Deterministic and Probability Analysis of Paper Machine Vibration Impact to the Structure Safety and Human Comfort
Abstract
This paper describes the probability and sensitivity analysis of the concrete frame and paper machine interaction. On the base of the experimental results, the calculation FEM model was verified. The uncertainties of the loads level, the material properties and other influences following the inaccuracy of the calculated model and numerical methods were considered in the approximation method RSM.
Full text
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 22
DETERMINISTIC AND PROBABILITY ANALYSIS
OF PAPER MACHINE VIBRATION IMPACT
TO THE STRUCTURE SAFETY AND HUMAN COMFORT
Ju aj KRÁLIK1, Ju aj KRÁLIK, j . 2
1Depa men o S uc u al mechanics, Facul y o Ci il Enginee ing, STU B a isla a, Radlinského 11, 810 05 B a isla a,
Slo akia
2Academy o Fine A s and Design in B a isla a, H iezdosla o o nam. 18, 814 37, B a isla a, Slo akia
ju aj.k alik@s uba.sk, [email p o ec ed]
DOI: 10.35181/ ces-2019-0004
Abs ac . This pape desc ibes he p obabili y and
sensi i i y analysis o he conc e e ame and pape
machine in e ac ion. On he base o he expe imen al
esul s, he calcula ion FEM model was e i ied. The
unce ain ies o he loads le el, he ma e ial p ope ies and
o he in luences ollowing he inaccu acy o he calcula ed
model and nume ical me hods we e conside ed in he
app oxima ion me hod RSM.
Keywo ds
ANSYS, Machine Vib a ion, P obabili y, Sa e y, Human
Com o , FEM, RSM.
1. In oduc ion
The pape p esen s solu ions o he p oblems ha ha e
a isen a e ins alling a new echnology o a highe -end
pape machine in o he o iginal ac o y building. A e he
s a o he ope a ion, he e we e p oblems wi h he
in e ac ion o he machine wi h he load-bea ing s uc u e,
which h ea ened bo h he load-bea ing s uc u e and he
impac on he human com o o he pe son wo king in he
hall.
Due o he p oblems o in e ac ion be ween he pape
machine and he exis ing indus ial hall s uc u e, i was
necessa y o expe imen ally measu e hese e ec s and o
modi y a compu a ional model and analyse he e ec o
in e ac ion on he s uc u es and human com o o he
wo ke s, and o p opose o he econs uc ion o he
exis ing s uc u e o design o dampe s o maximally
elimina e he e ec s o machine and s uc u e in e ac ion.
On base o he p oblems wi h he pape machine and
hall s uc u e in e ac ion, i was necessa y o analyse he
e ec o he dynamic in e ac ion by he expe imen al
measu emen s o he ib a ions o he s ool- echnology-
hall sys em o elimina e he ad e se esonan e ec s o he
p oposed echnology on he hall s uc u e. The econs uc-
ion wo k in ol ed he exchange o pa o he echnology
in he sc een, winding and ups eam pa o he machine.
Fig. 1: The sec ion o he hall ame
The suppo ing s uc u e o he hall consis s o a
ein o ced conc e e ame wi h a mason y walls. The
indi idual loo s o one hall sec ion a e ein o ced wi h
monoli hic conc e e pla es wi h g id beams. The sec ion o
he ein o ced conc e e columns is 45/70 cm, he ame
modulus is 9-4.5-4.5-6 m in ame plane and 6 m in
pe pendicula di ec ion. The machine is placed a le el
5.65 m. The bo om/ op le els o he columns a e a -
0.25/18.23 m.
The ollowing expe imen al and nume ical analyses
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 23
we e ca ied ou based on he need o e iew he concep
o cons uc ion wo k on he gi en objec :
• Expe imen al es ing and e alua ion o he
dynamic in e ac ion o he in e ac ion sys em in
all holding s a es o he pape machine,
• Nume ical Analysis o he P oblem o In e ac ion
wi h he P esen S a e Gi en Designed Machine
Pa ame e s.
As pa o he nume ical analysis, i was necessa y o
make a comple e dynamic calcula ion o he spa ial
sys em, a modal analysis conside ing he in e ac ion o he
subs uc u e-cons uc ion- echnology [6-21, 28].
2. Design c i e ia o he s uc u e
eliabili y and human com o
F om he poin o iew o he Eu ocode ecommenda ions
[5, 7, 13, 14] and na ional s anda ds [24, 25], he designe
should assess he e ec s o machine ib a ions on he
ollowing e ec s:
• Impac o machine ib a ions on building
cons uc ion
• In luence o ib a ions on man and on ope a ion
(mechanical, acous ic and op ical)
• Impac o Machine Vib a ion on Machine y
(manu ac u e 's ecommenda ions and
limi a ions)
• Based on he assessmen o all impac s, he
ollowing c i e ia [7] a e equi ed:
• C i e ia o he limi s a e o load-bea ing
capaci y and ins abili y o s uc u es [5]
• Physiological c i e ia [25]
• Ope a ional pe o mance c i e ia (manu ac u e 's
equi emen s)
In s anda d [25], he ca ego iza ion o s uc u es in
e ms o c i e ia o he 1s limi s a e is made based on
alues o e ec i e oscilla ion eloci y depending on he
eliabili y classes and he signi icance o he objec .
Rein o ced conc e e s uc u es o indus ial buildings a e
classi ied in he esis ance class E and he consequen ion
classes II.
The equi emen s o he design o he human com o
and i s p o ec ion a e de ined in he s anda ds [25]. The
s anda ds de ine he c i e ions o he human com o s om
he poin o he in e up ed and common ib a ions.
The c i e ions o he quali y o he ib a ion in luences
on he human com o a e no de ined only in dependency
on he in ensi y o ib a ions bu om he poin o iew o
he unc ionali y o he building ooms and he equency
and he ime o he ib a ion ac ion o he human. The ype
o he diag ams de ined in s anda d [25] is used o he
design o he in luence he ib a ions on human com o .
3. Expe imen al modal analysis
In o de o check he dynamic p ope ies o he s uc u e,
i was necessa y o measu e he ib a ion esponse in he
c i ical places [2-4, 18, 19]. A measu ing sys em was used,
he basic elemen o which was he piezoelec ic
accele ome e KD 35 and KD 22. Thei signal was led o
he in eg a ing RFT 00OLS ampli ie and a e
ampli ica ion o bo h he Tesla EMM 140 and he TRACE
860SA digi al oscilloscope.
Vib a ion accele a ion a es and alues we e measu ed
a i e loca ions [4]:
• on he main beam by he ope a o a he same si e,
• on he ou side o he building,
• on he loo in he cen e o he monoli hic slab,
• on he ope a o 's side,
• on he loo a he con ol loo ,
• on he loo .
a) Accele a ions a loo in ime
b) Accele a ion spec um a loo
Fig. 2: E alua ion o he expe imen al accele a ion eco d on he
bo om o cylinde d i e mo o [4]
F om he numbe o ib a ion spec a e alua ed, i was
possible o see he di e en equencies o indi idual
equencies om place o loca ion. The dominan eigen
equencies o he building s uc u e we e de e mined.
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 24
4. Nume ical analysis
Wi hin he nume ical analysis o he soil-s uc u e-
echnology in e ac ion sys em, i was necessa y o p o e
ha he s ool unde he pape machine mee s he c i e ia
se by he manu ac u e and, on he o he hand, he load-
bea ing s uc u e can ans e he dynamic load caused by
he echnology [1, 6, 11-15, 18, 19, 23, 26-28].
The spa ial disc e iza ion o he s uc u e was
pe o med by he one-dimensional elemen s LINK8 and
BEAM4 and wo-dimensional shell elemen s SHELL43.
Th ee calcu-la ion models we e cons uc ed - F am1,
F am2 and F am3 (Fig.3). The F am1 model esponds o
he o iginal design and o iginal load, F am2 o iginal
design and new load, and F am3 ein o ced cons uc ion
and new load. The o al calcula ion model consis s o 686
nodes and 1216 elemen s wi h six deg ees o eedom. The
pilla s a e ixed on he ounda ion pad.
Fig. 3: Calcula ion ame models - F am1, 2 and F am3
The dynamic calcula ion o he sys em consis ed o :
• modal analysis
• dynamic analysis o he esponse o ha monic
oscilla ion
()
=Mu + Cu + Ku F
(1)
whe e M, C, K a e he mass, damping and s i ness
ma ices, ,anduu u
a e ec o s o nodal accele a ion,
eloci ies and displacemen s. In he case o ha monic
exci ing o ces, we exp ess he ec o o he displacemen s
and exci a ion o ces as ollows
12
i
ie
Ω
=+uu u and 12
i
ie
Ω
=+FF F (2)
whe e u1 (o u2) is he eal (o imagina y) componen o
he ec o o displacemen s and F1 (o F2) is he eal (o
imagina y) componen o he exci a ion ec o o o ces.
A e we pu ela ionships (2) in o (1) we ge dynamic
equa ions (1) in he o m o complex equa ions
()
()
2
12 12
iii−Ω + Ω + = +KMCuuFF
(3)
The columns o ames a e join ed wi h he pad oo ing
embedded on he subsoil consis ing o a g a el wi h a
eloci y o shea wa es s = 700 m/s. The pad oo ing has
been modelled by LINK8 wea e elemen s, whose igidi y
and damping cha ac e is ics we e de e mined by [6],
whe e
ρ
is he speci ic g a i y o he soil, B, L a e g ound
plan dimensions o he base oo ,
β
x,
β
z,
β
ψ a e coe icien s
dependen on he shape o he oo acco ding o [6].
()
BLGk xx
βν
+= 12 ,
()
1
zz
kBLG
β
ν
=−
,
()
21kBLG
ψψ
β
ν
=−
, 3
16 3
kGR=,
()
422 6/
π
LBBLR += , (4)
GRkc xx
ρ
576,0=, GRkc zz
ρ
85,0=,
()
0.3 1ckRGB
ψψ ψ
ρ
=+
,
()
[]
RIikc k 5
21
ρ
+=
,
whe e kx, ky, kz a e longi udinal s i ness, kψ, k a e
o a ional and o sional s i ness, cx, cy, cz a e longi udinal
damping, cψ, c a e o a ional and o sional damping.
Due o he signi ican in luence o he s i ness o he
soil on he dynamic cha ac e is ics o he s uc u e o he
building [1, 11-15, 18], i is ad isable o conside h ee
low-medium-high alues, based on he median alue and
he alues o he lowe and uppe quan um, assuming he
no mal dis ibu ion [22]. The uppe and lowe alue kp
de ined o no mal dis ibu ion o he s i ness o he soil
a e exp essed in he o m [7]:
()
1
p
mpw
kk.u.k=± (5)
whe e kp is he quo ien o he s i ness o he subsoil ( o
p obabili y p = 0.05 and p = 0.95), km is he mean s i ness
o he subsoil, kw is he alue o he soil s i ness a ia ion
(kw = k a s/km), up is he no malized alue o he quo ien ,
quan i y. I you conside 24% o he s anda d de ia ion and
he no mal dis ibu ion, i is a ac o o 0.6 / 1 / 1.4 (Low /
Medium / High).
The in luence o soil s i ness on he equency
cha ac e is ics o he s uc u e is shown in Tab. 1. Modal
analysis was pe o med using he Lanczos i e a ion
me hod based on Cholean me hod o ac o iza ion o mass
and s i ness ma ix. The mode shape o wo o he c i ical
equencies can be seen in Fig. 4.
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 25
Tab. 1: Compa ison o he in luence o he soil s i ness o signi ican
modes
Model Mode in di ec . X/Y/Z
F ame Soil ype F equency
[Hz] Rela i e masses [%]
F1 L 1.03/1.04/5.05 58.51/58.35/44.82
and M 1.07/1.05/5.82 23.68/57.58/88.29
F2 H 1.09/1.06/6.2 58.50/57.34/49.56
L 1.15/4.24/6.14 55.01/41.81/46.10
F3 M 1.28/5.21/6.60 34.50/29.32/60.61
H 1.29/6.21/10.35 33.54/26.85/33.34
*) No e - L / M / H- lowe / middle / uppe s i ness o he soil
By compa ing he alues o he deciding eigen
equencies o he s uc u e, he igidi y o he soil
signi ican ly a ec s he alues o he equencies in he
ho izon al di ec ion. The e is a jump o decisi e
equencies a he low and medium s i ness o he soil. I
should be no ed ha he o he equencies a e close o
equencies han o he o iginal design.
a) The decisi e shape o oscilla ion in X di ec ion
b) The decisi e shape o oscilla ion in Y di ec ion
Fig. 4: P incipal modes o he o iginal s uc u e
A a pape speed o 450 m/min, he o a ion speed o
he 1.6 Hz d ying olle s is a s a e ha has exis ed o 10
yea s and does no esona e [4]. Inc easing he speed o
pape mo emen o 700 m/min ep esen s an inc ease in
he o a ion speed o cylinde s o 2.5 Hz. In he ange o
1.6 - 2.5 Hz, we ind ou own equencies, which ha e a
small sha e in he o al e ec i e weigh o he sys em. We
ha e deal wi h he di ec me hod o sol ing he complex
equa ions o he ha monic load by he oscilla ion o he
pape machine.
5. Loads and load combina ions
The load and load combina ion in he case o de e minis ic
as well as p obabilis ic assessmen o he limi s a e o load
capaci y and se iceabili y o he s uc u e a e conside ed
acco ding o STN ENV 1991-1 [7] as ollows:
A) De e minis ic combina ions
.in .in .1 .1
1
Gj kj Q k
j
GQ
γγ
≥
+
(6)
.sup .sup .1 .1
1
Gj kj Q k
j
GQ
γγ
≥
+
B) P obabilis ic combina ions
a a
1
kj k
j
g
GqQ
≥
+
(7)
whe e Gkj is he cha ac e is ic alue o cons an loads ( o
he ad e se e ec Gkj.in and he bene icial e ec o Gkj.sup),
Qk1 - he cha ac e is ic alue o he p edominan a iable
load,
γ
Gj - he pa ial coe icien o pe manen load, γQ1 -
he pa ial coe icien o a iable load 1, g a , q a -
a iable coe icien s in he o m o a s anda d his og am.
The pa ial coe icien alues in ela ions (6) and (7) a e
conside ed o he limi s a e o capaci y and usabili y as
ollows [7]:
• limi s a e o load capaci y
(
γ
Gj.in = 0.9;
γ
Gj.sup = 1.1;
γ
Q.1 = 1.5)
• limi s a e o se iceabili y
(
γ
Gj.in = 1.0;
γ
Gj.sup = 1.0;
γ
Q.1 = 1.0)
6. Unce ain ies o inpu pa ame e s
The a iabili y o he e ical s i ness o he soil (Table 2)
is de ined by he cha ac e is ic kz.k s i ness ob ained om
he in-si u measu emen s and he a iable coe icien
o kz. a .
Tab. 2: P obabili y model o inpu pa ame e s
Type Quan i ies Cha ac .
alues
Va iabil.
pa ame .
His o-
g am
*)
Mean
μ
De .
σ
Soil S i ness
k
z,k
k
z. a
N 1 0.24
Ma e ial Modulus
E
k
e
a
LN 1 0.05
Load Dead
G
k
g
a
N 1 0.10
Li e
Q
k
q
a
G 1 0.35
Ampli ude
F
k
a
LN 1 0.10
F equency
F
k
a
N 1 0.10
Model Ac ion
θ
E
Te
a
N 1 0.05
Resis ance
θ
R
T
a
N 1 0.05
*) N - No mal, LN - Logno mal, G - Gama
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 26
The s i ness o he s uc u e is de e mined by he
cha ac e is ic alue o he Young's Ek module and he
coe icien o a iabili y e a . The load is cha ac e ized by
he alues Gk, Fk, F .k and a iable ac o s g a , a and . a
(Tab. 2). The unce ain y o he compu a ional model is
conside ed by he a iable model coe icien s and he
a iable coe icien o load e ec o Gaussian no mal
dis ibu ion. The p obabilis ic analysis was pe o med
unde he ANSYS sys em by he app oxima e RSM
me hod using he CCD [14] expe imen al design me hod
o 79 simula ions. F om he esul s o he p obabilis ic
analysis models "F am1" and "F am2" show, ha he
dominan equency is changing in he di ec ion X ( om
0.83 Hz in 1.41 Hz), Y ( om 0.83 Hz o 1.37 Hz) and Z
( om 4.19 Hz-7.48 Hz). F om he esul s o he
p obabilis ic analysis models "F am1" and "F am2" show
ha he dominan equency is changing in he di ec ion X
( om 0.83 Hz in 1.41 Hz), Y (since in he case o pa ed
cons uc ion o "F am3" is he dominan equency o he
change in he di ec ion o X ( om 1.02 HZ-1.68 Hz), Y
(3.86 Hz o 6.63 Hz) and Z ( om 4.99 Hz o 8.35 Hz).
These anges o equencies can ha e a signi ican impac
on he esponse o ha monic oscilla ion he pape machine.
7. Compa ison o de e minis ic and
p obabilis ic analysis
Compa ison o de e minis ic and p obabilis ic solu ion o
he sa e y and eliabili y o he design o building is
documen ed in Table 3. F om he able see a compa ison
o he ho izon al and e ical displacemen s o he h ee
calcula ion models, he s uc u es (F am1, F am2 and
F am3) ob ained om he de e minis ic analysis ( o h ee
a ia ions o he soil s i ness) and om he p obabilis ic
analysis. The alues o maximum displacemen s,
eloci ies and accele a ion a he le el o he ounda ions
does no exceed he limi alues gi en in he s anda ds
STN 73 0032 and DIN 4150. Maximum e ical
displacemen s o he s uc u e indica e a possibili y o
ailu es in acco dance wi h he c i e ia STN 730036
(Tab.1).
Tab. 3: A compa ison o he maximum peak o he displacemen s a op
o ames
Model
Analysis
Di ec ion
*)
Displacemen [mm]
P obabili y o exceedance De .
5% 50% 95% σ
F am1 De e min. H 2.80 3.06 3.29 -
V 7.26 8.88 12.72 -
S ochas ic H 1.21 4.80 8.42 2.19
V 4.88 8.59 12.31 2.26
F am2 De e min. H 2.02 2.22 2.85 -
V 7.81 9.74 14.63 -
S ochas ic H 1.73 2.63 3.52 0.54
V 4.93 9.39 13.85 2.72
F am3 De e min. H 0.91 0.91 1.02 -
V 4.37 5.06 8.08 -
S ochas ic H 1.01 1.38 1.76 0.23
V 3.72 5.85 7.98 1.30
*) H – ho izon al, V - e ical
F om he poin o he human com o he peak eloci y
a loo le el we e calcula ed on o iginal and ein o ced
ame and compa ed wi h he g aph No.8 in nomog am o
s anda d [25]. The limi alue is equal 2.7 mm/s o
equency 2.5 Hz. The peak eloci ies in he ho izon al and
e ical di ec ions we e equal x.peak = 5.65 mm/s >
2.7 mm/s and z.peak=5.59 mm/s > 2.7 mm/s a o iginal
ame (F ame2). A e ein o cemen o he ame by
sys em o he conc e e walls he peak eloci ies in he
ho izon al and e ical di ec ions we e equal x.peak =
1.4 mm/s < 2.7 mm/s and z.peak = 0.44 mm/s < 2.7 mm/s
(F ame3) calcula ed de e minis ic. In he case o he
p obabilis ic analysis he peak eloci y o he p obabili y
o exceedance 95% in he ho izon al and e ical di ec ions
we e equal x.peak = 2.41 mm/s < 2.7 mm/s and z.peak =
0.43 mm/s < 2.7 mm/s (F ame3).
8. Conclusions
The eliabili y analysis o he sa e y and eliabili y o he
hall s uc u e wi h he pape machine, depending on he
a iabili y o he s i ness o he sub-soil, mechanical
cha ac e is ics o ma e ials, and he ope a ion o he
machine, as well as he unce ain y o he model and he
esis ance we e p esen ed in his pape . The analy ical
model was es ed by expe imen al measu emen on a eal
s uc u e. The me hodology o he p obabilis ic analysis o
he soil-s uc u e-machine in e ac ions was p esen ed on
he p ac ical p oblem in he pape ac o y a e changing
he echnology. A e ein o cemen o he ame wi h he
conc e e walls, he alues o he displacemen s we e
educed by 30%. The p obabilis ic analysis gi es o he
enginee -designe s a mo e complex in o ma ion’s abou
he in e ac ion o he sys em soil-s uc u e-machine as
de e minis ic.
Acknowledgemen
The p ojec was pe o med wi h he inancial suppo o
he G an Agency SR (VEGA 1/0265/16).
Re e ences
[1] BACHMAN e al., Vib a ion P oblems in S uc u es,
P ac ical Guidelines, BVB Be lin, 1997, ISBN 3-
7643-5148-9.
[2] ČAJKA, R., M. KREJSA. Measu ed Da a P ocessing
in Ci il S uc u e Using he DOP oC Me hod.
Ad anced Ma e ials Resea ch. Zu ich, Swi ze land:
T ans Tech Publica ions, 2014. Vol. 859, pp. 114-121
(8 p), ISSN 1662-8985, DOI: 10.4028/www.scien i ic
.ne /AMR.859.114.
[3] ČAJKA, R. e al. Expe imen al soil - conc e e pla e
in e ac ion es and nume ical models, Jou nal - Key
Enginee ing Ma e ials, Vol. 577-578, 2014, p. 33-36.
[4] DRŽÍK, M. e al. Ha monize he s ool- echnology-
hall in e ac ion sys em on a pape machine PM-8 in
SCP Ružombe ok, Enginee ing Buildings, 41 (10),
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 1 | 2019 | JUNE
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 27
1993, pp.337-341. (in Slo ak)
[5] EN 1990, Eu ocode – Basis o s uc u al design. CEN
B uxelles, 2002.
[6] GAZETAS, G. Founda ion ib a ions, Founda ion
Enginee ing Handbook, (H.Y. Fang, edi o ), Van
Nos and Reinhold, New Yo k, 1991.
[7] HANDBOOK 2, Implemen a ion o Eu ocodes
Relia-bili y Backg ounds. Guide o he basis o
s uc u al eliabili y and isk enginee ing ela ed o
Eu ocodes. De elopmen o Skills Facili a ing
Implemen a io o Eu ocodes,P oj.CZ/02/B/F/PP-
134007, 2005, P ague.
[8] KALA, Z. Va iance-based sensi i i y indices o
s ochas ic models wi h co ela ed inpu s, In. AIP
Con e ence P oc., ICNAAM 2014; Rodos Palace
Ho el Rhodes; G eece; 22 – 28 Sep embe 2014;
Volume 1648, DOI: 10.1063/1.491 3077.
[9] KALA, Z. Applica ions o Global Sensi i i y
Analysis Me hods in Ci il Enginee ing, In P oc. o
In . Con e ence, ESREL 2015, Zü ich, 2015, pp.
2541-2545, ISBN 978-1-138-02879-1.
[10] KOTRASOVA, K. e al. The possible causes o damage
o conc e e anks, nume ical expe imen o luid-
s uc u e-soil in e ac ion. Key Enginee ing Ma e ials.
Volume 738, 2017, pp. 227-237, ISSN: 10139826,
DOI: 10.4028/ www.scien i ic.ne /KEM. 738.227.
[11] KRÁLIK, J., J. KRÁLIK, j . P obabili y and Sensi i-
i y Analysis o Soil-S uc u e In e ac ion o High-
Rise Buildings, Slo ak Jou nal o Ci il Enginee ing,
Slo ak Uni e si y o Technology B a isla a, ol. 3,
2006, pp. 18-32.
[12] KRÁLIK, J. J. KRÁLIK, j . Seismic Analysis o
Rein o ced Conc e e F ame-Wall Sys ems
Conside ing Duc ili y E ec s in Acco dance o
Eu ocode. Enginee ing S uc u es. Else ie 2009,
ISSN 0141-0296, Vol. 31, Issue 12, pp. 2865-2872,
Decembe 2009.
[13] KRÁLIK, J. and J. KRÁLIK, j . P obabili y and
Sensi i i y Analysis o Machine Founda ion and Soil
In e ac ion. Applied and Compu a ional Mechanics.
ZCU Plzen. 2009, 12pp. Vol.3 No.1.
[14] KRÁLIK, J. Reliabili y Analysis o S uc u es Using
S ochas ic Fini e Elemen Me hod, Ed. STU
B a isla a, 2009, 143 pp.
[15] KRÁLIK, J. Expe imen al and Nume ical Analysis
o he Vib a ion Nega i e E ec s on he Humans. In:
8 h In e na ional Con e ence, DTDT 2010,
Sep embe 22–24, 2010, Uni e si y o J.E.Pu kyne,
ISBN 978-80-7414-270-3, 11 pp., in CD.
[16] KREJSA, M., P. JANAS, and V. KREJSA. Di ec
Op imized P obabilis ic Calcula ion, In. P oceedings
o he 3 d Eu opean Con e ence o Sys ems (ECS
'12), Pa is, F ance, Decembe 2-4, 2012, WSEAS
P ess, p. 216-221, ISBN: 978-1-61804-141-8.
[17] KREJSA, M., P. JANAS and V. KREJSA.
PROBCALC An e icien ool o p obabilis ic calcu-
la ions. In Ad anced Ma e ials Resea ch, 2014, 969,
p. 302-307. ISSN 1022-6680.
[18] MAKOVIČKA, D. and D. MAKOVIČKA, j . Dyna-
mic s uc u e esponse exci ed by echnical seismici y
e ec s, In Ad ances in Enginee ing So wa e, Volume
72, 2014, Pages 128-133, ISSN 0965-9978, doi.o g/
10.1016/j.ad engso .2013.05.003.
[19] MELCER, J. e al. Dynamics o T anspo S uc u es,
ŽU Zilina, 2006, ISBN 978-80-554-1178-1.
[20] NAPRSTEK, J. and O. FISCHER. Non-s a iona y
andom seismic esponse sol ed using gene alized
co ela ion me hod, In. Ad ances in Ea hquake
Enginee ing, 2, 1995, pp. 269-278.
[21] NÁPRSTEK, J. and S. HRAČOV. Modi ica ion o
modal p ope ies o a sys em wi h non-p opo ional
damping due o ib a ion abso be s and sub-soil
in e ac ion, In. 4 h In e na ional Con e ence on
Compu a ional Me hods in S uc u al Dynamics and
Ea hquake Enginee ing, COMPDYN 2013, Pages:
298-315, 2013.
[22] ROSOVSKY, D. V. S uc u al Reliabili y. Pa o publ.
W. Chen, The Ci il Enginee ing Handbook, 1999,
CRC P ess, W.F.Chen Ed., Clenson Uni e si y, SC.
[23] SUCHARDOVÁ P. and O. SUCHARDA. Manage-
men and Mode n Aspec s o Sa e y in Ci il
Enginee ing, In: Applied Mechanics and Ma e ials,
Volume 357-360, p. 2876-2880, CEABM 2013;
Jinan; China; 24-26 May 2013, Code 99141.
[24] STN ENV 1998-1-1, Design o s uc u es o ea h-
quake esis ance, SUTN B a isla a, 2005. (in Slo ak).
[25] STN ISO 2631-1 and 2, Mechanical ib a ions and
impac s. E alua ion o he human com o o he
human body. ÚNMS SR, 1999. (in Slo ak)
[26] SÝKORA, M. and M. HOLICKÝ. Assessmen o
Unce ain ies in Mechanical Models, Applied
Mecha-nics and Ma e ials, 2013, Vol. 378, pp 13-18,
TTP, Swi ze land, doi:
10.4028/www.scien i ic.ne /AMM. 378.13.
[27] ŠEJNOHA, M., J. ŠEJNOHA, M. KALOUSKOVÁ
and J. ZEMAN. S ochas ic analysis o ailu e o ea h
s uc u es, In. P obabilis ic Enginee ing Mechanics,
22(2), pp. 206-218. 2007,
doi:10.1016/j.p obengmech .2006.11.003.
[28] VAŠKOVÁ, J. and R. ČAJKA. Subsoil-s uc u e
in e ac ion sol ed in di e en FEM p og ams, In:
In e na ional Con e ence, SGEM, Volume 17, Issue
32, 2017, Pages 555-562, Albena; Bulga ia; 29 June-
5 July 2017, Code 130796, ISSN: 13142704, DOI:
10.5593/sgem2017/ 32/S13.072.
Abou Au ho s
Ju aj KRÁLIK was bo n in B a isla a, Slo akia. He
ecei ed his p o . om STU B a isla a in 2011. His
esea ch in e es s include applied mechanics.
Ju aj KRÁLIK, j . in B a isla a, Slo akia. He ecei ed
his PhD. om STU B a isla a in 2008. His esea ch
in e es s include applied mechanics.