Impact of COVID-19 containment measures on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease in the UK and Europe: the REUMAVID study (phase1)

Original article Impact of COVID-19 containment measures on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease in the UK and Europe: the REUMAVID study (phase1) Stephanie Rose Harrison 1,2 , Marco Garrido-Cumbrera 3,4 , Victoria Navarro-Compa´n 5 , Jose´ Correa-Ferna´ ndez 3 , Dale Webb 6 , Laura Christen 7 and Helena Marzo-Ortega 1,2 Abstract Objectives. The aim was to compare the impact of the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and lockdown measures on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in the UK and other European countries (OEC). Methods. REUMAVID was an online cross-sectional survey of seven European countries. The data collected included the following: demographics, lifestyle, employment, access to health-care services, disease-specific characteristics, the World Health Organization five well-being index (WHO-5), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), visual analogue scale (VAS) disease activity, and the perceived acceptable symptom scale. Results. One thousand eight hundred responses were received between April and July 2020 [UK, n¼558 (31.0%); OEC, n¼1242 (69.0%)]. UK patients were more likely to be older [mean (S.D.): UK 58.5 (13.4) years; OEC 50.0 (12.2) years], university educated [UK n¼302 (54.1%); OEC n¼572 (46.1%), quit smoking [UK n¼92 (59.4%); OEC n¼65 (16.2%)] and continue exercise [UK, n¼216 (49.2%); OEC, n¼228 (33.1%)], although, conversely, alcohol consumption increased [UK n¼99 (36.3%); OEC n¼98 (12.1%)]. UK patients felt informed about COVID-19 (UK 72.7%, OEC 57.4%) and kept their planned rheumatology [UK n¼87 (51.2%); OEC n¼213 (38.6%)] and/or general practice appointments [UK n¼87 (76.3%); OEC n¼310 (53.9%)]. Almost half the patients with RMDs reported a decline in health and well-being, although this was less common in UK patients [UK n¼214 (38.4%), OEC n¼618 (50.2%)], who reported better perceived acceptable symptom scale, VAS pain and HADS scores, but worse WHO-5 scores. Conclusions. UK RMD patients performed better in the physical and mental health domains tested, possibly owing to a less restrictive lockdown and better health-care access. These findings have implications for health-care services globally in planning patient care after the COVID-19 pandemic. Key words: rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, COVID-19, pandemic, well-being, mental health, United Kingdom, Europe 1 National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, 2 Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 3 Health and Territory Research, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain, 4 Axial Spondyloarthritis International Federation (ASIF), London, UK, 5 Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain, 6 National Ankylosing Spondylitis Society (NASS), London, UK and 7 Patient Engagement, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland Submitted 15 September 2021;accepted 17 November 2021 Correspondence to: Helena Marzo-Ortega, LIRMM, 2nd Floor Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK. E-mail: helena.marzo-orteg[email protected] CLINICAL SCIENCE V CThe Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Rheumatology Advances in Practice Rheumatology Advances in Practice 2021;00:1–9 https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab098 Advance Access Publication 4 December 2021 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has, and continues to, put an unprecedented strain on health-care systems globally. The speed at which both community and hospital health-care services reorganized to accommodate the influx in COVID-19 patients was remarkable; however, non-COVID-19 acute and elective services suffered significantly as a result [1,2]. Patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are potentially more likely to be adversely affected owing to a combination of factors, including reduced detection of flare or adverse treatment effects, lack of continuity of care and access to specialist support, and the requirement for stricter social distancing and shielding practices for those taking immunosuppressive medications [3–6]. In addition, patients with RMDs are known to have associated morbidities and poorer baseline physical and mental well-being when compared with otherwise healthy individuals [7–9]. Strategies to manage the impact of the pandemic locally, regionally, nationally and internationally have varied vastly, reflecting both rapidly evolving research and understanding of severe acute respiratory syndrom coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the inherent differences between populations, health-care systems and the wider socio-economic context [10]. Patients and clinicians alike faced an insurmountable task in interpreting conflicting information from the media, health-care organizations, charities and governments [11], with individual nations adopting different containment measures; for example, outdoor activities and exercise were permitted in the UK, whereas in Spain and Italy people were largely confined indoors [10,12]. Crucially, although stricter lockdown measures might provide more significant reassurance of protection from the virus, the detrimental effects on general health and well-being are also potentially greater. A better understanding of the impact of the pandemic on patients with RMDs is now needed to help rheumatologists and health-care systems address its short- and long-term health effects [13]. The REUMAVID study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders across European countries. In the present study, we compared the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown measures on rheumatology patients in the United Kingdom (UK) with RMD patients in other European countries (OEC). Methods REUMAVID is a multidisciplinary international consortium assembled at the start of the pandemic with the aim of assessing its impact on the physical/mental health and overall well-being of patients with RMDs from participating European countries (Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the UK), as described in detail previously [14]. Patients were recruited through national RMD patient groups that disseminated the survey link via their organizational websites. All participants were aged 18 years, residing in a REUMAVID-participating country, who had or were expected to have an appointment with their rheumatologist within 12 months of study entry. Before completing the survey, all patients provided informed consent electronically via the online survey platform. REUMAVID was first approved by the ethical committee of University Hospital La Paz under the code PI- 4121 and subsequently approved in all other participating countries as legally required. Patients first self-reported their diagnosis from the following list: ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis, FM, gout, JIA, myositis (PM or DM), OA, osteoporosis, peripheral spondyloarthritis, PMR, PsA, RA, synovitis, acne pustulosis hyperostosis and osteitis (SAPHO), SS, SLE, SSc (or scleroderma), vasculitis or arteritis. They then completed a 120-question survey covering multiple domains of physical and mental health and well-being including demographics, lifestyle habits and weight, provision of information on COVID-19, measures of disease activity and mental/physical health, and four validated scales to measure well-being: the World Health Organization five well-being index (WHO-5), which measures overall well-being [15]; the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) to measure anxiety/ depression levels [16,17]; a visual analogue scale (VAS) for disease activity; and the patient acceptable symptom scale [18]. Survey data were analysed using SPSS v.25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For continuous parametric variables, the mean (S.D.) is reported. Statistical significance between groups (the UK and OEC) were determined using Mann-Whitney test for individual variables. Categorical outcome variables are reported as a frequency/percentages, and statistically significant differences between the UK and OEC were determined using the v 2 test. Sample size is reported for each individual variable to highlight any areas of missing data. Key messages .The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic negatively affected the physical and mental health of European rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease patients. .Compared with other European counterparts, UK patients performed better in nearly all health domains tested. .The insights from this survey could help to shape the care of rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease patients post-pandemic. Stephanie R. Harrison et al. 2https://academic.oup.com/rheumap Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 Results Overall, 2731 patients with RMDs participated in the first phase of the study. Owing to those patients who completed <70% of the survey, data for 931 patients had to be discarded, leaving 1800 patients for data analysis, of whom 558 respondents (31%) were recruited by the National Ankylosing Spondylitis Society, the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society and Arthritis Action in the UK. Demographics Compared with OEC, UK participants were older [UK 58.5 (13.4) years; OEC 50.0 (12.2) years, P<0.001]. Overall, the vast majority of respondents were female, both in the UK and in the OEC [UK 78.7% (439), OEC 81.0% (1003), P¼0.262] and identified themselves as being married or in a relationship [UK 70.8% (395), OEC 69.1% (858), P¼0.008], with similar proportions of respondents from both the UK and OEC being members of patient organizations [UK 42.4% (236), OEC 41.2% (512), P¼0.627; Table 1]. In contrast, UK participants were more likely to have obtained a university qualification [UK 54.1% (302), OEC 46.1% (572), P<0.001] and to be retired [UK 35.5% (198), OEC 16.5% (205), P<0.001; Table 1]. Interestingly, among working participants teleworking was more common in the UK [UK 58.1% (144), OEC 32.9% (215), P<0.001; Table 1]. Weight and lifestyle More than half of the study participants were overweight or obese [BMI >25 kg/m 2 ; UK 57.4% (190), OEC 54.1% (640)], with rates of obesity (BMI >30 kg/m 2 ) being higher in the UK population [UK 31.4% (104), OEC 23.0% (272), P¼0.011; Table 1]. In addition, 39.2% (219) of the UK participants and 41.6% (517) in the OEC reported gaining weight during the first-wave period (P¼0.561). Almost one-third of participants reported smoking (31%: UK ¼155, OEC ¼401), although in the UK, 59.4% (92) of participants said they had quit smoking, compared with 16.2% (65) in OEC (P<0.001; Table 1). The converse was true for alcohol consumption, with 60.3% of all respondents reporting alcohol consumption and with UK participants admitting to drinking more [UK 36.3% (99), OEC 12.1% (98), P<0.001] or the same amount [UK 50.2% (137), OEC 32.9% (267), P<0.001] compared with their European counterparts, whereas nearly half of the respondents in the OEC did not drink at all [UK 0.4% (1), OEC 42.7% (347), P<0.001; Table 1]. UK participants were more likely to have continued physical activity during the pandemic [UK 49.2% (216), OEC 33.1% (228), P<0.001], to visit a natural environment [UK 51.9% (288), OEC 31.5% (275), P<0.001] and/or to go for daily walks outside [UK 38.4% (214), OEC 22.2% (276), P<0.001]. They were also more likely to do grocery shopping online [42.4% (65), OEC 17.8% (78), P<0.001], whereas in OEC, patients reported that someone from their household would go to the shop in person (P<0.001; Table 1). Access to rheumatology services More than half of the rheumatology patients in the UK were able to keep scheduled rheumatology appointments during the pandemic, which was more than in the OEC (UK 51.2 vs 38.6%, P¼0.004; Table 2). They were also more likely to be able to discuss the effects of treatment on COVID-19 with either their rheumatologist (81.0 vs 57.6%, P<0.001) or general practitioner (76.3 vs 53.9%, P<0.001). In contrast, around half of the patients reported not being able to continue their psychological/psychiatric therapies either online or via telephone, with no significant difference in the UK compared with OEC (45.7 vs 52.2%, P¼0.459; Table 2). Access to information on COVID-19 Overall, 35.4% of patients in the UK reported receiving no information on how COVID-19 might affect their RMD, compared with 51.6% in the OEC (P<0.001; Fig. 1). Rheumatologists were the main source of information for patients on how COVID-19 might affect their RMD, with twice as many UK patients (37.9%) reporting receiving such information vs those in the OEC (19.0%) (Fig. 1). The next most common source for this information was patient organizations (UK 33.3%, OEC 25.9%), followed by general practitioners (UK 19.2%, OEC 13.4%) and the national rheumatology societies (UK 9.4%, OEC 12.2%; Fig. 1). Interestingly, although patient organizations played an important role in providing information for patients in all countries, the focus of the information differed. For instance, in the UK, patient organizations provided more COVID-19-related information (UK 72.7%, OEC 57.4%), whereas in the OEC the patient groups provided more disease-related information (UK 30.3%, OEC 59.1%, P¼0.017; Fig. 2). Less information was provided overall on how to access their rheumatologist, home delivery of treatments and emotional/psychological support in both the UK and OEC (Fig. 2). Disease-specific characteristics and measures of overall health/well-being In the UK, 54.2% (302) of patients reported good or very good self-perceived health, compared with 27.8% (342) in OEC (P<0.001), and UK patients were less likely to report a deterioration in their health, with 38.4% (214) in the UK reporting worsening of their health compared with 50.2% (618) in the OEC (P<0.010; Table 3). More than two-thirds of patients in the UK and OEC reported increased disease activity, which was slightly less in the UK cohort [UK 67.6% (374), OEC 76.5% (920), P<0.001; Table 3). Levels of anxiety and depression were also worse in the OEC [HADS anxiety: UK 43.6% (241), OEC 63.5% (772), P<0.001; HADS depression: UK 33.6% (186), OEC 51.4% (625), P<0.001], although poorer overall well-being was reported by UK patients [WHO-5 50: UK 52.5% (292), OEC 47.3% (578), P¼0.043; Table 3]. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology https://academic.oup.com/rheumap 3 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 TABLE 1Socio-demographic, working life and anthropometric characteristics, lifestyle habits and outdoors contact during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic Characteristic Mean (S.D.) or n(%) P-value UK 558 (31.0%) OEC 1242 (69.0%) Age, years 58.5 (13.4) 50.0 ( 12.2) <0.001 * Gender (female), n¼1797 439 (78.7) 1003 (81.0) 0.262 Marital status Single 81 (14.5) 206 (16.6) 0.008* Married/in relationship 395 (70.8) 858 (69.1) Separated/divorced 51 (9.1) 144 (11.6) Widower/widow 31 (5.6) 34 (2.7) Educational level No schooling completed 13 (2.3) 7 (0.6) <0.001* Primary school 0 (0.0) 72 (5.8) Secondary school 94 (16.8) 213 (17.1) Vocational qualification 149 (26.7) 378 (30.4) University 302 (54.1) 572 (46.1) Employment status Retired 198 (35.5) 205 (16.5) <0.001* Teleworking, n¼901 144 (58.1) 215 (32.9) <0.001* Patient organization (member), n¼1798 236 (42.4) 512 (41.2) 0.627 BMI, kg/m 2 ,n¼1513 Underweight (<18.5) 14 (4.2) 41 (3.5) 0.011* Normal weight (18.5– 24.9) 127 (38.4) 501 (42.4) Overweight (25–29.9) 86 (26.0) 368 (31.1) Obesity (>30) 104 (31.4) 272 (23.0) Gaining weight during COVID-19 pandemic (yes) 219 (39.2) 517 (41.6) 0.561 Smoking during COVID-19 pandemic, n¼556 More than before 16 (10.3) 121 (30.2) <0.001* Same as before 34 (21.9) 153 (38.2) Less than before 11 (7.1) 46 (11.5) I’ve started smoking 2 (1.3) 16 (4.0) I’ve quit smoking 92 (59.4) 65 (16.2) Alcohol consumption during COVID-19 pandemic, n¼1085 More than before 99 (36.3) 98 (12.1) <0.001* Same as before 137 (50.2) 267 (32.9) Less than before 36 (13.2) 100 (12.3) I’m not drinking 1 (0.4) 347 (42.7) Physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic, n¼1128 Yes 216 (49.2) 228 (33.1) <0.001* No 91 (20.7) 423 (61.4) No, but it was compensated by other exercise 132 (30.1) 38 (5.5) Outdoors contact during COVID-19 pandemic Visits to natural environment (yes), n¼1429 288 (51.9) 275 (31.5) <0.001* Walking outside (every day) 214 (38.4) 276 (22.2) <0.001* Groceries shopping, n¼591 Going as usual 34 (22.1) 175 (40.0) <0.001* Someone from my household 44 (28.6) 156 (35.7) Someone from outside my household 11 (7.1) 28 (6.4) Online or by phone 65 (42.2) 78 (17.8) n¼1800, unless otherwise specified. *Statistically significant at P<0.05. COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; OEC: other European countries; UK: United Kingdom. Stephanie R. Harrison et al. 4https://academic.oup.com/rheumap Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 Discussion As the focus shifts from immediate treatment of SARS- CoV-2-infected patients and towards mitigating the effects of the pandemic on patients with chronic health conditions, there is a significant need to gain a better understanding of the indirect effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the overall well-being and disease activity of patients with RMDs. This survey compared and contrasted the experience of UK patients with that of OEC patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We felt that this analysis was of interest because political decisions led to different approaches in containment and lockdown measures throughout Europe. British respondents were generally older, with higher educational attainment and more likely to be retired, which is similar to previous surveys [19, 20]. As expected from the less stringent containment measures in the UK, more British patients continued to exercise, often outdoors or in a natural environment. TABLE 2Health-care utilization and psychological or psychiatric care during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic Health care Mean (S.D.) or n(%) P-value UK 558 (31.0%) OEC 1242 (69.0%) Health-care utilization Scheduled appointment with rheumatologist, n¼722 Yes 87 (51.2) 213 (38.6) 0.004* Contact with rheumatologist about possible effects of treatment on COVID-19, n¼430 Yes 94 (81.0) 181 (57.6) <0.001* Access to primary care or general practitioner, n¼689 Yes 87 (76.3) 310 (53.9) <0.001* Psychological or psychiatric care Not continuing psychological/psychiatric therapy (online or by telephone), n¼437 16 (45.7) 210 (52.2) 0.459 n¼1800, unless otherwise specified. *Statistically significant at P<0.05. COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; OEC: other European countries; UK: United Kingdom; VAS: visual analogue scale. FIG.1 Information received about how coronavirus disease 2019 might affect your rheumatic disease The information received about how COVID-19 might affect their condition was better rated by the UK sample (3.2 out of 5) vs the OEC (2.8 out of 5), and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). n¼1682. COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; OEC: other European countries; UK: United Kingdom. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology https://academic.oup.com/rheumap 5 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 They also reported quitting smoking, all of which have positive impacts on physical and mental health, although conversely, many UK respondents increased their alcohol consumption. Teleworking and online/telephone grocery shopping were also more common in the UK. British patients were more likely to keep their appointment with their rheumatologist or general practitioner, received more information on COVID-19 and had higher levels of satisfaction with the quality of that information. Self-reported health status, anxiety and depression levels were better in UK patients, although overall levels of well-being were comparatively worse, possibly owing to the self-reported nature of the instrument used [21]. Despite the comparatively better outcomes for British patients, there was still a significant burden associated with lockdown measures. One reason for this was the significant challenges that all health-care organizations faced in assimilating and disseminating high-quality guidelines in a rapidly changing research environment with no clear standard of best practice. At the start of the pandemic, EULAR published principles for the care of patients with RMDs; however, there were significant ramifications to their recommendations and many obstacles to their implementation, with lockdown, redeployment of health-care staff and strict social distancing [22]. As a result, less than half of the patients kept their rheumatology appointment (UK 51.2%, OEC 38.6%, P¼0.004), the impact of which is reflected in the selfreported disease-specific characteristics seen in this survey. Nevertheless, British patients still fared better overall, which might be attributable, in part, to less stringent government restrictions. Researchers at the University of Oxford developed a scoring system to compare the stringency of lockdown measures between countries quantitatively [10]. Using this resource, between January and June 2020, the UK had the least strict measures compared with the OEC. Given that adherence to lockdown rules in the first wave was high, especially among patients with RMDs who were considered vulnerable/extremely vulnerable [23,24], it seems reasonable to assume that the stringency of lockdown measures would impact on overall health and well-being. One notable difference between lockdown measures was that British patients were more likely to continue to exercise outdoors. Exercise and outdoor activity reduce anxiety and depression, improve overall well-being [25, 26], maintain mobility and reduce pain in patients with RMDs [5]. British patients also felt that they received better-quality RMD-specific guidance on COVID-19, which is likely to have provided some reassurance at a time of great uncertainty. In addition, more UK patients reported already belonging to patient organizations before the pandemic, and it is possible that having these support networks already established helped British patients to feel more connected to others in their position and facilitated rapid access information, making them feel empowered. Furthermore, UK patients appeared to use more digital technologies; for example, in grocery shopping online and teleworking, which might have provided a FIG.2 Type of support of patients from a patient organization OEC: other European countries; UK: United Kingdom. n¼331 Stephanie R. Harrison et al. 6https://academic.oup.com/rheumap Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 routine and some semblance of normality, contributing to improved resilience during the first wave. This study is the first to report the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical/mental health and overall well-being of patients from seven participating European countries, providing valuable insight into the impact associated with the different containment measures initiated in each country. These results can inform the future planning and delivery of services for patients with RMDs in Europe. There are some limitations, however, similar to other survey studies, with an over-representation of females, those who are retired and those with higher levels of educational attainment [27]. Nevertheless, the sex distribution might be related to the distribution of rheumatic disease in the survey, although approximately one-third of respondents had axial spondyloarthritis, which is more frequently diagnosed in males. Those with higher educational attainment are also more likely to engage with patient support groups and self-help measures and to be able easily to access and understand the rapidly evolving information on the pandemic. Conversely, those who work might have been deterred from participation in the survey owing to the length of time it would take to complete 120 questions, and those from lower socio-economic background and/or ethnic minority groups might not have access to adequate digital facilities or be able to access the survey in their native language [28]. Therefore, the relative impact of the pandemic on those of working age, males and those from a deprived background or ethnic minority group is unclear. In addition, the distribution of RMDs in this survey does not reflect the prevalence of RMDs in real-world practice, with over-representation of axial spondyloarthritis and RA, reflecting the instrumental role played by the patient societies collaborating in the REUMAVID study. Furthermore, the patient survey does not allow us to detect inter-regional and local differences in the patient experience, which is key information for care providers who need to use already stretched local resources effectively in the aftermath of the first wave of the pandemic. This is even more true of the second wave of the pandemic in the UK, where inter-regional lockdown practices differed significantly compared with the first wave. Future surveys should therefore seek to target under-represented groups and provide local and regional data. This survey is cross-sectional and, as alluded to above, experiences might well differ between different phases of the pandemic, even within the same country. Likewise, our survey does not include all European countries, and the patient experiences there, or indeed in non-European nations, could differ substantially. Finally, there is no control group of patients completing the survey before the pandemic, although in our TABLE 3Disease-specific characteristics Characteristic Mean (S.D.) or n(%) P-value UK 558 (31.0%) OEC 1242 (69.0%) Self-perceived health Very good 66 (11.8) 59 (4.8) <0.001* Good 236 (42.4) 283 (23.0) Fair 207 (37.2) 595 (48.4) Bad 47 (8.4) 246 (20.0) Very bad 1 (0.2) 46 (3.7) Change in health status during lockdown Much worse than before 23 (4.1) 159 (12.9) <0.001* Moderately worse 191 (34.3) 459 (37.3) Same as before 305 (54.8) 538 (43.8) Moderately better 34 (6.1) 63 (5.1) Much better than before 4 (0.7) 10 (0.8) VAS disease activity (4), n¼1756 374 (67.6) 920 (76.5) <0.001* VAS pain (4), n¼1421 373 (67.7) 701 (80.6) <0.001* WHO-5, n¼1777 Poor wellbeing (WHO-5 50) 292 (52.5) 578 (47.3) 0.043* HADS anxiety (0–21), n¼1769 Risk (8–21) 241 (43.6) 772 (63.5) <0.001* HADS depression (0–21), n¼1769 Risk (8–21) 186 (33.6) 625 (51.4) <0.001* n¼1786 unless otherwise specified. *Statistically significant at P<0.05. HADS: hospital anxiety and depression scale; OEC: other European countries; UK: United Kingdom; VAS: visual analogue scale; WHO-5: the World Health Organization five well-being index. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology https://academic.oup.com/rheumap 7 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 survey, patients, when asked, did report that their health had worsened relative to the pre-pandemic state. In conclusion, these data suggest that UK patients with RMDs performed better than OEC patients in the physical and mental health domains tested. UK respondents reported less smoking and greater levels of physical activity, although they consumed more alcohol, and they showed greater adaptation to digital platforms with increased use of online shopping and teleworking. These differences might be attributable to a multitude of factors, both known and unknown. Nevertheless, the REUMAVID survey does highlight some factors that could have played a role in the observed differences, including the fact that UK patients were living under comparatively less stringent lockdown measures with better access to outdoors spaces, health-care professionals and advice on COVID-19. Irrespective of the reasons underlying the differences, the REUMAVID survey highlights the clear negative effects of the first wave of the pandemic on the mental health of all patients with RMDs, even if UK respondents reported comparatively less anxiety and depression. These findings have broad implications for health-care services globally in planning patient care in the aftermath of the pandemic. Acknowledgements We would like to thank all of the patients who completed the survey, as well as all of the patient organizations and patient representatives who participated in the REUMAVID study, including: Souzi Makri from the Cyprus League Against Rheumatism (CYPLAR) from Cyprus, the Association Franc¸aise de Lutte Anti- Rhumatismale (AFLAR) from France, Katy Antonopoulou from the Hellenic League Against Rheumatism (ELEANA) from Greece, Serena Mingolla from the Associazione Nazionale Persone con Malattie Reumatologiche e Rare (APMAAR) from Italy, Elsa Fraz~ ao Mateus from the Portuguese League Against Rheumatic Diseases (LCPDR) from Portugal, Pedro Plazuelo Ramos from the Spanish Federation of Spondyloarthritis Associations (CEADE), the Spanish Patients’ Forum, UNiMiD, Spanish Rheumatology League (LIRE), Andalusian Rheumatology League (LIRA), Catalonia Rheumatology League and Galician Rheumatology League from Spain, and Jim Hamilton from the National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS), Clare Jacklin and Ailsa Bosworth from the National Rheumatoid Arthritis (NRAS), and Shantel Irwin from Arthritis Action from the UK. We would further like to thank Patricia Pertel, Maria-Magdalena Balp and Marina Milutinovic of Novartis Pharma AG for their contributions to the study design and execution. H.M.-O. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (LBRC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the (UK) National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR or the (UK) Department of Health. Funding: The REUMAVID study is supported by Novartis Pharma AG. Disclosure statement: H.M.-O. reports grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis; consultant for: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; speakers’ bureAbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. H.M.-O. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. L.C. is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. J.C. has received grant funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. D.W. has received grant funding from AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB. S.R.H. was sponsored to attend a medical conference by UCB and received financial reimbursement for speaking at an educational event organized by UCB. V.N.-C. reports honoraria/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. The remaining author has declared no conflicts of interest. Data availability statement Please direct any requests for access to raw data to the corresponding author. References 1 Moynihan R, Sanders S, Michaleff ZA et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e045343. 2 British Medical Association. The hidden impact of COVID-19 on patient care in the NHS in England. London, UK. 2020. https://www.bma.org.uk/media/2840/ the-hidden-impact-of-covid_web-pdf.pdf 3 British Society of Rheumatology. COVID-19 guidance. London, UK. 2020. https://www.rheumatology.org.uk/ practice-quality/covid-19-guidance 4 Roux CH, Brocq F, Gerald F, Pradier C, Bailly L. Impact of home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic on medication use and disease activity in spondyloarthritis patients. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1771–2. 5 Liew JW, Castillo M, Zaccagnino E et al. Patientreported disease activity in an axial spondyloarthritis cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020;2:533–9. 6 Seyahi E, Poyraz BC, Sut N, Akdogan S, Hamuryudan V. The psychological state and changes in the routine of the patients with rheumatic diseases during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Turkey: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40:1229–38. 7 Ziade N, El Khoury B, Zoghbi M et al. Prevalence and pattern of comorbidities in chronic rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: the COMORD study. Sci Rep 2020;10:7683. 8 Dougados M, Soubrier M, Antunez A et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis and evaluation of Stephanie R. Harrison et al. 8https://academic.oup.com/rheumap Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023 their monitoring: results of an international, crosssectional study (COMORA). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73: 62–8. 9 Zhao SS, Jones GT, Macfarlane GJ et al. Association between comorbidities and disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BSRBR-AS. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60:3189–98. 10 University of Oxford. COVID-19 government response tracker [Internet]. Oxford, UK. 2020. https://www.bsg.ox. ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-government- response-tracker#data 11 Dagen A, Sigfrid L, Cai E et al. Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: rapid review. BMJ 2020;369:m1936. 12 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Immune responses and immunity to SARS-CoV-2. 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/latestevidence/immune-responses 13 Nikiphorou E, Alpizar-Rodrigue D, Gastelum-Strozzi A, Buch M, Pela´ ez-Ballestas I. Syndemics & syndemogenesis in COVID-19 and rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: old challenges, new era. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60:2040–5. 14 Garrido-Cumbrera M, Marzo-Ortega H, Christen L et al. Assessment of impact of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in Europe: results from the REUMAVID study (phase 1). RMD Open 2021;7:e001546. 15 World Health Organization. Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the depcare project. Copenhagen, Denmark. 1998. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0016/130750/E60246.pdf 16 Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70. 17 Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69–77. 18 Tubach F, Ravaud P, Martin-Mola E et al. Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:1699–707. 19 Gouveia N, Rodrigues A, Euse´ bio M et al. Prevalence and social burden of active chronic low back pain in the adult Portuguese population: results from a national survey. Rheumatol Int 2016;36:183–97. 20 Kilic G, Kilic E, Ozgocmen S. Relationship between psychiatric status, self-reported outcome measures, and clinical parameters in axial spondyloarthritis. Medicine 2014;93:e337. 21 Linton M, Dieppe P, Medina-Lara A. Review of 99 selfreport measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010641. 22 Landewe´ RB, Machado PM, Kroon F et al. EULAR provisional recommendations for the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the context of SARS-CoV-2. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:851–8. 23 Hills S, Eraso Y. Factors associated with non-adherence to social distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic: a logistic regression analysis. BMC Public Health 2021;21:352. 24 Brown R, Coventry L, Pepper G. COVID-19: the relationship between perceptions of risk and behaviours during lockdown. Z Gesundh Wiss 2021:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01543-9. Online ahead of print. 25 Sharma A, Madaan V, Petty FD. Exercise for mental health. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2006;8:106. 26 National Health Service (NHS). Exercise for depression [Internet]. London UK. 2018. https://www.nhs.uk/mentalhealth/self-help/guides-tools-and-activities/exercise-for- depression/ 27 Smith WG. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). 2008. https://eric. ed.gov/?id¼ED501717. 28 De Man J, Campbell L, Tabana H, Wouters E. The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19. BMJ Open 2021;11:e043866. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology https://academic.oup.com/rheumap 9 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/5/3/rkab098/6449453 by Universidad de Sevilla user on 21 April 2023