scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Sustainable marketing strategies: Creating business value by meeting consumer expectation

Trivedi, Krunal,Trivedi, Pooja,Goswami, Vandana

Abstract

EconStor is a publication server for scholarly economic literature, provided as a non-commercial public service by the ZBW.

Full text

Trivedi, Krunal; Trivedi, Pooja; Goswami, Vandana Article Sustainable marketing strategies: Creating business value by meeting consumer expectation International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS) Provided in Cooperation with: International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS) Suggested Citation: Trivedi, Krunal; Trivedi, Pooja; Goswami, Vandana (2018) : Sustainable marketing strategies: Creating business value by meeting consumer expectation, International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), ISSN 2304-1366, IJMESS International Publishers, Jersey City, NJ, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 186-205 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/180785 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ 186 International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 2018, Vol. 7(2), pp. 186 – 205. ISSN 2304 – 1366 http://www.ijmess.com Sustainable Marketing Strategies: Creating Business Value by Meeting Consumer Expectation *Krunal Trivedi1 Pooja Trivedi2 Vandana Goswami3 1 Lincoln University of Business and Management, Sharjah, U.A.E 2 Academic Professional, Ontario, Canada 3 Faculty of Education, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajsthan, India Sustainable Marketing strategies are unavoidable for 21st century businesses. Companies have started investing huge amount on these activities. Consumers do expect companies to adopt sustainable strategies but realizing one’s need is the only drive for any consumer. Thus, there is gap between business sustainability practices and consumers’ expectations. To address this gap, the paper proposes a conceptual framework for sustainability strategies that businesses must adopt. The proposed framework can be an important standpoint for businesses to meet consumers’ expectations without compromising business value. The paper identified four major sustainable marketing strategies to be integrated into business practices. Keywords: Sustainable marketing strategies, business value, consumer expectations, societal marketing, modern marketing JEL: M19, M31 According to World Bank Report of 2015, economic growth of past two decades has lifted more than 660 million people out of poverty and has raised the income levels of millions more. Along with the development of emerging markets, the size and growth of affluent class in these markets has also improved. However, the development comes at an expense of environment and poor communities. Growth patterns have left hundreds of millions of people behind: 1.2 billion still lack access to electricity, 870 million are malnourished, and 780 million are still without access to clean, safe drinking water. This lopsided development has contributed too many environmental and social challenges (United Nations Environment Program, 2012). The emerging countries are new industrial economies and their economic, social and environmental infrastructure and systems are not ready to handle these challenges. Therefore, we can say that development is not on the track with need of growing population and resource constraints. On the other hand, today’s executives are dealing with a complex and unique social, environmental, Manuscript received December 17, 2017; revised April 20, 2018; accepted May 5, 2018. © The Author(s); Licensee IJMESS *Corresponding author: [email protected] Trivedi et al. 187 technological and market trends (Whelan and Fink, 2016). Executives are still hesitant to put sustainability strategies to the core, as they believe cost outweighs benefits. This mistaken belief is quite contrary to bottom line benefits and academic research on sustainable marketing practices. Sustainability practices definitely have positive influence on business performance. Consumers are also becoming aware of the ecological pressure their reckless consumption creates. So they are also mindful about products and services they prefer. Apart from consumers, companies are also feeling the heat from social media users and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) oriented towards wellbeing of environment (Sulaymon, 2016). Thus, the concept of Sustainability has gained lot of attention from researchers and practitioners. Sustainability is a symbolic concern of the modern world as there is constant fret of preserving the resources for the present and for future generation. Our Common Future (1987), was the first ever sustainability report published by World Commission on Economic Development (WCED). The report was also known as Brutland Report. This gave boost to further research on sustainability. Researchers have often signaled that business interests have caused rampant consumption patterns and it is responsibility of the business corporations to adopt societal marketing practices (Fuller, 1999; Gordon, Carrigan and Hastings, 2011; Heck and Yidan, 2013). The preservation of environment is primary responsibility of the businesses as Hawken (2007) remarks that: “because the corporations are the dominant institution on the planet, they must squarely address the social and environmental problems that afflict humankind”. UN Global Compact-Accenture (2014), reported view of 1,000 CEOs on sustainable business practices. According to this report, despite of growing commitment to environmental and broader sustainability issues, global economy is lagging behind the action needed to set society on a more sustainable pathway. Majority of the CEO’s believe that Sustainability is the way for future success but termed it as ‘frustrated ambition’ because rewards are fewer compared to efforts. Also, report of McKinsey (2012), confirmed that many companies are successfully integrating principles of sustainability into their business practices. Yet, they are uncertain about the quantifiable value created out of it. Today, companies are investing tremendous amount on saving energy, developing green products, holding their employees to achieve long-term growth and create business value. On the other hand there is rising pressure from consumers and other International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 188 stakeholders about advancing expectations. The research shows that business investors and consumers do care about sustainable business practices. The sustainable performance of companies can act as a decision maker in consumer buying behavior. Heck and Yidan (2013) explained that adopting sustainable strategies creates win‐ win situation where as it will benefit both environment and company. However, relationship between sustainability strategies and business value is still not quantified. The primary challenge for any company is to create value for consumers as well as investors. Purpose and Significance Consumers purchase consideration for sustainable brands directly depends on how business contributes towards improving their quality of life. Brown’s (2011) report suggests that post-recession, consumers priorities have changed. The report shows a high correlation between company’s sustainability performance and meeting consumer’s expectation. Company’s sustainability efforts are successful when consumers’ receive perceived value during purchase decision process. Businesses are the beacon for innovation and value creation, which can move society towards sustainable consumption. Based on previous literature, this paper aims to suggest sustainable business strategies for value creation. To successfully integrate sustainability vision in to business strategy, companies must incorporate four factors. The factors are: innovation, collaboration, communication and commitment. These strategies would make consumer believe about benefits of sustainable consumption (Obermiller et al., 2008; Beguerisse, 2013). Marketing not only has great potential to promote sustainable propaganda but can also foster sustainable lifestyle that contributes to businesses bottom-line. Consumers believe in sustainable business practices and do expect businesses to cope up with but their purchase decision reflects some contrasting practicality (Accenture, 2014). Consumers’ purchase decisions are dependent on perceived value derived from products or services. To address concerns of consumers and businesses, purpose of this research is to suggest potential sustainability marketing strategies, which will target consumers’ expectations through utility creation. The proposed model will help marketers to focus on consumer expectations without compromising business value. In academic literature, sustainable marketing strategies that create value for business and consumers are Trivedi et al. 189 infrequent. Scientific investigation of sustainable marketing strategies is still in nascent stage. Accordingly, primary aim of this article is to provide insight into sustainable marketing strategies that will create business value without compromising consumers’ needs. To fulfill the above objective, we present previous studies on sustainable marketing, consumer expectations and business value in the following section. Later, paper demonstrates relationship between Sustainable Marketing and value creation. Why Focus on Sustainable Marketing Strategies Work of Bowen (1953) is a stand point of the field recognized as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). CSR is a comprehensive set of strategies, policies and actions that are integral elements of business operations, embracing responsibility of past, present and future. Later, Brutland Report (WECD, 1987), coined the term Sustainability i.e. “ development that meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs ”. The academic interest in sustainability dates back 1990s, mainly in micro, and macroeconomics, environmental accounting, psychology, sociology and policy. Most of research on sustainability was conducted in China and other emerging Asian economies. However, sustainability as a business strategy has taken the front seat post 2005, when Hargroves and Smith (2005), identified principles of sustainability for businesses. These principles include; dealing cautiously with risk, appreciation and value for nature, integration of environmental, social, and economic goals in planning (“triple bottom line”), and community participation in planning, commitment to best practices, continuous improvement and good governance. Sir John Elkington (1994) proposed the framework of Triple Bottom Line. The framework has three basic components of sustainable business: Social equity, economic sustainability and environmental sustainability (Figure 1). The Triple Bottom Line is known as “People, Planet, Profit” and even by 3 E’s “Equity, Economic, Environment” (Heck and Yidan, 2013). The model of Triple Bottom line turns company towards assessing organizational success by the virtue of sustainability performance. Though sustainability is not a new idea but businesses didn’t understand the benefits and raised constant objections (Martin and Schouten, 2012). International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 190 Off late, businesses have realized that abstract and traditional approaches have failed to generate l on g term competitive advantage (Obermiller et al., 2008). More than 43 years ago marketing Guru Philip Kotler (1972) pioneered the concept of societal marketing. Source: Elkington (1994) Figure 1: Triple Bottom Line He intended to unite social and ecological issues into marketing strategies. Due to this fact societal marketing has become integral part of business rhetoric and scholarly literature (García-Rosell 2013; Kilbourne and Beckmann 1998; Montoro 2003). Sustainable marketing is a new addition towards the comprehensive development of marketing. Sustainable marketing includes the concepts of environment marketing, green marketing and societal marketing. Researchers consider them as more ethical forms of marketing businesses advance without exhausting environment and still fulfilling needs of present as well as future generations. Fuller (1999) defined sustainable marketing as “the process of planning, implementing, and controlling the development, pricing, promotion, and distribution of products in a manner that satisfies the following three criteria: (1) customer needs are met, (2) organizational goals are attained, and (3) the process is compatible with ecosystems”. In 2009, Belz and Peattie, presented an iconic model which integrated conventional forms of marketing into sustainable marketing (Figure 2). Belz and Peattie (2009) suggested that sustainability marketing requires long term orientation on relationship building rather than conventional short-term focus on transactions in modern marketing. Trivedi et al. 191 According to them, the entire process of marketing starting from market research to identify needs of the customer till loyalty building should have sustainability vision. The authors argued that to develop sustainable vision, it is important to merge previous sets of marketing ideas to create concept of Figure 2: Modern to Sustainable Marketing ‘ Sustainable Marketing’ (Figure 3). According to this model sustainable marketing is macro-marketing which influences entire system, such as, institutions, value chain or industries. Source: Peattie and Belz (2010) Figure 3. New Concept of Sustainable Marketing Renowned companies like Exxon, Enron, McDonalds and Nike have miserably failed because consumers felt them as non-sustainable. On the contrary, Toyota’ s synergy Drive, Volvo’s safety and Body Shop’s natural beauty, perception has created more revenue for the companies. However, sustainable business practices demand extra efforts and costs. Most often, cost of adopting these practices outweigh the benefits. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 192 It is not difficult to find examples of companies that have incurred losses because of their sustainability practices. For example, Mazda invested 15 years developing a hydrogen rotary car engine that is yet to achieve commercial success. Progressive Consumers’ Expectations In recent years, consumer interest in environmental friendly alternatives has risen dramatically, and so their expectations from businesses. Although there is an attitude-behavior gap, where there is an inconsistency between consumer attitudes and buying behavior (Grubor and Milovanov, 2017). According to Williams (2008), new generation consumers c a n n o t be misled by any indoctrinations. In 1990’ s there was ‘green boom’ where swathe of ‘environmentally friendly’ products and services swept the market. Acid rain, deforestation and the hole in the ozone layer were key concerns. Ozone depleting CFCs were banned and even products, which had never used CFC, were proudly labeled ‘CFC free’. Understandably, many consumers felt cheated. Williams (2008) argued that the latest consumer focus on environment and sustainability was just recent turning of the wheel which is cyclical (and fickle). The bubble will soon burst like the 90’s and consumers will soon stop worrying about environmental impact of their lifestyle. However, lubin and Esty (2010) argued that consumers are looking for companies and brands they feel have genuine commitments to environmental and social issues; and they’re voting with their wallets. They debated that due to global financial and environmental concerns sustainability will prove to be a mega trend. As suggested by Peattie and Belz (2010), it is devious to view characterize ‘consumer’ on the basis of their needs and wants only. The conventional view of consumer is quite narrow and abstracts them from rest of society and ecological system that they ultimately depend on. It is a bigger challenge for the companies today to engage, inform and persuade consumers based on their sustainability initiatives. Companies can only create business value by uniting their sustainability vision and twenty‐ first century consumers’ expectations. According to the report of UN Global Compact-Accenture (2014), “the millennial consumer, coming of age economically and empowered by new technologies and social media, is driving new expectations of all institutions in society, especially business”. Today’s consumers not only expect direct utility from the products and services but they also want to improve their health and Trivedi et al. 193 community well-being. Moreover, due to economic cycle of global recession, consumers have become more ‘Mindful’. Consumers no longer find joy in excessive spending and heedless consumption. Their buying pattern reflects a new trend of ‘Mindful Consumption’; consumers buying fewer products and fewer brands, and being more considered in their choices (Seth et al., 2011). Nestlé’s effort to develop a Nutritional Profiling System (NPS) across their food and beverages, Intel’s collaboration with USA Government to develop Smart Cities, Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan; all of these programs suggest that companies are creating a business case for their long term growth and competitiveness. However, according to an article b y Zakes (2017) published in Huffington Post, consumers view green and sustainable products or services as ‘more expensive and less effective’. This perception can be justified with many sustainable marketing strategists only focus on sustainability neglecting cost, efficacy and quality. Because of dynamism in consumer behavior traditional 4P’s (Product, Price, Place, Promotion) of marketing mix essentially be replaced with ‘4Cs’ of sustainability marketing mix; Customer solutions, Customer cost, Convenience and Communication (Belz and Peattie, 2009). Source: Belz and Peattie (2009) Figure 4. Traditional and Sustainable Marketing Mix Moreno Beguerisse (2013), presented a study to explain the link between customer value generation and sustainability practices. Its theoretical framework identified 3 pillars necessary to understand sustainability practices. These are Collaboration, Communication and Innovation. Sustainable Marketing and Business Value International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 200 First companies must prompt innovation in all their spheres. To meet broader needs of consumers and align with business value, companies should incorporate innovation in products, services and process. If the innovation genuinely improves lives, health and community well-being then consumers develops deeper connection with companies. These innovations should lead to efficacy and cost saving for consumers and organizations. Popular examples include hybrid cars, LED or CFL bulbs that meet consumers’ expectation without compromising the organizational performance. Figure 5. Proposed Sustainability Strategies for Fulfillment of Consumers’ Expectation and Generating Business Value Second, companies can develop greater trust and loyalty if they set in collaboration with NGO’s/ Government and other supply chain partners. An example of such collaboration is Coca-Cola and the World Wildlife Federation. These collaborations certify organizations’ claims of sustainability and are well beyond legal requirements. For example, H&M’s partnership with DoSomething.org to launch the Close the Loop College Cup competition, incentivizing U.S. college students and faculty to innovate means to higher recycling rates for clothing. Trivedi et al. 201 Third, companies constantly need to keep their customers engage through proper communication. Companies must regularly update consumers about their efforts towards social responsibility and environmental mitigation. Corporations must clearly display their purpose from ‘marketing’ to ‘mattering’. The evidences suggest that (Heck and Yidan, 2013) consumers are unaware of the social, ethical and environmental performance of the organizations. Consumers do wish to know more about companies’ sustainable practices claim. Active use of marketing communication and broader PR strategies help to create tangible impact on consumers’ perception about the brand. Marketing communication should encourage moderate consumption without compromising on bottom line of the business value. Compelling examples of this include: Mud Jeans, which leases jeans instead of selling them, encouraging customers to swap or return them after use; Terracycle, which excels at ‘making garbage great’ by converting used packaging and other waste to various branded assets Innovation Product/ Process/ Marketing (with advanced technology) Collaboration NGO’s/ Government/other organizations Environment protection campaigns Communication Constant communication with stakeholders and upholding transparency Commitment Constant engagement with consumers and employees Table 1: Sustainable Marketing Strategies Last, companies must show continual commitment towards sustainability practices, employees and consumers for seeking public trust. For instance, Home Depot, one of the world’s largest sellers of certified wood products holds up to sustainability practices by promising that harvested trees will be replenished. This commitment is difficult to measure; still Home Depot takes on to educate consumers International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 202 about effects of their buying behavior. The company informs them that on an average every American home consumes enough wood and paper products e q u i v a l e n t t o 64 trees each year (Home Depot, 2009). Another example is LEGO’s Sustainable Materials Centre, a commitment to tapping all employees of the company in an effort to come up with alternative, non-fossil-based raw materials to manufacture LEGO toys and packaging. CONCLUSION Researchers have repeatedly pointed the need to expand sustainability base from environment to business. Businesses can leverage their vision of sustainable practices in the form of competitive advantage, brand loyalty, risk mitigation and cost reduction. Researchers proved that sustainability practices adopted by a firm may gain more investors by the firm. It can also lead to an increased market value of firm. According to Bartlett (2012), social performance of a firm is still likely to derive the financial performance of the firm. Still much research is needed to prove positive correlation between the two. The recent economic, financial and environmental crisis calls for more of sustainable social development rather than mere economic growth. Businesses can steer this sustainable development with socially responsible, environmental mitigation and purposeful strategies. With public concern around, environmental issues growing, tougher regulations sustainable marketing practices are unavoidable. Marketers have adopted sustainable practices to avoid criticism from stakeholders but they are still unsure about consumer buying decision and business value gained. Sustainable marketing strategies can earn revenue when companies frame their marketing 4P’s in a manner that consumers feel empowered while using the products/services. Businesses need to display clear purpose and build trust to create long-term customer engagement. Internal and external stakeholders view sustainable-marketing practices that cause business value as more reliable. While companies are still wondering how to carry out sustainable marketing strategy to gain trust of stakeholders, consumers and society as a whole. Therefore, role of marketer is to communicate Trivedi et al. 203 company’s genuine commitment to responsible and sustainable marketing practices. Marketers also need to act as ‘collaborators’ within and outside organization to ensure the promises on sustainable marketing are honored. This article illustrates that sustainability is a main stream issue and cannot be isolated from business strategies. Those companies that proactively make sustainability core to business strategy will drive innovation and engender enthusiasm and loyalty from employees, customers, suppliers, communities and investors. Companies need to understand that they and society are inherently interdependent. This kind of mindset of not focusing only on short-term economic gains, as is usually the case with most nonsustainable/conventional business, allows sustainable business to be able to meet the needs of today’s customers without compromising on the needs of the future generation. Consumer will always be drawn to brands they trust, that are different from the rest, innovative, appeal to emotions and intelligence. Thus, the proposed sustainability marketing strategies can help marketers in gaining maximum business value from their sustainability initiatives. Empirical research to quantify the relationship between the proposed sustainability marketing practices and consumer expectations has a great opportunity for future research. The proposed model is based on existing literature and has potential to predict new phenomena. The proposed framework can be operationalized and tested to increase generalizability and validity. REFERENCES Alexander, H. (2015). Sustainability value management: Stronger metrics to drive differentiation and growth. A ccenture , 1-6. Bartlett, T. & Brian, D. (2012). The effect of corporate sustainability reporting on firm valuation . CMC Senior Theses. Paper 489. Belz, F. & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley. Bill, M. (2007). Designing Interactions. MIT Press . Bowen, H. (1953). In: Idowu S.O., Capaldi N., Zu L., Gupta A.D. (eds.). Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg Cambridge Institute for sustainable Leadership (2015). Ten international banks commit to finance sustainable agricultural commodities by 2020 . Crittenden, V.L., Crittenden, W.F., Ferrell, L.K., Ferrell, O. C. & Pinney, C.C. (2010). Market‐ oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions. Academy of Marketing Science , 39, 71– 85. CSR Middle East. (2014). Reshaping the Future. National Bank of Abu Dhabi Corporate Sustainability Report. Danone Research. (2008). Annual Report. Emery, B. (2012). Sustainable Marketing . England: Pearson. Fuller, D. (1999). Sustainable Marketing-Managerial Ecological Issues: Sage Publications, Inc. García-Rosell, J.C. (2013). A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable marketing: Promoting sustainability through action and International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences 204 research . Published theses. University of Lapland. Gelder, J. W. (2015). The do's and dont's of sustainable banking, a bank track manual. Available at: http://www.banktrack.org/download /the_dos_and_donts_of_sustainable_banking/061129_the_dos_a nd_donts_of_sustainable_banking_bt_manual.pdf Gordon, R., Carrigan, M. & Hastings, G. (2011). A framework for sustainable marketing, Marketing Theory , 11 (2): 143-163. Grubor, A. and Milovanov, O. (2017). Brand strategies in the era of sustainability. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems , 15(1): 78-88 Hawken, P. (2007). Blessed unrest: How the largest movement in the world came into being, and why no one saw it coming . New York: Viking. Hargroves, K. & Smith, M.H. (2005). The natural advantage of nations: Business opportunities, innovation and governance in the 21st century . Earthscan, London. Heck, G. & Yidan, X. (2013). The effects of sustainable marketing on brand equity and consumer behavior ‐ A case study of Cia , Hering. Published theses, Halmstad. Sweden. John, E. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review , 36 (2): 90-100. Kilbourne W.E. & Beckmann S.C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management , 14, 513– 532. Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing , 36(2): 46-54. Lubin, D. C. & Esty, D. A. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review , 42-50. Maggs, H. (2014). Why finance giants should bank on sustainability . Available at: http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/05/07/why-finance-giantsbank-sustainability. Maj Munch, A. & Arnold, T. (2006). Perspective on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production . Workshop of Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE). Copenhagen. Denmark. Martin, D.M. & Schouten, J.W. (2012). Sustainable marketing. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. McKinsey & Company. (2012). The business of sustainability: McKinsey Global Survey Results. Brown, M. (2011). How strong brands can lead to a more sustainable future . 1-4. Minton, E., Lee, C., Orth, U., Kim, C. & Kahle, L. (2012). Sustainable marketing and social media ‐ A cross-country analysis of motives for sustainable behaviors. Journal of Advertising , 41(4): 69-84. Montoro, R.F.J. (2003). The creation of brands based on ecological attributes: An empirical approximation . Doctoral Thesis. Granada, University of Granada Moreno-Beguerisse, M.A. (2013). A consumer-focused design approach for businesses to leverage sustainable consumption . Published theses, Loughborough University Munasinghe, M., Dasgupta, P., Southerton, D., Bows A. & McMeekin A. (2009). Consumers, business and climate change. The University of Manchester Sustainable Consumption Institute. Manchester Nidomolu, P. R. (2009). Why sustainability now is the key driver for innovation. Harvard Business Review , 1-9. Obermiller, C., Burke, C. & Atwood, A. (2008). Sustainable business as marketing strategy. Innovative Marketing , 4(3): 20-27 Oliveira, P. & Sullivan, A. (2008). Sustainability and its impact on brand value . Creating and Managing Brand Value. New York: Interbrand. Peattie, K. & Belz, F. (2010). Sustainability marketing - An innovative conception of marketing. Marketing Review St. Gallen , 27(5): 8-15. Prothero, A. & McDonagh, P. (2014). Sustainability as megatrend II. Journal of Macromarketing , 35(1): 7-10. Reutlinger, J. (2012). Sustainable marketing - The importance of being a sustainable business . Published theses, Lahti University of Applied Sciences. Rondenelli, D. (2004). Creating a vision for environmental responsibility in MNCs: Executive leadership and organizational change. Journal of International Business Education , 5-22. Seth, A.K. Suzuki, K. & Critchley, H.D. (2011). An interceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Frontiers in Psychology , 2, 395-421 Smith, D. & Burton, B. (2005). Use Gartner's framework to define a value-driven collaboration strategy . Retrieved 6 Jun. 2018, from https://www.gartner.com/doc/482879?ref=ddisp. Sulaymon, T. (2016). A marketing strategy for sustainable business. Bachelor thesis. JAMK university of applied science. Trivedi et al. 205 United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). Report of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). United Nations, New York. UN Global Compact and Accenture (2013). The CEO Study on Sustainability . Accenture. UN Global Compact-Accenture. (2014). The Investor Study: Insights from PRI Signatories. Accenture. WCED (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development Oxford University Press, Oxford. Whelan, T. & Fink, C. (2016). The comprehensive business case for sustainability. Harvard Business Review . Retrieved 29 Jan. 2018, from https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-comprehensive-business-case-for-sustainability. Williams, L. (2008). The mission statement: A corporate reporting tool with a past, present, and future. Journal of Business Communication , 45(2): 94-119. World Bank. (2015). Report. Retrieved from, http://www.worldbank.org /en/topic/sustainabledevelopment/overview#1 Zakes, A. (2017). Taking sustainability out of sustainable marketing . Retrieved 31 Jan. 2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/albezakes/taking-sustainability-out_b_9276934.html.