Determinants of loan repayment performance of micro and small enterprises: Empirical evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia
Abstract
EconStor is a publication server for scholarly economic literature, provided as a non-commercial public service by the ZBW.
Full text
Kiros, Yitbarek Weldegerima Article Determinants of loan repayment performance of micro and small enterprises: Empirical evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance (JEF) Provided in Cooperation with: The Academy of Entrepreneurial Finance (AEF), Los Angeles, CA, USA Suggested Citation: Kiros, Yitbarek Weldegerima (2022) : Determinants of loan repayment performance of micro and small enterprises: Empirical evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia, The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance (JEF), ISSN 2373-1761, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management and The Academy of Entrepreneurial Finance (AEF), Malibu, CA and Los Angeles, CA, Vol. 24, Iss. 2, pp. 59-76, https://doi.org/10.57229/2373-1761.1411 , https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jef/vol24/iss2/3 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/264426 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance Volume 24 Issue 2 Winter 2022, Issue 2 Article 3 2022 Determinants of Loan Repayment Performance of Micro and Determinants of Loan Repayment Performance of Micro and Small Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Somali Regional State, Small Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia Ethiopia Yitbarek Weldegerima Kiros Mr. JIGJIGA UNIVERSITY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jef Part of the Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Kiros, Yitbarek Weldegerima Mr. (2022) "Determinants of Loan Repayment Performance of Micro and Small Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia," The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance : Vol. 24: Iss. 2, pp. -. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jef/vol24/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact bailey.berr[email protected].
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 59 Determinants of Loan Repayment Performance of Micro and Small Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Somali Regional State, Ethiopia Yitbarek Kiros JigJiga University, Ethiopia [email protected] Abstract: Viable Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) that reach a large number of poor people who are not served by formal financial institutions have been a prime element for the growth of Ethiopia. To operate successfully MFIs have to make sure that the loan they disburse has to be repaid to have a financially sustainable and viable operation and contribute its share in the poverty reduction of the country. In light of this, this research study was carried to investigate the factors affecting loan settlement of Micro and Small Enterprises(MSEs) financed by Somali microfinance institutions considering lender characteristics. Both primary and secondary data were employed used. The primary data was collected by distributing questionnaires and through interviews. A total of 175 Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) were selected using the purposive sampling technique. The secondary data was acquired from various issues of annual reports of the Somali Micro Finance institution and other concerned institutions. Both descriptive analysis and econometric model (binary logistic regression) was employed to analyze the effect of the literature-driven variables on loan repayment (dependent variable) by borrowers. The binary logistic regression result revealed that among the variables hypothesized to affect loan repayment period, grace period, and timeliness of loan release have a statistically significant effect on loan repayment by the borrowers Whereas loan size has a statistically insignificant effect on loan repayment performance by the borrowers. Keywords: Loan Repayment Performance, MSEs, Logistic Regression, Somali Microfinance, Ethiopia
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 60 1. Introduction Microfinance institutions (MFIs) were established to fill the gap in the financial sector by providing funds to the lower income society. In most developing countries the objective of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) has been: firstly, reducing the risk of income shocks to help reduce poverty and secondly, raising asset accumulation to encourage private activity (Armendáriz & Gollier, 2000). One of the methodologies of MFIs is group lending. In group lending, the group obtains a loan under joint liability, so each member is made responsible for repayment of loans of his or her peers. The success of MFIs is because, in group based programs, the function of screening, monitoring and enforcement of repayment are to a large extent transferred from the bank to borrowers. The main argument is that, compared to the physically distant banks, group members can obtain at low cost, information regarding the reputation, indebtedness and wealth of the loan applicant and about his or her effort to ensure the repayment of the loan (Norhaziah & Mohdnoor, 2010). It is important to note, however, that group lending may not ensure high repayment rates at all times. When loans are received on the basis of joint liability, the risk of loan default by a particular member is shared by his/her peers. It may also be that borrower’s assessment of his or her peer’s likelihood of defaulting triggers the borrower’s own decision to default. And also groups beyond a certain size may experience increased difficulty of communication and coordination so that both information and monitoring advantage of the group are dilute (Manohar & Zeller, 1997). And also, the lenders cannot observe the behaviors of their clients whether they are honest and dishonest. They only observe the outcome, either the clients repay or not (Norhaziah & Mohdnoor, 2010). Hence, loan repayment problem is one of the critical issues of MFIs that cause the failure of MFIs (Norhaziah & Mohdnoor, 2010). Many scholars have identified many factors that affect the loan repayment performance of the MSEs (Armendáriz & Gollier, 2000; Manohar & Zeller, 1997; Njoku & Odii, 1999; Norhaziah & Mohdnoor, 2010). In Ethiopia also a number of researchers (Abraham, 2002,; Berhanu, 1999; Jemal, 2003; Mengistu, 1997 & 1999; Micha’el, 1996; Teferi, 2000) have identified a number of factors that affect loan repayment of borrowers. In this juncture it can be understood that loan repayment is affected by certain factors in a specific situation. Somali Microfinance Institution (SMFI) is the only microfinance institution operating in Somali Regional State of Ethiopia. In 2018 the loan default rate of SMFIs was estimated to be 65%. Hence, the purpose of this research was to examine and test the literature driven variably in affecting loan repayment performance of MSEs financed by SMFIs Furthermore, this is the first research conducted on l
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 61 2. Review of Literature 2.1 Review Empirical Studies: Global View In an attempt to empirically analyze the loan repayment determinants in micro enterprises in Madagascar, (Zeller 1996), employed a Tobit model using information obtained at the household, group and community level. The result based on 146 sample groups showed that enterprises with higher levels of social cohesion have abetter repayment rate. The result also lead to the conclusion that it is not the level of physical and human assets of the enterprises but the degree of variance of risky assets among members that contributes to better loan repayment. The result therefore indicated that heterogeneity in asset holdings among members and related intra group diversification in on and off farm enterprises, enables members to pool risks so as to better secure repayment of the loan. Furthermore, gains in the repayment rate due to risk pooling diminish at the margin because of increased costs of coordination, monitoring, and moral hazard that come with greater heterogeneity in groups. A study conducted by Ibtissem (2013), has carried out a study to find out thee determinants of microcredit repayment in Tunisian Microfinance. He has used a three categorical independent variables, Scio-demographic variables, loan characteristics variables, and behavioral variables using a binary logistic regressions model. As per the findings of Ibtissem (2013), the major determinants that affect the micro-credit repayment performance of borrowers were found to be Scio-demographic characteristics of respondents, past participation in micro-credit loans and past credit history of borrowers were the main factors that affect the micro-credit repayment of borrowers. Lincolin (2006), in his research in assessing the factors affecting the repayment rates of rural credit institutions of Indonesia by taking sample of 174 rural village credit institutions. Lincolin (2006), had employing a logistics regression approach has found out that social customs, social values, and sanction on defaulter by members had an influence on ensuring high loan repayment of the rural village credit institutions. Vigano (1993) in his study about the case of development bank of Burkina Faso employed a credit-scoring model. He found out that being women, married, aged, more business experience, value of assets, timeliness of loan release, small periodical repayments, project diversification and being a pre-existing depositor are positively related to loan repayment performance. On the other hand, loan in kind, smaller loan than required, long waiting period from application to loan release and availability of other source of credit were found to have negative relation with loan repayment performance. Kashuliza (1993) used a linear regression model to analyze determinants of loan repayment in small holder agriculture in the southern highlands of Tanzania. His study showed that education, attitude towards repayment, farm income and off-farm income positively affect loan repayment with farm income being significant, while age,
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 62 household expenditure and household size have negative influence on loan repayment performance with household expenditure being significant Von Pischke (1991) in his explanation about the cause of poor loan collection performance by formal agricultural lenders in developing countries, attributed to general conditions of low levels of economic development. Farm level causes of loan arrears as cited by him include small farmers’ poverty, large farmers’ political influence, low returns and lack of profitable innovation in tropical and sub-tropical agriculture, unfamiliarity with modern commercial practice among certain rural societies, cultural factors such as the weakness or absence of moral incentives or small group sanctions for timely repayment, illiteracy, lack of farm planning, insufficient supervision, and low level of formal education achieved by typical borrowers. Problems at the lender side include deficiency in loan administration and lack of market information such as system of credit rating based on repayment performance. In addition, difficulty in enforcing contracts through judicial or administrative law process could be cited as a country level problem constraining lender performance. Hunt (1996) examined the credit rationing technology of lenders and the repayment behavior of borrowers at a rural financial institution taking a sample of 504. Loan rationing equation and loan repayment equations estimated employing Tobit model using survey data at Guyana Cooperative Agricultural and Industrial Development Bank revealed that only 33% of the criteria utilized identified creditworthy borrowers implying that the screening technology was not efficient and needed to be repaired. The results also indicated that tightening the loan contract terms by reducing the grace period on loans and rejecting applications which had long processing times enhanced the pool of credit worthy borrowers. Female borrowers were also not rationed differently than male borrowers nor were they are worse payers than male borrowers (i.e. the variable sex was insignificant), but wealthy borrowers were bad credit risks as their repayment performance is poor. In general, the study showed that only four out of twelve explanatory variables, which are fishing, males in food crops and livestock, credit experience and sugar cane enhance creditworthiness, while other variables especially grace period, delays, and joint borrowers contribute significantly to the default problem. A study by Ade (1999) on the determinants of small holder loan repayment performance evidence from Nigerian micro-finance system found out that the proportion of borrowers with secondary education, number of times visited by loan officials and the loan size were the major factors that cause the loan default by the borrower.
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 63 Okorie (1986) provided empirical evidence and quantification of the extent to which some factors influence loan repayment among smallholder farmers in developing countries with particular reference to small holders farmers in Ondo state of Nigeria based on 45 sample units. Based on obtained result, these factors and their correlation coefficients with their signs are identified as follows: number of disbursement (+0.372), time of disbursement (+0.658), number of supervisory visits by credit officers after disbursement (+0.411) and the profitability of enterprise on which loan funds were invested (+0.309). Arene (1992) in an attempt to evaluate the credit delivery system of Supervised Agricultural Credit Schemes among small holder farmers in Anambra State of Nigeria with emphasis on loan repayment rate conducted a multiple regression analysis. The result is based on 95 sample farmers showed that timely loan repaying farmers had larger loan size, larger farm size, higher income, higher age, higher number of years in farming experience, shorter distance between home and source of loan, higher level of formal education, larger household size, higher level of adoption of innovations, and lower credit needs than defaulting farmers. The regression analysis showed that size of loan, farm size, income, age, number of years of farming experience, level of formal education and adoption to innovations are significantly and positively related to repayment rate, but distance between home and source of loan, household size, and credit needs account for less. Padmanabhan (1981) mentioned some of the specific reasons for default in rural credit projects which a development banker can possibly guard against at the time of project preparation or appraisal based on Indian experience. These factors include: under financing, over investment, imperfect analysis, unrealistic repayment schedule, inadequate technical support, improper planning of infrastructural support, ineffective arrangements, inadequate communication between branch office and head office, cursory assessment of response from the farmers, reduction in the unit value of projects and high propensity to consume. A study made by Njoku and Odii (1999) on the determinants of loan repayment in Nigeria by employing multiple regression model based on 300 sample beneficiaries indicated that poor loan repayment performance was as result of late release of loan funds, cumbersome loan application and disbursement procedures and emphasis on political considerations in loan approvals. In addition, loan diversion to non-agricultural enterprises as well as low enterprise returns resulting from low adoption rate of improved agricultural technologies contributed to poor loan repayment performance of small holders. Loan volume, years of farming experience, farming as major occupation, years of formal education, household size, loan period, farm size, farm output, value of assets and interest paid on loan were all highly significant determinants of loan default. The coefficients of loan volume, years of formal education, household size and interest paid on loan are positive while the
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 64 coefficients for years of farming experience, loan period, farm size, and farming as major occupation, farm output, and value of assets are negative. 2.2 Review of Empirical Studies: Ethiopian View In Ethiopia an econometric estimation was conducted by Mengistu (1997) based on survey data, on the determinants of loan repayment performance and efficacy of screening mechanism in urban Ethiopia, taking the case of Awassa and Bahir-Dar towns. The estimation result using binomial Probit model revealed that for Awassa, the number of persons employed and weekly installment repayment period are significantly and positively related with repaying loan in full while loan diversion is significantly and negatively related. In terms of the probability of falling in either of the groups, it is found that there is 53% probability of repaying loan in full. In the case of Bahir-Dar, loan expectation and number of workers employed have a positive relation with full loan repayment while loan diversion and availability of other sources of credit have a negative impact. The predicted probability of full loan repayment in this case is 78%. He employed 352 sample beneficiaries for the case of Awassa and 409 for Bahir-Dar. Muluken and Mesfin (2014) conducted a research study to assess the factors that affect the performance of Microfinance institutions operating in Hawasa city of Ethiopia. They took a sample of 199 microfinance intrusions and employed a descriptive research design approach. As per their findings, variables, such as, problems related to the repayment, diversion of loan into non-income generating activities, business condition of the borrowers and so on. On the other hand, institutional factors such as shortage of human resource, lack of cost effective technologies, shortage of loan capital and some others political factors which are related to MFIs performance were the major factors that affect the performance of microfinance institutions in Hawasa city. Berhanu (1999) and Teferri (2000) made an attempt employing a binomial probit model on determinants of loan repayment performance of micro enterprises with particular reference to POCSSBO in Addis Ababa and DECSI in Tigray. Birhanu found out that loan diversion, loan size and monthly income were undermining factors while beneficiaries’ age, perceived cost of default and suitability of repayment period were enhancing factors of loan repayment. Based on 2348 sample beneficiaries Teferri also came up with the result that education and size of loan are significant determinants in all the three cases (i.e. urban, rural and all sample beneficiaries) their sign being positive and negative respectively. Other variables such as sex, timeliness of loan disbursement and monthly income are positively and significantly related with loan repayment in rural and whole sample beneficiaries while loan diversion is negatively and significantly related with full loan repayment in urban and whole sample beneficiaries.
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 65 In another relevant study by Abraham (2002) an investigation on the determinants of repayment status of borrowers with reference to private borrowers around Zeway area who are financed by the Development Bank of Ethiopia (DBE). The estimation result employing Tobit model revealed that having other source of income education, work experience in related economic activity before the loan and engaging on economic activities other than agriculture are enhancing while loan diversion, being male borrower and giving extended loan repayment period are undermining factors of loan recovery performance. Bekele (2003) employed a logistic regression model to analyze the factors influencing loan repayment performance of small holders in Ethiopia. The authors used data on 309 borrowers of input loans in the Oromia and Amhara Regional states and found out that individuals who took larger loans had better repayment performances than those who took smaller loans. Further the results of the study revealed that late disbursement of inputs purchased by the loan funds was an important bottleneck in loan repayment while livestock were found to be important in improving the farmers’ repayment performance. Mengistu (1999) also made an empirical analysis on the determinants of industrial loan repayment in Ethiopia with particular reference to manufacturing firms in Addis Ababa. The regression result employing Tobit model based on 65 manufacturing firms revealed that total investment cost, ratio of value of collateral to total loan amount, the firm’s grace period, number of disbursement installments, and time were statistically insignificant, while repayment period and number of supervision are significantly and positively related to loan recovery rate. However, coefficients of loan amount and ratio of pre-operating interest to total loan amount are significant at 10% and 5% respectively and negatively related with loan recovery rate. Therefore, from the above empirical studies conducted in Ethiopia one can understand that most of them focused on identifying the determinants factors that affect the loan repayment performance of micro and small enterprises located in other parts of Ethiopia. Too little has been known about this issue in Somali regional State. However, to the best knowledge of the researcher there is no research conducted that focused on investigating the key determinant factors that affect loan repayment performance of the micro and small enterprises finance by Somali Microfinance Institution (SMFI) in the year 2016. 3. Research Method 3.1 Definition of MSEs in Ethiopia MSEs can be defined based on various criteria such as employment size, total asset, revenues/sales, to distinguish as micro and small enterprises in different countries. In the case of Ethiopia, paid up capital and number of employees are used to define MSEs. According to the revised micro and small development strategy, 2011, the revised definition considers employed labor force including family labor; total assets without working building and the division of sub sector in to services and
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 72 Variable P-value Decision Loan Size 0.000*** Reject Hypothesis Grace Period 0.037** Reject Hypothesis Repayment Period 0.000*** Accept Hypothesis Timeliness of Loan Release 0.094* Accept Hypothesis *** Significant at 1%, **Significant at 5%, *Significant at 10% Source: STATA output from survey data (2020). 5. Conclusion In developing countries like Ethiopia where unemployment and poverty is very high, micro and small enterprises plays crucial role in creating jobs. Currently, micro and small enterprises are dominating the business in the urban and areas across the world. However, micro and small enterprises face scarcity of capital to develop to medium and large scale enterprises and contribute to the country’s economic development. To tackle the problem of capital deficiency of MSEs, credit is a fundamental part for the development of MSEs sector. However, it is important that borrowed funds must be used for intended purposes and for the financial institutions to run profitable business venture so that MSEs can continue to get sustainable source of finance. In microfinance institutions, there are severe problems of loan default which erodes MFIs liquidity position and there by affecting MFIs financial viability and outreach operation. It is with this intention of identifying the factors that influence loan repayment performance of MSEs financed by SMFI was the primary motive of this research study. As per the finding of this research work, of 175 Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) 10.2.4~102(58.5%) were found to be non-defaulters whereas the remaining 73(41.5%) MSEs were found to be are defaulters. To identify the most important explanatory variables that affect loan repayment of the MSEs, a research study was conducted using binary logistic regression model. The model reveals that among four explanatory variables which were hypothesized to influence loan repayment, two variables (Repayment Period and Timeliness of loan release) were found to be statistically significant. The remaining two variables, which are, Loan Size and Grace Period, were found to be statistically insignificant. Therefore, Somali Microfinance Institution should revise its policy of loan disbarment and loan collection and above all modernize its loan tracking system using Information Technology (IT) as to ensure timely collection of loans outstanding thereby by sustaining the operation and outreach of the institution. 6. Further Research Direction Micro and Small Enterprises play vital role in poverty alleviation and unemployment reduction in the developing world in general and in Ethiopia in particular. There are many factors bedside the factors that are mentioned in this study which hinder ability of borrowers to fulfill their loan repayment obligations per the scheduled repayment periods. These factors include firm characteristics, project characteristics, general increase in price level of inputs, lack of appropriate working
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 73 place, high competition due to large number of entrants and other social and cultural factors. These factors were excluded from this study due to limitation in time and resource. Hence, an interesting and more fruitful finding may be reached by taking the above mentioned factors in to consideration.
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 74 Reference Abraham, G. (2002). Loan repayment and its determinants in small scale enterprises financing in Ethiopia the case of private borrowers around Zeway area, (Master’s Thesis), Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Ade, S. O. (1999). Determinants of small holder loan repayment performance: Evidence from Nigerian micro Finance system. Savings and Development, 1, 95-108. Arene, C. J. (1992). Loan repayment and technical assistance among small holder maize farmers in Nigeria. African Review of Money, Finance and Banking, Armendáriz de Aghion, B., & Gollier, C. (2000). Peer group formation in an adverse selection model. Economic Journal, 110 (01), 632-643. Bamlaku, A. (2006). Micro financing and poverty reduction in Ethiopia: A paper prepared under the Internship Program of IDRC, Nairobi. Bekele, T. (2003). Factors influencing loan repayment performance of small holder in Ethiopia, (Master’s Thesis), Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Berhanu, L. (1999). Micro enterprises credit and poverty alleviation in Ethiopia: The case of the project office for the creation of small-scale business opportunities in Addis Ababa, (Master’s Thesis), Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Chirwa, E. W. (1997). An econometric analysis of the determinants of agriculture credit payment in Malawi. African Review of Money Finance and Banking, Supplement of the Savings and Development Journal, 1(2), 107-119. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (FDRE). (2011). Micro & Small Enterprise Development Strategy: Provision framework and methods of implementation. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Hunte, C. K. (1996). Controlling loan default and improving the lending technology in credit institutions. Saving and Development, Quarterly Review, 1:45-59. Ibtissem, B., (2013): Microcredit Repayment: The Case of Tunisian Microfinance Bank, African Development Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013, 370–38, Retrieved from: African Development Review - 2013 - Baklouti - Determinants of Microcredit Repayment The Case of Tunisian Microfinance.pdf. Jemal, A. (2003). Microfinance and loan repayment performance: Case Study of the Oromia Credit and Savings Share Company (OCSSCO) in Kuyu, (Maters Thesis), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Kashuliza, A. (1993). Loan repayment and its determinants in smallholder agriculture: A case study in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. East Africa Review, 9(1). Lincolin, A., (2006): Assessing factors Affecting the Repayment Rate of Micro Finance Institutions: A Case Study of Village Credit Institutions of Gianyar, Bali, Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business May-August 2006, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 247– 273, Retrieved from: 5618-9499-1-PB (2).pdf. Manohar, S., & Zeller, M. (1997). Repayment performance in group-based credit programs in Bangladesh: An empirical analysis. World Development, 25(10), 1731-1742.
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance • Volume 24, No. 2, Winter 2022 • pp. 59-76 YITBAREK, K. • DETERTMINTS OF LOAN REPAYMENT • 75 Mengistu, B. (1997). Determinants of micro enterprises loan repayment and efficiency of screening mechanisms in urban Ethiopia: The case of Bahir Dar and Awassa town. Addis Ababa University. Mengistu, B. (1999). Determinants of industrial loan repayment in Ethiopia: The case of manufacturing firms in Addis Ababa, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Ethiopian Economy, 117-132. Micka’el, A. (1996). Micro-finance repayment problems in the informal sector in Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Journal of Business and Development, 1(2). Muluken, A. & Mesfin. L., (2014): Assessment of Factors Affecting the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: The Case of Hawassa City, Ethioia, JBAS Vol.6 No. 1 June 2014, 1. Retrieved from: 169088-Article Text-434855-1-10-20180404 (2).pdf. Njoku, J. E., & Odii, M. A. (1999). Determinants of loan repayment under the special emergency loan scheme (SEALS) in Nigeria: A case study in Imo State. African Review of Money Finance and Banking, 1, 39-51. Norhaziah, N., & Mohdnoor, M. (2010). Determinants of repayment performance in microcredit Programs. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(2). Okorie, A. (1986). Major determinants of agricultural small holder loan repayment in a developing economy: Empirical evidence from Ondo State, Nigeria. Savings and Development, 1, 89-98. Padmanabhan, K. P. (1981). Hedging loan delinquency in rural credit projects: Lessons from Indian experience. Savings and Development journal, 4, 263-270. Picture, International Labor Office, Geneva. Retrieved from http://info: Roslan, A. H., & Mohd, Z. A. (2009). Determinants of micro credit repayment in Malaysia: The case of Agro bank. Journal of Humanity and social sciences, 4(1), 45-52. Teferri, Z. (2000). Micro finance and the poor: The case of Dedebit Credit and Saving Institution (DECSI) in Tigray, (Master’s Thesis), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa. Teferri, Z. (2000). Micro finance and the poor: The case of Dedebit Credit and Saving Institution (DECSI) in Tigray, (Master’s Thesis), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa. Vigano, L. (1993). Credit scoring model for development banks: An African case study. Savings and Development, 17(4), 441-482. Von Pischke, J. D. (1991). Finance at the frontier: Debt capacity and the role of credit in the private economy. EDI Development Studies. The World Bank, WashingtonD.C.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/76309/dc2002/proceedings/pdf paper/ odule6ilo3. pd Zeller, M., (1996): Determinants of repayment performance in credit groups: The role of program design, intra-group risk pooling and social cohesion. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(3), 599-621.