Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage

Alam, S. M. Shafiul; Islam, K. M. Zahidul Article Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (JCSR) Provided in Cooperation with: SpringerOpen Suggested Citation: Alam, S. M. Shafiul; Islam, K. M. Zahidul (2021) : Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (JCSR), ISSN 2366-0074, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00062-w This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/297675 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage S. M. Shafiul Alam 1* and K. M. Zahidul Islam 2 Abstract Green concern is making a profound impact on building green competitive advantage (GCA) across the globe. Apparel sector of Bangladesh is at crossroads regarding sustainability of firms. Green initiatives are thus required for ensuring the survival of apparel sector. The current study attempts to examine the interplay among environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) dimensions, green corporate image (GCI), and green competitive advantage of firms. To address the research topic, structural equation modeling approach has been adopted. Based on prior research findings, five hypotheses have been devised and finally evaluated by collecting data from 53 apparel firms enlisted with Dhaka Stock Exchange, Bangladesh. The study findings reveal that the ECSR dimensions have critical role to play over building GCI and GCA at the firm level. The study attempted to integrate ECSR, GCI, and GCA and contributes to the holistic understanding of the green anxieties of the business world. Understanding the critical role of ECSR, this study calls for proactive managerial actions regarding organizational sustainability. Keywords: Environmental corporate social responsibility dimensions, Green corporate image, Green corporate advantage, Structural equation modeling Introduction Firms are increasingly recognizing the strategic benefits which stem from the integration of green concern in their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Environmental CSR (ECSR) and Building green corporate image (GCI) and attaining green competitive advantage (GCA) have become major areas of concentration among the business scholars worldwide. Studies identified building green image as a tool to help firms enhance their green competitive capacity (Ambec & Lanoie, 2008; Porter & van der Linde, 1995). In this connection, it is observed that development of new environmentally sustainable products and business operations result in higher level of efficiency in terms of resources investment, enhanced market, better corporate branding, higher sales, and eventually sustained competitive advantages (Fraj-Andrés, Martinez-Salinas, & Matute-Vallejo, 2009). It has been revealed by CSR research that green management has a pivotal role regarding establishing a firm’s image in the core of the business. Green practices have been considered as one of the very salient ingredients that eventually determine green image and green competitiveness of the firm (Schwaiger, 2004; Sellitto & Hermann, 2019). Evaluation of the firm’s image, its repute, and loyalty of customers are also affected substantially by green management of firms (Dutta, Umashankar, Choi, & Parsa, 2008). Introducing green innovation referred to as the innovation that emphasize environmental waste reduction, prevention of pollution and implementation of © The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 School of Business, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh Full list of author information is available at the end of the article International Journal o f Cor p orate Social Res p onsibilit y Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00062-w environmental management so as to ensure ecological wellbeing (Eiadat, Kelly, Roche, & Eyadat, 2008), which can increase key resource productivity substantially and would reduce costs related to the environment (Song & Yu, 2018). Besides, firms will be able to better manage the objections stemming from the government, international agencies, and society and thus can attain sustainable competitiveness (Calantone, Cavusgil, & Zhao, 2002). The emergence of environmentally sustained enterprises requires radical change in the philosophy of management of the organizations. In the new context, initiatives and strategies must go further than technical aspects. Dynamic and ecologically responsive norms, values, and behaviors are expected to form competitive capacity (Shrivastava, 1995). Hence, green culture might have the capacity to facilitate the progress towards sustainability. In this context, green culture is comprehended from the perspective of axiological attitude that describes green culture as the attitudinal elements, norms and values relating to environment (Ogiemwonyi, Harun, Alam, & Othman, 2020). In the organizational context, it is expected that the atmosphere of the firm is created in such a way that the actions of the firm uphold ecological norms and values (Baharov, 2000). In this connection, ECSR can be considered instrumental to attaining green competitive advantage (Welford, 1995). The present study endeavors to concentrate on the apparel sector of Bangladesh which is involved in designing, producing, and selling of garments, footwear and related accessories. This sector has been selected to address the research topic because apparel industries are being considered immensely imperative part of the economy of Bangladesh over the last few decades. At present, the apparel industry is the largest export-earner with about 27.9 billion in the fiscal year 2019–20 Bangladesh Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) Sustainability Report, 2020). This sector has made significant contributions to the economy from international trade and commerce, employment generation, mitigation of poverty, and especially empowerment of the women. Thus, sustainable action plan i.e. establishing plans for developing new models of business to go beyond the economic concentration and to attempt to integrate ecological, societal, and economic values by means of the actions of the organization (Cheema, Afsar, & Javed, 2020; Joyce & Paquin, 2016), has become a necessity in order to ascertain future steady advancement of this sector. However, this accomplishment requires time-proven sustainable strategies. It has been found that almost 82% of the export revenue has been received from apparel and clothing sector of Bangladesh (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2019). Now, apparel industry in Bangladesh is at a crossroads (Martin & Economy, 2013) as Alam, Azim, and Alias (2017) also revealed that apparel factories of Bangladesh are facing massive challenges regarding compliance with regard to green sustainability. Inadequate Welfare schemes and environmental protection conditions are getting issues of concern to be met. Research findings also amply document that owners’attitude towards sustainability is not positive yet. In this context, an exploration of the performance of apparel sector of Bangladesh seeks grave attention from the perspective of intensifying competition in relation to sustainability concern. This investigation is expected to provide considerable insight to the policy perspectives and academic interest as well. On this background, this research aims to examine the role of environmental CSR dimensions upon building green corporate image and green competitive advantage that are considered instrumental to the prospect of apparel sector. In contrast to the firms in developed nations, the willingness of Bangladeshi firms to mitigate emissions has not yet promised. Besides, the awareness regarding ecological protection is forming very slowly. Again, green image of the firm is considered very critical from the perspective of the movements of environmentalism and stricter international regulations regarding preservation of environment. In this context, attempts are required to examine the willingness of firms to build green image and whether this green image tends to contribute to green competitiveness or not. Therefore, this environmental concern needs to be explored to see the interplay among the variables concerned in this study. Even though the importance of building corporate image of the firm has become a great concern for the management practitioners considering prevention of natural environment, deep exploration of such impact received much less attention in the competitive literature (Bansal, 2005). Thus, it is a research urge of the time to explore how firms may enhance their green image and green competitiveness (Cronin, Smith, Gleim, Ramirez, & Martinez, 2011). Furthermore, although prior studies attempted to reveal the concept ECSR, green management, and environmental performance of firm (Chang, Yeh, & Li, 2020; Chuang & Huang, 2015; Chuang & Huang, 2018; Kao, Liu, Huang, & Chang, 2010; Lyon & Maxwell, 2008; Post, Rahman, & Rubow, 2011; Rahman & Post, 2012) no study offered, to the best of the knowledge of the researchers, an integrative framework in the area of environmental management comprising ECSR, green corporate image and green competitiveness. To fill the research gap mentioned above, this study seeks to address the following research questions: How and to what extent do environmental corporate social responsibility dimensions affect corporate green image and green competitive advantage? Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 2 of 16 How can an empirical integrative framework be devised to comprehend the interplay among ECSR dimensions, green corporate image, and green competitive advantage? What policy guidelines can be formulated for the practitioners based on the empirical framework? Rest of the paper is structured as follows. A brief description about the analytical framework has been given comprising major constructs and their interrelationships among them in section two. Methods and measurement of the constructs are delineated in the third section. Data analysis and discussion of results are described elaborately. Finally, the conclusion section is comprised of theoretical contribution, managerial contribution, and limitation of the study. Analytical framework Environmentally pioneering firms can attain first mover capacity and consequently may charge comparatively higher prices for green products and achieve green competitiveness (Chuang & Huang, 2015). While designing the conceptual framework, three dimensions of ECSR such as environmental philanthropy (E-philanthropy) (Carroll, 1991; Liu & Zhou, 2009; Onlaor & Rotchanakitumnuai, 2010; Peloza & Shang, 2011), environmental community involvement (E-Community involvement) (Ailawadi, Luan, Neslin, & Taylor, 2011; Rahman, 2011; Sen, Bhattacharya, & Korschun, 2006; Uddin, Tarique, & Hassan, 2008), and environmental customer wellbeing (E-Customer Wellbeing) (Carroll, 1991; Cochran, 2007; Mina Okada & Mais, 2010) have been conceived to influence green corporate image and green competitive advantage. Based on literature, for understanding the interplay among ECSR, green corporate image and green competitive advantage, the following research framework has been formulated (Fig. 1). Literature review and hypothesis development Green competitive advantages The concept of green competitive advantage has been described as the conditions of the firm that cannot be imitated by others under which the firm hold position regarding ecological management or sustainable innovation (Lin & Chen, 2017). Green capability is supposed to be dynamic in nature within the organization and in the business processes. This study holds that the dimensions of ECSR significantly influence green competitive advantage by means of ecological management. Establishing these green dynamic abilities are supposed to be reliable and permanent in the firms (Chen, 2008). Intelligent firms utilize ecological strategies for shaping their green competitiveness (Wang, Hu, Dai, & Burns, 2021). Firms can conduct green business processes as a responsibility which has the ability to form green image and effectively track sustainability in the organizations (Famiyeh, Adaku, Amoako-Gyampah, Asante-Darko, & Amoatey, 2018). In order to develop sustainable competitive edge, firms have to engage themselves in innovative and green initiatives (Wysocki, 2021). Many studies reported the existence of positive association between business performance and environmental concerns in relation to Fig. 1 Research Framework Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 3 of 16 competitiveness (Galdeano-Gómez, Céspedes-Lorente, & Martínez-del-Río, 2008; López-Gamero, Claver-Cortés, & Molina-Azorín, 2008). Firms are getting more and more inclined to ECSR (Barin Cruz & Avila Pedrozo, 2009) and green management (GM) which is referred to as the organization wide course of action that applies inventiveness for achieving sustainability, reduction of waste, ensuring societal responsibility, and competitiveness through incessant learning initiatives by endorsing environmental goal and strategy which are in line with overall goal of the organization (Pane Haden, Oyler, & Humphreys, 2009). Thus ECSR together with GM are nowadays is required by contemporary business world (Chang et al., 2020). From the perspective of ECSR, GM is supposed to enhance firms’environmental performance by meeting various expectations of different stakeholders of the firm like community, customers etc. (Bengtsson, 2008; Jackson & Apostolakou, 2010). Jorge, Madueño, Martínez-Martínez, and Sancho (2015) addressed the connection between environmental reputation and competitive achievement of firms. The outcome of the investigation found that environmental presentation of firms have a supportive, straight, and substantial impact on competitive edge of firms. Harris and Crane (2002) conducted a study to examine the effect of greening of the organization. They argued that inclusion of ecological concerns in the culture is expected to exert green capability which would be difficult for the competitors to find and reproduce. Resources which are not completely imitable in practice would provide sustainable competitive advantage as well (Barney, 1991). ECSR Rahman and Post (2012) contributed to the understanding of the concept ECSR comprehensively. ECSR is a multi-dimensional idea which relates to corporate governance, sustainability, and performance of the firm. The actual rationalization for studying the ecological dimensions of CSR is related to the fundamental notion of green business initiatives. Organizations which are comprised of ecological shields and sustainable procedures are supposed to follow dependable strategic orientation (Fernandes & Solimun, 2017). Green business organizations are supposed to follow the norms and principles regarding a balance of economic concern and societal parity and eventually ecological accountability (Alawattage & Fernando, 2017). Hence, ECSR is expected to contribute to building green corporate image and green competitive advantage which are two crucial constructs of the proposed study framework. Based on the fundamental Caroll’s model (1979), Rashid, Khalid, and Rahman (2015) identified three conceptual dimensions of ECSR: environmental philanthropy (E philanthropy), environmental community involvement (E community involvement), and environmental customer wellbeing (E customer wellbeing). E philanthropy is described as the willingness of the firm to endorse the wellbeing of others in the form of providing monetary benefits for the betterment of the society. From the perspective of ECSR, use of pecuniary resources for upholding initiatives and awareness with regard to environment hav become popular among organizations (Yadav, Gupta, Rani, & Rawat, 2018); Peloza & Shang, 2011). E community involvement refers to implementing CSR activities with regard to safeguarding the environment through involving community as a whole (Ailawadi et al., 2011;Rahman,2011). E customer wellbeing is described as creating and delivering finest products and services, providing appropriate product information, developing and distributing safe and ecofriendly and not injurious products to the customers (Turker, 2009). These ECSR dimensions are cosidered as constructs for the study because ECSR is supposed to help develop and maintain green corporate image and green competitive advantage (Chuang & Huang, 2018). Of late, the ECSR has got tremendous attention in the industry and in scholastic literature (Rahman & Post, 2012). Studies also found that ECSR has the substantial capacity to provide competitiveness to the firms (Rahman & Post, 2012). Sustainable competitiveness in operation can be achieved if ECSR is efficiently measured and implemented (Chuang & Huang, 2018). Thus, firms are increasingly putting impetus on long-standing attention for green initiatives in order to attain business competitiveness (Chuang & Huang, 2015). ECSR is expected to contribute to organizational sustainability markedly (Ugoani, 2019) which is defined as strengthening of social and economic systems considering the environmental issues with importance in business operations of the firms (The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development in London, CIPD, 2012). This concept has been considered very critical in successful operations of the business without jeopardizing the stake of the future generation (Boudreau & Ramstad, 2005). Generally unscrupulous and whimsical corporate interest and sheer arrogance of people in the society create various ecological upheavals (Banyte, Brazioniene, & Gadeikiene, 2010) which in turn may lead to ECSR as a compensating means on behalf of the firm. The corporate efforts include different forms of customer wellbeing (Jansson, Marell, & Nordlund, 2010; Pickett-Baker & Ozaki, 2008; Ramayah, Lee, & Mohamad, 2010), community involvement (Chiutsi, Mukoroverwa, Karigambe, & Mudzengi, 2011; Stronza & Gordillo, 2008; Weaver & Lawton, 2007), and various philanthropic activities, ecotourism, friendly workplace atmosphere (Nik Ramli, 2007) and these studies tended to provide the empirical ground for expanding firms’attitudes towards ECSR. Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 4 of 16 Green corporate image Bathmanathan and Hironaka (2016) described green corporate image as sustainability for progress where firms carryout their regular business operations without disturbing the future generation. Firms try to build green corporate image with a view to gaining competitiveness and increase market share. Since people have become more concern about ecological issues than before, businesses are experiencing huge pressure from the society to establish green corporate image. Consequently, this pressure is pushing firms to engage in environmental protective activities (Saran & Shokouhyar, 2021). Widyastuti (2019) argued that strength and quality of green corporate image would have an impact on building green competitive advantage of the firm. They also added that to attain sustainability firms are to exert sufficient effort for establishing green corporate image. Green corporate image is considered as one the crucial catalyst for attaining green competitive advantage (Sellitto, Camfield, & Buzuku, 2020). Green corporate image together with innovation would provide substantial green competitive advantage to the firms (Fernando, Jabbour, & Wah, 2019). Thus, this study seeks to validate the association between green corporate image and green competitive advantage. Association among E philanthropy, corporate green image, and green competitive advantage Porter and Kramer (2002) emphasized that firms have incorporated environmental philanthropy at the strategic level as a means for building economic and societal image at the same time to respond to the pressure from their stakeholders. Porter and Kramer (2002) argued that philanthropic activities are performed through active collaboration with environmental groups and agencies. Often, these initiatives are considered as a means for achieving positive green image in the market and responding to environmental regulations. Liu, Wei, Huang, and Tsai (2017) argued that environmental philanthropy is reinforced by business dividends articulated in the form of ECSR. Firms’philanthropic contribution is a very salient attribute of environmental CSR (Brammer & Millington, 2008; Porter & Kramer, 2002). Firms are nobly motivated by environmental philanthropy where they find themselves as fundamental part of the society. (Jhawar & Gupta, 2017; Richardson & Lanis, 2007). To be good citizen, the organizations must feel indebted to the society for philanthropic activities beyond any direct gain, though the firm would harvest benefits out of these initiatives (Avi-Yonah, 2008; Williams, 2007). Besides, environmental philanthropy is supposed to increase the sense of ethics and eventually contribute to achieve green competitiveness. Most often, firms are engaged in environmental philanthropic initiatives for alleviating negative image, gaining corporate trust, and enhancing reputation. It is recognized by Koehn and Ueng (2010) that firms can substantially distract public contemplation from adverse events by means of E philanthropic activities. Therefore, based on the literature the study proposes the following hypotheses: H 1a : E Philanthropy is positively associated with green corporate image of the firm. H 1b : E Philanthropy is positively associated with green competitive advantage of the firm. Association among E- community involvement, green corporate image, and green competitive advantage Firms’community building activities through CSR activities contribute substantially toward creating the sense of identity and loyalty among customers (Nik Ramli & Nor Irwani, 2013). Even stronger influence of community involvement is identified if these activities have orientation toward the positive image of the firm. Generally, customers are supposed to endorse positively the interactive initiatives of the firms toward community and society building. In this regard firms are likely to engage in identifying the needs of the society and concentrate on community-firm identification (Fonseca & Ferro, 2015). Timely efforts by the firms are important factors that form the basis for stakeholders’trust in corporate community involvement (CCI) initiatives (Baik & Park, 2019). In most of the cases, customer-firms identification serves as the credentials for CCI of the firm (Bhattacharya, Sen, & Korschun, 2008; Luo & Bhattacharya, 2006). Organizations are to line up their principles and values in accordance with the needs of the society and the environment (Garriga & Melé, 2004). It is the firm’s responsibility to ascertain that the activities of the firm are aimed at the benefit of the society and the environment (Yekini & Jallow, 2012). Yekini, Adelopo, and Adegbite (2017) identified CCI as an arrangement of corporate social initiative. Firms are to adjust their activities with the pressure of the ethical concern of the market in which they operate and seek green competitiveness by means of green image building. The salient aspects of corporate social initiatives for success are core competencies and corporate strategies in action. CCI is to be linked to the strategic route of the firm in case of successful implementation (Bek, Jones, & Pollitt, 2005). CCI is generally comprised of active involvement of employees and engagement of the firms are more directly linked to core aspects of the organization. The literature suggests that there is a positive relationship between E community involvement and green image of the firm. Hence, the following hypotheses are posited: Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 5 of 16 H 2a : E Community involvement is positively associated with green corporate image of the firm. H 2b : E Community involvement is positively associated with green competitive advantage of the firm. Association among E customer wellbeing, green corporate image, and green competitive advantage Customers perceive a positive image about the firm if they are induced by the environmental efforts of the firm which generally lead to repetitive patronage actions towards the company (Lee, Lee, & Cho, 2018; Trang, Lee, & Han, 2019). In the competitive market some of the firms take aggressive environmental efforts to ensure customer well-being as tool to retain and attract customers which eventually help build green image and green competitive advantage of the firm (Han, Yu, & Kim, 2019). Nowadays firms are increasingly implementing E-CSR to complement various brand loyalty game plans (Han, Chua, Ariza- Montes, & Untaru, 2020). If customers are convinced with the environmental concerns of the company, they most often evaluate the firm more positively by perceiving a connection between the firm and themselves (Fonseca & Ferro, 2015). Environment friendly products required by the customers may directly or indirectly enhance environmental image and loyalty that may act as an instrument to building green image of the firm (Lin, Chen, & Huang, 2014). In this connection, environmentally sustainable business processes are to be engaged in the organization to respond to ecologically oriented consumption behavior of the customers (Geiger, Fischer, & Schrader, 2018). Studies have revealed that love, respect, and loyalty for brand can be obtained by establishing the sense among the customers about responsibility regarding ecological concern (Han et al., 2019). Rashid et al. (2015) argued that perception of the customers about the quality of the products (services) can be influenced substantially by ensuring environmental CSR. Previous studies reveal a positive association between E customer well-being, green image, and green competitive advantage of the firm. Therefore, the following hypotheses have been proposed: H 3a : E Customer well-being is positively associated with green corporate image of the firm. H 3b : E Customer well-being is positively associated with green competitive advantage of the firm. Association between green image and green competitive advantage From the perspective of ECSR, green image of the firm is generally recognized as mental image or the perception the people held about the organization’s green concern (Widyastuti, 2019). This image is related to behavioral characteristics and effective communication in between the firm and its customers (Widyastuti, 2019). It is considered very crucial as it tends to describe how a particular firm is distinguished from other firms in the market and in effect this green image creates and preserves loyal customer in the long run which tends to provide substantial green competitiveness (Widyastuti et al., 2019); Chen, 2008; Widyastuti, 2019). Firm’s green image has been defined by Chen (2010) from the perspective of brand equity as the collection of attitudes toward a particular brand in the mindset of customer which is hooked to ecological pledges and apprehensions. Direct positive association has been recognized by Lee, Kim, and Kim (2018) between enhancement of green image of the firm and green practices. The outcome of the study revealed that ecological partnership with society is supposed to provide sustainable competitiveness in the firm. The study conducted by Chen (2008) established similar findings of the association between green image and green competitiveness. In this regard, green innovation would exert significant green image to the firm (Chen, 2010). Jain and Kaur (2004) argued that besides satisfying the ecological needs of the customers, green image has the capacity to augment green competitiveness of the firm substantially. Firms are to ensure ecological communication among stakeholder to disclose the relevance of environmental concerns that the firm is serious about (Abimbola, Lim, Hillestad, Xie, & Haugland, 2010). This communication is considered instrumental to consolidate the collective association with society for creating positive green image (Nair & Menon, 2008). By exerting efforts for building green image, firms can enhance their green competencies and new market besides avoiding the worry of objections from various stakeholders. Barney (1991) and Li, Ngniatedema, and Chen (2017) claimed that in the literature of environmental management, corporate image has been considered very contributory to building green repute, attaining green competitiveness and achieving green performance of the organizations. Firms are expected to boost their ecological and social initiatives parallelly for building green image in the market and reputation among customers (Chen, 2008,2010; Walker & Wan, 2012). Since, more and more firms are required to establish green management, firms would be establishing green corporate image and eventually green competitiveness (Bansal, 2005). Both management and marketing studies recognized the weight of ecological pledge to the society. From long before, management of the firms started to relate business activities to environmental endeavors to strengthening the green image of the company which tends to Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 6 of 16 form a valuable instrument to tackle the trouble stemming from the part of the society (Feola, 2015). Based on this backdrop the following hypothesis has been formulated: H 4 : E green image is positively associated with green competitiveness of the firm Methodology and measurement Data collection and the sample A self-administered questionnaire survey was carried out in July, 2019 on apparel factories of Bangladesh. The study used random sampling based on 53 apparel firms enlisted with Dhaka Stock Exchange. A total of 340 questionnaires were sent for collecting data. Mid and top-level management employees were selected as respondents since they are expected to possess knowledge about the concern for green management and authoritative power to take relevant operational and managerial decisions. Out of the sent questionnaires 302 questionnaires were returned and 268 were found to be useful for this empirical analysis with a successful response rate of 78.30%. Apparel industry has been selected for the research object because this sector is obliged to strictly handle their environmental waste to comply with environmental regulations. Moreover, this sector is facing tremendous compliance issues from different foreign buyers. Therefore, there is a huge pressure on this sector both from home and abroad. So, this study is expected to contribute to the exploration of how green image can enhance green competitiveness of the apparel firms. Before the questionnaire is administered to the potential respondents, five experts in the field of study have been consulted for identifying ambiguous terms and ensuring content validity. Besides, to reduce common method variance (CMV) (Lindell & Whitney, 2001), different respondents for different constructs have been considered. Definitions and measurements of the constructs All the items included in the questionnaire was measured by a five-point likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 denoting strong disagreement to strong agreement. The study utilized the following definitions and measurement of the constructs involved: Environmental CSR ECSR is conceived as the responsibility of the firms to integrate the ecological concerns in the operations, products, waste management, recycling, reducing practices that would distress the future generation of the country and the world (Mazurkiewicz, 2004). Other views regarding ECSR are described as the ecologically compatible activities of the firms which should embrace beyond the legal obligations in relation to wider good and co-opting adverse externalities (Lyon & Maxwell, 2008; Portney, 2008). The measurement for the dimensions of ECSR are adapted from the research work of Turker (2009): E-philanthropy (EPHI) EPHI 1:The firm contributes to the projects promoting the well-being of the society. EPHI 2: The firm invests into the projects for the future generations. EPHI 3: The firm contributes to support other nongovernmental agencies working in troublesome areas. E-community involvement (ECOM) ECOM 1: The firm takes part in the initiatives for promoting and improving the natural environment. ECOM 2: The firm aims at sustainable growth of the society for future generations. ECOM 3: The firm inspires employees for participating in societal activities voluntarily. ECOM 4: The firm operationalizes distinct schemes for mitigating the negative effects upon ecology. E-customer wellbeing (ECUS) ECUS 1: The firm shows respects to the rights of customers and legal aspects. ECUS 2: The firm discloses complete and precise information regarding products for the customers. Table 1 Demographic data of the respondents Frequency Percentage Gender Male 221 82.7 Female 47 17.3 Age 35–39 19 7 40–44 153 57 45–49 40 15 50–54 35 13 55–59 13 5 60 and above 8 3 Years of experience 5–10 212 79 More than 10 years 56 21 Education Graduate 29 11 Postgraduate 239 89 Employment status Employed 249 93 Self-employed 19 7 Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 7 of 16 ECUS 3: The firm considers customer satisfaction as a very high priority. Green corporate image (GCI) Based on the definition of green corporate image provided by Chang and Fong (2010), this study operationalized the term as the perceptions established based on the interplay among customer, firm, community, and personnel of the organization which are connected to the ecological pledges and apprehensions for environment. Based on the research by Walters (1978) and Chen (2008) the measures of green corporate image have been adapted from the work of Chang and Fong (2010). GCI 1: The firm produces trustworthy and steady green products. GCI 2: The firm has the capability of satisfying green requirements of customers. GCI 3: The firm possesses satisfactory ecological repute. GCI 4: The firm has outstanding performance regarding green management and environmental innovation. Green competitive advantage (GCA) According to Lin and Chen (2017) green competitive advantage has been defined as the critical aspects of the firms for enhancing attainment of sustainable progress. Based on the work of Lin and Chen (2017), the measures of green competitive advantage involve four items: GCA 1: The firm has low-cost competitive advantage regarding green management in comparison with major competitors. GCA 2: The firm offers better quality green products in comparison with major competitors. GCA 3: The firm invests more money in environmental research and development and green innovation than the competitors. GCA 4: The firm has greater capability than competitors regarding green management. Findings With a view to understanding the demographics of the respondents, a list of relevant information has been obtained from the questionnaire. Table 1lists descriptive statistics of the respondents. Among the respondents 83% of them are male and 17.3% are found female. Every respondent had at least 5 years of experience at the managerial position of the organization. Table 2 Scale summary Scale items Item loading Cronbach’s alpha Composite reliability E-Philanthropy 0.872 0.872 EPHI1 0.841 EPHI2 0.842 EPHI3 0.816 E-Community Involvement 0.931 0.932 ECOM1 0.839 ECOM2 0.917 ECOM3 0.904 ECOM4 0.855 E-Customer Wellbeing 0.892 0.893 ECUS1 0.814 ECUS2 0.842 ECUS3 0.915 Green corporate image 0.918 0.920 GCI1 0.778 GCI2 0.880 GCI3 0.888 GCI4 0.897 Green competitive advantage 0.835 0.835 GCA1 0.729 GCA2 0.803 GCA3 0.695 GCA4 0.762 Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 8 of 16 Moravcikova, D., Krizanova, A., Kliestikova, J., & Rypakova, M. (2017). Green marketing as the source of the competitive advantage of the business. Sustainability,9(12), 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122218. Nair, S. R., & Menon, C. G. (2008). An environmental marketing system–a proposed model based on Indian experience. Business Strategy and the Environment,17(8), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.586. Nik Ramli, N. A. R. (2007). Employee involvement in ems/iso and its spill over effect in consumer environmentally responsible behaviour (Doctoral dissertation, Phd Thesis). Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Nik Ramli, N. A. R., & Nor Irwani, A. R. (2013). CSR practices and customer loyalty. The mediating role of Corporate Image. In Colloquium on Administrative Science & Technology. IEEE Malaysia IE/IA Joint Chapter. Ogiemwonyi, O., Harun, A. B., Alam, M. N., & Othman, B. A. (2020). Do we care about going green? Measuring the effect of green environmental awareness, green product value and environmental attitude on green culture. An insight from Nigeria. Environmental and Climate Technologies,24(1), 254–274. https:// doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0015. Onlaor, W., & Rotchanakitumnuai, S. (2010). Enhancing customer loyalty towards corporate social responsibility of Thai mobile service providers. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,40(6), 41–52. Pane Haden, S. S., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: an exploratory analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041–1055. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,39(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6. Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281–293. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review,80(12), 56–68. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review,73(5), 120–134. Portney, P. R. (2008). The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: an empirical perspective. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society,50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642. Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2012). Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. Journal of Business Ethics,105(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1 007/s10551-011-0967-x. Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of definitions: ten dimensions of corporate social responsibility. World Review of Business Research,1(1), 166–176. Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007. Ramutsindela, M. (2009). The interconnections between environmental philanthropy and business: insights from the Southern African Nature Foundation. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa,70(1), 54– 69. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.0.0041. Rashid, N. R. N. A., Khalid, S. A., & Rahman, N. I. A. (2015). Environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): exploring its influence on customer loyalty. Procedia Economics and Finance,31, 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)01159-4. Responsible, C. I. P. D (2012). Sustainable business: HR leading the way–a collection of “thought pieces”. London: CIPD. Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,26(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ja ccpubpol.2007.10.003. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. The Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 534–559. Saeednia, H., & Valahzaghard, S. (2012). A study to measure the impact of customer perception, quality, environment concern and satisfaction on green customer loyalt. Management Science Letters,2(8), 2881–2888. https:// doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2012.09.022. Saha, M., & Darnton, G. (2005). Green companies or green con-panies: are companies really green, or are they pretending to be? Business and Society Review,110(2), 117–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00007.x. Santos, J. R. A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension,37(2), 1–5. Saran, S. M., & Shokouhyar, S. (2021). Crossing the chasm between green corporate image and green corporate identity: a text mining, social media-based case study on automakers. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(3), 1–24. Schwaiger, M. (2004). Components and parameters of corporate reputation—an empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review,56(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/1 0.1007/BF03396685. Sellitto, M. A., Camfield, C. G., & Buzuku, S. (2020). Green innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: a survey and structural model. Sustainable Production and Consumption,23,94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.04.007. Sellitto, M. A., & Hermann, F. F. (2019). Influence of green practices on organizational competitiveness: a study of the electrical and electronics industry. Engineering Management Journal,31(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1 080/10429247.2018.1522220. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,34(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978. Sethi,V.,&King,W.R.(1994).Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science,40(12), 1601–1627. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1601. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. The Academy of Management Review,20(4), 936–960. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280026. Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,25(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445. Statistics, B. B. O. (2019). Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh. Dhaka: Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning. Stronza, A., & Gordillo, J. (2008). Community views of ecotourism. Annals of Tourism Research,35(2), 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2008.01.002. Trang, H. L. T., Lee, J. S., & Han, H. (2019). How do green attributes elicit proenvironmental behaviors in guests? The case of green hotels in Vietnam. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing,36(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0548408.2018.1486782. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: a scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics,85(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1 0551-008-9780-6. Uddin, M. B., Tarique, K. M., & Hassan, M. (2008). Three dimensional aspects of corporate social responsibility. Ugoani, J. (2019). Business ethics and its effect on organizational sustainability. Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies,5(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.2044 8/807.5.2.119.131. Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics,109(2), 227–242. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4. Walters, C. G. (1978). Consumer behavior: an integrated framework. New York: Richard D. Irwin Inc. Wang, Y., Hu, H., Dai, W., & Burns, K. (2021). Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators,124, 107371. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.ecolind.2021.107371. Weaver, D. B., & Lawton, L. J. (2007). Twenty years on: the state of contemporary ecotourism research. Tourism Management,28(5), 1168–1179. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.004. Welford, R. (1995). Environmental strategy and sustainable development: the corporate challenge for the twenty-first century. Routledge. Widyastuti, S. (2019). Developing a green corporate image: an achievement for competitive advantage through organizational culture and green marketing strategy. Revista San Gregorio, (36). Widyastuti, S., Said, M., Siswono, S., & Firmansyah, D. A. (2019). Customer trust through green corporate image, green marketing strategy, and social responsibility: a case study. European Research Studies Journal, 22(2), 83–99. Williams, D. F. (2007). Developing the concept of tax governance. London: KPMG. Wysocki, J. (2021). Innovative green initiatives in the manufacturing SME sector in Poland. Sustainability,13(4), 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042386. Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 15 of 16 Yadav, N., Gupta, K., Rani, L., & Rawat, D. (2018). Drivers of sustainability practices and SMEs: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Sustainable Development,7(4), 531–531. Yekini, K., & Jallow, K. (2012). Corporate community involvement disclosures in annual report: a measure of corporate community development or a signal of CSR observance?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1):7–32. Yekini, K. C., Adelopo, I., & Adegbite, E. (2017). The impact of community expectations on corporate community involvement disclosures in the UK. Accounting Forum,41(3), 234–252. Publisher’sNote Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Alam and Islam International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2021) 6:8 Page 16 of 16