scieee Open visual document viewer

Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters for drilling LM5/ZrO2 composites using grey relational analysis

Juliyana, Sunder Jebarose

Abstract

In today’s world, engineering materials have changed dramatically. Traditional materials are failing to satisfy the demands of present applications, so several composites are being used to address these issues. Drilling is the most vital manufacturing process in most applications, and the drilled holes serve as maximum stress areas that need to be treated with extreme caution. The issue of selecting optimal parameters for drilling novel composite materials has fascinated researchers and professional engineers for a long time. In this work, LM5/ZrO2 composites are manufactured by stir casting using 3, 6, and 9 wt% zirconium dioxide (ZrO2 ) as reinforcement and LM5 aluminium alloy as matrix. Fabricated composites were drilled using the L27 OA to determine the optimum machining parameters by varying the input parameters. The purpose of this research is to find the optimal cutting parameters while simultaneously addressing the thrust force (TF), surface roughness (SR), and burr height (BH) of drilled holes for the novel composite LM5/ZrO2 using grey relational analysis (GRA). The significance of machining variables on the standard characteristics of the drilling as well as the contribution of machining parameters were found using GRA. However, to obtain the optimum values, a confirmation experiment was conducted as a last step. The experimental results and GRA reveal that a feed rate (F) of 50 m/s, a spindle speed (S) of 3000 rpm, Carbide drill material, and 6% reinforcement are the optimum process parameters for accomplishing maximum grey relational grade (GRG). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that drill material (29.08%) has the highest influence on GRG, followed by feed rate (24.24%) and spindle speed (19.52%). The interaction of feed rate and drill material has a minor impact on GRG; the variable reinforcement percentage and its interactions with all other variables were pooled up to the error term. The predicted GRG is 0.824, and the experimental value is 0.856. The predicted and experimental values match each other well. The error is 3.7%, which is very minimal. Mathematical models were also developed for all responses based on the drill bits used.

Full text

Ci a ion: Jeba ose Juliyana, S.; Udaya P akash, J.; ˇ Cep, R.; Ka hik, K. Mul i-Objec i e Op imiza ion o Machining Pa ame e s o D illing LM5/Z O2Composi es Using G ey Rela ional Analysis. Ma e ials 2023, 16, 3615. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ ma16103615 Academic Edi o s: An onio Ri ei o and Bol Xiao Recei ed: 2 Ap il 2023 Re ised: 21 Ap il 2023 Accep ed: 7 May 2023 Published: 9 May 2023 Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps:// c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/ 4.0/). ma e ials A icle Mul i-Objec i e Op imiza ion o Machining Pa ame e s o D illing LM5/Z O2Composi es Using G ey Rela ional Analysis Sunde Jeba ose Juliyana 1, Jaya elu Udaya P akash 1, Robe ˇ Cep 2and K ishnasamy Ka hik 1,* 1Depa men o Mechanical Enginee ing, Vel Tech Ranga ajan D . Sagun hala R&D Ins i u e o Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India; [email p o ec ed] (S.J.J.); [email p o ec ed] (J.U.P.) 2Depa men o Machining, Assembly and Enginee ing Me ology, Facul y o Mechanical Enginee ing, VSB-Technical Uni e si y o Os a a, 17. Lis opadu 2172/15, 708 00 Os a a, Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed] *Co espondence: [email p o ec ed] Abs ac : In oday’s wo ld, enginee ing ma e ials ha e changed d ama ically. T adi ional ma e ials a e ailing o sa is y he demands o p esen applica ions, so se e al composi es a e being used o add ess hese issues. D illing is he mos i al manu ac u ing p ocess in mos applica ions, and he d illed holes se e as maximum s ess a eas ha need o be ea ed wi h ex eme cau ion. The issue o selec ing op imal pa ame e s o d illing no el composi e ma e ials has ascina ed esea che s and p o essional enginee s o a long ime. In his wo k, LM5/Z O 2 composi es a e manu ac u ed by s i cas ing using 3, 6, and 9 w % zi conium dioxide (Z O 2 ) as ein o cemen and LM5 aluminium alloy as ma ix. Fab ica ed composi es we e d illed using he L 27 OA o de e mine he op imum machining pa ame e s by a ying he inpu pa ame e s. The pu pose o his esea ch is o ind he op imal cu ing pa ame e s while simul aneously add essing he h us o ce (TF), su ace oughness (SR), and bu heigh (BH) o d illed holes o he no el composi e LM5/Z O 2 using g ey ela ional analysis (GRA). The signi icance o machining a iables on he s anda d cha ac e is ics o he d illing as well as he con ibu ion o machining pa ame e s we e ound using GRA. Howe e , o ob ain he op imum alues, a con i ma ion expe imen was conduc ed as a las s ep. The expe imen al esul s and GRA e eal ha a eed a e (F) o 50 m/s, a spindle speed (S) o 3000 pm, Ca bide d ill ma e ial, and 6% ein o cemen a e he op imum p ocess pa ame e s o accomplishing maximum g ey ela ional g ade (GRG). Analysis o a iance (ANOVA) e eals ha d ill ma e ial (29.08%) has he highes in luence on GRG, ollowed by eed a e (24.24%) and spindle speed (19.52%). The in e ac ion o eed a e and d ill ma e ial has a mino impac on GRG; he a iable ein o cemen pe cen age and i s in e ac ions wi h all o he a iables we e pooled up o he e o e m. The p edic ed GRG is 0.824, and he expe imen al alue is 0.856. The p edic ed and expe imen al alues ma ch each o he well. The e o is 3.7%, which is e y minimal. Ma hema ical models we e also de eloped o all esponses based on he d ill bi s used. Keywo ds: composi es; d illing; g ey ela ional analysis; design o expe imen s; ANOVA 1. In oduc ion Aluminium ma ix composi es (AMCs) ha e gained he a en ion o many scien is s because he Al alloy o e comes he sho comings o e ous me als and p o ides he bes speci ied pe o mance pa ame e s. AMCs a e popula ma e ials o mee ing all o he igo ous demands in echnical applica ions ha equi e p ope ies such as low weigh , high s i ness, and medium s eng h [ 1 – 3 ]. AMCs combine he me al p ope ies o ma ix alloys wi h ce amic ein o cemen s o p oduce complex se ice empe a u e capabili ies, inc eased s eng h, and comp ession esis ance [ 4 – 6 ]. Noo ul Haq e al. (2008) p oposed a comp ehensi e wo-dimensional a ay wi h he GRA me hod o op imising p ocess pa ame e s o d illing Al/SiC composi es [ 7 ]. Ponnu el and Moo hy (2014) s udied he Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ma16103615 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ma e ials Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 2 o 13 impac o d illing pa ame e s on hyb id polyme composi es (MWCNTs) [ 8 ]. Op imal cu ing pa ame e s we e disco e ed using GRA while simul aneously add essing he TF, SR, and BH o d illed holes. The g ey- uzzy me hod was applied by Rajmohan e al. (2013) o ind he bes machining pa ame e s o d illing composi es o hyb id aluminium me al ma ix. In he expe imen s, a h ee-le el OA L 27 is used [ 9 ]. Emin Salu a e al. (2019) used a ho p ess o c ea e MMC, and he e ec s o he ou pu a iables on he TF and SR o composi es we e s udied using ANOVA [ 10 ]. The e ec s o p oduc ion a iables we e in es iga ed and isualised. I is possible o de e mine he ideal alue o each ou pu ac o using he S/N a io app oach. The indings demons a ed ha he addi ional phase ma e ial p opo ion was he p ima y de e minan o he SR o he MMCs o bo h eed a es. As he eed a e inc eased du ing machining, he TF and SR alues inc eased, acco ding o he li e a u e. Howe e , when he eed a e inc eased, he TF and SR alues in his MMC sys em dec eased, making his s udy mo e no el. Palanikuma e al. (2012) employed GRA o op imise he d illing pa ame e s o GFRP composi e d illing based on SR and TF. The Taguchi L 9 3-le el OA is employed in he expe imen . Using he GRG acqui ed om he GRA, hey es ablished he p e-eminen pa ame e s o mul i-pe o mance ea u es [ 11 ]. Da im (2001) examined he consequences o p ocess pa ame e s on he su ace quali y o u ned componen s. Expe imen s based on Taguchi’s me hodologies we e planned and ca ied ou on con olled machining o wo kpieces wi h p ede e mined cu ing condi ions. Those associa ions we e disco e ed using mul iple linea eg essions. Finally, hey used con i ma ion es s o compa e he heo e ical ou comes wi h he expec ed esul s om he co ela ions [ 12 ]. Samy and Kuma an (2017) concluded he e ec s o cu ing ac o s on empe a u e, TF, and SR on AA6351/B 4 C composi e ma e ials du ing d illing ope a ions. Comple ely di e en angles o i anium ni ide-coa ed ca bide d ill bi s, such as 90 ◦ , 118 ◦ , and 135 ◦ , we e employed. Lowe spindle speeds and eed a es a e used o achie e he much lowe empe a u e. Unsui able poin angles, on he o he hand, cause ool wea and inc ease su ace oughness. Changing he machining ac o s also a ec s he p oduc ion o h us o ce. The h us o ce is mino when d illing wi h a ool wi h a 135 ◦ poin angle, bu he delamina ion is g ea e [13]. Acco ding o Jun eng Xiang e al. (2017), SiCp/Al ma ix composi e ma e ials ha e nume ous ema kable physical and mechanical p ope ies. Thei goal is o in es iga e he mechanisms ha in luence he mac o-scale wea o diamond ools when d illing SiCp/Al composi e ma e ials. Aside om ha , d illing o ces and hole eliabili y we e used o assess he machinabili y o he SiCp/Al 6063 composi e ma e ial. The indings imply ha mechan- ically gene a ed ab asi e wea and he modynamically allowed chemical g aphi ica ion a e impo an and likely wea mechanisms in SiCp/Al6063 d illing. Diamond-coa ed ca bide d ills a e chosen o composi e ma e ial because o hei longli e, low wea a e, and abili y o gene a e su icien machined e iciency wi h a g owing numbe o holes [ 14 ]. Jayagan h e al. (2018) used Taguchi’s L 9 a ay o conduc d illing es s wi h a ious cu ing speeds, eeds, and cu ing luids. Su ace oughness alues dec ease, bu machining ime inc eases as cu ing speed and eed a e inc ease. Op imal p ocess pa ame e s ha e been designed and con i med o imp o e machinabili y. A highe speeds and eeds, he coconu oil medium p o ided supe io machinabili y [ 15 ]. Mahamani (2014) explo ed he e ec s o eed, speed, poin angle, and d ill bi diame e on su ace oughness (SR) in he d illing o AA2219/TiB 2 /Z B 2 hyb id composi es. In es iga ional analysis explo es he in luence o one p ocess a iable while keeping he o he a iables cons an [ 16 ]. Ekici e al. (2017) assessed he e ec s o p ocess pa ame e s on h us o ce (TF), SR, dimensional accu acy, and bu heigh (BH) when d illing Al/10B 4 C and Al/10B 4 C/5G composi es using ca bide wis d ills a a ious le els o speeds and eed a es unde d y cu ing condi ions. ANOVA was used o e alua e he pe cen age con ibu ion o p ocess a iables o p oduc quali y. Finally, hey de eloped s a is ical equa ions o e alua e quali y a ibu es. Al/10B 4 C/5G , a second-phase ma e ial wi h 5% g aphi e, dec eased he TF and BH o he composi es, enhancing he su ace’s quali y [17]. Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 3 o 13 Ra ind ana h e al. (2017) examined he consequences o p ocess pa ame e s du ing he d illing o Al2219/8% bo on ca bide (B 4 C) composi e and hyb id composi e Al2219/8% B 4 C/3% G . The expe imen was ca ied ou a a ious speeds and eeds; he impac o he TF and SR was examined, and he indings show ha when he FR ose, he TF and SR inc eased. Because g aphi e has good lub ica ing cha ac e is ics, hyb id composi es ha e lowe h us and a la ge su ace oughness [ 18 ]. In d illing SA182 wo k ma e ial, Sunil Ankalagi e al. (2017) s udied he ou come o d illing a iables such as F, S, and d ill poin angle on TF, SR, and ci cula i y e o . To explain he beha iou o machinabili y and hole quali y, he in es iga ions we e designed using an o hogonal a ay (OA) and esponse su ace me hodology (RSM). The easibili y o he models o he indica ed esponses was alida ed using an ANOVA. All he esponses we e ound o dec ease wi h inc easing spindle speed, while he ci cula i y e o dec eased wi h a high cu ing speed and eed, acco ding o he esponse su ace analysis. Ci cula i y e o and su ace oughness we e educed when he poin angle was inc eased [ 19 ]. This esea ch wo k’s objec i e is o conduc mul i-objec i e op imisa ion o d illing p ocess pa ame e s o achie ing minimum TF, SR, and BH o LM5/Z O 2 composi e and o in es iga e he e ec o p ocess pa ame e s on TF, BH, and SR. 2. Ma e ials and Me hods 2.1. Ma e ials Due o i s widesp ead a ailabili y, zi conia (Z O 2 ) has been chosen as he ein o cemen ma e ial and LM5 aluminium alloy as he ma ix. The alloy is used o de ices used in he p oduc ion o oods u s, culina y u ensils, and chemical indus ies, as well as o he moulding o ine polish a eas whe e qui e s ong co osion esis ance om sal wa e o ma ine a mosphe es is desi ed. They a e e y well known o hei aes he ic cas s as well as cas s u ilised in applica ions o building and deco a i e ma i ime i ings, ood handling dai y equipmen , and chemical and ma i ime plumbing i ings [ 20 ]. LM5 is examined o i s chemical composi ion by means o op ical emission spec ome y, and i is p esen ed in Table 1. Table 1. Chemical composi ion o aluminium alloy (LM5). Cu Mg Si Mn Fe Pb Zn Al 0.032 3.299 0.212 0.022 0.268 0.02 0.01 Balance Zi conium dioxide (Z O2), a c ys alline oxide o zi conium (zi conia), which is whi e in colou , is b oadly conside ed o be a ce amic elemen . Making zi conia includes he ga he ing and emo al o laid-o ing edien s and scum. Mining zi conia has many ou es, including plasma disassocia ion, chlo ine and alkali oxide disin eg a ion, and lime amalga- ma ion. Simila o many ce amics, zi conium oxide is a subs a e wi h a high ole ance o c ack p opaga ion. Z O 2 ce amics a e he mally es ablished, and o en hey a e he ma e ial o linking ce amics and s eel. Li le he mal conduc i i y and g ea s eng h a e ano he aw ul combina ion o p ope ies. 2.2. Manu ac u ing o LM5/Z O2Composi es To ab ica e he composi e, a closed u nace, which is o he C- ype, is used wi h he s i cas ing se -up. The s i e inco po a es a chuck o con enien sha in e changeabili y. I has a ou -bladed an impelle ha is made o high-ch omium s eel. Ini ially, small ingo s o LM5 alloy we e hea ed o a ound 850 ◦ C in he c ucible un il he en i e alloy was mel ed. To e adica e dampness in he ein o cemen , he Z O 2 powde is d ied o 20 min a 200 ◦ C using a mu le u nace. The s i e was p og essi ely inse ed in o he mel , c ea ing a o ex in he mol en me al. The wa med Z O 2 , wi h an a e age pa icle size o 60 o 80 µ m, was hen ca e ully and slowly mixed in o he liquid me al a a consis en a e while upholding he speed o he s i e a 600 pm. E en a e pa icle eeding, he s i ing con inued o ano he 7 min. To educe po osi y, a gon gas was added o he slu y Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 4 o 13 o h ee minu es be o e pou ing i in o he mould. The pou ing empe a u e was ixed a 750 ◦ C. To achie e uni o m solidi ica ion, he mould was wa med o 650 ◦ C o 30 min be o e pou ing he slu y in o i . This me hod was used o c ea e h ee dis inc se s o unique composi es cons uc ed o LM5 ein o ced wi h 3, 6, and 9 weigh pe cen s o Z O 2 pa icles [21]. 2.3. Mic os uc u e o Fab ica ed Composi es Using Op ical Mic oscopy Me allog aphic examina ions p o ide a signi ican in es iga i e ool and e ec i e quali y con ol. Samples we e collec ed om e e y composi e, and each su ace was inely polished o achie e a mi o -like sheen. The p ima y goal o a mic os uc u al analysis is o alida e he uni o m dispe sion o a ma ix’s ein o cemen pa icles. The op ical mic oscope was used o in es iga e he composi e specimens. The homoge- nous sp eading o ein o cemen pa icles in he ma ix is shown in he op ical pho omic o- g aphs (Figu e 1). The dispe sion o composi e Z O 2 pa icles is seen in he mic os uc u e o me al ma ix composi es con aining 3% and 6% Z O 2 . The p ima y aluminium g ains con ain he pa icles. MgAl 2 eu ec ic pa icles ha did no dissol e a e solidi ica ion a e p ecipi a ed a he g ain bounda ies. The magni ica ion is 200 × . The main aluminium phase includes g ains ha a e 40 o 60 mic ons in size. In he 9% Z O 2 composi e, pa icle dispe sal is de ec ed and exis s as la e al bunches on he g ain bounda ies, al hough he mic og aph only displays he esol ed composi e pa icles. Ma e ials2023,16,xFORPEERREVIEW4o 13   ingcon inued o ano he 7min.To educepo osi y,a gongaswasadded o heslu y o  h eeminu esbe o epou ingi in o hemould.Thepou ing empe a u ewas ixeda  750°C.Toachie euni o msolidi ica ion, hemouldwaswa med o650°C o 30min be o epou ing heslu yin oi .Thisme hodwasused oc ea e h eedis inc se so  uniquecomposi escons uc edo LM5 ein o cedwi h3,6,and9weigh pe cen so  Z O2pa icles[21]. 2.3.Mic os uc u eo Fab ica edComposi esUsingOp icalMic oscopy Me allog aphicexamina ionsp o ideasigni ican in es iga i e oolande ec i e quali ycon ol.Sampleswe ecollec ed ome e ycomposi e,andeachsu acewas inelypolished oachie eami o ‐likesheen.Thep ima ygoalo amic os uc u al analysisis o alida e heuni o mdispe siono ama ix’s ein o cemen pa icles. Theop icalmic oscopewasused oin es iga e hecomposi especimens.Theho‐ mogenoussp eadingo  ein o cemen pa iclesin hema ixisshownin heop ical pho omic og aphs(Figu e1).Thedispe siono composi eZ O2pa iclesisseenin he mic os uc u eo me alma ixcomposi escon aining3%and6%Z O2.Thep ima y aluminiumg ainscon ain hepa icles.MgAl2eu ec icpa icles ha didno dissol ea ‐ e solidi ica iona ep ecipi a eda  heg ainbounda ies.Themagni ica ionis200×.The mainaluminiumphaseincludesg ains ha a e40 o60mic onsinsize.In he9%Z O2 composi e,pa icledispe salisde ec edandexis sasla e albuncheson heg ain bounda ies,al hough hemic og aphonlydisplays he esol edcomposi epa icles.  (a)  (b) Figu e 1. Con . Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 5 o 13 Ma e ials2023,16,xFORPEERREVIEW5o 13    (c) Figu e1.Mic os uc u eso  ab ica edcomposi es.(a)LM5+3%Z O2;(b)LM5+6%Z O2;(c)LM5+ 9%Z O2. 2.4.D illingo LM5/Z O2Composi es TheGau a ‐BMV35T12(Model)Ve icalMachiningCen e(VMC),equippedwi h aKis le peizo‐elec icdynamome e showninFigu e2,isused o d illingholesin composi ema e ials.InFigu e3,specimen1 ep esen sLM5+3%Z O2,specimen2 ep‐ esen sLM5+6%Z O2andspecimen3 ep esen sLM5+9%Z O2.Acompu e ‐con olled da acollec ion oolcap u esands o es he esul so expe imen s.The eliabili yo  he d illedholeis hep ima yconce ndu ingd illing.Apiezo‐elec icdynamome e was used omeasu e heTFgene a eddu ingd illing,whichis hemainde e minan o  he hole’squali y.BHwas oundusing heVisionMeasu ingSys em(VMS),andSRwasde‐ e minedusing hesu ace oughness es e —su co de [22].Cu ing oolsusedin his esea chwo kwe emadeo  h eedi e en ma e ials:HSS,ca bide,and i aniumni ide (TiN)‐coa edca bide.Fo all h eed ills, hediame e is6mm, hepoin angleis118°, and hehelixangleis30°.Theexpe imen ’s ou p ima yp ocesspa ame e swe e picked.The h eele elso d illing a iablesa ep esen edinTable2.  Figu e2.Expe imen alse ‐upwi hadynamome e .  Figu e 1. Mic os uc u es o ab ica ed composi es. ( a ) LM5 + 3%Z O 2 ; ( b ) LM5 + 6%Z O 2 ; (c) LM5 + 9%Z O2. 2.4. D illing o LM5/Z O2Composi es The Gau a -BMV 35 T12 (Model) Ve ical Machining Cen e (VMC), equipped wi h a Kis le peizo-elec ic dynamome e shown in Figu e 2, is used o d illing holes in composi e ma e ials. In Figu e 3, specimen 1 ep esen s LM5 + 3%Z O 2, specimen 2 ep esen s LM5 + 6%Z O2 and specimen 3 ep esen s LM5 + 9%Z O 2. A compu e -con olled da a collec ion ool cap u es and s o es he esul s o expe imen s. The eliabili y o he d illed hole is he p ima y conce n du ing d illing. A piezo-elec ic dynamome e was used o measu e he TF gene a ed du ing d illing, which is he main de e minan o he hole’s quali y. BH was ound using he Vision Measu ing Sys em (VMS), and SR was de e mined using he su ace oughness es e —su co de [ 22 ]. Cu ing ools used in his esea ch wo k we e made o h ee di e en ma e ials: HSS, ca bide, and i anium ni ide (TiN)- coa ed ca bide. Fo all h ee d ills, he diame e is 6 mm, he poin angle is 118 ◦ , and he helix angle is 30 ◦ . The expe imen ’s ou p ima y p ocess pa ame e s we e picked. The h ee le els o d illing a iables a e p esen ed in Table 2. Ma e ials2023,16,xFORPEERREVIEW5o 13    (c) Figu e1.Mic os uc u eso  ab ica edcomposi es.(a)LM5+3%Z O2;(b)LM5+6%Z O2;(c)LM5+ 9%Z O2. 2.4.D illingo LM5/Z O2Composi es TheGau a ‐BMV35T12(Model)Ve icalMachiningCen e(VMC),equippedwi h aKis le peizo‐elec icdynamome e showninFigu e2,isused o d illingholesin composi ema e ials.InFigu e3,specimen1 ep esen sLM5+3%Z O2,specimen2 ep‐ esen sLM5+6%Z O2andspecimen3 ep esen sLM5+9%Z O2.Acompu e ‐con olled da acollec ion oolcap u esands o es he esul so expe imen s.The eliabili yo  he d illedholeis hep ima yconce ndu ingd illing.Apiezo‐elec icdynamome e was used omeasu e heTFgene a eddu ingd illing,whichis hemainde e minan o  he hole’squali y.BHwas oundusing heVisionMeasu ingSys em(VMS),andSRwasde‐ e minedusing hesu ace oughness es e —su co de [22].Cu ing oolsusedin his esea chwo kwe emadeo  h eedi e en ma e ials:HSS,ca bide,and i aniumni ide (TiN)‐coa edca bide.Fo all h eed ills, hediame e is6mm, hepoin angleis118°, and hehelixangleis30°.Theexpe imen ’s ou p ima yp ocesspa ame e swe e picked.The h eele elso d illing a iablesa ep esen edinTable2.  Figu e2.Expe imen alse ‐upwi hadynamome e .  Figu e 2. Expe imen al se -up wi h a dynamome e . Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 6 o 13 Ma e ials2023,16,xFORPEERREVIEW6o 13   Table2.D illingp ocesspa ame e sand hei le els. Fac o Le el1Le el2Le el3 F(mm/min)50100150 S( pm)100020003000 DHSSCa bideTiNCoa ed R(%)369  Figu e3.D illedholes. 2.5.G eyRela ionalAnalysis Mul i‐pe o mancecha ac e is icsa e ough oop imiseincomplexp ocesses; hence,GRAisla gelyemployed oadd esssucha oughp oblem.Thead an ageso  g eysys em heo yha ebeencon i medincopingwi h hechallengeso incomple e, pa ial,andunclea da a.The e msblack,whi e,andg eya ede ineddi e en lying ey ela ionalanalysis.Blackdeno esasys emwi hnoin o ma ion,whi edeno esasys em wi hexac in o ma ion,andg ey ep esen s hein o ma ionbe weenblackandwhi e. This echniqueadd esses heissueo imp o ing he esponse ea u eso cu en ma‐ chiningsys ems[23,24]. Ing ey ela ionalanalysis, he i s s episda ap e‐p ocessing,whe e heTF,SR,and BHexpe imen alda aa es anda dised obein he angeo ze o oone.Da a p e‐p ocessingis ypicallynecessa ybecause he angeanduni o oneda ase di e  om heo he s.Theme hodo con e ingasequencein oone ha iscompa able o he o iginaliscalledda ap e‐p ocessing.Dependingonada ase ies’cha ac e is ics, he e a eanumbe o da ap e‐p ocessingme hodsaccessible o GRA.The“high‐ e ‐ he‐be e ”cha ac e is icappliesi  he a ge  alueisin ini e.Thesequencecanbe no malisedasshowninEqua ion(1): * i x(k)= )(min)(max )(min)( )0()0( )0()0( kxkx kxkx ii ii  (1) When heo iginalsequencehas he“lowe ‐ he‐be e ”cha ac e is ic,i shouldbe no malisedasshowninEqua ion(2): * i x(k)= )(min)(max )()(max )0()0( )0()0( kxkx kxkx ii ii  (2) whe ei=1,2,...,mandk=1,2,...,nsigni y heo iginal e e encesequenceand p e‐p ocessedda a, espec i ely.* i x(k)deno es heno malised alue,)0( i x ep esen s hein endedsequence,min)( )0( kxideno es hesequence’sminimum alue,andmax Figu e 3. D illed holes. Table 2. D illing p ocess pa ame e s and hei le els. Fac o Le el 1 Le el 2 Le el 3 F (mm/min) 50 100 150 S ( pm) 1000 2000 3000 D HSS Ca bide TiN Coa ed R (%) 3 6 9 2.5. G ey Rela ional Analysis Mul i-pe o mance cha ac e is ics a e ough o op imise in complex p ocesses; hence, GRA is la gely employed o add ess such a ough p oblem. The ad an ages o g ey sys em heo y ha e been con i med in coping wi h he challenges o incomple e, pa ial, and unclea da a. The e ms black, whi e, and g ey a e de ined di e en ly in g ey ela ional analysis. Black deno es a sys em wi h no in o ma ion, whi e deno es a sys em wi h exac in o ma ion, and g ey ep esen s he in o ma ion be ween black and whi e. This echnique add esses he issue o imp o ing he esponse ea u es o cu en machining sys ems [ 23 , 24 ]. In g ey ela ional analysis, he i s s ep is da a p e-p ocessing, whe e he TF, SR, and BH expe imen al da a a e s anda dised o be in he ange o ze o o one. Da a p e-p ocessing is ypically necessa y because he ange and uni o one da a se di e om he o he s. The me hod o con e ing a sequence in o one ha is compa able o he o iginal is called da a p e-p ocessing. Depending on a da a se ies’ cha ac e is ics, he e a e a numbe o da a p e-p ocessing me hods accessible o GRA. The “highe - he-be e ” cha ac e is ic applies i he a ge alue is in ini e. The sequence can be no malised as shown in Equa ion (1): x∗ i(k)= x(0) i(k)−minx(0) i(k) maxx(0) i(k)−minx(0) i(k)(1) When he o iginal sequence has he“lowe - he-be e ” cha ac e is ic, i shouldbe no - malised as shown in Equa ion (2): x∗ i(k)= maxx(0) i(k)−x(0) i(k) maxx(0) i(k)−minx(0) i(k)(2) whe e i= 1, 2, . . . , m and k = 1, 2, . . . , n signi y he o iginal e e ence sequence and p e-p ocessed da a, espec i ely. x∗ i ( k ) deno es he no malised alue, x(0) i ep esen s he in ended sequence, min x(0) i(k) deno es he sequence’s minimum alue, and max x(0) i(k) ep esen s he sequence’s maximum alue. The o al numbe o obse a ions is n, whe eas he e a e m expe imen s. Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 7 o 13 2.6. G ey Rela ional Coe icien (GRC) A me ic used in GRA o judge he applicabili y o wo sys ems o sequences is he GRC. Equa ion (3) illus a es he GRC, which is used in GRA o show how closely ela ed he sequences o x0(k) and xi(k) a e o one ano he . γx0(k),x∗ i=∆min +ζ∆max ∆0i(k) + ζ∆max (3) whe e ∆0i (k) is also ecognised as he de ia ion sequence and eplica es he change be ween x0(k) and x∗ i(k). ∆0i(k) = x0(k)−x∗ i(k), ∆min is he smalles alue o ∆0i(k), ∆max is he la ges alue o ∆0i(k), and ζis he dis inguishing coe icien . In mos cases, he ζ alue is smalle and he dis inc abili y is la ge , so ζ = 0.5 is employed. 2.7. G ey Rela ional G ade (GRG) By calcula ing he GRC, he GRG is usually calcula ed using he a e age alue o he GRC. GRG is used o e alua e mul i- esponse cha ac e is ics. Equa ion (4) shows how i is exp essed: τi=1 n n ∑ i=1 (γ(x0(k),x∗ i(k))(4) whe e nis he numbe o p ocess esponses and τi is he GRG. The g ea e GRG shows ha he associa ed expe imen al esul is close o he ideal no malised alue. 2.8. P edic ing he Op imal Responses The op imal le els o each ac o a e used o p edic he bes answe s using he bes le els o each elemen in he Taguchi design o expe imen s, ollowed by con i ma ion ials. Depending on whe he he expe imen ’s objec i e is o minimise o maximise he esponse, he bes condi ion is selec ed [ 25 , 26 ]. When he e a e h ee le els, 1, 2, and 3, wi h le el 1 being he ideal si ua ion, and he e a e h ee componen s, A, B, and C, Equa ion (5) p o ides he p edic ed op imal esponse. µp ed =A1+B1+C1−2Y(5) whe e Yis he o e all mean esponse, and A1,B1,C1a e he a e age esponses a le el 1 o hese ac o s. 3. Resul s and Discussions 3.1. Expe imen al Resul s U ilising GRA, mul i-objec i e op imisa ion was pe o med wi h he in en ion o p oducing he minimum TF, SR, and BH simul aneously. Table 3lis s he ial ou comes and hei GRC, GRG, and anks. 3.2. Analysis and Discussion o Resul s The expe imen s a e anked acco ding o he GRG alues. Figu e 4e iden ly displays ha GRG is high o he i s le el o F, he hi d le el o SS, and he second le els o D and R% A1B3C2D2. Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 8 o 13 Table 3. Resul s o a g ey ela ional analysis (LM5/Z O2). Sl No Feed (mm/min) Speed ( pm) D ill Ma e ial Rein o cemen (w %) GRC o TF GRC o SR GRC o BH GRG Rank 1 50 1000 HSS 3 0.655 0.654 0.678 0.662 11 2 50 1000 Ca bide 6 0.615 0.744 0.695 0.685 10 3 50 1000 TiN Coa ed 9 0.612 0.499 0.781 0.631 13 4 50 2000 HSS 6 0.7 0.434 0.648 0.594 17 5 50 2000 Ca bide 9 0.84 0.744 0.496 0.693 9 6 50 2000 TiN Coa ed 3 0.904 0.433 0.76 0.699 8 7 50 3000 HSS 9 0.716 0.418 0.695 0.610 16 8 50 3000 Ca bide 3 0.969 0.702 0.678 0.783 2 9 50 3000 TiN Coa ed 6 1 0.747 1 0.916 1 10 100 1000 HSS 3 0.481 0.436 0.678 0.532 24 11 100 1000 Ca bide 6 0.421 1 0.864 0.762 3 12 100 1000 TiN Coa ed 9 0.454 0.583 0.695 0.577 19 13 100 2000 HSS 6 0.704 0.462 0.333 0.500 27 14 100 2000 Ca bide 9 0.625 0.758 0.741 0.708 5 15 100 2000 TiN Coa ed 3 0.7 0.392 0.509 0.534 23 16 100 3000 HSS 9 0.652 0.468 0.760 0.627 14 17 100 3000 Ca bide 3 0.846 0.581 0.678 0.702 7 18 100 3000 TiN Coa ed 6 0.762 0.487 0.935 0.728 4 19 150 1000 HSS 3 0.358 0.595 0.581 0.511 26 20 150 1000 Ca bide 6 0.348 0.414 0.891 0.551 20 21 150 1000 TiN Coa ed 9 0.333 0.559 0.85 0.581 18 22 150 2000 HSS 6 0.53 0.411 0.634 0.525 25 23 150 2000 Ca bide 9 0.497 0.522 0.634 0.551 21 24 150 2000 TiN Coa ed 3 0.577 0.516 0.77 0.621 15 25 150 3000 HSS 9 0.673 0.333 0.62 0.542 22 26 150 3000 Ca bide 3 0.747 0.522 0.85 0.706 6 27 150 3000 TiN Coa ed 6 0.704 0.581 0.695 0.66 12 Ma e ials2023,16,xFORPEERREVIEW9o 13    Figu e4.Responseg aphs o GRG. Themean esponse alues o each ac o le ela eshowninTable4.The ankshows ha  heDhasmo esigni icanceon heGRG, ollowedby heF,S,andR%.Theac ual expe imen als a egywase alua edwi ha95%le elo con idence.The indingso  he GRGANOVAa elis edinTable5.Theob ainedR 2  alue o GRGis80.47%.Fo F,SS, andD, hep‐ alueisless han0.05,indica ing ha  heyha easigni ican impac on he GRG. Table4.Response able o GRG(LM5/Z O 2 ). Le elFeedRa e(F)SpindleSpeed(S)D illMa e ial(D)Rein o cemen %(R) 10.6970 0.6102 0.5670 0.6389 20.6300 0.6028 0.6823 0.6579 30.5831 0.6971 0.6608 0.6133 Del a0.1139 0.0943 0.1153 0.0446 Rank23 1 4 Table5.ANOVA o GRG(LM5/Z O 2 ). Sou ceo Va ia ionDOFSSMSFpC% FeedRa e210.574 5.28719.93 0.002 24.24 SpindleSpeed28.516 4.25828.00 0.004 19.52 D illMa e ial212.688 6.344211.92 0.001 29.08 Feed a e*D illMa e ial43.326 0.83151.56 0.232 7.62 PooledE o 168.519 0.5324    19.53 To al2643.624   100.00 The abula edF‐ alueisF 0.05,2,16 =3.63.I isob ious omTable5 ha  heF‐ es ed alues o F,S,andDa eg ea e  han heF‐ abled alue,andhence heyha easigni i‐ can impac onGRG.TheF es  alueo R%andin e ac ionso Fwi ho he  a iablesa e less han he abula ed alue.I isno ed ha D(29.08%)has hemaximumin luenceon heGRG, ollowedbyF(24.24%)andS(19.52%).The esponse a iableR%and hein‐ e ac ionso Fwi he e yo he  a iablewe epooledup o hee o  e masi doesno  ha eamajo impac onGRG[27,28]. Figu e 4. Response g aphs o GRG. Ma e ials 2023,16, 3615 9 o 13 The mean esponse alues o each ac o le el a e shown in Table 4. The ank shows ha he D has mo e signi icance on he GRG, ollowed by he F, S, and R%. The ac ual expe imen al s a egy was e alua ed wi h a 95% le el o con idence. The indings o he GRG ANOVA a e lis ed in Table 5. The ob ained R 2 alue o GRG is 80.47%. Fo F, SS, and D, he p- alue is less han 0.05, indica ing ha hey ha e a signi ican impac on he GRG. Table 4. Response able o GRG (LM5/Z O2). Le el Feed Ra e (F) Spindle Speed (S) D ill Ma e ial (D) Rein o cemen % (R) 1 0.6970 0.6102 0.5670 0.6389 2 0.6300 0.6028 0.6823 0.6579 3 0.5831 0.6971 0.6608 0.6133 Del a 0.1139 0.0943 0.1153 0.0446 Rank 2 3 1 4 Table 5. ANOVA o GRG (LM5/Z O2). Sou ce o Va ia ion DOF SS MS F pC% Feed Ra e 2 10.574 5.2871 9.93 0.002 24.24 Spindle Speed 2 8.516 4.2582 8.00 0.004 19.52 D ill Ma e ial 2 12.688 6.3442 11.92 0.001 29.08 Feed a e*D ill Ma e ial 4 3.326 0.8315 1.56 0.232 7.62 Pooled E o 16 8.519 0.5324 19.53 To al 26 43.624 100.00 The abula ed F- alue is F 0.05, 2, 16 = 3.63. I is ob ious om Table 5 ha he F- es ed alues o F, S, and D a e g ea e han he F- abled alue, and hence hey ha e a signi ican impac on GRG.The F es alue o R% and in e ac ions o F wi h o he a iables a e less han he abula ed alue. I is no ed ha D (29.08%) has he maximum in luence on he GRG, ollowed by F (24.24%) and S (19.52%). The esponse a iable R% and he in e ac ions o F wi h e e y o he a iable we e pooled up o he e o e m as i does no ha e a majo impac on GRG [27,28]. 3.3. Con i ma ion Expe imen s The esul s o he con i ma ion expe imen s show ha he p edic ed GRG is 0.824 and he expe imen al alue is 0.856. A good ag eemen is ound be ween he p edic ed and in es iga ional alues, and he e o is 3.7%. 3.4. In luence o Inpu Va iables on GRG The TF, SR, and BH esponses we e included in he GRG as a high-quali y depic ion o all he esponses. Figu e 5displays he impac o he ac o s on he GRG. The GRG esponse g aph’s g ea es alue indica es ha d illing ac o s had a highe in luence on machin- abili y a ibu es [ 29 , 30 ]. The bes p ocess pa ame e s o d illing we e F = 50 mm/min, S = 3000 pm, D = Ca bide, and R = 6 w %, which led o he maximal alue o he GRG. The maximum GRG was ound a he lowes F and highes S, sugges ing ha he esponse TF, SR, and BH we e a hei lowes le els a he lowes F and highes S. This is due o a lowe TF esul ing om a dec ease in he amoun o ic ion be ween he d ill bi and he specimen [ 31 , 32 ]. A lowe F indica es a lowe d illing empe a u e, which enhances he quali y o he su ace. A lowe F was ound o esul in a lowe TF, which p o ided a sa is ac o y su ace inish a a smalle F. The wo kpiece so ens and pene a es smoo hly as a esul o he quick hea ise caused by ic ion a highe spindle speeds, which esul s in a smalle TF. Be e GRG alues a e p oduced by inc easing spindle speed because sho e