scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Reactions induced by 9Be in a four-body continuum-discretized coupled-channels framework

Casal Berbel, Jesús; Rodríguez Gallardo, Manuela; Arias Carrasco, José Miguel

Abstract

We investigate the elastic scattering of 9Be on 208Pb at beam energies above (50MeV) and below (40MeV) the Coulomb barrier. The reaction is described within a four-body framework using the Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channels (CDCC) method. The 9Be projectile states are generated using the analytical Transformed Harmonic Oscillator (THO) basis in hyperspherical coordinates. Our calculations confirm the importance of continuum effects at low energies.

Full text

arXiv:1704.01384v1 [nucl-th] 5 Apr 2017 Reactions induced by 9Be in a four-body continuum-discretized coupled-channels framework J. Casal, M. Rodr´ıguez-Gallardo and J. M. Arias Abstract We investigate the elastic scattering of 9Be on 208Pb at beam energies above (50 MeV) and below (40 MeV) the Coulomb barrier. The reaction is described within a four-body framework using the Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channels (CDCC) method. The 9Be projectile states are generated using the analytical Transformed Harmonic Oscillator (THO) basis in hyperspherical coordinates. Our calculations confirm the importance of continuum effects at low energies. Introduction The 9Be nucleus is a stable system but presents a small binding energy below the α + α +nthreshold [1], 1.5736 MeV. It shows also a Borromean structure, since none of the binary subsystems α + α or α +nform bound states. Reactions involving 9Be should reflect both its weakly-bound nature and its three-body structure. Previous calculations considering 9Be as a two-body projectile [2] and also as a three-body projectile [3] show that breakup effects are important even at sub-barrier energies. In this work, we describe the elastic scattering of 9Be on 208Pb within a four-body CDCC method [4,5], considering a three-body projectile plus a structureless target. We generate the projectile states within an α + α +nthree-body model using the analytical THO basis [6, 7] in hyperspherical coordinates. We pay special attention to the position of the relevant states of the system. The 3/2−ground state and the 9Be low-energy resonances are fixed to the experimental values. We refer the reader to Refs. [5,8] for details about the theoretical formalism. J. Casal ·M. Rodr´ıguez-Gallardo ·J. M. Arias Dpto. de F´ısica At´omica, Molecular y Nuclear, Facultad de F´ısica, Universidad de Sevilla, Apto. 1065, E-41080 Sevilla, Spain, e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 J. Casal, M. Rodr´ıguez-Gallardo and J. M. Arias Fig. 1 9Be + 208Pb elastic cross section at 50 MeV (left panel) and 40 MeV (right panel). Results The model space describing the 9Be projectile includes j π =3/2±,1/2±,5/2± states. The coupled equations are solved considering the projectile-target interaction multipole couplings to all orders. In Fig. 1 we show the elastic cross section angular distribution in the center of mass frame, relative to the Rutherford cross section, at beam energies above (50 MeV) and below (40 MeV) the Coulomb barrier. Dashed lines correspond to calculations including the ground state only, and solid lines are the full CDCC calculations. The experimental data are from Refs. [9] (circles) and [10] (squares). The agreement between our calculations and the data is improved when we include the coupling to breakup channels. We confirm that this effect is important even at energies below the Coulomb barrier. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Econom´ıa y Competitividad under FIS2014-53448-c2-1-P and FIS2014-51941-P, and by Junta de Andaluc´ıa under group number FQM-160 and Project P11-FQM-7632. J. Casal acknowledges a FPU grant from the Ministerio de Educaci´on, Cultura y Deporte, AP2010-3124. M. Rodr´ıguez-Gallardo acknowledges a postdoctoral contract by the VPPI of the Universidad de Sevilla. References 1. D. R. Tilley et al. Nucl. Phys. A, 745:155, 2004. 2. S. K. Pandit et al. Phys. Rev. C, 84:031601, 2011. 3. P. Descouvemont et al. Phys. Rev. C, 91:024606, 2015. 4. T. Matsumoto et al. Phys. Rev. C, 73:051602(R), 2006. 5. M. Rodr´ıguez-Gallardo et al. Phys. Rev. C, 77:064609, 2008. 6. J. Casal et al. Phys. Rev. C, 88:014327, 2013. 7. J. Casal et al. Phys. Rev. C, 90:044304, 2014. 8. J. Casal et al. Submitted to Phys. Rev. C, 2015. 9. R. J. Woolliscroft et al. Phys. Rev. C, 69:044612, 2004. 10. N. Yu et al. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 37:075108, 2010.