scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Materials Used in Resin Bonded Fixed Partial Denture: A Review Article

International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)

Abstract

Abstract The resin bonded fixed partial denture serves to be a fantastic solution for replacing missing teeth particularly when minimal tooth preparation would be desired. When opting for a Resin bonded fixed partial denture, clinicians should consider the method of fabrication [direct or indirect], the design [cantilever or fixed-fixed], and the material to be used. These decisions are affected by various clinical and aesthetic factors such as connector space, tooth position [anterior or posterior], patient preferences, and the dentists skills. Several materials can be used in the fabrication of resin bonded fixed partial denture such as metal alloys, all ceramic systems, fibre reinforced composites, and zirconia. This review article focuses on the different material choices available for resin bonded fixed partial denture fabrication, enumerating their properties ,advantages, limitations and clinical applications. 1, 2, 6, 8 ,10,13

Full text

International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR) IJDSIR : Dental Publication Service Available Online at:www.ijdsir.com Volume – 8, Issue – 6, November – 2025, Page No. : 50 - 53 Corresponding Author: Dr. Pinky A, ijdsir, Volume – 8 Issue - 6, Page No. : 50 - 53 Page50 ISSN: 2581-5989 PubMed - National Library of Medicine - ID: 101738774 Materials Used in Resin Bonded Fixed Partial Denture: A Review Article 1Dr. B. Devi Parameswari, MDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. 2Vaishnavi Sethuraman, Intern, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. 3Dr. Pinky A, Postgraduate, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. 4Dr. Krithika, MDS, Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. 5Dr. H Annapoorni, MDS, PhD, Professor and HOD, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. Corresponding Author: Dr. Pinky A, Postgraduate, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be university), Chennai. Citation of this Article: Dr. B. Devi Parameswari, Vaishnavi Sethuraman, Dr. Pinky A, Dr. Krithika, Dr. H Annapoorni, “Materials Used in Resin Bonded Fixed Partial Denture: A Review Article”, IJDSIRNovember – 2025, Volume – 8, Issue – 6, P. No. 50 – 53. Copyright: © 2025, Dr. Pinky A, et al. This is an open access journal and article distributed under the terms of the creative common’s attribution non-commercial License. Which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given, and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Type of Publication: Review Article Conflicts of Interest: Nil Abstract The resin bonded fixed partial denture serves to be a fantastic solution for replacing missing teeth particularly when minimal tooth preparation would be desired. When opting for a Resin bonded fixed partial denture, clinicians should consider the method of fabrication [direct or indirect], the design [cantilever or fixed-fixed], and the material to be used. These decisions are affected by various clinical and aesthetic factors such as connector space, tooth position [anterior or posterior], patient preferences, and the dentists skills. Several materials can be used in the fabrication of resin bonded fixed partial denture such as metal alloys, all ceramic systems, fibre reinforced composites, and zirconia. This review article focuses on the different material choices available for resin bonded fixed partial denture fabrication, enumerating their properties ,advantages, limitations and clinical applications. 1, 2, 6, 8 ,10,13 Dr. Pinky A, et al. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR) ©2025 IJDSIR, All Rights Reserved Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Page51 Keywords: resin bonded fixed partial denture, restorative treatment, material choice Introduction Rochette introduced resin bonded fixed partial denture in early 1970s, providing a conservative treatment choice for replacing missing teeth with minimal or no preparation of abutment teeth 1 The most commonly used materials used in resin-bonded fixed partial denture:  Gold alloy (earlier)  Base metal alloy  Cobalt chromium alloy  Nickel-chromium alloy  All ceramic  Fiber-reinforced composite  Zirconia. 2,4,6,8,10,13 Initially, gold alloys were being used, but newer advancements in dental materials have led to the adoption of base metal alloys, ceramics, and newer composite materials.2,4,6 These advancements allow for improved aesthetics, bond strength, and clinical performance of the fixed partial denture. 6,8,9,10 Materials Used In Resin Bonded Fixed Partial Denture: Gold Alloy Gold alloys are noble metals which were used historically in dentistry because of their excellent corrosion resistance, workability, and biocompatibility. 4,6 Dental gold alloys can be categorized based on their hardness and composition and may also contain additions like palladium and platinum for improving strength and for reducing thermal expansion. 6 Though they have been largely replaced by more affordable and stronger materials, gold alloys still offer a high precision and aesthetic outcomes when they are used as substructures in resin bonded fixed partial dentures.2,6 Galvano forming is a newer technique that allows for the creation of very thin gold frameworks, preserving more natural tooth structure as much as possible. 2 Base Metal Alloy A. Cobalt Chromium Alloys Cobalt chromium [Co-Cr] alloys have developed as a dependable alternative to gold due to their excellent mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and affordability.5 These alloys execute well under heavy masticatory forces, even in thin sections , making them desirable for resin bonded fixed partial dentures. 5,6 CAD/CAM milling and laser sintering are modern manufacturing methods that have improved the accuracy and clinical applicability of the cobalt chromium alloys. 5 Unlike nickel-based alloys, Cobalt-Chromium alloys pose a lower risk of allergic reactions. 5,7 B. Nickel Chromium Alloys: Nickel chromium alloys had been used widely for decades because of their strength and favourable bonding characteristics with porcelain. 4,6 They are cost friendly and mechanically strong, but their use has declined due to the rising concerns about nickel hypersensitivity in susceptible individuals who have allergies.7 The shift towards Cobalt – Chromium alloys is getting more evident because of these biocompatibility issues.5,7 All Ceramic All ceramic resin bonded fixed partial dentures are highly preferred as they provide metal free option and also cater to the needs of the patients with high aesthetic demands. 8,9All ceramics are particularly indicated for the replacement of anterior teeth in patients have stable occlusion and having healthy abutments.9 The Benefits of all ceramic resin bonded fixed partial dentures include Dr. Pinky A, et al. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR) ©2025 IJDSIR, All Rights Reserved Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 Page52 excellent translucency , biocompatibility to the patients , and require conservative tooth preparation.6,8,9 However, all ceramic restorations tend to get fractured under high masticatory forces especially when used in posterior tooth and also tend to get fractured in patients having parafunctional habits such as night grinding, etc.8,14 Cantilever designs are most commonly preferred because of their lower stress distribution. Fiber Reinforced Composite Fibre reinforced composites have the excellent combination of aesthetics and functional benefits and are largely gaining popularity as a minimally invasive material.10,11,12 Fibre reinforces composites use glass, carbon, or polyethylene fibres which are embedded in a resin matrix which helps to provide strength and flexibility to the fixed partial denture. 10,11 Fibre reinforced composite prosthesis can be fabricated chairside or in the laboratory and can be bonded directly to the enamel surfaces, that offers quick as well as costeffective tooth replacement.10,11 Despite having these many advantages , there are issues like wear resistance, water absorption , and technique sensitivity during cementation which may impact their long term success. 11,12 These materials are ideal for being used as temporary or interim prosthesis and can be easily repaired if they tend to get damaged. 10,11 Zirconia Zirconia, particularly 3Y -TZP [yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals], is recently one of the most durable ceramic materials that is being used in dentistry.13 It reflects superior fracture toughness as well as flexural strength, that makes it suitable for being used for both anterior and posterior restorations. Earlier generations of zirconia were opaque and also required veneering with porcelain, which increased the risk of chipping of the material.13,14 Newly introduced translucent monolithic zirconia variants provide with improvement of aesthetics and also eliminates the need for veneering. Also, occasional fracture of the veneers remain to be a concern in layered zirconia restorations and therefore a more long term clinical data is needed for further advancements. 14,15 Discussion Treatment options for replacing missing teeth should be considered based on patient preferences, biological factors, and economical constraints of the patient.15,16 Resin bonded fixed partial dentures provide a traditional and aesthetically attractive solution, especially for the patients who cannot undergo implant therapy or undergo a full coverage restorations.2,15 The development of materialsfrom traditionally used gold and metal alloys to the high strength ceramics and fibre reinforced composites are expanding the scope and indications for resin bonded fixed partial dentures.2,6,10,13 Zirconia and all ceramic systems do offer metal free alternatives and also provide excellent aesthetics but also require careful case selection due to possible fracture risks. 8,13,14 Ongoing research and development in material sciences continues to improve the long life and performance of these dental prosthesis. 13,16 Conclusion Despite somewhat lower survival rates compared to the conventional fixed partial dentures, resin bonded fixed partial dentures remain a worthwhile treatment modality in the selected cases. 8,15,17 Developments in dental materials particularly tooth coloured frameworks such as zirconia and fibre reinforced composite have increased the aesthetic potentials of the Resin bonded fixed partial dentures. 10,13,14 Dr. Pinky A, et al. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR) ©2025 IJDSIR, All Rights Reserved Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 Page53 However, long term clinical studies are required to establish their performance in relation to the available traditional metal based designs.15,17 Proper case selection, along with material centred considerations, is necessary for achieving predictable outcomes. 15,17 References 1. Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30 (4): 418–23. 2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1997. 3. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85(4):363–76. 4. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):351–63. 5. Al Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):138–45. 6. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2012. 7. Hensten-Pettersen A, Wictorin L. Allergic reactions to nickel-containing dental alloys. Scand J Dent Res. 1982;90(3):236–9. 8. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic RBFPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:73–85. 9. Kern M. All-ceramic, resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses. Quintessence Int. 2005;36(2):99–110. 10. Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(3):241–6. 11. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2000. 12. Malmstrom HS, Freedman M, Scolavino S, Renne WG. Fiber-reinforced materials: properties and clinical applications. Dent Today. 2003;22(7):66–71. 13. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):299– 307. 14. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int. 2006;37(9):685–93. 15. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses and implantsupported FDPs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:97–113. 16. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):725–31. 17. Creugers NH, Käyser AF, van’t Hof MA. A sevenand-a-half-year survival study of resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res. 1992;71(11):1822–5.