M. Tarique. 2019. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and bank risk: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Research in International Business and Finance 47: 507–19. UN. 1987. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. New York: UN, p. 39. UNEP FI. 2021. Green Finance. Available online: https://www.unepfi.org/areas-of-work/green-finance/ (accessed on 10 August 2023). World Bank. 2022. Helping Countries Adapt to a Changing World Contents. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 1–116. World Population Review. 2023. Middle East Population 2023. Available online: http://worldpopulationreview.com/continents/ middle-east-population (accessed on 18 August 2023). Wu, Qichun, Fumitaka Furuoka, and Shu Chui Lau. 2022. Corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: A meta-analysis. Management Research Review 45: 956–83. [CrossRef] Xia, Lianfeng, Yujia Liu, and Xu Yang. 2023. The response of green finance toward the sustainable environment: The role of renewable energy development and institutional quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 59249–61. [CrossRef] Xu, S., and X. Chen. 2021. Green finance and bank performance: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks. Sustainability 13: 2127. Zhang, Xin, Zhihui Wang, Xiaobing Zhong, Shouzhi Yang, and Abu Bakkar Siddik. 2022. Do Green Banking Activities Improve the Banks’ Environmental Performance? The Mediating Effect of Green Financing. Sustainability 14: 989. [CrossRef] Zheng, Guang-Wen, Abu Bakkar Siddik, Mohammad Masukujjaman, and Nazneen Fatema. 2021. Factors affecting the sustainability performance of financial institutions in Bangladesh: The role of green finance. Sustainability 13: 10165. [CrossRef] Zheng, Guang-Wen, and Abu Bakkar Siddik. 2022. Do Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Green Finance Dimensions Determine Environmental Performance? An Empirical Study on Bangladeshi Banking Institutions. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 890096. [CrossRef] Zhou, Xiaoguang, Xinmeng Tang, and Rui Zhang. 2020. Impact of green finance on economic development and environmental quality: A study based on provincial panel data from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27: 19915–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.