Prevalence of abdominal obesity in Spanish children and adolescents. do we need waist circumference measurements in pediatric practice?

Prevalence of Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Children and Adolescents. Do We Need Waist Circumference Measurements in Pediatric Practice? Helmut Schro ¨der 1,2 *, Lourdes Ribas 3,4 , Corinna Koebnick 5 , Anna Funtikova 1,2 , Santiago F. Gomez 1,6 , Montserat Fı ´to 1,4 , Carmen Perez-Rodrigo 7 , Lluis Serra-Majem 3,4,8 1Cardiovascular Risk and Nutrition Research Group (CARIN), REGICOR Study Group, Research Programme in Inflammatory and Cardiovascular Disorders (RICAD), IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain, 2CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 3Fundacio ´n para la Investigacio ´n Nutricional (Nutrition Research Foundation), Barcelona, Spain, 4CIBER Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, 5Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, United States of America, 6Fundacio ´n THAO, Barcelona, Spain, 7Community Nutrition Unit, Bilbao Department of Public Health, Bilbao, Spain, 8Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, Spain Abstract Background: Evidence indicates that central adiposity has increased to a higher degree than general adiposity in children and adolescents in recent decades. However, waist circumference is not a routine measurement in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of abdominal obesity based on waist circumferences (WC) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) in Spanish children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years. Further, the prevalence of abdominal obesity (AO) among normal and overweight individuals was analyzed. Design: Data were obtained from a study conducted from 1998 to 2000 in a representative national sample of 1521 children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years (50.0% female) in Spain. WC and WHtR measurements were obtained in addition to BMI. AO was defined as WHtR $0.50 (WHtR-AO), sex and age specific WC$90 th percentile (WC-AO1), and sex and age specific WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat measured by by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (WC-AO2). Results: IOTFbased overweight and obsity prevalence was 21.5% and 6.6% in children and 17.4% and 5.2% in adolescents, respectively. Abdominal obesity (AO) was defined as WHtR$0.50 (WHtR-AO), sexand age-specific WC$90th percentile (WC-AO1), and sexand age-specific WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (WC-AO2). The respective prevalence of WHtR-AO, WC-AO1, and WC-AO2 was 21.3% (24.6% boys; 17.9% girls), 9.4% (9.1% boys; 9.7% girls), and 26.8% (30.6% boys;22.9% girls) in children and 14.3% (20.0% boys; 8.7% girls), 9.6% (9.8% boys; 9.5% girls), and 21.1% (28.8% boys; 13.7% girls) in adolescents. Conclusion: The prevalence of AO in Spanish children and adolescents is of concern. The high proportion of AO observed in young patients who are normal weight or overweight indicates a need to include waist circumference measurements in routine clinical practice. Citation: Schro ¨der H, Ribas L, Koebnick C, Funtikova A, Gomez SF, et al. (2014) Prevalence of Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Children and Adolescents. Do We Need Waist Circumference Measurements in Pediatric Practice? PLoS ONE 9(1): e87549. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087549 Editor: Maria `Alemany, University of Barcelona, Faculty of Biology, Spain Received September 20, 2013; Accepted December 23, 2013; Published January 27, 2014 Copyright: ß2014 Schro ¨der et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: This work was supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER, (PI11/01900), the Spanish Ministry of Health [RED: Alimentacio ´n saludable en la prevencio ´n primaria de enfermedades cro ´nicas: la Red Predimed, one of the Redes Tema ´ticas de Investigacio ´n Cooperativa Sanitaria (RETICs)] Fundacio ´n Dieta Mediterra ´nea, Spain; and Kellogg’s Espan ˜a SA and Kellogg’s Company, Battle Creek, USA via the Fundacio ´n Universitaria de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria and the Fundacio ´n para la Investigacio ´n Nutricional and by a joint contract (Miguel Servet CP03/00115) with the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the Health Department of the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya). The CIBERESP and the CIBEROBN and the RETIC Predimed are initiatives of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected]s Introduction The childhood obesity epidemic is one of the greatest current challenges for health policy. Two surrogate measures of abdominal adiposity, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), have been related to cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents [1] and threshold measurements have been proposed to identify at-risk children [2]. In the latter study, the prevalence of abdominal obesity varied from 3.8% to 33.2% in the countries studied. This wide range is due in part to actual population differences and in part to differences in surrogate measures of abdominal adiposity and the cut-off points used to define abdominal obesity. Furthermore, the availability of nationally representative data on the prevalence of abdominal obesity in children is limited, obscuring the potential magnitude of the problem. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549 Elevated abdominal fat within the weight ranges defined as normal and overweight is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease and premature mortality adults [3,4]. Data from the Bogolusa Heart Study showed a high cardiometabolic risk among normal and overweight children with abdominal obesity compared to overweight children without excessive abdominal fat accumulation [5]. However, fat distribution is not routinely measured in clinical practice. Instead, national and international guidelines recommend the use of percentile cut-off points of weight and height based on country-specific growth charts to identify children and adolescents at cardiometabolic risk [6,7]. Secular trends of body mass index (BMI) and WC indicate greater increase in abdominal fat compared to general adiposity [8–11]. Furthermore, a representative study from the Balearic Islands showed that 20% of abdominally obese adolescents were classified as overweight [12]. Therefore, we hypothesized that a nationwide analysis would show an important proportion of normal and overweight children with elevated levels of abdominal adiposity. This study had two objectives: 1) To determine the prevalence of abdominal obesity based on WC and WHtR measurements in a representative national sample of Spanish children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years and 2) To analyze the proportion of abdominal obesity in normal and overweight young Spaniards. Based on current screening procedures and recommendations, these children and adolescents are unlikely to be characterized as being at high cardiometabolic risk. Methods Study design and subjects Parental written consent on behalf of each participant under 18 years was obtained. The study protocol and was approved by the ethics committee of the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition. The enKid study on nutritional status and food habits of Spanish children and young people, conducted between 1998 and 2000, was a cross-sectional survey of the Spanish population aged 2 to 24 years (n = 3534), selected by multistage random sampling procedures based on a population census. The theoretical sample size was set at 5500 individuals, taking into account an anticipated 70% participation rate, which would result in a sample of approximately 3.850 individuals. The objective of the EnKid study was two-fold: 1) to establish the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies among the population aged 2 to 24 years and 2) to analyze the association of these micronutrients with group membership. The sample size was calculated according to 1) the estimated prevalence of most micronutrients with 95% confidence interval and accuracy of +/25% of the average value of the micronutrient and 2) a statistical power of 80% to detect significant differences between two groups .= 10% of the mean of the micronutrients (setting the alpha error at p,= 0.05). The sample size was overestimated by 30% to cover possible losses due to census errors. The present study included 1521 participants aged 6 to 17 years. Data collection Home interviews were conducted by 43 dietitians and nutritionists who had undergone a rigorous selection and training process to standardize the data collection. Survey data were entered by the same field staff into laptop computers with software specifically designed for the study. Completed interview data were periodically sent to the co-ordinating centers in Barcelona and Bilbao. Antropometric measurements The anthropometric variables were gathered in the domicile of the participant. All the interviewers received the same theoretical/ practical standardized formation for the anthropometric measurements in a workshop. During this workshop all interviewers collected weight, height, and waist circumferences in the same model to evaluate the uniformity of data collection. Body weight, height, and waist circumferences were measured on the day of the interview, with the subject in underwear without shoes, using an electronic scale (to the nearest 100 g), a portable Kawe stadiometer (to the nearest 1 mm), and a Hoechst metric tape (to the nearest 1 mm), respectively. Measuring devices were systematically calibrated. Reference curves Waist circumference reference curves were calculated. To obtain the WC percentiles by age, a quantile regression spline was performed separately in boys and girls, using the rqss from quantreg [13], R package [14]. The technical details used to fit these models are described by Koenker et al. [15]. The degree of smoothness measured by lwas chosen by minimizing the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) of the model, optimizing the balance between smoothness and data fitting as suggested in [16]. The sexand age-specific 90th percentile of WC was calculated. Definition of obesity and abdominal obesity Excessive abdominal fat was defined as a) WHtR .0.50 [17] (WHtR-AO) b) equal to or greater than the sexand age-specific 90 th percentile of WC (WC-AO1), and c) sex and age specific WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat measured by by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (WC-AO2) [18]. The BMI categories followed Cole et al. [19]. Spanish recommendations for identifying overweight and obese children and adolescents are based on growth curves from [20]. We presented data on BMI categories based on the IOTF criteria [19] to facilitate international comparision of our data. In Spain, tables published by the F. Orbegozo Foundation [20] are frequently used in routine clinical practice to define BMI categories. Therefore, we additionally included data based on this definition. Both categories were used in our analysis. We presented data on BMI categories based on the IOTF criteria to facilitate international comparision of our data. In Spain, tables published by the Fundacion F. Orbegozo are frequently used in routine clinical practice to define BMI categories. Therefore, we additionally included data based on this definition. Statistical analysis Comparison of proportions of abdominal obesity and sociodemographic variables was performed by x 2 test. Differences were considered significant if P,0N05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 18N0. (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Ill., USA). The software program R was used to fit waist reference curves. Results Prevalence of WHtR-abdominal obesity was higher than general obesity based on IOTF definition. Mean WC and WHtR for boys and girls aged 6 to 11 years were 64.168.3 cm, 0.47360.05 cm/cm, 61.667.1 cm, and 0.45560.05 cm/cm, respectively. In adolescent boys and girls aged 12 to 17 years we found a mean WC and WHtR of 76.7610.4 cm, 0.45760.06 cm/cm, 69.567.7 cm, and 0.42960.05 cm/cm, respectively. A higher proportion of children had WHtR-AO and WC-AO2 compared to adolescents (Table 1). Among Screening for Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Youth PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 2 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549 adolescents, more boys than girls had WHtR-AO and WC-AO2. In this age group, WC-AO1 was more prominent in the south and Canary Islands than in central and north Spain (Table 1) but was less prevalent nationwide than WHtR-AO in the normal and overweight categories (Table 1). The prevalence of abdominal obesity among normal weight, overweight, and obese children and adolescents strongly depends on the definition of abdominal obesity and BMI categories (Table 2). Discussion Abdominal obesity, based on a WHtR ratio of equal to or greater than 0.50, and on WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, was highly prevalent in Spanish children and adolescents. A considerable proportion of normal and overweight children were abdominally obese and, thus, at risk of obesity associated comorbidities. Prevalence rates of abdominal obesity based on both WC and WHtR measures exceeded that of general obesity based on IOTF classification in Spanish children and adolescents. However, there is no consensus about an international WC threshold for abdominal obesity in children and adolescents. This likely contributed to the wide range of abdominal obesity that has been reported for national populations. Few national representative surveys have reported obesity prevalence in adolescents aged 10 to 18 years, but reports ranged from 3.8% 33.2% [2]. Compared to most of those surveys, abdominal obesity based on the 90 th percentile cut-off, but not the cut-off proposed by Taylor et al [18], was less prevalent in the present population. De Moraes and colleagues [2] indicate that most studies they reviewed did not use the appropriate statistical method to determine WC cut-offs. In the present study, the prevalence of abdominal obesity was considerably increased because the cut-off thresholds were based on the association between WC and high trunk fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In the absence of internationally validated cut-offs for abdominal obesity, however, it is difficult to interpret this finding. Furthermore, estimation of the true prevalence of abdominal obesity is affected by differential and non-differential misclassification. The consequence is an unpredictable overor underestimation of the true prevalence of abdominal obesity in a population It has been shown that the WHtR correctly discriminates between low and high levels of total and central fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children and adolescents [21,22]. Furthermore, abdominal adiposity defined by the WHtR is related to cardiometabolic risk in children and adolsecents [23– 26]. Two recently published studies demonstrate the predictive value of WHtR for detecting cardiometabolic risk [25,26]. However, neither of these studies found WHtR to have a better predictive capacity than WC and BMI. The WHtR has gained increasing interest as a simple measure of abdominal adiposity, independent of sex and age [17]. A cut-off of 0.50 has been proposed, based on studies of the association between WHtR and cardiometabolic risk in adults [17,27]. The weak association of this ratio with age seems to partially justify applying the same cut-off value for children and adolescents. Using this classification, 21.3% and 14.3% of children and adolescents, respectively, had abdominal obesity in the present population. Boys were more likely to have abdominal obesity than girls, particularly in the adolescent age range. This finding is in line with data from a nationwide Greek survey of children aged 6 to 12 years [28]. Considerably lower prevalence of abdominal obesity was reported in Swedish and English children and adolescents [29,30]. A striking contrast to these findings was reported from the NHANES survey [31]. Around one third of American children and adolescents are abdominally obese, with higher proportions among females. There was great regional heterogeneity in the prevalence of abdominal obesity. This finding is in line with the distribution of prevalence rates for obesity in the EnKid study and the high rate of regional heterogeneity in obesity prevalence reported by the Table 1. Prevalence of abdominal obesity in children and adolescents from Spain 1 . 6 to 11 years (n = 587) 12 to 17 years (n = 933) WC 2 WC 3 WHtR 4 WC 2 WC 3 WHtR 4 All 13.0 (10.3;15.8) 26.8 (23,2;30.4) 5 21.3 (18.1;24.8) 5 11.6 (9.5;13.7) 21.1 (18.5;23.8) 14.3 (12.1;16.6) Boys 14.3 (10.3;18.3) 30.6 (25.5;35.7) 6 24.6 (19.9;29.8) 12.2 (9.3;15.3) 28.8 (25.1;32.5) 6 20.0 (16.5;23.0) 6 Girls 11.8 (8.1;15.5) 22.9 (17.8;28.0) 5 17.9 (13.6;22.4) 5 10.9 (8.1;13.7) 13.7 (10.;17.3) 8.7 (6.2;11.3) Community size ,10000 12.4 (6.7;18.1) 29.5 (21.8;37.1) 20.9 (13.8;28.1) 11.7 (7.4;15.9) 20.2 (14.8;25.5) 11.2 (6.6;15.8) 10000–49999 13.5 (7.8;19.1) 24.5 (17.6;31.4) 22.0 (15.2;28.8) 12.6 (8.6;16.7) 17.6 (12.4;22.7) 18.4 (14.1;22.6) 50000–350000 10.6 (5.9;15.4) 26.2 (18.9;33.6) 19.5 (13.1;25.9) 9.0 (5.4;12.6) 22.6 (17.6;2.6) 11.5 (7.1;15.9) .350000 15.7 (9.9;21.4) 27.5 (20.4;34.5) 23.5 (17.0;30.1) 13.4 (8.6 (18.2) 24.7 (19.0;30.5) 16.4 (11.5;21.3) Region Center 18.7 (11.3;26.1) 34.9 (26.5;43.3) 30.8 (23.1;38.6) 11.7 (7.4;16.0) 20.1 (14.6;25.6) 16.4 (11.7:21.1) Northeast 10.3 (5.3;15.2) 17.8 (10.7;24.9) 20.0 (13.3;26.7) 6.4 (3.1;9.8) 15.8 (10.2;21.5) 11.3 (6.5;16.2) North 9.5 (4.7;14.2) 22.3 (15.;29.4) 18.2 (11.6;24.9) 10.3 (6.4;14.3) 20.3 (15.0;25.5) 10.8 (6.3;15.3) South 13.3 (6.5;20.0) 29.6 (20.9;28.3) 19.4 (11.2;27.5) 16.5 (10.4;22.7) 29.5 (22.7;36.3) 18.8 (13.0;24.7) Levante 15.2 (6.5;23.8) 37.9 (27.3;48.5) 19.7 (9.8;29.6) 13.9 (7.4;20.4) 22.2 (14.5;29.9) 16.7 (10.0;23.3) Canary Islands 22.2 (3.0;41.4) 33.3 (13.0;53.7) 22.2 (3.2;41.2) 25.0 (9.0;41.0) 28.6 (13.5;43.7) 20.7 (7.9;33.5) 1 Values are presented in percentage (95% confidence interval) 2 Waist circumferences above the sexand age-specific 90 th percentile. 3 Waist circumference cut-off according yo Taylor et al. [18] 4 Waist to height ratio $0.50 5 p,0.05 between age groups 6 p,0.05 within age group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087549.t001 Screening for Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Youth PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 3 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549 ALADINO study for children aged 6 to 9 years [32]. Different lifestyle habits between the regions of Spain might account for this finding. Evidence indicates that the prevalence of central adiposity has increased to a higher degree than general obesity in youth [8–11]. Results from the Bogolusa Heart Study showed that children within normal and overweight categories with abdominal obesity were at higher cardiometabolic risk than overweight children without excessive abdominal fat [5]. This is of particular concern because classification of general obesity is the measure to identify children at high risk of obesity-related comorbidities in routine clinical practice. For this reason, we calculated the proportion of children and adolescents with abdominal obesity at low to intermediate risk according to BMI classification of normal and overweight, respectively. Additionally, the concomitant presentation of general and abdominal obesity may demand a more aggressive intervention program than would general obesity in the absence of abdominal fat accumulation. In the present study we observed a concerning proportion of children and adolescents at high risk for obesity-related comorbidities who were not classified as such by BMI criteria. Abdominal obesity based on the WHtR threshold identified more children and adolescents at high risk in normal and overweight BMI categories than did the WC threshold alone. Kromeyer-Hauschild and colleagues [33] reported a high prevalence of abdominal obesity based on WHtR in overweight adolescents aged 11 to 17 years. Abdominal obesity was more prominent in overweight boys than girls, which is in line with findings of the present study. This proportion was somewhat lower in adolescents than in children. The same was true for general obesity in the presence of abdominal obesity. In the present study, a considerable proportion of obese children and adolescents were free of abdominal obesity. The question is whether these children should be treated less ‘‘aggressively’’ than their abdominally obese peers. The WHtR criteria for the characterization of abdominal obesity have generated interest because of easy calculation. Furthermore, the message of ‘‘keep your waist to half your height’’ is attractive for public health policy. However, a WHtR of Table 2. Prevalence of abdominal obesity according to BMI categories. IOTF 1 BMI categories Spain 2 Normal weight Overweight Obesity Normal weight Overweight Obesity 6–11 years WC 3 all 2.2 (0.8;3.6) 31.7 (23.6;39.9) 66.7 (51.9;81.5) 2.9 (1.3;4.5) 15.9 (6.8;24.9) 52.5 (42.7;62.2) boys 0 36.2 (24.9;47.6) 76.2 (58.0;94.4) 0 13.3 (3.4;23.3) 60.3 (47.8;72.9) girls 3.8 (1.2;6.3) 26.3 (14.9;37.7) 55.6 (32.6;78.5) 4.8 (2.1;7.6) 22.2 (3.0;41.4) 41.9 (27.1;56.6) WC 4 all 9.6 (6.8;12.5) 67.5 (59.2;75.8) 82.1 (70.1;94.1) 10.1 (7.2;13.0) 49.2 (36.9;61.6) 81.2 (73.6;88.8) boys 10.3 (6.2;14.5) 71.0 (60.3;81.7) 95.2 (86.1;104.3) 9.5 (5.3;13.6) 46.7 (32.1;61.2) 87.9 (79.5;96.3) girls 9.0 (5.1;12.8) 59.6 (46.9;72.4) 66.7 (44.9;88.4) 10.6 (6.6;14.6) 55.6 (32.6;78.5) 72.1 (58.7;85.5) WHtR 5 all 7.5 (4.9;10.0) 49.2 (40.5;57.9) 82.1 (70.0;94.1) 8.4 (5.7;11.1) 39.7 (27.6;51.8) 64.4 (55.0;73.7) boys 6.4 (3.0;9.8) 59.4 (47.8;71.0) 90.5 (77.9;103.0) 5.3 (2.1;8.4) 37.8 (23.6;51.9) 79.3 (68.9;89.7) girls 8.5 (4.7;12.2) 36.8 (24.3;49.4) 72.2 (51.5;92.9) 11.0 (6.9;15.1) 80.0 (55.2;104.8) 79.3 (68.9;89.7) 12–17years WC 3 all 1.7 (0.7;2.6) 31.3 (24.1;38.4) 89.6 (80.9;98.2) 1.3 (0.5;2.1) 16.9 (9.1;24.6) 60.4 (52.7;68.7) boys 0 22.3 (14.3;30.4) 86.5 (75.5;97.5) 0 11.5 (2.9;20.2) 55.7 (45.3;66.1) girls 2.8 (1.2;4.4) 47.4 (34.4;60.3) 100 2.1 (0.7;3.5) 24.3 (10.5;38.1) 69.6 (56.3;82.9) WC 4 all 5.3 (3.7;7.0) 67.5 (60.2;74.8) 97.9 (93.9;102.0) 5.3 (3.6;7.0) 43.8 (33.5;54.1) 87.3 (81.7;92.9) boys 6.1 (3.4;8.7) 73.8 (65.3;82.3) 97.3 (92.1;102.5) 7.0 (4.2;9.8) 53.8 (40.3;67.4) 92.0 (86.4;97.7) girls 4.8 (2.7;6.9) 56.1 (43.3;69.0) 100 3.9 (2.0;5.9) 29.7 (15.0;44.5) 78.3 (66.3;90.2) WHtR 5 all 1.8 (0.8;2.8) 44.1 (36.4;51.8) 97.9 (93.9; 102.0) 1.6 (0.7;2.5) 19.1 (10.9;27.3) 76.3 (69.1;83.5) boys 3.2 (1.2;5.1) 44.7 (31.1;54.3) 97.3 (92.1;102.5) 3.2 (1.2;5.1) 21.2 (10.1;32.3) 80.7 (72.4;88.9) girls 0.8 (20.1;1.6) 43.1 (30.4;55.8) 100 0.3 (20.0;0.8) 16.2 (4.3;28.1) 68.1 (54.8;81.4) 1 Prevalence calculated using IOTF reference values (cut-off points corresponding to an adult BMI$25 and ,30 kg/m2). Normal weight (70.9%; 76.6%), overweight (21.5%;17.4%), and obesity (6.6%;5.2%) (children; adolescents) [19]. 2 Normal weight (71.0%; 75.0%), overweight (10.7%;9.7%), and obesity (17.2%;14.5%) (children; adolescents) according to Hernandez [20]. 3 Waist circumferences above the sex and age specific 90 th percentile. 4 Sex and age specific WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat measured by by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [18]. 5 Waist to height ratio $0.5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087549.t002 Screening for Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Youth PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549 0.50 is not yet established as the optimal threshold for all populations and ethnicities. Indeed, two studies in different populations have reported different WHtR thresholds associated with cardiometabolic risk in children [34,35]. More studies establishing population-specific WHtR thresholds are needed. Limitations and strenghts A limitation of the present study was that pubertal status was not recored. Nonetheless, this study has several important strengths, including a nationwide population-based sample with standardized anthropometric measurements available. However, one might doubt about the actuality of the EnKid data. Recently published data from two nationally representative studies [32,36] showed few changes in overweight and obesity prevalence rates of children and adolescents in Spain compared to the EnKid study of about a decade earlier. Although this supports the relevance of the EnKid data concerning general obesity, a disproportional increase in waist circumferences compared to BMI has been reported in pediatric populations of other countries [8–11]. If this change is also true for youth in Spain, then the prevalence rates reported in our study would likely be underestimated, but this remains to be tested when newer data become available. Conclusions Abdominal obesity is highly prevalent in children and adolescents in Spain. Based on our results using sexand age-specific WC cut-off values associated with high trunk fat mass, a significant proportion of normal and overweight children and adolescents were abdominally obese and can be considered at cardiometabolic risk, but would not be identified using traditional screening methods. Our results indicate the need to incorporate waist circumference into routine clinical practice, in addition to traditional measurements of weight and height. Acknowledgments We appreciate the English revision by Elaine M. Lilly, Ph.D. Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: HS LR CK AF SFG MF CPR LS-M. Performed the experiments: HS LR CK AF SFG MF CPR LS-M. Analyzed the data: HS LR CK AF SFG MF CPR LS-M. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HS LR CK AF SFG MF CPR LS-M. Wrote the paper: HS. References 1. Lee CM, Huxley RR, Wildman RP (2008) Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 61:646–53. 2. de Moraes AC, Fadoni RP, Ricardi LM, Souza TC, Rosaneli CF, et al (2011) Prevalence of abdominal obesity in adolescents: a systematic review. Obes Rev 12:69–77. 3. Zhang C, Rexrode KM, van Dam RM, Li TY, Hu FB (2008) Abdominal obesity and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: sixteen years of follow-up in US women. Circulation 117:1658–67. 4. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R (2002) Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med 2002 162:2074–9. 5. Mokha JS, Srinivasan SR, Dasmahapatra P, Fernandez C, Chen W, et al. (2010) Utility of waist-to-height ratio in assessing the status of central obesity and related cardiometabolic risk profile among normal weight and overweight/obese children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. BMC Pediatr 10:73. 6. Barton M, US Preventive Services Task Force (2010) Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics 125:361–7. 7. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n Espan˜a (2009) Guı ´adePra´ctica Clı ´nica sobre la Prevencio´n y el Tratamiento de la Obesidad Infantojuvenil Ed: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´n Espan˜a, 2009. Available: http://www. gencat.cat/salut/depsan/units/aatrm/pdf/gpc_obesidad_infantojuvenil_ aatrm09.pdf. Accessed 2009 August. 8. Okosun IS, Boltri JM, Eriksen MP, Hepburn VA (2006) Trends in abdominal obesity in young people: United States 1988–2002. Ethn Dis 16:338–44. 9. McCarthy HD, Jarrett KV, Emmett PM, Rogers I (2005) Trends in waist circumferences in young British children: a comparative study. Int J Obes (Lond) 29:157–62. 10. McCarthy HD, Ellis SM, Cole TJ (2003) Central overweight and obesity in British youth aged 11-16 years: cross sectional surveys of waist circumference. BMJ 326: 624. 11. Garnett SP, Baur LA, Cowell CT (2011) The prevalence of increased central adiposity in Australian school children 1985 to 2007. Obes Rev 12:887–96. 12. Bibiloni Mdel M, Pons A, Tur JA (2013) Defining body fatness in adolescents: a proposal of the AFAD-A classification. PLoS One 8:e55849. 13. Koenker R (n.d.) quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.98. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package = quantreg. Accessed 2013 September. 14. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013 Vienna, Austria. Available: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 2013 September. 15. Koenker R, Ng P, Portnoy S (1994): Quantile Smoothing Splines. Biometrika 1994; 81:673–680 16. Koenker R (2010) Additive models for quantile regression: An analysis of risk factors for malnutrition in india. In H. D. Vinod (Ed.), Advances in Social Science Research Using R, volume 196 of Lecture Notes in Statistics chapter 2, (pp. 23–33). Springer. 17. Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M (2010) A systematic review of waist-toheight ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0?5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev 23:247– 69. 18. Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A (2000) Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3–19 y. Am J Clin Nutr 72:490–5. 19. Cole TJ (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320: 1240–3. 20. Hernandez M, Castellet J, Narvaiza JL, Rincon I, Ruiz E, et al. (1988) Curvas y tablas de crecimiento. Instituto sobre Crecimiento y Desarrollo. Fundacion F. Orbegozo. Madrid: Editorial Garsi. 21. Guntsche Z, Guntsche EM, Saravı ´FD, Gonzalez LM, Lopez Avellaneda C, et al. (2010) Umbilical waist-to-height ratio and trunk fat mass index (DXA) as markers of central adiposity and insulin resistance in Argentinean children with a family history of metabolic syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 23:245–56. 22. Hara M, Saitou E, Iwata F, Okada T, Harada K (2002) Waist-to-height ratio is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Japanese schoolchildren. J Atheroscler Thromb 9: 127–32. 23. Taylor RW, Williams SM, Grant AM, Taylor BJ, Goulding A (2011) Predictive ability of waist-to-height in relation to adiposity in children is not improved with age and sex-specific values. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19:1062–8. 24. Savva SC, Tornaritis M, Savva ME, Kourides Y, Panagi A, et al. (2000) Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 1453–1458. 25. Blu¨her S, Molz E, Wiegand S, Otto KP, Sergeyev E, et al Adiposity Patients Registry Initiative and German Competence Net Obesity (2013) Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio as predictors of cardiometabolic risk in childhood obesity depending on pubertal development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3384–93. 26. Graves L, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Ness A, et al. (2013) Waist-toheight ratio and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence: findings from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatr Obes. 2013 Jul 25. 27. Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S (2012) Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 13(3):275–86. 28. Tzotzas T, Kapantais E, Tziomalos K, Ioannidis I, Mortoglou A, et al. (2011) Prevalence of overweight and abdominal obesity in Greek children 6-12 years old: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey. Hippokratia 15:48–53. 29. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M (2006) A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message–‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. Int J Obes (Lond) 30:988–92. 30. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Vicente-Rodrı ´guez G, Sjo¨stro¨m M (2008) Central adiposity in 9and 15-year-old Swedish children from the European Youth Heart Study. Int J Pediatr Obes 3:212–6. 31. Li C, Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Cook S (2006) Recent trends in waist circumference and waist-height ratio among US children and adolescents. Pediatrics 118:e1390–8. Screening for Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Youth PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 5 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549 32. Pe´rez-Farino´s N, Lo´pez-Sobaler AM, Dal Re MA ´, Villar C, Labrado E, et al. (2013) The ALADINO study: a national study of prevalence of overweight and obesity in Spanish children in 2011. Biomed Res Int 2013:163687. 33. Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Neuhauser H, Schaffrath Rosario A, Schienkiewitz A (2013) Abdominal obesity in German adolescents defined by waist-to-height ratio and its association to elevated blood pressure: the KiGGS study. Obes Facts 6:165–75. 34. Elizondo-Montemayor L, Serrano-Gonza´lez M, Ugalde-Casas, BustamanteCareaga H, Cuello-Garcı ´a C PA (2011) Waist-to-height: cutoff matters in predicting metabolic syndrome in Mexican children. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 9:183–90. 35. Kruger HS, Faber M, Schutte AE, Ellis SM (2013) A proposed cutoff point of waist-to-height ratio for metabolic risk in African township adolescents. Nutrition 29:502–7. 36. Sa´nchez-Cruz JJ, Jime´nez-Moleo´n JJ, Ferna´ndez-Quesada F, Sa´nchez MJ (2013) Prevalence of child and youth obesity in Spain in 2012. Rev Esp Cardiol 66:371–6. Screening for Abdominal Obesity in Spanish Youth PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 6 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87549