Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson into bb¯¯ and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at s√ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

JHEP01(2022)063 Published for SISSA by Springer Received:September 7, 2021 Revised:December 3, 2021 Accepted:December 18, 2021 Published:January 13, 2022 Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson into b¯ b and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector The ATLAS collaboration Abstract: A search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson (H) into a b¯ bresonance plus missing transverse momentum is described. The search is performed with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider using 139 fb−1of pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV. The search targets events from ZH production in an NMSSM scenario where H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1, with ˜χ0 2→a˜χ0 1, where ais a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson and ˜χ0 1,2are the two lightest neutralinos. The decay of the aboson into a pair of b-quarks results in a peak in the dijet invariant mass distribution. The final-state signature consists of two leptons, two or more jets, at least one of which is identified as originating from a b-quark, and missing transverse momentum. Observations are consistent with Standard Model expectations and upper limits are set on the product of cross section times branching ratio for a threedimensional scan of the masses of the ˜χ0 2,˜χ0 1and aboson. Keywords: Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments), Supersymmetry, Beyond Standard Model ArXiv ePrint: 2109.02447 Open Access, Copyright CERN, for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Article funded by SCOAP3. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2022)063 JHEP01(2022)063 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The ATLAS detector 2 3 Data and simulated event samples 3 4 Object and event selection 4 4.1 Object reconstruction 4 4.2 Event selection 5 5 Background and statistical model 6 6 Systematic uncertainties 10 7 Results 11 8 Conclusion 12 The ATLAS collaboration 21 1 Introduction Since its introduction, the Standard Model (SM) has successfully predicted several new particles, culminating in the discovery of the Higgs boson (H) [1,2]. The Hboson, discovered by ATLAS and CMS at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [3], appears to have properties consistent with those predicted by the SM within current experimental uncertainties [4–6]. The 95% confidence level (CL) upper limit on the branching ratio for Hboson decays to beyond-the-SM (BSM) particles, from a combined ATLAS and CMS measurement of the Higgs boson couplings, is 34% [6], although this limit comes with some assumptions. A more recent ATLAS measurement, based on 80 fb−1of 13 TeV data [4], set a 95% CL upper limit of 21% on the branching ratio for Hboson decays via undetected modes. Given the magnitude of these limits and the assumptions that go into deriving them, direct searches for exotic decays of the Higgs boson remain a high priority [7]. Among the many final states discussed in ref. [7], this analysis most closely considers a scenario arising in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric SM (NMSSM) [8], a generalization of the minimal supersymmetric SM (MSSM) [9–13]. The MSSM is the simplest extension to the SM that incorporates supersymmetry (SUSY). It predicts four additional Higgs bosons, generally assumed to be heavier than the Hboson: two neutral states, the H0and A0bosons, as well as two charged states, the – 1 – JHEP01(2022)063 H±bosons. The measured mass of the Higgs boson [14,15] close to 125 GeV results in the reintroduction of a ‘little hierarchy’ problem [16] in the MSSM. This hierarchy is alleviated in the NMSSM by allowing for additional contributions to the mass of the Higgs boson from new scalar particles. The NMSSM contains an additional pseudoscalar Higgs boson (a), generally assumed to be less massive than the Hboson since its mass is protected by a Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry [8]. Previous searches for exotic Higgs boson decays involving the production of the a boson have focused on the R-symmetry limit [8] of the NMSSM, where the dominant decay channel is H→aa [17–27]. As proposed in refs. [28,29], the present analysis considers instead the region of parameter space near the PQ symmetry limit of the NMSSM. Near this limit, the decay H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1→a˜χ0 1˜χ0 1dominates over H→aa, where ˜χ0 2and ˜χ0 1are the two lightest neutralinos, which are admixtures of the supersymmetric partners of the Higgs and gauge bosons of the SM. If the decay a→bb is kinematically allowed, it is typically highly favoured. The ˜χ0 1is assumed to be stable, as obtained in R-parity conserving SUSY models [11]. The analysis presented in this paper uses 139 fb−1of pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector. It targets the H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1→a˜χ0 1˜χ0 1cascade decay, where the a→b¯ bdecay dominates, and the Hboson is produced in association with a Z boson. The Zboson is required in the analysis selection to decay into a pair of electrons or muons (hereafter referred to as leptons), which provide a signature to trigger upon and which reduce the multijet background.1The resulting final state consists of a pair of oppositely charged leptons, two jets, each containing a b-hadron (b-jets), and missing transverse momentum (Emiss T) from the two ˜χ0 1neutralinos. The search is performed for a range of mavalues, and for a few sets of fixed values of m˜χ0 1and m˜χ0 2. The primary Standard Model backgrounds in this search are Zbosons produced with heavy-flavour (bottom and charm) jets, hereafter labelled Z+HF, and tt events; their contributions are estimated from the data in control regions enhanced in these backgrounds. The dijet invariant mass is used as the final discriminant in a binned likelihood fit. The search, which compares an expected background shape in the signal region with the measured shape, is also sensitive in principle to other distortions of the dijet invariant mass spectrum arising from BSM physics effects. 2 The ATLAS detector The ATLAS experiment [30] at the LHC is a multipurpose particle detector with a forwardbackward symmetric cylindrical geometry and a near 4πcoverage in solid angle.2It consists of an inner tracking detector (ID) surrounded by a thin superconducting solenoid providing 1The contribution from Z→τ+τ−decays with the subsequent decays of the τ-leptons into light leptons is included in the signal definition and simulation but is suppressed by a factor of at least 2000 due to the event selection requirements. 2ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the centre of the detector and the z-axis along the beam pipe. The x-axis points from the IP to the centre of the LHC ring, and the y-axis points upwards. Cylindrical coordinates (r, φ)are used in the transverse plane, φbeing the azimuthal angle around the z-axis. The pseudorapidity is defined in terms of the polar – 2 – JHEP01(2022)063 a2 T axial magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters, and a muon spectrometer. The inner tracking detector covers the pseudorapidity range |η|<2.5. It consists of silicon pixel, silicon microstrip, and transition radiation tracking detectors. The insertable B-layer, installed before Run 2 [31,32], typically provides the innermost hit on a track. Lead/liquid-argon (LAr) sampling calorimeters provide electromagnetic (EM) energy measurements with high granularity. An iron/scintillator hadron calorimeter covers the central pseudorapidity range (|η|<1.7). The endcap and forward regions are instrumented with LAr calorimeters for EM and hadronic energy measurements up to |η|= 4.9. The muon spectrometer surrounds the calorimeters and is based on three large air-core toroidal superconducting magnets with eight coils each. The field integral of the toroids ranges between 2.0and 6.0 T m across most of the detector. The muon spectrometer includes a system of precision tracking chambers and fast detectors for triggering. A two-level trigger system [33] is used to select events. The first-level trigger is implemented in hardware and uses a subset of the detector information to keep the accepted event rate below 100 kHz. This is followed by a software-based trigger that reduces the accepted event rate to 1 kHz on average depending on the data-taking conditions. An extensive software suite [34] is used for real and simulated data reconstruction and analysis, for operation and in the trigger and data acquisition systems of the experiment. 3 Data and simulated event samples The data used in this analysis, corresponding to the full Run 2 dataset for pp collisions, were collected at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV during the 2015–2018 running periods using unprescaled single-lepton triggers with a threshold of 26 GeV (transverse energy, ET, for electrons and transverse momentum, pT, for muons) [35,36]. Events are selected for analysis only if they are of good quality [37] and if all the relevant detector components are known to have been in good operating condition, which corresponds to a total integrated luminosity of 139.0±2.4fb−1[38]. The recorded events contain an average of 34 inelastic pp collisions per bunch-crossing. Although the dominant SM backgrounds are modelled using a data-driven technique, Monte Carlo (MC) simulated events provide input to these techniques and are used to model the subdominant backgrounds and the ZH,H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1signal process. A summary of all the MC event generator programs used in the analysis is provided in table 1. Samples produced with alternative generators are used to estimate systematic uncertainties in the event modelling, as described in section 6. In the H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1simulated samples, a Higgs boson is produced in association with aZboson, using Powheg Box, while Pythia 8.210 is used to force the decay chain: H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1and ˜χ0 2→a˜χ0 1. The Zboson is forced to decay into e+e−or µ+µ−or τ+τ−. Both the Higgs and abosons have narrow widths, with the Higgs boson width set to its SM value and the awidth set to its mass (in GeV) times 10−5. The aboson is then required to decay angle θas η=−ln tan(θ/2). Angular distance is measured in units of ∆R≡p(∆η)2+ (∆φ)2. The transverse momentum and transverse energy, pTand ET, are defined as psin θand Esin θ, respectively. – 3 – JHEP01(2022)063 Process Generator Parton shower PDF Tune Normalization Nominal samples tt Powheg Box v2 [39–43]Pythia 8.230 [44]NNPDF3.0nlo [45] A14 [46], NNPDF2.3lo [47] NNLO+NNLL [48–54] Z+ jets Sherpa 2.2.1 [55]Sherpa [56–59]NNPDF3.0nnlo [45]Sherpa NNLO [60] Single-top (Wt)Powheg Box v2 [61]Pythia 8.230 NNPDF3.0nlo A14, NNPDF2.3lo NLO+NNLL [62] Diboson Sherpa 2.2.1–2.2.2 Sherpa NNPDF3.0nnlo Sherpa NLO NMSSM signal Powheg Box v2 Pythia 8.210 CTEQ6L1 [63]AZNLO [64]NNLO(QCD) + NLO(EWK) [65] Alternative samples tt Powheg Box v2 Herwig7 [66,67]NNPDF3.0nlo A14, NNPDF2.3lo NNLO+NNLL tt MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Pythia 8.230 NNPDF3.0nlo A14, NNPDF2.3lo NNLO+NNLL 2.6.0 [68] Z+ jets MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Pythia 8.186 [69]NNPDF3.0nnlo A14, NNPDF2.3lo NNLO 2.2.2 Table 1. Monte Carlo simulated samples used in this analysis. The top section shows the nominal samples used for SM backgrounds and the potential signal process. The bottom section shows alternative SM samples for evaluating the impact of theoretical systematic uncertainties. into a pair of b-quarks. The awidth is narrow enough that the experimental resolution dominates the reconstructed dijet invariant mass width for all masses considered here. All simulated processes are normalized using the most accurate theoretical cross-section predictions currently available and were generated at least to next-to-leading-order QCD accuracy. All samples of simulated background events were passed through the ATLAS detector simulation [70] based on Geant4 [71], while signal samples were passed through a fast simulation [72] based on a parameterization of showers in the ATLAS calorimeters and employing Geant4 elsewhere. The effects of multiple interactions in the same and nearby bunch crossings (pile-up) were modelled by overlaying the hard-scatter events with minimum-bias events simulated using the soft QCD processes of Pythia 8.186 [69] with the A3 [73] set of tuned parameters (tune) and NNPDF2.3LO [47] parton distribution functions (PDF). The minimum-bias samples were reweighted such that the pile-up distribution matches that in the data. For all samples of simulated events, except for those generated using Sherpa [55], the EvtGen 1.6.0 program [74] was used to describe the decays of bottom and charm hadrons. 4 Object and event selection 4.1 Object reconstruction Tracks measured in the ID [75] are used to reconstruct interaction vertices [76], of which the one with the highest sum of squared transverse momenta of associated tracks is selected as the primary vertex of the hard interaction. Electrons are reconstructed from clusters of energy deposits [77] in the electromagnetic calorimeter and matched to a track in the ID [78]. One electron must satisfy the Tight identification criteria with ET>30 GeV to be on the trigger efficiency plateau, and be matched to the trigger electron, while the second is required to satisfy the Medium identification criteria with ET>20 GeV [78]. In addition, these electrons must have |η|<2.47, be out- – 4 – JHEP01(2022)063 side the transition region between the barrel and endcap calorimeters (1.37 <|η|<1.52), and have small impact parameters:3|d0/σd0|<5and |z0sin(θ)|<0.5mm. Finally, these electrons are required to pass the Gradient isolation requirements [78]. Muons are reconstructed as described in refs. [79,80] and required to have |η|<2.7. The leading pTmuon is required to have pT>30 GeV so as to be on the trigger efficiency plateau, and must be matched to the trigger muon, while the second muon is required to have pT>20 GeV. These muons must satisfy the Medium identification criteria, pass the Gradient isolation requirements [79], and have |d0/σd0|<3and |z0sin(θ)|<0.5mm. In order to veto events with additional leptons, looser selection criteria are employed. Electrons are required to pass the LooseAndBLayerLLH requirements with ET>10 GeV and |η|<2.47. Muons are required to satisfy the Medium criteria with pT>4GeV and |η|<2.7. Jets are reconstructed from energy deposits in clusters of calorimeter cells [77] using the anti-ktalgorithm [81,82] with radius parameter R= 0.4. Jet cleaning criteria are used to identify jets arising from non-collision backgrounds or noise in the calorimeters [83] and events containing such jets are removed. Jets are calibrated using the standard energy scale corrections [84]. Jets are required to have pT>20 GeV and |η|<2.4. A jet vertex tagger [85] at the Medium working point is used to remove jets with 20 < pT<60 GeV and |η|<2.4which are identified as not being associated with the primary vertex of the hard interaction. Jets containing a b-hadron are identified as b-jets (b-tagged) using the MV2 multivariate discriminant [86], with the selection tuned to produce an average efficiency of 77% for b-jets, with corresponding light-flavour (u-, d-, s-quark and gluon) and c-jet misidentification efficiencies of 0.9% and 25% respectively, as measured in simulated tt events. Jets and leptons are reconstructed independently. To prevent double counting of these reconstructed objects, an overlap removal procedure for leptons and jets is applied [87]. The looser selection criteria for leptons, as described above, are employed for the overlap removal. The missing transverse momentum, with magnitude Emiss T, is calculated as the negative vector sum of the transverse momenta of all calibrated selected objects, such as electrons and jets, and is corrected to take into account the transverse momentum of muons. Tracks with pT>500 MeV, compatible with the primary vertex but not matched to any reconstructed object, are included in the Emiss Treconstruction to take into account the soft-radiation component that does not get clustered into any hard object [88]. To account for small efficiency differences between simulation and data, simulated events are corrected with scale factors covering lepton reconstruction, identification, isolation and trigger efficiencies, as well as jet pile-up rejection and flavour tagging efficiencies. 4.2 Event selection To select events consistent with the decay of the Higgs boson into a b¯ bpair plus Emiss T, this analysis focuses on ZH production in which the leptonic decay of the Zboson into 3Transverse (d0) and longitudinal (z0) impact parameters are defined relative to the primary vertex position, where the beam line is used to approximate the primary vertex position in the transverse plane. The uncertainty in d0is denoted by σd0. – 5 – JHEP01(2022)063 electrons or muons provides the trigger signature for the event. Events are required to have two leptons of the same flavour and opposite charge; events are rejected if any additional leptons are found. Events containing muons that are poorly reconstructed, with σ(q/p)/|q/p|>0.2where q/p is the charge-to-momentum ratio, or muons from cosmic-ray background, with |d0|>0.2mm or |z0|>1mm, are also rejected. Events in the signal region (SR) are required to satisfy the following: •Dilepton invariant mass in the range 81 < m`` <101 GeV •Dilepton pTwith p`` T>40 GeV •At least two jets with pT>20 GeV •Emiss T>100 GeV •Dijet invariant mass in the range 20 < mjj <120 GeV, based on the two jets with the highest pTin the event, at least one of which must be b-tagged •ApTfraction (pfrac T), defined [28] as the scalar sum of the pTof the dijet system and Emiss Tdivided by the dilepton pT, in the range: 0.8<pjj T+Emiss T p`` T <1.2 The requirement on pfrac Tis especially useful in reducing the tt background. Requiring only one b-tagged jet is a trade-off between signal acceptance and background rejection. Although the dijet resonance search is mainly sensitive to decays of particles with masses in the range 20–65 GeV, the window for the dijet invariant mass extends to higher values to take into account the tail in the dijet invariant mass distribution that results from choosing a jet that does not come from a→bb, and also to better constrain the background shape. In addition to the SR, two control regions are defined. A control region for Z+HF (CRZ) is defined with the same requirements as the SR except with 60 < Emiss T<100 GeV. Att control region (CRTop) is defined with the same criteria as the SR but with the m`` requirement inverted (and m`` >50 GeV). To validate the modelling of Emiss Tfor the Z+HF processes, a validation region VRMET is defined with the same criteria as the SR except that the Emiss Trequirement is loosened to Emiss T>50 GeV and the dijet invariant mass requirement is mjj >150 GeV. The selection criteria for the signal, control and validation regions are summarized in table 2. The acceptance times efficiency (for H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1→a˜χ0 1˜χ0 1→b¯ b˜χ0 1˜χ0 1) of the selection varies across the three dimensions of ma,m˜χ0 1, and m˜χ0 2, but is primarily a function of maand varies from approximately 0.4% to 1.1%, depending on the configuration of the three masses. 5 Background and statistical model The background in the SR is primarily composed of Z+HF and tt, with a small contribution from Zplus light-flavour jets (Z+light), single-top and diboson events. The – 6 – JHEP01(2022)063 SR CRZ CRTop VRMET Number of leptons 2 Number of jets ≥2 Number of b-tagged jets ≥1 Dilepton pT[GeV] >40 pTfraction [0.8, 1.2] Dilepton mass [GeV] [81, 101] [81, 101] [50, 81] or >101 [81, 101] Emiss T[GeV] >100 [60, 100] >100 >50 Dijet mass [GeV] [20, 120] [20, 120] [20, 120] >150 Table 2. Summary of the event selection criteria for the signal region (SR), Z+jets control region (CRZ), tt control region (CRTop), and a validation region for Emiss Tmodelling in Z+HF events (VRMET). The first five selection criteria are common to all regions. background from multijet production was studied using same-sign lepton pairs and found to be negligible. The cross sections for Z+HF and tt production in the simulation are scaled by normalization factors, µZ+HF and µtt , respectively, determined from a simultaneous fit to the number of events in data and simulation in CRZ and CRTop. Subdominant backgrounds in these regions are normalized to the theoretical cross sections specified in section 3, while the Z+HF and tt components are allowed to float. The calculated scale factors are µZ+HF = 0.955 ±0.032 and µtt = 0.798 ±0.033 where the uncertainties are statistical. Figure 1shows comparisons between data and simulation in the control and validation regions for a few characteristic observables after applying the Z+HF and tt scale factors. The contribution of signal events is less than 1% in CRTop and at most 3% in CRZ for all signal points. As described below, the background in the SR is modelled using a combination of the mjj distribution shapes from data in CRZ and CRTop to model Z+HF and tt, respectively, with only a small dependence on the MC simulation. The relatively small contributions of non-Z+HF events to CRZ (approximately 30%) and of non-tt events to CRTop (approximately 20%) are derived from MC simulation and subtracted, after applying the scale factors µZ+HF and µtt to the simulated data. The resulting mjj distributions, assumed to correspond to pure Z+HF and tt, are referred to as the ‘CRZ Z+HF’ and ‘CRTop tt’ distributions. The shape of the mjj distribution for Z+HF in CRZ is found to differ slightly from that in the SR, according to the predictions of the Sherpa MC generator. Therefore, the bin-by-bin ratio of the mjj distributions in CRZ and the SR, obtained from MC simulation and denoted by UZ+HF, is applied to the CRZ Z+HF mjj distribution from the data when assembling the background model. The correction is linear as a function of mjj and ranges from a factor of 0.6 at 20 GeV to just under 1.2 at 120 GeV. A similar comparison via MC simulation between the mjj shapes in CRTop and the SR shows no statistically significant shape difference. Therefore, no shape correction is made for CRTop. – 7 – JHEP01(2022)063 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Events / 10 GeV ATLAS -1 = 13 TeV, 139 fbs CRZ Data SM MC Z+b Z+c Z+light tt Single top Diboson Signal 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Dijet invariant mass [GeV] 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Data / SM MC (a) 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 Events / 20 GeV ATLAS -1 = 13 TeV, 139 fbs VRMET Data SM MC Z+b Z+c Z+light tt Single top Diboson Signal 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 [GeV] miss T E 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Data / SM MC (b) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Events / 10 GeV ATLAS -1 = 13 TeV, 139 fbs CRTop Data SM MC tt Single top Z+b Z+c Z+light Diboson Signal 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Dijet invariant mass [GeV] 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Data / SM MC (c) 1 10 2 10 3 10 Events / 20 GeV ATLAS -1 = 13 TeV, 139 fbs CRTop Data SM MC tt Single top Z+b Z+c Z+light Diboson Signal 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 [GeV] miss T E 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Data / SM MC (d) Figure 1. Comparison of data and simulation for (a) the dijet invariant mass in CRZ, (b) Emiss T in VRMET, (c) the dijet invariant mass in CRTop and (d) Emiss Tin CRTop. The Z+HF and tt scale factors, described in the text, have been applied to the simulated samples. The lower panels show the ratio of data to SM MC simulation. The total statistical and systematic uncertainties are denoted by the hatched band. Large fluctuations in single bins of the systematic uncertainty band can be caused by high-weight events in the systematic variation samples. The overlaid distribution labelled ‘Signal’ is for the model with (ma,m˜χ0 1,m˜χ0 2) = (45 GeV, 10 GeV, 80 GeV), setting all branching ratios to 100% in the decay chain H→˜χ0 2˜χ0 1→a˜χ0 1˜χ0 1→b¯ b˜χ0 1˜χ0 1. – 8 – JHEP01(2022)063 AvH Foundation, Germany; Herakleitos, Thales and Aristeia programmes co-financed by EU-ESF and the Greek NSRF, Greece; BSF-NSF and GIF, Israel; Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014-2021, Norway; NCN and NAWA, Poland; La Caixa Banking Foundation, CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya and PROMETEO and GenT Programmes Generalitat Valenciana, Spain; Göran Gustafssons Stiftelse, Sweden; The Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN, the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (U.K.) and BNL (U.S.A.), the Tier-2 facilities worldwide and large non-WLCG resource providers. Major contributors of computing resources are listed in ref. [97]. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. References [1] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE]. [2] CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE]. [3] L. Evans and P. Bryant eds., LHC Machine,2008 JINST 3S08001 [INSPIRE]. [4] ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb−1of proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012002 [arXiv:1909.02845] [INSPIRE]. [5] CMS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 421 [arXiv:1809.10733] [INSPIRE]. [6] ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at √s= 7 and 8TeV,JHEP 08 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1606.02266] [INSPIRE]. [7] D. Curtin et al., Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson,Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075004 [arXiv:1312.4992] [INSPIRE]. [8] U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model,Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE]. [9] P. Fayet, Supersymmetry and weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions,Phys. Lett. B 64 (1976) 159 [INSPIRE]. [10] P. Fayet, Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions,Phys. Lett. B 69 (1977) 489 [INSPIRE]. [11] G.R. Farrar and P. Fayet, Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry,Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 575 [INSPIRE]. – 15 – JHEP01(2022)063 [12] P. Fayet, Relations between the masses of the superpartners of leptons and quarks, the Goldstino couplings and the neutral currents,Phys. Lett. B 84 (1979) 416 [INSPIRE]. [13] S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5),Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 150 [INSPIRE]. [14] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the H→ZZ∗→4`and H→γγ channels with √s= 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 345 [arXiv:1806.00242] [INSPIRE]. [15] CMS collaboration, A measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the diphoton decay channel, Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135425 [arXiv:2002.06398] [INSPIRE]. [16] R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, The ‘LEP paradox’, in 4th Rencontres du Vietnam: physics at extreme energies (particle physics and astrophysics), (2000) [hep-ph/0007265] [INSPIRE]. [17] ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs bosons decaying to aa in the µµττ final state in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment,Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 052002 [arXiv:1505.01609] [INSPIRE]. [18] ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the γγjj final state in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 750 [arXiv:1803.11145] [INSPIRE]. [19] ATLAS collaboration, Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying into two spin-zero particles in the H→aa →4bchannel in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,JHEP 10 (2018) 031 [arXiv:1806.07355] [INSPIRE]. [20] ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the bbµµ final state in pp collision at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 1[arXiv:1807.00539] [INSPIRE]. [21] ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson decays into two new low-mass spin-0particles in the 4bchannel with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 112006 [arXiv:2005.12236] [INSPIRE]. [22] CMS collaboration, Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying into τleptons in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV,JHEP 01 (2016) 079 [arXiv:1510.06534] [INSPIRE]. [23] CMS collaboration, Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two τleptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,JHEP 11 (2018) 018 [arXiv:1805.04865] [INSPIRE]. [24] CMS collaboration, Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two bquarks and two τleptons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 462 [arXiv:1805.10191] [INSPIRE]. [25] CMS collaboration, Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two bquarks in pp collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 398 [arXiv:1812.06359] [INSPIRE]. [26] CMS collaboration, Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135087 [arXiv:1907.07235] [INSPIRE]. [27] CMS collaboration, Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boosted µµττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,JHEP 08 (2020) 139 [arXiv:2005.08694] [INSPIRE]. – 16 – JHEP01(2022)063 [28] J. Huang, T. Liu, L.-T. Wang and F. Yu, Supersymmetric Exotic Decays of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 221803 [arXiv:1309.6633] [INSPIRE]. [29] J. Huang, T. Liu, L.-T. Wang and F. Yu, Supersymmetric subelectroweak scale dark matter, the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, and exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson,Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 115006 [arXiv:1407.0038] [INSPIRE]. [30] ATLAS collaboration, The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,2008 JINST 3S08003 [INSPIRE]. [31] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS Insertable B-Layer Technical Design Report, Tech. Rep. CERN-LHCC-2010-013, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2010) [ATLAS-TDR-19] [Addendum CERN-LHCC-2012-009]. [32] B. Abbott et al., Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer,2018 JINST 13 T05008 [arXiv:1803.00844] [INSPIRE]. [33] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015,Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 317 [arXiv:1611.09661] [INSPIRE]. [34] ATLAS collaboration, The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware, Tech. Rep. ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2021). [35] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC run 2,Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 47 [arXiv:1909.00761] [INSPIRE]. [36] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2,2020 JINST 15 P09015 [arXiv:2004.13447] [INSPIRE]. [37] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking,2020 JINST 15 P04003 [arXiv:1911.04632] [INSPIRE]. [38] ATLAS collaboration, Luminosity determination in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2019-021, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2019). [39] S. Frixione, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction,JHEP 09 (2007) 126 [arXiv:0707.3088] [INSPIRE]. [40] P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE]. [41] S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method,JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE]. [42] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX,JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE]. [43] ATLAS collaboration, Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2016). [44] T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE]. [45] R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC run II,JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE]. [46] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS PYTHIA 8tunes to 7TeV data, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2014). – 17 – JHEP01(2022)063 [47] R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions with LHC data,Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 244 [arXiv:1207.1303] [INSPIRE]. [48] M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation,Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 695 [arXiv:1109.1536] [INSPIRE]. [49] M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov and P. Nason, Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation,Phys. Lett. B710 (2012) 612 [arXiv:1111.5869] [INSPIRE]. [50] P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Percent-Level-Precision Physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to q¯q→t¯ t+X,Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 132001 [arXiv:1204.5201] [INSPIRE]. [51] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels,JHEP 12 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1207.0236] [INSPIRE]. [52] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction,JHEP 01 (2013) 080 [arXiv:1210.6832] [INSPIRE]. [53] M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through O(α4 S),Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252004 [arXiv:1303.6254] [INSPIRE]. [54] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders,Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 [arXiv:1112.5675] [INSPIRE]. [55] E. Bothmann et al., Event generation with Sherpa 2.2,SciPost Phys. 7(2019) 034 [arXiv:1905.09127] [INSPIRE]. [56] S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods,JHEP 09 (2012) 049 [arXiv:1111.1220] [INSPIRE]. [57] S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers: the NLO case,JHEP 04 (2013) 027 [arXiv:1207.5030] [INSPIRE]. [58] S. Catani, F. Krauss, B.R. Webber and R. Kuhn, QCD matrix elements + parton showers, JHEP 11 (2001) 063 [hep-ph/0109231] [INSPIRE]. [59] S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements and truncated showers,JHEP 05 (2009) 053 [arXiv:0903.1219] [INSPIRE]. [60] C. Anastasiou, L.J. Dixon, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, High precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 094008 [hep-ph/0312266] [INSPIRE]. [61] E. Re, Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method,Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1547 [arXiv:1009.2450] [INSPIRE]. [62] N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W−or H−,Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 054018 [arXiv:1005.4451] [INSPIRE]. [63] J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai, P.M. Nadolsky and W.K. Tung, New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD Analysis,JHEP 07 (2002) 012 [hep-ph/0201195] [INSPIRE]. [64] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Z/γ∗boson transverse momentum distribution in pp collisions at √s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,JHEP 09 (2014) 145 [arXiv:1406.3660] [INSPIRE]. – 18 – JHEP01(2022)063 [65] D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector,arXiv:1610.07922 [INSPIRE]. [66] J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0release note,Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 196 [arXiv:1512.01178] [INSPIRE]. [67] M. Bähr et al., HERWIG++ physics and manual,Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639 [arXiv:0803.0883] [INSPIRE]. [68] J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE]. [69] T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1,Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE]. [70] ATLAS collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure,Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 823 [arXiv:1005.4568] [INSPIRE]. [71] GEANT4 collaboration, GEANT4— a simulation toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250 [INSPIRE]. [72] ATLAS collaboration, The simulation principle and performance of the ATLAS fast calorimeter simulation FastCaloSim, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-013, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2010). [73] ATLAS collaboration, The PYTHIA 8A3tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie-Landshoff diffractive model, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2016). [74] D.J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001) 152 [INSPIRE]. [75] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2,Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 673 [arXiv:1704.07983] [INSPIRE]. [76] ATLAS collaboration, Vertex reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector at √s= 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2015). [77] ATLAS collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1,Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 490 [arXiv:1603.02934] [INSPIRE]. [78] ATLAS collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton-proton collision data,2019 JINST 14 P12006 [arXiv:1908.00005] [INSPIRE]. [79] ATLAS collaboration, Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 292 [arXiv:1603.05598] [INSPIRE]. [80] ATLAS collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2pp collision data set at √s= 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 578 [arXiv:2012.00578] [INSPIRE]. [81] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-ktjet clustering algorithm,JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE]. [82] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual,Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE]. – 19 – JHEP01(2022)063 [83] ATLAS collaboration, Selection of jets produced in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2015-029, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2015). [84] ATLAS collaboration, Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 072002 [arXiv:1703.09665] [INSPIRE]. [85] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector,Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 581 [arXiv:1510.03823] [INSPIRE]. [86] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with t¯ tevents in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 970 [arXiv:1907.05120] [INSPIRE]. [87] ATLAS collaboration, Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the jets plus missing transverse momentum final state at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,JHEP 12 (2017) 085 [arXiv:1709.04183] [INSPIRE]. [88] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 903 [arXiv:1802.08168] [INSPIRE]. [89] G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2013) 2501] [arXiv:1007.1727] [INSPIRE]. [90] A.L. Read, Presentation of search results: the CLstechnique,J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693 [INSPIRE]. [91] ATLAS collaboration, Calibration of light-flavour b-jet mistagging rates using ATLAS proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2018-006, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2018). [92] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of b-tagging efficiency of c-jets in t¯ tevents using a likelihood approach with the ATLAS detector, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2018-001, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2018). [93] G. Avoni et al., The new LUCID-2detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS,2018 JINST 13 P07017 [INSPIRE]. [94] E. Bothmann, M. Schönherr and S. Schumann, Reweighting QCD matrix-element and parton-shower calculations,Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 590 [arXiv:1606.08753] [INSPIRE]. [95] ATLAS collaboration, Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling with Sherpa and MG5_aMC@NLO, Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-007, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2017). [96] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of H→b¯ bdecays and V H production with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 59 [arXiv:1808.08238] [INSPIRE]. [97] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS computing acknowledgements, Tech. Rep. ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-003, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2021). – 20 – JHEP01(2022)063 The ATLAS collaboration G. Aad99,B. Abbott124,D.C. Abbott100,A. Abed Abud34,K. Abeling51,D.K. Abhayasinghe91, S.H. Abidi27,H. Abramowicz157,H. Abreu156,Y. Abulaiti5,A.C. Abusleme Hoffman142a, B.S. Acharya64a,64b,p,B. Achkar51,L. Adam97,C. Adam Bourdarios4,L. Adamczyk81a, L. Adamek162,S.V. Addepalli24,J. Adelman117,A. Adiguzel11c,ae,S. Adorni52,T. Adye139, A.A. Affolder141,Y. Afik156,C. Agapopoulou62,M.N. Agaras12,J. Agarwala68a,68b, A. Aggarwal115,C. Agheorghiesei25c,J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra135f,135a,ad,A. Ahmad34, F. Ahmadov77,W.S. Ahmed101,X. Ai44,G. Aielli71a,71b,I. Aizenberg175,S. Akatsuka83, M. Akbiyik97,T.P.A. Åkesson94,A.V. Akimov108,K. Al Khoury37,G.L. Alberghi21b, J. Albert171,M.J. Alconada Verzini86,S. Alderweireldt48,M. Aleksa34,I.N. Aleksandrov77, C. Alexa25b,T. Alexopoulos9,A. Alfonsi116,F. Alfonsi21b,21a,M. Alhroob124,B. Ali137,S. Ali154, M. Aliev161,G. Alimonti66a,C. Allaire34,B.M.M. Allbrooke152,P.P. Allport19,A. Aloisio67a,67b, F. Alonso86,C. Alpigiani144, E. Alunno Camelia71a,71b,M. Alvarez Estevez96,M.G. Alviggi67a,67b, Y. Amaral Coutinho78b,A. Ambler101,L. Ambroz130, C. Amelung34,D. Amidei103, S.P. Amor Dos Santos135a,S. Amoroso44, C.S. Amrouche52,C. Anastopoulos145,N. Andari140, T. Andeen10,J.K. Anders18,S.Y. Andrean43a,43b,A. Andreazza66a,66b, V. Andrei59a, S. Angelidakis8,A. Angerami37,A.V. Anisenkov118b,118a,A. Annovi69a,C. Antel52, M.T. Anthony145,E. Antipov125,M. Antonelli49,D.J.A. Antrim16,F. Anulli70a,M. Aoki79, J.A. Aparisi Pozo169,M.A. Aparo152,L. Aperio Bella44,N. Aranzabal34,V. Araujo Ferraz78a, C. Arcangeletti49,A.T.H. Arce47,E. Arena88,J-F. Arguin107,S. Argyropoulos50,J.-H. Arling44, A.J. Armbruster34,A. Armstrong166,O. Arnaez162,H. Arnold34, Z.P. Arrubarrena Tame111, G. Artoni130,H. Asada113,K. Asai122,S. Asai159,N.A. Asbah57,E.M. Asimakopoulou167, L. Asquith152,J. Assahsah33d, K. Assamagan27,R. Astalos26a,R.J. Atkin31a, M. Atkinson168, N.B. Atlay17, H. Atmani58b,P.A. Atmasiddha103,K. Augsten137,S. Auricchio67a,67b, V.A. Austrup177,G. Avner156,G. Avolio34,M.K. Ayoub13c,G. Azuelos107,ak,D. Babal26a, H. Bachacou140,K. Bachas158,F. Backman43a,43b,A. Badea57,P. Bagnaia70a,70b, H. Bahrasemani148,A.J. Bailey169,V.R. Bailey168,J.T. Baines139,C. Bakalis9,O.K. Baker178, P.J. Bakker116,E. Bakos14,D. Bakshi Gupta7,S. Balaji153,R. Balasubramanian116, E.M. Baldin118b,118a,P. Balek138,E. Ballabene66a,66b,F. Balli140,W.K. Balunas130,J. Balz97, E. Banas82,M. Bandieramonte134,A. Bandyopadhyay17,S. Bansal22,L. Barak157, E.L. Barberio102,D. Barberis53b,53a,M. Barbero99, G. Barbour92,K.N. Barends31a, T. Barillari112,M-S. Barisits34,J. Barkeloo127,T. Barklow149,B.M. Barnett139,R.M. Barnett16, A. Baroncelli58a,G. Barone27,A.J. Barr130,L. Barranco Navarro43a,43b,F. Barreiro96, J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa13a,U. Barron157,S. Barsov133,F. Bartels59a,R. Bartoldus149, G. Bartolini99,A.E. Barton87,P. Bartos26a,A. Basalaev44,A. Basan97,I. Bashta72a,72b, A. Bassalat62,M.J. Basso162,C.R. Basson98,R.L. Bates55, S. Batlamous33e,J.R. Batley30, B. Batool147, M. Battaglia141,M. Bauce70a,70b,F. Bauer140,∗,P. Bauer22, H.S. Bawa29, A. Bayirli11c,J.B. Beacham47,T. Beau131,P.H. Beauchemin165,F. Becherer50,P. Bechtle22, H.P. Beck18,r,K. Becker173,C. Becot44,A.J. Beddall11a,V.A. Bednyakov77,C.P. Bee151, T.A. Beermann177,M. Begalli78b,M. Begel27,A. Behera151,J.K. Behr44, C. Beirao Da Cruz E Silva34,J.F. Beirer51,34,F. Beisiegel22,M. Belfkir4,G. Bella157, L. Bellagamba21b,A. Bellerive32,P. Bellos19,K. Beloborodov118b,118a,K. Belotskiy109, N.L. Belyaev109,D. Benchekroun33a,Y. Benhammou157,D.P. Benjamin27,M. Benoit27, J.R. Bensinger24,S. Bentvelsen116,L. Beresford34,M. Beretta49,D. Berge17, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann167,N. Berger4,B. Bergmann137,L.J. Bergsten24,J. Beringer16, S. Berlendis6,G. Bernardi131,C. Bernius149,F.U. Bernlochner22,T. Berry91,P. Berta44, A. Berthold46,I.A. Bertram87,O. Bessidskaia Bylund177,S. Bethke112,A. Betti40,A.J. Bevan90, – 21 – JHEP01(2022)063 S. Bhatta151,D.S. Bhattacharya172, P. Bhattarai24,V.S. Bhopatkar5, R. Bi134,R.M. Bianchi134, O. Biebel111,R. Bielski34,N.V. Biesuz69a,69b,M. Biglietti72a,T.R.V. Billoud137,M. Bindi51, A. Bingul11d,C. Bini70a,70b,S. Biondi21b,21a,C.J. Birch-sykes98,G.A. Bird19,139,M. Birman175, T. Bisanz34,J.P. Biswal2,D. Biswas176,k,A. Bitadze98,C. Bittrich46,K. Bjørke129,I. Bloch44, C. Blocker24,A. Blue55,U. Blumenschein90,J. Blumenthal97,G.J. Bobbink116, V.S. Bobrovnikov118b,118a,D. Bogavac12,A.G. Bogdanchikov118b,118a, C. Bohm43a,V. Boisvert91, P. Bokan44,T. Bold81a,M. Bomben131,M. Bona90,M. Boonekamp140,C.D. Booth91, A.G. Borbély55,H.M. Borecka-Bielska107,L.S. Borgna92,G. Borissov87,D. Bortoletto130, D. Boscherini21b,M. Bosman12,J.D. Bossio Sola101,K. Bouaouda33a,J. Boudreau134, E.V. Bouhova-Thacker87,D. Boumediene36,R. Bouquet131,A. Boveia123,J. Boyd34,D. Boye27, I.R. Boyko77,A.J. Bozson91,J. Bracinik19,N. Brahimi58d,58c,G. Brandt177,O. Brandt30, F. Braren44,B. Brau100,J.E. Brau127, W.D. Breaden Madden55,K. Brendlinger44,R. Brener175, L. Brenner34,R. Brenner167,S. Bressler175,B. Brickwedde97,D.L. Briglin19,D. Britton55, D. Britzger112,I. Brock22,R. Brock104,G. Brooijmans37,W.K. Brooks142d,E. Brost27, P.A. Bruckman de Renstrom82,B. Brüers44,D. Bruncko26b,A. Bruni21b,G. Bruni21b, M. Bruschi21b,N. Bruscino70a,70b,L. Bryngemark149,T. Buanes15,Q. Buat151,P. Buchholz147, A.G. Buckley55,I.A. Budagov77,M.K. Bugge129,O. Bulekov109,B.A. Bullard57,T.J. Burch117, S. Burdin88,C.D. Burgard44,A.M. Burger125,B. Burghgrave7,J.T.P. Burr44,C.D. Burton10, J.C. Burzynski100,V. Büscher97,P.J. Bussey55,J.M. Butler23,C.M. Buttar55, J.M. Butterworth92,W. Buttinger139, C.J. Buxo Vazquez104,A.R. Buzykaev118b,118a, G. Cabras21b,S. Cabrera Urbán169,D. Caforio54,H. Cai134,V.M.M. Cairo149,O. Cakir3a, N. Calace34,P. Calafiura16,G. Calderini131,P. Calfayan63,G. Callea55, L.P. Caloba78b, A. Caltabiano71a,71b,S. Calvente Lopez96,D. Calvet36,S. Calvet36,T.P. Calvet99, M. Calvetti69a,69b,R. Camacho Toro131,S. Camarda34,D. Camarero Munoz96,P. Camarri71a,71b, M.T. Camerlingo72a,72b,D. Cameron129,C. Camincher171,M. Campanelli92,A. Camplani38, V. Canale67a,67b,A. Canesse101,M. Cano Bret75,J. Cantero125,Y. Cao168,F. Capocasa24, M. Capua39b,39a, A. Carbone66a,66b,R. Cardarelli71a,F. Cardillo169,G. Carducci39b,39a, T. Carli34,G. Carlino67a,B.T. Carlson134,E.M. Carlson171,163a,L. Carminati66a,66b, M. Carnesale70a,70b,R.M.D. Carney149,S. Caron115,E. Carquin142d,S. Carrá44, G. Carratta21b,21a,J.W.S. Carter162,T.M. Carter48,D. Casadei31c,M.P. Casado12,h, A.F. Casha162,E.G. Castiglia178,F.L. Castillo59a,L. Castillo Garcia12,V. Castillo Gimenez169, N.F. Castro135a,135e,A. Catinaccio34,J.R. Catmore129, A. Cattai34,V. Cavaliere27, N. Cavalli21b,21a,V. Cavasinni69a,69b,E. Celebi11b,F. Celli130,K. Cerny126,A.S. Cerqueira78a, A. Cerri152,L. Cerrito71a,71b,F. Cerutti16,A. Cervelli21b,S.A. Cetin11b,Z. Chadi33a, D. Chakraborty117,M. Chala135f ,J. Chan176,W.S. Chan116,W.Y. Chan88,J.D. Chapman30, B. Chargeishvili155b,D.G. Charlton19,T.P. Charman90,M. Chatterjee18,S. Chekanov5, S.V. Chekulaev163a,G.A. Chelkov77,ag,A. Chen103,B. Chen157, C. Chen58a,C.H. Chen76, H. Chen13c,H. Chen27,J. Chen58a,J. Chen37,J. Chen24,S. Chen132,S.J. Chen13c,X. Chen58c, X. Chen13b,Y. Chen58a,Y-H. Chen44,C.L. Cheng176,H.C. Cheng60a,H.J. Cheng13a, A. Cheplakov77,E. Cheremushkina44,R. Cherkaoui El Moursli33e,E. Cheu6,K. Cheung61, L. Chevalier140,V. Chiarella49,G. Chiarelli69a,G. Chiodini65a,A.S. Chisholm19,A. Chitan25b, I. Chiu159,Y.H. Chiu171,M.V. Chizhov77,t,K. Choi10,A.R. Chomont70a,70b,Y. Chou100, Y.S. Chow116,L.D. Christopher31f ,M.C. Chu60a,X. Chu13a,13d,J. Chudoba136, J.J. Chwastowski82,D. Cieri112,K.M. Ciesla82,V. Cindro89,I.A. Cioară25b,A. Ciocio16, F. Cirotto67a,67b,Z.H. Citron175,l,M. Citterio66a, D.A. Ciubotaru25b,B.M. Ciungu162,A. Clark52, P.J. Clark48,J.M. Clavijo Columbie44,S.E. Clawson98,C. Clement43a,43b,L. Clissa21b,21a, Y. Coadou99,M. Cobal64a,64c,A. Coccaro53b, J. Cochran76,R.F. Coelho Barrue135a, R. Coelho Lopes De Sa100,S. Coelli66a, H. Cohen157,A.E.C. Coimbra34,B. Cole37,J. Collot56, – 22 – JHEP01(2022)063 P. Conde Muiño135a,135h,S.H. Connell31c,I.A. Connelly55,E.I. Conroy130,F. Conventi67a,al, H.G. Cooke19,A.M. Cooper-Sarkar130,F. Cormier170,L.D. Corpe34,M. Corradi70a,70b, E.E. Corrigan94,F. Corriveau101,aa,M.J. Costa169,F. Costanza4,D. Costanzo145,B.M. Cote123, G. Cowan91,J.W. Cowley30,J. Crane98,K. Cranmer121,R.A. Creager132,S. Crépé-Renaudin56, F. Crescioli131,M. Cristinziani147,M. Cristoforetti73a,73b,b,V. Croft165,G. Crosetti39b,39a, A. Cueto4,T. Cuhadar Donszelmann166,H. Cui13a,13d,A.R. Cukierman149,W.R. Cunningham55, S. Czekierda82,P. Czodrowski34,M.M. Czurylo59b,M.J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa58a, J.V. Da Fonseca Pinto78b,C. Da Via98,W. Dabrowski81a,T. Dado45,S. Dahbi31f ,T. Dai103, C. Dallapiccola100,M. Dam38,G. D’amen27,V. D’Amico72a,72b,J. Damp97,J.R. Dandoy132, M.F. Daneri28,M. Danninger148,V. Dao34,G. Darbo53b,S. Darmora5,A. Dattagupta127, S. D’Auria66a,66b,C. David163b,T. Davidek138,D.R. Davis47,B. Davis-Purcell32,I. Dawson90, K. De7,R. De Asmundis67a,M. De Beurs116,S. De Castro21b,21a,N. De Groot115,P. de Jong116, H. De la Torre104,A. De Maria13c,D. De Pedis70a,A. De Salvo70a,U. De Sanctis71a,71b, M. De Santis71a,71b,A. De Santo152,J.B. De Vivie De Regie56, D.V. Dedovich77,J. Degens116, A.M. Deiana40,J. Del Peso96,Y. Delabat Diaz44,F. Deliot140,C.M. Delitzsch6, M. Della Pietra67a,67b,D. Della Volpe52,A. Dell’Acqua34,L. Dell’Asta66a,66b,M. Delmastro4, P.A. Delsart56,S. Demers178,M. Demichev77,S.P. Denisov119,L. D’Eramo117,D. Derendarz82, J.E. Derkaoui33d,F. Derue131,P. Dervan88,K. Desch22,K. Dette162,C. Deutsch22, P.O. Deviveiros34,F.A. Di Bello70a,70b,A. Di Ciaccio71a,71b,L. Di Ciaccio4,C. Di Donato67a,67b, A. Di Girolamo34,G. Di Gregorio69a,69b,A. Di Luca73a,73b,B. Di Micco72a,72b,R. Di Nardo72a,72b, C. Diaconu99,F.A. Dias116,T. Dias Do Vale135a,M.A. Diaz142a,F.G. Diaz Capriles22, J. Dickinson16,M. Didenko169,E.B. Diehl103,J. Dietrich17,S. Díez Cornell44,C. Diez Pardos147, A. Dimitrievska16,W. Ding13b,J. Dingfelder22,I-M. Dinu25b,S.J. Dittmeier59b,F. Dittus34, F. Djama99,T. Djobava155b,J.I. Djuvsland15,M.A.B. Do Vale143,D. Dodsworth24,C. Doglioni94, J. Dolejsi138,Z. Dolezal138,M. Donadelli78c,B. Dong58c,J. Donini36,A. D’onofrio13c, M. D’Onofrio88,J. Dopke139,A. Doria67a,M.T. Dova86,A.T. Doyle55,E. Drechsler148, E. Dreyer148,T. Dreyer51,A.S. Drobac165,D. Du58b,T.A. du Pree116,F. Dubinin108, M. Dubovsky26a,A. Dubreuil52,E. Duchovni175,G. Duckeck111,O.A. Ducu34,25b,D. Duda112, A. Dudarev34,M. D’uffizi98,L. Duflot62,M. Dührssen34,C. Dülsen177,A.E. Dumitriu25b, M. Dunford59a,S. Dungs45,K. Dunne43a,43b,A. Duperrin99,H. Duran Yildiz3a,M. Düren54, A. Durglishvili155b,B. Dutta44,D. Duvnjak1,G.I. Dyckes132,M. Dyndal81a,S. Dysch98, B.S. Dziedzic82,B. Eckerova26a, M.G. Eggleston47,E. Egidio Purcino De Souza78b,L.F. Ehrke52, T. Eifert7,G. Eigen15,K. Einsweiler16,T. Ekelof167,Y. El Ghazali33b,H. El Jarrari33e, A. El Moussaouy33a,V. Ellajosyula167,M. Ellert167,F. Ellinghaus177,A.A. Elliot90,N. Ellis34, J. Elmsheuser27,M. Elsing34,D. Emeliyanov139,A. Emerman37,Y. Enari159,J. Erdmann45, A. Ereditato18,P.A. Erland82,M. Errenst177,M. Escalier62,C. Escobar169,O. Estrada Pastor169, E. Etzion157,G. Evans135a,H. Evans63,M.O. Evans152,A. Ezhilov133,F. Fabbri55, L. Fabbri21b,21a,V. Fabiani115,G. Facini173,V. Fadeyev141,R.M. Fakhrutdinov119,S. Falciano70a, P.J. Falke22,S. Falke34,J. Faltova138,Y. Fan13a,Y. Fang13a,Y. Fang13a,G. Fanourakis42, M. Fanti66a,66b,M. Faraj58c,A. Farbin7,A. Farilla72a,E.M. Farina68a,68b,T. Farooque104, S.M. Farrington48,P. Farthouat34,F. Fassi33e,D. Fassouliotis8,M. Faucci Giannelli71a,71b, W.J. Fawcett30,L. Fayard62,O.L. Fedin133,q,M. Feickert168,L. Feligioni99,A. Fell145,C. Feng58b, M. Feng13b,M.J. Fenton166, A.B. Fenyuk119,S.W. Ferguson41,J. Ferrando44,A. Ferrari167, P. Ferrari116,R. Ferrari68a,D. Ferrere52,C. Ferretti103,F. Fiedler97,A. Filipčič89,F. Filthaut115, M.C.N. Fiolhais135a,135c,a,L. Fiorini169,F. Fischer147,W.C. Fisher104,T. Fitschen19,I. Fleck147, P. Fleischmann103,T. Flick177,B.M. Flierl111,L. Flores132,L.R. Flores Castillo60a, F.M. Follega73a,73b,N. Fomin15,J.H. Foo162,G.T. Forcolin73a,73b, B.C. Forland63,A. Formica140, F.A. Förster12,A.C. Forti98, E. Fortin99,M.G. Foti130,D. Fournier62,H. Fox87, – 23 – JHEP01(2022)063 P. Francavilla69a,69b,S. Francescato70a,70b,M. Franchini21b,21a,S. Franchino59a, D. Francis34, L. Franco4,L. Franconi18,M. Franklin57,G. Frattari70a,70b,A.C. Freegard90, P.M. Freeman19, B. Freund107,W.S. Freund78b,E.M. Freundlich45,D. Froidevaux34,J.A. Frost130,Y. Fu58a, M. Fujimoto122,E. Fullana Torregrosa169,J. Fuster169,A. Gabrielli21b,21a,A. Gabrielli34, P. Gadow44,G. Gagliardi53b,53a,L.G. Gagnon16,G.E. Gallardo130,E.J. Gallas130,B.J. Gallop139, R. Gamboa Goni90,K.K. Gan123,S. Ganguly175,J. Gao58a,Y. Gao48,Y.S. Gao29,n, F.M. Garay Walls142a,C. García169,J.E. García Navarro169,J.A. García Pascual13a, M. Garcia-Sciveres16,R.W. Gardner35,D. Garg75,S. Gargiulo50, C.A. Garner162,V. Garonne129, S.J. Gasiorowski144,P. Gaspar78b,G. Gaudio68a,P. Gauzzi70a,70b,I.L. Gavrilenko108, A. Gavrilyuk120,C. Gay170,G. Gaycken44,E.N. Gazis9,A.A. Geanta25b,C.M. Gee141, C.N.P. Gee139,J. Geisen94,M. Geisen97,C. Gemme53b,M.H. Genest56,S. Gentile70a,70b, S. George91,W.F. George19,T. Geralis42, L.O. Gerlach51,P. Gessinger-Befurt97, M. Ghasemi Bostanabad171,M. Ghneimat147,A. Ghosh166,A. Ghosh75,B. Giacobbe21b, S. Giagu70a,70b,N. Giangiacomi162,P. Giannetti69a,A. Giannini67a,67b,S.M. Gibson91, M. Gignac141,D.T. Gil81b,B.J. Gilbert37,D. Gillberg32,G. Gilles116,N.E.K. Gillwald44, D.M. Gingrich2,ak,M.P. Giordani64a,64c,P.F. Giraud140,G. Giugliarelli64a,64c,D. Giugni66a, F. Giuli71a,71b,I. Gkialas8,i,E.L. Gkougkousis12,P. Gkountoumis9,L.K. Gladilin110, C. Glasman96,G.R. Gledhill127, M. Glisic127,I. Gnesi39b,d,M. Goblirsch-Kolb24, D. Godin107, S. Goldfarb102,T. Golling52,D. Golubkov119,J.P. Gombas104,A. Gomes135a,135b, R. Goncalves Gama51,R. Gonçalo135a,135c,G. Gonella127,L. Gonella19,A. Gongadze77, F. Gonnella19,J.L. Gonski37,S. González de la Hoz169,S. Gonzalez Fernandez12, R. Gonzalez Lopez88,C. Gonzalez Renteria16,R. Gonzalez Suarez167,S. Gonzalez-Sevilla52, G.R. Gonzalvo Rodriguez169,R.Y. González Andana142a,L. Goossens34,N.A. Gorasia19, P.A. Gorbounov120,H.A. Gordon27,B. Gorini34,E. Gorini65a,65b,A. Gorišek89,A.T. Goshaw47, M.I. Gostkin77,C.A. Gottardo115,M. Gouighri33b,V. Goumarre44,A.G. Goussiou144, N. Govender31c,C. Goy4,I. Grabowska-Bold81a,K. Graham32,E. Gramstad129, S. Grancagnolo17,M. Grandi152, V. Gratchev133,P.M. Gravila25f ,F.G. Gravili65a,65b, H.M. Gray16,C. Grefe22,I.M. Gregor44,P. Grenier149,K. Grevtsov44,C. Grieco12, N.A. Grieser124, A.A. Grillo141,K. Grimm29,m,S. Grinstein12,x,J.-F. Grivaz62,S. Groh97, E. Gross175,J. Grosse-Knetter51,Z.J. Grout92, C. Grud103,A. Grummer114,J.C. Grundy130, L. Guan103,W. Guan176,C. Gubbels170,J. Guenther34,J.G.R. Guerrero Rojas169,F. Guescini112, D. Guest17,R. Gugel97,A. Guida44,T. Guillemin4,S. Guindon34,J. Guo58c,L. Guo62, Y. Guo103,R. Gupta44,S. Gurbuz22,G. Gustavino124,M. Guth50,P. Gutierrez124, L.F. Gutierrez Zagazeta132,C. Gutschow92,C. Guyot140,C. Gwenlan130,C.B. Gwilliam88, E.S. Haaland129,A. Haas121,M. Habedank17,C. Haber16,H.K. Hadavand7,A. Hadef97, M. Haleem172,J. Haley125,J.J. Hall145,G. Halladjian104,G.D. Hallewell99,L. Halser18, K. Hamano171,H. Hamdaoui33e,M. Hamer22,G.N. Hamity48,K. Han58a,L. Han13c,L. Han58a, S. Han16,Y.F. Han162,K. Hanagaki79,v,M. Hance141,M.D. Hank35,R. Hankache98,E. Hansen94, J.B. Hansen38,J.D. Hansen38,M.C. Hansen22,P.H. Hansen38,K. Hara164,T. Harenberg177, S. Harkusha105,Y.T. Harris130, P.F. Harrison173,N.M. Hartman149,N.M. Hartmann111, Y. Hasegawa146,A. Hasib48,S. Hassani140,S. Haug18,R. Hauser104,M. Havranek137, C.M. Hawkes19,R.J. Hawkings34,S. Hayashida113,D. Hayden104,C. Hayes103,R.L. Hayes170, C.P. Hays130,J.M. Hays90,H.S. Hayward88,S.J. Haywood139,F. He58a,Y. He160,Y. He131, M.P. Heath48,V. Hedberg94,A.L. Heggelund129,N.D. Hehir90,C. Heidegger50,K.K. Heidegger50, W.D. Heidorn76,J. Heilman32,S. Heim44,T. Heim16,B. Heinemann44,ai,J.G. Heinlein132, J.J. Heinrich127,L. Heinrich34,J. Hejbal136,L. Helary44,A. Held121,S. Hellesund129, C.M. Helling141,S. Hellman43a,43b,C. Helsens34, R.C.W. Henderson87,L. Henkelmann30, A.M. Henriques Correia34,H. Herde149,Y. Hernández Jiménez151, H. Herr97,M.G. Herrmann111, – 24 – JHEP01(2022)063 N. Warrack55,A.T. Watson19,M.F. Watson19,G. Watts144,B.M. Waugh92,A.F. Webb10, C. Weber27,M.S. Weber18,S.A. Weber32,S.M. Weber59a, C. Wei58a,Y. Wei130, A.R. Weidberg130,J. Weingarten45,M. Weirich97,C. Weiser50,T. Wenaus27,B. Wendland45, T. Wengler34,S. Wenig34,N. Wermes22,M. Wessels59a,K. Whalen127,A.M. Wharton87, A.S. White57,A. White7,M.J. White1,D. Whiteson166,W. Wiedenmann176,C. Wiel46, M. Wielers139, N. Wieseotte97,C. Wiglesworth38,L.A.M. Wiik-Fuchs50, D.J. Wilbern124, H.G. Wilkens34,L.J. Wilkins91,D.M. Williams37, H.H. Williams132,S. Williams30,S. Willocq100, P.J. Windischhofer130,I. Wingerter-Seez4,F. Winklmeier127,B.T. Winter50, M. Wittgen149, M. Wobisch93,A. Wolf97,R. Wölker130, J. Wollrath166,M.W. Wolter82,H. Wolters135a,135c, V.W.S. Wong170,A.F. Wongel44,S.D. Worm44,B.K. Wosiek82,K.W. Woźniak82,K. Wraight55, J. Wu13a,13d,S.L. Wu176,X. Wu52,Y. Wu58a,Z. Wu140,58a,J. Wuerzinger130,T.R. Wyatt98, B.M. Wynne48,S. Xella38,J. Xiang60c,X. Xiao103,X. Xie58a, I. Xiotidis152,D. Xu13a, H. Xu58a, H. Xu58a,L. Xu58a,R. Xu132,T. Xu58a,W. Xu103,Y. Xu13b,Z. Xu58b,Z. Xu149,B. Yabsley153, S. Yacoob31a,N. Yamaguchi85,Y. Yamaguchi160, M. Yamatani159,H. Yamauchi164, T. Yamazaki16,Y. Yamazaki80, J. Yan58c,S. Yan130,Z. Yan23,H.J. Yang58c,58d,H.T. Yang16, S. Yang58a,T. Yang60c,X. Yang58a,X. Yang13a,Y. Yang159,Z. Yang103,58a,W-M. Yao16, Y.C. Yap44,H. Ye13c,J. Ye40,S. Ye27,I. Yeletskikh77,M.R. Yexley87,P. Yin37,K. Yorita174, K. Yoshihara76,C.J.S. Young34,C. Young149,R. Yuan58b,j,X. Yue59a,M. Zaazoua33e, B. Zabinski82,G. Zacharis9,E. Zaffaroni52,A.M. Zaitsev119,ag,T. Zakareishvili155b, N. Zakharchuk32,S. Zambito34,D. Zanzi50,S.V. Zeißner45,C. Zeitnitz177,G. Zemaityte130, J.C. Zeng168,O. Zenin119,T. Ženiš26a,S. Zenz90,S. Zerradi33a,D. Zerwas62,M. Zgubič130, B. Zhang13c,D.F. Zhang13b,G. Zhang13b,J. Zhang5,K. Zhang13a,L. Zhang13c,M. Zhang168, R. Zhang176, S. Zhang103,X. Zhang58c,X. Zhang58b,Z. Zhang62,P. Zhao47,Y. Zhao141, Z. Zhao58a,A. Zhemchugov77,Z. Zheng149,D. Zhong168, B. Zhou103,C. Zhou176,H. Zhou6, N. Zhou58c, Y. Zhou6,C.G. Zhu58b,C. Zhu13a,13d,H.L. Zhu58a,H. Zhu13a,J. Zhu103,Y. Zhu58a, X. Zhuang13a,K. Zhukov108,V. Zhulanov118b,118a,D. Zieminska63,N.I. Zimine77, S. Zimmermann50,∗,M. Ziolkowski147,L. Živković14,A. Zoccoli21b,21a,K. Zoch52,T.G. Zorbas145, O. Zormpa42,W. Zou37 and L. Zwalinski34 1Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Australia 2Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB; Canada 3 (a)Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara;(b)Istanbul Aydin University, Application and Research Center for Advanced Studies, Istanbul;(c)Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara; Turkey 4LAPP, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy; France 5High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL; United States of America 6Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ; United States of America 7Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX; United States of America 8Physics Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens; Greece 9Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou; Greece 10 Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX; United States of America 11 (a)Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul;(b)Istanbul Bilgi University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul;(c)Department of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul;(d)Department of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep; Turkey 12 Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona; Spain 13 (a)Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing;(b)Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing;(c)Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing;(d)University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS), Beijing; China – 31 – JHEP01(2022)063 14 Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade; Serbia 15 Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen; Norway 16 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley CA; United States of America 17 Institut für Physik, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin; Germany 18 Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern; Switzerland 19 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; United Kingdom 20 (a)Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá;(b)Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá; Colombia 21 (a)Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia A. Righi, Università di Bologna, Bologna;(b)INFN Sezione di Bologna; Italy 22 Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn; Germany 23 Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston MA; United States of America 24 Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham MA; United States of America 25 (a)Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov;(b)Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest;(c)Department of Physics, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Iasi;(d)National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department, Cluj-Napoca;(e)University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest;(f)West University in Timisoara, Timisoara; Romania 26 (a)Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava;(b)Department of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice; Slovak Republic 27 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY; United States of America 28 Departamento de Física (FCEN) and IFIBA, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET, Buenos Aires; Argentina 29 California State University, CA; United States of America 30 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; United Kingdom 31 (a)Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town;(b)iThemba Labs, Western Cape;(c)Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg;(d)National Institute of Physics, University of the Philippines Diliman (Philippines);(e)University of South Africa, Department of Physics, Pretoria;(f)School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; South Africa 32 Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa ON; Canada 33 (a)Faculté des Sciences Ain Chock, Réseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies - Université Hassan II, Casablanca;(b)Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn-Tofail, Kénitra;(c)Faculté des Sciences Semlalia, Université Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech;(d)LPMR, Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohamed Premier, Oujda;(e)Faculté des sciences, Université Mohammed V, Rabat; Morocco 34 CERN, Geneva; Switzerland 35 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago IL; United States of America 36 LPC, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand; France 37 Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington NY; United States of America 38 Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen; Denmark 39 (a)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria, Rende;(b)INFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati; Italy 40 Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX; United States of America 41 Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson TX; United States of America 42 National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Agia Paraskevi; Greece 43 (a)Department of Physics, Stockholm University;(b)Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm; Sweden 44 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen; Germany 45 Lehrstuhl für Experimentelle Physik IV, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund; Germany – 32 – JHEP01(2022)063 46 Institut für Kernund Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden; Germany 47 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham NC; United States of America 48 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh; United Kingdom 49 INFN e Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati; Italy 50 Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg; Germany 51 II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen; Germany 52 Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Genève; Switzerland 53 (a)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Genova;(b)INFN Sezione di Genova; Italy 54 II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen; Germany 55 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; United Kingdom 56 LPSC, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble INP, Grenoble; France 57 Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA; United States of America 58 (a)Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei;(b)Institute of Frontier and Interdisciplinary Science and Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation (MOE), Shandong University, Qingdao;(c)School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), SKLPPC, Shanghai;(d)Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai; China 59 (a)Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg;(b)Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg; Germany 60 (a)Department of Physics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong;(b)Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;(c)Department of Physics and Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; China 61 Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu; Taiwan 62 IJCLab, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, 91405, Orsay; France 63 Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington IN; United States of America 64 (a)INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine;(b)ICTP, Trieste;(c)Dipartimento Politecnico di Ingegneria e Architettura, Università di Udine, Udine; Italy 65 (a)INFN Sezione di Lecce;(b)Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università del Salento, Lecce; Italy 66 (a)INFN Sezione di Milano;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano, Milano; Italy 67 (a)INFN Sezione di Napoli;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli, Napoli; Italy 68 (a)INFN Sezione di Pavia;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pavia, Pavia; Italy 69 (a)INFN Sezione di Pisa;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica E. Fermi, Università di Pisa, Pisa; Italy 70 (a)INFN Sezione di Roma;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma; Italy 71 (a)INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata;(b)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma; Italy 72 (a)INFN Sezione di Roma Tre;(b)Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università Roma Tre, Roma; Italy 73 (a)INFN-TIFPA;(b)Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento; Italy 74 Institut für Astround Teilchenphysik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität, Innsbruck; Austria 75 University of Iowa, Iowa City IA; United States of America 76 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA; United States of America 77 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; Russia 78 (a)Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora;(b)Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro;(c)Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo; Brazil 79 KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba; Japan 80 Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe; Japan 81 (a)AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, – 33 – JHEP01(2022)063 Krakow;(b)Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow; Poland 82 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow; Poland 83 Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto; Japan 84 Kyoto University of Education, Kyoto; Japan 85 Research Center for Advanced Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Japan 86 Instituto de Física La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata; Argentina 87 Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster; United Kingdom 88 Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool; United Kingdom 89 Department of Experimental Particle Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute and Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana; Slovenia 90 School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London; United Kingdom 91 Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham; United Kingdom 92 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London; United Kingdom 93 Louisiana Tech University, Ruston LA; United States of America 94 Fysiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund; Sweden 95 Centre de Calcul de l’Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3), Villeurbanne; France 96 Departamento de Física Teorica C-15 and CIAFF, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid; Spain 97 Institut für Physik, Universität Mainz, Mainz; Germany 98 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester; United Kingdom 99 CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille; France 100 Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA; United States of America 101 Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal QC; Canada 102 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria; Australia 103 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI; United States of America 104 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI; United States of America 105 B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk; Belarus 106 Research Institute for Nuclear Problems of Byelorussian State University, Minsk; Belarus 107 Group of Particle Physics, University of Montreal, Montreal QC; Canada 108 P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Russia 109 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow; Russia 110 D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow; Russia 111 Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München; Germany 112 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), München; Germany 113 Graduate School of Science and Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya; Japan 114 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM; United States of America 115 Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University/Nikhef, Nijmegen; Netherlands 116 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Netherlands 117 Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL; United States of America 118 (a)Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics and NSU, SB RAS, Novosibirsk;(b)Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk; Russia 119 Institute for High Energy Physics of the National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Protvino; Russia 120 Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow; Russia – 34 – JHEP01(2022)063 121 Department of Physics, New York University, New York NY; United States of America 122 Ochanomizu University, Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo; Japan 123 Ohio State University, Columbus OH; United States of America 124 Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK; United States of America 125 Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK; United States of America 126 Palacký University, Joint Laboratory of Optics, Olomouc; Czech Republic 127 Institute for Fundamental Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR; United States of America 128 Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka; Japan 129 Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo; Norway 130 Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford; United Kingdom 131 LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris; France 132 Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA; United States of America 133 Konstantinov Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, PNPI, St. Petersburg; Russia 134 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA; United States of America 135 (a)Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas - LIP, Lisboa;(b)Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa;(c)Departamento de Física, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra;(d)Centro de Física Nuclear da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa;(e)Departamento de Física, Universidade do Minho, Braga;(f)Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, Granada (Spain);(g)Dep Física and CEFITEC of Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica;(h)Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; Portugal 136 Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague; Czech Republic 137 Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague; Czech Republic 138 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague; Czech Republic 139 Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot; United Kingdom 140 IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette; France 141 Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA; United States of America 142 (a)Departamento de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago;(b)Universidad Andres Bello, Department of Physics, Santiago;(c)Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica;(d)Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso; Chile 143 Universidade Federal de São João del Rei (UFSJ), São João del Rei; Brazil 144 Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA; United States of America 145 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; United Kingdom 146 Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano; Japan 147 Department Physik, Universität Siegen, Siegen; Germany 148 Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC; Canada 149 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford CA; United States of America 150 Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm; Sweden 151 Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY; United States of America 152 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton; United Kingdom 153 School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney; Australia 154 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei; Taiwan 155 (a)E. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi;(b)High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi; Georgia 156 Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa; Israel 157 Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv; – 35 – JHEP01(2022)063 Israel 158 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki; Greece 159 International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo; Japan 160 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo; Japan 161 Tomsk State University, Tomsk; Russia 162 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto ON; Canada 163 (a)TRIUMF, Vancouver BC;(b)Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto ON; Canada 164 Division of Physics and Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba; Japan 165 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford MA; United States of America 166 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA; United States of America 167 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala; Sweden 168 Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana IL; United States of America 169 Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia; Spain 170 Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Canada 171 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria BC; Canada 172 Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg; Germany 173 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry; United Kingdom 174 Waseda University, Tokyo; Japan 175 Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot; Israel 176 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI; United States of America 177 Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Fachgruppe Physik, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal; Germany 178 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven CT; United States of America aAlso at Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York, New York NY; United States of America bAlso at Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento; Italy cAlso at Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University; China dAlso at Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi; Italy eAlso at CERN, Geneva; Switzerland fAlso at CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille; France gAlso at Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Genève; Switzerland hAlso at Departament de Fisica de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona; Spain iAlso at Department of Financial and Management Engineering, University of the Aegean, Chios; Greece jAlso at Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI; United States of America kAlso at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; United States of America lAlso at Department of Physics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva; Israel mAlso at Department of Physics, California State University, East Bay; United States of America nAlso at Department of Physics, California State University, Fresno; United States of America oAlso at Department of Physics, California State University, Sacramento; United States of America pAlso at Department of Physics, King’s College London, London; United Kingdom qAlso at Department of Physics, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg; Russia – 36 – JHEP01(2022)063 rAlso at Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg; Switzerland sAlso at Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow; Russia tAlso at Faculty of Physics, Sofia University, ‘St. Kliment Ohridski’, Sofia; Bulgaria uAlso at Giresun University, Faculty of Engineering, Giresun; Turkey vAlso at Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka; Japan wAlso at Hellenic Open University, Patras; Greece xAlso at Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, ICREA, Barcelona; Spain yAlso at Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg; Germany zAlso at Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest; Hungary aa Also at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP); Canada ab Also at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku; Azerbaijan ac Also at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi; Georgia ad Also at Instituto de Fisica Teorica, IFT-UAM/CSIC, Madrid; Spain ae Also at Istanbul University, Dept. of Physics, Istanbul; Turkey af Also at Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; Russia ag Also at Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Dolgoprudny; Russia ah Also at National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow; Russia ai Also at Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg; Germany aj Also at The City College of New York, New York NY; United States of America ak Also at TRIUMF, Vancouver BC; Canada al Also at Universita di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli; Italy am Also at University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing; China an Also at Yeditepe University, Physics Department, Istanbul; Turkey ∗Deceased – 37 –