scieee Open visual document viewer

Explaining the freedom of information in local government: what influences information disclosure?

Tejedo-Romero, Francisca; Araújo, Joaquim Filipe

Abstract

In response to the growing demand from society to access public information, governments have been forced to be more transparent in the conduct of their activities. Based on the literature of information disclosure, this paper analyses factors that influenced the freedom of information in Spanish municipalities, and which explain the levels of information disclosure. For the purpose of this study, a dynamic panel System General Method of Moments (System-GMM) estimation was used to analyses data from 100 Spanish largest municipalities for the period of 2008-2014. Additionally, the sample was partitioned in two categories according to the province capital or not province capital criteria in order to find if there are interesting differences. The analysis indicates that disclosure of information about municipal management is associated with financial dependence, internet access, unemployment, electoral turnout and political rivalry. Differences found in the two categories of municipalities suggest that there may be institutional characteristics that could influence the dissemination of information. This study is a contribution to the growing body literature of information disclosure in order to understand what explains the variations of information disclosure among the municipalities.

Full text

www.cya.unam.mx/index.php/cya Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65 (4), 2020, 1-29 1 Accoun ing & Managemen *Co esponding au ho . E-mail add ess: F ancisca.T[email p o ec ed] (F. Tejedo Rome o). Pee Re iew unde he esponsibili y o Uni e sidad Nacional Au ónoma de México. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 0186- 1042/©2019 Uni e sidad Nacional Au ónoma de México, Facul ad de Con adu ía y Adminis ación. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY-NC-SA (h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) Explaining he eedom o in o ma ion in local go e nmen : Wha in luences in o ma ion disclosu e? Explicando el lib e acceso a la in o mación en el gobie no local: ¿qué in luye en la di ulgación de in o mación? F ancisca Tejedo-Rome o 1*, Joaquim Filipe Fe az Es e es A aujo2 Abs ac In esponse o he g owing demand om socie y o access public in o ma ion, go e nmen s ha e been o ced o be mo e anspa en in he conduc o hei ac i i ies. Based on he li e a u e o in o ma ion disclosu e, his pape analyses ac o s ha in luenced he eedom o in o ma ion in Spanish municipa- li ies, and which explain he le els o in o ma ion disclosu e. Fo he pu pose o his s udy, a dynamic panel Sys em Gene al Me hod o Momen s (Sys em-GMM) es ima ion was used o analyses da a om 100 Spanish la ges municipali ies o he pe iod o 2008-2014. Addi ionally, he sample was pa i ioned in wo ca ego ies acco ding o he p o ince capi al o no p o ince capi al c i e ia in o de o ind i he e a e in e es ing di e ences. The analysis indica es ha disclosu e o in o ma ion abou municipal Recei ed No embe 17, 2018; accep ed Oc obe 17, 2019 A ailable online Oc obe 21, 2019 1Depa amen o de Adminis ación de Emp esas, Uni e sidad de Cas illa-La Mancha, España 2Uni e sidade do Minho-Escola de Economia e Ges ao, Po ugal F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 2 managemen is associa ed wi h inancial dependence, in e ne access, unemploymen , elec o al u nou and poli ical i al y. Di e ences ound in he wo ca ego ies o municipali ies sugges ha he e may be ins i u ional cha ac e is ics ha could in luence he dissemina ion o in o ma ion. This s udy is a con ibu ion o he g owing body li e a u e o in o ma ion disclosu e in o de o unde s and wha explains he a ia ions o in o ma ion disclosu e among he municipali ies. JEL codes: H70, H79, H80 Keywo ds: In o ma ion disclosu e; T anspa ency; Local go e nmen ; F eedom o in o ma ion; Municipali ies Resumen En espues a a la c ecien e demanda de la sociedad pa a accede a la in o mación pública, los gobie nos se han is o o zados a se más anspa en es en el desa ollo de sus ac i idades. Basado en la li e a u a de di ulgación de in o mación, es e a ículo analiza los ac o es que in luye on en el lib e acceso a la in o mación en los municipios españoles y que explican los ni eles de di ulgación de in o mación. A los e ec os de es e es udio, se u ilizó la es imación del Mé odo Gene alizado de Momen os (GMM) de Sis ema (Sys em-GMM) de da os de panel en un modelo dinámico pa a analiza los da os de 100 municipios españoles más g andes pa a el pe íodo 2008-2014. Además, la mues a se ha di idido en dos ca ego ías según el c i e io de si los municipios son capi al de p o incia o no pa a de e mina si exis en di e encias in e esan es. El análisis indica que la di ulgación de in o mación sob e la ges ión municipal es á asociada con la dependencia inancie a, el acceso a in e ne , el desempleo, la pa icipación elec o al y la i alidad polí ica. Las di e encias encon adas en las dos ca ego ías de municipios sugie en que puede habe ca ac e ís icas ins i ucionales que pod ían in lui en la di ulgación de in o mación. Es e es udio es una con ibución a la c ecien e li e a u a sob e di ulgación de in o mación con la inalidad de comp ende qué explica las a iaciones de di ulgación de in o mación en e los municipios. Código JEL: H8, H79 Palab as cla e: Di ulgación de in o mación; T anspa encia; Gobie no local; Lib e acceso a la in o mación; Municipios In oduc ion In ecen decades, he p essu e o make public o ganiza ions mo e anspa en and he F ee- dom o In o ma ion laws1 (FOI), al e ed he adi ional cul u e o Public Adminis a ion and inc eased in o ma ion disclosu e, ein o cing he abili y o he public o access go e nmen in o ma ion (Pio owski & Van Ryzin, 2007). 1 The F eedom o In o ma ion laws a e egula ions which gi es e e y ci izen he igh o eques ce ain in o - ma ion held by he public bodies and o ganisa ions, including he go e nmen , egula o s and any public se ice companies. F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 3 In o ma ion disclosu e is a mechanism o imp o e he public us , and hold poli icians and o icials accoun able o hei ac ions and ou comes (Pa k & Blenkinsopp, 2011). I has inc eased wo ldwide in he public sec o unde he designa ion o anspa ency and i is an indi ec e ec p omo ed by New Public Managemen and New Public Go e nance (Gonzalez, Gasco & Llopis, 2007; Osbo ne, 2006), by opening public o ganiza ions, and inc easing he mechanisms o communica ion, accoun abili y and anspa ency. Conce ning he disclosu e o municipal in o ma ion, i is wo hwhile o build up i s unde s anding (G eco, Sciulli & D’onza, 2012). E icien use o sca ce esou ces equi es e ec i e mechanisms o dissemina e in o ma ion abou municipali ies’ decision-making, o imp o e public sec o communica ion and con idence. The issues in luencing in o ma ion disclosu e a e complex and been he esul o in e nal and ex e nal ac o s o he municipali ies. P e ious esea ch has indica ed ha in o ma ion disclosu e in local go e nmen s depend on poli ical and socio-economic ac o s (Albala e, 2013; Tejedo-Rome o & A aujo, 2018). O he s udies analyse in e nal ac o s like cul u e (Lopes & Se asquei o, 2017). Howe e , he e is s ill ambigui y in esul s and esea che s canno make consis en conclusions (Cucciniello, Po umbescu & G immelikhuijsen 2017). Maybe he inconsis ency o hese esul s lies in he design o he s udies (Alcaide-Muñoz, Rod íguez-Bolí a , & López-He nández, 2017), o in he implemen a ion o in o ma ion dis- closu e policies in coun ies wi h di e en adminis a i e cul u e whose in e nal and ex e nal ac o s o he municipali ies in luence in o ma ion disclosu e (Rod íguez, Ga cía & Gallego, 2011). Howe e , he e is s ill insu icien empi ical e idence o clea ly es ablish he in luence o such ac o s in in o ma ion disclosu e (Alcaide-Muñoz e al., 2017). Lowa cha in and Meni ield (2015) poin ou he need o u he de elopmen conce ning he ac o s in luencing he le els o anspa ency. In his ega d, Cucciniello e al. (2017) p opose he way o wa d sugges ing o academics o do simila s udies in o de o sys ema ically iden i y con ex ual condi ions ha a ec anspa ency ou comes, and conduc analyses using di e en app oaches. Resea ch shows he e a e impo an ac o s ha explain he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e in municipali ies (Alca az-Quiles, Na a o-Gale a & O iz-Rod íguez, 2015; Pio owski & Van Ryzin, 2007). In he case o Spanish municipali ies, i is wo h o analyse in o ma ion disclosu e h ough in e ne communica ion o acili a e ac i e in o ma ion, since in e ne has been an impo an ool o in o ma ion disclosu e. This s udy uses he anspa ency index as a p oxy o in o ma ion disclosu e, and iden i y he ac o s ha a ec in o ma ion disclosu e, in pa icula he egional e ec on anspa ency. The choice o conduc ing his analysis in Spanish municipali ies has o do wi h hei p oblems wi h in o ma ion disclosu e, which a e mo e equen a local le el (Cuad ado-Balles e os, 2014). Fi s ly, because social p essu e exe ed by ci izen mo emen s, as he case o he “los indignados”, compels municipali ies F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 4 o imp o e managemen e iciency, and be mo e anspa en in he managemen o public esou ces. Secondly, he inancial c isis p essu ed o mo e anspa ency in he managemen o public esou ces, pa icula ly hose unds come om cen al o egional ans e s. In bo h cases, in e ne access, as a oll o in o ma ion disclosu e, played an impo an ole. Hence, in o ma ion disclosu e and anspa ency may ha e an impo an ole wi hin he communica ion p ocess by opening o ganiza ions o esponsi e communica i e p ac ices owa ds ci izens. This pape con ibu es o bo h he academic and p ac ical ield on in o ma ion disclosu e analysing in e nal and ex e nal ac o s ha in luence municipali ies o disclosu e in o ma ion. Wi h espec o he academic ield, i empi ically es s a heo e ical amewo k explaining, wi hin he communica ion p ocess, wha in luenced in o ma ion disclosu e in Spanish muni- cipali ies be ween 2008 and 2014. Addi ionally, he sample was pa i ioned in wo ca ego ies acco ding o he p o ince capi al o no p o ince capi al c i e ia in o de o ind i he e a e in e es ing di e ences. I in ends o con ibu e o he ein o esea ch ha s udies he ac o s in luencing municipali ies’ in o ma ion disclosu e wi h impac on communica ion p ac ices. Fo his pu pose, his s udy does an econome ic analysis conside ing spa ial and empo al e ec s (municipali ies-yea s, panel da a me hodology) imp o ing he e iciency o econo- me ic es ima es by cap u ing unobse able he e ogenei y (Bal agi, 2014) and is especially ele an in iew o he empi ical obus ness o his s udy. A apis and Rei ano (2018) poin ou ha panel da a analysis is necessa y o imp o e he unde s anding o anspa ency and i s e olu ion o e ime. I p o ides he analysis wi h a ce ain deg ee o dynamism, achie ing bo h g ea e consis ency and be e explana o y powe . Howe e , o he s udies which use panel da a me hodology (Albala e, 2013), do no ake in o accoun a se ies o p oblems ha a ise when using panel da a me hodology, namely he c oss-sec ional dependence, g oupwise he e oskedas ici y and au oco ela ion, as well as he possible endogenei y p oblem. This s udy mi iga es hese p oblems by using he Sys em- GMM es ima o o a dynamic model o panel da a. Pe aining o p ac i ione s, he ou comes o his s udy b ing insigh s in o local go e nmen s, pa icula ly by answe ing he ollowing cen al esea ch ques ion: wha ac o s in luenced municipali ies’ in o ma ion? The indings could help iden i y he condi ions which ensu e ha municipali ies a e mo e anspa en , since he le el o anspa ency is he consequence o he e ec i e communica ion p ac ices wi hin municipali ies. In ac , he use o anspa ency has been ad oca ed in public ela ions o decades. The es o he pape is o ganized as ollows. The nex sec ion discusses he heo e ical amewo k o in o ma ion disclosu e ha will guide he analysis, and he ac o s ha in luen- ce such disclosu e. Then, he esea ch me hodology and he model will be p esen ed, while p o iding da a desc ip ion, ollowed by he empi ical analysis o he esul s and discussion o he main indings. Finally, he pape will ocus on he main conclusions. F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 5 In o ma ion Disclosu e as a mechanism o Good Go e nance Cu en schola ship and p ac ices emphasize he bene i s o openness in he disclosu e o in o ma ion and he p ocess o communica ion. Demand o in o ma ion disclosu e g ew apidly, wi h o ganiza ions, in bo h he p i a e and public sec o s, being encou aged o be mo e anspa en (Ball, 2009). In o ma ion disclosu e became an impo an i em in he agenda o nea ly e e y o ganiza ion, no only o open he go e nmen and make i mo e accoun able, bu also as a means o add essing he loss o public us in go e nmen and imp o ing he p ocess o communica ion. The li e a u e on anspa ency p esen s a di e si y o concep s, s essing h ee main issues: a) make public o ganiza ions’ decisions and ac ions mo e accoun able o ci izens, b) e- duce go e nmen sec ecy and, c) p o ide in o ma ion o he public by se e al mechanisms in o de o ha e accoun able o icials and decisions (Ball, 2009). Acco ding o Ellis and Fende (2006), anspa ency allows indi iduals o ind ou wha is happening inside he go e nmen h ough a ious in o ma ion disclosu e mechanisms. I is a means o imp o e go e nmen ou comes, adminis a i e and manage ial e ec i eness, as well as policy e ec i eness, by conduc ing public a ai s in he open o be subjec o public sc u iny. I includes he legal, poli ical, and ins i u ional s uc u es ha make in o ma ion on public o ganiza ions a ailable o ac o s, bo h inside and ou side he domes ic poli ical sys em. Al hough such anspa ency does no ensu e accoun abili y, o he end o co up ion, i does make i mo e likely. Mo eo e , se e al communica o s ecognize he posi i e e ec s o democ acy esul ing om anspa en communica ion p ac ices and he exis ence o a public in o med abou go e nmen ac ions. In o ma ion disclosu e goes beyond he me e access o in o ma ion, demanding in o ma ion o be unde s andable o ex e nal s akeholde s (A aujo & Tejedo-Rome o, 2016). The li e a u e on in o ma ion disclosu e e e s ou main p inciples. Fi s , in o ma ion abou public o ganiza ions’ ac i i ies a ec ing ci izen in e es s should be a ailable o he public. Second, such in o ma ion should be adjus ed o he in luence ha hose o ganisa ions ha e in he in e es s o ci izens. Thi d, he in o ma ion should be accessible o hose who use i , and, inally, social, poli ical, and economic s uc u es o socie y should be o ganized in ways ha allow ci izens o ake ac ion (Ball, 2009; Fung, 2013). Disclosing in o ma ion is he decision o make public he ac s o he go e nmen and i s ep esen a i es, and p o ide he ci il socie y wi h ele an in o ma ion in a comple e, eliable, imely, easily comp ehensible and eachable way. Disclosu e in o ma ion decision depends om ex e nal and in e nal ac o s o he municipali ies. The ole played by hose ac o s a e c i ical in in o ma ion disclosu e. The ex e nal ac o s can impose o p essu e o in o ma ion disclosu e, o ins ances p essu es om ci izens and go e nmen s, while in e nal ac o s, like cul u e and o he o ganiza ional cha ac e is ics, in luence openness and willingness o F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 6 disclose in o ma ion. Ne e heless, in o ma ion disclosu e abou go e nmen ac i i ies and public policies is a co e issue in anspa ency (Alca az-Quiles e al. 2015; A ms ong, 2011). This con ibu es owa ds mo e accu a e public in o ma ion, and a educ ion o he in o ma- ion de ici and asymme y be ween ci izens and go e nmen . Consequen ly, i imp o es he pe manen dialogue be ween policy make s and ci izens du ing he decision-making p ocess. I boos s he le el o con idence o ci izens in hei go e nmen and p omo es g ea e ci ic pa icipa ion. I is essen ial o good go e nance and o he p omo ion o hones and e hical go e nmen s (Bauh & G imes, 2013; Pa k & Blenkinsopp, 2011). In o he wo ds, he mos impo an pa o a public communica ion p ocess is ha go e nmen s communica e in an open, hones and imely way wi h hei ci izens, wi hou manipula ing he in o ma ion hey sha e. Imp o ing he quali y o good go e nance equi es imp o emen s o in o ma ion disclosu e le els. How does one measu e in o ma ion disclosu e? The e a e wo main app oaches o quan i y and measu e he in o ma ion p o ided by o ga- niza ions. The i s app oach uses con en analysis (K ippendo , 2004), which is a me hod o coding ex con en in o ca ego ies based on selec ed c i e ia. The second is he cons uc ion o a disclosu e index ha compa es and explains he di e ences in he scope and b ead h o in o ma ion disclosu e. The c ea ion o a disclosu e index is based on he gene al p inciples o con en (o hema ic) analysis as a me hod es ablished in social sciences. Fo he pu pose o his s udy, he anspa ency index is used as a p oxy o in o ma ion disclosu e, meaning he abili y o he public o access go e nmen in o ma ion (Pio owski & Van Ryzin, 2007; Robe s, 2006). Acco ding o K ippendo (2004), an index is a o m o in e ence ha can be pe o med on con en analysis, and i is de ined as a a iable whose impo ance in a gi en in es iga ion depends on he deg ee o which a co ela e o o he phenomena may be consi- de ed. I is an ins umen designed o measu e a numbe o i ems which, when he alues a e added, p o ides an indica i e alue o he le el o disclosu e in a speci ic con ex . The e o e, he Spanish municipali ies’ anspa ency index (TI), published by T anspa ency In e na ional Spain, is used o explo e he d i e s o Municipal public in o ma ion disclosu e. Theo e ical backg ound o T anspa ency Since he 1970’s, Local Go e nmen anspa ency has been a conce n o schola s, pa icu- la ly ocused on ac o s p omo ing mo e and be e disclosu e o public inancial in o ma ion (Rod íguez-Bolí a , Alcaide-Muñoz & López-He nández, 2013). Li e a u e abou anspa- ency is based on he explana ions p o ided by he agency heo y and he legi imacy heo y (Pa en, 1992; Suchman, 1995). Agency heo y ega ds elec ed o icials as agen s who ac in F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 7 he in e es o ci izens, he p incipal (Laswad, Fishe , & Oyele e, 2005). In such ela ionship, some p oblems can a ise when he e is in o ma ion asymme y (Eisenha d , 1989). Elec ed o icials do no ha e he same in e es s as ci izens, and he e o e, mus be held accoun able o hei ac ions, namely by p o ing hey ha e ac ed acco ding o hei esponsibili ies. In he same way, anspa en communica ion p ac ices and in o ma ion disclosu e, by olun a y o compulso y p o isions, has been a way o moni o he ac ions o elec ed o icials (Laswad e al., 2005), and educe in o ma ion asymme ies. I expands he le el o anspa ency and con idence in he go e nmen (Bauh & G imes, 2013). Hence, agency ela ionships be ween public sec o o ganiza ions and ci izens gene a e an incen i e o poli icians and public man- age s o disclose and inc ease he in o ma ion o e ed by hese en i ies, hus allowing hei ac i i ies o be con olled and sc u inized by ci izens and socie y. On he o he hand, Legi imacy Theo y claims ha in o ma ion disclosu e is a way o o ga- niza ions o legi imize hei ac ions owa ds ci izens. Legi imacy is “a gene alised pe cep ion o assump ion ha he ac ions o any en i y a e desi able, p ope , o app op ia e wi hin some socially cons uc ed sys em o no ms, alues, belie s and de ini ions” (Suchman, 1995, 574). In o ma ion disclosu e abou o ganiza ion’s ac i i ies is a way o legi imize hei ac ions be o e hei s akeholde s, and awa d legi imacy o o ganiza ions (Pa en, 1992). The heo y claims ha , i o ganiza ional legi imacy is h ea ened, o ganiza ions will disclose in o ma ion in an e o o p omo e i . The dissemina ion o in o ma ion may be used o win ci izens us back, and ep esen an a emp o change hei pe cep ions abou he unc ioning o he o ganiza ion. In addi ion, o e ing an image o good go e nance in esponse o gene al p essu es is a way o secu e legi imacy, and enhance local go e nmen epu a ion (Pina, To es & Royo, 2010). These heo ies help us unde s and in o ma ion asymme y in poli ical con ex s, and he need o in o ma ion disclosu e and anspa ency. Howe e , hey do no explain which ac o s ac ually in luence in o ma ion disclosu e. Since social and economic de elopmen s in Spain p essu ed poli icians o g ea e openness o make public o ganiza ions mo e accoun able and anspa en i is wo h o empi ically es he in luence o socioeconomic and poli ical ac o s on he le el o anspa ency. T anspa ency in Spanish Municipali ies Spanish municipali ies a e adap ing o socie y’s demand o mo e anspa en communi- ca ion p ac ices and anspa ency. Mo eo e , he e a e in e na ional o ganiza ions e alua ing he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e in di e en coun ies, including Spain. The cons uc ion o a anspa ency index by T anspa ency In e na ional Spain o e ed he oppo uni y and a oused he in e es o such analysis. The T anspa ency Index ocuses p ima ily on p oac- i e communica ion o in o ma ion by municipali ies. Access o public in o ma ion a local F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 8 go e nmen le el plays an essen ial ole in he o e all pe cep ion o he exis ence, o no , o an open go e nmen . The wo kings o a go e nmen will be mo e anspa en i he e is mo e in o ma ion a ailable and unde s andable, and he decision- making p ocesses a e mo e accessible (A ms ong, 2011). Acco ding o he Agency Theo y (Laswad, e al., 2005), dis- closu e o in o ma ion esponds o in e nal and ex e nal p essu es o anspa ency, educing in o ma ion asymme y. Spanish social mo emen s and he p essu e om cen al go e nmen o iscal con ol o e municipali ies we e ex e nal sou ces o p essu e o mo e anspa ency. In he same way, he esponse om municipali ies could be in luence municipal execu i e ideology and i s inancial dependence om cen al go e nmen . The inancial dependence om ex e nal unds equi e ha municipali ies should disclosu e mo e in o ma ion abou inancial managemen o hold elec ed o icials accoun able o hei ac ions. In o ma ion disclosu e, ei he as olun a y o compulso y, has been a way o educe in o ma ion asymme ies, and o inc ease he deg ee o con idence and public us in poli ical playe s (Fung, 2013) enhancing municipali ies’ epu a ion. I enhances legi imacy o elec ed public o icials (Pa en, 1992), p oducing a posi i e e ec on public pe cep ions abou poli ical decisions, p ojec ing an image o good go e nance. Ano he ac o ha a ec s communica ion and in o ma ion access, a e he In o ma ion and communica ion echnologies (ICTs), such as he In e ne , which ha e e olu ionized he way socie y communica es and in e ac s. This is also ue in he ela ionship be ween ins i u ions, ci izens, and he a ious le els o go e nmen . The p o ision o in o ma ion and documen s in he municipali ies’ websi es enables hem - ega dless o hei size and/o esou ces - o p o ide in o ma ion o ci izens abou hei o ganiza ion, ac i i ies, and decisions. The use o he In e ne by local go e nmen s o p oac i e communica ion and dissemina ion o in o - ma ion has se e al ad an ages. I c ea es moni o ing and con ol mechanisms, which is a way o enhance ci izen’s powe is-à- is local go e nmen (Laswad e al., 2005). I also allows ci izens o pa icipa e in public managemen in a mo e in o med manne , hus leading o an inc ease in ep esen a ion, and s eng hening he democ a ic sys em. To explo e wha d i es municipali ies’ in o ma ion disclosu e, his s udy used he Spanish municipali ies’ anspa ency index (TI) published by T anspa ency In e na ional Spain (TI- Spain). This index has been used in some p e ious s udies (Albala e, 2013), and is based on he collec ion o in o ma ion and ques ionnai es sen ou o municipali ies. The s udy used da a om T anspa ency In e na ional Spain om 2008 o 2014, as a p oxy o in o ma ion disclosu e. Fac o s A ec ing Municipali ies’ In o ma ion Disclosu e Some s udies ocus on in e nal ac o s o explain anspa ency in public o ganiza ions (Ruije , 2016). Howe e , he e idence is no unequi ocal because o he limi a ions o da a F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 9 ga he ed and econome ic analysis. O he s udies abou inancial anspa ency ocus on poli ical and socioeconomic ac o s (Guillamón, Bas ida & Beni o, 2011; Caba-Pé ez, Rod íguez-Bo- li a , & López-He nández, 2014). P oac i e in o ma ion disclosu e by municipali ies may be condi ioned by he exis ence o ce ain ac o s which may in luence and encou age he disse- mina ion o in o ma ion. In he pe iod analysed he e was p essu es om social mo emen s claiming o mo e anspa ency abou public se ice managemen and accoun abili y om poli icians. The in e ne and social ne wo ks we e impo an ool in in o ma ion disclosu e. D awing om and expanding upon p io wo ks he model build ook as i s e e ence he p e- ious li e a u e and a gues ha municipali ies’ p edisposi ion o anspa ency was in luenced by he ollowing in e nal and ex e nal ac o s o he municipali ies: Financial Dependence, In e ne access, Unemploymen , Elec o al Tu nou , Poli ical Ri al y, and Poli ical Ideology. I examines hese p e iously men ioned a iables because hey cons i u e he common basis o he exis ing models in academic li e a u e. The objec i e o his pape is o build up an explana o y model, suppo ed by he agency and he legi imacy heo ies ha apply alid ope a ionaliza ion o hese ac o s and es hei ela i e impo ance in Spanish municipal in o ma ion disclosu e. Addi ionally, i was con olled con ex ual Spanish municipal cha ac- e is ics such as, popula ion size, ci izens le el o educa ions and egional e ec , which we e including as con ol a iables (see con ol a iables in Resea ch Me hodology sec ion). The hypo heses a e de eloped and p oposed below. Financial Dependence. Much o he local e enue comes om cen al o sup ana ional go e nmen ans e s. Financial dependence plays an impo an ole in in o ma ion disclosu e by local go e nmen s. The g ea e he inancial dependence, he mo e accoun ing in o ma ion municipali ies ha e o disclose, and mo e anspa ency is equi ed, o accoun o he use o unds ecei ed. Accoun abili y and in o ma ion disclosu e by anspa en communica ion a e a c i ical pa o inancial con ol. Acco ding o he Agency Theo y (Laswad e al., 2005), i is expec ed ha when go e nmen unds a e ecei ed, municipali ies disclose in o ma ion accoun ing o he use o such unds, whils seeking o demons a e ha public manage s ha e ac ed acco ding o hei esponsibili ies (Ing am & DeJong, 1987). Empi ical s udies, such as hose conduc ed by Ing am and DeJong (1987), ha e concluded ha , when a municipali y ecei es a highe p opo ion o i s o al income as ans e s o unds om s a e and egional go e nmen s, his is an incen i e o g ea e disclosu e o inancial in o ma ion, in o de o demons a e he anspa en managemen o esou ces ecei ed. Al- caide-Muñoz, Rod íguez-Bolí a and López-He nández (2013) and Guillamón e al. (2011) ound ha municipali ies ha ecei e la ge ans e s epo mo e inancial in o ma ion, and a e mo e anspa en . Howe e , s udies by Caba-Pé ez, Rod íguez Bolí a and López He nández (2008) and Laswad e al., (2005) ound no signi ican ela ionship be ween ans e s ecei ed by he municipali y and i s disclosu e o in o ma ion. Fu he mo e, O iz-Rod íguez, Na a - F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 16 Panel B: Dummies Va iables 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Poli ical Ideology Pe cen age (%) 54 46 54 46 54 46 25 75 25 75 42.4 57.6 Regional Pa y Pe cen age (%) 56 44 56 44 56 44 57 43 57 43 56.4 43.6 N (Obse a ions) 100 100 100 100 100 500 Sou ce: Own elabo a ion Panel A shows ha , o e he yea s, he e we e inc eases in he alue o he anspa ency index in he municipali ies analysed, wi h he index aking an a e age alue o 69.1 du ing he pe iod 2008-2014, sugges ing a mo e anspa en communica ion p ocess. This inc ease may be due o he ac ha hose who go e n and manage he municipali y became awa e ha hei s akeholde s, especially ci izens, a e demanding mo e accoun able ac ions om poli icians as a esul o mis us . Acco ding o he legi imacy heo y in o ma- ion disclosu e and a be e communica ion p ocess is a way o eco e ha los us . This sugges s ha he le el o anspa ency in Spanish municipali ies is inc easing, in o de o legi imize hei ac ions o ci izens and educe he p oblem o agency. These esul s a e in line wi h hose ob ained in he wo k o Guillamón, e al. (2011), who obse ed an inc ease in he anspa ency index du ing 2008-2010. Also o ha pe iod, Cuad ado-Balles e os (2014) ob ained an a e age alue o he anspa ency index o 62.45 o he sample o he 110 la ges Spanish municipali ies. A alue simila o ha was ob ained in his s udy – 69.1 – which is somewha highe due o he inclusion in he s udy o he 2012 and 2014 alues. The esul s a e also consis en wi h hose ob ained by Albala e (2013) o 2012. Conce ning inancial dependence, he e was a s ong inc ease in 2009, which may ha e been mo i a ed by an a emp o boos he local economy h ough an inc ease in inancial esou ces om he cen al go e nmen , a ge ing lowe unemploymen . Howe e , wi h he wo sening o he c isis and he p essu es om he Eu opean Union and he cen al go e nmen o educe public deb , ans e s ecei ed we e hea ily in luenced, and he e was a d ama ic educ ion o inancial dependence in 2012. In e ne access has inc eased in Spanish households, om an a e age alue o 77.5 in 2008, o 93.8 in 2014. The e o e, mos Spanish households ha e access o he In e ne . In o - ma ion and communica ion echnologies ha e e olu ionized he way socie y communica es and in e ac . The unemploymen a e has inc eased o e he yea s. The mos signi ican inc ease oc- cu ed be ween 2008 and 2009, when he economic and inancial c isis s a ed in Spain. The F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 17 (18) OECD o ecas o he coming yea s es ima es ha he e will be a weak and slow eco e y o unemploymen (OECD, 2014). On he o he hand, elec o al u nou inc eased om 59% o 61.8% in he las elec ions. Pe haps he economic c isis and he social mo emen s mobilized ci izens o be mo e pa - icipa i e. Conce ning poli ical i al y, he numbe o poli ical pa ies inc eased in he las elec ions - om an a e age o nine poli ical pa ies by municipali y o ele en - maybe be- cause o he exis ing mis us among ci izens, esul ing om co up ion issues in some local go e nmen s, and a mo e agmen ed pa y sys em. The amoun o popula ion has no changed much o e he yea s, wi h an a e age alue o 216,210 inhabi an s o he pe iod. The a e age educa ional le el has emained s able o e ime, wi h a alue o 31.5 o he pe iod unde analysis. Panel B o Table 1 shows ha , in he 2007 elec ions, mos municipali ies in he sample we e uled by le -wing pa ies - 54% e sus 46%. Howe e , a e he las elec ions in 2011, poli ical ideology o he uling pa ies in mos municipali ies changed adically, mainly o igh -wing go e nmen s in 75% o he cases. The esul s o he 2011 local elec ions we e a punishmen o he le -wing uling pa y a cen al le el, esul ing om he bad economic ou comes ha ollowed he inancial c isis. The ex en o punishmen did no ake in o ac- coun he good pe o mance o le -wing pa ies a egional and local le el, no he cases o co up ion o bad pe o mance o some local go e nmen s uled by igh -wing pa ies. I was an exp ession o dissa is ac ion wi h espec o le -wing pa ies. The Regional Pa y a iable shows a link be ween he uling pa ies in each le el. In he egional-municipal case, 56.4% o municipali ies ha e he same uling pa y in each le el. The esul s om es ima ing Eq. (1) a e epo ed in Table 2, using dynamic panel Sys em- GMM es ima ion wi h obus s anda d e o s. Columns 2, 3 and 4 p esen one-s ep Sys em- GMM eg essions and columns 5, 6 and 7 p esen wo-s ep Sys em-GMM eg essions. In bo h models, he eg ession was es ima ed o each o he sample: he ull sample, he sample o he p o ince capi al municipali ies and he sample o no p o ince capi al municipali ies. Howe e , since he es ima ion esul s a e simila o he wo models (one-s ep and wo-s eps), he analysis will concen a e on he wo-s eps Sys em-GMM es ima ion. This es ima ion is mo e obus han he one-s ep. The pu pose o his s udy is o es ima e he e ec o he selec ed a iables on in o ma ion disclosu e, in o de o iden i y wha ac o s d i e anspa ency. To educe he in luence o ex eme alues, unemploymen a iable has been winso ized a he 5 h and 95 h pe cen iles. In addi ion, he na u al loga i hm o popula ion size a iable has also been used. F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 18 Table 2 De e minan s o Municipal T anspa ency in Spain in he pe iod o 2008-2014 Independen a iables Model One-s ep Model Two-s ep Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sam- ple Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o - ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue T anspa ency Index -1 0.3092*** 0.1488 0.3287*** 0.2923*** 0.1641 0.3220*** (0.0791) (0.106) (0.0915) (0.0895) (0.1374) (0.0945) 0.0001 0.1603 0.0003 0.0011 0.2322 0.0007 Financial Dependence 0.8012*** 0.7930*** 0.6532*** 0.7189*** 0.3636 0.8541*** (0.1986) (0.297) (0.2205) (0.1849) (0.3248) (0.1999) 0.0001 0.0076 0.0031 0.0001 0.2629 0.0000 In e ne access 1.4743*** 1.9619*** 0.9476* 1.3459*** 2.6770*** 0.8734** (0.3794) (0.6479) (0.5474) (0.4572) (0.9406) (0.4138) 0.0001 0.0025 0.0835 0.0032 0.0044 0.0348 Unemploy- men -1.9251*** -2.0111 -1.6120** -2.5881** -7.8638* -2.5264* (0.6194) (1.3606) (0.7937) (1.1368) (4.3641) (1.3443) 0.0019 0.1394 0.0423 0.0228 0.0716 0.0602 Elec o al u nou -0.7743*** -1.3138*** 0.1682 -0.7071** -1.2691** 0.0385 (0.272) (0.4587) (0.3721) (0.353) (0.5499) (0.5735) 0.0044 0.0042 0.6513 0.0452 0.021 0.9464 Poli ical Ri al y 1.2979*** 1.1453** 1.1129* 1.3752*** 1.5043 1.7407** (0.3548) (0.5626) (0.6394) (0.4932) (0.9644) (0.7237) 0.0003 0.0418 0.0818 0.0053 0.1188 0.0162 Poli ical Ideology 2.8777 -3.7608 12.2889** 0.5337 -4.4517 7.3358 (4.1581) (6.0089) (5.8102) (4.4402) (6.142) (6.7511) 0.4889 0.5314 0.0344 0.9043 0.4686 0.2772 Popula ion Size -7.2795*** -3.9546 -9.6656*** -6.8757*** -3.4706 -9.6189*** (1.9708) (2.8476) (3.3882) (2.3841) (3.8264) (3.431) 0.0002 0.1649 0.0043 0.0039 0.3644 0.0051 F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 19 Independen a iables Model One-s ep Model Two-s ep Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sam- ple Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o - ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Educa ion Le el 1.7437** 0.1479 2.5825** 2.4537** 2.0829 3.2609*** (0.8352) (1.4861) (1.0062) (1.0335) (1.9909) (1.2339) 0.0368 0.9207 0.0103 0.0176 0.2955 0.0082 Regional Pa y -0.6841 0.9076 0.0208 0.6301 6.5180 -0.7800 (1.8599) (3.3731) (2.7121) (2.4591) (5.4888) (3.4753) 0.713 0.7879 0.9939 0.7978 0.235 0.8224 Region: A agon -25.3256* -4.6088 0 -34.1757* -72.7873 0 (13.1177) (17.8972) 0 (18.7406) (50.9259) 0 0.0535 0.7968 . 0.0682 0.1529 . As u ias -7.3803 18.6647 -34.4558*** -17.0186 -41.5862 -63.2681** (8.373) (13.9394) (11.6101) (11.7454) (41.2382) (29.9172) 0.3781 0.1806 0.003 0.1473 0.3132 0.0344 Balea ic Islands 0.2645 -3.6243 0 -35.9422 -84.6557 0 (6.6514) (13.062) 0 (40.395) (58.5158) 0 0.9683 0.7814 . 0.3736 0.148 . Cana y Is- lands -13.4056* -5.4752 -22.6149** -14.7390** -5.1564 -27.4710*** (6.8993) (9.8062) (9.1927) (6.8709) (11.2436) (10.2383) 0.052 0.5766 0.0139 0.0319 0.6465 0.0073 Can ab ia -5.5566 16.7647 0 -19.3609 -18.9557 0 (8.5709) (16.3687) 0 (58.8387) (34.9095) 0 0.5168 0.3057 . 0.7421 0.5871 . Cas illa La Mancha 10.4199* 24.0728*** -14.7145* 6.0189 -16.1104 9.8389 (6.0058) (8.7792) (8.231) (7.9555) (27.4016) (44.3539) 0.0827 0.0061 0.0738 0.4493 0.5566 0.8244 F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 20 Independen a iables Model One-s ep Model Two-s ep Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sam- ple Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o - ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Cas illa Leon -6.0186 15.9380 0 -13.8340 -32.1572 0 (7.5529) (13.3016) 0 (10.4215) (34.6809) 0 0.4255 0.2308 . 0.1844 0.3538 . Ca alonia -28.3625*** -19.4364 -29.8969*** -35.5136*** -91.8768* -37.3135** (9.2322) (16.1833) (9.9364) (13.2798) (54.4679) (14.6375) 0.0021 0.2297 0.0026 0.0075 0.0916 0.0108 Ex emadu a -2.1578 0.7552 0 -6.0082 -8.0170 0 (8.1312) (10.9834) 0 (8.1854) (12.522) 0 0.7907 0.9452 . 0.4629 0.522 . Galicia -5.0009 18.4750 -20.2937** -11.4734 -23.4584 -24.8194** (7.0887) (11.3477) (8.0548) (8.4332) (28.4867) (9.9235) 0.4805 0.1035 0.0118 0.1737 0.4102 0.0124 Rioja -3.6812 23.2549 0 -36.9443 -79.0726 0 (8.7217 (15.3403) 0 (23.4242) (51.6805) 0 0.673 0.1295 . 0.1148 0.126 . Mad id -28.3484* 6.6320 -53.6193*** -45.9573** -105.1658 -64.1958*** (14.6581) (24.1057) (16.2301) (19.5924) (79.7565) (21.6535) 0.0531 0.7832 0.001 0.019 0.1873 0.003 Mu cia 10.7369 35.8136*** -4.1623 6.1970 -41.7531 -3.1848 (9.3686) (7.3976) (10.094) (13.4085) (48.8588) (11.0285) 0.2518 0 0.6801 0.644 0.3928 0.7727 Na a e -26.0260** 4.3969 0 -40.0361 -77.6562 0 (11.4126) (20.8769) 0 (56.8888) (72.4412) 0 0.0226 0.8332 . 0.4816 0.2837 . Basque Coun y -53.2956*** -12.8451 -78.3443*** -67.6400*** -96.9007 -96.3094*** (18.0147) (29.9309) (21.0283) (23.4845) (65.434) (26.5652) 0.0031 0.6678 0.0002 0.004 0.1386 0.0003 F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 21 Independen a iables Model One-s ep Model Two-s ep Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Full Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue P o ince Cap. Sam- ple Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue No P o - ince Cap. Sample Coe . (Rob. S d. E .) p- alue Valencia 4.4688 5.2705 -8.4144 1.8065 -23.6939 -8.4129 (5.8911) (10.8178) (7.1791) (8.1325) (25.4518) (10.523) 0.4481 0.6261 0.2412 0.8242 0.3519 0.424 Obse a ions 400 204 196 400 204 196 Nº g oups 100 51 49 100 51 49 Nº ins u- men s 50 50 43 50 50 43 A ellano– Bond es o AR(1)/ (p- alue) -5.43/(0.000) -3.84/(0.000) -3.30/(0.001) -4.80/(0.000) -3.30/ (0.001) -3.04/ (0.002) A ellano– Bond es o AR(2)/ (p- alue) 1.37/(0.170) 0.36/(0.717) 1.80/(0.282) 1.33/(0.185) 0.50/ (0.615) 1.25/(0.212) Hansen es / (p- alue) 28.48/(0.240) 17.08/ (0.845) 20.54/ (0.247) 28.48/(0.240) 17.08/ (0.845) 20.54/ (0.247) Χ2 26 440.32*** 13850.14*** 107.17*** 8210.95*** 355.27*** 2791.14*** Robus s anda d e o s wi h Windemeije ’s ini e sample co ec ion a e in pa en heses. *p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01. “.” omi ed a iables. Sou ce: Own elabo a ion The speci ica ion es s sugges ed by Roodman (2006) ha e been used o alida ion o he model by he wo-s ep Sys em-GMM eg ession. In his sense, he A ellano-Bond es s gen- e ally iden i ied high i s -o de au oco ela ion. The es shows ha he comple e es ima ion has an AR(1)=-4.80 and p- alue=0.000, he p o ince capi al municipali ies sample an AR(1)=- 4.80 and p- alue=0.000 and he no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples an AR(1)=-3.04 F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 22 and p- alue=0.0002. The esul s did no p o ide e idence o second-o de au oco ela ion wi h alues o AR(2)=1.33, p- alue=0.185; AR(2)=0.50, p- alue=0.615; AR(2)=1.25, p- alue=0.212; espec i ely. The Hansen es s o o e - iden i ying es ic ions con i m ha he se o ins umen s can be conside ed alid (Hansen es =28.48, p- alue=0.240; Hansen es =17.08, p- alue=0.845; Hansen es =20.54, p- alue=0.247; espec i ely). Mo eo e , he numbe o ins umen s (50, 50 and 43; espec i ely) does no exceed he numbe o g oups (100, 51 and 49; espec i ely), which suppo s he model’s co ec speci ica ion and is alid. And, he χ2 shows ha he o e all eg essions a e signi ican (χ226=8210.95, p- alue=0.000; χ226=355275, p- alue=0.000; χ226=2791.14, p- alue=0.000; espec i ely). The lagged alue o he dependen a iable (T anspa ency Index -1) was s a is ically sig- ni ican a 1% le el, in he ull and no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples (β0=0.2923, p- alue=0.0011; β0=0.3220, p- alue=0.0007; espec i ely). In o he wo ds, he amoun o in o ma ion disclosed depends on he amoun ha was p o ided in p e ious yea s. How- e e , hese esul s could no be con i med in he case o no p o ince capi al municipali ies (β0=0.1641, p- alue=0.2322). I was obse ed ha he inancial dependence a iable has a posi i e and signi ican e - ec o a signi icance le el o 1, in he ull and no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples (β1=0.7189, p- alue=0.0001; β1=0.8541, p- alue=0.0000; espec i ely). G ea e inancial dependence in municipali ies means hey will be mo e inclined o disclose in o ma ion as a way o legi imizing he ac ions o poli icians. Acco ding o he agency and legi imacy heo ies, his educes he agency p oblem and imp o es he con idence on municipali ies’ managemen . Alcaide-Muñoz e al., (2013) and Guillamón e al. (2011) ound ha munici- pali ies ha ecei e la ge ans e s om he s a e and egional go e nmen s disclose mo e in o ma ion. Howe e , hese esul s could no be con i med in he case o no p o ince capi al municipali ies (β1=0.3636, p- alue=0.2629). The e o e, hypo hesis H1 o mula ed in he heo e ical amewo k is accep ed. In e ne Access is signi ican a 1% le el, in he ull and no p o ince capi al municipa- li ies samples (β2=1.3459, p- alue=0.0032; β2=2.6770, p- alue=0.0044; espec i ely). and 5% le el o no p o ince capi al municipali ies sample (β2=0.8734, p- alue=0.0348). The g owing use o new in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies imp o es he communica ion p ocess and allows ci izens o inc ease hei use o he In e ne . I con ibu es o in o ma- ion dissemina ion, educing in o ma ion asymme y. A g ea e access o he In e ne could be a way o ci izens o pu p essu e on municipali ies o be mo e anspa en and disclose in o ma ion. The esul s con i m hose ob ained by Caba-Pé ez e al., (2014) and Pina e al., (2010). Hence, hypo hesis H2 is accep ed. Rega ding he unemploymen a iable, he e is a signi ican nega i e ela ionship o a signi icance le el o 5% in he ull sample (β3 =-2.5881, p- alue=0.0228) and o a signi i- F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 23 cance le el o 10% in he p o ince capi al and no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples (β3 =-7.8638, p- alue=0.0716; β3 =-2.5264, p- alue=0.0602; espec i ely). As discussed in he heo e ical amewo k, unemploymen is a p oxy o he economic s a us o municipali ies. In pe iods o c isis, an inc ease in his a iable is expec ed, and, consequen ly, he e is a s ong a emp by poli icians o hide he si ua ion, and he e o e, no disclose so much in o ma ion. Acco ding o he heo y o legi imacy, his is an a emp no o lose he con idence o he ci izens. A nega i e ela ionship has been obse ed, as concluded in he esea ch o Albala e (2013) and Caamaño-Aleg e e al. (2013). So, hypo hesis H3 is accep ed. Rega ding he a ia- ble elec o al u nou , i is signi ican a he 5% le el, and i is nega i ely associa ed wi h he dependen a iable, in he ull and no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples (β4=-0.7071, p- alue=0.0452; β4=-1.2691, p- alue=0.021; espec i ely) Hypo hesis H4 is con i med. I is easonable o assume ha he lowe he elec o al u nou , he lowe he us in municipal go e nmen . The e o e, as sugges ed by legi imacy and agency heo ies, in o de o inc ease ci izens’ in ol emen , municipali ies should p o ide ele an in o ma ion on budge s, plans, and ac i i ies con ibu ing o municipal anspa ency. Howe e , hese esul s could no be con i med o municipali ies ha a e no he p o ince capi al (β4=0.0385, p- alue=0.9464). The poli ical i al y a iable is posi i ely co ela ed wi h he anspa ency index a he 1% and 5% le el in he ull and no p o ince capi al municipali ies samples, espec i ely (β5 =1.3752, p- alue=0.0053; β5 = 1.7407, p- alue=0.0162; espec i ely). Hence, hypo hesis H5 can be con i med. This con i ms ha poli ical i al y c ea es incen i es o educe agency p oblems and in o ma ion asymme y. In he Spanish con ex , Ga cía-Sánchez e al. (2013) ound no signi ican in luence o poli ical i al y in in o ma ion disclosu e. This esul could no be con i med o he no p o ince capi al municipali ies (β5=1.5043, p- alue=0.1188). The e is no signi ican ela ionship wi h poli ical ideology. This esul con i ms o he s udies which a gue ha le -wing pa ies and igh -wing pa ies a e bo h in e es ed in anspa ency. The e o e, hypo hesis H6 is no con i med. O he ac o s, such as popula ion size, ci izens’ educa ional le el, and egion ha e a sig- ni ican in luence in he le el o municipal anspa ency in he ull and no p o ince capi al samples. These ac o s a e no signi ican o he p o ince capi al municipali ies’ sample. Howe e , o all cases, he e is no ela ionship ega ding he e ec o he egional pa y in he le el o municipal anspa ency. Conclusions This pape aimed o analyse he d i e s o in o ma ion disclosu e in he la ges Spanish municipali ies using panel da a analysis. Since he la ge municipali ies a e ele an , he sample was pa i ioned in o wo ca ego ies acco ding o he c i e ia: p o ince capi al municipali ies F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 24 and no p o ince capi al municipali ies. The indings o his pape a e a con ibu ion o he lou ishing body o e idence on his impo an ein o knowledge. In he pe iod unde analysis, esul s sugges ed an inc ease in he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e in Spanish municipali ies, helping o legi imize hei ac ions o ci izens and educe he p oblem o he agency. The g ea es a ia ion ook place in 2012, which co esponds o a change in he elec o al cycle due o he 2011 elec ions. Pe haps his was he consequence o social mo emen s, such as “los indignados”, whose o igin was mo i a ed by he pligh o ci izens. These indings a e consis en wi h he exis ence o p essu es om ci izens ega ding decision-making p ocess and how esou ces a e used, leading municipali ies o educe he asymme y o in o ma ion by disclosing in o ma ion. I shows ha municipal managemen changed owa ds mo e anspa ency, ying o espond o ci izens and o he s akeholde s’ p essu es. Fu he mo e, he e is empi ical e idence ha ce ain in e nal and ex e nal ac o s o he municipali ies in luence in o ma ion disclosu e. The ac o s ha ha e a signi ican e ec on in o ma ion disclosu e and d i e a mo e anspa en communica ion p ocess a e: inancial dependence, in e ne access, unemploymen , elec o al u nou , and poli ical i al y. Despi e he ini ial expec a ions, poli ical ideology had no signi ican e ec on he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e. Conside ing he p o ince capi al municipali ies and hose who a e no p o ince capi al, he esul s show he e a e di e ences in he ac o s ha in luence in o ma ion disclosu e. Hence, o p o ince capi al municipali ies, da a sugges ed ha ex e nal ac o s (unemploymen , elec o al u nou and in e ne access) ha e a signi ican e ec on in o ma ion disclosu e. Fo he no p o ince capi al municipali ies, bo h in e nal and ex e nal ac o s ( inancial depen- dence, poli ical i al y, unemploymen and in e ne access) ha e a signi ican e ec . On he o he hand, a iables such size o popula ion, educa ion le el and egion e ec in luenced in o ma ion disclosu e in he ull sample. Despi e he ini ial expec a ions, he egional pa y had no signi ican e ec in he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e in he ull sample; hese esul s we e simila o hose municipali ies ha a e no p o ince capi al. Howe e , hese a iables had no signi ican in luence in he p o ince capi al municipali ies. Ne e heless, he di e ence ound on municipali ies sugges s ha ins i u ional cha ac- e is ics could in luence in o ma ion disclosu e. In e nal ea u es o he municipali ies, such as o ganiza ional complexi y and cul u e and he s yle o public managemen , among o he s, could in luence he le el o in o ma ion disclosu e. This is wo h o s udy in u he s udies. The indings a e in line wi h he Agency Theo y, which pos ula e he exis ence o p essu e om ci izens on how decisions and ac ions a e aken, leading municipali ies o educe asym- me y o in o ma ion by disclosing in o ma ion. In he same way, acco ding o he Theo y o Legi imacy, municipali ies inc eased he le els o in o ma ion disclosu e as a way o legi imize he ac ions o poli ical leade s owa d ci izens. This sugges s ha ci izens a e demanding mo e F. Tejedo-Rome o, e al. / Con adu ía y Adminis ación 65(4) 2020, 1-29 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.22201/ ca.24488410e.2020.2299 25 openness and in o ma ion om poli icians due o he loss o con idence in hem. One o he main implica ions o p ac i ione s is ha in o ma ion disclosu e is a key aspec o educe in o ma ion asymme y be ween ci izens and poli icians, imp o e he communica- ion p ocess and inc ease accoun abili y. The highe he social engagemen and anspa ency, he mo e legi ima e is he decision-making p ocess o municipali ies. Go e nmen s should enhance he mechanisms o in o ma ion disclosu e, wo king side by side wi h in e na ional o ganiza ions o lea n om he in e na ional expe ience. On he o he hand, in e na ional o ganiza ions should encou age cen al go e nmen s o os e in o ma ion disclosu e, ac- coun abili y and anspa ency. As o he limi a ions o his esea ch, one has o poin ou da a a ailabili y. In o ma ion disclosu e was measu ed wi h a p oxy o he anspa ency index. The anspa ency index ocuses on he supply side, and i does no conside whe he he in o ma ion a ailable o ci izens is comple e, eliable, imely, easily comp ehensible and accessible. Howe e , he s udy does no analyse how ci izens pe cei e he in o ma ion. I would be in e es ing o ha e ex ensi e ques ionnai es om ci izens in each o he 100 municipali ies included in he da ase , in o de o assess hei le el o knowledge on hei municipali y’s ac i i ies and decisions. These opics would help expand he unde s anding on municipali ies’ disclosu e managemen . Since in o ma ion disclosu e is a complex issue, u u e esea ch should analyse he in luence o o he municipal in e nal ac o s, like cul u al aspec s, s a egic managemen , decision-making p ocess, which could in luence in o ma ion disclosu e and anspa ency. Acknowledgmen This s udy was conduc ed a he Resea ch Cen e in Poli ical Science (UIDB/ CPO/00758/2020), Uni e si y o Minho/Uni e si y o É o a and suppo ed by he Po uguese Founda ion o Science and Technology (FCT) and he Po uguese Minis y o Educa ion and Science h ough na ional unds Re e ences Albala e, D. (2013), The ins i u ional, economic and social de e minan s o local go e n- men anspa ency. Jou nal o Economic Policy Re o m, 16(1), 90-107. h ps://doi.o g/1 0.1080/17487870.2012.759422 Alcaide-Muñoz, L., Rod íguez-Bolí a , M. P., and López-He nández, A. M. (2013), Finan- cial de e minan s o imp o ing public sec o accoun abili y: a me a-analy ic s udy. T an-