Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter?

Jemiluyi, Olufunmilayo Olayemi; Jeke, Leward Article Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter? Cogent Economics & Finance Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Jemiluyi, Olufunmilayo Olayemi; Jeke, Leward (2023) : Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter?, Cogent Economics & Finance, ISSN 2332-2039, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/303963 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cogent Economics & Finance ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oaef20 Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter? Olufunmilayo Olayemi Jemiluyi & Leward Jeke To cite this article: Olufunmilayo Olayemi Jemiluyi & Leward Jeke (2023) Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter?, Cogent Economics & Finance, 11:1, 2172810, DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 © 2023 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Published online: 13 Feb 2023. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1909 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oaef20 DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS | RESEARCH ARTICLE Tax revenue mobilization effort in Southern African Development Community (SADC) bloc: Does ICT matter? Olufunmilayo Olayemi Jemiluyi 1 * and Leward Jeke 2 Abstract: In addition to performing their basic fiscal functions, governments in developing economies are constantly challenged by new and re-emerging socioeconomic issues such as insecurity, hunger, natural disaster, collapsing infrastructure and disease outbreaks. These piles of challenges have made the competition for limited resources fierce and hence the need to mobilize more funds. Bearing this in mind, this study explored the role of ICT in mobilizing tax revenue in a trade bloc made up of developing countries—Southern African Development Community (SADC). Using panel data of 12 member countries of the bloc between 2001 and 2020 within the Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) framework, the estimated parameters of the employed measures of ICT (internet usage and mobile cellular) indicated that ICT has a statistically significant positive effect on tax revenue. The results are consistent for all categories of taxes examined including total tax revenue, taxes on goods and services, and taxes on income, profit and capital gains. Following the outcomes of this study, it is recommended that in addition to sound public finance policies, policies aimed at fostering digital automation of tax processes should be focal in revenue mobilization plans of member countries. Subjects: Economics and Development; Economics; Finance Keywords: tax revenue; ICT; public finance; digital technology; Southern Africa; SADC 1. Introduction The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has again exemplified the significance of public revenue especially in the developing economies. In fact, fiscal buoyancy was a significant factor in how countries responded to the pandemic. Aside from the needed resources in the health sector to contain the spread of the virus and treat the infected population, the aftermath socioeconomic challenges of the scourge also have huge financial implications. While the poor developing countries were waiting on development partners for assistance due to fiscal constraints imposed by lean public resources, many rich developed countries were able to actively rise to the occasion owing to buoyant fiscal capacity. Thus, the latter were able to forestall various socioeconomic challenges fueled by the pandemic especially in the wake of the aftermath lockdowns. On the contrary, developing economies are still grappling with diverse socioeconomic woes exacerbated by the pandemic (OECD, 2020; World Bank (2021b)). Public revenue is in fact an integral aspect of any economy, representing a key ingredient in the achievement of developmental plans and agendas (IMF, 2017; World Bank (2021b)). In particular, mobilization of resources has been argued as a significant predictor of the achievement of the Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 1 of 14 Received: 30 September 2022 Accepted: 21 January 2023 *Corresponding author: Olufunmilayo Olayemi Jemiluyi, Department of Economics, Nelson Mandela University, Summerstrand Campus South, Port Elizabeth, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Reviewing editor: Goodness Aye, Agricultural Economics, University Of Agriculture, Makurdi Benue State, Nigeria Additional information is available at the end of the article © 2023 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Millennium Development Goals and the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a matter of fact, the poor success of MDGs in most developing countries was hinged on low domestic resources amongst other factors (UNDP, 2010); and in the same vein, it has been identified as a principal element in the failing of SDGs in those countries (United Nations, 2022a, 2022b; World Bank (2020, 2018). Saddled with diverse socioeconomic aspirations, competition for limited resources has become fierce in many developing countries (OECD, 2020). In addition to performing their basic fiscal functions, governments in developing economies are constantly challenged by new and re-emerging socioeconomic issues such as insecurity, hunger, natural disaster, collapsing infrastructure and disease outbreaks with huge implication for public resources (OECD, 2020). Although sources of public finance are diverse and vary in characteristics, due to features such as sustainability and stability, tax revenue has been pinpointed as a more reliable and efficient source of financing public expenditure than other sources such as foreign official development assistance (ODA), foreign investment inflows and debt which are often rippled with unsustainability and volatility. However, developing countries are particularly challenged in mobilizing tax revenue due to prevailing high level of tax evasion. Low tax revenue has been identified as both a cause and a product of underdevelopment in the developing regions (World Bank (2014, 2021a)). While tax revenue as a proportion of GDP is as high as 40 percent in rich developed countries, the largest share of lowerand middle-income countries are unable to mobilize tax revenue to the tune of 15 percent share of GDP (World Bank (2021a)). Evidence has shown that the ability of a government to raise tax is either enhanced or hampered by changes in certain factors such as the level of economic development (Gnangnon & Brun, 2019; Gupta, 2007), nature of the economy (Arodoye & Izevbigie, 2019; Manamba & Kaaya, 2020), openness to trade (Gnangnon & Brun, 2019), institutional quality (Gupta, 2007; Johnson & Omodero, 2021; Arvin et al., 2021) and foreign direct investment (Camara, 2022). Much recently, the wave of research on the role of ICT in economic performance has likewise permeated the public finance literature and its role in revenue mobilization has surged in recent time (Ofori et al., 2021; Otieno et al., 2013; Uyar et al., 2021; Wandaogo et al., 2022). The intuition that ICT will have a fueling effect on tax revenue generation is linked to its ability to mitigate the challenges of delay, high administrative cost, evasion and corruption associated with paper-based tax procedures (Ajala & Adegbite, 2020; OECD, 2021; IMF, 2021). In addition, ICT could spur tax revenue by increasing tax base through its employment generation capabilities, and also by spurring productivity through innovation, ICT could raise taxable income and profit in the economy (Cirera et al., 2016; Dedrick et al., 2013; UN-DESA, 2021). It is, however, argued, on the other hand, that ICT development could hamper tax revenue. Tax-generating capacity of ICT is contended on the ground that ICT erodes tax base by providing platforms for unrestricted cross-border transactions, thereby aiding taxpayers, particularly multinationals, to repatriate profits (Hanrahan, 2021; OECD, 2018). Owing to the dual challenge of low technological progress and paucity of public fund, the growing research thread has its focus more on the developing and emerging economies of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Although the strand of the literature for Africa and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in particular is growing (Adegboye et al., 2022; Adhikari, 2022; Ali et al., 2017; Mpofu, 2020; Ofori et al., 2021), we are making contribution to the literature by investigating the nexus in the southern region of SSA. Specifically, we evaluated the relationship in a sample of Southern Africa Development Community (SADC). While we are aware that the member countries of the SADC bloc were pooled in analyses on the continent of Africa and SSA, findings of such studies cannot be validated for specific sub-regions of the continent due to variation in political and socioeconomic structure among the pooled countries (Adegboye et al., 2022; Chimilila & Leyaro, 2018). Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 2 of 14 Although our interest in the SADC region is premised on the need to investigate the relationship within panel of countries with similar structure thereby controlling the problem of unobserved heterogeneity characterizing pooled analyses of countries with different structural context, the analysis is also worthy of consideration in the SADC region due to certain peculiarities of the region which may have implications for the relationship between ICT and revenue mobilization. In particular, the expected dividends of ICT are not automatic as certain enabling conditions such institutional quality, literacy and ICT access and usage are imperative to reaping the intuitive dividends; and these factors vary across countries, hence the need to reassess the relationship among countries with similar socioeconomic structure. For example, in addition to relatively better technology-support infrastructure such as power, there has also been higher investment in digital infrastructure in Southern Africa region than other sub-regions of SSA (Kraemer-Mbula & Muchie, 2009; Kraemer-Mbula et al., 2021). According to the Africa Infrastructure Development Index (AIDI) 2018 sub-region ranking, Southern Africa only came next to the Northern Africa region (Africa Development Bank (AfDB), 2018). On country basis, six of the fourteen Southern Africa countries are in the first twenty countries among the ranked 54 African countries. Moreover, level of literacy, which is a requisite for ICT skill and usage (Donou-Adonsou, 2018; Ortiz et al., 2015), is relatively higher in Southern Africa, and in the same vein, the sub-region is characterized by strong institutional quality (Kraemer-Mbula et al., 2021). For instance, Southern Africa ranks second in secondary education enrolment and completion rates among the five subregions of Africa (UNESCO,). Furthermore, the sub-region is a focus for development partners on the matter of digital development (Kraemer-Mbula et al., 2021; OECD, 2021). Therefore, given the above narratives, ICT could have unique implications for revenue generation in the sub-region. Thus, an empirical analysis of the role of ICT in revenue mobilization in the SADC region is worth considering as this will provide a more vivid understanding of the relationship in the sub-region and offer further insights on the subject matter. The rest of the article is structured as follows; next to this introductory section is a brief review of extant literatures on the subject matter. Sections 3 and 4 focus on methodology and results and discussion of findings, respectively, while the final section centers on conclusion and policy recommendations. 2. Literature review The wave of research on the role of ICT in economic performance has likewise permeated the public finance literature, and its role in revenue mobilization has particularly surged in recent times. In order to emphasize the contemporaneity of the ICT-revenue mobilization nexus, our review of literature focused on empirical evidence in recent time. Amongst the most recent studies, Wandaogo et al. (2022) assessed the revenue mobilization capacity of ICT-enabled Persons to Government (P2G) mobile payment system in developing countries. The propensity scores matching regression estimates showed that the investigated ICT product serves as a pulley for mobilizing different types of taxes in developing countries. Also, in another recent study, Martinez et al. (2022) examined factors that boost revenue collection in the OECD countries. Amongst other factors, the author and his colleagues documented digitalization as a foremost tax booster. Gnangnon and Brun (2018) tested the effect of government effort at bridging the gap between national internet usage and global average internet usage on revenue mobilization in a sample of developed and developing economies. The findings showed that reducing internet gap causes significant increase in tax revenue. Further analysis of the sub-samples showed that the effect is most significant in lower-income countries. In an earlier study, Koyuncu et al. (2016) tested the hypothesis whether ICT development stimulates tax revenue in developing countries. The fixed effect analysis based on 157 developing countries affirmed that ICT stimulates tax generation in the studied context. Moreover, in an attempt to find solution to the twin challenge of poor technological development and low public revenue in Africa, the ICT-tax revenue literature is also growing in the Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 3 of 14 continent. The relationship has been investigated at the aggregate level, sub-region as well as country-specific studies. For instance, in a literature review of ICT opportunities and challenges in the Africa continent, Mpofu (2020) argued that while revenue mobilization potentials are well documented, the potential could be compromised by negative externalities such as high cost of ICT products which could hinder the adoption of ICT in tax processes. In a study on SSA, Ofori et al. (2021) investigated the independent as well as the joint effect of ICT and industrialization on public revenue. The empirical analysis explored within the framework of GMM found that ICT is important for the generation of all categories of tax tested in the analysis. Similar findings were reported for SSA by Adegboye et al. (2022). In a firm-level analysis, Ali et al. (2017) assessed how the use of electronic sales register machines (ESRM) has influenced fiscal capacity of the Ethiopian economy and the resultant effect on VAT. The authors found that the adoption of the machine has led to significant rise in VAT revenue in the country. In a similar analysis on Nepal, Adhikari (2022) asserts that tax revenue has risen upon automation of tax administration process. Based on the estimates of the survey study, the effect was hinged on the costand time-saving effects of ICT. Otieno et al. (2013) also reported that effectiveness and efficiency are achieved in Homa Bay county of Kenya tax administration due to adoption of ICT-based tax system. In a quest to thoroughly explore the ICT-tax revenue nexus, a strand of the growing literature focuses on the indirect effect of ICT on tax revenue. For example, Uyar et al. (2021) examined the role of ICT in curbing the menace of tax evasion in a large sample of developing countries and hence the attendant implications for tax revenue. The panel analysis established that ICT amplifies the reducing effect of digitalization of government services on tax evasion with potential for increase in tax revenue. In a similar analysis of indirect effect of ICT on tax revenue, Gnangnon (2020) also found that internet usage promotes tax reform with resultant positive effect on revenue mobilization in developing countries. Mascagni et al. (2021) also tested if ICT helps in mitigating the challenge of non-tax compliance in Ethiopia. The authors found that ICT enhances tax compliance with a resultant effect of rise in both income taxes and VAT. Similar findings were documented by Li et al. (2020) and Harelimana and Gayawira (2020) for China and Rwanda respectively. In an empirical investigation focused on the Chinese Golden Tax Project (GTP) III Li et al. (2020) used data from quoted firms and the study’s findings indicated that the adoption of ICT-powered GTP raised tax compliance by almost 2 percent. In Rwanda, Harelimana and his colleagues found that electronic billing machine (EBM) promotes tax compliance among smalland medium-scale enterprises. On the contrary, in spite of the growing evidence on the tax fueling effect of ICT, a thread of the literature has likewise documented adverse or no effect of ICT on revenue generation. For example, Mallick (2021) using a composite ICT infrastructure index found that the use of ICT-enabled tax procedure has a statistically significant negative effect on mobilized direct and indirect tax revenue of the combined tiers of government in India. In the same vein, Okunogbe and Pouloquen (2022), in an assessment of how automation of tax administration has impacted tax payment in Tajikistan, found that introduction of e-filling of tax return increases tax evasion among firms which were previously unlikely to evade tax. Moreover, Hanrahan (2021) contend the revenuegenerating capacity of ICT in OECD countries. Exploring the effect of digitalization on taxgenerating capacities of the 36 member countries of the OECD, the static analyses suggest that advancement in digitalization of the economies deter tax generation, although the dynamic analysis suggests otherwise. In particular, the static analyses of pooled OLS and fixed effect estimators found that increasing digitalization of the economy has a statistically negative effect on tax revenue in the OECD countries. Furthermore, in an earlier study, Chimilila and Leyaro (2018) found varying effects of ICT types on tax revenue in SSA. The authors, using FMOLS estimator, found a statistically significant positive effect of internet usage while no significant effect was documented for mobile subscription. Using panel ECM estimator, mobile subscription has Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 4 of 14 a statistically negative effect on tax revenue while a statistically positive effect was found for internet usage. Thus, following an extensive review of related research, we uncovered that although the ICTrevenue mobilization literature is growing, it is particularly small for sub-Saharan Africa, and to the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the relationship for the Southern area of the subregion. 3. Methodology 3.1. Data and variables In order to investigate the possible role of ICT development in revenue mobilization in the SADC region, we collected annual time series on 12 member countries of SADC representing 75 percent membership of the trade bloc. Specifically, annual data spanning the periods of 2001 to 2020 were collected for Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. 2020. Our choice of countries is, however, largely determined by data availability. In particular, the adopted measures of tax categories employed in this study are missing for Democratic Republic of Congo, Congo Republic, Eswatini and Seychelles. The study period was also chosen based on availability of data and consideration for the intended method of estimation. In addition, the scope also coincides with the period of increased usage and penetration of ICT in the continent of Africa For robust analysis, we examined the role of ICT in revenue mobilization effort for different forms of taxes, namely total tax revenue (TAXR), taxes on goods and services (TAXGS), and taxes on income, profit and capital gains (TAXC) (see appendix A for the definition of the tax categories). Also, we adopted two measures of ICT development, namely percentage of the population using internet (INTUSER) and mobile cellular subscription (MOBILE), to account for ICT usage and access respectively. Other macroeconomic variables which have been identified as significant predictors of public revenue size were incorporated to curtail misspecification error due to omitted variable bias. Our choice of control variables was largely informed by consideration of the peculiarities of the context of our study, evidence from extant studies and data availability. Due to the significance of a country’s level of economic development and degree of involvement in international trade in revenue mobilization (Gupta, 2007; Ofori et al., 2018, 2022), we collected data on economic development proxy by GDP per capita growth rate (GDPCG) and degree of trade openness (TRADE). Moreover, urbanization and labour force size have been argued as significant predictors of tax performance (Cebula, 2018); hence, urban population as proportion of total population (URBP) and labour force participation rate (LFPR) were included to represent the degree of urbanization and rate of economic participation respectively. Urbanization is regarded an important influencer of tax revenue in developing countries as tax-generating economic activities are mostly in the urban cities and towns. Furthermore, owing to the relevance of the informal sector in sub-Saharan African region, informality measured by the proportion of contributing family workers was also accounted for in our mode. For uniformity, data were obtained only from the World Development Indicator (WDI), an online database of the World Bank which compiles data at national, regional and global levels from internationally recognized sources. 3.2. Estimation technique Since our study is concerned with pooling of data for many countries, our estimation strategy is therefore one of panel analysis. The meritorious features of panel model include its ability to control for heterogeneity in pooled data and enhancement of efficiency in estimation. Moreover, aside from its capacity in identifying and measuring relationships where time series are limited, panel model also mitigates the effect of multicollinearity in econometric regressions (Baltagi, 2005). While econometric literature is replete with various suggestions on estimation techniques Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 5 of 14 for panel models, not all is efficient in cointegrating regressions. For example, pooled ordinary least square (POLS), random and fixed effects models have been criticized for producing biased and inconsistent estimates when applied to regressions having cointegrated variables (Phillips & Hansen, 1990; Phillips & Moon, 1999). Thus, new methods with capacity to estimate cointegrating vectors of panel data were developed. These include within and between groups estimators such as ordinary least square estimators—fully modified OLS (FMOLS) and dynamic OLS (DOLS) estimators which have been adjudged efficient in producing unbiased estimates (Phillips & Hansen, 1990; Phillips & Moon, 1999; Kao & Chiang, 2001; Pedroni, 2000). DOLS is a parametric method including the lagged first difference, while the FMOLS is a nonparametric approach. The relative efficiencies of both estimators have been subjected to empirical debates. While studies such as Harris and Sollis (2005) showed that DOLS is more efficient than FMOLS, Pedroni (2000) argued that the latter is more efficient owing to the former’s higher size distortions. Ramirez (2007) also argued for the efficiency of FMOLS in small sample size. Since our study focuses only on Southern Africa represented by SADC trade bloc, our sample size is relatively small to what would have been obtained in the case of SSA, and we are further constrained by the challenge of data unavailability in some SADC member countries. Hence, we chose the FMOLS as the preferred method of estimation to combat the challenge of small size. Aside from its ability to produce asymptotically unbiased estimates in small samples, FMOLS also mitigates the inherent challenge of endogeneity and serial correlation in the regression model in addition to its capacity to correct for heterogeneity in cointegrating vectors (Hamit-Haggar, 2012; Pedroni, 2000). 3.3. Model estimation Based on the choice variables for the analysis, the functional form of the analytical model is represented as follows; Tax ¼ICT;Gdpcg;Urbg;Trade;Cont;Lfprð Þ (1) The estimated linear econometric equation is therefore stated as: Taxit ¼μ0þμ1ICTit þμ2Gdpcgit þμ3Urbgit þμ4Tradeit þμ5Contit þμ6Lfprit þεit (2) where: Taxit is the measure of tax revenue in country i at time t and ICTit is the measure of ICT development in country i at time t. Other variables are as earlier discussed. μ1;μ2;μ3;μ4;μ5;μ6 are the estimated coefficients which measure the effect of the principal regressor (ICT) and other explanatory variables respectively on tax revenue. As earlier noted, the role of ICT in revenue mobilization effort in the SADC region is tested using three categories of tax revenue and ICT is proxied by two measures of ICT—mobile cellular subscription and number of individuals using internet. Hence, two revenue models were estimated for each category of tax revenue with one measure of ICT included separately in each model; therefore, six tax revenue models were estimated in all. 3.4. FMOL pre-estimation test There are certain requisites which are critical to the use of FMOLS. First, it is of utmost importance that both the dependent and explanatory variables are stationary. While the method was initially developed for optimum estimation of cointegrating models whose variables are only stationary at first difference I(1; Phillips & Hansen, 1990), it has, however, been modified to allow for the estimation of models with only I(1) variable as well as those with combination of variables stationary at level (I(0) and at first difference I(1) (Phillips, 1993). Moreover, for the purpose of estimating long-run relationship, it is important to ensure that the concerned variables are capable of forming an equilibrium relationship over a long-run period (Engle & Granger, 1987; Pesaran et al., 2001). Thus, in order to ascertain the suitability of the choice method, we tested for the Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 6 of 14 stationarity properties of the series as well as the existence of long-run relationship among the series using unit root and cointegration tests respectively. 3.4.1. Unit root test Estimation of non-stationary time-series will produce biased results such that that the regression results will suggest the existence of significant relationships among the variables when in real sense, the variables are uncorrelated. In such situations, the regressions are said to be spurious and inferences based on such results are misleading (Cavaliere et al., 2015). Thus, we tested for the stationarity of the data employed in this study. While application of unit root and cointegration in panel analyses has been considered meritorious on the ground of its ability to increase the statistical power of the model relative to time series analyses, the procedures are, however, complicated (Breitung & Pesaran, 2005). Thus, high power tests have been developed to account for the complexities. Examples of such tests which have been extensively employed in the literature are Fisher-Augmented DickeyFuller (Fisher-ADF) and Philip-Perron (PP) tests which assume that the heterogeneous cross-section sequences have different individual unit root process. The results of the two unit root tests as presented in Table 1 show that the series’ order of integration are combinations of stationarity at level I(0) and at first difference I(1). For the FisherADF test, individuals using internet, per capita GDP growth rate and informality are stationary at level while other variables are only stationary at first difference. However, using PP test, all the variables are stationary at level except tax from income profit and capital gain, individuals using internet, mobile cellular subscription and trade openness. Having established stationarity of the series either at level or at first difference, we proceeded to test for long-run equilibrium relationship among the series 3.4.2. Cointegration test In addition to ascertaining the stationarity of the variables of interest to avoid biased estimates from spurious regressions, it is also important that the selected series share co-movement over a long period of time (Engle & Granger, 1987; Pesaran et al., 2001). In other words, for correct application of FMOLS, it is not only important that two or more variables are able to form equilibrium relationship, it is also crucial that the relationship is sustained in the long-run. This is known as level relationship or cointegration among the variables. There are similarly various econometric tests popularized in the literature for estimating cointegrating relationships among economic series. For this study, we adopted Kao (1999) cointegration test which is based on Engle and Granger’s (1987) two-step residual, having null hypothesis of no cointegration. While Kao (1999) specified both Dickey-Fuller (DF) and the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) tests, EViews 12 statistical package only reports the ADF t-statistics and the corresponding probability value. Since we proposed to estimate six separate models due to the adoption of three different types of tax revenue and two different measures of ICT development which are interchangeably incorporated in each model, we tested for cointegration among six different combinations of the adopted series. The results are presented in Table 2. The associated probability values of the reported t-statistic showed strong evidence of long-run relationship among the estimated series as the null hypothesis of no cointegration was rejected for all the combinations of the estimated series at the stipulated 5 percent level of significance. Having ascertained the existence of cointegration among the variables, the study proceeded to estimate the FMOLS model. 3.5. Fully modified OLS (FMOLS) estimation result and discussion The result of the FMOLS regression is presented in Table 3. The results are presented in three panels A, B and C representing the total tax revenue (TAXR), taxes on goods and services (TAXGS), and taxes on income, profit and capital gains (TAXC) regression models respectively. Each panel Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 7 of 14 Appendix: Definitions of tax variables (1) Total tax revenue (TAXR) is the total amount of tax collected from all categories of tax. (2) Taxes on goods and services (TAGS) is otherwise known as value-added tax. it is levied on all taxable goods and services sold for domestic consumption. It is calculated as a certain percentage of the price of the commodity, and included in the final price. It is collected on behalf of government by an intermediary, usually the seller. The aggregate TAGS is calculated as share of total revenue. (3) Profit, income and capital gain taxes (TAXC) are taxes levied on net income of individuals, profits of corporations and enterprises, and on capital gains. The aggregate TAXC is also calculated as share of total revenue. © 2023 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Cogent Economics & Finance (ISSN: 2332-2039) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group. Publishing with Cogent OA ensures: • Immediate, universal access to your article on publication • High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online • Download and citation statistics for your article • Rapid online publication • Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards • Retention of full copyright of your article • Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article • Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com Jemiluyi & Jeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 11: 2172810 https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2172810 Page 14 of 14