Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms

Zimon, Grzegorz; Habib, Ahmed Mohamed; Haluza, Daniela Article Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms Cogent Business & Management Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Zimon, Grzegorz; Habib, Ahmed Mohamed; Haluza, Daniela (2024) : Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms, Cogent Business & Management, ISSN 2331-1975, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/325923 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cogent Business & Management ISSN: 2331-1975 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20 Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms Grzegorz Zimon, Ahmed Mohamed Habib & Daniela Haluza To cite this article: Grzegorz Zimon, Ahmed Mohamed Habib & Daniela Haluza (2024) Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms, Cogent Business & Management, 11:1, 2292787, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 10 Dec 2023. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3784 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 18 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oabm20 MANAGEMENT | RESEARCH ARTICLE Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms Grzegorz Zimon 1 *, Ahmed Mohamed Habib 2 and Daniela Haluza 3 Abstract: This study explores the impact of adopting the quality management system according to the International Standardization for Organizations (ISO) standards called ISO 9001 on firms’ working capital management efficiency (WCME). This study analyzes Smalland Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the Polish construction industry. Regression analysis, difference tests, and robustness checks were conducted to achieve the goals of this study. The regression analysis results confirm a limited positive relationship between firms implementing ISO 9001 and WCME. Additionally, the difference tests show no significant differences in WCME between firms that implemented ISO 9001 and those that did not. During the coronavirus pandemic, a sharp decrease in inventory management costs was observed in firms. Inventories did not linger in warehouses, so they did not generate unnecessary costs, but were quickly sold at high margins. The inventory turnover rates on different days were low. These results suggest that controlling stock levels and receivables during crises is essential because payment bottlenecks and delayed deliveries can occur quickly. The insights generated from this study demonstrate that Polish SMEs in the construction industry fail to realize optimum WCME. Therefore, policymakers in Poland must improve managers’ and shareholders’ awareness of the usefulness of working capital management (WCM). Subjects: Political Economy; Economics; Finance; Business, Management and Accounting Keywords: ISO; working capital management; COVID-19; construction industry; financial markets; Poland 1. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic that started in early 2020 was a shock that primarily affected people’s health directly and had a significant impact on the economy, almost bringing it to a standstill (Fairlie, 2020; Gregurec et al., 2021; Habib, 2023; Habib & Mourad, 2023; Rodrigues et al., 2021). Fiscal policy was required to cushion the negative economic and social consequences of this shock. Support packages for households and companies were put together. Monetary policy plays a rather subordinate role in this context. Traditionally, monetary policy has supported the economy by making favorable financing conditions for private households, companies, and the state through interest rate cuts, thus stabilizing aggregate demand. This was hardly possible during the COVID19 pandemic. However, monetary policy could prevent the crisis in the real economy from Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 1 of 18 Received: 01 July 2023 Accepted: 05 December 2023 *Corresponding author: Grzegorz Zimon, Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Reviewing editor: Ansar Abbas, Management, Universitas Airlangga - Kampus B, Indonesia Additional information is available at the end of the article © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. spreading to the financial sector, exacerbating the crisis in the real economy. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, price movements have been violent. After the significant price slumps in equities and corporate bonds, a sharp decline in economic output has now been reflected in the first half of the year. The key question for an investment decision is whether and when there will be an economic recovery. In addition to falling share prices, the liquidity for securities trading has fallen sharply. Many securities can be traded only with increased price premiums or discounts. This phenomenon has already been observed in earlier financial crises, such as the 2008 financial crisis. This heightened uncertainty causes a simultaneous sell-off, amplifying the price action. In addition, technical market characteristics reinforce price movement, including a high proportion of passive funds, lower market depth due to regulatory requirements, and quantitative signals. At the beginning of March 2020, it became increasingly clear that the COVID-19 crisis had spread quickly in Europe. The economy was hit hard by a combined supply and demand shock due to the spread of the virus and government measures to contain the pandemic, such as lockdowns and curfews. The supply of goods and services declined as companies faced material shortages owing to disrupted supply chains. They also lacked workers who had to stay home because of illness or quarantine measures. Thus, the companies were forced to limit their production. The overall economic demand collapsed due to the crisis-related shutdown of the economy and public life. Private households and companies cannot demand goods or services. The loss of income associated with the shutdown further amplified the drop in demand, as did the high level of uncertainty regarding the duration and extent of the negative economic effects of the crisis. This uncertainty caused private households to consume less and companies to invest less. Since this was, and still is, a global shock, demand fell worldwide, which means that the demand for export goods was also falling. Monetary policy measures to stabilize the economy generally start on the demand side. Interest rate cuts improve the financing conditions for private households, companies, and governments and thus stimulate aggregate demand. However, this stabilization was not possible during the COVID-19 crisis. Even the most favorable financing conditions did not significantly increase companies’ and households’ demand for goods and services during a shutdown. Therefore, the monetary policy aimed at stabilizing aggregate demand played a subordinate role in the acute crisis. Accordingly, the key role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in the market during the COVID-19 crisis is to select an appropriate financial management strategy that ensures business continuity. During this period, it became particularly important for SMEs to manage their financial security, which is decisively influenced by working capital and financial liquidity. In many papers, one can find studies that indicate that introducing appropriate quality management systems brings many benefits to businesses (Kakouris & Sfakianaki, 2019; Pacheco et al., 2022; Urbonavicius, 2005; Zimon & Zimon, 2019). Some studies show that the use of various types of tools and systems related to quality management improves the efficiency of the functioning enterprise, improves the control system of selected processes, has a favorable impact on financial results, and increases the efficiency of the use of assets (Heras-Saizarbitoria & Boiral, 2015; Kakouris & Sfakianaki, 2019; Zimon & Zimon, 2019). Despite the various types of benefits that enterprises obtain owing to the introduction of appropriate systems, quality management is generally the type of system used in large enterprises. Introducing such systems incurs costs, and the effects of particular quality management standards appear only after some time. Managers of SMEs, when spending financial resources, expect quick effects in the form of revenue or optimization of cost levels. In the case of quality management systems, the implementation time of the respective systems can be long, and the effects appear later and depend on the discipline of the employees. Often, the benefits obtained are not expressed in monetary terms or monetary values because, for example, they demonstrate improved management of assets or eliminate errors that previously occurred. In such a case, it is necessary to perform several calculations to obtain information on what enterprises have gained financial benefits and how introducing the relevant ISO standard has contributed to offsetting losses. Nowadays, during financial crises, it seems particularly important to manage the company in such a way as to Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 2 of 18 avoid incurring unjustified costs and eliminate errors that can lead to the suspension of production or sales. Conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluating the impact of introducing quality management systems on the efficiency of asset management provides new indications of whether it is worth investing in such solutions, especially in SMEs, which are especially vulnerable to various types of crises that could halt their operations or lead to bankruptcy. 2. Literature review 2.1. Theoretical background Working capital is a buffer protecting the company against bankruptcy. Positive working capital and its management primarily keep the company in a good and healthy financial condition —“financial health” (Opler et al., 1999). The literature reports that working capital directly impacts the company’s financial liquidity (Aktas et al., 2015; Kasahun, 2020; Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006; Soda et al., 2022), profitability (Boțoc & Anton, 2017; Maheshwari, 2014; Mardones, 2022; Oladimeji & Aladejebi, 2020; Panda & Nanda, 2018) and costs (Moussa, 2018; Olagunju et al., 2020; Panigrahi, 2017). There are also authors who claim that working-capital decisions have a positive effect on the efficiency of enterprise-asset management (Banerjee & Guha Deb, 2023; Le, 2019; Lind et al., 2012; Olaoye & Okunade, 2020). The literature presents three main classical strategies for managing net working capital: conservative, moderate, and aggressive (Lind et al., 2012; Zimon, 2021). The conservative strategy is to keep current assets high and short-term liabilities relatively low and it is a safe strategy.The aggressive strategy to keep current assets low compared to current liabilities. Managers try to maintain a slight advantage of current assets over current liabilities. The high level of receivables is because sales based on trade credit are directed to regular customers and to low credibility (Zimon, 2021). The moderate strategy is about minimizing the weaknesses of previous strategies and maximizing their benefits. The scholarly discourse surrounding working capital delves into three primary rationales for maintaining cash reserves, as extensively documented in academic literature. The precautionary, transaction, and speculative motives pertain to the theoretical framework that posits cash as beneficial for firms and a robust safeguard against liquidity shortages (Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Mun & Jang, 2015). Cash is a necessary resource for firms to facilitate routine operations, address unexpected circumstances, and capitalize on potentially lucrative prospects that may emerge in the future (Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Martínez-Sola et al., 2018). Chang et al. (2017) stated that a firm’s cash reserves are theoretically balanced between benefits and costs. The resource-based theory is extensively employed in the field of finance. The theory posits that organizations have the potential to attain a lasting competitive edge through effective resource utilization (Habib, 2023). Efficient utilization of these resources enhances and capitalizes on internal strengths while mitigating external environmental vulnerabilities (Habib, 2023; Habib & Mourad, 2022). In this regard, WCM is essential for efficiently utilizing these resources and a sustainable competitive edge. The resource-based theory perspective points out that WCM is one of the most critical strategies (Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Habib & Mourad, 2022), and when managed well, it enhances a firm’s value (Aktas et al., 2015; Baños-Caballero et al., 2014; Chamberlain & Aucouturier, 2021; de Almeida & Eid, 2014; Dhole et al., 2019; Habib, 2022). In addition, the trade-off and pecking order theories have been extensively employed in finance. According to the trade-off theory, attaining an optimal cash level is accomplished by considering the equilibrium between the costs and benefits associated with it (Habib & Dalwai, 2023). Additionally, the trade-off theory posits that firms should establish a specific threshold for their debt ratio, beyond which an increase would result in financial difficulties (Bahreini & Adaoglu, 2018; Habib & Dalwai, 2023). As proposed by (Myers & Majluf, 1984), the pecking order theory posits that there is no optimal level of cash holdings. Based on its theoretical framework, a firm experiencing a cash shortage initially relies on internal sources of funds. Further, debt is considered Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 3 of 18 a more favorable option than equity if external financing is mandated, as equity may be associated with substantial issuing expenses, rendering it relatively more expensive than debt. 2.2. Hypotheses development The COVID-19 pandemic crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian war have made it clear that managers should look for tools to ensure that businesses can function in times of crisis. Changes in corporate financial management strategies are evident worldwide (Belas et al., 2022; Clampit et al., 2021; Demiraj et al., 2022; Gajdosikova et al., 2022; Habib, 2023; Puławska, 2021). Managers seek appropriate methods, tools, and strategies to optimize costs and increase profits. After 2019, it became apparent that the priorities had changed. More attention has been paid to ensuring the continuity of a company’s operations. The continuity of an entity’s operations is ensured by its financial resources and inventories, the most critical components that build working capital and liquidity levels. Effective management of working capital provides companies with financial security and financial means to settle their current obligations, that is, liquidity (Aregbeyen, 2013; Chasha et al., 2022; Enqvist et al., 2014; Habib & Kayani, 2022; Habib & Mourad, 2022; Janaćković et al., 2022; Juan García-Teruel & Martínez-Solano, 2007; Jurgilewicz et al., 2022; Nguyen et al., 2020; Piwowarski et al., 2022). WCM is gradually becoming more important than profitability management because it maintains optimum levels of working capital and cash conversion cycles (CCC), ensuring the financial security of a company and optimum profit levels (Adam et al., 2017; Afrifa et al., 2014; Aregbeyen, 2013; Farhan et al., 2021; Habib, 2022; Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Heryán, 2020; Juan García-Teruel & Martínez-Solano, 2007; Mazanec, 2022a; Nazir & Afza, 2009; Rasyid, 2017). Many companies have seen a noticeable shift in the strategy of managing working capital and liquidity from intensely aggressive to safe and conservative (Arnaldi et al., 2021; De Rozari et al., 2015; Mazanec, 2022b; Prsa, 2020; Ševkušić et al., 2022; Tsuruta, 2019; Yousaf et al., 2021, 2021). Today, the shift to conservative strategies in WCM will enormously increase the operating costs of an entity but will also provide security in times of crisis. Classic WCM strategies may not work well in times of crisis because they assume the inefficient management of current assets and liabilities. Companies should start building new conservative strategies in times of crisis, because they presume inadequate control of their assets and liabilities. Building and ensuring the continuity of the entity’s operations are based mainly on managing receivables from customers and inventories. In this context, it is essential to introduce mechanisms and tools to optimize the level of inventories and receivables from customers during crises. Quality management systems are an effective tool for improving control in these areas, as shown in the literature (Salehi et al., 2019; Zimon & Zimon, 2020). The introduction of appropriate procedures based on quality management systems should optimize current assets and liabilities. A lack of control over managing existing assets can lead to excessively high stock levels. Uncontrolled increases in inventory levels, in turn, result in unjustified costs, and stocks may lose value or become damaged. In the case of customer credit and the policy of managing receivables from customers, it is necessary to change strategies in times of crisis to reduce the length of trade credit granted to customers. In the case of receivables management, the COVID-19 crisis clearly showed that the blockage of deliveries led to a state in which goods became scarce, sometimes even unobtainable, increasing cash transactions. If sellers choose between trading credit and cash transactions, they select cash. Sales management during crises requires constant control. It should not be the case that a vendor has limited sales opportunities and can handle only a certain proportion of selected counterparties, usually strategic counterparties. In such a situation, comparing sales opportunities with orders from all the counterparties at a given moment is worthwhile. Selling only to strategic customers is a mistake. In the case of limited stock, it is worthwhile to distribute the available assortment appropriately among all essential contractors to the company. Failure to do so may lead to the departure of certain less-important customers, resulting in contractor loss costs. For SMEs, this is the most significant cost for a company. Recovering lost business is expensive, and every effort should be made to prevent a regular business partner from joining a competitor. Applying the relevant ISO 9001 standards can improve management control in the most critical Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 4 of 18 areas of building working capital (Salehi et al., 2019; Zimon & Zimon, 2019, 2020). ISO procedures make it possible to avoid mistakes, which is particularly important in times of crisis. ISO 9001 contains requirements for a quality management system applicable to any organization, regardless of size or type, which must demonstrate its ability to continuously provide products that comply with customer requirements and applicable regulations, and that strive to increase customer satisfaction (Aarts & Vos, 2001; Andres-Jimenez et al., 2020; Chiarini et al., 2020; Ukaegbu, 2014; Zimon, 2017a, 2017b; Zimon & Dellana, 2020; Zimon & Zimon, 2019). SMEs and large companies must use this standard. Introducing relevant ISO standards into a company brings benefits after a certain period in addition to costs. An organization’s benefits from implementing ISO 9001 and certifying the system can be divided into external and internal (Aarts & Vos, 2001; Zimon, 2017a, 2017b; Zimon & Dellana, 2020). Internal benefits may include ensuring the stability and repeatability of processes, ensuring and maintaining organizational governance through clearly defined operating procedures and the responsibilities and powers associated with them, and ensuring unambiguous data and information extracted from monitoring and measuring both products and services, as well as processes for use in managing the organization and its continuous improvement. Therefore, internal benefits are closely linked to WCM and liquidity assurance processes. External benefits may include improving a company’s image as a reliable business partner operating according to international standards and enhancing its competitiveness. To date, several studies have analyzed the impact of ISO standards on the functioning of SMEs (Andres-Jimenez et al., 2020; Fonseca & Lima, 2015; Siltori et al., 2021; Sıtkı İ lkay & Aslan, 2012; Tarí et al., 2012). Therefore, it seems that the introduction of quality management systems will optimize and strengthen the level of net working capital, which will improve the financial security of enterprises. In turn, the basic elements that create the level of liquidity and profitability are costs, current assets and current liabilities. There are studies that indicate that the introduction of appropriate quality management systems affects the effectiveness of managing these individual components (Zimon, 2015; Zimon & Dellana, 2020). It is difficult to find studies that address the impact of ISO 9001 on the level of net working capital in SMEs. In addition, during the COVID-19 crisis, ISO 9001 standards should be respected, and individual processes should be systematically controlled. Therefore, companies using ISO 9001 should achieve favorable results in the area of WCM, which will positively impact liquidity levels and profitability. Based on the above, this study investigates the following hypotheses: H 1 : On average, there are significant differences in the WCME among SMEs regarding the adoption of ISO 9001. H 2 : Adopting ISO 9001 standards has a positive and significant impact on WCME. 3. Methodology 3.1. Data description This research was conducted on a group of commercial enterprises operating in the construction industry. The units analyzed were classified as SMEs. The enterprises surveyed operate within industry-specific purchasing groups. For SMEs, functioning in multi-stakeholder organizations such as clusters or purchasing groups is an opportunity to stay in the market and fight for customers against market leaders or large companies. SMEs within purchasing groups benefit from economies of scale, which allow them to achieve high profitability and high levels of liquidity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many SMEs faced financial problems and went bankrupt (Fabeil et al., 2020; Mazanec, 2022a; Rodrigues et al., 2021; Zimon et al., 2022). For the current Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 5 of 18 study, units operating within purchasing groups were selected because the level of financial security in such multi-entity organizations is higher than that of units operating independently in the market. Therefore, we examined how the introduction of ISO 9001 quality management systems affects WCME. Suppose that units with ISO perform more favorably than companies that do not use ISO. In this case, the model of operating in purchasing groups using quality management systems may be a great safeguard for SMEs in times of crisis. The construction industry was chosen for the study because it operated without hindrance in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic. Poland has several industry-specific purchasing groups in the construction industry. Among these groups, 60 companies were active in 2020. Financial data from 42 companies (70% of all enterprises) were obtained for this study. The remaining companies do not provide information on their financial statements. The surveyed group was divided into SMEs using the ISO 9001 standard, and entities that did not use the ISO standard. Our sample included 42 firms with 84 firm-year observations. The enterprises analyzed operate in the largest purchasing group in the construction industry. Approximately 60 companies in Poland operate within these groups. In the study sample, only about 14 firms adhered to the ISO standards issued by the International Organization for Standardization. This study collected data on the COVID-19 period from 2020 to 2021. 3.2. Study model and variables measurement This study explores the influence of adopting ISO 9001 standards on WCME. To examine the relationship, the regression model can be expressed as follows: Where WCMEi,t represents firms working capital management efficiency as a dependent variable proxied by the CCC as a wide measure used in the academic studies of WCME (Addin Al-Mawsheki, 2022; Ahmad et al., 2022; Hamshari et al., 2022; Kundu et al., 2022; Nyeadi et al., 2018; Talonpoika et al., 2014; Tiwari et al., 2023; Yousaf et al., 2021). It considers a measure that defines the period that firms bear to transform their resources investments into cash flows. It is calculated by the sum of the financial year’s days of outstanding sales and inventory after excluding payables’ financial year’s days. ISOi,t is measured as a dummy variable and takes one if a firm has implemented quality management systems and zero otherwise. It considers a management system that possesses a generic nature, rendering it suitable for implementation in organizations of varying sizes, both in the private and public sectors, encompassing industrial, commercial, and service-oriented entities (Drosos et al., 2017; Psomas et al., 2013; Sıtkı İ lkay & Aslan, 2012; Zimon & Dellana, 2020). Furthermore, to augment the precision of the model, a number of control variables were utilized, such as a firm’s return on sales (ROS), firm size (SIZE), and debt ratio (LEV). ROSi,t represents a firm’s return on sales as a control variable, as the literature confirmed that firms’ WCME is related to operating efficiency and affects their operational and financial security (Habib, 2022; Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Habib & Kayani, 2023; Le et al., 2018; Purwoto & Wahyu Estining Rahayu, 2018; Zhang, 2016; Zimon, 2021; Zimon & Tarighi, 2021). It is calculated by dividing yearly operating profit of a firm to its net sales. SIZEi,t represents a firm’s size as a proxy to lessen heteroscedasticity problems between firms (Dalwai et al., 2023; Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Habib & Mourad, 2023, 2023; Habib & Shahwan, 2020; Shahwan & Habib, 2020). LEVi,t represents a firm’s debt ratio as a proxy to control financial leverage between firms, calculated by total debt of a firm to its total assets (Dalwai et al., 2023; Habib & Dalwai, 2023; Habib & Mourad, 2023; Habib & Shahwan, 2020; Shahwan & Habib, 2020). αi, t symbolizes gaussian noises. 4. Results 4.1. Descriptive statistics Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for the study variables. In Poland’s construction sector, the average WCME was 65.7, with a standard deviation of 35.5. The ISO criterion implementation Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 6 of 18 average was 0.33, with a standard deviation of 0.47. This indicates that most Polish construction firms do not apply ISO standards to measure their quality management systems. The average ROS level was 0.06, with a standard deviation of 0.09. The average SIZE was 0.45, with a standard deviation of 0.5. Additionally, the average LEV was 0.43, and the standard deviation was 0.21. 4.2. Correlation analysis Results of Pearson’s correlation for the study variables are shown in Table 2, Panel A. ROS levels and ISO levels had a significant and positive correlation. This finding suggests that ISO standards influence firms’ sales returns. SIZE has a positive relationship with ISO standards. This indicates that large firms are motivated to implement the ISO standards. WCME and LEV correlate positively but insignificantly with ISO. Furthermore, the findings indicated that no explanatory variables exhibited coefficients exceeding 0.80. The absence of multicollinearity among the explanatory variables in Panel B of Table 2 is indicated by the fact that the highest variance inflation factor (VIF) value was 2.26, and the tolerance (1/VIF) value was 0.44. 4.3. Differences analysis Table 3 presents the z-test results to verify the potential differences in WCME between firms that care about implementing ISO standards and those that overlook them. The Levene’s equality of variances tests indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the variance of WCME between the groups at a significance level of 0.05 (F-value = 0.512; p-value = 0.476). In addition, the WCME means of firms that implemented ISO standards were higher than those that did not, at 73 and 62, respectively. However, the independent-sample Z-test results indicated that the WCME means for the two groups were equal at a 0.05 significant Table 1. Descriptive statistics Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max WCME 84 65.7 35.5 −11 150 ISO 84 0.33 0.47 0.00 1.00 ROS 84 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.80 SIZE 84 0.45 0.50 0.00 1.00 LEV 84 0.43 0.21 0.05 0.84 Note: This table reports the descriptive statistics of the study variables. These variables include working capital management (WCME), quality management system (ISO), return on sales (ROS), firm size (SIZE), and leverage (LEV). Table 2. Pairwise correlations and multicollinearity results Variable CCC ISO ROS SIZE LEV Panel A: Pairwise correlations. WCME 1.000 ISO 0.147 1.000 ROS 0.245* 0.250* 1.000 SIZE 0.086 0.727* 0.248* 1.000 LEV −0.541* 0.027 −0.205 0.155 1.000 Panel B: Variance inflation factor and tolerance. Test ISO ROS SIZE LEV VIF 2.17 1.15 2.26 1.11 1/VIF 0.46 0.87 0.44 0.90 Note: This table reports the results of the pairwise correlations and multicollinearity tests of the study variables. These variables include working capital management (WCME), quality management system (ISO), return on sales (ROS), firm size (SIZE), and leverage (LEV). * Significant at 0.05 level. Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 7 of 18 control in financial management, it is necessary to look for and introduce new tools and methods to support the management process. This is confirmed by research by other authors who point to changes in SMEs management strategies in the area of working capital (Akgün & Karataş, 2021; Iqbal et al., 2023; Kayani, 2023; Salehi et al., 2019). Adapting and enhancing quality management systems seems a good solution for large and small enterprises. Author details Grzegorz Zimon 1 E-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-4438 Ahmed Mohamed Habib 2 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1728-6028 Daniela Haluza 3 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5619-2863 1 Department of Finance, Banking and Accountancy, Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland. 2 Accounting and Finance, Independent Research, Zagazig, Egypt. 3 Center for Public Health, Department for Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Citation information Cite this article as: Does the quality management system affect working capital management efficiency? Evidence from Polish firms, Grzegorz Zimon, Ahmed Mohamed Habib & Daniela Haluza, Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787. References Aarts, F. M., & Vos, E. (2001). The impact of ISO registration on New Zealand firms’ performance: A financial perspective. The TQM Magazine, 13(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780110384871 Adam, A. M., Quansah, E., & Kawor, S. (2017). Working capital management policies and returns of listed manufacturing firms in Ghana. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64(2), 255–269. https://doi. org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0017 Addin Al-Mawsheki, R. M. S. (2022). Effect of working capital policies on firms’ financial performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2087289. https:// doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2087289 Afrifa, G. A., Tauringana, V., & Tingbani, I. (2014). Working capital management and performance of listed SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 27(6), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331. 2015.1114351 Ahmad, M., Bashir, R., & Waqas, H. (2022). Working capital management and firm performance: Are their effects same in COVID-19 compared to financial crisis 2008? Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2101224. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039. 2022.2101224 Akgün, A. I., & Karataş, A. M. (2021). Investigating the relationship between working capital management and business performance: Evidence from the 2008 financial crisis of EU-28. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IJMF-08-2019-0294 Aktas, N., Croci, E., & Petmezas, D. (2015). Is working capital management value-enhancing? Evidence from firm performance and investments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 98–113. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.008 Andres-Jimenez, J., Medina-Merodio, J.-A., FernandezSanz, L., Martinez-Herraiz, J.-J., & Ruiz-Pardo, E. (2020). An intelligent framework for the evaluation of compliance with the requirements of ISO 9001: 2015. Sustainability, 12(13), 5471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12135471 Aregbeyen, O. (2013). The effects of working capital management on the profitability of Nigerian manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(3), 520–534. https://doi.org/10. 3846/16111699.2011.651626 Arnaldi, A., Nowak, B., Roscigno, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Working capital management and profitability: Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER), 12(2), 1911–1917. https://ijbmer.com/docs/volumes/vol12is sue2/ijbmer2021120204.pdf Bahreini, M., & Adaoglu, C. (2018). Dividend payouts of travel and leisure companies in Western Europe: An analysis of the determinants. Tourism Economics, 24 (7), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1354816618780867 Banerjee, P., & Guha Deb, S. (2023). Working capital management efficiency, managerial ability, and firm performance: New insights. Applied Economics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2208857 Baños-Caballero, S., García-Teruel, P. J., & MartínezSolano, P. (2014). Working capital management, corporate performance, and financial constraints. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 332–338. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.016 Basyith, A., Djazuli, A., Fauzi, F. J. A. E., & Review, F. (2021). Does working capital management affect profitability? Empirical evidence from Indonesia listed firms. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 11(3), 236–251. https:// doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2021.113.236.251 Belas, J., Gavurova, B., Dvorsky, J., Cepel, M., & Durana, P. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on selected areas of a management system in SMEs. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 3754–3777. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2021. 2004187 Boțoc, C., & Anton, S. G. (2017). Is profitability driven by working capital management? evidence for high-growth firms from emerging Europe. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(6), 1135–1155. https:// doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1402362 Chamberlain, T. W., & Aucouturier, J. (2021). Working capital management and firm performance: Some Evidence from Europe. International Advances in Economic Research, 27(4), 321–323. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11294-022-09839-6 Chang, Y., Benson, K., & Faff, R. (2017). Are excess cash holdings more valuable to firms in times of crisis? Financial constraints and governance matters. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 45, 157–173. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.05.007 Chasha, F., Kavele, M., & Kamau, C. G. (2022). Working capital management, liquidity and financial performance: Context of Kenyan SME’s. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4038724 Chiarini, A., Castellani, P., & Rossato, C. (2020). Factors for improving performance in ISO 9001 certified smalland medium-sized service enterprises. The TQM Journal, 32(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM05-2019-0141 Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 14 of 18 Clampit, J., Hasija, D., Dugan, M., & Gamble, J. (2021). The effect of Risk, R&D intensity, liquidity, and inventory on firm performance during COVID-19: Evidence from US Manufacturing industry. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 499. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jrfm14100499 Dalwai, T., Habib, A. M., Mohammadi, S. S., & Hussainey, K. (2023). Does managerial ability and Auditor report readability affect corporate liquidity and cost of debt? Asian Review of Accounting, 31(3), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2022-0151 de Almeida, J. R., & Eid, W. (2014). Access to finance, working capital management and company value: Evidences from Brazilian companies listed on BM&FBOVESPA. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 924–934. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.012 Demiraj, R., Dsouza, S., & Abiad, M. (2022). Working capital management impact on profitability: Pre-pandemic and pandemic evidence from the European automotive industry. Risks, 10(12), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10120236 De Rozari, P. E., Sudarma, Y. S., Indiastuti, R., & Febrian, E. (2015). The integrated measuring of working capital management efficiency on financial performance in Indonesia stock exchange. Information Management and Business Review, 7(3), 26–33. https://doi.org/10. 22610/imbr.v7i3.1150 Dhole, S., Mishra, S., & Pal, A. M. (2019). Efficient working capital management, financial constraints and firm value: A text-based analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 58, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin. 2019.101212 Drosos, D., Skordoulis, M., Chalikias, M., Kalantonis, P., & Papagrigoriou, A. (2017). The impact of ISO 9001 quality management system implementation in Tourism SMEs. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47732-9_10 Enqvist, J., Graham, M., & Nikkinen, J. (2014). The impact of working capital management on firm profitability in different business cycles: Evidence from Finland. Research in International Business and Finance, 32, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.03.005 Fabeil, N. F., Pazim, K. H., & Langgat, J. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic crisis on micro-enterprises: Entrepreneurs’ perspective on Business continuity and recovery strategy. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.31014/ aior.1992.03.02.241 Fairlie, R. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on small business owners: Evidence from the first three months after widespread social-distancing restrictions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 29(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12400 Farhan, N. H. S., Belhaj, F. A., Al-Ahdal, W. M., Almaqtari, F. A., & McMillan, D. (2021). An analysis of working capital management in India: An urgent need to refocus. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1924930. https:// doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1924930 Fonseca, L. M., & Lima, V. M. (2015). Impact of supplier management strategies on the organizational performance of ISO 9001 certified organizations. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 32. https://doi.org/10. 12776/qip.v19i2.592 Gajdosikova, D., Valaskova, K., Kliestik, T., & Machova, V. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on challenges in the construction sector: A case study of Slovak enterprises. Mathematics, 10(17), 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173130 Gregurec, I., Tomičić Furjan, M., & Tomičić-Pupek, K. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on sustainable Business models in SMEs. Sustainability, 13(3), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031098 Habib, A. M. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management and environmental, social, and governance performance affect a firm’s value? Evidence from the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir. 6(3).18-25.2022 Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, 9(7), e17847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17847 Habib, A. M., & Dalwai, T. (2023). Does the efficiency of a firm’s intellectual capital and working capital management affect its performance? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–28. ahead-of-print(ahead-ofprint). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01138-7 Habib, A. M., & Kayani, U. N. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management affect a firm’s financial distress? Evidence from UAE. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1567–1586. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2021-0440 Habib, A. M., & Kayani, U. N. (2023). Evaluating the super-efficiency of working capital management using data envelopment analysis: Does COVID-19 matter? Operations Research Forum, 4(2), 40. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s43069-023-00217-4 Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2022). Analyzing the efficiency of working capital management: A new approach based on DEA-Malmquist Technology. Operations Research Forum, 3(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43069-022-00155-7 Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2023). The influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices on US firms’ performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–20. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w Habib, A. M., & Shahwan, T. M. (2020). Measuring the operational and financial efficiency using a Malmquist data envelopment analysis: A case of Egyptian hospitals. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(9), 2521–2536. https://doi.org/10.1108/ bij-01-2020-0041 Hamshari, Y. M., Alqam, M. A., & Ali, H. Y. (2022). The impact of the corona epidemic on working capital management for jordanian companies listed on the amman stock exchange. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2157541. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23322039.2022.2157541 Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2015). Symbolic adoption of ISO 9000 in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of internal contingencies. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0266242613495748 Heryán, T. (2020). Managers of Tourism companies can no longer expect any financial support from company owners: Different working capital management due to the global financial crisis. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 23(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10. 15240/tul/001/2020-1-004 Iqbal, U. B., Nooney, L. K., Jose, S. M., & Chacho, S. A. (2023). How did the SMEs weather the storm: An empirical inquiry into the working capital management during the times of external shock. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 4(4), 4, pages 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015. 2023.2201690 Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 15 of 18 Janaćković, T., Georgiev, M., & Janaćković, M. (2022). Liquidity analysis of oil companies in the Republic of Serbia. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici, 58(48), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.5937/aneksub2248119j Juan García-Teruel, P., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2007). Effects of working capital management on SME profitability. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 3(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 17439130710738718 Jurgilewicz, M., Kozicki, B., Piwowarski, J., & Grabowska, S. (2022). Contemporary challenges for the Economic security of enterprises in Poland. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 12(1), 71–80. https://doi. org/10.47459/jssi.2022.12.6 Kabir Hassan, M., Aysan, A. F., Kayani, U. N., & Choudhury, T. (2023). Working capital as a firm performance savior? Evidence from Scandinavian countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf. 2023.101959 Kakouris, A., & Sfakianaki, E. (2019). Motives for implementing ISO 9000 – does enterprise size matter? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(2), 447–463. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0096 Kasahun, A. K. (2020). The impact of working capital management on firms’ profitability-case of selected sole proprietorship manufacturing firms in Adama city. Journal of Economics Finance, 11(1), 45–55. Kayani, U. N. (2023). Islamic Finance an alternative mode for short term financing – working capital management. International Journal of Islamic & Middle Eastern Finance & Management, 16(2), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2021-0290 Kundu, S., Quddus, K., & Jagannath Sharma, N. (2022). Does halo effect of innovative firms moderate the impact of working capital efficiency on firm value? Evidence from India. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10 (1), 2068240. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039. 2022.2068240 Lazaridis, I., & Tryfonidis, D. (2006). Relationship between working capital management and profitability of listed companies on the Athens stock exchange. Journal Financial Management Analyasis, 19, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfa-7-1-4 Le, B. (2019). Working capital management and firm’s valuation, profitability and risk: Evidence from a developing market.International. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-01-2018-0012 Le, H.-L., Vu, K.-T., Le, T.-B.-N., Du, N.-K., & Tran, M. D. (2018). Impact of working capital management on financial performance: The case of Vietnam. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10. 33094/8.2017.2018.31.15.20 Lind, L., Pirttil, M., Viskari, S., Schupp, F., & Karri, T. (2012). Working capital management in the automotive industry: Financial value chain analysis. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.04.003 Maheshwari, M. (2014). Measuring efficiency and performance of selected Indian steel companies in the context of working capital management. Pacific Business Review International, 6(11), 18–23. Mardones, J. G. (2022). Working capital management and business performance: Evidence from Latin American companies, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 3189–3205. https://doi.org/10. 1080/1331677X.2021.1986675 Martínez-Sola, C., García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2018). Cash holdings in SMEs: Speed of adjustment, growth and financing. Small Business Economics, 51(4), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11187-018-9990-y Mazanec, J. (2022a). The impact of working capital management on corporate performance in small–medium enterprises in the Visegrad group. Mathematics, 10(6), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10060951 Mazanec, J. (2022b). Working capital management as crucial tool for corporate performance in the transport sector: A case study of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Mathematics, 10(15), 2584. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/math10152584 Mourad, N., Habib, A. M., & Tharwat, A. (2021). Appraising healthcare systems’ efficiency in facing COVID-19 through data envelopment analysis. Decision Science Letters, 10(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl. 2021.2.007 Mourad, N., Tharwat, A., Habib, A. M., Wafik, D., & Hamed, M. A. (2022). Appraising the economic efficiency of european football teams: Evidence from covid-19 crisis using data envelop analysis. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 4383–4403. https:// journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/10611 Moussa, A. A. (2018). The impact of working capital management on firms’ performance and value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Asset Management, 19(4), 259–273. [Crossref] [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260018-0081-z. Mun, S. G., & Jang, S. (2015). Working capital, cash holding, and profitability of restaurant firms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.04.003 Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-405X(84)90023-0 Nazir, M. S., & Afza, T. (2009). Impact of aggressive working capital management policy on firms’ profitability. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 15(8), 19–30. https://lahore.comsats.edu.pk/Papers/ Abstracts/146-8588087906194227058.pdf Nguyen, A. H., Pham, H. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Impact of working capital management on firm’s profitability: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics & Business, 7(3), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO3.115 Nyeadi, J. D., Sare, Y. A., Aawaar, G., & McMillan, D. (2018). Determinants of working capital requirement in listed firms: Empirical evidence using a dynamic system GMM. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1558713. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018. 1558713 Oladimeji, D. J. A., & Aladejebi, O. (2020). The impact of working capital management on profitability: Evidence from selected small businesses in Nigeria. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 8(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.15640/ jsbed.v8n1a3 Olagunju, A. O., Nwaobia, A. N., & Ogundajo, G. O. (2020). Working capital and profitability of listed hotel companies in Nigeria. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism & Leisure, 9(4), 669–684. [Google Scholar]. Olaoye, S., & Okunade, R. (2020). Working capital management and profitability of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 26(7), 63–69. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2020/v26i730275. Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 16 of 18 Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3 Pacana, A., & Ulewicz, R. (2020). Analysis of causes and effects of implementation of the quality management system compliant with ISO 9001. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 283–296. https://doi. org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.21 Pacheco, L., Lobo, C., & Maldonado, I. (2022). Do ISO Certifications Enhance Internationalization? The Case of Portuguese Industrial SMEs. Sustainability, 14(3), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031335 Panda, A. K., & Nanda, S. (2018). Working capital financing and corporate profitability of Indian manufacturing firms. Management Decision, 56(2), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2017-0698 Panigrahi, A. (2017, January). Working capital management efficiency of Indian cement industry. NMIMS Journal of Economics and Public Policy. https://ssrn. com/abstract=2914312,II Piwowarski, J., Kozicki, B., Jurgilewicz, M., & Malec, N. (2022). Managing the financial security of organizations during the covid-19 pandemic – multivariate analysis. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 11(1), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.47459/jssi.2021.11.49 Prsa, D. (2020). The impact of working capital management on the profitability of Croatian manufacturing SMEs. Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews - Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic, 33(2), 371–382. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/ 362207 Psomas, E. L., Pantouvakis, A., & Kafetzopoulos, D. P. (2013). The impact of ISO 9001 effectiveness on the performance of service companies. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 23(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521311303426 Puławska, K. (2021). Financial stability of European Insurance companies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(6), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14060266 Purwoto, L., & Wahyu Estining Rahayu, C. (2018). Analysis of working capital management of industry practices in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research.Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2018), Chonburi, Thailand. Rasyid, R. (2017). Impact of the agressive working capital management policy on firm’s profitability and value: Study on non-financial listed firms in Indonesia stock exchange. In Advances in economics, business and management research (pp. 207–2016). Atlantis Press. Rodrigues, N. C. P., Dode, A. C., De Noronha Andrade, M. K., O’Dwyer, G., Monteiro, D. L. M., Reis, I. N. C., Rodrigues, R. P., Frossard, V. C., & Lino, V. T. S. (2021). The effect of continuous low-intensity exposure to electromagnetic fields from radio base stations to cancer mortality in Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031229 Salehi, M., Mahdavi, N., Zarif Agahi Dari, S., & Tarighi, H. (2019). Association between the availability of financial resources and working capital management with stock surplus returns in Iran. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(2), 343–361. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-11-2017-0439 Ševkušić, L. L., Bodiroga, R., & Vukoje, V. P. (2022). The assessment and ranking of the liquidity of Serbian agricultural enterprises. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade, 67(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10. 2298/JAS2203321S Shahwan, T. M., & Habib, A. M. (2020). Does the efficiency of corporate governance and intellectual capital affect a firm’s financial distress? Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-06-2019-0143 Siltori, P. F. S., Simon Rampasso, I., Martins, V. W. B., Anholon, R., Silva, D., & Souza Pinto, J. (2021). Analysis of ISO 9001 certification benefits in Brazilian companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(13–14), 1614–1632. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14783363.2020.1756246 Sıtkı İ lkay, M., & Aslan, E. (2012). The effect of the ISO 9001 quality management system on the performance of SMEs. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(7), 753–778. https://doi. org/10.1108/02656711211258517 Soda, M. Z., Hassan Makhlouf, M., Oroud, Y., & Al Omari, R. (2022). Is firms’ profitability affected by working capital management? A novel market-based evidence in Jordan. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1. https:// doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2049671 Talonpoika, A.-M., Monto, S., Pirttilä, M., & Kärri, T. (2014). Modifying the cash conversion cycle: Revealing concealed advance payments. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0130 Tarí, J. J., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Heras, I. (2012). Benefits of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, 5(2), 297–322. https://doi.org/10. 3926/jiem.488 Tiwari, S. C., Sayyad, M., Azam, M. S., & Sudesh, N. S. (2023). Determinants of WCM of Indian listed firms: A GMM regression approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2199550. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23322039.2023.2199550 Tsuruta, D. (2019). Working capital management during the global financial crisis: Evidence from Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 49, 206–219. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2019.01.002 Ukaegbu, B. (2014). The significance of working capital management in determining firm profitability: Evidence from developing economies in Africa. Research in International Business and Finance, 31, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2013.11.005 Urbonavicius, S. (2005). ISO system implementation in small and medium companies from new EU member countries: A tool of managerial and marketing benefits development. Research in International Business and Finance, 19(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ribaf.2005.03.002 Yousaf, M., Bris, P., Haider, I., & McMillan, D. (2021). Working capital management and firm’s profitability: Evidence from Czech certified firms from the EFQM excellence model. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1954318. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021. 1954318 Yousaf, M., Bris, P., & McMillan, D. (2021). Effects of working capital management on firm performance: Evidence from the EFQM certified firms. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1958504. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/23322039.2021.1958504 Zhang, D. (2016). Is working capital management valueenhancing? Evidence from non-listed Chinese firms’ performance and financial constraints. The Kyoto Economic Review, 85(1/2 (178/179), 69–103. https:// doi.org/10.11179/ker.85.69 Zimon, D. (2015). Impact of the implementation of quality management system on operating cost for small and medium-sized business organizations affiliated to a purchasing group. International Journal for Quality Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 17 of 18 Research, 9(4), 551–564. http://www.ijqr.net/journal/ v9-n4/1.pdf Zimon, D. (2017a). The influence of quality management systems for improvement of logistics supply in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.39 Zimon, D. (2017b). Quality management systems’ impact on the functioning of distribution channels in the FMCG market. Quality Access to Success, 18(156), 52–56. https://www.calitatea.ro/assets/arhiva/2017/ 2017-01-Contents.pdf Zimon, G. (2021). Working Capital. Encyclopedia, 1(3), 764–772. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030058 Zimon, D., & Dellana, S. (2020). A longitudinal exploratory study of ISO 9001 certification abandonment in smalland medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJQRM-10-2018-0284 Zimon, G., & Tarighi, H. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 global crisis on the working capital management policy: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 169. https://doi.org/10. 3390/jrfm14040169 Zimon, G., Tarighi, H., Salehi, M., & Sadowski, A. (2022). Assessment of financial security of SMEs operating in the renewable energy industry during COVID-19 pandemic. Energies, 15(24), 9627. https://doi.org/10. 3390/en15249627 Zimon, D., & Zimon, G. (2019). The impact of implementation of standardized quality management systems on management of liabilities in group purchasing organizations. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v23i1.1210 Zimon, G., & Zimon, D. (2020). Quality management systems and working capital SMEs in GPO—A case of Poland. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 1–13. https:// doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040076 Zimon et al., Cogent Business & Management (2024), 11: 2292787 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292787 Page 18 of 18