Farmers' credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu

Bonnke, Safari Mulume et al. Article Farmers' credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu Cogent Economics & Finance Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Bonnke, Safari Mulume et al. (2022) : Farmers' credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu, Cogent Economics & Finance, ISSN 2332-2039, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303647 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cogent Economics & Finance ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oaef20 Farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu Safari Mulume Bonnke, Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet, Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine, Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques, Victor Manyong & Zoumana Bamba To cite this article: Safari Mulume Bonnke, Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet, Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine, Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques, Victor Manyong & Zoumana Bamba (2022) Farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu, Cogent Economics & Finance, 10:1, 2071386, DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 © 2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Published online: 10 May 2022. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2560 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 9 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oaef20 Page 1 of 22 Farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu Safari Mulume Bonnke, Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet, Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine, Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques, Victor Manyong and Zoumana Bamba Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 GENERAL & APPLIED ECONOMICS | RESEARCH ARTICLE Farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu Safari Mulume Bonnke 1 , Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet 2 , Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine 3 , Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques 4 , Victor Manyong 5 and Zoumana Bamba 6 Abstract: This article assesses the opinions of youth tomato growers on the accessibility of agricultural credit and factors that influence the accessibility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Data originated from a household survey for the 2019/2020 farming season. We interviewed 218 youth tomato growers from 6 horticulture production zones in the South-Kivu, eastern DRC. The result reveals a low rate of 20.6% on accessing agricultural credit among tomato growers. The topmost nature of agricultural credit received was cash-based, mostly from informal sources of finance (92.7%). The findings reveal that the lack of information on agricultural credit, the fear of credit default, and the absence of Microfinance Institutions in the study areas were the highest-ranking factors hindering tomato growers from accessing agricultural credit services. Our probit model shows that total household income, gender, and tomato growers’ membership in a cooperative were essential factors that explain the probability of accessing agricultural credit. We recommend formalising the agricultural credit system by improving agri-finance extension service delivery to associations of tomato growers among the young to Safari Mulume Bonnke ABOUT THE AUTHOR Safari Mulume Bonnke is a fellow researcher at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture/ DRAgriculture/DR Congo in the socioeconomist team, South-Kivu and Tanganyika. He is also an Agripreneurs, Co-founderagripreneur, co-founder of the Kivu Agribusiness Group (KAG), which is an agribusiness platform and a consultation program that empowers groups of farmers with agribusiness skills. He is a PhD candidate in Agriculture Economics and agribusiness, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania. His research interest includesinterests include agricultural value chain analysis, agribusiness development and marketing, finance and food production, consumer behaviour. PUBLIC OF INTEREST STATEMENT The vegetable business size towards tomato production chain for the last two decades have increased in the Eastern DR. Congo, despite its exogenous dependence on importations from neighbouring countries. Perceived as an opportunity for youth job creation along the tomato production chain, the country’s agriculture policy and the private organization’s partners in promoting youth farmers towards horticulture production chain to enable both rural and urban youths to get well employed along with various niches of the production chain. This is through access to agricultural modern inputs and financial transactions. Despite such initiatives, agricultural credit accessibility is still yet low. We debate in the current paper that socioeconomic and institutional factors were relevant in explaining the level of credit accessibility among youth tomato farmers, which before have not been studied. The realistic findings emphasize the importance of considering such factors when designing a sustainable agricultural financial credit delivery model. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 2 of 22 Received: 25 October 2021 Accepted: 25 April 2022 *Corresponding author: Safari Mulume Bonnke bonnkesaf@gmail. com Agricultural economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Reviewing editor: Raoul Fani Djomo Choumbou, Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Buea, Buea Cameroon Additional information is available at the end of the article © 2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. access and use agricultural microcredit services effectively to enhance agricultural production, which is a proxy for rural employment creation and poverty reduction. Subjects: Development Studies; Sustainable Development; Rural Development; Economics and Development Keywords: Agricultural credit accessibility; horticulture; microfinance; probit model; South-Kivu; DRC 1. Introduction Many factors inhibit small-scale farmers’ potential to be efficient in their farming activities in developing countries. Among others, market failure of agricultural finance has been identified among the key factors (Weber & Musshoff, 2012). Besides, rudimentary agricultural techniques and inadequate agricultural production chains are also factors that alleviate productivity in the sector (Weber & Musshoff, 2012; M. Tadesse, 2014). In Africa, most impoverished people still live in rural areas and primarily work on smallholder subsistence farms for their livelihoods (McArthur & Sachs, 2018). Therefore, increased agricultural productivity should increase the income of the rural population, which will boost the demand for non-agricultural products, including industrial goods and services (Badibanga & Ulimwengu, 2019). According to the World Bank (2011), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), is endowed with substantial agricultural potential with 80 million ha of arable land, of which 4 million are irritable, climatic diversity and abundant water. These characteristics enable two annual harvests of various crops and pasture resources to support an estimated 40 million cattle or equivalent. Despite the great potential of being a food basket in Africa (Tollens, 2015), DRC has failed to make substantial investments and policy changes to achieve this potential. Previous research supports the idea that credit access is an essential catalyst in determining the productivity and growth of many businesses, including horticulture farming (Kuwornu et al., 2012; Nouman et al., 2013). Also, Chandio et al.’s (2021)’ study confirm that formal agricultural credit has a positive and significant impact on sugarcane yield in Pakistan. According to M. Tadesse (2014), credit service is considered more than just another source of inputs because it determines the access to the vital resources for farmers such as land, labour and farming implements. Therefore, agricultural credit and financial education are the first steps in revamping agricultural development and production efficiency (Sileshi et al., 2012). In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the horticulture sector has always been dominated by small-scale farmers producing for subsistence and commercial purposes (FA0, 2011). The agricultural industry is a critical component in supporting more than 75% of its population (IITA, 2019). It Figure 1. Source of agricultural credit in the study area. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 3 of 22 Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics and variables’ definition Variables Types of variable Measurement of variable Expected signs Access to agricultural credit Qualitative discrete Financial access in tomato farming (1: if Yes, and 0: Otherwise). To be estimated Means Age Quantitative Number of years old of farmers 34.317 +ve Education Quantitative Number of schooling years 7.009 -/+ve Family size Quantitative Number of people in the Hh 7.064 -/+ve Farming Exp Quantitative Years in tomato farming 6.972 +ve Farm size Quantitative Land under tomato cultivation per hectare 0.20 +ve Distance to MKt Quantitative Distance between farm to market in kilometer per hour 2.803 -ve Income Quantitative Total income in U$S $/Monthly 235.8 +ve Gender Qualitative Dummy sex (1: Male, 0: Female) (71,6% Vs 28.4%) -/+ve Extension services Qualitative Dummy visit Ext (1: Yes, 0: No) (12.4% Vs 87,6%) -/+ve Member_Cooperativ Qualitative Dummy M bre cooperative(1: Yes, 0: No) (46, 8, Vs 53,2%) -/+ve Source: Authors’ compilation. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 4 of 22 accounted for about 53% of the GDP (Gross Domestic Production) and represented 66% of employment in 2003 (IITA, 2019). The sector has the potential of reducing rural poverty if it receives the needed financial resources. Access to agricultural financial credit in the DRC has many challenges. They include the lack of financial education among smallholder farmers, weakness and lack of appropriate financial products from financial service Providers and the lack of collateral schemes from the government. According to Meyer (2011), poor access to agricultural financial credit might be attributed to the risks associated with the agricultural sector, particularly among smallholder farmers. These farmers lack collateral to secure credit facilities, coupled with farmers’ misuse of the agricultural credit. Consequently, it fails to achieve its full impact on productivity and ultimately impede their livelihood (Nouman et al., 2013). Nonetheless, tomato growers in many parts of the country, including the Ruzizi plain of DRC, are mainly constrained by inadequate access to credit to carry on with their activities. Moreover, the importance of credit in improving farm productivity depends on availability and accessibility and how the credit is allocated. In the same spirit, Saqib et al. (2018) confirm that agricultural credit is an essential input with modern technologies for increased farm productivity. Table 2. Agricultural credit access by territory Names of production zones Uvira Walungu Overall Percentage Khi 2 -T test Credit accessibility No 111 62 173 79.4 10.255*** Yes 17 28 45 20.6 Total 128 90 218 Source: Authors’ compilation. *, **, *** = significant at 10%, 5% and 1% level, respectively Table 3. Types of agricultural credit provided by financial institutions Frequencies Percentage Ranks In cash (currency) 30 66.6 Firsst1 st In-kind (needed inputs) 11 24.4 Second2 nd Both 4 8.8 Third3 rd Total 45 100.0 Source: Authors’ compilation. Table 4. Purpose and use of agricultural credit Frequency Percent Ranks Khi 2 test Purchasing farm inputs 3 6.6 Fourth4 th Expansion of the farm 4 8.8 Third3 rd Constitution of livestock 2 4.4 Fifth5 th 16.351*** Payment of debts 25 55.5 First1 st Uses for other household expenses 11 2.4 Second2 nd Total 45 100.0 Source: Authors’ compilation *, **, *** = significant at 10%, 5% and 1% level, respectively. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 5 of 22 Table 5. Constraints of accessing agricultural credit Min Max Mean Std. Deviation Mean Rank RANKS Khi 2 -T test Absence of banking institutions 1 5 3.39 1.214 3.01 3 rd Lack of agricultural credit information 1 5 3.78 1.118 3.44 1 st 43.690*** Fear of credit default 1 5 3.47 1.203 3.04 2 nd Long administration procedure 1 5 3.11 1.435 2.72 4 th Lack of credit collateral 1 5 3.23 1.335 2.79 5 th Source: Authors’ compilation. *, **, *** = significant at 10%, 5% and 1% level, respectively. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 6 of 22 Therefore, the current study seeks to analyse factors affecting access to agricultural financial credit of youth tomato growers and their perception towards credit uses in the horticulture subsector. Although many existing scientific pieces of research have closely studied the related matters of agricultural finance and explored the related risk that creates difficulties for farmers to access credit (Langat, 2013; Olusanya, 2012; Sebatta et al., 2014), banks compliances and bureaucracy towards agriculture credit access (Kiplimo et al., 2015), the importance of various socioeconomics (Kiros et al., 2022) and institutional (Chandio, Jiang, Rehman, Twumasi et al., 2021) factors whichfactors that explain access to finance for smallholder farmers has not been investigated intensively in sub-Saharan African countries. The current study sheds light on the status in credit participation of tomato youth growers and helps microfinance institutions to understand farmers’ credit utilisation. Our findings would inform policymakers on the challenges faced by youth tomato growers to access financial credit. Therefore, enabling a driver of farm-level financial policies implementation that improves the capital utilisation of credit in the agricultural sector. The major purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the factors influencing smallholder farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) by using econometric analysis 1.1. Relevant literature review There is a considerable number of research related to access to financial credit for small-scale farmers. They mostly link socio-economic and institutional factors that determine smallholder farmers’ credit access from one region to another (Chandio, Jiang, Rehman, Twumasi et al., 2021; Dube et al., 2015; Kiplimo et al., 2015; Muayila & Tollens, 2012). Other scholars focused on agriculture credit access analysis and agriculture productivity (Ahmad, 2011; Chandio, Jiang, Rehman, Akram et al., 2021; Chandio et al., 2018), or the adoption of improved agriculture (Anang et al., 2015). Finally, we identified another set of research that focuses on the relationship between farmers’ access to credit and climate change impacts on agriculture (Chandio et al., 2020; Gul et al., 2021, 2022; Rehman et al., 2021, 2019) Table 6. Probit estimation of factors explaining the accessibility of tomato farmers on agricultural credit accessibility Variables Marginal effect (dy/dx) Z-statistics Probability X–-values Age .0831 0.77 0.442 3.48 Education level .065 1.01 0.312 .51 Household size −.026 −0.38 0.703 1.85 Year of experience −.0258 −0.64 0.519 1.62 Distance to market .0188 0.35 0.724 .84 Total income −.013*** −2.77 0.006 10.31 Gender −.168*** −2.37 0.018 .72 Extension service .103 1.12 0.263 .12 Membership in farm Gpe .136*** 2.36 0.018 .468 Tomato land size .159 0.92 0.356 .20 N217 LR Chi-square 27.42*** Pseudo R0.124 Log-likelihood −97.06 Total %ge Predict 17.9 Note. Marginal effects are shown in percentage points and are derived through the sampled X mean values. *** denote statistical significance at the 1% level. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 7 of 22 4. Results and discussions 4.1. Descriptive statistics and association analysis Descriptive analysis in Table 1 showedshows that most youth tomato growers in Ruzizi plain were in the active young age range, from 15–35from 15 to 35 years, with an age of 34-years. Most of the respondents attended secondary school, and all have completed the secondary education level, considering the national equivalence of 6 years post-primary school being significant at 5% level showing that all the respondents were able to read and write as of the national schooling curricula. Also, the households of youth tomato farmers had an average mean size of 8 people at the survey time. The results also revealed that the distance between farmers’ home-based, the Banks, and Microfinance institutions were taken as a proxy of simplifying access to various financial services. Our results in Table 1 revealed an average mean distance of 3 kilometres3 km, indicating a positive association between distance and credit access. The average season income was found to be 990 634.53 Congolese Francs (FCs), as converted to USD 235.8. The survey results in Table 1 showsshow that the majority (71.6%) of household heads were males, while a few (28, .4%) were females headed. These findings highlight the significant role of male-headed in tomato farming households towards accessibility to agricultural financial credit. Moreover, our survey results in Table 1 revealed a low (12.4%) access to extension services among youth tomato farmers, thus lowering their probability of accessing agricultural credit in the study areas. Membership to farmers’ cooperatives increases the potential of enhancing members’ capacity for dealing with relevant agricultural credit information. Our results in Table 1 indicate also,also indicate that 46.8% of tomato farmers were cooperative members, which increased their chance of accessing agricultural credit. 4.2. Agricultural credit accessibility by production zones The actual changes in farming systems, from the traditional to the adoption of modern varieties of crops and increased cropping patterns among farmers, is an observed fact in the DRCongo. Consequently, hasit has led to a rise in demand for agricultural modern inputs. The DRCongo agriculture subsector is dominated by more than 85% of small scalesmall-scale farmers that are unable to afford high expenses related to the adopted modern farming patterns, this has currently led to increased demand for agricultural credit, as part of agriculture inputs for enhancing farm productivity and efficiency. However, the lack of agriculture credit continues to be a severe problem in rural DRCongo. Based on the current evidence in the study of Muayila and Tollens (2012) in their financial analysis in DRCDRC, it was reported that 71% of the farm households experienced various credit constraints. Those constraints areThese constraints include: the high applied interest rate, the level of collateral compliances, the bank bureaucracy and the credit transaction costs, combined with information asymmetry towards credit accessibility in remote areas, and these have directly impacted on their household welfare. To tackle these listed constraints, the fifth government of DRC havehas made some efforts for correcting the finance market failure in promoting agriculture credit to farmers, but those efforts have not yielded significant results. Furthermore, the government, IMFs and NGOs partners have recently adopted a memorandum of understanding (MoU) related to financial inclusion approaches towards youth farmers’ groups, this for supporting their agribusiness startups after their structuralization and Lélegalisation status. ThoughAlthough barriers to credit access are still significant, we are expecting inexpect in the near future the plausible results of the described approach. The survey results in Table 2 revealed the extent of agricultural credit accessibility by production zones in the tomato production areas of South-Kivu. The results indicate a low (20, 6%) rate of accessibility to agricultural credit among youth tomato growers. This situation was significantly affected by the location of tomato farmers. This low rate of accessibility to agricultural credit may be attributed to high credit market failure and transaction costs. This situation has led to a low Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 14 of 22 flow of improved inputs among farmers leading to low productivity. Nouman et al. (2013) reported that adequate access to agricultural credit among farmers is a good catalyst for increasing farming production efficiency. They also argued that agricultural credit accessibility would provide farmers with the funds to purchase the needed and improved technologies in their farming ventures as a proxy for enhancing their productivity. 4.3. Types of agricultural credit provided The results in Table 3 showsshow the descriptive towards the types of provided agricultural credit by micro-finance agencies to farmers in the region. The results revealed that almost 66.6% of the provided agricultural credit was cash-based, while only 24.4% of credit was provided in kind-based, and 8.8% of the agricultural credit provided credit was combined, both in kind-based and cashbased from cooperatives and, other agricultural programmes from NGOs. This trend may be explained due to the lack of financial behaviour among farmers in the region. In other words, the majority of agricultural credits flow in cash rather than in kind. Also, the country’s lack of a convenient seeds system could be orienting the agricultural credit policy. Such a system would be based on the supply of agriculture improved technology as credit vouchers, which is totally in kind while allowing access to all needed agriculture improved inputs and promoting farming contracts. 4.4. Source of agricultural credit Results in Figure 1 reveal a meagre proportion (7.3%) of the formal microfinance system providing agricultural credit to youth tomato growers in the study area compared to the informal sources (92.7%). The results imply that informal agricultural credit sources are most predominant in the region. They include Village Savings-Loans Associations (VSLA), groups of money lenders and relatives. On the other hand, the formal agricultural credit sources included commercial banks, government, and credit cooperatives. The possible reasons behind this predominance of the informal sources of agricultural finance in the region can be the lack of agricultural finance policies in the country and the wrong perception of microfinance institutions towards the agricultural sector’s risk, coupled with lack of the associated collateral. Dittoh (2006) shows that farmers’ smallholder has marginal participation in the formal credit market in developing countries. ThusThus, it could be taken as an advantage for revamping the subsector’s growth. 4.5. Purposes and uses of agricultural credit The results in Table 4 focused on the agreement and concordance among tomato growers’ responses on the ranked list of different uses of the received agricultural credit in the farming season 2019/2020. The results reveal a positive and moderate agreement among youth tomato farmers in their alternatives using of the received agricultural credit, which is significant at 1% level. Hence, most (55.5%) of tomato growers used the received agricultural credit to pay for the previously contracted debts ranked as the first alternative. And, 24.4% of youth tomato growers used the obtained credit for other household expenses. The results are congruent with Nimoh et al. (2011), who observed a significant diversion of credit to non-farming ventures. Similarly, Anyiro and Oriaku (2011) indicated that about 83% of smallholder farmers in Abia State, NigeriaNigeria, diverted their borrowed agricultural funds to other activities rather than for the purpose for which the credit was applied. And, 8% of tomato growers affected the credit on the expansion of their tomato farming ventures, and 6.6% only ranked the use of credit for purchasing the needed inputs for their tomato activities as the fourth alternative. The associated significance of Kendalls’ performance test gives information on farmers’ attitude towards using the received Agriculture credit. Better use of financial resources in the agriculture sector requires appropriate orientation to witness enhancement and growth in the tomato subsector. 4.6. Test of agreement between tomato farmers towards related constraints on accessing agricultural credit Table 5 shows the list of constraints in accessing agricultural credit among tomato growers in the region. The test’s purpose was to determine whether youth tomato growers were facing the same constraints on accessing credit in their farming ventures in the area. The result of the empirical Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 15 of 22 test with the value of F-Khi 2 = 43,69 as necessary at a 1% level of significance confirmed that the ranked list of constraints does affect the tomato growers. And hence, The lack of agricultural credit information had a high mean score of 3.44 and was the first, topmost constraint on accessing agricultural credit. The Fear of credit default with a score of 3.04 was ranked as the second. Our findings are supported by M. Tadesse (2014) and Weber and Musshoff (2012) in Ethiopia and Tanzania, respectively. They found that the attitude of fear due to the wrong perception towards the uncertainty of the agricultural subsector among small scalesmall-scale farmers has led to low participation in market finance. This can partly be attributed to the assumption that small-scale agriculture is risky. The non-existence of financial institutions in the rural areas scored 3.01 and has been ranked as the third most challenging constraint hindering accessibility to agricultural credit. They also reported that the long administration process on credit access, coupled with the lack of credit collateral, was ranked as fourth and fifth respectively as the most challenging problems constraining them from getting access to agricultural credit. 4.7. Probit estimation of the tomato households on agricultural credit accessibility The results in the analysis of factors affecting accessibility to agricultural credit among youth tomato growers are presented in Table 6. The likelihood ratio chi-square (χ 2 ) of 27.42 indicates that the estimated model, taken jointly, is statistically significant at a 1% level. This test testifies a robust explanatory power of the model in the studied reality towards youth farmers’ accessing agricultural credit. The results also showed that the selected explanatory variables correctly predict about 18% of the model. To avoid a multicollinearity problem, we ensure that the variable age and experience were not highly correlated. The results in Table 6 reveal that gender of the tomato growers in the study areas has a significant and negative influence on the marginal probability of accessing agricultural credit. This implies that being a female youth tomato producer increases the likelihood of accessing agricultural financial credit. Similarly, there was a significant negative link between household income and access to agricultural credit. This indicates that youth tomato growers with lower incomes are less likely to access agricultural credit than those with high incomes. Besides, membership in youth farmers’ groups/cooperatives had a significant and positive influence on the probability of accessing agricultural credit, confirming our prior hypothesised signs. This is supported by the new financial, and scientific claim that lenders can also take farmers’ membership as a proxy to social capital. 4.8. Discussion The results reveal that the probability of youth tomato farmers accessing agricultural finance depends on gender status. Keeping all other factors constant, being a male tomato grower reduces by 16.8% the chance of accessing agricultural credit instead of being a female tomato grower. This could be explained by the boom of programmes focusing on rural women’s financial empowerment in eastern DRC. The trend has been promoted the participation of more female-headed households in credit programmes than has been the case with male-headed households. Our results align with the results of other studies that have confirmed more involvement of women in the rural economy, which has led to the fact that women receive more attention from MFIs that provide them more credit than men. Results that are incongruent with the findings of Akudugu (2012), in his research conducted in the Ghana context, reported that male-headed farmers were having less likelihood of accessing agriculture credit, in Uganda (Mpuga, 2010), in Nigeria, Ajagbe (2012), and Ololade and Olagunju (2013) in their respective studies found that female tomato growers were more likely to get access to credit as opposed to male tomato growers. Lenders reported that women were more credit-worthy and had higher loan repayment rates than men. These results contrast with Awotide et al. (2016), who found also that male-headed households tend to have a larger output than their female counterparts due to their better access to productive inputs such as financial credit. While another study by Girma and Abebaw (2015) conducted in Ethiopia did not find a significant relationship between gender and credit access. Also, the results show a significant relationship between the household’s income and the likelihood of accessing financial, agricultural credit. This could be explained by the fact that income Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 16 of 22 level in this study was perceived as household wealth and endowment that could be evaluated as collateral for the demand of formal credit. All things remaining constant, most of our surveyed youth tomato growers were producing at a small-scale basis and hence were considered poorresourced and had a tiny capital endowment. Thus, the income level of youth tomato growers decreased the likelihood of accessing agricultural credit by 1.3%. The findings are supported by some lenders’ financial claims that small farmers are poor farmers and are very risky borrowers. The results contradict the conclusion of Duy et al. (2012). They established a positive and significant association between household income and agricultural credit access, claiming that a household’s capital endowments are vital in the demand for formal credit and the loan amount. The results in Table 6 show that being a member of a farmers’ cooperative increases the probability among youth tomato growing’ households of accessing agricultural credit by 13.7%. This may be explained by the perception of MFIs’ belief that membership in farmers’ associations decreases credit default risk. Thus, the net effect on the probability of being credit rationed cannot be predetermined. Holding all other factors constant, membership in farmers’ groups/cooperatives can be used to proxy social capital Omonona, and Ajani (2009). These findings corroborate the results of Brata (2005), Nugroho and O’hara (2008). They report a significant and positive relationship between borrowing from the banks and membership to business associations in Nigeria and Ethiopia. Also, it could be argued that financial credit through groups initiates peer selection effect among farmers who know each other, decreasing individual credit default and increasing farm income. Since, many microfinance institutions provide group lending credit, belonging to a farmers’ cooperative would ultimately increase the probability of accessing agricultural credit. We thereafter notice the contextual inconsistencies in the findings, that makes interesting the analysis of our research, the above results diverge and contradict the findings of Admasu and Paul (2010) and Chanyalew (2015), in their study conducted in Ethiopia and revealed that access to institutional loans is very limited when it comes to farmer cooperatives and especially to those engaged in production niches activities in general. Despite the expected prior hypothesized magnitude and, the evidence theory that supports each adopted explanatory variable in our research, we discover some regional disparities in the findings from different regions and countries that were not consistent. And that varies from different context-specific investigations across various group ages and communities, and hence led all the variables to be likely context-specific. With attention to the age of the youth tomato farmer, we hypothesized a positive influence on the likelihood of accessing credit, but surprisingly from the DRC context, it did show any statistical significance. This may be explained by the financial market failure in the rural areas of DRC, and especially towards farm groups on accessing formal credit. Our findings align with the results of Girma and Abebaw (2015) in their studies conducted in Ethiopia, they also did not find a statistically significant association between the two variables, while opposing the results of various studies piloted in Nigeria (Akpan et al., 2013) testified that age of the household is positively related to their loan demand. They claimed that older farmers were more likely to access credit. Because in the African context, old farmers have accumulated resources endowment and assets such as land and livestock capital that are solvable as credit collateral compared to young farmers. Nevertheless, Bing et al. (2008) in their study conducted in China found a negatively significant relationship between age and credit access. The same statement has been done by Chandio et al. (2021) in the context of Pakistan who showed that aged farmers are riskaverse and reluctant to access credit. In regards to the influence of education level of the farmer, in coping with credit access strategies, we have hypothesised the existing positive association between educational level and access to credit, though it showed any significance in our study context and being incongruent with the findings of Wiboonpongse et al. (2006). In his study conducted in Thailand, he reported an absence of a significant relationship between the two variables. We also noticed there are discrepancies in the findings of various studies conducted in different countries: for example, in Nigeria(Akpan et al., 2013), Kenya (Messah & Wanjai, 2011), Pakistan (Khan & Hussain, 2011), Ethiopia(Ethiopia (Girma & Abebaw, 2015), and Ghana (Akudugu, 2012). The education level of farmers was found to have a positive influence on credit access. while surprisingly contrast, another study from China (Bing et al., 2008) reported a negative influence on Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 17 of 22 credit demand. In EthiopiaEthiopia, Kiros et al. (2022) found that educational status is not linked to access to finance. Overall, the findings show that education level is one of the key variables that provide exposure to farmers and hence play a key role in influencing the decision to apply for financial credit. Considering the farmer household size, we hypothesized a positive influence on credit access, since the large the family size, constitute in the African context labour that can easily work and generates resources, that are needed to pay back the obtained credit. However, in our research, we did not find a significant association between household size and access to financial credit. Hence, based on the existing literature, it has shown up wide inconsistencies across countries to explain the two related variables. Considering the Asian context, the family size was reported to have a positive effect on credit access in India and China (Tang et al., 2010), while showed up a negative effect in the African context, taking the case of Kenya (Messah & Wanjai, 2011), and Nigeria (Akpan et al., 2013). The reason behind the positive effect in the Asian context and its negative influence in the African countries could be related to variations in socio-cultural aspects and the disparities in labour economic valuations in Asia as compared to Africa. Despite that the distance between the rural lenders and the financials and IMFs institutions haves not shown a significant relationship in this study, it supported our prior expectation, that claimed the negative relationship. And hence, corroborate with the findings of several studies to have a negative influence on loan access. For instance, studies conducted in Nigeria (Akpan et al., 2013), Pakistan (Pakistan (Khan & Hussain, 2011), and Ghana (Akudugu, 2012) showed a negative and significant relationship between distance to financial institutions and IMFs agencies and loan access. This is not astonishing as the distance is positively correlated to the transaction cost of borrowing and related information. With regards to farm size, it showed a positive association with credit access as hypothesized in our research. Our results are consistent with many other studies except Kiros et al. (2022) in the Ethiopian context because the land is a suitable asset that lender institutions in the African context do prefers as collateral for credit access. Studies from various countries such as: Pakistan (Khan & Hussain, 2011), China (Tang et al., 2010) and Ghana (Akudugu, 2012) show that farm size was positively influencing access to formal agriculture credit. This could suggest the fact that farmers with larger farm sizes are mostly engaged in expanding and modernising their farming activities, which led to higher exploitation costs as a proxy for credit demand while using their farm size as collateral. To the best of our knowledge, our research is the first to demonstrate the influence of numerous socioeconomic and institutional characteristics of smallholder youth farmers on accessing financial agricultural credit in South-Kivu, DRC. It also illustrates the relevant contribution to the existing literature regarding credit access among youth farmers to improve agricultural productivity. 5. Conclusion and policy implications This research examines the determinants of accessing agricultural credit among youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi Plain, of the DRC, using the surveys data from 218 smallholder farmers. The study has been conducted in the South-Kivu province of DRC and is mostly based on the field survey. A multistage sampling technique has been used to collect the data from smallholder farmers. We applied the probit estimation binary model to analyzse the data. The evidence from this study reveals that tomato growers’ membership in a cooperative has a positive and significant influence on the access to formal agricultural credit by smallholder youth tomato farmers, while the total household income level, gender of the household head have a negative effect on credit access. In the consequences of agricultural credit from financial institutions in South-Kivu/DRC, still, smallscale farmers have low access to agriculture credit due to the lack of agricultural credit information, fear of credit default, and absence of microfinance institutions coupled to the financial market imperfections. The current research noticed significant discrepancies in various findings from different countries and regions’ contexts compared to the DRC context in accessing determinants of agriculture credit accessibility among farmers. However, the selected explanatory Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 18 of 22 variables were relevant theoretically to validate the related hypothesis. Based on the study findings, our research recommends that there is a high need to improve access to extension services for youth tomato growers’ groups and, also to sensitize youth farmers’ to adhere to tomato cooperatives groups as this increases the probability of access to agricultural credit from financial institutions. Provision of agricultural credit-related information through farmers’ groups is also important and likely to change the risk attitude toward credit for youth farmers who are not currently accessing agricultural credit from financial institutions. In addition, financial institutions should supply agricultural credit to small-scale farmers at a low-interest rate and the terms and conditions should be made easy and flexible. Also, the government should invest in correcting the financial market imperfections for enabling youth farmers’ access to credit. All in all, this work presents fresh avenues to explore relevant socioeconomics and institutional factors that condition agricultural credit accessibility among youth tomato farmers in DRC’s financial market. However, our study did not analyse the effects of credit access on tomato yield and the associated risks of credit default among youth farmers. Future research should investigate the impact of agricultural credit on tomato productivity among youth farmers while testing their efficiencies in using financial resources, as we anticipate. Acknowledgements This paper is part of the author’ research followership grants 2000001374 “Enhancing Capacity to Apply Research Evidence (CARE) in Policy for Youth Engagement in Agribusiness and Rural Economic Activities in Africa” Project in the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), trough IITA [2000001374]. We also wish to thank Dr Paul Dontsop, Dr Victor Manyong, Dr Zoumana Bamba, and the Kivu Agribusiness Group research team for their help during fieldwork and data collection. Funding The current work was sponsored by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) under the grant 2000001374 “Enhancing Capacity to Apply Research Evidence (CARE) in Policy for Youth Engagement in Agribusiness and Rural Economic Activities in Africa” Project in the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), IITA [2000001374]. F#Batch 2. Author details Safari Mulume Bonnke 1 E-mail: [email protected] Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet 2 E-mail: [email protected] Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine 3 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-6379 Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques 4 E-mail: [email protected] Victor Manyong 5 E-mail: [email protected] Zoumana Bamba 6 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Agricultural economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. 2 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kalemie, Democratic Republic of theDR Congo. 3 School of Economics and Management, Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 4 Department of Commercial and Administration studies, Institut Supérieur Pédagogique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 5 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 6 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kinshasa, DR Democratic Republic of the Congo. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Citation information Cite this article as: Farmers’ credit access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Empirical evidence from youth tomato farmers in Ruzizi plain in South Kivu, Safari Mulume Bonnke, Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet, Alexis Nyamugira Biringanine, Mulumeoderhwa Shalukoma Jean-Jacques, Victor Manyong & Zoumana Bamba, Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386. References Admasu, A., & Paul, I. (2010). Assessment on the mechanisms and challenges of small scale agricultural credit from commercial banks in Ethiopia: The case of Ada‟aLibenworeda of Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(3), 323–302. Ahmad, N. (2011). Impact of institutional credit on agricultural output: A case study of Pakistan. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XVIII(10), 99–120. Ajagbe, F. A. (2012). Analysis of access to and demand for credit by small scale entrepreneurs: evidence from Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 180–183. Akpan, S. B., Patrick, I. V., & Udoka, S. J. (2013). Determinants of credit access and demand among poultry farmers in Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 3(2), 293– 307. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2013/2810 Akudugu, M. (2012). “Estimation of the determinants of credit demand by farmers and supply by Rural Banks in Ghana‟s. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2(2), 189–200. Anang, B. T., Sipilainen, T., Backman, S., & Kola, J. (2015). Factors influencing smallholder farmers access to agricultural microcredit in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(24), 2460–2469. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9536 Anyiro, C. O., & Oriaku, B. N. (2011). Access to and investment of formal micro credit by small holder farmers in Abia state, Nigeria. A case study of Absu Micro Finance Bank, Uturu. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v6i2.3861 Awotide, B. A., Karimov, A. A., & Diagne, A. (2016). Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 19 of 22 Agricultural and Food Economics, 4(1), 1–24. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s40100-016-0047-8 Badibanga, T., & Ulimwengu, J. (2019). Optimal investment for agricultural growth and poverty reduction in the democratic Republic of Congo a two-sector economic growth model. Applied Economics, 52(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1630709 Bing, Z., Guo-yu, Ping-gui, Z., Yang, C., & Shuai, Y. (2008). Empirical study on the financial repression of rural households‟ debit and credit and the effects on their welfare in less developed regions – Take Suqian city of Jiangsu province as an example. Journal of Modern Accounting & Auditing, 4(12), 27–34. Boucher, S. R., Carter, M. R., & Guirkinger, C. (2008). Risk rationing and wealth effects in credit markets: Theory and implications for agricultural development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2), 409–423. Brata, A. G. (2005). Accessing formal credit: Social capital versus ‘social position’(Lesson from a Javanese Village). 7th IRSA International Conference, Jakarta, 3–4. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19. Ro. https://doi.org/10. 4324/9780203180990 Chandio, A. A., Jiang, Y., Rehman, A., & Akram, W. (2021). Does formal credit enhance sugarcane productivity? A farm-level Study of Sindh, Pakistan. SAGE Open, 11(1), 215824402098853. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2158244020988533 Chandio, A. A., Jiang, Y., Rehman, A., & Rauf, A. (2020). Short and long-run impacts of climate change on agriculture: An empirical evidence from China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 12(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJCCSM-05-2019-0026 Chandio, A. A., Jiang, Y., Rehman, A., Twumasi, M. A., Pathan, A. G., & Mohsin, M. (2021). Determinants of demand for credit by smallholder farmers’: A farm level analysis based on survey in Sindh, Pakistan. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28 (3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244 020988533 Chandio, A. A., Jiang, Y., Wei, F., & Guangshun, X. (2018). Effects of agricultural credit on wheat productivity of small farms in Sindh, Pakistan: Are short-term loans better? Agricultural Finance Review, 78(5), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-02-2017-0010 Chanyalew, D. (2015). Ethiopia’s indigenous policy and growth: Agriculture, pastoral and rural development. Addis Abab. Dainelli, F., Giunta, F., & Cipollini, F. (2013). Determinants of SME credit worthiness under Basel rules: The value of credit history information. PSL Quarterly Review, 66 (264), 21–47. Danso-Abbeam, G., Ansah, I. G. K., & Ehiakpor, D. S. (2014). Microfinance and micro-small-medium scale enterprises (MSME’s) in Kasoa Municipality, Ghana. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 88, 1939–1956. Dittoh, S. (2006). Effective aid for small farmers in SubSaharan Africa: southern civil society perspective. Ghana Case Study. Dong, K., Dong, X., & Dong, C. (2019). Determinants of the global and regional CO2 emissions: What causes what and where? Applied Economics, 51(46), 5031– 5044. Dube, L., Mariga, T., & Mrema, M. (2015). Determinants of access to formal credit by smallholder tobacco farmers in Makoni District, Zimbabwe. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 034–042. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2015.1.011515003 Duy, V. Q., D’haese, M., Lemba, J., Hau, L. L., & D’Haese, L. (2012). Determinants of household access to formal credit in the rural areas of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. African and Asian Studies, 11(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341234 Effective aid for small farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: Southern civil society perspective. Ghana Case Study, (2006). Etonihu, K. I., Rahman, S. A., & Usman, S. (2013). Determinants of access to agricultural credit among crop farmers in a farming community of Nasarawa state, Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 5(5), 192–196. https://doi.org/ 10.5897/JDAE12.062 FA0. (2011). Annual report on FAO activities in support of producers‘ organizations and agricultural cooperatives. Ghimire, B., & Abo, R. (2013). An empirical investigation of Ivorian SMEs access to bank finance: Constraining factors at demand-level. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 2(4), 29–55. Gilligan, D., Harrower, S., & Quisumbing, A. (2005). How accurate are reports of credit constraints? Reconciling theory with respondents’ claims in Bukidnon, Philippines. Girma, M., & Abebaw, D. (2015). Determinants of formal credit market participation by rural farm households: Micro-level evidence from Ethiopia. Paper for presentation at the 13th International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Companies. Gul, A., Chandio, A. A., Siyal, S. A., Rehman, A., & Xiumin, W. (2021). How climate change is impacting the major yield crops of Pakistan? an exploration from longand short-run estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 18, 26660–26674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17579-z Gul, A., Xiumin, W., Chandio, A. A., Rehman, A., Siyal, S. A., & Asare, I. (2022). Tracking the effect of climatic and non-climatic elements on rice production in Pakistan using the ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 31886–31900. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-022-18541-3 Henri-Ukoha, A., Orebiyi, J. S., Obasi, P. C., Oguoma, N. N., Ohajianya, D. O., & Ibekwe, U. C. (2011). Determinants of loan acquisition from the financial institutions by small-scale farmers in Ohafia Agricultural zone of Abia State, South East Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 3(2), 67–74. Hossain, M., & Bayes, A. (2009). Rural economy & livelihoods: Insights from Bangladesh. A H Development Publishing House. https://www.amazon.com/Rural-EconomyLivelihoods-Insights-Bangladesh/dp/9848810064 IITA. (2019). innovations Scaling up. https://doi.org/0331. 4340 Khan, R., & Hussain, T. (2011). Demand for formal and informal credit in agriculture: A case study of cotton growers in Bahawalpur. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(10). Kiplimo, J. C., Ngenoh, E., Koech, W., & Bett, J. K. (2015). Determinants of access to credit financial services by smallholder farmers in Kenya. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 7(9), 303– 313. https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2014.0591 Kiros, S., Meshesha, G. B., Zone, S., State, A. R., & Chen, M. (2022). Factors affecting farmers ’ access to formal financial credit in Basona Worana district, North Showa Zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia factors affecting farmers ’ access to formal financial credit in Basona Worana district, North. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10 (1), 0–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022. 2035043 Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 20 of 22 Kumar, A., Singh, K. M., & Sinha, S. (2010). Institutional credit to agriculture sector in India : Status, performance and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23(December), 253–264. Kuwornu, J. K., Ohene-Ntow, I. D., & Asuming-Brempong, S. (2012). Agricultural credit allocation and constraint analyses of selected maize farmers in Ghana. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 2, 353–374. Langat, R. (2013). Determinants of lending to farmers by commercial banks in Kenya (Issue November) [University of Nairobi]. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/ bitstream/handle/11295/58537/Langat_ Determinants-of-lending-to-farmers-by-commercialbanks-in-Kenya.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=3 Lawal, J. O., Omonona, B. T., & Ajani, O. I. Y. (2009). Effects of social capital on credit access among cocoa farming households in Osun State. Lee, K. H., & Min, B. (2014). Globalization and carbon constrained global economy: a fad or a trend? Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 15(2), 105–121. Liu, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Xiang, H., & Wei, H. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of research on acid rain. Sustainability, 11(11), 3077. McArthur, J. W., & Sachs, J. D. (2018). Agriculture, aid, and economic growth in Africa. The World Bank, 33(1), 1– 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx029 Messah, O., & Wanjai, P. (2011). Factors that influence the demand for credit among small-scale investors: A case study of Meru Central District, Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(2). www.iiste. org Meyer, R. L. (2011). Subsidies as an instrument in agriculture finance: A review. https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/12696 Mpuga, P. (2010). Constraints in access to and demand for rural credit: Evidence from Uganda. African Development Review, 22(1), 115–148. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2009.00230.x Muayila, K., & Tollens, E. (2012). Assessing the impact of credit constraints on farm household economic welfare in the hinterland of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. African Journal of Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 12(3), 6095– 6109. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.51.10705 Nagler, J. (2002). Interpreting probit analysis. http://www. nyu.edu/classes/nagler/quantz/notes/probitI.pdf Nimoh, F., Kwasi, A., Tham-Agyekum, & Kwame, E. (2011). Effect of formal credit on the performance of the poultry industry: The case of urban and peri-urban Kumasi in the Ashanti Region. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. Nouman, M., Siddiqi, M., & Asim, S. (2013). Impact of socio-economic characteristics of farmers on access to agricultural credit. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 29(3), 469–476. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2336223 Nugroho, A. E., & O’hara, P. A. (2008). Microfinance sustainability and poverty outreach: A case study of microfinance and social capital in rural Java. Ololade, R. A., & Olagunju, F. I. (2013). Determinants of access to credit among rural farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 13(2), 16–22. Olusanya, S. (2012). Determinants of lending behaviour of commercial banks: Evidence from Nigeria, A co-integration analysis (1975-2010). Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(5), 71–80. https://doi.org/10. 9790/0837-0557180 Rehman, A., Ma, H., Ahmad, M., Irfan, M., Traore, O., & Chandio, A. A. (2021). Towards environmental sustainability: Devolving the influence of carbon dioxide emission to population growth, climate change, Forestry, livestock and crops production in Pakistan. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eco lind.2021.107460 Rehman, A., Ozturk, I., & Zhang, D. (2019). The causal connection between CO2 emissions and agricultural productivity in Pakistan: Empirical evidence from an autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing approach. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(8), 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081692 Saqib, S. E., Kuwornu, J. K., Panezia, S., & Ali, U. (2018). Factors determining subsistence farmers’ access to agricultural credit in flood-prone areas of Pakistan. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.001 Sebatta, C., Wamulume, M., & Mwansakilwa, C. (2014). Determinants of smallholder farmers’ access to agricultural finance in Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6 (11), 63. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n11p63 Shah, M., & Khan, H. J. (2008). Impact of agricultural credit on farm productivity and income of farmers in mountainous agriculture in northern Pakistan: A case study of selected villages in district Chitral. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 24(4), 713–718. https://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=PK2010000209 Sileshi, M., Nyikal, R., & Wangia, S. (2012). Factors affecting loan repayment performance of smallholder farmers in East Hararghe, Ethiopia. Simtowe, F., Zeller, M., & Diagne, A. (2008). Who is credit constrained? Evidence from Rural Malawi. Agricultural Finance Review, 68(2), 255–27. https:// doi.org/10.1108/00214660880001229 Tadesse, A. (2011). Market chain analysis of fruits for Gomma Woreda. Jimma Zone, Oromia National Regional State. Tadesse, M. (2014). Fertilizer adoption, credit access, and safety nets in rural Ethiopia. Agricultural Finance Review, 74(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-09-20120049 Tang, S., Guan, Z., & Jin, S. (2010). Formal and informal credit markets and rural credit demand in China. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. Association. AAEA, CAES and WAEA Joint Annual Meeting,Kyoto,Japan. Tollens, E. (2015). Les parcs agro-industriels et l’agriculture familiale. Les défis du secteur agricole en RDC. Conjonctures Congolaises, 148–158. https://www.ecacreac.eu/sites/default/files/pdf/2015_conjonctures_con golaises.pdf#page=147 Wakilur, R., Jianchao, L., & Cheng, E. (2011). Policies and performances of agricultural/rural credit in Bangladesh: What is the influence on agricultural production ? African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (31), 6440–6452. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.1575 Weber, R., & Musshoff, O. (2012). Is agricultural microcredit really more risky? Evidence from Tanzania. Agricultural Finance Review, 72(3), 416–435. https:// doi.org/10.1108/00021461211277268 Wiboonpongse, A., Sriboonchitta, S., & Chaovanapoonphol, Y. (2006). The demand for loans for major rice in the Upper North of Thailand. Contributed Paper for Presentation at International Association of Agricultural Economics Conference, Gold Coast, Australia. World Bank. (2011). République Démocratique du Congo: Accélérer la croissance et l’emploi. Rapport de synthèse. World Bank. Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 21 of 22 © 2022 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Cogent Economics & Finance (ISSN: 2332-2039) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group. Publishing with Cogent OA ensures: • Immediate, universal access to your article on publication • High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online • Download and citation statistics for your article • Rapid online publication • Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards • Retention of full copyright of your article • Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article • Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com Mulume Bonnke et al., Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2071386 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2071386 Page 22 of 22