scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

A three-scales model for the dispersion of radioactive spots from nuclear emergencies. Application to the Baltic Sea after the accident of Chernobyl

Toscano Jiménez, Manuel; García-Tenorio García-Balmaseda, Rafael

Abstract

This model is a improved version of a previously published Two-Scales model 1111 and includes the transport of particles in three spatial scales: small (kilometres), medium (decades of km), and large (hundreds of km). A 3-D dispersion model has been developed to analyse and simulate the dispersion of nuclear contaminants in marine ecosystems. This model is characterized by presenting high spatial resolution, by taking into account the possible binding of a fraction of the Contaminants to the suspended matter as well as its consequent sedimentation, and especially by formulating the diffusion processes using an original approach. The horizontal resolution of the model is 20 km, while for the vertical resolution a total of six layers are considered. The Baltic Sea has heen elected as the validation scenario of the model and the radionuclide Cs-137 as the radiotracer to be analysed. This scenario was the most contaminated ecosystem out of the Sonet Union due to the Chernohyl accident occurred at the end of April 1986, and the elected radiotracer Cs-137 was the main long-lived radioisotope emitted to the environment. A computation time of approximately 9 hours by using a Matlab code in a personal computer (AMD-1.4 GHz) was necessary. Different classical tools in Oceanography as well as different numerical methods (Monte Carlo, Finite differences) have been properly implemented in the model. The approaches adopted allow to save a lot of computational time [lo]

Full text

A Three-Scales Model for the Dispersion of Radioactive Spots from Nuclear Emergencies. Application to the Baltic Sea after the Accident of Chernobyl M. Toscano-Jimenez, Universidad de Sevilla Dpto. de Fisica Aplicada 111. Escuela Superior de Ingenieros. Avda. Descubrimientos s/n. 41092. Sevilla, Spain. e-mail: mtoscanotiiesi.us.es. Fax: 34 95 4 48 60 03 R. Garcia-Tenono, Universidad de Sevilla Departamento de Fisica Aplicada 11. E.T.S. Arquitectura Avda. Reina Mercedes, 2. 41012 Sevilla-Spain. Abstract- This model is a improved version of a previously published Two-Scales model 1111 and includes the transport of particles in three spatial scales: small (kilometres), medium (decades of km), and large (hundreds of km). A 3-D dispersion model has been developed to analyse and simulate the dispersion of nuclear contaminants in marine ecosystems. This model is characterized by presenting high spatial resolution, by taking into account the possible binding of a fraction of the Contaminants to the suspended matter as well as its consequent sedimentation, and especially by formulating the diffusion processes using an original approach. The horizontal resolution of the model is 20 km, while for the vertical resolution a total of six layers are considered. The Baltic Sea has heen elected as the validation scenario of the model and the radionuclide Cs-137 as the radiotracer to be analysed. This scenario was the most contaminated ecosystem out of the Sonet Union due to the Chernohyl accident occurred at the end of April 1986, and the elected radiotracer Cs-137 was the main long-lived radioisotope emitted to the environment. A computation time of approximately 9 hours by using a Matlab code in a personal computer (AMD-1.4 GHz) was necessary. Different classical tools in Oceanography as well as different numerical methods (Monte Carlo, Finite differences) have been properly implemented in the model. The approaches adopted allow to save a lot of computational time [lo]. I. INTRODUCTION The internal structure of the model can he described as follows: It is formed by three sub-models (Circulation, Diffusion and Sedimentation), together with the numerical and mixing algorithms implemented for the individual cells into which the scenario was divided. The influence of the winds, tides, and inertial forces is obviously very important in the numerical simulations. Eddy-like motions with variable intensities and scales are superimposed on the average circulation field. Experimental information on current spectra has been analysed. The model as a whole has been validated by comparing the evolution of the Cs-137 concentrations with experimental data taken from the literature. The Cs-137 model predictions are in an acceptable agreement with the experimental Cs- 137 maps, thereby guaranteeing the validity of the model. 11. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Circulation Sub-Model L The velocity ( v ) of a general point of OUT system can he described in a strai htfonvard way as the sum of its anpual mean velocity (v ) plus its associated F", fluctuation ( 2 ). rr r v = vm +v' (1.1.) $an Fig. I. Annual mean currents in layer 1, [0, 5]m Special attention needs to he paid to [2], which modelled the average currents in the Baltic Sea (considering the winds as the essential producing agent) with horizontal resolution of 10 km. Their results have 2362 - Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de Sevilla. Downloaded on May 19,2023 at 18:41:04 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. been validated through comparison with experimental measurements [3]. The thickness of the six layers considered are the following: [O,S]m, [5,10]m, [10,20]m, [20,4.0]m, [40,60]m and [60m,bottom], which are coincident with those considered in the Funkquist model. An interesting simplification was performed in [2], constructing a typical year which included the most probable meteorological events. The figure 1 shows the annual mean velocities for the layer [0, S]m. B. Horizontal diffusion This is one of the most important processes governing the dispersion in a complex system. Measurements in the Baltic Sea ( [I] and [6] ) show that current spectra have peaks for periods similar to those of wind spectra, i.e. in the order of days. In order to calculate turbulent exchange parameters, an essential step is to separate the mean flow and the associated fluctuations from the time series data. In Figure 2, and as an example, a representative cument spec" together with the different mean flows used in this work are shown. In this way, -the fluctuations with regard to the annual mean velocity, 2 , can he expressed as the sum of two terms: 111 v'=u'+w' (2.1.) where the field b' represents the small-:scale fluctuations shorter than two days, and where 3 represents the large-scale fluctuations affecting the system longer than two days. Velocity r,lcm/sl hual xn&n Dailvsean I A. Fig. 2. A representative current spectrum (based on 131) with the different mean flows proposed in this manuscript. B. I. Horizonfal small-scale ve1ocityfluctuations.- The first objective therefore is to simulate the value of the small-scale velocity fluctuation temi U: and U: for all the points of the ecosystem analysed. For the performance of these calculations, the variances of the two terms can he expressed in the following way: (2.2.) where K, and KV denote the horizontal diffusion coefficients, and T, and Ty are the Eulerian integral timescales in the horizontal directions. Based on equations (2.2.) we have used a set of average experimental values of K,, Kr T,, and c, compiled in[3]. The values of the average horizontaldifision coefficients which are compiled in Table I. TABLE I HORIZONTAL DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS, {K,.KJ As regards to the set of experimental values of T, and cv, we can indicate that they were in the interval [1.5,2.5] hours, with a clear maximum at 2.0 hours. In fact, through equations (2.2.) we can determine U: and U: at any point of the system, by the assignment of values from the Monte Carlo method, according to Gaussian distributions of probability. B.2. Horizontal large-scale velocityflucfuations.. Observations and analyses carried out at several stations distributed over the Baltic Sea indicate a correlation between the large-scale fluctuation velocities { w: , wi.} and the annual mean velocities { v:, v; } . Hence, and as a first approximation, our model assumes the following functions {F(v:),F(vy)} for the simulation of large-scale fluctuations: where /1 E [ 1,3], according to the study of the different spectra obtained in most of the stations distributed over the Baltic sea. Therefore, based on (2.3.), the 2363 - Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de Sevilla. Downloaded on May 19,2023 at 18:41:04 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. calculations of the velocities { w: , w;, } for each point of the system were also based on the Monte Carlo method in the same way as {Vi, Vi} . C. Vertical diffusion The modelling of the vertical component of the small-scale fluctuation velocity, U,', is based on the same theoretical fundamentals as those used for the horizontal simulation. Additionally, and at a depth of approximately 40 metres, the exchange of particles between upper and lower levels is clearly mitigated due to the presence of a halocline layer. For all these reasons, and based on the experimental values compiled in [12], for the simulation of the small-scale vertical turbulent velocities we have used the average annual values of K, for different depths which are shown in the Table 11. These average vertical-diffusion coefficients are applicable to every location of the system analysed. TABLE I1 VERTICAL DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS, K, (on%), USED IN THE DIFFUSION SUB-MODEL. For the description of the salinity dependence of the partition coefficients, we have taken the empirical formulation proposed by Weiss into consideration to correlate the commented magnitudes in the Baltic Sea in [I31 Kd(m3 / kg) = 30.0.exp[-0.117.S] (3.2.) while the average values of salinity (S=S( %o )) at different locations of the Baltic Sea have been extracted from [9]. In. RESULTS The model as a whole permits the simulation of the evolution of the concentrations in the Baltic Sea for the time interval June 1986- June 1987. The experimental spatial distribution maps of the I3'Cs concenhations on the initial and the fmal simulation dates, (see Figure 3) have been interpolated from experimental values found in several radiological journals [4], [5], [7] and 1131. D. Sedimentation Sub-Model It is necessary to bear in mind that a fraction of the radionuclide "'Cs can be fixed to the suspended matter present in the water column, and consequently can be deposited on the seabed. This sub-model is based on the hypothesis of the existence of equilibrium in the distribution of the analysed radionuclide between the dissolved and particulate phases. The magnitude of the equilibrium of a radionuclide between the dissolved and the particulate phases in an aquatic system is described by the partition coefficient Kd (m3kg). Determining the fractions F,, and F,,,and considering an average sedimentation rate of matter S,, (kg..m.'.g') for each water column characterized by height h(m), the proportion of the activity deposited per year in the sediment, LY, is given by the expression: which constitutes the core of this 2-D sedimentation submodel. By its application at different points of our ecosystem, it is possible to evaluate the losses, through sedimentation, of the analysed radionuclide (137Cs). Fig. 3. Experimental "'Cs specific activity distribution (Bqim') at the surface of the Baltic Sea in summer 1987 (final conditions). All the simulation was camed out using the code Matlab 5.3 on a personal computer AMD-1600 MHz. The computation time needed for the simulation of the complete year (summer'86-su"er'87) was approximately ten hours. In the performed simulation, two different time steps have been chosen for the execution of the model: Atw = 3 duys and , At,, = 6 hours were adopted in agreement with the decay times of the large- and smallscale velocity fluctuations, respectively, observed in the spectra. The sedimentation sub-model was mn by using At, = 6 hours as time step. As an example, only the modelled '37Cs distribution map for the superficial layer, in June 87, is going to be shown, which needs to be compared with the experimental distribution map shown in Figure 3. Figure 2364 - Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de Sevilla. Downloaded on May 19,2023 at 18:41:04 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. 4 corresponds to /z = 312 (Equations 2.3.). ‘The satisfactory agreement is evident. Fig. 4. Modelled ”’Cs specific activity distribution (Bqim’) at the superficial layer ofthe Baltic Sea in summer 1987 (1 = 31 2). IV. CONCLUSIONS This implemented model is formed by thee sub-models (circulation, diffusion and sedimentation), together with appropriate numerical and mixing algorithms. The model is presently restricted to simulations of shortimedium timescales, and is therefore valid in the prediction of the dispersion of contaminants after hypothetical accidents. The dispersion model as a whole was first validated by analysing the evolution of the I3’Cs concentrations in the Baltic Sea waters for the time interval June 1986-June 1987. The model predictions are in an acceptable agreement with the experimental distributions on the same date, thereby guaranteeing the validity of the model, REFERENCES [l] E. Franke. “A contribution to the investigations of the current conditions in the surface layer in the area of Darss Sill”. [Proceedings 121h Baltic Oceanographic Conference, Leningrad, 19801 [2] L. Funkquist and L. Gidhagen. “A model for pollution studies in the Baltic Sea”. SMHI-Report RH0-39,1984 [3] L. Gidhagen, L. Funkquist and R. Muthy, “Calculations of horizontal exchange coefficients seiies current meter data from the Baltic Sea”. SMHI-Report RO-1, 1986. [4] Z.G. Gritchenko et al., “Radiation situation in the Baltic Sea in 1986 in sea water and sediments”. Three years observations of the levels of some radionuclides in the Baltic Sea after the Chemobyl accident. Baltic Sea environment proceedings, vo1.3 1 pp.10-30, Helsinki, 1989(a). [5] Z.G. Gritchenko et al., “The results of determination of Sr-90, Cs-134, and Cs-137 in the water of the Baltic Sea in 1988”. Three years observations of the levels ofsome radionuclides in the Baltic Sea after the Chernobyl Occident. In Baltic Sea environment proceedings, vol. 31, pp.52-61, Helsinki, 1989(b) . [6] J. Kielmann, W.Krauss and K.H. Kennecke, “Currents and stratification in the Belt Sea and the southem Arkona Basin during 1962-68”. Kieler Meeresforsh.,vol. 29, 1973. [7] H. Nies, “The distribution of Chemohyl fallout over the Baltic Sea and its change during 1987 and 1988”. Three years observations of the levels of some radionuclides in the Baltic Sea after the Chernobyl accident. Baltic Sea environment proceedings, vol. 3 1, pp. 31-51, Helsinki, 1989. [SI A. Stigehrandt, A. 1983. “A model for the exchange of water and salt between the Baltic Skagerrak”, Joumal of Physical Oceanography, vo1.13, pp.411-27, 1983. [9] A. Svansson, “The water exchange of the Baltic”, Ambio SpecialReport, vol.1, pp.15-19, 1972. [lo] M. Toscano-Jimenez and R. Garcia- Tenorio, “Modelling The Dispersion Of I3’Cs In Marine Ecosystem Wlth Monte Carlo Methods”, Nuclear Instruments And Methods B, ~01.213, pp.789-793,2003, [ll] M. Toscano-Jimenez and R. Garcia- Tenorio, “A Three-Dimensional Model For The Dispersion Of Radioactive Substances In Marine Ecosystems. Application To The Baltic Sea After The Chemobyl Disaster”, Ocean Engineering, vo1.31, pp.999- 10 1 8, 2004. [I21 A. Viopio, “The Baltic Sea”. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.162-167, 1981. [13] D. Weiss, “The distribution of radionuclides in bottom sediments of the Open Baltic Sea and Greifswald Bodden”, Three yeus observations of levels of some radionuclides in the Baltic Sea after the Chernobyl accident. Baltic Sea environment proceedings, vo1.31 pp.94-122, Helsinki, 1989. - 2365 Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de Sevilla. Downloaded on May 19,2023 at 18:41:04 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.