Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange

Hutahayan, Benny; Fadli, Mohamad; Amimakmur, Satria Amiputra; Dewantara, Reka Article Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange Cogent Business & Management Provided in Cooperation with: Taylor & Francis Group Suggested Citation: Hutahayan, Benny; Fadli, Mohamad; Amimakmur, Satria Amiputra; Dewantara, Reka (2024) : Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, Cogent Business & Management, ISSN 2331-1975, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/326186 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cogent Business & Management ISSN: 2331-1975 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20 Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange Benny Hutahayan, Mohamad Fadli, Satria Amiputra Amimakmur & Reka Dewantara To cite this article: Benny Hutahayan, Mohamad Fadli, Satria Amiputra Amimakmur & Reka Dewantara (2024) Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange, Cogent Business & Management, 11:1, 2332950, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950 © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 01 Apr 2024. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2736 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oabm20 Banking & Finance | ReseaRch aRticle Cogent Business & ManageMent 2024, VoL. 11, no. 1, 2332950 Investment decision, legal certainty and its determinant factors: evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange Benny hutahayan , Mohamad Fadli, satria amiputra amimakmur and Reka Dewantara Brawijaya university, Malang, indonesia ABSTRACT in the context developing country, the relationship between legal certainty and investment decision is still an underexplored yet important context. this study investigates the effect of independent judicial system, legal culture, and the existence of government authority as the determinant factors that influence legal certainty and the influence of legal certainty on investment decisions in the context of companies listed on the indonesian stock exchange. the research employs partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze primary survey data gathered from 270 investors who are clients of investment Management companies in indonesia. the results indicate that an independent judicial system, legal culture, and the existence of government authority significant and positively affecting legal certainty and legal certainty has a significant and positive effect on investment decisions. this findings have various intriguing implications and provide valuable insights into how policymakers can improve their municipal bond regulation strategy to have better legal certainty; which will encourage more investors to invest. 1. Introduction the concept of legal certainty stands as a foundational pillar in the architecture of financial markets, serving to fortify confidence among both domestic and international investors while simultaneously enhancing transparency and predictability in investment environments. this principle, as underscored by Daniswara and Purwanto (2022), is crucial in fostering an ecosystem where investors can make informed decisions, underpinned by a robust understanding of legal frameworks and regulatory landscapes. the significance of legal certainty extends beyond mere regulatory compliance; it is instrumental in shaping an investment climate that is conducive to long-term planning and strategic investment, particularly in the realm of municipal bonds (irtyshcheva et al., 2020). Municipal bonds, as key financial instruments issued by local governments, are indispensable in mobilizing resources for public sector investments and regional infrastructure development (sharma, 2023). these instruments are not only pivotal in bridging funding gaps for critical infrastructure projects but also play a critical role in advancing community welfare and economic development at the local level (arnaud, 2023). according to the Organisation for economic co-operation and Development (OecD, 2015), investments facilitated through municipal bonds significantly contribute to the development of © 2024 the author(s). Published by informa uK Limited, trading as taylor & Francis group CONTACT Benny Hutahayan bennyhutaha[email protected], bennyhutaha[email protected].id Brawijaya university, Malang, indonesia 65145. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332950 this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. the terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 18 January 2024 Revised 14 March 2024 accepted 16 March 2024 REVIEWING EDITOR len tiu Wright, De Montfort University Faculty of Business and law, United kingdom of great Britain and northern ireland KEYWORDS indonesia stock exchange; legal certainty; investment decision; municipal bonds; structural equation modeling SUBJECTS Finance; Business; Management and accounting; economics; socio-legal studies 2 B. hUtahaYan etal. essential infrastructure, including but not limited to toll roads, bridges, tunnels, public schools, and water and sanitation systems, thereby catalyzing regional development and enhancing the quality of life for the society. the deployment of municipal bonds in financing such diverse infrastructure projects underscores the necessity of having a clear, stable, and predictable legal framework governing these financial instruments. as cebula (2020) highlights, the positive impact of these investments on revenue generation and community welfare hinges significantly on the legal certainty surrounding municipal bond regulations. this is because investors’ willingness to commit capital to these bonds is directly influenced by their perceptions of risk and the assurance of returns, which in turn are shaped by the legal and regulatory frameworks in place (schou-Zibell & Madhur, 2010). thus, ensuring legal certainty in the context of municipal bonds is not merely a regulatory concern but a critical enabler for maintaining the stability and attractiveness of the investment climate, encouraging the flow of capital into vital public sector projects, and ultimately, fostering sustainable economic growth and development (Rohmat, 2022). indonesia as a country with the fourth largest population in the world, namely 276 million people, an economy of UsD 1 trillion, a growing middle class, abundant natural resources and a stable economy are things that are attractive to domestic and foreign investors; however, investing in indonesia is still a challenge according to business contacts (central Bereau statistics of indonesia, 2021). in developing countries like indonesia, the effect legal certainty and investment decisions holds particular significance due to the unique challenges and opportunities present in these environments. legal certainty, defined as the degree of predictability and stability within the legal framework governing property rights, contracts, and regulations (Pistor, 2020; tapia-hoffmann & tapia-hoffmann, 2021), plays a crucial role in shaping investment decisions by both domestic and foreign investors (Parlindungan et al., 2023; Yu, 2023). Firstly, developing countries often face higher levels of political and economic volatility compared to their developed counterparts. in such contexts, legal certainty serves as a beacon of stability, providing investors with the confidence that their rights will be protected and their investments will be safeguarded against arbitrary government actions or regulatory changes (krever, 2011; Rodrik, 1991). From the agency theory perspective, the government, acting as an agent, is tasked with safeguarding the interests of bondholders who invest their funds in government bonds. conversely, bondholders, serving as principals, anticipate receiving the agreed-upon interest payments and repayment of principal at bond maturity. this dynamic involves an information disparity wherein the government possesses greater access to financial data and expenditure plans compared to bondholders (simonsen & hill, 1998). consequently, bondholders may face moral hazard, wherein the government is incentivized to undertake risky or irresponsible actions. however, the presence of robust legal frameworks plays a pivotal role in addressing this imbalance. enhanced legal certainty renders bond contracts more enforceable, thereby diminishing the likelihood of default and bolstering investor trust. such contracts typically outline the government’s obligations concerning interest payments, principal repayment, as well as requirements for budget transparency and fiscal responsibility (simonsen & hill, 1998). secondly, legal certainty directly impacts the cost of doing business in developing countries. a clear and well-defined legal framework reduces transaction costs associated with contract enforcement, dispute resolution, and regulatory compliance (Musole, 2009; Pongsiri, 2002). this, in turn, encourages investment by lowering the perceived risks and uncertainties inherent in business operations. conversely, a lack of legal certainty can deter investors, as they may perceive the higher operational and legal risks as prohibitive barriers to entry (schou-Zibell & Madhur, 2010). Moreover, legal certainty enhances investor protection and corporate governance standards, which are critical for attracting foreign direct investment (Moran et al., 2005) and fostering long-term sustainable growth (hermes & lensink, 2003). Foreign investors often prioritize jurisdictions with robust legal frameworks that offer strong investor protections, transparent regulatory regimes, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms (chen, 2015). By strengthening legal certainty, developing countries can improve their competitiveness in the global marketplace and attract the investment needed to upgrade infrastructure, create jobs, and spur innovation (Dutz & sharma, 2012). in this regard, indonesia’s ambition to strengthen infrastructure development through regional bonds has unfortunately regressed and become entangled in a web of legal issues. at the core of this problem cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 3 is the conflict between two seemingly balanced but ultimately contradictory laws: the law on Financial Relations between the central government and Regional governments (UU hkPD) and the Regional government law. On one hand, article 157 Paragraph (1) of UU hkPD acts as a strong gatekeeper, carefully outlining the intricacies of the steps in issuing regional bonds. every detail, from authorization procedures to budget allocations, must closely follow its instructions. however, entering article 300 Paragraph (2) of the Regional government law, another key holder with slightly different sets of keys emerges. this law also claims to regulate the process of issuing regional bonds, albeit with different provisions. some previous research discuss about legal certainty in the regulation of municipal bonds in various countries around the world is influenced by various factors, including an independent judicial system, legal culture, and government authority (carrillo et al., 2021; gao & li, 2021; guillaume, 2011; Olsen & gøtze, 2011; Oomen et al., 2021). Firstly, an independent judicial system is crucial for impartial decision-making, free from external pressures or political interference. this independence safeguards the judicial process, ensuring cases are adjudicated based on law and evidence and strengthening legal certainty (guillaume, 2011). additionally, in spain, carrillo et al. (2021) found that the consistency and clarity of laws serve as cornerstones, fostering public trust, minimizing disputes, and supporting economic and social stability. Meanwhile, Oomen et al. (2021) state that government authority in the netherlands, turkey, greece, and italy plays a fundamental role in shaping legal certainty in the municipal bond market. a strong and effective government is crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring legal certainty in the municipal bond market (Davey, 1989). in the context of this research, the focus on investment in municipal bonds over stocks was driven by several key considerations specific to the objectives and scope of the study. Municipal bonds offer unique benefits, such as tax advantages and a relatively lower risk profile compared to stocks (Richelson & Richelson, 2011), making them an appealing subject for analysis within the realm of public finance and investment strategies. given the research aim to explore aspects such as the impact of fiscal policies on local government financing, or the risk-return profile of municipal bonds, it was deemed more relevant to concentrate on bonds. therefore, this research attempts to combine the independent judicial system, legal culture, and the existence of government authority as the determinant factors that influence legal certainty of municipal bonds regulation from several previous literatures, then connect the influence of legal certainty on investment decisions in the context of companies listed on the indonesian stock exchange. in the domain of unexplored determinant factors influencing legal certainty and its consequential impact on investment decisions, we aim to shed light on a current research inquiry that has yet to be fully examined: 1. Do the independent judicial system, legal culture, and the existence of government authority has an effect on legal certainty? 2. Do legal certainty determine and interplay in explaining investment decisions? 2.Theoretical framework and hypotheses 2.1. The perspective of municipal bonds issuance in agency theory the explanation regarding municipal bonds within the framework of agency theory was previously presented by simonsen and hill (1998). the process of selling municipal bonds involves various participants from both the private and public sectors, who assume different roles as principals, agents, or sometimes both, depending on the situation. simonsen and hill (1998) illustrate the principal–agent relationships in municipal bonds generally in Figure 1. they state that Figure 1 is a simplified representation, as in reality, there may be additional layers of management, involvement of more private sector entities such as bond insurance companies or rating agencies, and complexities such as bond funds buying bonds from underwriters and selling shares to investors. From Figure 1, it is evident that there are only two actors who act as principals: the community/citizens issuing the bonds and the investors purchasing them. these actors often have conflicting interests. the community generally prefers lower interest rates to minimize taxes and fees, while investors seek higher interest rates for better investment returns. elected officials typically serve as direct agents of the 4 B. hUtahaYan etal. community, but in many cases, public managers, usually financial officials, handle bond sales, acting as agents for the elected officials. thus, elected officials serve as public agents as well as principals to public managers. Financial advisors (Fas) function as agents for the issuers since they are paid by them. therefore, although public managers act as agents for elected officials (and ultimately the community), they also serve as principals to various private sector consultants typically involved in bond sales (simonsen & hill, 1998). simonsen and hill (1998) argue that underwriters act as agents for both the issuer and the investor. their profit depends on the difference between the purchase price and the selling price of the bonds. Underwriters are motivated to ensure the sale occurs, but within this context, their incentive leans towards higher interest rates. this is because, with higher interest rates, if other things are considered equal, underwriters stand to gain more profit. 2.2. Independent judicial system and legal certainty Montesquieu’s theory of the separation of powers, particularly the independence of the judiciary, is a key element in modern constitutionalism (Vasilescu, 2014). this principle is crucial for maintaining the rule of law, preserving democracy, and protecting substantive rights (akhtar, 2023). however, the practical application of this theory can be challenging, as seen in the nigerian political system, where the judiciary often becomes the final arbiter in power struggles between the executive and legislative branches (abdulrasheed, 2021). Despite these challenges, Montesquieu’s theory remains relevant in contemporary discussions on the balance of powers and the role of the judiciary in maintaining a just and stable society. Furthermore, Zhao and Zhang (2022) point out that an independent judicial is a crucial foundation in the legal system. this independence ensures a government that is fair and impartial, which in turn builds trust among investors and companies, thereby stimulating economic growth. ippoliti et al. (2015) add that the efficiency of the judiciary is vital for an effective legal system that supports economic activities and entrepreneurship. ippoliti and tria (2020) indicate that reforms enhancing the performance of the judiciary, especially through the adoption of technology, are crucial for achieving justice. Figure 1. Principal–agent relationship in municipal bonds issuance. source: simonsen and Hill (1998). cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 5 Research consistently shows that an independent judicial is crucial for legal certainty and public trust in the legal system (Bühlmann & kunz, 2011). this independence is not only a matter of constitutional rules, but also of real-life experiences (Bühlmann & kunz, 2011). Judicial independence is a key component of the rule of law, particularly in the context of market economies and democracies (guarnieri & Piana, 2012). it serves as a check on the abuse of power by the state, ensuring that judges can make decisions based on the law. therefore, the maintenance of an independent judicial is essential for legal certainty and the protection of individual rights. consequently, we propose that: Hypothesis 1. independent Judicial system exert a positive effect on legal certainty. 2.3. Legal culture and legal certainty lon l. Fuller’s “the Morality of law” is a seminal work that emphasizes the importance of certain principles in the creation and application of laws. these principles, including generality, non-retroactivity, and clarity, are seen as essential for the functioning of a just legal system (Fuller, 1963). Rundle (2016) further explores Fuller’s concept of the “internal morality of law,” which he argues is both internal to the legal system and has moral significance. Murphy (2005) defends Fuller’s view that the rule of law has both instrumental and non-instrumental moral value, while schauer (2020) acknowledges Fuller’s significant contribution to the idea of the rule of law, despite some criticisms of his work. Bartholomew (1964) provides a comprehensive overview of Fuller’s key principles and their philosophical underpinnings. legal culture, as a crucial aspect of human society, plays a significant role in shaping legal certainty. Berman (2009) and Williams (1990) both emphasize the inextricable link between law and culture, with the latter highlighting the role of culture in shaping certainty. ibragimov and Makhmudova (2020) and Batyrbaev et al. (2021) further underscore the importance of legal culture in upholding the rule of law and the legitimacy of the social and legal order. these perspectives collectively suggest that legal culture, through its influence on legal consciousness and the values of society, is a key determinant of legal certainty. consequently, we propose that: Hypothesis 2. legal culture exert a positive effect on legal certainty. 2.4. The existence of government authority and legal certainty the existence of government authority and legal certainty is a crucial aspect of governance, particularly in the context of local government (Ostapenko, 2021). the need for institutions to control the broad authority of administration officials is emphasized, with the state administrative court playing a key role in this regard (Ruslin in soehartono et al., 2021). Research consistently shows that the existence of government authority positively affects legal certainty. lai et al. (2010) found that public confidence in legal authorities is higher in china, where the government has a strong presence, compared to taiwan. this is further supported by Ostapenko (2021), who emphasizes the importance of legal certainty in local government, particularly in protecting citizens from unpredictable and unequal treatment. corley and Wedeking (2014) adds that the expression of certainty in legal language can enhance the persuasiveness of a message, suggesting that a strong government can effectively communicate legal certainty. consequently, we propose our third hypothesis: Hypothesis 3. the existence of government authority exert a positive effect on legal certainty. 2.5. Legal certainty and investment decision in the context of the relationship between legal certainty and investment decision; the agency theory can be a foundation on this relationship. in the agency theory perspective as mentioned by simonsen and hill (1998), the government, as an agent, has the responsibility to represent the interests of bondholders who entrust their funds to the government through bond purchases. On the other hand, 6 B. hUtahaYan etal. bondholders are principals who expect to receive the promised interest payments and repayment of principal upon bond maturity. in this relationship, there is an information imbalance where the government has better access to information regarding its financial condition and expenditure plans than bondholders (simonsen & hill, 1998). this can expose bondholders to moral hazard, where the government may have incentives to engage in riskier or irresponsible actions. however, legal certainty plays a crucial role in remedying this dynamic. With high legal certainty, bond contracts become more enforceable, reducing the risk of default and increasing investor confidence (lu et al., 2019). Research consistently shows that legal certainty positively affects investment decisions. lopez et al. (2017) found that regulation-induced uncertainty, a type of legal uncertainty, is positively related to a firm’s decision to invest in measures to reduce environmental impact. alao and alao (2012) further emphasized the importance of regulatory bodies in minimizing policy uncertainty, which can lead to risk and instability in the investment climate. cukierman (1980) also highlighted the impact of uncertainty on investment decisions, with both demand and price uncertainty influencing firms’ investment plans. these studies collectively underscore the crucial role of legal certainty in promoting investment. thus, we propose that: Hypothesis 4. legal certainty exert a positive effect on investment Decision. the conceptual model depicted in Figure 2 is constructed based on the proposed hypotheses. 3. Research methodology 3.1. Population and procedure the data was collected from individuals holding shares or investing in companies listed on the indonesia stock exchange. however, specifically, the targeted individuals to respond were investors acting as clients of investment Management companies and having knowledge about bonds investment. Until now, there are 94 investment Management companies in indonesia. From each investment Management company, we target 2–3 of their clients who will be research respondents, so if calculated, the maximum target respondents in this study are 282 individuals/clients. We employed a cross-sectional methodology utilizing a self-reported survey technique with a diverse pool of respondents to optimize data effectiveness. initially, a roster of investors across the nine chosen sectors was gathered randomly, and their information was acquired from investment Management companies. secondly, researchers then contacted each individual via email acquired and inquired about their willingness to fill out the questionnaire prepared by us. each respondent was provided with a sealed package containing the survey questionnaire and a cover letter explaining the main purpose of the research and ensuring their anonymity. it is important to note that the original questionnaire was crafted in Bahasa indonesia, with english included as an alternative, following the suggestion of Brislin (1986). this was done to guarantee the clarity of the measurement tool’s content. Data collection was Figure 2. Conceptual framework. source: Processed by the author (2023). cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 7 conducted twice, with the first collection taking place in november 2023 and the second collection taking place in February until first week of March 2024. the first collection gathered a total of 91 completed questionnaires from investors in indonesia. Out of this number, only 80 (87.91%) questionnaires were fully completed. the second collection gathered a total of 196 questionnaires, with 179 questionnaires (91.3%) being fully completed. to address the potential influence of common Method Bias (cMB) on our findings, we conducted an examination of the data using variance inflation factor (ViF) as proposed by kock (2017) and harman’s single factor test as proposed by Podsakoff and Organ (1986). initially, we employed the ViF test to assess multicollinearity among the constructs obtained through the cross-sectional design. subsequently, we utilized harman’s single factor test through sPss software without rotation. this analysis revealed five components with eigenvalues exceeding one, collectively explaining 74.77% of the variance. notably, the primary factor accounted for 38.52% of the variance, which fell below the 50% threshold. an indication of potential cMB is suggested if the ViF value surpasses 5 (hair Jr etal., 2021). however, all construct ViF values were below this threshold, ranging from a maximum of 4.726 for X12 to a minimum of 1.539 for X23. 3.2. Measurements of research variables the survey instruments employed in this study were derived from previously published journal articles and were subsequently compiled in table 1 for potential future reference. Reflective measures were employed to develop the principal constructs utilized in this investigation. existing literature strongly recommends the utilization of the designated multi-item scales for construct formation, with assessment conducted on a 5-point likert scale ranging from “strongly Disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5). all scales exhibited satisfactory levels of reliability (α > 0.70) as indicated by hair et al. (2019). For example, the exogenous variable “independent Judicial system” (X1) was evaluated using a 4-item scale adapted from… Van Dijk and Vos (2018), with an example item stating, “Municipal bond regulations are firmly established in laws ensuring regulatory bodies’ independence from external influence”. the cronbach’s alpha value (α) was 0.885. a 5-item scale by Yuriy and Vyacheslav (2021) was employed to measure the endogenous variable, legal certainty of Municipal Bonds (Y1). an example item reads, “internal factors play a key role in shaping investor confidence and risk assessment in municipal bond markets” the scale exhibited a cronbach’s alpha value of 0.858. the full list of the questionnaire items can be seen in appendix and the comprehensive testing details can be found in table 1. Table 1. Variable metrics and measurements. Variable indicator source Cronbach-alpha (α) independent Judicial system (X1) Legal basis for independence (X11) Van Dijk and Vos (2018) 0.885 autonomy of the judiciary organization (X12) Judiciary funding (X13) Court system management (X14) Legal Culture (X2) Cultural aspects related to legal language (X21) Bárd (2021), Piszcz and sierocka (2020) 0.827 Cultural aspects related to legal interpretation (X22) Cultural aspects related to legal translation (X23) existence of government authority (X3) government corruption and transparency (X31) Kaufmann and Kraay (2007), MCC (2023), oeCD (2023) 0.890 anti-corruption laws (X32) anti-corruption bodies (X33) Predictability and consistency of legislation (X34) Legal Certainty of Municipal Bonds (Y1) Legal stability (Y11) Yuriy and Vyacheslav (2021) 0.858 Legal protection of investor rights (Y12) information disclosure (Y13) effective dispute resolution (Y14) Consistent law enforcement (Y15) investment Decision (Y2) internal factors (Y21) abdul Kareem et al. (2023) 0.869 information nature (Y22) Disclosure (Y23) external factors (Y24) information technology (Y25) Perception (Y26) sources: Processed by the author (2023). 14 B. hUtahaYan etal. Daniswara, a. a. D., & Purwanto, i. W. n. (2022). Juridical status of stock exchange and investor legal protection in forced delisting. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (Polri), 1(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i4.464 Davey, k. (1989). Strengthening municipal government. World Bank, infrastructure and Urban Development Department. Dutz, M. a., & sharma, s. (2012). green growth, technology and innovation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 5932. Fuller, l. l. (1963). The morality of law. Yale Univesity Press. gao, s., & li, Y. (2021). an empirical study on the adoption of blockchain-based games from users’ perspectives. The Electronic Library, 39(4), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-01-2021-0009 geisser, s. (1974). a predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi. org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101 guarnieri, c., & Piana, D. (2012). Judicial independence and the rule of law: exploring the european experience. in The culture of judicial independence (pp. 111–124). Brill nijhoff. guillaume, g. (2011). the use of precedent by international judges and arbitrators. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq025 guiso, l., & Parigi, g. (1999). investment and demand uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 185–227. hairJr, J. F., hult, g. t. M., Ringle, c. M., sarstedt, M., Danks, n. P., & Ray, s. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. springer nature. hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., sarstedt, M., & Ringle, c. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of Pls-seM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eBR-11-2018-0203 henckels, c. (2023). Justifying the protection of legitimate expectations in international investment law: legal certainty and arbitrary conduct. ICSID Review. Forthcoming. henseler, J., Ringle, c. M., & sarstedt, M. (2015). a new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11747-014-0403-8 hermes, n., & lensink, R. (2003). Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Studies, 40(1), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293707 hu, l., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 ibragimov, s., & Makhmudova, a. (2020). legal culture-the basis for the rule of law. Збірник Наукових Праць ΛΌГOΣ,1, 129–132. ippoliti, R., Melcarne, a., & Ramello, g. B. (2015). the impact of judicial efficiency on entrepreneurial action: a european perspective. Economic Notes, 44(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12030 ippoliti, R., & tria, g. (2020). efficiency of judicial systems: model definition and output estimation. Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2020.1776977 irtyshcheva, i., kramarenko, i., shults, s., Boiko, Y., Blishchuk, k., hryshyna, n., Popadynets, n., Dubynska, І., ishchenko, O., & krapyvina, D. (2020). Building favorable investment climate for economic development. Accounting, 6(5), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.006 islam, M. s. (2018). independent Judiciary: nature and facets from the international context. International Journal of Ethics in Social Sciences, 6(2), 15–32. kaufmann, D., & kraay, a. (2007). governance indicators: Where are we, where should we be going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012 kock, n. (2017). common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for Pls-seM. in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications (pp. 245–257). krajewski, M., & hoffmann, R. t. (2019). Research handbook on foreign direct investment. edward elgar Publishing. krever, t. (2011). the legal turn in late development theory: the rule of law and the World Bank’s Development Model. Harvard International Law Journal, 52, 287. krzykowski, M., Mariański, M., & Zięty, J. (2021). Principle of reasonable and legitimate expectations in international law as a premise for investments in the energy sector. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09471-x lai, Y.-l., cao, l., & Zhao, J. s. (2010). the impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: a comparison between china and taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 934–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.010 lopez, J. M. R., sakhel, a., & Busch, t. (2017). corporate investments and environmental regulation: the role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history. European Management Journal, 35(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.004 lu, J. Z., chao, J. J., & sheppard, J. R. (2019). Guarantees for mobilizing private investment in infrastructure. the World Bank. Mao, J. c. t., & helliwell, J. F. (1969). investment decision under uncertainty: theory and practice. The Journal of Finance, 24(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325297 Mcc. (2023). Political Rights indicator. https://www.mcc.gov/who-we-select/indicator/political-rights-indicator. accessed on July 1, 2023, at 09.00 WiB. Moran, t. h., graham, e. M., & Blomström, M. (2005). Does foreign direct investment promote development? Peterson institute. Murphy, c. (2005). lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law. Law and Philosophy, 24(3), 239–262. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10982-004-7990-3 cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 15 Musole, M. (2009). Property rights, transaction costs and institutional change: conceptual framework and literature review. Progress in Planning, 71(2), 43–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.002 OecD. (2015). infrastructure Financing instruments and incentivesc https://www.oecd.org/finance/private-pensions/ infrastructure-Financing-instruments-and-incentives.pdf. accessed on February 19, 2024, at 10.03 WiB. OecD. (2023). Policy Development and co-Ordination. https://par-portal.sigmaweb.org/areas/2/indicators/17/. accessed on July 1, 2023, at 12.30 WiB. Olsen, h. P., & gøtze, M. (2011). Restrained integration of european case Reports in Danish legal information systems and culture. Nordic Journal of International Law, 80(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181011X581173 Oomen, B., Baumgärtel, M., Miellet, s., Durmus, e., & sabchev, t. (2021). strategies of divergence: local authorities, law, and discretionary spaces in migration governance. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(4), 3608–3628. https://doi. org/10.1093/jrs/feab062 Orts, M. a. (2015). legal english and legal spanish: the role of culture and knowledge in the creation and interpretation of legal texts. ESP Today, 3(1), 25–43. Ostapenko, h. (2021). legal certainty in the aspect of local government. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, 119(119), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2021/4.119-11 Parlindungan, Januarita, R., & sundary, R. i. (2023). efforts to increase investment in Riau Province in terms of legal certainty and ease of licensing. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 2(4), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.24018/ ejpolitics.2023.2.4.106 Perry-kessaris, a. (2008). Recycle, reduce, and reflect: information overload and knowledge deficit in the field of foreign investment and the law. Journal of Law and Society, 35(s1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478. 2008.00425.x Pistor, k. (2020). the value of law. Theory and Society, 49(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09388-z Piszcz, a., & sierocka, h. (2020). the role of culture in legal languages, legal interpretation and legal translation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique, 33(3), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11196-020-09760-3 Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408 Pongsiri, n. (2002). Regulation and public‐private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(6), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210439634 Richelson, h., & Richelson, s. (2011). Bonds: The Unbeaten Path to Secure Investment Growth (Vol. 145). John Wiley & sons. Rodrik, D. (1991). Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 36(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(91)90034-s Rohmat, R. (2022). implication of investment legal political dynamics on the investment climate in indonesia. Law Review, 22(1), 063. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i1.5328 Rundle, k. (2016). Fuller’s internal morality of law. Philosophy Compass, 11(9), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12338 schauer, F. (2020). lon Fuller and the rule of law. Routledge handbook of the Rule of law (london: Routledge, Forthcoming 2020). Virginia Public law and legal theory Research Paper, 2020–2046. schou-Zibell, l., & Madhur, s. (2010). Regulatory reforms for improving the business environment in selected asian economies-how monitoring and comparative benchmarking can provide incentive for reform aDB Working Paper series on Regional economic integration. sharma, M. (2023). Mobilizing Resources through Municipal Bonds: experiences from Developed and Developing countries. simonsen, B., & hill, l. (1998). Municipal bond issuance: is there evidence of a principal‐agent problem? Public Budgeting & Finance, 18(4), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0275-1100.1998.01150.x slovic, P., Fleissner, D., & Bauman, W. s. (1972). analyzing the use of information in investment decision making: a methodological proposal. The Journal of Business, 45(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1086/295448 soehartono, s., tejomurti, k., aldyan, a., & indriyani, R. (2021). the establishing paradigm of dominus litis principle in indonesian administrative justice. Sriwijaya Law Review, 5(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.iss1.877. pp42-55 solovieva, V. V. (2023). legal culture as an important element legal system. Russian Studies in Law and Politics, 7(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.12731/2576-9634-2023-2-72-85 stasavage, D. (2002). Private investment and political institutions. Economics & Politics, 14(1), 41–63. https://doi. org/10.1111/1468-0343.00099 tapia-hoffmann, a. l., & tapia-hoffmann, a. l. (2021). Legal certainty and central bank autonomy in Latin American emerging markets. springer. Usman, a., hassan, M., & sial, a. (2022). independence of judiciary leading justice system to injudicious outline. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 4(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.52279/ljss.04.02.233246 Van Dijk, F., & Vos, g. (2018). a method for assessment of the independence and accountability of the judiciary. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.276 Vasilescu, g. (2014). Montesquieu “On the spirit of laws”. Jurnalul de Drept Si Stiinte Administrative, 1(1), 19–26. Williams, J. c. (1990). culture and certainty: legal history and the reconstructive project. Virginia Law Review, 76(4), 713. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073210 16 B. hUtahaYan etal. Xu, l., Wang, J., & Xin, Y. (2010). government control, uncertainty, and investment decisions in china’s listed companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 3, 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1755-3091(13)60022-2 Yu, c. (2023). legalizing international investment law. in Dispute settlement and the reform of international investment law (pp. 131–178). edward elgar Publishing. Yuriy, t., & Vyacheslav, s. (2021). smart contract: From definition to certainty. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 1, 100–122. Zegarlicki, J. (2018). legal certainty as an important value of the rule of law. Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 6(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.14746/fped.2017.6.2.19 Zhao, R., & Zhang, J. (2022). local judicial system reform and corporate investment: evidence from unified management of local courts below the province. China Economic Quarterly International, 2(4), 290–303. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2022.11.005 Appendix:The list of questionnaire items Variable indicator item independent judicial system (X1) Legal basis for independence (X11) • Municipal bond regulations are firmly established in laws ensuring regulatory bodies’ independence from external influence. • Legal frameworks empower regulatory agencies to enforce compliance without political or industry pressures. • Legislation provides clear mandates, reinforcing regulatory authorities’ independence. autonomy of the judiciary organization (X12) • Regulatory bodies overseeing municipal bonds operate with administrative autonomy. • transparent appointment processes ensure impartiality and integrity in regulatory actions. • Regulatory agencies have control over their budgets, enabling effective market oversight. Judiciary funding (X13) • adequate budgets support essential regulatory functions. • Diversified funding sources reduce reliance on government appropriations • transparent budgetary processes ensure effective resource utilization. Court system management (X14) • efficient case management expedites regulatory matters. • technology integration facilitates data management and market surveillance. • Professional development programs enhance regulatory staff expertise. Legal Culture (X2) Cultural aspects related to legal language (X21) • Legal documents reflect local cultural norms, enhancing understanding and compliance. • Culturally appropriate terminology fosters trust in the legal system. • Legal language promotes inclusivity and accessibility for diverse backgrounds. Cultural aspects related to legal interpretation (X22) • Legal interpretations consider cultural contexts, ensuring fair application. • Decisions incorporate cultural values, enhancing legitimacy. • interpretations minimize conflicts, promoting social harmony. Cultural aspects related to legal translation (X23) • translations accurately convey cultural meanings, bridging language barriers. • translated documents respect customs, fostering cross-cultural understanding. • translators navigate complexities, preserving original intent. existence of government authority (X3) government corruption and transparency (X31) • Widespread corruption undermines trust in public institutions. • Lack of transparency hinders accountability mechanisms. • Documented corruption instances highlight the need for action. anti-corruption laws (X32) • Comprehensive legislation signals commitment to combatting corruption. • Laws provide framework for prosecution, deterring misconduct. • Weak enforcement undermines effectiveness and trust. anti-corruption bodies (X33) • independent agencies investigate and prosecute corruption. • adequate resources empower bodies to combat corruption effectively. • independence and impartiality are crucial for effectiveness. Predictability and consistency of legislation (X34) • Legislation for municipal bonds remains stable, providing market certainty. • Market participants can anticipate regulatory changes, aiding long-term planning. • Changes in legislation are communicated clearly, minimizing disruptions. Legal Certainty of Municipal Bonds (Y1) Legal stability (Y11) • Legal framework ensures stability for municipal bond investors, reducing risk. • investor rights are protected by clear legal provisions. • stability encourages investment in municipal bonds, supporting development. Legal protection of investor rights (Y12) • investors enjoy legal safeguards against fraud or breaches. • Legal remedies are available for investor grievances. • transparency is promoted through clear guidelines on investor rights. information disclosure (Y13) • issuers must disclose pertinent information, enhancing transparency. • investors have access to reliable data for informed decisions. • Mandatory disclosure mitigates information imbalances in the market. effective dispute resolution (Y14) • Dispute resolution mechanisms are accessible and impartial. • Legal processes for dispute resolution are well-defined and enforced. • alternative dispute resolution methods expedite conflict resolution Consistent law enforcement (Y15) • Regulatory enforcement is consistent and impartial. • Violations are promptly addressed, maintaining market integrity. • sanctions deter non-compliance, ensuring regulatory adherence. cOgent BUsiness & ManageMent 17 Variable indicator item investment Decision (Y2) internal factors (Y21) • internal factors play a key role in shaping investor confidence and risk assessment in municipal bond markets. • Bond issuer’s financial health greatly influence investor decisions regarding municipal bonds. • understanding current investor’s financial health is vital for making well-informed investment choices. information nature (Y22) • the quality and availability of information greatly impact investor decisions in municipal bonds. • accurate and timely information is crucial for assessing risks and potential returns. • investors rely on information reliability to guide their actions in municipal bond markets. Disclosure (Y23) • transparency through disclosure is fundamental for fostering trust and confidence among investors in municipal bond markets. • adequate disclosure practices enable investors to assess the risks and rewards associated with municipal bond investments. • effective disclosure mechanisms promote accountability and market integrity, enhancing investor participation and liquidity in municipal bond markets. external factors (Y24) • external elements outside investors’ control play a pivotal role in municipal bond investments. • economic indicators, such as interest rates and inflation, play a pivotal role in shaping municipal bond investments. • economic trends, regulatory changes, and global events influence investor sentiment and market dynamics in municipal bond investments. information technology (Y25) • information technology plays a crucial role in facilitating access to market data and investment platforms for municipal bond investors. • Leveraging technology enhances the efficiency and transparency of municipal bond transactions. • effective utilization of information technology enables investors to make timely and well-informed investment decisions in municipal bonds Perception (Y26) • investor perception of regulatory oversight and market stability influences investment decisions in municipal bonds. • Maintaining positive perceptions of market integrity and regulatory effectiveness is essential for attracting and retaining investors in municipal bond markets. • Perceptions of transparency, fairness, and risk management practices shape investor trust and participation in municipal bond investments.