Optimum Mix Design for 3D Concrete Printing Using Mining Tailings: A Case Study in Spain

sustainability Article Optimum Mix Design for 3D Concrete Printing Using Mining Tailings: A Case Study in Spain Martina-Inmaculada Álvarez-Fernández 1,*, María-Belén Prendes-Gero 2, Celestino González-Nicieza 1, Diego-JoséGuerrero-Miguel 1and Juan Enrique Martínez-Martínez 2   Citation: Álvarez-Fernández, M.-I.; Prendes-Gero, M.-B.; González-Nicieza, C.; Guerrero-Miguel, D.-J.; Martínez-Martínez, J.E. Optimum Mix Design for 3D Concrete Printing Using Mining Tailings: A Case Study in Spain. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031568 Received: 30 November 2020 Accepted: 28 January 2021 Published: 2 February 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 1Mining Exploitation Department, EIMEM, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; [email protected] (C.G.-N.); [email protected] (D.-J.G.-M.) 2Construction Department, EPM, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; [email protected] (M.-B.P.-G.); [email protected] (J.E.M.-M.) *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A mix design, using a mixture of sand and mine tailings as aggregates, was selected to produce a cement-based 3D printing material suitable for building purposes. Different dosage rates of mine tailings, water, superplasticizers, and accelerators were added to the mixture with the end of looking for the optimum strength, workability and buildability. The term buildability includes aspects such as pumpability and printability. Different tests were carried out in order to compare homogeneous material strength with printed material strength, to evaluate the bonding strength between filaments, and to establish the relationship between fresh behaviour and buildability for printing applications. Finally, a mixture with 20% of recycled materials demonstrated its ability to be used as concrete printing material in the construction industry in the frame of circular economy concept. Keywords: concrete printing; printing buildability; rheological properties; fresh concrete 1. Introduction The mining tailings generated in the processes of treatment and concentration of ores are defined as solid mineral tailing with a reduced grain size, between silt (4 µ m to 62 µ m) and sand (62 µ m and 4 mm). These mining tailings are produced, transported, and deposited in the form of sludge in different structures or dumped into the aquatic environment. These deposits present a series of problems, especially when mining activity ceases, such as land occupation; the need to guarantee impermeability to prevent the escape of contaminants; and the control of seismic risks, erosion, piping, overflows, foundation failures, etc., to guarantee a certain long-term stability and minimise the risk of massive mobilisation of contaminants. In the last 80 years there are more than 120 relevant failures documented [ 1 , 2 ]. The most recent incident occurred on 25 January 2019, at the Brumadinho dam in Brazil, causing 250 deaths and 20 missing persons (counted 670 days after the event) [3]. Therefore, if mining tailings are not properly managed, these tailings can cause irreversible damage to the environment and constitute a danger to humans. Despite the environmental challenges associated with mining and its tailings, mining industries can be integrated to form a model of a circular economy that promotes the reduction of tailings through recycling and reuse of these materials. One alternative that is gaining strength is the reuse of these materials as a partial replacement for the aggregate used in concrete and mortar. There are some experimental studies on the use of marble tailing [ 4 , 5 ] or even the floating of similar minerals partially replacing the volume of aggregates when making concretes or mortars. Esmaeli and Aslani [ 6 ] analysed the use of copper mine tailing in concrete and revealed the success of the partial replacement material for the cement. Gou et al. [ 7 ] reviewed the Sustainability 2021,13, 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031568 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 2 of 14 potential utilization of tailings as a replacement for fine aggregates, such as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in mortar or concrete and in the production of cement clinker. Ince [ 8 ] reused gold-mine tailings in cement mortars, showing an improvement of properties such as compressive strength, water penetration depth, porosity. However, in these studies the cement or water content of the mixtures was not considered to be a critical parameter, seeing as neither the pumpability nor the buildability of the mixtures were being pursued. The application proposed in this research is the possibility of reusing mining tailings as a raw material in a cementitious mixture that can be used in an additive manufacturing process of structural elements. As an additive manufacturing process, the 3D concrete printing builds concrete components dependent on an additive, layer-based manufacturing technique [ 9 , 10 ]. An important added value is that this method can be used to build complex geometries without formwork. Fresh properties for printing material were evaluated through rheology tests by Le et al. [ 11 ]. The extrudability was evaluated with 9 mm wide filaments (printed from a 9 mm nozzle), and each filament was 300 mm long. However, this width is very small for most applications. The research now presented is more aligned with [ 12 ], which proposed the use of more friendly tests, such as slump or slump-flow, and that the buildability be evaluated in terms of maximum height printed before collapsing. Other research such as [ 13 , 14 ] are good reviews about the state of technology and the concrete mixtures’ properties. According to [ 15 ], the major challenge in concrete printing is to identify and maintain the mixture characteristics suitable for both printing and stacking up in layers. In this study, fresh mixtures with silica fume and superplasticizer were characterized for printability based on their rheological properties. Mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash-based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing were developed by Panda and Tan [16]. According to the bibliography, the use of recycled materials from mining processes has not yet been considered for this demanding application of additive manufacturing. In fact, a consistency must be achieved that allows the fresh material to flow, be pumpable, and adapt to complex shapes. At the same time, a buildability must be achieved that allows some strands to be deposited on top of others with an acceptable deformation in a time that is appropriate to the construction speed. Moreover, the material must be suitable to provide a good union between layers. The end of this paper is to demonstrate the employability of mining tailings from a flotation process as materials that partially replace conventional aggregate and to manufacture a mixture with the characteristics of strength, consistency, workability, and buildability required of a printable material. These are properties which, in the case of additive manufacturing, are opposed because, for example, a good workability normally implies a bad consistency and vice versa. 2. Research Objectives and Process The main objective of this study is to determine the optimal content of recycled material of mining origin that can be introduced into a cementitious mix so that its strength and workability are compatible for additive 3D manufacturing. In addition, it is intended to verify the viability of evaluating the suitability of the material from the point of view of its pumpability and extrudability by means of simple tests that are easily carried out on site, such as the Abrams mini cone [ 17 ] or the flow table test [18]. To characterize the adhesion between layers, a new test is proposed: loading with a chisel [ 19 ], which requires simple equipment, specifically a universal press and a chisel-type tool, which would be much simpler than, for example, a direct cut test. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 3 of 14 3. Materials and Test Methods The aim is to obtain an optimised mixture from recycled materials (mining tailings) which, together with conventional aggregates, cement, water and the necessary additives, presents characteristics of strength, workability and buildability adapted to additive manufacturing. 3.1. Materials The tailings come from one abandoned deposit in the north of Spain. From a granulometric point of view, they are a fine sand, as more than 99% is less than 0.25 mm, with an average size of 0.1 mm and the content of fines (silts and clays) of 18%. The coefficient of uniformity, Cu, is 2.40, and therefore, they are a very uniform material. The specific weight of the solid particles is 26.1 kN/m 3 . Mineralogically, the tailings are mainly made up of silica (80%), calcite (15%), and feldspars (5%). The filler aggregate is a commercial sand, also of siliceous origin, whose granulometric curve can be seen in Figure 1. With regard to the cement used, it is type IV/B (V) 32.5 N Portland cement. In some cases, to optimise the mixture, the addition of a superplasticizer type MasterRheobuild-1000 and/or an accelerator type MasterSeed has been tested. Both of them are products of MBCC Group [20]. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 3. Materials and Test Methods The aim is to obtain an optimised mixture from recycled materials (mining tailings) which, together with conventional aggregates, cement, water and the necessary additives, presents characteristics of strength, workability and buildability adapted to additive manufacturing. 3.1. Materials The tailings come from one abandoned deposit in the north of Spain. From a granulometric point of view, they are a fine sand, as more than 99% is less than 0.25 mm, with an average size of 0.1 mm and the content of fines (silts and clays) of 18%. The coefficient of uniformity, Cu, is 2.40, and therefore, they are a very uniform material. The specific weight of the solid particles is 26.1 kN/m 3 . Mineralogically, the tailings are mainly made up of silica (80%), calcite (15%), and feldspars (5%). The filler aggregate is a commercial sand, also of siliceous origin, whose granulometric curve can be seen in Figure 1. With regard to the cement used, it is type IV/B (V) 32.5 N Portland cement. In some cases, to optimise the mixture, the addition of a superplasticizer type MasterRheobuild-1000 and/or an accelerator type MasterSeed has been tested. Both of them are products of MBCC Group [20]. Figure 1. Granulometric curve of the tailings, the sand, and the final mixture of sand and tailings. 3.2. Test Methods The first step was to establish a common mixture and kneading methodology for all tested mixtures. Special attention was paid to ensure that the water temperature and kneading times were always the same due to the influence of these two parameters [21,22]. The summary of this process is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of the kneading process. Time Rate (min) Description 0–1 The tailings are mixed with 45% of the water 1–2 The rest of the aggregate (sand) is added 2–3 The cement is added 3–4 The remaining water and additives are added 4–7.5 The final mixture is carried out at maximum speed The test was carried out in four successive phases as described below, that attempt to resolve the conditioning factors of the material to be designed: strength, consistency, Figure 1. Granulometric curve of the tailings, the sand, and the final mixture of sand and tailings. 3.2. Test Methods The first step was to establish a common mixture and kneading methodology for all tested mixtures. Special attention was paid to ensure that the water temperature and kneading times were always the same due to the influence of these two parameters [ 21 , 22 ]. The summary of this process is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of the kneading process. Time Rate (min) Description 0–1 The tailings are mixed with 45% of the water 1–2 The rest of the aggregate (sand) is added 2–3 The cement is added 3–4 The remaining water and additives are added 4–7.5 The final mixture is carried out at maximum speed The test was carried out in four successive phases as described below, that attempt to resolve the conditioning factors of the material to be designed: strength, consistency, workability, and buildability. In the fourth phase, new techniques were developed to predict buildability from the fresh strength of cementitious mixtures. For the kneading and Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 4 of 14 taking into account the size of the granulometry of the materials, a double sigma mixer was used. • Phase 1: The water/cement ratios and the content of recycled tailings were adjusted to obtain a simple compressive strength of the material close to 25 MPa at 28 days (Table 2). This phase is necessary given that the granulometry of the tailings is very fine, which requires a higher moisture content so that the mixture has a suitable consistency for pumping and deposition, although this penalises the strength. During this phase, the samples are subjected to simple compressive and indirect tensile strength tests according to the UNE-EN:12390-3:2020 Standard [23]. • Phase 2: The dosages were optimised by adding a superplasticizer that improved workability by reducing the water content (which improves strength behaviour) (Table 3). Workability was evaluated by means of mini-slump tests and flow table tests. Conventional methods were chosen because the granulometry of the material and because they are easier to implement on a construction site. • Phase 3: The buildability of the mixtures was tested by fabrication. Samples made by depositing filaments on top of each other were tested to corroborate workability and evaluate the adhesion between layers. This adherence was evaluated by means of a penetration test with a metallic chisel, comparing it with that of the homogeneous material, without discontinuities between layers. This test has already been used for this purpose on materials with joints, such as slates. • Phase 4: A simple methodology was proposed to characterise the rheology of this type of material in order to evaluate how it improves its strength in the fresh state and therefore its capacity to withstand the addition of new filaments. These techniques were applied to the two mixtures that had shown the best buildability behaviour. Table 2. Composition of the mixtures tested in phase 1. ID Aggregate Cement (kg) Cement/ Aggregate Ratio Water (L) Water/ Cement Ratio Compressive Strength (UCS) (MPa) Standard Deviation of UCS Tensile Strength (TS) (MPa) Standard Deviation of TS Tailings (kg) Sand (kg) F1-M1 59 - 12 0.2 29 2.50 0.9 0.03 0.3 0.02 F1-M2 67 - 13 0.2 20 1.50 3.3 0.31 0.8 0.08 F1-M3 59 - 24 0.4 18 0.75 9.3 0.45 1.3 0.15 F1-M4 24 36 24 0.4 17 0.70 13.4 0.51 1.8 0.30 F1-M5 12 48 24 0.4 15 0.63 23.5 0.40 2.9 0.20 Table 3. Composition of the mixtures tested in the Phase 2. ID Water Content (%) Cement/Aggregate Ratio Water/Cement Ratio Superplasticizer Content (%) Other Additives Compressive Strength (UCS) (MPa) Standard Deviation of UCS F2-M1 21.0 0.4 0.50 0.5 NO 26.3 0.99 F2-M2 18.5 0.4 0.46 1.0 NO 28.7 1.02 F2-M3 18.5 0.4 0.46 1.0 Accelerator 26.6 0.91 F2-M4 18.5 0.4 0.46 0.5 NO 27.2 1.67 The mini-slump test is a simple and fast method to study the consistency of cement paste. The test was originally developed by Kantro [ 24 ] and later modified by Zhor and Bremner [ 25 ]. The mini-slump cone used has a top diameter of 70 mm, a bottom diameter of 92 mm, and a height of 120 mm (Figure 2). The cone is lifted, and the average spread of the paste, measured along two diagonals and two medians, is recorded after one minute. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 5 of 14 Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15 (a) (b) Figure 2. Mini-slump test: (a) cone geometry (cm); (b) aspect of one test. This test has been completed with the flow table test [18]. To perform the test, a cone mould with a top diameter of 13 cm and a bottom diameter of 20 cm is placed in the centre of one square plate with 70 cm sides. The cone is filled in two layers, each of which is compacted with a tamping filament. The plate is lifted with one attached handle a distance of 40 mm and then dropped a total of 15 times. The horizontal spread of the concrete is measured. In this case the same mould was used in the mini-slump test. 4. Results The main results of the four phases of the test are described below. 4.1. Phase 1: Determination of the Maximum Content of Tailings in the Mixture Different mixtures were created, optimising the content of tailings in the aggregate and the amount of water, so that all the mixtures were workable. For all of them, the strength to simple compressive and to indirect tensile at 14 and 28 days were evaluated through at least three tests for each mixture. Although this number of tests is less than the standard says, the goal of the study is to look for the optimised mixture and then increase the number of test with the idea of industrial implementation. Of the checked mixtures, many of them turned out to be unworkable, while the five most significant are shown in Table 2. In it, the results are the average value from three samples of each mixture. Attempts were made to work with the maximum quantity of recycled aggregates (100%), given that the first three mixtures do not contain sand. However, they require very high humidities that result in low values of simple compressive strength (below 10 MPa). The incorporation of sand (the last two mixtures) improves strength, exceeding 23 MPa for 20% recycled aggregate (F1-M5). This is mainly due to the fact that the incorporation of more sands makes it possible to reduce the water/cement ratio. This same dosage, in spite of the fact that its simple compressive strength does not reach the values required for structural concrete, will be taken as the starting point for phase 2. 4.2. Phase 2: Consistency and Workability In order to not reduce the content of recycled aggregates in the final mixture, it was decided to add a superplasticizer to the material to reduce the water content while maintaining workability and thus improving the strength of the mixture. In this way, four new mixtures were prepared. The characteristics of them are shown in Table 3. All of them have the same composition as the F1-M5 mixture, with the exception of the water content and the additives. The results are the average value from three samples of each mixture. As can be seen, in all cases, the reduction in the water/cement Figure 2. Mini-slump test: (a) cone geometry (cm); (b) aspect of one test. This test has been completed with the flow table test [ 18 ]. To perform the test, a cone mould with a top diameter of 13 cm and a bottom diameter of 20 cm is placed in the centre of one square plate with 70 cm sides. The cone is filled in two layers, each of which is compacted with a tamping filament. The plate is lifted with one attached handle a distance of 40 mm and then dropped a total of 15 times. The horizontal spread of the concrete is measured. In this case the same mould was used in the mini-slump test. 4. Results The main results of the four phases of the test are described below. 4.1. Phase 1: Determination of the Maximum Content of Tailings in the Mixture Different mixtures were created, optimising the content of tailings in the aggregate and the amount of water, so that all the mixtures were workable. For all of them, the strength to simple compressive and to indirect tensile at 14 and 28 days were evaluated through at least three tests for each mixture. Although this number of tests is less than the standard says, the goal of the study is to look for the optimised mixture and then increase the number of test with the idea of industrial implementation. Of the checked mixtures, many of them turned out to be unworkable, while the five most significant are shown in Table 2. In it, the results are the average value from three samples of each mixture. Attempts were made to work with the maximum quantity of recycled aggregates (100%), given that the first three mixtures do not contain sand. However, they require very high humidities that result in low values of simple compressive strength (below 10 MPa). The incorporation of sand (the last two mixtures) improves strength, exceeding 23 MPa for 20% recycled aggregate (F1-M5). This is mainly due to the fact that the incorporation of more sands makes it possible to reduce the water/cement ratio. This same dosage, in spite of the fact that its simple compressive strength does not reach the values required for structural concrete, will be taken as the starting point for phase 2. 4.2. Phase 2: Consistency and Workability In order to not reduce the content of recycled aggregates in the final mixture, it was decided to add a superplasticizer to the material to reduce the water content while maintaining workability and thus improving the strength of the mixture. In this way, four new mixtures were prepared. The characteristics of them are shown in Table 3. All of them have the same composition as the F1-M5 mixture, with the exception of the water content and the additives. The results are the average value from three samples of each mixture. As can be seen, in all cases, the reduction in the water/cement ratio makes it possible to achieve high simple compressive strengths above 25 MPa that represented the first objective. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 6 of 14 The F2-M3 mixture aims to improve the properties of the F2-M2 mixture for 3D printing applications by adding an accelerator so that the filaments reach the necessary strength earlier to allow their successive overlapping, one on top of the other. The workability and consistency of these materials was evaluated, firstly, by means of a test with the Abrams mini cone [ 17 ]. To define the time during which the material maintains its consistency characteristics, three tests were carried out for each mixture: one with the fresh material, another after 10 min, and another 20 min after mixing. Figure 3 shows the photographs of the four mixtures at the three times. The results of these tests are shown in Table 4. In it, D1 and D2 are the top and bottom diameter of the cone after the test. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15 ratio makes it possible to achieve high simple compressive strengths above 25 MPa that represented the first objective. The F2-M3 mixture aims to improve the properties of the F2-M2 mixture for 3D printing applications by adding an accelerator so that the filaments reach the necessary strength earlier to allow their successive overlapping, one on top of the other. The workability and consistency of these materials was evaluated, firstly, by means of a test with the Abrams mini cone [17]. To define the time during which the material maintains its consistency characteristics, three tests were carried out for each mixture: one with the fresh material, another after 10 min, and another 20 min after mixing. Figure 3 shows the photographs of the four mixtures at the three times. The results of these tests are shown in Table 4. In it, D1 and D2 are the top and bottom diameter of the cone after the test. Taking into account that the top and bottom diameters are initially of 70 and 92 mm (Figure 2), it is possible to say that the F2-M4 sample presents the smallest deformation due to its water and superplasticizer content, and with the same superplasticizer content but smaller water content, F2-M1 presents the biggest deformation. On the other hand, F2-M2 and F2-M3, with the same water content that F2-M4 but with more superplasticizer content, present intermediate deformation, although F2-M3 stabilizes first due to its higher accelerator content. Figure 3. Mini-slump tests. Table 4. Results of the test with Abrams mini cone in the material of the filaments. ID Time after Mixing (min) D1 × D2 (mm) F2-M1 1 78 × 78 10 78 × 78 20 78 × 75 F2-M2 1 70 × 86 10 75 × 92 20 74 × 85 F2-M3 1 74 × 76 10 73 × 77 20 73 × 75 F2-M4 1 71 × 76 10 71 × 75 20 73 × 75 Figure 3. Mini-slump tests. Table 4. Results of the test with Abrams mini cone in the material of the filaments. ID Time after Mixing (min) D1 ×D2 (mm) F2-M1 1 78 ×78 10 78 ×78 20 78 ×75 F2-M2 1 70 ×86 10 75 ×92 20 74 ×85 F2-M3 1 74 ×76 10 73 ×77 20 73 ×75 F2-M4 1 71 ×76 10 71 ×75 20 73 ×75 Taking into account that the top and bottom diameters are initially of 70 and 92 mm (Figure 2), it is possible to say that the F2-M4 sample presents the smallest deformation due to its water and superplasticizer content, and with the same superplasticizer content but smaller water content, F2-M1 presents the biggest deformation. On the other hand, F2-M2 and F2-M3, with the same water content that F2-M4 but with more superplasticizer content, present intermediate deformation, although F2-M3 stabilizes first due to its higher accelerator content. Figure 4shows the look of the four mixtures after being tested in the flow table apparatus [ 18 ]. The final dimensions, after the test, are shown in Table 5. In it, D1 and Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 7 of 14 D2 are the top and bottom diameter of the cone after the test that initially had a value of 13 and 20 cm respectively. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 15 Figure 4 shows the look of the four mixtures after being tested in the flow table apparatus [18]. The final dimensions, after the test, are shown in Table 5. In it, D1 and D2 are the top and bottom diameter of the cone after the test that initially had a value of 13 and 20 cm respectively. Figure 4. Look of the mixtures after the flow table tests. As in the previous test, F2-M4 presents the smallest deformation while F2-M1 presents the biggest deformation, and F2-M3 with intermediate deformations presents, with the time, less variation in the diameter due to its higher accelerator content. Table 5. Flow table tests results. ID Time after Mixing (min) D1 × D2 (cm) F2-M1 1 19.0 × 19.0 10 18.5 × 18.5 20 18.5 × 17.0 F2-M2 1 24.0 × 24.0 10 21.5 × 23.0 20 20.5 × 22.0 F2-M3 1 19.0 × 19.0 10 20.0 × 21.0 20 19.5 × 20.0 F2-M4 1 15.5 × 16.0 10 13.5 × 13.5 20 12.0 × 12.5 4.3. Phase 3: Buildability With phase 2 formulations, that is to say with F2-M1, F2-M2, F2-M3, and F2-M4 mixtures, small-scale filament deposition tests are initiated. Along the “printing” process with a 3D robot, filaments are overlapped on top of each other until the desired piece height is reached. In order to try to evaluate the behaviour of the material and validate its use before starting an industrial process, a device was designed to reproduce this type of printing on a laboratory scale. For this purpose, a carriage guided by rails was constructed to simulate the pumping of the filaments and ensured that they overlapped correctly (see Figure 5). The device contained graduated marks to determine the distance between the pipe mouth and the ground (height of the filament) and a screw fastening system to vary this distance and thus to superimpose several filaments. At the end of the pipe where the product was pumped (diameter 50 mm), a curved nozzle was placed at a 45° angle, which allowed for cleaner deposition, leaving one horizontal surface without dragging. The pump was a laboratory gear pump with a flow rate of 12 L/min and a power of 0.3 kW. Figure 4. Look of the mixtures after the flow table tests. Table 5. Flow table tests results. ID Time after Mixing (min) D1 ×D2 (cm) F2-M1 1 19.0 ×19.0 10 18.5 ×18.5 20 18.5 ×17.0 F2-M2 1 24.0 ×24.0 10 21.5 ×23.0 20 20.5 ×22.0 F2-M3 1 19.0 ×19.0 10 20.0 ×21.0 20 19.5 ×20.0 F2-M4 1 15.5 ×16.0 10 13.5 ×13.5 20 12.0 ×12.5 As in the previous test, F2-M4 presents the smallest deformation while F2-M1 presents the biggest deformation, and F2-M3 with intermediate deformations presents, with the time, less variation in the diameter due to its higher accelerator content. 4.3. Phase 3: Buildability With phase 2 formulations, that is to say with F2-M1, F2-M2, F2-M3, and F2-M4 mixtures, small-scale filament deposition tests are initiated. Along the “printing” process with a 3D robot, filaments are overlapped on top of each other until the desired piece height is reached. In order to try to evaluate the behaviour of the material and validate its use before starting an industrial process, a device was designed to reproduce this type of printing on a laboratory scale. For this purpose, a carriage guided by rails was constructed to simulate the pumping of the filaments and ensured that they overlapped correctly (see Figure 5). The device contained graduated marks to determine the distance between the pipe mouth and the ground (height of the filament) and a screw fastening system to vary this distance and thus to superimpose several filaments. At the end of the pipe where the product was pumped (diameter 50 mm), a curved nozzle was placed at a 45 ◦ angle, which allowed for cleaner deposition, leaving one horizontal surface without dragging. The pump was a laboratory gear pump with a flow rate of 12 L/min and a power of 0.3 kW. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 8 of 14 Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 15 (a) (b) (c) Figure 5. Printing device in the laboratory: (a) printing carriage; (b) curved nozzle, and (c) filament deposition. With this system, samples were prepared by adding filaments, and the behaviour of these ones as they overlap was checked. The common effect in all cases was the crushing of the lower layers as a result of the weight of the new filaments, although in all cases the consistency allows the addition of up to five layers. Figure 6 shows the samples prepared with each mixture. Figure 6. Samples manufactured by additive 3D printing with laboratory printing carriage. Figure 5. Printing device in the laboratory: (a) printing carriage; (b) curved nozzle, and (c) filament deposition. With this system, samples were prepared by adding filaments, and the behaviour of these ones as they overlap was checked. The common effect in all cases was the crushing of the lower layers as a result of the weight of the new filaments, although in all cases the consistency allows the addition of up to five layers. Figure 6shows the samples prepared with each mixture. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 15 (a) (b) (c) Figure 5. Printing device in the laboratory: (a) printing carriage; (b) curved nozzle, and (c) filament deposition. With this system, samples were prepared by adding filaments, and the behaviour of these ones as they overlap was checked. The common effect in all cases was the crushing of the lower layers as a result of the weight of the new filaments, although in all cases the consistency allows the addition of up to five layers. Figure 6 shows the samples prepared with each mixture. Figure 6. Samples manufactured by additive 3D printing with laboratory printing carriage. Figure 6. Samples manufactured by additive 3D printing with laboratory printing carriage. Sustainability 2021,13, 1568 9 of 14 From a visual observation, F2-M1 mixture is too fluid, and the layers are deformed too much. On the other hand, the F2-M4 mixture is too dry and does not allow the continuous pumping of material, which results in gaps and pumping failures. The F2-M2 and F2-M3 have the best behaviour. In the case of the F2-M2, it can be seen that there was a failure in the pumping of the fourth filament (Figure 7), which made the final section of the filament less thick. This failure, that only happened once, was due to a mechanical wear of the pump due to a larger particle, so the pump had to be repaired. As a consequence of the failure, the deposition of the next layer occurred irregularly. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 15 From a visual observation, F2-M1 mixture is too fluid, and the layers are deformed too much. On the other hand, the F2-M4 mixture is too dry and does not allow the continuous pumping of material, which results in gaps and pumping failures. The F2-M2 and F2-M3 have the best behaviour. In the case of the F2-M2, it can be seen that there was a failure in the pumping of the fourth filament (Figure 7), which made the final section of the filament less thick. This failure, that only happened once, was due to a mechanical wear of the pump due to a larger particle, so the pump had to be repaired. As a consequence of the failure, the deposition of the next layer occurred irregularly. Figure 7. Pumping sequence of the F2-M2 mixture with failure in the fourth filament. The next step was to check the influence of the manufacturing process on the strength of the printed material. Building using stacked filaments generates a discontinuous surface between them that can lead to weakness. In this case, the adhesion between layers was evaluated using a not-normalised penetration test that is widely used by slate companies in northern Spain [19]. The pieces were opened or separated in favour of their discontinuities using a flat chisel, similar to the artisanal exfoliation of the ornamental slate plates (Figure 8). The chisel was inserted in all interlayer, starting from the one closest to the edge. This way, there was only one layer to detach. The test was also carried out on the seamless material, which is used as a reference to quantify the strength reduction due to the joint. After that, the average of the tests of each group was made. The results are shown in Table 6, where material adhesion refers to the exfoliation strength of the seamless material and joint adhesion to the exfoliation strength of the joints. (a) (b) (c) Figure 8. Chisel test: (a) device, (b) look of manufacturing joints, and (c) detail of one material test. Figure 7. Pumping sequence of the F2-M2 mixture with failure in the fourth filament. The next step was to check the influence of the manufacturing process on the strength of the printed material. Building using stacked filaments generates a discontinuous surface between them that can lead to weakness. In this case, the adhesion between layers was evaluated using a not-normalised penetration test that is widely used by slate companies in northern Spain [ 19 ]. The pieces were opened or separated in favour of their discontinuities using a flat chisel, similar to the artisanal exfoliation of the ornamental slate plates (Figure 8). The chisel was inserted in all interlayer, starting from the one closest to the edge. This way, there was only one layer to detach. The test was also carried out on the seamless material, which is used as a reference to quantify the strength reduction due to the joint. After that, the average of the tests of each group was made. The results are shown in Table 6, where material adhesion refers to the exfoliation strength of the seamless material and joint adhesion to the exfoliation strength of the joints. Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 15 From a visual observation, F2-M1 mixture is too fluid, and the layers are deformed too much. On the other hand, the F2-M4 mixture is too dry and does not allow the continuous pumping of material, which results in gaps and pumping failures. The F2-M2 and F2-M3 have the best behaviour. In the case of the F2-M2, it can be seen that there was a failure in the pumping of the fourth filament (Figure 7), which made the final section of the filament less thick. This failure, that only happened once, was due to a mechanical wear of the pump due to a larger particle, so the pump had to be repaired. As a consequence of the failure, the deposition of the next layer occurred irregularly. Figure 7. Pumping sequence of the F2-M2 mixture with failure in the fourth filament. The next step was to check the influence of the manufacturing process on the strength of the printed material. Building using stacked filaments generates a discontinuous surface between them that can lead to weakness. In this case, the adhesion between layers was evaluated using a not-normalised penetration test that is widely used by slate companies in northern Spain [19]. The pieces were opened or separated in favour of their discontinuities using a flat chisel, similar to the artisanal exfoliation of the ornamental slate plates (Figure 8). The chisel was inserted in all interlayer, starting from the one closest to the edge. This way, there was only one layer to detach. The test was also carried out on the seamless material, which is used as a reference to quantify the strength reduction due to the joint. After that, the average of the tests of each group was made. The results are shown in Table 6, where material adhesion refers to the exfoliation strength of the seamless material and joint adhesion to the exfoliation strength of the joints. (a) (b) (c) Figure 8. Chisel test: (a) device, (b) look of manufacturing joints, and (c) detail of one material test. Figure 8. Chisel test: (a) device, (b) look of manufacturing joints, and (c) detail of one material test.