Circular economy practices in fashion design education: the first phase of a case study

Academic Editors: Juan Carlos Mosquera Feijoo, Marcos García Alberti and Fernando Suárez Guerra Received: 4 December 2024 Revised: 8 January 2025 Accepted: 17 January 2025 Published: 24 January 2025 Citation: Moreira, S.; Felgueiras, H.P.; Marques, A.D. Circular Economy Practices in Fashion Design Education: The First Phase of a Case Study. Sustainability 2025,17, 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030951 Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Article Circular Economy Practices in Fashion Design Education: The First Phase of a Case Study Sofia Moreira *, Helena P. Felgueiras and António Dinis Marques Centre for Textile Science and Technology (2C2T), Department of Textile Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal; [email protected] (H.P.F.); [email protected] (A.D.M.) *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: With the growing significance of the circular economy (CE) agenda in the fashion industry and, consequently, in fashion design education, this work introduces the initial phase of a case study that aims to ascertain whether CE principles and sustainability are part of the curriculum and pedagogical approaches employed by educators in the Fashion Design Technician course (FDTC) (level 4, National Qualifications Framework—QNQ, and European Qualifications Framework—EQF). Additionally, it seeks to identify the methodologies, strategies, and educational activities used to address these themes. This research outlines the review of documentary sources that facilitated the definition of the study’s object and sample and describes the implementation of a questionnaire survey to forty educators teaching this course across various disciplines encompassing the three training components (sociocultural, scientific, and technological) in fifteen out of the sixteen Portuguese vocational schools, during the academic year 2023/24. This phase of the case study has led to the conclusion that while the technical course curriculum may not extensively cover CE and sustainability, these topics are integral components of most pedagogical practices among the surveyed teachers. The methodologies, strategies, and activities employed display a strong commitment to fostering sustainable practices, predominantly nurturing environmental awareness among students. Keywords: circular economy; sustainability; education; fashion design 1. Introduction The circular economy (CE) model has garnered significant interest in recent years [1] and is gaining global recognition as a fundamental shift is needed to address pressing issues like climate change, waste, pollution, and biodiversity loss, while aiming to establish a resilient, regenerative, and equitable economy capable of long-term sustainability [ 2 ]. In this model, “waste and pollution are designed out, and products and materials are kept in use” [ 3 ] (p. 5), with this being perceived as a mindset for solving the world’s most pressing issues. Aligned with the principles of CE—which aim to minimize environmental impact through the efficient use of resources for as long as possible [ 4 ]—is circular product design (CPD). CPD focuses on material selection and product design [ 5 ], emphasizing the creation of products intended for reuse, refurbishment, or recycling. This approach extends product lifecycles and reduces waste [ 6 ], further reinforcing the essential connection between CE and sustainable design practices. Sustainability 2025,17, 951 https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030951 Sustainability 2025,17, 951 2 of 20 This highlights the pivotal role of design in mitigating not only adverse social impacts but also environmental ones, as approximately 80% of a product’s environmental footprint is determined during its early design stages of development [7]. Therefore, designers are inherently engaged in the preliminary conceptualization of product development, wielding significant influence over all subsequent stages of production and use, and their actions can either exacerbate or ameliorate the product’s environmental footprint [ 8 ]. By playing a significant role in the sustainability crisis, as their actions contribute to both the problem and the solution, designers promote, on one hand, product obsolescence, product proliferation, material consumption, and pollution, and, on the other hand, they also propose more efficient products and services, contributing to community regeneration and empower individuals [9]. As fashion stands as one of the most polluting industries globally, there is also a rising acknowledgment of the CE agenda. It is increasingly evident that the current industrial linear model (“from cradle to grave” [ 10 ]) is not sustainable in the long run, making fashion designers recognized as focal in steering fashion towards sustainability. In a world marked by constant transition, Østergaard and Dan [ 11 ] aptly refer to designers as “agents of change”, emphasizing their proactive role. It is crucial for designers to understand that the (sustainable) choices they make during the design process carry substantial implications for the entire textile chain [ 12 ]. Hence, the literature unmistakably portrays designers as key agents of change, driving the transformation of fashion design practices towards sustainability and actively contributing to the goals of sustainable development [8,11–15]. Therefore, to address the evolving paradigm of the fashion industry, it is crucial to recognize the essential need for training future fashion designers to effectively address the industry’s myriad challenges [ 16 ]. Consequently, to keep pace with the rapidly fastchanging world, fashion design education must undergo significant restructuring. Today’s world is vastly different from the era in which design originated: fashion design education imparts theoretical knowledge and practical skills related to the design process. These traditional design education models have prepared designers to address conventional industrial design challenges [ 17 ]. However, it is imperative for young designers to also possess literacy in sustainability [ 18 ], so fashion design education serves as a platform that equips them with the requisite knowledge and skills to integrate sustainable fashion practices into their professional endeavors and navigate an increasingly unpredictable industry [ 8 ]. Education plays a crucial role in providing future generations of product designers and their educators with the required knowledge, skills, and responsibility to make informed and conscientious decisions within their field [ 7 ]. Design education can, thus, serve as a fundamental tool in establishing an ethical fashion system and fostering social change [8]. Given these premises, the vital role that educational institutions (and teachers) play in this transition towards the CE becomes increasingly clear [8, 19]. Incorporating CE principles into education will not only provide learners with essential system-thinking skills but will also cultivate the mindsets needed to actively shape CE [ 19 ]. This incorporation narrows the divide between real-life experiences and those within the educational setting, transforming the educational system from being a barrier to being recognized as an essential part of the solution [ 20 ]. Recognizing the necessity of aligning our education systems with the evolving dynamics of the fashion industry is a good starting point for instigating change [20]. To enhance the performances of future fashion designers, it is imperative to refocus the curricula at design schools [ 18 , 20 ]. Traditionally, fashion design pedagogy prompts students to develop a product assortment reflecting their individual lifestyle or aesthetic preferences, often overlooking ecological considerations [ 18 ]. For this reason, it is crucial to determine Sustainability 2025,17, 951 3 of 20 whether CE principles and sustainability are integrated into the curriculum and pedagogical approaches of the Fashion Design Technician course (FDTC) in Portugal (level 4, National Qualifications Framework—QNQ, and European Qualifications Framework—EQF). Hence, the initial aim of this case study is to determine how CE principles and sustainability are integrated into the FDTC curriculum. This investigation goes beyond just analyzing documentary sources; it also involves gathering insights from teachers through the implementation of a questionnaire survey. Forty educators from various disciplines—encompassing sociocultural, scientific, and technological components—participated in the survey across fifteen out of sixteen Portuguese vocational schools during the 2023/24 academic year. This methodological approach not only identifies the presence of CE and sustainability themes but also sheds light on the methodologies, strategies, and educational activities used to address them. The findings from this phase of the case study indicated that while the FDTC curriculum may not completely cover CE and sustainability, these topics are essential components of the teaching methods employed by the surveyed educators. The methods, strategies, and activities employed highlight a solid dedication to promoting sustainable practices, especially by raising students’ environmental consciousness. 2. Materials and Methods The initial phase of the presented exploratory case study is part of a broader investigation aimed at tackling the following research question: “How can teaching-learning methodologies and strategies for the CE be redesigned to promote the adoption of concern and intervention behaviors regarding textile waste among high school students?” Therefore, the primary objective of this case study is to ascertain the current practices in classroom settings with students at this educational level, specifically examining whether the CE principles and sustainability are integrated into the curriculum and pedagogical approaches of teachers instructing fashion design in secondary education. The methodology was crafted with this objective in mind, commencing with the delineation of the study’s object and sample selection, drawing upon various documented sources. With these parameters clearly established, a questionnaire survey was administered to the selected sample. 2.1. Study Object In Portugal, as outlined by the Basic Law of the Education System [ 21 ] (subsection II, Art. 9 º and 10 º ), secondary education spans three academic years (10th, 11th, and 12th grades), culminating in the 12th grade as the final stage of mandatory, universal, and free education for all students up to the age of 18. Upon successful completion of basic education, students are eligible to enter this educational level, which aligns with Level 3 of the International Standard Classification of Education—ISCED [ 22 ], and Levels 3 and 4 of the National Qualifications Framework (QNQ) and European Qualifications Framework (EQF). The QNQ serves as a unique reference framework for categorizing all qualifications generated within the scope of the national educational and training system, regardless of their acquisition method, valuing skills acquired through formal, non-formal, and informal channels equally. This approach stems from the adoption of “EQF principles regarding the description of national qualifications in terms of learning outcomes” [ 23 ]. With its primary aim of enhancing transparency and comparability of individual qualifications, the EQF serves as a common European reference framework that allows for the alignment of qualification systems from various countries, serving as a conversion device to make qualifications clearer and more understandable across different countries and systems in Europe [ 24 ]. In Portugal, the QNQ aligns directly with the EQF, both comprising eight Sustainability 2025,17, 951 4 of 20 distinct qualification levels. Each level is delineated by a comprehensive set of indicators that outline the expected outcomes in terms of Knowledge, Skills, and Competencies, as detailed in Annex I of Decree n.º 782/2009 [23]. Considering the study’s target audience, only levels 3 and 4 correspond to secondary education. Level 3 is excluded, as its qualifications are tailored for “secondary education aimed at preparing for higher education”, whereas the educational and training pathways encompass “secondary education, route to further studies” or “level 3, without completion of secondary education” [ 23 ] (Annexes II and III). Consequently, level 4 qualification corresponds to secondary education obtained through dual certification pathways or secondary education aimed at furthering higher education with the addition of professional internships for a minimum of 6 months [23]. With the qualification level and area established, the object of study of this case study, according to the National Catalog of Classifications (CNQ) [ 25 ], falls within the domain of education and training 542—Textile, Clothing, Footwear, and Leather Industries. This sector comprises thirty qualifications, of which only two align directly with both level 4 QNQ/EQF and the specific field of study, fashion design. Among these, only the FDTC (qualification code 542107) is being taught in the academic year 2023/24 in sixteen schools nationwide, as confirmed by Moreira and Dinis [ 26 ], supplemented by the latest information available from the Educational Offer Portal [ 27 ]. Each of these educational institutions has been contacted to verify the inclusion of the FDTC in their curriculum offerings, and to initiate communication with the study participants, coordinators, and educators overseeing the diverse disciplines and short-term training units (UFCDs). The process leading to the definition of the study object is presented in a funnel diagram (Figure 1). This diagram illustrates the progression from general to specific concepts in the educational context, starting with Secondary Education in Portugal (Levels 3 and 4 QNQ), narrowing to Level 4 (Dual Certification Pathways), and further narrowing to the FDTC Qualification (Code 542107), highlighting how the study object is defined throughout the process. Sustainability 2025, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 22 comprising eight distinct qualification levels. Each level is delineated by a comprehensive set of indicators that outline the expected outcomes in terms of Knowledge, Skills, and Competencies, as detailed in Annex I of Decree n.º 782/2009 [23]. Considering the study’s target audience, only levels 3 and 4 correspond to secondary education. Level 3 is excluded, as its qualifications are tailored for “secondary education aimed at preparing for higher education”, whereas the educational and training pathways encompass “secondary education, route to further studies” or “level 3, without completion of secondary education” [23] (Annexes II and III). Consequently, level 4 qualification corresponds to secondary education obtained through dual certification pathways or secondary education aimed at furthering higher education with the addition of professional internships for a minimum of 6 months [23]. With the qualification level and area established, the object of study of this case study, according to the National Catalog of Classifications (CNQ) [25], falls within the domain of education and training 542—Textile, Clothing, Footwear, and Leather Industries. This sector comprises thirty qualifications, of which only two align directly with both level 4 QNQ/EQF and the specific field of study, fashion design. Among these, only the FDTC (qualification code 542107) is being taught in the academic year 2023/24 in sixteen schools nationwide, as confirmed by Moreira and Dinis [26], supplemented by the latest information available from the Educational Offer Portal [27]. Each of these educational institutions has been contacted to verify the inclusion of the FDTC in their curriculum offerings, and to initiate communication with the study participants, coordinators, and educators overseeing the diverse disciplines and short-term training units (UFCDs). The process leading to the definition of the study object is presented in a funnel diagram (Figure 1). This diagram illustrates the progression from general to specific concepts in the educational context, starting with Secondary Education in Portugal (Levels 3 and 4 QNQ), narrowing to Level 4 (Dual Certification Pathways), and further narrowing to the FDTC Qualification (Code 542107), highlighting how the study object is defined throughout the process. Figure 1. Funnel diagram illustrating the breakdown of the study object. To obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the study’s object, a variety of documentary sources were examined, including governmental records and the Figure 1. Funnel diagram illustrating the breakdown of the study object. To obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the study’s object, a variety of documentary sources were examined, including governmental records and the curricu- Sustainability 2025,17, 951 5 of 20 lum framework for course 542107—FDTC, a level 4 qualification with dual certification, currently valid in 2023. Chronologically, on 21 November 2006, Decree No. 1291/2006 was issued, which established a vocational course for fashion design technicians with the aim of providing professional training in this field. The order outlined a study plan for the course, specifying subjects for the scientific, sociocultural, and technical training components, totaling 3100 h of instruction [28]. In 2007, Decree-Law No. 396/2007 created the National Qualifications Catalog (CNQ) and assigned the National Agency for Qualification and Vocational Education, IP (ANQEP), the responsibility to elaborate upon and update this catalog. Updates to the catalog must be published in the Official Bulletin of Employment (BTE), as well as on the CNQ website [ 29 ] (Article 6, paragraph 7). Subsequently, Order No. 13456/2008 [ 30 ], dated 14 May approved the initial version of the CNQ, which outlines the framework for technical training in fashion design within training area 542, including the professional profile of a fashion design technician. The most recent update of the CNQ can be found in BTE, n.º 27, dated 22 July 2020 [31]. Thus, according to the CNQ, this training broadly covers activities such as planning, conceptualization, and designing of new clothing products and collections for men, women, children, jeanswear, and streetwear. This comprehensive process considers various factors including international fashion market trends, quality standards, functional requirements, and technical production constraints. As for the professional role of a fashion design technician, it encompasses seven key responsibilities, spanning from analyzing market trends and fashion forecasts to planning collections and designing garments, overseeing the entire production process, presenting, and promoting products to stakeholders and buyers, and ultimately, preparing reports and documentation to monitor their activities [32]. According to the level 4 descriptors of the QNQ, the ANQEP also outlines the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the fashion design technician reference framework, all of which are to be cultivated throughout the three year study plan. This plan, as delineated in the reviewed governmental documents, is structured into five components (sociocultural, scientific, technological, complementary, and work context training), each of which includes disciplines or UFCDs with varying hourly loads and credit points. The sociocultural and scientific training components encompass fundamental subjects common to all secondary education programs, such as Portuguese, Foreign Language, and Mathematics. Additionally, these components feature subjects more tailored to the focus area of this training, including Descriptive Geometry and History and Culture of Arts. The technological training component comprises UFCDs designed to foster the technical aspects of the fashion designer profession, covering areas such as design, pattern making, project development, illustration, graphic composition, and more (Table 1). Table 1. Simplified reference framework for the global training of the FDTC [32]. Component 1Discipline or UFCD Sociocultural Training Portuguese and Portuguese as a Non-Native Language (PLNM) Foreign Language I, II, or III Integration Area Physical Education Information and Communication Technology (ICT) or School Offer Citizenship and Development Scientific Training Descriptive Geometry History and Culture of the Arts Mathematics Moral and Religious Education Sustainability 2025,17, 951 6 of 20 Table 1. Cont. Component 1Discipline or UFCD Technological Training Basics of Jeanswear Jeanswear Design Project Basics of Streetwear Streetwear Design Project Development of Women’s Classics Women’s Apparel Design Project Development of Men’s Classics Men’s Apparel Design Project Dress Pattern Transformation Shirt Pattern Transformation Skirt and Pants Pattern Transformation Coat Pattern Making Apparel Assembly Apparel Manufacturing Bitmap Image and Vector Drawing Relationship Fashion Design Project Using CAD CAD Illustration Graphic Composition Commercial Fashion Design Project Creative Fashion Design Project Individual Collection Planning Individual Collection Development Volume Experimentation Prototype Modeling Prototype Construction Final Garment Construction Work Context Training Workplace training in vocational courses constitutes an autonomous component. Workplace training aims to help students acquire and develop technical, relational, and organizational skills relevant to the professional qualification to be obtained and is subject to its own regulation. 1 The complementary training component is not included, as it consists of a variety of optional UFCDs integrated into the curriculum according to the schools’ choices. Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Fashion Design Technician Course Curriculum To examine the incorporation of CE and sustainability topics into the FDTC curriculum, the reference provided in the CNQ [ 32 ] was consulted. For the sociocultural and scientific training components, two documents were reviewed: “Program” and the “Essential Learnings” [ 33 ]. These documents outline the subjects studied, the skills to be developed, objectives for each learning phase, learning scenarios, and suggested resources for specific activities. The analysis covered commonly attended subjects such as Portuguese, Foreign Language, Area of Integration, Physical Education, and ICT, Descriptive Geometry, History and Culture of the Arts, and Mathematics. The findings can be extrapolated to related subjects, such as Portuguese and Portuguese as a Non-Native Language, with similar outcomes. However, for the UFCDs in the technological training component, only objectives and content for each UFCD are provided, unlike the comprehensive documentation available for other subjects. Upon reviewing all of the previously gathered information, it becomes evident that the themes of CE and sustainability are absent in the contents and objectives outlined for the UFCDs of the technological training component, which are tailored to the fashion domain [ 29 ]. This is attributed to the succinct nature of the information provided, which primarily emphasizes technical matters. Among the sociocultural training subjects, only three—Foreign Language, Area of Integration, and Physical Education—exhibit some connection to the subjects being studied, although in some instances, the connection is quite minimal and primarily associated with the environmental aspect. Sustainability 2025,17, 951 7 of 20 The Foreign Language discipline, specifically English Continuation [ 33 ] (“Program”, pp. 46–47), emphasizes the importance of enhancing fundamental skills in interpretation (listening and reading), and production (speaking and writing), as well as more broader skills such as sociocultural and learning skills. The spotlight is on Module 6, titled “The World Around Us”, which focuses on environmental issues, encouraging students to adopt an environmentally conscious stance. The learning objectives of this module range from identifying environmental challenges to understanding contemporary natural resources and methods of environmental preservation, as well as recognizing the role of entities in managing these resources and using vocabulary related to environmental issues. Regarding learning situations, only one stands out, aiming to stimulate reflection on attitudes and behaviors towards ecological issues, which can be developed through comments on controversial quotations, newspaper articles, documentaries, and informational brochures on the main threats to environmental balance and proposals for environmental protection. These practices not only boost proficiency in the English language but also promote awareness and skills in environmental sustainability. The Area of Integration discipline is structured around three main domains: “The Individual”, “Society”, and “The World”, each subdivided into three thematic units, with each unit containing three problem-themes. In total, there are twenty-seven problemthemes, with only two standing out: problem-theme “3.3—Man-Nature: a sustainable relationship?” and “7.2—A global challenge: sustainable development”. Problem-theme 3.3 addresses the interaction between man and nature, encouraging students to reflect on environmental issues and adopt a sustainable approach. The environmental issue focuses on the depletion of natural resources and waste production. The curriculum provides a comprehensive framework outlining learning objectives, assessment criteria, and resources for this problem-theme, underscoring the significance of sustainability [33] (“Program”, pp. 32–33). Subsequently, problem-theme 7.2 examines environmental issues such as global imperatives, emphasizing the pivotal role of sustainable development in securing a dignified future for succeeding generations. It highlights the impact of increased human activities and significant damage caused to the environment, affecting the atmosphere, soil, water, and biodiversity. It also emphasizes the importance of promoting sustainable and supportive human development, preserving the physical environment, and managing natural resources rationally. Additionally, it underscores the need to respect socioeconomic, political, and cultural conditions to ensure that future generations enjoy a dignified life and have the freedom to exercise their rights [ 33 ] (“Essential Learnings”, p. 73). The learning objectives for this problem-theme revolve around sustainable development, with learning situations focusing heavily on the analysis of real documents, including journalistic and governmental sources. Finally, for the Physical Education discipline, the program is structured into three competency areas: “Body Awareness and Mastery”, “Well-being, Health, and Environment”, and “Interpersonal Relationships” [ 33 ]. It also lists extension areas for professional courses, covering a variety of physical activities, from team sports to dance and nature exploration. All these areas are divided into modules, with Module 9, focused on Nature Exploration Activities, and Module 14, Physical Activities, Contexts, and Health I, being particularly noteworthy. Both address concepts related to environmental quality and pollution, encouraging students to consider environmental preservation in their physical activities. For Module 14, methodological guidelines are presented, which include more theoretical content exposure sessions, although the curriculum actively promotes project-based and group activities to enrich the teaching-learning experience [ 33 ] (“Essential Learnings”, pp. 36–38). Sustainability 2025,17, 951 8 of 20 In summary, the curricula of the three analyzed disciplines, especially the Integration Area discipline, demonstrate a notable commitment to ecological matters and sustainable human development. There is a clear emphasis on raising awareness of environmental issues, such as preserving natural resources and promoting sustainable practices. This reflects an educational trend towards greater environmental awareness and social responsibility among students, preparing them to address contemporary environmental challenges. While CE is not explicitly mentioned, its foundational principles can be viewed as inherently linked to discussions on sustainability. 2.2. Questionnaire Survey The implemented questionnaire aims primarily to ascertain, in this initial stage, whether CE and sustainability are integrated into the pedagogical approach of FDTC teachers, and to explore the methodologies, strategies, and educational activities employed in addressing these themes within the classroom setting. The more specific objectives include the following: • Evaluating the emphasis placed on sustainability issues in the curriculum of the discipline(s) taught by teachers in the course’s study program. • Identifying sustainability concepts already embedded in the curriculum of the discipline(s) within this course’s study program, as indicated by educators. • Establishing connections between disciplines and UFCDs taught, and the integration and significance attributed to sustainability issues within this course. These specific objectives, particularly those related to the FDTC curriculum, enable a comparative analysis with the examination of documentary sources outlined in Section Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Fashion Design Technician Course Curriculum of this document. Hence, the questionnaire was structured into several sections, with the first section containing a brief introduction to the research project, the purpose of the survey, the study’s target audience, and the data management protocols. Participation in subsequent sections of the questionnaire was contingent upon granting consent for data processing, as stipulated in the “Obtaining Informed Consent” section, ensuring compliance with ethical and legal principles. The “Personal Identification” (Figure 2) and “Professional Identification” (Figure 3) sections aimed at delineate the study sample, featuring single-choice, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions. In the first section, the survey addressed the respondent’s age group, educational level, and area of specialization, while the following section identified their teaching institution, roles held, disciplines or UFCDs taught, and academic year details for the 2023/24 academic year in the FDTC. The subsequent section, titled “Framework”, focused on questions directly related to the analyzed themes. It encompassed a range of inquiries, including rating scales (from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree”), dichotomous queries, single-choice options, open-ended prompts, and those with conditional logic. All survey data are available in the University of Minho Data Repository for further review and analysis [34]. Sustainability 2025,17, 951 9 of 20 Sustainability 2025, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 22 Sample Before delving into the sample itself, it is important to note that participants in the survey’s initial section acknowledge the study’s objectives and consent to the handling of their data. They understand that their participation is voluntary and confidential, with responses kept anonymous and aggregated for educational, academic, and scientific purposes. The sample comprised forty teachers teaching the FDTC during the 2023/24 academic year. Their age distribution was as follows: one instructor fell within the 20 to 30 age bracket (2.5%), six were aged between 31 and 40 (15%), fifteen fell between 41 and 50 (37.5%), seventeen were between 51 and 60 (42.5%), and only one was over 61 years old (2.5%) (Figure 2). The majority of educators held qualifications equivalent to level 6 or higher on the QNQ. Twenty-seven had a bachelor’s or undergraduate degree (level 6 QNQ), eleven possessed a master’s degree (level 7 QNQ), and one held a doctorate (level 8 QNQ). Only one instructor held qualifications at level 3 of the QNQ, which is secondary education aimed at further studies at a higher level. In terms of their areas of training, twenty educators identified fashion and textiles as their exclusive or combined area, while the remaining twenty were spread across eight diverse areas: arts, psychology, sports, philosophy, product design, communication design, social studies, and mathematics. Figure 2. Descriptive analysis of the sample—personal identification information [34]. Among the sixteen schools offering the FDTC this academic year, fifteen took part in the study, representing most of the Portuguese institutions [34]. The distribution of schools in mainland Portugal was concentrated along the coast, primarily in the municipalities of Porto and Braga (North) and in Lisbon (Center) (Figure 3). The sample Figure 2. Descriptive analysis of the sample—personal identification information [34]. Sustainability 2025, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 22 distribution was quite varied, with one school having a notable presence with seven teachers. Regarding the thirty-seven disciplines or UFCDs included in the course, various combinations were reported, resulting in 312 recorded responses. Of these, 270 were exclusively related to UFCDs in the technological training component, involving 27 teachers. Interestingly, the UFCD “Commercial Fashion Project” garnered the highest number of responses, with 15 teachers. Also, of the forty respondents, eleven held multiple roles, including coordination of the FDTC. As for the distribution of responses by school year, the majority lied within the three school years (10th, 11th, and 12th grades), with seventeen responses. Eight responses were from the 10th and 11th grades, while six were specific to the 10th grade. Figure 3. Descriptive analysis of the sample—professional identification information [34]. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Fashion Design Technician Course Curriculum—Perspective of the Surveyed Teachers To explore the perspective of the surveyed teachers regarding the integration of CE and sustainability principles in the curriculum of the FDTC, they were prompted to select just one subject or UFCD they teach, considering the expectation that teachers would teach more than one subject/UFCD. As a result, 10 educators were responsible for teaching subjects within the sociocultural training component, 4 within the scientific training component, and 26 UFCDs within the technological training component. Figure 3. Descriptive analysis of the sample—professional identification information [34]. Sustainability 2025,17, 951 16 of 20 Table 7. Educators’ responses organized by the key concept ‘Practical Applications’ [34]. Practical Applications “I don’t use paper.” “Utilizing materials (e.g., fabrics and others) for more creative projects.” “Upcycling project (. . .); in the development projects of new pieces, we collect all the waste, gathering and using them in future projects. (. . .) Many of the textile materials used in the creation of our pieces are second-hand. (. . .)” “Alert to waste, reuse of materials with an understanding of the process, multiple use of created pieces.” “(. . .) For example, in the last proposal, students were asked to do a project on textile fibers and research eco-sustainable fibers, specifying characteristics, origin, and application. We also utilize our textile waste to create new fabrics later. This year we will create new materials with classroom leftovers to make objects (. . .)” “Research of materials, searching for sustainable raw materials at fashion fairs, monitoring the market for fashion trends related to sustainability.” “Viewing and analyzing case studies on the impact of fashion and the textile industry, (. . .).” “Avoid paper and fabric waste. Reuse fabrics. (. . .)” “Guidance in researching and practicing sustainable options in the creation and execution of fashion projects.” “I incorporate, (. . .), such as upcycling strategies, reuse, recycling, and new product construction. Fashion with added value based on extending its life cycle.” “Upcycling as a form of creative unlocking.” “Case analysis, (. . .)” “Projects developed with material reuse; waste separation in the classroom.” “(. . .) In more practical work, we reuse all the scraps from cutting pieces to make new fabrics or new pieces. We have our project ‘Trocas e Baldrocas’, which involves bringing clothes we no longer use, and students exchange them among themselves. (. . .)” 4. Conclusions and Future Recommendations After a review and interpretation of the documentary sources regarding the presence of CE and sustainability in the FDTC curriculum and after analyzing the perspectives of the educators on this matter, several conclusions and future recommendations emerged. Firstly, it was evident that there is a significant gap in the explicit inclusion of CE and sustainability in the curriculum documents of the disciplines in overall. This discrepancy has been documented by Sousa, Marques, and Broega [ 35 ], who analyzed the curricula of diverse Fashion Design courses, spanning from the professional level (level 4 QNQ/EQF) to higher education levels (levels 6, 7, and 8 QNQ/EQF). Their findings revealed that sustainability often emerges sporadically as a peripheral or isolated topic within specific subjects, rather than serving as the guiding principle that shapes the overall structure of these courses. This analysis can be extrapolated to the study, where only a few disciplinary curriculum documents addressed the theme in a shallow manner. This incongruity becomes even more pronounced within the UFCDs of the technological training component of the FDTC curriculum, where references were notably absent. With the direct connection to fashion design in these short-duration units, one would expect a more thorough integration of these themes. However, juxtaposing this, the viewpoints of the educators revealed strong support for the inclusion of various subjects related to these themes in the curriculum, indicating a solid commitment to promoting sustainability in Fashion Design education. Additionally, the majority of the surveyed educators had already integrated these issues into their pedagogical practice, as evidenced by the testimony of one educator that teaches various UFCDs in the technological component, and highlights that: “In all the UFCDs I teach, I emphasize to students the importance of contributing to a more sustainable fashion. However, despite this emphasis, it is not very evident in the proposed curriculum objectives, leading me to believe that the program is quite outdated” [34]. As such, concerns have also arisen regarding the lack of alignment between teachers’ expectations and the content of existing curriculum documents. Therefore, it can be asserted that promoting greater collaboration between educational policy makers and teaching professionals is essential to ensure that the curriculum truly meets the needs and expectations of the teaching community. It may even be suggested that there is a need for a curriculum review to incorporate these themes more comprehensively and inclusively, ensuring that students receive a holistic education that prepares them to face the contemporary challenges of the fashion industry in a more sustainable manner. With this curriculum review, it is also crucial to emphasize the importance of providing the Sustainability 2025,17, 951 17 of 20 necessary resources to encourage the adoption of sustainability practices and ensure their effective implementation by educators. This includes securing funding for sustainabilityfocused initiatives and providing updated teaching materials. While academia plays a pivotal role in preparing professionals and fostering responsible citizenship [ 36 ], its success depends on strong support from both governmental and school-level institutions to turn these objectives into tangible outcomes. Regarding the methodologies, strategies, and tools used in the classroom to address these themes, as previously mentioned, the majority of educators asserted that sustainable development is an integral part of their pedagogical practice. This demonstrates their dedication to fostering sustainable practices within the fashion industry and cultivating environmental awareness among students. Notably, there is an emphasis on material reuse, the use of recycled materials, the repurposing of textile waste, and upcycling techniques to create products, thereby minimizing textile waste. Furthermore, there was a clear focus on researching more sustainable materials, monitoring sustainable fashion trends, and exploring alternative, more conscientious approaches. In addition to waste reduction efforts, educators also emphasized energy consciousness, advocating for the reduction of not only fabric waste but also paper, water, and electricity consumption, thereby encouraging more efficient and mindful practices. Given the interest and commitment demonstrated by educators in providing a more holistic perspective on the fashion industry, it is clear that continuous training opportunities are essential to support their efforts. The findings highlight the need to integrate CE principles into the curriculum, which, in turn, underscores the importance of equipping teachers with the necessary skills and knowledge in this area. Tailored workshops or formal professional development programs could significantly enhance educators’ understanding of CE practices, enabling them to incorporate these concepts more effectively into their teaching. Aligning the curriculum with CE principles would not only empower educators but also foster greater student engagement, increasing awareness of sustainable practices and their importance within the fashion design industry and beyond. Education and raising awareness among students were central aspects, utilizing a variety of educational methods such as debates, lectures, documentary screenings, practical activities, field trips, case study analysis, and oral presentations. Some of these methods for teaching sustainable design, as suggested by Watkins et al. [ 7 ], include both generic and specific approaches, such as seminars, workshops, flipped classrooms, lectures, videos, and online classes. The goal is to deepen comprehension of the environmental, social, political, ethical, and economic challenges within the fashion industry and encourage reflection on possible solutions. Teachers also addressed the incorporation of sustainability principles into fashion projects presented to students, encouraging critical analysis and the pursuit of more conscientious solutions. Instruction centered on practical project development emerges as the predominant approach, fostering an advancement in various skills [7]. Dialogue was also presented as a strategy, with teachers reinforcing open communication with students about the importance of environmental preservation and the consequences of fashion industry practices, thus motivating them to contribute to a more sustainable future. Utilizing seminars as a teaching method also facilitates interactive presentations and discussions, thereby enhancing subject assimilation and nurturing critical thinking abilities [7]. The reported pedagogical approaches exhibit an interdisciplinary orientation, incorporating knowledge from various areas to address sustainability in fashion, including environmental, socio-emotional, economic, and ethical considerations. The integration of interdisciplinary methodologies seeks to stimulate curiosity, exploration, critical thinking, intercultural understanding, environmental awareness, and a problem-solving mindset Sustainability 2025,17, 951 18 of 20 among students [ 12 , 37 ]. Finally, it is worth mentioning that some teachers involved the school community by presenting projects to the community, organizing fairs, and initiatives that encouraged active student participation and raised awareness among community members. While valuable initial insights have been gained regarding the integration of CE and sustainability within the pedagogical framework of the FDTC, additional exploration is warranted. Engaging in interviews with teachers and course coordinators, especially those overseeing the UFCDs of the technological training component, may offer deeper insights into the methodologies, strategies, and activities relevant to CE and sustainability in fashion design education. Ultimately, these findings will have a practical application in the subsequent action research phase, guiding the development of more targeted and effective sustainable teaching-learning strategies. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su17030951/s1, and the DataRepositóriUM: https://doi.org/10 .34622/datarepositorium/GVGTRK [34]. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.M.; methodology, S.M. and A.D.M.; validation, S.M.; investigation, S.M.; data curation, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; writing—review and editing, H.P.F. and A.D.M.; supervision, A.D.M.; funding acquisition, H.P.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Competitiveness Program and the National Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal (FCT) under the projects UID/CTM/00264/2020 of Centre for Textile Science and Technology (2C2T) on its components Base (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00264/2020) and programmatic (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00264/2020). S.M. acknowledges FCT for PhD studentship 2022.13244.BD. H.P.F. acknowledges FCT for auxiliary researcher contract with reference 626 2021.02720.CEECIND. Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the anonymization of the data. Informed Consent Statement: The online questionnaires used/completed for the purposes of the study were anonymous. Informed consent was obtained by requiring participants to check a consent box in the first question of the questionnaire before proceeding. Data Availability Statement: Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. References 1. Circle Economy. Circularity Gap Report 2024: Closing the Global Circularity Gap. 2024. Available online: https://www. circularity-gap.world/2024 (accessed on 18 September 2024). 2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. The Circular Economy in Higher Education–Insights from Course Offerings in London and New York. 2021. Available online: https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/eychfk79tktg-grlsty/@/preview/1?o (accessed on 16 April 2024). 3. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Vision of a Circular Economy for Fashion. 2020. Available online: https://emf.thirdlight.com/ link/nbwff6ugh01m-y15u3p/@/preview/1?o (accessed on 2 February 2024). 4. Sarker, M.R.; Islam, M.; Marma, U.A.S.; Alam, M.M.; Shabur, M.A.; Rahman, M.S. Circular economy strategies: A fuzzy DEMATEL decision framework for the fast fashion footwear manufacture. Discov. Sustain. 2024,5, 260. [CrossRef] 5. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Volume 1. 2013. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-aneconomic-and-business-rationale-for-an (accessed on 2 February 2024). 6. Bonelli, F.; Caferra, R.; Morone, P. In need of a sustainable and just fashion industry: Identifying challenges and opportunities through a systematic literature review in a Global North/Global South perspective. Discov. Sustain. 2024,5, 186. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2025,17, 951 19 of 20 7. Watkins, M.; Casamayor, J.L.; Ramirez, M.; Moreno, M.; Faludi, J.; Pigosso, D.C.A. Sustainable product design education: Current practice. She Ji J. Des. Econ. Innovat. 2021,7, 611–637. [CrossRef] 8. Murzyn-Kupisz, M.; Hołuj, D. Fashion Design Education and Sustainability: Towards an Equilibrium between Craftsmanship and Artistic and Business Skills? Educ. Sci. 2021,11, 531. [CrossRef] 9. Fletcher, K.; Dewberry, E. Demi: A case study in design for sustainability. Int. J. High. Educ. 2002,3, 38–47. [CrossRef] 10. Braungart, M.; McDonough, W. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things; North Point Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. 11. Østergaard, T.; Dan, C. Circling round change. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2021), Herning, Denmark, 9–10 September 2021. [CrossRef] 12. Lara, L.; Cabral, I.; Cunha, J. Color in Sustainable Fashion: A Reflection on the Importance of Design Education. In Advances in Design, Music and Arts II. EIMAD 2022; Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, R., Correia Castilho, L., Dias, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 25, pp. 238–247. [CrossRef] 13. Kozlowski, A.; Bardecki, M.; Searcy, C. Tools for sustainable fashion design: An analysis of their fitness for purpose. Sustainability 2019,11, 3581. [CrossRef] 14. Grose, L. Fashion design education for sustainability practice. Reflections on undergraduate level teaching. In Sustainability in Fashion and Textiles. Values, Design, Production and Consumption; Gardetti, M.A., Torres, A.L., Eds.; Routledge/Green Leaf Publishing: London, UK, 2013; pp. 134–147. 15. Fletcher, K.; Dewberry, E.; Goggin, P. Sustainable Consumption by Design. In Exploring Sustainable Consumption: Conceptual Issues and Policy Perspectives; Cohen, M., Murphy, J., Eds.; Elseiver: London, UK, 2001; pp. 213–224. 16. Schulz, F.E.; Freire, L.H.; da Cunha, J.L.F.L. The 7 Complex Lessons from Edgar Morin Applied in Fashion Design Education for Sustainability. In Advances in Design, Music and Arts II. EIMAD 2022; Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, R., Correia Castilho, L., Dias, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 25, pp. 193–208. [CrossRef] 17. Collina, L. Designing design education: An articulated programme of collective open design activities. Des. J. 2017 ,20, 1000–1013. [CrossRef] 18. Binde, M.; Freimane, A. Is there a zero in a fashion design? In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University, London, UK, 8–9 September 2022. [CrossRef] 19. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future. 2017. Available online: https://emf.thirdlight.com/file/24/uiwtaHvud8YIG_uiSTauTlJH74/A%20New%20Textiles%20Economy:%20Redesigning% 20fashion%E2%80%99s%20future.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024). 20. Onur, D.A. Integrating Circular Economy, Collaboration and Craft Practice in Fashion Design Education in Developing Countries: A Case from Turkey. Fash. Pract. 2020,12, 55–77. [CrossRef] 21. Basic Law of the Education System. Lei n. º 46/86, de 14 de outubro, com alterações introduzidas por: Lei n. º 115/97; Lei n. º 49/2005; Lei n. º 85/2009; Lei n. º 16/2023. Diário da República eletrónico. 1986. Available online: https://dre.pt/dre/legislacaoconsolidada/lei/1986-34444975 (accessed on 20 April 2023). 22. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. 2012. Available online: https: //uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023). 23. Decree, n. º 782/2009, de 23 de julho. Diário da República Eletrónico, 1 ª Série, n. º 141, 4776–4778. 2009. Available online: https://files.dre.pt/1s/2009/07/14100/0477604778.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023). 24. Rocha, A.L.; Guia Interpretativo do Quadro Nacional de Qualificações. Agência Nacional para a Qualificação e Ensino Profissional, IP. 2014. Available online: https://anqep.gov.pt/np4/file/312/QNQ_GuiaInterpretativoQNQ_2014.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2023). 25. ANQEP Agência Nacional para a Qualificação e o Ensino Profissional, IP. Catálogo Nacional de Qualificações (CNQ)–Qualificações de dupla certificação. 2008. Available online: https://catalogo.anqep.gov.pt/qualificacoesPesquisa (accessed on 16 April 2023). 26. Moreira, S.; Dinis Marques, A. Education for the circular economy: Analysis of the high school curriculum for fashion design courses in Portugal. In Proceedings of the 16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2022), Online Conference, 7–8 March 2022. [CrossRef] 27. Educational Offer Portal-Portal da Oferta Educativa. Available online: https://www.ofertaformativa.gov.pt (accessed on 16 April 2024). 28. Decree n. º 1291/2006 de 21 de novembro. Diário da República Eletrónico, 1. ª Série, n. º 224, 8000–8001. 2006. Available online: https://files.dre.pt/1s/2006/11/22400/80008001.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024). 29. Decree-Law n. º 396/2007, de 31 de dezembro. Diário da República Eletrónico, 1. ª Série, n. º 251, 9165–9173. 2007. Available online: https://files.dre.pt/1s/2007/12/25100/0916509173.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024). 30. Order n. º 13456/2008, de 14 de maio. Diário da República Eletrónico, 2. ª Série, n. º 93, 21591–21597. 2008. Available online: https://files.diariodarepublica.pt/2s/2008/05/093000000/2159121597.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024). Sustainability 2025,17, 951 20 of 20 31. Boletim do Trabalho e Emprego (BTE), de 22 de julho. n. º 27, vol. 87, 2302–2400. 2020. Available online: http://bte.gep.msess.gov. pt/completos/2020/bte27_2020.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024). 32. ANQEP Agência Nacional para a Qualificação e o Ensino Profissional, IP. Catálogo Nacional de Qualificações (CNQ)–Técnico(a) de Design de Moda (alterado a 22 de julho de 2020). 2008. Available online: https://catalogo.anqep.gov.pt/qualificacoesDetalhe/ 7276 (accessed on 16 April 2024). 33. ANQEP Agência Nacional para a Qualificação e o Ensino Profissional. Programas e Aprendizagens Essenciais-Cursos Profissionais. Available online: https://www.anqep.gov.pt/np4/240.html (accessed on 16 April 2024). 34. Moreira, S.; Marques, A.D. Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Fashion Design Technician Course: Questionnaire Survey. Repositório de Dados da Universidade do Minho. 2024. Available online: https://datarepositorium.uminho.pt/dataset.xhtml? persistentId=doi:10.34622/datarepositorium/GVGTRK (accessed on 16 June 2024). 35. Sousa, E.; Marques, A.D.; Broega, A.C. Ensino da moda centrado na sustentabilidade: Instituições de ensino em Portugal com cursos em moda sustentável. In Proceedings of the 4 º CIMODE 2018–International Fashion and Design Congress, Madri, Spain, 10 July 2018; ISBN 978-989-54168-0-6. 36. Seixas, S.; Montagna, G.; Félix, M.J. Weaving the Gap: Giving a Place to Textile Design in Portuguese Higher Education. In Perspectives on Design III. Springer Series in Design and Innovation; Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Volume 34, pp. 275–296. [CrossRef] 37. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Delivering the Circular Economy: A Toolkit for Policymakers. 2015. Available online: https: //www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-toolkit-for-policymakers (accessed on 16 April 2024). Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.