scieee Open visual document viewer

Self-care deficit versus the potential to improve self-care: explanation of the nurse's clinical judgments

Lourenço, Marisa; Encarnação, Paula; Martins, Teresa; Araújo, Fátima; Machado, Paulo

Abstract

Background: people who become functionally dependent due to serious illness and/or the worsening of a chronic illness have different recovery paths. The attribution of the nursing diagnosis of self-care deficit versus potential to improve self-care requires, on the part of the nurse, a rigorous clinical judgment, for which a set of diagnostic activities is necessary. Objectives: the present study sought to identify the assumptions used by expert nurses when formulating the clinical judgment of self-care deficit versus the potential to improve self-care Methodology: qualitative design. Data were generated in two focus group meetings that included eleven nurses experienced in caring for persons with functional dependence and self-care defict. Previously prepared structured questions were used to facilitate discussion. The focus group meetings were recorded in audio and transcribed. Inductive content analysis was used to identify emerging themes. The checklist Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) was also used. Results: nurses` decision-making depends: the factors of influencing the potential to improve self-care abilities of a person with functional dependence, the domain of influence of these factors, and three fundamental aspects to consider when evaluating a person with functional dependence. Conclusions: the absence of recovery potential can rarely be deduced. People without cognitive impairment or with mild cognitive impairment present highest potential for recovery.

Full text

ARTIGO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO RIIS | Vol.4(2), 7-18 7 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde SELF-CARE DEFICIT VERSUS THE POTENTIAL TO IMPROVE SELF-CARE: EXPLANATION OF THE NURSE'S CLINICAL JUDGMENTS Comp omisso no au ocuidado e sus po encial pa a melho a o au ocuidado: Explanação do juízo clínico do en e mei o Comp omiso con el au ocuidado e sus po encial pa a mejo a el au ocuidado: explicación del juicio clínico de las en e mei as Ma isa Lou enço*, Paula Enca nação**, Te esa Ma ins***, Fá ima A aújo****, Paulo Machado***** ABSTRACT Backg ound: people who become unc ionally dependen due o se ious illness and/o he wo sening o a ch onic illness ha e di e en eco e y pa hs. The a ibu ion o he nu sing diagnosis o sel -ca e de ici e sus po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e equi es, on he pa o he nu se, a igo ous clinical judgmen , o which a se o diagnos ic ac i i ies is necessa y. Objec i es: he p esen s udy sough o iden i y he assump ions used by expe nu ses when o mula ing he clinical judgmen o sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e Me hodology: quali a i e design. Da a we e gene a ed in wo ocus g oup mee ings ha included ele en nu ses expe ienced in ca ing o pe sons wi h unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ic . P e iously p epa ed s uc u ed ques ions we e used o acili a e discussion. The ocus g oup mee ings we e eco ded in audio and ansc ibed. Induc i e con en analysis was used o iden i y eme ging hemes. The checklis Consolida ed C i e ia o Repo ing Quali a i e Resea ch (COREQ) was also used. Resul s: nu ses` decision-making depends: he ac o s o in luencing he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence, he domain o in luence o hese ac o s, and h ee undamen al aspec s o conside when e alua ing a pe son wi h unc ional dependence. Conclusions: he absence o eco e y po en ial can a ely be deduced. People wi hou cogni i e impai men o wi h mild cogni i e impai men p esen highes po en ial o eco e y. Keywo ds: nu sing diagnosis; sel -ca e; unc ional dependence; decision making RESUMO Enquad amen o: as pessoas em si uação de dependência uncional, de ido a doença g a e e ou ag a amen o de doença c ónica, êm pe cu sos di e en es no p ocesso de ecupe ação. A omada de decisão do en e mei o pa a melho a a au onomia da pessoa, es á sujei a aos dados de a aliação do seu po encial de ecupe ação. Obje i os: iden i ica os p essupos os u ilizados pelos en e mei os pa a enuncia o juízo clínico: au ocuidado comp ome ido e sus o po encial pa a melho a o au ocuidado. Me odologia: es udo quali a i o. Os dados o am ge ados em duas euniões de ocus g upo com onze en e mei os, com expe iência no cuida da pessoa com dependência uncional e comp omisso no au ocuidado. Fo am di ecionadas algumas pe gun as p e iamen e es u u adas pa a acili a a discussão. As e lexões o am g a adas em áudio e ansc i as. Análise de con eúdo indu i a oi usada pa a iden i ica os emas eme gen es. U ilizada a lis a de e i icação Consolida ed C i e ia o Repo ing Quali a i e Resea ch (COREQ). Resul ados: a omada de decisão dos en e mei os depende: dos a o es que in luenciam o po encial pa a melho a as capacidades pa a o au ocuidado de uma pessoa com dependência uncional, do domínio de in luência desses a o es e dos p essupos os u ilizados pa a a alia as capacidades da pessoa com dependência uncional. Conclusão: a ausência de po encial de ecupe ação a amen e pode se deduzida. Pessoas sem comp ome imen o cogni i o ou com comp ome imen o cogni i o le e, ap esen am maio po encial de ecupe ação. Pala as-Cha e: diagnós ico de en e magem; au ocuidado; dependência uncional; omada de decisão RESUMEN Ma co con ex ual: las pe sonas que se uel en uncionalmen e dependien es debido a una en e medad g a e o al empeo amien o de una en e medad c ónica ienen di e en es ías de ecupe ación. La oma de decisiones del en e me o pa a mejo a la au onomía del pacien e, es á suje a a la e aluación de da os de su po encial de ecupe ación. Obje i os: iden i ica los supues os u ilizados po las en e me as pa a enuncia el juicio clínico: au ocuidado comp ome ido e sus po encial pa a mejo a el au ocuidado. Me odología: diseño cuali a i o. Los da os se gene a on en dos euniones de g upos ocales que incluye on a once en e me as con expe iencia en el cuidado de pe sonas con dependencia uncional, comp omiso con el au ocuidado. Se u iliza on p egun as es uc u adas p e iamen e p epa adas pa a acili a la discusión. Las euniones de los g upos ocales se g aba on en audio y se ansc ibie on. Se u ilizó el análisis de con enido induc i o pa a iden i ica emas eme gen es. También se u ilizó la lis a de e i icación Consolida ed C i e ia o Repo ing Quali a i e Resea ch (COREQ). Resul ados: la oma de decisiones de las en e me as depende: los ac o es que in luyen en el po encial pa a mejo a las habilidades de au ocuidado de una pe sona con dependencia uncional, el dominio de in luencia de es os ac o es y los supues os que se hacen al e alua las capacidades de una pe sona con dependencia uncional. Conclusión: a a ez se puede deduci la ausencia de po encial de ecupe ación. Las pe sonas sin de e io o cogni i o o con de e io o cogni i o le e p esen an el mayo po encial de ecupe ación. Palab as Cla e: diagnós ico de en e me ía; au ocuidado; dependencia uncional; oma de decisiones *PhD, associa e p o esso and esea che a Po o Nu sing College and esea che a CINTESIS - h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0001-5953- 788X - Au ho 's con ibu ion: Concep ion and s udy design, Da a Collec ion, Da a analysis and in e p e a ion, D a ing he manusc ip , C i ical e ision o he in ellec ual con en **PhD, associa e p o esso a School o Nu sing, Uni e si y o Minho, and esea che a Coimb a Nu sing College - h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0002- 7458-8105 - Au ho 's con ibu ion: Concep ion and s udy design, Da a analysis and in e p e a ion, C i ical e ision o he in ellec ual con en *** PhD, coo dina ing p o esso , a Po o Nu sing College and esea che a CINTESIS - h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0003-3395-7653 - Au ho 's con ibu ion: Concep ion and s udy design, Da a Collec ion, Da a analysis and in e p e a ion, D a ing he manusc ip , C i ical e ision o he in ellec ual con en **** PhD, associa e p o esso , a Po o Nu sing College and esea che a CINTESIS - h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0002-3059-7480 - Au ho 's con ibu ion: Concep ion and s udy design, Da a Collec ion, C i ical e ision o he in ellec ual con en ***** PhD, coo dina ing p o esso , a Po o Nu sing College and esea che a CINTESIS - h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0002-3187-6860 - Au ho 's con ibu ion: Concep ion and s udy design, Da a Collec ion Como e e encia : Lou enço, M., Enca nação, P., Ma ins, T., A aújo, F., & Machado, P. (2021). Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s. Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde, 4(2) 7-18 Recebido pa a publicação: 01/07/2021 Acei e pa a publicação: 23/11/2021 Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 8 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde INTRODUCTION Loss o unc ional capaci y (physical and psychological) may be associa ed wi h he de e io a ion o a ch onic disease condi ion, which may condi ion he pe son o unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ici , ha is, o he need o someone o help in sel -ca e ac i i ies. Sel -ca e is conside ed he aking ca e o wha is needed o main ain onesel , keep onesel going and handle basic indi idual and in ima e necessi ies and ac i i ies in daily li e (In e na ional Council o Nu ses [ICN], 2019). Ac i i ies o daily li ing include ea ing, ba hing, d essing and und essing, using he oile , ge ing eady, ge ing ou o bed, mo ing be ween bed and chai and u ning in bed (ICN, 2019). O em is an impo an e e ence o he de elopmen o he concep o sel -ca e, ha ing de ined i as a p ac ice o ac i i ies ha indi iduals ini ia e and ca y ou o main ain li e, heal h, and well-being (O em, 1991). He heo y gi es special emphasis on heal h de ia ions, which is when a pe son is no able o p omo e he necessa y sel -ca e ac i i ies and equi es he help o ano he pe son. Many nu sing he apies aim o e e se unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ici as soon as possible. Assessing he sel -ca e ac i i ies ha he pe son is able o no o pe o m, acili a ing he de elopmen o knowledge and new sel -ca e skills, such as he assessmen and e o mula ion o housing condi ions, emo ing ba ie s o mobili y, o pu ing hand ailings in he ba h oom, a e o g ea use when he dependen pe son has he po en ial o imp o e (Lou enço, 2015). Fo people wi h unc ional dependence and a high le el o commi men in sel - ca e, nu sing in e en ions aim o eplace he pe son when pe o ming sel -ca e ac i i ies. In o he wo ds, he nu ses' ac ions a e p edominan ly o he ype o execu e; o example, posi ion, ba he, d ess, eed (ICN, 2019). The p esen s udy sough o iden i y he assump ions used by expe nu ses when o mula ing he clinical judgmen o sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e BACKGROUND P omo e sel -ca e is he i s le el o heal hca e p o ided, and i s scope includes heal h p omo ion, disease p e en ion, ehabili a ion, and pallia i e ca e (WHO, 2019). Sel -ca e ac i i ies in a pe son wi h se e al ch onic condi ions, in an ad anced s age o he disease, and e idencing cogni i e al e a ions a e a cu en challenge (Jaa sma e al., 2017). Addi ionally, he in luence o amily, iends, and heal h p o essionals in de eloping sel -ca e abili ies needs o be u he in es iga ed (Riegel e al., 2017). Riegel e al. (2012), in he Middle-Range heo y on sel -ca e in he con ex o ch onic illness, based on clinical p ac ice, de ine sel -ca e as a p ocess o heal h main enance and disease managemen a he . This p ocess equi es a pe son o be in ol ed and ac i ely engaged in hei own heal h-illness ansi ion. The e o e, sel -ca e is unde s ood as a polysemic concep and a dynamic p ocess ha depends on a pe son's will powe . Is in luenced by indi idual needs, capaci ies, p e iously iden i ied disabili ies, and a pe cep ion o hei new heal h condi ion. Hence, some sel -ca e ac i i ies di e acco ding o he pe son (Riegel e al., 2012). Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 9 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde A e he acu e phase o an illness, he onse o he unc ional dependence and he sel -ca e de ici a e conside ed p io i ies, meaning ha a pe son mus ini ia e hei eco e y p ocess. Se e al ac o s can limi he abili y o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence o eco e sel -ca e beha io s and ac ions a indi idual and social le els. As well age, heal h s a us, decision-making abili y, physical abili y o pe o m sel -ca e ac ions, cogni i e and emo ional abili y (Jaa sma e al., 2017), expe ience, mo i a ion, belie s, cul u al alues, habi s, unc ional and cogni i e abili ies, suppo sys em, access o ca e and sel -e icacy (Lou enço, 2015; Riegel e al., 2012, Vellone e al., 2016). The cu en inc easing need o heal hca e esponses associa ed wi h unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ici is a signi ican challenge o heal h se ices and, in pa icula , o nu ses. The changes in a pe son's abili y o pe o m sel -ca e ac i i ies can be ansla ed in o wo nu sing diagnos ic labels sus ained on di e en decision-making bases. Fo he diagnos ic label-impai ed sel -ca e a nu se p esc ibes nu sing in e en ions ha eplace he pe son in sel - ca e ac ions. Fo he diagnos ic label-po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies a nu se can p esc ibe in e en ions ha include assis ance, in o ma ion, and aining o imp o e o egain he pe o mance o sel -ca e ac i i ies and p omo e au onomy. The designa ion o po en ial e e s o inhe en e capaci y o coming in o being (ISO 18104, 2014, p.4) ha is, he pe son's abili y and he oppo uni y o de elop new sel -ca e abili ies and, hus, become mo e au onomous. Quei ós e al., (2021) s a es ha he e a e wo pe spec i es o diagnos ic easoning, gi en he uni e sal sel -ca e equi emen s: i) sel -ca e de ici o ii) he indi idual's oppo uni y o de elop skills and/o knowledge o deal wi h he sel -ca e de ici . Highligh ing he indi idual need o acqui e knowledge and mas e skills o managing a new challenging condi ion (Quei ós e al., 2021, p.6). In he long- e m, hese in e en ions will p oduce di e en ou comes wi h ega ds o a pe son's heal h condi ion. Howe e , he ques ion emains, which pa ien s ha e eco e y po en ial? Imp o ing he abili y o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence o pe o m sel -ca e ac i i ies implies sys ema izing a p o essional app oach in o de o egula ly and speci ically assess he di e en impai men s. Such as physical, psychological, and o he cons ain s/limi a ions, ela ed o he momen and con ex expe ienced by he pe son (Lou enço, 2015). The ac o s ha posi i ely and nega i ely in luence he sel -ca e beha io s o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence a e well known (Schulman-G een e al., 2016). Howe e , his e idence has had li le ans e abili y o clinical nu sing p ac ice (Lou enço, 2015). Despi e he exis ence o se e al s udies ocused on iden i ying ac o s ha in luence sel -ca e beha io s o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence (Jaa sma e al., 2017; Vellone e al., 2016), in he con ex o clinical p ac ice, no assessmen ins umen exis s o help nu ses iden i y he di e en ia ing indica o s o he diagnoses, sel -ca e de ici o po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies. METHODS Design This is an explo a o y s udy, using a quali a i e me hod comp ising in e iews wi h a ocus g oup. Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 10 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde The Consolida ed C i e ia o Quali a i e Resea ch Repo s (COREQ) checklis was used (Supplemen a y File 1). The s udy included wo mee ings held in 2019 wi h ele en nu ses expe ienced in he ca e o pe sons wi h unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ic . The mee ings las ed abou wo hou s and 30 minu es (K uege & Casey, 2014). Pa icipan s Pa icipan s we e selec ed by an in en ional sampling me hod o ob ain de ailed desc ip ions o he wo k expe ience ele an o he s udy (K uege & Casey, 2014). The selec ion c i e ia we e: a) o be a nu se wi h ad anced aining in ehabili a ion nu sing, ecognized by he Na ional O de o Nu ses; b) ha e a leas h ee yea s expe ience in ca ing o people wi h unc ional dependency and commi men o sel - ca e; and c) sign he in o med consen o m, olun a ily ag eeing o pa icipa e in he s udy and au ho ize he dissemina ion o he esul s ob ained in he scien i ic ield. Two weeks be o e he ocus g oup, pa icipan s we e con ac ed by email, and he in o med consen o m was sen , cla i ying he objec i es o he s udy, pa icipa ion c i e ia, s udy me hods, and he es ima ed du a ion. Th ee days be o e he ocus g oup was held, pa icipan s we e con ac ed by elephone o con i m he mee ings. The place whe e he mee ings we e held was accessible o all pa icipan s. Pa icipan s we e mos ly women (82%), aged 36 yea s o olde , wi h ad anced aining in ehabili a ion nu sing, and wi h 15 yea s o mo e o p o essional expe ience. Pa icipan s wo ked in long- e m ca e uni s o unc ional ehabili a ion and aining in sel - ca e ac i i ies. Da a collec ion The in e ac ion among he g oup p oduced impo an in o ma ion ele an o he concep s s udied, and pa icipan s we e encou aged o discuss and commen on hough s and expe iences on he opics unde discussion. P e iously p epa ed ques ions we e used in a semi-s uc u ed manne o acili a e discussions. Ques ions we e p epa ed h ough collabo a ion and inpu o all he au ho s o he documen ( able 1). Table 1 Ques ions used in ocus g oup 1-Fo a pe son who su e ed a c i ical episode and became unc ionally dependen , wha ac o s do you ecognize ha could ha e in luenced his/he abili ies o imp o e sel -ca e? 2-Wha is he domain o in luence o he men ioned ac o s on a pe son's abili y? 3-Iden i y h ee undamen al aspec s o conside when e alua ing a pe son wi h unc ional dependence? The ques ions ga e ise o aluable discussions and e lec ions among he pa icipan s. Pa icipan s we e also allowed o aise ques ions du ing he ocus g oup in e iews. The sessions we e mode a ed by he i s au ho o he pape , who p esen ed he opics o discussion, kep an ac i e ole in conduc ing and main aining he discou se, ensu ing ha each pa icipan had he oppo uni y o expose his o he opinions. Pos -i s and a whi eboa d we e used o collec opinions abou he i s ques ion p esen ed by he mode a o . The pa icipan s eco ded on pos -i s ac o s ha , in hei Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 11 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde opinion, in luence he eco e y po en ial o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence and sel -ca e de ici . Subsequen ly, hese concep s we e g ouped hie a chically in o unc ional domains. The o he au ho s o he pape assis ed in his ask. The mode a o also p esen ed he o he ques ions. The pa icipan s discussed hei opinions, which we e audio- eco ded. A e da a collec ion, he in e iews we e ansc ibed, and he in o ma ion ob ained was submi ed o con en analysis, ollowing he S auss & Co bin (2014) guidelines. The mode a o pe o med he ansc ip ion because she had inside in o ma ion abou acial exp essions, ges u es, and one o oice in which he speeches we e deli e ed. I ems ha ecei ed a o able ag eemen om a leas six (55%) o he ele en ocus g oup pa icipan s we e added o he esul s. The con en analysis esul s we e colla ed in a epo ha was e u ned o he pa icipan s a he second ocus g oup mee ing. The second ocus g oup mee ing s a ed wi h he pa icipan s eading he epo o 40 minu es. This was ollowed by a discussion o opinions abou he alida ion o he in o ma ion. This ocus g oup mee ing was also audio- eco ded. All sugges ions o change we e ai h ully ca ied ou in he inal epo by he mode a o . All igh s ela ed o da a p o ec ion we e espec ed in he s udy. Da a analysis The da a ga he ed om he pa icipan s' discussion we e a he cen e o he coding wo k om an induc i e pe spec i e. The knowledge eme ged p og essi ely and was ma ked by he clinical expe ise o he p o essionals. The coding p ocess was he i s phase o he analysis, whe e he subs an i e codes, p ope ies, and dimensions we e iden i ied. This phase was ollowed by axial coding. The p e iously g ouped da a we e eg ouped in o concep s o iden i y he ca ego ies p esen . The selec i e coding, which was he las phase o he analy ical p ocess, included he e inemen o he ca ego ies and subca ego ies p e iously iden i ied. These we e compa ed and analyzed con inuously, in eg a ing some da a, and a cen al ca ego y eme ged (S auss & Co bin, 2014). RESULTS Wi hin he g oup o ele en expe ehabili a ion nu ses, nine we e women. The a e age age was 42.27 yea s. Mo e han hal he expe s (six) had o e i een yea s o wo k expe ience, h ee had en yea s, one nu se had wel e yea s, and ano he nu se had six yea s. All expe s wo ked on unc ional ehabili a ion uni s in ei he inpa ien o communi y con ex s and we e ecognized by hei pee s as ha ing an ou s anding nu sing esume. diagnos ic labels ha we e indica i e o he need o ca e o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence included sel -ca e de ici o po en ial o imp o e sel - -making was dependen on 1) ac o s in luencing he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence, 2) he domain o in luence o hese ac o s, and 3) h ee undamen al aspec s o conside when e alua ing a pe son wi h unc ional dependence The ac o s ha in luence a pe son wi h unc ional dependence o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies a e (a) unc ional capaci y ha includes cogni i e and physical issues, (b) emo ional ac o s, and (c) suppo Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 12 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde sys em, which includes amily membe s, heal h p o essionals, ime, and en i onmen ( able 2). Table 2 Fac o s ha in luence he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence Ca ego y Subca ego y Indica o Func ional capaci y Cogni i e Consciousness O ien a ion: Time, space and sel -pe son Senso y pe cep ion Memo y, hough , easoning A ailabili y Knowledge (heal h li e acy) Physical Balance Muscle s eng h Join mo emen Mo o coo dina ion Emo ional ac o s Belie s Sel -e icacy Expec a ions Voli ion: Willpowe , mo i a ion, sel -con ol Adap a ion, accep ance o he heal h condi ion Hope In ol emen P e ious expe iences Suppo Sys em Family Family in ol emen Knowledge A i ude Expec a ions Heal h p o essionals Ca e philosophy (biomedical model) A i ude En i onmen Communi y (Access o nu ses wi h ad anced p ac ice in ehabili a ion) Household a chi ec u al ba ie s Lack o ma e ial esou ces (assis i e de ice) Time Reco e y ime The p esence o se e e cogni i e impai men (caused by memo y, hough , o easoning al e a ions) is a -making p ocesses, leading hem o op o he diagnos ic label sel -ca e de ici . Unal e ed unc ional capaci y, posi i e emo ions, mo i a ion, and ini ia i e, posi i ely in luence he eco e y p ocess o a dependen pe son's sel -ca e abili ies. These indica o s sugges ha a nu se should op o he diagnos ic label po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies. Low willpowe , pe cep ion o low sel - e icacy, and he absence o li e goals we e conside ed ac o s ha nega i ely in luence a pe son's eco e y p ocess. These indica o s e lec he educed po en ial o he eco e y o sel -ca e abili ies and a e likely o lead o de ici in sel -ca e, leading o nu ses deciding on in e en ions ha o en eplace he pe son in sel -ca e ac ions ( able 3). Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 13 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde Table 3 Domains o in luence o iden i ied ac o s on po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili ies Ca ego y Indica o De e minan ac o Cogni ion: memo y, hough , and easoning Fac o s o posi i e in luence Func ional capaci y, posi i e emo ions, mo i a ion, and ini ia i e Fac o s o nega i e in luence Low willpowe , pe cep ion o low sel -e icacy, absence o li e goals Expe nu ses conside ha he assessmen o he abili y o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence mus ake in o accoun h ee o he ollowing aspec s (a) he iming o he assessmen , wi h he esul s guiding he le el o assis ance in heal h ca e; (b) he indica o s o assessmen , which in o m he igo o nu ses' decision-making and moni o he e ec i eness o a pe son's esponse du ing he au onomy eco e y p ocess; and (c) sys ema ic in he e alua ion, which acili a es he eadjus men o nu sing in e en ions and espec i e expec ed ou comes. DISCUSSION The p esen s udy sough o iden i y he assump ions used by expe nu ses when o mula ing he clinical judgmen o sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e. E alua ing whe he o no a pe son has he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e abili y in ol es speci ic c i e ia. A p ese ed cogni i e unc ion is essen ial o ecei e, decode, and e ain in o ma ion (Bidwell, 2015). Du e al. (2007) demons a ed ha impai ed unc ional and cogni i e capabili ies nega i ely a ec a pe son's abili y and in e es o be in ol ed in sel -ca e ac i i ies, which may make he assessmen pa icula ly challenging. Func ional capaci y e lec s he di icul ies ha a pe son may expe ience when pe o ming a ask o ac ion ha equi es a speci ic cogni i e s a us, which includes awa eness, o ien a ion, senso y pe cep ion, memo y, hough , easoning, and knowledge (in o ma ion acqui ed and/o pe cei ed). Acco ding o Jaa sma e al. (2017), a pe son needs o ha e speci ic unc ional and cogni i e skills o become in ol ed in sel -ca e, including making choices, iden i ying ca e needs, and knowing how o con ac a heal hca e p o essional when necessa y. Hence, a pe son needs o ha e a ce ain deg ee o in ol emen in hei ca e p ocess and commi o hei heal h and well-being. Func ional capaci y also includes physical s a us, a ca ego y iden i ied in ou s udy. Thus, muscle s eng h, mo o coo dina ion, balance, and join a e body p ocesses ha , a e being e alua ed, a e used o de e mine whe he o no a (N1). Howe e , e di icul ies a pe son aces when pe o ming sel -ca e ac i i ies (washing he back, d essing om he wais down, o al hygiene) [...] despi e impai men [...]" (N9). Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 14 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde hese ypes o de ici s, expe iencing hem o a long ime due o ch onic disease si ua ions, o en adop s a egies o pe o m sel -ca e ac i i ies (N4). Emo ional ac o s we e a ca ego y ha eme ged om his s udy and included mul iple indica o s showing how a pe son goes h ough he ehabili a ion p ocess o unc ional capaci y. Mos o he expe nu ses epo ed ha unc ional capaci y condi ions he p ocess o sel -ca e eco e y o a dependen pe son. Mo eo e , hinde ing belie s, o changes in he pe cep ion o sel -e icacy and demo i a ion, can indica e I can, bu I do no wan o, because I am in a denial phase hand, ha ing expec a ions, mo i a ion, and being in ol ed is essen ial o he adap a ion o he cu en heal h condi ion and imp o emen in sel -ca e au onomy Being ocused on he eco e y o hei indi idual capaci ies helps a pe son in he eco e y p ocess. These opinions co obo a e he esul s o se e al s udies ha demons a e he in luence ha emo ional ac o s ha e on a pe son's in ol emen du ing he p ocess o egaining sel -ca e abili ies (Chang e al., 2017; Sil a, 2019). Hope is also a ype o emo ion ha , once p esen , allows a pe son o deal wi h a s ess ul si ua ion mo e e ec i ely (Pin o e al., 2012). I assumes a he apeu ic ole, s onge han op imism, and is a ele an coping s a egy wi h in luence o e a pe son's well-being. O he in luencing ac o s epo ed by he pa icipan s we e p e ious expe iences. P e ious expe iences a e used as e ec i e pa e n iden i ie s ha p o ide ele an clues, sugges expec ed ou comes associa ed wi h speci ic esponses, and poin o easonable objec i es and ac ions in ce ain si ua ions (Jaa sma e al., 2017). Howe e , hey may also be po en inhibi o s o he de elopmen o he abili y o imp o e sel -ca e, as desc ibed by one expe ienced nu se, I am dealing wi h a pe son who, due o a p e ious nega i e expe ience, does no cu en ly wan o be ained on how o ans e om bed o chai , because he ell du ing hei p e ious hospi aliza ion (N11). The challenge o nu ses is o iden i y whe he p e ious expe iences acili a e o he momen s o assessmen and he de elop he abili y o pe o m sel -ca e. These p o essionals ha e a ield o ac ion ha allows hem o unde s and he expe iences and adap hem o imp o e indi idual pe o mance abili ies (N5). Wi hin his domain o emo ional ac o s, mo al p inciples and belie s ha e also eme ged, a ibu ing mo e meaning o li e, o ganizing, and men ally building a balance o eali y (Lou enço, 2015). The suppo sys em ca ego y was s uc u ed in o ou subca ego ies: amily, heal h p o essionals, en i onmen , and ime ac o s. Family is conside ed ca dinal suppo o a dependen pe son (Chen e al., 2017). Family suppo inc eases pa icipan s' in ol emen and con idence in he p ocess o egaining au onomy and p o es o be a acili a ing esou ce o de elop app op ia e sel -ca e abili ies and beha io s (Lou enço, 2015; Riegel e al., 2017). Ca ing o a amily membe wi h unc ional dependence is a linge ing, pain ul eali y wi hin he amily con ex (Chen e al., 2017 he lack o amily esou ces a ec s he unde u iliza ion o heal h se ices due o he p olonged delay o a pa ien 's discha ge [...] he ype o amily ca ing o he dependen pe son has a s ong (N8). Wi hin hei ca egi e ole, amily Sel -ca e de ici e sus he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e: explana ion o he nu se's clinical judgmen s 15 RIIS Re is a de In es igação & Ino ação em Saúde membe s mus ge ac i ely in ol ed, be empa he ic, and a ailable o imp o e hei knowledge. Some imes we a e aced wi h amily ca egi e s who do no wan he dependen pe son o be au onomous [...] o en eplacing hem in hei ac i i ies, like d essing, ba hing, ea ing and e en choosing hei clo hes. These amily membe s conside ha he bes way o show a ec ion is o hem o eplace hei amily membe in his/he daily li e ac i i ies (N8). Acco ding o expe nu ses, he philosophy o ca e and heal hca e p o essionals' a i ude can in luence a pe son wi h unc ional dependence o de elop sel - ca e abili ies. When guided by a biomedical model, nu ses conside ha he main enance o body p ocesses, managemen o signs and symp oms, and he apeu ic p esc ip ions a e p io i y a eas. Wha we wan is o he pe son o keep he body p ocesses unc ioning and no de elop p essu e ulce s, o example , a pe son-cen e ed ca e -making. The psychological and emo ional aspec s mus be included and should be conside ed signi ican a eas in he eco e y p ocess o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence (Dineen-G i in e al., 2019; Lou enço, 2015). This is con i med by one nu se (N8) pa icipa ing in ou s udy in addi ion o he domain o body p ocesses, o he equally impo an ac o s such as emo ional aspec s, need o be conside ed when o mula ing a diagnos ic judgmen o a pe son wi h he po en ial o imp o e sel -ca e Acco ding o he nu ses in ou s udy, i is essen ial o adop a mo i a ing a i ude when ca ing o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence, p omo ing sel -e icacy and empowe men o egain au onomy. Nu ses mus be a ailable, a en i e, and cu ious o explo e he pe son's pe spec i es, in e es s, and needs. The s udy expe s conside ed language and a i ude ex emely impo an : "The language we use wi h [people wi h unc ional dependence] canno be p essing, igo ous o ocused exclusi ely on obliga ions o e en on guil The nu se wi h ad anced aining is mo e con iden in he he apeu ic ela ionship hey es ablish wi h a (N1). "I is impo an ha each o us choose a i udes ha help a pe son imp o e hei sel -e icacy [...]" (N11). The en i onmen also in luences he abili y o a pe son wi h unc ional dependence o imp o e sel - ca e. A chi ec u al ba ie s ha in e e e wi h accessibili y a home can nega i ely ehabili a ion p ocess, hinde ing he eco e y o au onomy (Lee e al., 2018). The lack o ma e ial esou ces such as assis i e de ices was ound o hinde he p ocess o a heal hy ansi ion o imp o e au onomy in sel -ca e (Roelands e al., 2002). Residency a eas co e ed by egula nu se home isi s inc eased he pe cep ion o pa ien s and amily ca egi e ega ding he home-ca e o mal suppo o heal h p o essionals Sha ing expe iences wi hin pee g oups, he pa ien 's con ac wi h people who ha e li ed simila si ua ions and he esul s achie ed, we e ound o inc ease in ol emen in he p ocess o acqui ing skills because people el ha i was possible o o e come he si ua ion (Lou enço, 2015). Nu ses pa icipa ing in his s udy also conside ed ha eco e y ime was associa ed wi h he oppo uni y o eco e y a ying acco ding o each pe son. We some imes a e in such a hu y ha we do no gi e people wi h unc ional dependence a chance o ca y The wo sening o he disease and he unc ional capaci y